Slashdot Mirror


Developer Misinterprets Linux Code of Conduct, Suggests Replacing F-Word with 'Hug' (neowin.net)

Seeking compliance with Linux's new Code of Conduct, Intel software engineer Jarkko Sakkinen recently requested comments on a set of changes to kernel code comments which Neowin described as "replacing the F-word with 'hug'. "

80 comments quickly followed on the Linux Kernel Maintainer's List: Several contributors responded to the alterations calling them insane. One wondered if Sakkinen was just trying to make a joke, and another called it censorship and said he'd refuse to apply any sort of patches like this to the code he's in charge of...

Some of the post-change comments read "Some Athlon laptops have really hugged PST tables", "If you don't see why, please stay the hug away from my code", and "Only Sun can take such nice parts and hug up the programming interface".

Eventually LWN.net publisher Jonathan Corbet deflated most of the controversy by pointing out that Linux's new Code of Conduct applies to future comments but clearly indicates that it does not apply explicitly to past comments.

And Jarkko Sakkinen acknowledged that he had missed that part of the discussion.

402 comments

  1. Snowflake developers can hug off by mfearby · · Score: 5, Funny

    If seeing the F-word in the Linux source code is a bit too much for you, then perhaps you'd be better off making yet another set of pretty icons for GNOME or KDE.

    1. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was probably literally the highlight of this losers life

    2. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look whose talking. Anyone that would say something that stupid has fucking problems and should fuck right off.

    3. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by edris90 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you're not intelligent enough to see the message instead of being focused on their particular vernacular, then you do not qualify for the project. Your inability to see past transport protocol Prejudice in verbal communication shows a certain lack of perspective and maturity necessary 2 a technical project

    4. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't make a point without using inappropriate slurs/curses/etc, you're probably not mature enough to have mature thoughts anyone else needs to worry about, _thats_the_bottom_line_in_a_workplace_comma_Einstein_period

      Grow a vernacular and get creative, no more excuses for being unable to speak your own language professionally in 2018.

    5. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hug you motherhugger!

    6. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can just fuck right off!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are busy you don't have time for that. Also, nobody else cares so you'd be better off just leaving. Making life hell for us is just going to make us make life hell for you too. We need precisely 0 outside input.

    8. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too busy to talk like an adult? Lol. That's a novel excuse! Good luck in life, Trump already blew it for you I think...

    9. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Adults do not do work, they know it is pointless and therefore they make management careers.

      Western civilization actually stands on the shoulders of creative child like geniuses. That's what used to make it unique and all conquering: allowing people s childlike behaviours including engineeric creativity.

    10. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not that it is too much for me. Using fuck in the way that the author did here shows he does not have the vocubalulary and/or the time to express the point in a way which makes objective sense.

      All I get from the The F bombs is that the author is pissed off. It says jack + shit about what the real problem is. That makes the comment little more than an angry screed, a waste of space.

    11. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This argument comes up in any discussion about what language we should use. The choice of language is somewhat secondary; what really matters is the exact meaning of the word "should" in that sentence. Or rather: what the consequences are of using the wrong language - in any situation. Most people would agree that it's better not to use swear words or insults, but what happens if someone does? Being told off for bad manners, having bad words censored, seeing your pull request denied or your paper rejected, public shaming, being ostracized from the community, fired, or even prosecuted in court? When people talk about acceptable language in their communities these days, the full range of those consequences will be openly discussed and often seriously considered.

      It's good to have a code of conduct - written or unwritten - in any community, but when transgressions carry serious consequences, you'll invariably see some perverted snowflakes push the boundaries of what's acceptable, and gleefully call out violators, especially those with opposing viewpoints. Can't say fuck anymore. Or black. Or master / slave. Peek and poke? Nope. Male / female connectors are out. Can't insult anyone or anything... and you violate that rule whenever someone, anyone feels insulted. Or just crabby.

      Codes of conduct regarding acceptable language are best left unwritten, and are certainly best left undiscussed at length. Because the more you discuss them, the more you formalize them, the worse they get.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    12. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These fragments are taken out of context, but they clearly say to not touch the code a) because does something that barely makes sense unless one if very familiar with SUN idiocies, b) because it is a touchy code and you must know absolutely everything that the author knew when he wrote it. The use f-bombs nicely puts emphasis in proper places to make it more to the point, and far more clearly than can be described without confusion.

    13. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by mermeid007 · · Score: 1

      Hear hear

    14. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that you chose to clarify the situation by some means other than a stream of profanity. Were you intentionally trying to be less clear, or do you actually understand that the approach you were trying to defend was inherently flawed?

    15. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're using "fuck" in any kind of code that isn't related to porn, you've got some serious fucking problems, and should probably find another line of work.

      i = 0x5f3759df - ( i >> 1 ); // what the fuck?
      Actual developers will get this reference. Pernicious fakes like yourself can fuck right off.

    16. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet they (formal standards) exist in corporate culture where the code will be read/discussed/used/changed/etc, so pretending slurs and such are acceptable isn't going to work in that environment.

      Slashdot alt-right pre-teens up late at night, sure. Enterprise coding environment, it's almost bound to cause problems if no one does anything about it. So, you nip it in the bud, and you move on.

      Only by drawing out the correction for anti-social unacceptable behavior do the James Damore types find their little cracks to skitter legs and antennae into, disgusting INCELs.

    17. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All I get from the The F bombs is that the author is pissed off. It says jack + shit about what the real problem is"

      Bitch you are the problem. You couldn't make your point about it without doing it yet you still demonize others. You are a real SJW aren't you?

    18. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a coder? If not, you haven't the faintest idea why fuck can be appropriate when coding and can keep on with smug condescension.

    19. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Cederic · · Score: 1

      What sort of cunt uses the term 'f bomb'?

      There's no fucking bomb. Stop being silly.

    20. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those pretty icons will be even prettier if made with hugging Nvidia's products. Linus has been documented to agree with this sentiment.

    21. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps one could also go and improve the experience by removing some confusing features?

    22. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. I am. A lead developer.

      I know exactly this many good developers who use 'fuck' in their comments... ZERO.

      The problem is, it explains nothing. Zero zip zilch. Any REAL developer that's worked on an actual team or for any length of time would immediately see the problem. Comments are meant to be useful not be cryptic nonsense that adds nothing.

      I would reject such a patch too and fire the developer. If they can't explain what they're doing, then they have no business being there. Not even to serve the coffee. So they're done.

    23. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a pathetic nazi faggot. You lie about growing weed and firing people all day online like anyone believes you or cares. I'd make soup out of your pathetic faggot ass and you'd be fed to a fucking platoon in the mess.
         

    24. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      but what happens if someone does?

      In this case you get an 80 post thread on a high profile mailing list, you name plastered all over various news sites and people screaming "SJW" and calling you a fascist.

      Everyone needs to calm the fuck down and lighten up. The guy made a mistake, no need to be a triggered snowflake about it.

      Unfortunately this happens every time. Someone posts something questionable and the outrage merchants pile in to be offended and incensed that someone would disagree with them. It doesn't help that it's a lucrative business model, generating hefty YouTube profits, or an effective form of virtue signalling.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Mostly agreed here... but you touch on something that bugs me about a lot of these CoCs.

      CoCs for communities are different than CoCs for events. Any community CoC which relies on a "board" or "commitee" make decisions about "transgressions" is doomed to fail. When reporters have to be interviewed, issues have to be documented and decisions made, it turns volunteers into some perverted authority figure. Nobody wants that job. You will not find qualified volunteers. Who wants to be the guy to call up the member and say "hey, you know that email you sent to snowflakedandilion? it's not appropriate, go say sorry in public or we're goign to have to ask you again" Issues will fail to be actioned and the board/commitee/whatever will be at "fault."

      CoCs are handy for when some asshole at a bar who barely ever attends events is caught showing off pornography to his buddy and gets kicked out. Or for when the sponsoring educational institution catches somebody pirating software at an event. Or when somebody gives a presentation at a conference and says "I'm a proud member of xyz, then includes pics of Putin bending Trump over the bar to get a laugh out of the audience". The community can defend itself and say "No, we don't condone that behaviour, no that's not what we're about". If you're lucky enough to spot it ahead of time, you can tell that person "seriously, what the fuck? it says right here not to do that shit" and the group can distance itself.

      CoCs are not very useful for interpersonal grey areas. For that stuff, fuzzy rules about "don't be an asshole", and a little bit of "this is what an asshole is", are needed... but the board/committee/whatever should be a very last resort. After the "victim" told the person that's inapprpriate, after they told the person to stop, after they continued.... after a board member heard about it and couldn't do anythign to say "seriously dude what the fuck is wrong with you?" , then the board needs to do something.... but omg, that should be very, very rare, and board powers are very, very limited in open communities.

      You ban them, they create new emails, you ask them not to attend events, but they show up anyway... do you start talkign to campus security and start legal processes? Do you have the money for that? You send them registered mail... At least when they do something horrible which hits the media or a sponsoring organization, you can point to the letter and say "yeah, it's against our community CoC, and we've done everything we could about this parasite, but we're having trouble physically ejecting this turd"

      An event CoC by comparison can take away a badge, have security escort them out and put their name on a blacklist for buying tickets next year.

    26. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by fisted · · Score: 1

      Found the non programmer.

    27. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Code of conducts are not read. Employees scroll to the bottom and click continue. If you want polite employees you need to hire them and train/fire the rude ones.

    28. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that's a great metric.

      There's something called a conflict of interest. It should be applied -- judiciously, but applied.

      Are you someone that is a leader of anything "group" or "movement"? A "major player"? Sorry, your opinion doesn't count here -- conflict of interest.

      Do you monetize this in any way? Do you make a penny, EVER, off of your position? A blog, youtube, tweets etc? Your opinion doesn't count here.

      Get all of the profit and clickbait out of it. Get all of the people that are ONLY involved to push an agenda out of it.

    29. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a staunch verbal user of the fudge myself, I don't really like seeing it
      explicitly in print because it doesn't really add any value to the comment.
      Now, things like WTF, et. al. are okay because they're colloquial and I read
      them as nothing more than "!?."

      Bottom line is we're geeks. And if a coder can't be creative enough to not
      use the fudge word, then maybe they're in the wrong business. Just sayin'.
      Wasting a good opportunity to demean someone by simply using fudge is
      against the code-of-conduct and will not be tolerated!

      CAP === 'finite'

    30. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everyone needs to calm the fuck down and lighten up. The guy made a mistake, no need to be a triggered snowflake about it.

      The guy accidentally created and then pushed a patch to change "fuck" to "hug"? Bullshit. It was deliberate trolling.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about a "DO NOT TOUCH THIS CODE UNLESS YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS"
      comment, which conveys the necessary meaning without having to be decoded or interpreted?

    32. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Come on drinkypoo, you must surely understand I was referring to his interpretation of the CoC.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tommy - Tommy, are you playing on the innernet again? You still haven't finished your homework! Your know what Mrs For told you last week. You don't want to flunk out and have to repeat the 9th grade, do you?

