I use OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS, and Android, so exceptions/substitutions are made when an app isn't available for a given platform.
DropBox - Because that's where all the stuff I'm working on at any given time is.
Firefox - Because I'm a same-browser-on-everything kinda guy, and I'm too stuck in my ways for that to be Chrome.
LibreOffice - Because I'm a same-wp-on-everything kinda guy, but not so stuck in my ways that it has be OpenOffice.
Manga Studio - Because I create comics as a hobby, and even on the machines that don't have stylus input, I like to be able to open the projects I'm working on, and work on lettering or coloring. I don't use the GIMP because I think it's worth buying myself nice software sometimes, and I don't use Adobe Creative Shite anymore because that doesn't have to mean wasting money.
CyberDuck - Because a simple drag-and-drop ftp client is handy for getting my stuff where it's going.
I don't see it happening. The US military has become the federal government's most dependable jobs program. It's like the Depression-era Civilian Conservation Corps... but not civilian (and not doing conservation work). In an economy where "defense" has become an important sector, budget cuts mean layoffs.
The only thing I know about WhatsApp is that for a while I was getting a lot of mail that was either spam from it or from scammers pretending to be it.
"E-sport" is an attempt to apply the macho-associated word "sport" (usually understood to be a physical activity) to gaming. Competitive video gaming (even for an audience) is really no different from competitive chess or poker. You sit down and you match your ability to play a game against other people playing the same game. Something one can reasonably be proud of being good at, so the pretending-it's-something-else aspect is a bit childish.
Which might help explain the lack of appeal to female participants: childishness in adult males is really, really off-putting. Combined with the aggressiveness of a competitive activity... it's worse.
I recently special-ordered a desktop computer for my very-computer-illiterate mother (a retired musician) and somewhat-computer-illiterate father (a retired lawyer) to use, to avoid confusing them with Metro. Meanwhile my niece (I'm too old for my "little sister" to be relevant) has no trouble at all dealing with the traditional Windows Explorer desktop (though she prefers her Mac, which is mostly the same) because she grew up with it. In fact, it's the only interface she's ever known, which makes replacing it a bit problematic. It's way too late in the game to start worrying about a dumbed-down UI for computer illiterates.
Why didn't you list DOS 2? Oh yeah, because it was hugely popular (for its time), thanks to its support for hard drives with subdirectories. Not as widely deployed as DOS 3 would be, but far from a flop.
You're correct that DOS 4 flopped. That's one data point. (And really, that was IBM's failure, not Microsoft's.)
DOS 6 was widely adopted, replacing DOS 5 (which had little to recommend it except that it wasn't DOS 4) and living a long and productive life under the 16-bit versions of Windows.
Windows 98 enjoyed quite a bit of success, and (except for being a trojan for IE4) deservedly so; 98SE was the Windows that people stuck with on their older hardware rather than installing the resource-hogging Windows XP. Perhaps you were thinking of the deservedly-reviled Windows ME, which followed it?
You're also correct that Vista and Win8 have been flops. So that's three data points, but non-consecutive. Microsoft's success/failure pattern isn't quite as simple as you misremember.
This is not just nature. Isle Royale's ecosystem was disrupted when Europeans came to the region and started trying to strip it of mineral, forest, and animal resources. In the early 20th century we turned most of it back over to nature, but by then the some of the major indigenous species (and the peoples who hunted them on a small scale) had been wiped out. Most importantly, the coyotes are gone, and moose have moved in to replace the caribou. The wolves (and the foxes that remain) have filled the coyotes' niche as predators, but because of the increasing difficulty of reaching the island from the mainland, they've had difficulty establishing a viable population. This is something "we" screwed up.
There's a lot more than the wolves that draws people to Isle Royale. (Most people who visit the island never even see a wolf. I consider myself lucky to have glimpsed one briefly, as it tracked a moose and her calf.) Visitors come for the trails, the moose, the fishing, the scenery, and the relatively solitude. Losing the wolves would mean that the island would lose a little mystique, but far more important would be the long-term repercussions on the island's ecosystem.
Global warming isn't "to blame" for this situation, but it is a factor: the infrequency of ice bridges between the mainland and the island has grown because of it. The real "blame" is more general human interference.
