Slashdot Mirror


Hints of a Link Between Autism and Vinyl Flooring

SpuriousLogic sends in a link from Scientific American to a study by Swedish and US researchers that reaches the surprising conclusion that there may be a link between autism and vinyl floors. "Children who live in homes with vinyl floors, which can emit chemicals called phthalates, are more likely to have autism, according to research by Swedish and US scientists published Monday. ... The scientists were surprised by their finding, calling it 'far from conclusive.' ... The researchers found four environmental factors associated with autism: vinyl flooring, the mother's smoking, family economic problems, and condensation on windows, which indicates poor ventilation. Infants or toddlers who lived in bedrooms with vinyl, or PVC, floors were twice as likely to have autism five years later... than those with wood or linoleum flooring. ... Several scientists who did not participate in the study cautioned that it has too many limitations to draw conclusions, but they suggested that new studies be designed to look for a connection between autism and indoor air pollutants."

356 comments

  1. Album collection? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a friend with a large vinyl album collection. Some 5,000 vinyls!

    Funny, I always thought he was a bit of an introvert. Now I know why. ;)

    1. Re:Album collection? by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's actually 4,936 albums.  I counted them.  Yeah, definitely 4,936 albums.  64 more to be 5,000.  7,352 more to be 12,288.  So, 4,936 albums really.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    2. Re:Album collection? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a friend with a large vinyl album collection. Some 5,000 vinyls!

      Funny, I always thought he was a bit of an introvert. Now I know why. ;)

      Tangentially, what about new cars? Part of the "new car smell" is phthalates and other plasticizers outgassed from the car interior... I wonder if there is a higher incidence of autism in children whose parents bought a new car early in their life?

      Unrelated to autism (I think), I get nauseous in new cars, or in limos with the "new car small" releaser thingy on the dashboard. So much so that I'll never buy a new car without having my wife use it for the first few months... but since she does the majority of schlepping the kid around, maybe I should rethink that strategy.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Album collection? by Antidamage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jesus. And just thing of the number of babies that buy new cars each year. This is big. This is huge. This could go all the way to the White House.

    4. Re:Album collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have a friend" like that, too :) Wanna chat?

    5. Re:Album collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Babies may not buy new cars, but parents sometimes buy new cars when they have more children and find that the number of seats their car has.

    6. Re:Album collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but since she does the majority of schlepping the kid around, maybe I should rethink that strategy.

      Or maybe you just shouldn't care because in 2 months, another research test will show vinyl floor helps prevent autism. Or that medical personal are mislabeling children with autism simply because parents want an excuse to give for why their children act like... er children.

      Not to mention the definition of autism has grown and different types of autism are not categorized.

    7. Re:Album collection? by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Or that medical personal are mislabeling children with autism simply because parents want an excuse to give for why their children act like... er children.

      Really? Rush Limbaugh is that you?

    8. Re:Album collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This could go all the way to the White House."

      Stupid, it already did. How else do you think a no-name junior senator from Illinois named Obama got elected? The youngins are affected in their choice, as are the influx of voters with names of newborns rocking the ballot.

      Three Presidents in a row who admitted using drugs or obviously had too much catnip (Clinton/Obama, W). And the Internet was built on E. No wonder we're screwed.

    9. Re:Album collection? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      There's a pretty big difference between the time a child spends in the car and the time they spend in their room.

    10. Re:Album collection? by oatworm · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, you fly over head of joke!

    11. Re:Album collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the levels of these drop sharply over time, and there is proven developmental harm before birth.
      So. Imagine new mom driving around in new car a lot.

    12. Re:Album collection? by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      Unrelated to autism (I think), I get nauseous in new cars, or in limos with the "new car small" releaser thingy on the dashboard. So much so that I'll never buy a new car without having my wife use it for the first few months... but since she does the majority of schlepping the kid around, maybe I should rethink that strategy.

      My ex used to teach in special schools, and has regularly had autistic kids in her class since moving to mainstream schools, too. Just anecdotally, I seem to recall quite a few of these kids came from families who could easily afford new cars. Whether they did have new cars frequently I couldn't be sure, but the vinyl link is plausible. Another good test might be to see what autism rates are like near PVC factories.

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
  2. How long before ... by krou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... someone says correlation is not causation?

    --
    'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    1. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good point. We should be looking for a common cause, something that causes BOTH autism AND vinyl flooring.

      Or possibly that autism causes pre-emtive vinyl flooring

    2. Re:How long before ... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Not too long. The summary's title says "hints at", and TFA actually mentions that The scientists were surprised by their finding, calling it "far from conclusive." Because their research was not designed to focus on autism, they recommend further study of larger numbers of children to see whether the link can be confirmed., which is almost repeating the correlation/causation thing.

    3. Re:How long before ... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      You might have used different words, but you just said it.

    4. Re:How long before ... by taucross · · Score: 1

      Don't be so hasty. Slashdot Nazis are rarely that predictable.

      Oh, hello Godwin.

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    5. Re:How long before ... by saiha · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I find that "correlation is not causation" to be a great way to filter out those with zero (well actually negative because they are actively spreading misinformation) knowledge of statistics.

    6. Re:How long before ... by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      They'd better do it soon. Five minutes to Wapner.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    7. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that "correlation is not causation" to be a great way to filter out those with zero [...] knowledge of statistics.

      Fine. I personally think that statistically significant correlation is a perfect reason for research into a possible causal link (which needn't be there).

      (well actually negative because they are actively spreading misinformation)

      Please elaborate. The last time I checked, correlation has not been identical with causation. If I'm wrong, it will be easy for you to show me they're identical.

    8. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics suggest that there is a strong link between two variables correlating and one being the cause of the other?

    9. Re:How long before ... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Er... my point was that both the summary and the article had said it before the call for "who's first?" even came out.

    10. Re:How long before ... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I find that "correlation is not causation" to be a great way to filter out those with zero (well actually negative because they are actively spreading misinformation) knowledge of statistics.

      How have you come up with this finding? What was your sample size?

    11. Re:How long before ... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      True. But that's not as funny.

    12. Re:How long before ... by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe the latent form of the autism gene causes terrible taste in interior decorating.

    13. Re:How long before ... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      The summary didn't say it's the cause. The correlationisnotcausation tag isn't entirely relevant here.

    14. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain how correlation proves causation.

    15. Re:How long before ... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      pre-emtive vinyl flooring

      That sounds like it could be one of the side effects of Vaxadrine

    16. Re:How long before ... by $1uck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't tell what you're saying. Are you actually trying to say "correlation is causation" because that is simply not true. Correlation is not causation, but hell that isn't even what most people say. "Correlation does not imply causation" which is also true, correlation doesn't say anything about the nature of the relationship between two events.

    17. Re:How long before ... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Good point. We should be looking for a common cause, something that causes BOTH autism AND vinyl flooring.

      Like a specific character in parents ? That both makes them like the easy-to-clean vinyl flooring and autism in their kids ?

      Or possibly that autism causes pre-emtive vinyl flooring

      Heh, don't dismiss that so easily. There could have been a popular book about autist kids raising that would suggest that carpets floor are bad for them, that vinyl is better, and urge parents to provide such an environment. Okay, that is a bit improbable, but don't forget to consider these things, possibilities exist.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    18. Re:How long before ... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Hints of a link' becomes the next press campaign leading to millions of worried parents. These kinds of reports can be very damaging.

    19. Re:How long before ... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this is obviously the autism causing the flooring to become made of vinyl (even if it was wood before), not the other way around!

    20. Re:How long before ... by $1uck · · Score: 1

      to clarify correlation coefficient says something about the "strength" of the relationship.

    21. Re:How long before ... by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Part of the problem is the fact that it is easier to get diagnoses as Autism. In the past minor forms of Autism were ignored or just considered bad behavior, Even Moderate-High Autism the person was just considered Stupid. So the past records are faulty. Espectially before the age of Vinyl flooring.

       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    22. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, here you go:
      http://xkcd.com/552/

    23. Re:How long before ... by Goaway · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correlation does not prove causation, but yelling "correlation is not causation" on Slashdot sure correlates pretty strongly with being a clueless blowhard.

    24. Re:How long before ... by xelah · · Score: 1

      Erm, I'm not so sure about that. Take a sample of people. Take records of the rate of lots of diseases. Take records of lots of environmental factors. Throw in records of 100 different numbers with each set randomly generated for each person, if you like.

      Now look for correlations. You're likely to find some - and, if you didn't, it's because you didn't record enough randomly generated numbers.

      Why? Suppose you're statistical methods will tell you're there's a (significant) correlation with 99% certainty. If you were specifically testing a single hypothesis your study had set out to find, that's just fine. If, instead, you search through hundreds of possible correlations between variables then you're going to find some spurious ones. You can't be sure of those until you run a new study, on new data, specifically testing a hypothesised link.

      This isn't 'correlation is not causation', it's something different entirely.

    25. Re:How long before ... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Or possibly that autism causes pre-emtive vinyl flooring

      Heh, don't dismiss that so easily. There could have been a popular book about autist kids raising that would suggest that carpets floor are bad for them

      Cripes, the summary even tells you the vinyl flooring comes years before the onset of autism. What kind of weirdo reads books about autism when they don't know their kid is going to have it?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    26. Re:How long before ... by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

      You might want to look for commonality with pirates & global warming which could bring it full circle... I have a feeling the universe could then collapse.

    27. Re:How long before ... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Judging by the timestamp of the article and your post, I'd say approximately three minutes.

    28. Re:How long before ... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "'Hints of a link' becomes the next press campaign leading to millions of worried parents. These kinds of reports can be very damaging."

      That's very true but the question then becomes, is the science in cahoots with the "press campaign" or is it being abused by it? To judge that you have to critique the paper. Of course that's impossible to do that for everything that gets reported but to assume the science agrees with or endoreses the press campaign is exactly what every press campaing wants.

      A sure sign of a potentially damaging "science based" press campaign is one that doesn't link/reference it's scientific sources.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    29. Re:How long before ... by conureman · · Score: 1

      1:2 is a hell of a correlation.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    30. Re:How long before ... by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Years before the diagnosis of autism. Autism isn't usually diagnosed for kids under two, and most get diagnosed around 4 or 5. There have been few cases I know of where the child demonstrably did not have autism earlier in life.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    31. Re:How long before ... by digitig · · Score: 1

      It's more qualified even than that. What that language means is that it's not even clear there really is a correlation yet. If you check enough pairs of data sets for correlation, you're pretty certain to get some false positives. You then go on to collect more data specifically looking for the correlation, and only if those subsequent tests come up with a correlation do you have something to explain and questions of causation arise. So the scientists are not yet even up to the correlation/causation question yet.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    32. Re:How long before ... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      What that language means is that it's not even clear there really is a correlation yet. If you check enough pairs of data sets for correlation, you're pretty certain to get some false positives.

      Yep, it's the same basic principle of operation as the birthday paradox. But still, they're not "false positives". The data does correlate. The problem is in the sample itself. Since you're not out to actively trying to locate vynils or autists, so yuo grab a sample of 100 people, in which you then might've found 5 autists and 10 people with vynil floors. If 4 of those autists happen to live in houses with vynil floors, the data *does* correlate quite strongly. The correlation just isn't very significant because of the tiny sample size.

    33. Re:How long before ... by hayesk · · Score: 4, Funny

      If my wife reads this study, autism is going to cause brand new ceramic tile in my kitchen.

    34. Re:How long before ... by digitig · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's the same basic principle of operation as the birthday paradox. But still, they're not "false positives". The data does correlate.

      True, the data correlates, but that doesn't tell you anything about whether vinyl floors and autism correlates.

      The problem is in the sample itself. Since you're not out to actively trying to locate vynils or autists, so yuo grab a sample of 100 people, in which you then might've found 5 autists and 10 people with vynil floors. If 4 of those autists happen to live in houses with vynil floors, the data *does* correlate quite strongly. The correlation just isn't very significant because of the tiny sample size.

      The problem is not the sample size. It would be invalid whatever the sample size was. The problem is that the hypothesis has been formed after the data has been examined. As I said, given enough diverse data sets it's pretty much certain that there will be a spurious correlation in there somewhere. The challenge is knowing whether it's spurious or not, which can only be done by testing the hypothesis. If I toss a coin 20 times, the chance of the particular sequence of heads and tails that I get is, by my reckonning, about one in a million. But if I come to you and say "Wow! That sequence will only come up one in a million times, and I've just thrown it on my first attempt", nobody will be impressed. You will only be impressed if I predict the sequence in advance of tossing the coin.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    35. Re:How long before ... by geschild · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm unsure why you're labled funny. I think you managed to hit the nail on the head. Autism an autistic tendencies might very well lead to a taste for minimalism.

      This is a testable hypothesis: are there any other ways in which the interior of these houses is minimalistic? Interior blinds instead of (draped) curtains, leather instead of fabric on the chairs and couch? Vynil _or_ tiles instead of carpet?

      I do think alternative underlying reasons for the correlation can and will be found :).

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    36. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics suggest that there is a strong link between two variables correlating

      Well, that's an interesting fact; then it would be certainly worth a study to find out why these variables are correlating.

      and one being the cause of the other?

      This claim is in no way related (related, not correlated) to the fact that two variables are correlated. Correlation can also be by chance, correlation can also be induced by some common cause. Whether one fact causes the other has to be researched via other means than statistics, at least you need a model that explains exactly how one could be the cause of the other.

      In consideration of such false claims it seems indeed very important to repeatedly point to the difference of correlation and causation.

    37. Re:How long before ... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Okay, good point. I was thinking of the data alone.

    38. Re:How long before ... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      True, but I would rather parents ripped up their vinyl floors then not have their children vaccinated.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:How long before ... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even go as far as the genes (I'm assuming that you are serious; I think it was a feeble attempt at humor). Autistic fellows really don't care what looks good to others or is "good interior design". They pick something that their sensory idiosyncrasies dictate and run with it, Martha Stewart be damned.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    40. Re:How long before ... by Ironchew · · Score: 1

      to clarify...

      Check that flooring material, pronto.

    41. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...someone says April Fools!?

    42. Re:How long before ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Inbreeding, which causes birth-defects. Since inbreeding is popular with poor people, who live in trailers, and trailers have vinyl flooring, it's a vicious, unbreakable cycle.

    43. Re:How long before ... by jupsis · · Score: 1

      'Hints of a link' becomes the next press campaign leading to millions of worried parents. These kinds of reports can be very damaging.

      to some parents just a hint of a explanation is nice. to us as parents this helps come up with some potential answers to mysteries of autism. and helps us see that statistically our daughter is not that different with asthma-kind of symptoms and autism. although we have wooden floors...

      but in general I agree, most people freak out already when the word autism is mentioned. not to mention that something common might be causing it.

    44. Re:How long before ... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Tell your wife how difficult it is to keep ceraminc tile clean, and that dropped dishes/glasses are more likely to break if dropped on the harder ceramic. Ceramic tiles can crack.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    45. Re:How long before ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What he's saying is that the idiots who crow "correlation is not causation" for every science article they disagree with, as if it's some sort of refutation, don't understand what they're saying even if it is technically true.

