Slashdot Mirror


Getting Started In Linux

In previous posts, I've asked for the Slashdot community to help me identify good books and websites for developers and I thought the response was really useful. This time, I'd like to ask you all for your recommendations for great Linux beginner books and also what you think is the best way of showing off Linux on TV. Read on for more info ... I do this thing twice on month on TechTV's "The Screen Savers" where I try to show off something neat about Linux and Open Source software. At the end of each segment, I give out my email address for people to send questions. The question I get most is "What book should I get to help me learn Linux?" I have a couple of books that I do recommend, but I want to hear what you guys think so I can link to this conversation and have it be available for everyone to refer to.

Additionally, any tips on what you guys would think would make good open-source oriented TV and make people really want to try out Linux would be appreciated.

618 comments

  1. Linux books by redshift-systems · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found Slackware unleashed an excellent Slack book for beginners.

    1. Re:Linux books by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Informative
      I agree...the Unleashed series are pretty good, if a little thin in their coverage sometimes. (That said, that last complaint is from a book in the series I bought in '97, so it may well have changed by now.)

      I'd also recommend the O'Reilly Learning Linux/Redhat/Debian set. Well worth the money, and they deserve the endorsement.

    2. Re:Linux books by redshift-systems · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice.
      Wow, a whole set? After import tax and exchange rates (in Australia) that would set me back some $400 (AUD) for a 3 book O'reilly set. As an aside, why do these technical books cost us so much here? Can they not be manufactured in Australia?

    3. Re:Linux books by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Something that you may want to look into, as far as O'Reilly books are concerend, is the Safari bookshelf. I'm not sure how taxes would work out but it would certainly save you money in the long run. The selection of books available through Safari seems to be impressive. I don't have first-hand experience with it myself, but it's something I've always considered.

    4. Re:Linux books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aftenposten~

    5. Re:Linux books by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      They CAN be, but international publishing is a mucky, mucky game.

      for all it's many faults the current government has been pretty dedicated in trying to increase the parrallel importation of media (cd's books etc)

      they aren't all there yet.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    6. Re:Linux books by redshift-systems · · Score: 1

      Not there is damn right, theyre about $40 short on the average IT book if u ask me. And even the co-op bookshop has a lower discount in technical books than other books. You have to ask why this selective policy? Why would a medical book attract a higher discount than an IT book? Smells like taking advantage to me.

    7. Re:Linux books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naba Barkakati is my favorite author. I have his Red Hat Linux Secrets, 3rd addition. Seriously, I keep that book right by the computer and refer to it when I need something. With the start that I got with that book, I move along fairly well when I have something go wrong. To me, Linux is fun, my hobby. Not everything works perfectly, for sure, but there are plenty of suprises that keep me interested.

    8. Re:Linux books by hatrisc · · Score: 0

      Agreed with Slackware Unleased. I also like all of the O'Reilly books. Especially Running Linux.

      As for how to show off linux, I'd go with the latest stable KDE with some fancy schmancy neato theme, and show the fact that you can play decent games on it. Lots of people love to play games and might be intrigued to try Linux if they 1) had the idea that KDE or GNOME is similar to what they are used to. 2) They know that they can play their Popular games such as Quake 3 Arena, etc. 3) Know that programs such as Acrobat reader, real player, and xmms (a winamp looking program) are available, since they are fairly popular. 4) Its alot, but, showing an Outlook clone, OpenOffice, and other needed software is another thing.

      Basically show the world that switching to Linux based software does not require sacrafice, or at least as much sacrafice as many people believe.

      --
      I write code.
    9. Re:Linux books by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      Hmm, interesting question. But IT books are only good for a short season, since technology changes so quickly. People's innards, on the other hand, don't vary too much from one year to the next, so the medical books would seem to be current for a longer season. BTW, the main used book store here in Jacksonville, FL that I know about (Chamblin's Bookmine) stopped carrying IT books altogether, because they couldn't make any money on them. I think people tend to keep the IT books that they buy for as long as they are useful, so they don't make it into the used market until they're hopelessly out of date.

    10. Re:Linux books by des09 · · Score: 1

      I have used Safari at the beginning of projects, during the "ramp up" phase where I may be consulting 5 or 10 books for insights and introductions to technologies, not reading each book, just going for the most applicable chapters. This has been immensely helpful.

      --
      .sigless since 2003
    11. Re:Linux books by Zwack · · Score: 2

      Sendmail This is the perfect book to spin your head, and leave you with a headache for months. But it's the topic, not the book, that's so complicated. If it didn't do absolutely everything, I'm sure it would be simpler to use.

      The book IS complicated, yes, that is because the subject is complicated, but Sendmail IS way more complicated than it needs to be.

      The TOPIC (running a mail server) is not that complicated... as long as the server isn't Sendmail.

      A lot of alternative mail servers are simpler to configure which makes them easier to use, and easier to prove secure.

      Look at Qmail or Zmail as examples.

      Yes, I know I'm being pedantic, but even if you never use anything but Sendmail, looking into the RFCs or alternative mail servers will give you some insights into both mail servers in general, and different approaches to the same problem.

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    12. Re:Linux books by JWSmythe · · Score: 2


      I agree with you completely. Sendmail has grown since day #1, and can do just about everything you can imagine. It does more than anyone could possibly want to do with it. Since most installations use the default sendmail.cf and all, it's really overkill.

      But, since it's installed with just about every installion of *nix by default, it's important to know..

      I do understand how "easy" SMTP can be. I've written a few scripts to send out EMail *VERY* directly. Like, they connect to a remote mail server's port 25, and issue commands and listen to their responses. Pretty much, I've written the sending part of an SMTP server.. I haven't attempted to receiving part yet, but it could be fun to do someday. :) Usually I'm just lazy though, and send mail with

      open (MAIL, "|/usr/bin/sendmail");
      print MAIL "From: someone@somewhere\n";
      print MAIL "To: Someone@somewhereelse\n";
      print MAIL "Subject: Something\n";
      print MAIL "\n\n";
      print MAIL @BODY;
      close (MAIL);

      If someone were setting up for themselves, I'd recommend exploring the alternatives (Qmail has been highly recommended to me many times). But for someone like me that needs to work on other people's servers frequently, Sendmail is essential, since they all are using it.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  2. It it obvious? by Opusnbill7 · · Score: 1, Informative

    O'Reilly of course! :)

    1. Re:It it obvious? by YahoKa · · Score: 1
      I find the O'Reilly books to be the best out of all the computer books published. The best is definitely "Web Design in a Nutshell" - it will teach you to be a good web designer and not some child who knows html.

      Well that's my $0.02 on O'Reilly ...

    2. Re:It it obvious? by GrendelT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Running Linux by O'Reilly was essential for me. (still is at times!) - it's a great reference book once you've gone thru it all.
      LinuxNewbie.org has some nice how-to/help files that were also big for me.

    3. Re:It it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it will teach you to be a good web designer and not some child who knows html.

      There is a hell of a lot more to being a *good* web designer that 'Web Design in a Nutshell' will teach you. It's good as far as it goes but barely scratches the surface.

      You can't be a 'designer' unless you know the industry-standard tools inside out (Illustrator, Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Flash) and client side technologies.

      You can't be a good 'developer' unless you know the technologies (XHTML, DHTML, XML, CSS) and server-side software.

      Although 'Web Design in a Nutshell' touches a little on these topics, it's a very lightweight treatment.

  3. Favorite book by wray · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linux in a Nutshell, concise, to the point, reference manual for just getting stuff done.

    --
    Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
    1. Re:Favorite book by dunar · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Aggreed. O'Reilly books are great - they have all the information one could want and none of the fluff. Sometimes hard to just sit and read, but when you want a soultion, example, definition, etc., they are the best.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
      -dunar

    2. Re:Favorite book by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, yes -- but for a beginner, go with one of the Learning books.

      Something I meant to put in my first comment re: Learning up above -- the most important thing, I would say, is to make sure you give 'em a book with the distro on CD. Those poor saps on d/u will appreciate it.

    3. Re:Favorite book by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am an O'Reilly fan but I found Linux in a Nutshell to be startlingly lame. Most of it is taken up by a rehash of the man page entries for all of the common Linux shell commands (grep, cat, tar, ln, ...) There are plenty of free resources (including said man pages) that you can use to find out which arguments do what for a given command.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    4. Re:Favorite book by tricknology · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a great book, however it is not for beginners. It is more of a reference for the intermediate to advanced user. A book for beginners should not assume that the user knows anything about Linux (or computers in general, for that matter).

      --
      I never been so broke that I couldn't leave town.
    5. Re:Favorite book by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I'll second that. I've got a couple feet of linux books on my shelf, but Nutshell is the one that's actually been *useful* when I find myself confronted with a prompt, a command, and a WTF??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Favorite book by Great_Fool · · Score: 1

      Linux in a Nutshell. Just realized it's the one on my bookshell that's looking more dog-eared than the rest. Has all the answers, and is actually easy to find stuff in it. Funny, but thinking about it, I don't use the manuals much. I just use Linux . . . it really is easy.

    7. Re:Favorite book by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but it is so easier to read on a piece of paper than on a screen. Not even mentioning that a good index and some cross references are priceless compared to a man page.

      But I agree, a good book should have some added value.

    8. Re:Favorite book by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty much a beginner at linux, and that was the one book I wanted. I did come from a Dos based environment and mostly wanted a reference that explained all the commands and options, so I can look up ls when I'm thinking of dir. I'll second the distro book, a nicer manual would make Lycoris quite a bit more accesable to us noobs. I did check out the Corel Linux manual and Sam's Learning Linux in 24 hours, both were useful but Linux in a Nutshell was by far the best.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    9. Re:Favorite book by lousyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Definitely not Linux in a Nutshell. That's the book I first bought when I decided to go Linux. It didn't help a bit.

      Now, Running Linux, on the other hand. Running Linux helped me tremendously. Running Linux was such a cure for my newbie-ness.

      -Todd

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
    10. Re:Favorite book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running Linux is good because, despite being out for a few years now, it isn't quite out of date. I guess this is because the concepts it covers (X configuration, programming tools, Samba, networking, etc) are not things that go out of date quickly. Obviously the section on KDE/Gnome could do with updating but they have moved along so far since Running Linux was published.

    11. Re:Favorite book by pathloss · · Score: 1

      in india, most of the "mainstream" linux craze started with a great community effort by a local computer magazine pc quest that published a RH distro. the writeups abt how to install etc came with the magazine. one other good book is unix concepts by sumithaba das.

    12. Re:Favorite book by stotterj · · Score: 1
      I agree. A newbie needs more than a book that just explains what -v and -R turn on and off for command X. I think that most newbies could start working with O'Reilly's "Running Linux." This book explains what and why you are doing something, like how the file system is organized, how permissions work, what the kernel does, etc.

      In short, I think it is written for the Linux newbie that is not a computer newbie, which is probably a large chunk of the audience in question above.

    13. Re:Favorite book by Flagbrew · · Score: 1

      On the topic of O'Reilly, might I add that Running Linux, whatever edition they are on now, is a valuable tool in understanding how things work.

    14. Re:Favorite book by Tmack · · Score: 1
      There are plenty of free resources (including said man pages) that you can use to find out which arguments do what for a given command.

      Yes, but what I had the most problems with when learning *nix wasnt finding what a particular command did, it was finding the command to begin with. The book I went with, mainly because it happened to be in the school library, was Slackware Unleashed. Got me started pretty quick on what alot of people think is one of the less user friendly Linux distro's around. That was back around 1996 so Im not sure how the current versions are. But it did give a really good overview of the most commonly used commands before going into more specific administrative stuff. It also walks you through setting your system up.

      TM

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    15. Re:Favorite book by eth00 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, especially with a min debian install, you do not get all the tools. I have flipped to the front where there is a indexing of all commands in catagories and found it. Overall the book is not the best for a NEW user but great for somebody who knows there way around the command prompt, it is never farther than a arms reach from my desk!

    16. Re:Favorite book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's a "man" page???
      where do i start?
      thank you

    17. Re:Favorite book by 4m3 · · Score: 1

      I think this book may intimidate some users who arn't computer or tech savy... after all the way it's written isn't very... friendly. is there a Linux for dummies?

  4. Uh huh. by glenkim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's just all get our RTFM's out of system now.

    1. Re:Uh huh. by jpmoney · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, that and 'man command.' At work we do some back-end processing via DB2 on AIX and I showed 'man ln' to a coworker the other day and you would have thought it was the second coming of Jesus.

      Of course the next command they typed in after doing their symlink was 'man vi' and I was happy. There is still hope.

      --
      unf.
    2. Re:Uh huh. by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Informative

      man info

      I've always found man pages to be somewhat lacking in depth. They're great for looking up a limited set of information about a command or topic and, don't get me wrong, a resource that can't be done without. Something else to point new users to are texinfo documents. The standards info textutils, info fileutils and info bash are something every newbie should be made aware of.

      I just noticed your comment was geared towards AIX, so I guess this doesn't apply (not sure there), but texinfo for Linux I highly recommend.

    3. Re:Uh huh. by krmt · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's interesting. I've rarely found the texinfo pages to be of any real use to me when a manpage fails.

      I don't know how it is for other distros, but every debian package puts its documentation in /usr/share/doc/packagename. If the manpage fails me at all, this is where I go first. The documentation that came with a program is often the most useful documentation you're going to find, especially because the Readme's and the like often have a lot of quick notes in them. The changelogs have tons of good info too. Of course, to be able to use these docs requires knowing what program you're looking for in the first place, which requires some experience, but it's by far the most useful documentation that's physically on my system.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    4. Re:Uh huh. by Scalli0n · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making me aware of that.

      Now I know more :) (Seriously.)

      --
      Sig & Below
      Yuck Fou
    5. Re:Uh huh. by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      There is no "starting" manpage. All the manpages are linked in a vast web to such a degree that each page has 3 or 4 "prerequisites" with equally complicated manpages. They are useless until you know at least the basics of processes, the shell (make that *all* the shells), the filesystem, and all sorts of other things that no single manpage gathers into one place and presents in a digestible manner.

    6. Re:Uh huh. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I groan every time I see a manpage that points me to info for more information. GNU info is an abomination. The interface to it is just totally unusable and unwieldy. The interface should be more like links. It should have fast, easy-to-use search functionality. The documentation should have color and make use of bold and underlined text to accent important regions and section headings the way manpages do. There should be standard sections for info documentation like their are for manpages (Name, Synopsis, Description, Options, Examples, Files, etc).

      GNU tried to innovate in unix documentation with info, but the results were dismal. This is the year 2002, documentation doesn't have to be like this. We have learned a lot about presenting formatted documents from the web. A replacement for manpages should have hyperlinks, semantic markup, good search functionality, a good command-line reader, a GUI reader, and most importantly, quality documentation. Documentation with good formatting, good use of hyperlinks, and standard sections for quick access to relevant information. A format with these things could blow both manpages and info out of the water. It could even become a standard format for more than just unix commands. It could become a self-contained manual for using a unix system in a way that manpages aren't, and info wants to be but isn't. Wouldn't that be nice?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    7. Re:Uh huh. by rastos1 · · Score: 1
      I think you are missing something like info2html utility.(try entering "info:gcc" in konqueror URL field)
      AFAIK the searching of info/man pages in KDE was dropped in ago a year - unfortunatelly - and is waiting to be picked up again.

    8. Re:Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, use lynx to view your man pages.
      get real, not everyone has X.

    9. Re:Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      listen dude, if dont know how to use info, then say so. Did you ever go through the info tutorial? learn it. if you want information and want it fast, nothing beats info in it's ability to navigate with single letter keystrokes. Ever seen it's use with emacs? jumps right to the relevant section, if need be. Sure, the information could be badly written but dont beat-up info because you found the text to be an abomination. that's like shooting the messenger.... info does whatever you thought albeit in a non-sexy,simple and efficient way.

    10. Re:Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is talking about X? Even on the console, you can have bold type and colors. lynx has a fine interface. Certainly better than info.

    11. Re:Uh huh. by cowbutt · · Score: 2
      man intro

      --

    12. Re:Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE 3's help engine includes the man and info pages, with hyperlinks.

      Just show that to the viewers. It's actually more useful than Windows' help, IMNHO.

    13. Re:Uh huh. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      lynx also uses single letter keystrokes to do most things. Only lynx is much easier to use and more intuitive. I don't see how info needs to be that much harder to use. I shouldn't need to go through a 10-minute tutorial to get *help*! info doesn't do "whatever I thought." It doesn't have good searches (not just searching the page you're on, but the entire documentation for a program or the whole system), it doesn't have nice formatting, it doesn't have an easy-to-use interface, it doesn't even have the ability to reflow text to fit into your terminal window! 80 column wrapped plain ascii text is not my idea of great documentation. Despite the addition of hyperlinks (which can be added to manpages, see KDE's manpage viewer), info is a step backwards from manpages.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    14. Re:Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ever seen it's use with emacs? jumps right to the relevant section...

      Whooo hooo! That's fucking rocket science man!

      I think maybe you are trying to justify your investment in learning this POS when there are so many better ways to do it. A help system should be obvious and intuitive!

    15. Re:Uh huh. by jbrocklin · · Score: 1

      Not to hit you here, but are you going to volunteer to fix the console based version or make a standard? After all, the joy of linux is that you can go in and do just that...just a thought...

      --Joe

      "The whole of Science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thought." --Albert Einstein

    16. Re:Uh huh. by garysears · · Score: 1

      I learned by reading the the * manual, too. I.E. the Linux Bible is nothing but reprinted FAQ docs. That gets you going. Looking at my desktop under my "desktop" I have LINUX in a Nutshell by O'Reilly and Linux System Commands by M&T Books. For everything else, hit the man pages, man.

