Slashdot Mirror


Activision Blizzard Cuts 8% of Jobs Amid 'Record Results In 2018' (kotaku.com)

On an earnings call this afternoon, publisher Activision Blizzard said that it would be eliminating 8% of its staff. "In 2018, Activision Blizzard had roughly 9,600 employees, which would mean nearly 800 people are now out of work," reports Kotaku. "This afternoon, the mega-publisher began notifying those who are being laid off across its various organizations, which include Activision, Blizzard, and King." From the report: On the earnings call, Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick told investors that the company had "once again achieved record results in 2018" but that the company would be consolidating and restructuring because of missed expectations for 2018 and lowered expectations for 2019. The company said it would be cutting mainly non-game-development departments and bolstering its development staff for franchises like Call of Duty and Diablo. Development sources from across the industry told Kotaku this afternoon that the layoffs have affected Activision publishing, Blizzard, King, and some of Activision's studios, including High Moon. At Blizzard, the layoffs appear to only have affected non-game-development departments, such as publishing and esports, both of which were expected to be hit hard. "Over the last few years, many of our non-development teams expanded to support various needs," Blizzard president J. Allen Brack said in a note to staff. "Currently staffing levels on some teams are out of proportion with our current release slate. This means we need to scale down some areas of our organization. I'm sorry to share that we will be parting ways with some of our colleagues in the U.S. today. In our regional offices, we anticipate similar evaluations, subject to local requirements."

Thankfully, the letter promised "a comprehensive severance package," continued health benefits, career coaching, and job placement assistance as well as profit-sharing bonuses for the previous year to those who are being laid off at Blizzard. "There's no way to make this transition easy for impacted employees, but we are doing what we can to support our colleagues," Brack wrote.

112 comments

  1. Don't worry by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    "This afternoon, the mega-publisher began notifying those who are being laid off across its various organizations, which include Activision, Blizzard, and King."

    Don't worry - I'm sure there are still plenty of iterations of Candy Crush still in the pipeline.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $4 billion made by metrotransactions in 2018 were not enough to keep them afloat? The whole economy is doomed.
      And I'm pretty sure Candy*rush(tm) is from another publisher, I think is from Facebook, their thing is more heroine... I mean, yet another World of Warcraft clone :p

    2. Re:Don't worry by kenh · · Score: 1

      Not enough to keep them afloat

      They didn't say they were going out of business, they said they were over-staffed - there is a difference.

      Did you notice this in TFS?

      Thankfully, the letter promised "a comprehensive severance package," continued health benefits, career coaching, and job placement assistance as well as profit-sharing bonuses for the previous year to those who are being laid off at Blizzard.

      They are giving the laid-off workers their profit-sharing bonuses - that seems pretty reasonable.

      This action will take them from 9,600 employees down to around 8,800, that's a huge number of employees, I think the company is doing fine.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Don't worry by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      And I'm pretty sure Candy*rush(tm) is from another publisher, I think is from Facebook,

      Nope, it's King.

      Facebook seems to do very little actual development. They mainly open up their platform to companies like King and Zynga, as well as look for new ways to market your personal data to whomever they can.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re: Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably profit sharing bonuses for the year you worked there (it says previous year) is a contractual obligation. The continuing healthcare, etc is good, though.

    5. Re: Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonuses are never contractual below C-level positions, a bonus is always discretionary.

    6. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Profit sharing can be 0.000001%, so 'seems' to be pretty reasonable might be the operative word. The truth is, Blizzard is going into re-hash mode, just like EA and other major game companies looking to lower their risk and raise temporary profit values for share holder happiness.

      Face it folks, Blizzard is shit. Good thing you have phones, though, right?

    7. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8800 employees seems like nothing.
      I've worked for businesses that were global and had a presence of 50k+ employees. I've also worked for businesses where it was 15 and 100-200 people.
      I guess I'm shocked that Activation/Blizzard is not bigger than 8800 to begin with.

    8. Re: Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In France the government promised min wage workers would get a bonus : paid with tax money and since it's not wage it doesn't contribute to your unemployment benefits, retirement and healthcare. (things the government wants to put on the chopping block). Hence if you read in the media "they got a 100 euro [actually 90 or less] monthly min wage increase and they're still rioting" that's why.

