Slashdot Mirror


Detroit Wants Its Own High-Tech Visa

dcblogs writes "Detroit, a city in bankruptcy and dealing with a shrinking population, hopes to turn itself around with the help of 50,000 employment-based green cards. In exchange for the visa, an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time. The visas would be made available under the EB-2 visa category, a visa for advanced degree professionals or those deemed with 'exceptional ability' in the sciences, arts and business. The proposal was made by Michigan's governor, Rick Snyder. Daniel Costa, an immigration policy analyst at Economic Policy Institute, said Snyder would have more credibility on the issue if he were doing more to help workers in Detroit. In 2011, the state cut jobless benefits by six weeks to 20. 'I also think the federal government should be offering people in the U.S. some money and land in Detroit if they'll move there,' said Costa, or 'just offer it to people across the country who have advanced degrees.'"

398 comments

  1. The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Shoten · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a familiar lifestyle for people from third-world countries with high crime, corrupt cops and crumbling infrastructure.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The city has been terribly managed for decades. I'm not sure what ground Costa has on criticizing Governor Snyder here though.. the city was given years to clean up its act and didn't really do anything of note, so he only recently stepped in to get the city managed by competent people using Michigan's "emergency manager" laws. They city needs a rapid rise in tax base or a bailout.. since Americans aren't exactly flocking to Detroit (even though property is cheap and employment is available if you have skill) and bail out money isn't to be had, pleading for immigrant help isn't exactly off base. It's not even Snyder's original idea, this has been floated for awhile now.

    2. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a familiar lifestyle for people from third-world countries with high crime, corrupt cops and crumbling infrastructure.

      So just like LA, NYC, SF, etc...

    3. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldnt getting the real green cards be better for everyone involved both long term and short term?

      Maybe 'must stay 1 year' or something would not be an unreasonable tradeoff...

      However, most visa's are just a way to create a gov mandate a union. The union being 'i am an American' in this case.
      http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/chap08p1.html
      http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/chap20p1.html

      However, the first state/city to move on 'we will help you move here from where ever' will see in 10-15 years a large influx of higher educated people. As they will enjoy a large group of people who feel like 'this is my new home'. As well as a large group willing to do what it takes to get things done. Instead of being isolationist we should welcome them. We are instead looking for every way to keep immigrants down.

    4. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by mlts · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Portland suffered through this fate many years ago. There is one thing that will put Detroit back on the map, something California and Texas do not have...

      Fresh water. Chip plants need it, businesses require this to run. When the major aquifers dry up and make sunbelt areas extremely expensive to live in (barring an advance in desalination, and even then, trying to pump that water inland), Detroit, and Michigan in general, will be relevant again. No water worries, fairly stable terrain (no earthquakes), worst issue might be blizzards.

      I'd give Detroit a couple years for it to reach its nadir, because the one-two punch of a continual drought combined with the extreme populations trying to live in desert will eventually cause an exodus back to the northern climates, as that will be where the companies relocate and where the jobs will be.

    5. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Why would anyone from a third world shithole come to America and live in a third world shithole?

    6. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michigan will be fine but Detroit itself will still be a hellhole. The smart companies will just move farther north.

    7. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ebno-10db · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So just like LA, NYC, SF, etc...

      With the possible exception of infrastructure, you obviously don't know jack about LA, NYC or SF. In case your name is Rip van Winkle, crime rates have been steadily declining for the last 20 years. Maybe you're worried about hippies too. Sorry, but none have been seen in the wild since the 1970's (and they were passe then).

    8. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously know jack about Detroit.

    9. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "barring an advance in desalination,"
      actually we can do it now with desalination, no advancement really needed.

      ", Detroit, and Michigan in general, will be relevant again"
      nope, never happen. Crappy weather, high crime, republican stripping away representation for all but about 50,000 people, no industry... nothing really.
      It's a City, and state, mostly built on 1 industry that is now global.

      And when the mid est dries up, well, the human race as we know it will be on the way out.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs hippies when you are drowning in hipsters? (This is officially my 1000th and final hipster joke ever. Rejoice!)

    11. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michigan will be fine but Detroit itself will still be a hellhole. The smart companies will just move farther north.

      The smart companies will move to Buffalo.

    12. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      ...a familiar lifestyle for people from third-world countries with high crime, corrupt cops and crumbling infrastructure.

      Add "required to live and work there", and you have created the US version of the 21st-century ghetto. Congratulations.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    13. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who needs hippies when you are drowning in hipsters? (This is officially my 1000th and final hipster joke ever. Rejoice!)

      I was making hipster jokes before they were cool.

    14. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by techprophet · · Score: 0

      And you're still making them after it was cool.

    15. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Detroit already is one big 21st-century ghetto... blight, ruined buildings, rampant crime, and rampant iPhones

    16. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the Republicans' fault that Detroit is in the state that it's in?

      Detroit has had one-party Democrat rule for more than two generations.

    17. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      The city government has third world-style corruption, too, with pay to play for contracts and sham charities run by family members where you "donate", and some sister or child gets $100k/year to "manage", on top of "renting" a room in their house to it for work for a bargain of $4500/mo.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    18. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know if Detroit will ever be "important" again, but Michigan as a whole has more going for it than former automotive plants, and "fresh water" only hints at it. That water's good for more than just drinking and industrial uses, after all: it's important for agriculture and has a whole lot of recreational potential too. The whole belt west of metro Detroit (and a bit to the north) is good for a variety of farming. North of that are countless forested lakes and rivers which are great for fishing and canoeing. And then there are the Great Lakes themselves, which have seasonal sandy beaches (think "California without the saltwater"), and are good for boating and also fishing. Lonely Planet listed Michigan's west coast and nearby Grand Rapids as their "top travel destination" for 2014, which is admittedly hype, but reflects well on the state's potential economic future, regardless of Detroit and the auto industry.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    19. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Richy_T · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      But now it's ironic.

    20. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by thaylin · · Score: 0

      He said ONE of the reasons, not the only reason.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    21. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by bdcrazy · · Score: 0

      You think the great lakes are inexhaustible fresh water? Also, they are getting more and more polluted and more and more water is being removed each year. I believe that we are near the beginning as to how political it will be. It may rival the American southwest as to how much each municipality is allowed to take each year etc.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    22. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which makes him a hipster!

    23. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you know that it doesn't matter how much one party is represented in the local, state and federal government, it's always the other party that is up to something crooked that is the cause of every problem.
       
      Just like with the refusal by the Republicans to give another 85 billion dollars to the federal government.... An entity with trillions at its disposal and 85 billion nearly brings it to a grinding halt? Of course the near collapse of the government was the fault of the Tea Party. Right? In reality it's a way of the government showing the slave, er, I mean citizen that they'll take what they want and any attempt to stop them will make life hard on the little guy.
       
      geekoid has either bought heavily into this lie or he's benefiting from the lie in some fashion. Hook, line and sinker. It's sad when you think of it, people willing to sell everyone else down river to make their party look good on paper. It's the fuel of today's political machine. My party, right or wrong.

    24. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it hasn't been cool yet.

    25. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      The smart companies will move further south because Detroit is one of the few places in the US where you go south to get to Canada.

    26. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Detroit doesn't have nearly the bad winter conditions that Buffalo has. That said, Buffalo doesn't have near the crime that Detroit does.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    27. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And nothing that Detroit has to offer except being close to Canada would appeal to me, and that's just not enough. Doesn't matter what they pay me or what conditions that are offered, it's probably safer to go to Afghanistan anyway.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    28. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      republican stripping away representation for all but about 50,000 people, no industry...

      I'll agree with you on all but the above. I grew up in the city, and still visit occasionally. You'll need a lot of bulldozers, some new industries, and government to lower the outrageous taxes the city has.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    29. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by kenh · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, DeBlassio will reverse the drop in crime rates...

      --
      Ken
    30. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by kenh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Republican politicians were neither 'the' nor 'a' reason Detroit was mis-managed. Literal decades after decades of single-party rule robbed the locals of any need for their politicians to defend/justify their actions, so they went off the rails in a spectacular fashion.

      The ONLY blame you can heap on Republicans in Detroit would be for letting the Democrats run the city by failing to win more elections... But are we really going to blame the loser of an election for the actions of the winner?

      --
      Ken
    31. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by dcw3 · · Score: 3

      Lakes Michigan and Superior have seen a small drop over the last 20 years, which likely depends on overall precipitation. Others have not. From Wikipedia: The source of water levels in the lakes is tied to what was left by melting glaciers when the lakes took their present form. Annually, only about 1% is "new" water originating from rivers, precipitation, and groundwater springs that drain into the lakes. This is balanced by evaporation and drainage, making the level of the lakes historically constant.[10]

      As for pollution, do you have any references? I'd argue that the lakes have gotten cleaner since the 70s, but I don't have evidence other than my own visuals.

      Useful water level link below shows history back to the 1800s.
      http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    32. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I am amused that your tagline references the dunning kruger effect, yet you seem unaware of the genetic IQ of the majority of residents of Detroit.

      Yeah, the problem with Detroit is REPUBLICANS and NOT ENOUGH DEMOCRACY!

      hahahaha

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    33. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by michrech · · Score: 1

      I'd make the argument that you can, at least in part... If the Republicans could put forth a/some candidate(s) that weren't so damned extreme, they might have had a chance at providing a counter-balance to the Democrats that have allegedly managed to run Detroit into the ground...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    34. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move them to Houghton MI! It's copper country, and home to Michigan Tech (MI T)! And don't worry about the wolves and bears, they rarely come near city limits.

    35. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You think the great lakes are inexhaustible fresh water?

      Inexhaustible? Nope. But they are vast and very few other places on earth have anything like them. The Great Lakes have around 84% of the surface fresh water in the US. Like any resource it needs careful tending but folks who don't live around the Great Lakes don't really grasp how big they are. They properly should be termed inland Seas. With the possible exception of the Mississippi river watershed there is no more important source of water in the entire US. It's no exaggeration to say that the economy of the US and Canada would be greatly diminished without them.

      Also, they are getting more and more polluted and more and more water is being removed each year

      Actually the lakes have been getting significantly cleaner for the past few decades. Had you spent any effort looking you would find copious evidence proving that fact. I've lived around the great lakes for most of my life so I've seen it first hand. Lake Erie was a lot more polluted when I was a child than it is today.

      Lake Michigan and Huron are historically low but it is still within the range of normal and has been more or less steady for the past several years. Water level in the lakes fluctuate by as much as several feet from year to year normally. People do divert water (particularly around Chicago) but the Great Lakes Compact will largely prevent any mass removal of water from the watershed.

    36. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the near collapse of the government was the fault of the Tea Party. Right? In reality it's a way of the government showing the slave, er, I mean citizen that they'll take what they want and any attempt to stop them will make life hard on the little guy.

      Next you'll say that paying park rangers overtime to guard barricades around national monuments was a waste of money, when it's clear to anyone with a brain that people snapping pictures of Lincoln's statue would steal his soul if not kept in check during the govt shutdown.

    37. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
      "There is nothing sadder than an aging hipster"

      Lenny Bruce

      Unfortunately the snippet is so widespread on the net I am unable to find the whole rant, which was epic.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    38. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by penglust · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So instead of using those powers to fix the issues preventing American workers from considering moving to Detroit you want to bring in immigrants who have no idea of the problems and force them to stay there or be deported. If it gets worse then send them home.

      This is at best a band aid on a gaping wound.

    39. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      Those two are probably related. Statistics show crime drops as the temperature drops.

    40. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd make the argument that you can, at least in part... If the Republicans could put forth a/some candidate(s) that weren't so damned extreme, they might have had a chance at providing a counter-balance to the Democrats that have allegedly managed to run Detroit into the ground...

      Detroit literally went bankrupt under Democratic rule and you call Republican candidates "extreme"?

      What. The. Fuck.

    41. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "crime rates have been steadily declining for the last 20 years."

      Please come to Detroit and walk around, you will be 100% safe.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    42. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think bulldozers alone could lower the outrageous taxes. Cut the fat! (Or plow it under...)

    43. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Informative

      counter-balance to the Democrats that have allegedly managed to run Detroit into the ground...

      "allegedly" ???

      Its a fact that Detroit was run into the ground, and its also a fact that the Democrats ran the city for literally 5 contiguous decades.

      You seem to be hypothesizing that Detroit might have been run into the ground by people that werent making any of the decisions there, rather than the people that were. Interesting blindfold you have.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    44. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Move them to Houghton MI! It's copper country, and home to Michigan Tech (MI T)! And don't worry about the wolves and bears, they rarely come near city limits.

      This is actually not a bad idea. Houghton/Hancock are very nice areas and have a ready population of students and people with relatively strong work ethic. I went to MTU and think it was a great area and there isn't much wildlife wandering around that I ever saw. The tough part is lack of a respectable size airport (two flights of a small turbo prop doesn't cut it) and no real rail lines (most tracks farther up in UP were abandoned and have been turned to snowmobile trails.

      That being said, you probably would be better off in the South East portion of the UP...Escanaba, Menominee, etc. They still have good industry and workers, rail, access to Lake Michigan (shipping)...and a couple of good pasty places.

    45. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Do you equally blame Kansas Democrats for that states Republican leadership? Not that Kansas is as mismanaged as Detroit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Combine this with Detroit being a one industry town that got hurt bad when that industry faced a downturn. Seattle used to have much the same problem in that Boeing was the big employer. When it had problems the city had problems.
      Detroit has a lot of problems.
      1. Corruption. The city government and unions are both corrupt and mutually reenforcing. Make Michigan a right to work state. The unions have not done a good job keeping people working.
      2. Crime. The level of crime in Detroit is several times the nation average and is a lot worse than San Francisco which also has an issue with Crime. Here is the comparison between Detroit and San Francisco http://www.areavibes.com/crime...

      The easy solution for Detroit would be a lot of money. Start tearing down parts of the city and building green spaces Keep expanding the people mover and M1 street car line for better transportation and extend them to the universities, the airport and so on. Fiber to the door every where, offer incentives for people to build homes and apartments. Do not forget the well light sidewalks and bike paths. The problem is all that takes money which Detroit does not have.
         

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    47. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Michigan is exactly like California without the saltwater...or the good weather, or the high tech industry, or the interesting fun things to do, or the crazy ethnic mix...exactly alike.

      One of the grossest web pages I've ever seen involved the kind of great lake Salmon that Michigan fishermen will eat. Vile black fish, that judging by their smiles was as good as it got up there. Lets not even get into Mule deer vs Whitetail.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    48. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But here's the thing Buffalo doesn't really get cold. Since it's on the eastern side of lake Erie, Buffalo gets heated in the winter by the relatively warm water and cooled in the summer by the relatively cooler water.

    49. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      You're right, which is why I said nothing about it.

    50. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I was making hipster jokes before they were cool.

      The term hipster dates to the 1940's. Were you using the term during or after WWII?

      P.S. Obviously kids today don't know no history, nor english neither.

    51. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I may be safe since there's nobody there anymore. However, I was referring to the other three major cities mentioned, and national statistics, rather than Detroit. There are always exceptions.

    52. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you can't drive down a street in Manhattan without a gang of 200 violent motorcyclists (including a couple of cops) chasing you, smashing your window, dragging you out into the street, and beating you within an inch of your life.

      I will agree though, the OP was wrong to compare SF to those other places.

    53. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Unless they're coming from Somalia or Afghanistan, they're probably safer in their home country.

    54. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      I think he's refering to the emergency city manager that Snyder put in to work out the financial crisis. Basically, the people in Detroit are pissed that after 5 decades of voting for democrats who ran their budget into the ground, the Governor decided that putting in a Democrat emergency manager wasn't the best idea. While I don't necessarily agree with everything Snyder has done, this certainly was not a bad thing. Change was necessary, and I don't think it would have happened any other way.

    55. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      Having done some Salmon fishing in Michigan, I have no clue what you're talking about. Lake Michigan Salmon is good stuff. The only nasty stuff I've seen is when you go river fishing trying to catch Spawning Salmon. The fish are going to die, and are certainly not very good tasting. Most people don't keep the ones they catch, and the ones that are "nice" are typically smoked to improve the flavor.

    56. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by naris · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "make sunbelt areas extremely expensive to live in"?
      They already are extremely expensive to live in, especially compared to Michigan.

    57. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by thaylin · · Score: 0

      You understand that they are not mutual exclusive right, GOP and its tea partiers are way more extreme than the dems.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    58. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Have you ever done any Salmon fishing in the ocean or anywhere near the mouth of a river on the ocean?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    59. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      There are lots of blame I can heap on republicans, just as much a dems, because they are both the same, except for the far righter which I would which I would hate to have in office, or more accurately I hate having in office since I am from NC.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    60. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's wonderful for fishing, canoeing, boating, and also fishing.

    61. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      Fishing, no. I've had plenty of fresh ocean salmon in my travels in Alaska and the west coast. Certainly there is some taste difference, but I doubt many people could put their finger on the difference unless given both at the same time.