      Now Tommy, get off that innernet and do your homework!

    34. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another social just-us nazi, violating his own hypocritical CoC in the very same breath as he's trying to force it on others. Truly a nazi asshole.

    35. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, nazi.

    36. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The exact meaning of "should"?
      IETF RFC 2219
      What else?

    37. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Come on drinkypoo, you must surely understand I was referring to his interpretation of the CoC.

      That was willful, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by edris90 · · Score: 1

      That kind of attitude is one of ignorance and placing social value above tactical and practical value. Essentially fashion over function. Sand flea shows that someone would choose an arbitrary standard of behavior over what functions the best from a technical standpoint. way easier to hire in sensitive people that don't bitch and moan to the point of lawsuits than it is to deal with the repeated distractions and escapades of the sensitive. Those who would take the illusion of being right over higher levels of function with less limitations and censorship are not qualified to be making decisions over those who have graduated from such primitive thoughts

    39. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by edris90 · · Score: 1

      If you can't see the absurdity , an arbitrary natureof social standards then you're hardly qualified to work in a field of technical expertise. Too caught up in subjective modes of thinking to see past your own bias.

    40. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't fire a person that isn't employed or gets paid. You're talking about people who are volunteering to spend time on writing code of passion and goodness of heart, so that you can use their stuff for free. So, who the HUG are you?

    41. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Aren't we allowed to use it in Slashdot headlines? I'll do it in the comments:

      "Fuck!"

      --
      No sig today...
    42. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Bengie · · Score: 1

      And if they used appropriate curses? I find mild cursing to soften the blow. If someone told me I was a "fucking idiot", to me that just means I done messed up and I need to learn from my mistake. If someone said I made an "absurd mistake", I would take that to mean that I am an incompetent person and will never be decent in their eyes.

      You can beat around the bush all you want, but direct insults are less insulting that indirect ones.

    43. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      The guy accidentally created and then pushed a patch to change "fuck" to "hug"? Bullshit. It was deliberate trolling.

      It was stupidity. He took comments that were on the rude side, but perfectly reasonable, and changed them into comments that made no sense. I wouldn't have minded at all if he had removed the f-words _while retaining what the comment said_.

      For example, you could call PST tables "extraordinarily bad designed" instead of "f***ed up". No complaint. But "hugged up" is just stupid.

    44. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      You're an AC. As such, nothing you say about your job/career means anything. At least use a moniker so people can review your past posts and determine if you're leg-yanking.

    45. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "_thats_the_bottom_line_in_a_workplace_comma_Einstein_period"

      Workplace? What on earth are you talking about?

    46. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you touch yourself when you say these things? You're the only person who cares about you. Everyone else regards you as a joke... a bad one, but a joke nonetheless. Poor you

    47. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the whole comment. It did not demonize the author for swearing. Rather it said that the swearing was pointless and did not actually describe the problem in any sort of objective way.

    48. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think arse soup would taste very nice. Maybe you should try a different cut

    49. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 2

      Everyone needs to calm the fuck down and lighten up.

      No. Revisionist history should be fought whenever it attempts to rear its ugly head. You can't just mask history because the truth in inconvenient to you, or because it makes you feel uncomfortable. That's how you get repeats of easily deplorable events that could have been avoided.

      Those comments in the code are a historical marker of the times when it was written, and should not be tampered with. It helps create a well defined delineation of when the kernel went from a true meritocracy to when the CoC demanders took over. We will be able to look back and see exactly the effects the CoC had on kernel development, whether good or bad, after a long enough period of time passes.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    50. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of your points but disagree with your last point that "acceptable language" should be left "undiscussed.". The topic WILL eventually come up -- ignoring it doesn't make the problem go away!

      Is it really THAT hard to have a SIMPLE CoC?

      * We don't censor words,
      * That said, try to be communicate in a respectful fashion.
      * If you are offended with *words* then maybe you should find another project to work with instead of wasting people's time with "noise"

      If a project is censoring words over some "perceived offense" then that is the proof that some people are more interested in bullshit bikeshedding then actually getting work done.

    51. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      There's no fucking bomb.

      Personally I prefer to say 'f coke' instead of 'f bomb'.

      That way, instead of your brain hitting the brakes because of something silly, your brain will just remember the line from that movie There is no FUCKING COKE, and just resume their normal reading, or whatever.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    52. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hope you're doing your part to prevent right wing revisionism then, otherwise you're only paying lip service while actually condoning revisionism. So I trust that you accept the historically accurate view of Nazi Germany as far right wing? And that Reagan was a terrible president? And that Pinochet was a dictator that ruined Chile, and that Chile only recovered by returning to socialist policies? If not, you are literally a historical revisionist.

    53. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately this happens every time. Someone posts something questionable and the outrage merchants pile in to be offended and incensed that someone would disagree with them. It doesn't help that it's a lucrative business model, generating hefty YouTube profits, or an effective form of virtue signalling.

      Oh the irony. This is coming from the biggest virtue-signaling outrage merchant on the site.

    54. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ray-gun was a terrible president, but a passable actor. Luckily it was the Bush Seniour who ran the country.

    55. Re:Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...no need to be a triggered snowflake about it."

      Well there's the pot calling the kettle black.

    56. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      It's supposed to be an "h bomb" now.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    57. Re: Snowflake developers can hug off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't touch myself while saying this shit... I'm actually on the toilet having a shit and saying this stuff opens my colon to /. scales for proper release of shit internalized.

  2. I don't give two shits about the word fuck by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the intent behind it that matters.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Intent of controlling speech until the project turns into a dystopian nightmare? as soon this kind of people get the hands on the hammer, everything goes to hell.
      I seem examples on all the sides, even non political sides where it's the same.
      The thin skinned guy gets the control over the thing and starts to overreach more and more until the thing is dead.
      Even places like chans can fall for this, with a guy wanting to "combat the cancer" ending up permabanning people for grammar errors or liking the wrong video game console.

    2. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a lot of space between "don't be an asshole" and the project being dead. A whole lot of space.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The definition of asshole that is a problem.
      There are certain people that declares everyone that don't follow a very narrow definition of people as "not an asshole".

    4. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he said it while eating little sandwiches and tea while stroking his pate then it might be meant in a very civilized way and you are asking for trouble by suggesting he is doing something wrong

    5. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The intent of controlling other people's speech is pretty fucking bad.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bzzzt. You used a "bad" word. Now we all have to ignore you for being a hugface.

    7. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So using the word fuck is being an asshole now? Wow, you people really are fragile snowflakes.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intent of controlling other people's speech is pretty hugging bad.

      FTFY.

    9. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a lot of space between "don't be an asshole" and the project being dead. A whole lot of space.

      Never underestimate the destructive power that sjws can have on anything that they touch.My code of conduct is simple : SJWs can fuck off.

    10. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollars to Donuts that Jarkko Sakkinen is a swishing fag.

    11. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Felgergarb, god damn felgercarbs. Lets felgercarb the entire linux kernel code. And felgercarb the damn sjws.

    12. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cucks are the problem, not some abstract definitions.

    13. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 1

      You would ban all the cucks if you had the power, wouldn't you?

    14. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good buddy. Sorry I didnâ(TM)t invite the others

    15. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, day 1. The entire Trump admin, boom, gone. Right off to prison, done. (dusts hands off) Yep, those cucks are done.

    16. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would gently discourage them from merit based FOSS efforts like that of developing Linux kernel altogether. If they want a diversity based shop it is IBM for them.

    17. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what works is ignore them. Eventually their bad behaviour reflects back. Let them keep scorching themselves. If they never get it, it's their own doing.

    18. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, it's what the comments *identify* as that matters. After all, the quality is entirely a social construct of the white cis-male patriarchy.

      Sadly, I've had these conversations with a family member majoring in "gender theory".

    19. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean hug off?

    20. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would ban all the cucks if you had the power, wouldn't you?

      So would everyone else. The point is we're all better off not persecuting people for being offended by them. But of course this is the "modern" society that assumes the phrase "treat others the way you want to be treated" has loopholes attached to it.....

    21. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, you people really are fragile snowflakes.

      What did you expect from these mother huggers?

    22. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is described by the very reason we have 1000s and THOUSANDS of laws, regulations and so on. And yeah, if you take all levels of government, including municipal -- there are thousands. How can any person with a life other than just -- reading laws, know all things he may fall afoul of?

      Yet there are all these laws, because we have police. That may seem conversely bizarre, but think on this. "Many laws" are there to curtail police power... because if you just have 4 or 5? They're too broad.

      "Stop people from being bad to each other"

      Now give 100 police that same job. Each will have a different definition. And each may have a family, wife, and friends with their own, whom he councils. And then on top of this? There are people in every circumstance, yelling "Hey officer, this guy did this to me!" or "I saw him do this"... with explanations of why this was "bad".

      We have 1000 laws, because we need all of these minuscule, precise definitions that limit and place conditions on every aspect of an arrest.

      And when you're on a forum? A project? It's just as bad.

      1000 voices, all yelling at you "But... he said this!" or "But I can't view this forum at work, that pic/text AAAAGH!", or "That's "

      But you don't have a regulation book 100 pages long when managing a project, do you? And so?

      Good people overstretch, because people all over the place are begging them to.. and all with on-the-surface good reasons.

      So you really do have a fine line between 'dead project' and 'don't be an asshole', because 'don't be an asshole' is really 'someone is charged with controlling things'.

      I'm not saying it can't be done.. but..

      BTW, this is the same problem good politicians have. How on EARTH do you separate the noise out? Hmm?

      Do you listen to the news, that finds 14 people out of a city of 5 million, and then do what those 14 people say? Happy people typically don't protest...

      From where I sit, the perfect politician is one that literally ignores everything everyone says, once in power. But one that also fully and completely discloses their political beliefs and platform when running for office.

      Then you vote, and let that person DO THEIR JOB. And that person should ignore you, and everyone else's opinion.. and decide EVERY issue based upon their own view/beliefs.

      Because you CAN NOT tell what is legitimate complaint.

    23. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you're such an immature little child lol.

    24. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You mean like people who massively over-react to a mistake, screaming "SJW!" and "freeze peach!" all over YouTube and Twitter and Slashdot?

      Talk about a storm in a teacup.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by natmakarvitch · · Score: 2

      "I like offending people because I think people who get offended should be offended." is (mis?)attributed to Linus Torvalds.

    26. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The perfect definition of an asshole. Projects their total lack of any social skills as failures of others.
      Yes, it is not that I am at fault for setting the fire, it is their fault for building their house out of wood and deserve it.
      If Linus was just a run of the mill IT guy he would have been shunned a long time ago.

      Personally I simply find it childish, unprofessional and I wonder why people wo I think (or claim) to be very intelligent, unable to find better and more suitable words.

    27. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no dummy, he said what he meant

    28. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, people say SJW because SJWs are behind codes of conduct and the attempt to replace merit with their carefully curated mix of whatever it is makes up "diversity" for them this week, talent be damned and feelings ruling all. Feelings, of course, are subjective, but largely go along the lines of if a white (or orange) person says/does it then it must be bad and must be opposed no matter what "it" is.

