I find it surprising that according to this statistic one third of Mac users stopped using Macs during the last 8 months. Or did the market grow a lot (don't think so)? I can see that some Mac users would switch to Windows (or occasionally to Linux), but one third in 8 months? Seems actually unlikely.
Shhh. No one is interested in logic or plausibility, or being on topic.
So you ban the floating section that screws up scrolling (this is not a Space versus PageDown debate, ya dills) and then, hell, get rid of a stack of other stuff too.
Obviously if it goes into a house or something otherwise substantial, it’ll be stable for a century.
But the less-realised benefit is that modern tips don’t really rot much, so even when you’re done with the wood (or to a lesser extent, wood product) it’ll be stable for a long time — long enough for us to work our crap out.
In a perverse way the most efficient action in a coal-burning society may be to simply destroy the trees locally in a high-efficiency burner to generate power. Not many tree farmers are emotionally keen on that, though.
I understand the claims. It’s publicity for the firm/industry.
But there are reasons to model the effect of losing one or more lane: you want to see the effect of having a bus or multiple-passenger-only lane, or better know how to schedule maintenance.
Slashdot Mirror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
(yeah, it helps — is hilarious — if you know the character beforehand)
I find it surprising that according to this statistic one third of Mac users stopped using Macs during the last 8 months. Or did the market grow a lot (don't think so)?
I can see that some Mac users would switch to Windows (or occasionally to Linux), but one third in 8 months? Seems actually unlikely.
Shhh. No one is interested in logic or plausibility, or being on topic.
So you ban the floating section that screws up scrolling (this is not a Space versus PageDown debate, ya dills) and then, hell, get rid of a stack of other stuff too.
Obviously if it goes into a house or something otherwise substantial, it’ll be stable for a century.
But the less-realised benefit is that modern tips don’t really rot much, so even when you’re done with the wood (or to a lesser extent, wood product) it’ll be stable for a long time — long enough for us to work our crap out.
In a perverse way the most efficient action in a coal-burning society may be to simply destroy the trees locally in a high-efficiency burner to generate power. Not many tree farmers are emotionally keen on that, though.
I understand the claims. It’s publicity for the firm/industry.
But there are reasons to model the effect of losing one or more lane: you want to see the effect of having a bus or multiple-passenger-only lane, or better know how to schedule maintenance.
Don't forget the drop bears!