Well, we're withdrawing from the rest of the world, like you asked us to. We're going to take all our troops home, from Europe, from Korea, from Japan, everywhere. You hate our guts. It's been shouted loud and clear for a long time and don't think we didn't get the message, because we did. Slashdot is a US-centric site and it will remain so.
Here's an idea: why don't you make your own tech site and it can be worldly? You can have global citizens posting and ban everything but metric units and so on. It'll be bliss. Off with you now, get to work and stop bothering the Americans.
Yeah, that's because you were already a leftist. But seriously, how can you be a leftist and be for right-wing things like nationalism? Hillary promised us more and more and more globalism, and fuck the American worker. Her plan was to give citizenship to fuckloads of Syrians, WTF? How would that possibly help the American people?
How can you be simultaneously pro-Obama and anti-globalism? That's like being pro-Hitler and pro-Semite. They're two ideas that don't go together.
The whole "calling people racist for disagreeing with Obama's globalist vision of the future" went out of fashion the day after Election Day. Maybe you didn't get the memo?
If you want to know how we ended up like this, please watch this video: "President Trump: How & Why...". It is a must-view for people exactly like you for how the level of political discourse got so low. It's by a leftist, so you know he's telling the truth and has been fact-checked. It's really sad what he's saying and it is all 100% true.
I don't know if you were alive these last 8 years, but anyone who mocked or belittled the President was immediately shouted down as racist. With Trump in office, it will become OK to criticize the President again, which is a huge improvement.
Investigative journalism will also make a big comeback, after an 8 year hibernation. The positives will just keep coming. The media is supposed to exist in eternal opposition to the government, but during Obama they twisted their purpose and became pro-government mouthpieces. They were caught red-handed supporting Hillary's campaign. California does not require any proof of citizenship to vote.
...and yet if it got a glowing review it would be proof positive that Consumer Reports nailed it and has a great reputation for not accepting bribes, etc. Face it, it's just that they trashed your favorite car and now you have to reply by trashing CR.
Wha...?? The media isn't liberal? Are you delusional? Did the whole world not see the US media drop any pretense at journalism and and became
people who had a conclusion that they reached, and then searched for facts to
show that Hillary Clinton was a winner. That didn't happen in your world? FUCKING SERIOUSLY?
The only reason they're more widely read is because they cover news that the mainstream media deliberately ignores as part of their biased, partisan coverage. The MSM has only themselves to blame for its rise. And if you're going to blame Breitbart for being biased and give the MSM a free pass for the same, then Breitbart is going to just get stronger. How many MSM outlets peddled the "Hands up don't shoot" lie? How many uncritically accepted Mattress Girl or the Rolling Stone non-rape story or any of the other hoaxes they perpetrated?
And most damning of all, the MSM is trying to use its power to get people to stop reading alternative media. This means that they're effective and truthful, because if the enemy is lying then they're no threat. To say nothing of the tyrannical, 1984 themes of doing such an abhorrent act.
This is the kind of crazy that comes from existing in an echo chamber where everything good is left-wing and the right are scary enemies. It's self-reinforcing and is quite ignorant as well.
The entire space program was thoroughly right-wing and patriotic from the beginning. It was a giant dick-waving competition with the Soviet Union over who was better, communism or capitalism. The few leftists in the space program were engaged in trying to steal the tech and deliver it to the Soviets. Wehrner von Braun, the father of the Saturn V rocket, was a Nazi and you can't get more right-wing than that. Science and STEM occupations in general are regularly attacked by the left for being exclusionary, unwelcoming to women, and all of the other crimes that we know so well. Now suddenly the right can't do calculus?
The really crazy part is the sudden left-wing identification with weapons. The left has long been hoplophobic and now they suddenly overnight lost their fear of guns? These are people who won't even be in the same room if an unloaded pistol is lying on a table. They'll leave the building, it freaks them out.
You also notice in this post there is no difference made between the right wing (most people in America) and the alt.right (a few thousand people). They are put together in the same bucket so that the odious beliefs of the alt.right may contaminate the entire right. The principle is: add a thimble of wine to a gallon of sewage and you've got a gallon of sewage, but add a thimble of sewage to a gallon of wine and you've got a gallon of sewage. This is just plain ignorant, but it's the new philosophy of the ctrl.left and sadly it has a good chance of working.
