Slashdot Mirror


iPod Most Popular Music Player on Microsoft Campus

bblazer writes "Wired is running an article about how despite the displeasure of management, the iPod is the most popular music player on the Microsoft campus. The article states that 80% of those who have digital music players have an iPod. Employees have even started using different headphones to be a bit more stealthy about it."

1,017 comments

  1. Bill buys Apple? by turtled · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if he'll make an attempt to buy Apple, and say it's his idea... It's like Coke employees drinking Pepsi.

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      There's an old cartoon floating around that shows a Pepsi truck driver being called into the boss's office. The driver gets fired because they found "coke" on him :)

    2. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not a bit like Coke employees drinking Pepsi (which they'd be pretty dumb to do as they'd probably have access to all the free Coke they wanted). iPod is a neo-Walkman, the only way it threatens MS is in the fact that it totally ignores their pointless, me-too, proprietary .wma crapmat.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Bill buys Apple? by essreenim · · Score: 1
      Nothing to see here.

      That happens in almost everything. People have an association of work with the product of...their work. Go figure.

      move along now..

    4. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Didn't Microsoft already buy $150 million dollars worth of Apple in the late 90s? (In exchange for Apple using IE) I don't remember if they bought that in stock or what, but if they did it was a pretty good investment.

    5. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would have been a good investment if they'd held on to it. They sold it off years ago.

    6. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Golias · · Score: 5, Informative

      They did. They also paid an "undisclosed" ammount of money under the table to settle any remaining possibility of litigation over stolen technologies, and agreed on a plan which would allow MS to make future purchases of Apple's OS breakthroughs.

      However, in their haste to hype a "Microsoft buys Apple" story, the press often ignores three important facts about the purchase:

      1. They were non-voting shares.

      2. $150 Million is a very tiny percentage of Apple's publicly-traded shares.

      3. Microsoft has already sold them off, and made a huge profit doing so.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's like Coke employees drinking Pepsi.
      I think that only happens in Pepsi commercials. ;)
    8. Re:Bill buys Apple? by sndtech · · Score: 1

      In a recent presentation at Acadia University, the president of Microsoft Canada, Frank Clegg, admitted to owning three iPods in his family

    9. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Coke employees who drink Pepsi get fired.

      No questions asked, no fighting for your job. You get fired. This includes if your boss sees you at Pizza Hut, Taco Bell or KFC, since those entities are owned by TriCon, who also owns Pepsi.

      Coke's employee base is very nearly fanatical in their loyalty to their product, and use of "the blue" is not accepted. I worked in a building *owned* by Coke, and we were not even allowed to have a Pepsi machine on our floor.

    10. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "which they'd be pretty dumb to do as they'd probably have access to all the free Coke they wanted"

      Right... cause most companies are big about giving away their products (read profits) to their employees. How many iPods do you figure Apple gives to it's administrative assistants?

    11. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of companies use their products as perks for employees. Soda doesn't cost that much (except when you factor in packaging and marketing) so it wouldn't break Coca Cola to give free drinks to its employees.

    12. Re:Bill buys Apple? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      The university here also does not allow Pepsi machines. I wonder if Coca-Cola pwns us too?

      * actually they do have an exclusive beverage contract with the campus, so our lousy union gets paid to allow Coke to price gouge us. Quite common in colleges and high schools now.

    13. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 5, Informative
      the only way it threatens MS is in the fact that it totally ignores their pointless, me-too, proprietary .wma crapmat.
      Huh? How is that not significant? Do you have any idea how much money MS spent on their WMA format and DRM? Tons of development cash and marketing cash went into their media format/platform? MS is hoping to get a bunch of royalties off of their media/DRM platform. If their platform is not widely adopted or replaced by AAC/FairPlay, it puts a big dent in potential revenues for MS from multimedia.

      There is also the other factor of exposure to Apple products. The more consumers that buy Apple iPods, the more that may just buy a Mac Mini, eMac, iMac, iBook or PowerBook. That means less revenue to MS for their OS cash-cow.

      I personally hope Apple kicks their butt with the iPod and become the defacto digital music format. The latest home DVD player I bought can play MP3's and WMA files. Maybe the next-gen of DVD players will drop WMA and pick up AAC w/FairPlay.

      MS has a lot to lose if they don't control the major digital music format.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    14. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Hallow · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine used to drive a truck for Coke (delivered sodas and refilled vending machines). He could have been fired for drinking Pepsi products or eating, watching a movie, doing any kind of business that served pepsi (and not coke).

    15. Re:Bill buys Apple? by iamacat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How many iPods do you figure Apple gives to it's administrative assistants?

      I would be shocked if the answer is smaller than the number of administrative assistants with satisfactory performance. It's cheaper than giving a cash bonus for the price of iPod and you get free viral marketing both to visitors and to general population of Bay Area.

    16. Re:Bill buys Apple? by timster · · Score: 1

      Tricon was owned *by* Pepsi once upon a time, but they certainly do not own Pepsi. And they are called "Yum Brands" now. So your information is a little out of date at least.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    17. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      The university I am at just changed from Coke to Pepsi. An article in our school paper stated that the university gets US$0.84 per 20oz bottle for Dr. Pepper and Seven Up products and US$0.70 per 20oz bottle of Pepsi. The cost to the student is US$1.25 per bottle.

      Not sure what the terms of the old Coke contract were.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    18. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I didn't have a huge amount of experience working for large soft drinks manufacturers, but I have worked for Mars, and they offer their staff give-away discounts on a great many of their confectionary, food an pet-food products. I would imagine that Coca-Cola would - at the very least - offer their staff a substantial discount. We all know that MS offer their staff a pretty hefty discount on their software, it's not exactly unusual.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    19. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      names are off, but the deal still exists.

      the people I know who work for coke drink Mountain Dew, but take careful pains to hide that fact from their superiors. I've known more than a few who got fired for having lunch at Taco Bell.

    20. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      MS is ATTEMPTING lock-in in the "mp3" world, they currently have virtually none. Apple is attempting the same thing, but succeeding. MS can't lose what it doesn't already have, can it? If MS made an iPod competitor ( and maybe used to XBox as its net connection, music store access point and charge station, they had a valid complaint against their employees.

      I think MS controlling media access is just their egomaniacal wet-dream. It won't happen, it shouldn't happen and - if they bet the rest of the company that it will happen - they might take their eyes off the Office ball just long enough to lose that market too.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    21. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "He could have been fired for drinking Pepsi products or eating, watching a movie, doing any kind of business that served pepsi (and not coke)."

      Fired for watching a movie with Pepsi in it? Are you tripping?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    22. Re:Bill buys Apple? by malfunct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes but maybe Microsoft understands that one of the tools to competion is understanding why your opponents are ahead. I mean I've heard that MS employees use linux from time to time as well and it makes good sense to me. How do you understand what is really good about a product if you don't experience the good and bad things for yourself?

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    23. Re:Bill buys Apple? by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > in their haste to hype a "Microsoft buys Apple" story, the press
      > often ignores three important facts

      No kidding. That was some of the worst tech reporting I had seen at the time.

      They also ignored that as part of the deal, Apple dropped their lawsuit against Microsoft for stealing QuickTime software code, Microsoft agreed to develop Office for the Mac for five years, and Apple agreed to not develop any new text-to-speech capabilities for the Mac (this one wasn't allowed to leak for a while).

      I don't know how this information was kept secret -- both companies are publically owned (and I own shares of both, so I get their annual reports), so they should have had to disclose it.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    24. Re:Bill buys Apple? by myrdred · · Score: 1

      Got any source for your third point? I've seen people state this a lot, but I haven't seen any reliable information about them actually selling it.

    25. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gross. Mars sells pet products? That explains it then.

    26. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      They sell the best petfood by far - you should read the labels on stuff sometimes, you might learn about which companies it is that make the stuff you buy. Being an informed consumer only helps you in the long run.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    27. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My iPod mounts as a removable disk in Windows XP, no proprietary drivers required.

    28. Re:Bill buys Apple? by duck_oil · · Score: 1

      I used to feel this way too. But ya know what? I wouldn't want to feed it songs any other way but iTunes or use the HD with anything but the Finder.

    29. Re:Bill buys Apple? by anonicon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FWIW, if your Archos ever bites the dust (God forbid - it is a nice player), consider checking out the Xclef 500 - I'm getting one instead of an iPod because it's just a portable hard drive that doesn't use any drivers, and has a really good battery life without being $100 to replace like an iPod.

      http://www.digmind.com/store/index_500.html

      Don't mean to sound like a marketing droid, but it looks nice.

    30. Re:Bill buys Apple? by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

      I heard third hand from someone on the interwebs (so it must be true) that everyone that was a direct Apple employee got an iPod shuffle for free. I really wouldn't be surprised about that.

      --
      ||:|::
    31. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "I've known more than a few who got fired for having lunch at Taco Bell."

      The more times I hear this the sadder I become. Where you eat is none of your employer's business. What you drink in your own time is between you and your softdrink god.

      When did Americans accept peonage as a cost of living? Shouldn't our employers live in castles? Maybe corporations should just stop pretending to be businesses and just promote people to ranks such as Squire, Knight, Baron, Duke, Prince, King...

    32. Re:Bill buys Apple? by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "it totally ignores their pointless, me-too, proprietary .wma crapmat"

      Unlike, say, Apple's pointless, me-too, proprietary FairPlay crapmat?

    33. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      When you park a vehicle with the Coca Cola logo at a place that exclusively serves Pepsi products, what do you think management is going to think of your company loyalty?

    34. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      I do agree with you. I have an Archos Jukbox 20 and the thing is a tank. Though I can mount it as a mass-storage device under any OS I have tried withou issue. Oh, and it also only supports MP3's wich is just fine with me.

      However, if currently the market is only going to give us locked-down DRM crap, I would at least want the DRM crap from a less-evil comany than MS. I personally do not own an iPOD and don't see myself buying one since any device I purchase next I will want it to work 100% with Linux. I was looking into a Neuros since it will work with Linux and support OGG and MP3, oh and has Open Source code.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    35. Re:Bill buys Apple? by sedna · · Score: 1


      Which of course the iPod does...

    36. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      FairPlay isn't the crapmat, MP4/AAC is, and it's a pretty good crapmat as crapmats go. I use the lossless version for my stuff.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    37. Re:Bill buys Apple? by timster · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds brilliant. I need to start a company so I can use those titles.

      Want to come work for me as a Peasant I? Minimum wage and no benefits and you can't work more than 20 hours a week until you're promoted to a Peasant II.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    38. Re:Bill buys Apple? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      MS has a lot to lose if they don't control the major digital music format.

      You mean they have a lot to not gain. They can't lose what they don't have.

    39. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a direct Apple employee. Many of us have the iPod shuffle but we had to buy them for ourselves.

    40. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I thought the iPod locks out the music section and only allows you to use iTunes to transfer files to/from the iPod. Are you able to just drop MP3 files to your mounted iPod and than play them? The reason that would be important to me is because Apple does not have a Linux iTune client so I would have no way to get music onto an iPod from Linux. With my old Archo Jukebox, I just plug it into to Linux or Windows and drag-n-drop MP3 files, no other software required.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    41. Re:Bill buys Apple? by ack154 · · Score: 1

      The iPod battery can be replaced for $50. It's widely known. And any battery will die over time - you have to accept that. Of course, you can buy whatever player you like, I just hope people don't base a purchase on thinking another device's battery is expensive to replace.

    42. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      With feudalism, at least, the lord owes you his protection, up to a point, in exchange for your vows.

      Corporations expect loyalty, but return none of it. They want a purely business relationship -- money for showing up, with no sentimentality or human feelings, with you, but expect you to bend the knee, piss in a bottle, look in the retinal scanner and submit to them reviewing your private dining and drinking habits?

      At least when your local lord had you killed, it was with a personal, knife-to-your-groin sort of animosity that showed you that you were valued.

    43. Re:Bill buys Apple? by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPod "locks out" the music by putting it in an invisible folder. The directory structure is pretty unintelligble, though, and it relies on an XML database for locating the songs and information. There are third party programs to transfer files, and even a Perl script could probably do the trick.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    44. Re:Bill buys Apple? by TheoGB · · Score: 1

      " I would at least want the DRM crap from a less-evil comany than MS"

      Oh come one. MS happen to be huge but they're actually less evil than pretty much any company Dubya's connected with (for example).

      At the end of the day Apple would act just like MS if it was in their position (and I'm not saying you would necessarily prefer Apple to be giving the 'DRM crap'). But all companies will be evil. Just the way of things.

      The iPod's cool if you just want a music player and money isn't an issue. If you want a recorder on a part with the trusty MD then the world becomes murkier and you end up buying an iRiver like me.

    45. Re:Bill buys Apple? by over_exposed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My roommate interned with Pfizer and they sold (and likely still sell) their products to their employees for a very small fraction of retail. Granted, it was all gums, mints and off the shelf medications (no prescriptions, sorry). I remember one day he came home witha shopping back full of packs of gum, cough drops, allergy and pain meds, mints, candies and the like and the whole bag cost him about $5.

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    46. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Torontoman · · Score: 1

      >It's not a bit like Coke employees drinking Pepsi

      It is EXACTLY like Coke employees drinking Pepsi.

      I worked at Coke - and saw people fired for drinking Gatorade. I saw people fired because they have distant family members working at a private label brand.

      And before people wonder what level of employee I'm referring to - I'm not talking people with access to 'the secret formula' - I'm talking about people who work in the warehouse and drive a lift truck. SO imagine if a manager or VP walked in with a Dr. Pepper? Toasted.

    47. Re:Bill buys Apple? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The thing is a tank, but the USB chip sucks ass.
      My died, so I'm relagated to using the USB2 dongle for everything, which is fine for file transfers, but sucks when I'm streaming content from the drive in mass-storage mode.

      On a related note, anyone know where I can get a replacement USB interface chip for the thing?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    48. Re:Bill buys Apple? by RustyIC · · Score: 1

      I work for KPMG, who does the audit work for Pepsi. Part of our contract is that we will not have any Coke products at firm sponsered events. Nice marketing tool, considering we have 100,000 across the globe.

    49. Re:Bill buys Apple? by lalas · · Score: 1

      Granted, it was all gums, mints and off the shelf medications (no prescriptions, sorry).
      Pfizer employees can also get reimbursed for their Pfizer-produced prescription meds. They just can't walk into the company store and get them.

    50. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm getting one instead of an iPod because it's just a portable hard drive that doesn't use any drivers

      To use the ipod as USB storage you don't need any drivers (it's just a normal usb disk). To copy songs from/to the ipod, you do need an application that handles the ipod's music database (a few simple files on the ipod's usb-mounted disk), but there are several which you can put on the ipod itself and therefore have available to you where ever you go. Even if you really can't get any sort of program to run (e.g., a solaris box mounting it as a usb volume), you can still copy the music files normally, though you'll have a slightly harder time finding them, because the ipod renames/moves them to speed up the UI.

      Honestly, if your player doesn't have a centralized database, it will have a slow UI. The only way to quickly display meta-information (song title, and so on) is to have it in a central database. Otherwise you spend several seconds waiting for a menu to show up each time you make a selection.

      Ofcourse, if you're looking at the DMC offerings, likely you just want something to tinker with, and the ipod is definitely not good for tinkerers.

    51. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll

      You sure? I read a review of different players last week and I'm sure it said otherwise.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    52. Re:Bill buys Apple? by mfago · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How many iPods do you figure Apple gives to it's administrative assistants?

      Actually, Apple supposedly is going to give an iPod Shuffle to every single employee. Apple Store employees get them first -- good advertising.

    53. Re:Bill buys Apple? by mr100percent · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Apple to reward employees with free iPod Shuffles. "Seeing as last year we all received additional vacation time, an iPod shuffle is a small investment for a company to reward its employees for the best quarter in our history," remarked one employee.

    54. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You're right. Apple has no desire to support the Linux platform. Why should they, Linux is a very small miche on the desktop, and Apple has a small niche of their own to support. The Windows client was a necessity to reach 95% of the market. The Linux client isn't.

      But the linux community is used to writing it's own software. Write your own iPod client for Linux. If all you are wanting to do is transfer MP3s, it's not that hard.

      Or use your old Archaos Jukebox or buy another. No one really cares what you do.

    55. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But 80% of players being iPods is not "using them from time to time." And competitive products bought for genuine competitor evaluation are bought by the company, not by employees out of their own pockets. Your excuse is bogus.

    56. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do me a favor, admit you don't want an ipod because you think it's taking the easy way out, not because you think it is somehow crippled. I can't see someone honestly being as misinformed as your post would indicate and being a geek at the same time.

      The ipod works 100 percent with linux. It's just a usb mass storage device (the ipod's music database being just a set of files on the hard drive when mounted). There is a lot of software to manage the ipod's music catalog on linux (such as gtkpod or mypod). Or you could even roll your own quite easily. It also supports mp3 and mp4 (roughly the same quality/filesize ratio as ogg vorbis). There is no lockdown crap on the ipod at all. In fact, it unlocks drm-protected files which will not play on players that don't support drm, even if those players support the fileformat.

    57. Re:Bill buys Apple? by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WMA is entirely ms-owned and not standardized, fairplay is a layer over MPEG4/AAC, which is standardized and not under apple's control.

    58. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AJWM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Windows XP, no proprietary drivers required.

      Uh, what is Windows XP but one big proprietary driver?

      --
      -- Alastair
    59. Re:Bill buys Apple? by ThousandStars · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There is also the other factor of exposure to Apple products. The more consumers that buy Apple iPods, the more that may just buy a Mac Mini, eMac, iMac, iBook or PowerBook. That means less revenue to MS for their OS cash-cow.

      I seriously doubt MS is even remotely worried about this, since Apple would have to have five or ten times its present sales to even make a small dent. More importantly, I doubt any corporate clients are going to go Apple just because of the iPod and mini. Besides, they probably make as much if not more money from Apple users than they do from Windows users because of the price of MSO:Mac and VPC -- both of which I bought.

      Most importantly, however, MS can pull the plug on Apple anytime they want by eliminating MSO:Mac. Fact is, a whole lot of people, myself included, exist in a world dominated by MSO and need to interact with it; if Office:Mac didn't exist, I wouldn't own a PowerBook. Hell, if VPC didn't exist I probably wouldn't, because I also need Access.

      Any time MS wants to, they can effectively kill, or at least really marginalize, Apple with their MSO weapon.

    60. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Dav3K · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting. 'cause I have heard quite the opposite. MS employees are often forbidden to touch linux or anything GPL'ed so that there is no possibility of their code being influenced by it.

    61. Re:Bill buys Apple? by rjung2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think there's a difference in Bill Gates' mind.

    62. Re:Bill buys Apple? by clarkcox3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You read wrong. The iPod shows up as a standard USB or FireWire hard-drive.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    63. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you guys just can't help but take a shot at GWB any chance you get. FFS, he'll be gone in 4 years. Cry in private, your embarrassing yourself.

    64. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      When you park a vehicle with the Coca Cola logo at a place that exclusively serves Pepsi products, what do you think management is going to think of your company loyalty?

      Your personal car has a big Coca Cola graphic?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    65. Re:Bill buys Apple? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      I'm quite surprised the terms were made public. The terms of the Coke deal here were sealed, much to the displeasure of those outside the union. Often they'll make it public that they're paying for a scoreboard or some other visible piece of hardware, but otherwise keep the deal secret. I imagine it was a similar deal to what you describe though.

      I think the biggest reason they used to seal those deals is so that they could offer different deals to different campuses, and not have them realize they're being ripped off. That, and they probably wanted to prevent a bidding war with the competitor - Pepsi and Coke might start driving up the contract amounts through a bidding war, which really is not good for either of them. Negotiate and sign in secret, so that your opponent can't one-up you.

    66. Re:Bill buys Apple? by bynary · · Score: 1

      Yes, the iPod can be mounted as removable storage in XP and OS X. A friend of mine just did it this last weekend. And it doesn't require any special drivers or software (assuming, of course, that you have the USB 2.0 or Firewire drivers installed). And contrary to popular opinion, it can be used to listen to non-DRM media.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    67. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      No, these people were driving Coca-Cola vans, or were driving company cars.

    68. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but Windows does NOT ocupy 95% of the market.

    69. Re:Bill buys Apple? by DJCF · · Score: 1

      I've heard that MS employees use linux from time to time

      Actually, that makes a helluva lot of sense. Now if only they'd start using their own products so they know how crap they are...

    70. Re:Bill buys Apple? by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      But Coke make Dr Pepper. At least the UK franchise does and I can't imagine Pepsi selling to them.

      Or are you saying that if a manager or VP walked in with a Dr Pepper at Microsoft they'd be fired?

    71. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh come one. MS happen to be huge but they're actually less evil than pretty much any company Dubya's connected with (for example).

      Maybe, maybe not. But companies that Dubya's connected to are not companies that consumers directly interact with, so they don't matter that much to us. There are no consumer products that I can buy at stores sold by Halliburton. Yes, they are making tons of money from the American taxpayer, but we can't change that with our buying habits, only by voting.

      MS, Apple, Best Buy, etc., are all corporations that we as consumers directly interact with. I can hurt Best Buy by not shopping there, and by telling everyone I know to to shop there. I can help Apple by buying an iPod (I haven't, but I could).

      So, to a consumer, companies like MS, Best Buy, and Lexmark are going to seem much more evil, because of the control they attempt to exert in our daily lives. Companies like Halliburton are much less visible; I don't get a receipt from the IRS showing me how much of my tax money went to their corporate coffers.

    72. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      I've known more than a few who got fired for having lunch at Taco Bell.
      And none of those employees fought that in court? I don't see how a company can legally fire you for where you eat on your lunch break. Unless of cource those employees signed some type of contract when they were hired that stated they would never buy/use a Pepsi product.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    73. Re:Bill buys Apple? by DJCF · · Score: 1

      That you were evangelising to the coke-less?

    74. Re:Bill buys Apple? by bahamat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe the next-gen of DVD players will drop WMA and pick up AAC w/FairPlay.


      They can. Check out the next-gen of DVD players here. It's so advanced though it will only hook up to TV's with DVI input. You can get a composite video adapter though, for about $20.
    75. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      In right to work states, such as Georgia (where Coke is based) they can fire you for any reason they wish, as long as that reason does not violate any number of laws preventing discrimination due to age, religion, race or physical handicap.

    76. Re:Bill buys Apple? by hawk · · Score: 1

      I tried an A&W hamburger with my daughter a couple of weekends ago. My conclusion is that they exist by secret support by McDonalds, who wants to avoid the stigma of the dullest and most flavorless burger on the market.

      And in front of me at the drive in window was a Domino delivery car. Now, I knew their pizza was horrible, having learned that jaw muscles could feel pain last time I ate it over fifteen years ago. But so bad that he would buy a meal at A&W? Wow.

      And then we got to the window to the clerk that couldn't correctly count the 11 pennies I handed her(off by 2, for crying out loud!)

      hawk

    77. Re:Bill buys Apple? by jr87 · · Score: 1

      for linux with ipod you need a.) firewire kernel modules b.) sbp2 (make sure it's a module) c.)ipod d.) gtkpod or similar... music is stored in a hidden Music folder that is easy to get to. and you can just edi the xml database file...(I suggest using gtkpod)

    78. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Fareq · · Score: 1

      hell, I don't work for Coca-Cola and *I* get all the free sodas I can drink.

      For that matter, Microsoft employees *also* get all the free soda they can drink... and I think they have both coke and pepsi... but I don't really remember...

    79. Re:Bill buys Apple? by kmudrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      The reason that would be important to me is because Apple does not have a Linux iTune client so I would have no way to get music onto an iPod from Linux.

      gtkpod is a GPL'd program that does just that. Works quite well with my 4th generation ipod and linux.

    80. Re:Bill buys Apple? by hawk · · Score: 1

      All your iPods are belong to Bill . . .

      hawk

    81. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that matter, if you just copy the whole dir structure to a hard drive, then tell iTunes to add them to your library and "keep your iTunes folder organized" it re-sorts everything automagically for you.

      Very convenient for when your hard drive full o' MP3s crashes...

    82. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple agreed to not develop any new text-to-speech capabilities for the Mac (this one wasn't allowed to leak for a while)

      That sounds completely bogus to me (and I would be in a position to know whether Apple agreed to that or not).

    83. Re:Bill buys Apple? by jacobcaz · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • Coke's employee base is very nearly fanatical in their loyalty to their product
      It's not just Coke/Pepsi. The husband of a lady I work with is employed by DPSUBG (Dr. Pepper, Seven-up Bottling group). One of their key products is Royal Crown cola (RC).

      When RC big-wigs are in town for a visit, the local account reps get a detailed agenda built, including all dining stops while said big-wig is in town.

      The local reps then work with the restaruants to make sure that RC and only RC is served in the presence of said Royal Crown big-wig.

      There is just about no place I know of in town that serves RC products. So this is a highly choreographed ritual they go through about twice a year. They even coach the hostesses and wait staff to offer an "RC" cola, not just a "soda" or even worse a "Coke".

    84. Re:Bill buys Apple? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No questions asked, no fighting for your job. You get fired. This includes if your boss sees you at Pizza Hut, Taco Bell or KFC, since those entities are owned by TriCon, who also owns Pepsi.


      I'm not disputing you, because it sounds like something that could happen ....

      But how legal is this?? Surely to god eating at a Pizza Hut can't be considered valid grounds for termination.

      Can a company actually try to have sway on the stuff that you do outside of work to this extent? I know they try all the time, but this one just sounds obscene.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    85. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Damvan · · Score: 1

      As someone who has spent quite a bit of time in Pepsi bottling plants (not working for Pepsi), at least on the Pepsi side, they have no access to free Pepsi at the plant, and the vending machines are actually quite expensive.

    86. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe he means if you're on the job or on lunch break or wearing coke branded clothing, etc. and found eating at one of those places...

    87. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod works beautifully in Linux. It is mounted and accessed like any removable firewire harddrive and gtkpod does an excellent job maintaining my mp3 collection and syncing it with my iPod.

    88. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      It wasn't kept secret, it was just not publicized. All the PR revolved around the "Microsoft loves Macs and wants to support Apple" / "Apple appreciates MS's support and love that they make Mac software" angle. The lawsuit was never allowed to become front-page news, and this was before Apple-related Internet muckraking reached the levels of today, so it never had a chance to become common knowledge.

    89. Re:Bill buys Apple? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Apple agreed to not develop any new text-to-speech capabilities for the Mac

      Hmm. I'd wondered why OS X still includes the same speech synthesis engine as Mac OS 8. Do you know if there was a time limitation on this agreement? It sounds really bad, and Apple would do well to either drop it or replace it with something a bit less dated (you can barely understand what it's saying).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    90. Re:Bill buys Apple? by sg3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Hmm. I'd wondered why OS X still includes the same speech
      > synthesis engine as Mac OS 8. Do you know if there was a
      > time limitation on this agreement? It sounds really bad, and
      > Apple would do well to either drop it or replace it with
      > something a bit less dated (you can barely understand what
      > it's saying).

      I think you nailed this on the head; apparently that's why the speech capabilities haven't been improved since 8.

      I read the time limit was five years, which is why Apple is introducing the new spoken word interface for Tiger (due later this year).

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    91. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Lifewolf · · Score: 1

      The more times I hear this the sadder I become. Where you eat is none of your employer's business. What you drink in your own time is between you and your softdrink god.

      My wife works for a large pet supply company. During the hiring process, every employee has to sign a document agreeing to immediate termination if he/she is ever seen in another pet store or purchasing any pets or pet supplies from any other retailer.

      By the terms of the contract, she can't buy a can of food for the cat while she's picking up bread and milk at the grocery store. I'll let you guess how much she pays attention to this contract.

      --
      "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
    92. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Bun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the end of the day Apple would act just like MS if it was in their position (and I'm not saying you would necessarily prefer Apple to be giving the 'DRM crap'). But all companies will be evil. Just the way of things.

      One documentary went so far as to compare corporations to psychopaths.

      --
      "Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
    93. Re:Bill buys Apple? by tenton · · Score: 1

      No, Dr. Pepper sometimes uses Coke to bottle the drinks, but they are not owned by Coke (nor does Coke make them). The Coca Cola Corp has a Dr. Pepper clone (Mr. Pibb).

      (plus the fact that I've seen places that only serve Pepsi, like Taco Bell, have Dr. Pepper available).

      I doubt things are different in the UK, but who knows.

    94. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you insane? why do you think cherry coke had such a big advertising budget in the 80s?

    95. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Think how much damage he can do in four whole years, though.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    96. Re:Bill buys Apple? by dq5+studios · · Score: 1
      As someone who has spent quite a bit of time in Pepsi bottling plants (not working for Pepsi), at least on the Pepsi side, they have no access to free Pepsi at the plant, and the vending machines are actually quite expensive.


      My uncle used to work for pepsi (delivery driver I think) and he said the same thing. It was much cheaper to buy from the gas station he was delviering to then to buy straight from pepsi.
    97. Re:Bill buys Apple? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Very legal.

      Coke drinker, or Pepsi drinker aren't protected classes of workers. "Doesn't like the Three Stooges" is a similarly non-protected class of workers. As long as your decision to hire or fire isn't based on a federally (or often, more restrictive state/county/city) mandated protected class of worker (age, regilion, ethnicity, disability, whistle-blower) then you can pretty much screen based on any OTHER criteria you want -- as long as it doesn't de-facto also screen based on one of the other criteria.

    98. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Which western democracy has employment law so lacking that someone could actually be legitimately fired for drinking the wrong brand of soft drink?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    99. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we get Jeb for another eight after that, though?

    100. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      94% then. Worldwide.

    101. Re:Bill buys Apple? by flahavin · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Bill/MSFT already own a good chunk of Apple?
      Isn't that the only reason why they made Internet Explorer and Office for the mac?

    102. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. it goes 4 yrs, 8 off, 8 yrs, 4off, 4 yrs, 8 off, etc...

    103. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if your BIOS supports it, you can even boot off your iPod.

    104. Re:Bill buys Apple? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      I think he means "attending a restaurant/movie theater/sporting event where Pepsi has the beverage concession." Still sounds somewhat extreme to me (can't he just order water?), but not to the extreme of forbidding attendance at movies that portray Pepsi drinking.

    105. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My high school was offered a deal with Pepsi for $15,000 if they placed a Pepsi machine in the cafeteria; this offer was made public. Coke offered $20,000 in private, and they went for it.
      If the Coke deal had been public, Pepsi would have made a higher offer, and we would have had a Pepsi machine, but Coke kept quiet and they won.

    106. Re:Bill buys Apple? by jgerry · · Score: 1

      Atlanta native here, home of Coke worldwide headquarters. I don't know how it is now, but Coca-Cola Company employees (don't EVER say you work at Coke, you work at "The Coca-Cola Company") used to be rabid about their loyalty, and their hatred of Pepsi products.

      When I was in high school back in the late 80's, one of my friends' dad was their CFO or some such high-up job. One afternoon, we removed all the Coke products from the kitchen cabinets, pantry, and refrigerator. There was a lot of it! We replaced it all with Pepsi. Then we sat around and waited for her dad to get home.

      Let's just say he was not amused. He was, in fact, very angry, both at his daughter and all of us. We were asked to leave the house. I still think about that afternoon all the time and I laugh my ass off.

      I'm pretty sure we told him to take a chill pill (It was the 80s).

    107. Re:Bill buys Apple? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      RC Cola? That's server no where around here. Just Dr. Pepper. I've always loved Dr. Pepper, but I think now I might like Pibb Xtra even better. But you can't buy that here, only in restaurants like Fizolli's and Stake 'N Shake.

    108. Re:Bill buys Apple? by ProfKyne · · Score: 1

      I worked in a building *owned* by Coke, and we were not even allowed to have a Pepsi machine on our floor.

      I went to a university "owned" by Coke, and we did not have a Pepsi machine anywhere on the one-square-mile campus.

      --
      "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
    109. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still lunacy. And Americans call themselves 'free'?

    110. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Dr. Pepper is actually an independent brand that sells bottling rights to distributors in each region. In Buffalo, NY, it's Pepsi.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    111. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iRiver H320 and H340 are very comparable to an iPod, mount as a standard USB disk drive and play MP3, WMA, and OGG files. 100% linux compatible, as well as offering DRM services for windows users - I highly recommend this player.

    112. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      hmmm, SOOOO i could fire a women bceause she likes to wear skirts?

      or an olde rperson bceause the dont' like rock?

      or a disable person because they don't like sports?

      Hell if thats true then you can fire whoever the fuck youw ant for whatever stange reason as long as its not for those mandated protected class reasons. But you can still fire them because you thaught up some other reason??

      Thou i think you should beable to hire/fire whoever you want for whatever reason you want, if you own the corp, i mean hey its your money!

    113. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I have heard of gtkpod and it looks pretty cool. However, it is not an officially support software application from Apple. So if I were to use it and something happened to my iPod, do you think Apple would honor my warranty? I don't. I personally want to see an officially supported way to work with an iPod under Linux. Honestly, that is the only thing holding me back from buying an iPod. Oh and the fact that I need to connect an line-in into the device I buy and record. I record about 2 hours of content from the church I go to and I then convert that into audio CD for other members. Last I heard, the iPod does not allow one to record. That is why I personally am planning on getting an Neuros. It will work under Linux and MS Windows and also allow me to record content as MP3.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    114. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Yes, but that doesn't mean it is unconstitutional. IANAL, so I am not sure on this point. It would be interesting to see an employee fight this in a "right to work" states. I don't see how an employee has a right over what you do during your personal time.

      Just because a state has a law does not mean that law is not unconstitutional. I personally would love to see people challenge these types of laws at a federal level.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    115. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      While many called your post funny, I don't really see the Mac Mini as the "nextgen" DVD player. You can currently buy a DVD at Walmart for $30! Yes, it is crap, but it plays a DVD just fine. You can get a good DVD player for maybe $70-$80. That is far less than $500 for a Mac Mini. I don't think a Mac Mini will replace a standard DVD player anytime soon. Oh, and I am not busting on the Mac Mini, I think they are great little computers. However, they won't replace a typical DVD unless Apple can sell them for less than $100.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    116. Re:Bill buys Apple? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The answer would be 100% of them.

      Apple recently gave out iPod shuffles to all their employees.

    117. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Besides, they probably make as much if not more money from Apple users than they do from Windows users because of the price of MSO:Mac and VPC
      Do you know how to count? All the sales of MS software to Apple users doesn't even touch the sales of MS software to non-Apple users. Seriously, do some _basic_ math. Apple accounts for maybe 3% of all computer users while MS is at least 95% of computer users. Exactly how can 3% of the users account for more in gross sales than 95% of the computer users? MS's biggest cash cows are their OS which, last I checked, is not sold with a new Mac, and their Office suite. Corporate clients account for the majority of the MS Office suite sales.

      You seem to really over emphasize MSO. Yes it is the dominate office suite on the PC, however there are other compatible alternatives. OpenOffice can handle a ton of MS Office docs and it will only get better. Apple just came out with some very impressive Office-type applications that can easily handle the office suite needs of the Apple community.

      As far as _you_ needing MS Access, I would say you are not the majority. The Majority of home users I know need a word processor and that is about it. Apple has that covered either with Apples own new product or with OpenOffice. I am a senior programmer for a fortune 500 with 140,000+ employees. I can tell you from experience that a very, _very_ small fraction of our employees need Access for anything. The majority use Word and Excel, and once in a while PowerPoint. We actually discourage Access usage, since it is far easier for our DBA's to create a database and us programmers to put together a webapp to handle any database needs of the masses. Non of our important systems are allowed to be based on MS Access. Now, MS Access may be used by a single "power-user", however when more than two people need an application that access data, a real data base is used. Currently where I work we have Oracle for mission critical data and MS SQL Server for departmental type applications.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    118. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      No one really cares what you do.
      And where in my post did I suggest that people should "care" what I do? I stated why I personally would not buy an iPod. I don't want a device that doesn't work on Linux and more importantly I don't want a device that doesnsn't let me record. I never understood why the iPod doesn't have a line-in for recording, it just seems brain-dead to me for Apple to not included such a simple feature.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    119. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      You have a USB2 dongle? Wow, I must have a really old version. Mine just connects with a USB cable is is USB 1.1 only. Dog slow to transfer a lot of MP3 files. I just start the transfer at night and go to bed. However, it is built like a tank. I dropped the thing a ton of times and it "takes a licken and keeps on ticken" as Timex would say.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    120. Re:Bill buys Apple? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      hmmm, SOOOO i could fire a women bceause she likes to wear skirts? or an olde rperson bceause the dont' like rock? or a disable person because they don't like sports?

      Do you not know the meaning of "as long as it doesn't de-facto also screen based on one of the other criteria"?

      Ass.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    121. Re:Bill buys Apple? by bahamat · · Score: 1

      In that same token, I don't think I'd call a $30 Wal-Mart DVD player exactly "next-gen". I don't even think the "good" $80 players are anywhere close to next-gen either. DVD players are comodity now. When the current class of DVD players was considered "next gen" technology even the crapiest ones were about $500. What do you think the first blue-ray dvd player will cost? Probably about $500 until prices come down (which they will). Yes, you can get a bottom of the line dirt cheap player, but it's bottom of the line, certainly not next generation.

      A next gen dvd player, IMHO, should play DVD's, CD's, be combined with a PVR, network with computers in the home, play music, photo slideshows, play games, support 7.1 surround sound, HD-DVD, Blue-Ray, and more. Of those technologies that currently available, the only thing the Mac Mini can't do right off the bat is PVR capability (you need to buy a firewire TV-Tuner for that).

      This is also something that Microsoft realizes, that's why there's this big push for the "media PC". Except that the Media PC is $2000. Even if you bought a TV-Tuner for the Mac Mini your total cost is still half the cost of a Windows Media Center PC. And as Steve Jobs said many times in the keynote speech, 2005 is the year of HD. The Mac Mini is HD ready. Windows is not.

      So be a cheapskate if you want to. I don't care in the slightest. I've got the rockinest DVD player on the block and it's called a Mac Mini.

    122. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When one is crying for one's country, it's best done in public.

    123. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So $50 for a battery is cheap? Sheesh...compared to what??

    124. Re:Bill buys Apple? by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      There is just about no place I know of in town that serves RC products. So this is a highly choreographed ritual they go through about twice a year. They even coach the hostesses and wait staff to offer an "RC" cola, not just a "soda" or even worse a "Coke".

      Why couldn't they just eat at White Castle for their whole visit? They've got RC products.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    125. Re:Bill buys Apple? by brainstyle · · Score: 1
      Coke's employee base is very nearly fanatical in their loyalty to their product, and use of "the blue" is not accepted

      Seems like Pepsi's is, too. I know the daughter of one of the vice presidents of PepsiCo, and it was really something to hear her talk about how good Pepsi is, how the war with Coke isn't over, and how Coke's constantly used nasty practices to keep Pepsi down. I thought it sounded so sad, caring that much about something as unimportant as a consumer product. I then looked at all my Apple gear and felt really, really sad for myself.

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    126. Re:Bill buys Apple? by carboncopy79 · · Score: 1

      I know that Carlsberg brewery gives it's higher level employees ONE cartoon of beer per month.

      Have a friend who quit working there; afraid of being an alcoholic.

      And all employees can buy their beers real cheap.

    127. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Ah! The stupidity to post as an AC, and the stupidity to vote Bush. It kind of fits.

      "There's an old saying in Tennessee. I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee, that says: Fool me once... shame on... shame on you... If fooled, you can't get fooled again."

    128. Re:Bill buys Apple? by eliasen · · Score: 1

      Efficient recording is more difficult because doing lossy compression is far more computationally-intensive than doing the corresponding decompression. It would likely take significantly more costly computing hardware to do recording and efficient compression. Not to mention the corresponding increase in expense of adding analog-to-digital converters, etc.

      --
      Make your computer ten thousand times larger--try Frink
    129. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lose face.
      Lose the game.
      Lose the money invested in R&D.
      Lose the money invested in Marketing.
      Lose the money investing in MSN music store.
      Lose market share in the desktop PC market because of the iPod halo effect.
      Lose still more of that reputation that they used to have that they never lose.
      Microsoft can certainly lose.

    130. Re:Bill buys Apple? by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought the iPod locks out the music section and only allows you to use iTunes to transfer files to/from the iPod.