    17. Re:Uh huh. by greenrd · · Score: 2
      GNU info is an abomination. The interface to it is just totally unusable and unwieldy. The interface should be more like links.

      Fortunately, pinfo provides a good lynx-like interface to both info and man pages. I always use pinfo now when I want to view man or info pages (except when I hit one of its small number of bugs, like not being able to open certain info pages).

    18. Re:Uh huh. by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2

      We're supposed to be talking about newbies here, right? Now, let's take a simple command such as ls.

      The man page for ls gives a two sentence description of what it is followed by extremely terse one-liners describing the options.

      The texinfo file for ls has a full page before it even begins to go into the command-line options. The options themselves are described in detail.

      Oh, and if you look at the SEE ALSO section of the LS(1) man page, it mentions where the full documentation is. Guess where?

    19. Re:Uh huh. by commbat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making me aware of that.

      Now I know more :) (Seriously.)


      I bet you could even know less.

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
    20. Re:Uh huh. by commbat · · Score: 1

      man intro

      (Edited to get past 'lameness filter')

      INTRO(1) Linux Programmer's Manual INTRO(1)

      NAME intro - Introduction to user commands

      DESCRIPTION This chapter describes user commands.

      AUTHORS Look at the header of the manual page for the author(s) and copyright conditions. Note that these can be different from page to page!

      Linux 1993-07-24 INTRO(1)

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
    21. Re:Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So run it under the debugger with one of the offending files, find the problem, fix it and submit your fix so every can benefit.

    22. Re:Uh huh. by cowbutt · · Score: 2

      Mine's dated 2002-08-06 and contains a /lot/ more (useful) information.

    23. Re:Uh huh. by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      if you are using konqueror under KDE, you can type #command into the address field, and it will open the man page for that command. With that you get good formating, use fo hyperlinks, standard sections, and colors.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    24. Re:Uh huh. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      Hey, cool. I'll definitely be using pinfo from now on. I still prefer the formatting and content of man pages to info pages though.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    25. Re:Uh huh. by Malcolm+MacArthur · · Score: 1
      Man pages are TERRIBLE for newbies (IMHO) because of two factors:
      1. The information is presented serially - one screen at a time. Ever tried doing some shell scripts? Let's do a man if... ah, of course it's a shell command (you eventually realise). So, let's do man sh... OK, I'm reading... Jeez, how many pages have I gone through... ah, there's if... oh damn, I just went past it and I don't know how to make this thing go back a page.
      2. Where are the examples? I have seen VERY few man pages that actually demonstrate examples of the command you want to run. This is a worse deficiency than the first one. So you're expected to use your brains and work it out in your head, or create your own testbed to see if it does what you THINK it does? Come on! This is the 21st century!

      The first big computer system I used (and I'm not trolling against Unix here - I'm a Unix admin these days part-time) ran VMS. So, I learned to log on (not hard) and then, what do you do when you get stuck? Type help (Contrary to popular belief, VMS can handle commands entered in small letters ;). Stuck with the directory command? Try help, then directory, then examples!

      Unix is a nice system, but it sucks for 'online learnability'. (Yes, I have found systems that are more terse and virtually impossible to learn 'online'. Try Nortel telephone exhanges :)

    26. Re:Uh huh. by Anitra · · Score: 1

      Of course, to be able to use these docs requires knowing what program you're looking for in the first place...

      That's what always frustrates me about trying to learn anything new in Unix. How do you find out the right command/program for a task (without asking a Unix-y person)?

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    27. Re:Uh huh. by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
      Let's just all get our RTFM's out of system now.

      .

      Well I read through all the f***ing manuals I could find, Joy of Sex, 101 Sexual Positions, etc., but it does not explain how to configure Mandrake to work with my cheap PC.

      And to top it all off, I now have carpal tunnel in my wrist for some reason... :-P

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    28. Re:Uh huh. by Shane+Hathaway · · Score: 1

      Eric Raymond agrees!

      http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/doclifter/

      doclifter translates troff (which, I presume, is the format of man pages) to DocBook. I saw his short presentation on this project at OSCON 2002. His goal is to migrate the good work already done to a more capable format.

    29. Re:Uh huh. by AstroSurf · · Score: 1

      >> every debian package puts its documentation in /usr/share/doc/packagename. If the manpage fails me at all, this is where I go first. All well and good but ... newbies! They (I!) don't know that /usr/share/[anything] exists, for cryin' out loud! I bought Corel Deluxe when it came out (no comments on why I shouldn't have it, please). I've installed it several times and I always have to go back to Windows because *I don't know ANYTHING about Linux*!!! Whenever I try to find out, it quickly becomes clear that whatever I read makes an assumption that I know about _some_ aspect -- but I don't! So I wind up no farther along. What is /usr/[anything]? Why is it set up that way? What's the overriding rationale behind it all? I've installed several other Linuxes too and I always have to throw them away cause I can't make them work with my DSL (or even with dial-up, and I _do_ have a hardware modem). Used the Roaring Penguin PPPoE client. Try to install, get a couple screens of errors, about which I know NOTHING! On WinLinux, it installed perfectly, without a peep. Doesn't work. Why? How can I know? I don't know anything. The PPPoE docs say don't be set to have your network card come up at boot. How do I stop it? Once I've booted, how do I bring it up? Dunno. Still haven't found out. You guys will know when Corel Linux came out. I've been trying to run it for _years_! And I still can't. This is a Bad Thing and should not be. Will I be able to do it after reading Running Linux. Maybe. But don't tell me about the resources available on the system, I can't USE the system! I tell ya... Once I get Linux up and working with my DSL, I'll never go back to Win. All I have to do is throw away spam anyway. :/ I'll just add that I came to the PC from the Amiga, kicking and screaming. ;) -- AstroSurf ==== and having previewed this, I can see that I don't know how to make a paragraph on /. either. GRR!!!

      --
      Astro
  5. Learn the command line by dcstimm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Learn to use the command line and not a pretty gui, it will teach you alot about how Unix and Linux works, Plus it makes you look cool to your friends when ur flying though the command line:)

    Gotta love the tab key!

    1. Re:Learn the command line by zapfie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus it makes you look cool to your friends when ur flying though the command line:)

      ......

      *weeps for humanity*

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    2. Re:Learn the command line by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and it also turns off anyone who struggles with Windows or MacOS now. Or even just subsists in them

    3. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gotta love the tab key!

      Actually, I got so used to the tab key that when I got back to *gasp* Windows, I kept hitting it and expecting it to complete the directory/filename for me.

    4. Re:Learn the command line by IceCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Before I started getting into Linux and such I had a friend that was sysadmin who would just fly along at command line on his FreeBSD and Linux boxes. I would always think he was doing something really fancy and such. Then I learned more and realized whenever he would first sit at a console he would out of habit just start typing things like df, ls -l, vmstat, etc. More to get his thinking process started than anything else....

    5. Re:Learn the command line by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Learn to use the command line and not a pretty gui, it will teach you alot about how Unix and Linux works, Plus it makes you look cool to your friends when ur flying though the command line:)

      Yeah, I saw chrisd on the Screen Savers showing how to set up a UT game server on a Linux box. He got to the part where you start the server, which required typing in a command with some arcane options.

      On TV, it looked just as impressive as Richard Nixon did debating JFK. The camera zoomed in and tried to focus on the tiny text, but to no avail. The Screen Savers host rolled his eyes and made a snide comment; viewers were referred to the show's website to find a copy of this magical command sequence.

      The command line does not make for good TV.

    6. Re:Learn the command line by Thatto · · Score: 1



      If you knew how to type :-)

    7. Re:Learn the command line by EatHam · · Score: 1

      ummmm... it does. At least on my windows2000 box it does. Of course, you have to dick around with the registry (can't remember the location) or just download the TweakUI tools straight from Microsoft. There's a bunch of stuff in there. One thing I found interesting was the "how long do you want to wait to see the menu after you click on it?" question. Erm, how about not at all? OT I know, but whatever. I'll put an obligatory karma comment in here, then I'll be OK. It's OT, but I have karma to burn...

    8. Re:Learn the command line by madfgurtbn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Learn to use the command line and not a pretty gui, it will teach you alot about how Unix and Linux works

      Please, no CLI! This is for newbies, and newbies don't want to know command line stuff. I have never seen Linux on TV where Chris or anyone else on tv who bothers to show even the simplest tasks accomplished without CLI.

      Best thing to show on tv is that you can actually can get by without a command line. Show the config gui's. Show that you can accomplish real work without having to understand command line. CLI scares away newbies.

      Newbies do not want to use CLI.
      Newbies should not want to use the CLI
      Newbies should not be expected by BOFH's to understand command line.

      Newbies should experience free as in freedom. In the long run, that is the only real advantage we have.

      Newbies need to understand where OSS comes from as a community, and how they can contribute to that community without writing code more than they need to "how Unix/Linux works".

      Sorry, I will get off my soapbox now.

      Carry on.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    9. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHHAAHHA. I actually do that too.. just type random commands to get going.

      ls
      cd
      ls
      ps aux
      ifconfig
      cd ..
      ls

      *now I'm ready to figure out what the hell I want to do*

    10. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux Cookbook is good and has a lot of command line stuff :D And free. Here You can also buy a paper version.

    11. Re:Learn the command line by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a feeling we all (command line jockeys, that is) do this to some extent. For me, I type pwd after practically every cd even though I know exactly what directory I'm in. I think it has something to do with busy fingers helping the mind concentrate on the task at hand.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    12. Re:Learn the command line by Mnemia · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think that people who don't want to learn to use the CLI will ever be happy with Linux in its present state. These types of users should just stick with Windows or MacOSX if they aren't willing to try to learn the CLI.

      You have to learn the CLI if you want to use Linux in any sort of reasonable fashion. How could you possibly deal with, for instance, securing Linux without the CLI?

      GUIs in general are pretty clunky for quite a few tasks (Linux GUIs especially), and the CLI is not. We should be teaching newbies to use each when it's appropriate, not to rely on clicking some magic boxes.

    13. Re:Learn the command line by AntiFreeze · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I have to partially disagree with you. In general, you're right. But people who express an interest in learning Linux should realize that part of Linux *is* the command line. At this point in Linux's development, a user will need to access the command line in one form or another from time to time.

      Don't shrink away from it and say users don't want to know about it, or that it scares users away. Conversely, don't make out Linux to be only the command line. Don't spend too much time talking about the command line and shell scripting and how anything the gui does you can do from the command line. Completely ignoring a large part of the system that a user will need to use is dishonest. There is a healthy balance to be found.

      Your other points are extremely poignant and I agree with them fully. Newbies should experience the freedom gained by using Linux, the sense of community in the Linux world, and one's ability to contribute to that community.

      --

      ---
      "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

    14. Re:Learn the command line by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      The unix style tab function is on by default in XP, with the main difference from unix being that it cycles through possible completions rather than displaying all of them.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    15. Re:Learn the command line by Emrys · · Score: 2

      I was a Linux newbie once. If someone had started me with a GUI and I'd not realized the CLI was there, I would never have bothered.

      Newbie != point and drooler.

    16. Re:Learn the command line by E1v!$ · · Score: 0

      Impressive and cool.

    17. Re:Learn the command line by addps4cat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm an ls junky. It's pretty much automatic cd blah; ls. I should just be done with it and alias it in.

      --
      Don't eat shrimp candy, just a heads up.
    18. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Newbies do not want to use CLI.
      Newbies should not want to use the CLI
      Newbies should not be expected by BOFH's to understand command line.


      Of course they shouldn't be expected to learn a CLI right away. They should be able to do simple things by pointing and clicking. Then, when they want to learn more and start using the power of GNU/Linux or Unix, then they can learn to use the CLI.

      The point is, those who want to do only simple things (email, web browsing, typing and printing documents, and simple games) should be able to do them with a GUI. And those who want to do complicated things will be willing to learn a CLI.

    19. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Please, no CLI! This is for newbies, and newbies don't want to know command line stuff....Best thing to show on tv is that you can actually can get by without a command line. Show the config gui's....Newbies should experience free as in freedom. In the long run, that is the only real advantage we have."

      The Gui is exactly what held me back. In fact, slave owners were quite delibrate in keeping there slaves ignorant. You educate someone and they will see there freedom.

    20. Re:Learn the command line by McCarrum · · Score: 2

      Gotta love the tab key!

      Don't forget Ctrl-R at the command line.

    21. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This man has worked in IT.

    22. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What, no CLI? WTF are you thinking installing a GUI? Do you know how much space you can save by just installing a CLI with sh (definitely not bash), ls and rm??? Tons. Impress people by showing them how little space Linux needs on their 48TB drive. After that, you can show them nice programs such as grep and cat (no vi/nvi/vim or emacs bloat here). With cat, you can do anything, including creating your own ogg vorbis music files or Microsoft Office documents by hand (so they will understand how the programs work behind-the-scenes). And for the final show, you can show off Linux by backing up all the files created with cat with mount /dev/fd0 (for 5.25 floppies, of course) and mv *. Or, if you're feeling lucky, you can try the newfangled tar program.
      Good luck with that GUI bloat.

    23. Re:Learn the command line by statichead · · Score: 1

      The command line does not make for good TV.
      My terms look pretty slick;-)

    24. Re:Learn the command line by ibennetch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The camera zoomed in and tried to focus on the tiny text, but to no avail

      Well, not having seen the episode in question I don't want to come across as being critical, but in general there are a number of things that can be done that would have solved this problem. For example; all professional lenses I've ever seen have a macro setting that allows one to focus on close objects, but requires a few seconds of tweaking the focus to get just right. But a scan converter and direct output of the computer's display would be better. The local news has something like this - they can zoom in on parts of their web page to show where you can find more information, etc. Maybe they weren't prepared for this; but I'd think a network like TechTV would be prepared to show screenshots...

      The Screen Savers host rolled his eyes and made a snide comment

      Again, I haven't seen the show so I don't know what was said, but it sounds like a technical problem or lack of planning is what caused the 'problem' - not chrisd or Linux. Any eye rolling or snide comments would have been completely out of line.

      viewers were referred to the show's website to find a copy of this magical command sequence

      This is what should have happened in the first place. Most people aren't going to sit in front of their TV with a laptop or wireless keyboard typing in everything that happens - it happens too fast and besides, most people are too slow at typing and following along with things. Having the commands posted online should have been planned from the beginning. Maybe a nice short article or tutorial explaining things, for those who missed the segment but catch it online. That's how I see the internet(1) being used in congunction with conventianal media such as TV.

      footnote:
      1 - yeah; I know 'internet' *should* be capitalized but it looks weird

    25. Re:Learn the command line by Random+Addict · · Score: 1
      Madfgurtbn wrote:
      Newbies do not want to use CLI. Newbies should not want to use the CLI Newbies should not be expected by BOFH's to understand command line.

      Stuff and nonsense!! The command line and it's flexibility is what drew me to Linux in the first place. It seems to me the Linux command line is far more flexible than the DOS CLI. Plus I got sick of Windows crashes, lockups and illegal operations. I like the command line. I liked the command line when I knew next to nothing about Linux a year ago. I like the command line more the more I learn about Linux. Plus, there is the advantage, with Linux, that when an article is getting slashdotted and Netscape takes forever to to access it, you can switch to the command line and read the article with Lynx. Of course, that advantage vanishes if the whole point of the article is an image...but what is perfect about anything?

      My opinion may be a little biased though. My first computer was a lousy 33MHz CPU motherboard with one meg of RAM running MSDOS 4.0 And my first 'net access was a dialup connection with a 2400 bps modem to a Unix shell...so I guess I had a little grounding in CLI use before I "graduated" to Windows. And oh yes, I think highly of Osborne's Linux: The Complete Reference. I have the Third edition, which is probably obsolete now, but that's okay with me, as the version of Linux I run came on a CD included with the book. I paid $15.99 for my copy of the Complete Reference, marked down from $39.99 in a clearance at B. Dalton.

      --
      __
      The optimist proclaims we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this may be true.
    26. Re:Learn the command line by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that it's easier to use the command line. It's a pain to scan through the start menu looking for wordperfect when back in the DOS days, I could just run my "WP" batch file.

      All you have to learn to get start is 5-10 commands and you're much better off with DOS or linux from the command line. Even now, I use the command prompt in windows instead of the GUI tools.

      Jason

    27. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The command line and it's flexibility is what drew me to Linux in the first place. (Emphasis added to "me")

      That was you. Now what about the other 99.99% of the population? If you think CLI has a real future, you are truely hopeless. Once all you antiquated, backwards thinking, die-hard nostalgic nerds die off, CLI will be gone for good. This is 2002, not 1972. It's not reasonable to expect or want anyone to learn obsolete ways of doing things except for any particular historical yernings that individual may have to see how things were done in the stone age.

    28. Re:Learn the command line by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is a complete computer newbie who has no desire to learn computers the CLI is too much and will always be too much. The experienced Win user and/or old DOS user will be able to eventually enjoy the power of the command line. Most Mac poeple I know would never use the CLI.

      I came from the old school dos/win user. I'm still running win2k for games. I have my priorities straight though, Windows is a toy and *BSD/Linux can be both a toy and a serious tool.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    29. Re:Learn the command line by statichead · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I will get off my soapbox now.
      ok i'll step up

      It really sucks trying to use vi when you have to edit a config file and really have not the slightest idea what vi is. mp rules!

      Give me a gui any day. I like having 10 wterms going along with netscape, tkdesk, etc. CLI doesn't have to be so painful, especially when it is integrated into a workstation environment.

      I'm off

    30. Re:Learn the command line by Scalli0n · · Score: 1

      Yeah, MS cant stop copying linux...