Damn, the denial is strong with you. You just tried to discredit original research. Do you even realize how denialist that is? If doing your own research isn't good enough, then damn what is?
Did you even read the article? Please do, it's important. The subject admits he's a leftist and confirms he's running a false flag operation. Read the whole thing from top to bottom, it is well worth five minutes of your (and everyone else's) time. Especially read the byline.
Laura Sydell fell in love with the intimate storytelling qualities of radio, which combined her passion for theatre and writing with her addiction to news. Over her career she has covered politics, arts, media, religion, and entrepreneurship. Currently Sydell is the Digital Culture Correspondent for NPR's All Things Considered, Morning Edition, Weekend Edition, and NPR.org.
Breathtaking contempt for the people, admiration for ruthless authoritarians who opened fire at Tiananmen Square in 1989, and a conclusion that this gives them a moral high ground. Wow. Adolf Hitler, is that you? If not, take a long hard look at yourself and what you just said.
"Late 2012, early 2013 I was spending a lot of time researching what is now being referred to as the alt-right. I identified a problem with the news that they were spreading and created Disinfomedia as a response to that. The whole idea from the start was to build a site that could infiltrate the echo chambers of the alt-right, publish blatantly false or fictional stories, and then be able to publicly denounce those stories and point out the fact that they were fiction."
You didn't get it, did you? You're making my point for me. You shouldn't believe the mainstream media because they're not credible. You saw, I saw, the entire world saw them totally back Hillary Clinton in a shameful abandonment of the last shreds of them being truth-tellers. Moreover on an entirely journalistic standpoint, they entirely missed the real story of the election. Like, it didn't even enter their consciousness.
You have to realize just how much the recent election shocked the shit out of the media. Wow, there is a whole world out there and they have NO IDEA what is going on. They have been living in a bubble and that bubble was burst, badly, on election night. They are deep hurting and this isn't any kind of fake crocodile tears hurt. It's for real and they are going to engage in the kind of defense mechanisms that humans engage in when they are hurt this badly.
So, what should their reaction be to the fact that the world doesn't conform to how they think? Take a long, hard look at themselves and change? Or double down, adopt a fortress mentality, and deny that there's anything wrong? Label these dissenting voices "fake news" and strive mightily the MSM's chief weapon, credibility, to discredit them.
If you just laughed at the idea that the mainstream media is credible after the shit they pulled in the election, then you know what I'm talking about. They were 100% backing Hillary and the whole world saw it. They had themselves convinced that she had a 93% chance of winning and they believed it. After a shock like that, who can blame them for reacting this way? They have a lot to lose. Not just their million dollar salaries, but their entire way of life and worldview is being threatened. Why not attack the truth-tellers? It has a chance of working, and anything's better than actually facing the cold hard truth. Facing the truth is last resort after everything else has failed and the MSM is a long way from that. They have powerful resources and are not about to give up.
Better to get your news on controversial topics from news sources like Infowars or Breitbart. These sites have a huuuuuge audience, larger than the mainstream media, and they report stories that the MSM refuses to cover. Think about it: when powerful people tell you to ignore news sources, what should you do? (A) Obey and be a good little drone. Or (B) take it as proof positive that these news sources are broadcasting very inconvenient narratives that they really don't want you to know. Hell, I used to think Alex Jones was a crazy man, but damn if they're trying to suppress him then he MUST be saying something important, otherwise he'd just be ignored! Read for yourself, evaluate for yourself, if you think they're full of shit that's your decision. But read them yourself, don't let the MSM tell you what's credible and what's not, because their credibility is bullshit! Make up your own mind!
One side says, "don't pay attention to those others, they're fake!" and the other side says, "consider us, we'll tell you things the other side is hiding, just make up your own mind." What do thinking people do in this situation?
That's hilarious where you trot out the New York Times like it's some kind of credible news site. I don't know if you noticed, but the NYT and the rest of the US mainstream media completely discredited itself in the recent election by coming out in full force backing Hillary. The whole world saw it. And now that they haven't learned a thing and are doing what they always do - show support for the powerful and shit on the little guy - you're still linking to their fake news? Seriously? It's laughable.