    9. Re:Don't worry by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      It's a way to clean out the house on all those under performers, or people in positions that are not doing much. And all companies have them.

  2. eSports vs streamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thing is eSports has to compete with established game streamers, and people are already invested in their favorite personalities. And when it comes to competition, it's much more interesting to participate than to watch.

    eSports, like other sports franchises, are subject to just as much BS involving drugs, prima donnas, branding schemes and other things that tarnish the experience and repel viewers.

    There are controversies with big streamers as well, but just as accessible are those that aren't involved in controversy. With eSports you don't have much choice. It's either put up with BS or don't watch.

    1. Re:eSports vs streamers by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      Games. Games for regular people to play. Games for regular people to have fun playing.

      The rest is just a diversion.

    2. Re:eSports vs streamers by Altrag · · Score: 1

      There's also the issue that Blizzard consistently treats esports as an afterthought to fill the streams at blizzcon. I think overwatch may be done a bit better (haven't watched it much) but ive watched streams of all their other esports leagues and they're just not done all that well. The announcers tend to be flat and boring, the production quality is low, etc.

      I mean it's not like they're streaming a local school club or something but compared to the behemoth - league of legends - they tend to come across as a bit of a sad also-ran.

      If Blizzard wants to really put a stake in esports, they'll have to put in some effort (and likely a lot of dollars) to really define their role and their games rather than just acting like it's nothing more than another stage spectacle once a year (or so.)

      Of course I have no idea if Blizzard does care.. maybe they're perfectly happy with their esports always being second tier rather than putting in the effort. And if that's the case then I guess it is what it is and their leagues will continue to be mediocre side show attractions.

    3. Re:eSports vs streamers by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Since Blizzard was taken over by Activision, it's all about the profits. eSports isn't that much of a money generator, it promotes your game/brand and creates a fanbase but it doesn't immediately give you (the diminishing) millions of dollars like releasing Call of Duty 21 on XBox.

      eSports and the 'classic' Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft and Diablo) games have a loyal following, but they're hard games to make and trying to monetize them with DLC (eg. Diablo 3) hasn't worked well because the fans expect a fully fleshed out game with consistent lore when you pay top dollar for the title/franchise, you don't expect a Blizzard game to take you out of the game every 5 minutes into the real world to remind you to spend real money. Even things like Heroes and Hearthstone with loads of DLC and a huge fan base are 'too much work' given the revenue it brings in and the revenue model is based on respectively cramming and gambling which has turned a lot of people off.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:eSports vs streamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they literally invest in a full sized arena? That's an afterthought?

  3. Learn by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    to help journalists learn to code.
    Do the art work for computer courses that teach code to journalists?
    Create an Ada OS?
    Help with CUDA like support on Linux?
    Mixed Reality & VR https://research.mozilla.org/m...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Learn by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Teaching journalists to code was taking the piss for them telling coal miners, learn how to code. Most of those so called journalists, if they could have learned how to code, they would have learned how to code, they ain't THAT stupid but yeah, some people, well, lets be fucking honest, most people simply can not learn how to code in any meaningful commercially competitive productive manner, not a hope, simply the way it is.

      No matter the effort at training in anything, in commercially competitive terms, some and an many cases, many will simply fail to compete and be unemployable in the work they were claimed to have be trained in and in truth extremely unlikely to complete the training.

      They are simply doing disposable workers, no need for them in this quarter so fire them and hire new cheaper workers for 3 quarter, 2 quarters from now and fire them when not needed. Work cheap for blizzard, you suckers, get out and get out as soon as possible, EA Blizzard, the disposable workforce and we are disposable customers and you know what EA Blizzard are just as disposable for us. Down they go, another company will take up that commercial space, probably a better company, until the psycho take it over and it collapses and the cycle continues.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds a lot like a strawman attack. Can you cite any particular journalists/articles that told coal miners to learn to code?

    3. Re:Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/05/06/477033781/from-coal-to-code-a-new-path-for-laid-off-miners-in-kentucky

      learn to use google.