      --
      Sig & Below
      Yuck Fou
    31. Re:Learn the command line by mbmaster · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the tab key is something we all should be thankful for every day. It saves you a lot of irritation and really speeds up your work if used frequent. You know, the console looks even more cool with FrameBuffer (as you already may know ;), but to bad the Tux doesn't stay at all time. :( Is there some hidden option or any option at all which makes the Tux stay after login?

    32. Re:Learn the command line by EvanED · · Score: 2

      I disagree. Most common functions are covered by keyboard shortcuts. If they're not, you can always use the hotkeys associated with the menu; that's just an extra stroke usually. So use of programs are not hindered by the fact that they're GUIs. (The only exception to this I can think of is actually starting programs, but that's not *that* common an activity that the performance hit from using menus is overruled.) Even if command line access is slightly *faster*, GUIs are *much* easier to learn and use. Well, if the GUI is well done. I tend to use the command box when I use AutoCAD 'cause I can't figure out what half the icons are.

    33. Re:Learn the command line by chrisd · · Score: 2
      I haveto tell you that I was pretty unhappy with how that episode came out. Doing anything in the shell on tv is very difficult. I'm trying to stick mostly to pretty graphical apps, but believe me when I tell you that I try more now than ever to stay away from the command line whenever possible.

      chrisd

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    34. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then you'd just list the directory twice from typing ls again after that out of habit. :P

    35. Re:Learn the command line by isorox · · Score: 2

      Please, no CLI!

      I disagree, I think TV should have more Command Line Interface Terminals....

    36. Re:Learn the command line by Random+Addict · · Score: 1
      Moloch666wrote:
      I think the point is a complete computer newbie who has no desire to learn computers the CLI is too much and will always be too much.

      Well, yeah I can go along with that. However, I thought we were talking about Linux newbies rather than complete computer newbies. What puzzles me though is the thought of complete computer newbies who don't want to learn computers. Something there is resistant to analysis...

      --
      __
      The optimist proclaims we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this may be true.
    37. Re:Learn the command line by $rtbl_this · · Score: 3, Informative

      How could you possibly deal with, for instance, securing Linux without the CLI?

      Bastille Linux. I'm not saying that it's a complete solution to every security issue a Linux user may come across, but it's a very newbie friendly way of locking down a box in the first place.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
    38. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plus it makes you look cool to your friends when ur flying though the command line:)

      What friends?

      This may be one of the main reasons why 'normal' people will never accept Linux.

      The ability to use a CLI isn't *cool* to most well-adjusted, properly-socialized people. It's just boring and incomprehensible.

      I use a CLI every day and have done for over 20 years and I don't find CLIs in the least cool.

      Ok, they have a kind of minimalist, utilitarian appeal, but cool they ain't. Also I would definately not be impressed with some spotty kid trying to type faster than Mavis Beacon ;)

    39. Re:Learn the command line by stotterj · · Score: 1
      As someone who can remember being a Linux newbie, I could not disagree with this more! CLI and shell scripts are what first attracted me to linux, and I suspect the same is true for others.

      I started computing on a 286 DOS machine (no win 3.1) so a CLI didn't scare me.

      In fact, the first linux I tried was one of the linux-on-a-floppy distros, without a GUI. I networked two 486s together with the help of "Linux for dummies" and lots of man pages, but without GUI utilities. When I installed my first "real" distribution with X, I already knew how important the CLI was, even when X was running.

    40. Re:Learn the command line by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you show an OS on tv.. you must use the pretty buttons, fading menus, shaking dialog boxes and transparent dragging all with anti-aliased everything and alpha blending.. if you can have every icon animated and have a fading red letters over the top of it all blinking WARNING! you will have the TV audience rivited to their sets...

      reality has no place on TV. espically on tech TV and screen savers. Only one of the hosts there has a clue.. and I have stopped paying attention to the show cince that wedding band appeared on megans finger.

      Tech TV is NOT for anyone but the fresh newbie or clueless CEO that is trying to be techno-hip. what they need to do is shoehorn in their 8 hours of programming that they rerun over and over every day with a "screen savers" for the sysadmin. cover advanced topics and advanced things... in the morning become the Bloomberg of the IT caste... become THE channel that is on the tv in the rack in the server room.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    41. Re:Learn the command line by jmertic · · Score: 1

      And it really was worse than that. Even though although I do look forward to chrisd's segments on the Screen Savers, the are just painful sometimes to follow. One previous segment had him showing people how to do using flocks (which I didn't understand that choice, but whatever) do make a webpage counter. He briefly showed the code and then the code working, soon after followed by his site being slashdotted. The code presentation was a quick camera shot at a few lines and a quick description. It seemed a bit to daunting of a task to do for thier audience, and I think it should have been presented differently.

      And I don't put chrisd completely at fault for this. His segments are the only ones that use the command line or viewing text in a text file, so the producers should try to better gear those segments to that they are easier to follow for thier audience via better camera shots, etc. If I hadn't a clue about linux and watched those episodes, I'd avoid Linux like the plague.

    42. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I saw that, it was the episode that convinced me that Martin may be a tool. He basicaly said, "I don't want to type in some weird command, I want to click on an icon."

    43. Re:Learn the command line by madfgurtbn · · Score: 2

      I started computing on a 286 DOS machine (no win 3.1) so a CLI didn't scare me.

      So explain again why a newbie should be be enthusiastic about having to learn to use CLI?

      Let's see, a 286 pre-win3.11 means about, what, 1990? 1988? So you have over a decade of CLI experience.

      See, to you, a CLI is your first environment, so you feel comfortable there, but to the billions of recent and soon to be computer users, a CLI is not a challenging but rewarding intellectual problem, but is instead a daunting and puzzling waste of time.

      Remember that slashdotters are not "users", we are "experts". If you bought a car and the first thing the salesperson did was explain that to make it go all you haved to do is get our your toolbox and solder together these two wires and make a couple adjustments to the timing, you would quickly be out the door.

      M$ and Apple, and I think Lindows, understand and accept the simple fact that users do not have any interest in becoming experts. I think Lindows is currently our last best hope for a really user-friendly (to us experts that means "crippled") interface.

      But experts should not care if Lindows is crippled, because we know how to get through to the useful parts, not that we would be using Lindows on our own machines, of course.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    44. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lumpy wrote: "...what they need to do is shoehorn in their 8 hours of programming that they rerun over and over every day with a "screen savers" for the sysadmin. cover advanced topics and advanced things..."

      Good idea! Then Tech TV can become the only network that can count it viewership on one or two hands, if it lasts that long. I would venture to say that there are more non-sys admins in the world than there are sys admins, and Tech TV has to attract a large enough audience to stay on the air.

      I happen to enjoy The Screen Savers when i get a chance to watch it. While I do find it a bit Windows-centric at times (although nowhere near as Microsoft rah-rah as Call For Help), I usually find it interesting and entertaining and often informative as well.

    45. Re:Learn the command line by walt_huntsman · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely! I am not an expert, but I occasionally check out the discussions on Slashdot.

      I was attracted to Linux not because of the command line but because it provided an open alternative to Microsoft. I've used Microsoft products for a long time (Word, PowerPoint, FrontPage, etc.), but I don't like the corporate morality in place at Microsoft, and I don't like the direction the company is headed. And while I have not yet gotten comfortable enough with it to make Linux my full time OS of choice, I am hopeful of getting there - even before I ever do much with CLI.

      As a relative "newbie" with regard to Linux, I am offended by those who suggest that people like me who don't want to learn (or don't always have the time to learn) CLI should stick to Windows and Macs. The implicit argument is that only those "in the know" are entitled to freedom of choice.

      Such attitudes will do more than Microsoft ever could to keep people from trying and adopting Linux. In my opinion, that would be a shame.

    46. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all you've ever known is GUI, what makes you think you *want* "freedom"?

    47. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, when I was a newbie, (I sorta still am), I _only_ had the CLI. My hard drive was only 376Mb or so, which meant I didn't have room for X. I learned a lot, with some help from "UNIX for Dummies"

    48. Re:Learn the command line by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry, I guess you were talking about Linux newbies, I misread.

      I could example of a a complete computer newbie who doesn't want to learn computers is my girlfriend. She hates them, but she wanted to be able to communicate via email with some friends and family and look up the occasional website. I'm sure there are many people thrown in using computers even though they don't want to, it's just the way things are moving today almost everyone needs to be somewhat familiar.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    49. Re:Learn the command line by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      I could example of a a complete computer newbie

      Should read...

      A good example of a a complete computer newbie

      Damn it mistyped that time.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    50. Re:Learn the command line by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Command line really is a great way to get to know the system. I recently went in head first into linux as a newbie; I found an old alpha and installed debian on it. I can't get X to work (which REALLY irritates me), so I'm stuck at command line. As a result, I'm really getting to know the system. I've just been tinkering around with it on our home network; exploring commands, learning how to set up servers for ftp, ssh, http, mail...I've been having a lot of fun. My wife thinks I'm insane sending e-mails to myself....

      Not to mention that it feels pretty cool to have an Alpha with command line Debian running.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    51. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly that attitude seems to come with the territory and the assumption that a CLI is intuitive and/or easy. A lot of people mistake speed for ease of use. Although even speed isn't always improved with a CLI.

      I would hope this community can eventually see the right tool for the job is not always Linux.
      Dillusions are hard to conquer and the Linux community seems to be full of em.

    52. Re:Learn the command line by zapfie · · Score: 1

      That's not really part of Linux.. it's part of BASH, or whatever shell you are using.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    53. Re:Learn the command line by Valken · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is... MS wised up and implemented it in their command prompt (though not wise enough to turn an useful functionality on by default).

    54. Re:Learn the command line by zapfie · · Score: 1

      It's not part of Linux itself. It's part of the shell program you choose. It is perfectly possible to use Linux, and have a shell that does not support tab completions. Also, tab completion is on by default in XP now.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    55. Re:Learn the command line by Orintz · · Score: 1

      I disagree, Newbies do like the CLI at least I
      do, and I still consider myself a newbie. So much
      can be done from the command line that can't be
      done from a canned GUI app. Take a simple script for
      example, cp /usr/home/me/whatever.jpg "`date+
      %Y%m%d%H%M`.jpg" and cron that hourly off of
      an image taken hourly (whatever.jpg)
      to make an image archive...it is exactly what I wanted.
      Don't give up on CLI for newbies instead mix it
      in with some GUI apps. It is really how it goes.

    56. Re:Learn the command line by commbat · · Score: 1

      That was you. Now what about the other 99.99% of the population? If you think CLI has a real future, you are truely hopeless.

      $sed -e 's/99\.99/\.0003/' -e 's/hopeless/brilliant/'

      --
      'Intellectual Properties' are uncontrollable in the wild. To base an economy on them is just stupid.
    57. Re:Learn the command line by TACD · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? I was (am) a Linux newbie, and within about ten minutes of using it the CLI was by far my favourite aspect. The power so lacking in Windows to be able to press a few keys and zip straight out of X to a CLI to find out exactly what's what is great. I think demonstrating the CLI, and devoting a part of any Linux introduction to showing how powerful and non-scary it is is pretty important.

      --
      Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
    58. Re:Learn the command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, when I started using KDE I found a familiar "start button" in the lower left hand corner of the screen...

    59. Re:Learn the command line by ecolitalks · · Score: 1

      There is not much to play with the command line. Unless you know one computer language.

  6. Good example for TV: by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Go to a site that makes you play whack-a-mole with pop-up windows in Explorer. Then go there in Mozilla.

    Very visual, easily understood, and it'll appeal to everyone who's ever had that happen to them before.

    1. Re:Good example for TV: by ejdmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or even better, show off Phoenix! It's so purdy and fast... :)

    2. Re:Good example for TV: by mdechene · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good example for TV:
      Go to a site that makes you play whack-a-mole with pop-up windows in Explorer. Then go there in Mozilla.


      Yeah, but, how are you going to get away with showing porn on TV?

      --

      Karma: Not Particularly Funny.
    3. Re:Good example for TV: by diwelf · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what was meant about learning using tv, but what about if you setup some sort of aalib program to grab your screen and then capture it to mpeg files, and then you could put together a 'this is hwo you learn linux' video with actual clips from teh CLI so the user could pause/ff the video or whatever and see what they want to see up close and see everything scroll up the screen and everything.. just an idea.

      --
      ----- diwelf
    4. Re:Good example for TV: by dirvish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the same not, go to a site with one of those annoying adds that flashes Red "YOU ARE A WINNER!!! CLICK HERE TO CLAIM YOUR PRIZE!!!" and is so bright it hurts your eyes. Then right-click on the image and select "Block Images from this Server" from the menu that pops up. Most people have no need for any images that are hosted on doubleclick.net's servers.

    5. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can show em all the really cool shockwave games and stuff online!

      Shockwave programs aren't web pages, they're shockwave programs. Whether or not they run in a browser window depends entirely on whether or not the manufacturer made a plug-in to run them there. I can make anything I want run in a web browser, but that doesn't make it a web page, and that doesn't mean your browser is broken if it can't run them.

      Or my banks online page, and how to see cancelled cheques, transfer funds, and.

      your bank's webpage is broken, you should tell them to fix it. Mozilla is more standars compliant than internet explorer. If they won't use correct HTML, then that's their fault.

      Besides, it's only like a 5 minute segment. He doesn't have time to wait for 'zilla to load.

      You can make mozilla always run in the background so it pops up instantly when you want to use it, just like IE does. Only you can turn mozilla off if you don't want it hogging your memory.

    6. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already had that on Tech TV

    7. Re:Good example for TV: by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 4, Insightful
      your bank's webpage is broken, you should tell them to fix it. Mozilla is more standars compliant than internet explorer. If they won't use correct HTML, then that's their fault.

      Are you linux guys that naive? Seriously. What company of any size just suddenly jumps to attention to appease the nasal whines of someone using -- and let's be honest here -- an oddball product? Standards compliance means, say it with me, nothing in this world that is essentially run by popularity contest.

      'Tell[ing] them to fix it' means bringing in some HTML or JS or PHP or Perl or ASP or whatever jerk, who doesn't work for free mind you, to make it go. And, why again? Oh yeah, for 0.03 percent of all potential clients. Ideally, sure, that's just what happens, but in the real world that e-mail never even gets read.

      Your idealism is heartwarming, but in order to "tell" anyone anything, you'd better bring some actual business reasons that aren't comprised of a whiteboard presentation of HTML standards and a pocket-full of hope. You (and I) as Mozilla users are ostensibly alone and no one hears our screams.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    8. Re:Good example for TV: by brsmith4 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd hardly call Mozilla an odd-ball product considering many, many sites have already made changes to accomodate it and the very similar Netscape 6.x 7.x series. My bank, Bank of America, somehow found it useful to make its online banking site Mozilla compatible. Maybe said parent post should consider a different bank if Online Banking is so important to him.

    9. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we? Fuck off.

    10. Re:Good example for TV: by los+furtive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I spent 3 years doing tech support with IBM for almost two dozen different companies, including no less than 4 banks. You would not believe how much the banks will compete to keep you as thier customer, and if it means making their browser Netscape/Mozilla compliant, most of them will do it. After all, for the pidly sum of $38,000, they can expect to keep at least 5,000 customers happy (and you know i'm guessing on the very very low end of the scale). 11.5% of the browser population is still a large part of a business' clientel. Another way to look at it, a user is just as likely to be gay as to use a non-MS browser. I'm just sayin'....

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    11. Re:Good example for TV: by LadyLucky · · Score: 2
      That's just silly.

      I use Mozilla on windows.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    12. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your bank's webpage is broken, you should tell them to fix it.
      Always assume that it is the bank's fault Mozilla does allow access to banking pages.

      I think that's what the poster is referring to, but even that is a non-issue now that 1.2.1 has been released.

    13. Re:Good example for TV: by ryochiji · · Score: 2
      >That's just silly. I use Mozilla on windows.

      There's nothing silly about it. Mozilla is Open Source. Even on Windows.

    14. Re:Good example for TV: by Chops · · Score: 2

      ... or turn off animated GIFs. My personal favorite is the ad that says, "If this banner is flashing, YOU ARE A WINNER! Click here!" It doesn't flash for me. It seems I'm not a winner.

    15. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What company of any size just suddenly jumps to attention to appease the nasal whines of someone using -- and let's be honest here -- an oddball product?

      They don't need to jump to the attention to Mozilla (an "oddball product", so you say). They just need to jump to the attention of HTML standards. If they did that they wouldn't have to jump to any one product's attention (unless it didn't properly implement the standard, of course).

      That's the whole point of standards. If they wrote correct HTML to begin with, they wouldn't have to fix their web pages every time a new browser (or a new version of a browser) gains popularity. They'd probably save a lot of money in the long run.

    16. Re:Good example for TV: by Artifex · · Score: 2
      Go to a site that makes you play whack-a-mole with pop-up windows in Explorer. Then go there in Mozilla


      I coulda sworn they make a Mozilla for MS-Windows.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    17. Re:Good example for TV: by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

      That's right. Pity the article is about Linux.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    18. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry, but if you switch banks simply because your bank's online banking system doesn't support your flavour-of-the-week browser, you're a fool.

    19. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At work we use IE only HTML. At first, it was IE 4.0 only, but when people moved to IE5, we needed to change it. Then it was IE5 only, until people started moving to IE 6. Another change.

      If we instead had changed it to be standards compliant, we would not have had the problems *each and every time* a new version of IE is released.

      Writing standards compliant HTML is *cheaper*, because the standard does not change very often compared to the non-standard stuff.

    20. Re:Good example for TV: by Cloud+9 · · Score: 2
      I coulda sworn they make a Mozilla for MS-Windows.

      Yes, but what you are forgetting is that Christ asked for demos of open source software, not just open source software for linux. While I'm sure that's what his emphasis is on, the parent's post is still correct.