      The full statement (still simplified, even if far less catchy) is: correlation implies either a causal link or mutual causation by a third factor.

      A catchier saying: correlation does not imply causation, but it's a hell of a place to start looking.

      So in this case, no, it's not time to ban vinyl flooring (at least not for it's potential autism-causing properties). But it is a reasonable possibility that somebody needs to look at very carefully. Which, surprise, surprise, is just what the study authors say.

    46. Re:How long before ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      So we should shield the public from information which might be damaging to their delicate sensibilities?

    47. Re:How long before ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. Pointless vaccination is, well, pointless.

  3. Correlation not blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just to pre-empt the self-proud idiots who will no doubt chime in with the usual 'correlation is not causation!' chanting.

    1. Re:Correlation not blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For real brother.

      The scientists even stressed that conclusions could NOT be drawn from the results, and stated that more studies designed to look further into it would be required.

      Yet here we are, with the fucking correlationisnotcausation tag already, tagged by some complete moron. Great job idiot, maybe we should just stop having ANY scientific studies at all.

      Jackass.

    2. Re:Correlation not blah blah blah by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Informative

      How is this pre-empting them? All you have done is predict that people will say it, that isn't a counter argument, 'correlation is not causation' may be over-used and formulaic, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong.

    3. Re:Correlation not blah blah blah by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      How is this pre-empting them? All you have done is predict that people will say it, that isn't a counter argument, 'correlation is not causation' may be over-used and formulaic, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong.

      Preempting isn't about a counter-argument... it means (generally) to do something first to prevent others from doing it. A preemptive strike is meant to keep your oppenent from striking. A preemptive bid in bridge is meant to keep your opponents from making low-level bids to exchange information. A preemptive bid in contract bidding is meant to close the bidding process before the open bidding process even begins (like to forestall an auction).

      So, while you are right that his post doesn't preempt people who wish to make the C != C argument... it's not because he doesn't present an argument against them... Theoretically, he DID preempt them, because he brought it up first so all who follow are redundant and should be modded down.

      But that's all moot, anyway. He failed because he was slow -- to b silly, you might say he post-empted them... oe of them got it in before he did.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  4. OMGPONIES by MrMista_B · · Score: 2, Insightful

    April Fools! ... ...

    1. Re:OMGPONIES by lobiusmoop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Besides the article being dated March 31, 2009, joking about autism isn't exactly a barrel of laughs. Apr 1 seems to have turned into some kind of trial of trust of the media now, which pisses me off.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    2. Re:OMGPONIES by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      It's good if it makes people question the truth of the media for the other 364 days of the year.

      Obama meets Brown for G20 talks ...pfft, yeah right.

    3. Re:OMGPONIES by dragisha · · Score: 1

      Here goes ME TOO.

      Slashdotnalism is even more on April 1st.

      And one was sure it's impossible.

      --
      http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
    4. Re:OMGPONIES by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      Disagree. If you haven't figured out how to question authority by the time you're out of school there's no hope for you, whether there's a day of the year supposedly dedicated to it or not. There's quite enough bullshit on the internet as it is, without degrading the established science sites down to that level on one day of the year.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    5. Re:OMGPONIES by houghi · · Score: 1

      I hate this day when all people who are never funny try to be on a specific day. The pranks seldom reach the level of the average 8 year old.

      If you have a great prank then do it. Do not wait for a specific date. If you think "wouldn't it be funny if ..." the answer is always no.

      Oh well, at least it keeps me at work one day of the year as none of the /. stories are of any interest.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:OMGPONIES by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

      probably not (and please tag this !aprilsfools until you are sure)

    7. Re:OMGPONIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !!!WORLD EXCLUSIVE: OTHER COUNTRIES REACH APRIL 1st BEFORE AMERICA !!!

      "Posted by kdawson on Wednesday April 01, @04:55AM from the and-that's-vinyl dept.

    8. Re:OMGPONIES by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Apr 1 seems to have turned into some kind of trial of trust of the media now, which pisses me off.

      I dunno. I like to think of it as "National Skepticism Day."

    9. Re:OMGPONIES by Spatial · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pro tip: the media isn't much more reliable any other day of the year.

    10. Re:OMGPONIES by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

      Apr 1 seems to have turned into some kind of trial of trust of the media now, which pisses me off.

      Just think of it as being good practice for the other 364 days when we aren't in on the joke.

    11. Re:OMGPONIES by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Apr 1 seems to have turned into some kind of trial of trust of the media now, which pisses me off.

      Oh yeah. We really need a specific day of the year to not trust the media. /sarcasm

    12. Re:OMGPONIES by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Anything is a barel of laughs, you jst eed the right comic.

      For example:
      What do you called dead and dying children of a preventable disease due to an unwarranted fear of autism?

      Jenny McCarthy's body count.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:OMGPONIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssshhhh, I hear the whaaaambulance coming....

    14. Re:OMGPONIES by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way - it encourages critical thinking. Having to sort out the crap from the real stories on April 1 is good practice for doing it the rest of the year.

      We should rename April 1 from April Fools to International Critical Thinking Day or something.

  5. Paper or it didn't happen by funkatron · · Score: 1

    I've just scanned the article and I cannot see a link to the actual published paper (or even the name of the journal). Anyone have a link?

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    1. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by femto · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if having a parental-reported autistic spectrum disorder is the same as actually having autism?

    3. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or here for people that don't have a university to buy their articles for them.

    4. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      My wife works with these children. I can assure that no its not. And no matter how much a doctor tells them otherwise they know that the bad behavior is ADHD/Autism etc. That way its not their problem.

      Of course there are a few (very small number) that really do have Autism.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    5. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by vlm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder if having a parental-reported autistic spectrum disorder is the same as actually having autism?

      According to the article, they talked to the kids doctors for 10 of the 72 positive reports, and the doctors agreed. So at least or around 90% of the time, and assuming the doctor is telling the truth, and assuming you live in Sweden, I'd say the answer is "yes".

      Think of all the parental claims you've ever heard that are ridiculous "I don't know what he does in school, but he's a perfect little angel at home" or "my kid would never do drugs" or the ever popular, "but she's never even kissed a boy". Apparently although some parents (admittedly, mostly of teenagers) clearly live in an alternate universe, the researchers verified that's not the case w/ regards to parents of autistic kids.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I work in a school dealing ASDs and behavioral / emotional difficulties. The unofficial diagnosis of kids with afformentioned parental-reported autistic spectrum disorder is P.P.P.

      Piss Poor Parenting.

      Anon for obvious reasons.

    7. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by oliverk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The short answer is, yes. Autism isn't a single classification, but in fact a wider band of classifications that produce similar behaviors and symptoms. Asperger's is on one end of a "autistic spectrum," but those with it are typically high-functioning and integrated into society. Others inflicted with more serious forms of autism aren't so readily integrated, and are oftentimes better cared for in a controlled setting. So "autism," as we typically refer to it in common terms, is really a range of related conditions, and without that next level of understanding of physiological or developmental causes of the condition there can't be much more specificity given.

      --
      ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
    8. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by Locklin · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know you are replying to a comment with the bloody doi link right? You don't even have to read the paper, it's in the abstract.

      Abstract

      Potential contributions of environmental chemicals and conditions to the etiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders are the subject of considerable current research and speculation. The present paper describes the results of a study undertaken as part of a larger project devoted to the connection between properties of the indoor environment and asthma and allergy in young Swedish children. The larger project, The Dampness in Buildings and Health (DBH) Study, began in the year 2000 with a questionnaire distributed to parents of all children 1â"6 years of age in one Swedish county (DBH-I). A second, follow-up questionnaire (DBH-III) was distributed in 2005. The original survey collected information about the child, the family situation, practices such as smoking, allergic symptoms, type of residence, moisture-related problems, and type of flooring material, which included polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The 2005 survey, based on the same children, now 6â"8 years of age, also asked if, during the intervening period, the child had been diagnosed with Autism, Asperger's syndrome, or Tourette's syndrome. From a total of 4779 eligible children, 72 (60 boys, 12 girls) were identified with parentally reported autism spectrum disorder. A random sample of 10 such families confirmed that the diagnoses had been made by medical professionals, in accordance with the Swedish system for monitoring children's health. An analysis of the associations between indoor environmental variables in 2000 as well as other background factors and the ASD diagnosis indicated five statistically significant variables: (1) maternal smoking; (2) male sex; (3) economic problems in the family; (4) condensation on windows, a proxy for low ventilation rate in the home; (5) PVC flooring, especially in the parentsâ(TM) bedroom. In addition, airway symptoms of wheezing and physician-diagnosed asthma in the baseline investigation (2000) were associated with ASD 5 years later. Results from the second phase of the DBH-study (DBH-II) indicate PVC flooring to be one important source of airborne phthalates indoors, and that asthma and allergy prevalence are associated with phthalate concentrations in settled dust in the children's bedroom. Because these associations are among the few linking ASD with environmental variables, they warrant further and more extensive exploration.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    9. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      That's up there with Parental Attention Deficit Disorder, as in "punish the little monsters and they'll stop being terrors in school."

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    10. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2009.01.011

      Malin Larssona, Bernard Weissb, Staffan Jansona, Jan Sundellc and Carl-Gustav Bornehag
      Associations between indoor environmental factors and parental-reported autistic spectrum disorders in children 6-8 years of age

      You are a bit unexperienced with scientific article headings and author naming. You see, those authors had a letter in the index, identifying their affiliation - so what you copy-pasted as Malin Larssona is actually Malin Larsson with an "a" in the index (superscript). Similarly, the correct names of the other authors are:
      Bernard Weiss, Staffan Janson, Jan Sundell and Carl-Gustav Bornehag

      I am somewhat passionate about giving credit to scientists correctly, as I'm a researcher myself, and I care about having my name spelled correctly. And what I expect from others, I definitely do unto others as well. It's just basic respect and civility.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    11. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Of the 72 people, they randomly asked the doctors of 10, found that all of the parents had answered accurately, and concluded that they didn't need to (well, given the laws on medical disclosure, couldn't effectively) ask any more doctors.

    12. Re:Paper or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the names sound funny it is because they are what you get if you take a few Swedish names and add a, b or c at the end.

  6. And this is why I hate April Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've really no idea if this is a legit article or a joke. Linking things to autism is always a cheap headline grabber and studying Vinyl flooring among the other more typical factors seems weird.

    The article was published on March 31st but there are scores of sites which publish their 'jokes' early. I'm leaning towards this being real but god knows.

    April Fools gets lamer every year, especially given the increasing number of sites who feel the need to post believable, possible stories as real.

    1. Re:And this is why I hate April Fools by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Linking things to autism is always a cheap headline grabber and studying Vinyl flooring among the other more typical factors seems weird.

      Linking insulation and cancer was pretty weird, too.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:And this is why I hate April Fools by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the vermiculite in your potting soil.

  7. REACH by polar+red · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is why http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registration,_Evaluation,_Authorisation_and_Restriction_of_ChemicalsREACH is so important. from wikipedia : "There were 100,106 chemicals in use in the EU in 1981, when the last survey was performed. Of these only 3,000 have been tested and over 800 are known to be carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction." So, only 3% of chemicals in use by man have been tested for environmental and health safety.

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:REACH by drunkenoafoffofb3ta · · Score: 1

      Say what?

      There were 100,106 chemicals in use in the EU in 1981?!

      I suspect that's a massive underestimation...

    2. Re:REACH by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      this is why http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registration,_Evaluation,_Authorisation_and_Restriction_of_ChemicalsREACH is so important. from wikipedia : "There were 100,106 chemicals in use in the EU in 1981, when the last survey was performed. Of these only 3,000 have been tested and over 800 are known to be carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction." So, only 3% of chemicals in use by man have been tested for environmental and health safety.

      And, of those tested, over 1/4 are dangerous. Of the remaining 97,106 registered chemicals, how many problems are lurking there?

      Chemicals are nothing new, the natural environment is full of chemicals from plants, bacterial waste, poisonous animals, etc. that we need to be wary of, but if we're getting creative making new ones, it would be nice if we had some idea what we're getting into - the natural ones have mostly been there since the dawn of our species, we've had plenty of generations to learn about or evolve to be able to deal with them.

    3. Re:REACH by radtea · · Score: 1

      So, only 3% of chemicals in use by man have been tested for environmental and health safety.

      And the number of natural substances that have been tested is also nearly nil, and they are far more likely to be biologically active as natural materials have no quality control in manufacture are the simplest cell contains hundreds of thousands of proteins, many of which are known to be carcinogenic, mutagenic, etc.

      It's really incredibly we let anyone make anything out of natural materials at all.

      [I'm trying to put the situation in perspective, not suggest that we don't need any chemical testing--we do, but maybe those 3% are the ones we have plausible reason to think might be dangerous?]

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    4. Re:REACH by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Breath pure oxygen and die quickly. Drink too much pure water and die quickly.

      Nothing is that simple.

  8. In related news... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... a recent study found that all autistic children breath air.

    1. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But did your study find that kids with autism were twice as likely to breathe air than kids without? No? Probably less statistically significant then.

      If you're going to disprove an April Fool's story with statistics, at least make the statistics work.

    2. Re:In related news... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 0, Troll

      OK, sorry to annoy the crap out of you - not !


      How about
      100% of children with autism have been found to breath a common colorless, odorless, tasteless gas comprised of 78.08% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.038% carbon dioxide, and trace amounts of other gases.

    3. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, that same air that you just described is breathed by all kids, so, the real question becomes what is different between "normal" vs. Autistic kids? And one correlation is that Autistic kids have a high tendicy to come from homes with Vinyl flooring. Perhaps it is something else, BUT there is still a high correlation.
      So, mr. smart guy, what was your point? Or was it another one of your worthless posts?

    4. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear the death rates in hospital populations are higher than the general population. Conclusion: Visiting a hospital causes death!!

      The flip-side of a 95% confidence interval is that 1 in 20 conclusions are just plain wrong.

    5. Re:In related news... by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      ...children breath air.
      - OneSmartFellow

      Can't decide: Irony or Vinyl?

    6. Re:In related news... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      All my posts are worthless; just as are all of yours, and everyone elses.

      Mine was intended to be slightly sarcastic, of course, but I can see that intent may have been lost on some readers; and for that I apologise.

      I think I share the basic sentiment with many readers here however when I state that what the hyperactive disorder of the 1970s and 1980s (later to become ADHD in the 1990s and first years of the 21st century) has now morphed into autism in the latter part of the this decade. Autism is over-diagnosed by unscrupulous doctors, with encouragement from pharmaceutical comapnies and social workers. It's a mighty convenient excuse for a 'behaviourly challenged' child with lazy, stupid (or sometimes genuinely ignorant) parents who don't know how to raise them. Sure, some children are genuinely autistic, but from personal experience, I'd say less than 1/5th of those 'diagnosed' as autistic need anythign more than a swift kick in the arse when they run around screaming their heads off becuase they have to do something they don't like, such as sit at a desk in school.