      Yes, it does, although I believe that with Windows you can still see the 'hidden' folders. To get around this with OS X, you can:
      Launch Terminal
      Type 'ln -s /Volumes/your_iPod_name_here/iPod_Control/Music/F* /* ~/Desktop/My_Temp_Files/'

      You now have shortcuts to all the music on your iPod via the 'My_Temp_Files' folder, which is located on your desktop, for convenience.

      To copy, again from the Terminal:
      cp -R /Volumes/your_iPod_name_here/iPod_Control/Music/ /full_path_to_destination_here

      (tig)
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    131. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Ten time present sales would be about 30% marketshare. That's a hell of a lot more than a small dent. No, if Apple doubled their marketshare, then Microsoft would be seriously worried, it'd make a big dent in their revenues, and the press about it happening would cause a positive feedback effect.

      And it's not really about corporates. Apple's main market is the SOHO market these days. And that wouldn't be killed by the withdrawal of MS Office - at least once Apple have added a spreadsheet to iWork.

    132. Re:Bill buys Apple? by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      A semi-reliable gaming platform?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    133. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter if the Employee's are purchasing Apple iPods... Microsoft ITSELF is purchasing Apple G5 Workstations FOR THEIR EMPLOYEE's as they use them for creating MS Software for the MAC Platform... if that isn't enough to convince you that Apple has it made, I don't know what is... How often do you see software made by Apple for a Windows Platform???

    134. Re:Bill buys Apple? by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      How the hell do you become an alcoholic drinking one carton of beer a month?

      I'm an alcoholic and I can assure you it requires at least 2 cartons a week. ;-)

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    135. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      GTKPod does a pretty good job of updating the song database on my iPod, all I need to do is retrieve the DB, drag and drop songs, and then update the DB and it works.

    136. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To an Apple Zealot, of course. The same people who think the $799 eMac is not overpriced.

    137. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you have against cross-dressers, eh?

    138. Re:Bill buys Apple? by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      Golly, and here I am thinking it would be sensible to just put a machine in for each, charge them both rental fees or a percentage on sales, and let the students decide which brand they want to drink.

      So much for free choice and competition I suppose.

      In the past I have actually walked out of stores without a purchase when it becomes apparent that they have an exclusive deal to sell nothing but Coke products (usually because I am looking for 'Red Bull' or 'V' and all they have is the Coke clone 'Lift'.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    139. Re:Bill buys Apple? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You read wrong. The iPod shows up as a standard USB or FireWire hard-drive.

      But you can't put music on it that way.

    140. Re:Bill buys Apple? by zentogo · · Score: 1

      Really? I drag and drop to the Ipod often with OSX and I have done it in XP too. Sometimes I dont like ITUNES because of the way it stores the MUSIC on OSX so-- I have a seperate Music folder that ITUNES can access, but I also often just manually browse it and drop files into the ipod. And on windows I can see all the hidden files. I have friends storing info on Ipods as well. I think Apple is Just slowly opening it up. Once they get a bigger market share, I believe they will start allowing people to write software and other apps that use the IPOD differently. You can store text files and calendar files on it now as well as the address book from OSX. It has alot of uses IMHO.

      --
      I basically do nothing.
    141. Re:Bill buys Apple? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      A next gen dvd player, IMHO, should play DVD's, CD's, be combined with a PVR, network with computers in the home, play music, photo slideshows, play games, support 7.1 surround sound, HD-DVD, Blue-Ray, and more. Of those technologies that currently available, the only thing the Mac Mini can't do right off the bat is PVR capability (you need to buy a firewire TV-Tuner for that).

      What you describe is not a DVD player, though it does happen to play DVDs.

    142. Re:Bill buys Apple? by bryanthompson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well as long as you people keep on continuing with this elitist attitude, instead of being inclusive and offering viable alternatives, you'll continue to lose elections to people you think are as stupid as Bush.

      If Bush voters are so stupid, then your party of intellectual superiority should have had no problem convincing them of your agenda.

    143. Re:Bill buys Apple? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      But surely Apple could do it at a competitive price? The Neuros costs less than the iPod and can record from FM, Mic and Line-In to MP3 or wav. I really don't see why Apple would not be able to handle simple MP3 recording. My dog-old Archos Jukebox 20 can do real-time MP3 recording without a hitch, and it is only running at 12MHz with crappy MP3 decoding/enocoding hardware. The iPod surely has much newer and faster hardware than the my old Archos.

      If Archos could enable real-time encoding way back when and the current Nueros can enable now for less price, I really don't see why Apple doesn't offer it.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    144. Re:Bill buys Apple? by MrYotsuya · · Score: 1

      Fool me once... shame on... shame on you... If fooled, you can't get fooled again."

      You forgot to insert the ten-second pause before he mangles the saying.

    145. Re:Bill buys Apple? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Besides, they probably make as much if not more money from Apple users than they do from Windows users because of the price of MSO:Mac and VPC
      Do you know how to count?
      From context, it appears the GP was indicating that Microsoft makes more on each Mac OS X user than on each Windows user. I base this on the fact that the conversation was on Apple stealing marketshare from Windows. Think about this: if the GP's thesis is true and each Mac OS X user gives MS more money than each Windows user, then increasing Apple marketshare, while surely still an ego problem, would result in greater revenue at MS. Now, is that thesis true? Perhaps. Assuming 0% piracy (and I would say piracy is far lower on the Mac platform than on Windows, so this is not a slanted assumption):

      Home machines:
      XP home OEM: $65 (average Internet price, and you know HP/Dell/GW2k get a serious break on it)
      MS Works, or similar, software for each home machine: $10 (assuming the OEM even buys the MS offering rather than a cheaper one.)
      Total revenue per Windows user: $75

      "Pro" machines:
      XP pro OEM: $100 (same disclaimer applies for real OEM pricing).
      Office OEM: $218
      (this is the SBE, the cheapest that has Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and the extraneous Publisher. Basic, which excludes PowerPoint and Pub, can be had for $100 less.)
      Total revenue per Windows user: $318

      Mac users that buy MSO, or MSO+VPC:
      Office for Mac OS X: $399
      Virtual PC with Win2k: $249
      (2k is more usable on emulation than $30-cheaper XP Home)
      Total revenue per Mac user: $400 with MSO; $650 with VPC

      Well, you be the judge. It depends on piracy and on MSO's popularity on Mac OS X.
    146. Re:Bill buys Apple? by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Maybe because of the "delicate" relationship Apple has with MS, they just released iWork with the Word Processor and are waiting to see if it picks up.

      Later they can add the spreadsheet as a normal "upgrade" if market share starts to increase.

      /I can't beleive they wouldn't have a spreadsheet planned right now.

    147. Re:Bill buys Apple? by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Pfizer sold their Adams candy unit to Cadbury, so no more free candy for them!

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    148. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm not American. My favoured party is in power. I'm not speaking for Democrats when I point out how dumb you are in electing that fool. The rest of the world knows it too.

    149. Re:Bill buys Apple? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are waiting for market share. I think they just have the same team working on all the office apps. They announced Keynote at MacWorld 2004, and Pages at MacWorld 2005. I'd place a large wager on the spreadsheet appearing at MacWorld 2006.

    150. Re:Bill buys Apple? by jcr · · Score: 1

      He could have been fired for drinking Pepsi products ..and he could have made a tidy sum on a wrongful-termination lawsuit in that event.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    151. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, we get 4 years of Hillary and then 8 years of Jeb? Fuck me sideways. I wonder if the country will still be left standing at the end of it?

    152. Re:Bill buys Apple? by carboncopy79 · · Score: 1

      I am just qouting the reason my friend gave me; for leaving Carlsberg.

      Join an AA recently?

    153. Re:Bill buys Apple? by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      Do you know how to count?

      Do you know how to read? As the first reply indicated, I was referring to revenue per user, not total revenue.

      There might be somewhat compatible alternatives to Word, but none that are as fully featured and fast. I also think you underestimate the need for Word compatibility among users, and particularly businesses.

    154. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On what grounds would such a law be unconstitutional?

    155. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      How often do you see software made by Apple for a Windows Platform???

      Well, if I regularly used Windows, I might see it every time I ran the QuickTime player or iTunes if I'd downloaded them.

    156. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll
      You read wrong.
      I did, did I? Open the review in l'Ordinateur Individuel (Fevrier 2005) and tell me what it says.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    157. Re:Bill buys Apple? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The dongle is an add-on, like the CF card reader and video recorder. It plugs into the bottom of the unit. pretty cool, but the mechanical attachment is not stabile.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    158. Re:Bill buys Apple? by SilentChris · · Score: 1, Troll

      And who else besides Apple uses it? Right. If something is essentially only licensed to one huge company, it's under their control (they can use their buying power to sway future versions of the layer).

    159. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at GM and its socially inept to drive a non-GM car, but you aren't going to get fired for it* (note: I am contract and I work at a corporate office, not a plant. "Actual employees" and plant workers could face different scenarios).

      * You will get cut off in the parking garage though. If we meet at a ramp at the same time and you are driving a Taurus, F you buddy. :)

    160. Re:Bill buys Apple? by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you didn't read wrong, but if that is the case, then they wrote wrong. If they wrote that the iPod doesn't show up as a standard mass-storage USB device, then they are flat wrong.

      I've been using iPods as storage devices since the original 5GB model. Hell, I've had bootable partitions with disk repair tools on my iPod that I've used as rescue disks. I guess I was just imagining that if your magazine says otherwise.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    161. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like for it to be a Coke & a Pepsi machine side by side. But the companies wouldn't give nearly the kind of kickback to the universities if they allowed competition. I imagine less than half.

      -Kevin(sharpestmarble, gmail.com)

    162. Re:Bill buys Apple? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      doesn't use any drivers, and has a really good battery life without being $100 to replace like an iPod.

      It's already been pointed out to you that you don't know what you're talking about ( what iPod drivers? ) but I want to clarify what a previous post said about the battery price- they said it's $50. They can be had much cheaper, and you can replace them with higher-capacity batteries than they ship with.

      They are between $25.99 and $39.95, depending on model of iPod and battery capacity.

      They give you a couple of 'installation tools' with that, too, though I hear a sharp screwdriver or a couple of guitar picks do the trick if you don't get these 'tools'.

    163. Re:Bill buys Apple? by anothergene · · Score: 1


      I never understood why the iPod doesn't have a line-in for recording, it just seems brain-dead to me for Apple to not included such a simple feature.


      Because it's meant to be an uncluttered device that is easily useable and understandable by a large segment of the population... ie not techies.

      It's not aimed at the technie market that wants it to do everything under the sun including be a clumsy cumbersume device with a million and one options.

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
    164. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You know the deal with Mr. Pibb and Dr. Pepper, right? They were half brothers. They both went to med school, but Mr. Pibb dropped out and became a back alley abortionist. Pibb was constantly in financial or legal trouble (or a combination of the two) and many times Dr. Pepper helped him out with either loans or using his influence as an important member of the community.

      Dr. Pepper concocted a health tonic that became very successful, to the point where he was fabulously wealthy. Enraged by jealousy, Mr. Pibb broke into Dr. Pepper's house one night and stole the secret formula.

      So now you know the background between the rivalry between Dr. Pepper and his half brother (some say he was a bastard, as well) Mr. Pibb.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    165. Re:Bill buys Apple? by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


      > copy the whole dir structure to a hard drive, then tell iTunes
      > to add them to your library and "keep your iTunes folder organized"
      > it re-sorts everything automagically for you.

      mark the parent poster up -- i've used this handy trick before,
      and it works great - saved me hours and hours having to manually
      reorg all that music.

    166. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who else besides Apple uses it? Right. If something is essentially only licensed to one huge company, it's under their control (they can use their buying power to sway future versions of the layer).

      *laughs*

      This is MPEG4, as in the next generation of MPEG2. AAC is an audio coding subset of it. MPEG4 AAC is what XM uses to encode their radio with. It's what 3GPP has adopted as a high-quality audio standard for cellphones. That apple happens to have adopted it only speaks to its quality, not to any sort of control apple might be imagined to have over it.

      I just wish people would bash apple over proprietary stuff that's actually proprietary, like aqua, instead of over the stuff that's only imagined to be proprietary, like the vast majority of their hardware and software line (just look at the actual technologies they use, apple is BIG on open standards and open source, except for the actual GUI).

    167. Re:Bill buys Apple? by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      'twas a joke my friend. hence the ;-)

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    168. Re:Bill buys Apple? by the+italian · · Score: 0

      just because you are tied to their teet doesn't mean everyone else is.

      --
      http://www.1053.org -=We use big words=-
    169. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Torontoman · · Score: 1

      Well, In Canada it's a pepsi licensed product. Point is - I've seen it happen. Problem is - it happened. What can I / we do about it? Not much. It's like GM strongy suggesting that their employees drive GM cars... They can't really do much to stop it if the want to drive a Honda - but hey you didn't tighten that bolt quite hard enough - can I talk to you - what's with your lousy attitude?

    170. Re:Bill buys Apple? by IvanXQZ · · Score: 1

      "And as Steve Jobs said many times in the keynote speech, 2005 is the year of HD. The Mac Mini is HD ready. Windows is not."

      I'm a bleed-six-colors Apple guy, but this statement is incorrect. The only way the Mac mini is HD ready is in that iMovie, the bundled entry-level movie editing app, now supports HD content. That's it. If you don't use iMovie, it's no different than Windows with regard to HD. Neither the OS nor the hardware has any inherent support for HD more than Windows running with an appropriate video card. Almost all HTPC's people have been been rolling over the past several years are based on Windows.

    171. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      Some correction to be made: The speech technologies in Tiger is the same as ever. Ever meaning since it was introduced a long with the mac in 1984.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
    172. Re:Bill buys Apple? by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      I'll have to ask my mom again, but there is someone in my family who was a "higher-up" at RC Cola. This could be interesting. Thanks for the story!

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    173. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0

      Looks like the Apple botty^H^H^H fanboys got some modpoints!

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    174. Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you didn't read wrong, but if that is the case, then they wrote wrong.
      Maybe the journalists should have got their facts right, but the same applies to you, troll.
    175. Re:Bill buys Apple? by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      No one really cares what you do.

      That's not a very /.-like attitude.

  2. What's the big deal? by Hobbes69 · · Score: 0

    Are there any Microsoft branded players? I'm not aware of any but I'm not in the market either. Also, doesn't Microsoft own like 20% of Apple?

    1. Re:What's the big deal? by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good god, this old chestnut again.

      Microsoft bought a small amount of non-voting stock in Apple some time ago as part of a deal that kept IE and Office on the Mac platform.

      Microsoft has long since sold those shares, at a fair profit I might add.

      Microsoft doesn't own any part of Apple at present.

    2. Re:What's the big deal? by mmkkbb · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Well, I'm glad this popped up quick.

      The answer is: NO. MS bought $150 million of Apple stock. Not even enough to be a voting share.

      --
      -mkb
    3. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Microsoft bought a small amount of non-voting stock in Apple some time ago as part of a deal that kept IE and Office on the Mac platform.

      Microsoft has long since sold those shares, at a fair profit I might add."

      Actually, Microsoft 'bought' the nonvoting stock to prevent Steve Jobs from suing their ass over blatent rips of Quicktime that was brought to his attention while Owner / CEO of NeXT. It meant nothing to him at the time because he was a scorned man, having been fired by the company he started several years earlier. Once NeXT was bought up and he was brought on as a 'consultant', he was once again in a position to care about Apple's goings-on and layed it on the line with Bill that Microsoft was going to be sued and even at their weakest, Apple had several billion in the bank (and to this day, in a much more liquid form than Microsoft).

      As such, it was deemed that Microsoft would save face by 'investing' almost a billion in nonvoting stock that should have by all means been worthless after a few years with Apple's then track record, but at the same time, no one expected SJ to make a return as he had (most expected at the time, he'd transition NeXT to Apple and go to the next little 'big thing' he had planned). This also helped in the rublings of the Antitrust suit in Microsoft's advantage.

      Microsoft was never supposed to make any money, but it nearly doubled their investment by the time they cashed out.

      I got this info from one of the higher ups at Apple at a conference about the time of the investment...but as I'm posting as an AC, you should take this with a grain of salt.

    4. Re:What's the big deal? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, they bought non-voting stock.

      How much they paid doesn't really mean anything.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:What's the big deal? by FlyingPostman · · Score: 0

      Buying Apple would be the most stupid thing Microsoft could ever do. It benefits MS greatly to keep Apple alive. They need some sort of competition even if its only small. I doubt buying them out would even pass the regulators.

    6. Re:What's the big deal? by pagenscum_295 · · Score: 1

      Here are the products they are pushing on MS site http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/devi ces/category.aspx?categoryid=600 http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/devi ces/category.aspx?categoryid=600

    7. Re:What's the big deal? by Delta2.0 · · Score: 1

      I really will not pay too much attention to this type of thing until the management is tracking down employees with dual boot comp running linux. Now that would be fun to see

    8. Re:What's the big deal? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Should any of the above matter?

      What I find interesting is that Microsoft employees dont feel that they can purchase the music player they want without pressure. I mean, if they are pumped up and *want* to purchase a Microsoft based/backed product, more power to them. By the same token, if they prefer the Apple player, this should *not* be frowned upon.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    9. Re:What's the big deal? by martian265 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Interesting how Apple fan-boys always come up with tid-bits like this. When MS bought those shares, they stated it was because they were helping out a "friend" and investing in their future. I seem to remember that everyone, except you apparently, saw it as an attempt by MS to prove to the DoJ that they weren't a monopoly.

      Actually, Microsoft 'bought' the nonvoting stock to prevent Steve Jobs from suing their ass over blatent rips of Quicktime that was brought to his attention while Owner / CEO of NeXT.

      That's odd that Apple doesn't own the patents to Quicktime. Most companies don't allow employees (even CEOs etc) to own such business critical patents, so that they can't leave the company and start taking their royalties etc. Of course this is the probably the case here as well, considering that only the inventor or the company the inventor works for can own an patent (Steve Jobs didn't write Quicktime).

      You also mention that Apple had several billion in the bank. Excuse me while I laugh uncontrollably for several minutes. If they had that kind of money in the bank at the time, then they wouldn't have been pursuing bankruptcy on grounds of lack of funds to pay their debtors (which they were set to file bankruptcy right before they got the cash infusion).

      One last thing, if Jobs had cancelled the alleged patent suit against MS because of the stock purchase, that would have been extortion.

      Interesting version of history the Apple fan-boys come up with.

    10. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Apple does own the patents on 'quicktime'. But all in all, this wasn't even a patent issue, so much as a copyright issue. Direct lines of code were removed. Its the same with the old wave files were simply recoded apple standard files (those *WEREN'T* owned by apple, but used by them) with reverse byte orders to make them unplayable -- this was before WAVE became WAV and as much of a container file as Quicktime is.

      This is the thing with Quicktime, it is a container file. It is HEAVILY patented on many layers. Steve Jobs didn't own the patent, but he had the inside scoop while he was with NeXT as a former Softie that have moved on to this company had wanted to give him a laugh about his former company that fired him.

      As for owning a patent, you can buy and sell patents at will. The inventors name will be on it, but seriously, you don't know what you are talking about.

      As for bankruptcy -- Apple was never near bankruptcy. This is an urbal legend. They own quite a bit in Silicon Valley propery -- the physicial dirt. At the worst, this dirt was worth almost as much as the intellectual properties and the products they had -- but they could have lived off the rent at the time. The dirty secret of all this is that when their stock was at its lowest, the hard cold properties were worth far more than all the stock valuation combined. It was said that the family of al Saud had actively tried buying the company because it would have been like buying the land for pennies on the dollar. They could have stripped the assets and turned the company back over and still made a lot of money.

      As for extortion, yes and no. If you tell your sister you are going to publish naked photos of her and her boyfriend if she doesn't pay you $100, thats extortion. If you advertise these same photos to the highest bidder -- or merely the first $100 that lands in your lap with your sister having the right of first refusal, its not. Big difference for what ammounts to the same thing. Throw a lawyer into the mix, and most likely it is extortion, but legal extortion. Very few settlements actually ever make it to court. The preferred method to dealing with civil cases is to have it mediated outside the court first, before the courts will ever look at it. If this isn't the case, many judges will order a mediation and order the proceedings closed until such time as both sides meet privately -- and generally with a stern warning that they are not to waste the courts time again.

      As for Apple Fan-boy, I might be. I've also been a consultant to both Microsoft and Apple at a number of times over the last 10 years. I was in Cupertino a three weeks ago. I like dealing with Apple far more than I like dealing with Microsoft, but at the same time, I like the checks Microsoft pays out a little more. They pay on time, and generally don't negotiate on the bill. But its all good.

      Again, I am a Coward, so take this as you might.

    11. Re:What's the big deal? by naelurec · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was curious, so I looked up the 10-Q for Apple in summer of 1997..

      Even though they were struggling (year over year), they still had over $1 billion in cash assets, $212 in short term investments, $1.2 billion in A/R .. this compared to around $1.9 billion total current liabilities.

      Granted, compared to the latest 10-Q you can see they are definitely more financial secure right now.. but at the time, I don't think they necessarily needed the cash infusion to stay afloat -- they still had quite a bit of flex room.

    12. Re:What's the big deal? by Reverberant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sigh... we've been through this before

      Apple demanded $1.2 billion from Microsoft for alleged patent infringements...

      The negotiations that resulted led to a strategic agreement between the two companies in August 1997, one part of which called for Microsoft to invest $150 million in Apple and for Apple to install Microsoft's Internet Explorer as the default Web browser for its customers... As part of his videotaped deposition, however, Microsoft Chairman and CEO Bill Gates testified repeatedly that his primary goal was to resolve the patent issues with Apple and obtain a patent cross license.

      Straight from the horse's mouth.

    13. Re:What's the big deal? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Quoth the AC:
      "Again, I am a Coward, so take this as you might."

      Sure. If you posted as l33t_sk1lz or some such I'd just take your word for it.

    14. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Others have responded to question of the billion dollar in the bank with links to back up the fact.

      That's odd that Apple doesn't own the patents to Quicktime. Most companies don't allow employees (even CEOs etc) to own such business critical patents, so that they can't leave the company and start taking their royalties etc. Of course this is the probably the case here as well, considering that only the inventor or the company the inventor works for can own an patent (Steve Jobs didn't write Quicktime).

      It's not so much as to prevent Jobs from suing Microsoft, but rather to persuade Jobs to drop the ongoing lawsuit.

      http://www.ciar.org/ttk/cpuinfo/cpu-timeline.html
      December 1994
      Apple Computer sues San Francisco Canyon Company for using Apple Computer's QuickTime code to speed up Microsoft's Video for Windows product.
      This continued with Apple suing Intel and Microsoft as well.

      One last thing, if Jobs had cancelled the alleged patent suit against MS because of the stock purchase, that would have been extortion.

      1. It's not just stock purchase, but also a guarantee that Microsoft will keep Office:Mac development for 5 years. It's more important to Apple thatn $150M investment.
      2. No, it's called settlement. Happens all the time. Microsoft likes paying cash to avoid lawsuit going forward.

      Interesting version of history the Apple fan-boys come up with.

      It's interesting how Microsoft lapdogs make up stories. Where are your links to facts to back up your claims?
    15. Re:What's the big deal? by Gropo · · Score: 1

      But-but-but... That's not how I learned it in "The Pirates of Silicon Valley"!

      Man, I had put off seeing that movie until I discovered a VHS copy in the G/F's brother's old apartment. Watched it a couple weeks ago for the first time.

      It dawned on me why so many nerfherders out here on the internets are so obstreperously clueless about the MS/Apple investment deal, not to mention how the development of the mainstream GUI actually transpired...

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  3. Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by SouperDouper · · Score: 1

    it's free apple advertising, and they're really not comfortable, at least in my ears.

    1. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by AddressException · · Score: 1

      That's fine for you, but the Microsofties are changing them because of the association with a competing product, not because of the comfort level.

    2. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Competing product? Since when did Microsoft sell a portable MP3 player?

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    3. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      Since when is it wrong to use a competing product? If I were to work at McDonald's I would eat Wendy's a LOT. McDonald's food sucks. The story's a bit different with my current job, however. I work at the local AMC theater. There's no way I'm gonna go to a Star theater for the simple fact that it would cost me money to see a movie and that I prefer the AMC experience to other theaters. Anyway. IF I worked at Microsoft, I would use an iPod if I felt it were the superior product. Just as if I worked at Apple, I would use an MS-based MP3 player, if I felt it was the superior product.

    4. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by Rotund+Prickpull · · Score: 0, Funny

      No, it's because they don't want to look gay.

    5. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by michrech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a competing product becuase MS licenses the .wma stuff to third parties to put into their MP3 players.

      It's also a competing product becuase MS has the MSN Music Store -- and guess what. It doesn't work with Apple's iPod.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    6. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Parent said association with a competing product: iPods are associated with Apple, which shares many markets with Microsoft, among them Operating Systems, Software Media players, media file formats and computer peripherals.

    7. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPod headphones scream yuppie. I know people who have been mugged for wearing them; if they've got an iPod, and don't mind showing the world how hip and tech-conscious they are, who knows what more expensive gadgetry they have on them?

      /Owns an iPod, loves it, is scared/too embarassed to wear the headphones.

    8. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I've never known anyone who's been mugged. I live in a boring place.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac Business Unit people must be afraid to even show up to work!

    10. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Licencing out the .WMA format for other MP3 players does not make it an apples-to-apples comparison. Apple sells both MP3 hardware and software. Microsoft sells only "mp3" software. It's impossible to compete on the basis of hardware alone, then - Microsoft cannot compete when it comes to hardware simply because it does not sell mp3 hardware.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    11. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by michrech · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. They don't need to be selling hardware. They still sell music and Apple's iPod is not compatible with the MSN Music store. That being the case, Apple's iPod *IS* a competitor to what MS sells, regardless of whether MS sells MP3 hardware or not. Plus, MS, as I stated before, makes money by selling licenses to the .wma format to vendors that DO make MP3 hardware. Not purchasing one of those players is more money lost in MS's eyes.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    12. Re:Changing headphones isn't so bad.... by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

      Uh... it does when I convert it from M$'s format... ;D

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  4. I wonder... by BigDogCH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if Microsoft employees use a disproportionately large number of MACs, or are more likely to be Firefox users. I mean, fast food workers never want to eat where they have worked, and people who work at many factories refuse to buy products from that factory. Maybe they feel hatred towards their employer.

    1. Re:I wonder... by AddressException · · Score: 2, Funny
      • large number of MACs
      • The slashdot technique to debate: You misspeelled a word, so your arguement is dumber then me.

      No comment!
    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have a female friend that applied for a job at Bluebell inc. they manufacture Wrangler brand bluejeans, they did not hire her, this happened about 10 years ago and since then she refuses to buy any products manufactured by Bluebell, and opts for Levi Strauss...

      can't say i blame her, she needed the job at the time...

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> ...fast food workers never want to eat where they have worked...

      I worked at Taco John's ((American) Regional Taco Bell equivalent), and I have no problem eating there now. The food was actually prepared to order though, so maybe that's some of the difference over a place like McDonald's.

    4. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in fact, this was one of the main reasons i switched to Mac/OSX

      i spend most of my freetime on a computer, so i consider it like RSI help for operating systems.

    5. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I knew someone who worked at a Taco Bell, and most of their food, including meat, was precooked and sealed in bags. I think all they had to cook at the store was to fry the shells. Unless there is a really nasty employee with a Hepatitis fog around them, I don't mind eating there.

    6. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats one of the lamest reasons to not buy a product I've ever heard. Is there some more important reason? Were they rude? I mean, come on...

    7. Re:I wonder... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's that they feel hatred towards their employer so much as once you see what goes on behind the scenes, and what the product is really like, it loses its appeal, whether that be because of horrible insecurity, bad sanitation, bad QA, etc.

    8. Re:I wonder... by SpottedKuh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [F]ast food workers never want to eat where they have worked.

      I have never worked in fast food, but I have worked in the food-preparation industry. And I can say that I am leery about eating anything from my former employer; and, it has nothing to do with hatred toward my employer. While it was only a summer job to get me through my first year of university, I had an excellent employer and the pay was good. Unfortunately, I saw the kind of sanitation practices that took place during the preparation of food (including, for example, people touching food with licked fingers).

      [P]eople who work at many factories refuse to buy products from that factory.

      This time I speak not from my own experience, but from that of a good friend of mine who worked at a pipe-fitting factory. While the factory and its management had strict safety protocols (regarding both its employees and its finished products), most employees blatently disregarded those protocols. Many close calls (including falling pipes barely missing people and chemical spills being sealed just in time) resulted from the lax attitude of most employees toward those protocols. More important for the consumer, though, many employees tried to slack off as much as possible, resulting in many pipes that were cracked or otherwise unusable, but were only discovered during the final phase of product quality checks. Arguably, with such an attitude prevalent, some faulty products must make it out of the factory. Hence, I would understand anyone's unease at buying from such a factory after seeing first hand (or, in my case, hearing second-hand) about the safety violations.

      Of course, one could argue that such issues would exist at almost any factory or any fast food restaurant (or, almost anywhere, quite frankly), but I suppose something about our perception of a particular location changes after having experienced the issues up close.

    9. Re:I wonder... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No... Fast food workers refuse to eat where they work for 2 reasons, first they know what goes in the food (scary stuff), and second they are sick of the taste and smell of it.

      Factory workers on the other hand... well, let's break that up, those who work in factories that produce foods, they once again see what goes into it... (that's very scary stuff, I've seen what goes into most cookies and crackers... most of the ingredients are also found in windex...) Now as for the other group, they simply know the flaws in the products their factory produces...

      In the case of Microsoft, their employees tried their product, found it inferior, and moved on. Don't forget, MS is a huge company, and you'll note the article specifically mentions that the media group is all using MS based players... that's probably due to fear of losing your job, rather than thinking your product is superior... but anyways...

      What I'm trying to get at, is that the don't feel hatred to their employeers as the parent tried to imply, they simply know a little too much about the product produced...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    10. Re:I wonder... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I have never worked in fast food, but I have worked in the food-preparation industry. And I can say that I am leery about eating anything from my former employer; and, it has nothing to do with hatred toward my employer. While it was only a summer job to get me through my first year of university, I had an excellent employer and the pay was good. Unfortunately, I saw the kind of sanitation practices that took place during the preparation of food (including, for example, people touching food with licked fingers).

      As a counter-example, I worked at a McDonalds for a year, and I still eat there on occation (It's still unheathy, no matter how clean it may be there). Corporate owned McDonalds resturants are cleaned to a degree that you won't find in any other food-service establishment. Their stuff may be greasy, fattening, or just plain gross (I can't even look at a Filet-O-Fish), but it's all sanitary.

      I'd say that people who won't eat at a place they cooked, or won't use products made by a company they work for reflects on the quality of the work, not on a distaste for things people know too much about (all the flaws, etc...). I bet everybody who works at Apple uses an iPod too.

    11. Re:I wonder... by BigDogCH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On a side note, a friend of mine works at a factory that had a terrible rate of accidents and injuries. Two years ago, they instituted a new injury policy. If nobody gets hurt in a department for 1 year, then everyone there gets an extra days pay. If 2 years, then 2 days pay each. If 3...... Since then, not one single injury has happened. This is not entirely true, but people now don't report minor scratches (which before let them leave work early). Also, if you don't miss a day of work all year, you get $100 the first year, $200 the 2nd, etc.... It has worked great! My friends department has not had an injury in 2 years, and the average days missed went from 10/year down to 1.5/year. And it only cost the company a few hundred bucks, which they quickly make up for in not sending anyone to the hospital. Now if someone is doing something dumb, everyone complains to them, and shows them the better way. Maybe this wouldn't work anywhere, and it has it's flaws, but so far it seems great.

    12. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The slashdot technique to debate: You misspeelled a word, so your arguement is dumber then me.
      Am I the only one to notice that most people spelling "Mac" as "MAC" are either trolls or genuine idiots. (Neither applies to the grandparent, though. His comment is well worth the +5, Interesting.)
    13. Re:I wonder... by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder if Microsoft employees use a disproportionately large number of MACs, or are more likely to be Firefox users.

      No, they are not disproportionately Macintosh users compared to the rest of the software industry (unless they work for MacBU). No, they do not hate their employer. No, they are not more likely to use Firefox compared to other software professionals at other companies.

      I base this on having worked there in the past.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    14. Re:I wonder... by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His sig is decrying the spelling/grammar naziism of Slashdot. He's basically excusing his own potential spelling mistakes and saying you should concentrate on the meat of a comment. No hypocrisy here.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    15. Re:I wonder... by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      First off: it's "Macs" not "MACS." A Mac is a computer, while a MAC, IIRC, is a machine address code.

      Back on-topic I wouldn't be surprised if a fair number of Microsoft employees use Macs; they probably have the money and the technical inclination to learn more about all aspects of computer software.

      Furthermore, it's relatively easy to run a variety of operating systems with VPC, so on a Mac they might run OS X and Windows and Linux. Or dual-boot OS X and Linux, because eventually everyone, I think, gets tired of their own dogfood.

      Sadoly, however, I can't imagine how one would measure this, so I suppose we'll just have to go on rumor and innuendo. Maybe someone from MS -- and not the MBU -- will post.

      The MBU, btw, is the Mac Business Unit, which produces OS X versions of Office and such. I read the blog of one of their developers sometimes, which is here.

    16. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac is short for Macintosh, and it is not an acronym for anything.

    17. Re:I wonder... by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

      C'mon all you guys that are bashing the parent ... Maybe Microsoft employees do use a disproportionately large number of media access control addresses. I mean, with all the ethernetworked devices in their cubicles and homes, they very well could be above average!

      :-D Fwiw, I still [rarely] eat at McDonalds, even though I worked their one summer. I mostly avoid it because, hey, that stuff isn't so great for your body.

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    18. Re:I wonder... by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed that on my post as well. I even previewed it for once! It didn't help I guess.

      What I do not grasp is that AddressException quoted a capitalization mistake in my post, then also quoted my sig. Am I missing something here? Is he insulting himself? Seriously, I don't understand.

    19. Re:I wonder... by EaterOfDog · · Score: 1

      I think it's important to remember that food born illness usually comes from an employees hands and not their environment. You can sicken a lot of people and maybe kill a few by not washing your hands just once. I picked up the habit of frequent hand washing while cooking in restaurants. It is a good habit when you touch peoples keyboards all day.

      --

      Crushing my karma one post at a time.
    20. Re:I wonder... by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      A day's pay for everybody at the factory amounts to only a few hundred bucks?

    21. Re:I wonder... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a taco bell, and yes almost everything comes precooked and in bags. Just dump them in boiling water, open and dump into pans.

      I still eat there, too. While the "beef" isn't kangaroo or rat, it is about 50% fillers.

    22. Re:I wonder... by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      He has 6 people in his department. The average is probably $9 per hour, or less. So, $432. $432 is well worth no hospital visits. There are probably 12-15 departments. ALso, this bonus is paid cash (actual bills, in the hand, which many like).

    23. Re:I wonder... by codemachine · · Score: 1

      So like anyone else in IT, you're seeing many of them avoid IE like the plague? Those who have a clue anyhow.

      Internal IE-only apps may foil that though, especially at Microsoft.

    24. Re:I wonder... by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

      Worked at Grocery distribution hub. After seeing how the food was handle I felt I could no longer buy from the stores they supplied.

      Ignorance is bliss!

      --
      My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    25. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that's very scary stuff, I've seen what goes into most cookies and crackers... most of the ingredients are also found in windex...


      Why is that scary? Because Windex has safe everyday ingredients in addition to the ones you shouldn't consume? Everyone always makes arguments like this that just make me laugh. You really think most fast food workers know what 2-Butoxyethanol is? They don't eat there because when you eat there every single day you get sick of it, that's it.

    26. Re:I wonder... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      It was a open secret that in a locked case, deep in the sanctum sanctorum of Intel, Yea even unto Andy Groves' own office, there did dwell a Macintosh...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    27. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, seeing how many computers are networked and need hardware address on the Microsoft campus, I'd say they probably *do* use a disproportionate number of MACs. :)

    28. Re:I wonder... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I worked a number of fast food jobs in college, and ate where I worked (pizza hut, local campus place, amusement park). I never got sick of it, but that probably explains why I weigh over 220 pounds today :-)

    29. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I still eat there, too. While the "beef" isn't kangaroo or rat, it is about 50% fillers.
      Kangaroo is actually quite good. Rat, I dunno.
    30. Re:I wonder... by pyros · · Score: 1

      it's a joke, you're supposed to laugh.

    31. Re:I wonder... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your saying that working at Miscrosoft is a bit like working at MacDonalds ?

    32. Re:I wonder... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I used to work at a taco bell, and yes almost everything comes precooked and in bags. Just dump them in boiling water, open and dump into pans."

      Yeah...but, it wasn't always that way. I remember back in the day, seeing them making the refried beans...but, for 'consistancy' they are all boil in the bag stuff now.

      I miss the days of Taco Bell when much of the stuff was still cooked/prepped onsite...and back when the Enchirito was large item...and had real black olives on it and I think even sour cream at no extra charge...

      And what ever happened to the "Extreme Sauce"...only stuff they had there that was actually a hot sauce...haven't seen that in years...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:I wonder... by michrech · · Score: 1

      I do not have perfect spelling, and I make mistakes. I post here searching for someone to discuss/debate with, yet all I run into is idiots.

      Judging by your ID, you must be fairly new here.. :)

      Slashdot is full of idiots. That is something you will have to get used to.

      I have recently started using every mod point I can to mod negativly those who fall into the spelling/grammar nazi catagory.

      There are a few of us available to debate. Problem is that number seems to be dwindling day by day... :)

      Oh.. And to keep this on topic -- The only MP3 player I own is an Awia CD-based one. :)

      --
      bork bork bork!
    34. Re:I wonder... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " I'm not sure if it's that they feel hatred towards their employer so much as once you see what goes on behind the scenes, and what the product is really like, it loses its appeal, whether that be because of horrible insecurity, bad sanitation, bad QA, etc."

      Yeah...was like that when I was in grad school, and waited tables and bartended at an Olive Garden. Back then it was owned by General Foods....I used to joke that if you took the label off the cans of tomato sauce they used...you'd see a picture of "Dee" (Chef Boyardee). They did, back then, however, make the meat sauce from scratch. The one thing that killed me was the Italian Dressing everyone goes on about. Nothing more than Wishbone Italian dressing, mixed with parmasean cheese, eggs...and whipped up. Basically, just store bought crap, thickened and whipped up.

      I don't generally go there anymore...but, I now live in New Orleans, where you pretty much shun 'chain restaurants'...the smaller, indy places here are all over and just make killer food.

      I dunno if they still do it..but, back when I bartended there...the best deal in the world at an OG, was to get a top shelf long island tea. They only had 3 drink tiers...and then, the highest...also being the highest they could charge you on the computer..was about $7. Well, a LIT with Stoli,Tanqueray, Baccardi 151..etc...whatever premium liquors you like..was a bargain.

      I need to find an OG..ask the bartender if they still have those tiers...and have a fun HH.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:I wonder... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I have never worked in fast food, but I have worked in the food-preparation industry. And I can say that I am leery about eating anything from my former employer; and, it has nothing to do with hatred toward my employer. While it was only a summer job to get me through my first year of university, I had an excellent employer and the pay was good. Unfortunately, I saw the kind of sanitation practices that took place during the preparation of food (including, for example, people touching food with licked fingers)."

      I'd venture to say that if most people KNEW what went on in most every restaurant....they'd never eat out again period...

      :-)

      I mean..if you drop a steak on your floor..do you throw it away, or brush it off and eat it?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    36. Re:I wonder... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 5, Informative

      Excuse me - I'm in the media group, and the only people I know of on my team who have a portable media player have an iPod. In fact, some of the people who work on portable devices have an iPod. I can't speculate as to the reason, but I will point out that Apple is still ahead of the curve in releases. Sure, you can find a little Samsung device that has the same features as the Mini, but it's hard to find. Apple has their own store, and they're a much more recognized brand.

    37. Re:I wonder... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      what product are you talking about? the wma format? most test have shown that for the most part wma and the aac format are pretty close in quality...

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    38. Re:I wonder... by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Internally, Microsoft employees using Firefox has jumped from 4.5% to nearly 10% in the last year. I believe this is mostly due to the developers and sys admins.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    39. Re:I wonder... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      "actual bills, in the hand, which many like"

      Does anyone not like cash?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    40. Re:I wonder... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      Cool... As I stated earlier, I was simply extracting info from the article, if you guys in the media group use iPods, that means the very people who are working on the competing products have a good template to work with right on them... I can only see good come of this... :)

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    41. Re:I wonder... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "No... Fast food workers refuse to eat where they work for 2 reasons, first they know what goes in the food (scary stuff), and second they are sick of the taste and smell of it."