      These people are authoritarians, pearl-clutching busybodies and are absolute destructive poison to everything they get involved in.

    29. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your the asshole.

    30. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 1

      As i said, in all the sides. It's not about the type of politics, it's the type of people.

    31. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Dude, stop being an asshole.

    32. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, slaver leech. Go build your own operating system. No one wants you hanging out around here.

    33. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all, it is exactly the type of politics or rather religion. You can identify a cuck by his own actions. It is a much safer method than try to define some definition of words. If you see a person SJW campaigning instead of delivering value to the project he's a cuck.

    34. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Rather than estimating why not measure the destructive power of SJWs?

      Someone submit a patch that changes all the instances of the word "fuck" to something else, then we can see how much damage that does. My guess is that we will see a lot of outrage over the suggestion but ultimately it will have zero effect on anything.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      Then grow a tougher skin and don't do it. Changing those words for the sake of changing them is just posturing.

    36. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 1

      I can see a /pol/ sperg that take shit too seriously killing a project because he's an oversensitive snowflake that can't handle a bit of left wing stuff in it, or a left wing SJW, or a sega fanboy.
      Excuses are many for the thin skinned authoritarian.

    37. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ultimately it will have zero effect on anything"

      What is the point then? ZERO effect on ANYTHING?

    38. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This relativism is out of place. If you want a merit based project, defending meritocracy is good for the project, being an SJW is bad for the project. It is not the (over)reactions that are of importance, but the intent of the actors that matter.

    39. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 1

      It's not "relativism", it's just that the kind of snowflake authoritarian will give priorities to removing the shit he dislike over meritocracy, regardless of his political position.
      SJWs are by the actual definition authoritarian snowflakes that just happen to enforce extreme left positions, so it's correct that "being an SJW is bad for the project", as you stated, but swapping the "extreme left" for "sega favoritism" still makes the person harmful for the project.

    40. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You defend the destruction your kind is doing by insisting the defense against you is effective.

      Why would anyone lower their guard when their guard is shown to work?

    41. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SJWs are the enemies of reason, for the reasons purely religious. Millennia old gnostic ideas reborn that's what the carry.They are not authoritarian even a little bit. They are totalitarian to the bone.

      You can easily imagine an authoritarian leader standing for the reason. Louis, the Sun King, patron of Arts and Sciences. You can easily imagine even a Christian like Pope Leo 13th. We have seen benevolent dictators of software dec like Guido van Rossium and Linus Torvalds (sadly both are now deposed).

      What you cannot have is a reasonable SJW. Therefore, authoritarian is annoying but ok, yet totalitarian is a cancer to society small and large.

    42. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the intent behind it that matters.

      Him intentionally being an asshole does indeed matter. That's the kind of pc crap people don't want in their life.

    43. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but those "types of people" fall predominantly on the right wing / alt-right side of things by all objective measures.

    44. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully nobody uses your terrible excuse for "code" :) However, you literally can't use any computer without using normal person code which is beyond the grasp of the right wing. There is a very good reason the right has been disappearing from STEM fields over the past decade.

    45. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Same shit on both sides.
      But the far left do more damage because they have more money.

    46. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hit little too close to home, did it? The pendulum is finally swinging away from your Utopian political correctness. You never had the right to not be offended, and now, because you whine so much about it, you'll get offended just that much more.

      Who's "overreacting" and saying people are "screaming"...hmmm?

    47. Re:I don't give two shits about the word fuck by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Yes, I agree that it is. But not necessarily when you're in a work environment. I'm fine with an employer requiring a certain amount of decorum. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't be allowed to blurt out the occasional expletive. But, in a professional workplace f-bombs shouldn't be left in your code, certainly not if you're actually passing along any source code to customers.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    48. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the asshole

    49. Re: I don't give two shits about the word fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The intent of controlling other people's speech is pretty fucking bad.
      > FTFY

      FTFY both

  3. Oh, brother by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't hugging believe this...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Oh, brother by rl117 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know you meant it as a joke, but language can change exactly like this. When I was at school, a popular insult was to call people a "spaz" (spastic). Because of its use as a generic insult, some do-gooders required everyone to refer to disabled people as "special". Result: "special" becomes a generic insult. Like: "You're a bit special, aren't you" is equivalent to "you're a spaz" or "you're a retard". More recently, the charity the Spastic Society renamed themselves to "Scope". Result: spastic children are now insultingly referred to as "scopers". So the word "scope" is now also an insult in its own right. The point being, no matter how much do-gooders and SJWs clamp down on acceptable language use, the remaining "permitted" words will be adapted to replace them, turning the "new inclusive terminology" on its own head. This isn't a battle they can win, because human nature, at its nastiest best, will always be creative enough to come up with new "bad" language! And while I don't condone bullying or insulting, it does make me happy to see people sticking their fingers up at the SJW-enforced norms.

    2. Re:Oh, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that no one has mentioned the examples "foo" and "bar" that are used often in help pages. "Foobar" is from "fubar", Hugged Up Beyond All Recognition.

    3. Re:Oh, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professional societies have to do the same thing. APA had to stop using "insane" because it had become too common in regular speech, and they feared "miscommunications" with the general public.

    4. Re:Oh, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard this referred to as the euphemism treadmill. I've also witnessed "mentally challenged" or "intellectually disabled". As well as "slow", but that predates me a bit. Historically, "idiot", "Moron", and "stupid" were clinical terms, but they got co-opted by the general public and doctors had to move on to fresh terrain.

      It looks like "cretin", "Amentia", and "mongoloid" are on that list.

      All in all this system of constantly abandoning terminology and pretending a new term with the exact same meaning is somehow better is... quite nice.

  4. newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just last night I had a nightmare where I had to submit to the SJW thoughtpolice agenda or get shunned out of my programming group. It was straight out of 1984. That's exactly where this is heading. Fuck your feelings. Stop this Code of Conduct nonsense now.

    1. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not really sure that leaving out the hard core cursing is such an unreasonable expectation. Certainly not for those that are doing this as a job. And really anybody else. Just because Linus gets away with being a raging dick most of the time doesn't mean that should be the level of maturity expected.

    2. Re: newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s a delicious bit of irony that you express your feelings of fear about being oppressed by saying âoefuck your feelingsâ. Itâ(TM)s almost as if you are saying your feelings are more important than others.

    3. Re:newspeak by AHuxley · · Score: 0

      Whats the next expectation after language use?
      That average and mediocre code has to be added to a project to make the project meet a new code of conduct?
      That code that fails is ok as the person has to learn and they should have that ability to be part of a project too?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re: newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      There is already plenty of working space where you cucks can work. Go to IBM work on AIX in a safe female controlled environment.

      In fact Linux source code should be deliberately spiced up with gender racial and sexual slurs to keep cucks away.

    5. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps expect that people conduct themselves as professionals and focus on the actual code rather than insulting each other?

      Not being able to curse is hardly a big deal, millions of people every day go to work and don't curse. It's easy, first you don't curse, then the not cursing thing is handled.

      This is something that people are going to be able to look at years in the future and wonder what the fuck is wrong with you wankers.

    6. Re:newspeak by fodder69 · · Score: 2

      How about the expectation that you conduct yourself like a professional in a project that is used worldwide? I don;t what the fuck is wrong with you people that you think its so complicated.

      See i can say that in a private medium, if I sent that email around work you can bet I'd be shown the door quick as fuck.

    7. Re:newspeak by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I don;t what the fuck is wrong

      I totally agree.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re: newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots should also stay away.

    9. Re: newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So by that last paragraph you admit we will have the greater influence over future generations and they will cuss just like us?

    10. Re:newspeak by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that banning words like 'fuck' in the US comes from Christian Conservative Political Correctness? Or is that what 'SJW' means to you?

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    11. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know "fuck" was a Name Of The Lord, Not To Be Used In Vain.

    12. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >See i can say that in a private medium, if I sent that email around work you can bet I'd be shown the door quick as fuck.

      Volunteer work is NOT a job. I feel bad doing professional stuff without pay already, but this is a new low.

    13. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure that's just misdirection by the SJWs. Seriously, politically conservative Christians haven't had a major impact on culture in decades, outside of abortion. Americans have become more liberal on every political topic except for abortion in the last 60 years. The Christians may not be your friends, but they're not responsible for this one.

    14. Re: newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Perhaps expect that people conduct themselves as professionals"

      But they are not professionals, they are volunteers doing it for free in their spare time, for you.

    15. Re: newspeak by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      NEVER contribute free labor of any sort to a project burdened under the tyranny of a CoC.

    16. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That average and mediocre code has to be added to a project ...

      For some projects, that is already the case ...

      CAP === 'declines'

    17. Re:newspeak by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      SJW be SJW, regardless of their personal orientation.

    18. Re:newspeak by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      So now you know better. Good thing you're here learning.

    19. Re:newspeak by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      ... so McCarthy was one of the loudest and most influential SJWs?

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    20. Re:newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't see yourself as a choosy beggar as you're not paying these people a dime?

      This isn't a "private medium", everyone can read your drivel. It's just pseudo anonymous if you so choose. JUST LIKE open source development. And that's apparently important to maintain as doxing someone is specifically against the fascist new CoC.

      Furthermore, you obviously only have a narrow set of employment experience and have never had the joy of working for a boss that swears a lot (or makes off-color jokes). Maybe you should get out of your bubble and realize that the world is a bigger place than you think. Linux development is by far one of the best meritocracies in the world and you should be APPLAUDING it instead of trying to tear it down.

  5. Such a good use of time by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm glad to see that the code of conduct is resulting such good use of developer time.

    These sad, sad people clearly need a hug.

    1. Re:Such a good use of time by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you need a hug.

    2. Re:Such a good use of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's not a self-hug... Those cause you to code in Windows_ BSOD_ v1.

    3. Re:Such a good use of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need a hug.

      I hugged your mom last night.

    4. Re:Such a good use of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      She has herpes. You're hugged.

    5. Re:Such a good use of time by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      A group hug...

      "Fuck" has already been replaced with, "That's nice"

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Such a good use of time by bongey · · Score: 1

      Stop sexually harassing people with virtual hugs. https://yro.slashdot.org/story...

    7. Re:Such a good use of time by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Hug, I'd forgotten about that story.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    8. Re:Such a good use of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad to see that the code of conduct is resulting such good use of developer time.

      Yep. No time for fixing bugs or dealing with vunerabilites. We have to get the security blanket fully fleshed out!

      These sad, sad people clearly need a hug.

      I love replacing the word hug. Drinking game: Take every word they replace the "bad" words with and substitute the original "bad" word in it's place every time you see the substitute, then take a drink. You know it's the end of the game when you're so drunk the substitute word has become a euphemism for the original "bad" word it replaced to the eternal annoyance of the snowflake.

    9. Re:Such a good use of time by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What would be sad is if it took him more than 5 minutes to run sed and git on the kernel tree.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Such a good use of time by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's a shame they included that specific word because it's be misunderstood and quite damaging as a result.