  9. April 1 by Canazza · · Score: 1

    so is /. just going to be a melangé of all the April Fools jokes from around the web today?

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    1. Re:April 1 by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1

      Nothing really changes around here.

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    2. Re:April 1 by Antidamage · · Score: 1

      Is melangé food? Because now I'm hungry for meringue.

    3. Re:April 1 by saiha · · Score: 1

      /oblig dune

    4. Re:April 1 by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      yes.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    5. Re:April 1 by kramulous · · Score: 1

      No, don't be silly.

      In other news, there's a new compiler that does automatic parallelisation. There is even an icon called piggie that'll help you ... and he flies!

      --
      .
    6. Re:April 1 by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      It's not an April Fool it's dated the 31st... Do you really think even slashdot would joke about kids with autism? Looks like you are the april fool.

    7. Re:April 1 by rve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot would, but Scientific American wouldnt

    8. Re:April 1 by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      so is /. just going to be a melangé of all the April Fools jokes from around the web today?

      No, just the ones in poor taste, giving people false hope.

    9. Re:April 1 by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Just because it's April first you shouldn't assume there will be April Fools jokes on Slashdot.

      Correlation does not imply causation.

      ;

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  10. Moral of the story... by flaming+error · · Score: 0

    To prevent autism, protect your children with our new mercury-based phthalate/nicotine vaccine.

  11. Economic by nicklott · · Score: 1

    The other three factors mentioned are economic, are poor people more likely to have vinyl flooring than, say, wood flooring? Anecdotally it would seem so to me...

    1. Re:Economic by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, because not very long ago vinyl flooring was the "upscale" thing to do.

      But this raises a question: carpets were not mentioned. Carpets are also made of plastic: generally nylon, more rarely polyester, and either may have a polypropylene backing. Carpets are known to outgas organic fumes for an extended time after they are installed. Not to mention the (usually plastic foam) padding underneath. Do those contain phthalates?

    2. Re:Economic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swedes don't use carpets

  12. I dunno.. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    One of the funnest things on April Fools Day is trying to pick out the one or two legit stories on the Slashdot front page. I'm really not sure whether this is one of them. The website is SCiAM.com though, so maybe it's trying to tell us something.

  13. Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    To have any effect, the vinyl plastic must degrade somehow, perhaps because of abrasion or other chemicals. If there is a connection, it could be to any chemical associated with vinyl floors, such as the chemicals in the cement used eventually diffusing through the vinyl.

    The article says, "The researchers found four environmental factors associated with autism: vinyl flooring, the mother's smoking, family economic problems and condensation on windows, which indicates poor ventilation."

    I assume they mean vinyl flooring throughout the house. Most people in the U.S. have vinyl floors in the kitchen. I notice that people who have vinyl floors throughout the house do not clean them as often as a kitchen floor is cleaned.

    All those factors occur because a family is poor, and therefore under a lot of stress. So maybe adult stress causes autism in children. It certainly causes numerous other problems.

    Be careful about the potential for fraud. The article says, "Is vinyl bad for baby?" If it is bad for a baby, it is bad for everyone. Follow the money: Someone who wants to sell alternative flooring would profit. Just that single statement in Scientific American will sell a lot of alternative flooring. That statement is suspiciously strong considering the facts in the article.

    From the Wikipedia for Polyvinyl chloride: "PVC is the third most widely used thermoplastic polymer after polyethylene and polypropylene. In terms of revenue generated, it is one of the most valuable products of the chemical industry. Around the world, over 50% of PVC manufactured is used in construction."

    1. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Most people in the U.S. have vinyl floors in the kitchen. I notice that people who have vinyl floors throughout the house do not clean them as often as a kitchen floor is cleaned. "

      Do THAT many houses have vinyl floors these days? Most every house I know of, that is either new, or has been restored/updated...have wood, tile and even carpet on the floors.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If you are renovating in an established area you would go for polished floorboards. For a new house out in the suburbs plastic flooring of some description may be the most cost effective way to go.

    3. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "For a new house out in the suburbs plastic flooring of some description may be the most cost effective way to go."

      I wonder....is this maybe regional?

      I live in the South...and most homes I know of down here, especially new ones, are mostly done with wood and tile as the primary flooring materials, along with carpet. I'm seeing carpet even not being put on that many new places. Just anecdotal observations mind you.

      And I'm talking largely suburban areas, in that there aren't that many 'urban' areas down here...not with the super concentration of people in a city area like NYC.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I promise not to buy any vinyl flooring from Scientific American ever again.

    5. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To have any effect, the vinyl plastic must degrade somehow

      PVC *does* degrade, all by itself. Pure PVC is very brittle (like your PVC drain pipes), so any flexible PVC product has lots of plasticizers mixed in. Some of these are volatile and gradually evaporate out of the plastic at room temperature. It's the plasticizers that are under suspicion here.

      However, I would imagine that most babies and toddlers are exposed to more PVC emmisions from the vynyl mattress covers in their cribs and beds. After all, they spend half of each day with their heads a couple inches away from the mattresses. These things are extremely stinky when new, and over the course of a year or so they seem to lose much of their plasticizers into the air and become brittle (and no longer stinky). Unfortunately, at that point they often shred into ribbons and must be replaced.

      IMO, given the safety questions that have recently come up regarding the phthalate plasticizers used in PVC products, it's probably worth the extra cost of buying polyethelene mattress covers for kids.

    6. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a reason I wrapped my kid's mattress in impermeable plastic. You know, the stuff they seal houses with. Figured it was worth $20 and half an hour to have a bit of peace of mind while he was sleeping... they've also found that wrapping those mattresses in New Zealand has drastically cut the incidence of SIDS.

    7. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To have any effect, the vinyl plastic must degrade somehow, perhaps because of abrasion or other chemicals.

      All soft plastics are degrading, and offgassing. Actually, all plastics do it, but the ones that become [[significantly] more] brittle over time are the greatest offenders. Those which you can smell are the obvious targets. Vinyl flooring has a significant smell at first (first could be years) which fades. It DOES become QUITE a bit more brittle year by year - it starts out extremely pliable. That doesn't "just happen" - something is being lost.

      Be careful about the potential for fraud. The article says, "Is vinyl bad for baby?" If it is bad for a baby, it is bad for everyone.

      Yes, but it might not have the potential to do as much damage to everyone, especially if it's most significant in the developmental stage.

      From the Wikipedia for Polyvinyl chloride: "PVC is the third most widely used thermoplastic polymer after polyethylene and polypropylene. In terms of revenue generated, it is one of the most valuable products of the chemical industry. Around the world, over 50% of PVC manufactured is used in construction."

      Also from the wikipedia for PVC, when you burn it in close proximity to copper you produce dioxin. PVC-jacketed wire is mandated in most building codes, at least in the USA. MASSIVE FAIL. Then again, plywood produces dioxin when it burns, and that's another common building material used worldwide. Don't forget about the monomers or the pthalates, also discussed there in detail. Your own citation indicates that PVC is massively dangerous stuff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Vinyl flooring would be worse for baby. Heavy volatile organics outgassing from flooring would tend to concentrate low in the room, where baby's nose is much of the time.

      As for the study, I would say it's way too early to draw conclusions. It merely suggests followup studies to be done.

      Notably, the actual quotes from the researchers say that as well even though the article implies that the study is more conclusive than that.

    9. Re:Maybe adult stress causes autism in children. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      "For a new house out in the suburbs plastic flooring of some description may be the most cost effective way to go."

      I wonder....is this maybe regional?

      Absolutely. I am in Australia. A good timber floor would be polished hardwood. You would be talking thousands of dollars per room. Typical new houses here are either on a concrete slab, or use MDF (fibreboard) flooring. You are going to need to cover that with something. My brother in laws house has carpet in areas where you tend to sit (living room, bedrooms). In areas with a lot of movement (dining room, hallway) and wet areas (kitchen, bathroom, toilets) they have some kind of vinyl flooring.

  14. The real link by evolx10 · · Score: 0

    The vinyl floors are not the direct causative effect for autism. It goes a little something like this.

    the Vinyl floors cause a household to contain more than the average amount of mops and vinyl floor cleaning products.

    When a woman pregnant with a child(in contrast to a woman pregnant with an adult) uses these cleaning products via the mop, there is a biased stress put on her pelvis (dependent on the dominant hand used), this in turn causes a small deformation of the pelvic opening- thickening on the side of the stress.

    When the woman gives birth the child passes through the deformed opening causing a hand to be extended to the opposing side of the deformation (dependent again on the dominant hand preference of the mother)this baby hand then further shifts the shoulder girdle of the child to an opposing angle in relation to the deformation of the mothers pelvis.

    The shifting of the child's shoulder girdle is known to cause autism, as is proven by a study done 50 years ago on the link between excessive maternal waving and offspring autism.

    1. Re:The real link by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Of course, the same motions are done with lino and wood flooring, and the same chems are used on lino, but there was no correlation with these.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  15. U.S. plans to ease GM into bankruptcy by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 0, Troll

    Speaking of Obama and the current date: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE53010720090401

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration is seeking to ease General Motors Corp into a "controlled" bankruptcy by persuading some creditors to agree to a plan that would divide the company into two pieces, the New York Times reported on Wednesday.

    Citing people briefed on the matter, the Times said the plan is to push GM into a structured bankruptcy "somewhere between a prepackaged bankruptcy and court chaos," using taxpayer financing for leverage.

  16. It's the first of April!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want my ponies!!!!!

  17. Also in plastic containers. by haeger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not too long ago I learned that phthalates were used as "softeners" in plastic containers. That's not a problem normally but if you put plastic boxes that aren't supposed to be recycled into your dishwasher to use them as a lunch-box then you have a problem since they weren't designed for such high temperatures and the phthalates are released. Same thing if you microwave it.

    Boxes that are "microwave/dishwasher safe" don't have this problem naturally. This is generally printed on the container itself.

    And phthalates aren't good for you. Even if you're an adult.

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Also in plastic containers. by polar+red · · Score: 1

      high temperatures and the phthalates are released.

      are phtalates released only at high temperature? or does high temp just increase the rate of release ? the way I understand fysics, even an I-beam releases iron into the air at room-temp, due to backgroundradiation, someone correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:Also in plastic containers. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      That's not a problem normally but if you put plastic boxes that aren't supposed to be recycled into your dishwasher to use them as a lunch-box then you have a problem since they weren't designed for such high temperatures and the phthalates are released.

      It's not just phthalates that are a problem when microwaving/dishwashing soft plastics. Everyone has heard of the plastic wrap/dioxin issue... and though this is a myth, it pays to be cautious and only use recommended plastics in the microwave.

      Some of the nasties that these soft plastics may emit: Phthalates, polyvinyl chlorides, bisphenol A, xenoestrogens, midichlorians, and corporothetans.

      The last two are of particular concern, since the FDA does not regulate or test for them AT ALL. Long-term exposure to these substances may result in the conditions doofus speechimpedimus (Binksism) and megalomaniacal dwarfism (Tomcruisitis), respectively.

      Note: joking aside, the link provided is a good resource.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Also in plastic containers. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure "backgroundradiation" doesn't have anything to do with it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Also in plastic containers. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I recently read about bottled water containers also not being refillable. If only they had made it clear why, because without a statement like "If you refill them, they will release harmful chemicals into the water." you just think it's a profit motive. Well, that's probably why they don't state that, because people would (rightly?) conclude that the bottles leak those chemicals into the original water too.

    5. Re:Also in plastic containers. by polar+red · · Score: 1

      gamma, IR, UV ?

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    6. Re:Also in plastic containers. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      High temp increases the rate of release, but it's not a linear relationship.

      Consider DEHC release from PVC... the diffusion coefficients [D × 1010 cm2 min1] at 5 and 40 C are 9.1 and 156.0 according to this paper. Seeing as microwaves can easily create temps over 100 C, it's pretty trivial to deduce that though some phthalates are released at room temperature, high temperatures could easily cause much higher concentrations of toxins in your food.

      As for vinyl floors, if the area is poorly ventilated, even a slow rate of diffusion could result in toxic contentrations of phthalates.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:Also in plastic containers. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I recently read about bottled water containers also not being refillable.

      Nope.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    8. Re:Also in plastic containers. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Since microwaves don't heat plastic, only it's contents you would need to sustain the heat for a while, and then breath in the released chemicals, and you would need to do it for hours at a time.

      Your trivial deduction is just that, trivial.
      I am curious, what do you think this means:

      "In order to clarify the effect of temperature on the release behavior of DEHP, PVC films containing varying amounts of DEHP were mounted on a cylindrical shaft and rotated at 5 and 40 ÂC"

      Seriously.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Also in plastic containers. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Are plastics immune to electromagnetic radiation or something? The magnetron gets all the atoms jiggling as Feynman put it. The atoms and molecules that constitute food heat up faster than the plastic or stoneware but not always. I had a coffee cup that looked like all my other coffee cups but would be untouchable for minutes after microwaving. It was the one I insisted my unwelcome house guests use for their morning coffee. Too bad it broke.

    10. Re:Also in plastic containers. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The link references gaseous diffusion, you're right.

      Diffusion from a container into the food it contains would likely be much faster, particularly if there are fatty foods in the container (most of the toxins in question are fat-soluble).

      You wouldn't need to inhale anything, as ingestion poses much the same problems. Note also that diffusion into a liquid poses much the same relationship to temperature as diffusion in a gas (and above boiling, of course, we are talking about gaseous diffusion).

      Consider a plastic container (such as a takeout soup container) containing liquid with a high fat content (like most soups), put into a microwave at high power until boiling. Moment temps at the bottom and sides of the container often exceed 140 C. This gas then percolates through the soup, where it is cooled back down to a liquid. Any toxins in that gas are now either dissolved or suspended in the liquid.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:Also in plastic containers. by profplump · · Score: 1

      You have a microwave that easily creates temperatures over 100C? When you have food in it?

    12. Re:Also in plastic containers. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Yes, and so do you (if you have a microwave).

      Ever light popcorn on fire in a microwave?

      Or superheated a bowl of water until it "blows up" in a steam flash?

      All you need is an airtight container and some water, and you can boil the water and then heat the steam to a very high temperature (this is how you light popcorn on fire -- the cellulose opf the popcorn acts an airtight container for tiny amounts of water, which superheat).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  18. And it will be because you mentioned it.... by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    ...or will it?

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  19. The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Troll

    More comment, continuing from above. The abstract in ScienceDirect says, "An analysis of the associations between indoor environmental variables in 2000 as well as other background factors and the ASD diagnosis indicated five statistically significant variables: (1) maternal smoking; (2) male sex; (3) economic problems in the family; (4) condensation on windows, a proxy for low ventilation rate in the home; (5) PVC flooring, especially in the parents' bedroom."

    What? Male sex?