      Now stop acting like a tool.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    21. Re:Good example for TV: by Cloud+9 · · Score: 2

      That should have read Chris. That was either a freudian slip, or I need to stop drinking at 8AM. =]

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    22. Re:Good example for TV: by vivian · · Score: 1

      Another great example - many households would have two PCs now right? or be considering getting a second for Linux? Demonstrate how well Linux runs over a home network, using VNC so they can have their windows/mac *AND* play with Linux - using VNC on Windows etc to look at the Linux box. Better yet, they don't need a second monitor/keyboard/mouse, so less hardware to buy for those looking at a cheap way to experiment with it without risking somehow trashing their existing system with a dual boot setup etc. Of course of they have several computers at home, everyone can "play" with Linux *at once* from their various PCs through several VNC sessions.

    23. Re:Good example for TV: by brsmith4 · · Score: 2

      I'd also hardly say that Mozilla is my flavor-of the week browser considering I have been using it for almost two years. And no, if I cannot access my bank's online services for some odd-ball reason (i.e. my browser isn't supported), then I think it's time to find a bank that does simply because a bank that supports all browsers shows that it is out for its customers when it caters to their needs.

    24. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "11.5%....a user is just as likely to be gay as to use a non-MS browser"

      Ha! Your gay percentage is sorely mistaken--no doubt a brainwash from the gay-friendly media: This article dispells the myth with reputable sources.

      The percentage is closer to 2%.

    25. Re:Good example for TV: by buggered · · Score: 1

      The instant I can't access my account information with Netscape/Mozilla at any of my banks, I'm on the blower. I don't use IE. Period! If any of them ever told me that I had to use IE to access my information I'd close that account so fast it would make their heads swim. So far I've only had a couple of problems and had to call and everytime I have had a satisfactory outcome.

    26. Re:Good example for TV: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! Your gay percentage is sorely mistaken--no doubt a brainwash from the gay-friendly media: This article dispells the myth with reputable sources. [familyresearchinst.org]

      Coming from a right-wing, anti-gay, christian/nazi organization. Yeah, that is definitely a more reliable source of information than the washington post, newsweek, and fortune.

    27. Re:Good example for TV: by PCanalyst · · Score: 1

      My suggestion is show how to use a Linux system to do really useful things:
      -Setting up a game server (sounds like you did that already).
      -Setting up a personal web site
      -Make a file server that can be accessed by other machines (NFS).
      -How to store all those MP3s/OGGs/MPEGs/DIVXs for access throughout the house on a wireless LAN.
      -Show unique software you can't get for Windows.

      Please note: the CLI WILL scare off newbies. The CLI is great for professionals who type all day and have memorized all the commands. The rest of us prefer a powerful GUI (and that is not an oxymoron).

      --
      Don't sweat it, it's only ones and zeros...
    28. Re:Good example for TV: by vicviper · · Score: 1

      You've never seen porn on TV? You need to get out mo.. Umm.. just watch Skinimax.

    29. Re:Good example for TV: by j7953 · · Score: 2
      Your idealism is heartwarming, but in order to "tell" anyone anything, you'd better bring some actual business reasons that aren't comprised of a whiteboard presentation of HTML standards and a pocket-full of hope.

      In the long term, coding a web site according to standards will make that web site much easier to maintain.

      When you have any type of automation in creating the pages (and that's true for almost every serious web site, even if it might be something as simple as adding a header and a footer to every document), you'll need some standard anyway, because whatever software you use to generate the pages will have certain expectations regarding its input. So, why not use the standard? It will make sure that you are not locked into one vendor's software, or, if you have an in-house solution, that you can replace large parts of it with standards tools (e.g. replace your own template processing code with an XSLT processor), so you'll save on maintenance cost. Another problem if you don't code to standards is that the non-standard way is probably less well documented. Again, this will increase the costs of maintaining your pages, page templates, and software.

      Of course, if what you have right now is non-standard, then rewriting your code to make it standards compliant can be quite a lot of work and will cost money, but I'd look at it as an investment. Flexibility is important in today's markets. E.g. what if AOL drops Internet Explorer and bundles Netscape/Mozilla instead? How fast can your business react to that situation? Ideally, you don't have to react at all, because you already cared about standards before. Lean back and enjoy the customers coming to you from those of your competitors that couldn't adopt to the new situation within exactly zero seconds.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  7. Running Linux by wormbin · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fourth edition of Running Linux came out this month. Great for beginners.

    1. Re:Running Linux by tongue · · Score: 2

      I started on linux using this book's second edition... even today that one is still gold. the fourth edition i'm sure is even better and more current. definitely recommend this one to anyone who is halfway technical and wants to learn linux.

    2. Re:Running Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got the 3rd edition of Running Linux. This book is hands down the best for anyone wanting to get started with Linux. Couple this book with a pocket size book on basic Unix commands and you're set! It's how I started.

      -Robert

      P.S. BTW, I really appreciate the Linux segments you do on The Screensavers. Linux needs more mainstream exposure. Keep up the good work.

    3. Re:Running Linux by butt-rock+camaro · · Score: 1

      Absolutely the best beginner's Linux book out there. Period. Because it doesn't really matter how many man pages or reference texts you read when you don't know how to make sense out of them. This book gives you the fundamental knowledge to be able to go on and gainfully use the howto's and other reference material.

    4. Re:Running Linux by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      I've got the third edition, and that is also very good!

    5. Re:Running Linux by zachjb · · Score: 1

      I have this book and it has helped me learn the Linux operating system. It teaches you everything you need to know from the oh so important command line to how to compile a new kernel.

      I say if you are going to give a book that teaches Linux to a newbie for X-Mas, I say get them this one.

      Also, the humor that the O'Reilly puts into the books is always a nice little ice breaker when you are stressed out because you are trying to learn grep.

      --

      --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
    6. Re:Running Linux by dfung · · Score: 1

      I'll add into the affirmative chorus here. I started with the first edition right when Linux was starting to really gather momentum in the tinkerer world. I was 7 years past some solid unix user experience, but no significant hands-on admin experience.

      Got a set of CDs (geez, this was also before residential high bandwidth or CD burners) and this book at the recommendation of a friend. Really awesome and accessible if you can wander around unix a bit but have never configured a daemon before.

      Actually, I remember now that I had to bum a boot floppy off my bud as well, as CDs weren't bootable back then (at least my system didn't do that).

      The great thing about this book is that it's logically laid out without being 3" thick. If you want to try something and don't get it, you often can type in an example from the book to get rolling, which gives you the confidence to really muck yourself up AND the confidence to put it back.

      I got a later edition (brown instead of the original teal) and there were many improvements, so I'm sure the latest would be an excellent update.

    7. Re:Running Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition
      (Version 1.0.0)???

      I've heard its pretty good and I've read a couple of pages and it looked pretty cool actually. I know it's online but that's off topic =)

  8. First the basics... by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great Expectations ... then follow it up with ...

    The Great Failure

    And dont forget The Communist Manifesto

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:First the basics... by UU7 · · Score: 1

      hahaha
      nice ;)

    2. Re:First the basics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The communist Manifesto is a good book. There are some scary similarities to what is going on now in the US and whaat was written in that book.

      I still say the economic side of communism is good, it is the government that you have to worry about. The problem is most people don't know what the difference is.

    3. Re:First the basics... by c0dedude · · Score: 1
      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  9. Whee by zapfie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Killer Linux app to show off:

    VMWare

    Try THAT under Windows!

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
    1. Re:Whee by cicatrix1 · · Score: 2

      Uhhhh there is a win32 version of it. GG.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    2. Re:Whee by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, VMware makes a Windows version

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    3. Re:Whee by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Uhhh.. it was a joke, in case you hadn't noticed. GG.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    4. Re:Whee by algernon7 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ummm...ok.

    5. Re:Whee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... I AM doing just that under windows...
      Unfortunately, my work forces me to use predominantly windows-based development tools, but I am running a Linux box or two in VMWare for all the other stuff...

  10. jump right in by Raiford · · Score: 3, Informative
    Just get a distro and jump right in. Books ! Books ! You don't need no stikin books ! Curl up with all the HOW-TOs and spend many gratifying hours configuring XFree on the Slackware distribution. This may sound like a troll but there is a lot of truth to what I am saying. If you want to learn quickly, deeply and well get your feet wet with a distrobution that causes you to think and hack and tweek.

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    1. Re:jump right in by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While there are a breed of hackers who would consider "many hours" getting to a point where a system is set up, most people just want to use a computer and would consider that time fustrating rather than "gratifying." I know I got extremely fustrated trying to get XFree working under Mandrake, and the gratification of getting the nVidia drivers downloaded through Lynx and installed only slightly made up for it. Oh, the reason I had Mandrake? Mainly because I was having problems getting Red Hat to talk to my sound card. Despite many hours of work on that, I made no progress at all.

    2. Re:jump right in by IceCat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Keep in mind there are two types of people (well, at LEAST two types of people) who want to use Linux, those that want to hack and tweek and those that just want to use it to get their work done.

      I definitely agree though that for the hackers and tweekers your way works best in the long run. Often times when I am helping a friend with a Linux question the first thing I say is "Well open up a terminal window and then..."

    3. Re:jump right in by Cutriss · · Score: 2

      Humans are all unique, and not everyone has the same learning process that you do. Furthermore, there isn't a one-to-one correlation between Linux advocates and that same learning process.

      I've been trying to get into Linux for the last eight years or so, and I've always been put off by it in some way or another. I've finally got myself a firewall/router set up now using Trustix, and I know my way around the system. It's gratifying to know that I had to do a lot of discovery and playing around to finally get it to work by myself, but it took many, many hours to do it.

      It still isn't running named, though. I've read all the HOWTOs and man pages I can find, and I still can't get it working properly. That doesn't mean I'm a stupid lUser...that means that there's a miscommunication between me and the documentation. It'd likely be fixed by...surprise!...different documentation.

      If the Linux community wants to see Linux go mainstream, they have to learn how to adapt it to the mainstream. You can't just expect the other 99.9% of the population to "figure things out" in the one specific way that everyone else has done it before, despite how well it may have worked for you.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    4. Re:jump right in by failrate · · Score: 1

      Yar, let's see, I can (depending on the system) type '?' or "help", and then when I'm done, I can type "man" for any topic I run across... hmmm... except for installing, why would I need a physical book? And if I have a Mac, a browser, and an ISP, I don't even need a book for help in installation, do I?

      --
      Voodoo Girl is the bomb!
    5. Re:jump right in by speedplane · · Score: 0

      Well you can't blame him. Most tweekers and hackers are proud to admit they never picked up one book or went to a single class. Its just a matter of how efficiently you want to learn.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    6. Re:jump right in by Raiford · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's why the README_first file was invented !

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    7. Re:jump right in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maby linux is not for you..
      get microsoft Windows XP! It colorfull
      i am sure you will like it

    8. Re:jump right in by swankypimp · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I got started several years ago with a SAMS' Teach Yourself Linux book and included RedHat CD, and then changed to Slackware later on once I determined Linux was something I liked. One advantage of the How-To books is the CD that some include; it is easier to spend $15 for the newbie distro de jour than to download an ISO on a 56k connection. Also, there's something psychologically calming about flipping through a physical book rather than hunting through an unknown file system structure for the info you need.

      I agree with your main point, though. I learned most of what I know about Linux on slack; Red Hat 5.0 seemed like my blindly clicking a bunch of dialogue boxes that masked the internal operations of the machine. However, I didn't switch until I felt confident in my ability to navigate man pages and the web to find what I needed.

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    9. Re:jump right in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their r 2 types of people: those who think that their r 2 types of people and those who know better

    10. Re:jump right in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the "just get a distro" part, but the no books part is only if you have a POS computer and LOTS of time to tinker -- something I was fortunate enough to have (the time, not the POS computer -- mine is a brand new Comcrap Presorry-o. GRR! No, wait! Yep! Had the POS computer too!). The problem with most users is that they do not know where to begin to tinker. They need a starting point. They need some guidance. If I just sat you down at a blank table with a yellow legal tablet and said, "learn calculus," could you honestly do it without prior knowledge except 5th grade math? I don't think you could.

      What I think is good is learning through error, but not without direction. I would reccomend picking up a boxed Linux distro, like Mandrake (they have nice documentation), and curl up with it and then just goof around in your spare time with your POS 486 you bought at a flea market for $50. The docs will get your sparkling new CompuWonder 2000 up and running so you can use it and your tinkering on the 486 will teach you very well.

      You can do that, or find me and I'd be more than happy to impart my wealth of Linux knowledge on you! Happy computing to all new Linux users. I wish you all well, but do remember: "no pain, no gain." Just remember to keep your pain on the POS 486 and the gain on the CompuWonder 2000! I know that from experience!

    11. Re:jump right in by Raiford · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My bias comes from the era when I got into Linux. When I first installed Linux from floppy images downloaded from the net the kernal version was 0.99 patch level 14. There were no books around at that time. What you learned, you learned from tinkering and posting questions to usenet. I was already familiar with a number of *nix flavors and knew what to ask. I do encourage the new user to find whatever reference they feel comfortable with. The pioneer days were great though.

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    12. Re:jump right in by haroldK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need a physical book because we're not talking about you. When I started out, I hated having to check syntax in man. I had to either write down the info I wanted or try to remember it. Most of the time, I couldn't figure our what I wanted from the man page because there was too much there and it wasn't in plain English.

      A book will help a newbie get the info they need and help them understand it, and they'll be able to quickly reference it in the future. A book has a lot more space to explain options and arguments than a man page does.

      People learn in different ways. This TV show isn't targeted at the people who would just, out of the blue, decide they wanted to try it out. They need to be shown what it can do and why it's neat. That's not likely to be a person who will want to learn what commands do by digging around.

    13. Re:jump right in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...on the Slackware distribution

      This has got to be the best way to go.

      I am dead #$%@ing serious!!

      Slackware kicks large amounts of ass Slackware

      I am sure that I am trolling, whatever the f#ck that means.

    14. Re:jump right in by fdisk3hs · · Score: 1

      i agree, go to www.linuxdoc.org, or burn off an iso and print the key docs off of it. the 'dos-win-to-linux-howto' and the 'installation-how-to' should get you going. a bunch of screw-ups and do-overs later, and you'll be off and running. i printed out those two docs and absorbed them for a week before even trying an install. three or four weeks later and i was on the internet running netscape, but not until after i had tried two different pc's, three hard drives and two modems. what can i say, it was all user error. i later had linux running on both pc's using all the hard drives and modems...
      i would recommend using a book once you get tired of 'ok, now i can install gnu/linux, run df and ls, and connect to the internet and run netscape'. when you're ready to learn how to think about all of the elements of the system better, and really tear into things, pick up a book.
      the old 'unix system administrator's bible' was a great book too. it used to come with freebsd on cd circa '95, then slackware later on, i don't know if there is a new version in print...
      i have the 'redhat linux unleashed' book, and i read the whole thing before starting my current job as an it manager. it really helped me get my head in the game, but the sysadmin bible was more thorough along those lines...
      btw, links-gui doesn't understand my shift keys right now,
      my .02, lr

    15. Re:jump right in by Grantman · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you about jumping right in. My first experience with Linux was installing Mandrake 8 on my HP Pavillion Laptop computer. While the installer made the process very easy, it still didnt help the fact that Mandrake didnt (on it's own) offer support for half of the hardware in my machine. Because I really didnt know that much about what I was doing, and because in trying to make things work using Mandrake's GUI config's, I usually ended up making things worse, not better, I gave in and scrapped Mandrake. My recent experiences were quite a bit better though. I ordered Debian on cd and and installed just a basic Command Line debian environment in dual boot with Windows XP (seeing as I only have one machine). From there, A friend of mine showed me the wonders of recompiling the kernel, and like that, I had all of my hardware (or at least all of it I cared about) working. Then, I installed XFree86, Installed WindowMaker, and before long, I had a very usefull Linux system. Whenever I ran into problems with something, I would just boot back to Windows, go to google, and do some reading about how other people did what I need to do, and then it's back to Linux to try to make it work for me. There is a real sense of pride in having a Linux system running that you've played a great role in making work. I still find, that even though I have text editors installed for WindowMaker, I much prefer to jump back to command line and use their editors if i need to edit a config file or do something like that. Even newbies need to know where the real power in Linux is, the command line. If your Windows Install bites it, most likely your going to have to reinstall windows. Not very often you can come back. In linux, if X stops working, you've still got the command line (which is where I started out), so, your not totally lost. X will generally give you a reason why it cant start, so, you just fix the problem, and your good to go again. But, enough from me. I just thought I'd give the input of a newbie who dived right into the command line, albeit with a safety rope on (my Windows Install still intact). Maybe it's just the geek in me, but I think we should try to understand what's running under X (the command line) before we play with X.

  11. Just start,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best way to start using linux is to just jump head first into it. Thats how I did it, I made a spare partition on my disk, installed slackware (I was terrified at first, since I knew its not the easiest distro around) on it, and just started using it. You learn a LOT just by trial and error.

    Along the way I bought O'Reilly's Running Linux, but I only occasionally use it as a refference.

    My point here is that no book can teach you what hands on experience can teach you!

    Have fun!

    1. Re:Just start,,, by gomoX · · Score: 1

      I agree no book is as good as experience... But, you know, i was glad to set up XFree on a slackware AFTER i had been around with mandrake/redhat for a while.
      At the beginning i hardly could do much more than ls... I dont think its a good beginning. (IMHO)

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
  12. Books... by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

    Learning Red Hat Linux
    by Bill McCarty
    Publisher: (who else?) ORielly
    Cover: Guy wearing a hat. No animal.

