No, I'm an atheist which means that I'll only believe in your deity if you can prove it exists. Now please prove to me that your god exists or stop bothering me.
This is local temperature change you are looking at and then claiming it is global warming, and if it were the other way (everything was getting colder locally) you would ignore it and say that it is globally that matters.
That is not to say there is not global climate change, there is, but there is also a lot of claims of stuff being related which is not (that is not to even say your local situation is not.)
But more to the point when you see a glacier going the wrong way for your theory or whatever you find a way to write it off and then quote the movement of a few buildings locally as proof positive the other way than the evidence in the article? Few people argue about global warming but they do discuss how big a deal it is and if it is caused by man. Also as with your local example of local climate change people adapt to changes.
The changes I'm seeing all over the N-Atlantic tell me that this is more than a 'local climate change', science confirms this and we have examples of what happened earlier in the earth's history when this much carbon dioxide was de-sequestered into the atmosphere. Long story short, it wasn't pretty. Given the choice between believing thousands of scientists saying the climate is changing and a few useful idiots shilling for the fossil fuel industry who say it isn't, I'm going to pick the scientists.
For some evidence of global warming. It's been decades now, and everything they've shown us as evidence has turned out not to be the case.
I wonder if in fifty years they'll be going on about global warming, even when it still isn't happening?
Here you go: http://berkeleyearth.org/globa..., now rejoice in the fact that your life long quest is over. Perhaps you can spend the rest of your life waiting for Trickle-down economics to start working?
For starters, Christianity does not implicitly or explicitly teach that global warming is real or not.
Secondly, per capita Christianity has (probably, no real number here) more educated people than any other religious group.
i.e. there are more ignorant people that subscribes to Hinduism, Buddhism or Islam.
Where is your Hate now?!??!/Checkmate
They can't be all that intelligent if they believe in an entity whose existence cannot be proven and whose priests tell them how to live their lives, which they do for rear of their god whose existence cannot be proven will toss them in a hell that nobody can prove exists.
No it doesn't. I can measure climate change, I can observe it and I can feel it's impact on my surroundings.
Funny, it reminds me of Chris Reimer's video channel audience that is shrinking by the minute. For sure he ain't no god although he likes to think he is somehow.
A bowl of Pasta can be god if you choose to worship it. That's how religion works.
I takes more faith to believe in Climate Change theories than to believe in God.
No it doesn't. I can measure climate change, I can observe it and I can feel it's impact on my surroundings. God is an imaginary being that only your clergy can communicate with and whose existence cannot be documented. This invisible being that only the clergy can communicate with tells them how it wants you to behave and that it will smite you and cast you into a place of eternal torture called hell whose existence cannot be documented either. Give me climate science over your imaginary friend any day.
You guys have so much deceit in this thread. I get you're trying to lie to others to change their opinion, but please for your own sake tell me you're not actually lying to yourself about this stuff to make yourself feel better? That is not healthy. There's a few of you here that should probably seek help.
What? That the free Beacon is a conservative rag that hired Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump? That is a matter of public record. This is only the end of Season 1, but there is so much more dirt on Trump that can be used to fuck up his life, I'm looking forward to Season 2.
Yet it is not the GOP. Is it? But why does the DNC and the Clinton campaign get a free pass from you? Is it because you believe that those you favor shouldn't have to play by the same rules, or suffer the same consequences as those you don't like? Justice isn't blind, right?
Free pass on what? Opposition research? Are you seriously telling me that the GOP has never done that because they have Christian Morality ? It's not illegal to compile opposition research on somebody and if that turns up that he suffers from urolagnia that's not the DNC's fault.
Free Beacon is an independent, conservative leaning news site. The Clinton campaign and the DNC are directly involved in the election. BIG difference there...
.. the beacon is funded by Republican donors, including Paul Singer, which makes it part of the larger Republican hive, it is not independent nor is it fair and unbalanced. But never mind that, since when is it a crime for political parties like the Democrats to dig up opposition research on their opponents? Or is that another one of those thing that's perfectly OK when Republican do it, but becomes an act of treason when Democrats do that exact same thing?
What's the difference between information and news, from the standpoint of a technology company like Apple, and why?
Information: grep searches the named input FILEs (or standard input if no files are named, or if a single hyphen-minus (-) is given as file name) for lines containing a match to the given PATTERN. By default, grep prints the matching lines.
News. (broke 25 minutes ago at the time of writing according to Google News):
Mueller told Justice Dept. three weeks ago he wouldn't reach a conclusion on obstruction.
