Interesting, I always thought that anyone who judges his opponent based on a single word is just looking for an excuse to avoid an intellectual challenge.
Eventually, if it gets to everyone, you may be correct. But before it, when it will only be some of the population, you'll get some decentralized version of mccarthyism with people attacking others in the hope that they will not be exposed themselves.
I am not saying he doesn't deserve it, I'm just saying that what happens to him is a precedent, and I think that wikis/forums like that will be created for other people too.
I believe that for every person one can find a group of a thousand wackos with enough internet know-how and hatred. It is just a matter of organizing them and of showing that it can be done. Chris-chan's haters showed that it can be done, I suspect they will not be the only example.
This is what we currently have in Israel, with right wingers doxxing and arranging attacks on leftists. Currently it seems the favored solution is migrating to germany (yes, I know, jews running away to germany, ironic).
Entire wikis created on people, documenting every mistake they ever did on their life, allowing online collaborations between thousands in phishing/harassing. AI and data mining will probably make this much easier as they improve.
1) I think that there is no "us", some people are improved by tech and others are fucked by it.
2) Humans can already be hacked by a 3rd party, it's called social engineering. If we gained telepahty or enhanced brains, then more remote forms of hacking would become possible as well. The more forms of input and output you can process, the more hacks will be available.
No. "no true scotsman" is a famous logical fallacy where you take the bad people in your group and insist they are not a true X. For an SJW, this would be insisting that man haters and false complainers are not part of the SJW movement (not saying that all SJWs/leftists are like that, likely most of them are not). For a right winger it would be denying the connection between right wing and facism.
I think that while in theory prudery has nothing to do with social justice, in practice, in the last 5 years, they come together.
(and yes, if someone will tell me that the right wing contains facists and racists, I will not say "they are not true right wingers", I will say "bummer, you are right")
As a jew I don't know christianity very well, can you please explain to me where and how does christianity talk against a cashless society? (This is not a critical reply, I just want to learn).
You create something that nobody wants or needs and then convince them that they have to buy it because they "love the brand" or because it's "rare" or because it's "better" even though it's the same.
As a person who ensures his hands' health, I have to ask, did they finally fix the bugs with mousekeys?
The Bugs are: 1) Sensitivity only be configured through command-line. 2) If you switch a mouse button the speed settings are lost and you need to run xkbset again).
Slashdot Mirror
C also has libraries, you know, things like glib for example.
But wait, I'll make it easy for you. SJW SJW SJW SJW SJW. See? Now I am just an inferior dog of Trump, you don't have to answer back.
Interesting, I always thought that anyone who judges his opponent based on a single word is just looking for an excuse to avoid an intellectual challenge.
When you will show them empiric proof except for "I feel that way" that there are 60 genders?
In the long term everybody needs to move to cities
That's one option, another option is for enough people to die and/or not be born.
Ccalling your opponent a dog is a sure way to get them on your side. Indeed, such great eloquence.
Eventually, if it gets to everyone, you may be correct. But before it, when it will only be some of the population, you'll get some decentralized version of mccarthyism with people attacking others in the hope that they will not be exposed themselves.
Too bad the stalking started before the scamming. The scamming started once Chris realized that he can use the exposure he got to make some cash.
I am not saying he doesn't deserve it, I'm just saying that what happens to him is a precedent, and I think that wikis/forums like that will be created for other people too.
I believe that for every person one can find a group of a thousand wackos with enough internet know-how and hatred. It is just a matter of organizing them and of showing that it can be done. Chris-chan's haters showed that it can be done, I suspect they will not be the only example.
This is what we currently have in Israel, with right wingers doxxing and arranging attacks on leftists. Currently it seems the favored solution is migrating to germany (yes, I know, jews running away to germany, ironic).
I suspect the future of trolling is something like this: https://sonichu.com/
Entire wikis created on people, documenting every mistake they ever did on their life, allowing online collaborations between thousands in phishing/harassing. AI and data mining will probably make this much easier as they improve.
Everyone hates the poor
8) Maybe you are too old
you are doing something wrong
All these stupid bums just choosing to be too old, to hell with them, right? They could have just chosen to be young instead.
1) I think that there is no "us", some people are improved by tech and others are fucked by it.
2) Humans can already be hacked by a 3rd party, it's called social engineering. If we gained telepahty or enhanced brains, then more remote forms of hacking would become possible as well. The more forms of input and output you can process, the more hacks will be available.
No. "no true scotsman" is a famous logical fallacy where you take the bad people in your group and insist they are not a true X. For an SJW, this would be insisting that man haters and false complainers are not part of the SJW movement (not saying that all SJWs/leftists are like that, likely most of them are not). For a right winger it would be denying the connection between right wing and facism.
I think that while in theory prudery has nothing to do with social justice, in practice, in the last 5 years, they come together.
No true Scotsman - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(and yes, if someone will tell me that the right wing contains facists and racists, I will not say "they are not true right wingers", I will say "bummer, you are right")
"not need computers" and "be always connected to a portable micro computer implanted in our heads" are functionally the same thing.
Where I live, I assume that most of my taxes go to services that I don't use (I live in a religious corrupted country).
I managed to escape the robber on the street today, he robbed you instead, guess I "beat you up" according to your logic.
As a jew I don't know christianity very well, can you please explain to me where and how does christianity talk against a cashless society? (This is not a critical reply, I just want to learn).
Of course that someone wants it, as Edward Bernays would say, consent can be manufactured.
You create something that nobody wants or needs and then convince them that they have to buy it because they "love the brand" or because it's "rare" or because it's "better" even though it's the same.
As a person who ensures his hands' health, I have to ask, did they finally fix the bugs with mousekeys?
The Bugs are:
1) Sensitivity only be configured through command-line.
2) If you switch a mouse button the speed settings are lost and you need to run xkbset again).
Forgot to say this, but the globals in erlang, unlike the locals, are mutable.