    4. Re: Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not journalists telling them to learn to code but rather reporting on efforts related to reskilling opportunities.

    5. Re:Learn by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Most of those so called journalists, if they could have learned how to code, they would have learned how to code, they ain't THAT stupid but yeah, some people, well, lets be fucking honest, most people simply can not learn how to code in any meaningful commercially competitive productive manner, not a hope, simply the way it is.

      A lot of people simply can't learn to write a coherent and correctly punctuated sentence either.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re: Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Language evolves dealwiddit. Shito shito frito doritto.

    7. Re: Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking the piss.

      Gee. Wonder where you're from.

    8. Re: Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess instead of you learning to Google that guy needs to learn to read.

    9. Re: Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there were a bunch of articles, by people who worked for newspapers in the job of gather facts and presenting them to the public, that said it wasn't bad for miners to lose their jobs, because those out of work miners could take classes to learn how to program.

      Alternately, you could say: Journalists told miners to Learn to Code.

      These things are equivalent. You're just whining because it's your side's ox being gored this time.

  4. Never Knew That Activision Took Over Blizz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know why WoW has been going down the toilet and ramping up the micro-transactions.

    1. Re: Never Knew That Activision Took Over Blizz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happened a decade ago.

    2. Re: Never Knew That Activision Took Over Blizz by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      Blizzard had a fair amount of autonomy under Activision until just recently. With Morhaime removed as company president and the recent focus on cost-cutting, you should expect increasing prioritization of shareholder value over entertainment value.

  5. It's been a record year for blunders by WolfgangVL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The video-game industry spent 2018 shooting itself in the foot. Waiting for Bethesda and EA to follow suit.

    "missed expectations for 2018 and lowered expectations for 2019" == The microtransactions and loot-boxes are not working out. We need to start actually making games with realistic budgets and profit expectations.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Waiting for Bethesda and EA to follow suit.

      Didn't Bethesda promise a pay-to-win iOS Elder Scroll's game at last year's WWDC?

    2. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd hope Bethesda would learn with Fallout 76 but they continue to polish that turd

    3. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I think that Bethesda and EA already both have followed suit. Each had terrible sales for flagship games (Fallout 76 and Battlefield V for Bethesda and EA respectively) and EA had its stock price cut in half by the end of 2018.

    4. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by darkain · · Score: 2

      What are you waiting for? EA pioneered canning people. https://heavy.com/games/2017/1...

    5. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just a realistic budget and profit expectation that's needed - what's needed is some risk. They almost all play it safe, and just iterate the same-old-same-old now with better graphics.

      Trust that you've got good people, (that is, if you haven't laid them all off) and let them try something new. A lot of the tries will be flops, but if you can find that big new thing, you're going to make bank. No, it's not a sure thing. But FFS, you're just laying people off left and right anyway. Might as well take a risk to have a break-out hit in the process.

      If I was in the business, I think I'd rather try something crazy innovative and get laid off when it didn't work out than grind out another clone of a decade old game only to get laid off anyway.

      And if you're just trying to milk your stock incentives, you've got enough name recognition and money to risk having to take your golden parachute and go cry on your yacht for 6 months before getting hired somewhere else. Take a risk and shoot for a giant payout! I mean, if you're the C* of a major gaming company, you absolutely do not have anything to lose. At least nothing that you're going to miss.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    6. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The video-game industry"

      What's with the hyphen? Seriously?

    7. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those laid off people need to team up and make indie games.
      4 or 5 people per team a few basics need to happen: Storytelling, UI, Coding, Art.

      Chucklefish did quite well with a "team" of one by listening to the customer on reddit.

    8. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      I think they meant follow suit in layoffs.

    9. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EA was even killing studios before that, they just weren't owned by EA (they were just the publisher). I signed a non-attribution, non-disclosure agreement with them, so not naming names. They could sue me into the stone age.

    10. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The industry may have, but the ones doing the layoffs have announced quite a hefty profit and the CEO just scored himself a nice 8 figure bonus.

    11. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      what's needed is some risk

      Oh I don't think anyone has taken a bigger risk than Blizzard recently. Announcing a mobile game at Blizcon? The developers are lucky they didn't get lynched by the angry mob.