Better to get your news on controversial topics from actual credible news sources like Infowars or Breitbart. These sites have a huuuuuge audience, larger than the mainstream media, and they report stories that the MSM refuses to cover. Think about it: when powerful people tell you to ignore news sources, what should you do? (A) Obey and be a good little drone. Or (B) take it as proof positive that these news sources are broadcasting very inconvenient narratives that they really don't want you to know. Read for yourself, evaluate for yourself, if you think they're full of shit that's your decision. But read them yourself, don't let the MSM tell you what's credible and what's not, because their credibility is bullshit! Make up your own mind!
"Cheese Pizza" stands for CP, which means child porn in pedo slang. You've got these Instagram posts of kids in sexy poses with pedos making comments like "nice pizza". The Comet Pizza logo incorporates pedo iconage. And most damning of all, the NYT is standing up for its powerful friends by publishing defending articles with unsourced allegations like "None of it was true."
A lot of us have been trained to spot bullshit online and the NYT is full of it. Where are their citations? When they make claims, where is the backup? The whole thing didn't start from crazy citizens, it started from the hacked emails where there were very strange references to "pizza" in situations where it didn't belong. When powerful people tell you to stop doing something and there's nothing to see here, you do the opposite.
A telling reaction, eh? Immediately assume the worst, and project your pre-existing biases on the situation. Let me guess, you were recently waving around the Mexican flag and chanting, "Trump is not my President." Well you're right you know, your president is named Enrique Pena Nieto.
It's kind of the whole idea behind a protest that it's a public event. How else are people going to find it to attend? How else is the media going to cover it and only cover the peaceful part, leaving out the property destruction and hate crimes? Left unsaid, of course, is the idea that the entire howling mob could just "go dark" by turning their phones off or putting them in metallic potato chip bags.
Pretty telling reaction you have there. Instead of, "Hurray, this man who I thought was evil incarnate is changing his mind in view of new information, exactly what we want to see in a politician," it's nothing but hatred towards the downtrodden Americans to whom he was the last resort for change. You're not by chance a big-city liberal, are you? That would explain a lot.
Never forget that Trump was never, ever a positive candidate that people were for. He was the last dying gasp of a people who were being crushed by heartless sociopathic globalists. He was a big "NO" to Hillary, the Democrats, the Republicans, and the entire "fuck you, middle America" mentality that they represent. And from your comment, you sound like one of them. Here's one of your tribe with a typical stone-hearted reaction, do you agree with him? How does that make you feel?
In this election, if you support Donald Trump, you are "the others." I have zero interest in knowing, interacting with, tolerating or otherwise sharing my time or bits of my life with anyone who supports Trump. I don't say that defiantly or righteously, just as fact. Don't follow me on social media. Don't talk to me at parties, at school functions, as a neighbor or even as a friend. Your decision says all I need to know about you. You can't unspin it or rationalize it to me.
The nonsense is nonsense. The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
If she didn't do anything wrong, then why does Obama need to pardon her? The million dollar question that nobody has been asking because it's an inconvenient truth.
"If you support Donald Trump, you are "the others." I have zero interest in knowing, interacting with, tolerating or otherwise sharing my time or bits of my life with anyone who supports Trump. I don't say that defiantly or righteously, just as fact. Don't follow me on social media. Don't talk to me at parties, at school functions, as a neighbor or even as a friend. Your decision says all I need to know about you. You can't unspin it or rationalize it to me."
Are you from an alternate timeline where the "recognizable news organizations from around the world" were not revealed as total deceptive pieces of shit a few weeks ago?
The subtext is that the recognizable news organizations from around the world are no more or no less reputable than other random people and sites on the internet. That's what we learned.
And when these recognizable news organizations call other news organizations fake news, they're just desperately defending their turf from encroachment. Did your news tell you that #49 on GQ's list of "The Most Powerful People in Washington" is James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong. You know, the one in the center of the rapidly expanding #PizzaGate scandal, where pedophiles are connected to the heart of the Democratic party? You might be reading fake news.
Seriously, people, this Comet Ping Pong thing is beyond fucked up. It's all for realsies, too. I wonder how the "real news" and "fake news" will differ in their coverage of it as it explodes in the next few months, or if they will even cover it at all.
Why on Earth would Hillary ever need a pardon? She didn't do anything wrong. Would your news knowingly endorse a criminal who needed a pardon? Huh, that's odd.