    62. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Informative

      People say that every time someone who isn't considered "tough on crime" gets elected, but the statistics often tell a different story. People say Giuliani did a great job of reducing crime, but the precipitious drop actually started under Dinkins (who also started a lot of the "broken windows" policies). The steep decline continued after Giuliani appointed Bratton PC, but then started to decrease after 2 years when Giuliani fired Bratton. Note that the LA crime rate started dropping faster after Bratton became PC there. Later Giuliani appointed Kerik the crook as PC, despite almost all advice being against it.

      Giuliani, like all politicians, takes credit for everything good during his administration, and denies responsibility for anything bad. If you want to know what led to NYC's decline in crime during that era, the objective evidence says it had little to do Giuliani. Rather the tree big factors are.
      1. Overall national drop in crime rate (the reasons for which are a major debate).
      2. Bratton
      3. Dinkins

    63. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only seem extreme because you don't agree with them. You understand this simple rule of perception, right?

    64. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ..and here is a video of the Detroit city council in action.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    65. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      Actually not true at all. I dont agree with dems or moderate republicans, but I dont believe them to be extreme....Just because you dont agree with someone does not mean you think they are extreme, you do understand that simple fact, right?

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    66. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the high property taxes.

    67. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      you can't drive down a street in Manhattan without a gang of 200 violent motorcyclists ... I will agree though, the OP was wrong to compare SF to those other places.

      Both NYC and LA have lower crime rates than SF for murder, overall violent crimes, robbery, property crimes and burglary.

      NYC is also safer than Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Las Vegas, Oklahoma City, St. Louis, and Wichita to name but a few. It may be the big bad city, but it's a lot safer than the stereotypes.

      Source.

    68. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a citizen of the state I can tell you that what many people disagreed with was the ability of these city managers to throw elected officials out of office. If you're going to do that, then you should at least be required to vote for the replacement, but that didn't happen either.

    69. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Great Lakes area in general is seriously underrated and undervalued, and with people tightening their belts with regard to travel and leisure expenses, having places to go here in the Midwest is important. It's sending a lot of people looking inward for hidden gems they probably overlooked while they were booking family vacations to the Atlantic coast, once reasonably affordable as late as the 1990's but no longer. I know a lot of my colleagues are getting fed up waiting for travel expenses to come back down and just marking the likes of Florida and the Carolinas off of their lists entirely. Traveling that far is just too expensive now and while many of them miss it, they've been there before already.

      Now personally, I think Minnesota ranks among the best summertime destinations that you can head to in this part of the country, but Michigan and Wisconsin are also high on the list and Michigan could very well dethrone Minnesota for me. All three places boast wonderful scenery and plenty of recreational water. Ohio and Indiana have a bit of it, but those places are rich in it. The tourist areas tend to be a lot less crowded than say, Daytona or Myrtle Beach, and a lot less expensive to stay in. Just be sure not to spend too much time in Illinois, unless you're headed to Chicago there's almost nothing to see there.

      The only other downside is that we actually have wintertime here, and those are places you definitely don't want to be when it's cold. That generally applies to the entire Midwest. In the warm season it's great, in the cold season you'll wish you were anywhere but here.

    70. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to America. Meet the new boss , same as the old boss.

    71. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by haruchai · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the GOP - look at the labels they've slapped on Obama, who according to them is the most extreme, left-wing socialist President in American history and has appointed nothing but leftist hardliners to the bench, his cabinet and all of the "Czar" posts.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    72. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      yes because your anecdotal statement makes it true for all.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    73. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      It's only Southern California that is normally dry and lacking on fresh water -- Northern California has lakes, rivers and springs all over the place providing fresh water to residents/businesses. We've just been in a drought for the past year or two, as shown in the satellite images of the Sierra snowpack on the same day in January 2013 & 2014.

      Beyond the drought, our problem is twofold... We have to share the water with the Central Valley farms (which IIRC now raise water-intensive crops that sell well, rather than drought-tolerant ones) & heavily-populated/theme-park-filled SoCal, which sucks a *lot* of water. Also, greed among local politicians, landowners & developers over the past decade has led to a huge boom in residential, business & vineyard development, so we go through reserves during dry periods *much* faster than we used to.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    74. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by antdude · · Score: 1

      OCP, RoboCop, ED-209, etc. :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    75. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Your search skills need some sharpening and it seems you've been asleep the past few years.
      Join us in reality, Rip Van Winkle.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    76. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turning Detroit into a plantation that uses indentured servants... LOL!

    77. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Sure, Michigan has second-rate salmon. But where are you going to find saltwater perch or walleye or trout, all of which are better?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    78. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ThEATrE · · Score: 1

      But are we really going to blame the loser of an election for the actions of the winner?

      See: retards blaming Nader for Bush.

    79. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but if one goes to NYC, you must deal with those insufferable New Yorkers.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    80. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by RoLi · · Score: 1

      First rule of political correctness: If a protected class fails, it is always somebody else's fault.

    81. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buffalo gets a bad rap from the network weather people. The lakes keep it warmer than the midwest in the winter, cooler in the summer, and it isn't even the snowiest place in the state. Even then most of the snow gets dumped south of the city.

    82. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You'll need a lot of bulldozers, some new industries, and government to lower the outrageous taxes the city has.

      Why bulldoze? Move the remaining people into a single area of the city and use the rest as a post-industrial theme park - Futureland for the 21st century.

      Ukraine sells Chernobyl tours, so there's a precedent for turning man-made disasters into cash cows.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    83. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democratic governence is definitely an issue, but the cratering of the population from white flight and a declining auto industry, from it's high of 1.8 million in 1950 to less than 3/4 of a million currently, majorly contributed to the economic problems they are in now.

    84. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the people living in the suburbs of Detroit could vote for the Mayor of Detroit, then perhaps a corrupt mayor with no regard for the state of the city wouldn't have been elected.

      Snyder has done more to hurt jobs in Michigan than anything else, and now he suddenly cares about jobs in Detroit? That man isn't going to be governor for very much longer.

    85. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I played with that comparison thing and never did find a 'more dangerous' city. The nearest I found was Stockton CA, at 19% less dangerous than Detroit.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    86. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would note this does indicate the presence of one failing of the Republican party. The Republican party often wants even their small branches to tow the main party line, even as they're somewhat more liberal or conservative depending upon the area. In a city like Detroit, the local (city level) branch of the Republican party likely needs to be more liberal than the Democratic party branch in many states; alas, this would mean they would have to be in favor of things that conflict with the national party, since the national party won't let them do this they effectively concede the city to the Democratic party. If winner takes all voting wasn't the standard in the US, Detroit would have its own local "conservative" party that was conservative by Destroit's standards and would thus challenge the Detroit Democratic party.

      "Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made." -- Otto von Bismark

    87. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are nice ideas, but much of the country doesn't have such amenities in their cities much less suburbia to the degree you suggest.

      I don't think we socially should invest and reward a portion of society who actively took part in their own demise. Let the place burn, the last 30 years of residents of Detroit would left to their own devices.

    88. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The most dangerous city in the US is East St. Louis IL
      http://www.areavibes.com/crime...
      Detroit is number 6 on the list.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    89. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      There is a generation of children that are living their that will suffer because of many of those choices. Detroit does offer some interesting opportunities because of all those empty houses and buildings. Large scale redevelopment is easy in an area that is almost empty vs one that is full of people.
      This is not just to help those that live in Detroit now but to help people that are living in cities that have outrageous housing costs. Good paying jobs combined with a low cost of living will attract companies and people to those cities and in not take the pressure off of cities like San Francisco as far as housing costs at least offer them a place that is both nice to live and has good job opportunities. The US needs more cites like Seattle, Austin, Dallas, Portland, and Colorado Springs. Cities like Detroit could become a city like those or it can stay a slum. A slum hurts everyone.
       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    90. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Maybe Detroit needs a CCTV system for a few years to get the crime under control. The issue is getting ride of it after the crime level drops. That would be a hard sell since you would be taking out a system that "worked".
      The better solution is honestly jobs. High employment usually drops crime.
       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    91. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ha, I didn't think of E.St.Louis, and I know someone who grew up there... he tells me that standing on your front lawn in the evening was an invitation to get shot, and that was over 50 years ago.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    92. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Plenty of hippies still around in SF. Also in NYC, though between the hipsters and the yuppies they've kind of been kicked to the curb and are hard to distinguish from regular homeless people.

    93. Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      90% of /. posts, explained: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

      Including your own, obviously.

    94. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Oh, those evil Republicans! They deliberately sabotaged Detroit by putting up bad candidates, hoping Democrats would get into power bankrupt the city and then! Obviously, it's a sinister plot by Republicans to buy all that real estate for cheap and make the 1% even wealthier!

    95. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      The easy solution for Detroit would be a lot of money.

      Adding money to a corrupt government and union town is like throwing gasoline on a fire.

      A better solution would be to break up Detroit into a large number of small, independent private developments in which the residents actually own shares, similar to an HOA. They can then individually contract out security, trash pickup, maintenance, and other services. Corruption doesn't pay if you have to corrupt thousands of HOAs one at a time. Developments that remain blighted and whose blight harms neighboring developments can be sued and taken over or razed by their neighbors (no central authority establishing blight).

      Corruption becomes worse the bigger the units of governance become, because the bigger they become, the more return on investment corporations and unions get on their efforts to corrupt government.

    96. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That is a very sad statement don't you think?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    97. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That is why I would want to see Michigan become a right to work state at least for a while. The Unions there have become more about corruption than about securing benefits for the workers.
      The HOA idea is interesting but also scary. HOAs are not corruption free and might be worse than a large government. The real cure for corruption is a strong middle class.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    98. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    99. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      The HOA idea is interesting but also scary. HOAs are not corruption free and might be worse than a large government.

      That's a different kind of "corruption". Your HOA officers may steal your money, but they are not usually a worthwhile target for lobbyists or unions, they are too small. Furthermore, when corruption occurs, since they are private, you can take them to court on equal terms and for much more than you can take a city to court. And in the worst case, you can always sell your stake (if at a loss) and move across the street; you don't have to leave the entire city.

      The real cure for corruption is a strong middle class.

      Empty words and a ridiculous proposition. The middle class is doing just fine, and it's strong. But it didn't manage to prevent either Bush or Obama from paying off their corporate cronies, and they aren't able to stop the corruption or financial disaster in California either.

    100. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If you look at this site http://www.transparency.org/co... You will see that as a nation the US isn't doing that bad as far as corruption goes. I would disagree with you about the HOA moving is not that simple of a solution for most people. Also lots of HOAs means lots of small targets for corruption vs a few larger targets. If you take a look at Chicago politics you will see that the most effective targets are often Alderman.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    101. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      If you look at this site http://www.transparency.org/co... [transparency.org] You will see that as a nation the US isn't doing that bad as far as corruption goes.

      First of all, TI measures perception of corruption, not actual corruption. In addition, the term "corruption" has many meanings. Here, we are talking about rent seeking and lobbying, while TI is mostly concerned with the illegal kind of corruption.

      If you take a look at Chicago politics you will see that the most effective targets are often Alderman.

      Yes, but they end up determining the pay-out of very large sums of money, and that money is often spent far away from the people who paid for it. I can't have an informed opinion on whether some neighborhood several miles from me really needs its roads redone, I can have an informed opinion whether my HOA needs to do it for my development; all the money that is spent by an HOA is spent where you can see it and determine whether you got your money's worth. And, as I was saying, you can't take your alderman to civil court for hurting you financially through bad decisions, but you can certainly do that with your HOA and its members.

  2. Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's the problem with importing more and more workers: They're going to get fucked by the Big Boys just like the rest of is. I have no illusions about this.

    How about Dan Costa's idea? If the feds want Detroit to live, offer business grants to get people to open up shop there, give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I think you've had enough decades of "fewer people=fewer problems" as an attempt to improve things.

    2. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Open up shops to do what? Shops usually depend don't here buying a large employer to have a income base high enough to support shops.

      And if you have a high tech degree, why would you want to start a business there? VC practically don't exist, you contemporaries are all on the coast. Try getting 10 million to start a software company in Detroit.

      Detroit is just like every other city when the primary employment went away. It just happens to be a large 'mill town.,'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The idea that big business=everything is bullshit and backward. Big business is not supporting life in the US any longer and hasn't for years.

      The idea is to make your city and town a place that isn't a hellhole for the creative. Stop giving tax abatements to huge corporations that are actually employing few workers and who are often seeing NEGATIVE taxation. Start giving some help to the small businesses instead of the big ones.

      Of course this takes deep thinking and common sense which are at all time lows in the USA right now.

    4. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I think you've had enough decades of "fewer people=fewer problems" as an attempt to improve things.

      I'm not sure I get what you're laying down; how would importing foreigners to work in Detroit improve things for the millions of people living there already, moreso than encouraging Americans to do the same?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Open up shops to do what? Shops usually depend don't here buying a large employer to have a income base high enough to support shops.

      You seem lack an understanding of the colloquialism, "to open up shop," as well as having a very limited definition of the term, "shop"

      Probably not a lot of profit to be had for 'boutique' shops, but there are auto shops, carpentry shops, metalworking shops, etc., that would be quite viable in a place like The Motor City, regardless of it's current condition.

      And if you have a high tech degree, why would you want to start a business there? VC practically don't exist, you contemporaries are all on the coast.

      Right - why would foreigners with high-tech degrees want to start a business in Detroit? At least as Americans, we have a somewhat vested interest in keeping one of our large cities alive. I can imagine foreign companies selling off large tracts of land and assets the moment they take ownership, assuming they can find a buyer.

      Try getting 10 million to start a software company in Detroit.

      It still blows my mind that today, in an age where we can communicate instantly with people all over the planet, industries still tend to centralize geographically. Silicon Valley had a purpose at first, but I can't figure out for the life of me why anyone would want to invest, today, in companies that are based in one of the most business-and-individual-unfriendly regions of the nation.

      Detroit is just like every other city when the primary employment went away.

      Such as?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain this negative taxation concept. I am aware of tax law and there can be low taxes, ever 'zero' taxes, and definitely never negative taxes - using money. I have been unable to get anywhere near low taxes no matter how creative an accountant I hire.

      So tell us, how is this done please.

    7. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Because the people left in Detroit are trapped in a cycle of poverty, mostly with no real prospects due to lack of education(or they'd have moved out to someplace that would pay for their skills)? Every city has that problem, it's just usually bolstered by a more robust economy to help pull people out. The lack of employable people keeps employers away. The lack of employers keeps people from training for jobs they could have. And all that remains is a sense of desperation and crime.

      The neoclassical position is that these problems fix themselves, and I think it's evidentially untrue(given, as I said, the last couple decades). The other really really long term solution(that I can see) is to let things get so bad and deteriorated that Detroit can start over from a small-town situation, but that's still decades of suffering like things are at least.

    8. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 2

      give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.

      So I like the idea but it's kind of a chicken vs egg thing.

      High tech companies need HIGHLY skilled workers. Most of the unemployed autoworkers in Detroit are not highly skilled.

      So unless you are including in your proposal a big training budget (and that's assuming people have the desire and or aptitude to become highly skilled) it won't work.

      However, there are a number of support roles (like garbage collection and construction) that are NOT highly skilled but that will go up as people get imported. Think about it, import 50,000 people and they'll all want to eat at restaurants, have people fix their mcmansions (and maybe hire gardeners) etc., etc.

      So actually in this case maybe the government does have a good idea.

    9. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      If you can't get the people already there to be productive import them!

      Personally I say let it die, scrape the ruins into a big ditch and make it the dump for the rest of the US. That would be an improvement.

    10. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by HetMes · · Score: 1

      Please, do tell us how the region of Detroit is going to attract money, thereby lifting the longterm level of wealth, when your plan is to just poor some money into it for a couple of year. Detroit got poor because they were no longer attracting money via the car industry. Tell us how your plan deals with the source of the problems, not the symptoms of their results.

    11. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Because the people left in Detroit are trapped in a cycle of poverty, mostly with no real prospects due to lack of education(or they'd have moved out to someplace that would pay for their skills)? Every city has that problem, it's just usually bolstered by a more robust economy to help pull people out. The lack of employable people keeps employers away. The lack of employers keeps people from training for jobs they could have. And all that remains is a sense of desperation and crime.

      I think the crime is more of a deterrent to rebirth than lack of skilled and educated workers - you don't have to be that smart or learned to be a 'process handler' in a manufacturing setting. Of course, to bring manufacturing back to Detroit would mean that our government would have to modify or cancel a lot of those "free trade agreements" that our 'leaders' have, personally, profited from enacting.

      Detroit isn't dying because the people living there suddenly decided being criminals was better than working; Detroit is dying because all the 'good jobs' people used to be able to get there have been exported to China and Mexico. We won't be able to fix anything until we fix the root issue first.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Dan Costa's idea? If the feds want Detroit to live, offer business grants to get people to open up shop there, give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.

      The existing population isn't that stupid to want to move to Detroit. They need suckers...er..immigrants who don't know any better.

    13. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.

      So I like the idea but it's kind of a chicken vs egg thing.

      High tech companies need HIGHLY skilled workers. Most of the unemployed autoworkers in Detroit are not highly skilled.

      Why does it have to be "high tech companies" and "HIGHLY skilled workers?" Why can't we, as a nation, demand that our government stop allowing corporations to outsource our jobs to indentured servants in other countries?