    12. Re:It's been a record year for blunders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for the Sears CEO. Just keep cutting and riding the pig. Bacon tastes good. While it lasts.

  6. Bad all around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not a record year. Don't let the misleading slashdot headline and summary fool you. They are idiots.

    The real news on Activision Blizzard

    1. Re:Bad all around by Creepy · · Score: 2

      Yeah - I got laid off after 9.8% growth when they required 10% growth, as did 15% of the company. Got a consultant role that paid basically the same (benefits aren't as good), but pay is decent; Everyone I know that was laid off was hired by the same consulting company, and all of them extremely competent. I have no idea what the layoff criteria was, but I could pick 15 more incompetent workers than the did, but I imagine it was all about salary.

    2. Re:Bad all around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: you're not actually a developer are you?
      So... what would you say... you do?
      And why are you at a video game company? You know that producing video games requires programming and digital art and very little of anything else, right?

    3. Re:Bad all around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awwww poor little innocent anonymous sweet summer child...

      What i do? I weasel my way around to higher paying positions by screwing everyone else. I specially like to screw naive children like you, your tears taste so sweet.
      This works because i handle people on individual level and suck up to he bosses who will support me if i get into trouble. Its called corruption but we don't like to call it that way, it scares children. And if you every even look at me the wrong way, you are outta here, mister. Now get back to work!

  7. Supply And Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rise of high quality easy to use engines have led to an oversupply of games. That in turn has reduced demand for all games. Companies with high expenses can no longer hide behind a technical barrier of entry and thus limited supply of titles. The market can no longer sustain companies with large budgets producing mediocre games. We've seen layoffs and bankruptcies in 2018. I expect it will get worse over the coming years, with the only real business winners being the two engine makers, the distributors, the console producers, and the third world Unity developers.

  8. Non-dev = commodity human by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >> the layoffs appear to only have affected non-game-development departments

    Good news from the perspective of a Slashdot citizen: tech skills continue to keep us out of the pool of commodity humans.

    1. Re: Non-dev = commodity human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I think non-dev I think about the team behind Overwatch comics that was tasked with making a character gay.

    2. Re: Non-dev = commodity human by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Tracer is really cute and sexy. Besides, she's an imaginary character, who the fuck cares if she's gay or not?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re: Non-dev = commodity human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb people that fantasize with her being their imaginary girlfriend and future waifu... and on the other side, the other people fantasizing being in a threesome with her girlfriend.... So, immature people with poor social skills.

    4. Re: Non-dev = commodity human by kenh · · Score: 1

      So, immature people with poor social skills.

      That describes their entire customer base.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:Non-dev = commodity human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good news from the perspective of a Slashdot citizen: tech skills continue to keep us out of the pool of commodity humans.

      A silver lining for the laid off non-technical personnel is that they now have more time to learn to code.

    6. Re: Non-dev = commodity human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Story writers probably fits into the dev category.
      Non-devs seems to be marketing staff, people managing social media and those involved in e-sports.

    7. Re:Non-dev = commodity human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I think non-game-dev I wonder if they got rid of tech support staff (internal and consumers), network admins, web devs...

    8. Re: Non-dev = commodity human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i thought he meant soldier?

  9. Who the hell plays Wow anymore? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I remember back on slashdot where Wow was so big whole stories were on it and addiction was covered. Today? A few old geeks may still log in on occasion. I think micro transactions have went there course and now the CEO wants his bonus and since Wow can't grow he needs to cut costs to give himself more bonus money.

    At this point I would sell if I were a long term investor. Maybe stay for short term boosts but since Kung fu panda a half decade ago I am surprised it is still around. WOTLK was the last good expansion ... written before Activation bought em.

  10. ActiBliz is going full mobile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their game plan is to go full mobile and automate as much as they can to keep their costs down. I'm surprised it wasn't more people given the axe. Oh and Asia/China is their market interest now, everyone else can pound sand judging by how they're doing things lately.

  11. They're prepping for the recession by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    that everyone knows is coming. It's so frustrating because we know a recession is coming and we're doing jack squat to stop it. Just more layoffs to keep the stock prices high and maybe another round of tax cuts.