If your news endorsed Hillary, you might be reading fake news. If your news is telling you to stay away from alternative media, you're definitely reading fake news. Keep seeking out new opinions and new news sources, people! Don't let the mainstream media tell you what's fake and what's not. They have the most to lose when you go to sites like Infowars instead of CNN or NBC. Of course they're going to protect themselves!
And as far as strife within the Democratic Party goes, IF - and this is a big IF - Trump makes sustainable improvements to the inner cities, the Democratic Party is dead.
Check the source - nytimes.com. Fake news! How do you spot fake news? Are they the same people cheering on the Hamilton cast for using the stage to push a political agenda? And yet they are upset at Kanye for using the stage to push a political agenda? Fake news!
Most damning of all, is your news telling you not to listen to alternative sources of news? THINK about that one for a minute. Who on earth would ever say something like that? Fake news, that's who.
Well, there isn't any such thing as unbiased news. There's just news that wears its bias on its sleeve. I just today started watching Alex Jones and Infowars. I always thought he was a crank weirdo, but if they're trying to ban him, then WTF? Obviously he is saying something they want to suppress, something harmful to globalism. I've got to find out for myself what the big deal is.
I've just scratched the surface but Elites Panic As Trump Begins To Deliver was an eye-opener. Big megabanks are tax-exempt? I had no idea. Hearing him tell big city liberals "What anti-human nasties, you really are." 100% true. But the kicker, what you'll never hear anyone in the liberal media say: "Find out yourself, and learn what they're doing to you and your family!" DAMN that's some powerful stuff.
It's an exciting new world. Watch that one video I linked above and see what it does for you. IF - and this is a big IF - Trump makes sustainable improvements to the inner cities, the Democratic Party is dead.ï Good luck in your quest for truth, and always remember if the MSM tells you not to listen to someone, then always do the exact opposite!
Whaa? Personal character does indeed count. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence! And yet, his name is trash today, all his accomplishments void, because he owned slaves. It's not a logical fallacy, it's being taught in legitimate, serious universities. It's so ingrained that I wonder just how you even came up with this idea that it doesn't count. If the Wikileaks came from Russian intelligence agencies then they should be disregarded as they were trying to rig our election (and in fact did so successfully!) It's a big shit sandwich.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, we're withdrawing from the rest of the world, like you asked us to. We're going to take all our troops home, from Europe, from Korea, from Japan, everywhere. You hate our guts. It's been shouted loud and clear for a long time and don't think we didn't get the message, because we did. Slashdot is a US-centric site and it will remain so.
Here's an idea: why don't you make your own tech site and it can be worldly? You can have global citizens posting and ban everything but metric units and so on. It'll be bliss. Off with you now, get to work and stop bothering the Americans.
Yeah, that's because you were already a leftist. But seriously, how can you be a leftist and be for right-wing things like nationalism? Hillary promised us more and more and more globalism, and fuck the American worker. Her plan was to give citizenship to fuckloads of Syrians, WTF? How would that possibly help the American people?
How can you be simultaneously pro-Obama and anti-globalism? That's like being pro-Hitler and pro-Semite. They're two ideas that don't go together.
The whole "calling people racist for disagreeing with Obama's globalist vision of the future" went out of fashion the day after Election Day. Maybe you didn't get the memo?
If you want to know how we ended up like this, please watch this video: "President Trump: How & Why...". It is a must-view for people exactly like you for how the level of political discourse got so low. It's by a leftist, so you know he's telling the truth and has been fact-checked. It's really sad what he's saying and it is all 100% true.
Well uneducated whites voted hard for Trump, so I think this is a good payback for them.
I don't know if you were alive these last 8 years, but anyone who mocked or belittled the President was immediately shouted down as racist. With Trump in office, it will become OK to criticize the President again, which is a huge improvement.
Investigative journalism will also make a big comeback, after an 8 year hibernation. The positives will just keep coming. The media is supposed to exist in eternal opposition to the government, but during Obama they twisted their purpose and became pro-government mouthpieces. They were caught red-handed supporting Hillary's campaign. California does not require any proof of citizenship to vote.
...and yet if it got a glowing review it would be proof positive that Consumer Reports nailed it and has a great reputation for not accepting bribes, etc. Face it, it's just that they trashed your favorite car and now you have to reply by trashing CR.
Wha...?? The media isn't liberal? Are you delusional? Did the whole world not see the US media drop any pretense at journalism and and became people who had a conclusion that they reached, and then searched for facts to show that Hillary Clinton was a winner. That didn't happen in your world? FUCKING SERIOUSLY?