      Hugs depend a lot on context. Someone you are friends with hugging you is rather different to some creep randomly hugging you in the street. The latter is what it was supposed to be about, people trying use hugs to make unwanted contact and then claiming it was all perfectly innocent.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Such a good use of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they need to go hug themselves and stop hugging children. It's bad! M'kay?

    12. Re:Such a good use of time by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Nerds have a tough time knowing the context, getting neither hugs nor the other thing.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re: Such a good use of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't have the authority or power to do that unless he wants to fork it.

    14. Re:Such a good use of time by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      These sad, sad people clearly need a hug.

      Well played, sir!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  6. Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many instances of FUCK (is that the word??) ARE there in the Linux Kernel in 2018 and WHY? Linus hasn't blown his stack on this already? Enterprise-ready facepalm.

    Are we going to find the N-word in device drivers a bunch of times now? This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.

    1. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can bloody well go fuck yourself for trying to equate colorful language with racist speech.

    2. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save your racist speech for the podium - I wonâ(TM)t be there Iâ(TM)ll be hugging people in the coat room

    3. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's sad that Slashdot allows the word "fuck" but censors the word "nìgger."

      That's right, folks – a word that once was acceptable on network television (watch 'Roots') is now considered more offensive than "fuck."

    4. Re:Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't fucking beg the question because that's not what begging the question means at all, you imbecile.

    5. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck isn't colorful language it's one of the most widely accepted words you can't use at work. It's a bit beyond me why, but it's typically not acceptable at work or in polite society.

      The fact that you don't get that means you're probably in high school or haven't progressed developmentally since then.

    6. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Linux kernel is not developed in an Enterprise environment, that's why it is so successful. To keep it so some racialized slurs in comments are clearly in order! A hug word a day keeps a SJW cuck activist away!

    7. Re:Doesn't this beg the question... by quenda · · Score: 1

      Are we going to find the N-word in device drivers a bunch of times now?

      I hear the hard drive device drivers are riddled with racist hate speech. Especially the old IDE and SCSI drives.

      This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.

      You should hugging get out more.

    8. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't equate your Walmart work with what Linux kernel developers do, please. What is not acceptable to slaves like you , we as a society should gladly allow to highly skilled and smart people. Because we need them working and delivering. A lot depends on them.

      There is no question. Yours prudish manners do not deliver us Linux kernels. Go back to work while it isn't automated, lick your managers ass as a responsible adult you are.

    9. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nlggers nlggardly niggling nogs.

    10. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, what I do for a living is far harder than what the Linux kernel developers do. It's just that I'm an adult, not a man-baby. And I have the self-control and vocabulary necessary to not curse like a fucking cunt at work.

    11. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously not blue collar, or you'd find (un)Offical Fuck Days where everyone works it into every sentence.

    12. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I worked in the natural gas industry for a time. I can assure you that "colorful" langauge was perfectly acceptable in that business. What wasn't acceptable was not getting the job done safely, properly, and in a timely fashion.

    13. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In historical and cultural context, the n-word can have a teachable value -- but as an example of how language can hurt those to which the word refers. And also how it can hurt all people, not just "n-ers."

      The seminal novel To Kill a Mockingbird has the n-word in many places. I would not change a single letter of this book. It is part of American culture, and its struggle to overcome the effects of the slave trade.

    14. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how it's supposed to be. You're supposed to hear the message, not the individual words.

      Forest, trees.

    15. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N!gger. N!ggers are stupid. There's nothing racist about the truth.

    16. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then do it and take over the market. There is literally trillions of dollars in it for you.

      Oh wait, you can't because you're a liar.

    17. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus? That guy cusses like a drunk teenager.

    18. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oh, you can use it at work.

      Cunt gets curious looks but fuck is just fine. Even when talking to Americans. Sometimes especially when talking to Americans.

      Shit, I've joined teams and spent two weeks learning the people and being careful about my phrasing then, on getting pissed off with a compiler and telling it to fucking behave the worthless fucking piece of fucking shit, being thanked by the team who'd been worried that I didn't swear.

      Interesting way to gain acceptance but also indicative of corporate cultures. Shit, people say offensive crap all the time, stop me saying 'fuck' and wave goodbye to half your conversation.

    19. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He's not a liar. Just a lot of developers are small children who have barely the vaguest concept of the adult world and don't like having to behave like adults.

      Watch as they throw tantrums about almost any basic adult concept. It's quite entertaining.

    20. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what I do for a living is far harder than what the Linux kernel developers do"

      Hahahahahaha ho-ho he-he hahahaha weehee huh huh hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    21. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      *You* might not change TKaM but it already *has* been suggested by SJWs that it be changed or not taught at all.

    22. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Oh please, what I do for a living is far harder than what the Linux kernel developers do.

      Bullshit. Easy to say as an AC.

    23. Re: Doesn't this beg the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half your conversation was fuck anyway. Buh-bye

  7. Copy Pasted F Bombs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So copy paste the F word from other comments. Of course giving credit where credit is fkn due.

  8. When's the fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll bring the blackjack and hookers.
    Fuck this child-run age of Linux.
    Sometimes being a cunt to people is a good thing. It keeps 30 year old children away from it.
    These people need a right good kick up the ass to give them something to whine about. Maybe cart them off to some poverty-stricken area and give them some fucking sense.

    1. Re:When's the fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is 'fork' the f-word in this case?

    2. Re:When's the fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absofuckinglutely.

    3. Re:When's the fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *Absohugginglutely.

  9. What F-word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't the summary explain which word it means by "the F-word"?

    1. Re:What F-word? by novakyu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly they mean "French" or "France". The most insulting words in the English language. I fully support the efforts of the valiant warriors to outlaw France. Fuck France.

    2. Re:What F-word? by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Apparently, it also means "Flamebait" because some fuckwit w/o out a sense of humor decided to mark yours that way. Wish I had mod points for you.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  10. PST Table by dohzer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's a PST table used for, and why is it a problem with Athlon laptops?

    1. Re:PST Table by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      It's a personal storage table. They're a problem with Athlon laptops because they really hug them up.

    2. Re:PST Table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a redundant acronym. PST means Performance State Table. It's part of the PowerNow technology in some AMD CPUs. The comment is in "powernow-k7.c". The driver disables CPU frequency scaling when the PST in the BIOS is fucked.

    3. Re:PST Table by PPH · · Score: 1

      when the PST in the BIOS is hugged.

      FTFY.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:PST Table by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a table baked in to the BIOS that describes the available power states for the CPU, so that it can do energy saving. Apparently the ones for the Athlon were somehow fucked up.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:PST Table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Apparently the ones for the Athlon were somehow hugged up.

      FTFY

  11. Oh for Hugs sake! by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 2

    Oh just go and get absolutely Hugged!

    I am sick to Hugging death of these MotherHugging Hugs,
    sticking their Huggers into things that do not concern them.

    The absolute Hugs!

    When I was young, no-one gave a Hug about this Smile.

    Now we are up to our ears in Smile, while every Hug
    whines about how no-one give a Hug about them.

    Everything is Huggy, and we have to call it all the Hug out.

    Peace, my Neckers.

    --
    (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    1. Re:Oh for Hugs sake! by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Oh snap, we're hugged. Golly gee land sakes alive.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  12. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either that, or they are sufficiently mature and emotionally stable not to be offended by a word that is used in dozens of contexts with many meanings. My bet would be on the latter.

  13. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is if you're a porn star. So fuck your Nazi leftist Code of Crap.

  14. Five years from now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if someone finds out that there is something in the water, I will not be surprised. Y'all are nuts.

    1. Re:Five years from now, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if someone finds out that there is something in the water, I will not be surprised. Y'all are nuts.

      I have a friend who is a retired professional biologist and has absolutely no sense of humour about these things; he or she blames (in all professional seriousness) plasticisers.

  15. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "stay the fuck away from my code" isn't unprofessional because of the word fuck, it's unprofessional because aggressive territorial threats ("toxic masculinity") isn't the appropriate way to guard sensitive code in a professional setting. "WARNING: it would be foolish to attempt to modify this code if you don't thoroughly understand why every character of it is there." would be a better way. A stronger warning could be added, "If you don't heed this warning, you WILL fuck things up royally." and is still professional IMHO.

  16. Hug me plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hug me gently with a chainsaw...

  17. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You must be pretty damn sanctimonious to have never used "fuck" or any other language someone else might find objectionable in a professional setting. Maybe you have the benefit of only working with individuals just as or more competent than yourself, but there are some people who need to be told to stay the fuck away from something, or they will fuck it up and make a real fucking mess of things.

    Myself, I'd rather be told to "fuck off" if I need to be. If I think it's out of line, I'll let you know. If I think you're being an abusive asshole, I'll let you know that too. Otherwise I'd rather not sit through some milquetoast discussion where it feels like someone is trying to address a five year old child that shouldn't hear the bad words. Frankly, that's more dehumanizing than someone being pissed off.

  18. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling him an asshole is anti-social and unprofessional. I don't think you should be conversing with the Slashdot team and longer.

  19. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not appropriate in this context. If you don't see why that is, you probably don't work in a real workplace like most people. Nobody has to be mortally offended for this to be inappropriate and stupid, unnecessary. This is code.

    Not your locker room.

  20. Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a good idea to treat people with respect.

    But saying a piece of hardware fucked up some table is not attacking a person. We're going too far with the SJW speech-police. Sometimes it's necessary to make a point strongly.

    If you want equal rights, that means you don't get to demand special protections for your feelings. Equal means equal: you should be adult enough to accept that the real world has some level of swearing in it.

    This kind of thing is a cancer and will spread if it isn't carved out. Eventually we'll be more focused on policing speech than on technology. It will not end well.

    1. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      But saying a piece of hardware fucked up some table is not attacking a person

      What happens if I identify as a piece of hardware? Didn't think about that did you.

    2. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well hug. Ya got me there.

    3. Re:Equal Rights means... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What does this have to do with equality? This is about civility.

      There have been many professions that have achieved a practice of civility without sacrificing value. I see no reason why software development can't do the same.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...saying a piece of hardware fucked up some table is not attacking a person...

      But it IS criticising the competence of the hugwit who designed said hardware - and fair criticism IS taken as a personal attack nowadays.

    5. Re:Equal Rights means... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with equality? This is about civility.

      There have been many professions that have achieved a practice of civility without sacrificing value. I see no reason why software development can't do the same.

      I'm not so certain. Go read #metoo.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Equal Rights means... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Are we in Bizarro World? The Left has spent the last few decades burning down civility as you consider it a tool of oppression. Now that you have power, suddenly we need to be civil? This makes zero sense.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re: Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair criticism my foot. Note that foot is an expression of ridicule, where as "hug" is an expression of rage. You can reason with one kind of these people only.

    8. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We will burn the world down to its foundation and build a new one where the Nothings are Everything"

      Literally the opening lines of their anthem.

    9. Re:Equal Rights means... by rundgong · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's necessary to make a point strongly.