    It's not even like we don't know what to do: Regulate Wall Street so they can't gamble with our money (and make no mistake, it's out money since they're "too big to fail"), pump some money into the supply side (Tax Cuts for people who actually spend money, e.g. the working class, and the "Green New Deal"), increase the minimum wage and lift those stupid bloody tariffs. It doesn't do good to put tariffs on China when they can just build their stuff in Mexico and ship it here duty free (lord I shouldn't have to explain that).

    And where the hell is the media in all this? Why the hell aren't they calling the current Admin out for doing nothing to stop the recession?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They're prepping for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming Canada?

    2. Re:They're prepping for the recession by SirAstral · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "It's not even like we don't know what to do:"

      Boy you got that right!

      " Regulate Wall Street so they can't gamble with our money"

      Never going to work... not ever!

      The only thing that is going to happen is that new laws designed but make it look like you are getting what you wanted but ultimately will be used to just make you subservient and to further entrench the wealth of the elite into a smaller group of hands.

      You, like most others, are going to spend their entire lives under the thumb of the bourgeois because you keep giving them power over you. When you elect someone to perform that regulation you are either going to elect them from the crowd you are trying to regulate or they will join their cause when all of that money get flashed in their face. They will crumble too... and not long after you have already trashed them as part of the problem the moment they make even a single mistake.

      " It doesn't do good to put tariffs on China when they can just build their stuff in Mexico and ship it here duty free (lord I shouldn't have to explain that)."

      No, you do have to explain that, and what is the real shame is that you figured that much out but still think you can "vote in" relief.

      There is only 1 viable source of regulatory control... the consumers, for them to effectively boycott shit businesses and institutions... that is REAL democracy! Voting with your wallets, and as long as you convince yourself that voting in a buyable stooge that is going to betray you to look after the interests you should be looking after you are going to deserve every dagger you get in the back!

      It is better to have to deal with the inconveniences of too much liberty than to have to deal with the inconveniences of too little liberty.

      Regulation will only work long enough for the generation that put it into place to die, after which it is forgotten and then turned into a bludgeon to further bash over the heads of the next generation... just like College Tuition fees and the near impossibility of getting out from under them even during a bankruptcy.

      The entire financial institution from top to bottom is there to treat you like a servant and regardless of the mouth breathing of either party it will be maintained.

    3. Re:They're prepping for the recession by kenh · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow, you seem really pissed, but uninformed.

      How does increasing the minimum wage help us avoid a recession?

      Are you aware of the new trade agreement w/ Mexico? It sounds like you had your talking point ready from the NAFTA days of yesteryear.

      The tariffs are a bargaining chip to lower Chinese tariffs on American goods. It is amazing how many critics of Trump fail to grasp even the most basic negotiating tactics - for instance, why does the administration say they can't rule out another (partial) government shutdown? Because to take that off the table weakens their bargaining position. Kinda like when the government says a military invasion/boots on the ground is a possibility in some country - they don't want to send our troops over there, they want the fear of us sending our troops over there to force the parties to negotiate.

      Trump always said, to get the best outcome for yourself/your side in any negotiation, you can't fall in love with the deal - you have to be able to walk away, only by being able to walk away can you force the best deal from your opponent. Why does the press fail to understand this simple concept?

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:They're prepping for the recession by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      And where the hell is the media in all this? Why the hell aren't they calling the current Admin out for doing nothing to stop the recession?

      Funny thing there. If you tell everyone that the current administration is doing nothing to stop the impending recession, you actually cause people to be concerned which in turn can trigger the very recession you were trying to avoid.

      The other thing is that people don't like bad news and studies have demonstrated that they begin to avoid news if it shows their own outlook as bleak (but they relish bad news for perceived enemies). Yeah, it's kinda like humans have their own Peril Sensitive Sunglasses.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    5. Re:They're prepping for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      green new deal!

      you. are a moron.

    6. Re:They're prepping for the recession by blahplusplus · · Score: 2

      And where the hell is the media in all this? Why the hell aren't they calling the current Admin out for doing nothing to stop the recession?