OK, sorry. Let's back up and provide a citation. " "Is The New York Times a Liberal Newspaper? Of course it is."
--Source: New York Times
Of course, this isn't good enough, it never is. This eight minute video (faster if you play at 1.5 speed) has a great supporter and friend of the liberal media calling them out on their ridiculous liberal bias. That's not good enough either, but I gotta run.
The only reason they're more widely read is because they cover news that the mainstream media deliberately ignores as part of their biased, partisan coverage. The MSM has only themselves to blame for its rise. And if you're going to blame Breitbart for being biased and give the MSM a free pass for the same, then Breitbart is going to just get stronger. How many MSM outlets peddled the "Hands up don't shoot" lie? How many uncritically accepted Mattress Girl or the Rolling Stone non-rape story or any of the other hoaxes they perpetrated?
And most damning of all, the MSM is trying to use its power to get people to stop reading alternative media. This means that they're effective and truthful, because if the enemy is lying then they're no threat. To say nothing of the tyrannical, 1984 themes of doing such an abhorrent act.
This is the kind of crazy that comes from existing in an echo chamber where everything good is left-wing and the right are scary enemies. It's self-reinforcing and is quite ignorant as well.
The entire space program was thoroughly right-wing and patriotic from the beginning. It was a giant dick-waving competition with the Soviet Union over who was better, communism or capitalism. The few leftists in the space program were engaged in trying to steal the tech and deliver it to the Soviets. Wehrner von Braun, the father of the Saturn V rocket, was a Nazi and you can't get more right-wing than that. Science and STEM occupations in general are regularly attacked by the left for being exclusionary, unwelcoming to women, and all of the other crimes that we know so well. Now suddenly the right can't do calculus?
The really crazy part is the sudden left-wing identification with weapons. The left has long been hoplophobic and now they suddenly overnight lost their fear of guns? These are people who won't even be in the same room if an unloaded pistol is lying on a table. They'll leave the building, it freaks them out.
You also notice in this post there is no difference made between the right wing (most people in America) and the alt.right (a few thousand people). They are put together in the same bucket so that the odious beliefs of the alt.right may contaminate the entire right. The principle is: add a thimble of wine to a gallon of sewage and you've got a gallon of sewage, but add a thimble of sewage to a gallon of wine and you've got a gallon of sewage. This is just plain ignorant, but it's the new philosophy of the ctrl.left and sadly it has a good chance of working.
Damn, the denial is strong with you. You just tried to discredit original research. Do you even realize how denialist that is? If doing your own research isn't good enough, then damn what is?
Did you even read the article? Please do, it's important. The subject admits he's a leftist and confirms he's running a false flag operation. Read the whole thing from top to bottom, it is well worth five minutes of your (and everyone else's) time. Especially read the byline.
By Laura Sydell
NPR
Breathtaking contempt for the people, admiration for ruthless authoritarians who opened fire at Tiananmen Square in 1989, and a conclusion that this gives them a moral high ground. Wow. Adolf Hitler, is that you? If not, take a long hard look at yourself and what you just said.
You didn't get it, did you? You're making my point for me. You shouldn't believe the mainstream media because they're not credible. You saw, I saw, the entire world saw them totally back Hillary Clinton in a shameful abandonment of the last shreds of them being truth-tellers. Moreover on an entirely journalistic standpoint, they entirely missed the real story of the election. Like, it didn't even enter their consciousness.
When powerful people tell you to ignore news, what should you do? Obey, or disobey purely on principle and go and see what they want to hide? Did you know a lot of this "fake news" is being created by leftists themselves as false flag operations to try to discredit these new media? If you didn't, then you're probably getting fake news. These false flag operators are also making five figures a month from ad sales, which is hypocritical seeing how anti-capitalist they all are.
You have to realize just how much the recent election shocked the shit out of the media. Wow, there is a whole world out there and they have NO IDEA what is going on. They have been living in a bubble and that bubble was burst, badly, on election night. They are deep hurting and this isn't any kind of fake crocodile tears hurt. It's for real and they are going to engage in the kind of defense mechanisms that humans engage in when they are hurt this badly.
