Yeah, a device were you have to delete a lot of crappy music including voice SPAM somebody uploaded on it after your walk through town, that sounds like an iPod killer to me.
This guy is probably no different - he wants Apple to succeed, he just critizes what he believes are dumb things.
You mean the guy who uses his site "Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows" to cheer every move Microsoft makes, only mentioning Apple when Microsoft is "obviously" better and was first to do something? Do you have a web site "Cleveland Indians Rock"?
Yeah, I was wondering about this too. Apple beating projections for the post-christmas quarter would seem to be a sign that they're doing pretty well right now...
Well, that's why you are not a stock market analyst.
Well, that's nothing new. Problem is, Apple is one of the first to report. For years the market made "educated" guesses that the others would at least have fared as well as Apple. And sometimes it even was right.
Stocks slumped Thursday for the second straight day in a brisk, broad sell-off that knocked major indexes to new lows for 2005.
Investors cited unease about the economy, pointing to signs that tighter credit and high energy costs are taking the wind out of consumer spending and corporate profit growth.
Apple as a "luxury" brand is of course the obvious victim for losing the most, so the carefull know when to get out. Does this make sense? Well, this is the stock market we're talking about.
Layer 3 switching is a relatively new term, which has been ?extended? by a numerous vendors to describe their products. For example, one school uses this term to describe fast IP routing via hardware, while another school uses it to describe Multi Protocol Over ATM (MPOA). For the purpose of this discussion, Layer 3 switches are superfast rout-ers that do Layer 3 forwarding in hardware. In this article, we will mainly discuss Layer 3 switching in the context of fast IP routing, with a brief discussion of the other areas of application.
The whole point of the MM03 issue is that it took 6 years before the underlying errors (substantive or cosmetic doesn't matter for this problem) were uncovered. No matter whether MM03 is right or wrong in its larger conclusions, it's clear that nobody replicated MBH98 properly for six years all the while it was being used in the political realm to make huge changes in economic/environmental policy.
So far nobody has been able to verify M&M's claims either. I can see why you are perfectly happy with that.
I really can't comment on the reliability of unnamed authors with unnamed publications providing similar results that I can't check. You may very well be right but without any documentation, your comment is worthless in a scientific debate on reliability.
No. If you use the MM05 convention and include all the significant PCs, you get the same answer. If you don't use any PCA at all, you get the same answer. If you use a completely different methodology (i.e. Rutherford et al, 2005), you get basically the same answer. Only if you remove significant portions of the data do you get a different (and worse) answer.
9) Was MBH98 the final word on the climate of last millennium?
Not at all. There has been significant progress on many aspects of climate reconstructions since MBH98. Firstly, there are more and better quality proxy data available. There are new methodologies such as described in Rutherford et al (2005) or Moberg et al (2005) that address recognised problems with incomplete data series and the challenge of incorporating lower resolution data into the mix. Progress is likely to continue on all these fronts. As of now, all of the 'Hockey Team' reconstructions (shown left) agree that the late 20th century is anomalous in the context of last millennium, and possibly the last two millennia.
though you forgot that data is regularly backed up if you have half a brain and knocking out a major system in your network could cripple it and cost a great deal of money
How much good does a back-up do, when you can't access your hard-drive. Or hard-drives. Or your back-up servers hard-drives. You'll have to buy a new hard-drive to back-down your stuff.
First of all: there is more optimization in that article than just that of the idle loop (even if the given reason speeding up the generation of that spinning "beach ball of death" is another joke).
But that "idle loop" actually does something, it increments a counter - and thus calculates a lot of numbers. The optimized, vectorized loop does the same (yes, it does calculate the exact same numbers), just faster. Another victory for AliVec.
Who said anything about a typo. Others get basically the same results as MBH, even when using completely different methods. The only outlier is MM, who say everybody else claims 2+2=5.
Slashdot Mirror
64-Bit Audio File Format - Record more than 4GB of audio into a single file in Core Audio Format.
Remap modifiers such as control and caps lock for compatibility with Windows and UNIX keyboard conventions.
Yeah, a device were you have to delete a lot of crappy music including voice SPAM somebody uploaded on it after your walk through town, that sounds like an iPod killer to me.
Holy perspective mishap, Batman! That sight must have been stitched from at least 3 different images.
You mean the guy who uses his site "Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows" to cheer every move Microsoft makes, only mentioning Apple when Microsoft is "obviously" better and was first to do something? Do you have a web site "Cleveland Indians Rock"?
Yeah, why would anybody buy a Mac Mini instead of an iMac, when the iMac has just been updated 4 month before the release of the Mini.
Well, that's why you are not a stock market analyst.
Well, that's nothing new. Problem is, Apple is one of the first to report. For years the market made "educated" guesses that the others would at least have fared as well as Apple. And sometimes it even was right.
with the Russians Claim Their Hackers the Best In the World Article - Winner is a Russian ;-)
He basically did the same with Cracker . An actor who enjoys playing different roles and avoids being typecast. He must be a complete moron.
Somebody already installed some on your computer for you.
The question is: How many will try to use The Force to get ahead in the line?
The "previous image" shows a vehicle with wheels.
The bartender says: "Sorry, one dollar minimum charge."
Somehow I have the feeling that this is the deciding factor for most politicians.
Scew you, Lamer Smith. Get Real to open up their store first before you open your potty mouth again.
And that goes for you too.
The original iMac was announced months before it was available to the public.
So far nobody has been able to verify M&M's claims either. I can see why you are perfectly happy with that.
I really can't comment on the reliability of unnamed authors with unnamed publications providing similar results that I can't check. You may very well be right but without any documentation, your comment is worthless in a scientific debate on reliability.
Dummies guide to the latest "Hockey Stick" controversy
How much good does a back-up do, when you can't access your hard-drive. Or hard-drives. Or your back-up servers hard-drives. You'll have to buy a new hard-drive to back-down your stuff.
But that "idle loop" actually does something, it increments a counter - and thus calculates a lot of numbers. The optimized, vectorized loop does the same (yes, it does calculate the exact same numbers), just faster. Another victory for AliVec.
Hey, I think it works even better the other way around.
Who said anything about a typo. Others get basically the same results as MBH, even when using completely different methods. The only outlier is MM, who say everybody else claims 2+2=5.