      The media doesn't work for the public, it's there to lie to you and keep you distracted.

      Media under capitalism

    7. Re:They're prepping for the recession by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I am just waiting for the day... that an entire productive force or at least the part driving the development simply quits away and founds their own company in case of such a layoff.
      I am just gessing what panic the management suddenly would get in case of such a situation.

    8. Re:They're prepping for the recession by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      I don't think they fail to understand it at all. At least on the management side of things they probably try to follow the same rules themselves every day. The talking heads can't walk and chew bubble gum at the same time though. But none of that matters because Orange Man Bad. They will shit on him and misrepresent the story because he beat their golden girl. The guy is gunning for a Nobel and you have morons claiming he is the antichrist.

    9. Re:They're prepping for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are well paid, because if you're serious I have no idea what to tell you.

      You can type, and you seem to have a brain, try using it.

      I'm not going to engage in an argument with someone with their head so far up their ass or buried so deep in the sand they believe in a "democratic shut down" when the republicans controlled all three sections of government when said shutdown began.

      Just read a LOT of different news sources. I'm not saying to trust ever major outlet or anything, just read a variety. A variety does not constitute Brietbart, Fox News, and Free Republic. Feel free to keep reading those, but please read sources with opposing biases. See how different groups spin things, and then make a decision.

      Oh, and if you still believe in brietbart or fox news after that, please stay home on voting day, don't talk to anyone about politics, and possibly go to a hospital, because there is seriously something wrong with your brain.

    10. Re:They're prepping for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How does increasing the minimum wage help us avoid a recession?", 66% of the economy is consumer spending. Thus increasing the money available to folks that shall spend it. Since contrary to the claims of your "trickle down", businesses create jobs to respond to demand, more money being spent prevents stagnation and keeps businesses open.

      "new trade agreement w/ Mexico", the minimally changed agreement which has not yet been ratified, in no way prevents having the products touched in Mexico to avoid the 100% "political theater with no regard for the damage" tariffs.

      "how many critics of Trump fail to grasp even the most basic negotiating tactics", Trump has been played by every single person that was willing to lie to him. He is and has always been a spoiled idiot with a huge ego. He just negotiated substantially less than he could have gotten by not shutting down the government. What a master of "negotiating tactics" President Dotard is.

      "Trump always said", no, his ghost writer said it. Trump doesn't get out of bed early enough to be involved in anything of importance. That is why he has six hours a day to watch TV.

       

    11. Re:They're prepping for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where the hell is the media in all this?

      Pumping out propaganda by the bowlful. What else do you think keeps things whole thing going?

  12. Learn to code! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait...

  13. 5.8 million by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    if these numbers are to be believed.

    The 770 are folks need to support new product launches. Activision is letting them go because they're not releasing anything next year (except maybe a COD).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  14. What about the dividends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They made sure that there was no impact to investors right? Still expecting to pay out a dividend in May?

    That's the attitude I'm supposed to have right? Screw the little people as long as I continue to sit on my fat ass and make money doing nothing?

    1. Re:What about the dividends? by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "little people" are the 800 or so people being let go as "redundant" to the company needs, and are getting a period of free healthcare coverage, a generous severance package, and their profit-sharing bonus from last year.

      Short of keeping the employees in no-show jobs, they are doing the right thing by "the little people" IMHO.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: What about the dividends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about it? It's not an exclusive club. Go buy shares if you want the dividend.

      Not sure why people expect Activision to retain employees that don't help the bottom line. It's a business not a jobs program.

    3. Re:What about the dividends? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      They are doing the best thing possible given their gross levels of company mismanagement.

      Generous severance packages suck compared to having a steady job at a company that is able to create stable sustainable employment.

  15. Re: i'm sure they're just giving the programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how dare you mock this very important subject
    the future of the entire species depends on my ideas
    only i am smart enough to decode the messages from our ancestors telling us to build cylinder habitats in orbit
    for the entire species you see
    but not the animals or the trees
    they can start their own space program the fuckers
    what did they ever do for us

  16. i would ask, but by Texmaize · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You understand China uses tariffs to wonderful effect don't you? I suspect you don't since you are repeating lines that others have fed you.