      There is a third reason.

      I speak from experience from three years employment at a fast food joint when I was a yungun: we couldn't afford the food. We were paid around US$4 an hour back then, and a meal would run you about six bucks. With abbreviated shifts, you'd pull down maybe 18-24 dollars a day, net. Eating at the restaurant was an experience I rarely indulged in, even with a 10 percent discount. I still wonder what some of the menu tasted like. And sneaking food was a termination offence. The owner had the left over food weighed at the end of the day by a trusted manager, and the figure was crunched with the days total weight sold to see if anyone was sneaking a gizzard or a mushroom on the side.

      The franchise was rescinded by the home company after I left -- the boss had finally cut too many corners and fired too many good people, and the place became a healthcode violating dump.

    42. Re:I wonder... by azuretek · · Score: 1

      I too have worked in fast food and I still eat there regularly. I even worked for a smaller chain of local restaraunts and I love eating there, it was clean and everyone washed their hands. I dont think I could have worked in the place if the other employees were so disgusting (I dont understand how people work at places where employees spit in food)

      On a related note (to the actual subject), I dont personally have an Ipod but since MS dosen't make a player itself (no not just liscense wmv) there shouldn't be a problem with Mac gear. In fact I'd encourage my employees to use software not made by MS (Linux, BSD, OS X) that way all the good ideas would eventually make it into the OS. (oh like you've never looked at another program to figure out how to do it yourself?)

    43. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In point of fact, I very commonly see fast-food workers eating their own food. When I worked at a Pizza place in High School, I'd eat pizza all the time.

    44. Re:I wonder... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Lots of people attribute "special" to food items that are anything but special in restaurants. While my next story is Taco John's as well, the "super hot" sauce that customers come in "because no one else does it that way" is just an industrial can of jalapeno peppers, opened poured straight into a blender, pureed and put in a bottle.

      Of course, then there's the stuff that just swears you off a restaurant. When I worked at Taco John's, the first time I was asked to make a batch of the taco beef, I cooked up the 20 pounds of hamburger and asked where I should drain the grease (as I'd already drained it into a pan). 3 people rushed in to warn me not to drain it or I'd get in trouble. Having to pour 4 pounds of fat back into that meat was pretty much the end of it for me.

    45. Re:I wonder... by Altus · · Score: 1



      I spoke with a guy who works at one of those huge industrial kitchens that makes this food (along with food for many many many other fast food chains). He said that Taco bell had far and away the best quality of food and the highest standards of preparation... and that everything went out sealed and ready to go...

      he was very supportive of taco bell... said wendys was pretty darn good too... but would not eat at Mcdonalds.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    46. Re:I wonder... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I thought dumb meant silent or couldn't speak. Wouldn't stupid be a more correct term?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    47. Re:I wonder... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Damn, Apple didn't hire me 10 years ago, when I dropped out of college to fix Macs. Why did I ever buy another Mac?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    48. Re:I wonder... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Is this that place that didn't want to conflict with McDunelds?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    49. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Microsoft employees use a disproportionately large number of MACs

      WHY do so many people write "Mac" in CAPS? ARE three letter words assumed to be acronums by default? LET us ALL do this. CAN YOU imagine THE FUN English teachers will have, correcting ALL those papers using "THE NEW capitalization?"

      or, we can review the rules for shortening words:

      First, take a word: Macintosh
      Then, pull off the letters after, say, the first syllable:
      Mac + intosh
      Now send intosh to /dev/null, leaving: Mac

      NOW STOP! DO NOT GO ON TO NEXT STEP!
      Change letters to caps for some inexplicable reason: MAC
      THE PREVIOUS STEP IS WRONG! DON'T DO IT!

    50. Re:I wonder... by Smokin+Goat+McGruff · · Score: 1

      One of my best friends fixed commercial food equipment. He says McDonalds consistently has the cleanest kitchens.

      For the people that worked in restaurants that they will no longer eat in: what makes you think most other retaurants are any different? I'd rather not know what goes on in many kitchens!

      --
      "There are no cool guys in musicals." -- Coach McGuirk
    51. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I thought dumb meant silent or couldn't speak. Wouldn't stupid be a more correct term?

      No, mute means silent or can't speak, unless you mean to be deliberately insulting (can't speak == low intelligence).

    52. Re:I wonder... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Except that we don't make a competing product.

    53. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company secretly called this elimination of kitchens as the "K-Minus Initiative" -- something that nerd rap group Commodore 64 apparently knew about firsthand.

    54. Re:I wonder... by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wouldn't call that competing either...;)

    55. Re:I wonder... by greed · · Score: 1
      (that's very scary stuff, I've seen what goes into most cookies and crackers... most of the ingredients are also found in windex...)

      That'd be dihydrogen monoxide (also found in most industrial waste) and color?

    56. Re:I wonder... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      My experience is that Microsoft employees, at least the engineering staff: developers, QA - I don't have knowledge about IT support staff or about non-technical people- is that they aren't very much different than other people in the industry with one small exception: you don't typically see people who express highly anti-microsoft views. (Mildly anti-microsoft: yes. Pro linux: yes, Pro mac: yes - but again not disproportionate to any other company.) If someone can't think of anything good about MS, they probably won't work there.)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    57. Re:I wonder... by hawk · · Score: 1

      Corporate owned McDonalds resturants are cleaned to a degree that you won't find in any other food-service establishment.

      McDonalds is *built* on that. In the era of the greasy spoons, mothers knew that they would find clean restrooms at McDonalds, and asked fathers to stop there.

      A couple (few?) years ago Union 76 (or Unocal, or whatever they're called now) ran a massive clean bathrooms advertising campaign.

      hawk

    58. Re:I wonder... by Uggy · · Score: 1

      Just to throw in an alternate viewpoint - I waited tables through college at a variety of establishments both franchise (Casa Gallardo - El Torito in the mid-west, dunno if they still exist) and private restaurants.

      I have always seen and practiced a high level of attention to sanitation and procedure. I always felt comfortable eating where I worked, and would continue to. If the restaurant wants to stay in business they had better make sure that procedures are followed. The managers are tough, want to keep their jobs, and are audited frequently by the health department (they are tough too and I found out the hard way they don't like jokes... kinda like the TSA people).

      Anyway, my personal experience with food service was positive. The people from the top down were concerned with doing things right and in the few instances where people stepped out of line, they were fired on the spot. Waiters, line cooks, and dessert guys are easy to find.

      --
      Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
    59. Re:I wonder... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1



      Well, in my case, I don't eat Dunkin Donuts because I worked there as a teen. I don't have any particular dislike for the company, and I liked my manager.

      But I've seen the glaze vat.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    60. Re:I wonder... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Duh. I should of googled it:

      speechless: unable to speak temporarily; "struck dumb"; "speechless with shock"
      www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn

      lacking the power of human speech; "dumb animals"
      www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn

      unable to speak because of hereditary deafness
      www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn

      Not revealing flavor or aroma; closed; typical of wines that are too young or too cold.
      www.sallys-place.com/beverages/wine/wine_gl ossery. htm

      Characteristic description of a young wine with yet-to-develop aromas and flavours. A synonym for "closed-in". Named so because it seems "unable to speak".
      zebra.biol.sc.edu/smell/wine_glossary.htm l

      Characteristic description of a young wine with yet-to-develop aromas and flavours. A synonym for "closed-in". Named so because it seems "unable to speak".
      www.radanovich.house.gov/wine/tastingglos sary.htm

      ADJECTIVE: (Offensive) A synonym for mute, or unable to speak, now considered offensive. In its nineteenth-century usage, it did not reflect anything about mental or intellectual abilities. An example of its continuing use is the expression "dumb struck."
      www.disabilitymuseum.org/glossary.php

      Describes a phase that young wines undergo when their flavors and aromas are undeveloped. A synonym of CLOSED. The cause and lthe duration of this phase is a subject of great controversy, and one which seemingly lacks scientific explanation.
      128.200.136.180/ea/wine/tastings/glo ssary.html

      implying the lack of a programmed in intelligence
      www.netprivacypower.org/glossary/

      from natural infirmity (Ex. 4:11); not knowing what to say (Prov. 31:8); unwillingness to speak (Ps. 39:9; Lev. 10:3). Christ repeatedly restored the dumb (Matt. 9:32, 33; Luke 11:14; Matt. 12:22) to the use of speech.
      www.jesuscaresaboutyou.org/ebd/T0001000.h tml

      Describes a phase young wines undergo when their flavors and aromas are undeveloped. A synonym of closed.
      www.judgedolph.com/Generalpages/WineGloss ary.asp

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    61. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn! why would you drain it?! that shit is gold for the ol' taste buds.

    62. Re:I wonder... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I still eat there, too. While the "beef" isn't kangaroo or rat, it is about 50% fillers.

      Kangaroo meat is actually pretty good, just FYI.

    63. Re:I wonder... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In high school I spent about a three years working in fast food and it made a distinct impression on me. I worked at Popeye's, then McDonalds, and finally Chick-Fil-A and the only one of the three I'll go anywhere near now is Chick-Fil-A.

      The one I worked in was fanatically spotless. I don't know if it's all of them but a great many are owned by Uber-Christian franchise owners who are crazy about the clean and the lord. I didn't fit in with the majority of the crew there being a godless heathen and all but I'll give them points for being obsessively clean.

      I don't even want to think about, much less mention what I saw at Popeye's and McDonalds. I've tried hard to black those months out of my mind.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    64. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except we do make a competing subcomponent.

    65. Re:I wonder... by danielsfca2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > we couldn't afford the food.

      When I was 17-18, I worked at Jack In The Box. It was my first job. I ate there all the time, and so did most of my coworkers. Everyone was very good about food handling there, so we weren't to. We got a 50% discount if we were working that day, and 20% discount on our day off. So on days I worked, I usually ate during work on my lunchbreak, and after or before work. If I was feeling broke, I just bought a 99-cent item like a Jumbo Jack or two tacos, so it was only 54 cents. Since I made $6.75/hour, a buck a day wasn't an unaffordable price.

      In 2003, though, I worked at a McDonald's in Massachusetts. I never once ate there, because of the "OMG the way they handle food here is so disgusting" factor.

      And as a final note, Disney doesn't give any of its theme-park employees any break on its ridiculously-priced, low-quality theme-park fast food. So considering the slave wages they pay, their employees literally can't afford the food. One meal would cost about two hours' pay. (this also from experience.)

    66. Re:I wonder... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      . Should I mention that I have a teaching degree (that always draws out the grammar psychos)?

      Wait. I think I heard this one. You're the guy who escaped from the Swedish insane asylum, only to be discovered years later, teaching school in Norway. =)

      Do I need to reword it?

      You might, if you're trying to communicate something. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    67. Re:I wonder... by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      I may be totally out in left field on this one (or in Norway), but I have no idea what you just said? Are you implying that Norway has a problem with psycho teachers, or is this similar to some joke that I obviously have not heard. Wait, Norway schools are like Swedish insane asylums? Oh god, I'm not sleeping tonight. I need to get this.

      Ohreally_factor, I just looked through a few of your other posts, and your sig, and I am not sure you are totally stable! But, you are surely keeping people on their toes! Good job! Wow! I will never drink Mr. Pib again.

    68. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And as a final note, Disney doesn't give any of its theme-park employees any break on its ridiculously-priced, low-quality theme-park fast food. So considering the slave wages they pay, their employees literally can't afford the food. One meal would cost about two hours' pay. (this also from experience.)

      Well, regarding Disney, I have to say it depends. Disneyworld does indeed not give its employees any discounts on food or merchandise. And anyone who has ever lived in the Orlando/Kissimee area knows that people who eat there are either lazy or idiots. For crying out loud, the parking tickets are good for the entire day and there's an IHOP right outside the premises. There are also a lot of great smaller restaurants in the area (tourists will most likely not know about those and employees might have a hard time eating there and being back on time).

      Disney treats their Resort employees differently though. They do basically get the same treatment any hotel employee would.

      Overall, Disney isn't that evil of a company. I'm not saying they're good but they do offer discounts to their employees (as in family members get in free) and they do offer special passes to FL residents.

    69. Re:I wonder... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I may be totally out in left field on this one (or in Norway), but I have no idea what you just said?

      Wait, Norway schools are like Swedish insane asylums? Oh god, I'm not sleeping tonight. I need to get this.

      You got it. It was a joke I heard in Sweden. I heard a similar joke in Norway, but in that joke, it was a Norwegian insane asylum and the guy was discovered teaching in Sweden. I suppose one could modify this joke to fit any regional rivalry.

      I am not sure you are totally stable!

      Someone mod this up as insightful! =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    70. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Brilliant sig!

  5. Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Microsoft employee's open letter to Bill Gates almost made me choke. In case you haven't read it, let me paraphrase: "How do we make an iPod killer?" he asks rhetorically. "First we must harness the blogosphere!" he answers. "Then we'll design the interface by committee. Synergize, baby."

    Anyway, I found it interesting how clearly the note reveals (what seems to be) Microsoft's general thought process. Never lead, always follow. I mean, how pathetic is this sort of blatant, shameless me-tooism? While innovators like Apple are trying to build the future, Microsoft employees like this guy are trying desperately to catch up... and they still can't figure out how.

    Just my two cents from an Apple fanboy. Flame on...

    1. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by computerme · · Score: 1

      wow. after reading scoble open letter about the ipod, i now think even less of him. AND i wasn't sure that was EVEN possible....

    2. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, while your characterization of Apple as a ceaseless innovator may be a little over the top, you do have a point about Microsoft, one that demonstrates the dangers inherent in a monopoly or oligopoly controlled industry.

      Microsoft doesn't innovate because they don't NEED to innovate. They know that they can be late to the party on a particular feature or product, and they will still be able to capture the majority of the market, because they can offer two things that no one else can possibly provide:
      1.) the strength of the Microsoft name, and
      2.) Seamless integration with Windows, a family of operating systems that over 90% of the public uses, and which only one company has full access to the internals of: Microsoft.

      If the innovation does not fit into a category that can be exploited in this way, Microsoft can either purchase and rebrand the technology, or develop their own clones and bury the competition in predatory pricing and overwhelming marketing.

      Why bother to innovate when it's so much easier not to?

    3. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Geekenstein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being a copycat has always been a strategic business move. Let some other company develop a product, spend countless revisions figuring out what doesn't work, have lots of expensive bombs and R&D costs. Then you simply make a cheaper version of the sucessful product without comitting your own resources to forging the path.

      That, my friend, is known as smart business.

      Need an example? Here's a quick one. Tivo and the satellite/cable PVRs. The content providers can do it cheaper, because they don't have those large R&D bills. Tivo, on the other hand, has to produce the product, pay the expenses incurred, and still somehow make a profit.

      The innovator is usually the one who ends up going out of business. Apple is (currently) the exception.

    4. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      innovators like Apple are trying to build the future

      I can't decide whether you and the moderators that modded you up are stupid, or if you're astroturfing. Either way, you've just cost Apple a sale. Instead of buying a Mac to play WoW on, I'm going with a PC, and it's entirely due to your statements, you and the others like you.

    5. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by nine-times · · Score: 1
      "How do we make an iPod killer?" he asks rhetorically. "First we must harness the blogosphere!" he answers.

      Yeah, I followed the link hoping for some interesting comments on design and features, but his answers to "how to make an iPod killer" are all about marketing and advertising and celebrity endorsements. Not that those hurt, but how about making a good device?

    6. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 3, Funny

      So apple invented the hard drive based mp3 player? Holy crap, that's amazing.

      You got served.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    7. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness. There's already more than enough classless plebes buying Macs nowadays.

    8. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why bother to innovate when it's so much easier not to?

      Open source software in a nutshell.

    9. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by SunFan · · Score: 1


      I was about to say that Microsoft's only innovation was their model of business ethics, but, alas, even that ain't new.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    10. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      LOL - mod up insightful, interesting, and funny!!

    11. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You know what's really funny about that idea? I mean, apart from the fact that it presumes a bunch of people in a room are somehow smarter than any of them individually.

      What's really funny about that idea is that if it were to be carried out perfectly, if it were to work perfectly, the end result would be ...the iPod.

      Is it possible that somebody, someday, might come up with a better music player? Sure, anything's possible. But the iPod is so good, so far ahead of anything else, that for most of us it kind of defines what a good music player should be. It sets the bar, and everything else is just copying.

    12. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      No, Apple invented a hard drive mp3 player that wasn't crap.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    13. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So apple invented the hard drive based mp3 player?

      Basically, yeah.

      You know who invented the automobile? Depending on how you define the term, there are as many as half a dozen possible answers, none of them later than 1893.

      But do you know who really invented the automobile, for all practical purposes? That's right. Henry Ford, in 1908.

      Apple is to the iPod as Henry Ford is to the car.

    14. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by martian265 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, Apple invented a chic looking hard drive mp3 player that everybody assumed that you must be cool if you own one. And then they marketed with a series of bizarre and silly commercials that 90% of the people hated, but figured that the commercial must be so cool that they couldn't understand it and therefore they must buy an iPod to regain some of their coolness.

    15. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      s/car/Model T/

      --
      Why not fork?
    16. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by pmj · · Score: 1

      Does it crack anyone else up when people say "seamless integration with Windows!"? :)

      --
      Are you BioCurious?
    17. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seamless integration with Windows, a family of operating systems that over 90% of the public uses, and which only one company has full access to the internals of: Microsoft.

      Hah! Windows doesn't even seamlessly integrate with itself, much less external products. Microsoft wouldn't know seamless integration if it hit them over the head while crying out, "Hello! I am seamless integration!"

      Of course, they can pretend, which convinces most people.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    18. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by bwcarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your iPod/car analogy is a bit off, but overall, you're right.

      The Wright Brothers are given credit for inventing the first heavier than air aircraft, but how often do you see their names attached to a brand?

      Mocking Apple because they didn't invent the mp3 based music player (or the online music store) is like discrediting Burt Rutan's work because he didn't invent the airplane.

    19. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree with you except for one thing - Apple isn't exactly an innovator. They certainly came late to the mp3 player market; similarly they weren't the first to sell a "personal computer" or a dozen other things that people regularly describe as an Apple "invention".

      What Apple has done is make these products incredibly popular, and done very well out of them. Which kind of reaffirms your description of the innovator going out of business and the more savvy companies making a killing out of the market.

    20. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Dynedain · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're an idiot. Henry Ford invented the production line and applied the idea to automobile construction.

      And there were many MP3 players (both harddrive and otherwise) out before the iPod. Creative had at least half a dozen different models alone.

      But by your logic, Al Gore really invented the Internet.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    21. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by tomstdenis · · Score: 0

      Mod up.

      400+ dollar music players... innovation?

      Well fuck for 1000 dollars I could build in a 13" LCD, 23 hours of battery...

      PRACTICAL and EFFICIENT are two "innovations" that come to mind.

      If this gizmo which is probably easy to break and/or loose [cuz of the size] costs 400 dollars [canadian] then... how innovative is that? I mean are they just making reeams of profits on it? If so... well screw them because 400 is a lot for a toy.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    22. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by iamacat · · Score: 1

      TiVo so far didn't try to fight for customers, they just want to get bundled with those satellite/cable services. I think it's clear what people want - rip DVDs, burn VCDs and DVD-Rs, watch and download recordings over Internet, no monthly fees. Content providers are going to scream, but I am sure music industry had misgivings about iTMS as well.

      If they go out of business without trying their best to make customers happy, it's not the fault of any copycat or monopoly. It's just their own stupidity.

    23. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, by his logic Bill Gates invented the computer.

    24. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      it's amazing how stupid they/he is.

      you want to make an iPod killer? it is very VERY simple make something similar in design and operation to the ipod but go further. add 802.11b and the ability to listen to internet broadcasts at hotspots. give it the ability to wake up and sync with the music database every 8 or 12 hours wirelessly... you leave your msPod in your coat pocket, it wakes, grabs new music content and shut's down...

      The Element Aireo does this right now but their sunc software sucks giant turds and their player software is horribly limited.

      I have been working on putting linux on it so I can give it the ability to listen to webcasts at 802.11 hotspots as well as a huge amount of other features... (wirelessly grab podcasts from the player it's self instead of relying on a stupid computer side app)

      MS can beat me to the punch on this one, and if they use their head and do it right they could completely kick the iPod's arse.

      but personally I doubt they can. the AutoPC was a gigantic flop because they did a half assed job on it, the tablet PC is a huge flop because it's also half-assed, so I would expect any MS iPod killer to be similary half assed or completely destoryed by adding some stupid content control so you can only listen to "scantified" or "licensed" shoutcasts (or more probable... not even support shoutcast/icecast/real)

      more likely Apple will get wifi on the ipod and hopefully allow the owners of the ipod to listen to whatever internet audio broadcasts they want.

      there is so much that canbe done with these portable players that the companies are ignoring or are too frightened to impliment.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    25. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a lesson in logic:
      If the meeting went 'perfectly', the result would not be the ipod. Why not? Because the ipod isn't perfect. If it were, how could even the possibility exist that anyone could make a better music player? If it were, would it lack features?

      Please, people. Please. Think about what you are saying. You toss around words like 'perfectly' with no appreciation for their actual meaning. Sigh.

      Also, it didn't 'set the bar'. It 'raised the bar'. You see, it wasn't the very first portable hard-drive-based music player. Therefore the bar was already set (albeit set low). Sigh again.

    26. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by berchca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you're being a little hard on Microsoft (whom I am not a big fan of and generally don't use their products.) While MS always seems to be holding the gun as the one coming up with the knock-off, it is a fact of life that in every industry a new product is either covered in patents (which have their own evils) or quickly reproduced.

      In fashion, it goes like this:
      1) Armani/Gucci/whomever releases new jeans that are actually worn to the point of looking stained.
      2) Next year, Levi's adds this to their lineup as their most expensive sort of jeans.
      3) A year after that, you buy them at Wal-Mart from brands you've never heard of in sizes Gucci wouldn't be caught dead making.

      In food it goes like this:
      A few months ago I was turned onto a food called the Portugeuse Muffin. No idea how it relates to Portugal, but it's become very popular. Made by a company out of Boston and hard to find. Not a few weeks ago I noticed Trader Joes was carrying their own version. And if it sells, I have not doubt that the Thomas Corperation, long established monopoly of the muffin business, will release their own, squashing the small Boston bakery under their unkind heel.

      Innovation only lasts so long. MS wants an iPod killer? Maybe. What about Creative? They want one pretty bad themselves.

    27. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by shut_up_man · · Score: 4, Funny

      This reminds me of an analogy that I read somewhere, perhaps from Robert X Cringely... it said there are three types of tech companies:

      1) The Commandos
      These guys are doing crazy new stuff in wacky situations, inventing and improvising and breaking new ground. They are happiest going where no-one has gone before, creating new products and whole new markets. If they aren't doing wild new stuff, they get bored and go somewhere else. In many ways, this is Apple.

      2) The Soldiers
      Soldiers go in once markets and products have been established by the commandos. They take these original ideas and solidify them, securing the area with polish and marketing glitz. In many ways, this is Microsoft.

      3) The Police
      Once the war is won, the Police maintain the status quo. They aren't interested in creating markets or inventing new products, they just want things to say the same and keep making cash for their organization. In many ways, this is Dell.

      Now I can see holes in these descriptions already, but I do get the feeling that Microsoft isn't in the insanely great new product business. It's risky, requires rare and volatile skills, and it doesn't end up making that much money in the long run. And that last point is the key, because Microsoft really isn't a tech company. They are a money company. They make tonnes and tonnes of money, and they don't care about the other stuff.

    28. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think the flash/cd mp3 player market was a "party"? Both of those technologies sucked. I used an mp3 cd-player for quite a while, but its difficult and cumbersome technology for most people.

      Apple waited until there was the opportunity for a Killer product to be made, and made it. Now they own the market, and they deserve it.

    29. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      hate to tell you this, but apple did not invent the mp3 player. the ipod is simply bettering what was already out as well.

    30. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you've never actually looked at the mp3 player market.

      I make frequent long drives, and had an mp3-cd player for a long time. I've never owned a mac and until OS X would never have even considered it.

      But the ipod really is awesome. I needed to make the move to a hard-drive mp3 player, and Apple's was and is still the best by far. INCLUDING PRICE. I got a 20gb ipod for $250. As much as I'd like to play Ogg and whatever else, ipod has the smallest+cheapest+(mp4>=ogg) mp3 player.

      For 50+$ more I could've gotten an mp3 player 3 times the size, half the battery life, and with 20 more buttons on the face (horrible interface). NO THANKS.

      I'm thinking about getting a Mac Mini now. Haven't quite convinced myself, but its getting tough to resist the more I think about it.

      If you're not a Microsoft employee and really think Apple is That Bad, you might want to come out from your dark hole and start looking around at the real world.

    31. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by gellenburg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The automobile was invented by Mr. Daihmler in Germany.

      Henry Ford invented the assembly-line which made mass-production of automobiles possibles.

      That is, if you wanted one in black.

      Apple did not invent the MP3 player.

      Apple mass-marketed an MP3 player that looekd good, was easy to use, and had the features consumers were craving.

      And no, the iPod doesn't *just* work with the iTMS.

      I use mine regularly with sites such as eMusic, Magnatunes, and other MP3 sites. iTunes likes those files just fine.

    32. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by eclectic4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The innovator is usually the one who ends up going out of business. Apple is (currently) the exception."

      Yes, that beleaguered company should be going out of business any decade now, I can feel it...

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    33. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      huh? henry ford is not thought of by anyone as the inventor of the car. he is the pioneer of assembly line manufacturing. thats why he is famous. not a very good analogy at all.

    34. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're about the stupidest fuck I've seen on Slashdot lately, and that's saying a lot.

      Allow me to explain the parent of your post, since you're too damn retarded to figure it out. YES there were some shitty hard drive mp3 players out before the IPOD, just as there were shitty cars out before Henry Ford. But when Apple brought their innovation to the portable music business, they CREATED the market. No one was talking about or buying hard drive mp3 players before the IPOD because they were crap.

      Now everyone knows what an ipod is, and you can walk down any street in new york and see dozens of pairs of white headphones. The IPOD is to portable music, as the Model T is to cars. It's the one that realized the product as a large consumer market.

    35. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      Benz beat Daimler and Maybach by more than a year, and got the patent. But if you expand your definition to include other types of engines, Anderson had an electric carriage in 1832, and Cugnot had a steam-powered tractor in 1769!

      And none of them are remembered as the father of the automobile, because their inventions were neither practical nor widely adopted. Not until Henry Ford came along were cars both useful and popular.

      Thanks for demonstrating my analogy, though.

    36. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While innovators like Apple are trying to build the future, Microsoft employees like this guy are trying desperately to catch up... and they still can't figure out how.

      Um.. sorta like Linux on the desktop guys ?

    37. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Henry Ford didn't invent the production line. He had toured meatpacking plants in Chicago where the processes were already nascent and applied the techniques to automobile manufacturing.

      Same way, I might add, Apple saw the nascent flash/hard drive MP3 player market and improved on it to make something truly worth calling "innovation."

    38. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by codifus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why bother to innovate when it's easier to copy and buy them out? R&D at MS? What's that? MS has been the king of letting someone else do the R&D gruntwork, then they swoop in with their mass marketing and billions in cash to flush them out. If you extrapolate this ideology further, what will MS do once there are no more companies to buy or copy? Are they going to work to improve our computing experience? So long as they're making money, most probably not. This should make a great plot for a movie. Who will save us from the evil empire of software un-inventiveness? CD

    39. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not logic. It's semiotics.

      Please think about what you're saying. You toss around words like "logic" with no appreciation for the actual meaning.

    40. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the same token, Linus if going to invent the desktop any day now 'cause that's the only thing people will remember afterwards.

    41. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So apple invented the hard drive based mp3 player?

      Basically, yeah.


      Apple had the first widespread success with one, but I seem to remember things like the Creative Nomad predating it by a matter of years, so completely untrue.

      You know who invented the automobile? Depending on how you define the term, there are as many as half a dozen possible answers, none of them later than 1893.

      But do you know who really invented the automobile, for all practical purposes? That's right. Henry Ford, in 1908.
      nobody. Ford was the first to mass produce 'em. There's a huge difference.

      Apple is to the iPod as Henry Ford is to the car.


      Well, "Apple is to the portable MP3 player what Henry Ford was to the car" might be closer to accurate. You've rather overmixed your metaphors and created a bit of a mish-mash.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    42. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by glrotate · · Score: 1

      TiVo so far didn't try to fight for customers

      I wonder what all of those Tivo commercials were for then?

      I think it's clear what people want - rip DVDs, burn VCDs and DVD-Rs, watch and download recordings over Internet,

      No people want a pvr that's built into their cable box, that they don't have to buy, and is just a few dollars more on their cable bill.

    43. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the matter? Sand in your vagina?

    44. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if they still do this, but when I was a teen back in the 70s the SAT included a reading comprehension test. You had to read a paragraph, then answer questions about what that paragraph said.

      You flunked that test, didn't you?

    45. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Kwil · · Score: 1

      One more thing they can offer..

      A huge bankroll to prop up undercutting of the competition.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    46. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, Apple invented a hard drive mp3 player that wasn't crap."

      Bollocks.

    47. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting thought... I'd say that you've got them mixed up a bit though.

      The Commandos are the small organizations (or individuals) that develop cool stuff. Often nobody ever hears about them, and or they get bought up by larger companies. Who invented the mobile mp3 player? Damned if I know. Archos, maybe? Theirs was one of the first on the market, I know this.. But it was probably some geek in Russia who had the idea and built it.

      I think Apple fits into The Soldiers category more than MS. I mean, MS constantly "innovates" based on Apple's current direction. Who made the computer and the MP3 player usable by idiots? Apple.

      MS definitely fits into the police category. Over the last 3 revisions of their OS just how much has changed?

    48. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      I am so sick of people saying that the iPod is popular because of marketing.

      If it were marketing, the first wave of iPod users would have told their friends that it's sort of neat looking but isn't anything special and it wouldn't have as much of the market as it does.

      It is great because of how easy it is to use. Because of how the entire experience of moving the music is easy. Because of its simplicity.

      I don't do things because they are popular. Neither do a lot of other people. Maybe consider that it's popular because of its merits, not because of its ads.

    49. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't afford an ipod huh? That sucks man.

    50. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I don't know if they still do this, but when I was a teen back in the 70s the SAT included a reading comprehension test. You had to read a paragraph, then answer questions about what that paragraph said.

      You flunked that test, didn't you?


      No thanks, I've already eaten.

      And for the record, claiming that Henry Ford "practically invented the automobile" is still a false assertion. It would be no more true to assert Bill Gates invented computers and Al Gore invented the internet.

      Sure, you could say that Bill Gates was the first to have a really hugely successful company which sold software (which may not be true even), but that wouldn't imply that he, for all practical purposes, invented computers and/or software. Merely, he is the first to make money with it.

      Spotting specious logic in paragraphs was on the tests I had to take.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    51. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivo's technology is licensed in each of those satellite/cable PVRs.

      Tivo makes money from those, too.

      The reason Tivo doesn't make more money is that their model was based off of subscription revenue, and the cable companies cut that off when they license a box from them.

    52. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by rjung2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any moron can invent an MP3 player. Just look at all the cheapjack no-name players from Asia.

      It takes an Apple to invent a better MP3 player -- one that's so easy to use, all you have to do is plug it into your computer and it essentially does everything else.

      That is why the iPod is a raging success.

    53. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by jsebrech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple invented the hard drive based consumer mp3 player. Before that the only people with HD-based mp3 players were geeks or early adopters, with players that catered to that crowd (advanced recording features, large physical dimensions to afford large disk sizes, extra geek stuff like ethernet interfaces, ...). The ipod made it possible to give your mom an mp3 player and have her make use of it with minimal guidance. This is because the entire "ipod experience" (and I know that's a laden term) fits together smoothly, from the first time you turn it on, over how you use itunes to put music on there, to actually putting on an album during daily use. There are no "tricks" you need to figure out. It all just works. This is incidentally why the windows ipod market didn't really take off until itunes became available on windows. The software before that was so horrible my mind has blanked out its name. Ah, yes, now I remember, musicmatch, which was anything but. *shivers*

      I have yet to see another HD-based mp3 player that has the entire package: a good player UI, good PC music management software, and an easy way to get almost any sort of music legally from the internet.

    54. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      How about discrediting Burt Rutan's work because 62 miles straight up doesn't mean shit when you're trying to get into orbit?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    55. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      You see, it is representative of Microsoft's vision after all :-)

      It seems that they keep forgetting that part...

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    56. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While innovators like Apple are trying to build the future, Microsoft employees like this guy are trying desperately to catch up

      Please, like the Apple's iPod was the first portable digital music player?

      Apple looked at what was already out there, figured out how to do it better (although I personally dont' see what the big deal is, I've got an iRiver flash model that I've always thought was the bestplayer out there since I don't want the risk of a portable-whoops! hard drive, but that's me), just like the MS drone is doing.

      Apple rarely truly innovates any longer, they're doing the same thing MS is - watching the world evolve and improving on what already exists.

    57. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is to the iPod as Henry Ford is to the car.

      Funny, you got the first half spot on - but I'm not sure you meant it in the way that your previous paragraph implied. You probably meant:

      Apple is to the Portable Hard-Drive Based Mp3 Player as Henry Ford is to the Car.

      Although I doubt may people would agree with you since Apple didn't invent it, perfect the manufacture of it, or do anything spectacular with it other than the input (yawn) and the marketing (which wasn't as much a part of Ford's car success as the fact that through mass production was able to make a reliable item that the average person could afford).

      Or, if we were to correct your actual statement, it would probably be

      Apple is to the iPod as Henry Ford is to the Ford Model T.

      Which would be entirely correct, but doesn't back your original point.

      What were you trying to say again, you lost me?

    58. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MS has been the king of letting someone else do the R&D gruntwork"

      They didn't even write their own TCP/IP stack! They needed to steal it from BSD!

    59. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "They wouldn't know seamless integration if it painted itself purple and danced naked on a harpsichord, singing 'seamless integration is here again'!"

    60. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by jazzis · · Score: 1

      He must be new around here... and never experienced "seamless integration" of a real OS and not MS clunky junk.

    61. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      How about discrediting NASA's early work because 22,000 mph in a circle doesn't mean shit when you're trying to land a man on the Moon?

    62. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford invented the automobile that most people could afford.

      Apple invented the MP3 player that most people want.

    63. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      But do you know who really invented the automobile, for all practical purposes? That's right. Henry Ford, in 1908.

      If by "right" you mean "entirely incorrect", sure. Who taught you that? All Ford did was introduce mass production methods to the automaking process, which had the result of making autos more affordable and more accessible, but in no way can be construed as "inventing" the auto.

      (A better example might have been to question whether it was Tesla or Marconi that invented radio.)

      Apple really didn't invent the hard drive based MP3 player. I was playing MP3s off my computer's hard drive, and people were taking their music with them on Diamond Rio's and the like for years before the iPod was introduced. (The few people that bought the Compaq-designed, Korea-manufactured Hango PJB-100 were even doing both as far back as 1999.) The iPod was a refinement, not a revelation.

      The iPod shuffle, even more so. How different is this new-for-2005 device in concept than the original portable MP3 players of 1998?

    64. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 1

      Well it must be pointed out that Google didn't innovate the search engine, they just did it better when ventures like Hotbot and AltaVista dropped the ball.

      Microsoft is just following that tradition of letting others find a path to food and then totally dominate that path until everyone thinks they blazed it...

    65. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Then why don't people use a TV built into their cable box, VCR/DVD player built into their cable box, phone built into their phone line or computer built into their Internet service? They can certainly offer a bundle for convenience, but many people will want extra features, like wireless download of recorded MPEG4s to a notebook. Or if someone tries to force people to use a particular PVR with a service, or say a particular OS with a new computer, it's time for some heavy-handed antitrust action.

    66. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Paisley+Phrog · · Score: 1

      I was amazed at step three...

      "3) Pay whatever big money it'll take to get stars like Elton John, Ludacris, Eminem, Shania Twain to work on designing an entirely new player from the ground up...."

      R-i-i-g-h-t, that's how you beat Apple's great design, by asking *songwriters* to design your player. This is akin to asking the chef to build the table his dinner sits on. Sure, he'll get the job done, but you're probably better off asking a master carpenter....

    67. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All Ford did was introduce mass production methods to the automaking process

      All Ford did was turn the car from an experiment into a product that was soon owned by millions and that changed literally every aspect of life in the developed world. That's all. Nothing important there. Right?

      Apple really didn't invent the hard drive based MP3 player.

      For practical purposes, they did. They invented the music player that people actually bought.

      Your blah-blah about the "Hango PJB-100" is just about the funniest thing I've read all day. Because, you know, when you say "portable music player," the first thing to pop into everybody's mind is "Hango PJB-100."

      How different is this new-for-2005 device in concept than the original portable MP3 players of 1998?

      It's incredibly easy to use, and it's $99.

    68. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point, along with every other reply here. The OP said "invented" when he probably should have said "popularised," but the intent it virtually the same. Ford is remembered as the person who brought cars to the masses, and Apple is already being remembered as the MP3 player company.

      Neither one invented all the concepts involved, but refined them and dressed them up for mass consumtion.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    69. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well "pioneer of assembly line manufacturing" is even pushing it... that's more of the grade-school history sound-bite version. Lots of industries had been moving towards assembly lines for decades. Ford was just the first to apply it to something as big and complicated as a car -- before that they were considered something that only an artisan machinist could build.

      But think about it from the perspective of the market:
      pre-Ford -- no real market, cars are curiousities only for tech geeks with lots of disposible income
      post-Ford -- country is now a car culture

      pre-iPod -- no real market, mp3 hardware are curiosities only for tech geeks with lots of disposible income
      post-iPod -- mp3 players sell millions

      I think the analogy was spot on.

    70. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT, yo. Also, why you so stoopit, stoopit?

    71. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Sique · · Score: 1

      Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach invented the motocycle in 1885 (and they got a patent for it).
      And they invented the first rather high touring gasoline engine. The models before the Daimler-Maybach construction were revving at about 200/min, while Gottlieb Daimler invented the glow tube ignition and thus was able to get his engine at 900/min. (The glow tube later got replaced by Bosch's invention of the high voltage magnet ignition, which is basicly used until today). The motocycle was build to show the capabilities of the new, comparatively small and light machine, which got far beyond the current uses of the gasoline engine, which was mainly employed to power machines in workshops.
      (Benz's engine which powered the Patent Motor Waggon, the first gasoline powered car, used already a magnetic ignition, but was maxing out at about 450/min).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    72. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      And, just to drive this further off-topic, Frederick Haynes developed the first reliable transmission before Ford got into the game. Haynes is pretty much forgotten today, but in his day he was well-known because he changed the industry. Cars could become more reliable AND larger. IIRC, he was the inspiration for one of the characters in Booth Tarkington's "The Magnificent Ambersons". Without that, and one hundred other innovations, cars weren't going to be the industry they became. The amazing thing is that Haynes' company lasted at least until 1915, when Theordore Dreiser visited the factory (noted in his travelogue "A Hoosier Holiday".)

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    73. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the stupidest thing I've heard all day. A LOT of people had mp3 players prior to the creation of the iPod. Creative had a large market of harddrive based mp3 players before hand, as far as I remember they had the first large capacity mp3 device made, and aside from its steep price tag and uncomfortable size, it was well known. Just nothing spells "trendy" like Apple. Do you really think that an mp3 player supported by the musical industry is not going to be hyped? Henry Ford was the first person to mass-produce automobiles, and that's why he's credited with their invention. Man, go get some common sense.

    74. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by speed-sf · · Score: 1

      Now let's keep it real here. I too am a mac fanboy, I have the iPod, a powerbook, and a mac mini. BUT let's keep remember one simple fact. Apple snagged the windowed OS from Xerox.

      As Bill put it to Steve, "I feel like I broke into Xerox to steal their TV only to find you stonle it first."

      --
      All your database are belong to us
    75. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      And yet, despite all these contributions, none of these guys are remembered by history. Daimler is the name of a car company, a name with as much connection to the history of the automobile as Toyota or Hyundai.