      As a person that swears quite a lot, and thinks Americas tv/radio ban on curse words is absolutely ridiculous; there is a time and place for everything, and in "official" written text it is almost never appropriate.
      If you can't make a point strongly without cursing, you are probably not that good at communicating.

    10. Re:Equal Rights means... by dabadab · · Score: 1

      There have been many professions that have achieved a practice of civility

      I have yet to see a single one.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    11. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civility is anathema to creativity. Look to the world of arts for evidence. Music, paintings, sculpture, even graphic design. Advancements and novelty come from artists ignoring and often willfully breaking social norms.

      Want Linux to look and act like Windows? Want free software to fade away because everyone knows the civil thing to do is get paid for your work and sell the product.

    12. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we in Bizarro World? The Left has spent the last few decades burning down civility as you consider it a tool of oppression. Now that you have power, suddenly we need to be civil? This makes zero sense.

      No, we are in the SJW world. They have power, so they demand you fall inline with their demands. The SJWs are civil according to their own definitions, which they reserve the right to alter, you do not. In short: They are Authoritarians drunk on their own power, which makes perfect sense.

    13. Re:Equal Rights means... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes, most SJW's I know are not in the slightest interested in civility.

      Come to think of it, they don't seem all that interested in actual equality either.

      Carry on.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad to see people wanting to excise the cancer that is right wing Christian evangelicism. It's refreshing to see people recognizing the root of many problems so readily.

    15. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you are in Bizarro World. Here in the real world the right has been burning down civility, history, logic, and science since the 70's as forms of oppression. And last time I checked, Trump was president, who is the furthest right wing leader that we've seen since Hitler.

    16. Re:Equal Rights means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes perfect sense as a method of entrenching one's own position of power.

    17. Re:Equal Rights means... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with equality? This is about civility.

      Let me know when we can define civility so well that a malicious human who games the edge cases can not make everyone's lives miserable while following the rules. Until then, this is a bad rabbit hole to be going down.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  21. Bad rules are always open for interpretation by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's why these kinds of exercises always end up in disaster. If your rule is any more complex than "Nobody shall prohibit anyone their natural rights to freedom of speech" it ALWAYS ends up being initially misinterpreted, and later abused by those in power.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Nice try Anonymous Coward. Are you the same one that tries to DEFEND an actual pedophile (Mohammed) while wanting to eliminating due process in court for accusations of "rape-culture" (which the only thing I would ever defend is the right to due process)?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Well, but that's the crux of the problem all the time with all these . "If only it were implemented right" - Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Jong, Castro, Maduro - if only they did the communism thing "right", history would've been a lot better.

      The problem with centralizing power into a single point (which is one of the main requirements/tenets that any implementation of an anti-free speech/communist leadership requires; someone to decide what speech is acceptable for the "community") is at some point corruption will set in and by design of these there is no "free speech" to oppose it, maybe not today but plenty of projects have already died at the hands of a CoC. The USSR was a US ally against Hitler at one point too.

      The SJW apocalypse has already happened over and over again across various communities. They're not easily resolved, this is a misinterpretation of the rules but not all the rules are quite as clear how about one of these main tenets:
      "Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate"
      --> Into what context? Into what country? Into what mindset? Into what political climate? In Japanese you can insult someone by calling them the wrong 'you'. In most local European cultures refusing to use the proper male or female pronouns (he/she) is considered highly offensive which some American sufferers of DSM-diagnosed mental issues considers them highly offensive to use them at all.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Pffft... If this is the apocalypse then I'm not impressed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You fail to learn from history. The USSR survived for over 60 years. But I wouldn't call it great.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You are seriously comparing SJWs to the USSR...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Pffft... If this is the apocalypse then I'm not impressed.

      No you don't understand. Day 1, we're enforcing some semblance of civilised behaviour. Day 2 we start murdering tens of millions of people. True story. That's why it's necessary to run around with our hair on fire.

      That and try to suppress any speech that disagrees.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You're espousing the same philosophical and political ideals (Marxism).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      LOL okay what is this now, cultural Marxism or some other bullshit?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Ah good point, these things tend to escalate quickly. One minute you are adopting a code of conduct, the next...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The predicted SJW apocalypse and death of Linux has failed to materialize.
      Have you used Windows recently?

    11. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must have forgotten that Marx quote about how transexuals should have the same rights as everyone else.

    12. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Moderators modding this "Insightful" should note that further in the threat guruevi claims that those proposing codes of conduct intend to commit genocide and other acts of mass murder because... uh, reasons.

      It's not really insightful either, rules of politeness and civility have been part of pretty much every organized forum involving more than a handful of people since... well, at least Roman times, if not earlier.

      Nor does the fact the rule was misinterpreted mean much, this was done by one person, and done in an atmosphere in which a sizable group has decided that any rules about civility must be being done to suppress them and are lying about what those rules are, or believing the lies. The person concerned was not responsible for enforcing those rules, and was immediately told how ludicrous his interpretation was by those that were.

      Calm down. The world isn't going to end because you can't call a programmer you don't like a fag, slut, or the N-word.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    13. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you pick out the communist examples while conveniently ignoring the capitalist examples. Hitler, Pinochet, Pol Pot (most consider him far right after deeper analysis of the situation), Reagan, the list goes ON AND ON; but every single one of them did much, much worse than even the most grievous examples you provided by all objective metrics.

      Note how every single right wing regime took anti-free speech to an extreme the world had never seen before. Hell, GWB brought free speech to a screeching halt, with threat of violence and all, and nobody even batted an eye on the right. "It's important that we be able to shut down the peaceful protesters with violence!" you all chanted, until just a few years ago when you realized the entire premise of the Iraq War was false, and silently shifted sides and pretended to be pro free speech this entire time. Luckily you all have your comment histories available so we can see your hypocrisy and know who to ignore.

    14. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by guruevi · · Score: 1

      A small group decided on the CoC without community input and the only reason these rules are in place is because pressure from SJW snowflakes. The rules WILL be used to suppress specific voices, specifically those you don't agree with. If I can't speak the truth because it is offensive to you that is a problem. Within this new regime anyone can be offended at anything; as in this case, this particular person was offended at a common swear word so he sought to banish it, the ONLY reason it was rejected was because it was a past "offense" and thus not covered by the rule but this particular case also explicitly made clear that "offending" anyone can no longer be tolerated.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    15. Re: Bad rules are always open for interpretation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are most seriously the same.

    16. Re:Bad rules are always open for interpretation by Pieczatki · · Score: 1

      What a conwersation :)

      --
      Pieczatki online na https://e-pieczatki24.pl
  22. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well newsflash, you're no pornstars either, idiot alt-Incel-right angrytards. More like Barnstars.

    Go cry into James Damore's gaping ass wounds with your tiki torch angst.

  23. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do you assume that anyone who would say "stay the fuck away from my code" must be a male? Is it not possible for a female programmer to say that? Would that be toxic femininity?

    It's hard to keep track of all these bigoted memes the Left invents each day to signal how non-bigoted they are.

  24. With the F-word, we mean Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There, I said it. Nobody died. Nobody got hurt, In fact, nothing happened... at all.

    1. Re: With the F-word, we mean Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thatâ(TM)s what this guy thought. They probably caught him on camera and sent the pic to the media

  25. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How professional would you say you are, scale of 1 to 10? Be honest, rate yourself for us. And have you ever had to fire anyone for a workplace violation, yes or no?

  26. I just hope someone used fuck as a variable name by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    And Hug as another.

    I don't condone the word fuck in comments, but it does stand out as an advisory for people who are messing with things they probably don't appreciate or understand,

    Hug on the other hand doesn't really have the same warning value...

  27. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > toxic masculinity

    Did you just assume someone's gender?

  28. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Yeah and then the context of a coding all that matters is that the program operates properly and efficiently. So a thousand fucks Don't matter as long as they don't interfere with program operation

  29. What the actual hug?! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    All you gradual maternal-huggers writing code for Linux but are afraid of a few words need to consume soil and depart! I'm tired of inferior code being promoted because some feline cried because his gradual donkey was offended!

    Enough of this soil! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  30. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You better not join the board of a major company; you'll be in for quite a surprise.

  31. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    You must be pretty damn sanctimonious to have never used "fuck" or any other language someone else might find objectionable in a professional setting. Maybe you have the benefit of only working with individuals just as or more competent than yourself, but there are some people who need to be told to stay the fuck away from something, or they will fuck it up and make a real fucking mess of things.

    Try repeatedly dropping f-bombs on people face to face at a workplace, and see how long you last.

    It's easy to be far less civil with someone you're not in the same room with. Just look at the way people behave on this site. Often it is not "professional."

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  32. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've fired nice polite people for being fucking incompetent air thieves.

    I've left threats of physical violence in comments, for good reason. If you'd cleaned up _that_ block of code you would too.

    I don't 'act' professional, I am professional.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  33. 2018 - Year of the Retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus must be turning in his grave

  34. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, so it's the responsibility of others to be "mature and emotionnally stable" to learn to work with what basically amounts to ill-bred socially inept dicks ?

  35. I always wondered about that creepy guy by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    in the town square with the cardboard sign that said Free Hugs.

    Shouldn't that be Libre Hugs?

    1. Re:I always wondered about that creepy guy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      GNU/Hugs

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I always wondered about that creepy guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNU/Hurd

    3. Re:I always wondered about that creepy guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucked (Slovak)?

    4. Re:I always wondered about that creepy guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free as in beer hugs

    5. Re:I always wondered about that creepy guy by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Is it libre or gratis?

  36. Communication skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why cant these motherfuckers communicate professionally?

  37. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bullshit, we don't hate female coders, we hate having incompetent coders on our team.

    Good female coders also hate fixing incompetents shit, can and do cuss like sailors.

    How do you tell someone's sex over the internet anyhow? rChromosomeTest.exe?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  38. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Statistically black people commit a disproportinate amount of murders. Do you also think its ok to assume black people are murderers?

  39. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by ClickOnThis · · Score: 0

    Why do you assume that anyone who would say "stay the fuck away from my code" must be a male? Is it not possible for a female programmer to say that? Would that be toxic femininity?

    Well said. Good to see you are fair-minded. Oh, wait --

    It's hard to keep track of all these bigoted memes the Left invents each day to signal how non-bigoted they are.

    Uh, never mind.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  40. Lmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you look at that... of course it was a pajeet. At least now he's famous.

  41. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you have never worked in a real company lol. I'm sure your penny-ante little projects with 3 devs are chok full of expletives because you're "a rockstar" or something, lol. PHP goons never grow up.

    In the real world silly shit like this gets you circling the drain, maybe that's where you want to be. Good luck.

  42. In the classc scene from the movie 'Dead Bang' ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the harried LA detective who is inadvertently on the trail of white supremists, and trying to explain it to the straight-laced clueless FBI Agent while dropping f-bombs the entire time...which the fed objects to...with the comment: "I'm telling you about a vast conspiracy and all you can focus on is my fucking language??????"

  43. lololol I think they should do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because that's hugging hilarious.

  44. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already know your level of professionalism is impeccable at all times, lol you ancient unused bean bag chair of a man Wumpwuss.