    Suited for RH 7.2, but can probably be easily applied to other distros.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  13. Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by fetta · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mark Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux is the best beginner's book on Linux I've ever found. After reading this book, all the man pages and HowTos finally started making sense.

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
    1. Re:Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by MrChubble · · Score: 1

      I agree, this book has been a great guide for me. Its a mandatory book for my operating systems class, where we use linux as a basis for the class. It teaches a very important skill early on, how to use VI. This is something more books should spend time on.

    2. Re:Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree,
      Mark Sobel rules. Very much to the point, mini-skirt coverage (long eough to cover the matters, short enough to keep up the interest)

    3. Re:Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. That is an excellent book. It is the book that was required for my Linux 101 class. My collection of Linux books has grown significantly since then (20+ and growing), but I still reach for Sobell's "A Practical Guide to Linux" frequently.

      The only drawback to the book is its age. The GUI and Linux Apps have changed a lot since that book was written.

    4. Re:Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by evil_roy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The content of this book is spot on. Just as important is the layout of the book and Sobell has nailed the best way to present this sort of text. It is quick and easy to find exactly what you need.

      Whilst the content of other texts may be more extensive it is no good if you can't find what you need. Running Linux falls into this category - a great book until you come across the Practical Guide, after which the other manuals start gathering dust.

    5. Re:Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by tjhanson · · Score: 0

      It's a little dated, but that was my first Linux book, fwd by Linus. Also, amazon has it on special right now with "Nutshell."

    6. Re: Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > The content of this book is spot on. Just as important is the layout of the book and Sobell has nailed the best way to present this sort of text. It is quick and easy to find exactly what you need.

      FWIW, Sobel has a new book A Practical Guide to Red Hat Linux 8 in press, supposedly out this month. Shame about the distro-/version- specific presentation, but the TOC makes it look like it will be a good book for anyone who matches the relevant distro/version.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:Sobell's A Practical Guide to Linux by TexTex · · Score: 2

      Mark Sobell should be shipping his next book, A Practical Guide to Red Hat 8, by the end of the month. I'm hoping it updates his previous tome, A Practical Guide to Linux, which was published in 1997, with some newer information as well as Red Hat specific tasks.

      Still, A Practical Guide to Linux is about as good as you can get for introductions without worrying about the forboding sense O'Reilly sometimes gives you with technical writing.

      --
      -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
  14. Linux Superbowl Commercial by PaddyM · · Score: 2

    With that song from Sesame Street:
    "Cooperation... Makes it happen."
    "Cooperation... Working together."
    (Dig it)

    Maybe change Dig It to Linux. But maybe not.

    1. Re:Linux Superbowl Commercial by 20_ooodbye · · Score: 2, Funny

      or even better:

      Big black on white title :"Corperation"
      followed pictures of people straining under the opressive yoke of Microsoft

      Then "Co-operation" followed by happy smiley linux users and a large computer animated tux looking as if he's a belly full of cod.

  15. start with the warez groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    alt.binaries.warez.linux

    There's no place better

  16. some useful sites by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are some sites you will find useful which are going beyond newbie level.

    www.linuxdoc.org (Linux documentation project)
    www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book (linux device drivers 2nd edition)
    www.advancedlinuxprogramming.com
    ftp:// rtfm.mit.edu/pub/faqs/unix-faq
    sources.redhat.com /autobook/ (automake autoconf book)
    www.scyld.com/network (network device drivers)
    linuxassembly.org
    linuxsocket.org
    kern elnewbies.org (kernel info)
    freebooks.boom.ru
    www.maththinking.com/boa t/booksIndex.html

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    1. Re:some useful sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma Whore

    2. Re:some useful sites by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 0, Troll

      Jealousy whore - post something useful for once in your life.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    3. Re:some useful sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great modding - keep up the good work.

  17. Re:Puting gas on the fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux falls somewhere between win95 and windows 3.1

  18. Ronco by stand · · Score: 1
    what you think is the best way of showing off Linux on TV

    I think a late night infomercial with that Ronco guy would be extremely effective [It slices, it dices, and makes juliened fries].

    --
    Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    1. Re:Ronco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      set it ... and forget it

    2. Re:Ronco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think a late night infomercial with that Ronco guy would be extremely effective [It slices, it dices, and makes juliened fries].

      Excitable Announcer: Are you sick and tired of this? [shot of some dude downloading porn then getting the BSOD. "Aw man!"]

      Lame-ass closed-source software getting you down? [same dude hunched over with BSOD in background. thought balloon: "THIS SUXX0R5!!!!11"]

      Well move over Winblowze, 'cause RONCO LINUX is here!

      It slices, it dices, it humps, it dumps, it bakes a cake and takes a leak on the seat while it's in heat. fo shizzles ma nizzle, linux is the tops, ma man be linus (he's got his big penis!). it starts up a riot and it never stop, you want me be quiet? well then call the cops...

      ahem

      Yes, linux does it all and it's guaranteed to NOT make you gay. It's fun for the whole family, just watch:

      [little girl using bash: "Heehee, I'm l337!! w00+!!!"]

      [grandma using mozilla to view goatse.cx: "You M$ f4gg0ts can blow me!"]

      [dude from earlier successfully downloading porn: "Dude! I feel less gay already!"]

      How much would you expect to pay for such an amazing system?

      $99.99?!?
      $89.99?!?!
      $79.99?!??!!

      !?!?

      Order the Ronco Distro today and pay only three easy instalments of $14.99!

      BUT WAIT! That's not all!!

      Order now and we'll toss in two CDs of free software at no extra cost!!!!

      Operators are standing by! This is a limited-time offer!! ORDER NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111

      (ronco enterprises will not be held liable for time wasted setting up linux. ronco enterprises does not endorse rms or any of his views. ronco enterprises has never been affiliated with the communist party. ronco enterprises is a god-fearing corporation. ronco enterprises is required to reveal the following: ronco enterprises is being investigated for fraud in thirteen states; please check with your local authorities.) tt

  19. A Book just doesn't cut it by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Face it, a book just doesn't cut it. Nobody should be required to pick up a manual and read through hundreds of pages before they're able to use something. That's the main difference between products that fail and products that succeed. It all hinges on the usability and intuitiveness of what you're dealing with. What is needed is a really good "teaching Linux" distro. It installs automatically and flawlessly, and it first boots up into a tutorial that the user can go through while exploring the system and learning the ins and outs. Obviously you'd want to keep root access away from the newbie user until they get more adjusted. You can't expect someone to read a whole book and just "get it". You need to acclimatize people in gradually. This is one of the reasons Windows is successful and Linux isn't, for the most part: ease of use. Windows just works. To get a Linux install to my satisfaction took over 100 hours. Most people simply don't have that kind of patience.

    1. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nobody should be required to pick up a manual and read through hundreds of pages before they're able to use something.

      Err yes they should and that goes for anything technical. Reading and training are essential but practice is most important. We're not learning to ride a bike here. I think what your trying to say is that reading a book on programming isn't going to make you a good programmer because it won't. Often I see ppl ask dumb questions that could be solved by typing in a man command. I think the absolute first thing any newbie should read are these 2 documents ->

      Asking smart questions
      How to report bugs effectively

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    2. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by zer0vector · · Score: 1

      Its been mentioned alot lately, but I think Knoppix is the exact answer for this question. The entire OS is contained on the CD, and it boots without a problem detecting most hardware automatically. CDs like this would be a great way for people to experiment with Linux without worrying about partitioning, installing, and possibly screwing up their system. Of course, I wouldn't recommend this for any longtime use, since you can't change much in the OS, and you're CD drive is always occupied, but its a good way to start.

      --

      ----
      Striving to put right what once went wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap, will be the leap ho
    3. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Jsprat23 · · Score: 1

      I think my biggest problem with computer books is the time factor. Most of them are out of date by the time they hit the presses. I think we need to be recommending books and how-tos that focus on the unchanging fundamentals. By learning the fundamentals, one can approach every linux problem with a basic toobox and have some kind of clue.

    4. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Sanga · · Score: 1

      Lycoris anyone.

      It is from Redmond, it is Linux, it is so easy that a 2 year old can install.

    5. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      Funny, I have never gotten windows installed to my satisfaction.

      note: I am writing this from a Win2k machine (ohh the hypocrisy)

      --
      --meh--
    6. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1

      I respectfully disagree. Not everything you use a computer for is especially technical. If you just want a computer for Word Processing, Web Browsing and Email, you shouldn't need to pour over man page after man page just to learn how to do basic tasks like installing a program and logging in usermode. It should be possible to do a brief, visual howto that can explain this to complete newbies who have no desire to maintain a network or a server. That is, after all, how Windows does it, and what people credit Windows as doing well.

      Now on the other hand, if you are doing technical things (coding, running a network, a web server, a file server, etc), then there's plenty of reason to pour over documentation. Then its important. For mundane stuff, it really should be easy to explain to complete newbies.

    7. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Radical+Rad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have known many office workers who only became moderately productive using MS Office and Windows after studying books and going to classes. Contrary to your FUD, MS Windows doesn't 'just work' and it never has. There is an entire industry devoted to training users on Microsoft products and the fact that it exists is evidence that those products are not intuitive and only usable after many long hard hours of study and practice.

      Furthermore, 'ease of use' is no longer a valid argument in the battle for the desktop. An office worker using X Windows has no more reason to open a command prompt than one using MS Windows. Star Office and Mozilla are accessible through icons, and the filesystem is easily accessible through Konquerer or Nautilus.

      People who are resistant to switching to Linux are mostly that way because of their preconscious memories of the painful, slow learning process that they struggled through when they learned MS Windows. They fear 'learning a new operating system' when they don't even feel confident in the one they have been working on for a decade.

      It is such a wonderful feeling when I show people that X Windows is just like MS Windows. Everything is done by clicking on buttons and files can be cut, copied, and pasted just like they are used to. Star Office 6 looks so similar to MS Office and Corel Office and Lotus SmartSuite that there just is no learning curve. They are immediately productive on their new, free system.

      Well I have to go now and spread the joy of Linux elsewhere...

      PS. What in the heck did you do for 100 hours? It took me about 10 minutes to tweak Redhat the way I like it.

    8. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Face it, a book just doesn't cut it. Nobody should be required to pick up a manual and read through hundreds of pages before they're able to use something."

      Does your state have a driver's manual?(that, of course, you must read to get your licence?) Where do you live, so that I can stay the hell away?

    9. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by dsmorey · · Score: 1

      I would have agreed with your point of not "picking up a manual and reading through hundreds of pages". But then our company decided to switch over to Linux from Windows 2000 and a Windows domain. It's a long hard process, but it's going well. If I wouldn't have had Running Linux there is a lot I would have been lost with. You have to remember, Linux newbies don't know what to really look for to learn. Yeah, installing your first system and messing around is good and all, but really checking out some good material helps out with things you just wouldn't have thought of.

      The best part of reading Running Linux is I've actually learn things our resident Linux guru didn't know. Helped in some area we didn't expect me to help in. This is a guy that installed his first Linux system when he was around 13 on a 486 25sx, definitely knows his stuff.

      So, no, books are definitely not the 100%, tride and true way to go, you have to get down to messing with the system, but still good idea to look around at people that are paid to teach us newbies.

    10. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2

      I think the extent of 'reading' is where the confusion may lay. Of course the extent of reading depends on the task at hand and the person. Books weigh differently in terms of subject matter and depending on who wrote it. Of course reading a book on how to write a letter is nearly ridiculous, reading a book on kernel hacking or building a rocket is not enough.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    11. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by CarbonCopy123 · · Score: 1

      I think the absolute first thing any newbie should read are these 2 documents ->
      Asking smart questions [tuxedo.org]



      before you can even ask a question you need to read a manual. think about that for a min... seriously... think about it.
      ====
      Newbie: I have a question on...
      Linux guru: You asked you question incorrectly. RTFM on asking questions, so i can properly tell you to RTFM to solve your problem. ====
      and we wonder why linux isn't found on evey desktop!

    12. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      I am not sure I can agree. You say it took you 100 hours. How many of those hours were spent getting Linux to work the way you want?

      Consider the time savings if you decided to work more like Linux does...

    13. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by The+Patient · · Score: 1

      "questions that could be solved by typing in a man command"
      Sure, but that assumes you managed to get to the point where you CAN type in a man command, which isn't likely if ... well, you know.

    14. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2

      well which comes first, 'man X' or 'man man'?

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    15. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2

      I don't know what there is to think about, please explain. There are ppl who don't read manuals that end up asking too many questions that could of been answered reading the manual. I merely pointed out the 'asking smart questions' because I'm sick and tired of getting asked 'dumb questions' that could of been answered without annoying anyone ie, reading the manual. RTFM comes into play here.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    16. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to report bugs effectively [greenend.org.uk]

      Yeah. Definitely. That should be required before you can even download Linux. That's all you'll be doing anyway.

    17. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither if you unable to install linux. Which was the point. You missed it.

    18. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking from experience? You've been to stupid to manage a linux install before?

    19. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by megaduck · · Score: 2

      Err yes they should and that goes for anything technical.

      I think that attitude is one of the prime obstacles of putting Linux on the desktop. Correct or not, the attitude of the common person is that computers should be as simple and painless to use as possible. People's big complaint with Windows is that it's difficult and frustrating. Linux isn't going to gain any ground by being even more difficult.

      Apple has made tremendous gains by creating a full UNIX system where people never ever have to be exposed to a command line. That's what people want, and we're not going to bring Linux to the masses until we make room for the clueless newbies who don't want to ever look at a man page. Not once.

      Listen, my mom is never going to be a competent sysadmin, nor should she need to be. She just wants to send pictures of the kids to her friends, write letters, and make home movies with a minimum of fuss. Insisting that she should learn "How to ask smart questions" and "Report bugs effectively" ensures that she's not going to use Linux. Ever.

      --
      This .sig for rent.
    20. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      "Does your state have a driver's manual?(that, of course, you must read to get your licence?) Where do you live, so that I can stay the hell away?" Wow, you really missed the point. My state does have a driver's manual. But guess what? That's not how I learned to drive. You dont' learn how to drive by reading a book. You learn how to drive through practice. We're not all "John Does" like you apparently are: we can't just pick up a book and become an expert. I, at least, not some experience and practice first.

    21. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you'd want to keep root access away from the newbie user until they get more adjusted.

      I have never used a non root account... They're for pussies! Believe me, you learn fast when you fsck up as root! My greatest fsck up to date has been: #rm -rf /etc
    22. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2

      I think that attitude is one of the prime obstacles of putting Linux on the desktop

      Putting linux on the desktop might be one of your aims but it isn't one of mine, besides, it is there already to a degree. Comparing linux to windows doesn't do you any favours either. I recently installed redhat 8, and although I think they have done a fine job 'dumbening' the interface down for capturing an ex-windows user new to the linux scene, it can't say I'm a big fan of un-dumbening it. Besides, redhat is a company for profit and it is in their best interests to gain a market.

      Unless you've done some coding or any technical work in your time, those docs are obviously not for you - unless you read them you would of realized that. Still, asking a question already answered in a book/manual already available is akin to not looking before you leap.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    23. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Well, your car is technical as hell. I hope that you read the user's manual and wiring specs cover to cover before you put the key in the ignition. And, I hope that you completely understand how your air conditioning unit works before you ever flipped a switch.

      This is a completely bogus argument. The whole point in having high technology is to make people's lives easier, not more difficult. Attitudes like yours is why Linux is still, by and large, just for techno-geek hobbyists. I don't care how W2K works. I just want it to work. Period. No dicking around with obscure commands. No hours and hours just to set it up, or configure it. I install it. It works. That's all I need to know. Maybe if Linux ever worked that well, it would become just as popular, too.

    24. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2

      It seems your for making things non-technical, such as linux. Until you accomplish such a task - reading the manual stays. I was talking about programming and applying knowledge to a task actually - not surfing the net, reading email and playing games. Besides I don't know any car that doesn't come with a manual - you picked a pretty bad example. "I wonder what petrol this car takes, well let's just pick one and see", "How do I put water in the radiator?","Where does the oil go?" - Gee thats complicated, I'm not buying that car going back to riding my bike.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    25. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Thanks for perpetuating the sort of ignorance and complacency that makes people pick up the phone and call me rather than look in the fscking help. No, it's not really a technician's job to handhold and teach people how to be productive with PCs.

    26. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > well which comes first, 'man X' or 'man man'?

      Neither.

      You've made the assumption that our new Linux user even *knows* that manpages exist, and how to access them. Windows/MacOSpre-X have no corresponding concept, so how would someone coming from those worlds know about man w/o having read a basics book first?..

    27. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by karearea · · Score: 1

      Windows doesn't just work. It has taken me 100 odd hours to get my Windows 2000 installation to my satisfaction.

      Install an application as administrator, login as me and run it, login as admin, adjust registry - file paths etc, login as me run it, login as admin, change file security, login as me, admin, me, admin, me .....

      It is suprising (well, not really) the number of applications that seem to think that it is OK to be able to write to the application directory rather than the user directory.

    28. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You NEED a manual to figure out how to put water in a radiator or where to put oil? Jesus, you're pathethic.

    29. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2

      Not me, other ppl. Someone once asked me 'where does the water go' and I couldn't believe it myself.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    30. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, something like a manual. Something like the 'man' page. How long before you really think a new user of linux won't find out about 'man', 'apropros' and 'info' ? Over 6 months? And windows users have .hlp files.

    31. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by redmond · · Score: 1

      I find your last statement to be laughable at the least. To say that "Windows just works" is just ridiculous. If Windows would just work, I wouldn't have a job. I have installed Linux numerous times and had a working system after a single reboot, at which time it might well run for days, months, years, forever or longer without problems. Don't try that with your Windows box.