The summary is misleading in suggesting that new wolves have come to Isle Royale fairly often. They haven't (I think there were only two documented migrations) which is why this ongoing study has been so scientifically useful: the island has been a (mostly) closed system for decades, allowing scientists such as Rolf Peterson to track the system without too many external variables. Before the wolves arrived over the ice, Isle Royale was being deforested by its moose population (which can swim to the island). Prior to that, the apex predators on the island were humans, during the island's period as a mining, logging, and resort area. After the island was made a national park, humans left that role, which created a boom in the moose population, which led to overgrazing, which led to starvation of the moose, etc. The wolves have stabilized that system.
Before humans became a major influence on the island, it had a different predator/prey system, based on coyotes and caribou. But both of those populations have died out, and humans almost certainly played a part in that. Isle Royale is being preserved today as a wilderness, but it isn't an "untainted" one, and hasn't been for a couple hundred years. It is what it is because of human activities. Humans didn't introduce the wolves to Isle Royale, but in a very real sense, we made them necessary. Which is why I support the idea of restocking the island's wolf population, in much the same way that we restocked many of the rivers of the Great Lakes region after destroying their fish populations.
Yeah, Google Fiber will be great for accessing YouTube and Google Maps. It might not be quite so effective for accessing services that compete with Google.
Google is no different from Comcast or Verizon or AT&T. Without governmental enforcement of net neutrality, carriers cannot be trusted to provide equal service to competing services.
I don't know if Detroit will ever be "important" again, but Michigan as a whole has more going for it than former automotive plants, and "fresh water" only hints at it. That water's good for more than just drinking and industrial uses, after all: it's important for agriculture and has a whole lot of recreational potential too. The whole belt west of metro Detroit (and a bit to the north) is good for a variety of farming. North of that are countless forested lakes and rivers which are great for fishing and canoeing. And then there are the Great Lakes themselves, which have seasonal sandy beaches (think "California without the saltwater"), and are good for boating and also fishing. Lonely Planet listed Michigan's west coast and nearby Grand Rapids as their "top travel destination" for 2014, which is admittedly hype, but reflects well on the state's potential economic future, regardless of Detroit and the auto industry.
My SAT score (1510) was almost as high as Mr. Bill's. I scored similarly on the GREs (general and comp-sci), and hit the 90th percentile when I took the LSAT cold (having no idea what kinds of questions would be on it) on a dare. Yet I absolutely suck at chess, and other exercises in tactical or strategic thinking. Despite the literary/cinematic cliché of using "plays chess" to show that someone is really, really smart, it actually reflects only a very specific kind of intelligence, to say nothing of developing the skills and experience to play it well. This match-up was about as meaningful as putting a pro basketball player in a half-pipe competition with a skateboarding whiz.
Social networking isn't itself a network; it's a concept, and that concept doesn't benefit from network effects because various social-networking networks don't interact.
And the Bell System was in fact a single company for decades, and achieved its self-perpetuating status by the time it was artificially broken up.
The assumption that Facebook will decline in the medium term is challenged by the examples of other networks which became pervasive enough that they became effectively perpetual (at least until disrupted by outside forces). The telephone network, the Interstate highway system, and the power grid have all held on and show no signs of going away (even as the telephone network merges with the internet). Oh yeah: and the internet.
As for the trend of a decline in googling for "facebook", that could just as easily reflect the fact that fewer people need to search for it. Either they've bookmarked it, it's their home page, their browser is smart enough to do URL completion, or it's perpetually at the top of their history, so they never hit Google on the way to it.
Don't get me wrong: Facebook will go away at some point, just like the phone system and Interstates will fade away before humanity does. But projections that it is already in decline (or trending toward that inflection point) may be premature.
With infections, I've always taken the approach of doing only as much symptom-relief as absolutely for my sanity/productivity/safety. Things like fever and coughing are part of the body's immune response, and letting them do their work will result in a faster recovery, so I'll put up with the discomfort and inconvenience.
You seem to be completely overlooking the issue of copyright. Re-appropriating the domain was apparently within Nagios' rights, but copying the contents of the web site was not. Trademark rights are not virally transmissible to copyright.