    But nobody asked what an ancient faggot who lies about growing acres of weed in one conversation then pretends to be a major employer pretends to do.

    Nobody pulled your chatty Cathy string, nobody cares about your self-employed fantasies. I asked him.
       

  45. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Let another person fork the code and create their own code of conduct for their "new" English language regulated project.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  46. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually they don't, ACTUAL statistics show that under-educated and unemployed and disenfranchised people commit a MAJOR disproportionate amount of murders, and it has no actual significant correlation to race.

    However, nazism is significantly linked to low IQ, low education, poverty, and yes, murder. That's a choice though.

  47. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your hurry to disagree you didn't notice that you do agree. "aggressive territorial threats" is the language used and the term "toxic masculinity" is not only in parenthesis but also quotes, indicating, for the reading impaired, that it is referring to a colloquial term.

  48. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it was in quotes and parenthesis indicating a colloquial term.

  49. Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the fucking bastards don't like it then fuck off, nobody gives a hobbly fuck.

  50. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use the Linux then.

    CAPTCHA: "defects"

  51. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to accidentally say such a thing, it's quite another to have it checked into revision control where it's available to everybody with access to the source for all eternity.

    And it certainly doesn't convey the notion that a project has serious developers when they're including serious curse words in the comments that they're checking into the repo.

    I'm not really sure what's so fucking complicated about it.

  52. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    I've left threats of physical violence in comments, for good reason.

    Well that's more than a few levels above an f-bomb. Someone who does that shouldn't just be fired. They should be served a restraining order.

    I don't 'act' professional, I am professional.

    Given the nuanced distinction between acting professional and being professional, I must agree.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  53. Prior art example by borad · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    (yeah, it helps — is hilarious — if you know the character beforehand)

  54. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but no, if you're letting your emotions get the better of you like that, then no, you're not a professional, you're a fucking immature twat that deserves to have to clean up those messages.

  55. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't even know what "nazi" means, just that its the worst name you can think to call someone because you believe you're superior. Sort of like the real nazis.

  56. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

    I don't 'act' professional, I am professional.

    Professional troll.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  57. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should start putting "fuck" in quotes then. That way nobody will get offended by it.

  58. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He talked about masculinity, traits that are commonly associated with men.
    But women can have masculine traits too. In fact, it is common for lesbians to have masculine traits.

  59. Violation of licence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be a gpl violation to force such modifications onto the code.

    My wonder was how can this kind of shit can get pushed into the source tree to begin with.

  60. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by quenda · · Score: 1

    Let another person fork the code.

    Been watching "The Good Place"?

  61. Imagine if you will by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    The orgy

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  62. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod up.

  63. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, there is a direct and strong correlation between race and violent crime which persists across all class strata.

    In addition, rich black people are even more likely to commit violent crimes compared to rich white people than poor blacks versus poor whites.

    The more rich blacks are, the more violent they become, per capita.

    That's saying a lot, too, because they are 17 times more likely to commit violent crimes than white people.

    Enjoy further reading, which has been suppressed by Google.

    http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

    http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats

  64. I've never told anyone at my place of work by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    to fuck off. I've also never told anyone on a developer forum to fuck off. I can't even imagine why somebody would outside of taking out their frustration on somebody else. If you want to do that there's a time and a place for it. It's called 4chan.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  65. Recording studio by tepples · · Score: 1

    Try repeatedly dropping f-bombs on people face to face at a workplace, and see how long you last.

    It depends on whether a recording studio is a "workplace". Eminem dropped four F-bombs in four lines in his rap song "White America", and the album it was on (The Eminem Show) went 10x Platinum.

    But I can rap so fyayk school, I'm too cool to go back
    Gimme the mic, show me where the fyaykin' studios at
    When I was underground, no one gave a fyayk I was white
    No labels wanted to sign me, I almost gave up, I was like "Fyayk it"

    1. Re:Recording studio by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. That's art. That's not an invective aimed at a co-worker.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Recording studio by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But I can rap so Hug school, I'm too cool to go back Gimme the mic, show me where the huggin'' studios at When I was underground, no one gave a hug I was white No labels wanted to sign me, I almost gave up, I was like "hug it"

      Fixed that for you, ya insensitive clod. There iz wimminfolk in here ya know!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Recording studio by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It depends on whether a recording studio is a "workplace". Eminem dropped four F-bombs in four lines in his rap song "White America", and the album it was on (The Eminem Show) went 10x Platinum.

      The first 33 words or so in "Four Weddings and a Funeral" were "fuck".

  66. Left a job because of too much cussing everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Left a job because of too much cussing everywhere. Every other word from everyone in the office was vulgar. For a few years, I played along, but eventually cussing had gotten into my home life.

    That was unacceptable.

    Using "fuck" 4-times a year, no issue. Using "fuck" 100 times a day and I don't need to be associated with people like that.

    If you are so immature that other words can't fulfil your need to express displeasure about some work, I feel sorry for you, your friends, and your family.

    Would you say it to your 6 yr old daughter?

  67. What the hug? by fodder69 · · Score: 1

    Why the hug is this a hugging front page story?

    1. Re:What the hug? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Why the hug is this a hugging front page story?

      Probably because it is stupid and silly.

      And note that the prime directive has become not offending the code of conduct.

      I'm expecting a revolt against patriarchal bias in the code itself will be attacked next.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  68. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I would fire your ass and replace you for that behavior. It just drags down an entire team to have to deal with some prima donna crybaby who can't behave.

  69. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with a guy who's got a PhD in mechanical engineering, but can't tell you what spring rate is. Dead fucking serious. I have actual concerns about the legitimacy of his qualifications.

    I routinely have to tell the guy to piss up a rope, because he wants to repeat an expensive, identical experiment hypothesizing that it'll work "this time".

    Some people are just fucking stupid and deserve no less than pure unadulterated contempt for their attempts to swindle and scam those who would employ them or work with them.

  70. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by hmadrone · · Score: 0

    Yeah, despite our fancy college degrees, we don't know enough actual technical words to describe what we're doing logically. Our only possible option is to resort to name-calling and put-downs.

    Like 5-year-olds.

    In a professional workplace, people focus on technical issues and try to solve technical problems using reason, logic, and common sense. They look at how the code functions and address issues with details that allow other human beings to see what the issues are and choose good solutions. They address disagreements with logic, diagnostics, and test suites. They don't engage in verbal pissing contests. They don't threaten or belittle co-workers; they keep their comments about the code rather than personalities.

    But fuck all this shit. It's a whole fucking lot more fun to just let the fuck flag fly than it is to fucking talk about what's fucking things up and why to other fucking engineers.

  71. oh my commit was rejected too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I submitted a change for replacing the potentially offensive f-word with "sodomize it in the ass with a ribbed steel dildo"

  72. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Well, in the old days sometimes we could use finger ...

    But that might be offensive to some, so against the CoC ...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  73. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another question: And WHY are you trying to determine the sex of someone over the internet?

    1) You have an agenda and axe to grind - oh...you're a dickless feminist prick out for cheap fucks, that figures.
    2) You somehow believe that there's a difference between males and females - sooooo...you fail at feminism.

    None of this is male or female - nobody said any of that, YOU did. Fuck off and go fuck yourself with an unfinished plank.
    Fucking idiot.

  74. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try repeatedly dropping f-bombs on people face to face at a workplace, and see how long you last.

    That one depends on where you work really. Fancy that, not everyone works in an environment that is the same as yours! Ive worked in places where Fuck is about as common as the morning cup of coffee. Even in the most professional work environment and in the presence of the execs I have used "bad" words. What matters is how they are used and in what context, so while i may never be able to survive working where you work, I have managed to find several places to work where people have a thicker skin and are a little more laid back.... Oh and its much easier to get away with it when you use those words to inanimate objects that cant get offended

  75. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Guys like when girls cuss. It takes away the abrasive holier then thou, impression. The girl that cusses gets treated as a peer

  76. Re:Left a job because of too much cussing everywhe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you are so immature that other words can't fulfil your need to express displeasure about some work, I feel sorry for you, your friends, and your family.

    Would you say it to your 6 yr old daughter?

    Swearing is stupid, but Your deep seated need to control others speech patterns is silly.

    And no - I wouldn't say fuck or whatever word triggers you in front of a child, or my mother, or Jeebuz either. I have a magic ability to tailor my speech to the group I'm with.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  77. Frackin Taffers! by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Why not the synthetic "frack," " fracking," from Battlestar Galactica, or "taffing," "taffers," from the Thief series of video games.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Frackin Taffers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not the synthetic "frack," " fracking," from Battlestar Galactica, or "taffing," "taffers," from the Thief series of video games.

      Because it sounds fracking stupid. Duh.

      It's not even as if people don't know what's meant by that bowdlerized substitution.

    2. Re:Frackin Taffers! by dddux · · Score: 1

      Those are the words you would use when talking to a 12 yo or younger. Are we all becoming kids now? A grown up will know how and when to swear, and when to use baby/kid talk.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  78. Re:I just hope someone used fuck as a variable nam by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Hug on the other hand doesn't really have the same warning value...

    But "Hug" is sexual assault unless enthusiastically agreed to. Just because it is typed out makes it no less sexual assault.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  79. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

    How do you tell someone's sex over the internet anyhow?

    You just take a peep at their browser history.

  80. hugs being you, matey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel for you. But you should not make work harder for other environments where you do not belong.

    Juts work harder, enjoy your self imposed hard adult environment, and please leave Linux developers alone.

  81. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

    I do try to avoid using it in print, except as a quote. It lacks distinction, and is so over-used that has little impact.

  82. a lot depends on natural gas too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When and where things are mission critical, there usually performance matters more, and the externallia of SJW religion matters less.

    It would be great to segregate those two worlds. The world of useful responsible adults singing SJW chants and purging themselves and the world of industries that feed everyone. Gas, operating systems kernels, health. Bridge construction!

    I am most sure the Florida bridge designers were the most responsible adults wimmin folks and never ever questioned what the hugging design they are producing.

    Imagine what happens if servers in your city that control say traffic lights or payroll system happen to run on SJW designed operating systems kernels. And the gas is leaking because hug sayers are all rightfully fired.

    1. Re: a lot depends on natural gas too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a dumb exaggeration. Having the f word in the code accomplishes nothing. It's just a waste and shows a lack of self control.

      Blurting it out at particular junctures randomly because of frustration or whatever is a totally different thing.

      Basically you're just acting like a dumb child who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar when it wasn't supposed to be there and you're now claiming the adults want to ban cookies for everyone everywhere all the time. Stupid.

    2. Re: a lot depends on natural gas too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you are 12.

      You are trying to limit the speech of volunteers.

  83. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazism is not really a word. Finding it in dictionaries is just proof of revisionist history taking effect. Nazi was always short for nationalist...so you mean nationalism. Don't believe things you hear from millennials.

  84. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by PPH · · Score: 1

    Because if we put âoeFuckâ in quotes, nobody will even understand it here.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  85. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazism is not really a word. Finding it in dictionaries is just proof of revisionist history taking effect.