      Hell, if I had the capital, do you know what business I know I could start and run successfully in Detroit? A firearms manufacturing plant - nobody needs a degree to be a machinist or forklift operator, plus it's not like there'd be a shortage of customers.

      Would I prefer to start my own car company? Sure as hell I would, but thanks to legislation like NAFTA, there's no way I'd be able to compete with the multi-billion dollar car companies who cut costs by farming work out to the Chinese and Mexicans.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this pretty much the same thing as indentured servitude?

    15. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If you can't get the people already there to be productive import them!

      The question is, has anyone tried? Or is this one of those "searching for unicorns" situations, like when Microsoft begs Uncle Sam for more H1B visa workers, claiming they can't find any Americans qualified and willing to do the work?

      Personally I say let it die, scrape the ruins into a big ditch and make it the dump for the rest of the US. That would be an improvement.

      Fine for you.

      I like to fix things, and I don't like to give up. Call it a quirk.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      My case: the root issue isn't fixable.

    17. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Please, do tell us how the region of Detroit is going to attract money, thereby lifting the longterm level of wealth, when your plan is to just poor some money into it for a couple of year.

      Assuming you went to school there, I'd drop some serious bucks on increasing the quality of education, specifically in the 'spelling and grammar' arenas. Sheesh.

      Detroit got poor because they were no longer attracting money via the car industry. Tell us how your plan deals with the source of the problems, not the symptoms of their results.

      "Became" poor, not "got."

      Despite an obvious paucity of English education, you already named the solution: Bring the manufacturing jobs back. Really, is there any reason Ford makes car parts in Mexico, other than to help a small handful of people secure shit-tons of personal wealth? It's not like outsourcing made cars any cheaper.

      But hey, it doesn't have to be cars, they could become a mecca of firearms manufacturing, or drone production, or any of a million possible industries that employ both low- and high-skill workers. You just have to fucking try, instead of writing millions of people off because you don't want to be bothered with how shitty a situation they happen to be in at the moment.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    18. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality check: those jobs aren't coming back - if they leave China and Mexico, it will be for deeper into Latin America, Asia, or Africa and/or for automated plants that will employ a small fraction of the workers the old factories did. Had those free trade agreements not gone into effect, the alternative was to replace the international step with lesser automation that would still have decimated the workforce.

    19. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      My case: the root issue isn't fixable.

      With a collective attitude like that, you're probably right.

      We, as a nation, need a sea change from "selfish assholism" to "helping each other out, because if we all win, we're all winners."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    20. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the city hadn't taxed the shit out of those with income, they wouldn't have left. Then again, maybe they would with the terrible schools, and high crime rate. Detroit isn't like "Every city", it's worse, and won't get better until the corruption in local government is cleaned up.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    21. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative Income Tax, for a specific example: EITC

    22. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      And you think being run down and desperate is going to make them less corrupt?

    23. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let the people of Detroit figure it out. I guess the time frame for that is not very convenient, though. "Importing" a bunch of people will just continue the alleged cycle of ingrained poverty.

    24. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      It's addressable but that's not the same as fixable*. Human problems aren't going away.

      *this claim is applicable to current tech levels, and social mores. It's possible to perceive a world where you can fix everything, a la star trek. I'm not arguing hypotheticals.

    25. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      And why are you arguing against letting new people become the people of Detroit? I still don't see what you're thinking will actually make things better about a "do nothing" strategy.

    26. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It's addressable but that's not the same as fixable*. Human problems aren't going away.

      Gotcha, on the same page now.

      There's something funny/sad about that second sentence that I just can't put my finger on.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    27. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley had a purpose at first, but I can't figure out for the life of me why anyone would want to invest, today, in companies that are based in one of the most business-and-individual-unfriendly regions of the nation.

      Because there are a lot of competent people there and these days people don't stay in the same job for a very long time. People circulate between companies quite a lot and it's easier to get people to move to a place for a job if they have the option of other jobs in the same area if it doesn't work out for them. If you create a company in the bay area, you can easily find people who are looking for a bit of a change to work for you. If you move to the bay area, you can easily find a lot of companies looking to hire competent people (and some who will settle for not-totally-incompetent people).

      You need to develop a critical mass of demand for a particular skill set for this kind of environment to become self-sustaining and the more companies are there, the easier it becomes for others. It's somewhat counter-intuitive, but it's the same reason why you often see shops and restaurants selling similar things in clusters - both benefit from people who go to one in the knowledge that if it's full or out of stock of what they want they can go to one of the others.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    28. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

      Yeah... I'm sure there's even less with any high tech knowledge. If by Detroit you mean people in Michigain yes. But local Detroiters are very poorly educated.

    29. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't really get this plan at all. Massive unemployment and the solution is to import 50,000 new workers? To do what jobs?

      Shouldn't the plan be to lure business in first and then import extra workers if they are needed?

    30. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by thaylin · · Score: 1

      I have paid a negative income tax for a few years while in college as an adult. It is called tax credits, which are paid even if you have no income.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    31. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      > My case: the root issue isn't fixable.
      With a collective attitude like that, you're probably right.
      We, as a nation, need a sea change from "selfish assholism" to "helping each other out, because if we all win, we're all winners."

      I think you're both right.

      The root problem simply isn't fixable. As you say, the nation needs a sea change, but that's about as likely as Vulcans visiting us and establishing first contact next week.

    32. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It still blows my mind that today, in an age where we can communicate instantly with people all over the planet, industries still tend to centralize geographically. Silicon Valley had a purpose at first, but I can't figure out for the life of me why anyone would want to invest, today, in companies that are based in one of the most business-and-individual-unfriendly regions of the nation.

      Because you can't run a company without workers, and there's no qualified workers in Detroit. You're not going to be able to attract talent for your software firm to Detroit, or some other bumblefuck town in flyover country, because the workers don't want to live there. Even if don't have anything against living in Bumblefuck, many professional workers (esp. engineers) don't want to pack up and move to a place where there's only one employer, because then you have no alternatives if you get laid off, or you're not getting appropriate raises. In Silicon Valley, there's tons of jobs and high salaries. If your employer sucks or isn't paying enough or lays you off, you just go get a job across the street the next Monday. You can't do that in Fargo.

      Also, your contention about being "individual-unfriendly" is bogus. California stands apart from most other states in that non-compete clauses in employment contracts are unenforceable. If you work at some company in a town that's dominated by a particular industry (in a non-CA state), you may find yourself unable to get another job if you want to or need to leave your job for some reason, because all those companies are competitors. In California, this isn't the case; if you work company A and their competitor company B offers you a better deal, you can go to work there. I'd say that's extremely employee-friendly. It's all the other states that are individual-unfriendly, and excessively business-friendly.

    33. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by stdarg · · Score: 1

      That's a big "if." Compared to much of the world, even the poor and criminal element here are helped out enormously, and yet most of them do not become winners. Haven't you heard of the cycle of poverty?

    34. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a chip to try to get automakers' engineering efforts back into the city, by saying "You can get better (nudge nudge cheaper) labor in Detroit proper".

    35. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      > My case: the root issue isn't fixable.
      With a collective attitude like that, you're probably right.
      We, as a nation, need a sea change from "selfish assholism" to "helping each other out, because if we all win, we're all winners."

      I think you're both right.

      The root problem simply isn't fixable. As you say, the nation needs a sea change, but that's about as likely as Vulcans visiting us and establishing first contact next week.

      Sometimes I wonder if we haven't been invited into the galactic community because we're so damn unfixable.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    36. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Because you can't run a company without workers, and there's no qualified workers in Detroit.

      Like how the fracking companies had to give up on digging for oil in the Dakotas, because there weren't any qualified workers there, right?

      Oh, wait, that's not what happened - the fracking companies opened shop, and workers poured into the area, so many of them that housing costs became unsustainable.

      Apparently, if you build it, they really will come.

      Also, your contention about being "individual-unfriendly" is bogus.

      As a midwesterner who, over the decades, has seen countless people move here from California, most of them stating their reasoning being related to taxation and lack of property rights out there, I'm going to disagree based on personal experience.

      If you work at some company in a town that's dominated by a particular industry (in a non-CA state), you may find yourself unable to get another job if you want to or need to leave your job for some reason, because all those companies are competitors. In California, this isn't the case; if you work company A and their competitor company B offers you a better deal, you can go to work there.

      Uh, you do know that slavery and indentured servitude are illegal, right? Going to a different company because you got a better offer has nothing to do with the state you live in.

      But wait; wasn't it just last week that a bunch of Silicon Valley companies got their asses handed to them by the courts for colluding on non-hiring agreements?

      Isn't that pretty much the complete opposite of the picture you're trying to paint here?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    37. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I've wondered the exact same thing. The ETs probably have a quarantine set up around our solar system to make sure we don't get out and none of them wander in. Notice how we had lots of alleged UFO encounters in years past? When was the last time you heard of one? Maybe some of those were real, and they hung out and observed us for a while before deciding we're all a bunch of idiotic assholes, and have now left.

    38. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      That's a big "if." Compared to much of the world, even the poor and criminal element here are helped out enormously, and yet most of them do not become winners. Haven't you heard of the cycle of poverty?

      Well, the real problem is in convincing the people with power to care about the people without it.

      Which usually doesn't happen without open and violent revolution.

      If I had any idea what to do about it, I'd have done it already.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    39. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schenectady and GE (just like Detroit is known as Motor City, Schenectady is known as Electric City). Fortunately the area is anchored by state government and education in nearby Albany and Troy; and since it is relatively simple to commute to these still-living cities, people still live there... but it has basically become an Albany suburb.

    40. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Uh, you do know that slavery and indentured servitude are illegal, right? Going to a different company because you got a better offer has nothing to do with the state you live in.

      Bullshit. If you sign a non-compete agreement in most states, companies can and will hold you to that. Since so many companies in certain areas do it, it becomes effectively impossible to work in that industry without signing one. Not a problem in California, because these clauses aren't enforceable there. It has everything to do with the state you live in.

      But wait; wasn't it just last week that a bunch of Silicon Valley companies got their asses handed to them by the courts for colluding on non-hiring agreements?

      That's different. Those companies (illegally) colluded to not poach each other's employees, or to hire them away from each other. That's different from the employees having non-compete agreements; basically it was an end-run around the fact that they couldn't hold their employees to non-compete contracts. And yes, they got their asses handed to them, rightfully. Something like that would not have happened in most other states, since in most other places employees are forced to sign those contracts as a condition for employment.

      Isn't that pretty much the complete opposite of the picture you're trying to paint here?

      No, how so? It's very simple: if you live in, say, Virginia, and work for company A, you're not allowed to work for company B because you signed a non-compete contract. So you have to leave the state to get a job at a competitor in the industry. If you live in California, you don't have that problem. You may have had a problem getting hired at a competitor if you worked at a select small group of very large companies and wanted to work for another large company that was part of this collusion, but this didn't affect the vast majority of companies in the state. Now that the deal's been busted, it doesn't apply any more, so everyone is free to work at competitors, unlike in other states.

      Like how the fracking companies had to give up on digging for oil in the Dakotas, because there weren't any qualified workers there, right?

      Oil workers are not like software engineers. There's lots of software engineering jobs out there in places much more desirable than Detroit, and there's a high barrier to entry in the profession (namely, a college degree, and relevant experience). Oil workers can only get jobs where the oil is, due to geology, and there's a low barrier to entry. Any moron can be an oil worker. Because the work is usually located in remote areas, the companies offer relatively high pay for oil workers to go there, just like the pay offered to people to work in Afghanistan or Alaska.

    41. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I've wondered the exact same thing. The ETs probably have a quarantine set up around our solar system to make sure we don't get out and none of them wander in.

      Yea, that's pretty much my theory for why the Voyager probe keeps failing to leave the solar system; it's not that scientists have a vague definition of what counts as 'leaving the solar system,' it's just that Voyager keeps bumping into the fence.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    42. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Eventually it'll leave the solar system and the automated quarantine enforcer robots will blast it to bits. Back here on Earth, we'll just think it finally died. They'll do this to all our extra-solar-system probes; let them survive for a good long time (since it's so far to the next star system anyway), then vaporize them when the Earthers won't suspect it's anything more than normal old-age failure of the equipment. At our current rate of progress, we'll probably never actually send any manned ships or anything more substantial than Voyager out of the solar system (we'll destroy ourselves first).

    43. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If you sign a non-compete agreement in most states, companies can and will hold you to that

      Never thought of that... probably because I've never signed one myself.

      Since so many companies in certain areas do it, it becomes effectively impossible to work in that industry without signing one. Not a problem in California, because these clauses aren't enforceable there.

      So, these industries, that enforce non-comps across the board... do they even open up shop in CA?

      Those companies (illegally) colluded to not poach each other's employees, or to hire them away from each other. That's different from the employees having non-compete agreements; basically it was an end-run around the fact that they couldn't hold their employees to non-compete contracts. And yes, they got their asses handed to them, rightfully. Something like that would not have happened in most other states, since in most other places employees are forced to sign those contracts as a condition for employment.

      Now granted, I've only worked in a couple of states, and never signed a non-comp, but as far as I'm aware it's pretty much "at-will" employment most places, in that employment can be terminated by either party, at any time, for any reason. But again, that's based purely on my own experience.

      Oil workers are not like software engineers. There's lots of software engineering jobs out there in places much more desirable than Detroit, and there's a high barrier to entry in the profession (namely, a college degree, and relevant experience).

      Hey, machine shops are "high-tech" compared to, say, a bakery.

      All a matter of perspective.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    44. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So, these industries, that enforce non-comps across the board... do they even open up shop in CA?

      Yes, they even demand tech workers to sign them at some companies in CA. They're hoping for ignorance, that the workers won't know their rights. No court will ever enforce such a contract clause in the state; it's come up before and been thrown out. It'd be nice if they just passed a law banning such contract language, but I guess unenforceability is better than nothing.

      Now granted, I've only worked in a couple of states, and never signed a non-comp, but as far as I'm aware it's pretty much "at-will" employment most places, in that employment can be terminated by either party, at any time, for any reason. But again, that's based purely on my own experience.

      That's mostly orthogonal. Most states are indeed at-will employment, but lots of jobs involve employment contracts of some type. If they employer puts a non-compete in there and you sign it, you're legally bound by it in most states. Usually, if the company terminates you, the clause doesn't apply (or else you could fight it in court as that clause doesn't provide "consideration"), but if you leave of your own accord, it does.

      It actually hit me at my first job out of college (in VA); I worked at a small company near my university. They paid peanuts and I had other issues with them, so I tried to go to the other big employer in that town, which happened to be their competitor. They were very interested until I informed them of my non-compete contract. These contracts aren't universal by any means (I don't remember seeing any at jobs I worked at in AZ), but some companies do push them.

    45. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      At our current rate of progress, we'll probably never actually send any manned ships or anything more substantial than Voyager out of the solar system (we'll destroy ourselves first).

      Man, I sure hope so.

      $Deity help us we figure out interstellar travel before they decide we're mature enough to spread throughout the galaxy. The council may just decide to feed this whole sector to a black hole sooner than allow the human virus, er, race, to infect the rest of the universe.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    46. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      They're hoping for ignorance, that the workers won't know their rights.

      OK, now that I can believe.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    47. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite an obvious paucity of English education, you already named the solution: Bring the manufacturing jobs back. Really, is there any reason Ford makes car parts in Mexico, other than to help a small handful of people secure shit-tons of personal wealth? It's not like outsourcing made cars any cheaper.

      Yes. They don't have to deal with UAW dickheads and their stupid work rules, so Ford can run the factories more efficiently than is possible in the US & Canada. It also helps them compete in the global market - the same reason why the European and Japanese automakers are investing heaps of money in Mexico.

    48. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also takes resisting the bribes, I mean political donations covered by free speech, of big businesses. Or at least resisting letting them corrupt you. That's the real roadblock to your suggestion, in my opinion.

    49. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The cost for an H1-B should be a scholarship for someone to be trained to that job. It shouldn't be cheaper to pull in someone else, rather than train them up. If they don't want to wait to train them, fine. But make them pay for it, and then lets start training people up.

    50. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      The cost for an H1-B should be more than a scholarship for someone to be trained to that job.

      FTFY.

      Sadly, I've seen entirely too many situations where Corporation A still preferred the H1B (or illegal immigrant, depending on the jobs skill level), even though hiring an American had similar costs.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    51. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring the manufacturing jobs back. Really, is there any reason Ford makes car parts in Mexico, other than to help a small handful of people secure shit-tons of personal wealth? It's not like outsourcing made cars any cheaper.

      Unions more greedy here than in Mexico?
      Less minorities in Mexico so less "Protectors of Minorities" in action. What you as employer can do with employee who is untouchable?

      But hey, it doesn't have to be cars, they could become a mecca of firearms manufacturing, or drone production, or any of a million possible industries that employ both low- and high-skill workers. You just have to fucking try, instead of writing millions of people off because you don't want to be bothered with how shitty a situation they happen to be in at the moment.

      What about those "millions" trying "to do something"?
      They are not serfs bound to the land. (in opposition to proposed special immigrants).
      Voting with your feet. Moving to the greener pasture. At least (in theory) they have one or two common languages. (Yo - ain't any language)

      Look at the situation in the EU in the "new members" countries. Migration is high, even with language barrier.