So, what should their reaction be to the fact that the world doesn't conform to how they think? Take a long, hard look at themselves and change? Or double down, adopt a fortress mentality, and deny that there's anything wrong? Label these dissenting voices "fake news" and strive mightily the MSM's chief weapon, credibility, to discredit them.
If you just laughed at the idea that the mainstream media is credible after the shit they pulled in the election, then you know what I'm talking about. They were 100% backing Hillary and the whole world saw it. They had themselves convinced that she had a 93% chance of winning and they believed it. After a shock like that, who can blame them for reacting this way? They have a lot to lose. Not just their million dollar salaries, but their entire way of life and worldview is being threatened. Why not attack the truth-tellers? It has a chance of working, and anything's better than actually facing the cold hard truth. Facing the truth is last resort after everything else has failed and the MSM is a long way from that. They have powerful resources and are not about to give up.
Better to get your news on controversial topics from news sources like Infowars or Breitbart. These sites have a huuuuuge audience, larger than the mainstream media, and they report stories that the MSM refuses to cover. Think about it: when powerful people tell you to ignore news sources, what should you do? (A) Obey and be a good little drone. Or (B) take it as proof positive that these news sources are broadcasting very inconvenient narratives that they really don't want you to know. Hell, I used to think Alex Jones was a crazy man, but damn if they're trying to suppress him then he MUST be saying something important, otherwise he'd just be ignored! Read for yourself, evaluate for yourself, if you think they're full of shit that's your decision. But read them yourself, don't let the MSM tell you what's credible and what's not, because their credibility is bullshit! Make up your own mind!
One side says, "don't pay attention to those others, they're fake!" and the other side says, "consider us, we'll tell you things the other side is hiding, just make up your own mind." What do thinking people do in this situation?
That's hilarious where you trot out the New York Times like it's some kind of credible news site. I don't know if you noticed, but the NYT and the rest of the US mainstream media completely discredited itself in the recent election by coming out in full force backing Hillary. The whole world saw it. And now that they haven't learned a thing and are doing what they always do - show support for the powerful and shit on the little guy - you're still linking to their fake news? Seriously? It's laughable.
Better to get your news on controversial topics from actual credible news sources like Infowars or Breitbart. These sites have a huuuuuge audience, larger than the mainstream media, and they report stories that the MSM refuses to cover. Think about it: when powerful people tell you to ignore news sources, what should you do? (A) Obey and be a good little drone. Or (B) take it as proof positive that these news sources are broadcasting very inconvenient narratives that they really don't want you to know. Read for yourself, evaluate for yourself, if you think they're full of shit that's your decision. But read them yourself, don't let the MSM tell you what's credible and what's not, because their credibility is bullshit! Make up your own mind!
"Cheese Pizza" stands for CP, which means child porn in pedo slang. You've got these Instagram posts of kids in sexy poses with pedos making comments like "nice pizza". The Comet Pizza logo incorporates pedo iconage. And most damning of all, the NYT is standing up for its powerful friends by publishing defending articles with unsourced allegations like "None of it was true."
A lot of us have been trained to spot bullshit online and the NYT is full of it. Where are their citations? When they make claims, where is the backup? The whole thing didn't start from crazy citizens, it started from the hacked emails where there were very strange references to "pizza" in situations where it didn't belong. When powerful people tell you to stop doing something and there's nothing to see here, you do the opposite.
We need to ask the question: how does this advance the cause of social justice?
If it doesn't, then why do it? Go on to the next, more deserving person.
So, you are just totally ignoring the fact that the PRI in Mexico rigged elections for 80 years with nothing but paper and pencil?
Did you not know that before I just told you? What is the source of your uneducated stupidity?
A telling reaction, eh? Immediately assume the worst, and project your pre-existing biases on the situation. Let me guess, you were recently waving around the Mexican flag and chanting, "Trump is not my President." Well you're right you know, your president is named Enrique Pena Nieto.
It's kind of the whole idea behind a protest that it's a public event. How else are people going to find it to attend? How else is the media going to cover it and only cover the peaceful part, leaving out the property destruction and hate crimes? Left unsaid, of course, is the idea that the entire howling mob could just "go dark" by turning their phones off or putting them in metallic potato chip bags.
Pretty telling reaction you have there. Instead of, "Hurray, this man who I thought was evil incarnate is changing his mind in view of new information, exactly what we want to see in a politician," it's nothing but hatred towards the downtrodden Americans to whom he was the last resort for change. You're not by chance a big-city liberal, are you? That would explain a lot.
