She was given a few questions, but they weren't the exact questions that were asked, but nonetheless were on the same subject. It's highly probable that she was already prepping for those subjects, because c'mon, it's Hillary Clinton. We've seen the e-mails where they frame a potential subject in a negative light to come up with positive answers. If she wasn't given those question subjects in advance she still would have killed it.
What she did wrong was use her own potentially vulnerable e-mail and server instead of a government-issued e-mail. They (the republicans) also believe she lied about it, but so far they have no evidence that she is guilty of perjury
Ethically, she messed up. Legally, she's fine. She broke policy, not the law.
Joe is so serious, that he breaks federal anti-discrimination laws to suit his personal style of justice. That justice being putting minorities in their place because they could potentially be illegals, murderers, drug dealers, and rapists.
Right, because his alleged prank/accident requires the death penalty.
You're telling me that the majority of humans out there, including you, haven't made a huge fuck up before? Lets just fry everybody who accidentally fucks something up without the foresight to know the outcome.
2/3rds of our population would be removed.
Maybe you'd fit in better in Saudi Arabia or other like-minded backwards-ass caveman societies.
$20? More like $50,000 note with Trump's face on it, if he had his way. We'd also have crazy inflation, and much like Zimbabwe, everybody will be carrying around wheelbarrows full of 'em.
1. It was the media saying that they were reopening the investigation.
And someone told the media, and the memo was given to congress, not the media. So someone in congress misinterpreted or misled the media when informing them of the development. So far it's been determined that it was Chaffetz who stated that it was reopened.
When a tech company holds a launch event/conference, you'll experience multiple news releases on tech-related websites.
If you experience negative side effects from multiple-news-release syndrome, may I suggest a codeine suppository? Or maybe a horse tranquilizer? It'll knock you out for about 24 hours and by the time you come back, it'll be all over.
It annoys me to no end when there's a link to page, that cites another page talking about the same thing, and you have to go to that page to get the actual source.
WHAT THE FUCK! JUST POST THE DIRECT SOURCE!
Nobody cares for some random website's opinion on the topic, give us what we want!
But nooo... we have to deal with shitty web UI's and obtrusive advertisements three times over( if not using adblock).
As the late, great Hunter S. Thomson put it, lets cut down to the brass tacks, shall we?
Slashdot Mirror
somebody can only use ad hominem attacks when their positions and "facts" have been challenged.
She was given a few questions, but they weren't the exact questions that were asked, but nonetheless were on the same subject. It's highly probable that she was already prepping for those subjects, because c'mon, it's Hillary Clinton. We've seen the e-mails where they frame a potential subject in a negative light to come up with positive answers. If she wasn't given those question subjects in advance she still would have killed it.
But keep it up. You Trump shills are on a roll.
The Shill is strong in this one.
For the nth time, Bill Clinton isn't running for President.
What she did wrong was use her own potentially vulnerable e-mail and server instead of a government-issued e-mail. They (the republicans) also believe she lied about it, but so far they have no evidence that she is guilty of perjury
Ethically, she messed up. Legally, she's fine. She broke policy, not the law.
Joe is so serious, that he breaks federal anti-discrimination laws to suit his personal style of justice. That justice being putting minorities in their place because they could potentially be illegals, murderers, drug dealers, and rapists.
Right, because his alleged prank/accident requires the death penalty.
You're telling me that the majority of humans out there, including you, haven't made a huge fuck up before? Lets just fry everybody who accidentally fucks something up without the foresight to know the outcome.
2/3rds of our population would be removed.
Maybe you'd fit in better in Saudi Arabia or other like-minded backwards-ass caveman societies.
They raised me to be evil. You know, that old chestnut
They Were signed into AOL. Took them 10 years to figure out how to sign off.
$20? More like $50,000 note with Trump's face on it, if he had his way. We'd also have crazy inflation, and much like Zimbabwe, everybody will be carrying around wheelbarrows full of 'em.
Say it with me... Dictator Trump.
but where's the play part? They payed her.. but what did they get other than her talking to them?
1. It was the media saying that they were reopening the investigation.
And someone told the media, and the memo was given to congress, not the media. So someone in congress misinterpreted or misled the media when informing them of the development. So far it's been determined that it was Chaffetz who stated that it was reopened.
that's all speculation by politicians looking for a "hook" to keep attacking Clinton.
Chaffetz
Oh absolutely. Chaffetz has it out for Clinton.
Have you ever eaten human? They're GRRRRRREEAAT!
I think we have a pretty good example of Poe's Law here
Lets just execute everybody, then we don't have to deal with anyone's bullshit.
When a tech company holds a launch event/conference, you'll experience multiple news releases on tech-related websites.
If you experience negative side effects from multiple-news-release syndrome, may I suggest a codeine suppository? Or maybe a horse tranquilizer? It'll knock you out for about 24 hours and by the time you come back, it'll be all over.
They haven't bought them yet. That's still to be determined, and will likely(hopefully) be blocked.
But still people will be using cameras with film in them because they like the control they have over the entire process.
I saw someone using a disposable the other day. I was in pure shock for the fact that those still exist.
You expect a touch-based, contextual menu display bar to maintain functionality for the long haul?
Brave man, you are.
Just in case you haven't already been bludgeoned enough by pedantry, Dorothy's shoes were Silver. Something Something Technicolor...
Perfectly timed
It annoys me to no end when there's a link to page, that cites another page talking about the same thing, and you have to go to that page to get the actual source.
WHAT THE FUCK! JUST POST THE DIRECT SOURCE!
Nobody cares for some random website's opinion on the topic, give us what we want!
But nooo... we have to deal with shitty web UI's and obtrusive advertisements three times over( if not using adblock).
As the late, great Hunter S. Thomson put it, lets cut down to the brass tacks, shall we?