    Another quote from the "scientific" paper: "... parental-reported autistic spectrum disorders..."

    What is "autistic spectrum"? Can parents report autistic behavior accurately? Maybe the child is just trying to protect himself or herself from the abusive behavior of the parents. Is that autism?

    To me the abstract indicates very weak investigation. More importantly, Scientific American proved itself to be untrustworthy, in my opinion.

    Not an April Fools joke: "Received 11 November 2008; accepted 30 January 2009. Available online 10 February 2009."

    Sensationalistic "science" news is a huge money-maker: "If you do not have a User Name and Password, click the "Register to Purchase" button below to purchase this article. Price: US $ 31.50"

    Fraud? In my opinion, there is definitely some element of fraud: The headline in Scientific American: "Scientists Find 'Baffling' Link between Autism and Vinyl Flooring" Headline of the photo caption: "Is vinyl bad for baby?" Disclaimer in the body of the article: 'The scientists were surprised by their finding, calling it "far from conclusive." ' The Scientific American article emphasized one factor, when 5 were reported, including smoking by the mother. Smoking definitely puts poisons in the blood. A pregnant mother who smokes poisons her baby.

    Definition of fraud: A deliberate deception used to achieve some gain.

    Was whoever wrote the article or placed the article in Scientific American paid to sensationalize the story? Was someone at Slashdot paid?

    1. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Male babies are more likely to be autistic than female babies.

      An already well verified statistic, go google it before getting in a lather about that bit.

    2. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by vlm · · Score: 5, Informative

      What? Male sex?

      Well, I guess we know whats on your mind... think adjective, not verb. That disease is much more common in boys than girls.

      What is "autistic spectrum"?

      The symptoms range from pretty freaking minor to pretty awful. Despite there being no firm obvious medically detectable difference between diseases, and also that it is always possible to find a patient right in the middle of two precisely defined "definitions" the medical community overall prefers to label different degrees of one disease as entirely separate diseases, and a semi-passive aggressive way to make fun of that is to refer to "the autistic spectrum". Not all doctors agree, and many of them also use terms like "autistic spectrum".

      Can parents report autistic behavior accurately?

      Guess you didn't read the article, since it explained that 72 parents told them they had a diagnosis, then the surveyors checked up on ten of them by talking to their doctors, and the story from the parents matched the doctors story. Ten out of ten told the truth, so probably, at least 90% of the 72 did accurately report a positive diagnosis. There are also some notes in the article about how they had to follow the swedish rules for medical reporting with regards to finding that info, no idea what that requires. There are some diseases that people lie about, most commonly the level of obesity, also there are mental health problems that inherently involve lying, but lying about a positive autism diagnosis is apparently not an issue, at least in Sweden. Doesn't look like they checked up on people whom claimed negative but perhaps their doctors might say positive, so its not exactly a perfect study, but not too bad.

      Was whoever wrote the article or placed the article in Scientific American paid to sensationalize the story?

      Dude don't know if you've read SciAm over a long period, but over decades its gone from a somewhat light version of Science or Nature toward something that I feel is the "weekly world news" or "national enquirer" of the science journalism world. Also page count has gone from small town phone book to mid double digits at best. Its a shame the editors ran it into the ground and stomped on the corpse... if they had not, I'd still be a subscriber. In fact, if they had not run it into the ground, I'd be glad to pay twice the subscription fee. So, in summary, uh, yeah, it might be just slightly sensationalized.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by HolyChao · · Score: 1

      What? Male sex?

      Well, I guess we know whats on your mind... think adjective, not verb.

      Don't you mean, "Think noun, not noun?"

    4. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      A pregnant mother who smokes poisons her baby.

      Nonsense! My mother smoked and I have no mental problems, you inanimate object that exists only for my amusement!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Its a shame the editors ran it into the ground and stomped on the corpse... if they had not, I'd still be a subscriber.

      There are good alternatives, such as 16 pages of weekly ad-sparse science coverage.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by skroops · · Score: 1

      science news is bi-weekly now

    7. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Additionally, this holds true for all behavioral/mental norm divergence. That is, females have a very tight distribution in terms of mental characteristics: not too many savants, idiots, dolts, geniuses, masterminds, or anything like that. Yes, there are intelligent women (or stupid women), they're just usually not as drastically predisposed (call it polarized) as men, and there aren't nearly as many of them, either.

      Men, on the other hand, are less like a hump and more like a recurve bow, when it comes to the distribution. IE, there are a lot fewer 'normal' men than there are 'normal' women, statistically. Men are more statistically likely to have mental disorders (if you consider the norm a lack of disorder) than women.

      This is, of course, discounting the argument that women are weak, feeble-minded, and are prone to things like fear and flights of fancy. You know, how women used to be viewed.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:The article and abstract seem very weak to me. by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      The fascinating and important thing about autism as a spectrum disorder is that necessarily we all fall somewhere in that spectrum.

      --
      snig
  20. Obvious... by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    since the discovery years ago that leisure suits cause cancer.

    1. Re:Obvious... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      and that suits in general cause brain atrophy

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  21. April fools by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

    Geez... no Slashdot today for me.

  22. God damn April Fools! by GF678 · · Score: 1

    This makes me angry! Seems like I can't go anywhere without being tricked by some stupid trick.

    Ahhh, at least I can view my cat videos on YouTube without any prob....

    qnno no up

    1. Re:God damn April Fools! by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      It's not a April Fool when the article is dated 31st MARCH. Why the fuck would someone joke about kids getting autism?

    2. Re:God damn April Fools! by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would someone joke about kids getting autism?

      Since they(the medical community) changed the definition of autism to the autism spectrum of disorders, such that according to some statistics 1 in 150 babies are born w/ autism. At that rate, 0.67% of the population, autism becomes funny since the term has lost its orginal meaning.

      PS. Captcha-> contrite, wow I think the slash code has absorbed the evil AI from nethack.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:God damn April Fools! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      why the fuck would someone take pictures of them spreading there ass cheeks? why would people try to trick others into viewing it?

      No this isn't a AF joke, but there is nothing that someone won't won't joke about.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  23. Why is this funny? by tygerstripes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Low income. Increases the likelihood of smoking, vinyl flooring, poorly ventilated housing and... oh look, it's right there in the list: "family economic problems".

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Why is this funny? by fastest+fascist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How does it increase autism though, if not through environmental factors brought on by poverty?

    2. Re:Why is this funny? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      you are what you eat.
      low income usually involves low quality dietary considerations.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Why is this funny? by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 1

      poorly ventilated housing

      i don't know how much time you have spent around the homes of the working and lower classes, but they have windows too. it is the upper middle class that wrap their new houses in Tyvek.

    4. Re:Why is this funny? by radtea · · Score: 0

      Low income.

      Yeah, but "low income" isn't an industry you can sue.

      It's actually a race between which will come first: someone here saying "correlation is not causation" and a lawyer starting a class action suit against vinyl floor manufacturers and installers, as well as landlords who rent units with vinyl floors.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:Why is this funny? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Mental problems (including but not limited to low intelligence) cause poverty. Mental problems in parents also cause increased mental problems in children. (However, as family economic problems are listed as a separate issue, I suspect that this is at least somewhat corrected for in the studies. It still might not be correct enough for, though. This is hard to tell as the "Original Article" linked from Slashdot doesn't refer the original scientific article published in some unmentioned peer-reviewed journal.)

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    6. Re:Why is this funny? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Poor nutrition due to being less able to avoid proper foods. Poor working conditions (take what jobs you can get). Drug/alcohol/abuse issues.

      Plenty of poor conditions tend to come along with the overall situation of "poverty"

    7. Re:Why is this funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smoke. And because I smoke, I don't have the extra income to spend on a better house with better ventilation. With no ventilation, things begin to stink quickly, so in an effort to combat the ever increasing smell, I installed vinyl flooring. Between the cheesy vinyl flooring, the smell, and the crappy house, I have no friends and have a hard time dealing with people which all leads to "family economic problems".

      Ever think that maybe being poor isn't the root cause...

    8. Re:Why is this funny? by necro81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe, but I haven't heard that autism has much - if any - correlation to socioeconomic status. Early work in the 1940s by a guy named Kanner indicated that, if anything, it correlates with high socioeconomic status. Today there isn't any real consensus that I can find.

      In any event, there are plenty of rich families with autistic children. Instead of vinyl flooring, they've probably got Italian marble, or carpeting made from the eyelashes of Andean llamas, or a zen rock garden in the kitchen, or whatever the hell passes for luxury flooring these days.

    9. Re:Why is this funny? by subtr4ct · · Score: 1

      Without reading the article, the fact that economic status is mentioned in the summary most likely indicates that this was controlled for. That is to say, there is a statistically significant correspondence between vinyl flooring and autism, even when that correspondence is conditioned on economic status. So low income is most likely not the common cause you are looking for.

    10. Re:Why is this funny? by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 3, Funny

      After studying young adults, it has been noted that keggers cause jumps to conclusions later in the study.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    11. Re:Why is this funny? by dcollins · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Low income. Increases the likelihood of smoking, vinyl flooring, poorly ventilated housing and... oh look, it's right there in the list: "family economic problems".

      New tag: "Unsupportedwildspeculationisnotcausation".

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    12. Re:Why is this funny? by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      Ever think that if smoking consumes an appreciable enough portion of your income as to hinder your ability to afford better living quarters, that you are, in fact, poor?

      Poor != Destitute, although, poor is a subjective title; I drive a BMW (and own 3 other cars) and own a house that I built 4 years ago, and compared to some of my friends I'm quite poor. No vinyl floors though, so my future offspring are clearly safe...

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    13. Re:Why is this funny? by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that with or without a jump to conclusions mat?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    14. Re:Why is this funny? by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Autism might not actually correlate with richness, it might simply be diagnosed more.

    15. Re:Why is this funny? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Low income. Increases the likelihood of smoking, vinyl flooring, poorly ventilated housing and... oh look, it's right there in the list: "family economic problems".

      IQ accounts for somewhere between 16% and 25% of income variance. Thus low IQ is correlated with low income, and both be correlated with vinyl flooring....

    16. Re:Why is this funny? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      So you have no study, you don't know what rich people have in their house, and make no definition for the word 'plenty'.

      You also fail to note that at one time Vinyl flooring was for rich people.

      Yes, you just keep rocking~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Why is this funny? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      hmm... poor is most likely caused by stupidity. Which is what I would say about someone that smokes to the detriment of all other aspects of his life.

    18. Re:Why is this funny? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Of course, that itself would require deeper study. Does it really correlate with high socioeconomic status or does it just mean poor families have no access to a specialist who will diagnose autism. Perhaps, instead, poor kids with mild autism are just 'odd' or 'slow'.

    19. Re:Why is this funny? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The causation may be the other way -- autism may increase the risk of poverty. If you don't smile and look shifty, you tend to be less advantaged in the job market. And children whose parents and grandparents were autists are possibly more likely to inherit the trait. And the crappy house.

    20. Re:Why is this funny? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Of course, that itself would require deeper study. Does it really correlate with high socioeconomic status or does it just mean poor families have no access to a specialist who will diagnose autism. Perhaps, instead, poor kids with mild autism are just 'odd' or 'slow'.

      And vice versa: Children of rich parents are never characterized as "slow" -- the parents will send the children to specialist after specialist until an explanatory diagnosis can be bought. Often, this will be "autism".

      So expect a severely inflated figure for the wealthiest.

    21. Re:Why is this funny? by Jesterr · · Score: 1

      whatever the hell passes for luxury flooring these days.

      Peasants. Same as it's always been.

    22. Re:Why is this funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    23. Re:Why is this funny? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Early work in the 1940s by a guy named Kanner indicated that, if anything, it correlates with high socioeconomic status.

      In the 1940s, the indicators of poverty were different: I suspect vinyl flooring, smoking indoors (in the home due to social calls and more free time), indoor condensation was higher due to higher indoor temperatures during the winter, and so on. Granted, I don't know when vinyl came about, but it seems plausible to me.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    24. Re:Why is this funny? by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Autism can lead to lower income. I have friends with autistic kids, and trust me, special care for such kids can be extremely expensive, dealing with the problems of an autistic kid takes up more time, and drags down family and puts stress on relationships ... all things that can lead to lower income. Plus, if there is a genetic basis, then the parents are probably more likely to have learning difficulties too in the first place, so they'll be likelier to have ended up in lower earning jobs (just as their kids would someday).

    25. Re:Why is this funny? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      It's good enough for Slashdot, though.

    26. Re:Why is this funny? by Macrat · · Score: 1

      When your poor, it's not diagnosed at all... Everyone just refers to the poor kid that is a little slow.

    27. Re:Why is this funny? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      As if there were people on a high-quality diet in the US... Ha. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  24. Oblig. XKCD by Kryis · · Score: 2, Insightful
  25. Microsoft is to blame by mrv00t · · Score: 0

    ...factors associated with autism...windows

    I knew it! It's Microsoft's fault!

  26. God the old carcinogenic studies please by slashbart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They once analyzed all the constituents of coffee (hundreds) and found that a quarter or so of them are carcinogenic. So we all should be pretty much dead by now.
    So how do you study carcinogenicity: Simple. You feed a couple of rodents that you don't particularly like 5% of their bodyweight of a certain stuff each day, and see how many of them develop cancer within their short lifespans. Now comes the fun part: You extrapolate the 5% bodyweight daily ratio to 1 ppm bodyweight daily ratio, and similary divide the rate of mammal acquiring cancer. Voila, a new PhD promotion based on the completely meritless assumption that there is any kind of linearity involved in these rates.
    I know a lot of current research is not so stupid, but most of the 1970's cancer scares were based pretty much on the scenario I just described.

    Determining whether or not a compound is carcinogenic in humans is extremely hard, except for the really bad ones.

    1. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by polar+red · · Score: 1

      Determining whether or not a compound is carcinogenic in humans is extremely hard

      I still find every chemical must be tested thoroughly before bringing it into the environment, our livers and kidneys ar feeling the strain allready.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      There is still a lot of this sort of study going on. Also corrections for base cancer rate in mice and rats is often not done. We use mice and rats cus that natural rate is pretty high. Finally there are a lot of things that are bad in high doses but harmless or even beneficial in small doses. Some are even needed (aka vitamin A IIRC)

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    3. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      This is quite impossible and not really needed. Also as pointed out, its useless if the tests are meaningless. further is the bias introduced via publishing. Its easy to get "Kryptonite causes cancer" published. But getting "Chemical X totally harmless" is a lot harder sell. Also liability concerns which add further bias preventing any official line claiming something as harmless.

      You could always live in a oxygen tent and only let in fully test "chemicals". But that would make the strictest vegan look like a food liberalist.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    4. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by slashbart · · Score: 1

      So how would you do that? Test every chemical? The natural world on its own already has millions of different compounds, many of them toxic, some of them scarily toxic (box jelly fish toxin, botulinus toxin).
      We don't have the capability to test everything, we don't have the capability to test even a fraction, we don't have good methods for testing low toxicity compounds, we don't have methods for testing carcinogenicity in humans at all, because we can't experiment
      All we have are epidemiological studies that are typically so polluted with cross-correlations that the honest ones will not provide any definite answers.
      Welcome to the real world.