      Henry Ford is remembered as the father of the automobile because he's the first one who got it right.

      That's why Apple is the father of the portable music player, and people who argue that "Apple didn't invent it" and that "so-n-so had a steam-powered phonograph in 1922" are completely off the mark.

      Thanks.

    76. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that Apple is like Fidel Castro?

    77. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by aj50 · · Score: 1

      MS would be th epolice if they could manage it but fortunately they're being dragged along (in some areas) by the competition, even if it is just me tooism.

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    78. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by cvn74lt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what this guy said. Hard to believe all the other posters missed the point. Sure Ford didn't "invent" the car, but ask most anyone who did, and I bet that's the answer you get because he made them available to everyone.

    79. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Henry Ford invented the production line and applied the idea to automobile construction.

      Well, on the first point you're only out by a few thousand years but on the second point, Ransom "oldsmobile" Olds used an assembly line before Ford, according to the same site.

    80. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      They invented something that already existed but marketed the product to the "cool" people.

      If you have a hat, and I market the same hat but get more people to buy it.. Did I invent the hat?

      I had a Rio Riot and all you had to do was plug it into your computer and launch Mediamatch Jukebox, import your songs and it was set up. iTunes doesn't make anything easier.

      MusicMatch wasn't hard to use. People actually still choose to use it over other products.

      You want to see a hard drive based mp3 player that has the stuff you ask for? Look at the new line from Rio. Or Archos.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    81. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Definitions of invent on the Web:

      To think up or make something new. highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0072486740/student_ view0/chapter7/glossary.html

      How are they inventing something that already exists?

      You invent the first sprocket in the world, I improve upon your original design. Did I invent the sprocket?

      Maybe something like "Apple re-defined the hard drive based mp3" but they did NOT invent.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    82. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by gellenburg · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      Wasn't sure if it was Benz or Daimler.

      Gut told me Benz, went with Daimler anyway.

      Mea culpa. It was Benz.

    83. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      You remind me of the geek lemming.

      "Look at all those morons! Everyone knows that intelligent lemmings follow each other over THIS cliff."

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    84. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      "No thanks, I've already eaten."

      I friended you for that, thanks for the laugh!

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    85. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Actually my iShuffle integrated seamlessly with Windows XP ... oh wait that's Apple again!

    86. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by yardbird · · Score: 1

      Pretty good, although I would shift Apple and MS to #2 and #3 respectively and put someone like Nomad at #1; they make stuff for early adopters, which Apple then perfects for a mass market.

      --
      Free, legal music for iTunes users.
    87. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by rw2 · · Score: 1

      It is great because of how easy it is to use

      I've owned both a iPod click wheel and a Rio Karma and I find the Karma easier to use. I think advertising indeed has a lot to do with it.

    88. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      you buy them at Wal-Mart from brands you've never heard of in sizes Gucci wouldn't be caught dead making.

      Let me guess: 6?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    89. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Henry Ford was the first person to mass-produce automobiles, and that's why he's credited with their invention.

      Thanks for finally wrapping your head around exactly what the poster was saying. It's a shame that you didn't grasp it until after you'd already started typing. But let me introduce you to my little friend. He's on your keyboard. You might have seen him. His name is "delete."

    90. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should always be the first to invent something. But if you aren't the first you should implement the best version of it. But if you can't implement the best version, you should definately be the cheapest product out there...

    91. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by orichter · · Score: 1

      The automobile was invented by Mr. Daihmler in Germany.

      Henry Ford invented the assembly-line which made mass-production of automobiles possibles.

      That is, if you wanted one in black.

      Apple did not invent the MP3 player.

      Apple mass-marketed an MP3 player that looekd good, was easy to use, and had the features consumers were craving.


      Are you really so dense that you didn't get his point, or did you just assume that everyone else here was so stupid that they wouldn't get it. If you re-read the grandparent, you'll notice that the point he made was exactly the point you made. It's just that he wrote it at the college level, and you translated it for 3rd graders.

    92. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      Obviously you aren't the majority or else people would be buying Karmas. People aren't as stupid as you think. If they found the iPod difficult to use, they wouldn't buy it. Period.

    93. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by orichter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And for the record, claiming that Henry Ford "practically invented the automobile" is still a false assertion. It would be no more true to assert Bill Gates invented computers and Al Gore invented the internet.


      Your statement is utter nonsense. What you say might be true if he claimed that Ford invented the automobile. What he said, however is that Ford practically invented the automobile after he explicitly stated that Ford did not actually technically invent the automobile. Read literally, his statement could be interpreted as, "Ford invented the practical form of the automobile," which is precisely true, though a little less wieldy. In the same way you could say correctly that Bill Gates practically invented the personal computer (i.e. he invented the form in which most people experience personal computers). Saying that Al Gore practically invented the internet, however, is not a proper comparison, and is simply untrue. Saying Tim Burners-Lee practically invented the internet, however, would make a reasonable comparison even though Burners-Lee didn't actually invent it. To deny this is to imply that the phrase "practically invented" has no meaning in the same way as the phrase "practically got pregnant" has no meaning. If that is what you are arguing, then we'll just have to disagree, but otherwise, you're being overly pedantic about a statement which clearly and consisely expressed what he was trying to express, which is after all the purpose of language. Are you honestly telling me that you couldn't figure out what the great-grandparent post was trying to say. If so, you really must have flunked that reading comprehension test.

    94. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Apple is to the iPod as Henry Ford is to the car.

      huh? Don't you mean Apple is to the iPod as Henry Ford is to the Ford Automobile? Or Apple is to hard-disk based MP3 players as Henry Ford is to the car?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    95. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Ransome Olds introduced the assembly line to automobile production years before Ford.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    96. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The OP said "invented" when he probably should have said "popularised," but the intent it virtually the same.

      "Invention" is engineering.
      "Popularization" is marketing.

      I would have thought that Slashdotters would be more aware of this distinction.

    97. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      I know. By "innovation" I meant a usable mp3 player.

      No one person, or company, invented the mp3 player. Apple "did not invent" the mp3 player in the same sense that the Wright brothers "did not invent" the manned flying machine.

    98. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too!!!

    99. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by runamok1 · · Score: 1

      Innovation, research and development costs lots of money up front. When you have the market percentage that MS does, it is most likely easier to see what works, copy it and 90% of people will buy it/ use it.

      The other issue is that million dollar ideas at MS are almost useless. That is such a small percentage of their total revenue that they don't even bother. As has been said before, MS's largest competitor is MS's last generation products. E.g. Office 2000.

    100. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      2.) Seamless integration with Windows, a family of operating systems that over 90% of the public uses, and which only one company has full access to the internals of: Microsoft.

      Frankly, I think that point is moot. Seamless integration with Windows is just not what it is cut out to be. iTunes proves that regardless of what Microsoft puts out.. customers will flock elsewhere if they can get feature A, B and C that isn't in the integrated MS product. All this competition forces companies like Apple to keep innovating and think about opening up lest they have another Mac meltdown.

    101. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Nailer · · Score: 1

      You've rather overmixed your metaphors and created a bit of a mish-mash.

      Oh yeah? Well don't bite the hand that rocks the cradle of love.

    102. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by rw2 · · Score: 1

      1) I didn't say people were stupid.

      2) I didn't say the iPod was hard to use.

      Period.

    103. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by tidge · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever mentions Microsoft Research.

      I don't know if it's because they've never come up with anything good, or because a lot of their things end up finding their way to developers and behind the scene's folks more that the mass consumer market.

    104. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fuck's sake. What is it about the word "invent" that you don't understand?

    105. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      No people want a pvr that's built into their cable box, that they don't have to buy, and is just a few dollars more on their cable bill.
      Really? And have you interviewed all these "people"? I personally do not want a PVR from my cable provider. I want a PVR that lets me record what _I_ want when _I_ want with no stupid DRM crap. I pay about $100 US a month for my digital cable and cable modem package, the last thing I want is my cable company telling me I cannot record a show for whatever reason.

      Please don't try to speak on behalf of "people", it makes you sound like an ID10T. Unless ofcourse you have personally interviewed the millions of people in the USA or $YOUR_COUNTRY that have have a cable box and asked them what they want in a PVR.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    106. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I momentarily considered rewriting the "innovators such as Apple" part, but I figured... you know, it's been a while since I've seen a healthy flamewar here. Looks like I got what I deserved. :)

    107. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      Yes, that beleaguered company should be going out of business any decade now, I can feel it...

      Is that you, Dvorak?

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    108. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think the flash/cd mp3 player market was a "party"? Both of those technologies sucked. I used an mp3 cd-player for quite a while, but its difficult and cumbersome technology for most people.

      I didn't describe the flash/cd mp3 market as a "party". In fact I didn't describe any market as a "party". I didn't even mention cd mp3 players.

      Apple waited until there was the opportunity for a Killer product to be made, and made it.

      That's kinda what I said.

    109. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      No, Apple invented a chic looking hard drive mp3 player that everybody assumed that you must be cool if you own one.

      No, Apple developed a chic-looking hard drive MP3 player that at first wasn't even Windows-compatible. It got great reviews because it was small, elegant and easy-to-use, with features not found on other players at the time. Its sales have really taken off since then, but it took a while. You seem to be one of those people who forgets the iPod was around before 2004. As time went on, it became clearer just how much better (opinion, obviously, and YMMV) it was than other things. The "fashion" aspect of it wasn't even there at all at first (in late 2001); that emerged after a while.

      And then they marketed with a series of bizarre and silly commercials that 90% of the people hated, but figured that the commercial must be so cool that they couldn't understand it and therefore they must buy an iPod to regain some of their coolness.

      The iPod advertising has been through a number of totally different phases. I'd also be very interested in your detailed research that conclusively established "90% of the people hated, but figured that the commercial must be so cool that they couldn't understand it," etc.

    110. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1
      they weren't the first to sell a "personal computer" or a dozen other things that people regularly describe as an Apple "invention".

      Uh, actually, yes, Apple was the first company to sell a personal computer. Let's see...the Apple I was the first personal computer to ever come with a keyboard, the Apple II was the first to come completely assembled, the first in a plastic case, the first with color graphics, the first with high-res, the first with sound, the first with paddles, the first with BASIC in ROM, the second to use your home television (after the Apple I)....

      So yes, Apple was the first to sell a personal computer. Let's give credit where credit is due.
    111. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by More+Trouble · · Score: 1

      Henry Ford invented the assembly-line which made mass-production of automobiles possibles.
      That is, if you wanted one in black.

      And the first iPods were available in any color you want, as long as it was white.

      :w

    112. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      "Seamless integration with Windows, a family of operating systems"

      Where I come from Sex with a family member is illegal and unethical. Microsoft's monolithic windows centric culture will lead to their demise. How do you think epidemics spread? They have to have a transportation mechanism.

      Microsoft products have more holes that swiss cheese. Today I just found out that NTFS and ACL's get cached and trashed. Make sure your web server doesn't have more than 4 million files on it, or you might just get hacked due to ACLs auto-magically removed. That is a feature you paid for.

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/327009/EN-US/
      h ttp://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=831375

      --
      Your Average Joe
    113. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by ky11x · · Score: 1

      You've totally missed the parent poster's point...

    114. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, Apple has been going out of business since the late 1970's. . . any decade now.

    115. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      You seemed to have confused innovation with invention. Go learn the difference, then come back and talk to us.

    116. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Puggs · · Score: 1
      uhh the iPod does "Just Work" with the iTMS, that is if you take Apple's definition of "Just Working".

      You can use all your mp3's from the other services too, but the iTMS does Just Work...

      ;-)

      sorry, that was a terrible joke - its 5am.... *Clicks Submit anyway*

    117. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

      The Wright Brothers are given credit for inventing the first heavier than air aircraft, but how often do you see their names attached to a brand?
      Curtiss-Wright
      http://www.curtisswright.com/

    118. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Way to miss the forest for the trees; strike two.

      You don't think that Ford's application of the assembly line to automotive manufacturing doesn't count as engineering? You're right, that's definitely marketing.

      Yes, the *act* of making something popular is a marketing field, but making it possible to make something popular - now that's applied engineering.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    119. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by ahillen · · Score: 1

      And yet, despite all these contributions, none of these guys are remembered by history.

      I guess it depends where you learn your history. Daimler and Benz are quite well known names here in Germany. One of the first divison football clubs plays in the "Gottlieb Daimler Stadion" (Stuttgart, of course, where the headquater of todays DaimlerChrysler is located). If you have the fealing that they were not remembered by the history, than it rather tells something about the common phenomenon called "not invented here syndrom".

    120. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      They may not be able to make their products seemlessly integrate with each other, but they can put up barriers to make sure competitors products integrate even worse.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    121. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, that would be:"Proprietary software in a nutshell"

    122. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I nearly laughed out loud when I read that comment..

    123. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Sique · · Score: 1

      I learned most of motor history as a child in the local Traffic Museum in Dresden, which is full with stories about Gottlieb Daimler, Carl Benz and Wilhelm Maybach. They have replicas of Daimler's motocycle (the Petroleum-Reitwagen) and Benz's Patent Motorwagen, but I can't remember seeing there a single Ford-labelled exponat.
      So for me Henry Ford was just some footnote to automobile history, not a predominant figure.
      The same effect goes for the airplane: Stories about Otto Lilienthal, Hans Grade and Hugo Junkers, but the Brothers Wright are given just a short side note.
      (With Otto Lilienthal being the first who got flying "heavier than air" basicly right, Hans Grade being the first who was using the airplane commercially and Hugo Junkers getting credited for the Junkers F13, the first full metal airplane.)
      As you can see, every country has its own stories of who is the most important for a certain technological development. Henry Ford may be great in the U.S., but that doesn't count anywhere else.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    124. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent to my reply is good evidence that people just pick-and-chose to support their untenable positions.

      Well, you're certainly the expert there.

    125. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth hurts, doesn't it, open-source-boy?

    126. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by IvanXQZ · · Score: 1

      "Apple didn't invent it, perfect the manufacture of it, or do anything spectacular with it other than the input (yawn) and the marketing..."

      Not that this hasn't been said about thirty times in this thread alone, but I was keenly aware of the MP3 player options when the iPod was released, and I owned a few. No, Apple didn't invent the MP3 player. But it's totally untrue that they didn't do anything spectactular with it, even if the UI fails to impress you.

      There were a number of flash players (I owned two), and IIRC two hard drive based players, the Creative Nomad (which I owned) and the Archos Jukebox. The flash players has 128MB tops, and the hard drive players were huge bricks with no battery life.

      The iPod was the first device to get the advantages of both types of both flash (small, long battery) and hard drive (high capacity) together into one device -- a huge synergy. The MP3 player wasn't really a useful product for most until this marriage. Maybe someone else would have done it eventually, but Apple did it first, and did it very well from the outset.

      But they didn't stop there -- they took the extra step of being the first to really think about how to intelligently manage music with both a desktop application and a portable device. The iTunes-iPod relationship was vastly superior to anything else available at the time -- all other desktop applications basically treated the player like a disk drive, rather than an portable extension of your desktop jukebox. (Later, they extended iTunes to allow music purchasing, and again there was no online music source that came close to that level of ease and integration.)

      And, of course, they made the iPod look good and gave it a very usable interface, which may bore you, but IMO it was just the icing on the cake.

      So they deserve credit for doing something spectacular with it, even if they didn't invent it. They made it a player people really liked. Furthermore, Apple gave their competitors *two and a half years* of lead time to catch up and improve on Apple's ideas, because the iPod didn't really start flying until the Windows version of iTunes was released. No one even came close to a device like an iPod in all that time, allowing Apple to run away with the market.

      A quick timeline, abbreviated from ipod-lounge.com:
      April 2001: iPod released, Mac-only, FireWire-only.
      July 2002: Windows compatibility announced via the execreble MusicMatch Jukebox, but FireWire is still required.
      April 2003: USB-compatible iPods are released, though MMJB is still required on Windows. iTunes Music Store is released for Mac.
      October 2003: iTunes for Windows (including the Music Store) is released, finally bringing Windows iPod users into feature parity with Mac iPod users.

      So what the hell was everyone waiting for? There were 1.5 million plus total iPods sold prior to the release of iTunes for Windows, in the first two and a half years of release. That figure doubled in eight months, and then the numbers really went crazy after that: they sold 4.5 million in the final quarter of 2004 alone.

      Don't give Apple credit if you want, but they did what no one did before them, and gave others plenty of time to best them and no one did. I think you could say they deserve their success. You can't chalk it all up to marketing. They released what was clearly the best product of its type, and (arguably) still is.

    127. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by IvanXQZ · · Score: 1

      The Riot came out nearly a year after the iPod. I'd argue with you about MMJB being as easy as iTunes but let's just say that it is. Even so, the Riot was still a brick compared with the iPod, on account of its laptop hard drive. You couldn't put it in your purse or pocket unless you wear ugly oversized pants which I'm guessing you do. So not only did the Riot not exist before the iPod, but still wasn't nearly as small or light, and isn't the whole point of a portable music player to be as portable (i.e. small and light) as possible? The iPod was like no player that came before it, whether you want to believe that, and for the most part it's like no player which came after it either (although finally some reasonable alternatives surfaced this year). So Apple didn't market it to cool people, it marketed it to people smart enough to choose the obviously superior product. Sorry you're not one of those.

      Yeah, IHBT. I know.

    128. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by IvanXQZ · · Score: 1

      That's not semiotics. It's semantics. You fail it.

    129. Re:Representative of Microsoft's "vision" by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Wow, aren't you the jackass. Not only do I own an iPod after all the other mp3 players I tried broke after a few days at work.

      The iPod didn't INVENT shit. Which is all I was saying.

      The Riot had a better UI and better playlist generation on the fly. Oh, and battery life. It had a longer battery life, also.

      And the attack on my pants, nice one.

      You cannot invent something that exists. You haven't argued against me at all.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  6. Why iPod anyway? by schestowitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With SD Cards reaching 1GB in size, why don't people just use PDA's for music? A mystery or just an impending trend?

    --
    My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
    1. Re:Why iPod anyway? by .Spyder78. · · Score: 1

      Because bigger is better, didn't ya know? If it has more GB's, it has to be better. I'm waiting for the 100gb music player so I can store 2398462439875342 songs on it for 1,000,000 hours of music bliss... ...yeah, I know the battery only lasts 15 hours. So??

    2. Re:Why iPod anyway? by dknight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      while PDAs have decent general-purpose use battery life these days, mp3s kill them pretty quick. besides that, they're still generally bigger than an ipod... pdas also tend to be more expensive and you still wind up with less space than an ipod.

    3. Re:Why iPod anyway? by yetdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One word: style. It's chic to have one of these, and it extends to the interface. A pretty looking piece of dung is still a piece of dung, but Apple has managed to take something that looks amazing and make it work just as it looks.

    4. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Jheaden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Two words... Battery Life

      Most PDAs I've used just don't have the battery life that a dedicated device has. I know mine doesn't (HP iPAQ 1945), although that is the low end of PDAs anymore.

    5. Re:Why iPod anyway? by astebbin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well.... considering the fact that my iPod has 40gb, and my Palm only has two, I'll go with the iPod. Plus, the iPod mini is smaller and fits easier in the pocket than a Microsoft PocketPC.

    6. Re:Why iPod anyway? by pdbogen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interestingly enough: The lack of a good player, no worthwhile eyes-off interface, and battery life. My iPod lasts a lot longer than my PDA would, if my PDA were playing music (empirical evidence)

      That, and a 1GB SD card comes up on Froogle for $54. This is a third the price of the 1GB iPod shuffle, but does not include the cost of the playing device, which is almost certainly at least $100.

      So, you've got a comparably priced solution, with a worse interface, and shorter battery life. Of course, a PDA is still a PDA, in the end.. So it really depends on what feature set you are most interested in.

      Anyway, I have a 40GB iPod, which would be about $2,200 in SD cards, and it cost me less than $200 (thanks, freeipods.com)

    7. Re:Why iPod anyway? by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To match the capacity of an iPod, you'd need to buy 20, 1GB cards. That's about $1500 for media alone.

    8. Re:Why iPod anyway? by mingot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For me the attraction to the iPod (or at least hard drive MP3 players) is being able to put my entire music collection on it. I have about 19 gigs of music files and it's hard to get a decent subset of that because I'll inevitably want to hear a song I didn't put on the 1 gig sized playlist over the course of a day. Add that to the fact that I'm LAZY and don't want to waste time building a playlist every night and the "fire and forget" nature of the hard drive players become must have.

    9. Re:Why iPod anyway? by schestowitz · · Score: 1

      Okay, I see the points you all make, but allow me to say this: -1GB is enough for a day's worth of music, right? When you get bored, reload the PDA. -Battery life - my Tungsten will handle about 5 hours of playtime. -The screen of a modern PDA is far superior. -Have you seen Palm MP3 players? Very highly functional.

      --
      My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
    10. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Enevitable · · Score: 0

      I would imagine that the quality from a PDA would not be as up to par, as a device devoted solely to the playing of music, plus as others have said, the iPod is more of a status symbol now

    11. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      What the hell do I need a PDA for? I have an iPod. It holds contacts, has games, plays music, has a calendar, etc.

      PDAs are for dorks and people who think they have a busy life.

      iPods are for music.

      (those lines not meant as trolling but an accurate response you would get from a large chunk of the population)

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    12. Re:Why iPod anyway? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Many people don't need PDA functions, and even for those of us who do the standalones have advantages:

      1) Price - a 4GB SD card will cost much more than a flash based 4GB MP3 player.

      2) Size - iPod minis and shuffles are smaller than any PDA on the market and even the biggest current iPod Photos compare favourably on pocket real estate.

      3) Capacity - 60GB SD card or even CF microdrive? I don't think so. Fair enough, most people don't need the full 60, but even the sensible 20GB capacity doesn't have any real competition from publically available cards, and plenty of people like to have their whole music collection with them to choose whatever they feel like hearing.

      4) Ease of use - iPods are set out (extremely nicely) to play and organise music. PDAs are not, and as such have loading times, fiddly small buttons and touchscreens that are hard to use one handed.

      5) Battery life - big fat backlit colour touchscreen or small, clear, functional monochrome display.

    13. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Probably because I don't want to be carrying around 40 of them to equal the space on my iPod, and then have to swap them out all the time. Also, with my iPod I can shuffle my whole music collection at once.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    14. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that obviously is the case but I put the thing in my pocket and listen to it. I don't give a crap what it looks like.

    15. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      -1GB is enough for a day's worth of music, right? When you get bored, reload the PDA.

      Hence the iPod shuffle, which is smaller and easier to use --and cheaper --than any PDA.

      Here's the thing: most people don't carry PDAs. Of those who do, very few are interested in listening to their headphones while they have their PDAs on them. They're interested in listening to music while, for example, they run. It's a royal pain to carry a PDF around with you when you run, not least of which because if you drop it, you are going to break the screen, which means buying a new one.

      So now Apple has a $150 music player that's smaller than small and so easy to use it's almost like magic. Plug in to computer ...wait briefly ...unplug ...plug into ears ...hear music. Poof.

      Basically, a PDA makes a lousy iPod because it's not got nearly enough storage, and it makes a lousy iPod shuffle because it's far too big and expensive.

    16. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that with SD cards reaching 1 gig in size I wonder why more people aren't going with flash MP3 players with expansion slots.

      Of course, the Ipod has a better interface than the flash mp3 players. Most flash players are based on the assumption that good navigation isn't necessary due to the small storage size of the device.

      As flash storage continues to get larger someone is going to have to figure out that a flash device with a worthwhile nav system and an expansion slot (or two!) would be a good idea. Of course, it would have to be in a price range to make it look good next to the Ipod Mini - say $150. It wouldn't be hard to make a better interface - just leave behind the idea that the device needs to be smaller than the average lighter. Base it around a bunch of old Palm Vx screens, they've gotta be sitting in a warehouse somewhere.

      I know that's what I keep lookin around for. I kinda hoped the apple flash-player would do this, but in fact they decided to go as completely opposite from what I wanted as possible. =| Too bad that apart from the Apple chic the shuffle has absolutely nothing to recommend it.

      Still shopping...

      Adam

    17. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Golias · · Score: 1

      If you are the sort of person who already has the need to lug around a PDA, and you can get enough battery life out of it, then by all means use it for your MP3 player and save yourself the hassle of carrying yet another device.

      I, on the other hand, don't even wear a watch. I sometimes carry a mobile phone (which is the very smallest one I could afford), and I almost always have my iPod with me. It's like having a "pull-out" faceplate for your car stereo which you can still listen to while you're out of the car.

      I used to carry a PDA, but then I realized a few things about it:

      1. All my work appointments happen when I'm at work, in front of a computer with a perfectly good appointment program.

      2. All my contacts are stored in my phone, and I don't look them up or even pay attention to the numbers - I just select them and hit "call."

      3. When I'm not at work, I prefer to let my time be largely unstructured.

      4. Clipping a PDA to your belt is a perhaps a rather metrosexual look, but the best alternative (wearing a belt-pouch, a.k.a. "belly bag" a.k.a. "fanny pack", a.k.a. "man purse") is downright full-on Richard Simmons gay. Jeans pockets provide room for a wallet, an iPod, a money clip, a phone, and keys. Walking around with anything more than that requires some kind of luggage space.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    18. Re:Why iPod anyway? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      The answer is obvious... if I'm listening to tunes on my Palm, I can't surf the 'net.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    19. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it cost me less than $200 (thanks, freeipods.com)

      It cost you less than $200 from _free_ipods.com, eh? Interesting.

    20. Re:Why iPod anyway? by amberp · · Score: 1

      "1,000,000 hours of music bliss"
      That means, if you start listening now without repeating any song and listening contineously, 24 hours a day and 365 days a year, then also it would take you 114 Years to listen to all of your collection just once.
      are you alien or something ?

    21. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      > With SD Cards reaching 1GB in size, why don't people just use PDA's for music? A mystery or just an impending trend?

      Feh. When the Shuffle came out I thought, "Hey, I can use my PDA and save a hundred bucks." It's a Viewsonic PocketPC I got through MSDN, with Windows Media Player built-in. I stuck an SD memory card in it and loaded up a couple CDs worth of MP3s. Built a playlist and tried to listen.

      What a joke! I can only play one song, then I have to pull out the stylus and go through the menus to start another. The repeat and shuffle settings do nothing. Try to skip to another song, and it hangs with an "Opening" message until I go to the playlist again and manually open another song. Having to stop what I'm doing every 4 minutes or so to start another song sort of breaks up my activity.

      It's designed to work better than this, but it just plain doesn't work (well, it is Microsoft software, what do you expect?). I finally gave up - I'll eventually pick up a Shuffle and have a player that works.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    22. Re:Why iPod anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All it needs is no wireless, and the pda can be officially dubbed "lame".

    23. Re:Why iPod anyway? by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      $0 is less than $200, so it still fits, no? ;-)

    24. Re:Why iPod anyway? by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      It was actually about $170. I have a 40GB iPod. I got a 20GB free, which I traded in for a refund at an apple store and paid the difference for a 40GB and a wired remote kit.

    25. Re:Why iPod anyway? by vought · · Score: 1

      Because PDA sales have been delining for the past three years and are now at a five-year low.

      That's why.

  7. Huh? by JamesD_UK · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why is this particularly interesting? Should they should be using a digital portable music player made by Microsoft instead of Apple?

    The iPod is the most popular digital music player. It's fairly like that if you take any subset of the population that the iPod will also be their most popular player.

    1. Re:Huh? by computerme · · Score: 1

      its interesting because Microsoft makes the software for all of the ipod's competitors...

      what if it turned out if 80% of msoft people used OSX at work?

      interesting now? yep...

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, the iPod is supposed to be Apple's Trojan horse into the desktop market, isn't it? I wonder how many Microsoft employees are, even now, awaiting the arrival of their shiny new Mac minis... :)

    3. Re:Huh? by colanut · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It is interesting because (from the goddamn article):
      So popular is the iPod, executives are increasingly sending out memos frowning on its use.
      Microsoft doesn't currently make hardware, but the sure as hell make a competing media format. Balmer and co have made a lot of noise about the iPod as well. But the point is, how can you make an Apple killer if your own employees are using the competition.
    4. Re:Huh? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      It might be interesting if your points were actually valid. There are many players that don't use MS software at all. Also, your OSX "analogy" doesn't apply, because MS has a competing product.

      Try harder next time.

    5. Re:Huh? by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Why is this particularly interesting?

      - If employees in Microsoft are allowed to carry a portable MP3 player, then does the management have a right to control which one they can?

      - If after one year we find 80% of Microsoft employees carry non-iPod players, would that not be interesting. And would there not be undue pressure on employees ... leading to similar class action suits against Walmart ... although the softies will be too soft to raise stink and lose their fat checks.

      - If Microsoft was making MP3 players, even then should it matter what the employees buy? What if General Mills said you must eat only our cereals!!

      It is interesting because it is an interesting take on reality (iPod share), management conflicts, employee preferences despite kool-aid. Sometimes just an honest peek into the realities behind a FUD campaign is interesting.

    6. Re:Huh? by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I think it's supposed to be interesting because Microsoft, as a company, is trying to badmouth iPods. They've tried to characterize iPods and the iTMS as an evil monopoly that hurts consumers by using file-formats to enforce vendor lock-in.

      People immediately noticed the irony of Microsoft badmouthing another Apple by claiming Apple practices business methods which are standard-operating-procedure at MS. Now we have an additional source of amusement, in that, while the company spews FUD about the inferiority of the iPod, the company's employees are using that same product in large numbers, thereby demonstrating that the complaints are, indeed, FUD.

    7. Re:Huh? by Naikrovek · · Score: 2

      windows HAS competing products. that's why MS management appears to be getting a little chafed by the idea that their minions use a competing product.

      drop the wiseassery and RTFA next time.

    8. Re:Huh? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      It's interesting because Microsoft is doing so much with their WMA and DRM stuff that's incompatible with iPods. Yet all of their employees are going "Screw your stuff, this is so much better."

      There's more to the mp3 players than who makes them. You've got to consider the media player tied to it (iTunes vs Windows Media Player), music store it works with (iTMS vs whoever else), DRM schemes involved, cmopatible file types, etc. Microsoft is competing with Apple on all of those fronts *except* the player market.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    9. Re:Huh? by jdwest · · Score: 1

      ummm ... research?!? Yeah, that's it!

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    10. Re:Huh? by FreakyGeeky · · Score: 1

      Well I work for Purina and I'm only allowed to eat Puppy Chow.

    11. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But the point is, how can you make an Apple killer if your own employees are using the competition."

      I think the REAL question is "how can you make an Apple killer if you don't, in fact, make a competing product?"

      What, are employees supposed to go out and get the Microsoft MP3 player?

    12. Re:Huh? by jargoone · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with TFA, which I did read.

      I'll try harder to make this very clear to you: Microsoft does not sell a Microsoft branded portable audio player. If they did, that would be a competing product. They don't, so they don't have a product that competes with the iPod. I'm not talking about the software that the PC runs to support the player, I'm talking about the player itself.

      Got it now?

    13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "...how can you make an Apple killer if your own employees are using the competition."

      Actually, the best way to make a competition killer is to let your employees use that competition's product.

      Seriously. Microsoft's executives are idiots for trying to clamp down on use of iPods. They should be embracing it. After all, who could possibly be more knowledgable about how to improve on a product than the very people who use that product.

      They're getting free market research here. Wanna find out why the iPod is so popular? Ask your own employees who use it. Wanna know when you've succeeded in making a competing product that's better? Take a look at your own campus and see if your own employees are making the switch. If not, keep trying.

      The problem is, the culture among Microsoft executives is not one of trying to create the best product, but one of trying to suppress the best product in favour of the Microsoft version.

    14. Re:Huh? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      In related news... it was found that Microsoft employees don't drive Microsoft cars.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    15. Re:Huh? by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Even worse take it a bit further..

      What if General Mills said you must eat only General Mills and verified your conformance during your periodic "random" drug test? Assuming there's something they can test for unique to their products of course.

      In the mega-corporate America this could be quite a troubling trend for workers. Don't utter any opinion on anything and consult hr on any personal purchase as you may be crossing your employer.

    16. Re:Huh? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      it is a simple matter to import wma files into the ipod (through conversion)
      this article is a bunch of hype from people that dont know what they are talking about.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    17. Re:Huh? by SIGPUNKT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you've got a beautiful glossy coat!

      --
      Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
    18. Re:Huh? by moonbender · · Score: 2

      No, they are clearly supposed to go out and get one of the players that supports PlaysForSure, Microsoft's DRM FUD scheme. Motto: "Look for the PlaysForSure logo on Windowsbased Media Connect devices. Match it to the PlaysForSure logo on the hottest online music stores and you'll know the music will play for sure."

      Note that the PlaysForSure site apparently is down, "An application error occurred on the server." Way to go, Microsoft!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    19. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they do license WMA to companies that do sell competing audio players. How happy do you think representatives from Creative, iRiver, etc. are when they show up at the MSFT campus and see a ton of people with iPods? They're probably pissed and start thinking that MSFT has stabbed them in the back...again.

    20. Re:Huh? by kkovach · · Score: 0

      Wait, are you saying I'm allowed to eat Frosted Flakes!? :-)

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    21. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or legally smoking in your own home.

    22. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they should really get on the reverse engineering problem shouldn't they. Make it as general as possible, and sell it to everyone, and update whenever Apple does, including publicity about how Apple's inevitable new firmwear updates will remove some of your iPod's functionality.

      Nothing would pucker Jobs ass more than doing all the hard work, and assuming all the risk only to have "The Machine" come in and sell a chunk of their high margin marketplace to all commers. Microsoft: Trust Buster.

    23. Re:Huh? by talaper · · Score: 1

      Why is this particularly interesting?

      you're forgetting that employees owning iPods implicitly means employees using iTunes. and you can assume that if they have an iPod and use iTunes, they're most likely buying songs from the ITMS as well.

      this means that MS employees are:
      a) using a piece of hardware that MS doesn't support, which competes with hardware that it does
      b) using software that is in direct competition with MS products
      c) constantly spending money in a store that directly competes with an MS store

      man, that's got to be a mighty large kick in the nuts for them..

    24. Re:Huh? by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      What ? You switched the directions here. It's not like: they use iPod's, we bash them, then make an iPod killer, but it should be exactly the opposite: make an iPod killer, then - if you can - persuade the guys to switch to it.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    25. Re:Huh? by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what if the MS employees only use iTunes and their iPod to use and sort their MP3s? I don't have an iPod but I only have MP3s in iTunes.

    26. Re:Huh? by digitalcowboy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. That site is good for a laugh.

      Here's another amusing bit from the top right of the main page:
      "Choose your music. Choose your device. Know it's going to work. When your device and music service are compatible with each other, all you have to do is choose the music that's compatible with you. Look for the PlaysForSure logo..."

      All I have to do is choose the right device and the right music service, huh? And I do that by looking for the logo?

      That's simple enough.

      (There is no step 3.)

  8. headphones by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Employees have even started using different headphones to be a bit more stealthy about it.

    Could be, or maybe they just don't want to get mugged. White iPod headphone do a great job of saying "I've got an expensive, easy to steal piece of electronics on me."

    Also, iPod headphones suck. after half an hour my ears started hurting with the old ones.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:headphones by dezzo · · Score: 0

      yes, the headphones are really bad acoustically. They may look nice, but it's about the sound.

    2. Re:headphones by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. They are uncomfortable, and sound like crap. And, they're ugly. Mine are sitting in the box in the basement, and I'm using an inexpensive replacement instead.

    3. Re:headphones by profet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could be, or maybe they just don't want to get mugged. White iPod headphone do a great job of saying "I've got an expensive, easy to steal piece of electronics on me."

      So thats why the iPod shuffle was released... Its all coming together now...

    4. Re:headphones by gotgenes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could be, or maybe they just don't want to get mugged. White iPod headphone do a great job of saying "I've got an expensive, easy to steal piece of electronics on me."

      Exactly! 'Cause I know I certainly keep hearing about these muggings that happen to all these people wearing iPods in upper-middle class neighborhoods, schools, universities, and especially large, patrolled software giant campuses.

      ...

      --
      It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
    5. Re:headphones by computerme · · Score: 1

      that white earphone thing getting mugged was an urban myth...

      you do know that it was made up...?

      kinda like the easter bunny...

      oh and the ipod phones may suck to you but obviously not everyone has your pro level ears... they seem just fine to me...and the vast majority of the 10 million ipod owners out there...

    6. Re:headphones by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      My left ear is a bit smaller than my right, the buds that came with the iPod hurt like a bastard in my left ear and made it all red. I looked in the apple store and found a nice set of normal earbuds for like $20 and snagged 'em up. They work great and fit nicely in even my deformed mutant ear.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    7. Re:headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you do know that it was made up...?

      Well, I am inclined to disagree.

    8. Re:headphones by beeshman · · Score: 1

      I once thought the iPod headphones were crappy and uncomfortable until I put the little black covers over the ear pieces. It makes them more comfortable and also seems to beef the bass up a bit -- probably fitting a little more snugly and able to resonate a bit.

    9. Re:headphones by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Could be, or maybe they just don't want to get mugged. White iPod headphone do a great job of saying "I've got an expensive, easy to steal piece of electronics on me."

      Yeah, because you just know there's a mugger around every corner on the Microsoft Campus...

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    10. Re:headphones by Coopa · · Score: 1

      It wasn't an urban myth here. The slashdot article that was on here http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/30/ 1631231&tid=176&tid=3 was released by my local police authority. There were reports of people in this area being targeted as the bright white earphones are highly visible.

    11. Re:headphones by zieroh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could be, or maybe they just don't want to get mugged

      Yeah, I hear that crime is a real problem on the Microsoft campus.

      Besides, employees mugging each other is just an outward symptom of working for a company that's mugging everyone else.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    12. Re:headphones by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Only problem with the iPod is the battery. Which is virtually dead in a year if you don't recharge at will. Headphones and sound was never an issue. Accessories I'd blame Griffith technology first.

    13. Re:headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://headroom.headphone.com/layout.php

      Go here for all sorts of info on good headphones. There are both expensive and inexpensive alternatives.

    14. Re:headphones by halivar · · Score: 1

      I certainly keep hearing about these muggings that happen to all these people wearing iPods in [...] especially large, patrolled software giant campuses.

      I don't know. I just bought a copy of Windows XP Home, and I feel pretty robbed right now.

    15. Re:headphones by EnglishSteve · · Score: 1

      If you *really* want to hear what music on an iPod should sound like, go here:

      http://www.etymotic.com/

      I have a set of the ER-6i in-ear headphones and all I can say is... Wow. They're not cheap, but the sound quality difference is amazing.

    16. Re:headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could just be that they find those headphones uncomfortable. I love my iPod but I could only put up with those headphones for about a day before replacing them. I don't know if you need to be squarely in the reality distortion field to like them or what. They're just terrible.

      If you want earbud headphones go with the high end Sony ones (don't have the model # handy; sorry)

    17. Re:headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know quite a few iPod users who ditched the headphones because of their poor quality. Most of them actually liked the style, but couldn't bear to keep using them over other more comfortable and better sounding headphones.

    18. Re:headphones by legirons · · Score: 1

      White iPod headphone do a great job of saying "I've got an expensive, easy to steal piece of electronics on me."

      And walking out of a Microsoft Office at 6pm doesn't?

    19. Re:headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that many MS employees live in downtown Seattle? While not a ghetto, it isn't exactly the safest place to walk around in flashing high value items.

    20. Re:headphones by velocipenguin · · Score: 0

      And walking out of a Microsoft Office at 6pm doesn't?

      Well, Clippy the paper clip certainly doesn't have much room to conceal small electronic devices, and I'm not sure who else would be walking out of Microsoft Office...

      --

      Move 'sig'. For great justice!
    21. Re:headphones by frinkster · · Score: 1

      I personally know someone that was mugged for her iPod. I actually thought it was strange because it happened in the "safe" environment of her university campus instead of the neighborhood she lives in, which is not the best neighborhood in the city.

  9. Could it be by CDOS_CDOS+run · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you imagine people using the most popular product of it's kind?? I bet many of them drive HONDAS too!!!! What will Bill do?? Micorsoft doesn't compete with Apples Ipod, why would anyone at Microsoft care?

    1. Re:Could it be by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Micorsoft doesn't compete with Apples Ipod, why would anyone at Microsoft care?

      Yeah , right. Its just a coincidence that most (and I think all) other music players use MS based software and run WMV files (which the iPod doesn't).