Never forget that Trump was never, ever a positive candidate that people were for. He was the last dying gasp of a people who were being crushed by heartless sociopathic globalists. He was a big "NO" to Hillary, the Democrats, the Republicans, and the entire "fuck you, middle America" mentality that they represent. And from your comment, you sound like one of them. Here's one of your tribe with a typical stone-hearted reaction, do you agree with him? How does that make you feel?
-- Tim Goodman
The nonsense is nonsense. The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
If she didn't do anything wrong, then why does Obama need to pardon her? The million dollar question that nobody has been asking because it's an inconvenient truth.
-- Tim Goodman
Are you from an alternate timeline where the "recognizable news organizations from around the world" were not revealed as total deceptive pieces of shit a few weeks ago?
The subtext is that the recognizable news organizations from around the world are no more or no less reputable than other random people and sites on the internet. That's what we learned.
And when these recognizable news organizations call other news organizations fake news, they're just desperately defending their turf from encroachment. Did your news tell you that #49 on GQ's list of "The Most Powerful People in Washington" is James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong. You know, the one in the center of the rapidly expanding #PizzaGate scandal, where pedophiles are connected to the heart of the Democratic party? You might be reading fake news.
Seriously, people, this Comet Ping Pong thing is beyond fucked up. It's all for realsies, too. I wonder how the "real news" and "fake news" will differ in their coverage of it as it explodes in the next few months, or if they will even cover it at all.
Why on Earth would Hillary ever need a pardon? She didn't do anything wrong. Would your news knowingly endorse a criminal who needed a pardon? Huh, that's odd.
If your news endorsed Hillary, you might be reading fake news. If your news is telling you to stay away from alternative media, you're definitely reading fake news. Keep seeking out new opinions and new news sources, people! Don't let the mainstream media tell you what's fake and what's not. They have the most to lose when you go to sites like Infowars instead of CNN or NBC. Of course they're going to protect themselves!
And as far as strife within the Democratic Party goes, IF - and this is a big IF - Trump makes sustainable improvements to the inner cities, the Democratic Party is dead.
Check the source - nytimes.com. Fake news! How do you spot fake news? Are they the same people cheering on the Hamilton cast for using the stage to push a political agenda? And yet they are upset at Kanye for using the stage to push a political agenda? Fake news!
Did your news tell you that Japanese Deputy Prime Minister Aso said today, "There's no point in Japan making policy based on the guesses of American newspapers when they're always wrong"? Why didn't your news tell you this? Maybe your news is fake news!
Is your news telling you Sessions is racist and yet he marched at Selma with civil rights leaders? Fake news!
If your news outlet didn't mention that Hillary got caught on tape rigging the 2006 Palestinian elections, you were definitely watching fake news.
Most damning of all, is your news telling you not to listen to alternative sources of news? THINK about that one for a minute. Who on earth would ever say something like that? Fake news, that's who.
Well, there isn't any such thing as unbiased news. There's just news that wears its bias on its sleeve. I just today started watching Alex Jones and Infowars. I always thought he was a crank weirdo, but if they're trying to ban him, then WTF? Obviously he is saying something they want to suppress, something harmful to globalism. I've got to find out for myself what the big deal is.
I've just scratched the surface but Elites Panic As Trump Begins To Deliver was an eye-opener. Big megabanks are tax-exempt? I had no idea. Hearing him tell big city liberals "What anti-human nasties, you really are." 100% true. But the kicker, what you'll never hear anyone in the liberal media say: "Find out yourself, and learn what they're doing to you and your family!" DAMN that's some powerful stuff.
It's an exciting new world. Watch that one video I linked above and see what it does for you. IF - and this is a big IF - Trump makes sustainable improvements to the inner cities, the Democratic Party is dead.ï Good luck in your quest for truth, and always remember if the MSM tells you not to listen to someone, then always do the exact opposite!
Whaa? Personal character does indeed count. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence! And yet, his name is trash today, all his accomplishments void, because he owned slaves. It's not a logical fallacy, it's being taught in legitimate, serious universities. It's so ingrained that I wonder just how you even came up with this idea that it doesn't count. If the Wikileaks came from Russian intelligence agencies then they should be disregarded as they were trying to rig our election (and in fact did so successfully!) It's a big shit sandwich.