All christian religious outfits. I'm quite happy to point the finger at the whole of christendom. Got any links to organized coverups for non-christian orgs?
Can I remind you that you self-censor all the time, for exactly that reason? "to appease those that might find the material offensive."
While thinking "you are stupid" or "I hate you" when conversing with a co-worker, you're not saying those things out loud. Why? Because they are offensive to some people, though maybe not to you as you're actually thinking it. Swap any offensive thought and any other person in place of co-worker and the argument still holds true. And don't tell me you don't ever think bad thoughts about anyone, all humans do.
You know what else is an act of blatant censorship in your world? The fact that the New York Times did not write about what you had for breakfast. Go on, call them up now and demand to know why they didn't run that story, and then accuse them of blatant censorship.
In that case, for every program they broadcast you're accusing them of censoring every single other program on the grounds that it cannot be watched at this current point in time.
It *was* 55, then it *was* 65. Given that the first sentence in your linked wiki page is "Speed limits in the United States are set by each state or territory" it very much sounds like there *is* no federal speed limit.
Perhaps you meant "The same way the federal speed limit was enforced within states."
Then maybe Christians should stop referencing the bible all together, instead of cherry-picking the bits they think god *really* meant.
If the bible is as flawed as you say it is (and I am not arguing that point), why not throw it away all together and come up with another book to live by. Either write it yourself, or wait for a deity to appear and write it for you.
Slashdot Mirror
(all Germans at the time were Nazis ...)
Incorrect. Please check your facts, or stop making things up.
Ok so that would also mean that if you buy music or software then you think you have the right to copy and distribute or resell it..
He's not copying nor distributing nor reselling the PS3. Your comparison does not apply.
You need to do it from the CLI
(g, d &r)
I can google for that comment
Would this be a CLI google?
Now, what about the U.S. budget crisis? Can you offer more of your sage advice on how to solve that?
-dZ.
Pull out of the three wars, slash military spending.
Next!
How about an idiot governor tax?
For all the idiot governors out there. Can't tax their IQ, so we'll have to find something better to tax.
How about idiot voter tax for those who vote in idiot governors?
Yup, I had one from TiVo.
All christian religious outfits. I'm quite happy to point the finger at the whole of christendom. Got any links to organized coverups for non-christian orgs?
I don't "own" any public domain facts. Barack Obama is POTUS, but do I have to claim to own that fact? Do you need me to cite my source on that?
Feel free to STEAL that fact from me ... not.
Hear hear. Mod points if I had 'em.
So you started a rumour, big whoop. It's their job to report on transfer rumours.
The issue is that they stole the fact ...
Maybe they stole the text, but you cannot steal a fact that's in the public domain.
Can I remind you that you self-censor all the time, for exactly that reason? "to appease those that might find the material offensive."
While thinking "you are stupid" or "I hate you" when conversing with a co-worker, you're not saying those things out loud. Why? Because they are offensive to some people, though maybe not to you as you're actually thinking it. Swap any offensive thought and any other person in place of co-worker and the argument still holds true. And don't tell me you don't ever think bad thoughts about anyone, all humans do.
I challenge you to tell a single joke that's actually funny that nobody can take offense at.
Pretty much anything by Eddie Izzard.
You know what else is an act of blatant censorship in your world? The fact that the New York Times did not write about what you had for breakfast. Go on, call them up now and demand to know why they didn't run that story, and then accuse them of blatant censorship.
In that case, for every program they broadcast you're accusing them of censoring every single other program on the grounds that it cannot be watched at this current point in time.
I vote for both. If you want to stamp out corruption, use as many tools as you can get your hands on.
It *was* 55, then it *was* 65. Given that the first sentence in your linked wiki page is "Speed limits in the United States are set by each state or territory" it very much sounds like there *is* no federal speed limit.
Perhaps you meant "The same way the federal speed limit was enforced within states."
The same way the federal speed limit is enforced within states.
Really? What's the federal speed limit?
Yeah! The reason I bought a car that gets 40 mpg instead of an SUV was to evade taxes!
I think you meant "avoid taxes", unless you're looking for the feds to be knocking on your door.
I like Windows, but Vista was that decade's ME.
Firefly was really a Western.
So was Star Trek.
Pictures of naked people engaging in sex acts is not an idea.
I'd say it's a freakin excellent idea.
Then maybe Christians should stop referencing the bible all together, instead of cherry-picking the bits they think god *really* meant.
If the bible is as flawed as you say it is (and I am not arguing that point), why not throw it away all together and come up with another book to live by. Either write it yourself, or wait for a deity to appear and write it for you.
Ugh.
A person ... has no more right to discriminate against you because of your choice of bedmate(s) as they do because of your choice of cheese, or beer.
This is true in so far as any person has every right to discriminate against you for whatever reason they bloody well choose.