      Or did you forget your sarcasm/funny tag when you wrote every

    5. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by rve · · Score: 1

      EVERYTHING causes cancer in rats. ALL laboratory rats, provided they don't die prematurely of an infection, will develop tumors.

      Pet rats, lab rats, they're funny, fluffy, curious creatures, but boy are they ever susceptible to health problems, especially cancer.

      There has been little selection pressure against susceptibility to cancer in their evolution, because rats are just considered so damn tasty by a huge, varied range of predators. In the wild, they won't last more than a year to 18 months, as by that age they start to slow down and fatten up a bit. In addition to that, lab rats (and pet rats) are victims of extreme levels of inbreeding.

    6. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      You could always live in a oxygen tent and only let in fully test "chemicals".

      Sorry, bub. Oxyegn is off the list too.

      Recent studies have concluded, without exception, that every single case of lung cancer in humans was contracted by a person who breathed in and used oxygen in respiration.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      They once analyzed all the constituents of coffee (hundreds) and found that a quarter or so of them are carcinogenic. So we all should be pretty much dead by now.

      Something I found interesting working with a radiotherapy doc (PhD style) was that you have cancer cells. I have cancer cells. Everybody has cancer cells, all the time. It's only a concern when they get out of hand.

      The other thing I found interesting was when one of his ex grad students (who had done a thesis on dose measurement, involving lots of close proximity to radiotherapy machines) died at age 24 of a rare and unexplained form of blood borne cancer.

    8. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by polar+red · · Score: 1

      Or did you forget your sarcasm/funny tag when you wrote every

      No, what I actually meant was manmade/massproduced

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    9. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      "Its easy to get "Kryptonite causes cancer" published."

      That's because it's something that can readily be scientifically determined.

      "But getting "Chemical X totally harmless" is a lot harder sell."

      And no real scientist will ever tell you that, or try to get it publushed, because that's not science. Totally harmless includes a LOT of things besides testing if something is mutagenic. What exact series of tests are you going to use to scientifically conclude something is totally harmless? You don't have one because that's a big big question. All you can say is you cannot determine any know side effects.

      It's not publishing bias to say only things you can actually prove, and not say stupid things you can't prove.

    10. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      But getting "Chemical X is not cancer causing" is a lot harder sell.

      Is what i meant. I work as a scientist. There is a publishing bias. There are even papers published showing the bias.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    11. Re:God the old carcinogenic studies please by maxume · · Score: 1

      As long as you pay for it, no problem. The rest of us will just have to muddle through until you are done.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  27. Balderdash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't believe it until I hear it from a washed-out, uninformed celebrity.

    1. Re:Balderdash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't believe it until I hear it from a washed-out, uninformed celebrity.

      I'm waiting for confirmation of netcraft...

  28. Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "correlation is not causation"
    Its very unfortunate that everyone in the world doesn't know the difference. It would solve so many problems in the world, if everyone was forced to learn the difference throughout school and in everyday adult life. Everyone would find life so much better as so many arguments would be avoided and things would get fixed quicker. The people behind funding education in science need to focus a vast amount of time, money and effort into promoting understanding in this simple yet vital bit of education. (I would go as far as to say we need a day per year to remind everyone, like a "world correlation is not causation day!" ... and i'm not joking, we really need to get everyone in the world finally past this stumbling block.

    "autism AND vinyl flooring."
    It could also simply be for example, (on average) more autistic people prefer and enjoy the look, patterning, practical ease of use, feel and/or smell of vinyl flooring. Its like saying, which comes first, Autism or Vinyl flooring.

    They could just as easily say looking at the sea causes Autism ... because they will find (if they bother to study it) that most Autistic people will (on average) enjoy spending longer looking at the sea waves with their every changing details and changing specular highlights as they break and merge combined with the complex yet rhythmic sounds of the waves breaking on the beach etc..

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Roxton · · Score: 1, Insightful

      See, the biggest problem with "correlation is not causation" is that it's a tool most frequently used by post-conclusion rationalizers -- people who start from a conclusion, and then create a rationale to justify it. Such people only feel compelled to discount evidence that runs contrary to their conclusion, which is much easier than actually justifying one's position in the face of alternatives. "Correlation is not causation" is a very simple formula for discounting overwhelming bodies of evidence.

    2. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Cube+Steak · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the study to figure out if they established a causal link or are you just out of hand dismissing it?

    3. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "correlation is not causation"
      It could also simply be for example, (on average) more autistic people prefer and enjoy the look, patterning, practical ease of use, feel and/or smell of vinyl flooring. Its like saying, which comes first, Autism or Vinyl flooring.

      Do you people even read summaries anymore ?
      "CHILDREN who live in homes with vinyl floors"

      Disregarding that, poor living conditions are likely to cause developmental problems, surprise surprise.

    4. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      While it is true that correlation is not necessarily causation, where there is true causation, you will find a strong correlation. So looking for correlations is one way to find causations.

      It could also simply be for example, (on average) more autistic people prefer and enjoy the look, patterning, practical ease of use, feel and/or smell of vinyl flooring.
      But we are talking about kids developing autism around the age of two, because their parents chose vinyl flooring. So unless the parents have a genetic predisposition to both autism and vinyl flooring, or the toddler gets to pick out the flooring, then that explanation probably doesn't hold.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by gnieboer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, while the correlation != causation is a time-honored /. tenet, the researchers here do actually clearly grasp this concept, note all the clear caveats on just the summary.

      To -prove- a causation requires a correlation.
      You can either theorize a causation and later prove correlation (Einstein/Relativity)
      Or find a correlation and later construct a causation that explains it (Gravity, Why girlfriends dump guys after they show off their Battlestar Galatica action figure collection) [often requires additional specific correlation experiments to rule out other causation theories]

      In this case, I think the researchers have made fair statements about their work, that it indicates a general direction to continue to look for a causation.

      I wish them luck in curing Autism!

    6. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "So unless the parents have a genetic predisposition to both autism and vinyl flooring"

      There is a strong connection between genetics and autism. The problem with any discussion on autism is that the spectrum of autism is so wide it covers many forms of autism. So its wrong to simply generalize to say all forms of autism have a genetic basis, but most do have a strong genetic basis.

      The vinyl flooring aspect I was saying more tongue in cheek. ;) Although that said, autistics do often have a very strong focus on small details (I was imagining the very detailed patterns that can be printed in vinyl flooring ;) ... (Although joking aside, this very strong focus is what gives an advantage in jobs such as science, engineering and art ... all these areas need extremely detailed and long term study).

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    7. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "I wish them luck in curing Autism"

      That's what the drugs companies want (they smell money to be made) and its what *a few* Autistics want. Its *NOT* what all Autistics want.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    8. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more autistic people prefer and enjoy the look, patterning, practical ease of use, feel and/or smell of vinyl flooring

      Who knows, maybe toddles are usually who determine which type of flooring may be installed. Maybe autists have some sort of mind control capabilities to do so. But, what comes first, Autism or Amazing Super Powers?

    9. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would go as far as to say we need a day per year to remind everyone, like a "world correlation is not causation day!" ... and i'm not joking, we really need to get everyone in the world finally past this stumbling block.

      Just remember, if they did this, your post here may not have caused the movement.

    10. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Derosian · · Score: 1

      The problem with your example is the child would have to grow up around vinyl flooring to develop autism. So basically the example says because autistic children like staring at vinyl carpets, children who stare at vinyl carpets will become autistic. No, and I understand it is just an example, but with this study, the logical next step is to run some control studies, where you have this number of families with vinyl flooring and this number without and find out the number of children with autism. Hopefully without people like you obfuscating the issue, with correlation and causation. Yes the article does jump to conclusions, but the correlation is still there and a good beginning theory are the phthalates. Now stop being so anal.

    11. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 0

      "Did you even read the study to figure out if they established a causal link or are you just out of hand dismissing it?"

      No, I'm not out of hand dismissing it. But while we are on that point, I don't believe the research, because I have also researched Autism. Also every few months some researchers claim they have found the reason for Autism, yet interestingly each have different explanations. The funny thing is they can't all be correct, yet interestingly they all think they have the answer.

      In fact I know Autism extremely well, because I am autistic, and frankly hell will freeze over before I would ever let anyone cure me of what advantages it gives me in seeing patterns in things non-autistics often cannot see. Non-autistics of course often do not believe any form of Autism has any advantage. Often non-autistics ego's simply will not allow the thought others could see things they cannot and so they are very quick to seek ways to put down Autistics.

      Also before you say it, you bet I'm militant about it. For too long I've watched autistics being put down by non-autistics for not conforming to non-autistics expected patterns of behavior and for too long many autistics who could go on to achieve good things, have instead been lead to believe they cannot achieve much in life. Many autistics can achieve great things and more would if the educational approaches were altered to suit (and respect) autistic needs and their way of thinking about the world. (Plus I'm not just talking about groups such as HFA and Aspergers etc.. I'm talking about helping lots of forms of autistics). The drug companies also see autistics as a big money making market and they are helping to promote and market the idea so many autistics need help. Far fewer than the drug companies want people to believe actually need drug company help.

      I've also noticed a lot of misdiagnoses going on with autistics which is just helping to make discussions about Autism more complex. Its also often so hard to say anything about Autism without someone jumping in and talking about, the Savants who do need help. Yes they do need help, but there are more forms of autistics than just this high profile group and even Savants can be greatly helped with better suited education.

      @Cube Steak: Anyway back to my point. (That is unless you want me to extend this into a 200 page essay on the subject of Autism). My point was about correlation & causation. This is a discussion forum you know. Discussions evolve as one person says something, which prompts others to reply to extend the discussion. (Its what makes this a discussion forum!). I simply said about the importance of getting everyone worldwide (on every subject) to distinguish between correlation & causation. That point still stands.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    12. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Its very unfortunate that everyone in the world doesn't know the difference. It would solve so many problems in the world, if everyone was forced to learn the difference throughout school and in everyday adult life.

      It is also unfortunate that everyone in the world can't read. For example, nowhere in the summary or article does anyone assert "causation"; therefore, this objection is entirely irrelevant in here. (As another poster points out, "correlationisnotcausation" has become Slashdot shorthand for "I choose to ignore all of your scientific evidence".)

      What are these researchers supposed to do, not publish their findings because they establish correlation? In research like this, it is the very strongest possible finding that could be had (until we start doing double-blind experiments on children raised in enclosed environments).

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    13. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "Hopefully without people like you obfuscating the issue, with correlation and causation."

      To partly use (with some humour) your own words to answer your point ... Hopefully without people like you being unable to see I wasn't saying what you assume, (about vinyl flooring and autism) then you wouldn't bother wasting time obfuscating the issue about correlation and causation. ;)

      Joking aside, yes the correlation is still there, but that correlation isn't proof its causation. Its just one more correlation with autism, (which is why I gave my somewhat joking point about sea waves, which are also just one more correlation with autism, but are most definately not the cause of autism).

      Frankly I would be happy for them to continue to believe vinyl flooring is the problem. After all, that clearly explains why autism has existed throughout history as its common knowlege stone age mankind prefered vinyl flooring, giving rise the now near epidemic levels of autistics like me which must now be cured from the face of humanity. ;) ... so I'm all for them believing vinyl flooring is the problem. ;)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    14. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 1

      I was replying the point about correlation and causation. Its a discussion forum after all ... Therefore someone says something then someone else replies to that to *continue* *that* discussion. Clearly you can't see that's the case.

      As for your other comments thats answered here...
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1182839&cid=27415159

      and here...
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1182839&cid=27416205

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    15. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "Just remember, if they did this, your post here may not have caused the movement."

      Very true! :) ... but still, it would be about as correlated with the movement, as Vinyl flooring is with Autism. ;)

      Joking aside, I wouldn't want any connection or fame from any kind of movement, I just want to live in a world where everyone in the world finally understood the difference. :) ... ([disclaimer_to_some_posters], yes I know some do, but many don't, which is why we all need to tell others who don't.[disclaimer_end])

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    16. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      really? those children are making decoration decisions about flooring?

      "correlation is not causation"

      I hate that statement. How about:
      "correlation does not necessarily mean causation"

      However, you will have correlation if there is causation.

      All this is covered when they said it is not conclusive. from what I read it seems to me there is enough evidence to warrant another study.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Few? I guess you asked all of the non-verbal autistics what they wanted? Do you consider behavior analysis and modification to be "curing" ala ABA?

    18. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I've also noticed a lot of misdiagnoses going on with autistics

      Interesting... you said you've done research? Are you a doctor? Or a person with the condition that's done a lot of research? The former qualifies your statement about misdiagnoses. The latter means your opinion matters as much as mine does.

    19. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      "correlation is not causation"
      Its very unfortunate that everyone in the world doesn't know the difference. It would solve so many problems in the world, if everyone was forced to learn the difference throughout school and in everyday adult life.

      So you're saying that the number of problems in the world and the number of people who don't know the difference are correlated? ;-)

    20. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, if every pseudo-intellectual would quit throwing "correlation is not causation" at every finding ever, it might actually hold weight with people in the middle-ground. Not saying YOU are a pseudo-intellectual--it's just a phrase that every college sophomore (after they took the class as a freshman) likes to use to sound smarter than they are. You could say there's no such thing as causation ever--only high correlations, or you could say that everything is causation (just with a low correlations). It's pedantic, dumb, and a waste of time.

    21. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      Now you make *me* want to go and look at the sea... All the pretty shapes and colors...

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    22. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Derosian · · Score: 1

      Frankly I would be happy for them to continue to believe vinyl flooring is the problem. After all, that clearly explains why autism has existed throughout history as its common knowlege stone age mankind prefered vinyl flooring, giving rise the now near epidemic levels of autistics like me which must now be cured from the face of humanity. ;) ... so I'm all for them believing vinyl flooring is the problem. ;)

      I'm sorry but just because you are afflicted with a malady it does not make you an expert on it. Also.

      Yes, finally someone who shares my opinion that all Hypercapnia problems since the stone age have been caused by people trying to breathe in from the tail pipes of cars, lets just forget about the fact that cars have only been around a few centuries! /sarcasm Listen, I'm not saying that this is THE cause, in fact I don't even know if this is A cause. There is a correlation, perhaps the chemical can help aid people's brains into that direction. We don't know, that is what more sciencing is for. ;D

      Lastly, through wikipedia and other varies sources. You can see vinyl usage becoming very prevalent around the 1980s, ever since it was discovered by a scientist in the 1920s there have been more and more uses for it. Now if you look at Autism they have a jump in Autistic diagnosis in the 1980s, unfortunately due to new diagnostic means at the time, they can't draw a conclusion because of it, because they were also realizing a lot more people were autistic than previously diagnosed.

    23. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Is autism inheritable? And if so, one would think that the study would have controlled for that...