      I do however agree that there isn't a single book that will educate someone on Linux. It's just too broad of a subject matter. With that said, I have found a couple of books to be very useful, Linux System Administration by Marcel Gagne is a good book about setting up your machine to do what you want. It's kinda short on shell scripting, but that's not for beginners anyway. There are some good sections about finding and installing new software, which can be somewhat daunting for a new user. Overall, it's a good place for a new user to learn about some of the nuances of *nix, and the book doesn't focus on one distribution. Secondly, I have found the Unleashed series of books to be very helpful for reference material. I wouldn't want to pick one up to read cover to cover, but I like having one around to look up stuff occassionally. These probably aren't for beginners, but maybe for intermediate users

      --
      :wq
    32. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Doc+Martin,+Bugman · · Score: 1

      I think we all should keep in mind that most OSes in general aren't easy or intuitive. That wonderful feeling that you get when you show people that X Windows is just like MS Windows is *because* you know X Windows. The first time I installed Linux on a machine it took me over 1/2 to figure out the location of an installed application. The concept of a Root user vs a non-Root user is NOT intuitive.
      Linux in general behaves much differently than MS Windows (which in and of itself is hardly a problem--it' just a fact)Keep in mind that even workflow imporvements (like multiple desktop panes) have to be learned. THe whole point of an OS beginning guide is to show the frame work of the system and to give the user a good enough background so that they can ask pertinent questions and havve a good idea as to where they can go to get them answered.

      Sometimes people forget how much of working with a computer is learned.

      An interresting aside -- two Years ago, a freind of mine visited me from the left coast. This person had not used a computer since High School (in the Mid eighties). She said she heared that there was information she wanted to look at on the internet and asked if "I had the internet". I saind sure just go to my machine and click on the big letter N on the desktop to open the browser. She looked at me confused-- I figure she did know where to click. so I grabbed the moouse and pionted to the icon. I then said "see, click here" "How did you do that?" "What?" I said. "Get that to do something"- she said. I told her "I just double clicked on it with my mouse" "That thing in you hand is a mouse?" It wa sthen that I realized that she had never user the mouse. So I showed her that grgabbing the mouse caused the cursor to move around on screeen. She fell in lov and for the next 15 just moved the cursor around the screen. No clicking, no dragging just moving the mouse. She was amazed that her movements would cause something to move on screen like that. She thought it was the coolest thing, even though she didn't do anything with it. It was strange to see someone so excited by a mouse. I had forgot that there was a time during my lifetime that mainstream computers didn't have mice -- just like they didn't have GUIs. All of this stuff had to be designed.

      Once products were bulit from these designs, people had to *Learn* how to use them. That's where a beginning guide is really handy.

    33. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that a bad example? You can drive a car without reading a technical manual. There are a few things that _anyone_ can teach you, for example adding oil/water, or how to drive for that matter. It's not like you need a four year degree or some strange obsession with cars to use one on a day to day basis.

      A mainstream person going into linux would probably prefer a gui environment similar to windows or mac. I think there are many would would rather optionally learn the technical side, rather than be forced to, as they don't have the time or inclination. I think they would want it to work first, and learn second.

    34. Re:A Book just doesn't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, does the state you live in require you to take a driving exam both written and practical? Or does anyone aimlessly hop into a car and start driving "And look there is a dog driving the bus". So by your assertion car manufacturers don't need to throw in a manual and anyone can drive a car.

  20. My first Linux Book: by Longinus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Oreilly's Running Linux

    This was the book I read before even touching a Linux terminal. It was an invaluable lesson in the ways of Linux and provides a nice gentle intro for new users (and by new, I mean new to Linux, not computing. A good deal of technical understanding is required to appreciate this book. Not for Grandma is what I'm trying to say...). The 4th Edition just came out so it's all up to date again, and I would reccomened it to anyone interested in, well, Running Linux. This book is much more useful to a new user than Linux in a Nutshell since it is a narrative guide to learning Linux, and not a reference book like Nutshell.

  21. Hrm..... by mdechene · · Score: 5, Funny

    Getting started in Linux is easy. First, read this . Then, follow all the steps in it Backwards. Backwards is key. After that, you should be all setup.

    --

    Karma: Not Particularly Funny.
    1. Re:Hrm..... by isorox · · Score: 2

      Interesting, they migrate to windows, I upgrade to linux...

    2. Re:Hrm..... by Timmeh · · Score: 2

      I like that that's one of the few pages @ microsoft.com that renders very well in a non-IE browser... heh

  22. Ask Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q =beginning+linux+book&btnG=Google+Search

    Rumour has it that google also works on the GNU/Linux platform.

  23. Not like this biased d00d by MissMyNewton · · Score: 1
    --

    ---

    Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

  24. Some Suggestions by msowka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... Linux has become such a great Complete Solution for everyone. I'm not sure what the TV show's target audience is, but here are some suggestions:
    For The DeveloperShow how easy it is to setup Apache/PHP and start rolling out web apps...
    For The Office TypeShow off OpenOffice, it's MS import capabilities, equations marksup (For The Artsy Type [gnome plug] Show 'em art.gnome.org to point out the thriving arts community, 100% free gimp

    I'm not sure why everyone is set on reading "dead trees" for Linux info, it's all out on the web! I, myself, learned from the great Red Hat online docs...

    That's my 2 cents worth.

  25. OT: Anyone summarize previous query responses? by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just a thought...

    Since the submitter (chrisd) asked for opinions and got feedback, wouldn't it be nice if someone filtered the responses and provided a digest? The original queries were for books for developers and books for web development. Furthermore, if someone already has done some filtering, it would be great to see the results.

    S

    1. Re: OT: Anyone summarize previous query responses? by thedji · · Score: 1
      --
      ... and then there were none
    2. Re:OT: Anyone summarize previous query responses? by ilyag · · Score: 2

      Can someone also compile and provide me with a digest of how to use Linux?

      Sorry, if this looks like a flame...

    3. Re:OT: Anyone summarize previous query responses? by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 1

      You needed a digest?

      ari@creideiki bin $ wget -q -O - "http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/10/0 029253&mode=nested&tid=99"|md5sum
      d82f1910bf6d016 2e870c1b9045a164b -

    4. Re:OT: Anyone summarize previous query responses? by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 2

      Here is a quick summary, with a rating for each entry: click here

    5. Re:OT: Anyone summarize previous query responses? by vldmr_krn · · Score: 1

      wouldn't it be nice if someone filtered the responses and provided a digest?

      Browse at +5

  26. mastering regular expressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many books that teach the general unix utilities..more/less, cat, grep, etc, but one of the better intermediate in my opinions is Mastering Regular Expressions, by Friedl. While there are many ways to learn the basics, it's just a matter of learning what each do, and then you'll be thirsty for more, or looking for a way to improve what you know. Regular expressions are integrated in many unix tools, and are one of the more powerful things about UNIX; this book helped me understand how they work, and made me comfortable using them.

    1. Re:mastering regular expressions by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Great Great Great book, but not a book for someone just learning *nix. If someone wants to know some simple wildcarding they will start bleeding out the ears when someone tries to explain the difference between dfa and nfa (did I remember that right, I loaned my copy out?) regex engines. This is a book for someone that wants to make vi sing and Perl dance. If they are new to *nix get them a good book on vi[m] and a good shell scripting book with lots of examples. The power of unix-style systems only shines through the first time you pipe find, grep, sed, sort, and unique into one command line, then nohup it and route the error messages to /dev/null.

  27. Personality Dependant by wray · · Score: 1

    For me, it was a great beginners book because I am a developer, and I like quick information lookup. Ciphening through text to descover an answer is frustrating. Not to say that other books that are not like this are poor, but quality reference books are usually my number one choice.

    --
    Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
  28. i heard by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    Those black and yellow books are good.
    Those orange and white ones will also do. :p

  29. What to show on TV by ruszka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While what I have in mind is nothing special or cool, it is something that I think many people really need to see. My parents, for example, use the computer to play games, mostly card games, browse the web, send email, and other every day things. The thing that bothers them is that they have no control whatsoever. Something crashes and they have no clue what they can do as a user.

    It would be beneficial to many average users to see that Linux can do all of the every day tasks they perform. Show them the simple things. They can use email, web browsers, play games that come with kde or gnome, and still play web-based games like Yahoo! Pool. Getting them started on something they feel comfortable with will be an easy step they can make. Then they can move onto controlling and customizing the OS one piece at a time.

  30. Show off the Apps! by jgkastra · · Score: 1

    It would probably be best to show off the applications. Have the Linux box connect to a Windows box via Samba, perhaps? Use WINE to run some killer Windows application (Half-Life, Warcraft 3...)? Copy something onto a CDRW via UDF (just in the console, that'll get 'em)? Who is your audience? Obviously, it's geeks, but which group?

    As for the book, a book is a great thing to have as a reference, but it's still gonna be tough if you can't figure something out and the book doesn't cover your program. You might want to say something about finding a LUG, too.

    1. Re:Show off the Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok this might sound dumb but are lugs still around?

      i just recently start using linux a few months ago and after fiddling around and getting frustrated alot i did manage to learn somethings and basicly became the macosx admn at work(i know its not linux but for somereason noone else could figure it out)
      so basickly what im saying is with the amount of information availabe do lugs still exist?

      maybe its just cause i live los angeles?

    2. Re:Show off the Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok.. you raise some valid points. Why not film those uber-nerds at my local LUG (hell, only nerds would wanna use Linux so it's not like you're going to alienate more than .005% of the population) and make Linux out as what it is - a geeky OS that takes a billion tweaks to make it useful... then you can move along to those "killer Windows application(s)" but please don't mention that they run twice as fast on Windows! Gotta keep that unreasoning OSS bias in there, right? Then do some pointless shit like copying files onto a CD using only the CLI! Boy, that'll sure show the retards still watching just what a nerd you are! On second thought, anybody who's interested in a LUG probably already has a membership.. and games under Linux lick ass (performance performance performance) and the CLI is only good if you don't do actual end-user-type work (ie, video/audio ANYTHING, page layout, web browsing, email with formatting, whatever)

      sorry kid, but Linux is only good for serving. I can prove it to ya.. just log all those hours you put in trying to get a game running under WINE, and how much time you waste with your config files (or whatever shoddy Control Panel ripoff you guys think will "kill" Windows forever) and then try the exact same shit on Win2K. Case in point. Sorry. Goodbye.

    3. Re:Show off the Apps! by otprof · · Score: 1

      It would probably be best to show off the applications. Have the Linux box connect to a Windows box via Samba, perhaps?

      Even better, have a computer running Windows XP home and try to connect to an NT network... then have a Linux box successfully do this trick. If you were sending you child off to college, do you want them to be able to connect to their network shares? Not with Home... you'll need to spend the big bucks on Pro! Somehow, this information isn't making it to the BestBuy salespeople.

  31. Re:I recommend these books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must agree. running linux is a very good reference.

  32. My first two books by superfoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's my first two books I bought, and why I like them. First of all, for any distro: Running Linux, latest edition you can get. Why? It is a book you can read cover to cover. It has some scary stories of the old days of installation in the beginning. You realize how easy it has gotten. Then you will learn the many different ways to do the same thing. You don't have to be on a computer to learn from this book. If you are using Red Hat, then grab Red Hat Linux Unleashed. Why? This has MUCH more specific information. It's not something you can read cover to cover, you read the different sections as you need to learn them. In general though, I've never found a bad O'Reilly book...

    1. Re:My first two books by hduff · · Score: 1

      As the co-author of Red Hat Linux 8.0 Unleashed, I can say that the new edition (due in bookstores soon) has been extensively re-written to make the information more accessible to newer Linux users while trying to adequately address the needs of more seasoned veterans.

      I'd be delighted to hear from the Slashdot community as to how well we succeeded, what we did well, and what we can do better next time.

      Hoyt Duff

      .
      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  33. Linux Books by fjorn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some of the books I have on my shelf are:

    -O'Reilly:Linux in a Nutshell (good reference, somewhat bad as you need to know command)
    -Sam's: Slackware Unleashed
    -Coriolis open Press: Linux System Administration Black Book
    -Sam's: Linux Complete Command Reference

    Finally:
    - Sam's: Maximum Linux Security

  34. Day to Day by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When I first started using Linux a few years ago, I did it just to see what it was about. At that time, I thought it was interesting, but didn't know that you could really DO anything on it other that use it as a server. Sure you could surf the internet, but...

    It was only later that I found out you could wordprocess, play games, and do many other things. I would suggest showing how to do everyday stuff, as a comparison to Windows and/or OS X. I don't mean a "see Linux is better 'cause it doesn't crash and it does this and doesn't crash and..." kind of stuff. I mean showing that you can play MP3s and they work just as well as under windows. And that they sound just as good as under windows. Show a wordprocessor or two. Show some web browsers. Show it can play shockwave flash, java, and other things. Show Quake III and UT2k3. And make sure to point out that the performance is always like in windows, if not better. I don't mean braging, but more of "see we're just as good." Show how Linux can be used for many things. Play a DVD, burn a CD, etc.

    Other than the above "practical" things, show some neat stuff. Show a few windowmanagers. Sure there is GNOME and KDE, but what about showing Enlighenment, WindowMaker (my fav), and other cool ones. Show Quake III in one window, UT2K3 in another (or maybe just two Quake III connected to eachother) and have something else up doing something; to show that Linux is good at juggleing things.

    I know you've shown at least one of these things in the past (MP3s) but I don't get to watch much TV lately. And of course, these are just my ideas. I'm sure the other posters have come up with some cool ideas by now.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Day to Day by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Play a DVD
      Do you mean with DeCSS? Hmm, break the law on national TV... Great way to attract people to linux!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Day to Day by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      The parent post is great.

      I'd like to see this done on a $199 Lindows/Ly-whatever Walmart PC just in time for the holiday season. Or just install Mandrake on there. Show them they can do all the Windows/Mac stuff from a free OS.

      I'd start off with Phoenix loading up five or six homepages on boot and playing around with features like outline and search, pop-up blocking, middle-click opens new tab, tabbed bookmarks, etc.

      Move on over to some popular site and do something. Goto fark.com and 'photoshop' a photo using gimp. Make it funny.

      Show off evolution's Outlook-like interface. Show them the features. Make sure they know its free and Outlook sure isn't. Install a client side spam filter and show it off.

      Fire up Open Office and edit a Word document.

      In a nutshell, make it as 'windowsy' and non-threatening as possible.

    3. Re:Day to Day by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I think the game idea especially is good. With all the complaining about gaming and linux, I think a lot of people are of the opinion that linux has no games at all. I believe I'd have switched over far earlier if I'd been aware of some of what's out there. For people like me who only do a little gaming it seems to me linux is perfectly viable for that purpose. Even something like Ultima 7 running in exult, or some of the better dos games running in dosbox might catch the eye of the nostalgic.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:Day to Day by t1m0r4n · · Score: 1
      Other than the above "practical" things, show some neat stuff. Show a few windowmanagers.

      I couldn't agree more. Tools to change the appearance of Windows are hugely popular. And, of course, the first thing every dork wants to know about the next version is how it's going to look. Despite being a turn-off to business, I think fancy WMs have helped bring a fair number of people to Linux -- and of course, it looks cool on TV.

      And, well, rather than posting yet another Me2, I'll put 'em both here. Running Linux by Matt Welsh is THE best book. I can not say enough good things about it.

    5. Re:Day to Day by toogreen · · Score: 1

      Show them how you can play and stream quicktime and windows media player files using MPlayer. MPlayer's latest release just plays about any format/codec possible. Don't forget to mention that it's free and open-source.

      OpenOffice is important to demonstrate as well. Also talk about hardware compatibily and maybe show a TV tuner or webcam running under it. Maybe demonstrate Gnomemeeting for videoconferencing. Samba definately is worth talking about too.

      Demonstrate Gaim, and Amsn for keeping in touch with the usual instant messenging buddies. Show a flash site, and some java. OpenGL and WineX for games...

      You could aslo make them realize how the console can be useful by showing them how easily you can download a file from a "HTTP://" url by using "wget http://somewhere.com/somemovie.mov", instead of getting an annoying quicktime player embedded to start under internet explorer when typing in the url. Also how they can e-mail quickly from it using "mail someone@somewhere.com".

      I guess i have tons of other ideas, I think the most important is to demonstrate how they can find alternative software as valuable if not better than what they use already.. They don't want to miss their every day-to-day apps!

  35. books by sstory · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Probably the most important thing for a Linux beginner is a book on how to withstand infantile criticism by hordes of 17-yr-old nerds with a superiority complex. You'll see a lot of that if you try to learn linux. For not already possessing all the esoteric knowledge, you will be berated and demeaned in the foulest terms. Hopefully you'll encounter enough of the good free-software people to keep you involved. Furthermore I'd suggest reading In the Beginning Was the Command Line by Neal Stephenson. Good layman overview of the history/philosophy.

    1. Re:books by ShittyGumDrops · · Score: 0

      I second the suggestion of In The Beginning Was The Command Line.

      I read this right about the time I started using linux, and it really grounds the whole experience from a cultural perspective.

      It often seems that hobists who install linux after seeing it on programs like the Screen Savers do so for somewhat muddled reasons, (Woah, Leo and Patrick are so cool! Me too! Me too!) or for reasons that are purely technical. (Woah, fewer popups? My own webserver? Yay!)

      These shows are great for bringing people into the fold, but Stephenson gives you all the incentive to stay. Its a great read.

    2. Re:books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YUO ARE TEH SUCK!!1! L4M3R!!!

    3. Re:books by Patersmith · · Score: 1


      It is infantile, but you have to understand that a lot of these "geeks" have been marginalized for being different, smart. When that trait becomes something of value, the natural human reaction is payback for all those years of teasing and towel-snapping and spitballs and humiliation.

