As often as not, the only hits you get are posts in forums where someone is asking the exact same question you need answered... and getting no replies. Since 2005.
Obviously, all you have to do is put data in the outside server that's encrypted in some other way. Then Facebook just has a link to data that's really just a link to somewhere else. See? Problem solved.
I don't know the details of their contract but... didn't the copyright expired like 50 years ago? Have we moved into a society where copyrights never expire?
A license bestows upon the licensee the right (within specified restrictions) to do something that normally is prohibited by law. It's not against the law to have a CD or an MP3 in your possession, or to listen to it. Copyright grants the rights holder certain exclusive rights, but those are not among them. You don't buy a music license to listen to music. You buy what you bought: a physical object with a recording of music encoded on it, or a digital file that serves a similar purpose. What you would need a license for would be anything that the rights holder has exclusive right to do, for example to make another copy or to perform the work publicly. If you bought a physical object and it broke, tough. You should have taken better care of it. Unless you were lead to believe the object in question was significantly more durable than it was in practice. That's fraud. If you bought a digital file with an artifically enforced limited lifespan, that's your tough luck again unless you were lead to believe you were buying something else.
That all seems perfectly reasonable. So, this constitution, it's only a couple of weeks old, then? Because if it hasn't been enforced for something more like 70 years, for example, it would make less sense to feel a sudden need to start enforcing it now.
Take a look at some actual numbers: http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/250.html . Notice the bottom 50% of taxpayers by income are paying an average of 3%. You're asking them to increase their tax burden by 17% of their income. Now look at the top 1%, the people making more than $388,806 a year. You're their new best friend.
Whose side are _you_ on?
Not to mention, you're completely off topic. The article in question relates to corporate taxes, not individual income taxes.
So what you're saying is that when people come to you with their broken computers, you see a lot more people who've stayed with Vista than have downgraded to XP. Your assumption is that the subset of users with broken computers corresponds roughly to the inverse subset of users whose computers are not broken. I'm not convinced you have grounds for that assumption. It's at least equally plausible that a larger percentage of users who stay with Vista end up bringing their computers to you to fix them.
So, what you're saying is that you've observed a correlation between a belief that correlation is not causation and an ability to solve problems and avoid arguments.
Yeah, as opposed to something like Linux, which is... oh wait... crap. No offense to Linux users, I'm one myself, but it's just not everyday that you see Microsoft described as "geared to the techie user". Everything in Windows is obfuscated and hidden from the technical user by the elaborate machinations designed to allow the 'average joe' to accomplish simply only those things that Microsoft assumes the 'average joe' wants to do.
I think we can anticipate that, considering it's being created by the company that has the most well known security reputation of any company, world-wide.
Slashdot Mirror
because this represents the first time the human brain has been involved in the process of updating Twitter.
The belief that there are certain things which it is of vital importance not to appear to condone.
The analysis was of 30 studies, not 30 cases. It would be helpful to know how many cases each of those 30 studies represents, though.
No reason why you couldn't...
alias manual=/usr/bin/man
Knock yourself out.
As often as not, the only hits you get are posts in forums where someone is asking the exact same question you need answered... and getting no replies. Since 2005.
Obviously, all you have to do is put data in the outside server that's encrypted in some other way. Then Facebook just has a link to data that's really just a link to somewhere else. See? Problem solved.
Wrestling isn't a charity...
(And before I lose all my karma... this is a joke.)
I don't know the details of their contract but... didn't the copyright expired like 50 years ago? Have we moved into a society where copyrights never expire?
Fixed that for you.
Probably not those of us who run our own mail servers... and aren't Google. :)
You must be new here.
It's not a question of petaflops. Cells grow, new synapses form, it routes functions around damaged areas... Yeah, we're a long way off.
A license bestows upon the licensee the right (within specified restrictions) to do something that normally is prohibited by law. It's not against the law to have a CD or an MP3 in your possession, or to listen to it. Copyright grants the rights holder certain exclusive rights, but those are not among them. You don't buy a music license to listen to music. You buy what you bought: a physical object with a recording of music encoded on it, or a digital file that serves a similar purpose. What you would need a license for would be anything that the rights holder has exclusive right to do, for example to make another copy or to perform the work publicly.
If you bought a physical object and it broke, tough. You should have taken better care of it. Unless you were lead to believe the object in question was significantly more durable than it was in practice. That's fraud. If you bought a digital file with an artifically enforced limited lifespan, that's your tough luck again unless you were lead to believe you were buying something else.
Sure, but if the publishing company goes bankrupt, that doesn't stop you reading the book.
That all seems perfectly reasonable. So, this constitution, it's only a couple of weeks old, then? Because if it hasn't been enforced for something more like 70 years, for example, it would make less sense to feel a sudden need to start enforcing it now.
Good luck with that.
In practice, it would penalize those who don't sneak out in the middle of the night and crap on their neighbors' lawns.
That's right! I'd love to give a -1 to everyone who uses that tired phrase.
Take a look at some actual numbers: http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/250.html . Notice the bottom 50% of taxpayers by income are paying an average of 3%. You're asking them to increase their tax burden by 17% of their income. Now look at the top 1%, the people making more than $388,806 a year. You're their new best friend.
Whose side are _you_ on?
Not to mention, you're completely off topic. The article in question relates to corporate taxes, not individual income taxes.
So what you're saying is that when people come to you with their broken computers, you see a lot more people who've stayed with Vista than have downgraded to XP. Your assumption is that the subset of users with broken computers corresponds roughly to the inverse subset of users whose computers are not broken. I'm not convinced you have grounds for that assumption. It's at least equally plausible that a larger percentage of users who stay with Vista end up bringing their computers to you to fix them.
So, what you're saying is that you've observed a correlation between a belief that correlation is not causation and an ability to solve problems and avoid arguments.
Totally thinking the same thing...
Yeah, as opposed to something like Linux, which is... oh wait... crap.
No offense to Linux users, I'm one myself, but it's just not everyday that you see Microsoft described as "geared to the techie user". Everything in Windows is obfuscated and hidden from the technical user by the elaborate machinations designed to allow the 'average joe' to accomplish simply only those things that Microsoft assumes the 'average joe' wants to do.
Uninstall? Seriously? It's been a long time since you used Microsoft software, hasn't it?
I think we can anticipate that, considering it's being created by the company that has the most well known security reputation of any company, world-wide.
If I could C TFA...