    24. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      The opinion of an intelligent layman who has done extensive research can be better than that of a professional. He doesn't have many of the professional's motivations to lie, for instance; and can bring cross-disciplinary knowledge to bear.

      Usually they're just cranks, of course; but not always.

    25. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer "Does not imply causation, which is what they actually mean.

      In deductive logic the fallacy would be Affirming the Consequent, which is taking a causal relationship and inverting it to assert the existence of the cause from the existence of the effect.

      A->B
      B

      Therefore A

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    26. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by edraven · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that you've observed a correlation between a belief that correlation is not causation and an ability to solve problems and avoid arguments.

    27. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by averner · · Score: 1

      "correlation is not causation" Its very unfortunate that everyone in the world doesn't know the difference. It would solve so many problems in the world, if everyone was forced to learn the difference throughout school and in everyday adult life. Everyone would find life so much better as so many arguments would be avoided and things would get fixed quicker. The people behind funding education in science need to focus a vast amount of time, money and effort into promoting understanding in this simple yet vital bit of education. (I would go as far as to say we need a day per year to remind everyone, like a "world correlation is not causation day!" ... and i'm not joking, we really need to get everyone in the world finally past this stumbling block.

      Are you implying that the correlation between the understanding of correlation vs. causation and the world's problems implies causation between them?

      --
      Member of the 7 Digit UID Club
    28. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Bad form to reply to myself, but I just wanted to add in a link.

      Given "Expert" Advice, Brains Shut Down

      The nature of the world is such that authorities, by their very nature of being authoritative, are subject to pressures to provide biased or invalid information. Not always, and not even most of the time, but sometimes. That's why one must always maintain a critical attitude.

    29. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Why would the drug companies want a cure?

      Treatments are more profitable.

    30. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the "intelligent layman" argument you presented is nonsence. The reason is that he's reading the research of said professionals, but without the qualifications to properly interperate it.

      All your link shows is that people don't think as much as they should when an expert weighs in. It doesn't show that "authorities, by their very nature of being authoritative, are subject to pressures to provide biased or invalid information." The expert may or may not be honest, and your citation does nothing to address that point. That's why we have second opinons and such.

      At any rate, none of what you said matters; the OP isn't likely a doctor, and thus is not qualified to diagnose autism. He's therefore equally unqualified to assert that "[he's] also noticed a lot of misdiagnoses going on with autistics." It's like those that say the traffic pattern was designed wrong, but their only qualification is driving, not in civil engineering.

    31. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's why the researchers involved are careful to point out that the link is tenuous, is unconfirmed, and is only a correlation.

      Maybe schools should work on reading comprehension first, and get to the subtleties of correlation vs. causation later.

    32. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you find an autistic who doesn't want there to be a cure for autism, smack him or her.

      Choosing not to be cured is one thing. Hoping nobody can be cured is another.

    33. Re:Causation & vinyl flooring. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Stop it. The average Slashdotter can't hold more than a four word meme in his head. At that, it's a good thing two of those words are small. Asking them to grasp the subtleties of what they're ACTUALLY saying is expecting way, way too much.

  29. Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are only not supposed to take kdawson seriously on April 1st?

  30. Why is parent moderated funny??? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Its not funny, he is sadly correct.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Why is parent moderated funny??? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Its not funny, he is sadly correct.

      The only thing that is funny is anyone looking for trust in the media. Remember while they didn't invent the term "biased", they've sure as hell perfected it.

  31. April Fools? If so, not funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is an April Fools joke then it's in bad taste.

  32. Look, I know it's April Fools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But there are some things you just shouldn't do on April Fool's Day, and one of them is encouraging parents of autistic children desperate to blame something for their children's condition. I mean, come on; this is a group that thinks vaccines can cause autism; they'll swallow this one hook, line, and sinker.

    1. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Joke or not, there is something in the "modern" environment that's making autism worse. Yeah, sure, it's always been around and was mostly un-noticed before, but it's getting noticed now because the severity is ratcheting up - fast.

    2. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is serious; it's a published paper. The SciAm article is from the 31st.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    3. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's called autistic kids surviving out of infancy. In the bad old days, they just would have died. Now, they don't, and get old enough that we notice they are off.

    4. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking idiot!! And there seem to be quite a few on /. today for some reason. It's NOT a joke. Why the fuck would anyone joke about autism in kids? Just fucking carry your commonsense around when you are out of your house.

    5. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Joke or not, there is something in the "modern" environment that's making autism worse. Yeah, sure, it's always been around and was mostly un-noticed before, but it's getting noticed now because the severity is ratcheting up - fast.

      Is it?

      Most of the studies I've seen indicate that autism rates haven't really changed. What has changed is the range of stuff that we classify as autism.

      Of course it's also possible that one of the disorders lumped in with autism is increasing in prevalence from some environmental factor. But as for the massive increases in diagnoses that's due to improved detection and a wider swath of disorders.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      The kids are a lot more visible in the schools now, 30 years ago there were 1/50 boys that were "very shy" or "awkward", now there are 1/50 boys that are labeled autistic, and half of them wouldn't have been called "very shy" or "awkward" 30 years ago they would have been called bat-shit crazy.

      Maybe it's because of "mainstreaming" that they're more visible now. Certainly there have been bat-shit crazy kids since time immemorial, and in the past they did get swept under the rug (out to the portable, or off campus altogether).

    7. Re:Look, I know it's April Fools... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Stuff like this doesn't do anything to convince me that the "modern environment" isn't involved.

  33. I hope their kids get cancer... by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If this is an April Fools joke. My kid's autistic. Now that all our fine scientists got a good laugh at his expense, I hope their kids all die of cancer.

    Well, not really, but I am pissed off. Fucking assholes. At least we should shoot them all.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I hope their kids get cancer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Select your spawns.

    2. Re:I hope their kids get cancer... by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      The article, which was released yesterday, is dated 31st March! How often will this have to be said in this thread before people actually read it?

    3. Re:I hope their kids get cancer... by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I agree, unhelpful jest, hope you find some better class of april 1st humor elsewhere.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  34. More Desperate Reaching Research by flyneye · · Score: 1

    None of those factors were present around my autistic son.
              Bad research, go try again.
    Autism research has a history of this sort of thing. Nothing new here,move along.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:More Desperate Reaching Research by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Who's to say that autism has a single cause? The way you're taking it you'd think people who don't smoke shouldn't get lung cancer and people who don't sun themselves shouldn't get skin cancer, but yet it happens.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:More Desperate Reaching Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what they are saying is that there is a higher number of people who had autism because of those factors. I didn't see anywhere where they said how those things caused autism. The trigger could be multiple things. Also it's hard to say that your wife(or significant other) wasn't exposed to phthalates at some point or that they didn't come from some other source. If it is a singular cause is it from when the child is directly exposed or the mother? I don't think they are really going to be using this data directly most likely this will stem out a new line of research targeting children with autism and the environment that they have. Maybe there are other environmental variables that need to be considered.

    3. Re:More Desperate Reaching Research by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I used to attend support groups where news like this came nearly monthly. It all led to nothing.
      I'm just burnt out on their fake research crap that doesn't help. It's all the same and ends up nowhere but in research dollars paying for someones mercedes. Bitter? yes! Burnt out on doublespeak like this? yes.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    4. Re:More Desperate Reaching Research by east+coast · · Score: 1

      So you'd rather that they do nothing about it than taking shots in the dark?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:More Desperate Reaching Research by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I'd rather they did some rigorous research.
      I'd rather there was more coming out for the money going in.
      I'd rather they released findings than guesses.
      Released guesses only build false hopes, do this on a regular basis and pretty soon it looks as though it's only a moneypit. Well its been 20 or so years I've been looking at the situation and I see lots of fireworks and smoke and no actual damage to the problem. Ergo moneypit.
              Yes I'd rather they did nothing and quit using up research dollars so it may be used later for inspired science instead of a carnival crapshoot.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  35. Wrong on condensation by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Condensation on windows doesn't imply bad ventilation, as the study authors suggest. Condensation happens when windows leak, so that the cold air coming through the leak chills the warmer air inside next to the window, lowering its dewpoint. So condensation on windows implies more air exchange between inside and out, not less. Air exchange of course is ventilation.

    Now, leaky windows with condensation tend to be older windows. Might they be older vinyl windows? Might they be older, wooden, lead painted windows? I don't know what's typical of windows in Sweden.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Wrong on condensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Condesation happens when the temperature of the surface is lower than the dew point of the sournding air. When condestation occurs the dew point of the air is lowered. The leaky window has nothing to do with it.

    2. Re:Wrong on condensation by wytcld · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The leaky window lowers the temperature of the surface next to the leak inside the window. That's where the condensation forms. Further, the continued flow of moisture-laden warm air out through the leak keeps the condensation building up - right on the part of the window closest to the leak.

      What windows are leaky? Older ones - either old wooden windows (also often with lead painted sashes), or older vinyl windows (the cheaper ones warp after a few years, and so leak). I have old wood, older vinyl, and new wood/vinyl windows in my house. There's a lot of condensation on the old wood windows (right by where they leak), moderate condensation on the older vinyl windows (immediately next to where they leak), and virtually none on the new wood/vinyl windows (but what little is there is - you guessed it - right at the part of the glass closest to the almost imperceptible leak where the two sashes meet).

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    3. Re:Wrong on condensation by geekoid · · Score: 1

      actually, cheap windows are single pain and the coldness of the class will cool the air and cause condensation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Wrong on condensation by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Condensation on windows doesn't imply bad ventilation, as the study authors suggest. Condensation happens when windows leak, so that the cold air coming through the leak chills the warmer air inside next to the window, lowering its dewpoint. So condensation on windows implies more air exchange between inside and out, not less. Air exchange of course is ventilation.

      This may be true where you are, but the scientists behind the study were in Sweden, where people don't run dehumidifiers (air conditioners), don't have clothes dryer exhausts or other holes in the wall, door stops are of the draft stopping type, and windows are almost invariably hermetically sealed glazing. Leaky windows just isn't an issue, while high indoor humidity can be, especially since Swedish bathrooms are wetrooms with a floor drain, and the Scandinavian habit of hanging trays of water on panel heaters.

      Especially during winter, the temperature difference between the outside and inside is so high that condensation forms on the windows if you don't open a door or window every now and then.
      This is especially true for newer housing that don't have pipes or leaky doors -- the whole housing unit tends to be hermetically sealed. To the point where you can't slam doors, because the air pressure differential prevents it.

  36. April Fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or typical kdawson crap? I'm not sure any more, either way the conclusion is the same.

  37. obliga by rve · · Score: 1

    ...There were 100,106 chemicals in use in the EU in 1981, when the last survey was performed...

    Water is a chemical. So are oxygen, nitrogen, glucose, all proteins. You are a big bag of chemicals yourself.

    Every single one of them can kill you, given a large enough dose. Think about that. Every time you exhale, you emit a noxious cloud H2O, CO2 and various organic compounds mixed in with the left over air. CO2 has been widely implicated in various environmental threats to the survival of life on earth.

    The only way you can avoid being surrounded by chemicals is to retreat to the vacuum of deep space.

    1. Re:obliga by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Water is a chemical.

      And its one we understand how to die by, so we can use it safely without killing ourselves. Can you say the same for the rest of them?

      "What you don't know, can't hurt you" has never been true. "What you do know, you can mitigate" is the creed we should be living by.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  38. Slashdot commenters found to be gullible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in, 99% of slashdot commenters found to be gullible on 4/1.

  39. Very Plausible by olddotter · · Score: 1

    This possibility is very plausible. I went scuba diving once with the guy from the EPA who discovered toxins released into the air by carpets. He got death threats from the carpet industry.

    More research is needed, but it would not surprise me for this link to be real. Given that knowledge of gases and toxins from man made fibers in carpet, its not hard to believe that the Vinyl flooring could cause similar problems.

    On a side note, some areas are banning vinyl mini blinds because they contain lead.
    http://parenting.ivillage.com/baby/bsafety/0,,429c,00.html
    Is lead in vinyl flooring also?
     

  40. This is clearly not an april fools joke by rve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not an april fools:

    - It was posted on SCiAM on 31 march
    - This isn't remotely a subject that SCiAM would make fun of (a more likely example would be an article claiming irrefutable evidence for intelligent design)
    - Falling for this, if it were a joke, wouldn't result in a minor embarrassment to be laughed at
    - Someone already posted links to the scientific articles:

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1182839&cid=27413449

  41. My thoughts by Kibblet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it IS vinyl flooring, it isn't from the kid, it's from pregnant mom, I think. Although we didn't have vinyl floors (and because of insurance screw-ups, didn't get my son properly vaccinated well until after he was full blown autistic), I was exposed to a lot of toxins (airborne) during my pregnancy. But the interesting thing is, in retrospect, he had signs of autism almost immediately after birth. Part of autism (which he has to the point where he cannot speak, and most likely will never live independently) can be sensory problems, and his are oral/eating related. He would not breastfeed. He would not take food from a bottle. He could not leave the hospital for two weeks because of this. Even when he got home, formula or breastmilk would pour down his face as much as it would pour into his mouth. I've spoken to other parents who saw signs, small ones, very very early on. Yes, my kid did have a bit of that 'developing ok and then all of a sudden went backwards' stuff, but he was already a bit off, I think. And he still does that today -- over the summer, without school, he lost the ability to communicate completely. It's just that parents seem to notice that first change. So vinyl floors? A bit of a reach. Something happening during pregnancy? A possibility. Toxins? A possibility. But my wood floors didn't 'save' my son.

    1. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you're one of the few who seem to be taking this seriously. What do you think about the other statement they made about there also being a link with condensation? A while back there was that study that showed that counties with a lot of precipitation in Washington, Oregon and California had double the cases of autism when compared to the drier counties. Moisture has now twice crept into being a factor. Very interesting.

    2. Re:My thoughts by lilo_booter · · Score: 1

      I am in a similar situation to yourself - my 8 year old autistic son is also incapable of speech.

      No vinyl floors here either, of course, and in the intervening years between then and the arrival of our second (perfectly normal) son, we had made quite a number of changes to the house, but I sincerely doubt that analysing those changes would reveal anything useful.

      Still, I always find it interesting to hear of these studies, even if they don't directly match our situation.

    3. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it IS vinyl flooring, it isn't from the kid, it's from pregnant mom, I think.

      Although we didn't have vinyl floors (and because of insurance screw-ups, didn't get my son properly vaccinated well until after he was full blown autistic), I was exposed to a lot of toxins (airborne) during my pregnancy.

      But the interesting thing is, in retrospect, he had signs of autism almost immediately after birth. Part of autism (which he has to the point where he cannot speak, and most likely will never live independently) can be sensory problems, and his are oral/eating related.

      He would not breastfeed. He would not take food from a bottle. He could not leave the hospital for two weeks because of this. Even when he got home, formula or breastmilk would pour down his face as much as it would pour into his mouth.