Taking help-desk calls, I've been horrified to find out that there are people who use it for typing any uppercase letters. I'll sometimes use remote-viewing software to watch someone's screen as they're trying to log in to something, and as they're typing their password I'd see the Caps-Lock warning pop up. I'd warn them that they'd accidentally hit Caps-Lock and that would mess up typing their password. "So how am I supposed to type a capital letter?" they'd ask.
All the more reason that key needs to be removed from keyboards 20 years ago.
The manchild who wrote that article needs to take a time-out and grow up a little. It's not like he's talking about Dvorak v. Qwerty or any kind of radical redesign (like we're seeing on on-screen phone/tablet keyboards). It's just trying to figure out what works.
This is hardly something new. In the early days of the Personal Computer, IBM went through some changes trying different keyboard layouts. The original PC/XT keyboard had the arrow/Home/End/PgDn/PgUp/Del/Ins keys overlaid with the numeric keypad (requiring that now-pointless Num Lock key). The AT gave us an Enter key that also covered the current location of the Backslash key. The 101 keyboard of the PS/2 made further changes. Most of them were improvements, and I'm glad we had them.
And portable-computer manufacturers have been doing the same kinds of innovations/experiments since the original Compaq: trying to figure out how to fit all the functions of a full-size keyboard in a smaller space. He's just noticed this now? The dozen cursor-control keys are found in dozens of different places on different laptops. Buy the ones you like, don't buy the ones you don't. I hate having a Fn key in the lower left where Ctrl should be, so I avoid those. Meanwhile I will reward with my money any manufacturer who banishes that big useless harm-causing Caps Lock key.
Slashdot Mirror
He fell victim to his own reality distortion field.
I use OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS, and Android, so exceptions/substitutions are made when an app isn't available for a given platform.
DropBox - Because that's where all the stuff I'm working on at any given time is.
Firefox - Because I'm a same-browser-on-everything kinda guy, and I'm too stuck in my ways for that to be Chrome.
LibreOffice - Because I'm a same-wp-on-everything kinda guy, but not so stuck in my ways that it has be OpenOffice.
Manga Studio - Because I create comics as a hobby, and even on the machines that don't have stylus input, I like to be able to open the projects I'm working on, and work on lettering or coloring. I don't use the GIMP because I think it's worth buying myself nice software sometimes, and I don't use Adobe Creative Shite anymore because that doesn't have to mean wasting money.
CyberDuck - Because a simple drag-and-drop ftp client is handy for getting my stuff where it's going.
I use the 52-pick-up sort
I don't see it happening. The US military has become the federal government's most dependable jobs program. It's like the Depression-era Civilian Conservation Corps... but not civilian (and not doing conservation work). In an economy where "defense" has become an important sector, budget cuts mean layoffs.
The only thing I know about WhatsApp is that for a while I was getting a lot of mail that was either spam from it or from scammers pretending to be it.
Soft robots have been with us for decades.
"E-sport" is an attempt to apply the macho-associated word "sport" (usually understood to be a physical activity) to gaming. Competitive video gaming (even for an audience) is really no different from competitive chess or poker. You sit down and you match your ability to play a game against other people playing the same game. Something one can reasonably be proud of being good at, so the pretending-it's-something-else aspect is a bit childish.
Which might help explain the lack of appeal to female participants: childishness in adult males is really, really off-putting. Combined with the aggressiveness of a competitive activity... it's worse.
Lots and lots of people don't consider hunting or fishing "sports". Those are effectively a whole different sense of the word "sporting".
I recently special-ordered a desktop computer for my very-computer-illiterate mother (a retired musician) and somewhat-computer-illiterate father (a retired lawyer) to use, to avoid confusing them with Metro. Meanwhile my niece (I'm too old for my "little sister" to be relevant) has no trouble at all dealing with the traditional Windows Explorer desktop (though she prefers her Mac, which is mostly the same) because she grew up with it. In fact, it's the only interface she's ever known, which makes replacing it a bit problematic. It's way too late in the game to start worrying about a dumbed-down UI for computer illiterates.