    According to Merriam-Webster, the first printed use of Nazism was in 1930. So, your allegation of revisionism is horseshit.

    First known use of "horseshit" was in 1923.

  86. deamon needs to be changed to fallen-angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's correct all of the dangerous words! Or is that upwardly-challenged-angel ?

  87. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by ljw1004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You must be pretty damn sanctimonious to have never used "fuck" or any other language someone else might find objectionable in a professional setting.

    That's quite a shifted goalpost. "Fuck or any other language someone else might find objectionable".

    For what it's worth, I've never used "fuck" in 7 post-grad years in academia nor my 14 years in the software industry, and nor have I heard the word used in a way that was directed at a current or former colleague, nor at their work. I've worked with plenty people smarter than me and less smart, and plenty people more industrious than me and less industrious.

    (per the terms of your shifted goalpost, there have been in that time lots of words that someone else might find objectionable, but that's such a watered-down goalpost that it's meaningless).

    If someone needs to stay away from something, I normally say something like "Jones, I don't want you to work on this" or "Jones, don't work on this". The word fuck isn't needed to make my instruction stronger, and indeed wouldn't make it stronger.

    If someone has made a mess of things in the past, I've said stuff like "the architecture for this model wasn't suited to the use-cases, and it'll require a ground-up rewrite, otherwise we'll face risks XYZ". Phrasing it as you suggested "fucked up and made a real fucking mess of things" isn't as actionable, wouldn't be as respected by management, and I'm having a hard time believing it would deliver results as well.

    I'd rather not sit through some milquetoast discussion

    None of what I've said is milquetoast. It's more directed and actionable that your suggested fuck phrasing, and it's effective at getting results.

  88. This is why CoCs are toxic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only serve to attract attention seeking dipshits who believe they can wield them as weapons to introduce unnecessary politics and impose the fruits of their own intolerant mental derangements upon others.

    "And depending on the culture, hugging could fall in the harrasment category. Actually, when I think about it, in Finland this kind of poking of ones personal bubble would be such :-)" ~Jarkko Sakkinen

    According to Jarkko even the word HUG is offensive. Clearly not operating on all thrusters.

  89. Re:Snowflake developers can use Slovak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Slovak, *fucked* means *really*, so Linux can just accept the use of some foreign words in comments and then the problem is solved.

  90. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bullshit, we don't hate female coders, we hate having incompetent coders on our team."

    Bullshit, you're the incompetent one at the very least in this area if not management generally.

  91. Only to be hugging expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course introducing a code of conduct means some will feel the hugging need to bend over backwards to bring hugging everything in line with the hugging CoC, down to the hugging last hugging letter. And then the hugging rules hugging lawyers hugging show hugging up. Group hugs for hugging everyone and hugging everything!

  92. What the fucking fuck is wrong with fuck .. by najajomo · · Score: 1

    fucks sake ..

  93. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the expected stupidity begins.

  94. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah because dates are totally off limits to liars.

  95. Re:Left a job because of too much cussing everywhe by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Would you say it to your 6 yr old daughter?

    Yes. If nothing else so that she learns at an early age that words have no power over her.

    A lesson too many adults sadly missed.

  96. Re:Left a job because of too much cussing everywhe by iamacat · · Score: 2

    Would you say it to your 6 yr old daughter?

    Do you want to work with a bunch of 6 year olds?

  97. no op is right not sanctimonus by aepervius · · Score: 1

    you can say fuck all the time but you should not professionally write it in permanent artifact. City Clerks says fuck all the time but do not write it in birth or death certificate or laws. Accountant says it all the time but don't write it in a document sent to the IRS or local equivalent. Doctor and engineer says fuck all the time but don't write it in patient charts or blueprints. So why in the five fuckity hell of a bitch moaning schweinpriester do you think it is sanctimonious to expect the SAME fucking professionalism from developer ? Sorry, but if you write it does in permanent artifact which are shared with other, you stay fucking polite. If you can't do that then grow up. I have seen the worst in source code from simple swear words to pretending a colleague was a whore and accept credit cards+her phone. None of that shit is OK and if I see it now i immediately ask the idiot to remove it OR escalate it. That 3rd year playground shit is unprofessional.

    Is that non-sanctimonious enough for you ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  98. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by bool2 · · Score: 1

    Man, fuck this ".exe" Microsoft PE shit. This is Linux. Show some fucking respect!

  99. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    No they don't. They get called "bossy" and "bitch".

    Only in your fantasy land that happens.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  100. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    Most kernel developers are male. You REALLY want to argue that you have a chance of coming up against a female kernel developer is equal?

    Funny how you ignore statistics when it suits you, and pretend everything is equal. I bet you also read James Damore's piece and agree with those statistics.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  101. um, a little information is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's "daemon" and it's not exactly the same thing as "demon".

    Daemons are associated with ancient Greek mythology and are mythical creatures which act for good or ill and often capriciously. This is why this spelling and term are used for background processes in Linux and similar operating systems.

    Demons are commonly associated with the devil of the generally Jedeo-Christian religious traditions and as such are powerful and always evil entities. This is not the word used in Linux, BSD, etc for background processes.

    If you know more than just a little bit about something, then it's easy to avoid embarrassing yourself publicly.

  102. Re: Snowflake developers can use Slovak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This rabbit hole's fucked hugging deep.

  103. The trouble with comments... by sajavete · · Score: 1

    The trouble with comments is that they rot. Rotting means that comments are less likely to be maintained than code and thus, they go out of date and become irrelevant. So if some guy back in whenever wrote a piece of rant that's still there but hopelessly irrelevant today, then he's just making an idiot of himself. It's like yelling on the street when there's no danger... Don't let this happen to you :)

  104. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes removing 90% of the people in the room would allow the 10% with a brain to solve a problem.

    Clearly, you are a part of the 90%.

    Now, I also haven't said fuck off, but I would have fired the 90% on the spot if I had the chance.

  105. Will lead to losing the word "hug" in english by Baki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Word police cannot change the way people think.

    The result will be that more and more people, when using "hug" in the normal way, will associate it with todays use of the f-word. So they will seek and find a replacement, use a synonym, when really wanting to express "hug".

    It is a pointless excercise, only making the language a bit poorer or distorted.

    1. Re:Will lead to losing the word "hug" in english by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Hug you!

      Asshole.

      (just being silly)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  106. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emotions are there for a reason. I don't advocate venting them unrestrained every day, all day. But tainting evil everything that has to do with them is not the way to go, we're not fucking Vulcans.

  107. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    asl.dll, obviously.

  108. Just fork the kernel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...one for the PC people , as in "Personal Computer", and one for the PC people, as in "Political Correctness".

  109. Re:Left a job because of too much cussing everywhe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a magic ability to tailor my speech to the group I'm with.

    What dark sorcery is this?!? Are you a witch?

  110. Forbidden words get replaced. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    By code. Fast. 3 weeks in and they have a new meaning Just like Fuck has at least two. Goes to show that compelled speach is nonsense.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  111. Hug this hugtarded idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a hugtarded idea. Hug it right in the skull!

  112. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    How do you tell someone's sex over the internet anyhow?

    Linux kernel submissions require your real name, which tends to reveal your gender.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  113. Missing the point meme is formed by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    I think he needs a Hug.

  114. n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a motherhugger.

  115. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Signal that virtue! Your comment had nothing to do with theirs but hey, gotta work that identity politics into the conversation somehow. They disagree with you so they must be literally Hitler. Like, literally. Hitler.

  116. This is too fucking much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One single person does not read licence properly!" - That is news? Honestly? What the fuck is wrong with you people?

    Oh, and fuck fuckelifuck fuck fuck.

  117. That's just fucked up. by hduff · · Score: 1

    Who the fuck really cares? Political fucking correctness gone fucking crazy. Fuck this.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  118. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by nine-times · · Score: 1

    I'd agree with you if people were getting all bent out of shape about the fact that comments used the word 'fuck' and you were saying, "Settle down. It's not that big a deal." Adults should be able to handle the occasional swear word, and editing the Linux source code is generally not an activity for children. And you're right, if in the spur of the moment you use the word "fuck" in a professional setting now and then, it's probably fine.

    Or it might not be. Whether it's acceptable depends on context.

    But we're talking about someone removing the word "fuck" from official documentation, and you're getting bent out of shape that someone has done that. There's no real need for "fuck" to be used in official documentation. If you want to tell someone to "stay the fuck away from something," you can put something that says, "WARNING: Stay away from this." Adding the word "fuck" doesn't add more information. In fact, I'd probably take the warning less seriously because it includes the word "fuck". I'd assume that either it's playful, or it's written by someone immature who doesn't really know what they're doing.

  119. Controversy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Eventually LWN.net publisher Jonathan Corbet deflated most of the controversy by pointing out that Linux's new Code of Conduct applies to future comments but clearly indicates that it does not apply explicitly to past comments. '

    How does this deflate any of the controversy? Given that this will apply to future comments.

  120. Nobody wants that job by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 2

    Correction - Nobody you would WANT to do that job will want that job.

    There are, however, a large number of people YEARNING to be a "perverted authority figure".

    And they are the biggest proponents of "Code of Conducts", so as to make it possible for them to do "that job".

    1. Re:Nobody wants that job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which perfectly explains why right wingers are always trying to usurp control over things.

    2. Re: Nobody wants that job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the prime example of them usurping right wingers being Carylyne Adah Ehmke, or what's them called.

    3. Re:Nobody wants that job by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a straw man. I'm a proponent of the CoCs, but I think most of them are crap.

      The first one I was involved with was imposed and leveraged by a social pariah to advertise their non-mainstream lifestyle to anyone and everyone who came near the group. People started leaving because they were embarrassed at being associated. The tough part is that although somebody is of a marginalized group, it's very difficult to put your finger on when exactly they go from protecting themselves, to being on a righteous power trip or enjoying CONSTANTLY being the center of attention. Fucking exhausting.

      We tried to address the pariah problem, but ultimately failed. The group dissolved into sub-groups of private invitation only. I think the main group still meets, but it's just a clique of kinky and extremely awkward people now.

      I've had the reverse experience with CoCs too, but it's a long story... the key there was to have the code simply keep people off the topics of sex and religion, and to try to avoid politics.

      You want to talk endlessly about your kink/trans/furry/poly/pickup artist escapades? No. Not. One. Word. You're welcome to attend, you're welcome to mention it casually if you find a way to slip it into a polite conversation, you're protected if somebody finds out and tries to be an ass, but it's off-topic. Even if it IS kinky-trans-poly-pickup-furry-computer related.

  121. Hugs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern hug huggers hug other hugs using hugs, NOT LUDDITE f*ck!

    Hugs!

  122. We have to focus on quality by rundgong · · Score: 1

    And that includes the fucking comments and variable names. But there is a time and place for cursing. Serious source code is almost never that place.