    52. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Why can't we, as a nation, demand that our government stop allowing corporations to outsource our jobs to indentured servants in other countries?

      We could demand that, but its less efficient for everyone. You would be trading away low priced goods for low age jobs, or another way to state it is that you want to buy low wage jobs with high priced goods. Still one more way to state it is that you want the government to require both businesses and people to be exploited by forcing them to stay in Detroit.

      No matter how it is stated, its stupid. The problem is that you arent actually considering the consequences of what you are saying, just like how the leaders of Detroit didnt consider the consequences of their liberal policies. The solution to harmful policies is not to demand that the government prevent people from avoiding those harmful policies. They are harmful, its why they are fleeing, and the solution isnt optimistic good intentions. The solution is to stop doing harmful things. The solution is to face the consequences of reality and realize that you cannot every sustain the kind of liberal utopia that Detroit wanted to be without fucking people really really rough and hard.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    53. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I've seen entirely too many situations where Corporation A still preferred the H1B (or illegal immigrant, depending on the jobs skill level), even though hiring an American had similar costs.

      That's illegal. If an American is available for the job, they aren't allowed to use the foreigner, regardless of cost.

    54. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The city government was corrupt long before it was run down and desperate. I didn't insinuate what you asked, but how would you approach cleaning up and making them less desperate, prior to cleaning house in the local government? How would you attract businesses (and jobs) prior to doing that?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    55. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I've seen entirely too many situations where Corporation A still preferred the H1B (or illegal immigrant, depending on the jobs skill level), even though hiring an American had similar costs.

      That's illegal. If an American is available for the job, they aren't allowed to use the foreigner, regardless of cost.

      Well, thank goodness American corporations are champions of law, who would never break, skirt, or outright buy one just because they know they can get away with it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    56. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Fixing the broken law with more laws won't work, if the problem with the law is nobody is following it. Try enforcement first, before changing the law. It's amazing what happens when a law gets enforced.

    57. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Note, I never said we need more laws. In fact, if anything we need less, and yes, equal enforcement of the laws already on the books.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    58. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Some laws are equally ignored. And a new law to fix an unenforced law rarely works. But sometimes we want the law followed, and a new law feels like doing something to that end, since the enforcement is so far from our control (MADD with DUI, when unsafe driving was always illegal).

    59. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      To add to that example, sometimes when a law actually is enforced, it's enforced in the dumbest, most counter-productive way imaginable - regarding DUIs, the continued use of unconstitutional, stationary checkpoints, when every study shows that increased patrols in areas where alcohol is consumed (the "bar districts") is a much more effective deterrent.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    60. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The other great thing about DUIs is that the standards are now so low that talking on a phone is worse than "legaly drunk" and the number of DUI fatalities is gowring, as they have to continue to justify their MADD campaign (madd as in the hatter), a mob boss that kills an informant, and throws him in the trunk, dead, crashes on the way to dump the body. If the dead body, dead before the crash, were to test positive for alcohol, the crash would be listed as "alcohol involved" even if none of the drivers had any traces of alcohol in their system. It wouldn't get a DUI conviction for the mob boss, but it would get listed in FARS as "alcohol related" and be used in nexy year's MADD campaign.

      Zealotry is good for quick sweeping changes (the mindset of the US changed much faster with MADD), but horrible for the last 20% (plenty of people still think "I'll be ok", but aren't, but won't be swayed by any MADD campaign).

      MADD started out good, but ended up corrupted by the prohibitionists. They should have declared victory in about 1998 and closed down, with a promise to come back if the progress was lost, rather than turning into a rabid anti-drinking organization.

    61. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So, Fat Mike was right: the idiots have taken over.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    62. Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's been true since as long as anyone can remember (though void for people sufficiently old enough that they only *think* they remember). Mainly since 1960, the first presidential election determined, in a large part, through TV viewing.

  3. Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They ran themselves into the ground. Let them suffer the consequences.

    1. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that we tried to bail Detroit automakers out. We should have required that they sell to someone who was with the times. If we would have let them be bought up by other car makers with a clue about making reliable cars with low gas requirements, we would see those factories still open, but with a Toyota or Honda sign hanging over the door. True, there would be 3 or 4 rich Japanese men rather than 3 or 4 rich Americans in charge of the wealth generated, but we would still have employment in Detroit.

    2. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

      Amen.

    3. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You obviously don't know your own car makers do you? I grew up in North America, but live in Europe. Want to know a dirty little secret? I can get reliable low gas requirement AMERICAN cars in Europe. Around 1999 we bought a Jeep Wrangler and then took it to Canada. Since it was NORTH AMERICAN built we could import the car without problems. What was interesting was that the Jeep dealership who had to do some minor changes spent nearly 1.5 hours inspecting the car. We thought something was wrong and asked how come they took so long. Answer, "your Wrangler is Awesome it has so many efficiency features and electronics that I have never seen on sale here."

      I recently had a discussion about this with an American and the problem is not the American car makers, but Americans. They want from their American car makers BIG FAT engines with BIG FAT chassis. Americans are not willing to go for the reliable low gas requirements cars because they are "wimpy" cars. The cars I drive here are American built and they are not wimpy. They might not have 600 HP, but who the frig cares since it is not that useful anyways. And even less useful in America...

      Go figure, eh!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    4. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by prefec2 · · Score: 2

      I know this is an unfamiliar concept in the US, but the people in Detroit are in need and require help from the rest of the country. Their city structure is designed for a much larger population. Now the city must undergo a large transformation. First, it must be determined what the future for Detroit should be, otherwise it will end in chaos. Second, if the government and police are corrupt, this corruption must be ended. Third, initiatives to support start-ups and new businesses must be launched to support an initial growth impulse. To do all this, the state and the USA itself must support these steps. We had similar problems in North-Rhine-Westphalia and in East-Germany. In such situation you have two options: Let them solve their problem alone which will result in emigration of the skilled people to other regions or countries. The remaining people are mostly less skilled and educated, as their mobility is lower. Furthermore, women have a higher mobility than men, which will result in a men surplus, which often cause more violence.

      From a civilizing view, this would be a catastrophe. It would also be disruptive to the state structure and therefor disruptive for any democratic society. As a state is a relevant construct for capitalism and the construction and coordination of a society, it is important to support Detroit.

    5. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah wah wah. I shit my pants and now I want someone else to wipe my arse.

    6. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Migraineman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This isn't a natural disaster. This is the result of *decades* of mismanagement and corruption. If the system is so broken that is cannot be repaired, and fighting the system is an unwinnable battle, your only viable solution is to leave. And that's what you're seeing here. People are leaving Detroit en masse.

      Detroit is a city, but it is far from being an essential resource. If it imploded tomorrow, I doubt it would be more than an interesting news tidbit for the rest of the nation.

      Finally, it's clear that you don't comprehend freedom. Freedom includes the ability to royally screw yourself by making one bad decision after another. Detroit has made many bad decisions over the years, and it is completely outside the pervue of the US Federal government to step in and mandate that the rest of the nation support a city or to dictate how a city is run ... regardless of how poorly the locals are running it.

    7. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From a civilizing view, what Detroit needs is a neutron bomb dropped on it.

    8. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best thing for Detroit and the rest of the country would be to plow it under and turn it back into farmland. Pay the few people there to move somewhere, anywhere else - especially outside the US.

      It is the cheapest, most productive thing that can be done. Best for the people of Detroit, best for Michigan, best for the US and best for the whole world.

      Everybody but the crooks win.

    9. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by crakbone · · Score: 2

      Actually that is wrong. There are reasons to have large big cars in the US. Frankly we are a giant country. Try driving from Los Angeles to Chicago in a tiny car some time. Midwest and western united states there is a ton of space between locations. Trying to do that in a tiny car does not work. As far as mileage goes the US car makers are to blame. We want fuel efficient cars, even with gas prices in the US two to three times better than the EU we still do a ton more driving and a fuel efficient car would be a god send. But we get messed over on fuel efficiency. We got the smart car and I thought "this will be great. Those little things get great mileage in Europe". What we got was not what you get in the EU. It had worse gas mileage than a VW Jetta. We don't get the nice Diesels you get there. Shoot, our first Hybrid car had worse mileage than our diesel cars. We don't want to have gas guzzlers but if we are going to live with them we might as well be comfortable in them.

    10. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So screw all the people there? Have a little compassion.

      Not everyone is able to judge their government's ability with both parties excellent at marketing. And sometimes it's a choice of less bad.

      People are in trouble, you don't just toss 'em to the wolves because they made mistakes. Some of those mistakes they had no control over.

    11. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Beside freedom people have also other rights, which you seem to have forgotten. Anyway, the people still living in Detroit do so, because they cannot just leave. Either these people have a job and not the prospect of getting one elsewhere or they have not the resources to move. So while the administration in Detroit messed up, the people still living their have to pay for it. On a side note, there is something called compassion. You cannot let them die, just because they are unable to solve their present crisis. This is pretty much inhuman.

      And as the USA claim always to stay up for human rights:
      - Freedom (to go where you want, to work want you want, to pray to your favorite deity, own something, etc.)
      - Protection
      - Housing (you have the right to live somewhere)
      - Work (you have to right to be provided with work or something to do)
      - Education
      - Health
      http://www.un.org/en/documents...

      So in essence, even if you have made a long list of wrong decisions and failed miserably, you still have these rights. And you deserve to be helped. If you are a criminal, your rights, especially freedom will be limited, because you are such a big disruption to other people rights.

    12. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      What is a catastrophe is that they haven't just foreclosed on the whole thing and sell it off. How much longer do we have to watch it linger. Pull the life support and let the damn thing die.

    13. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of Americans have invested a ton of their identity into what they drive. I bought a charity lottery ticket from a guy about a year ago. The prize was a Ford Mustang. I told him that if I won the car that I'd probably just sell it, hopefully right back to the dealership so I'd never have to take possession of it. He asked what I was driving and I told him that I drove a low-end Subaru. And the look on his face astounded me as he blurted out "But this is a sports car!"
       
      I know the guy from some mutual friends. He doesn't have much going on for himself as a person aside from a good paying job that lets him supplement his lack of real self worth with all kinds of toys. That aside, his feelings on the matter pretty much mirror tons of people in this nation. Sadly even people who have lots to offer in the way of ability and motivation also feed themselves into the concept that owning something makes you a better person.
       
      Ah, but this is Slashdot, we see plenty of this same kind of thing from people with their cell phones and those who talk up their gaming rigs... Nothing that anyone with enough money can't buy. Instead show me what you're doing with it and I might be impressed.

    14. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      When I lived in the Netherlands I bought a Ford Focus. Far from being a "cheap" car, it cost 30,000 EUR, and was BEAUTIFUL (and definitely comparable in driving ability to a BMW 3 series or other similar).

      My friends from the US were floored when they took a ride in it...

    15. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      For any company I would say yes let it die. But in this case the city was fucked up by industry and the local administration and now the people of Detroit have to suffer. So yes they have to start over, but someone has to help them. Furthermore, a totally abandoned Detroit would be a environmental hazard. Someone has to clean up.

    16. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 2

      Try driving from Los Angeles to Chicago in a tiny car some time. Midwest and western united states there is a ton of space between locations. Trying to do that in a tiny car does not work.

      I'm not sure I understand your argument. What about small cars makes them unsuitable for traveling long distances?

      When I was in college, I owned a Toyota Tercel, a very small car. Drove everywhere with it, without a problem. I have driven from Michigan to Texas with it multiple times.

      If anything they're better since they tend to get better gas mileage. Or you arguing they small cars are uncomfortable? Well, then that's a subjective thing that brings little to the discussion at hand.

    17. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Took a 7000+ mile road trip around the country in about 16 days.... in a Chevy Aveo. Was more than comfortable, held up fine, and handled the highway speeds and mountain passes without a hitch.

      People just *think* they need a massive car to drive around.

    18. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not in college anymore. I had far higher tolerances for lots of things 20 years ago. I'd be willing to bet you're in the same boat.

    19. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently had a discussion about this with an American and the problem is not the American car makers, but Americans. They want from their American car makers BIG FAT engines with BIG FAT chassis.

      No, I think this is the point... people in the midwest want their giant land yachts, so American car companies in their isolation think this applies to the entire country. It doesn't. In Boston I see cars from foreign brands are more common than for domestic brands for exactly this reason. Isn't it sad that a German, Japanese, or Korean company has a better handle on what many Americans want than American companies do?

    20. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      And as the USA claim always to stay up for human rights: ... [un.org]

      Here's one of your bigger problems: we do believe in human rights, but we don't define them the same way the UN does. In particular, our background and beliefs reflect negative rights (freedom from interference by others) rather than positive rights (the right to goods or services which others in turn have an obligation to supply—slavery by any other name).

      So, applying this to the situation at hand, we believe that people living in Detroit have the right to leave—no one has the right to hold them there—but not that anyone has any (legal) obligation to help them do so. People have the right to work—if two people choose to enter an employer-employee relationship under mutually agreeable terms, no one has the right to step in and prevent it—but not that anyone is obligated to offer any particular person a job. And so on for housing, education, health care... you are free to seek these for yourself, without interference, alone or working together with other like-minded individuals, but no one else is obligated to provide them for you.

      Lest this seem callous, keep in mind that this is only the legal side. Socially, the same groups which most closely adhere to the traditional American values of liberty, independence and self-reliance are also the ones which have historically done the most to support those who find themselves in need of assistance, both privately and through donations to private-sector charitable organizations. The more personal the assistance, the more effective it is at restoring the recipient's status as an equal and effective member of society, as opposed to remaining forever dependent on public handouts. The distinction is important psychologically; an impersonal entitlement does nothing to boost your confidence or encourage you to get back on your feet so you can repay the favor, whereas private assistance means that someone has chosen to take an interest in you and believes that you are worth helping.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    21. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      No, our rights are well enumerated, starting with Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

      You do not have a right to protection.
      You do not have a right to housing.
      You do not have a right to employment.
      You do not have a right to education.
      You do not have a right to health.

      You have a right to pursue all of these things, but you are not entitled to them. If you choose to be employed, you need to earn that employment. No business is obligated to hire you simply because you are a wonderful person. Further, you may choose to be unemployed, in which case the State is not obligated to support you to your satisfaction. We have programs in place to support people who become unemployed due to no fault of their own, but these are transitional programs, not lifestyles.

      You do have a right to speak up about bad and corrupt government.
      You do have a right to vote.
      You do have a right to participate in government, at multiple levels.

      As for compassion, I do know there will be victims of this situation. However, the vast majority of Detroit residents have been tolerating this disaster of a city for decades, and are now upset that the fairytale they have been spoon-fed isn't coming to fruition. I have trouble being sympathetic for folks who trot mindlessly down a well-marked dead-end road and get upset when the road ends.

    22. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the United States, we don't accept the bogus extras in the UN Declaration.
      People who put "the right to paid vacation" on the same level with freedom of speech and the right not to be imprisoned for your opinions are simply delusional.
      Americans don't believe that people have the right to other people's property, just for existing.

    23. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      "your Wrangler is Awesome it has so many efficiency features and electronics that I have never seen on sale here."

      Could you list some of those features?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    24. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by thaylin · · Score: 2
      Someone does not know their constitution, or only a limited knowledge their constitution. There is this part in the 9th which states

      The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

      This means our rights are NOT well enumerated, and some of those things you say are not a right could be.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    25. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I understand your argument. What about small cars makes them unsuitable for traveling long distances?

      I can answer that. If you weigh 300 pounds, a small car is going to get uncomfortable really really fast. You might be able to put up with it for very short trips around town (like if you have a really short commute with no rush-hour traffic), but no longer.

      Small cars work for people in other countries because they have BMIs well under 25. In America, it's highly unusual to have a BMI of less than 30 unless you're under 20 years old.

    26. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Only in America do people think Mustangs are "sports cars".

    27. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that instead of trying to revitalize a dying city no one wants to live in and that doesn't have much decent industry left, what we need to do is bring these people to the jobs. There's lots of agricultural jobs in the southern states, for instance, which we have Mexican immigrants working at. Why not ship unemployed Americans down there and let them have those jobs instead?

    28. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At this point it's way past compassion and well into enabling.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of agricultural jobs in the south that are done by Mexican immigrants and guest workers. Why not move the Detroit residents down there to do them instead? Also, there's lots of other minimum-wage jobs in cities around the country that have been taken over by immigrants (frequently illegal immigrants); why not put these citizens to work at these jobs instead? Why are our politicians and various liberal groups on the "comprehensive immigration reform" (amnesty) bandwagon, and giving out all kinds of free government benefits to these immigrants, while our own people are suffering and unemployed?

    30. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      The term "right" has been abused over the years to the point that most people would equate the following two statements as peers:
      - I have the right to participate in representative government.
      - I have the right to eat Cheetos in my bed.

      In the context of this discussion, the right in question is freedom - freedom to secure housing, freedom to seek education, freedom to protect yourself. The State does not have an obligation to fix your bad decisions, nor does it have the authority to do so (because that would infringe on your personal freedom.)