Why didn't you list DOS 2? Oh yeah, because it was hugely popular (for its time), thanks to its support for hard drives with subdirectories. Not as widely deployed as DOS 3 would be, but far from a flop.
You're correct that DOS 4 flopped. That's one data point. (And really, that was IBM's failure, not Microsoft's.)
DOS 6 was widely adopted, replacing DOS 5 (which had little to recommend it except that it wasn't DOS 4) and living a long and productive life under the 16-bit versions of Windows.
Windows 98 enjoyed quite a bit of success, and (except for being a trojan for IE4) deservedly so; 98SE was the Windows that people stuck with on their older hardware rather than installing the resource-hogging Windows XP. Perhaps you were thinking of the deservedly-reviled Windows ME, which followed it?
You're also correct that Vista and Win8 have been flops. So that's three data points, but non-consecutive. Microsoft's success/failure pattern isn't quite as simple as you misremember.
This is not just nature. Isle Royale's ecosystem was disrupted when Europeans came to the region and started trying to strip it of mineral, forest, and animal resources. In the early 20th century we turned most of it back over to nature, but by then the some of the major indigenous species (and the peoples who hunted them on a small scale) had been wiped out. Most importantly, the coyotes are gone, and moose have moved in to replace the caribou. The wolves (and the foxes that remain) have filled the coyotes' niche as predators, but because of the increasing difficulty of reaching the island from the mainland, they've had difficulty establishing a viable population. This is something "we" screwed up.
There's a lot more than the wolves that draws people to Isle Royale. (Most people who visit the island never even see a wolf. I consider myself lucky to have glimpsed one briefly, as it tracked a moose and her calf.) Visitors come for the trails, the moose, the fishing, the scenery, and the relatively solitude. Losing the wolves would mean that the island would lose a little mystique, but far more important would be the long-term repercussions on the island's ecosystem.
Global warming isn't "to blame" for this situation, but it is a factor: the infrequency of ice bridges between the mainland and the island has grown because of it. The real "blame" is more general human interference.
The summary is misleading in suggesting that new wolves have come to Isle Royale fairly often. They haven't (I think there were only two documented migrations) which is why this ongoing study has been so scientifically useful: the island has been a (mostly) closed system for decades, allowing scientists such as Rolf Peterson to track the system without too many external variables. Before the wolves arrived over the ice, Isle Royale was being deforested by its moose population (which can swim to the island). Prior to that, the apex predators on the island were humans, during the island's period as a mining, logging, and resort area. After the island was made a national park, humans left that role, which created a boom in the moose population, which led to overgrazing, which led to starvation of the moose, etc. The wolves have stabilized that system.
Before humans became a major influence on the island, it had a different predator/prey system, based on coyotes and caribou. But both of those populations have died out, and humans almost certainly played a part in that. Isle Royale is being preserved today as a wilderness, but it isn't an "untainted" one, and hasn't been for a couple hundred years. It is what it is because of human activities. Humans didn't introduce the wolves to Isle Royale, but in a very real sense, we made them necessary. Which is why I support the idea of restocking the island's wolf population, in much the same way that we restocked many of the rivers of the Great Lakes region after destroying their fish populations.
Yeah, Google Fiber will be great for accessing YouTube and Google Maps. It might not be quite so effective for accessing services that compete with Google.
Google is no different from Comcast or Verizon or AT&T. Without governmental enforcement of net neutrality, carriers cannot be trusted to provide equal service to competing services.
"because tools for monitoring the performance of carriers will emerge nd we'll catch them if they try."
Oooh! Some geeks will "catch them". That must have these megacorporations (with Congresscritters on their payrolls) just shaking in their boots.
I don't know if Detroit will ever be "important" again, but Michigan as a whole has more going for it than former automotive plants, and "fresh water" only hints at it. That water's good for more than just drinking and industrial uses, after all: it's important for agriculture and has a whole lot of recreational potential too. The whole belt west of metro Detroit (and a bit to the north) is good for a variety of farming. North of that are countless forested lakes and rivers which are great for fishing and canoeing. And then there are the Great Lakes themselves, which have seasonal sandy beaches (think "California without the saltwater"), and are good for boating and also fishing. Lonely Planet listed Michigan's west coast and nearby Grand Rapids as their "top travel destination" for 2014, which is admittedly hype, but reflects well on the state's potential economic future, regardless of Detroit and the auto industry.
