What about combination locks? That seems like a better comparison to an encrypted file. Surely it's been decided by now if requiring someone to turn over the combination to a lock counts as testimony or not.
Well yes, that phrase is just words that sounds nice. You could pick the numbers 10, 1000, or any other and it would work the same. The reason is because the number isn't important. It's just an illustration of the legal doctrine of presumed innocence. The doctrine itself doesn't aim for any particular ratio of imprisoned innocent to free guilty but the level of doubt required to punish someone has been clearly established as "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Some of that may be true, but I doubt we need to simulate all of that to reproduce a brains function. We don't need to simulate transistors to emulate a computer architecture after all.
It's not obvious to me that a brain simulating algorithm would be parallelizable enough to run effectively in chunks distributed over the internet. Or maybe it would but that's just not as fun as a 50,000 node computer.
Months ago Google released a library that can be included in your app for compatibility with Fragments down to Android 1.6, no need to wait for Ice Cream.
Even with in-the-sewer approval ratings, Congressional incumbents tend to enjoy a remarkable re-election rate (I've seen figure in excess of 90%).
Congressional approval ratings aren't typically that low. Sure as a group they are low, but approval of individual congressmen among their constituents is usually not too bad.
What part of having a health care system that treats Kings and other foreign heads of state but does nothing for a large percentage of actual Americans do you think is a good thing?
Two questions. First, are you just assuming this to be the case or is it a documented fact? Second, does it really make you feel good to compare the US health care system to what's available in the poorest nations on earth?
The reason corporations are still using XP has little to do with security. It's because of the expense of retraining support people and updating software that was designed to run on XP or IE 6.
You guys are missing the point entirely. In general Google has happily released the code for Android versions so that amateurs can make their own releases. Honeycomb however happens to be entirely broken for the devices that most people want to put it on. If it wasn't an entirely broken version then they would have no problem releasing the code as they always have in the past.
They are supposed to save state when you switch to another app. Ideally the app will have another opportunity to save state before the system shuts it down, but there's no guarantee of that.
Slashdot Mirror
What about combination locks? That seems like a better comparison to an encrypted file. Surely it's been decided by now if requiring someone to turn over the combination to a lock counts as testimony or not.
Well yes, that phrase is just words that sounds nice. You could pick the numbers 10, 1000, or any other and it would work the same. The reason is because the number isn't important. It's just an illustration of the legal doctrine of presumed innocence. The doctrine itself doesn't aim for any particular ratio of imprisoned innocent to free guilty but the level of doubt required to punish someone has been clearly established as "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Some of that may be true, but I doubt we need to simulate all of that to reproduce a brains function. We don't need to simulate transistors to emulate a computer architecture after all.
It's not obvious to me that a brain simulating algorithm would be parallelizable enough to run effectively in chunks distributed over the internet. Or maybe it would but that's just not as fun as a 50,000 node computer.
Months ago Google released a library that can be included in your app for compatibility with Fragments down to Android 1.6, no need to wait for Ice Cream.
Even with in-the-sewer approval ratings, Congressional incumbents tend to enjoy a remarkable re-election rate (I've seen figure in excess of 90%).
Congressional approval ratings aren't typically that low. Sure as a group they are low, but approval of individual congressmen among their constituents is usually not too bad.
T-Mobile has SIM only rates. I'm sure it won't survive the merger though.
What part of having a health care system that treats Kings and other foreign heads of state but does nothing for a large percentage of actual Americans do you think is a good thing?
Two questions. First, are you just assuming this to be the case or is it a documented fact? Second, does it really make you feel good to compare the US health care system to what's available in the poorest nations on earth?
He never had the pleasure of seeing the modern Republican party in action.
Are you sure about that? When was Java ever an interpreted language?
You're thinking of The Yes Men.
I have a Nexus One, so my carrier didn't touch my phone, but I haven't seen it on my friends phones from T-Mo.
The reason corporations are still using XP has little to do with security. It's because of the expense of retraining support people and updating software that was designed to run on XP or IE 6.
It doesn't require root on the Nexus phones, are their others? The non-Nexus phones I've seen all have the wifi hotspot option removed.
Yes, please elaborate. It's been awhile since I read that book, but I don't remember him making any such proof.
In the house? No I wouldn't expect a filibuster in the house.
Well that has nothing at all to do with my question, but thanks for trying.
That makes sense if you know the stars initial spin. I'm curious how that is known.
Don't you mean, 11?
Fixed that for you.
Oh please, the internet as all of us know it didn't exist back then. When this patent was filed spam hadn't even been invented yet.
Are you serious? No one is saying that coal is anywhere near as radioactive as uranium.
You guys are missing the point entirely. In general Google has happily released the code for Android versions so that amateurs can make their own releases. Honeycomb however happens to be entirely broken for the devices that most people want to put it on. If it wasn't an entirely broken version then they would have no problem releasing the code as they always have in the past.
They are supposed to save state when you switch to another app. Ideally the app will have another opportunity to save state before the system shuts it down, but there's no guarantee of that.
What makes you think that?