      So while you have a "right" (aka "are free") to eat Cheetos in your bed, expecting the State to provide the Cheetos and the bed is ridiculous. You are, however, free to obtain them yourself.

    31. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by thaylin · · Score: 1
      Firstly that does not in any way counter my argument, you stated rights were well generated, and implied that since they were you had no other rights, as evidenced by your list, which is what I countered, and you seemed to have ignored.

      Secondly you, yourself, are abusing the word right.. You have a right to secure housing, you just do not have a right to have it given to you, meaning the government should not be allowed to make your house less secure for some reason. As for protection, it was one of the reasons the US was founded..

      Just because you have a right does not mean it is something that has to be given to you, just means the government does not have the right to take it away from you, or infringe on it. For example having the freedom of speech does not mean the government is obligated to buy you a podium to stand at and speak, just that it cannot block access to the podium you want to speak at.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    32. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, our rights are well enumerated, starting with Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

      The Declaration of Independence is not the Constitution.

    33. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Detroit's problems can't be fixed by just saying "Oh, the poor people, let's throw billions of dollars at them." Detroit's problems are like the problems of a meth addict. You can't help the meth addict by giving him money for more meth. You have to get him off the meth first -- which means, he has to want to get off the meth; if he wants to keep doing meth, sad to say, there is no help for him. That's just grim reality

      Helping the people of Detroit is going to require fixing Detroit's endemic problems, but there's no significant constituencey in Detroit for fixing the problems. Fixing the problems are going to be masively unpopular in Detroit, resulting in either abject failure of the attempt, or constant shrieks of "That un-Democratic!!"

    34. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really wasn't about the car, it was about the attitude. But thanks for missing the point.

    35. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. My wife, daughter, and I drove between Missouri and New York multiple times in a Mazda Protege. I'm 6'0" tall and I had plenty of legroom to make the 18 hour drive comfortably.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    36. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone is driving faster these days. Having a car that struggles at the speed limit will end up being kind of dangerous in certain areas.

    37. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by thaylin · · Score: 1

      No, but the declaration is seen by the government as being part of the body of natural laws that include it and the constitution.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    38. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      We don't get the nice Diesels you get there.

      We don't? Is the diesel Jetta that I'm driving, and that is consistently getting 43-44 MPG on the highway, a figment of my imagination?

    39. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Natural laws are irrelevant to a court a law.

    40. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by guises · · Score: 1

      That doesn't say anything. How is a big engine more tolerable than a small one for driving cross-country?

    41. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by crakbone · · Score: 1

      No it's not. It had to be completely re-engineered by VW for the US and was canceled for a short time because of that. It is not the same diesel they have in the EU.

    42. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It might not be the same exact thing, but it sure does get nice mileage, so what do I care if it's bolt-for-bolt identical or not?

    43. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Because the US Jetta is 37.8 miles to the gallon and the UK Jetta is 45.4 miles to the gallon. http://www.fuelly.com/car/volk...

    44. Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      My 2011 US Jetta Sportwagon is officially 39 MPG (that's US gallons, of course, not UK ones) on the highway, but in practice it's consistently showing 43-44 MPG (measured by driving from Seattle to Portland & back and then seeing how much it took to refill the tank at the station). I don't know why they underestimate the numbers like that, and whether it has anything to do with the limitations of the official tests used to measure it in either country.

  4. Glorious Detroit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    1. Re:Glorious Detroit! by operagost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Democratic Party should be the one imploding, not the GOP-- but the offer of free handouts is a tough one to campaign against. It's amazing how most failing cities have been under de facto on-party rule for decades, yet that party has managed to blame the other one for all its ills.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Glorious Detroit! by Alomex · · Score: 1

      but the offer of free handouts is a tough one to campaign against.

      Yes, it is rather surprising how enticing food is when you are unemployed at home with kids, no work and no prospect of employment. Funny that.

      The GOP could come with proposals such as retraining and plans to move people out of economically depressed areas which are unlikely to recover, or they could sit in a posh country club and rally against the 43% moochers.

      If you do so, just don't come and act surprised then that we don't vote for your invective and vindictive party.

    3. Re:Glorious Detroit! by operagost · · Score: 1

      Let's study your response.

      It appears you are arguing I oppose all social programs. With no evidence presented to support that, this is a straw man.

      In your next statement, you appear to defend the Democrats by complaining that the GOP isn't doing anything except railing against "43% moochers". My original argument was based on the fact that these cities are ruled by the other party, so expecting a party not in power to take action is unreasonable. You also seem to demand that they take specific actions which would require large amounts of public money and probably infringements on property rights, which is not only a false dilemma but also in opposition to the very objectives the GOP claims to have.

      In your last statement, you assume that I'm a member of the Republican party. I am not. I have voted for people of various parties in the last few elections.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Glorious Detroit! by Alomex · · Score: 1

      It appears you are arguing I oppose all social programs.

      Huh? I was talking about the republican party, not you.

      you appear to defend the Democrats by complaining that the GOP

      Huh^2. I'm simply pointing out why people don't vote republican in spite of obvious failings of the democratic party in Detroit. This justifies why people voting Democrat, it doesn't justify democratic policies in Detroit.

      You also seem to demand that they take specific actions which would require large amounts of public money and probably infringements on property rights,

      Right, like they have never done anything like that (defense spending, cough, subsidies to oil industry, subsidies to agricultural conglomerates).

      Reality is that todays GOP only remembers the deficit and fiscal probity when it comes to helping people in need. But when it comes to giving massive tax breaks to the wealthy all those financial considerations go out the window and they open the deficit taps.

      Yet simpletons fall for the deficit rhetoric in spite of the actual voting record of the GOP in congress and White House.

    5. Re:Glorious Detroit! by Wormsign · · Score: 1

      Detroit has a corruption problem, regardless of political party. The only reason the politicians in Detroit are Democrat is that the African-American population votes overwhelmingly Democrat. If they voted Republican, we'd have the same assholes running for office but they would be R instead of D. Cronyism and corruption transcend party and the jerks in Detroit are opportunists of the highest order.

    6. Re:Glorious Detroit! by thaylin · · Score: 1

      You of all people should not be talking about logical fallacies, as your post claiming them are full of them, starting with the assumption he is talking about you directly, when he clearly is talking about the GOP in general.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    7. Re:Glorious Detroit! by operagost · · Score: 1

      I used the term "free handouts", which he translated into "any and all welfare programs" and then implied that I was a Republican, which I was not.

      It seems you missed the nuance.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Glorious Detroit! by thaylin · · Score: 1

      He made no such implications...You assumed he was talking about you, however every use of the word you in his post seems to be directed generally at the GOP, or some other third party. It seems you over thought his post.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    9. Re:Glorious Detroit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The root Detroit's problems is that they failed to read the free market correctly. They made grandious promises to get workers to preform the tasks demanded by the electorate. When you are competing with a boom industry for local workers you end up paying alot more, (price of labor rises). When the boom industry goes bust, or in Detroit's case, goes Mexico, the market price of labor falls too. However lowering labor prices for private sector workers is alot easier then public sector workers, many having taken defered compensation in the form of pentions. As the tax base falls, so does the ability to pay the defered compensation. ie Money that is owed for work already done. This triggers an increase in taxes which just adds fuel to the fire.

      Can't say I really blame them too much. Imagine in 1980 telling the city, that you are going to plan for the day GM goes bankrupt. That wouldn't win you any elections, from either side of the isle.

    10. Re:Glorious Detroit! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      The Democratic Party should be the one imploding, not the GOP-- but the offer of free handouts is a tough one to campaign against. It's amazing how most failing cities have been under de facto on-party rule for decades, yet that party has managed to blame the other one for all its ills.

      I think you're confused in that the GOP doesn't offer free hand outs. It does, but just not to the people, but to corporations and the rich. Spending by the GOP still is much more than the Democrats, just less of it goes to help America or her people.

  5. Federal govt give away land? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Does the federal government own land in Detroit?

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Federal govt give away land? by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      Probably he wants the federal government to buy that land :-(

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    2. Re:Federal govt give away land? by operagost · · Score: 1

      You'll have to forgive Costa. He's one of those folks who think we have a unitary government here, where D.C. would be calling all the shots. All those abandoned properties in Detroit are at the disposal of either the state or the city. That being said, I'm not sure a manifest destiny-era land giveaway would actually work today. There are vacant properties that will not sell for literally $1, because there are no infrastructure or services. It will take some incentives for investors to come in and create a new Detroit in these areas, but no politicians have the courage to do something that will be decried as "corporate welfare" to the political establishment.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Federal govt give away land? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will Congress and the Michigan legislature agree to enact legislation removing state jurisdiction from Detroit and making it a zone of exclusive federal jurisdiction? This would make it convenient because the Constitution most in part applies only to the STATES. Downes v. Bidwell allows Congress to rule with legislative supremacy like Parliament in federal zones.

  6. Because immigrants aren't citizens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to have slaves. They can't just pack up and go if they don't like it anymore unless they want their lives to be even worse. "Hello sir! I'm willing to suck your cock in Detroit. Much better than the cock I was sucking in India!"

    Did anyone think of incentivising the "natives" to live and work in Detroit? Oh? They want too much money? They want to be able to live outside of work as well, have fun, holidays, kids, friends? The selfish fucks...

  7. 50 thousand new residents by Salo2112 · · Score: 1

    doing what? Haven't most people left because there aren't enough jobs? You want to pay off your debts, charge people an exit tax.

    1. Re:50 thousand new residents by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      doing what? Haven't most people left because there aren't enough jobs? You want to pay off your debts, charge people an exit tax.

      Shhh ... they might be listening!

    2. Re:50 thousand new residents by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      Not just residents/people. They are individuals with advanced degrees. The thinking is.. they will be part of projects and develop plans that need to be carried out. Then labor in Detroit might have something to do besides destroy the place or leave.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    3. Re:50 thousand new residents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rap music?

    4. Re:50 thousand new residents by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Michigan passed an exit tax on businesses 15 years ago. It hasn't worked as expected by the people who passed it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:50 thousand new residents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to a white guy like Eminem to take the only thing left in a predominantly black city.

  8. Looking for how the feds can help by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    It seems like a default position for state and municipal politicians to primarily look at how the federal government can help them. If anybody should pay people to come to Detroit, shouldn't it be Detroit or Michigan?

    The visa issue has to be federal, of course.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:Looking for how the feds can help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, but this is part of a subtler and more insidious plan.

      Lets think through this logically:
      1) more skilled foreign talent arrives, and for some reason they go to Detroit
      2) while walking through the ruins, skilled foreign talent gets mugged by local unskilled thuggery
      3) skilled foreign talent takes the first opportunity to flee, and begins telling tales of the dangers of the USA
      4) decrease in extranational interest in US work visas
      5) more US tech jobs available for US techies

      It's genius, I can hardly believe a politician could come up with the idea.

  9. Wage Slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has come full circle.

    1. Re:Wage Slavery by ichthus · · Score: 1

      I came here to comment the same thing. "An immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time." I don't see how else that sentence could be interpreted -- is that not the very definition of slavery? Sure, one could argue that the wage these workers would make could classify their situation as simple employment, but even slaves receive bread and water.

      --
      sig: sauer
    2. Re:Wage Slavery by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, such programs translate to a conditional permanent residence permit that is eventually replaced with an unconditional one, after some period of time. For example, this is how it works for people who get a green card by marrying a citizen - it's a full-fledged green card in all respects, save that it is conditional on the continuation of marriage. If you are not divorced in two years, you can apply for and receive an unrestricted green card.

      This is not slavery, because a holder of such a green card always has an option of backing out from the deal at any time. Of course, this would also mean that he can't stay in the country (well, unless he found some alternative means to obtain legal status).

    3. Re:Wage Slavery by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are free to leave at any time, you just move back to India (or wherever). You can't take the incentive and then walk away and use the incentive to start a life in California. That's slavery like a coupon is slavery.

      If you want to use that coupon, you can only do so at Target. Slavery!!!

  10. That is just dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If Detroit had 50.000 job positions for advanced degree professionals or those deemed with 'exceptional ability' in the sciences, arts and business, then it would not be in the shit-hole it currently is in.

  11. Unemployment rate 17,7% by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With an unemployment rate of 17.7%, it doesn't look to me like they need MORE people imported to look for work. Looks to me like they need to be spurring businesses to start there so that they can hire some of these people who are looking for work.
    As we well know, 17.7% means that these are the number of people on the eligible list of unemployment benefits...which they just cut to 20 weeks. So, it doesn't include the number of people who never found a job while they were on unemployment and now have neither a job nor can collect unemployment.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by ebrandsberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the idea is that if they have visas to hand out to companies, the companies will be willing to put offices in Detroit for those people to work in. From there, services will be needed from the lower-skill people in the area, think food service, etc. This will then eat into the 17.1% unemployment. The problem isn't the number of workers but the type and skill of the workers, and getting things back in balance. I'm not sure this is the right solution to the problem, but I am willing to consider that it may be A solution to the problem for now.

    2. Re: Unemployment rate 17,7% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Almost any American with enough skill and brains to make any positive impact to Detroit has already left Detroit. This is a desperate gamble to find some people who might be able to pay taxes and create businesses there. Screaming protectionism in the face of visas isn't going to help. The citizens living there have already let Detroit collapse.

    3. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      It's the 21st Century my good man, it's time you put aside this notion of "trying something different" -- if not employing people local to Detroit caused the problem, in the 21st Century we try again to "not employ people."

      I thought if you watched TV you would learn that "beating a dead horse" was our national pastime.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    4. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by generic_screenname · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The unemployment rate varies by sector. Unemployment in manufacturing is very high for obvious reasons. Unemployment in sectors like IT is much lower, partly because it's so hard to convince talent to relocate to Detroit and/or stay in the area.

    5. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is asking for ADVANCED EDUCATED people, that frankly, rules out yanks (and most brits).

    6. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that if they have visas to hand out to companies, the companies will be willing to put offices in Detroit for those people to work in. From there, services will be needed from the lower-skill people in the area, think food service, etc. This will then eat into the 17.1% unemployment. The problem isn't the number of workers but the type and skill of the workers, and getting things back in balance. I'm not sure this is the right solution to the problem, but I am willing to consider that it may be A solution to the problem for now.

      No doubt there are qualified Americans who would be willing to live and work in the Detroit area (somewhere around there anyway) if they were sufficiently financially motivated.

      This is just another ploy for American corporations to pay as little as possible to their workers.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    7. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      These visas should be denied for the same reason renaissance zones (low tax areas) should be denied -- they prop up the old system rather than fix it.

      People vote with their feet, fleeing the corruption and growing inefficiencies and taxes. This uses tricks of law to entice people back in...temporarily...where they just keep the dying heartbeat pulsing a little longer.

      These are iatrogenic problems. The solution is not a pseudo-cure by attacking voting with your feet with "incentives".

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      So basically the theory is "We should have the same kind of indentured servants that Silicon Valley has, se we can impress our corporate overlords enough that they'll throw some crumbs our way!"

      That doesn't work so long as there's another country willing to bend over backwards for its corporate overlords in a way that the US isn't: Environmental and labor safety laws - who needs 'em?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    9. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by scamper_22 · · Score: 2

      You don't seem to understand the modern progressive outlook for the Western World.

      Western people should only do interesting work or government work.

      Everything else is built upon mass immigration from the developing world who will do the work Western people don't want to do (for a variety of reason... low pay, too much technical training for the pay, no job security, too much risk...).

      Then you tax the immigrants and use it to provide welfare for the Western people unable to do interesting or government work.

      This is the same pattern from Michigan, California, to Canada to Europe.

      I'm not even saying this to knock it, but it's pretty darn apparent that is how they envision life. In some ways, if they can make it work, it works quite well. The immigrants win by supposedly taking on a better job and moving to a better area.
      The western society wins by gaining a tax base and jobs.
      And hopefully the left overs in the Western world are able to be supported by enough of a tax base created by the immigrant population to make it a win-win-win.

      Now of course, I don't see it as particularly workable. But that's the theory that much of the progressive Western World has been based on for the past few decades.

    10. Re: Unemployment rate 17,7% by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only left Detroit, but left the state. Michigan is a job desert and has been since 2001. Grand Rapids is now the largest city and has some opportunities but only in Medical. The whole state is swirling the toilet and has been for over 2 decades due to the worthless leadership we have had in the past 3 governors and elected officials.

      Lansing is a toilet, Everything south of lansing is worse (Flint included), and everything up I-75 to the bridge is also dead or dying. Saginaw is a cesspool as bad as Flint and Detroit.

      The state is dying, our current moron governor cant even control his GOP state congress who are passing bills that are anti citizen and anti worker in every way. They "claim" to attract jobs, yet more and more companies flee the state every day.

      It's sad because it is a pretty place to live but the roads are crap, the bridges are falling down and the government is complete inept from the state level down to the township level.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I'm not sure this is the right solution to the problem, but I am willing to consider that it may be A solution to the problem for now.

      No, the right solution is a fleet of bulldozers, or an invasion force. Detroit City is not a usable size for it's current condition. Either bulldoze tens of thousands of buildings to make a smaller city, more appropriate to what the population can afford to support, or find a way to annex the suburbs where most of the population has already flown to, so you have a larger population that can afford to support more city.