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
    1. Re:i would ask, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A constant sense of amusement and frustration comes from knowing that the majority of people who have an opinion can have these two thoughts simultaneously:

      Tariffs of any amount don't work.

      China has huge tariffs which led to a strong market position with protections for local workers.

  17. As a former Radical Entertainment employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me just say, "Fuck you Kotick. You're a miserable shitstain of a human being."

  18. and an 8% increase in it's dividend, coincidence? by rjejr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides announcing the the 8% increase in their stock dividend they also announced a $1.5B, that's billion with a B, stock buyback. That's enough money to pay 1,500 employees, if those employees made $1 million per year. Sickening.

  19. 77 Billion USD in China will get you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USD 77 Billion is equivalent to RMB 519.75 Billion

    Distance between Shanghai and Beijing = 663 Miles

    Cost of HST (High Speed Train) project in between Shanghai / Beijing = USD 32 Billion

    Distance between LA and SF = 302 Miles

    Therefore, a Chinese HST project for a 302 mile long line would cost USD 16 Billion, or so

    The USD 77 Billion wasted could have gotten us Four LA to SF HST line, with USD 13 Billion in spare change, to boot.

  20. Mean the C levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are getting millions in bonuses.

  21. Give and take by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    We keep reading about stuff like this, and companies wonder why the workforce no longer have any loyalty towards their employers and will jump ship as soon as something better comes along?

  22. Re:and an 8% increase in it's dividend, coincidenc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The new Pump and Dump. The stock gets a pump, the employees get the dump.

  23. Trumps Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lock up putins buttboy already!!

  24. Maybe these laid off programmers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...should retrain and learn to code?

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:Maybe these laid off programmers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're racist!

  25. Imagine by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    being so misguided as to think a company posting their best results ever has ANY effect on whether companies continue to hold on to staff deemed unnecessary.

  26. Yes and no by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    The powers that be have long since noticed that. They've been working for a decade or two to commoditize tech skills. There's been quite a bit of success, and if you haven't seen it you're just lucky.

    It's not that hard to do really. You take a tech task and break it down into smaller and smaller chunks, assigning a person to each chunk, so that no one person is critical to the entire task. You then document the hell out of everything while using as much standard equipment as possible to avoid "institutional" knowledge.

    If you think the billionaire class hasn't noticed that some of their employees are "irreplaceable" you're sorely mistaken. They're working on it, they just haven't gotten around to your job yet. It's a big economy after all. Some of us will slip through the cracks even, but that's just survival bias...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. Regulating Wall Street worked just fine by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    until we stopped doing it. It started with a bit of Carter and Reagan, who began dialing back regulations on what banks could do and making stock buy backs legal (funny thing, those used to be illegal market manipulation). Clinton continued it by breaking down the wall between "Main Street" and "Wall Street" banks so that investors could mix doggy stock investments with safe mortgage investments.

    Undoing all that would be a start. Talk to any economist who isn't paid by right wing think tanks and they'll tell you the rest.

    Following the Great Depression economists at Universities spent decades studying all this and figuring out solutions. The only problem is nobody listens to them. Get rich quick schemes are too popular.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Regulating Wall Street worked just fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that investors could mix doggy stock investments with safe mortgage investments.

      Woof!

  28. What about those tax cuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about those tax cuts?

  29. It's all about the looting by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Not loot crates, but more loot for senior execs, whose compensation will skyrocket while they fire employees.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. disposable humans by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    They work at dehumanizing their "human resources" so they can sleep at night when they pull these things all the time. People wonder how genocide and such horrible things can even happen when there are actually a bunch of Satan worshipers involved... They only need look towards their local MBAs.

    They need to pay a price for laying off human workers like they are excess resources so they are not so casual about hiring them and give them stuff to do for longer term planning if something doesn't work out. You never see them saying "our highly paid MBAs didn't meet the expectations they sold us on so we are laying them off." It's always shifting blame to somebody or something other than themselves... Their gambling with the organizations stability hardly has consequences and even when it does they get a golden parachute and find another place to gamble.

