Not sure if you were being funny or real but...why is it assumed that it's god's will to have people lead these short tortured live's but not his will to give us the ability to cure them?
Is that really a problem? Not everyone has a university degree. And this is available online so you can look at it whenever you want.
"People who do not understand the difference between a set and a list, should not even be allowed to be involved in any part of the development cycle of an arbitrary information system or computer application."
Gotta start somewhere.
What about the kids just headed to university who want a quick start? What about people just interested in these like project managers who aren't that technical?
Did you really end it with "Regards, The Kaosaur"??
B/c up until that point it sounded like it came from a person who knew what they were talking about. But the ending detracted. I mean come on...the Kaosaur?!?!
That makes you sound like some script kiddy who likes to use his "hacker alias" as if it's his new name.
But they weren't convicted. The judgement (thanks to a link from someone above) says that nobody admitted to anything. They just agreed to some terms and that was that.
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f200400/200457.ht m
What does the 2nd paragraph have to do with the first? I thought you were going to mention the various posts saying that what Apple is doing is crazy. Yet you instead turn it into a post about how Apple than Microsoft is better than Microsoft even when it comes to rumour sites.
I know, you're trying to be funny with a cliched joke. Seems that a lot of people are buying this logic though. However, it's the opposite of the logic that is cried out when something like suprnova.org getting closed down happens.
We can't shoot the supplier (suprnova) for offering illegal goods that people then *choose* to download.
However, we can shoot the supplier (MS) of a security flaw that allows someone to install software. This software then exploits a fundamental issue in somebody elses (Googles) software. Then we're allowed to be blame the supplier?
I know it's not a perfect analogy, as none are. However it does seem that the standard only works in whatever way fits peoples viewpoints best. Since we all know that everything MS does is evil, and everything Google does is good, we can then work at cognitive dissonating a reason that a Google flaw is MicroSofts fault. Bravo!
That's some real fine writing but he asked how it's MORE complex than simple collisions. As in "I don't see what the big deal is, it's obvious this would happen"
Yes, he allowed scripts to continue to run but that's what your average user will do. They don't know what that error meant but to them, if they click no, then the site may not work properly after that.
He was modelling real world usage and that was the right action to take in this case.
Slashdot Mirror
Can you prove that they are?
So just ignore that suggestion then. Can't expect the app to mind-read whether you "know what you're doing" or not.
The whole idea of it pointing out these errors is so you can pick which ones you'd like to employ.
See the following post:
d =12065580
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=143985&ci
Well, there were some slight sarcasm clues but no irony ones. It's always tough to be sure if people are being sarcastic or not...
Not sure if you were being funny or real but...why is it assumed that it's god's will to have people lead these short tortured live's but not his will to give us the ability to cure them?
I can't tell if that's serious or sarcastic. Well done!
Troll? Are you kidding me? I don't care if I get modded down but jeez, at least have somewhat of a credible case when you do it.
Is that really a problem? Not everyone has a university degree. And this is available online so you can look at it whenever you want.
"People who do not understand the difference between a set and a list, should not even be allowed to be involved in any part of the development cycle of an arbitrary information system or computer application."
Gotta start somewhere.
What about the kids just headed to university who want a quick start? What about people just interested in these like project managers who aren't that technical?
B/c this isn't about individuals. It's about corporations who delayed rollouts so they could test it before rolling it out.
If there any L-User admins that just click Yes...well I think that's not an MS issue.
Did you really end it with "Regards, The Kaosaur"??
B/c up until that point it sounded like it came from a person who knew what they were talking about. But the ending detracted. I mean come on...the Kaosaur?!?!
That makes you sound like some script kiddy who likes to use his "hacker alias" as if it's his new name.
But they weren't convicted. The judgement (thanks to a link from someone above) says that nobody admitted to anything. They just agreed to some terms and that was that.
t m
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f200400/200457.h
And there couldn't be any other machines at google. Nope. None. The only ones we can see are the ones on Netcraft. Yep.
"let it collapse into another dimension like that house at the end of poltergeist."
awe man. *throws rented copy of Poltergeist at wall*
But their software and the wma format are in use with many other competing players
Where did it say "microsoft powered mp3 player"? I read the article and didn't see it.
Also, it's Wired. I think they know that MP3 is not a "microsoft format".
I've got mod points but damned if I can't find the "+1 for effort, -1 for originality" option. Oh well.
See my previous reply to the last guy ;)
Doesn't matter how painless it is, it's still setting up a webserver.
Yeah, but that doesn't really address his point that you need to set up a webserver to do this.
He's looking for a "native" samba solution to do this without needing to use a web server for this.
What does the 2nd paragraph have to do with the first? I thought you were going to mention the various posts saying that what Apple is doing is crazy. Yet you instead turn it into a post about how Apple than Microsoft is better than Microsoft even when it comes to rumour sites.
"Good luck in your future endeavors, you Capitalist Pig."
;)
I think that's what the Russians said at the end of the Cold War wasn't it
I know, you're trying to be funny with a cliched joke. Seems that a lot of people are buying this logic though. However, it's the opposite of the logic that is cried out when something like suprnova.org getting closed down happens.
We can't shoot the supplier (suprnova) for offering illegal goods that people then *choose* to download.
However, we can shoot the supplier (MS) of a security flaw that allows someone to install software. This software then exploits a fundamental issue in somebody elses (Googles) software. Then we're allowed to be blame the supplier?
I know it's not a perfect analogy, as none are. However it does seem that the standard only works in whatever way fits peoples viewpoints best. Since we all know that everything MS does is evil, and everything Google does is good, we can then work at cognitive dissonating a reason that a Google flaw is MicroSofts fault. Bravo!
That's some real fine writing but he asked how it's MORE complex than simple collisions. As in "I don't see what the big deal is, it's obvious this would happen"
Yes, he allowed scripts to continue to run but that's what your average user will do. They don't know what that error meant but to them, if they click no, then the site may not work properly after that.
He was modelling real world usage and that was the right action to take in this case.
oh come on. "prefers to stay anonymous". did you want them to leave their name and street address? get over it. FireFox has problems ok. deal with it.
I have seen a zip download that contained...wait for it...a 3 line batch file for MSDOS. Now if that's not a legit use of zip, I don't know what is!