    12. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a sec, the Republican plan is the Progressive plan... I think you need to put down the Kool-aid.

    13. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to make sure.

    14. Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What do you propose happens to those without the means to move?

  12. Wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    What about the 20+ million unemployed US citizens?

    The people who are making this decision are part of the same group of people responsible for destroying Detroit.

    Toledo, OH had high hopes following Detroit's economic/business model - they still do, even though they watched Detroit crash and burn.

    We have become a country of sheep.

    1. Re:Wait. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "What about the 20+ million unemployed US citizens?"

      the GOP says, "fuck em"

      Until people get off their asses and votes these entitled assholes out of office that are afraid of upsetting their rich donors by calling them the scumbags they really are, nothing will change.

      I'm not anti republican, I'm anti GOP, those rich scumbag protecting assholes are NOT republicans.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Wait. by stenvar · · Score: 1

      "What about the 20+ million unemployed US citizens?" the GOP says, "fuck em"

      No, the GOP says that the Democrats are fucking the unemployed by destroying jobs and opportunities.

      Obama's and the Democrat's stimulus program that they ran on in 2008 worked like shit and failed to achieve anything of what they promised. We are worse off today than Obama said we'd be without his stimulus program. Democrats are incompetent on the economy.

      Until people get off their asses and votes these entitled assholes out of office that are afraid of upsetting their rich donors by calling them the scumbags they really are, nothing will change.

      Exactly. You are talking about the Democrats, of course, many of whom are very rich.

      I'm not anti republican, I'm anti GOP, those rich scumbag protecting assholes are NOT republicans.

      Many of those "rich scumbag protecting assholes" are people who run small businesses, saved a lifetime, and/or spent a long time getting to the top of their profession for a few years of high income.

      Furthermore, above median earners (i.e., middle class, far from rich) are generally split evenly between independents, Republicans, and Democrats.

      Of course, people at the bottom of the income scale, of course, vote overwhelmingly Democratic, because Democrats promise them more and more free government handouts.

    3. Re:Wait. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "Many of those "rich scumbag protecting assholes" are people who run small businesses, saved a lifetime, and/or spent a long time getting to the top of their profession for a few years of high income."

      This is a gold plated bold faced lie. the tax increase for the wealthy is for the people that make $500,000 or more a year per person. people who run small businesses done even beginning to approach that kind of income. I work for a guy that employs 30 people, he only makes $180K a year.

      Thus is the second problem, Fool republicans that listen to the talking morons on Fox news or worse, their idiot leader, Rush Limbaugh. Get some real education before you claim how hurt the small business owner will be by taxing the ultra rich.

      We need a 30% flat tax on all assholes that makes $500K or more a year, and tax at 50% any stock or trading incomes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Wait. by stenvar · · Score: 1

      the tax increase for the wealthy is for the people that make $500,000 or more a year per person. people who run small businesses done even beginning to approach that kind of income.

      "The wealthy" means people with high net worth; left wing demagogues like to conflate wealth with high income, but they have little to do with one another. High income individuals often are not rich, and many wealthy people were never high income earners.

      As for the high income earners, you demonize them as some distinct, evil class of people sucking the country dry. In reality, most high income earners are middle class people who have a few good years some time towards the end of their careers, money they often desperately need to save for retirement. But, hey, don't let facts get in the way of some good bigotry and hatred.

      Get some real education before you claim how hurt the small business owner will be by taxing the ultra rich. ... We need a 30% flat tax on all assholes that makes $500K or more a year, and tax at 50% any stock or trading incomes.

      That's not going to hurt the "ultra rich"; they don't have much income and if you tax their trading, they simply won't bother and instead engage in other money-making activities that you can't tax. Your suggestions are going to hurt a real-estate agent who has an unusually good year, or an Apple employee who is selling stock in order to buy a house in Cupertino. In the long term, it's going to hurt the stock market, and with it everybody's retirement portfolios. It's jerks like you that are screwing the middle class with your idiotic and ignorant proposals.

      You obviously know absolutely nothing about personal finance, US demographics, or economics. If there is one consolation, ignorance and stupidity like yours means you'll likely never be able to live or retire comfortably. But because you can't figure out why others can, you lash out.

  13. Good Idea I think by goblinspy · · Score: 0

    I see the point. If you attract people who would normally not come to this area with an incentive of being part of America if you stay there and survive 5 years and also pay the taxes during that time as EB2 has wage guidelines. I think we might see some innovation. May be some company will setup shop there and have the workers work in Detroit but have clients all over. I see way too many opportunities for the city to come back. There are no jobs there right now for anyone so the government cannot give these non existent jobs to job hunting Americans. I also believe that they don't have money to relocate Americans by providing incentives.

  14. Colonialism??? by jplourde · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program? It seems awfully familiar to what the Brits did to/in India during the 1800s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_indenture_system)

    1. Re:Colonialism??? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program? It seems awfully familiar to what the Brits did to/in India during the 1800s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_indenture_system)

      Actually it's exactly like indentureed servitude and it's been done long before the 1800's.

      I suppose it's legal since these folks will be volunteers.

      In the United States, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA) of 2000 extended servitude to cover peonage as well as Involuntary Servitude.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    2. Re:Colonialism??? by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program?

      Yes. This whole idea is completely contrary to the American ideal of immigration. A permanent resident visa should is, should be, and always has been, for the entire country. You should no more be able to stop immigrants from moving anywhere in the country they want, than you should citizens. Something about the Constitution making this a united country, and the federal government controlling immigration.

    3. Re:Colonialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are the current H1-Bs any different?

    4. Re:Colonialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or wht the Brits did to the German immigrants in the late 1600s... until they violently revolted.

    5. Re:Colonialism??? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program? It seems awfully familiar to what the Brits did to/in India during the 1800s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_indenture_system)

      Except that presumably these immigrants would have the right to leave Detroit (and the USA) whenever they want.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    6. Re:Colonialism??? by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      American colonies had indentured servants in the 1700s. According to Wikipedia, about half of the voluntary European colonists during this period were indentured for a period of time before becoming free.

    7. Re:Colonialism??? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program?

      Yes. This whole idea is completely contrary to the American ideal of immigration. A permanent resident visa should is, should be, and always has been, for the entire country. You should no more be able to stop immigrants from moving anywhere in the country they want, than you should citizens. Something about the Constitution making this a united country, and the federal government controlling immigration.

      No, it actually isn't that much of a stretch. We have visas that tie residency to a certain company sponsoring the visa. If you change companies before citizenship becomes available, the new company has to sponsor you (which many companies don't care to do). So effectively the person is tied to that company in most cases. Tying a person to a specific geographical area isn't that much of a reach, but it is a terrible idea. Each desperate location will offer bigger and bigger incentives, create a race to the bottom, and the immigration system will be even worse than now.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    8. Re:Colonialism??? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Right, and then just like in Tejas / Texas, they'll marry the local people, then have a revolt and join the uh...union? Chinese search engine Baidu is interested in expanding internationally. The trans-revolutionary name of Detroit, Michigan will be: Meng Tan tian, Daihatsu -- The former means something like flat, smooth, quiet, peaceful in Chinese; The latter is a Japanese automaker (note that the 'first' and 'last' names get swapped around).

      The manufacturing we once relied on Detroit's for is now done overseas. Nevada could face similar problems when gambling and sex work is legalized. Since they're positioned between California and the rest of the nation, Nevada would be logistically natural home for call-centers. Their temporary revolutionary name will be Devadas -- Indian for "servant of the gods".

    9. Re:Colonialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's exactly like indentureed servitude and it's been done long before the 1800's.

      Its nothing like indentured servitude. No one says for WHOM you must work, just in what area.
      In fact what it is, is a form of homesteading
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestead_Acts

    10. Re:Colonialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even close.

      If you want to stay in the country on this particular work visa, you agree to live and work in Detroit. If these conditions do not appeal to you, you can apply for a different work visa without those same restrictions. It may be more difficult to get one, but that is the tradeoff for not having the same restrictions.

      This is not indentured labor, it is a choice that the applicant is free to make, with full knowledge of the conditions of the visa.

    11. Re:Colonialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1-Bs are not technically, but are practically under this restriction already. Their sponsor dictates where they work, and changing jobs is enough of a problem that it's why companies can pay H1Bs significantly less than citizens -- which in turn is why companies want H1Bs.

    12. Re:Colonialism??? by HetMes · · Score: 1

      Just imagine the kind of management this would attract, if employers face the choice between being abused and deportation.

    13. Re:Colonialism??? by crakbone · · Score: 1

      I like that Voluntary there. I am sure the Irish people put into indentured service really wanted to reduce their numbers to about 200,000 thousand and be sold off at a rate of 5 to a black slave. http://www.globalresearch.ca/t...

    14. Re:Colonialism??? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      Most visa programs have similar requirements, globally. For the most part, if you are not a refugee or special circumstance, and a country lets you come work, they want you to be contributing to the economy (not moving in and then immediately onto the dole).

      Most likely the terms of the visa are that you can go back home, but you can't stay in the US if you choose to leave Detroit (unlike the indentured servant program)

    15. Re:Colonialism??? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Permanent Resident and Visa are two different things.

      H-1B Visas are tied to a company, and legally you're bound to the company that got it for you. If they fire you, you have about 2 weeks to leave the country as the visa automatically expires. (Which seems in line with the proposed idea, just you'll have the visa not as long as you remain in the company, but rather in the state, however, another company can pick that visa up and renew it and you can move around).

      Permanent residency is not actually a visa and it's not bound to a particular company.

    16. Re:Colonialism??? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      No, it actually isn't that much of a stretch. We have visas that tie residency to a certain company sponsoring the visa.

      It isn't that much different from the garbage we have now, but it's very different from the past. Companies were expressly forbidden from offering jobs to people who weren't already residents because it was understood that that would simply be a tactic to drive down wages. Apparently many people these days don't understand that, or think it's acceptable.

  15. I've heard of this idea before. by GT66 · · Score: 1

    The concept of "company town" gets a spit and polish for the 21st century. Good job repackaging yesterday's failed concepts, Detroit!

  16. Old news!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard this 4 days ago on NPR!! While Slashdot, was spreading culturally bias, political leaning 'news' about about fisherman in Japan.
    FU - samzenpus

  17. solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should build walls around the city so their remaining citizens cannot leave.

    1. Re:solutions by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      And get visa's to import a bunch of Mongolians to help remove even the temptation of leaving, as well as giving the populace something to bond over.

  18. How about they employ the people living here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh that's right... nobody is willing to pay higher than slave wages anymore.

    1. Re:How about they employ the people living here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that's right... nobody is willing to pay higher than slave wages anymore.

      I'm fairly certain most jobs pay more than zero. Ergo, your comment is false.

    2. Re:How about they employ the people living here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell corporate sycophantry...

    3. Re:How about they employ the people living here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell whiny entitlement complexes...

  19. Not just handouts - public employee unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Look at how much of Democratic campaigns are funded by contributions from public employee unions.

    We now have a government by the government for the government. AKA the Democratic Party.

    1. Re:Not just handouts - public employee unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sheep echoing talking points.

      BAA BAA BAA

      "If you like your plan, you can keep it." (until you can't)

      "Warrantless wiretaps are unconstitional." (until you elect me!)

      and never forget the saddest talking point of all, echoed by brainless shitheads who dream of become as smart as sheep one day:

      "WARZ ON WIMMEN!!!"

    2. Re:Not just handouts - public employee unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the saddest talking point of all, echoed by brainless shitheads who dream of become as smart as sheep one day:

      If you're going to go there, you might as well admit you've got the biggest retards on your side what with "legitimate rape".

    3. Re:Not just handouts - public employee unions by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Faux outrage at words that clearly had a different meaning than what was claimed.

    4. Re:Not just handouts - public employee unions by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Not that I agree with what he said but the left's willingness to lie and distort is shameless.

  20. They're *educated* foreigners by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How are you going to convince someone with an advanced degree to settle in effing Detroit? They are going to want to escape the poverty of the third world!

    The problem facing Detroit is not a lack of people with advanced degrees. The problem is decades of life under a corrupt mayor, high crime, crushing taxes, over-regulation, and shitty weather.

    The situation is improving a lot lately, but it has a long way to go. You can't solve this overnight by issuing a bunch of visas. Detroit needs to get serious about redevelopment, crime prevention, and attracting business. Once there are good jobs there, you'll have plenty of Americans with advanced degrees going there. I don't have to remind you that we're in the midst of a "jobless recovery".

    All of these things are happening already. It's just a slow process to undo decades of mismanagement.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:They're *educated* foreigners by stewbee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I grew up in what most people would call Detroit. More specifically, in the Detroit metropolitan area. I left Michigan in 2004 when I finished college, and I have an advanced degree (MSEE). I actually have started to apply to jobs back in Michigan. There are a few reasons for this.

      1. There are a lot of jobs there right now. Seriously, go to monster and search for engineering jobs in Detroit and Ann Arbor.
      2. The cost of living is ridiculously low. We are talking great 3-4 bedroom houses in nice areas for around 250k. In most tech job locations around the country (Boston, Silicon Valley, etc), this doesn't buy you squat. other things are much cheaper too, like food and gas compared to where I am living now.
      3. I still have family there, so it would be nice to be able to make a quick drive to see my relatives.

      Now that said, there is certainly a certain type of person they are looking for in these jobs that makes getting past the HR filters difficult. Many of open positions are looking for people that have had automotive experience before, which I don't have. So in spite of having many of the other qualifications, I think that I will have a difficult time for this reason alone.

      And I hate to have to say this over and over again to people, but Detroit is just one city in the area. While I agree that Detroit has been mismanaged, the rest of the area is quite nice and look forward to moving back someday.

    2. Re:They're *educated* foreigners by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I grew up in what most people would call Detroit. More specifically, in the Detroit metropolitan area.

      Speaking as someone who has never lived in Michigan, I do not think of Farmington Hills when someone says "Detroit". When someone says "Detroit", I think of Detroit, the city. If they say Detroit metro area, that means something completely different to me.

      Also, I didn't read from the article that it was about attracting people to work outside the city limits. My reading was that it was for Detroit proper, to help in the city's redevelopment.

      Many of open positions are looking for people that have had automotive experience before, which I don't have.

      I know that you have zero control over this, but I thought I'd give my unsolicited opinion on it anyway. As someone who has worked in several different industries, I think that requiring specific industry experience is stupid. Especially if you're trying to convince people that Detroit is an acceptable city to live in, as compared with NoCal, NYC, DC, etc.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:They're *educated* foreigners by stewbee · · Score: 1

      I know that you have zero control over this, but I thought I'd give my unsolicited opinion on it anyway. As someone who has worked in several different industries, I think that requiring specific industry experience is stupid.

      Completely agree with this sentiment, but there is not much I can do about what HR people think is important. The best I can do is let my experience speak for itself, which is plenty and diverse. It is reminiscent of requiring 5 years experience in tech that is 2 years old, or even worse, filling your resume with BS mundane details to get past HR filters that would be implied in the nature of the work.

      Especially if you're trying to convince people that Detroit is an acceptable city to live in, as compared with NoCal, NYC, DC, etc.

      Mutually exclusive arguments. I can like living in a city and not agree with the hiring practices of the companies. And I certainly can not like a city and like the hiring requirements. I still argue that Detroit is a good place to live, and I am sure that DC, NYC have companies which require certain experiences too. DC probably wants people eligible for security clearances, for example.

      Speaking as someone who has never lived in Michigan, I do not think of Farmington Hills when someone says "Detroit". When someone says "Detroit", I think of Detroit, the city. If they say Detroit metro area, that means something completely different to me.

      When speaking to people who are not from Michigan, why waste my time by saying "I live in Farmington Hillls" to then further qualify with "It's a city near Detroit" ? I would not expect people from outside Detroit to know where Towns like Beverly Hills, Berkeley, Livonia, etc are which are all suburbs of Detroit. I think this is the approach most people take when talking geographically where they are from, as someone that has also lived in CA, IL, CT, VA, FL. Let's be honest, the reason that most of the suburbs around larger cities exist is to support the larger city. It makes sense to identify with the major city since that is what most people will understand.

      As for the specifics of actual jobs in Detroit or in the suburbs of Detroit. I will admit that I did not read the article (until just now, but this is slashdot, so it should be the expected norm). The fact that Snyder is calling for this specifically in Detroit is just dumb. None of the companies that I have been looking at have offices in the city proper. I guess that is why they had to qualify this with "work and live". Are they going to force companies to open in Detroit then? Stupid.

    4. Re:They're *educated* foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having grown up in a suburb of Detroit as well I totally agree with the above poster. Detroit proper is a city with it's entire working population not living in it. Basically what happened was that the city collapsed under it's own corruption and anyone who had the means left for the suburbs. The area surrounding Detroit is one of the richest in the country. It has 4 of the top 100 the richest per captia cities in the country in it: Grosse Point Twp, Bloomfield Hills, Franklin, and Grosse Point Shores.

    5. Re:They're *educated* foreigners by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Mutually exclusive arguments. I can like living in a city and not agree with the hiring practices of the companies.

      I agree. I never meant to tie one to the other. I was just spouting off at random.