    There are real costs to laying people off abruptly which are externalized as much as possible by management... and they'll go so far as to exploit bankruptcy on purpose and steal the pension fund. When will people realize sociopaths gravitate towards management? They serve a useful purpose but need to be kept from sharp objects and monitored. A % of laid off people get into drugs and depression and develop health issues -- with costly results for society. One would think they'd go for the higher pay people to minimize the # of people. (besides isn't the purpose of higher pay is higher responsibility?)

  31. Sadly not going to happen by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    60-80% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. Where would they get the capital to live without a paycheck for the 3-5 years it takes to establish a business?

    Also the job market's pretty bad across the board. They can find people to replace them pretty easily. Workers lack solidarity so it'd be easy to get "scabs" (google the term if you haven't heard it).

    This is gonna sound harsh, but we shouldn't indulge in fantasy. And "Walking off the Job to compete with your Boss" is by far the most famous business themed fantasy. In practice your Boss has capital and market share and he either buries you in price cuts or buys you outright.

    At the same time we shouldn't despair. There _is_ a solution, but you're not gonna find it in the current, heavily distorted, markets. We need to man up and start regulating again. Stop buying into Ayn Rand (you're post is pretty much John Galt). There's a reason nobody paid her much mind in her day. Her ideas don't work. Just ask Eddie Lampert and Kansas.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Sadly not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is gonna sound harsh, but we shouldn't indulge in fantasy. And "Walking off the Job to compete with your Boss" is by far the most famous business themed fantasy. In practice your Boss has capital and market share and he either buries you in price cuts or buys you outright.

      I was thinking of litigation which is yet more scary. Anything from use of patent treasure chest against you, to tip off to the IRS or concerned regulation authorities, to digging a pseudo rape case, or any byzantine issue I can't think of.

  32. Replacing Americans with visa workers? Offshoring? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Are they just going to have less workers? Or are they going to foreign workers in some manner?

  33. Re:and an 8% increase in it's dividend, coincidenc by supercell · · Score: 1

    You see in the New World Order companies don't invest in Employees they invest in the company stock. This is why no employee should have any loyalty to a large company. You are just an expense item on a spread sheet.

  34. One of Activision's CEOs by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    once said (and I'm paraphrasing here) that he wanted to take all the fun out of making video games and make it just another business because that's what would be the most profitable. I'm fairly certain that he was deeply resentful of the fact that he was running a video game company and not something more grandiose like an arms manufacturer.

    Point is, these are not gamers. They don't think like gamers. They think like businessmen. Innovation isn't their thing. Let other's innovate and they'll be there to crank out a copy. Look at PUBG. They're doing alright, but the bigger companies are moving in (Epic with Fortnight and now EA with Apex Legends). Activision just fell behind on that curve, but the curve still works.

    Let somebody else take the risk while you reap the rewards. This works because you can beat them to market on the consoles and release a better product because you can throw more money at optimizations. Again, PUBG needs a beast of a machine to hit a stable 60, but Fortnight does it on a Toaster.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  35. Found the quote on Ars by rsilvergun · · Score: 1
    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  36. Learn to code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...The company said it would be cutting mainly non-game-development departments...

    What?! My PhD in feminist dance theory and professional victimhood doesn't actually produce anything?!
    HOW DARE YOU!
    You racist, sexist, homophobe, islamophobe, white, male, cis-gendered, bigots had better give me back my make-work job or I'm going to go complain about this on twitter!

  37. CCP games should ggett thatt market cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blizzard lost its certified material with activision ,going the atari way ( i know epic )

    CCP should be gettting billions , they are the tesla of the car industry.

  38. Re:and an 8% increase in it's dividend, coincidenc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your attitude is sickening worm. Disobeying your feudal lord is punishable by 1 year in castle dungeons.

  39. Re:Replacing Americans with visa workers? Offshori by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent green ! its made out of people! :D

    Legend:
    soylent green = $$$

  40. Stop complaining. by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Blizzard is a business that exists to make money for its investors, not to keep people employed. Employment is merely incidental. Even the games are incidental.

    Look at the greater system that generates this behavior and propose changes if you want to do something about it.

    Whining about the actors within it is useless.