That is a twisted history you have. Citation needed - because everything I've seen says the dossier was started after the DNC and the Clinton campaign began funding Fusion GPS. Rachel Maddow would be proud of you!
I don’t have to go get far for a citation you said it yourself:
No, that is not correct. It was started by the Free Beacon, but then dropped...
... although you tried made it sound like the Washington Free Beacon is some DNC mouthpiece by neglecting to mention the fact that the Beacon is a conservative site that shills for the RNC. The Beacon contracted with Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump in October 2015. When Trump was crowned god emperor of right wing loony-land Fusion was dropped by the Beacon and the DNC took over the dirt mining project but that still does not change the fact that it was started by a Republican entity.
Question: Why doesn't ASUS build their computers so the standard Microsoft Updates would fix most of the problems, and not deal with their own update tool.
Answer: Because using certified parts is expensive too.
So use cheap parts + cheap labor and sell their systems at market price = profit.
That post is a microcosm of why I never buy Asus -> Mod this guy up.
Eh, no, It was the Republicans who commissioned the 'dossier', the Democrats just picked up where the Republican left off after they decoded Trump was their new god emperor.
No, that is not correct. It was started by the Free Beacon, but then dropped. It was not funded by the GOP. However, we do have the Clinton campaign and the DNC paying Fusion GPS. So no - you're wrong. The GOP did NOT commission the dossier. That's a lie. The Democrats own that one - and like most things, they want to get rid of their connection - so they lie about it.
I didn't say the GOP commissioned that dossier I said it was Republicans, the Washington Free Beacon is a conservative website that shills for the GOP which makes it part of the GOP hive-mind. When the Beacon dropped the dossier after Trump became god-emperor of the right wing Fusion GPS sold it to the DNC. Now that is free market capitalism at work, as a conservative you should approve:-)
Trump (not the Republicans) win because the Democrats ignored the "little people" on their quest for "progression". You know, the "little people" that work and pay taxes and wonder what the hell is it in for them? The Democrats don't even pay them lip service anymore. And no, I'm not a Republican or a Trump fan. But Hillary was a "progressive" idiot. And her husband was a shyster who should be selling used cars somewhere.
Yeah, and Trump is doing sooooooo much to help the little people.
The Clinton campaign did the same thing. The difference is, we've had 2 years of investigation into the Trump campaign and it was found to not be collusion. Shall we now do the same with the Clinton campaign and the DNC, who financed the dossier which was written by a foreigner, with Russian influences, to damage their opponent? Or is that not collusion?
Eh, no, It was the Republicans who commissioned the 'dossier', the Democrats just picked up where the Republican left off after they decoded Trump was their new god emperor.
Oh, another sky screamer who thinks if he wishes hard enough the big bad orange man will go away to jail and a new age will be ushered in where gays are put upon a pedestal, free speech is outlawed when they disagree with popular opinion and nobody owns guns.
Gays? Another Christian Conservative Trumpkin who thinks everybody else is as insecure in their sexual orientation as he is.
After two and a half years of liberal russophobia and accusations of treason, we arrived to this? Did anyone actually with at least half a brain believe this was going to end somewhat different? Anyways, it's hard to believe that Congress and the corporate news media will leave the President alone after this. So watch the news echo chamber closely over the next few days as Russia investigation now morphs into "obstruction of justice" and "campaign finance" investigation.
Well, Steve Bannon did say at the beginning that Trump was too stupid to collude with his own campaign so him colluding with Russia was a ridiculous idea since that would exceed his extremely limited mental capabilities.
The Mueller report is just the end of the beginning. Grab your popcorn, folks.
Yup, the real fun begins when they out his tax returns charge him with everything from insurance fraud to tax cheating and start disassembling Trump's 'empire'.
Did you really want Clinton selling out to big tech firms?
Fancy the idea of training your replacement that is willing to take â..." your salary?
So you are basically arguing, by bringing Clinton into this, that if Clinton is entitled to commit crimes it's OK for Trump to commit crimes too? Wasn't Trump supposed to drain the swamp?
You basically called ~82% of the world population stupid [1]. And over 70% of them are "Minorities" [2]
You are basically everything the nu-Left hates these days...
[1]https://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/ [2] https://www2.palomar.edu/anthr...
No, I'm an atheist which means that I'll only believe in your deity if you can prove it exists. Now please prove to me that your god exists or stop bothering me.
This is local temperature change you are looking at and then claiming it is global warming, and if it were the other way (everything was getting colder locally) you would ignore it and say that it is globally that matters. That is not to say there is not global climate change, there is, but there is also a lot of claims of stuff being related which is not (that is not to even say your local situation is not.) But more to the point when you see a glacier going the wrong way for your theory or whatever you find a way to write it off and then quote the movement of a few buildings locally as proof positive the other way than the evidence in the article? Few people argue about global warming but they do discuss how big a deal it is and if it is caused by man. Also as with your local example of local climate change people adapt to changes.
The changes I'm seeing all over the N-Atlantic tell me that this is more than a 'local climate change', science confirms this and we have examples of what happened earlier in the earth's history when this much carbon dioxide was de-sequestered into the atmosphere. Long story short, it wasn't pretty. Given the choice between believing thousands of scientists saying the climate is changing and a few useful idiots shilling for the fossil fuel industry who say it isn't, I'm going to pick the scientists.
For some evidence of global warming. It's been decades now, and everything they've shown us as evidence has turned out not to be the case.
I wonder if in fifty years they'll be going on about global warming, even when it still isn't happening?
Here you go: http://berkeleyearth.org/globa..., now rejoice in the fact that your life long quest is over. Perhaps you can spend the rest of your life waiting for Trickle-down economics to start working?
>Implying Christians are the real issue
For starters, Christianity does not implicitly or explicitly teach that global warming is real or not. Secondly, per capita Christianity has (probably, no real number here) more educated people than any other religious group. i.e. there are more ignorant people that subscribes to Hinduism, Buddhism or Islam.
Where is your Hate now?!??! /Checkmate
They can't be all that intelligent if they believe in an entity whose existence cannot be proven and whose priests tell them how to live their lives, which they do for rear of their god whose existence cannot be proven will toss them in a hell that nobody can prove exists.
No it doesn't. I can measure climate change, I can observe it and I can feel it's impact on my surroundings.
Funny, it reminds me of Chris Reimer's video channel audience that is shrinking by the minute. For sure he ain't no god although he likes to think he is somehow.
A bowl of Pasta can be god if you choose to worship it. That's how religion works.
I takes more faith to believe in Climate Change theories than to believe in God.
No it doesn't. I can measure climate change, I can observe it and I can feel it's impact on my surroundings. God is an imaginary being that only your clergy can communicate with and whose existence cannot be documented. This invisible being that only the clergy can communicate with tells them how it wants you to behave and that it will smite you and cast you into a place of eternal torture called hell whose existence cannot be documented either. Give me climate science over your imaginary friend any day.
You guys have so much deceit in this thread. I get you're trying to lie to others to change their opinion, but please for your own sake tell me you're not actually lying to yourself about this stuff to make yourself feel better? That is not healthy. There's a few of you here that should probably seek help.
What? That the free Beacon is a conservative rag that hired Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump? That is a matter of public record. This is only the end of Season 1, but there is so much more dirt on Trump that can be used to fuck up his life, I'm looking forward to Season 2.
Yet it is not the GOP. Is it? But why does the DNC and the Clinton campaign get a free pass from you? Is it because you believe that those you favor shouldn't have to play by the same rules, or suffer the same consequences as those you don't like? Justice isn't blind, right?
Free pass on what? Opposition research? Are you seriously telling me that the GOP has never done that because they have Christian Morality ? It's not illegal to compile opposition research on somebody and if that turns up that he suffers from urolagnia that's not the DNC's fault.
Holy fucking SHIT you are retarded.
No, I'm using Trumpkin logic on you, but that's pretty much the same thing ... and why do you worship feces?
Free Beacon is an independent, conservative leaning news site. The Clinton campaign and the DNC are directly involved in the election. BIG difference there...
.. the beacon is funded by Republican donors, including Paul Singer, which makes it part of the larger Republican hive, it is not independent nor is it fair and unbalanced. But never mind that, since when is it a crime for political parties like the Democrats to dig up opposition research on their opponents? Or is that another one of those thing that's perfectly OK when Republican do it, but becomes an act of treason when Democrats do that exact same thing?
What's the difference between information and news, from the standpoint of a technology company like Apple, and why?
Information:
grep searches the named input FILEs (or standard input if no files are named, or if a single hyphen-minus (-) is given as file name) for lines containing a match to the given PATTERN. By default, grep prints the matching lines.
News. (broke 25 minutes ago at the time of writing according to Google News):
Mueller told Justice Dept. three weeks ago he wouldn't reach a conclusion on obstruction.
That is a twisted history you have. Citation needed - because everything I've seen says the dossier was started after the DNC and the Clinton campaign began funding Fusion GPS. Rachel Maddow would be proud of you!
I don’t have to go get far for a citation you said it yourself:
No, that is not correct. It was started by the Free Beacon, but then dropped...
... although you tried made it sound like the Washington Free Beacon is some DNC mouthpiece by neglecting to mention the fact that the Beacon is a conservative site that shills for the RNC. The Beacon contracted with Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump in October 2015. When Trump was crowned god emperor of right wing loony-land Fusion was dropped by the Beacon and the DNC took over the dirt mining project but that still does not change the fact that it was started by a Republican entity.
Answer: Those people are expensive.
Question: Why doesn't ASUS build their computers so the standard Microsoft Updates would fix most of the problems, and not deal with their own update tool. Answer: Because using certified parts is expensive too.
So use cheap parts + cheap labor and sell their systems at market price = profit.
That post is a microcosm of why I never buy Asus -> Mod this guy up.
Eh, no, It was the Republicans who commissioned the 'dossier', the Democrats just picked up where the Republican left off after they decoded Trump was their new god emperor.
No, that is not correct. It was started by the Free Beacon, but then dropped. It was not funded by the GOP. However, we do have the Clinton campaign and the DNC paying Fusion GPS. So no - you're wrong. The GOP did NOT commission the dossier. That's a lie. The Democrats own that one - and like most things, they want to get rid of their connection - so they lie about it.
I didn't say the GOP commissioned that dossier I said it was Republicans, the Washington Free Beacon is a conservative website that shills for the GOP which makes it part of the GOP hive-mind. When the Beacon dropped the dossier after Trump became god-emperor of the right wing Fusion GPS sold it to the DNC. Now that is free market capitalism at work, as a conservative you should approve :-)
Except that they should recoup the cost of the whole investigation in the fines and unpaid taxes they uncovered.
Same for the Hillary e-mails investigation.
The more flexible the language, the more ways you can screw up and allow a security hole.
Case in point: PERL.
Trump (not the Republicans) win because the Democrats ignored the "little people" on their quest for "progression". You know, the "little people" that work and pay taxes and wonder what the hell is it in for them? The Democrats don't even pay them lip service anymore. And no, I'm not a Republican or a Trump fan. But Hillary was a "progressive" idiot. And her husband was a shyster who should be selling used cars somewhere.
Yeah, and Trump is doing sooooooo much to help the little people.
The Clinton campaign did the same thing. The difference is, we've had 2 years of investigation into the Trump campaign and it was found to not be collusion. Shall we now do the same with the Clinton campaign and the DNC, who financed the dossier which was written by a foreigner, with Russian influences, to damage their opponent? Or is that not collusion?
Eh, no, It was the Republicans who commissioned the 'dossier', the Democrats just picked up where the Republican left off after they decoded Trump was their new god emperor.
Oh, another sky screamer who thinks if he wishes hard enough the big bad orange man will go away to jail and a new age will be ushered in where gays are put upon a pedestal, free speech is outlawed when they disagree with popular opinion and nobody owns guns.
Gays? Another Christian Conservative Trumpkin who thinks everybody else is as insecure in their sexual orientation as he is.
Welcome to Fantasy Island. I hope you enjoy your stay.
Oh, another Trumpkin who thinks Trump is a Jesus like beacon of morality and honesty in a dark swamp of corruption.
whenever talking about the 2016 election. Clinton is very relevant.
... because she won the popular vote and Trump is a looser.
After two and a half years of liberal russophobia and accusations of treason, we arrived to this? Did anyone actually with at least half a brain believe this was going to end somewhat different? Anyways, it's hard to believe that Congress and the corporate news media will leave the President alone after this. So watch the news echo chamber closely over the next few days as Russia investigation now morphs into "obstruction of justice" and "campaign finance" investigation.
Well, Steve Bannon did say at the beginning that Trump was too stupid to collude with his own campaign so him colluding with Russia was a ridiculous idea since that would exceed his extremely limited mental capabilities.
The Mueller report is just the end of the beginning. Grab your popcorn, folks.
Yup, the real fun begins when they out his tax returns charge him with everything from insurance fraud to tax cheating and start disassembling Trump's 'empire'.
Anti globalist sounds very pro common man to me.
Did you really want Clinton selling out to big tech firms?
Fancy the idea of training your replacement that is willing to take â..." your salary?
So you are basically arguing, by bringing Clinton into this, that if Clinton is entitled to commit crimes it's OK for Trump to commit crimes too? Wasn't Trump supposed to drain the swamp?
The real question is why did our president just have a Twitter fight with a dead man?
I think George Conway has you covered on that subject: https://twitter.com/gtconway3d...