      All I was trying to say with that was that if you told me that I could have a job in Detroit proper or NYC proper, I wouldn't even give one tenth of one hoot what the job was. I'd choose NYC every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.

      When speaking to people who are not from Michigan, why waste my time by saying "I live in Farmington Hillls" to then further qualify with "It's a city near Detroit" ?

      I recommend that you say you're from the Detroit metro area, in that case. Most Americans understand the concept of "suburbs".

      The fact that Snyder is calling for this specifically in Detroit is just dumb. None of the companies that I have been looking at have offices in the city proper. I guess that is why they had to qualify this with "work and live". Are they going to force companies to open in Detroit then? Stupid.

      Well, I won't argue with your opinion on that, but the goal of the program seems to get people to live and work inside of Detroit proper, in an effort to revitalize the city. The suburbs don't need revitalization as they didn't spend decades as a squalid war zone.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  21. Don't forget the weather... by RocketScientist · · Score: 0

    So yeah, snow, ice, snow, sleet, ice, cold rain, snow, sleet, and ice.

    Sorry, any place that advertises, among its many amenities, great ice fishing isn't somewhere I want to live.

    "Hey, you can move to Detroit and freeze your ass off 6 months a year, or you can live anywhere south of there and it's better!"

    Yeesh.

    1. Re:Don't forget the weather... by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      It's only four months, not six.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    2. Re:Don't forget the weather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually closer to 3. Mid November through mid Feburary. Although this year we could not afford to pay the heating bill because of Detroit, so it is a lot colder.

      Now one of those southern pussies that whines when it dips below 60.... yeah they think it's cold for 6 months. Real men have no problems with cold.

    3. Re:Don't forget the weather... by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I the same vein anyplace with average temperatures in the 80's for any more than a week or two at a time isn't some place that I really want to live. But we all do what we need to get by. The weather is one of the last considerations when I pick a place to live. Cost of living and employment being the top concerns for me, with quality of schools after that. So far it always seems to be one of those situations where you can pick two of the three while all abandoning hope for the third.

  22. Money and land? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can offer 40 acres and a mule to move there.

  23. the numbers don't work out on this by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    There are about 150,000 EB-2 visas given out every year. 1/3 of those are going to go to Detroit? Maybe they'll increase the total by 50k just for Detroit, that would still be 1/4 of the granted EB-2 visas. There is tremendous demand for these, and someone (a US business) usually pays for the substantial legal bills for the application. The people who get these visas don't grow on trees, it's probably the most competitive one you can go for, depending on where you're from. I've known experienced scientists who haven't qualified for it.

  24. When working with the homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many have not checked out of society, they have been pushed out due to their values of ethics, hardwork and knowledge. If you want cars that fall apart like software, go ahead. just make sure your license agreement demonises the user as a "hacker".

  25. High Tech VISA by rossdee · · Score: 1

    They should talk to Bank Of America, or Citi
    They have cards with the new chip technology to prevent fraud

    1. Re:High Tech VISA by tech.kyle · · Score: 1
      Yes, I get the joke, but joking aside, I've seen this in Canada for a while. I don't know if I'd call it "new". It's always fun to pop up to Vancouver and have the person behind the counter (typically a young Asian girl, being Vancouver) stick my non-chipped card in the reader, become confused, pull it out, stick it in, become even more confused, pull it out, sudden realization, awkwardly swipe the card, start to walk off until I say "You'll need a signature from me".

      Makes me feel outdated, tbh. I thought this was America.

      --
      If we colonize Mars, it won't be the World Wide Web anymore. UWW?
  26. What am I missing? by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I missing something here? Who are these 50,000 people supposed to work for? The article vaguely mentions them, "opening businesses", but I have to ask, open businesesses doing what?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  27. They should pay people to move OUT of Detroit by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    Help people get a new start in another city with more job opportunities, don't bring in more people when unemployment there is so high.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    1. Re:They should pay people to move OUT of Detroit by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The problem is that most of those people lack skills. A lot of car production jobs are not skilled or the skills are not highly transferable.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  28. Keynsianomics by drfred79 · · Score: 0

    Always makes me laugh to hear the argument that extending unemployment benefits increases employment. They are contradictory, obviously.

    1. Re:Keynsianomics by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Ok.. provide the citation!

      Just because it is contradictory in your brain doesn't mean that is what reality is.

      Really... go ahead. Show the citation that unemployment benefits increases unemployment. You won't do it because the data show exactly the opposite!

    2. Re:Keynsianomics by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 0

      Always makes me laugh to hear ignorant folks like you spout off like leaving people flapping in the breeze is a good way to do things.

      People having 0 income, slowly losing everything they own up to and including a place to live, and being unable to drive anywhere to find jobs or make it to interviews certainly won't increase employment. So tell me, Mr. Smarty Man (or Woman), what's the better way to do things? You're clearly a pillar of economic know how, tell Detroit exactly how to get out of the mess their in.

      We're waiting.

    3. Re:Keynsianomics by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2

      At some point, if you can't find a job, you need for the greater good to settle for what you can find. For example, after the construction bubble popped in housing, should we just keep construction workers on permanent unemployment? Or should we encourage them to do something different with their lives?

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    4. Re:Keynsianomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I suppose letting people starve to death would up the percentage of people employed as the would be immune from starvation! it's a solution alright, not to mention the uptick in work at the morgues! And disease, why all the disease that will spread from those wretched urchins will absolutely drive medical costs through the roof! What's wrong with a sinking ship, as long as you're in first class, anyway?

    5. Re:Keynsianomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nothing else, at least the unemployed getting unemployment benefits held a job at one point in the recent past. Take the money from the lifetime welfare leaches... they're never going to step up as long as they don't have to.

    6. Re:Keynsianomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they instantly become doctors and engineers and lived happily ever after. The end.

      When you've been in construction your whole life, you need training to do something else. That requires money, and letting people know how they can get that training.

      Also, moving to a place where there are jobs costs money, you have to sell your house (hard to do with no jobs for people to want). Not everyone has the captial to do so.

    7. Re:Keynsianomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. What will they do? by Virtucon · · Score: 2

    There's a lot of decay in Detroit, so much so that it's unattractive to new businesses. Even if you get get more workers into Detroit, what would they do for a living? Plow down more blocks of vacant, dilapidated houses? As has been said here, the unemployment rate in Detroit is in the high teens and if there's ever going to be a re-birth, what has to happen is that businesses need to be able to move back into Detroit and that requires a solid government and a solid infrastructure otherwise you may just as well bulldoze the rest down.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  30. Really? by jwestveer · · Score: 0

    Frick you Detroit. Hire Americans.

  31. But letting immigrants in would ruin GOP chances! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We musn't have that!

  32. Escape route to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Costa missed a big selling point for Detroit - proximity to Canada. If things keep getting worse instead of better, you're only a bridge away from Windsor, Ontario, Canada! Mexicans upset with low employment and poverty go North and cross the border for a better in the States. That same option is available to us! Southern Ontario has the same climate as Detroit, nicer people, generic drugs, and way less gun and violent crime. Sounds like a solution to me!

    (The thing is - even I don't know if know if I'm joking or not...)

    1. Re:Escape route to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Mexicans are moving back to Mexico because their economy is doing better than the US'. The taxes and cost of some products are a bitch though.

    2. Re:Escape route to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, yes. Windsor: the promise land.

  33. that's racist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't one Detroits problems high unemployment?

    So, the solution is to bring people in to work?

    What does that say about the people who are there?

  34. What's the interest rate on this Visa card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the City of Detroit would make some decent coin from the transaction fees plus the interest rate on the Visa card balance.

    Good idea.

  35. Need suckers to pay for benefits! by spotvt01 · · Score: 1

    Essentially what they're admitting is that they cannot attract enough tax-paying US residents to Detroit. Therefore, they need to look elsewhere for people who are willing to work hard enough to generate the necessary tax revenues needed pay for the services which current residents want and to rescue Detroit from their woes.

    This is the ultimate representation of the failure of a community.

    1. Re:Need suckers to pay for benefits! by x0ra · · Score: 1

      For a green card, I would *eventually* take a job there. Btw, how long is the servitude expected to last ?

    2. Re:Need suckers to pay for benefits! by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Actually, Michigan is more gun friendly than is California... It would be a better choice for me to go there. And yes, for me, the more firearm restriction there is, the least is the place desirable.

  36. Real barrier by kenh · · Score: 1

    'I also think the federal government should be offering people in the U.S. some money and land in Detroit if they'll move there,'

    Yeah, because the only thing keeping people out of Detroit now is high land prices!

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Real barrier by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      'I also think the federal government should be offering people in the U.S. some money and land in Detroit if they'll move there,'

      Yeah, because the only thing keeping people out of Detroit now is high land prices!

      Land and money, not money for land.

      Give me a small to medium sized machine shop, and the money to pay for startup costs, I'll have 20 - 50 people working full time by the end of the month. Probably sooner.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Real barrier by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Give me a small to medium sized machine shop, and the money to pay for startup costs, I'll have 20 - 50 people working full time by the end of the month.

      Yeah, but you can do that pretty much anywhere in the country, from Mississippi to Montana. People who can work machine shop jobs are a dime a dozen, and they're all out of work, and for the same reasons. The capital to hire them has all been captured by people who were already billionaires, people who literally have more money than they can possibly use. Such people would never even consider starting a machine shop with 50 employees, and if they tried, it would fail miserably because they would load it up so top heavy with idiot cronies that it would fall over the moment the seed money ran out.

      And so far, everybody who talks about how much we "need more small business" is leaving out the rest of what they're thinking: "...that we can victimize." Vulture Capitalists want to pick your brain of all your ideas, pay you less than the prevailing wage for what you're doing (and it had better be something highly skilled and highly technical), then sell off the company after 3 years to one of their best buddy billionaires, who will promptly run it into the ground and close it, either because it competed with something they already had or because they don't understand what it was. It's all about the hallowed Exit Strategy. Building a small business that will persist and keep sending its profit to its handful of employees and its merely millionaire owners for the rest of their lives is anathema to the way capital works in this country today.

      We won't even talk about the banks. If you applied for a bank loan for a machine shop, the first question they would ask is, "Where in China were you planning on siting this shop?" and when you explained you wanted to put it in the US, they'd laugh you out of the building.

  37. Place an ad that says willing to work for free by msmonroe · · Score: 1

    This country is addicted to free or cheap labor. There are plenty of people that can fill these jobs, the problem is that most of these people are not will to work for the low wages that they want to pay.

    1. Re:Place an ad that says willing to work for free by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Or live in the warzone slums of Detroit.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Place an ad that says willing to work for free by msmonroe · · Score: 1

      Yeah low pay + warzone is not a great combo..

  38. Detroit Metro (not City) is a nice place to live by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    actually we can do it now with desalination, no advancement really needed.

    Not economically. Industrial scale desalinization is still far too expensive to be practical in most places.

    ", Detroit, and Michigan in general, will be relevant again"
    nope, never happen. Crappy weather, high crime, republican stripping away representation for all but about 50,000 people, no industry... nothing really.

    I have news for you. The Detroit Metro area is relevant NOW and has been for a long time. Don't confuse Detroit City with the greater Detroit metropolitan area. Detroit City has its problems and they'll take a while to solve but relatively few people live and work there. About 680,000 people live in Detroit City versus about 3,700,000 in the suburbs. Oakland county immediately to the north of Detroit City is one of the 10 wealthiest counties in the entire US, has a AAA bond rating (the highest possible) and 60% of the Fortune 500 have facilities in the county. It's a genuinely nice place to live - I should know because I live there. When most people say they are "from Detroit" what most really mean is that they live in Detroit Metro, ie the suburbs.

    No industry? Hah! Michigan is still the beating heart of manufacturing in the US. The amount of manufacturing that goes on here is astonishing even with the auto industry problems. And it isn't just making cars. Not by a long shot. The number of engineers and high tech jobs here is only exceeded by 3 or 4 cities in the entire US. (do you have any idea how much technology goes into making cars?)

    Oh and the weather is only "crappy" for part of the year if you can't handle snow. Spring, summer and fall in Michigan are gorgeous and so is winter once you get outdoors and move around. Personally I like to go skiing, snowshoeing, and skating and Michigan is terrific for outdoor activities year round. Within a 10 mile radius of my house I have over 16,000 acres of public parks with every outdoor activity imaginable available to me. Horse riding, skiing, running, biking, sailing, kayaking, golf, hiking, camping, etc. You name it I can be doing it (season permitting) within 30 minutes.

  39. more importantly, SMALL business grants! by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    offer business grants to get people to open up shop there, give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.

    More importantly, give them SMALL business grants, so that Detroit develops a very diverse economy, and you have lots of 2, 3, 10, 50 employee companies that are providing a diversity of services. Even better, give priority to non-franchises so the money stays in the local economy (and the country, for that matter, instead of getting shipped off to a Cayman holding company.) Bring back the bakers, the shoe shops, the florists, etc.

    The last thing Detroit needs is another mono-industry or mono-company economy. That's how damn near every 'boom town' gets burned...they start catering to one company or industry, and become the city equivalent of codependent. The point of a city is to be a good place to live, not a good place to work...

    1. Re:more importantly, SMALL business grants! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Super insightful commentary. SuperBanana.

      With the constant drone of 'jobs, jobs, jobs,' I think we often forget that there's much more to life than working.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:more importantly, SMALL business grants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to stop it with the grants altogether. The grants always inevitably go to big corporations who promise to build a multi million dollar something there so they get huge tax payer funded subsidies then never build anything. All the people arguing D vs R have it completely wrong. It's good old fashioned cronyism that causes the little guy to lose.

      While people are demanding business grants, the city started "operation compliance" to send police to shut down so called illegal businesses like an improperly zoned tire shop. I'm sure everyone in detroit is sleeping safer knowing the police are shuttering people's livelihood over paperwork.

      Cut taxes. Make it easier to start a business. People are trying to get back to work. Vote third party and stop voting for cronyism.

  40. High-Tech visas? In Detroit? by Andrio · · Score: 1

    Sweet, I've always wanted Robocop to be real.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  41. While the rest of us in Michigan.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Want Detroit to be sold to Ohio or Canada. Please can we just make that entire armpit of the state go away?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  42. I would consider servitude... by x0ra · · Score: 1

    ... but only in the People Republic of California. At least, the weather's nice there.

  43. Work with some great companies by sjbe · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of decay in Detroit, so much so that it's unattractive to new businesses.

    Actually lots of businesses see Detroit as long term attractive. There are numerous people like Dan Gilbert who are buying up property left and right and moving businesses downtown. You can get property REALLY cheap and make a killing if you know what you are doing. There is a LOT of opportunity in Detroit City for those who are entrepreneurial. I have relatives who just opened up a coffee shop and others who have restaurants in downtown Detroit. It's a terrific place to do business.

    Even if you get get more workers into Detroit, what would they do for a living?

    How about go to work for General Motors (their headquarters and much engineering are downtown), or Compuware, or Quicken Loans, or American Axle or Ernst & Young or PriceWaterhouseCoopers, or Blue Cross or HP Enterprise Services, or many others. There are jobs in law, finance, medicine, biomedical research, engineering, software and marketing. Good, high paying jobs.

    Plow down more blocks of vacant, dilapidated houses?

    Already happening. Detroit City used to have a lot more people than it does not. Much of the land is going to get re-purposed in the coming years. Yeah, it'll take quite a while to finish the job but they've already started.

  44. Re:But letting immigrants in would ruin GOP chance by x0ra · · Score: 1

    I would vote GOP if I had the chance to.

  45. Re:Detroit Metro (not City) is a nice place to liv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Great Lakes have a moderating effect on the regional temperature compared to the temps just a little west, north, or even south. When the polar vortex came through, MI had a minor bubble of warmth that Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio lacked. Highs were -15F down south where it was -6 in MI.

  46. Uh, author has it wrong... by msauve · · Score: 1

    "Snyder would have more credibility on the issue if he were doing more to help workers in Detroit. In 2011, the state cut jobless benefits by six weeks to 20."

    Paying unemployment is not helping workers, by definition.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Uh, author has it wrong... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Paying unemployment is helping people who were workers fairly recently, and who are trying to become workers again. It allows workers to stay in areas where actual employment is iffy from month to month, and allows them to take more chances with employment. If you have no unemployment benefits, and suffer a temporary economic downturn (and recovery from something like Detroit is going to have a lot of ups and downs), so many of the competent and halfway competent people will leave to really hinder a recovery from said downturn.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  47. Why save Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should Detroit be saved? If the city has collapsed, then maybe there is a good reason for it. The only reason it existed in the first place was access to steel, workers, and shipping over the lakes. Now that our country has much better transportation infrastructure, access to steel and shipping over the lakes are unimportant. The workers aren't really needed either, since almost all of our manufacturing can be automated. The only thing that kept Detroit going for so long was inertia. Now that the inertia has changed, Detroit doesn't have any manufacturing advantage over any other city in the country. Capitalism, free market, and survival of the fittest all say that Detroit needs to go away. There is no reason for government meddling, and waste, to save it.

  48. Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And nothing that Detroit has to offer except being close to Canada would appeal to me, and that's just not enough.