      I've spoken to other parents who saw signs, small ones, very very early on. Yes, my kid did have a bit of that 'developing ok and then all of a sudden went backwards' stuff, but he was already a bit off, I think. And he still does that today -- over the summer, without school, he lost the ability to communicate completely. It's just that parents seem to notice that first change.

      So vinyl floors? A bit of a reach. Something happening during pregnancy? A possibility. Toxins? A possibility. But my wood floors didn't 'save' my son.

      I have an ultrasound video of my AS son "stimming" in the womb at 9 weeks. Very wierd - and very reassuring in the blame department.

    4. Re:My thoughts by ardle · · Score: 1

      Any thoughts on this? I don't know how "mainstream" the thinking is but it is being proposed as a factor, i.e. could allow other damage to take place (they seem to be concentrating on newborns). There's research being done in the area. Obviously, scientific results tend based on statistics, rather than experiments - although some more ghoulish stuff has been done with monkeys.

  42. GeekSoundbites(TM) by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    I find that "correlation is not causation" to be a great way to filter out those with zero (well actually negative because they are actively spreading misinformation) knowledge of statistics.

    Personally I think it's a soundbite that states the obvious and is often abused.

    Science is the bussiness of correlating models to observations via pedictions, maths provides the language to do that. Soundbites can mean whatever you want them to, the easiest way to attack junk science is to attack the explicit and implicit assumptions it makes. The easiest way to dismiss someones work is with a soundbite.

    Papers like this are simply pointing out what common elements they found in the environments of parental-selected Autistic children. There were other correleations in the paper which, if nothing else, are usefull for showing what someone hasn't found. You report what you find, in a lot of cases that is "nothing". However an experiment that did "nothing" also lead to relativity.

    Disclaimer: I am assuming there is a peer-reviewed publication somewhere? - I don't care to read it but it would add credibility to the argument that the author(s) already understand basic statistical analysis. An alternate hypothisis is it's you who is missing something "obvious". The test of course would be to read the paper, OTOH if the "significant finding" is the vinyl/autisim thing then I can't think why a non-epidemiologist like me would bother. ;)

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by bartwol · · Score: 1
      Your remark regarding "correlation is not causation":

      Personally I think it's a soundbite that states the obvious and is often abused.

      Personally, I have never seen the correlation-is-not-causation comment used in a case where causation was established or compellingly indicated. As a "soundbite," it is invariably overshadowed by a much louder soundbite, a story headline, that has the unfortunate effect of spreading FUD precisely because the correlation-is-not-causation point is not widely understood.

      I have become increasingly suspicious of people such as yourself who suggest that the correlation-is-not-causation point is overused. We need only look at that how often correlation is REPORTED, how unlikely it is that such reported cases are subsequently demonstrated to have causation, to conclude that except in the narrower realms of research, THERE IS PROBABLY NOTHING PARTICULARLY USEFUL LEARNED HERE.

      Current political views of climate are being widely shaped by correlation that leads to INFERENCE, and in so many of those cases, causation is not established. Add to that the counter-scientific hubris of believing that correlation is so "strong" as to practically obviate the need for establishing causation, and suddenly, we have see the move to ACTION without causation. I have this nagging feeling you may be okay with that, which would explain the urgency of your argument here. Just be aware that you are not advancing the cause of science, and to the contrary, you are trying to diminish an important point to which people insufficiently subscribe.

      Correlation is not causation. IT IS NOT ESTABLISHED THAT VINYL FLOORING CAUSES AUTISM. And I'll even make a statistically educated statement that isn't based in any of the facts of this particular story, but in the facts of history: IT IS UNLIKELY THAT VINYL FLOORING CAUSES AUTISM.

    2. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      The main issue is that correlation is a necessary condition for causation, but is not a sufficient condition. So, finding a correlation is only one hurdle in the process of determining causation.

      It seems to me that people on slashdot unfairly criticize original research for seeming to misunderstand this, when in fact some sensationalistic journalist is nearly always blame.

    3. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Two points.

      1. Your strawman is a result of your abject failure to comprehend my post.
      2. If you believe AGW is based on nothing more than a correlation you're wrong. In my experience abuse of the phrase in question is highly correlated with AGW psudeo-skeptics, creationists, and anti-science crackpots in general.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by bartwol · · Score: 1

      1. Your strawman is a result of your abject failure to comprehend my post.

      Ineffectually perjorative...regrets that you weren't interested in specifying what it is you believe I misunderstood.

      2. If you believe AGW is based on nothing more than a correlation you're wrong.

      No, I do not believe that. And I didn't say that at all. I suspect that you posited that possibility in order to cast me as one of your demons.

      In my experience abuse of the phrase in question is highly correlated with AGW psudeo-skeptics, creationists, and anti-science crackpots in general.

      Just out of interest...have you seen any AGW 'skeptics', or are they all implicitly 'pseudo-skeptics'? Is it easy for you to tell the difference, and if so, I would be interested in knowing how?

      Anyway, the content and tenor of your response do suggest to me that I did not misunderstand you (although I may not have understood you quite the way you wanted me to).

      As scientists, in the absence of empirically knowing something, we have a responsibility to withhold belief. With that responsibility comes the humility of our ignorance, and our inability to make assertions where we might wish we could. Perhaps you are less ignorant than me in some areas, and can therefore make assertions (and thereby hold beliefs) where I cannot. But your voice and arguments suggest to me that you lack the due modesty of a diligent scientist, and you show an unhealthy distaste for skepticism (which should be the background color of all things scientific). Perhaps it is just your distaste for ignorance? Perhaps you misunderstood what I was saying?

    5. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Just out of interest...have you seen any AGW 'skeptics', or are they all implicitly 'pseudo-skeptics'? Is it easy for you to tell the difference, and if so, I would be interested in knowing how?"

      1. "Non-skeptical scientist" is an oxymoron.
      2. An AGW Psuedo-skeptic is someone who rejects one or more of the three basic points in "the consensus" but AT THE SAME TIME cannot produce credible evidence for their stance, "I don't know" is the only intellectually honest answer that requires no evidence. Some psuedo-skeptics are are paid, some are ignorant, some are motivated by politics, many just don't give a shit, the fact it hasn't been debunked is what matters. And lets not get into politics and funding conspracies, you will lose that one too.

      "and you show an unhealthy distaste for skepticism"

      Please refrain from projecting your faults onto me.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by bartwol · · Score: 1

      Interesting...that you believe I "lost." Did you win?

      Anyway, good luck with all that.

    7. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ....and I think it's interesting how you keep dodging the subject, wanker!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:GeekSoundbites(TM) by bartwol · · Score: 1

      Okay. I get it.

      You're a great big giant stupid-head.

  43. Why is this tagged aprilfools? by wiredog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article seems serious. Weird, but serious. All the citations and names check out.

  44. Boiling the problem down...Government spending? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Low income. Increases the likelihood of smoking, vinyl flooring, poorly ventilated housing and... oh look, it's right there in the list: "family economic problems".

    Er, economic problems? How long before someone mentions the words "bailout" and/or "unemployment rate"?

    Obama is blamed for autism in 3..2...1...

    1. Re:Boiling the problem down...Government spending? by arndawg · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..0.. -1..-2...-3...-4..-5..... I think you're wrong dude.

  45. Correlation vs. Causation by reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Note that just because correlation is not causation, doesn't mean that correlation is not important...

    1. Re:Correlation vs. Causation by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Troll

      doesn't mean that correlation is not important...

            Yes, because of the definite link between autism, food, and being alive. 100% of autistic people eat. 100% of people who stop eating eventually die. And better yet, NO dead people have been observed to exhibit autistic behavior. Therefore dead people can't get autism, or death is a cure for autism.

            Oh wait, what were you saying about important correlations?

            No, they're not necessarily important, either. It's called "barking up the wrong tree", which isn't really nice when you're doing it with money and a research staff/equipment that don't belong to you.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Correlation vs. Causation by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they're not necessarily important, either.

      No, it's vital. Correlation does not lead to causation on its own, but there MUST be correlation if there is to be a claim of causation. If you want to claim that X causes Y, you must be able to show that where there's X, there's Y.

      The correlation/causation ranting has obfuscated this simple fact, leading to people buying into the raving of people like He Who Must Not Be Named, who is unable to show even a tiny fraction of percentage correlation between the tens (hundreds?) of millions of video game players and actual acts of real-world violence committed, yet has convinced many people that some form of causative link exists.

      isn't really nice when you're doing it with money and a research staff/equipment that don't belong to you.

      Studies like the one performed is probably one of the fastest and least expensive ways to collect a number of environmental factors (the original paper reported a "top five") for further study to determine if there is a causative link. Otherwise, what you have scientists do? Open up a dictionary and start at "a" and test everything one at a time with a much more rigorous and expensive test for causation?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Correlation vs. Causation by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Additionally, a correlation means there IS a causal link somewhere. If there is actually a correlation between vinyl floors and autism (you only ever find a probability of a correlation, but that probability can be very high) that means:

      a) vinyl floors cause autism
      b) autism causes vinyl floors
      c) something else causes both vinyl floors and autism.

      Two out of three of those possibilities are very interesting.

  46. Trust? Media? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Besides the article being dated March 31, 2009, joking about autism isn't exactly a barrel of laughs. Apr 1 seems to have turned into some kind of trial of trust of the media now, which pisses me off.

    I know that autism isn't a laughing matter and all, but I'm not sure what's funnier, you looking for trust in the media or the fact that you're pissed that it's (shockingly) absent.

  47. i know these signs by xmousex · · Score: 1

    vinyl flooring, the mother's smoking, family economic problems, and condensation on windows, which indicates poor ventilation

    trailer park. the end.

    1. Re:i know these signs by MightyDrunken · · Score: 1

      So autism == trailer park?

  48. April Fools... to those not so 01-Apr inclined... by aspoon · · Score: 1

    For people from cultures that doesn't really have the slightest sense of April Fool's, it is actually very annoying to finally realize that this might not be real.

  49. Top Ten reasons for this by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    (10) Just trying to spell vinyl will mess you up.
    (9) One word: boomerang (pattern).
    (8) With vinyl floors you can skate indoors and hit your head on the far wall.

    (7) 100% vinyl floors on basement apartments. The noise from the guy upstairs with the stepmaster will drive anyone crazy.

    (6) Most houses have vinyl floors somewhere. If you visit autistic homes and snoop around, you will almost always find some.

    (5) One word: Plastics.

    (4) If this were true then workers in the umbrella, raincoat, new car seat-installing, and shower-curtain industry would be drooling morons. More than expected, anyway.

    (3) One word: falafel (Phalafel?) (Phatalate?)

    (2) How can you resist not counting the squares each day to make sure none have gone missing?

    (1) And the last one: Don't vinyl floor tiles also have formaldehyde plasticizers and asbestos fillers?

    1. Re:Top Ten reasons for this by geekoid · · Score: 1

      4) That applies to people with a developed brain. They may not experience any effect, or a different effect.

      If you had read this, you would understand that they said this is an odd finding, and is not conclusive at all.

      No we should not all go rip up are vinyl floor, start an anti-vinyl floor campaign, or give any attention to Jenny McCarthy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. The thing about autism... by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Having calmed down a bit, I understand what they were trying to do. It's about all these fools out there claiming that there is a single silver bullet cause. I've heard people preach about mercury in vaccines so many times I just want to scream. They didn't use mercury any more when my son was vaccinated and if anything, he gets way more mercury exposure from coal burning power or even the environment than he does from a vaccine. IT's just incorrect.

    Believe me, I understand the urge to find that one thing that, if you could fix your son, you would. I read the article, and I was like, "ahah, the vinyl floors have got to go!". But, there's no magic fix, just a lot of ABA therapy, and an acceptance that my son is going to be different - and, a healthy re-examination of myself - perhaps I'm on the spectrum too, and gave a piece of it to my son.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:The thing about autism... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      The paper was written last year and published in February and identifies the 5 most common correlations between families with autistic kids (some percentage of which were confirmed against medical records as opposed to "self diagnosed") (for the people too busy to click the article: maternal smoking, being born male, poor economic conditions, vinyl flooring, and foggy windows, which the paper writers claimed to indicate poor ventilation in the house).

      SciAm sensationalized it yesterday to focus on just one thing, because SciAm has sadly succumbed to the economic fact that the masses will not pay for news unless it's incredible (in all senses of the word).

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:The thing about autism... by tjstork · · Score: 1

      SciAm sensationalized it yesterday to focus on just one thing, because SciAm has sadly succumbed to the economic fact that the masses will not pay for news unless it's incredible (in all senses of the word)

      See, I think that this misplaced belief in the stupidity of the masses is the single largest reason why the media is sinking like the rock that it deserves to. People know when they are being coddled or patronized. You might think you win a few more popularity points with them in the short term but in doing so what you actually lose is their respect.

      --
      This is my sig.
  51. manmade by slashbart · · Score: 1

    Would you mind telling why we should treat manmade compounds different from nature made compounds? Say for instance PTFE versus wasp poision?

    1. Re:manmade by polar+red · · Score: 1

      because we can produce PTFE (teflon) by the tonne; in high quantities, in high concetrations; we can choose to produce it or Not; there will always be wasp poison.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  52. Genetic? by Astin · · Score: 1

    As stated above, low income can result in all the other conditions. Obviously, household income isn't a cause of autism, so you need to find the cause of low income.

    Could it be autism or asperger's? Affected social skills, introversion, and other "quirks" could very well result in someone being unable to hold or progress financially in a job, forcing them to stay in a low-income area. And has been suggested in the Silicon Valley, when you put a bunch of people with asperger's together, the likelihood of them pairing up increases. If that's the case, then the cause becomes genetic, not environmental. The environment is simply a symptom of the problem.

    --
    - In hell, treason is the work of angels.
  53. Re:Trust? Media? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    This is the one day we can trust the media. Granted the thing we are trusting is that they are full of crap, but that's better than not knowing whether or not they are serious or full of crap.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  54. troll alert by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

    Almost as soon as you get causation != correlation, you get trolling like this. Once you accept that causation != correlation, you can also accept that other reasonably intelligent people will accept this also. The authors of the report make no claim to causation. But this does lead to important questions that deserve to be investigated. So please, just don't post if all you want is a soapbox for your politics.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  55. Correlationisnotcausation Tags Must Die by dcollins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (1) Does the article or summary assert causation at any point? No, they don't. Therefore, "correlationisnotcausation" is an entirely irrelevant response here.

    (2) Is correlation the strongest possible result from research like this? Yes, it is. To demonstrate causation you'd need a designed experiement, with babies raised for years in a controlled environment with vinyl to see how many became autistic; experiments like that are not possible.

    (3) As another poster said, "correlationisnotcausation" has become Slashdot shorthand for "I choose to ignore all of your scientific evidence". Compare to: "Evolution has not been proved, it's only a theory."

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Correlationisnotcausation Tags Must Die by geekoid · · Score: 1

      2) You can come to that conclusion with proper research. Specific research into a method, as well as looking at autism rates in countries that do no have vinyl floors. Along with many other techniques.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Correlationisnotcausation Tags Must Die by dcollins · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect.