    2. Re:Could it be by hillg3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Microsoft does compete in a way. Since iPod owners can't buy their music on music.msn.com they're losing money to Apple.

    3. Re:Could it be by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does in fact compete with the iPod. The iPod's file format of choice is of course AACs' bought from iTunes. Microsoft has a lot of money invested in their DRM music format (WMA). WMA's will not play on your iPod at all. So while they don't compete with the "hardware" per say, they most definitly compete with the file format that is used.

    4. Re:Could it be by slagdogg · · Score: 1

      I bet many of them drive HONDAS too!!!!

      Having been to the MS campus many times, Hondas are a rare sight. Porsches seem to be the transport of choice, but I've also seen Ferraris and Lambos amongst the scores of 'Vettes and Vipers. These sightings were far more common 5 years ago, but there are still quite a few of the "big stock winner" MS employees still grinding away there.

      --
      (Score:-1, Wrong)
    5. Re:Could it be by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1
      I bet many of them drive HONDAS too!!!!
      The WMV format competes with AAC - if a person buys and iPod, Microsftisn't getting royalties for the WMV format. Also iPod users are more likely to buy tunes from iTMS, not Microsoft's competeing music store.

      On a side note, though, I am so not looking foreward to the day that Microsoft starts making auto parts to "compete" with Honda.
      At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 mi/gal."

      Recently General Motors addressed this comment by releasing the statement "Yes, but would you want your car to crash twice a day?"

      So here's what would happen if Microsoft made cars:
      1. Every time they repainted the lines on the road you would have to buy a new car.
      2. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason, and you would just accept this, restart and drive on.
      3. Occasionally, executing a manoeuvre would cause your car to stop and fail and you would have to re-install the engine. For some strange reason, you would accept this too.
      4. You could only have one person in the car at a time, unless you bought "Car95" or "CarNT". But, then you would have to buy more seats.
      5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast, twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.
      6. The Macintosh car owners would get expensive Microsoft upgrades to their cars, which would make their cars run much slower.
      7. The oil, gas and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single "general car default" warning light.
      8. New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.
      9. The airbag system would say "are you sure?" before going off.
      10. If you were involved in a crash, you would have no idea what happened.
      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    6. Re:Could it be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, Redundant -1, Off Topic -1, Lame poster

    7. Re:Could it be by krel · · Score: 1

      They might not necessarily be losing money to Apple since the iPod supports plain-jane AAC and MP3 (and a bunch of other formats) in addition to music from the iTunes Music Store. Less than 1% of the music on my iPod came from iTMS. Also, I doubt Microsoft would be making any money off their online music store anyways (uninformed assumption), seeing as Apple doesn't make any money off its store.

      --
      karma: ouch!
    8. Re:Could it be by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Micorsoft doesn't compete with Apples Ipod

      Er, yes it does. They license the Windows Media technology to the same hardware manufacturers who could be licensing the iPod. Also WMP's audio functionality competes (or tries to) with iTunes.

    9. Re:Could it be by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't produce car (thank god).

      Wondering what would happen if they did? First your post would be insightful instead of funny :) and

      http://www.vbrad.com/pf.asp?p=Misc/hum_ms_cars.htm

      MS guys posting AC, don't check that URL or... Evil Bill gets you :)

  10. Best comment ever, from a M$ manager by dmuth · · Score: 4, Funny
    Straight from the article:
    But at the Windows Digital Media Group, which is charged with software for portable players and the WMA format, using an iPod is not a good career move.

    "In the media group they all smoke the company dope on that one," the manager said.


    So a Microsoft manager is comparing their own products to mind-altering substances? I won't dispute that!

    1. Re:Best comment ever, from a M$ manager by CactusInvasion · · Score: 1

      The best defense: I was here trying to get WMAs working on it, boss! See, then we can convert all those iPod users to us! Honest!

  11. Here comes Bill! by Pirogoeth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quick! Put that thing away!

    --
    Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
  12. This makes no sense... by dook43 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why would people who spend all day on the computer have portable music players?

    --
    This comment was randomly generated by a school of piranhas chewing on the PCB of a Microsoft Natural Keyboard.
    1. Re:This makes no sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Why would people who spend all day on the computer have portable music players?

      Plug the player into a dock at your work & home PC then pump music through the computer speakers while the thing charges.

    2. Re:This makes no sense... by slimak · · Score: 5, Funny

      At my work, we are not allowed to use company resources for personal use. This includes playing audio CDs on our computers, playing digital audio on our workstations, etc. So a portable player is a good solution. I should probably not be posting to slashdot either...hmmm.

    3. Re:This makes no sense... by Cassius105 · · Score: 1

      because they want to bring there music collection into work and listen to it

      and i dont think the sys admins would appreciate people filling the hard drives with mp3s

    4. Re:This makes no sense... by hab136 · · Score: 1
      Why would people who spend all day on the computer have portable music players?

      So you have something to listen to while you're staring at that blue screen!

      (And seriously, because it's more convenient, no syncing problems, etc)

    5. Re:This makes no sense... by jargoone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because all my music is on my portable. I am not permitted to have my music collection on my work system. A DVD would work, but I would still need 4 of them, and I'm too lazy to switch. I have my iPod on me anyway, I just get here and drop it into the dock. Plus, I don't lose my music when I reboot with a newly-built kernel. :-)

    6. Re:This makes no sense... by Sesticulus · · Score: 0

      Because you have all your playlist, music, etc. set up on your home computer. Because your company won't let you put unapproved software on your machine to play your music. Because your company still puts 20gig harddrives in brand new machines, the corporate image only needs 15gig, and best of all because you're hoping you'll meet one of those fabled hot chicks that want to plug their headphones into your ipod (only to find out that you're a closet show tunes fan).

      Lots of reasons to carry a portable even when you sit in front of a machine.

    7. Re:This makes no sense... by shurikt · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's pretty draconian. Do they let you use their air-conditioning during lunch, or do you have to go outside?

    8. Re:This makes no sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the bus ride home?

      Because we're not allowed to put gigantic collections of MP3's on our desktops?

      Because we don't even have soundcards?

    9. Re:This makes no sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because their Windows PC's keep crashing?

    10. Re:This makes no sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the computer they are starring at, doesen't have a sound card.

      Thus the iPod shuffle I bought.

    11. Re:This makes no sense... by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Sometimes NO amount of money they offer for a job is worth it.

    12. Re:This makes no sense... by karnal · · Score: 1

      1. Never tempt company policy when it comes to their machine and their network. (Of course, I shoudln't be posting on slashdot right now, but oh well.)

      2. In my case, I bought a Zen because I can't stand the fact that my laptop, once every 5 seconds, makes noise on the output stage of the sound card. Not noticable on speakers at normal volume, but with headphones you can pick it up easily...

      So, I'll sum it up -- I don't want fired, and I don't like noise with my music...

      --
      Karnal
    13. Re:This makes no sense... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's not that unusual, really. Many companies have a policy on the books, at least, that says something along the lines of "employees have no right to use company assets for personal use". This means that you have no right to use your computer to play music, and no right to use the internet connection or e-mail service for anything not-work-related.

      There are some good reasons for this. First of all, it's the rationale that justifies things like web and e-mail filtering, restricting employees from installing spyware, etc. Basically, it's not your computer. It's the business's computer, and they can do with it as they please.

      Now, how severely enforced this policy is is a different matter. I've uninstalled spyware and deleted pirated software/music from computers. I've even deleted large portions of legal mp3 collections when a user complained that their computer was "broken", and it turned out their 40 GB hard drive was filled with 35 GB of music. I've filtered out inappropriate web sites and viewed user e-mail without explicit permission from that user. I would usually warn the user, but if it's not feasible, I don't feel that I've wronged them by doing these things.

      Why? Bottom line: it's not your computer. If you don't want your mp3 collection deleted, don't put it on the company's computer. If you don't want me to be able to read your e-mail, don't use the company's e-mail. If you don't want me to know what you look at online, don't use the company's internet connection. I tell everyone this upfront, too.

    14. Re:This makes no sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure hope you don't work for an ISP.

    15. Re:This makes no sense... by shurikt · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Don't save your Mp3s on my network drives, or I will delete them without warning. But! Not being able to use the CD drive to listen to music? How could that possibly have any effect on company resources? What, because it might wear out more quickly? Is it okay if I use the headphone jack? That's what I was responding to. And I still think it's draconian.

    16. Re:This makes no sense... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Informative
      I agree that I don't see the purpose of restricting users ability to listen to music CDs, except for two things. First, in the abstract, it's their property and they have the right to do it. That doesn't mean it makes sense, but you have the right to do nonsensical things with your own property. Second, it's possible that there is a good reason for this restriction you and I aren't thinking of.

      I've disabled and even removed CD drives from machines. Usually, it's because I was making a kiosk that would sit in a public place. However, I can remember one instance where the employee kept loading games onto his machine (ones that could be run after copying, without an install, so locking down permissions didn't help).

      The guy complained his computer was slow and getting errors, and it turned out to be a bunch of games running in the background. When we told him to close his games, he complained to his supervisor that we wouldn't "fix" his computer, and we explained to the supervisor that he was playing games. Rather than fire the guy outright, the supervisor asked us if we could keep him from playing games. I disabled his CD drive.

      So all I'm saying is, having worked in IT but not knowing the specifics of this situation, I can't completely rule out the possibility that there's a reasonable (non-draconian) explanation as to why they wouldn't allow employees to use their computers for playing music.

    17. Re:This makes no sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't completely rule out the possibility that there's a reasonable (non-draconian) explanation as to why they wouldn't allow employees to use their computers for playing music.

      Possibly... They don't want their employees listening to music on the job? Wearing headphones in an environment that requires human interaction is a pretty antisocial thing to do.

      Perhaps a manager had it with employees who didn't (or pretended not to) hear the person five feet away trying to get their attention because they had headphones on.

  13. RTFA by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most of the competitors to the iPod use Microsoft software:

    Of course, Microsoft's software is used by dozens of competing music players from manufacturers like Creative Technology, Rio and Sony. Its Windows Media Audio, or WMA, format is supported by several online music stores, including Napster, Musicmatch and Wal-Mart.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  14. MS tasteless again? by CactusInvasion · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think it'd be a total coup for Bill to be seen with one and just say offhandedly, "Oh, they're pretty good" and then go back to whatever he was doing. It boggles the mind that management at Microsoft has nothing better to do than chase down iPod users. That employees think they have to hide them is frightening. I can only imagine that meeting with the boss: "Uhh, yeah. We've seen you using an MP3 player made by someone other than us. We're going to have to let you go."

  15. So? by jonr · · Score: 0, Troll

    IPod (iPod?) is _the_ most popular mp3 player, why not on MS campus? Does MS even make a mp3 player? /slow news day, eh?

  16. First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by Zemplar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here you have it folks. Not everyone at Microsoft is hatching ill-conceived ideas; apparently it's only the Management.

    1. Re:First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      On a serious note, as much as we at Slashdot love to bash M$ and its employees, people need to realize something. When you have the kind of money Microsoft has, you don't hire run of the mill employees. You hire the best, because you can afford the best. Make no mistake, there are some SMART people over there, its just that they get tied down by stupid rules, policies, and corporate visions. And this is a perfect example.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      I'd be the first to agree with you.

      However, at this point during my workday comic relief is more welcome than rational and insightful comments. I read /. for fun and for the occasional informational tidbit; not the other way around.

    3. Re:First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I understand your point. Are we supposed to cut MS slack because they take brilliant people and turn out bad products?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      No, my point is to make people realize that there's hardly a bunch of morons over at M$. It just so happens that the few morons there are seem to be running the show. Or rather, they may not be morons, they just don't have their customers (or employees) best interests at heart.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by 3263827 · · Score: 1

      That's a non sequitur. Microsoft hires the best talent that applies to MS, not necessarily the best talent in the industry. Lots of smart people are uninterested in working for MS, and money doesn't necessarily change that, especially for the best in the industry. They can get jobs anywhere they want.

    6. Re:First Sign of Intelligent Life at Microsoft! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      First sight? They've had a Mac Business Unit for years!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. Wow, that certainly is surprising... by Rakthar · · Score: 1, Insightful
    So, if we look at the numbers:

    The Ipod owns 80% of the digital media player market.

    Of the MS employees who own a digital media player, 80% of them own Ipods.

    So this means that MS employees are just regular people who happen to work at Microsoft?

    This story is analogous to a breaking headline such as "Pizza hut driver seen eating Dominos!" "Adidas executive wears Nike for his morning run!" "Pepsi bottler drinks Coca-Cola at hot dog stand!"

  18. And you expected...? by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

    Well, Microsoft workers or not, they all know what the best MP3 player is out there. I don't see too much of a problem as there isn't any direct competition that I know of. There are no Microsoft-branded HD MP3 players out there. I understand the incongruency of this, but it's not like I can blame them for having good taste.

    --
    Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    1. Re:And you expected...? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      good taste? an iPod is just like any other over-priced conspicious consumption item. See "Pimp my ride" Just because something looks nice and is expensive doesn't mean it's good taste.

  19. Apple Employees are as much a consumer as you are. by teiresias · · Score: 1

    Would management be pleased that their employees were using the Rio's or any of the other mp3 products out there? Is this because Microsoft has some displeasure of it's employees using a product that were not made by Microsoft? If that's so is the MS I-Pod killer that far around the corner?

    Seriously, it's an I-pod. Get over it. If it was effecting their productivity that would be one thing but I doubt it's the case. And get over the fact that MS employees are using I-Pods. They're as much a consumer as you are.

    --
    -Teiresias
  20. This Just In! by Smegma4U · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The iPod is the most popular music player just about anywhere you would look, whether it be a company, school, or recreational area.

    That's because they have the largest market share of any MP3 manufacturer.

    It's not like M$ has their own branded player yet...

    --
    If it's supposed to move and doesn't, use WD-40. If it moves and it shouldn't, use duct tape.
  21. outside their firewall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MS has an unsecured network for test projects - a little bird told me that when launching iTunes on this unsecured network (from within the MS campus) you can see dozens, if not hundreds of shared iTunes libraries--all being shared by Rendezvous.

    1. Re:outside their firewall... by Queer+Boy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      when launching iTunes on this unsecured network (from within the MS campus) you can see dozens, if not hundreds of shared iTunes libraries--all being shared by Rendezvous.

      Microserfs have stated quite a few times that the Macintosh Business Unit (MacBU) is one of their most profitable divisions. They do little to no advertising for Microsoft Office on Macintosh and most of the innovations for the Windows version of Office are created by the MacBU, being implemented in the Mac version of Office first. Does the Windows version of Word have Notebook view yet?

      I'm not at all suprised that you would find a horde of iTunes shared libraries when they have a pretty healthy team working on a profitable product.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:outside their firewall... by cocotoni · · Score: 1
      Does the Windows version of Word have Notebook view yet?

      You can do it, but with another product of the Office suite - OneNote.

      OneNote has appeared for Windows in the Office 2003 suite, so before Mac Office 2004.

      In fact OneNote is a great product, except for a brain-dead omission of the search-and-replace feature. I have never seen a text-editing product without such feature. Hell, even edlin can do the replace.

    3. Re:outside their firewall... by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does advertise the Mac version of Office in the Mac magazines like MacAddict and Macworld. Also, the tv ads for Office likely benefit the Mac product as well.

      --
      End of Line.
  22. iPod comments by ButtNutt · · Score: 0

    As a die hard PC/MSFT user, I have to say that the iPod is really the pinnacle of mp3 players. The look/feel is clearly superior to any other products. Plus you also get some "trendy" intangible benifits similar to the ones Starbucks and Banana Republic bestow. You cannot underestimate that. Finally, my thoughts are that Bill kinda likes Apple being there as "anti-monopoly" insurance. Apple is trying to venture into the set top box territory with the miniMac, so there is a little competition with Windows Media Center so it will be interesting to see how that space shapes up...

  23. and who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    who cares, good lord it is a stupid little music player, not teh end all of everything.

    last time i checked MS doesnt make a portable music player either.

    1. Re:and who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most "ipod killers", are MSFT players.

      Your are teh lamest AC on slashdot.

  24. A matter of time by Enevitable · · Score: 1, Funny

    Until microsoft makes their own branded MP3, I can't imagine the DRM fiasco that would be

  25. The Simple Truth by SpottedKuh · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the cutest line of TFA is:

    Neither Apple nor Microsoft responded to requests for comment.

    Apple need not say anything; the article said it all. As for Microsoft, there simply is nothing they could say.

  26. Insight into the campus here... by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually work for Microsoft (gasp! and I also read Slashdot!). My cube-mate owns an iPod. I remember the week after MSN Music was launched, he took his iPod with him into the cafeteria. He was waiting in line to grab his lunch and noticed that people kept cutting in front of him in line. He couldn't figure out what the heck was going on until he realized the people cutting in front were all from the music division. They had seen the white earphones and were "punishing" him for going with the competitor.
    Sometimes people can be very petty here.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft is staffed entirely by cocks from what I can tell.

      No wonder their software is so full of holes.

    2. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you really work at MS? You don't see cube farms at MS, folks get thier own office with a door.

    3. Re:Insight into the campus here... by douthat · · Score: 1

      he ... noticed that people kept cutting in front of him in line. ... They ... were "punishing" him for going with the competitor.

      I bet that, at recess, he was beat up for playing with --ugh-- girls! (GROSS!) Then the teacher then put him in time-out for tattling.

      Seriously, that sounds like a bunch kindergardeners. I think he should have been compelled to cut in front of THEM for making such an uncompelling product!

      It's funny. Laugh

      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    4. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got cut in front of the other day at the checkout at Staples. I did not have an iPod. Can you be insightful and explain to me why that person cut in front of me?
      Did your friend say anything to them? If not then he/she is just a freaking wimp and that is probably why they cut in line.

      Why do people with iPods think the world is out to get them or the world is so happy and excited by their presence? You bought a product from a company. You are not part of that product, you have NOTHING to do with that product, that product does not make you the center of attention. Your only connection with that product is you paid for it just as any one else in the world can do the same. No difference with buying an exotic car. The only connection you have with that car is money you laid out for it. That does not make you a special person or part of what makes the product appear special.

    5. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Contractors get cubes, full-time employees get offices with doors. Remember that MS usually has twice as many contractors as employees, and for many contractors the holy grail is a full-time job.

      Posted AC for a reason...

    6. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Pendersempai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Holy cow. What an incisive summary of Microsoft's attitude, from the grandest corporate strategy all the way down to the microcosmic world of the individual employee.

    7. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously your friend is completely clueless regarding proper queue behavior. If someone cuts in line you call them on it and if it is food line, shoving them back out of the queue is acceptable behavior.

    8. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the Microsoft corporate environment create such an attitude in their employees, or does the company simply attract people who already have that attitude?

    9. Re:Insight into the campus here... by mapmaker · · Score: 4, Funny
      My cube-mate owns an iPod.

      Are you saying that Microsoft employees have to share cubicles? You don't even get your own grey box to sit in?

    10. Re:Insight into the campus here... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Both. Based on the grads that they recruited from my college, I would say that it's a requirement to be a jerk. The first time they came to our campus was the first time anyone needed to complain to the placement office about recruiters harrassing students.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    11. Re:Insight into the campus here... by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean you were a Microsoft employee...

    12. Re:Insight into the campus here... by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

      Not in my experience (6 years ago or so).

      4 permatemps in an office with room enough for 4 tables and workstations - but no more.

      And that one guy kept playing the same CD. With that whiney "Where are all the Cowboys" song.

    13. Re:Insight into the campus here... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Good grief. If people were being that petty in my building, I'd have called them out publicly on it.

    14. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your only connection with that product is you paid for it just as any one else in the world can do the same. No difference with buying an exotic car. The only connection you have with that car is money you laid out for it

      Geez, what are you? A piece of wood? People do have connections to the products they buy, especially that contribute to their image. It's called emotional attachment. Have you seen guys so proud of their new sports car or motorcycles? How about cell phones? Or clothes? And yes, products do say something about your personality. Shy girls will not wear clothes that barely hide their boobs. Wimpy guys will not ride Harley and wear spiked leather jackets. Conservatives people won't be caught dead with eyebrow, lip and tongue piercings and tattoos. They only pay money for them, but they do have attachments to them. Not physical nor rational, but attachment notheless.

    15. Re:Insight into the campus here... by tgd · · Score: 1

      That was my experience visiting there, too.

      I didn't see a cube in any of the buildings I was in.

    16. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great goggly moogly.

      Jeebus help me if I ever become some idiotic corporate drone who acts in such a petty manner.

      Leave the man be. It's his money. He can buy what he wants.

    17. Re:Insight into the campus here... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      He couldn't figure out what the heck was going on until he realized the people cutting in front were all from the music division.

      Now, in other workplaces where you have some friendly competition this could be a common scene. But I suspect that in a friendly workplace, they would joke about it in a way that he'd understand that it was just a tounge-in-cheek joke and not any malice behind it.

      If, and only if, this is something that happens in the Microsoft cafeteria, it is not a place I'd work. I rather prefer the "Oh, you're using the iPod! Yeah that's a kickass product. You know, we have to build something even better and cooler and push those smug Apple guys off the throne. So long, enjoy your iPod while I sneak in front of you as a punshment for using it *snicker*"-approach.

    18. Re:Insight into the campus here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? How about "made up," just like the original article.

    19. Re:Insight into the campus here... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      He was waiting in line to grab his lunch and noticed that people kept cutting in front of him in line.

      Yeah, welll you should see the Windows GUI team and the Mac Business Unit. Whenever the Mac BU fets praise for inventing things and concepts that surface in Office for Windows two years later, the Windows GUI team BEATS UP the Mac team and STEAL their lunch money.

      Don't even get started on the Unix services team and the Patent Lawyer team...

  27. iPods at MS, Windows at Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked at Sun Microsystems New York Office, the majority of Java developers & managers carried Dell laptops loaded with Windows. No Solaris & not even Linux. Reasoning - Java JRE 1.3 ran best on Wondows, & that is what 90% of their Wall St clients used as well. Who cud argue with that ?

  28. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why the hell would they use Macs? That's just plain stupid.

    1. Re:No by SunFan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why the hell would they use Macs?

      Everyone needs a role model.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    2. Re:No by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Why the hell shouldn't they? MS makes some of the biggest Mac apps. after all.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:No by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And I suppose the Mac version of Office is developed on Windows machines and never tested?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably true, looking at how flaky it is.

    5. Re:No by Sarth · · Score: 1
      And I suppose the Mac version of Office is developed on Windows machines and never tested?

      That would explain a few things...

      --

      ... and, so began, the legend of the Five-point Atkins Exploding Heart Technique!

  29. It's natural. by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

    The iPod has the best user interface and best looks of any hard disc player out there. Sure, it doesn't have ogg vorbis support and it is a little expensive, but it still beats all the competition that I'm aware of. It's got tonnes of geek appeal - of course every programmer is going to want one!

    If Bill doesn't like it then Microsoft should bring out their own product. It worked with the XBox...

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
  30. This could work for David Letterman by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 1

    Remember his old NBC / CBS jokes....a variation on them....could work for other companies.

    1. Dave, you are recording the program now, what do you watch when you go home.

    Of course, Leno - who watches CBS?

    2. Today Les Moonves (CBS Boss) had a busy day. There are so many series to review, so many decisions to make, such a tough life. So when he reached home, he relaxed watching an episode of Friends on NBC.

    I am sure other jokes can be built. But you have to imagine Dave speaking for these to have some effect.

    I personally recall working in Reebok and a colleague wearing Nikes, and the trouble he got from management.

    Slightly off topic, but I hope "Funny" moderators.

  31. Well... by astebbin · · Score: 1

    It's not like people are going to walk around with Media Center PC's slung around their backs.

    Though I am sure that somewhere, someone has tried to do this and ended up flat on their back with several hundred dollars of busted equipment that didn't work right in the first place...

  32. So what they need ... by airrage · · Score: 1

    So what they need is a iPod case mod. Something plastic and industrial looking that would "snap-on" over the iPod.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  33. Amazing that corp security allows them by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A 40Gb writable device that easily attaches to one's computer.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooo and we all have admin provilidges on our machines ... and laptops with CD burners.

      Microsoft trusts its employees.

    2. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by nick_davison · · Score: 0, Troll

      A 40Gb writable device that easily attaches to one's computer.

      Yeah, but Microsoft knows that all of their PCs run Windows and hence will never stay up long enough to write that kind of data anyway.

      Security through ineptitude. It's the new rage.

    3. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by Ironsides · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      >A 40Gb writable device that easily attaches to one's computer.

      Yeah, but Microsoft knows that all of their PCs run Windows and hence will never stay up long enough to write that kind of data anyway.


      We get great uptime here at work and at home. Last time we rebooted was to install security updates. All PCs we have that are not on the network go for months without rebooting. Uptime is not a problem. Patching is.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by winkydink · · Score: 1
      Which explains how source code was posted to the net recently.

      Any organization of sufficient size has untrustworthy people. Any.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the fact that they trust their employees here. We're admins on our computers, and can more or less install the software we want - other than stuff that threatens network security or legal issues, for obvious reasons. People install games on their machines, music, etc.

      The culture really is different than many other companies. It's an amazing place to work. I have not once regretted coming to work here. And I used to be one of the Slashdot hordes bashing the place as 'evil'.

    6. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's not forget email, phone, paper. Maybe we should also restrict movement inside and out of buildings, force them to live inside their office while you're at it.

      Security is built against external threats, the incentive for not leaking anything is pretty strong.

    7. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Email can be logged and tracked. Hard to move 40Gb over the phone or on paper.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    8. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Windows has indeed gotten stable enough that the jokes about instability sound tired, but it's not bulletproof yet. Just last week I got a bluescreen from the adobe svg viewer 6 beta by loading an svg file that was 100 percent to spec. A simple browser plugin shouldn't be able to do a division by zero in kernel space (which is what I surmise caused the bluescreen), even if it is only beta.

      And ofcourse, there is still the file locking problem you mention that causes the need for a reboot when some types of updates are installed. If only windows had inodes.

    9. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

      Heck, I work in aerospace and I can have my iPod (after I fill out a form). I'll be instantly shot dead by cybernetic killdroids if I take it into a classified area, but in the open areas it's cool.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    10. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by nick_davison · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Definition of a troll:

      Someone who deliberately takes a contrary stance in order to garner satisfaction from the outrage of others.

      On slashdot, a joke about Microsoft's legendary insecurity and unreliability is just that... a joke. Given the audience is well known for its dislike of MS, it is hard to see how it's a deliberately contrary troll. Karmawhoring, perhaps, but not a troll.

      Going on to an extreme Christian discussion forum and stating, "God is great, pagans are bad." would be, at worst, seen as lame and immature - but certainly not trolling as it agrees with the prevailing view of that community.

    11. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you say, lame and immature. Would you be satisfied with "flamebait"?

    12. Re:Amazing that corp security allows them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Sigh] it does if it is using the video driver and there is a bug in the video driver :(

      I had one version of the nvidia video driver that would bluescreen when you scolled a window fast. ANY window, IE, Notpad, whatever. The scrolling function was "hardware" accelerated and that function caused a bug in the driver.

      Drivers are really the one remaining serious weak point of any OS. Even if they are running outside the kernel, video/sound and network drivers on Linux give me 10x the grief of any other aspect of running it.

  34. Apple beware! by warderz · · Score: 0

    The MSPod is coming soon! With numerous features, such as bsod and random skipping!

  35. What else is smuggled in? by CTO1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps there are a few employees that are sneaking in Knoppix CDs disguised as AOL disks.

  36. there has got to be a good wma--aac converter by kgruscho · · Score: 1

    if that many of the MS folk use ipods, somebody has got have a decent protected wma converter out there to put music from the media player stores onto their ipod without loss of quality.

    1. Re:there has got to be a good wma--aac converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called iTunes.

      From http://www.apple.com/itunes/import.html

      "If you're excited about using iTunes, but have already have a music collection built up in other programs, you're in luck. iTunes can import music from Windows Media Player, MusicMatch and any other app that uses MP3, AAC or WMA(unprotected).

      iTunes 4.5 will now convert files digitized by Windows Media Player in unprotected format to AAC, so you can use them in iTunes or on iPod. When you import your MusicMatch library or other MP3 collection, you can choose to let iTunes make a copy of the library, or point to the old files. If you want to gather up all your music later, iTunes lets you consolidate your library anytime."

    2. Re:there has got to be a good wma--aac converter by kgruscho · · Score: 1

      PROTECTED WMA, itunes cant do it

  37. That's nothing by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Did Bill Gates check what kind of browsers his employees are using lately? Or where they go to search the web or check e-mail. Talk about elephant in the house...

  38. Company Dope by Cliff.Braun · · Score: 1

    They have company dope? Even Google doesn't do that.

    1. Re:Company Dope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to work for a small web company for that. We often do our best work done during what has become known as 'special meetings'.

  39. Oh god. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Another day, another Apple fanboy story (and another tick on my preferences page :).

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Oh god. by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      c'mon--cut him some slack. enjoy the irony of the story.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  40. Pulp fiction time by savagedome · · Score: 2, Funny

    The way Steve looked at it, this iPod was your birthright. He'd be damned if any of the slopes were gonna get their greasy yellow hands on his boy's birthright. So he hid it in the one place he knew he could hide something: his ass. Five long months, he wore this iPod up his ass and disguised himself on the Microsoft campus. Then when he left because of dysentery, he gave me the iPod. I hid this uncomfortable piece of metal up my ass for two more months. Then, after seven months, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give the iPod to you.

    Make sure the wire coming out of the headphone jack is not too thick. Sometimes it hurts but I can tell you that once you use iPod, you will never go back.

    With apologies to Mr.Tarantino

    1. Re:Pulp fiction time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should've used an iPod Shuffle:- just like an oversized Suppository.

  41. reasons why this is an issue for MS by musikit · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. if their own employees don't buy into DRM and WMA how can expect the general public to.
    example. you work for MS. are you going to tell your parents to buy a Rio with WMA technology or an IPOD.

    2. the "eat your own dog food approach" we'll how can you tell if your cooking sucks if your not "taste testing"

    3. 7 degrees of seperation.
    I.E. MS employees X number of people (i donno exactly how many but we will say 20k for exmaple) the average family is 2.3 people. so 46k people. each of those people has say 10 friends 460k people. and 2 extended families ( round to 5) or...2.3 mil people...

    1. Re:reasons why this is an issue for MS by arnwald · · Score: 1

      Man,

      you oughta work for Wired ! You are not at all adjusting for existing family relations. 2.3 mil people is ridiculous !

      T.

      --
      My other sig is Funny.
  42. So? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    "Despite the displeasure of management, the iPod is the most popular music player on the Microsoft campus."

    If they don't like it then make their own goddamn player and sell it to their employees.

  43. as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by sootman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Robert Scoble--one of the people mentioned in the article--has already written about it. "Personally there's no way that 80% of our employees own an MP3 player. I don't know what world that source is living in, but it's not the one I live in... the story is a non-starter. I know a lot of Apple employees who play Halo 2 too. Is that a story?"

    Ed Bott has some good comments too: "Now read the story. Read it carefully.... Note that the entire thingis based on an interview with one "high-level [Microsoft] manager who asked to remain anonymous." From this one source, we are able to calculate with confidence that 16,000 employees at Microsoft's Redmond campus own iPods... taking an offhand remark from an unknown source (who may or may not have a hidden agenda and who may or may not know what he's talking about) and extrapolating it to the entire campus is just silly...
    One thing they teach you in Journalism 101 is that when you have a single anonymous source, you don't have a story. That's still true."

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by bigdaddyhame · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umm... the article said that 80% of M$ employees WHO OWN MP3 PLAYERS use iPods.

      ""About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod," said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous. "It's pretty staggering.""

      then Kahney goes on to contradict himself:

      "The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player -- that translates to 16,000 iPod users among the 25,000 who work at or near Microsoft's corporate campus."

      It doesn't translate to that - it translates to 80% of 16,000 which would be 12,000. Still a significant number.

      --
      ---- You are fully entitled to my opinion.
    2. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by bigdaddyhame · · Score: 1

      sorry, my mental calculator broke - 80% of 16,000 is 12,800.

      --
      ---- You are fully entitled to my opinion.
    3. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by sootman · · Score: 1

      Yes, it says that, and it ALSO says 80% of ALL EMPLOYEES own MP3 players as well. Read it again, carefully. (Sorry for the caps, too lazy for (em) tags.)

      ""About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod," said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous. "It's pretty staggering." The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player"

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      No, the math is right. If 80% of 25,000 people own a music player, that's 20,000. If 80% of 20,000 people own an iPod, that's 16,000. The math is right on.

      Whether the facts are right or not is another question entirely.

    5. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by klang · · Score: 1

      Well, it also asumes that 100% of all Microsoft employees have a music player, which I seriously doubt.

      White earbuds are seen and frowned upon because it's an Apple product, so what?

      It should actually be frowned upon because it's a high capacity/speed storage device ideal for industrial espionage ...

    6. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by gunnk · · Score: 2, Informative

      No --

      80% of MS employees have a player.
      80% of those employees have an iPod.
      Total number of employees on campus is 25,000.

      (0.8)(0.8)(25,000)=16,000

      The original article is correct.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    7. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by waltmarkers · · Score: 1

      Actually, your math is very wrong. Let me help.

      25,000 X .80 = 20,000

      20,000 X .80 = 16,000

      The author was correct. Please return to your scheduled nitpicking.

    8. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      One thing they teach you in Journalism 101 is that when you have a single anonymous source, you don't have a story. That's still true.

      You need to be on Nicholas Ciarelli's (AKA Nick dePlume) legal defense!

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    9. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know a lot of Apple employees who play Halo 2 too. Is that a story?

      No, Apple employees playing Halo 2 is not a story, since Apple doesn't make anything to remotely compete with Halo 2, a video game only available on Microsoft's Xbox platform.

      If however, Apple employees were buying Windows PCs in order to play Halo (the original) which has been ported to OS X then that _would_ be a story.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    10. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet it sucks on a mac, just like everything else.

    11. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Bet it sucks on a mac, just like everything else.

      That was a good one! You really showed me.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    12. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Darth · · Score: 1

      Bet it sucks on a mac, just like everything else.

      I agree. Halo sucked on everything else it ran on. Why would it be any different on the mac?

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    13. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by sootman · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Well, it also asumes that 100% of all Microsoft employees have a music player, which I seriously doubt.

      No, it doesn't. God, how many times do we have to do this? The article may not be perfectly written, but here's what it says.

      "The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player."

      and

      " 'About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod,' said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous. 'It's pretty staggering.' "

      Got it?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    14. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by real+gumby · · Score: 1
      Yea, there were problems with TFA but Scoble's comment is bogus. TFA said that 80% of players on campus were iPods:
      "About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod,"
      Otherwise, yea, the article's probably rubbish, but perfectly reasonable it's-funny-laugh material.
    15. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by ms47 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the article says that 80% OF THOSE WHO HAVE DIGITAL MUSIC PLAYERS have an iPod. This, is believable.

    16. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Razzberry28 · · Score: 1

      It's 80% of those who have music players, not 80% of the employees. That's how I read it anyways.

    17. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Personally there's no way that 80% of our employees own an MP3 player.


      I love it when supposedly sharp individuals, that would like us to listen to what they say and change our point of view to match their's display juvenile reading comprehension. The line from the Wired article was: "About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod" That's not saying 80% of M$ employees, that's 80% of those with MP3 players. Heck, if that number was 5, then that would be a whopping 4 iPods on campus (another term they "borrowed" from Apple). Admittedly, his reading comprehension may not be crap, he may just be assuming the readers' IQ's are barely double digits and think a comment like that refutes what was actually said and therefore there's not a single shred of truth in the whole article.
    18. Re:as usual, take wired with a grain of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, take another look at the article: "The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player." That's what Scoble was referring to.

      And you slam other people's reading comprehension?

  44. In other news... by GbrDead · · Score: 1

    ... most Microsoft employees run Linux at home and discuss Apache configuration problems at the coffee corners using a special code language :-)

  45. And this matters because... by slungsolow · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah.. I forgot that iPods don't work within the windows operating...

    Oh wait... no... One of the reasons that the iPod is so damn popular is because it works on the windows operating system. Why in god's name would Billy get upset over a piece of hardware being used? For that matter, why would he get upset with a piece of hardware being used that his company doesn't even compete against.

    This would make more sense if microsoft had a handheld gaming unit, and everyone on the redmond campus was walking around with a DS or a PSP. I can see him getting pissed in that case.

    1. Re:And this matters because... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      >> For that matter, why would he get upset with a piece of hardware being used that his company doesn't even compete against.

      A lot of people keep asking this. I don't know for certain, but I strongly suspect that Microsoft gets a bit of money for every player sold that has WMA format support. If not, I -know- they get a bit of money for every song sold in WMA format. Not many of those songs being sold for iPod users, eh?

      Don't look at competition on a product-to-product basis. Look at it on a dollar-to-dollar basis.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:And this matters because... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      It's about control. Microsoft owns WMA and can use it as a strategic weapon. Microsoft has no control over the technology in the iPod.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:And this matters because... by EricWright · · Score: 1

      I'm nearly 100% certain they get royalties for every WMA capable device sold. This happened with gif and/or jpeg patent holders (i forget which, possibly both) and digital cameras.

      Every iPod sold is a non-WMA-compatible device that lines Apple's coffers, but does nothing for BillG and SteveB. Naturally, the people in charge of Microsoft won't like this. Of course, the solution is obvious. Build a better device and people will buy it. Well, I won't because I don't intend to let MS have any of my cash, but "people" will.

  46. It goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "they seem just fine to me"

    Right.

    Now do you understand why so many people use windows? It seems fine to them!

    So if you can accept that people who have a little knowledge know that Windows sucks, why can you not accept that people who know what good sound is know that the Apple iPod earpuds suck?

    Seriously, think it through.

  47. I can only imagine.... by astebbin · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hey! You with the iPod, put it away right now!"

    "Yes sir, sorry sir."

    "Ok, just make sure it never happens again. Wait a minute... is that Knoppix running on your workstation?!? Bill, for the last time..."

  48. Best Quote: by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    "But at the Windows Digital Media Group, which is charged with software for portable players and the WMA format, using an iPod is not a good career move.

    'In the media group they all smoke the company dope on that one,' the manager said."

    Don't take the brown acid, man!

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  49. First User? by vbdrummer0 · · Score: 1

    I wonder who the first Microsoft guy was that brought an iPod onto campus. That must've taken balls.

    1. Re:First User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fedex guy?

  50. Consider whose campus it is by ianscot · · Score: 1
    these muggings that happen to all these people wearing iPods in ... large, patrolled software giant campuses.

    The mind reels with examples of ways in which Bill G. and his cohorts might go about acquiring someone else's iPod.

    Business ethics are one of the few areas in life where I honestly do think things "trickle down." Petty theft isn't at all unheard of at big corporate "campuses."

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Consider whose campus it is by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      You think that Bill Gates needs to steal an iPod?

      That's actually pretty funny.

      When you have billions, you don't need to steal a $400 mp3 player.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Consider whose campus it is by ksheff · · Score: 1

      you do it because you can.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Consider whose campus it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does if he doesn't want anyone seeing or knowing he buys an iPod. :)

  51. Re:FP? by skaffen42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes?

    No. Now grow up.

    --
    People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
  52. MSN Music employee here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    And I highly doubt anyone on this team would cut in line at the cafe because someone had an iPod. Many of us have iPods and other players. We don't discriminate.

    1. Re:MSN Music employee here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way, fuck that guy. If he can't support my hard work he can wait for lunch.

    2. Re:MSN Music employee here... by mbbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, why are you an Anonymous Coward if there is no stigma attached to using an Ipod at Microsoft?

      --

      mbbac

    3. Re:MSN Music employee here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beacuse I didn't feel like tying my name to this thread when it involves leaked corporate information (not that my post did, just in general).

    4. Re:MSN Music employee here... by micromuncher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note - We don't discriminate [we cut everyone off.]

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    5. Re:MSN Music employee here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This confirms that people in your division use the iPod, though?

  53. BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Employees have even started using different headphones to be a bit more stealthy about it."

    Bullshit Alert! Nobody is going to reprimand an individual for owning and/or using a competitive product at Microsoft. Thats simply not the way things work there and its silly to suggest it.

