Are you refering to the Outlook Rules-Wizard (Organize->Rules Wizard)?
I find it to be less useful than Naive Bayes filtering.
The "junk E-mail sender" list is useless since the spam has fake "from" adresses that change all the time.
And the word-filters? I can't edit them myself! They should be downloaded from a website - a feature which is broken (at least here i Denmark) because the URL is a dead link.
I have no other options for E-mail than Outlook at work, so I would really like to know what kind of clever filter you are talking about.
And we have trouble: A php script creating a (temporary) file will not be able to use it, because it will be owned by the Apache server, not the owner of the PHP script.
All the government-big-brother BS is just not valid. Tracking people is done by tracking SIM cards. No one cares what phone a terrorist is using, they care what SIM card he is using.
IMEIs have one use: Preventing theft. The person in possession of a phone gains nothing, nada, zero (you get it) by changing the IMEI unless he is a phone thief.
It's not about potential bad uses! It's about one (1) very real bad use.
Changing the IMEI number is bad. It is only useful for thieves. Period.
The user gains NOTHING by changing the IMEI, since he is identifying himself by the SIM card mounted in the phone at the moment he is using it. All user access, the number the phone reacts to, network info etc. is loaded into the SIM card, not the IMEI number.
The phone is identifying itself to the phone company and they check (they should!) in the register to see if the phone is stolen or not. They would rather not provide this service and some do not, mainly in poor countries where my stolen phone is most likely in use right now.
This government big-brother thing you are trying to pull here is not valid. SIM card is what they track, not IMEI numbers.
Slashdot Mirror
In marketing, bigger is better. Any unit which produces higher numbers therefore is better.
That's why we'll be using horsepowers and not kilowatts for car engines forever.
This also explains the use of cubic inches in this text.
Sometimes 1kByte of data will save your life (e.g. weather forecast before going to sea)
The author seems to miss this point. Data value has nothing to do with data size.
Another example: A measurement of some sort may cost plenty of $$$'s to take and still be very useful (=valueable).
too bad I used up my mod points...
The problem of the web today:
Everyone starts a new page instead of helping out with one of the existing ones!
Yes, it takes some effort to find the existing ones. But starting yet another small incomplete site is just plain wrong and unfriendly to new users.
By the way, how
about this site?
Well, why don't you join in and help the best one?
You want it to be free (gratis) which is only possible if you help for free.
You get what you work for.
By the way, maps are useless. Ranges are around 25-100 meters which means that you'll need very detailed (that is very expensive) maps.
Address/zip code searches would be much better and as a side-effect easy to implement.
Are all your networks set up in Ad-Hoc mode without encryption?
They all have the same SSID?
Or do you have (that is maintain) a lot of profiles, you can switch between?
you should try the site:
http://www.sslug.dk
which is a goldmine of nicely arranged information about Linux.
Well, it't in Danish which is very similar to the "Bokmål" of Norway.
Are you refering to the Outlook Rules-Wizard (Organize->Rules Wizard)?
I find it to be less useful than Naive Bayes filtering.
The "junk E-mail sender" list is useless since the spam has fake "from" adresses that change all the time.
And the word-filters? I can't edit them myself! They should be downloaded from a website - a feature which is broken (at least here i Denmark) because the URL is a dead link.
I have no other options for E-mail than Outlook at work, so I would really like to know what kind of clever filter you are talking about.
Well, they do. Some cut off large subnets in Brazil and asia, when the operators of those nets don't respond to abuse reports.
Boring and labor-intensive method, but it works.
'cause they include clever spam filters.
I'm trying out POPfile (Naive Bayes text classifier and a POP3 proxy) these days, it's looking good so far.
Well, this system combines the advantages of trains with the flexibility of cars.
Seems to be a great idea to me - I'm not related to the inventor, "Jensen" is just a very common name in Denmark.
It is a MS Word document, but this answers my own questions
Thank you - I've been looking for that info. Now, where did you find it?
The FAQ files didn't mention those facts (or I just could not find it).
Mozilla users can turn those off. Neat!
Yes, I've got a private IP space on my side of the ADSL router, I've got. And since the router has a public IP on the other side, it's useful.
This new parallel Internet on the other hand, it's got no public routeable IP numbers, right? Hence it must forever stay a parallel network.
Won't this new network stay pretty useless until content providers start making contents available on the new network?
Btw, dont talk about drugs as if using them was normal. It's not.
It seems to be a parallel Internet on the air.
IP range 1.x.y.z and no routing to/from the "old" internet.
Can any gurus out there tell me about possible uses for this?
Can I E-mail anyone on the old Internet from this new user-driven, no-subnet, free net?
The EU is in the process of giving in to the mega--multi-euro film&music industry as well.
INFOSOC in English
That'll be the end of legal reverse engineering in the EU as well.
And we have trouble: A php script creating a (temporary) file will not be able to use it, because it will be owned by the Apache server, not the owner of the PHP script.
This is not fixed in Apache 2, AFAIK.
No, I don't work for them or have any other connection to them.
This site has much more reliable data
Best regards from Linux user #127040...
That's silly.
The DRM will need the feedback to function.
So... blocking the feedback in the firewall will just make it impossible for you to use the music/film/whatever you "own".
No it isn't.
VIN's are not tranmitted to anyone all the time.
IMEIs are - and so are the SIM card data. The SIM card is what you can use to track the user, not the IMEI. It's strictly for theft protection.
IMEI's identyfy the particular phone.
SIM cards indentify the particular user.
All the government-big-brother BS is just not valid. Tracking people is done by tracking SIM cards. No one cares what phone a terrorist is using, they care what SIM card he is using.
IMEIs have one use: Preventing theft. The person in possession of a phone gains nothing, nada, zero (you get it) by changing the IMEI unless he is a phone thief.
It's not about potential bad uses! It's about one (1) very real bad use.
Changing the IMEI number is bad. It is only useful for thieves. Period.
The user gains NOTHING by changing the IMEI, since he is identifying himself by the SIM card mounted in the phone at the moment he is using it. All user access, the number the phone reacts to, network info etc. is loaded into the SIM card, not the IMEI number.
The phone is identifying itself to the phone company and they check (they should!) in the register to see if the phone is stolen or not. They would rather not provide this service and some do not, mainly in poor countries where my stolen phone is most likely in use right now.
This government big-brother thing you are trying to pull here is not valid. SIM card is what they track, not IMEI numbers.