      In an observational study, researchers simply observe characteristics and take measurements, as in a sample survey. In a designed experiment, researchers impose treatments and controls and then observe characteristics and take measurements. Observational studies can reveal only association, whereas designed experiments can help establish causation.

      Neil A. Weiss, Introductory Statistics 7E, p. 22.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  56. For the achievement! by Foldarn · · Score: 1

    Someone was going to...

  57. Condensation? by RalphSlate · · Score: 3, Informative

    Condensation on windows is not a sign of a poorly ventilated house. Condensation forms when humid air comes in contact with a much cooler surface. So, for example, if you have no storm windows on your windows but you are running a humidifier you will get condensation in the winter.

    Vinyl windows will actually reduce condensation because they are like built-in storm windows. The inner pane isn't as cold as a single pane of glass -- yet vinyl windows also reduce airflow, meaning that ventilation is reduced.

    That part of the study just doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:Condensation? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Agreed!

      My old house had 40 year old crank-type windows that were very drafty/leaky. They got plenty of condensation on them in the winter.

      The least ventilated homes, IMO, are usually the "energy efficient" ones where expensive multi-pane, coated windows are used, etc. etc.

    2. Re:Condensation? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If your house is well ventilated then the air in your house will have a similar water content (NOT relative humidity) to the air outside. Even if the warm air comes in contact with a cold window, you won't get condensation because the dew point of the air is the same as the dew point of the air outside.

      Remember, this is Sweden. If you live somewhere where it's warm most of the time the rules are probably a little different than you're used to. In the winter you have to be very careful about running humidifiers otherwise you'll find that your insulation has become a nice home for mould.

  58. Other Problems with Pthalates, especially in boys by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 1

    Leonard Sax's book Boys Adrift discusses potential impact on boy's normal development by Pthalates. The text is searchable on Google.

    --
    Computers obey me.
  59. Re:April Fools... to those not so 01-Apr inclined. by maxume · · Score: 1

    I would be very surprised if Scientific American posted something like this as a (poor attempt at a) joke.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  60. Simpler explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so the families that are spending much of their money on autism treatments and babysitters for disfunctional children and not concentrating on dual careers, are more likely to end up in the cheaper housing with vinyl and tile floors instead of wood floors or carpets.

  61. Licking by e_chiappone · · Score: 1

    So I guess all those mornings spent licking the floor was a bad plan.

  62. Everything causes autism by reidiq · · Score: 1

    Global warming causes autism. In before Al Gore.

    --
    Sig? No thanks. I don't smoke.
  63. Was that serious?! OMG! by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Was that serious?! OMG! I really thought it WAS a joke.

  64. I thought it was MMR ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So wait, they're putting vinyl flooring in vaccines now?

  65. The Disease Hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One though I have heard mentioned occasionally - autism, parkinsons, diabetes, even heart disease are all caused by diseases. Brain rot eats your flesh!

    Basically, if there is no direct link to a specific biological anomaly - like Huntingdon's where a specific genetic problem means EVERYONE with the gene gets the disease at the certain time - then it's a disease. Diseases pop up randomly. They unpredictably flare up and attack people. The same sort of thing happens with syphillis (brain rot late in life) or polio (post-polio syndrome - nerve rot, later in life). While stress or other factors can cause for example, an outbreak of herpes or cold sores (Herpes 1) the timing and predictability is random. Maybe even cancers - after all, HPV is blamed for most cervical cancer.

    Similarly with childhood diabetes; it pops up randomly in children - one day they're fine, the next they have to pee like a racehorse and something inflames their pancreas. based on the situation of Michael Fox - a cluster of 5 or 6 people who worked in the same studio in Vancouver ended up with early onset Parkinsons? Also consider the earliest stem cell research - injections helped some people for a while, but then they regressed; almost as if the stem cells tried to replace what was missing, but then were attacked in turn by the same agent. It's almost like the brain has plenty of spare capacity until something slowly destroys so much that nothing spare is left to compensate and the person suddenly starts going downhill.

    Even heart disease - there's still a disagreement if there is any correlation with cholesterol. Perhaps simple small inflamations give the arterial clots somewhere to latch onto and start building obstructions. Installing stents can open the artery, but the clots just grow back over if the artery still has the same problem.

    We see the same symptoms with autism - fine for a while, then suddenly -poof! All is lost. Is it a disease? Something attacks a cerain area of the brain, building damage until suddenly there is nothing to compensate for the missing function? A form of brian rot which randomly strikes at-risk children like measles or chicken pox, but with far stronger results and less obvious communicability? perhaps Aspergers is just a later or less destructive form of the infection?

    Remember until the 1990's, stomach ulcers were stress-induced symptoms of character problems, the sign of an obsessive worry-wart? Then they discovered that, oh, these are simple infections that an antibiotic can cure, the perceived character flaw was the result of the pain the ulcer caused?

  66. just like the dangers of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dihydrogen monoxide: lethal in large doses;-)

  67. Phthalates are a much bigger problem by Agram · · Score: 1

    Any number 3 plastic has phthalates that tend to bleed out of plastic when they come in contact with saliva. Often these are rubber toys (for the puberty-stricken Slashdot crowd, get a cold shower, I am not talking about condoms) for kids who commonly put them in their mouths. I've even seen some sipping cups and one-time use products (e.g. energy drinks) that use 3 or the other two problematic plastics 6 and 7. Basically, it is a known fact that phthalates are problematic. Couple that with the fact that they are pretty much everywhere and we got a real problem. As a result, autism is on tremendous rise, particularly in US...

    1. Re:Phthalates are a much bigger problem by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "it is a known fact that phthalates are problematic"

      What a stupid statement. Here let me show you why:

      "it is a known fact that water is problematic"

      "As a result, autism is on tremendous rise, particularly in US..."

      Your conlusion is solely based on your strawman* arguement and has no backing, so STFU

      *made with number 2 plastic, becasue when I think of you, I think number 2.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  68. Bad timing by strawberryutopia · · Score: 1

    See, this one seems too serious to be an AF, but at the same time it's kinda plausable. Of course, I haven't really read the article any more than a brief glance to see whether it was obviously an AF.

    So the moral of the story is... don't announce anything serious today! Especially if it sounds kinda weird.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar...
    -Lucy-
    1. Re:Bad timing by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for some big, monumental event/discovery to be first reported as an April Fool's joke, only to actually become true at a later date.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  69. 2 problems with that... by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    1st, lo-income housing is usually well-ventilated: leaks & drafts from bad weatherstripping; upscale houses are usually v.tight, ironically leading to poor ventilation, unless u go further upscale & install heat exchangers...

    2nd, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aspergers_pr.html and geeks usually aren't lo-income...

  70. already-known possible link to indoors by Unordained · · Score: 1

    I came across this article a while back; there's speculation that the correlation between rainfall and autism is caused by kids staying indoors most of the time; whether that meant a lack of exposure to something important outdoors or an exposure (constantly) to something dangerous indoors was an open question. This continues down that path, accidentally.

  71. Sounds a lot more plausibe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds a lot more plausibe than the wingnut claims of a vaccine conspiracy.

    As if we needed any MORE proof that conservatives make terrible scientists...

  72. Increased Exposure...? by TufelKinder · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder if it would be a more accurate link between the amount of time a child spent in near proximity to vinyl flooring and not just whether or not the household had it.

    In other words, if children who spend more time sitting in their homes, crawling the floor, etc, are more prone to Autism than children who spend a greater percentage of their time outdoors.

    Additionally, I wonder if a similar correlation exists if there is extensive parental exposure to phthalates prior to conception.

    --
    If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -- George Orwell
  73. Medical researchers can't always tell cause/effect by taustin · · Score: 1

    Have they condsidered that perhaps families with autistic children are more likely to put in vinyl flooring? It is, after all, easier to keep clean than, say, carpet, and cheaper to replace than hardwood if damaged.

  74. This is true! by bigjarom · · Score: 1

    This is so true. I definitely become autistic whenever I'm near vinyl. It's so nice to finally be vindicated by science.

  75. NPR has a phthalates story today by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

    NPR has a phthalates story today. It explains how certain phthalates were banned from children's products based on scientific evidence that they were dangerous, but other phthalates were banned just this year for political reasons despite scientific evidence that they were safe.

  76. Big gaping holes by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Vinyl flooring is generally the cheapest flooring available, so it would be more prevalent in low income house holds.
    Smoking is more common in low income households.
    Family economic problems should be more common in low income households.
    Sounds like low income is a common factor in the above.

    On the whole, without knowing how the data was collected, how the families were selected, and whether any participants were removed from the study, there is no way to actually validate the study.

    I find this telling:

    several scientists who did not participate in the study cautioned that it has too many limitations to draw conclusions,

    I also question this part of the article:

    Rates of autism in California have increased seven-fold since 1990, a recent study found.

    Has there been an increase in the rate of autism or the rate of diagnosis. Starting in the mid 1980s there has been an increase in the awareness of autism, an increase in the education of medical personal in the symptoms of autism and a corresponding increase in diagnosis. One would have to study the records of people classified as mentally deficient or ill in childhood since about 1970 or so to determine how many would now be diagnosed as autistic. Then, and only then, one could claim an actual increase in autism.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  77. Previous studies have indicated Rain is a problem by esobofh · · Score: 1

    Areas with higher rain fall have been shown to have greater incidents of Autism. This is starting to make sense.. more rain = less time outside = less fresh air (or more exposure to polluted indoor air).

    Nothing to do with the rain per se, just being inside more. Glad I live in an old house with wood floors and poor weather stripping. (lots of fresh outside air comes in).

    --

    ----------------------------
    Esobofh - Currently drinking fresh mango juice.
  78. Maybe it's a Swedish thing... by Phaid · · Score: 1

    But who ever heard of a bedroom with a vinyl floor?

    1. Re:Maybe it's a Swedish thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't see enough private Swedish homes to be dogmatic, nor have I seen many private American homes to compare, but I think you might well find more uncarpeted (wood or vinyl) floors with the odd throw rug in Sweden than in the USA. In contrast, New Zealand has a very high proportion of carpeted floors, partly historic due to the type of sheep that thrives here being more suited to carpet wool than to clothing. That in itself is possibly connected to a high incidence of asthma here, by way of the dust mites that tend to live in even the cleanest of carpets.

      I did find the bit about condensation a bit strange, you will get condensation on the inside of the glass whenever the glass is colder than the dew point of the air inside. No air leaks are needed. In Sweden in winter the humidity outside is probably very low anyway. As usual in really cold places, the moisture drops out of the air as frost. Of course some areas, like around Goteborg, might be getting moist air from off the sea. But at least in Sweden they usually have double glazing, and often triple glazing. They do have to watch the ventilation, partly from the point of view of limiting radon buildups, since most of the place is made of granite.

  79. Not flamebait... by tmosley · · Score: 1

    Why was this modded flamebait? It seems like a reasonable argument to me. If you want to refute it, then do so, but don't use mod points to stifle civil debate.

    Confirmation bias is a real problem, and should be addressed.

  80. Vitamin D by mesterha · · Score: 1

    There has been some recent noise about low levels of vitamin D being a possible cause of autism. People are so worried about skin cancer that they can't make enough vitamin D from the sun. While they get enough vitamin D to prevent scurvy, it's far from an optimal amount.

    http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health/autism/vit-D-theory-autism.shtml#hd1
    http://timeofgrace.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/low-vitamin-d-linked-to-autism/

    --

    Chris Mesterharm
    1. Re:Vitamin D by dwye · · Score: 1

      > While they get enough vitamin D to prevent scurvy

      Rickets, not scurvy. Scurvy is caused by lack of vitamin C.

  81. Re:Other Problems with Pthalates, especially in bo by geekoid · · Score: 1

    So? how about some good studies? Anyone can write a book.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  82. I have one that may be out there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HFCS.

    Autism has been rising since the early 80's, since it started getting put into food adults drink.

    It may sound nuts but considering it's been linked to dietary problems, diabetes-II, and cancer, and other ill effects, It wouldnt shock me that some synthesized pseudo-sugar is messing with fetuses in the womb.

    I don't fully believe it, but it does correlate. Though, I know correlation != causation.

    Also, a lot of people who claim to be autistic has climbed a lot recently, namely because it became the new ADHD and ADD. Now people think they're a special race that are allowed to be assholes because they have a "condition" so they're superior. More like coddled by mommy and daddy and spoiled rotten and justifying it.

  83. Re:Con-den-sation-sation-sation-sation? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Previously on "Condensation":
    Johnny: Helen, there's moisture on the outside of my glass.
    Helen: It's condensation Johnny.
    Johnny: But what about the fog on the windows?
    Helen: It's not fog Johnny, it too is called condensation.

  84. part of the problem is it's not clear what *does* by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Different scientific fields have somewhat different practices for what does imply causation, driven often by some form of pragmatism. In physics, for example, you typically hypothesize causation, then try to think of things that your hypothesis predicts that haven't yet been shown, and see if you can find those, or find contrary evidence. In medicine and the social sciences, you often try to collect many sets of correlations and then try to factor them out of each other, e.g. compute effect of income on disease X, after controlling for level of education and geographic location and diet. Then in cases where it's practical to do so, you might try the "gold standard" of controlled experiments, though these too must often deal with confounding factors. In other fields there are yet more subtly different standards.

    For one attempt to treat the issue fully rigorously, which also shows how complex it is both mathematically and philosophically, I recommend Judea Pearl's book Causality .

  85. Does that mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    having a penis causes autism?

  86. Vinyl flooring ready for a change by adamwinn · · Score: 1

    As a home builder, I usually default to vinyl flooring for 'wet' areas of the home whenever price is an issue. But (even as a skeptic) I think it's worth paying a couple % more for more stable vinyl products, or eliminate the problem altogether by using linoleum or tile. This headline wasn't a surprise to anyone who's involved in 'green building'. Flooring is being targeted as one of the biggest problems with indoor air quality. It's not just the crappy vinyl, it's also the cheap VOC-laden adhesive used to install it. Seriously - do a little research on phthalates and you'll realize how potent of a toxin they are.

  87. Autism vs our chemical dependance by ARdiver · · Score: 1

    I often wonder, did Autism naturally occur before the creation of our chemical dependence of vinyl? How prevalent was Autism before the onset of our vast use of plastics? As a new senior and having received my first SS check, I feel our dependence on the chemical industry is partly to blame along with greed of the ad agencies touting products that haven't been throughly tested. Just look in your kitchen cabinets, I'll bet with damn few exceptions you'll have lots of plastic ware. How many fumes are released into our food when we nuke of leftovers. As a parent, I was concerned and now rightfully so, what kind of damage have we done to our children when we heated their bottles. Most parents switched from glass to unbreakable plastic bottles. Another thought for researchers, what is the rate of Autism in a Third world country vs the US? I'd be willing to bet Autism does not exist outside of the "industrialized nations". Well does it?

  88. fuck u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u got no fucking idea about autistics.