    I'm pretty sure you've never actually spent any time in Detroit or you'd realize what you just said is very ignorant. Yes Detroit has its problems but it's hardly the hell hole it is made out to be. There are excellent employers, plenty of entertainment within easy reach, great restaurants, and more. Plus you have easy access to the Great Lakes, Michigan and Canada which are all amazing. I could easily see myself living in downtown Detroit under the right circumstances. I live not far from Detroit as it is and I go downtown regularly. Like any big city it has its nicer areas and other areas you probably should steer away from. People go downtown all the time for sporting events (Lions, Tigers and Red Wings), cultural events (DIA), casinos, restaurants and more.

    1. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by davester666 · · Score: 1

      No mention of the Pistons? :-(

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by Wormsign · · Score: 2

      The Pistons play in Auburn Hills, not Detroit. So if you are going "downtown" for stuff as the poster stated, you are not seeing the pistons.

    3. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by sjbe · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Pistons play in Auburn Hills, not Detroit. So if you are going "downtown" for stuff as the poster stated, you are not seeing the pistons.

      You will note that I did not mention the Pistons. Of course if basketball is your thing, Auburn Hills is just a short drive right up I-75 and just off the highway. 20 Minute drive from the northern border of Detroit, traffic permitting. They also hold games sometimes at Ford Field downtown - college and Final Four stuff usually.

      Eventually the Pistons are probably going to move downtown just like the other sports teams. Right now the Palace is still in pretty nice shape unlike the Silverdome and the old (now torn down) Tiger's stadium. I've already heard talk about it. The Red Wings are trying to get a replacement for Joe Louis Arena which is getting pretty shabby looking.

    4. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by naris · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have lived in Detroit and paying an extra tax so that I have no police, no fire department, no streetlights, no security, no infrastructure and unplowed streets is just not appealing. Especially when you can live 8 or more miles north to live in a better area without the drawbacks or the extra tax.

    5. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, a satisfied former third world country resident right here, see it does work!

    6. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like crime. I like to be able to walk around outside, even at night, without significant worry. Where can I walk at night in Detroit?

    7. Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lived in Detroit and paying an extra tax so that I have no police, no fire department, no streetlights, no security, no infrastructure and unplowed streets is just not appealing. Especially when you can live 8 or more miles north to live in a better area without the drawbacks or the extra tax.

      Since you're lying, I will state you have not lived in Detroit.

  49. High tech work force already nearby by sjbe · · Score: 1

    High tech companies need HIGHLY skilled workers. Most of the unemployed autoworkers in Detroit are not highly skilled.

    Detroit Metro has a HUGE supply of highly skilled engineers and other high tech workers. There are only 3-4 cities in the entire US with more high tech jobs than around Metro Detroit. The problem is that these folks are already employed out in the suburbs were about 5/6 of the population lives. There are a surprising number of companies moving to downtown Detroit and they are bringing workers with them.

  50. Land mines on 8 mile road by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    From Steve Sailer:

    We are constantly told that the U.S. border, unlike say the Finnish or Israeli border, is impossible to enforce. Yet 8 Mile Road, the northern municipal boundary of Detroit, is apparently seeded with landmines or something because nobody seems to wonder how the new visa-holders will somehow be corralled permanently in Detroit instead of quickly moving to Birmingham, MI or Ann Arbor or San Diego or some other place in the U.S. nicer than Detroit.

    1. Re:Land mines on 8 mile road by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      We are constantly told that the U.S. border, unlike say the Finnish or Israeli border, is impossible to enforce. Yet 8 Mile Road, the northern municipal boundary of Detroit, is apparently seeded with landmines or something because nobody seems to wonder how the new visa-holders will somehow be corralled permanently in Detroit instead of quickly moving to Birmingham, MI or Ann Arbor or San Diego or some other place in the U.S. nicer than Detroit.

      I can tell him why they won't move to Ann Arbor or San Diego: real estate prices.

  51. Can't find enough citizens for your city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsource them. That's right folks, outsourcing is the wave of the future. Why bother actually doing your job when you can hire someone from a third world country to do for you? Need to fill a whole bunch of vacancies in your crumbling city? Outsource them! Yessss Everybody is doing it now so can you.

  52. Indentured Servitude Has Returned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like a conservative to bring us back to the future.

  53. Tax on a 40,000 house should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    25 bucks a year. If you had that you would have more reverse snow birds that you could shake a stick at.

  54. Different Idea by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

    I had read that somewhere in... Spain? They had a much better idea. If 5 people (or so, sketchy on details) would get together and form a business, the government would give them 3-5? years of their unemployment as a lump sum.... Here you go, go start a business. Oddly enough, that region had a LOT of co-op/small businesses.

    Importing more people to Detroit is a stupid idea. Why not foster the entrepreneurial spirit of the people already there?

    Homesteading is another good idea. Give away free houses (instead of bulldozing them) to people who start businesses.

    Oh wait, those two completely awesome ideas are SOCIALIST!!!! Can't have that.....

  55. Contamination. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chip manufacturing contaminates water.

    That's what they're not telling you.

  56. colemen just a symptom by callmetheraven · · Score: 0

    Many /.ers have posted that Detroit is a disaster because of mismanagement by Coleman young, but that is only a sliver of the truth.

    Detroit is the most segregated major city in America - 83% black, but for some reason there is no call for "diversity" from the anti-white leftstream media. Detroit used to be majority white city, and produced vast wealth. Black people rioted in the 60's, and over time the white majority packed up and left. And productivity left with them.

    Sure, Coleman was about as bad as mayors get, but he was elected time and again - why? Black nationalism, a PC friendly name for black racism. Coleman Young complained about the money leaving with the whites - but being a black supremacist moron, he thought these people left with mattresses stuffed with cash, not realizing that the wealth of the white exodus was in their productivity, not in hard currency.

    Blacks were handed the keys to a complete modern metropolis and the resident industrires - and following black standard operating procedure, all this wealth was neglected or squandered into nothing. The once beautiful city is a ruin. It's disgusting.

    Black people, for whatever reason whether it's genetic or cultural who knows, do not produce wealth as a group. Yet the media and leftists, and those who just don't want to be shouted at by them, will not comment on the obvious, pretend that Detroit's problems have some mysterious cause that nobody can identify. They pretend that there is some conspiracy, or mysterious economic undertow, or maybe the ground was cursed by and evil witch. They will never mention the simple truth: A city is its people, the people are the city. The dirt and buildings are just decoration, not even important. Detroit's problems = Detroit's people. Black people.

    If Detroit imports 50,000 visa workers, they will probably set up shop and succeed. Provided that they are not killed by the natives and their love of violence. And after the visa workes have succeeded, the natives will be exactly where they are now because the content of their character will not be improved. Detroit's tax base would get better, but that little bit of parasitism is about the only benefit the locals would see.

    I'm sure some of you are already composing retaliatory screeds about the great black individuals you know - but individuals aren't what I'm talking about. I'm talking about populations, and when the sample sets get big trends emerge, and it takes a big poisonous dose of Political Correctness to avoid noticing.

    --
    You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  57. Personally by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    I'd rather move to The Congo.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  58. I used to teach at a community college by AnAlchemist · · Score: 2

    I feel bad for students studying IT at community colleges, especially in Detroit. Why aren't they be hired, instead of politicians asking to import foreign labor?

    It's frustrating, because I want to be able to tell them that because of a shortage of IT workers, big companies are looking to hire and train them.

    But they're not... IBM/Accenture/etc. would rather hire foreigners at lower rates than hire local community college students that understand the American language and culture perfectly.

    Forget IBM/Accenture/etc.... now the local _politicians_ are saying that those students aren't going to get IT jobs because local foreigners are going to get them.

    I understand that the local politicians are in a very tough spot, since the decisions that are dooming Detroit were made decades ago. With a shrinking population, imported high-income (therefore, high tax paying) labor seems like as good a decision as any, but, frankly, it's insulting to the local students.

    Tell me that as a 18-year-old impressionable youth in Detroit, after hearing this article, you wouldn't think that a life of drugs and crime would be a better way to get out of poverty than IT.

  59. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Wrangler has a straight six engine based from a 50 year old design. You'll be lucky to get 18mpg while driving it even with a manual. Can you name any of these efficiency features? Its probably one of the most basic vehicle designs you'll see.

  60. Detroit, a city dyning from Liberal Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who think socialism works, go to Detroit and you will see the cancer of "From each according to his ability to each according to his need" as the abomination sinks into the depths of the hell on earth it created for itself. I have no love for this city, but to send immigrants there as their first vision of our great country is just sad. What do you do when the immigrants flee ...oh wait I get it.. brilliant, solve the immigration issue by making people think the USA is Detroit. Bloody brilliant. People will fear coming to this country. Wow sorry I missed it, just brilliant.

    1. Re:Detroit, a city dyning from Liberal Cancer by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I think it can work as has been shown in the Scandinavian countries. For example, Norway has the second highest GDP per capita after Luxembourg and is the second wealthiest country in monetary value. Large industries are also controlled by the government. Higher education is free.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    2. Re:Detroit, a city dyning from Liberal Cancer by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Yes, it "can work" if you happen to be a tiny nation sitting on vast amounts of oil (Norway) or an even tinier tax haven and banking capital wedged between two major and powerful neighbors (Luxembourg).

      For nations that don't have these unusual featuers, however, the outcome is more like Greece or Spain: massive debt, risk of default, massive unemployment, deteriorating economy, etc.. Just like Detroit.

    3. Re:Detroit, a city dyning from Liberal Cancer by AaronW · · Score: 1

      The problems of Greece and Spain have more to do with overspending and the European central bank rather than being socialist. The high unemployment is due to the harsh measures that were handed down which just made things worse. It is not due to socialism but from bad management of government funds. Another big problem in Europe is that governments lack a lot of control over their currency since it is all handled by the central bank. Great Britain kept their currency for just that reason and do not have the huge problems that some other European countries are experiencing.

      Other socialists countries are also doing fairly well. The Chinese economy has been doing fairly well though now many Chinese are upset about the things the government has ignored (like the environment, human rights and corruption).

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    4. Re:Detroit, a city dyning from Liberal Cancer by stenvar · · Score: 1

      The problems of Greece and Spain have more to do with overspending and the European central bank rather than being socialist.

      Yes: the problems of Greece and Spain are entirely due to overspending, just like those of Detroit.

      It's "socialist" in the sense that this overspending is justified in terms of socialist terms, although, of course, there is no intrinsic reason socialist nations need to overspend; the other choice they have is to simply push their populations into poverty directly without first running up a huge debt. Historically, that's the more usual course, since nobody would lend them money.

      The high unemployment is due to the harsh measures that were handed down which just made things worse.

      Yes: Greece and Spain employed many people in fake, unproductive jobs and financed that by borrowing from countries like Germany. But what you call "harsh measures" is simply an understandable desire of Germans not to waste any more money on this arrangement. Why should Germans pay (and lose their money on) Greeks to be employed in useless jobs?

      Another big problem in Europe is that governments lack a lot of control over their currency since it is all handled by the central bank

      By itself, that isn't a problem. It became a problem only because it enabled countries like Spain and Greece to spend more than they otherwise would.

      Other socialists countries are also doing fairly well. The Chinese economy has been doing fairly well though now many Chinese are upset about the things the government has ignored (like the environment, human rights and corruption).

      Fairly well? China is below the Dominican Republic and below world average in terms of per-capita GDP, and that's probably with lots of fake data and hidden government debt. Furthermore, China is not a "progressive" or "liberal" country in the sense of Detroit: government services are extremely limited for most Chinese.

  61. No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people prefer 3rd world countries to detroit

  62. I think everyone here is missing the point ... by lexx21 · · Score: 1

    of what was being said in the article. They want to offer 50000 visas to foreign workers. Do you honestly think that they will pay these guys to "live and work in Detroid for an undetermined amount of time" the same way that they would an American worker? They want cheap labor, that is all. That is how they are going to try to draw business back into that area. It's not about Democrat or Republican, it's about corrupt and ignorant management of that city.

  63. Plantation Detroit by daverk · · Score: 1

    This sounds like they just want to bring back slavery.

  64. America First? by artisteeternite · · Score: 1

    Why not offer incentives to bring American workers to the area?

  65. Leaded gasoline = Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the gasoline theory, which correlates the reduction in leaded gasoline (which phased in at different times in different states) with the reduction in crime years later (which also got moving at different times in different states), on the basis that low-level lead poisoning has behavioral effects.

  66. No I will not go there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what anybody else thinks, but there is no amount of money you could pay me to live in Detroit, and if i need a visa to get a job there that is even more reason for me to stay away, plus it is part of the USA needing a visa for a state is stupid anyway. I say strip down all of the government and police force, and then try to improve the city.

  67. Detroit - the new old-south? by peterofoz · · Score: 1
    On the surface it sure sounds like it has the structure and makings of the indentured-servant, only a short difference from slavery. There are plenty of unemployed and under-employed in the USA today. I give this idea two thumbs down.

    I'd suggest:

    Continue to downsize Detroit city limits. Reduce operating costs.

    Employ locals for demolition and cleanup work

    Clean up the town zone by zone

    Clean out government corruption

    Reinvent - attract new business with tax incentives. There is no going back to the old model.

  68. Yep, the problem's always management by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and govmint. 'cause having several hundred thousand jobs go overseas (and to Mexico, thanks NAFTA!) and then have to support a city with millions jobless while real wages plummeted for 40 years certainly had no impact whatsoever...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  69. Pretty much by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    The Dems didn't help. You see, NAFTA pretty much wrecked what little was left of the blue collar industry there was. The Dems still supported it though, so there's that. The difference was the Reps basically said "Adapt or Die in a Fire" where the Dems wanted social programs to ease the pain.

    There's other stuff the Reps did on a National level that hurt Detroit. See, that's sorta the problem Detroit has. They're a victim of outsourcing, off shoring, and a geneneral attact on the the middle class in America. There was a name for it back in the 90s: "Cheap Labor Conservatives". Sort of a response to "Tax and Spend Liberal". It's not as catchy though....

    That's the trouble with Liberalism. It's complex answers to complex problems. It can't compete with Conservative ideology because it's not an ideology per se, just the desire to _do_ something instead of leaving everything to the "invisible hand"... :(

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  70. Citation needed? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Detroit went to hell when the Auto Industry moved to Japan/China/Mexico. Sure, there's mismanagement, but you get that everywhere (Silicon Valley, I'm lookin' at you). What _specifically_ could the Dems in Detroit do when their entire tax base lost their livelihoods and the 1%ers started cutting wages like mad? I guess they coulda done like West Virginia and cut environmental safety regs left/right. Only I hear you can't drink the water...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  71. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe that people are still falling for the ruse of the "two-party" system. They collude together to further their individual (singular person) agendas.

  72. Detroit is obsolete and this is why: by couchslug · · Score: 1

    The industrial model on which Detroit was based is obsolete, there is no reason to spend vast sums to remove obsolete infrastructure when greenfield locations in States with better climates are cheap, and the geographic advantages Detroit had many decades ago are gone.
    It is perfectly reasonable to shrink Detroit, demolish obsolete housing stock and bury onsite, then leave unsupportable areas unsupported.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  73. Re:The real point of Detroit [3rd wld]... by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    ...forgot the unsustainably high, 3rd world tax levels part.

  74. Raze it to the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it as a wildlife habitat even if some of the wildlife was once civilized.

  75. not surpizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when Unions have too much power, and democrats say in power in a state too long. Got Unions that only care about their members, and will destroy everyone else to get them more. And you got the democrat party that that are economic ignorant.

    The state needs someone like Scott Walker to turn it around. Its been amazing how stupid he has made democrats look

    Detroit need immigrants because they are use to high crime rate. But I guess the state only has minimal paying jobs available, so they need to get people who are willing to be paid minimal to work there.

  76. Let's go ahead and do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, as long as they're willing to foot the bill to enclose the live/work area with 30 foot fences, surveillance cameras, motion sensors, and machine gun nests on autopilot to prevent escape. Good deal! Now let's get those same conditions on Silicon Valley companies if they're so dedicated to hiring the unwashed proto-terrorist hordes from the 3rd world.

  77. Invest in the people who are already there by gig · · Score: 1

    You can put money into schools in Detroit and create Detroit-native high tech workers. That is actually the responsibility of the Detroit-area governments. No innovation is necessary.

  78. Culture change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A deteriorating culture is almost impossible to turn around without an injection of new blood, new ideas, and new life.

  79. Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer.. by kenh · · Score: 1

    Which existing policy that DeBlassio has promised to repeal/reverse will accelerate the the drop in crime in NYC?

    --
    Ken
  80. Better get them from Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want them to have any hope of living.

  81. More Taxes!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my.... More waste of our tax payer dollars. I'm ashamed to say I live in Michigan, and have such a "Dick Head" of a governor as Rick Snyder!

  82. Have you looked at Detroit lately? by Reziac · · Score: 1

    "...required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time..."

    Wouldn't that qualify as 'cruel and unusual punishment'??

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  83. And Robocop got created by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would work for OCP...

  84. Paging Dr. Klahn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously folks, "Fist full of Yen" is not a blueprint, and neither is "1984".

    Also

    "Send them to... Detroit!"