    1. Re:BULLSHIT! by Warlock7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, couldn't use your real name? What's the matter Ballmer? Were you afraid that somebody would castigate you for it? Eh, MonkeyBoy? :P

  54. Percentage by Leadmagnet · · Score: 1

    those percentages seem about the same as the general population. And since MS doesn't actually make or sell there own player I wouldn't be surprised.

    --
    http://www.leadmagnet.50megs.com
  55. Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for a small group in Sony. At least half the group has iPods. I'm the only non-iPod user that I know of. I have an iRiver.

    This is pretty sad as unlike Microsoft, we actually MAKE a player and get a substantial employee discount.

    (Posted anonymously for obvious reasons.)

  56. Tales from redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I brought an iPod when i worked at Redmond this summer for an internship and used it around campus. Quite a few people in my group had them as well. Can't say I ever got any "dodgy looks" or such.

    What i think it boils down to is the fact that iPods are pretty cool and pretty good at doing what they do (play digital music) - Microsoft Employees a paid pretty well, and the younger ones often love all the lastest gadgets and assorted Geekery, the ipod falls squarely into this catagory with added cool factor.

  57. They'll be fired for sure... by Whom99 · · Score: 0

    ...when they discover they've all been hacked to run Lunix

  58. I suspect the issue is battery life by sczimme · · Score: 1


    With SD Cards reaching 1GB in size, why don't people just use PDA's for music? A mystery or just an impending trend?

    It seems most people already lament the battery life of their portable devices. If a PDA's battery already is marginal [in the owner's opinion] then the additional power consumption caused by playing music for an extended period of time would be Considered Harmful.

    The power drain would come primarily from driving the speakers: even the small ones in headphones consume a certain amount of power. That, and the device would not be able to shut itself off or otherwise use some power management features.

    I also suspect that 1GB would not be enough for some people. (Please - no inane comments about that urban-legend quote from billg.)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  59. You've never been to MS, have you? by Bobdoer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are people other than programmers and testers out there. Some managers have to cross campus repeatedly to get to their meetings.



    And this may come as a surprise to you, but some people there even like to play sports and stay in shape! Not everyone there is a stereotypical /.er. ;)

  60. windows by poweredx · · Score: 1

    they prolly modified it to include windows :p

  61. Here comes Bill-Wireless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It gets a funny, but why doesn't the iPod have a wireless pair of headphones?*

    *If anyone says "power"? Remember that "/." story about beaming power through the air.

    1. Re:Here comes Bill-Wireless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would suck having to listen to the music blaring from the guy next to me on the train... or other such interference. It would probably suck even more for other people listening to MY music (for them, I enjoy what is quite possibly the worst music).

      I've actually been in many situations where in a 4 seat bench, all 4 people sitting there are listening through iPods. Imagine how bad it would be there. In larger scenarios, the cross intereference would be crazy.

    2. Re:Here comes Bill-Wireless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does. Get an FM transmitter, and get a pair of headphones with built-in radio receiver (they've gotten less bulky). Instant wireless headphones.

    3. Re:Here comes Bill-Wireless. by orasio · · Score: 1

      There's a better way.
      Why not transmit the wave info in and analog form, using low frequencies, with some air compressing-decompressing device built on the gadget itself sitting on the desk, and then pick them up with some air-wave decoding thingy that we could have in our ears??
      Think about that! you could even have no-earpiece Ipods!! that's even better than wireless.

      Well, maybe there's prior art http://www.transistor.org/collection/spica/spica.h tml

  62. Here's how you handle that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone cuts in front of you:

    1) Tap them on the shoulder
    2) Say "excuse me, but the back of the line is over there"
    3) Persist and ask "Are you purposely trying to be rude?"
    4) As they turn around step slightly forward making sure to step hard on their instep.
    5) As they start falling forward, keep pressure on their instep and appear to help but shove them backwards
    6) You'll rip up their ankle.
    7) Scream "Oh my god, he's hurt"
    8) Keep saying over and over "How did this happen? Which one of you b*stards did this?"

    Now, I wouldn't be afraid of getting my ass kicked primarily because they're a bunch of computer geeks.

    If this was a normal place that you didn't care about your job, you could literally provoke the guy so that you could cripple him for life in the name of self-defense.

    1. Re:Here's how you handle that by dmuth · · Score: 1
      Now, I wouldn't be afraid of getting my ass kicked primarily because they're a bunch of computer geeks.

      Me neither, but I would be afraid of losing my job for assaulting a fellow employee. Even of there are no witnessess, people don't just "rip up their ankle" spontaenously.

      I agree with what the others have said in this thread. Just walk away. It is indeed "petty bullshit", and it's not worth having drama over.

    2. Re:Here's how you handle that by AmericaHater · · Score: 1
      The traditional technique in this situation is;
      1. to slash his tyres;
      2. Follow him home and beat him up;
      3. Fuck is wife and infect her with Linux.

      Variations of the first two have always worked for me.

    3. Re:Here's how you handle that by avandesande · · Score: 1

      a hot, wet SBD works for me.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  63. ipods bought by many? Wow, I'm surprised. by loraksus · · Score: 1

    Can't really blame them, I'm going to get flamed for this, but it is the best player out there on the market if you just "want something to work without playing with it" and looks good while it's doing it. The interface is intuitive, the wheel is hella cool and it takes about 10 seconds to learn how to use.
    Added to that they look expensive, aren't that bulky. Not everyone at Microsoft is a programmer geek.
    The "just sync, don't bother me" feature is nice too. Sometimes you just want your stuff to work without thinking about it.

    The majority of the players out there for PC are DRM crippled and have shitty drivers, some 3rd parties even sell driver upgrades for mp3 players because the company does a shit job of it.
    Not enough allow you to mount the unit as a drive and copy the files there.
    Archos does, and they makes a bunch of nice units, but their designs are bulky, that isn't really a bad thing, they usually the newest features and their stuff is cheap and it works reliably, but it is sort of like comparing a pinto to a caddy.

    Iriver had the H20 which were great, but they've been discontinued. They have some video one now, but it looks kinda crappy.

    The article says it, people returned their Windows devices (ie PC Garbage) because they DIDN'T WORK. The Windows Digital Media division needs to get beat with the clue stick and start getting on the asses of lazy manufacturers who release shoddy products with a "windows compatible" sticker on the box.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:ipods bought by many? Wow, I'm surprised. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Not enough allow you to mount the unit as a drive and copy the files there.

      Look up MPIO and Creative. They use the USB mass storage driver. Decent designs and interfaces too.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:ipods bought by many? Wow, I'm surprised. by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Check out the new iriver http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/hd/

      Only 5 GB size, but shows photos, plays mp3s (my preferred format since it's car-stereo compatible), and is drag-and-drop in a USB storage kind of way. (So works with windows, mac, linux.)

      Also has a removeable battery (buy an extra to take with you!).

      Fits nearly every criteria I have for a music player. (Have an ipod, not satisfied.)

  64. Re:If I had their stock options... by rworne · · Score: 1

    Mac centric? You are a few years behind the curve. I'll help you catch up:

    10/23/2001 iPod announced, Mac-only
    11/2001 First 3rd party Windows workarounds appear
    7/17/2002 Apple iPod officially supports Windows along with Musicmatch jukebox
    4/28/2003 iTunes music store launched (Mac-only)
    10/16/2003 iTunes music store now supports Windows and iTunes is available for Windows

    Regarding the "draconian DRM", is there anyone else who allows several different machines to share music downloaded with one account as well as burn tracks to CD and download to a portable player?

    Finally, whether the iPod is too expensive for what it is (or not) is a personal choice and I'll leave it at that.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  65. experiencemore must be an internal site... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    The link in the article that the manager pointed employees to, http://experiencemore, doesn't seem to resolve to anything here - I wonder if that's an internal site, and what is on it? Or perhaps they just messed up the URL.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:experiencemore must be an internal site... by The+Hobo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If a website contains no TLD or main site name (for example microsoft.com) it assumes it's on a local intranet, so yes it is an internal site, for example here I can type http://ece/ and it will show me the page you would see at http://www.ece.uwaterloo.ca since I'm on the uwaterloo.ca domain's computers

      http://experiencemore is likely just an internal pointer to this site
      For your information, the same applies for mail servers, so if I send an email from this mail server using the local email service (not a webmail thing like hotmail) I can send an email to a person by sending it to user@engmail for example which, to a person outside the University network would have to user@engmail.uwaterloo.ca

      Hope this was helpful, if you already knew, I'm not trying to sound condenscending...

      --
      There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
  66. Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by ianscot · · Score: 1
    That's a sad anecdote.

    At another "campus," seeing that would have provoked a positive ton of good-natured ribbing. The person with the iPod would have given some back, and in the end maybe the music division would have gotten a(nother) quick sense of why even an MS employee could have made that choice. Might have resulted in an actual competitive advantage for the eventual MS product.

    I guess my suspicions about the level of communication at MS are pretty well verified. It's never seemed like the people writing the "outline" feature in Word were talking to the people who wrote the "styles" feature. Partly it's just a big company thing, but I dunno, I'm tempted to think there's something more there...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At another "campus," seeing that would have provoked a positive ton of good-natured ribbing. The person with the iPod would have given some back, and in the end maybe the music division would have gotten a(nother) quick sense of why even an MS employee could have made that choice. Might have resulted in an actual competitive advantage for the eventual MS product.

      Oh barf. Who fucking cares? If the original scenario actually happened you know what I would have done? Walked away. You know why? Because I just don't get involved in the petty little bullshit that goes on with workplace drama.

      If Suzy is banging Mark after work who the fuck cares? If Amy is wearing the same clothes as Jenny but only less expensive versions I just don't care.

      Stupid, petty, childish, work-place drama exists everywhere. There's no need to whine about it online and there's certainly no need to bring it up on Slashdot just because it has MSFT, Apple, and iPod contained in the story.

      Use whatever fucking MP3 player you like. Drive whatever car you want. Fuck whoever you want to fuck. Keep your mouths shut about what other people do unless it has some direct impact on your fucking job.

    2. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's telling. For example, my dad worked for a big tire company and earned his career there. Yet, I had to lower myself to buy tires from a competitor, because their tires were better for my car, and even the employee discount wasn't a good enough incentive. It's important to see companies "eating their own dogfood," because it shows confidence that they can live with their own products. The fact that Microsoft employees visibly use Apple gear might mean it is actually an act of corporate civil disobediance ("our products are so lame that I have to make a statement").

    3. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I second that! Keep work at work, and leave the drama at home.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This sounds great and all, but unfortunately, in many workplaces, the other employees just won't leave you the f**k alone, no matter how much you try to just keep to yourself and do your job without getting involved in the petty politics. These people will then decide that they don't like you, and find a way to get you fired. It's happened to my girlfriend many times in law offices. Usually, they gossip a lot, make up false allegations, and get other people to turn against you. When the HR person is turned, then you're going to be looking for a new job. If you're male, you probably don't have that much of a problem with this, but from what I've heard, being a female and working around other females is hell.

    5. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's important to see companies "eating their own dogfood," because it shows confidence that they can live with their own products.

      While this is true, how they accomplish this task is also important. For example, MS could buy every employ a WMA-based player and ban iPods, but if people were unhappy, it wouldn't accomplish much.

      At IBM, everyone is forced to use Lotus Notes, despite is extreme suckiness compared to other e-mail solutions. If there was an IMAP solution, a large chuck of the company would switch in a heartbeat, but it's simply not an option.

      So IBM employees appear to be eating their own dogfood, but it's because dog food is the only thing on the menu.

    6. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by blamanj · · Score: 1

      Here's another way not to "eat your own dog food." According to this story Sanyo employees have been requested to buy Sanyo products, presumably whether they need them or not, to limit the huge quarterly loss the company is expecting.

    7. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I betcha Mark cares. Or at least he will when he starts getting that itchy feeling.

      Suzy's been around.

    8. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's happened to my girlfriend many times in law offices.

      Maybe there is no conspiracy and your girlfriend is just an asshole.

    9. Re:Corporate culture "trickles down" that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use whatever fucking MP3 player you like. Drive whatever car you want. Fuck whoever you want to fuck. Keep your mouths shut about what other people do unless it has some direct impact on your fucking job.

      Apparently, it does. This is not some isolated incident (if the story to be believed), but part of a pattern of abusive behaviour. Not only that, apparently from the memos, the managements implicitly support that sort of behaviour by making iPod users "traitors" and what not.

      Clearly, from TFA, the managements do not agree with your attitude on "Use(-ing) whatever fucking MP3 player you like".

  67. Here are several reasons: by momus_radar · · Score: 1
    1. Keeping your digital music files on a company or school-owned computer can land you and your employer/school into some legal trouble.

    2. Some companies/schools don't like employees/students wasting their bandwidth on streaming music.

    3. It helps block out the annoying and sometimes disgusting noises your coworkers/fellow students make.

    4. The radio station at work/the common area really sucks.

    5. Because they can.

  68. Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Tell the guys as sony to open-source ATRAC & ATRAC3. Then maybe they'll get somebody else to use it.

    Or do people over there view the ATRAC* stuff as the holy grail?

  69. Not uncommon at MS by mclove · · Score: 1

    When I worked in the Pocket PC division, my boss carried around a Palm Vx. (as did many other people there, actually) They eventually started handing out free XDA's, which I believe won them a few converts...

  70. nothing new really by jackherer · · Score: 1

    I worked for Apple UK a few years ago and was told to keep a fujitsu server running nt hidden from senior management even though I was using it to support educational customers with nt servers!

  71. why its an issue by micromuncher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone who's been on the campus knows what I'm talking about...

    On campus, you gotta eat the dog food. Its the only dog food in town. No one else makes dog food. If they did, its five years old.

    In the data visualization group, Java was a currio. One member has Java books on his shelf dating back to 1997. That's the last time it was interesting, because its not the company dog food.

    So... why is it an issue? Because the blinders are comming off. All that propaganda that the boys and girls are told about the company being the only company, and the only one that does cool things, is starting to look like its passed through a reality distortion filter.

    Is there a reason why the bungie guys play golf facing towards the main parking lot?

    I remember when Wang had the ad "Wang: the chink in IBM's armor."

    How about "Apple: in the ear on Microsoft's eve."

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    1. Re:why its an issue by Gropo · · Score: 1
      I remember when Wang had the ad "Wang: the chink in IBM's armor."

      How about "Apple: in the ear on Microsoft's eve."
      Sure, works for me. The only thing is, the Wang Tower at the corner of 495 and the Lowell Connector hasn't had the the giant "WANG" sign for 20 years--in other words Wang just flat-out wasn't the "chink" in "IBM's armor" by a long shot.

      I'd really hate to see the sign at 1 Infinite loop someday read "Cognizent Nanotech" (or whatever) come 2015 because Apple refused to eventually license the FairPlay/AAC combo... Not that they have all their eggs in that one basket like Wang had with "workgroup miniframes" (or whatever they called them).

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  72. Management displeasure? by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    Somehow I find it hard to believe that Microsoft management would frown upon their employees' usage of iPods since it is after all a personal accesory of choice. Note that Microsoft does not make any music players though it does license media player technology.

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    1. Re:Management displeasure? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I agree. People assume that because most Apple people are rabidly anti-MS that MS people don't like Apple. Not true. Apple puts out some nice stuff. I personally would never buy and iPod but I understand why many people do.

  73. They don't like their dogfood.... by amberp · · Score: 1

    It seems like Playforsure http://www.playsforsure.com/Default.aspx is good...
    but not good enough for Dogfooding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eat_one's_own_dog_foo d

  74. Grammar Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was effecting their productivity...

    That's affecting. You can witness an effect or an affectation, but you affect something effectively.

  75. Inside Microsoft by iMaple · · Score: 1

    Employee1 : (Listening to music while tapping happily at his keyboard)
    Employee2: Hey u there , u cant fool me with those ugly black headphones, your face gives it away
    Emp1: Whaa... No I dont have no iPod
    Emp2: Hahaha always works, that old trick of mine
    Emp1: Nooooo its not mine, I just wanted to 'test' it you know , becos we make really better products
    Emp2: Yeah, tell me that some other time now hand that white thingy to me before I call the guards
    Emp2:(Irritated) No not the cocaine dude, who cares about a 1000$ of trash, Give me that iPop NOW!!
    Emp1: (Meekly) ok
    Emp2:(Suddenly looking at the screen) WHAT !!! Thats Gentoo!!! You gay or something !! And I cant belive it , You are posting on slashdot AGAIN !!! Bill , you are sick. The therapy is not working. How can I convince you ..Those people HATE you
    Emp1(aka Gates): But but I thought now that I run Gentoo .....

  76. Why can't they just make Windows Media Player compatible with the iPod? Windows already recognizes the iPod as an external hard drive.

    Is there some Apple rule against it?

    --
    CKSCIII
    1. Re:WMP by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of microsoft making WMP compatible with the ipod. it's a matter of apple making the ipod compatible with WMP. every company out there, it's THEIR responsibility to make their player work with WMP. microsoft would have no time if they had to develop WMP drivers for every single mp3 player out there.

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  77. who cares about Microsoft anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is becoming less and less important. I give a damn about those guys as long as they leave me alone. Actually, that's not quite true - I bought a couple hundred put options on MSFT - that stock is hoovering around 26.40 today and the company is ways beyond its peak so you can see it well below 10 by end of the year.

  78. Not suprising by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Though the note about the headphones is a good thing.

    People have been mugged because of the trademark white headphones. It's a sign that you may be carrying an expensive (in demand) iPod.

    It's actually a safety thing. Get other headphones that aren't white... and keep the iPod in your pocket. Then a casual person on the street doesn't know if you have a $5 Walmart Personal Radio or a $400 iPod.

    This reminds me of the time Microsoft fired an employee for taking a picture of a shipment of Apple PowerMac G5's arriving at Microsoft's campus. :-D

  79. Embedded tidbit on MS reacting to Google by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I found this one detail rather interesting:

    This thing would need to be built even faster than MSN Toolbar Suite (which was built in six months).

    Hmm, the MSN Toolbar done in six months. What on earth could have caused such a panic that made that possible? The Google toolbar!! That just shows how worried they are.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  80. actually.. by .Spyder78. · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it was just a fluke that you replied to mine but.. I was being terribly sarcastic. ;)

    1. Re:actually.. by schestowitz · · Score: 0

      I know, but you were the first to reply. I had to complete my statement and defend it.

      --
      My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
  81. radicality ? stupidity ? whatever by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    If the company I worked for started bugging me about me buying and using the digital music player of my choice (which I would do, being a music-fanatic all over, I listen to music almost all day long when I get the chance, wherever I am), that would really make me quit.

    I'm not kidding, I really am quite frank on this. No position of mine at a company, nor anyhow good salary could make me stay.

    If MS doesn't like their people having iPods, then wait till they start ordering G5's and running Windows under virtual machines :D

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  82. Steve Jobs used an 80x86 lap top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After NeXT was bought out, Steve Jobs used an 80x86 laptop until Apple came out with something he liked. It seems to me this kind of ``embarrassment,'' if you will, provides the incentive to produce something you feel good about, something you want to use. The difference in thinking here is interesting.

  83. WHY can't the others make usable products? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Seriously. There's something odd about this. I'm not a great Microsoft fan, but a lot of their software is reasonably usable. (Excel, for example). I like Apple's hardware, but lots of other companies make quality, thoughtfully designed PC's, laptops, and so forth.

    Digital cameras are a good example of a whole product category that have to cram globs of electronics and boatloads of figures into a tiny package, and for the most part they do it quite successfully and gracefully. It's NOT usual to hear people say "I couldn't get my digital camera to work at all" or "it froze up on me in the middle of photographing the kids' birthday party."

    The big knock on non-iPod players, echoed in many reviews of would-be "iPod killers," is that people just can't get them to work. The article says that Robert Scoble "said he's heard from several executives who dutifully bought Microsoft-powered players, tried them, failed to get them working, and returned them in favor of an iPod. He went through the same experience..."

    I won't trivialize UI design by saying "it's not rocket science," but what exactly is wrong with all of Apple's competitors? It's not as if Apple didn't have DRM.

    Are all the competitive products SO weighed down by all sorts of hidden evil goals and agendas that there's little time and effort that can be spared on serving the consumer?

    1. Re:WHY can't the others make usable products? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I own a Neuros player and I've used an iPod. My Neuros is every bit as usable as the iPod. Its firmware and software are open. It supports OGG out of the box. The CEO is an active participant in the forums. No evil agenda there.
      And it isn't as if the iPod never locks up. It does.

      I really liked your point about cameras though. I hadn't thought of that.

  84. Microsoft's not about to dominate here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... given their disappointing sales in other peripherals. How many of us have Microsoft joysticks?

  85. Sneaky? No neccessary by SgtClueLs · · Score: 1

    Using different headphones is not sneaky, it's neccesity. The ear buds are flag, muddy sounding headphones that you should throw away right now! Might I suggest some fantastic Etymotic headphones.

  86. Mugger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and his name is Bill Gates.

  87. Motorola CEO gave away free phones by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back when I used to work at Motorola in Schaumburg, the CEO sent out a company-wide email saying how he was displeased at the number of employees seen with Nokia and other non-Motorola phones. So he offered free Motorola phones to the first 1,000 employees that responded and urged the rest to buy a Motorola.

    He was especially pissed at the salesmen, trying to sign the big carriers to promote Motorola phones, who had Nokia's hanging from their belt! Makes sense for the visible people I guess.

    1. Re:Motorola CEO gave away free phones by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      You don't need to tell me that. After 2 years, I was ready to croak and decided to leave my good job behind and bail.

    2. Re:Motorola CEO gave away free phones by dcam · · Score: 1

      Earth calling Motorola: your phones are crap. I got burnt on a T720 and went back to nokia. I'd have taken almost any nokia in preference to any Motorola. My advice to Motorola: Build a usable, responsive interface.

      There may be a similar attitude to MP3 players at Microsoft.

      --
      meh
    3. Re:Motorola CEO gave away free phones by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      Earth calling Motorola: your phones are crap. I got burnt on a T720 and went back to nokia. I'd have taken almost any nokia in preference to any Motorola. My advice to Motorola: Build a usable, responsive interface.

      When I worked at Motorola in 2000-2002, Motorola phones had superior RF and mechanics (except for the terrible antenna on the V120 and early V60 phones). Yes, the software is not so great. A StarTAC has been known to be dropped from a motorcyle, going 70 mph, ran over by a truck, and it still turned on and made a phone call. Dipped in a swimming pool? Let her dry out for a couple weeks and give it a try.

    4. Re:Motorola CEO gave away free phones by dcam · · Score: 1

      I had my motorola crash on me during phone calls numerous times. This was after a firmware update from the original fimware. RF doesn't do much for you if your software isn't up to scratch.

      --
      meh
    5. Re:Motorola CEO gave away free phones by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1
      A StarTAC has been known to be dropped from a motorcyle, going 70 mph, ran over by a truck, and it still turned on and made a phone call.

      That's pretty amazing. Year before last I was entering a freeway on my motorbike, doing about 70 mph as I merged from the on ramp. A sudden gust of wind blew my unbuttoned jacket up behind me for a split second. I felt something fall out of the inside pocket and looked in the rear view mirror just in time to see my tiny Nokia hit the pavement ... and seconds later get crushed by an 18-wheeler.

      It was flattened too -- the whole phone was barely a millimeter thick. I replaced it with a Panasonic ToughPhone, but maybe I shoulda looked into a Moto.

  88. GMAFB by inteller · · Score: 1

    Who gives a fuck what Microsoft employees use. If it isn't work related and doesn't interfere with work, they should be able to buy and use whatever they want. OMG!! This just in! A Sun worker uses XP! STOP THE PRESSES!

  89. Shocking! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The most popular portable music player in the world is the most popular portable music player on Microsoft's campus?! How is that possible?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Shocking! by jhwang · · Score: 1

      OK, it's been said already, but:

      "Coke, the most popular cola in ther world, is the most popular cola on the Pepsi campus?! How is that possible?!"

      "Microsoft Windows, the most popular pc OS in the world, is the most popular OS on the Apple campus?! How is that possible?!"

    2. Re:Shocking! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Here's a tip. An argument by analogy MUST be analogous.

      The Pepsi campus sells Pepsi and NO Coke. (Actually, I'd guess they practically give it away.)

      The Microsoft campus sells absolutely NO portable music players. Any portable music player brought onto the Microsoft campus necessarily had to be bought off campus. And I'll say it again, since the iPod is the best selling portable music player in the world, why is it surprising that it is also the best seller in the Seattle area?! Is it news that iPod is the best selling portable music player in Dallas Texas?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:Shocking! by jhwang · · Score: 1

      You seem to assume that the Microsoft campus is a representative subset of the Seattle population when it comes to portable music devices. I disagree.

      Consumers who happen to microsoft employees are presumably geekier and more knowledgeable about technology alternatives than the standard seattle citizen. Moreover, they work for a company that actively competes with the iPod from a consumer entertainment platform perspective. If you don't believe me, look for the Mossberg quote at the end of this article:

      http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/ptech/08/18/file.fo rm ats/

      Thus, msft employees are NOT a representative subset. We SHOULD be surprised if they purchase iPods in the same proportion as the rest of the seattle population.

      Here's a hypothetical example. For the sake of argument, assume that Honda is the best selling carmaker in the US--it has 80% of the market. In the absence of other information, your logic is correct. Given any random town, we would assume that that Honda would be the best selling car. If i then said that Honda is the best selling car in Detroit, or among GM employees, wouldn't you be surprised? I would find it remarkable if 80% of the cars driven into the GM employee parking lot were Hondas.

      The point is that GM employees and Microsoft employees are NOT representative subsets of the consumer population--because of industry knowledge, company loyalty, and peer pressure from coworkers. Therefore, if these employees purchase competing products at the same rate as the regular population, that IS surprising.

    4. Re:Shocking! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you picked a bad analogy again. I live right in the middle of the wasteland formerly known as the motor city. Where I live if you work for GM (for example) and buy some other companies' car, it will get keyed, dented, or worse. It's actually getting better. There once was a time when ANY Japanese car found in a GM parking lot would automatically be towed away, regardless of who owned it.

      I do see your point, however. I just don't see the iPod as being less geeky than any other music player.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    5. Re:Shocking! by jhwang · · Score: 1

      It's funny you live in the area--i figure you know what's going on there. I meant my car example to be totally hypothetical. But I don't see how it is a bad analogy? just asking... :-)

      analogies are almost never perfect. but as long as they illustrate the point (e.g., company employees are not fair subsets of the consumer population), an analogy does its job, right?

    6. Re:Shocking! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Here is how bad it is in my area. I work for an elected official in a BIG GM town. He can only buy GM vehicles. If the unions ever found out he owned a non-GM vehicle, he'd have to kiss their endorsement good-bye. He's actually looking forward to retirement so he can finally buy a car he really wants.

      I get your point that company employees are only subsets of a larger population. But I don't see anything inherent in the iPod to compel Microsoft serfs to buy anything else.

      Now I'd certainly see it differently IF Microsoft actually sold its own portable music player, instead of licensing it out. For example, I'd be shocked to learn that there are more PS2s on the Microsoft campus than Xboxes.

      But because Microsoft only makes portable music players perhipherally, I don't see anything to cause Microsoft employees to buy them. It's not like Microsoft makes anyone money on them. We all know that Microsoft makes the vast majority of its money on Office and Windows.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  90. Spotted Around The Pro Sports Club by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    I work out with my Ipod at the Microsoft Health club all the time and it is the ONLY music player I see! Every once in awhile I will spot someone with one of those tiny little MP3 players but practically everyone brings their Ipod's to work out.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Spotted Around The Pro Sports Club by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Hiya Trollie McTroll.

      Well suppose you use your brain for a change and give that jerky knee a rest, eh?

      It is often stressed to me and others to 'eat your own dogfood' but to those of us with cerebral activity beyond that of a sea cucumber (present company included), we realize that Microsoft doesn't always make the best product.

      And so we find it fascinating whenever we find someone booting up a Mac, reading a Linux book or Listening to an Ipod.

      Feel free to crawl back under your rock now.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  91. Re:Apple Employees are as much a consumer as you a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not an "I-Pod". It's an iPod.

    And it says something when a company that is hell bent on making their product the industry standard has 80% of their digital-audio-player-owning employees using an iPod. If a company won't eat it's own food, then how can they reasonably expect anyone else to?

    Moran.

  92. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, uh, speaking as a Microsoft employee who does own an iPod and does use different headphones... when I got my iPod Mini (back when they were downright impossible to acquire), coworkers were always stopping by saying "Oh, you got one of those, they're so cool" and asking to try it out and stuff. I started using different headphones because the ones they came with, while nice, didn't do a very good job blocking out external sound. I've never gotten crap for using one.

    I don't know where you people get the idea that everyone here drinks the Kool-Aid. We make Office for Mac, remember? People talk about their Macs at home all the time, make fun of MSN Search for sucking, listen to music on their iPods, run FireFox, and play Nintendo / Sony video games. It's not a cult

    As for the guy that was using his iPod in the cafeteria, what the hell? It's lunch. Go with some friends. Talk. Socialize. Maybe people were cutting in front of him because he looks like a freakin' dork listening to music while buying food.

  93. Re:Apple Employees are as much a consumer as you a by zieroh · · Score: 1

    it's an I-pod

    Actually, it's an iPod, not an I-pod. I can't imagine what rock you've been living under for the last year if you don't know how to spell it.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  94. Avril quote by ButtNutt · · Score: 0

    "I would kick them in the box and shove them" -Avril Lavigne

    1. Re:Avril quote by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      This isn't fark. But it is a trap...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  95. need competition ... that they can control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft needs pretend competition. Rather than let the "alternative types" go off the the uncontrollable Linux, Bill Gates can contain them in the Apple world.

    1. Re:need competition ... that they can control by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " Microsoft needs pretend competition. Rather than let the "alternative types" go off the the uncontrollable Linux, Bill Gates can contain them in the Apple world."

      It's true. It's like when I used to play Civilisation a lot, I used to play it with the goal of making the highest population (number of citizens) I could possibly make, which basically meant wiping out all the other nations and planting cities on every possible square of land.

      But here's the thing, if you wiped out all your competitors completely then it was game over, much like it would be for Microsoft and their tenuous anti-trust situation. So what I would do would be to leave one enemy city alive (usually on a tiny single square sized island and stick a few battleships next to it to keep it totally isolated. That way you can keep playing the game and build up your massive mono-culture and the competition doesn't bother you much but is just enough to stop the game from continuing.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    2. Re:need competition ... that they can control by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      That should end "just enough to stop the game from finishing"

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  96. We'll know MS is *really* serious about no iPods.. by alispguru · · Score: 1

    ... when they block iTunes at the microsoft.com firewall.

    Or worse, leave it open and fire anyone who accesses it from work...

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  97. Eeeeeeewww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, fast food workers never want to eat where they have worked

    You, sir, have scared away my taste for burgers. Just imagining how they smash all that filthy mass of meat... brb bathroom :(

  98. Skin Trade by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe there's a market at Microsoft for iPod HW skins, that make iPods look like their clunkier MS-driven cousins. MS employs over 15,000 people, and $1000 for a mask that lets you keep your MS job could make $millions!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Skin Trade by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
      100% Flamebait

      I summarize the article, and suggest a joke solution to the problems it expressly identifies. That's "Flamebait"? TrollMods work for Microsoft brand security.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  99. apple doesn't "innovate" by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The innovator is usually the one who ends up going out of business. Apple is (currently) the exception.

    I don't think Apple does much innovation of that kind anymore. They seem to have taken another track to the typical "lead, follow, or..." paradigm: taking something that exists, and making it cool. Did they invent the portable music player? No, they made it cool and really usable.

    Also, just to nitpick: TiVo supplies DirecTV's PVRs. I think TiVo is here to stay. But I realize you could have picked 1000 other examples that supported your thesis.

    1. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They don't invent the product, but they do a lot of innovation when it comes to how to apply said product.

    2. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by OhPlz · · Score: 3, Informative

      TiVo may be a dead duck soon. DirecTV did not renew their contract with them. Their chairman and president just bolted. His example does support his thesis.

    3. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by rjung2k · · Score: 0

      I don't think Apple does much innovation of that kind anymore. They seem to have taken another track to the typical "lead, follow, or..." paradigm: taking something that exists, and making it better and easier.

      There, I fixed that for you.

    4. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      TiVo may be a dead duck soon. DirecTV did not renew their contract with them. Their chairman and president just bolted. His example does support his thesis.

      Yikes, news to me as a direcTV owner. I withdraw said comment!

    5. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      I don't think Apple does much innovation of that kind anymore. They seem to have taken another track to the typical "lead, follow, or..." paradigm: taking something that exists, and making it better and easier.

      Actually, I like how I had it. Better is extremely subjective. I'll probably grant easier, but it isn't the n00bs that apple gets margins from, it's the style-conscious.

    6. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      I have yet to hear an iPod owner say, "It's a hassle to use, but damn if it doesn't look cool." Have you? Or are you just pulling your stereotypes of iPod owners out of your posterior?

    7. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      The menu structure is actually more difficult to deal with than a case of cds and a cd player. So the iPod isn't either easier to use or more efficient, from my perspective, except perhaps in terms of space. That pretty much leaves "cool" as the only reason for me to buy one.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    8. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The menu structure is actually more difficult to deal with than a case of cds and a cd player.


      You're kidding, right? My iPod contains at least 100 albums and has room for hundreds more. Carrying hundreds and hundreds of Red Book Audio CDs around would be very inconvenient even without the bulk and weight of the jewel cases.
    9. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by derF024 · · Score: 1

      I have yet to hear an iPod owner say, "It's a hassle to use, but damn if it doesn't look cool." Have you? Or are you just pulling your stereotypes of iPod owners out of your posterior?

      I'm not an iPod owner, but I have used them on multiple occasions and for the life of me, I can't figure the interface out. I have a Rio Karma, whose interface I was able to pick up in about 5 seconds, but with the iPod I've always felt that it was a guessing game as to what was going to happen whenever I pushed a button. Apple could learn a thing or two by looking at the much more intuitive interface on the Karma. The iPod does, however, look pretty cool.

    10. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      Except "perhaps in terms of space"? It's ALL about space. Try taking 200 CDs in your backpack on the bus. The scroll wheel seems like a pretty simple interface by comparison.

    11. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      200 CDs worth? Where are you taking the bus that calls for that?

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    12. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I just said to an AC, you seemed to have confused innovation with invention, because hell yes they innovate.

      Did they invent the portable music player?

      See what I mean? No, they weren't the first to make one, they just made a player that had a capacity hundereds of times greater than the flash players of the time, at a fraction of the size of the desktop-hardrive based players such as the Arcos. That's innovation.

    13. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      I have yet to hear an iPod owner say, "It's a hassle to use, but damn if it doesn't look cool." Have you? Or are you just pulling your stereotypes of iPod owners out of your posterior?

      I know a lot if iPod owners - expect to number myself among them soon - and I've never heard one tell me that they got that over a Sony because they couldn't figure the Sony out. Maybe it's because I'm in grad school and not surrounded by fucktards, I don't know. But, again, just being easier doesn't get Apple 60% margins on those iPods. Being cool does.

    14. Re:apple doesn't "innovate" by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      Even if you are going across town, you aren't going to listen to ALL 200 CDs but you may want to listen to any tune at any time. That's the point. All your music in your pocket.

  100. Maybe a sign? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    First off... what music player does MSFT make?

    Second, assuming they have a gizmo 2000 ... if their OWN employees won't use it... maybe that's because they "innovated" too much? ...

    This article [or the posters resume] is just stupid. Why would using Apple products be bad at MSFT... MSFT WRITES MAC SOFTWARE!!!!

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  101. bottom up versus top down by jhwang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    shows the power of demand-driven bottom-up interest in digital music players versus the top-down directives from a supplier (i.e., marketing initiatives from the corporate office). the most successful marketing campaigns mix top-down from the supplier and the bottom-up from the consumer of course. in this case, microsoft is out of that product loop with their own employees.

    And the posters above who claim that microsoft is not competing with Apple, you're wrong. In a narrow sense, it's true that Microsoft does not sell a portable music device. In a larger sense, Microsoft IS competing with Apple when it comes to digital consumer entertainment platforms.

    That is why Microsfot has spent more than a year denigrating the iPod and promoting its "open" audio format and associated MP3 players. This is why microsoft has been pushing "http://www.digitaljoy.com/" at CES.

    Just because Microsoft does not manufacture Intel hardware, are you going to say Microsoft doesn't compete with Apple b/c Apple sells computers? Sheesh!

  102. Consider your source by nick_davison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Robert Scoble--one of the people mentioned in the article--has already written about it. "Personally there's no way that 80% of our employees own an MP3 player. I don't know what world that source is living in, but it's not the one I live in...

    He went on to state, "Personally there's no way that 80% of our employees use more than 640k of ram. I don't know what world that source is living in, but it's not the one I live in..."

    Because, after all, if someone at Microsoft doesn't recognise people's usage patterns and habits, it can't be true.

    Remember, this is the same guy who stated, "3) Pay whatever big money it'll take to get ... Elton John ...[and] Shania Twain to work on designing an entirely new player from the ground up." link

    I don't know what world he lives in. I don't think I want to. I do know they'd have fabulous, sequined and ruffled, faux 17th century french MP3 players with a disneyfied country theme. Kind of like Euro Disney, when you think about it. That's enough to tell me I don't want to live there.

    Just because a source contradicts the original, it doesn't make it a good one.

    1. Re:Consider your source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't really that many people here that own mp3 players. Four people on my team own one, 2 of which are iPods. Out of 50 people.

      I would have a hard time imagining that 80% of the people at the company own and use one on a regular basis. You'd expect to see far more people walking around with headphones on (and you rarely see that).

    2. Re:Consider your source by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Do you work for Microsoft?

      I work for a game company. Here the numbers are up around 60-70%. As a demographic, we're mostly young tech obsessed males with a reasonably high disposable income.

      Microsoft's campus is famous for hiring the extremely nerdy and presenting them with very high disposable incomes - particularly as the campus is also famous for promoting lifestyles that aren't condusive to other things that interfere with those disposable incomes (like dating, wives, kids, etc.)

      I may be wrong, of course. It's entirely possible that the way Microsoft's campus is portrayed is entirely incorrect and they match the standard societal demographic and usage patterns. At a guess though, they don't - and so are going to have way over the norm levels of PDAs, MP3 players, etc. compared to say your typical office or engineering firm.

    3. Re:Consider your source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do work for Microsoft and the parent to your post is right. I don't see tons of people walking around with iPods. Seriously, if 16,000 out of 25,000 people had one they would be hard to miss. Sure, I see them every now and then, but even on my own team I'd say out of everyone that owns one (which is more like 40%), it's 50/50 whether it's an iPod or not. I'm one of the ones that own an Archos Jukebox with a 60GB HD running Rockbox.

      Don't bother making comments about the demographic of our campus because it just really shows that you don't know what you're talking about. Many people here are married (like myself) and have kids (not me, whew!), but MS doesn't "promote" lifestyles.

      The "anonymous" source in this story is absolute bunk. Both numbers he provided were 80%. 80% have a music player and 80% of those are iPods? He just pulled this number out of his ass. He didn't even try very hard and Wired gobbled it up. Pretty sad, really.

  103. Shhhhh... don't say it...! by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could it be ... could it be you've come up with a worthwhile reason why we have patents?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Shhhhh... don't say it...! by Saxerman · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. We do have patents and innovators are still going out of business.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    2. Re:Shhhhh... don't say it...! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but what we all know what patents were intended to accomplish.

    3. Re:Shhhhh... don't say it...! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      No, not really. At least not in software. You think these people popped open the top of a tivo, looked inside for a few minutes, and just bought off the shelf software and a few chips that had the same numbers as tivo's and a harddrive to build their copycat?

      No, they had to write their own software, route and manufacture their own boards, either from scratch or through the long, hard, and not at all inexpensive task of reverse-engineering Tivo's hardware and software.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:Shhhhh... don't say it...! by Vince+Mo'aluka · · Score: 1

      The principle of first to market would easily take the place of patent law, as far as creating incentive to innovate and serve the consumer in general, in a market which allows force only in self-defense. (IP law is offensive, not defensive, because it requires an initiation of force. The concept of owning an idea is not found in human nature, and would not be honored without the threat of force.)

      The proposition that technological firms would stop innovating or producing in the abscense of IP law stands in direct contrast to human history. Human beings have been doing clever things (some might say "innovating") for millions of years without the aid of IP law.