      Now who's cool? Now you need my help huh?? Tell me how stupid you are. Tell me!! TELL ME YOU'RE A MORON!!!

      *twitch*

      I need a coffee.

    4. Re:books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about a deep, psychological problem there. Something that needs to be treated if you ask me.

      If this is their attitude for being 'smart' then I don't think they're smart. They're bunch of dumb pricks who need a good ass-whooping. I've run into many such geeks with attitude who know less than a fraction of what I know about Linux and computers in general, and they're itching to use that little knowledge as a weapon against some poor newbie. They live for such moments.

      Bury those fuckheads, I say.

  36. Linux On TV... by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've all seen the IBM ads with the basketball team, and specifically the one featuring Linux ("Because He Loves The Game" So TRUE!). Now, here for all of /. to see, is my Linux Commercial pitch.

    The commercial opens with the side of a large house shown. This house has many, many windows, some ornate, some plain. After a few seconds, a baseball smashes through one of them, shattering it. After a few more seconds, another baseball smashes another window. Several quick cuts of different windows being smashed by more and more baseballs. Cut to a pile of baseballs laying on the ground. After a moment, a black CG flipper reaches down and picks one up. The camera follows the ball to reveal Tux, wearing a ball cap bearing the "official" Tux logo, and he's got an EVIL grin. The final cut to the product screen, which says "Linux: Smashing Convention. http://www.linux.org" and a final sound of a ball shattering glass.

    Let the Love Fest Begin...

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:Linux On TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the gayest thing I've ever seen.

      And I've been to San Francisco. In summer.

    2. Re:Linux On TV... by drfreak · · Score: 1

      I'll second that.

    3. Re:Linux On TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does everyone *think* they can be a marketeer? I mean seriously, what kind of a person thinks this crap up?

    4. Re:Linux On TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would post the URL of a site with precisely what you are describing in still image form, but I do not want to have my instructor's web site slashdotted, especially one week before finals. I don't think that would make him particularly happy with me, and I do want my well-deserved A.

    5. Re:Linux On TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah! Great pitch!

      You want to associate the 'product' with notions of vandalism, 'EVIL' and possibly anarchy!

      Worse than that, the viewing public wouldn't understant a fucking second of it.

      A product has to be fairly well positioned already before it can take any advantage of prime-time ad. slots.

      I don't forsee a great future on Madison Avenue for you sonny boy.

    6. Re:Linux On TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I would post the URL of a site with precisely what you are describing in still image form

      Awww cute! Did your mommy let you do it with your crayons?

  37. Why buy anything? The best is free! by bushda · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go to http://sunsite.dk/linux-newbie/ and get the Linux Newbie Administrator's Guide.

    I've bought different linux books in the past to try and get me started, and none were as good as the LNAG. Best of all - it's free! Read it online, or download it and print it off at work to piss off your co-workers. :)

    - Dave

    --
    There are two seasons in my world - Hockey and Construction
    1. Re:Why buy anything? The best is free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      thaks for the info, it is truly helpful.

      cheers dave!

    2. Re:Why buy anything? The best is free! by Pike65 · · Score: 2

      Good God, man!

      A link of that quality deserves A tags!

      Also Beginning Unix by Mike Joy is in a similar vein and well worth investigating. I managed to get a free HTML version because we have a deal going between our university and Warwick - where Joy works - but I can't find an online version for you guys. Sorry . . .

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
  38. It wasn't really a joke by danny256 · · Score: 1

    he seemed pretty serious and confident. The funny thing is, if that was that guy's only reason for using linux, is he going to switch to windows now?

    1. Re:It wasn't really a joke by zapfie · · Score: 1

      That was me.. I posted it. It was a joke... but apparently not a very good one, because nobody got it.. The irony was that you could run Windows under Linux, but that's not a reason to switch from Windows.. meh, nevermind.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    2. Re:It wasn't really a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have been more of a joke if you said win4lin...that would be funny, vmware is just dumb.

    3. Re:It wasn't really a joke by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Oh well.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
  39. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Show how people spend more time getting linux to work than they do using it for anything useful?

    Or show how long it takes a person to read the documents so they can understand what is going on?

    Or so how every time something breaks the first thing linux users do is go ask their friends, family, a priest or a psychologist why they are having problems?

    Personally I used linux for a long time and theres a lot of really neat things you can do, namely the one I like is the ability to sort through massive numbers of mp3s and rip out annoying characters like )"(#'$ from the filenames but as a practical os, well, just do this. Get a clock, every time you stop using the OS to either learn how to get something to work or fix something, start the timer, then when you return to using the os, stop it. This includes everything from configuring window managers to recompiling the kernel.

    In fact, Id say linux is a great os because the side effects is that you get people who learn how to solve incredibly complex problems using any means possible, but then once the problems are solved they instantly find new ones to tackle rather than enjoying the sunny weather

    just my thoughts, and yes I use windows but only because Ive no use for linux on my p200 laptop while in japan drinking tea and LIVING deus ex...

    if you see an italian in a trenchcoat wearing dark sunglasses thats me

    -Italian wearing sunglasses and trenchcoat

  40. Uhh.. Mozilla is for WINDOWS, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering there are perfectly good (if not better) builds of Mozilla and Phoenix for Windows that would not only be unimpressive, it would be misleading and irresponsible.

    1. Re:Uhh.. Mozilla is for WINDOWS, too by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed -- but he was also asking for good examples of Open Source goodness for TV. That's what I had in mind.

  41. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux learns you!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on dude, where is the enthusiasm!?

  42. Best place for linux information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google.com

  43. Not really a book... by Bobulusman · · Score: 2

    but I am starting out in Linux right now and I'm finding LFS (Linux From Scratch) to be a very good tutorial to the ins and outs of a linux system.

    For people who don't want to look it up, it basically has you compile a custom version of linux on a separate partition. Since you have to install everything from scratch, you are forced to learn what everything does.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  44. Great generic *nix book by AntiFreeze · · Score: 5, Informative
    UNIX for Programmers and Users (Second Edition) is an excellent book. Well, to be fair, it was the first edition which eased me into *nix years ago. With such an excellent first edition, I'm sure the second is even stronger.

    Graham Glass is a skilled writer who is capable of introducing complex topics and commands easily to the reader, regardless of their skill level. His book benefited me greatly, and even allowed my father to gain a good footing in unix commands and philosophy.

    I have recommended this book to numerous people over the years, to people who just wanted some familiarity with unix commands, to people who were interested in learning Linux, to students looking for interesting things to delve into, and to many others. The book has benefited them all. Although it is not directly a Linux book, it is exceptional at providing the tools necessary to use any unix-like system. This makes this book a wonderful reference or a great starting out point if you're just beginning.

    In other words, I highly recommend it.

    --

    ---
    "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

  45. In Soviet Russia... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    the Screen Savers watch you!

    I like mine better.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  46. Start with Rute! by digitect · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Start with Rute.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:Start with Rute! by tigertigr · · Score: 1

      I agree with this post.

      Rute is a great guide in general and really helped me understand quite a few of the concepts. It gets straight to the point by going through common useages of commands. Plus, it's free and searchable.

    2. Re:Start with Rute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 underratted. I'm no newbie, but I'll have to keep this in my bookmarks so I can refer it to ppl.

    3. Re:Start with Rute! by shuane · · Score: 1

      Rute is an excellent step by step introduction and it also contains a reasonable level of detail for those of us who care. It is available for download, in a variety of formats, for free, from the link in the parent post. I believe you can also buy the book in dead-tree format.

      I also have been reading Running Linux (which others have linked to in earlier comments). This has very in-depth chapters describing things in detail. The detail might scare the average newbie away though :).

      Also worth considering, though it's probably not for beginners, is UNIX Power Tools .

      --
      This signature intentionally has just seven words.
  47. Unix book: The Unix Programming Enviroment by efutch · · Score: 1

    By Kernigham & Pike, covers using *nix from the command line, shell scripts, using a little bit of Lex & Yacc, and some source code management. IT IS dated, but it will give you a whole tour through the operating system from a "power user" perspective...forget all the wimpy GUI stuff. Highly Recommended, but too lazy to paste the Amazon link.

    --
    Minix en español! http://www.es-minix.org
    1. Re:Unix book: The Unix Programming Enviroment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good book. I still my have beat-down copy from the 80's.

  48. Linux for beginners: Knoppix by Everard+Took · · Score: 2, Interesting

    /. pointed me to the excellent Knoppix version; I splurged a whole five dollars for the CD. What does it do for you? Let's you see if your hardware is compatible with Linux and does not write anything to your hard drive while doing so. If you wish to introduce new folks to Linux, this is a good way to do it. It totally removes any fear-factor about having to dump your current system and try something that just might not work for you. No, it's not a book but for me, it was better than a book. I'd rather buy a book than take a class but I'd also rather buy a tool rather than read about it in a book. Hands on, know what I mean?

    1. Re:Linux for beginners: Knoppix by stubaggs · · Score: 1

      hey, perhaps you could even get a techTV branded (knoppix 3.1 was branded for linuxtag), and send some out to lucky/curious viewers !

    2. Re:Linux for beginners: Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix is definately the way to show people. I just recently got to play with it, and I have givin it out to friends to try and they are pumped and ready for me to install full pblown Linux on thier machines. Also you can pass a script to knoppix and get it to install (so I am told) Another good thing is maybe show people red hat 8 with the new GUI.

  49. Linux on TV by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best way to illustrate the power of Linux on TV, is to demonstrate a Linux box doing something that is considered unusual and desireable. Something that will make people say "Wow... I can't do that with this other OS I'm using. I should try Linux." It shouldn't be too hard to come up with a bunch of gee-whiz cool tasks that Linux can do, and that other OS cannot.

    Either that, or have Linux performing some intensive server oriented task, alongside a computer running one of those other, more common OS's. Show how Linux does more and does it faster.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:Linux on TV by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1
      I agree, but I think in addition to this show everyday tasks that people might not have realized can be done with Linux. People won't want to switch for the cool unusual technology unless they know they can still use the technology they're used to. Instead of:

      "Wow... I can't do that with this other OS I'm using. I should try Linux."
      aim for
      "Wow... I can't do that with this other OS I'm using. I should try Linux...Hmm, they say I can listen to all of my MP3s and print out my Word documents too. I *really* should try Linux!"

    2. Re:Linux on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It shouldn't be too hard to come up with a bunch of gee-whiz cool tasks that Linux can do, and that other OS cannot.

      Really? Ok, if it isn't that hard, can you name me THREE things that Linux can do that any other OS cannot?

      Here are my three...

      1) Display a feeble-looking penguin mascot

      2) Cause outbreaks of pseudo-religous fervour and zealotry unsurpassed since the Spanish Inquisition.

      3) Require everything to be prefixed by 'GNU'

    3. Re:Linux on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wow... I can't do that with this other OS I'm using. I should try Linux...Hmm, they say I can listen to all of my MP3s and print out my Word documents too. I *really* should try Linux!"

      I hope you were being ironic!

  50. A good Unix book by Newcastle22 · · Score: 1
    I am taking a class on Unix at my local community college over the internet. The textbook we are using is really a great text for learning the classic Unix/Linux shell utilities like grep, sed, awk, ls, etc. The book is "Unix Made Easy" by John Muster. It's a very thick book, but is highly interactive. You even learn how to write scripts.

    The only downside that I see is that it doesn't have a lot of administrator type stuff, like how to install a distro or install programs. However, as someone who believes that all Linux users should learn the shell, I would recommend this book to any Linux beginner.

    Dan

    1. Re:A good Unix book by Newcastle22 · · Score: 1

      P.S. I love the Screensavers. I think that the show deserves to have more Linux content. I made sure to catch the episode with Richard Stallman, and Chris DiBona appearances are always great. The Sreensavers' audience is ready for more Tux!

  51. The title belies its true value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aside from whatever Linux-specific books get recommended here, one of the best investments you can make in the transition out of rank UNIX-beginner status is "UNIX Power Tools" published by O'Reilly. Its title is really a misnomer as it's actually an excellent book that teaches you all the finer points (which are not really all that "fine" if you really want to make UNIX work for you) about using UNIX. You don't at all have to be an "advanced"/"power" user and in fact, I'd argue that the greatest benefit from reading can be derived by those less experienced with UNIX. If you want to *understand* what you're doing in a UNIX system, with information that most certainly applies to Linux, get/read a copy of this book.

  52. Go to your local college..... by idiotnot · · Score: 2

    Get some of the basic shell instructions that are provided for new users. Normally it's just a few sheets long, and describes how to login to the system, how to move files, how to check e-mail, yadda yadda yadda.

    This kind of basic stuff, I think, is more important than any book one could read. After someone is somewhat proficient just navigating around, then the books become interesting and relevant.

    Teach the new user how to use vi.

    Although nano/pico are more user-friendly, and you may like emacs (although I think that's nuts), any system the new user logs into will have some variant of vi. The use doesn't have to go much beyond describing the two modes, and how to insert and delete text.

    1. Re:Go to your local college..... by Animats · · Score: 2
      Teach the new user how to use vi.

      Hello? It's 2002. Everybody uses mouse-oriented editors now.

      I wrote tens of thousands of lines of code using VI, but that was a long time ago, back in the 1980s.

    2. Re:Go to your local college..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach the new user how to use vi.

      Is that before or after you stuff their penis in a food processor?

    3. Re:Go to your local college..... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Funny

      *presses ctrl-z and looks up*

      Eh? What am I using here? ;)

    4. Re:Go to your local college..... by dubious9 · · Score: 2

      Come on, I'd rather fire up vi to do a small edit, than wait for a GUI editor to fire up, vi will always be faster. I grew up with GUI editors, but vi still has its place.

      Besides, what are you going to do when you can't get into X for some reason and have to edit some file (ie. XF86Config.conf etc.) If you are a home user self administrator its harder not to use a good text based editor.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    5. Re:Go to your local college..... by TheABomb · · Score: 1
      Teach the new user how to use vi.
      Hello? It's 2002. Everybody uses mouse-oriented editors now.
      There are graphical versions of vi. I use gvim all the time (since it runs under Windows, which I regrettably have to run from time to time).
      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    6. Re:Go to your local college..... by yokem_55 · · Score: 1

      That's what nano is for. Far more intuitive.

      --
      ...and IN SOVIET RUSSIA, beowulf clusters imagine 1, 2, 3 profit!!!! jokes made out of YOU!!!
    7. Re:Go to your local college..... by dubious9 · · Score: 2

      True, but far smipler and less standard. Also I don't think Red Hat and Mandrake install nano by default, but every unix out there has some version of vi. If you work with unicies long enough to know the standard /usr/bin:/sbin set, you should also know vi.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
  53. install something without reboot by iamkrinkle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is one thing that really impressed me when converting, i install a program and it worked.. no reboot! *gasp* As for showing things on tv, play some dvd's and mp3's, chat a little on gaim, stuff that people do on a regular basis. I've been talking to people about linux lately, and there are a lot of misconceptions... try to debunk some big ones. I have a friend who swears that whenever you add any new hardware, you HAVE to re-compile the kernel. Another thing i hear a lot is that even if a game has linux binaries, it runs like crap. play some unreal or wolfenstien (the new ones ;)) to show it's quite fine.

    Another good idea would be to show them some of the free software out there. if they need to edit some pix, they can just d/l the gimp... no need to pirate/look for cracks.

    One last thought about helping people that are new to linux: it's a completely different perspective of an operating system. It's taken from a muilti-user perspective, whereas windows is pretty much one person on one computer. Once you understand this, things make more sense..especially the file system layout. when i first started i always wondered why everything went on / instead of breaking it up into drives. and why do i have a home directory? if you tihnk in terms of only one person on a computer, it's hard to get the concept.

    1. Re:install something without reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a Sony digital camera recently. It came with a piece of Windows software that I loaded on my wife's machine. It was positively inscrutable. Lots of icons, no tool tips, no text menus, but very colorful. I downloaded the Gimp and she figured it out basic image editing pretty quick.

    2. Re:install something without reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever tried installing 6+ applications one after the other, clicking 'no' to each one when it asks you to reboot, and then watch your happy little install of your windows operating system turn to spaghetti soup? Heh... you dumb 'arse' fuck...

    3. Re:install something without reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i install a program and it worked..

      Linux: It just works...

      You nailed it on the head my friend (I hope you can feel the dripping sarcasm, but somehow I doubt it).

  54. A book of HOWTOS by GreatOgre · · Score: 1

    When I was a newbie, I just printed out the HOWTO's that I needed. Now, when I try to remember something cool I learned three or four years ago reading the howto's, I just look them back up. But the problem is I just don't know what I did with that damned notebook that has them printed in ...

  55. It makes Julienne potatoes? Wow! by Corvaith · · Score: 2

    You mean I've been making them by hand all this time, when I could have just done it on the computer?

    Hm. Now, that would be an example. "Look, you can even insert a potato into this cooling fan..."

    Now, I already knew that mine functioned as a hot plate. Love those Athlons.

  56. TV demo: email, spreadsheet and word processing by anon+coward · · Score: 1

    What my Windows friends keep asking me for: Linux alternatives to Word, Excel and Outlook Express. And what they really want is not some verbage like, "Open Office, don't worry, be happy". What they want is a side-by-side demo showing how compatible the Linux alternatives are, both in user interface and file formats.

    1. Re:TV demo: email, spreadsheet and word processing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this the hell up. Please.

  57. Why not show games? by c0dedude · · Score: 1

    It seems linux games don't get the respect they deserve, and I think someone should really show them off. Give 'em tux racer, nethack, and some cool GL stuff in x. And, for that matter, show off the cool fully themeable x, with stuff like enlightenment and kde and gnome etc. And wine, and all the other (not an) emulators availible. Really show off that Linux is fun, too. And some of the cool rendering with stuff like blender or some blender games (now that blender is open sourced).