My SAT score (1510) was almost as high as Mr. Bill's. I scored similarly on the GREs (general and comp-sci), and hit the 90th percentile when I took the LSAT cold (having no idea what kinds of questions would be on it) on a dare. Yet I absolutely suck at chess, and other exercises in tactical or strategic thinking. Despite the literary/cinematic cliché of using "plays chess" to show that someone is really, really smart, it actually reflects only a very specific kind of intelligence, to say nothing of developing the skills and experience to play it well. This match-up was about as meaningful as putting a pro basketball player in a half-pipe competition with a skateboarding whiz.
Social networking isn't itself a network; it's a concept, and that concept doesn't benefit from network effects because various social-networking networks don't interact.
And the Bell System was in fact a single company for decades, and achieved its self-perpetuating status by the time it was artificially broken up.
The assumption that Facebook will decline in the medium term is challenged by the examples of other networks which became pervasive enough that they became effectively perpetual (at least until disrupted by outside forces). The telephone network, the Interstate highway system, and the power grid have all held on and show no signs of going away (even as the telephone network merges with the internet). Oh yeah: and the internet.
As for the trend of a decline in googling for "facebook", that could just as easily reflect the fact that fewer people need to search for it. Either they've bookmarked it, it's their home page, their browser is smart enough to do URL completion, or it's perpetually at the top of their history, so they never hit Google on the way to it.
Don't get me wrong: Facebook will go away at some point, just like the phone system and Interstates will fade away before humanity does. But projections that it is already in decline (or trending toward that inflection point) may be premature.
With infections, I've always taken the approach of doing only as much symptom-relief as absolutely for my sanity/productivity/safety. Things like fever and coughing are part of the body's immune response, and letting them do their work will result in a faster recovery, so I'll put up with the discomfort and inconvenience.
"Fortunately there's a thing called Auto-Tune so they make it sound OK."
No, I don't think Auto-Tune has ever produced that result.
You seem to be completely overlooking the issue of copyright. Re-appropriating the domain was apparently within Nagios' rights, but copying the contents of the web site was not. Trademark rights are not virally transmissible to copyright.
"Seriously, who uses freaking caps-lock?"
Taking help-desk calls, I've been horrified to find out that there are people who use it for typing any uppercase letters. I'll sometimes use remote-viewing software to watch someone's screen as they're trying to log in to something, and as they're typing their password I'd see the Caps-Lock warning pop up. I'd warn them that they'd accidentally hit Caps-Lock and that would mess up typing their password. "So how am I supposed to type a capital letter?" they'd ask.
All the more reason that key needs to be removed from keyboards 20 years ago.
The manchild who wrote that article needs to take a time-out and grow up a little. It's not like he's talking about Dvorak v. Qwerty or any kind of radical redesign (like we're seeing on on-screen phone/tablet keyboards). It's just trying to figure out what works.
This is hardly something new. In the early days of the Personal Computer, IBM went through some changes trying different keyboard layouts. The original PC/XT keyboard had the arrow/Home/End/PgDn/PgUp/Del/Ins keys overlaid with the numeric keypad (requiring that now-pointless Num Lock key). The AT gave us an Enter key that also covered the current location of the Backslash key. The 101 keyboard of the PS/2 made further changes. Most of them were improvements, and I'm glad we had them.
And portable-computer manufacturers have been doing the same kinds of innovations/experiments since the original Compaq: trying to figure out how to fit all the functions of a full-size keyboard in a smaller space. He's just noticed this now? The dozen cursor-control keys are found in dozens of different places on different laptops. Buy the ones you like, don't buy the ones you don't. I hate having a Fn key in the lower left where Ctrl should be, so I avoid those. Meanwhile I will reward with my money any manufacturer who banishes that big useless harm-causing Caps Lock key.
Anyone who is in love with the Caps Lock key is obviously fucking insane and deserves to be ignored.