      --
      You took his stuff. You pound him.
  104. Re:If I had their stock options... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

    Yes, $99 is way too much to pay for a 512 MB music player that's so small you could conceivably swallow it.

  105. So What. by n-baxley · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked MS didn't have an MP3 player on the market.

    1. Re:So What. by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      But their software and the wma format are in use with many other competing players

  106. That page makes little sense in context though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I figured it was soemthing like an intranet site, you would think there was some way to reach the site from the outside.

    But I don't think the site you pointed to is what they were talking about, since the context was digital music players that supported Windows Media. The site you linked to is all about XP and what it can do for you. Perhaps he was trying to halt the spread of Powerbooks on campus. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  107. I wonder... by BigDogCH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rudeboy, you are my hero. I put that sig on a few days ago when the grammer nazis were driving me nuts. I thought it was simple, yet nobody grasps it. Do I need to reword it? I am sick of people worrying more about spelling than content. I do not have perfect spelling, and I make mistakes. I post here searching for someone to discuss/debate with, yet all I run into is idiots. Should I mention that I have a teaching degree (that always draws out the grammar psychos)?

  108. Re:We'll know MS is *really* serious about no iPod by klang · · Score: 1

    ...well, blocking iTunes in the company firewall is not unheard of .. that's what the company I work for do. Not being in an iTunesMusicStore certified country, I don't mind, I've just noticed, that's all..

  109. Its called Group Policies by lysium · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unlike you, Microsoft knows the full power of Group Policies, and how the entire network can be configured to deny installation of external devices. Resorting to imperfect physical security would only annoy employees while failing to protect against cursory concealment techniques.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Its called Group Policies by lost_n_confused · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A very secure feature unless one has a live CD that can mount the NTFS file system read only and run a USB driver to copy files to an external device. How does MS Group Policies effect that? People can create an ssh connection to a Linux or Mac OS X box and scp files away to their hearts content.

      --
      -- To mess up an OS X box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.--
    2. Re:Its called Group Policies by scarolan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but do they *enforce* their group policy. How can you make a companywide ban on removable media? Preposterous.

    3. Re:Its called Group Policies by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      Simple, lock the BIOS settings so you can't change configuration and set to boot from hard drive, and never boot from removable media.

      No need to boot from CD on machines that are configured, and if they need to be booted from CD for some reason, the person is there with the password to change the BIOS settings.

    4. Re:Its called Group Policies by lubricated · · Score: 1

      yes, when I worked at Microsoft, I thought now I would get to see what a properly run windows network was like. Turned out it was just like everyother windows network. Shit doesn't work. You see stuff by accident you aren't supposed to. Exchange still looses peoples email. in other words it just like any other windows network.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:Its called Group Policies by lost_n_confused · · Score: 1

      That is OK except you can by pass the BIOS password too. I have had to do it many times on machines that people set the BIOS password and left the company. I use to have an old DOS utility that would pull the encrypted password string and then it was a simple matter to decrypt the password. Now I can boot the computer from my disk and you can't stop me. The only way to be sure is to use Terminal Server so there is nothing local.

      --
      -- To mess up an OS X box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.--
    6. Re:Its called Group Policies by pmhudepo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Resorting to imperfect physical security [...]

      As opposed to, say, perfect technological security?

    7. Re:Its called Group Policies by lysium · · Score: 1

      Unfamiliar with the terminology, I see. "Group Policies" are a technological feature of Active Directory networks. The operating system enforces the rulesets passed down from the master servers. If the admins set the rule that removable media cannot be attached to PCs, then any Windows PC connected to the network (not the PHYSICAL network, but the services on the physical network) will not recognize removeable media, period.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  110. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out these Mäkkintos maikrokompuuters manufactured by Äpl komupter inkorporatet. I've seen them receiving some rave reviews lately.

  111. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't decide if the parent post is a troll or flamebait.

  112. The big cardinal sin. by demonic-halo · · Score: 1

    Now if we can get the figures to how many M$ employees use Google.

    =)

  113. "A single anonymous source" by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 2, Funny
    "One thing they teach you in Journalism 101 is that when you have a single anonymous source, you don't have a story."

    Well, you'll never get a job at CBS with THAT attitude, young man!

  114. Simple solution, it seems to me by Brent+Nordquist · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If they're really serious about "eating their own dog food," they should can the executive grumbling and hinting. They should just give every employee (outside the Mac group maybe) a free MP3/WMA/whatever player, one that reflects the corporate goals, and then ban the iPod on campus. Why go halfway? It only makes them appear unable to stem the tide of what's cool... far worse PR than if they'd said nothing.

    If they won't do that, then shut up and let the employees use what they want. And maybe try to actually innovate and create a product with an experience that will draw them back.

    --
    Brent J. Nordquist N0BJN
  115. I am confused??!! by avandesande · · Score: 1

    what is a 'microsoft powered mp3 player'??
    do they mean non-aac playing?

    this article is terminally stupid..

    mp3 is not a microsoft format.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:I am confused??!! by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Where did it say "microsoft powered mp3 player"? I read the article and didn't see it.

      Also, it's Wired. I think they know that MP3 is not a "microsoft format".

    2. Re:I am confused??!! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      here is the real quote (sorry about the misquote)

      The Microsoft manager said he's heard from several executives who dutifully bought Microsoft-powered players, tried them, failed to get them working, and returned them in favor of an iPod. He went through the same experience, he said.

      it is a really dumb anecdote, there are plenty of great non-ipod players (at least from the standpoint of reliability)

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  116. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by iroll · · Score: 1

    parent is a copy/past troll. Move along, nothing to see here.

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  117. iPods work better with Macs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there are any brave microsoftites who have requisitioned Mac's for their office (since it works better with the iPod). Without their PC bsod'ing all day they might even be able to turn that company around.

  118. why they realy changed earbuds... by cwestpha · · Score: 1

    Lets face it the earbuds Apple includes are ok, but compared to what you can get for the price of the wired remote they are absolute crap. Oh and Gates has always liked Apple, he kind of has a soft spot for it... soft as in he wont totaly destroy it but keep it alive to point to it as competition and remember the "good old days" (read less lawsuits against them).

  119. Identifying with the target market by amichalo · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting issue because it brings up the question of the 'target market'.

    To illustrate, consider the executives of a national mobile home builder. None of these executives live in the mobile homes they sell, but justify their actions because they are not in the demographic of the mobile home target market.

    Conversely, consider the alternative "I liked it so much, I bought the company" situation where a product is so good and has such a broad demographic that everyone who works for them owns and uses the product.

    I would argue that portable media players do not appeal to as wide a target market as say, Bic Pens. But at the same time, they are not as niche as the mobile home market either.

    If Bic had their own staff showing up to company meetings with the other guy's pens, I would say they would be in same boat as Microsoft. But of course, Bic is not in that same boat.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  120. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

    You can roll your own with a VIA ITX form factor mobo and get a small case too. It is a little larger than the Mac Mini but smaller than the ShuttleX. You get an option for installing your own CPU or you can use VIA's CPU in a fanless solution plus external wall power supply.

    http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/spearhead/m in i-itx/

    Do a search and you will find more info.

  121. Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Coke employee, if I brought a pepsi product to work (say as part of my brown bag lunch), it's looked down on pretty harshly. It's almost to the point of being grounds for termination. It's not just a can of pepsi soda, but any of Pepsi's brands (chips, snacks, fruit juices etc...).

    MSFT doesn't fire people for wearing iPODs...

    1. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Wow. Mars wouldn't do that. They had CONFIDENCE in their products enough not to force them down people's throats, and that confidence is justified.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by redmond_herring · · Score: 1


      MSFT doesn't fire people for wearing iPODs...

      ...yet.

      --
      Stephen Colbert on race: "While skin and race are often synonymous, skin cleansing is good, race cleansing is bad."
    3. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People should be fired for having either Coke or Pepsi - they're both completely worthless, evil, nutritionless, tooth-decaying shit. You basically work for a cigarette company.

    4. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by richieb · · Score: 5, Funny
      As a Coke employee, if I brought a pepsi product to work ....

      It's much worse when a Pepsi employee tests positive for coke....

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    5. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      MSFT doesn't fire people for wearing iPODs...

      not YET, anyway. Microsoft is definetly interested in some kind of hardware mp3 player. They're always expanding their business (as many corporations do). You have the X-Box as an example.

      However, corporate 'identity' isn't exclusive to MS. Most large corporations have some ways to 'encourage' employees to stick with the brands they make.

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
    6. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. is this really the situation with workers' rights in the USA, year 2005? The employer gets to dictate what food you get to buy for yourself?

      That's just 19th century.

    7. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      I find Coca-Cola a fairly tasty and refreshing drink when I'm hot and thirsty. I don't think it was ever intended as a replacement for water.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by anime_boy · · Score: 1

      No Mountain Dew for him. But as far as the employer firing you, a Insurance company in Michigan layed off any employee who smokes just last week, weither on or off the job.

    9. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by jred · · Score: 1

      That's *exactly* what I was thinking...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    10. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard of choice or self determination. Quit trying to force your views down other peoples throats.

    11. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but comparing soft drinks to cigarettes is way off-base, and frankly quite stupid.

      It's true that soft drinks have no real nutritional value, but they do have sugar, which people can use for energy. However, most importantly, soft drinks don't have any significant negative effects (at least any that have been proven) when they are consumed in reasonable quantities. They are even quite useful sometimes, such as when you're feeling nauseous or have an upset stomach.

      Obviously, soft drinks do have a lot of calories, and for people without fast metabolisms, drinking lots of them tends to make them gain weight. That's called "abuse"; the solution is to not drink so many. The same goes for alcohol: a glass of wine with dinner won't make you drunk or kill your liver, and has been shown in recent studies to extend your life. Drinking wine or other alcoholic drinks constantly gives you cirrhosis. Should we ban alcohol because of this?

      What about sugary desserts such as cookies, cakes, and other confections? Do you think those are just like cigarettes too?

    12. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      At least that actually makes sense: people who smoke require more health care, and thus cost more for insurance companies to cover. If you had a choice between two employees, and one cost significantly less because of his health care costs (which are entirely his own fault), wouldn't you want to hire the cheaper one?

    13. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by hawk · · Score: 1

      [me nods sagely]

      Yep. Then it's time to reach for the Pepsi AC . . .

      hawk

    14. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      At least that actually makes sense: people who smoke require more health care, and thus cost more for insurance companies to cover. If you had a choice between two employees, and one cost significantly less because of his health care costs (which are entirely his own fault), wouldn't you want to hire the cheaper one?

      Are they going to fire everybody who is fat? Rides a motorcycle? Likes to climb mountains? Lives in a dangerous neighborhood?

    15. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Are they going to fire everybody who is fat? Rides a motorcycle? Likes to climb mountains? Lives in a dangerous neighborhood?

      Apparently, the company is setting up programs for overweight employees to help them lose weight. I don't think they're allowed to fire them because of discrimination laws. However, there's nothing saying you can't discriminate against people for smoking, riding motorcycles, etc. But of course, you have to weigh the advantages and disadvantages. Is there enough of a potential benefit to firing motorcycle riders to make it worth it? Apparently, the company thought so in the case of smokers.

    16. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same as in any CPG company. Try buying Murphys for a Diageo employee... or bringing Nestlé products into a Cadburys site... or Unilever products into Nestlé... or using cloth nappies as a Procter & Gamble employee.

      Oddly, Nestlé don't seem to mind too much...

    17. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid at university in Columbia, Missouri, I worked in the Coke bottling plant during the summer there in Columbia. One day I came back from lunch and walked into the plant as I was finishing off my bottle of Pepsi. The production line foreman saw the bottle, very swiftly approached me and grabbed the bottle from my hand and very forcefully smashed it against the wall and told me to clean up "that shit". I honestly had not thought about what I was doing, bringing a Pepsi into the plant. I immediately apologized to the foreman and that was that. Oh, and I cleaned up "that shit". Whatever. Now I live in Mexico and I drink Coke. Go figure.

    18. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

      I'm was suprised that this was "news" when I heard about it last week. Back 20 or so years ago my mother worked for U.S. Gypsum here in Illinois. They tried the same exact stunt, claiming that smokers cost too much for health care and they had the right to fire people that smoked outside the office. It went absolutely nowhere. I don't even think it went to court. If it did it didn't last long. Mom was a heavy smoker at the time and never lost a day of work.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    19. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous behaviour. That guy should have been disciplined or fired.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    20. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever ask your mom why she smoked? Was it because she knew she looked bad and wanted to try to be cool? Was it because she was making up for some lack of self confidence or some incompleteness in her life? Was it because she wanted to do what all the other kids were doing? Was it because she was a braindead hick who did what the good advertisers told her to do? Was it because she imagined the cigarettes helped her relax, or feel better? Do you ever resent the fact that you had to breathe in all that smoke and carcinogenic particles when you were growing up? Were you ever disgusted with the way she smelled or the way her teeth looked?

    21. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      "soft drinks don't have any significant negative effects" WHat ever happened to type 2 diabetes? Too much sugar now does you no favor later in life.

    22. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about too much sugar? You're telling me that consuming one soft drink, EVER, will give you type 2 diabetes? Go back and re-read my message. I said that soft drinks are not harmful in reasonable quantities, just like wine is not harmful in reasonable quantities. This doesn't mean you can consume bottles of it every day.

    23. Re:Not like Coke employees drinking pepsi. by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      So your reasonable is the same as everyone elses? I have seen what McDonalds deem a reasonable quantity, I don't call a small vat of coke a good quantity. Ever watch Supersize Me?

  122. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forcefully introducing a new copy-and-paste troll and studying how much time it would take for even the dumbest of slashdotters to realize that it indeed is a troll would be a neat academic study.

  123. "If you build it, they will come." by cplusplus · · Score: 1

    Make a good product and people will buy it. I really don't find this too suprising.

    --
    "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
  124. As a long-time Apple user/developer/fan... by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    ...I just have one thing to say:

    Neener neener! :-)

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    1. Re:As a long-time Apple user/developer/fan... by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it looks bad when MS employees aren't buying the MS brand MP3 players... oh wait, they don't make any.

  125. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    " It's "Macintosh", not McIntosh. It's Mac not MAC. A MAC refers to something completely different, as noted by the acronym-like capitalization. Why in the world would an abbreviation (Mac for Macintosh) be capitalized?"

    Yup...McIntosh is extremely high end audio gear ...I understand misspelling the name...but, what does the capitalization have to do with how you spell mac, Mac, or MAC? All the same to me? I just take it in context as to what they're talking about...though I never thought about all acronyms being all uppercase. Heck...most everything I type is in lowercase...so, I don't come across much other than that...

    :-)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  126. Shenanigans by Smilin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I'm obligated by fate to respond to your post. See I work at Coke and my last job was at Microsoft :D

    It is definately a career limiting move to use a Pepsi product at Coke as it should be. Everyone knows better so it's not an issue. It's a very cutthroat rivalry and just like you won't find an Eagles player wearing a Patriots jersey, you won't find a Coke employee holding a can of Pepsi.

    As for iPods at Microsoft.. I call bullshit on the whole article. MS doesn't give a crap if people use iPods. The guys there are the most technology saavy group you'll find anywhere. The iPod has a natural appeal to them. Employee happiness is a huge priority for MS and it helps them retain great talent. They won't jeopardize it over something silly like that.

    So Shenanigans on that article!

    1. Re:Shenanigans by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful
      For me the significance of the article wasn't the "carrer limiting move" part. It was the point that even in a "technology saavy group", who have a built in bias to prefer Microsoft related products, all else being equal. Even there, 80% of users choose iPods of all the WMA playing devices that Bill's so keen on.

      It rather proves the point of which technology is best, and which is doomed to fail.

    2. Re:Shenanigans by neil.orourke · · Score: 1

      Are you confusing the issue of "iPod vs. everything else" with "wma vs. everything else"?

      My wife has an iPod. It is, without a doubt, the slickest piece of computing machinery in our house. All the other portable music players are clunky by comparison, or too limited. The fact that it plays mp3 or aac is totally irrelevent.

    3. Re:Shenanigans by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      It'll play .aif and .wav too.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Shenanigans by Smilin · · Score: 1

      I don't think one has anything to really do with the other. There are media players that play Windows Media but there are no Microsoft made portable music devices. What people really want isn't one music format or another. No, what they want is the music. If you want to really turn it into some kind of competition then the real winner is MP3 because "that's where the music is".

      WMA is doing just fine out there even in the face of overwhelming competition from the "free" mp3 standard. I'm sure MS would love it if the iPod supported them but they are far from "doomed". WMA is doing perfectly fine against it's *real* competition, Apple's quicktime.

      If you want to see what else a "technology saavy group" chooses, go see what OS they are running or what video game console they are playing. Think anyone at MS is using Palm over PocketPC?

      ---

      The #1 thing I want you to get out of my previous post is this: MS management doesn't care about what music player it's employees are using. That article and the author's "source" are full of crap.

    5. Re:Shenanigans by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Yeah right. According to you: Microsoft isn't in competition with iPod because they don't make the hardware. Yet Microsoft is in competition with Palm even though they don't make the hardware.

      It's an astoturfing campaign. I hear this argument from Microsoft employees all over the web. Because they are losing the audio player market, they pretending that they aren't even playing in the market. If they were winning, they'd be trumpetting it from the rooftops.

      Anyone who saw the embarrasing Gates keynote at CES, or read the follow on interviews knows full well that WMA players are Microsofts number one marketing objective right now. Don't even try to pretend it doesn't matter because they "aren't competing in the market".

      ---

      I don't care whether MS managers care. I only care that even at Microsoft people are voting with their wallets not to use the Microsoft playsfersure solution.

    6. Re:Shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the fact that Bill Gates bought his mom an iMac way back when? ;-)

    7. Re:Shenanigans by Smilin · · Score: 1

      hehe dude. Seriously. MS doesn't make an iPod. Settle down, don't feel so threatened.

      I think iPods are great. However, I can't even name the proprietary format they use (nor can most people). No one cares including MS management. If you see the iPod music format spread outside the iPod, THEN you'll probably see some competition building. Don't confuse the iPod hardware with the software like you just did with the Palm OS (that PocketPC is in competition with).

      I saw the Gates keynote and read all the interviews. It looks to me like MS is invading your living room, not your headphones. I think Sony and Tivo have more to worry about than Apple (who sold out and made peace to MS a long time ago).

      I also think you just want to believe that the "bad guy", Microsoft is after the "good guy", Apple. Get over it. It's ok for people to like a great product like the iPod. It doesn't have to be a conspiracy. If they were really after them you would feel it. Just ask Sony, VMWare, Wordperfect, Novell, Lotus, Palm or Netscape.

      Again, MS management doesn't give a crap about people using the iPod. Heck, they are probably wearing one while they draft their plans on how to get Media Center into your SUV. Both you and the guy who wrote that article sound just like the typical MS bigots. You can't let someone just take delight in owning their iPod, you have to use it as some sort of imagined victory over Bill. Go find peace with yourself.

    8. Re:Shenanigans by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Way to go illustrating the exact fake argument I described. Saying that Apple's 70% market share doesn't matter to Microsoft because it doesn't make music player hardware is as dumb as saying it wouldn't matter to Microsoft if Apple had 70% of the computer market because Micrsoft don't make PCs.

      Microsoft intend to make money from the music download market in 3 ways. By collecting rotyalties from the WMV format, by selling embedded software, and by selling musci downloads from MSC music store. All 3 sources of revenue are worse off for only having less than 30% of the market available than if they had the full 100%. To say the contrary, as you and other Microsoft employees do, is pure stupidity. It's an excuse to cover for not being able to win the market for Microsoft.

      If they were really after them you would feel it.

      Oh they really are after the market. And they're losing it. Just as they have with the smartphone market. Admit it. It won't hurt you to own up to the markets where Microsoft is losing.

  127. Shhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ruin an Apple fanboys karma boost !

  128. The big story here is not the iPod by NullProg · · Score: 1

    The big story here is how one software company went from embracing new ideas and technology to one which defends against it.

    Instead of making Windows interoperate better with the iPod, Microsoft instead chooses to push their flawed design on consumers. This lack of vision towards customer needs versus monopoly maintenance might lead to their downfall.

    Speaking of design, lets compare the two. iPod is but a component of the digital lifestyle Steve Jobs has been pushing for years. The consumer friendly design and operation reflect this. WMP on the other hand was created to generate revenue. Utilizing the windows user base, Microsoft had hoped to sell WMA codec licenses to hardware manufacturers and content producers. Consumer friendly operation was not part of the design goals.

    This is why the iPod selling so much is keeping Billy G. at the office late at night, When consumers and employees aren't buying WMP enabled hardware, manufacturers and content producers don't see the need to license WMA.

    Kudos to Apple, HP and iPod owners. You just prevented an assimilation attempt by the Borg :)

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
    1. Re:The big story here is not the iPod by ndtechnologies · · Score: 0

      How interesting that even in the early 1980's when Bill G. said that Macintosh was the leading innovator for home computing, how they are now trying to play catch up with them. The same can be said for a lot of other companies. Remember that Sony just admitted their error in the .mp3 player arena, and I am sure that a lot of companies are kicking themselves for not churning out the portable music player idea sooner as well.

      --
      I have nothing clever to put here...
  129. What about at Apple? by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if 20% of the people who own digital music players at apple own something other than an iPod. Does Apple send memos telling them to not buy a Nomad? I'd like to see what the precentage is there too.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  130. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd be much better off just providing better MP3 support.

    And yes, there are elements in Sony who can't see past their own love of DRM.

  131. Bill using iPod in Teen Beat by Sophrosyne · · Score: 5, Funny

    A little image I fixed up in photoshop :)
    Here

    1. Re:Bill using iPod in Teen Beat by Sophrosyne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also did a blue screen pic for the other one:
      here

    2. Re:Bill using iPod in Teen Beat by antdude · · Score: 1

      Is Bill throwing a floppy disk?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Bill using iPod in Teen Beat by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone is throwing it at him ...Ninja Style.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    4. Re:Bill using iPod in Teen Beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dreamy.

  132. Why I hate Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pendantic Fucks Like You Who Think They Are Funny.

    Just in case you really do have your head up your ass, it's like this:
    if no accidents for 1 year, then everyone gets $xxx.xx. If no accidents for 2 years, then everyone gets $xxx.xx twice over. This repeats till there is an accident.

    Not:
    no accidents for 1 year, $xxx.xx is divided equally among all workers. You almost have to deliberately ignore common sense to draw that conclusion.

    Although, /. is definately not a breeding ground for common sense.

    1. Re:Why I hate Slashdot by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      eachPersonsIndividualBonusInDollers=(yearsWithoutA ccidents*100)

  133. IPod is/has simply ... by jzarling · · Score: 1

    a better product,(expect for replacement batteries)
    been marketed better,

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  134. Exactly by ad0gg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Because apple invented the first mp3 player. Oh wait they didn't. What have they invented? GUI nope, mouse nope.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  135. Learning? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Question: What's the best way to find out what makes a product popular?

    Ask a bunch of people, or, use it yourself?

    I'm going with the latter on this one. Formats aside, MS doesn't have a product that competes with the iPod... but if they wanted to make one they'd better know what they're competing with first, don't ya think?

  136. Why would you care? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    Pepsi is for the Next Generation. Coke is for drinking.

    1. Re:Why would you care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or for doing lines off a hooker's ass in a gas station rest room while filming a donkey having sex with a midget.

    2. Re:Why would you care? by Trespass · · Score: 3, Funny

      That was you!?

  137. "started using different headphones?" by mkeroppi · · Score: 1

    Well of course! iPod's earphones is the worst of them all. Makes me regret I didn't sell them before I tried them since people will buy them for $10. Also, anything after 2nd generation got this output impedance problem; you'll have huge distortions in the bass with any unamped headphones. Not to mention the bug with high bitrate mp3 in 3rd gens.

  138. Microsoft? Understand? by rjung2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes but maybe Microsoft understands that one of the tools to competion is understanding why your opponents are ahead.

    This is a joke, right? In Microsoft's entire history, their responses to a competitive threat are:

    1. Buy 'em out.
    2. Stomp 'em out.

    There's nothing in there about "understanding"; all problems are nails, and they've got a sledgehammer.

    What's really pissing off MS right now is that none of these tactics will work w/r/t Apple and the iPod.

  139. I find that hard to believe by swb · · Score: 1

    Why did he let them punk him?

    I'm a reasonable guy and I'll let a friend or two join someone ahead of me, but the third guy gets told to get to the back of the line.

    1. Re:I find that hard to believe by kneecarrot · · Score: 1

      Well, he's a huge nerd with poor social skills. He has a hard enough time politely saying "no" to telemarketers. As for actual confrontation, forget it. Besides, his huge lice-infested beard makes it difficult for others to hear what he is mumbling.

      --

      I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

  140. what constitutes sufficient size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sufficient size >= 1 employee

    There is no shortage of weasels. They are everywhere walking among us. Luckily I got these cool sunglasses that me see them.

  141. Robert Scoble: 2nd Grade Reading Level by jubitzu · · Score: 0

    Obviously this man cannot read and comprehend a single sentence. 80% of Microsoft employees who own an MP3 player cannot be quantified with knowing the number of Microsoft employees who own MP3 players. The article makes no claim that 80% of ALL Microsoft employees own iPods.

    If you cannot convince them, confuse them.

    - Harry S Truman

  142. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux now most popular OS on microsoft campus. http://ipodlinux.org/Main_Page

  143. so what? by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

    This is in the same lines as working at a "Honda" dealership and driving a "Nissan". Lots of people do it.

    1. Re:so what? by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Agreed, it's the usual Mac worshipping straw grasping that Wired likes to do and /. always buys into because it comes with a side of MS bashing. Seriously, if the money Bill Gates puts into AIDS research came up with a cure people around here would still find a way to bash it.

  144. Under penalty of DEATH! by GatesGhost · · Score: 0

    i wonder if gates will just steal the ipod like he did the apple os? He'll call it, winpod.

  145. subject by McBeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A microsoft recruiter came by my school a couple days ago showing off some new digital media player toy that that microsoft came up with. When students started comparing it to the iPod, he admitted that we should probably just get Ipods if we didnt' care about pictures or music.

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
  146. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I understand misspelling the name...but, what does the capitalization have to do with how you spell mac, Mac, or MAC? All the same to me? I just take it in context as to what they're talking about...

    Because, Cayenne- actually, can I just call you CAY? Because, CAY, a nickname for something, such as "Mac" for "Macintosh" is just a nickname, not an acronym, and with all capitals, readers think it actually is one; when people see me call you CAY, they'll thing it's something like "Computer-Adept Youth", rather than your name.

    Clarity really is important, particularly in text communications.

    -T

  147. I use a PDA by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

    The iPod is obviously a vastly superior mp3 player, because that is what it was designed to do. However, a PDA is a better solution for some people, myself included.

    Here's why:

    I already own the PDA. I use it for all the typical uses (calendar, contacts, birthdays, games, reading news and documents, et cetera). A $50 SD card is a much more economical solution for me than a $399.99 iPod. An iPod would just be one more (expensive) thing I would have to carry around. Other, cheaper, mp3 players might not have the cost issue, but would still be one more thing to carry around.

    I don't need more than a 1GB of portable music. When I'm in the mood for a different set of music, all I need are CONFIG_MMC, CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK, and a Perl script.

    Battery life, as many iPod fans here have mentioned, has never been an issue for me. I've never had to stop listening due to low battery. RealOne Player for PalmOS actually takes battery life into account and shuts off the display when the Palm is only being used as an mp3 player.

  148. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by arh9623 · · Score: 0

    Isn't the McIntosh a high end amp?

  149. OT: on sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Using IE is like hitting yourself in the head repeatedly with a brick and wondering why you keep yelling 'OUCH!'

    Actuall it's more like dropping your pants, bending over and grabbing your ankles and wondering why you keep getting things shoved up your ass.

  150. MOD PARENT UP - SENTENCE COMPREHENSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!)

  151. Re:If I had their stock options... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

    Do not eat iPod Shuffle.

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  152. so then why shuffle? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    if the price for twice as much ram and a player is the same as a shuffle, then why get the shuffle? anyway I only spent $60 on my SD-mp3 player, and it had built in ram as well...

  153. I use different headphones... by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

    ... because the very stylish apple ones are pretty shit. what you want is some Sone MDREX71SL. Very good, and reasonably priced too.

  154. iRiver... by ShadowFlyP · · Score: 1

    I'd think employees would be more worried about being seen with an iRiver, since that runs Linux and all. An iPod doesn't have much direct impact to MS.

  155. GM by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 3, Interesting

    GM encourages their employees to ask for non-GM cars when renting so as to check out the competition. You steal ideas where you can find them.

    1. Re:GM by raddan · · Score: 1
      I work at a small but profitable publishing company. Almost every wall in our offices are lined with bookshelves, very few of which contain books by us. Many of these books have been read and written in to the point of falling apart.

      This should be a wake-up call for Microsoft. Reading our competition's books is a stratagem that has served us very well.

  156. Funny geography by javacrypto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One part of the article mentions Bellingham, WA:

    "iPod shipments to Apple's nearby store in Bellingham."

    But another part mentions the Bell Square mall:

    "the gal at the Bellevue Square Apple Store"

    If you know your Washington geography, you know that the Bell Square mall is in Bellvue, right next to Redmond. However, Bellingham is 2 hours to the north, near the Canadian border.

    At first I could not figure out why all the Softies were driving all the way up to Bellingham to get their iPods, but this looks like a mistake in the article itself. This does not mean that the whole article is wrong, but just this part.

    1. Re:Funny geography by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      There is a mall in Bellingham called Bellis Fair which is similiar sounding (I guess) to Bell Square. Perhaps that (coupled with Bellingham and Bellevue similar names) is where the confusion is coming from.

      That and lazy copy editors.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    2. Re:Funny geography by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      By the time I had got to it, they had posted a correction.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  157. Re:Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you value your karma, don't insult the Apple© Slashvertisements(TM) while logged in!

  158. http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif by i41Overlord · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  159. Like it would be for stealth.... by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1

    ...probably not just for that. The simple thing is, the stock iPod headphones suck ass. And suck at that, too. Any sane person would buy a better pair.

  160. Robert Scoble is a moron, who by melted · · Score: 1

    thinks too much about himself. That's why he's not even a program manager, he's a technical evangelist. When you're not good enough to produce at least something (specs), but have been with the company for a long time - that's the position they give you at MSFT.

    Don't judge Microsoft by what he says. There are some brilliant minds there. There are mediocre ones as well (as Robert clearly demonstrates). There are tons of people with iPods also, and some with apple stickers on their cars even. Nobody is hiding anything. When Microsoft releases a product that doesn't suck, I'm the first to buy it. Trouble is, that doesn't happen often, for one reason or another.

  161. Brand loyalty by employees, or else... by jasenj1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That your desire for a tasty burrito is stronger than your concern over being Coke's bitch every moment of your life.

    - Jasen.

    1. Re:Brand loyalty by employees, or else... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      The difference there is that you signed a contract indicating you agreed to these restrictions. If you want a tasty burrito, don't go to Taco Bell.

  162. iop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you use Rockbox!

  163. The difference between a smart co and a dumb co... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... Is that the smart co will see this and say 'how do we make our own dogfood better than this?', then go out and do it.

    The dumb co will see this and put out a memo telling folks it's a CLM.

    Gosh, I wonder which way this will go?

    (And yes, I know M$ doesn't build the player hardware, but they _could_.. I mean, they build good HW (xbox, kynds, mice, joysticks)...)

  164. Not the same thing. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Coke and Pepsi compete. Microsoft and Apple don't really compete. Microsoft makes software, Apple makes hardware. True, the PC is viewed as MS domain, but MS doesn't actually manufacture the hardware. On this specific topic, MS doesn't have a product to compete with the Ipod. Sure, .wma is the format that MS would like to see adopted as the standard format for media content, but they aren't actually selling content in that format.

    MS even makes software for Apple computers. This would be akin to Coke making drink holders for Pepsi products if the analogy held true.

    When I worked at MS, I used to get a kick out of wearing an imac shirt I got from an apple vendor a couple of years ago. Most people wouldn't give it second notice, but every now and then, a clueless drone would make a comment. Now if I showed up with wearing a 'Linux Roxorz MS Boxorz!' shirt, I'm sure that would raise a few eyebrows....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Not the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple makes software too. Not only for its own machines, but for Windows (iTunes and QuickTime.) That's direct competition with Microsoft.

      Apple has always been Microsoft's competitor -- maybe even their number one competitor. When someone goes Mac, they've chosen against Microsoft technology, bigtime. And Bill Gates has always known this, even when Apple was at its most marginal.

    2. Re:Not the same thing. by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      That it seems to be causing a stir seems to indicate that MS *does* think it competes with the iPod. As another poster pointed out, MS gets money in liscensing the WMA format out to other people who are in hardware competition with the iPod, so in an indirect way, it makes sense if they take notice.

    3. Re:Not the same thing. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      No they haven't. Before the IBM PC, Microsoft was just another app vendor for Apple's computer systems.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Not the same thing. by MCBacklash · · Score: 1

      But they *will* be selling it soon....

    5. Re:Not the same thing. by Deeze · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of wearing my OS/2 "Been there, Done that" t-shirt on that hot August night back in '95, going into Comp-USA at midnight, eating pizza and drinking sodas on BG's tab whilst watching the drones line up to get their fix of Win95. Course me and a couple guys were cruising the "Other" isle. Did get an odd look from the MS rep. I just smiled and waved :D.

  165. Re:If I had their stock options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "iPod shuffle." Big p, little s.

  166. "A bit more stealthy" ? by solios · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I live in a college town, and every motherhumper who can afford khakis and polo shirts is running around with the signature white earbuds trailing out of their ears. The hugeass I'M A DJ NO REALLY headphones are totally last year.

    You rarely see the players but you know they're wearing them. Only a matter of time until muggers figure this out- these hipster doofuses all eager to be cool have market themselves as being worth at least fifty to a hundred bucks on the back-of-the-truck resale channel.

  167. Microsoft doesn't currently make hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck do you think the MS mouse is?

  168. No one can imagine YOU doing that... by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Your entire response was exactly the sort of petty crap you're so bravely fomenting against. You just did exactly what you'd do in real life -- which is, go spew a bunch of attitude.

    Does the cognitive dissonance hurt any?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:No one can imagine YOU doing that... by garcia · · Score: 1

      Your entire response was exactly the sort of petty crap you're so bravely fomenting against. You just did exactly what you'd do in real life -- which is, go spew a bunch of attitude.

      Cool, I didn't know any of my coworkers read Slashdot. Glad to hear of you over the net and never in person...

      I don't spew attitude. I tell people straight up that I am uninterested in workplace drama.

  169. And they only have 20% of the market. by crovira · · Score: 1

    NONE of them can make a good profit because they entered into competition prematurely and with a Microsoft product (WMA).

    And NONE of them can afford the usual Microsoft technique of surviving until revision 3.X.

    This is NOT the desktop (the corporate market where corporate buyers just wanted compatibility,) and Microsoft can't dictate personal tastes.

    As long as Apple sticks to its 'end-run' strategy around Microsoft, they're going to keep winning. Yeah Microsoft owns the desktop but that's ALL it owns, partly because of the anti-trust tactics it employed when it made sure that it owned it.

    NONE of the hundreds of people in my building and the thousands of people who work in the bank is rushing out to buy a WMA product.

    They just went out to J&R at lunch time to buy iPods though.

    That's going to continue happpening.

    There is NOTHING that Microsoft can do about it until it gets off the desktop (and that just aint happening.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:And they only have 20% of the market. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      NONE of them can make a good profit because they entered into competition prematurely and with a Microsoft product (WMA).

      Do you seriously believe that the reason the iPod has a large market share is because it can't play WMA? Most people are buying MP3 players. They really don't care if they can/cannot play WMA, OGG, AAC, etc.

  170. My prediction: WinTunes by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    Here it comes. Microsoft knows that it's losing this to Apple so their next "innovation" will be WinTunes. It will come preinstalled on all Windows machines and suddenly a lot of PC vendors will mysteriously no longer want to preinstall iTunes. Via some funky reverse-engineering WinTunes will work perfectly with iTunes music store and the iPod and Microsoft will extend the iTunes music store experience with unique features for WinTunes users. And then, a new WinTunes store and the WinPlayer. Apple will sue them for it, but it will drag on so long in the courts that Microsoft will have already driven iTunes music store and the iPod into an early grave.

    And people still won't listen when you and I and every "fanatical Microsoft hater" on the planet scream about illegal monopolies.

    Sigh. I'm only partly joking about this, btw. Sadly, I would bet money that this scenario or something like this will happen in the next few years.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  171. It's called an analogy? by ianscot · · Score: 1
    You might want to look the word up. Then look up "irony."

    I was imagining Bill's business practices, played in microcosm as an attempt to filch that $400 piece of hardware. Imagine the equivalent of BSA strongarming, on that small scale. Golly, no, I was not literally suggesting that Bill needs an iPod.

    (Sheesh.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:It's called an analogy? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      When you post, and you use a thesaurus while you're making your post.. What makes you think that big fancy words are going to make you sound "more correct"?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:It's called an analogy? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that big fancy words are going to make you sound "more correct"?

      What makes you think microcosm is a big, fancy word? Any why are you treating an explained joke like some sort of debate?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:It's called an analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... what was the "big fancy word" in his post? Microcosm? Strongarming? Filch? Equivalent? Literally?

      None of these should be unfamiliar to anyone with a third-grade education. In other words (small words you can understand):

      YOU ARE DENSE.

  172. Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Paradox · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And there were many MP3 players (both harddrive and otherwise) out before the iPod. Creative had at least half a dozen different models alone.
    Stop right there. If memory serves me correctly, the only notable entry in the world of large-capacity HD-based was the Nomad Jukebox. Rememebr that thing? Dumb as a brick and twice as heavy? The old, "Pray you get 3 hours of battery life" Nomad Jukebox?

    Haha. Very funny. Sorry, not a fair comparison.

    What Apple came up with was a high-capacity affordable music player with an interface that no one has betterted, to date, along with a weight/form/design factor that sits in an optimal tradeoff zone. They also championed a tight integration into a general music suite (as opposed to a separate tool that works on files).

    Oh yeah, and then Apple built the music store into the same client that plays the music, organizes the music, and syncs your iPod. So far only iTMS and MusicMatch even try to do this as more than a token gesture, and it's hard to argue for MusicMatch over iTMS.

    If that's not enough to make it an "innovation" then I don't know what is. Did carriage builders complain that the automobiel was really their invention, just without the engine and obedient steering?

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    1. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by rw2 · · Score: 1

      What Apple came up with was a high-capacity affordable music player with an interface that no one has betterted, to date

      I disagree. This is a subjective area, but I've owned both an iPod click wheel and a Rio Karma and overall I prefer the Karma. If I could have the karma menuing system with the iPod form-factor *that* would be the machine I would most like to own.

      Because the iPod menuing system is so weak I have a hard time understanding the cult of iPod except as, well, a cult.

    2. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Exactly. Everyone here is making the common mistake of believing that innovation==invention. Innovation is far more than that, it is invention and the process of bringing a new product to market successfully. Apple have proved that they are very good at it.

      An example of the difference that comes to mind is the fact that for many years, Philips were fantastic inventors, but crap innovators, the products were just not successful.

    3. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Paradox · · Score: 1

      This is a subjective area, but I've owned both an iPod click wheel and a Rio Karma and overall I prefer the Karma.


      You're welcome to your own opinion, but keep in mind that the market seems to disagree, in general.


      Err, I find the karma's interface is nearly useless compared to the iPod system. The only thing I've seen that's worse, to date, is the Rio Zen interface. My god, that's awful. My thumb hurts just using it.


      Because the iPod menuing system is so weak...


      How is it weak at all? It seems that everyone else copied it nearly verbatim.
      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    4. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yeah, and then Apple built the music store into the same client that plays the music, organizes the music, and syncs your iPod. So far only iTMS and MusicMatch even try to do this as more than a token gesture, and it's hard to argue for MusicMatch over iTMS.

      This is really the most brilliant thing Apple did, and it's obviously a strategy they had been working on for years as iTunes predated the iPod by quite a long time. The one-two combination of the leading playback hardware and the leading music store have raised a tremendous barrier to entry across the entire digital music market. No other music store stands a chance when their songs can't play on the most popular hardware, and other hardware is at a huge disadvantage when they can't play existing collections of ITMS music and can't be used to buy from the ITMS in the future (don't forget that you don't need to have an iPod to start buying from the music store). It's going to take simultaneous revolutions on the order of the original iPod and iTunes combined to break this kind of lock, and it's unlikely that will happen anytime soon.

    5. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by rw2 · · Score: 1

      You're welcome to your own opinion, but keep in mind that the market seems to disagree, in general.

      Not that I particularly care what "the market" thinks, but in this instance I seriously doubt that it has made any vote. I know very few people who have used anything other than the iPod and thus have no basis for comparison. This is fine from a market perspective, apple was an early mover who came out with a smooth unit and people thought it was "good enough". More power to them. But I've used a couple units now and they aren't my favorite.

      Err, I find the karma's interface is nearly useless compared to the iPod system.

      Heh. I guess we don't see things the same way!

      One thing I miss from my old Karma (may it RIP after its accident) was being able to see all the details associated with a song. Apple seems to have decided that only the artist, title and album are worth viewing.

      Also, I *strongly* prefer the karma browse idiom of picking a letter of the alphabet to narrow the scope instead of spinning through thousands of songs or hundreds of artists to get to the right point in a list of everything.

      On the iPod side I do love being able to rate songs and use that as criteria for playlist creation.

      Speaking of playlists. Is it possible to create one on the iPod? On the karma one can create playlists on the karma itself.

      Also, the silly wheel metaphor is OK I suppose, but at least on the 4g is way too sensitive on some menus and not sensative enough in others. Tuning is required here.

      How is it weak at all? It seems that everyone else copied it nearly verbatim.

      Not the Karma. ;-)

      Also, on the non-interface side, I prefer vorbis and the iPod of course doesn't speak it. This wasn't a deal breaker for me though as my wife had an mp3 only player so we were ripping to that anyway.

    6. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Paradox · · Score: 1
      Not that I particularly care what "the market" thinks, but in this instance I seriously doubt that it has made any vote. I know very few people who have used anything other than the iPod and thus have no basis for comparison. This is fine from a market perspective, apple was an early mover who came out with a smooth unit and people thought it was "good enough". More power to them. But I've used a couple units now and they aren't my favorite.
      I think people are more informed than you give them credit for. My grandfather tried a bunch of players and was going to buy a Creative Zen, until I told him he could indeed use an iPod on his PC. After he realized that, it took him about 10 seconds to decide which he wanted.
      Also, I *strongly* prefer the karma browse idiom of picking a letter of the alphabet to narrow the scope instead of spinning through thousands of songs or hundreds of artists to get to the right point in a list of everything.
      This is disingenuous, I'm sure you realize you're comparing philosophies and not features. The iPod revolves around its interaction with iTunes. In general you don't browse your library with an iPod, you use your iTunes organizations to control that. Since it's so easy to dock and control the iPod, and iTunes makes it so simple to control, the iPod deliberately does not go to great lengths to sort through large libraries.

      The same goes for making playlists. The iPod is, conceptually anyways, for playing, not creating lists. I've never tried this operation on a model like yours, but from the controls you seem to have, it'd be obnoxious at best.

      Also, the silly wheel metaphor is OK I suppose, but at least on the 4g is way too sensitive on some menus and not sensative enough in others. Tuning is required here.
      The "silly wheel metaphor" is pretty much hands-down superior, because you can do it continuously. For the Zen and the Karma, you have to keep lifting your hand over and over again, stroking the interface to get where you want.

      As for the sensitivity, maybe you failed to notice that the speed at which you move your hand directly corresponds to the speed at which you move (with a maximum acceleration curve). Move your finger slowly and it's very precise, move it quickly and it goes real fast.

      Also, on the non-interface side, I prefer vorbis and the iPod of course doesn't speak it.
      You're right, I guess. It doesn't speak vorbis. But I like how people complain that they can't get the "better sounding files of vorbis" on the iPod, but the machines they use to play MP3s have a demonstrably lower sound output quality than the iPod.

      That's like complaining that your car's acceleration is unresponsive while you're driving through 2ft deep mud. It's not the car, it's the environment in which it runs!

      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    7. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by rw2 · · Score: 1

      I think people are more informed than you give them credit for

      You are entitled to your opinion. Heck, I even said that mine was from personal experience. It could be that nearly everyone has tried both the iPod and the Karma. All I can base my opinion on is that 5:1 people I know haven't heard of the Karma and 20:1 they haven't tried it.

      This is disingenuous

      Excuse me? That's either the wrong word or you are being an ass.

      I'm sure you realize you're comparing philosophies and not features.

      I have no idea what you are talking about. Is philosophy another word for not giving the user the menu options he wants? The fact remains that I like the Karma better. If you want to say that I like the karma philosophy better and not the karma options then whatever. I don't have the first clue what value that distinction makes.

      In general you don't browse your library with an iPod, you use your iTunes organizations to control that.

      In my case, which is all I've ever argued, this is simply not true. I very, very rarely use iTunes. I use iTunes to rip cds and put them on my iPod. I've also created a few smart lists.

      Since it's so easy to dock and control the iPod, and iTunes makes it so simple to control, the iPod deliberately does not go to great lengths to sort through large libraries.

      Right. And this is my complaint.

      I don't find the iPod easy to doc and control because I am not often near my dock and often when I am I don't have the time nor inclination to boot up my laptop, make the usb connection and screw around with iTunes. I want these features on my iPod. This is one reason I liked the Karma better. I could do these things either from their software or from their device. I wasn't forced into what they thought the way I should use their gadget was.

      The iPod is, conceptually anyways, for playing, not creating lists.

      Exactly. This is one thing I don't like about it.

      The "silly wheel metaphor" is pretty much hands-down superior

      Dude, how can you make a statement like that. I said that *I* didn't like it. I don't claim that everyone should be like me.

      you can do it continuously. For the Zen and the Karma, you have to keep lifting your hand over and over again, stroking the interface to get where you want.

      Bullocks. If I want to simulate the weaker iPod interface on a Karma I can pull up a list of everything and just hold down the joystick until I get where I'm going. No continuous lifting required. Just sit there and wait and wait, just like the iPod.

      OTOH, if I instead want to get where I'm going more quickly, I can choose the letter I'm looking for and reduce the option set by a factor of 10-15.

      As for the sensitivity, maybe you failed to notice that the speed at which you move your hand directly corresponds to the speed at which you move (with a maximum acceleration curve).

      Yes. I've had an iPod for four months and I've never noticed that.

      (for the sake of the mods, that was sarcasm).

      You're right, I guess. It doesn't speak vorbis. But I like how people complain that they can't get the "better sounding files of vorbis" on the iPod, but the machines they use to play MP3s have a demonstrably lower sound output quality than the iPod.

      1) the iPod sound isn't any better than the Karma.

      2) there are several reasons to choose vorbis other than sound quality

      Don't be so defensive dude. I'm not saying you have to switch to Karma. Just that *I* like it better.

    8. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, the silly wheel metaphor is OK I suppose, but at least on the 4g is way too sensitive on some menus and not sensative enough in others. Tuning is required here.

      Or, possibly, reading the fucking manual.

      The scroll wheel is shaped like a doughnut, right, with an inner edge and an outer edge. If you run your finger around the inside edge of the wheel, the cursor moves quickly. If you run your finger around the outside edge it moves more slowly. If you run it in the middle, it moves at a speed between the two extremes.

      Back when the Mac was first introduced, it came with a fairly lengthy tutorial on how to use the mouse. It taught people things like "if you reach the edge of your desk, pick the mouse up and move it back to the center." If you didn't have this instruction, you'd be just as frustrated with a mouse as you are with a scroll wheel.

      (As for the rest of your blather ...in your opinion, everything that's good about the iPod and iTunes is really bad, and everything that's bad about the competition is really good. I'm starting to suspect that you're just trolling.)

    9. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by rw2 · · Score: 1

      Or, possibly, reading the fucking manual.

      Thanks.

      (As for the rest of your blather ...in your opinion, everything that's good about the iPod and iTunes is really bad, and everything that's bad about the competition is really good. I'm starting to suspect that you're just trolling.)

      Nope. Just like the Karma better. But it's nice to see that I can't have a different opinion without being a troll.

    10. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      Your "different opinion" is conspicuous and suspicious. You have no reason to like the other product better than the iPod; you just insist that you do. You claim that the other product's joystick is superior to the scroll wheel when (1) it clearly is not, and (2) you don't even know how to use the scroll wheel. Et cetera, et cetera.

      To me, that all adds up to the conclusion that you're not actually sharing your opinion. You're just talking down the iPod for some reason. Hell, for all I know maybe you work for some company that wants to compete with Apple, so you go on the Internet and reverse-astroturf. I have no idea.

      I'm just saying that your "different opinion" makes no sense, so it seems like you're trolling.

    11. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

      'Your "different opinion" is conspicuous and suspicious. You have no reason to like the other product better than the iPod; you just insist that you do.'

      Yikes, either the parent was a clever troll or Slashdot group think is even worse than I thought it was.

      You are not allowed to question the collective. Please report for re-education immediately.

      --

      Physics is good

    12. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by rw2 · · Score: 1

      Yikes, either the parent was a clever troll or Slashdot group think is even worse than I thought it was.

      But with group think you never have to decide anything yourself!

    13. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by rw2 · · Score: 1

      You have no reason to like the other product better than the iPod

      I listed four reasons in the great-grandparent.

      You claim that the other product's joystick is superior to the scroll wheel when (1) it clearly is not, and (2) you don't even know how to use the scroll wheel.

      lol

      1) I don't like the joystick. I like the menus. The joystick is a device prone to fail mechanically.

      2) I do know how to use a scroll wheel. I just happen to think it is not perfect.

    14. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Think Different(TM).

      Just don't have a "different opinion"....

    15. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No other music store stands a chance when their songs can't play on the most popular hardware, and other hardware is at a huge disadvantage when they can't play existing collections of ITMS music and can't be used to buy from the ITMS in the future (don't forget that you don't need to have an iPod to start buying from the music store).

      However, the songs (DRM'd WMA) from almost every other popular music store play on almost every other popular device. One free app (Windows Media Player 10) can play/organize all of these songs and can synch with all of these players. Several other good apps can also play/organize/synch these songs and devices.

      In the long run, I think WMA will win unless Apple allows more hardware, music stores, and apps to work with FairPlay'd AAC and iPods. Being the most popular now won't mean shit unless the buyer already spent a pile of money on iPods and DRM'd AAC files.

    16. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh yeah, and then Apple built the music store into the same client that plays the music, organizes the music, and syncs your iPod. So far only iTMS and MusicMatch even try to do this as more than a token gesture, and it's hard to argue for MusicMatch over iTMS.

      The music stores that use WMA don't need to build the client that plays the music, organizes the music, and synchs the device. They can use Windows Media Player 10 or any other good client (Quintessential Player, J. River Media Jukebox, WinAmp, RealPlayer, MusicMatch) to play, organize, and synch. Having one store integrated into one app may be valuable to those that don't want a choice. Some would rather use a web browser to choose among a variety of stores and then choose their favorite music player/organizer/syncher with their purchased songs.

    17. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      No, you didn't.

      You said that you wanted to see something other than title, artist, album, cover art, rating and duration. What that "something other" might be, God himself can only guess. Then you said that you "prefer" the extra step that the other thingy makes you jump thorough, but that's obviously based on your confusion about how to use playlists and scrollwheels. Then you said that the iPod doesn't let you create playlists, which is wrong. Then you said that the scroll wheel is either too sensitive or not sensitive enough, which is again based on the fact that you don't understand how to use it.

      You didn't list anything. You just trolled.

    18. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You certainly get defensive when someone doesn't agree with what you feel their opinion should be. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess you're a liberal.

    19. Re:Hold it right there, pre-iPod HD players? by Paradox · · Score: 1

      They can use Windows Media Player 10 or any other good client (Quintessential Player, J. River Media Jukebox, WinAmp, RealPlayer, MusicMatch) to play, organize, and synch.


      "And coming around the final turn, in the rear is 'Anonymous Coward Misses the Point.'"


      iTunes' integration with my music store does not limit me from using other music stores (although other aspects, like the file format, do). The real power of this integration is that there is no intermediate step between purchase and play/sync/organize/burn. It goes straight into your music collection, indexed and ready.


      The value of that is amazing. Integration with other products always seems to be an american product weak point, and these days there's no excuse for it.


      Besides, I do have a choice of music player (no one makes me use iTunes and there are other iPod sync tools out there), and I chose iTunes. I have a choice of music stores as well, and I have to ask, why would I use anything but the iTunes music store? More songs, the best DRM policies (although no DRM can be called good, less DRM is better).


      The only other music player I've seen that to-date even comes close to giving me as much control over my music collection is MusicMatch, and I still think iTunes is superior to it.


      People do have a choice, and they're choosing the iPod and iTunes Music Store in droves, even when they don't own macs. Heck, we just saw that Microsoft employees are buying them. This is called "Market Domination by a Superior Product and Superior Marketing." It's a rare thing to see, so sit back and enjoy it.

      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  173. No-Parc it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everyone needs a role model."

    And Xerox Parc is Apple's role model.

    1. Re:No-Parc it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the horse-drawn buggy was Henry Ford's model.

  174. Obsessed with bloody ipods, we are ! by orbit500 · · Score: 1

    It's the start of the slippery slope ! http://www.mantlepies.com/ipods.htm

  175. 80% of MP3 player owners, not employees by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    The article said "About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod"...

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:80% of MP3 player owners, not employees by klang · · Score: 1

      yeah, there are a couple of lines in the article that will clash seriously, when both are asumed 100% true.
      I find it very hard to believe, that there shold be 16.000 iPods on the Microsoft Campus. Whereas a claim that 80% of the mp3 owners have selected the iPod is more believable and follows the current trends in mp3 market shares.

  176. Can't handle the Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple fanboys just can't handle the truth.

  177. just read what it says .. by klang · · Score: 1

    "The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player."

    No, that's what you say it says. What it says is

    About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod

    note the "who have" in that sentence?

    That is, for every 5 people you see lurking around with earbuds in their heads, 4 will be iPod owners (regardless of the color of those earbuds, which is touched upon later)

    I actually read the article .. both before I posted and before it was refered by slashdot.

    1. Re:just read what it says .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE DENSE.

    2. Re:just read what it says .. by sootman · · Score: 1

      >"The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player."
      >No, that's what you say it says. What it says is
      >About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod
      >note the "who have" in that sentence?

      Jesus holy christ. This is the last time I am going to rely to this. Posted below, on three separate lines, are three consecutive sentences from TFA. Draw your own conclusions. The math might be off, everything else might be wrong, but THIS IS WHAT THE ARTICLE SAYS. Watch closely. Yes, he says "who have" in the first sentence, but he says "80 percent" twice and the one I'm referring to is the second instance of that. It's kind of tricky, but try to keep up. The part I'm referring to is between a bunch of !!!s. Ready? Here it comes.

      1) "About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod," said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous.
      2) "It's pretty staggering."
      3) !!!The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player!!! -- that translates to 16,000 iPod users among the 25,000 who work at or near Microsoft's corporate campus.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:just read what it says .. by klang · · Score: 1

      do you really believe that every single one of the twenty five thousand Microsoft employees have some sort of mp3 player?

      do you really believe, that there are 16.000 iPods on campus?

      will you totally disregard the possibility, that only one of the two lines in article is correct? (making #3 in your comment slightly incorrect and disregarding #2 as a comment)

      an 80% iPod market share among Microsoft employees is not really news, considering that 80% of the marked is what the iPod has..

  178. Headphones by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

    Place your bets on how long it'll be until we see stories about crooks mugging the white-headphone people.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  179. Pepsi truck coke can! by krudler · · Score: 1

    When I was at school I saw a driver in his pepsi truck, drinking a can of coke. I'm seriously not kidding!

    In an unrelated note I just realized that when i try to type "pepsi", the word, "penis" comes out. Weird? But I am serious about the coke truck thing, (note when I tried to write "coke", "code" came out... Wow, one of those days

  180. you lost ... martch 30th 2004.. by klang · · Score: 1
    1. Re:you lost ... martch 30th 2004.. by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      Wrong, I WIN. See, I secretly placed my bet as "negative 11 months", so your first article confirms it ;)

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    2. Re:you lost ... martch 30th 2004.. by klang · · Score: 1

      Damn, secretly placed bets! :-)

  181. MapPoint geography by IronyChef · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the author used MapPoint...

  182. M$ is not Dope! by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    So a Microsoft manager is comparing their own products to mind-altering substances? I won't dispute that!

    I will dispute that. Most reports from users of mind-altering substances are far more positive than reports from users of Microsoft products, in my experience.

    Try these phrases on for size:

    "Hey man, that was some great Excel! Got any more?"

    "Dammit, that f$cking bud crashed! I lost my whole report, and I have to present tomorrow!"

    See? Doesn't work.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    1. Re:M$ is not Dope! by lubricated · · Score: 1

      f$cking = fucking

      why do people do this.

      fuck, shit, asshole, cunt

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
  183. what misers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked as a busboy at a mid-level (something like a ~$15/entree place today) restaurant when I was in high school. My shift was something like 4PM-10PM. All employees got their choice of one entree from about the lower-priced 50% of the menu plus one heaping plate from the salad bar, plus as much soda as we wanted. We could eat on the clock as long as we kept up with our jobs. It was a minimum wage job, but I felt appreciated and worked hard.

  184. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, he's joking.

  185. Re:PC competition for I-Mini dotMAC? by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1
    Who's a bigger idiot, the troll or the person that responds to one?

    I hope this doesn't turn out to be ironic.

  186. analogy by krokodil · · Score: 1

    Last time I've checked Microsoft was not producing portable MP3 player with hard-drive.

    So it is not like parking your BMW car on General Motors factory parking lot, but rather riding BMW motorcycle to your work on GM factory.

  187. Sold off? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    3. Microsoft has already sold them off, and made a huge profit doing so.

    Care to provide a link or something? For years I wasn'r able to find anything showing MS sold those shares. Contrary I think they were traded for voting stock.

  188. How extremely noble of you by ianscot · · Score: 1
    What I said in my post was: in a different corporate culture, you wouldn't see that kind of petty stuff in the cafeteria. People would give each other a hard time for fun, and maybe there'd be people talking to each other a little bit. How exactly was that an endorsement of pettiness in the workplace, again?

    So if someone cut you off in a lunch line, you'd walk away. Because clearly so you're so extremely mature... Except, in response to a message you didn't read right, you went off the deep end with a bunch of "This is crap! I'm above all that!" hoo-ey. You spewed attitude -- without actually reading what you were responding to.

    Oh, no, you wouldn't be involved in office politics...

    What you're so "uninterested" in is the reactions people have to your lack of social skills. You think when you alienate them -- "because you don't play those kind of games" -- that means you're a real straight talker. Good luck with that. Hope your job on the LAN team works out for you.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:How extremely noble of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're so "uninterested" in is the reactions people have to your lack of social skills. You think when you alienate them -- "because you don't play those kind of games" -- that means you're a real straight talker. Good luck with that. Hope your job on the LAN team works out for you.

      Umm, wow, you're a self-righteous fuck aren't you? Did you get made fun of behind your back today? Yeah, you did.

      You know why you did? Because you think that you know how the fucking world works... Problem for you is that you have no fucking idea.

      You don't need to be "social" at work. You go to work, you do your work, you go the fuck home. I don't care to talk to other employees outside of the job description I need to complete. If you like to shoot the shit about who's fucking who and what MP3 player should be banned then you should come work for me and I'll be sure to give you enough work to keep your nose to the grindstone for the rest of the day.

      LAN team? Don't know what you're talking about. Must be some high and mighty bullshit that you are spewing again.

  189. It's all Microsoft's fault! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    If MS doesn't like their employees owning iPods, they should quit paying them so much.

    In fact, they could seriously diminish the iPod sales by cutting salaries, yet providing the bonus of a free player running MS software. Wouldn't that go over well!

    The real issues should be about listing to your iPod when you should be working. And not using the company Internet to download your DRM-infested music. I wonder if iTunes is blocked at the MS firewall?

    It has got to be w00t to run the nearest Apple Store to the MS campus. The guy ought to put a live web-cam with sound in there. :^)

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:It's all Microsoft's fault! by RedWolves2 · · Score: 0

      " If MS doesn't like their employees owning iPods, they should quit paying them so much."

      Just so you know I didn't read past that sentence...as soon as I read it I knew you were an idiot.

    2. Re:It's all Microsoft's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! Looks like somebody left their sense of humor on the bus this morning...

  190. wow, good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good job inserting your entire foot in your mouth. Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile in 1908, it was the Model T came off of the assembly line which showed unskilled or specialized workers that only did one task can put together a car in parts. If you check Wikipedia, they say Carl Benz, Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach (and associates) are credited with the invtention in 1886. Insightful yet incorrect, yes, it's Slashdot.

    1. Re:wow, good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dear douche bag,

      feel free to miss the point

      sincerely,
      a clue

  191. As Bismarck observed . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    Men who love sausage and respect the law should not observe the making of either . . .

    hawk

  192. M$ paid for my iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was intern at Microsoft in Summer 2003. At the end of the summer, my group bought me a 15GB iPod, and it was paid for with the group's morale budget.

    I don't think this is a big deal on campus, and I suspect most people replace their headphones because the ones that come with the iPod aren't all that great.

  193. mnb Re:Bill buys Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that's a bit different than the way the story was presented earlier in the thread, isn't it?

  194. And good luck running Win as a non-Admin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you could theoretically manage users on Windows with group policies, but anyone doing development (or anything outside of writing Word docs) will be stymied trying to get their work done without administrative rights.

    I couldn't even run (and obviously not install) the MS Spyware tool as a non-admin user.

  195. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaa Dude thats funny

  196. Re:that was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I found it funny. But I'm just a poor AC myself

  197. Duh by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who actually uses the white headphones? you're gonna get jacked within the year.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  198. mmmm . . .enchiritos . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    I'm not the only one who pretty much stopped going there when the old enchirito was dropped. They have somethign now with the same name, but it's not even similar.

    And at that time, if you managed to both spend $5 *and* eat it all, you'd be waddling back to your car. 59, 79, 99 . . .

    hawk

  199. Paul "I Love Microsoft FOR LIFE" Thurrott's reply by very · · Score: 4, Informative

    Paul "The Microsoft's Whipping Boy" Thurrott sez:
    "Hide The Truth, Here Comes Leander Kahney
    Leander Kahney is a reporter for Wired News. I've been doing a little research into him lately, after being hugely disappointed with his book "Cult of Mac," which is a collection of his Mac-oriented Wired articles. The problem? Kahney's not into facts. Instead, he likes to sprinkle his articles with anecdotal evidence and quotes from a single source, which he then sells as facts. No big deal, right? I mean, that's what most bloggers, tech new aggregator sites, and Mac news sites do too. Sure. But the problem is that Kahney writes for Wired. And thus, he is representing a respected source. That is, people believe this crap."


    Read more @: http://www.internet-nexus.com/

    Honestly, who in the right mind would want to believe Paul Thurrott?

    Has Paul Thurrott even realized that he is the Rush Limbaugh of Microsoft?

  200. Who's the moron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robert Scoble is a moron, who thinks too much about himself. That's why he's not even a program manager, he's a technical evangelist. When you're not good enough to produce at least something (specs), but have been with the company for a long time - that's the position they give you at MSFT.

    Scoble hasn't been working at Microsoft for a long time. He's been working there for about one year.

  201. And Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many Microsoft employees have FireFox installed ? :-D

  202. On the go playlists by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

    Speaking of playlists. Is it possible to create one on the iPod? On the karma one can create playlists on the karma itself.

    Yes. They're called "On the go" playlists, can you can create as many as you like, one at a time. In the menu system, when you are on a song/artist/genre/etc., you press and hold the selection button. The entry flashes and is added to the current "On the go" playlist. When you're done creating the playlists, you can save it off and begin a new one. These "On the go" playlists are synced back into iTunes when you get back to your computer so you can mess about with them.

    There's a little animation at the top of this page.

    1. Re:On the go playlists by rw2 · · Score: 1

      Not quite how I want it to work, but _extremely_ useful in any case. Thanks much for the tip!

      I especially like that I can add a couple songs to my on-the-go playlist and begin playing it. Then circle back and add more songs. (I used to do this all the time on the Karma so it was the first thing I tried just now)

    2. Re:On the go playlists by SeanAhern · · Score: 1
      Not quite how I want it to work, but _extremely_ useful in any case. Thanks much for the tip!

      You're welcome. Yeah, there are a couple nits I have with the iPod UI, but it's pretty good.

      Now that I'm thinking of it, lemme see if I can list some of my nits:
      • No access to information other than Title/Artist/Album/Rating
      • No ability to add a song to an on-the-go playlist while looking at the "playing" screen
      • Though the title scrolls horizontally if it's too long, the artist and the album do not. If they're too long, I just get ellipses (...). Bleah.
      • Have to manually create "A", "B", "C", etc. playlists if I want to browse Artists/Albums/Titles that way.
      And my biggest nit:
      • Rating is the only thing I can change (other than the automatically updated play count). I want some ability to "mark" a song if it has problems (skipping CD, bad sound quality, cut off song) other than giving it a 1-star rating. I'd like to use the stars for real song rating, rather than having to reserve one of my 5 for the "special" case.
  203. You're a caustic one arent' you? by Mars+Ultor · · Score: 1

    And you're extremely dense. His point, to paraphrase was "Henry Ford is to the car as Apple is to the portable Mp3 Player"

    And he's right. How many of those pre-ipod models had the market share the iPod does? Apple came and turned the iPod into THE mp3 player. They didn't invent the damn thing anymore than Ford invented the car - but they got it into the hands of hundreds of thousands (millions?) of people better than anyone else. Period. Next time think a little before being a negative shit.

    --
    "Nokia is not a country, it's the capital of Finland!" -Moderated "Informative". Yeesh.
    1. Re:You're a caustic one arent' you? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      How many of those pre-ipod models had the market share the iPod does?

      I'm not sure who the first one to the market was with a HDD based MP3 player, but I'm pretty sure they had 100% market share for atleast a little while.

    2. Re:You're a caustic one arent' you? by Mars+Ultor · · Score: 1
      but I'm pretty sure they had 100% market share for atleast a little while


      Now you're just nitpicking. yes, on a pure technicality, the FIRST hdd mp3 player to market had 100% of the market until other HDD mp3 players came out. Wow, that just totally blew my point out of the water. No, wait - it didn't.

      What I'm arguing is that the iPod has become THE mp3 player - it has decimated other HDD players AND flash players - it doesn't discriminate. Apple found the magic needed to bring the iPod to that kind of popularity (over 60% of the market share of ALL mp3 players). If semantics is all you have to reply with, I recommend saving your bandwidth.
      --
      "Nokia is not a country, it's the capital of Finland!" -Moderated "Informative". Yeesh.
  204. I don’t have mod points... by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

    ...but my two points of karma say you're spot-on.

  205. The Other 20% are Lying by akpoff · · Score: 1

    ;-)

  206. Mary Jo? by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    ""In the media group they all smoke the company dope on that one," the manager said.

    Mary Jo Foley, editor of Microsoft Watch, said "

    I like how they have "smoke...dope" right before someone named "Mary J"(ane). :P

  207. That's pretty funny by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    "Digital Joy" is a wierd name in that context, probably more meaningful to the OTHER convention going on down the road from CES.

    I don't think they've done a compelling job so far telling the average consumer why it is bettre to stick with Windows Media.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's pretty funny by althalus1969 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, "Digital ... what?!"

      You know, "Joysticks" and "Digital" creates a very .. uum.. interesting image.

      Anyway, Microsoft, your bad. You were developing some good hardware there, how did you miss this one?

  208. Slashdot History: Apple releases iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Posted by CmdrTaco on Tuesday October 23, @11:20AM
    from the well-thats-not-very-exciting dept.


    The BrownFury writes "At an invitation only event Apple has released their new MP3 player called the iPod. iPod is the size of a deck of cards. 2.4" wide by 4" tall by .78" thick 6.5 ounces. 5 GB HDD, 10 hr battery life, charged via FireWire. Works as a firewire drive as well. Works in conjunctions with iTunes 2. Here are Live updates". No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    First iPod article on slashdot.

  209. Microsoft makes software for Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since Mac OSes only run on proprietary Apple hardware, they are not substantive competitors.

  210. Re:LOLJEWS by e2ka · · Score: 1

    haha, this is why I browse at +6 Troll.

  211. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft doesn't even make a music player. This is like saying that the most popular photocopier on Microsoft campus is a Xerox machine. Who cares.

  212. I'll save you the trouble by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    Look up PJB100 on google and you'll find out about the first widely distributed HD MP3 player.

    Nice player, it is considered big these days, but battery life is excellent, and the sound is terrific.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:I'll save you the trouble by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      And nobody --nobody --remembers it. Which was precisely my point. It doesn't matter who was the first. What matters is who was the first to do it right.

  213. Please please. Look up the PJB100. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.epinions.com/RemoteSolution_PJB_100_6GB _USB_MP3_Standard_Player__Blue___Hard_Drive_Storag e_PJB100_6GB

    It originally came with a 4.6G HD.

    I'll bet the iPod team ripped a few of these apart. The only thing it lacked really, was iTunes. Other than that, its still better than 75% of the MP3 players out there.

  214. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By your rules, Microsoft Invented the Operating System.

    Shit man, if we can just make it up as we go along, Sony invented the transister. Zenith invented the TV set. Oh, and Apple invented the portable MP3 player. Hell, they invented MP3's, and earbuds too.

    What else are you completely mistaken about? I'll bet lots of things. Did you know that the US was once a colony of England? Or that nobody believed the world was flat? Or that Christopher Columbus never made it to mainland U.S.?

    There's a whole world out there to learn about. I envy you. You get to learn real facts. The rest of us learned them in grade school, but you've got a whole brave new world in front of you.

    P.S. Stephen King didn't invent the horror novel, either.

  215. Its no use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're talking with people who think henry ford invented the car, and bill gates invented the PC.

    I mean seriously, people are stupid. Like this guy.

  216. Brand loyalty by employees, or else...EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The difference there is that you signed a contract indicating you agreed to these restrictions. If you want a tasty burrito, don't go to Taco Bell."

    I rather doubt those contracts are legal.

  217. Headphones for stealth? by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bullshit. Those crappy white headphones that come with it suck balls and you should only use them if you think the iPod is a status symbol rather than a solid device. People aren't using other headphones to hide the fact that they're using an iPod. They're using other headphones because the white ones suck ass.

    They hurt and if you have to take them out - which, being a portable device you probably will frequently - they have to be held onto or something so they don't flop to the ground. Get a set of headphones that have some sort of connection between the two earpieces so they can be quickly hung around your neck and then replaced just easily.

    Newsflash Apple, people's ear canals aren't round.

    I prefer Sony MDR-A44L's over anything but currently it costs half as much to have another pair shipped (mine finally broke after 5 years of abuse) as it does for the headphones themselves. Like $15 headphones with $7 shipping. grrrrr

    My second favorite pair is are these Yamaha studio-like ones that are remarkably light and comfortable enough to wear for 8+ hours (as are the MDRs), but with a 6' cord. However they are basically like a pair of ear muffs they can make your head too hot in a hot room (my office is).

    I miss my MDRs.

    --

    Question everything

  218. Steathly Headphones? by Rai · · Score: 1

    Employees have even started using different headphones to be a bit more stealthy about it.

    I have an iPod and I use different headphones because the ones included aren't very comfortable. They don't sound that great either. As great (and expensive) as the iPod is, it should include better headphones.

  219. Well, I'd argue by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    The PJB100 was never intended to take the market. It was simply first. Hango had no presence in the U.S. market, and still doesn't.

    They simply made a gadget that proved there was a market. The software was not pretty, but it had one great feature that iTunes does not:
    It can/could rip a song from a CD and save it directly to the player.

    Which is just trivia.

    The point is that Apple didn't invent the MP3 player. They didn't invent the HD MP3 player. They didn't even popularize the MP3 player. But they managed to take it from the realm of gadgets into people's pockets. That's a big deal. And its enough of a big deal that we don't have to exaggerate and say "Apple invented the MP3 player".

    Sony didn't invent the transistor radio, but they sure made them popular.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Well, I'd argue by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      No, the point is that for all practical purposes, Apple did invent the music player. If it weren't for Apple, they'd still be, well, about as popular as the "PJB-100."

  220. Re:Paul "I Love Microsoft FOR LIFE" Thurrott's rep by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    It's impossible to have any sense of shame after you've sold your soul.

  221. The company dope must be methamphetamines... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No self respecting company that smoked actual
    Marijuana and offered it on a company wide basis
    would be as shitty and overbearing as M$ has proven
    themselves to be.

    Rating the business as an individual?? I'd say
    they're a hardcore meth-head with a side crack
    habit that goes on an occasional PCP binge.

    Tired of all the time they waste for myself and those around me.

    Wish they WOULD smoke pot... turn them into a better company it would.

  222. Bay Area Pizza Huts serve Coke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >This includes if your boss sees you at Pizza Hut, >Taco Bell or KFC, since those entities are owned by >TriCon, who also owns Pepsi.

    I regularly commute between the Southeastern US and the Bay Area. In the Bay Area, every Pizza Hut I have been to serves Coke.

    Can anyone shed some light as to why? If they're owened by the company that owns Pepsi, you'd think they'd sell Pepsi, like everywhere else.

  223. Mod this guy up. He's exactly right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're buying a freaking toy to listen to music. Its not a necessity even.

    People buy these things because they think it somehow reflects on their good taste. I have an iPod, but I hide it, and I don't use the earbuds because (a) earbuds in general are a bad idea (b) they suck (c) they fairly scream "Look at me, I'm unique an hip, just like the other 20M people who bought an ipod".

    Really just pathetic. Give this post a +5 insightful.

    As for people cutting in line, kick their ass a little.

  224. Which is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider 90% of everything crap. Including people. If you're a person who buys stuff to enjoy it, great. If you're a person who buys stuff because you think its a reflection on your life, I hope that you're sterlized or have a horrible accident before you manage to breed.

    Pathetic.

  225. No Competition from MS by Mystic0 · · Score: 1

    Parent is right. Microsoft does not have a product to directly compete with the iPod, so it seems perfectly logical and acceptable for MS employees to use the iPod.

  226. How many UAW auto workers drive Foreign cars? by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    They do it. You can go to ANY GM plan and see Fords and Chrysler cars right next to the GM cars. You will even see Cheap foreign cars. You might get some flack but not too much. It depends who you are as well...

    --
    Your Average Joe
  227. It's from 'Accidental Empires' by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    ...I know, because I've been rereading it this week.

    ~Philly

  228. If by "snagged" you mean... by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    .."received permission from Xerox to use concepts Xerox had no plans to put into a marketable product, in exchange for letting Xerox invest $1M in Apple stock," then yes.

    If you were implying they just stole the GUI from PARC, then you're incorrect.

    There was an implicit quid pro quo-- $1M investment in exchange for a tour of PARC and demo of their stuff. In "Triumph of the Nerds," former PARC employee Adele Goldberg explains that she flat out refused to demo the stuff in question to the Apple contingent until she was directly ordered to do so by her superiors, and even explained the reason for her refusal to them. And they ordered her to do the demo.

    ~Philly

  229. The reporter is an idiot by ajp · · Score: 1

    Example: The reporter claims Bellevue Square Mall is in "nearby Bellingham". A quick check of a map--Microsoft supplied or otherwise--will show that Bellingham is two freaking hours away from Microsoft campus. So where could Bellevue Square be? Um, Bellevue, maybe? A city which is, oh, yeah, right next to Microsoft's Redmond.

    Face it: if Wired's reporter can't even be bothered to fact check a MAP how can you even believe that this article isn't a piece of overblown crap? The only difference between this Wired article and most Slashdot comments is that Wired actually prints on paper. This is a fine example of a fanboy whipping on Microsoft for instant anti-establishment credibility.

    1. Re:The reporter is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You forgot to tell us how Bill Gates's dick tastes.

    2. Re:The reporter is an idiot by zulux · · Score: 1

      You forgot to tell us how Bill Gates's dick tastes.


      He found out Bill was gay - his dick tastes like shit.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:The reporter is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs told me it tastes like chicken.

  230. Obligatory History Of The World, Part I Quote by 808140 · · Score: 1

    "Do you care if it falls?"

    "What?"

    "The Roman Empire."

    A pause. "Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck it..."

  231. Hi Mr. Paul Thurrott! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul Thurrott is posting on SlashDot?

  232. That explains it, then by melted · · Score: 1

    He'll get over it. I was pretty enthusiastic during my first year there, too. Then the whole Dilbert-likeness of it all started driving me insane.

  233. Total crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read any MS employees blog, and they all confirm that this "news" is total crap.

    Not that ./ crowd cares for facts but anyway.

  234. "I have seen lots of Softies blog about it" by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    Mary Jo Foley, editor of Microsoft Watch, said she had no knowledge of the iPod's popularity on Microsoft's campus, but has noticed a lot of iPod chatter among Microsoft's legions of bloggers.

    "I have seen lots of Softies blog about it," she wrote in an e-mail.

    I don't envy Ms. Foly reading "lots" of Microsoft bloggarrhea. The poor woman!

    Still, at least the Softies have hard ons for something good. ;-)

  235. Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at Creative, everyone uses Creative players here. Oh, we have a couple of iPods and iRivers around but they are for... research purposes. Somehow it seems many people here believe we are the ones who will become the iPod killer eventually.

    Posted anonymously too for obvious reasons...

  236. A genuin MSN Music employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yepp, that sounds like something we would do (in fact, I've done it on several occasions). I mean, why are those people advertising the competition? It makes no sense.

  237. Cartoon of beer? by timbos · · Score: 1

    I know that Carlsberg brewery gives it's higher level employees ONE cartoon [sic] of beer per month

    You mean something like this?
    ;-)

  238. Nah! They are hiding their iPods from Ballmer by imtheguru · · Score: 1

    Remember, Ballmer said that iPod users are thieves and that the most common format of music on an iPod is 'stolen'.

    i would like to see his response to the rampant "thievery" by the company's own loyal staff.

    Then again, Ballmer probably can't put his money where his mouth is, coz his foot is blocking the way.

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
  239. Halo Effect? by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    OK, so what happens when M$ people start requisitioning imac mini's etc to feed their iPods?

    1. Re:Halo Effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because we all know you can't run itunes on windows, or use an ipod with windows. If apple had their way they would require that you must own a mac in order to use an ipod.

  240. Re:It's all Microsoft's fault! FLAMEBAIT -1 by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Oh! Looks like somebody left their sense of humor on the bus this morning.

    Or they need some Flamebait -1 to offset all that other good Karma they've been getting. :^)

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  241. Chick-Fil-A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chick-Fil-A is great, in my experience. The one in our area is run by people who are indeed serious Christians, but whatever your faith, you have to applaud business people who highly value the well being of both their customers and their employees.

  242. Because astroturfing doesn't exist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your individual experience does not constitute the rest of the world.

    Says the guy whose opinions on the iPod are based purely on Google. If it's on the Internet, it must be true! The fact that Google searches retrieve results is incontrovertible proof!

    Please. Go back into your hole.

  243. Fuzzy math by halepark · · Score: 1

    "About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod," said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous.

    The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player -- that translates to 16,000 iPod users among the 25,000 who work at or near Microsoft's corporate campus."


    Uh, I think that's 80% of whatever % of the 25,000 have music players.

    1. Re:Fuzzy math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no. It is crystal clear math... and poor reading comprehension on your part.

      25,000 Softies
      80% have an MP3 player
      80% x 25,0000 = 20,000

      80% of the MP3 owning Softies have an iPod
      20,000 x 80% = 16,000

  244. It ate my rolling papers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... then i went to snort the line of cocaine ...and it was like, beep beep beep beep beep beep beep..

    Ellen Feiss

  245. Dell is innovative and crazy in their own way by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    Once the war is won, the Police maintain the status quo. They aren't interested in creating markets or inventing new products, they just want things to say the same and keep making cash for their organization. In many ways, this is Dell.

    Though, from another perspective, Dell is innovative in their sales, manufacturing, and logistical model. So, while they don't care about the novelty of the end product, the reason for their success is what they do to create those products -- faster, cheaper, etc. than the competition.

    Dell killed IBM's PC business and is on the way to killing HP's.

    --
    -Stu