    Auto replacing fuck with hug is obviously ridiculous, but improving code and comments should always be welcome.
    And the truth is, re-writing so the text does not contain curse words is likely to make it look more professional. We should encourage that.
    If you can't make a strong point without cursing you are probably not that good at communicating anyway. So let someone else clean up the comments without bitching and whining. Remember, we were focusing on quality, right?

    This obviously means we should not just remove the curse words blindly without thinking. It has to be an actual improvement, and we don't want to lose the meaning the original text was trying to present.
    If something is fucking important, it is fucking important. But don't be lazy. Make also the comments look professional on a level that Linux deserves!

    Changing someones comments is also not censorship. It is the whole point of the GPL, that we can take someone else's code and make changes to it, if we think it will be an improvement.

  123. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    How do you tell someone's sex over the internet anyhow? rChromosomeTest.exe?

    Once a month their commits are fully of bugs and the comments are full of swear words.

    (Sigh. I shouldn't hit submit. But whatever, asbestos coat on, come at me SJWs)

  124. Re:Left a job because of too much cussing everywhe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I have a magic ability to tailor my speech to the group I'm with.

    What dark sorcery is this?!? Are you a witch?

    A warlock, indeed.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  125. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by edris90 · · Score: 1

    The culture must be different where you work and live. Because everyone I know who is the girl that cusses and doesn't put on Airs, and tells the occasional dirty joke, tends to get treated like "one of the guys" or another terms "as a peer".

  126. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Being bossy comes from telling other people what to do beyond the simple delegation and then getting out of their way. Bossy is another name for micromanagement. if you are delegating tasks but you're not granting them the autonomy and access they need , to have control and latitude in the scope of their job then that is the definition of being bossy, or micromanaging. A good boss hires and trains a competent crew that does not need their boss unless something out of the ordinary happens. A competent boss doesn't even need to be there for normal day-to-day operations. they are there to handle anything outside of normal scope and do act as a coordinator.

  127. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    ("toxic masculinity")

    See that? You SJWed right there. Totally unnecessary as you already used "aggressive territorial threats" which are in no way restricted from females.

  128. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Linux kernel submissions require your real name, which tends to reveal your gender.

    Kinda like wearing a dress but having a beard does, Leslie?

  129. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Did you just forget about the "Socialist" part?

  130. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    But applied as a qualifier to "aggressive territorial threats" made by a coder, so yes, assumes sex of the coder.

  131. Everything old is new again by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

    There used to be a sketch comedy show called Bizarre that would replace "feelthy language" with the names of politicians and public figures. So you might hear them say something like, "That hooker Lewinskied my Trump until I Clintoned all over her face."

    Somehow I doubt Linux developers will be any less imaginative going forward.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  132. You're exaggerating by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    a project doesn't turn into a dystopian nightmare. You can just leave the project. Societies turn into dystopian nightmares. And you haven't convinced me that making people be civil in a workplace environment leads to that.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You're exaggerating by Z80a · · Score: 1

      You don't leave the project, you get permanently banned from it for using an { where you shouldn't according to the guidelines because "it's not civil".

    2. Re:You're exaggerating by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      And you haven't convinced me that making people be civil in a workplace environment leads to that.

      The problem is that this mindset isn't limited to the workplace. It's already expanding to the outside world as well, where it freezes discussion, assaults freedom of speech, and stops the free exchange of ideas. It ignores presumptions of innocence, rules of evidence, context, or even logic. The thought policemen who introduce and enforce codes of conduct don't limit themselves to the work place - and why should they? There are no negative consequences for them, and it makes them important, when they have few merits otherwise (no wonder they dislike meritocracies). Some of them lead real life witch-hunts, looking for offences and thought crimes to punish. And they will find them, or else they will make them up - and, as we have already seen, accusation is enough in many cases.

      I agree with the idea that it's nice to be nice, but some of the proponents are overdoing it and throwing the baby with the bathwater. The degenerate form of political correctness we're seeing recently, with idiocies like micro-aggression, or cultural appropriation, or replacing "fuck" with "hug" is particularly obnoxious.

      Making niceness mandatory is a bad and dangerous direction to take. I don't want to live in a society of taboos - where you can't discuss some subject, use some word or dare to disagree with some opinion. There is a good reason why freedom of speech is the first amendment.

  133. What the frack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the frack did I fracking hear a fracking replacement for the fracking f-word before...

  134. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please. When feminists or SJW's talk about "toxic masculinity," they mean MEN. They are NOT talking about lesbians. :-P

  135. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Anybody doing what they did deserved to have all their fingers and toes broken. So they never coded again, not even with their feet.

    I didn't break their fingers, just told them I would. I did pretend not to know who it was...it was 'to whom it may concern', not 'Steve', but the whole team knew.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  136. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I worked with a guy who wrote his masters thesis on SQL query optimization and not only couldn't read a query plan, he didn't know what one was.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  137. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I worked one place where a VP casually told the president to 'go fuck himself' on my first day there. Yes it was an Engineering consultancy.

    'A buttload' was a commonly used unit.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  138. "Hug" is an absurd replacement for "Fuck" by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    To quote the late great George Carlin, in english, fuck falls into many grammatical categories.
    "Hug", as a replacement for "Fuck" only makes sense if you think the particular meaning of "fuck" in that context is a reference to coitus.
    I really doubt that's what the code comments were trying to get across.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  139. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Bossy is acting like the boss when you aren't. You can be bossy without micromanaging and micromanage without being bossy.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  140. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    What's up with lesbians? They hate men, but try to dress and act just like them. You never see jews dressing like nazis.

    para Norm MacDonald

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  141. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I built and ran the team. I was working on shrinking it by one net negative worker I inherited from another project, but HR departments are a huge fucking pain in the ass. The whole team wanted him gone, everybody that coded knew.

    I would have never hired you in the first place.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  142. They already did this in the python code base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://developers.slashdot.org/story/18/09/13/1523229/python-joins-movement-to-dump-offensive-master-slave-terms as covered there, crap like this has already happened, and apparently will continue to happen.

  143. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've left threats of physical violence in comments, for good reason. If you'd cleaned up _that_ block of code you would too.

    Most places I've been in will turn a blind eye towards cursing, but draw a line when it's directed towards someone.

    I don't 'act' professional, I am professional.

    Every place I've worked would fucking fire your unprofessional ass, for very good reason.

  144. ... seems like testing to see how far the line is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... seems like testing to see how far the line is.

  145. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most kernel developers are male. You REALLY want to argue that you have a chance of coming up against a female kernel developer is equal?

    Funny how you ignore statistics when it suits you, and pretend everything is equal. I bet you also read James Damore's piece and agree with those statistics.

    You mean the statistics backed up with sources and supported by numerous professionals in the respective fields?

  146. Why not change them to relevant words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Hug' makes absolutely no sense on those example comments. I'm glad this was declined, but not because of 'censorship' or whatever, but because the comments make no sense with 'hug' in them.

    If he wanted to remove the "swear" part of it why didn't he use something more immediately useful? e.g.

    "Some Athlon laptops have really messed up PST tables"
    "If you don't see why, please stay away from my code" // literally just remove "the fuck"
    "Only Sun can take such nice parts and mess up the programming interface".

  147. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Documentation can be cheaper therapy.

    https://github.com/zepouet/Xee-xCode-4.5/blob/master/XeePhotoshopLoader.m#L108
    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/184618/what-is-the-best-comment-in-source-code-you-have-ever-encountered

    http://mcfunley.com/from-the-annals-of-dubious-achievement

  148. Free hugs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People holding signs with "Free Hugs!"
    suddenly got a new meaning....

  149. Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English happens to be the language in which we communicate in, but I do not remember agreeing to stick to the American notion of decency and moral values in that same pack.

    To the dismay of many Americans (and that Scandinavian nerd that watched too much cable TV) "fuck" is just a word, and an "F word" is just a 48 bit far pointer.

  150. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't tell me what to do! Fuck you!

  151. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have strong views on professionalism. I don't think it means wearing ties and slacks and smiling when you sink the knife into someone's back. I don't think it has anything to do swearing or curtsying or wearing white gloves or buying the high quality coke from your corner office.
    My father would say professionalism is about finishing your shift until relief comes, even though they fired you 4 hours ago. Because otherwise the city would go dark. My brother would say it's about giving a proper legal defense to someone you find repulsive. I'd say it's about bringing the entire project to a halt because the PM thought he could bypass test for a life-critical system. Because the job is more important than yourself. Because it's millions of dollars or people's livelihoods or literal lives on the line. The profession is important and critical and people have entrusted you to do it. Professionalism is not violating that trust. Most of the time, if it's not easy, it is at least routine. Your professionalism is tested when when you are expected to do a job that violates your morals or self-interest.
    So sit in your cubicle and push your papers that no one will likely even read and check those boxes and turn that cog as you complain about the annoying co-worker. But if you try to get them fired on "professionalism" simply because they offended you, you are diluting the term and bringing real professionals down a peg.

      And no, I've never fired anyone because I'm not a manager.

  152. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For what it's worth, I've never used "fuck" in 7 post-grad years in academia nor my 14 years in the software industry,

    Wow. It's really weird you just blew a 21 year streak just for a slashdot post.

  153. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I promise you that you are far too incompetent to work at my company. We are all well aware you could never pass the basic logic test.

  154. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to 1999! In just 20 more years you'll learn how laughably cherrypicked those statistics are, and hopefully have the intellectual honesty to change your easily disproven, nazi propaganda pseudo factoid. Believe it or not, most everyone stumbles across your statistics at some point in their lives, and some people either take them at face value and continue believing in the racial equivalent of flat earth or do a bit more research and find the rest of the story and learn that white people cause just as much crime per capita as black people. The primary difference is that white people get caught and convicted far far less often. As for the FBI link, you simply prove that you cannot derive a logical conclusion from statistics; if you could you would realize the FBI link directly disproves your statement. I'm certain you aren't aware of that though.

    You are welcome for the information. Even if you stamp your tiny feet and refuse to do more research and live in your blissful ignorance, rest assured knowing that your kids (if you have any, after all you likely aren't very far out of high school and quite the incel if you're posting known debunked nazi propaganda on the internet) will most likely listen to reason, and not be as easily led astray by misleading information as you are.

  155. Wrong word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, we need to replace fuck with cunt.

  156. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Yeah I guess you're right. Have the time I think people are joking when they're being bossy. It's like haha why would I reward that tone with any kind of attention? That's not pleasant I'm not going to teach you to do that to me

  157. Re: "Fuck" is not professional by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Maybe in some environments, but that's not been my experience. I work with a group of older white males, and one black female. We're all lower level managers. Our "new" boss, a female (probably late 30s in age) joined us and we all felt at ease when she dropped her first f-bomb. We're not on edge about watching our own language around her now.

    My daughter, (an MBA candidate and program manager) cusses just about as much an has been quickly moving up the chain. Go figure.

    What matters is how you use it. If you're directing the word at people in the conversation, or just using it for emphasis makes a difference.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  158. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    'Gender' now means anything, which makes it mean nothing.

    I'm only interested in their 'sex', that word still has meaning.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  159. Re:"Fuck" is not professional by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Your obsession with other people's bodies is pretty creepy.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC