"And so I've asked my team to develop a proposal for a new data dividend for Californians, because we recognize that data has value and it belongs to you."
Except that this wealth is not only created by Californians, or even only by Americans. The wealth is created by people all around the world. So that wealth should be split evenly by the number of users in those other countries/states/provinces.
Bitcoin is private, in the sense that all you know is that address A sent X bitcoins to address B. You don't know who is associated with the addresses. Bitcoin is reliable and secure, because once the transactions are in the blockchain, nobody can block or revert them*. Bitcoin is efficient... well, at least it used to be, but it turns out proof-of-work is a terrible idea once you get past the proof-of-concept phase.
* There's always the danger of a 51% attack, but anyone stupid enough to attempt that would destroy the value of their own coins.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe only allow certificates to be used on devices registered with the enterprises themselves?
The weakest link in hardware/software security is people.
To summarize: people are a problem. - Douglas Adams (short version of the original to better fit the topic)
Haven't your heard about the new 74HC00? It has built-in AI!
Don't give them ideas!
So... a real thing built with a fake intelligence talking about imaginary beings?
Today only! Any Alexa-enabled device, only $6.66!
You can give away smartphones for free, it wouldn't make much difference.
It's the damn carriers that are expensive, especially in Canada.
Here are the data-only plans from the three major carriers:
Rogers: $25/400MB
Bell: $30/500MB
Telus: $30/500MB
Yes, those are megabytes caps, in 2019. Not a typo.
Thankfully, Slashdot does not have this problem.
Hold my beer / challenge accepted.
That's the kind of stuff a mythbuster-style show could do.
Except that this wealth is not only created by Californians, or even only by Americans. The wealth is created by people all around the world. So that wealth should be split evenly by the number of users in those other countries/states/provinces.
But that's not the fault of the Bitcoin protocol, that's the exchanges themselves.
Tracer is really cute and sexy. Besides, she's an imaginary character, who the fuck cares if she's gay or not?
Bitcoin is private, in the sense that all you know is that address A sent X bitcoins to address B. You don't know who is associated with the addresses.
Bitcoin is reliable and secure, because once the transactions are in the blockchain, nobody can block or revert them*.
Bitcoin is efficient... well, at least it used to be, but it turns out proof-of-work is a terrible idea once you get past the proof-of-concept phase.
* There's always the danger of a 51% attack, but anyone stupid enough to attempt that would destroy the value of their own coins.
And we're supposed to trust the advice of someone who can't even spell "hardwire"?
No secondary backups? Talk about amateurs.
It depends on the definition of "criminal".
Damn, talk about annoying.
Oh! So they do know where the data ended up. Just restore it! You know, like in the movies?
Bitcoin is all of those. Unfortunately, there's humans involved in the transactions, which is where the flaws reside.
You just have to hope that they know sign language.
I think the car is just the container for all the money.
https://southpark.fandom.com/w...
Apple no longer makes router and now Amazon is selling those.
What's next? AmazonOS?
I'm no math expert, but it does sound like he was spending 3x the money he earned.
Tong Zou, that's who. Didn't you read the article?
More to the point, never buy eggs because they're too fragile.