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Why not show games? by darketernal · · Score: 1

      Coming from a background of Quake 1/3 and Counter-Strike, and even with RPGs such as FF4, 6, and Chrono Trigger, Nethack was sorely disappointing and boring for me.. :|

      If you're going to show it to the average linux convert, make sure you show it to him LAST... :|

    2. Re:Why not show games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you obviously don't deserve to live.

    3. Re:Why not show games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why games like UT2003, TuxRacing, and NWN (still waiting, but promised. Looks like we won't have to wait too much longer!) are available for our favorite platform. I like cheesy arcade games, but am also impressed by the companies willing to try something new. I say, show the soon to be Linux users whatever would please them the most last, that way you build up to it, like a good novel. :-)

    4. Re:Why not show games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and video drivers aren't. I love playing my favorite SNES games at less then 1fps with software emulation of Open GL on my P1000. Oh and not to mention not being able to stretch the image to full screen. Fun, Fun.

  58. Think UNIX by stumeister · · Score: 1

    Coming from a NT background, I found learning Linux rather frustrating. I was continually trying to find out "what is the Linux/Unix equivalent of task/command X in Windows?", but what is needed is a shift in thinking. I found Think Unix by Jon Lasser to be a great book for assisting in making the paradigm shift to the *nix way of thinking. It's written in a rather entertaining way too.

    1. Re:Think UNIX by hdparm · · Score: 2
      Coming from the same background, I actually found learning Linux far less difficult than NT.

      This may sound strange but I have found an explanation in a fact that the whole logic of the Linux (*NIX) system is much better fit for me and the way I think. I guess system openness and the ability to try and do virtually anything with it helps a lot as well.

  59. The only thing you need to know... by Fapestniegd · · Score: 4, Funny

    # man man

    1. Re:The only thing you need to know... by cwis42 · · Score: 1

      # man man

      I would rather suggest:

      $ man man

    2. Re:The only thing you need to know... by NegativeK · · Score: 1

      # man man

      Wait - You did mean $ man man , right?

      --
      This statement is false.
    3. Re:The only thing you need to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I typed in # man man and it didn't do anything

    4. Re:The only thing you need to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work on a typewriter.

  60. Beginning Administrator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're beginning with Linux as a Sysadmin - especially if you're coming from the Windows NT world - be sure to check out the server projects at http://www.rhsd.net. They're designing the project so that even the newest admin should be able to handle it!

  61. You shouldn't miss this by jsse · · Score: 1

    YOu can find rich source of articles, tutorials and tips here.

    If you are so obsessive with paper book, print them out. Most of the articles there are in pdf format. :)

  62. Another site... by aerojad · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.linuxnewbie.org

    Don't think anyone posted that yet.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  63. Re:MODS ON CRACK by GimmeFuel · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are good suggestions, but the links are part of Amazon's affiliate program. If someone clicks them and then buys the books, the poster is going to get a cut of it.

  64. Two books by doggo · · Score: 1

    Running Linux, 4th Edition
    By MattWelsh,Matthias KalleDalheimer,TerryDawson,LarKaufman
    4th EditionDecember 2002
    0-596-00272-6, Order Number: 2726
    692 pages, $44.95 US, $69.95 CA, £31.95 UK

    Essential System Administration, 3rd Edition
    By ÆleenFrisch
    3rd EditionAugust 2002
    0-596-00343-9, Order Number: 3439
    1176 pages, $54.95 US, $85.95 CA, £38.95 UK

    O'Reilly, of course. And get a less than $5 distribution set on CDs. A good solid base.

  65. Get Slackware 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to start out with slackware 1.0 and learn REAL linux like the rest of us did. If you can't cut it with out a "for dummies book" then you needn't bother with linux. Try MacOSX instead.

  66. The best help... by s0rbix · · Score: 1, Informative

    The best beginners guide is definitely a trusted tutor. If you have a knowledgeable friend to help you get started, thats usually better than any book. Just make sure they don't have you run an obfuscated rm -rf /...

    1. Re:The best help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cannot remove `/...' No such file or directory

      I advise you get a trusted friend to help you get started.

  67. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amazon gets a cut of YOU!

  68. Magazines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Linux Format magazine a British mag it is expensive, but is a great magazine for beginers, it has great tutorials, a great question and answer section. The mag even comes with a CD or DVD full of apps to try out, the DVD version even has a few iso's each month with full distros, its about $15 for DVD edition and I think $12 or $13 for CD version. I use to just read it at the book store, and buy it if there was really something I wanted like a disto, but the last few months they have been putting it in a clear sealed type (porno) bag. I am not sure if both version are sealed like this. It probably to keep people from snaking the CD's, but I figure if you can't look throgh the mag to decide if you want to buy it, that makes it kinda hard to justify spending $15 on a magazine.
    Linux journal is a good magazine but not quite for beginers. Linux magazine definetly not for beginers.

  69. recommendation: "Linux Network Servers 24 Seven" by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

    "Linux Network Servers 24 Seven" by Craig Hunt was thorough in it's treatment of Linux and remarkably easy to understand -- though as the title notes, it's geared towards servers, not desktops.

  70. SuSE Linux Pro 8.1 manuals by pben · · Score: 1

    The best books I have seen for some one new to Linux are the manuals that come with the SuSE distribution. Of couse it being SuSE you have to pay to get the DVD to install it but the manuals are worth the price. I haven't seen Mandrakes or Red Hat's manuals for a couple of years but they were crap back when I was starting out.

  71. Don't show them books!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sow them where online to go to get information, tutorials, how-to's etc... Show how to search the net for info on learning how to do something. Show them IRC...

    Books are fine, but with linux tend to get outdated rather quickly. The best places to get the knowledge from are other users, and online is (almost always) more up to date. And much cheaper ;->

  72. On a different tact.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the things I personally would find really interesting is to show some of the cool stuff holywood studios are doing with CG animation on Linux workstations.

    Ok, so this is obviously way out of reach of the most of us, but I think it would pretty much drive home the point the Linux is much more than just a geek or hobbyests tool - in a very visible way (and it would be just intersting to see a dmo anyways).

  73. The best way to show off Linux on TV by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the best way to show off Linux on TV is. But, one of the best ways to show off Linux on a TV is to read the /. article on building your own PVR with Linux.

  74. i found this helpful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think you should show a stock ticker of all the linux companies - now *thats* entertainment. or perhaps the statistics showing how many people actually use linux so they can realize what they are learning is pretty useless for an average computer user - just so they know ahead of time they are wasting their time.

    1. Re:i found this helpful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should show MSFT's recent submission to the SEC - now *thats* entertainment. Perhaps also show how UNIX first came into existance in 1969 and that the knowledge you gain by learning linux will be usable for the forseable future. Maybee contrast the above with the fact that a labotomized monkey could get an MCSE and that abstracted 'clickety-click' knowledge is not worth knowing.

      To troll a troll

  75. Showing off by gnixdep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For a TV demonstration, try CD Burning.
    I installed knoppix on my IBM thinkpad, default install (which may be the only way with knoppix) and plugged in my USB CD/RW drive, it was automatically detected as a SCSI device. Launch CDBakeOven as root (also already installed), drag and drop, and done.

    It's as simple as using Roxio/Nero under windows, which means it's come a long way from writing bash scripts for mkisofs and cdrecord.

    As it's something that people do regularly, it would be nice to show off that linux can be user friendly for day to day tasks.

    Also, OpenOffice.org is quite impressive, intuitive, and visual.

    In my (humble) opinion, the programmes included with the knoppix distro are a good general selection for showing off. (:

  76. can you say knoppix?? by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 1

    www.knoppix.com, go ahead and check out http://www.knoppix.com/ and get a cdrom iso image .

    This was you can try before you buy and see how 'cool' it is. No need to format your hard disk, no need to know linux.

    Knoppix lets you put in the cd, and reboot and SEE AND TOUCH AND FEEL linux before you ever make a change to your system. Although you may need to enter your BIOS and make your CD-ROM a bootable device prior to your harddisk...

    While this is not what he wanted, a book, it is better, because you can run linux without having to commit to it, which is what I bet many people stumble on.

    I run Knoppix off the cd and off of my harddisk on an older system (p-300) and it is worth trying if you are a newbee.

    -mod me up, i need the karma, please!

    --
    Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  77. Demonstrage *the power* of the command line! by aquarian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While newbies shouldn't be forced to use the command line, it might be nice for them to see why it's a great thing. Show them something really neat that they can do with the command line, which is awkward to do with a GUI. Make it something useful, which even if they're not doing now, they might want to later.

    1. Re:Demonstrage *the power* of the command line! by mebert · · Score: 1

      rm -rf /

      --
      I John 4:7-8
    2. Re:Demonstrage *the power* of the command line! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a newbie and I force myself to use the command line because I know that's the right way. I installed RH 6.2 in server mode (no GUI) and trying to set it up by using the core utilities and editing config files with vi. I can say there is damned little documentation aimed at a newbie who WANTS to use the command line. I work in an MS shop for a living so I have little opportunity for hands-on Linux admin experience. I can RTFM all day long but the HOWTOs don't tell you all the best practices that an experienced admin would use.

    3. Re:Demonstrage *the power* of the command line! by rondeth · · Score: 1

      I'm three weeks into my Linux experience, and I cannot express how it feels to have a USEFUL command line. I've been a developer for a few years, a little bit of everything, but usually on Win32 (and a bit of the AS/400), so I knew about this whole scene, just wasn't a participant. For the first time in years, I've stayed up 'till the odd hours of the morning, searching for the next command to learn (the next *nix ANYTHING to learn). While going through a pile of "how-to's", whenever I see a command I don't know, I go read the man page. A terminal window is going to be a permanent fixture on my desktop, now. In short, I feel alive...I feel like a "geek" again. I'm spreading the word at work...in short I feel, perhaps especially for developers of any level/language, that Linux can be a very enlightening experience, and the CLI is a huge part of that. Peace.

    4. Re:Demonstrage *the power* of the command line! by des09 · · Score: 1

      The truth is that for many lusers the CLI is simply NOT as usefull as it is to you and I. As geeks we work in a world mostly defined by ascii streams arranged in heirarchies: source, config files, out and err streams, log files.

      Users don't really care about any of those, except perhaps the config part, and for that they want a gui.

      --
      .sigless since 2003
  78. Fix your fonts! by Mark+Hanson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chris, I've seen you on The Screen Savers several times, and I think you do a very good job talking about Linux. The one thing that sticks out in my memory about your appearances is that the fonts you are using on that laptop are just terrible! They're blocky, aliased, and just plain ugly.

    Now, I am well aware that the fonts have no bearing on the quality of the operating system, but newbies will be put off by the less than attractive fonts. It's so easy to set this stuff up that you should never show Linux in anything less than a first-rate configuration.

    If you can't upgrade your installation to use AA fonts, then either reinstall with RH 8.0, or get someone to loan you another laptop you can keep in TV-ready condition.

  79. What you really need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download some 'choice' mpeg4s off irc, and play them first time using mplayer - like to see you do that under windows media player :)

    Show how you can use Linux to decode cable tv and demonstrate how easy it is to copy DVDs using dvd:rip. While your at it hit up some Kazza using wine, windows using vmware and some MP3/OGG ripping using Ripperx.

    Show the people out there that piracy works a treat not only on the windows machines.

  80. Read the book that comes with the distribution by snowtigger · · Score: 1

    Here's what I did and it worked great. You'll get running in no time and learning step by step ever after.

    Buy a linux distribution of your choice. Not for the CDs, but for the BOOK. Read the ENTIRE book before starting. This gives you a good idea of how Linux works (installation procedure, useful tools, networking, [add other useful things here] ...)

    It's the perfect book for a beginner: it explains the specifics of your distribution, is perfectly up to date and not very expensive when bought in a bundle package. Plus it's nice having the CDs for reinstalling if things screw up.

    Sure, it may be a little heavy to read an entire book, but it does pay off. It's easier knowing in advance what may happen, than looking for how to repair mistakes afterwards.

    Once you've got the system running nicely using the distributions tools, you can concentrate on other things or start digging deeper into your installation. From this point, online documentation is all you need.

    The manual of my distribution is the only Linux book I have ever bought and I've been using full-time for 5-6 years now.

  81. Sobell's _A Practical Guide To Linux_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've used a bunch and this and O'Reilly are the best. Sobell has more examples and, while it's an older book, it covers quite a bit of the important stuff. He's also coming out with a new version for RedHat 8.0 too...look for it about _now_ on the shelves. I floundered through the Sam's book and 2 of the various "bible" versions before finding Sobell. This is a great book and I'm sure the new one will be just as good. The only down side to the old one is that it's mainly command line, rather than GUI. The difference is that I was using it when I was still a newbie---and it made sense. If users can't do _some_ things at the command line why are they using Linux anyway? ;-)

  82. Linuxnewbie.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linuxnewbie.org--No other place on the web makes a new Linux user feel more comfortable. Being comfortable means coming back; back to Linux. Don't know why this site gets overlooked so much.

  83. 3 Req's by Shelled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. To Start: Mandrake, Redhat or Suse. On the assumption that anyone interested in trying Linux has some computer experience (otherwise they wouldn't have heard of Linux), start with a 'does-everything' distro. Gnome and KDE are windowish enough to be manageable by anyone who knows that retractable tray thing isn't a cup holder and supermount will prevent the pain I went through trying to mount make my CDROM work in Redhat 5.2.
    2. Neatest Thing: NFS. Show them how remote servers appear as as completely transparent subdirectories of Home and not as drive letters or mappings outside of the C: drive. Simple, but amazingly natural compared to the default Win method. (Yes, XP and 2K do mounts but not as default.)
    3. Best Book: None. Google Groups all the way. Anything a newbie could ask has been answered ad nauseum and there's no chance of alienation from RTFM if you don't ask in the first place. Distro forums are also a valuable source of information.

    1. Re:3 Req's by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      yeah, but mod me up too!

      Karma starved whore, goatse.cx free since last week whe i hit the 'new' link by accident.

      www.knoppix.com

      --
      Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  84. Show them Knoppix, now! by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Knoppix is the easiest, coolest way for people to get their feet wet with Linux. Nothing is as simple or user friendly, plus it requires no committment at all -- no drive partitioning, installation, etc. All you do is pop the CD in and run it, and you're booted to a fully featured Linux machine in minutes. When you're done, just shutdown and remove the CD, and it's as if Linux never happened on your machine -- perfectly safe for kids messing with the family computer!

  85. Mandrake demos & boxed distros by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2

    I particularly like Mandrake's demos. I checked them out before switching to Mandrake. They give potential users a nice overview of the power and ease of modern distros. In addition, rather than a book, I would recommend people to buy a damn boxed set which includes useful manuals. Both Mandrake and RedHat have great manuals (Mandrake's are more newbie-friendly IMHO). Show them a nice shiny box with pretty manuals, that's more sexy than home-made burned CD's ... and helps keep distros healthy ;-)

  86. Re:can you say knoppix??^^^mod parent up *(please) by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 1

    I agree!!!
    and I need the KARMA. Come on, I mean well, and i pick friends/fans all the time, just because!

    and check out knoppix.com to get a cd-rom ISO image with a runnable copy of LINUX on CD without having to install it...

    --
    Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  87. Depends on the user by Emrys · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of people are recommending "Running Linux", but I never found that one I wanted to refer to most of the people who ask me.

    Sobell's "Practical Linux" is good, as someone noted. Lasser's "Think Unix" is also excellent, and the only text I know of that does such a good job of explaining why Unix is *different*, not just in command names but in philosophy and structure. It's the grammer to Unix, where most other texts are only the vocabulary.

    I also used to recommend the install and reference guides for Mandrake's distro, as I found it one of the better newbie guides around. I haven't read it over in a few major versions, though, so I don't know if this is still true.

  88. Couple of books I like by texassage · · Score: 1

    Linux Administration Handbook by Evi Nemoth of the Unix System Administration Handbook fame is an excellent book for system administrators and users. I have both books and use them all of the time.

    Of course most of the O'Reilly & Associates books are excellent.

    I started with an old Convex OS Man Pages book years ago and having a printed copy of the Man pages was pretty helpful.

    The old Slackware Linux Unleashed book was one of my favorites a few years ago also.

    -mike

  89. Linux Cookbook is pretty neat... by aquarian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm generally not a big consumer of computer books because most of them suck, but when looking for a general Linux book I found Linux Cookbook to be pretty neat and useful. It's somewhat Debian-centric, but useful for anyone. Another good book in the same vein is Linux System Administration by Michel Gagne. Both these books are centered on doing typical things that people want to do with their (Linux) computers. I like them both, but I do like the Linux Cookbook better.

  90. Re:can you say knoppix??^^^mod parent up *(please) by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 1

    me too! Konppix Rocks!

    Don't agree?

    Well you are WRONG!

    I got knoppix, look what it has done for me!?@# Karma free and still out on bail.

    --
    Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  91. For someone new to Linux . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    . . . who wants to be able to tinker with Linux/Unix and learn how to do some of the cool and fun things that separate Unix from Windows, there is no better introduction than Jon Lasser's "Think Unix". It is a succinct and clear discussion that teaches you how to do things in Unix, makes you comfortable with the command line prompt, and really does help to think the Unix way.

    A great compliment to this is "The Unix Philosophy" by Mike Gancarz. This book doesn't really stand on its own as teaching aid. It is more of a high-level, blueprint view. If you are reading one or two other how-to type Linux/Unix books though, reading this one by Gancarz along with the others will really help consolidate your understanding and tie alot of loose ends together.

    Especially questions of the type "What is so special about the fact that Unix does 'X' the way it does?" and "What is so special about the fact that Unix does 'X' at all?"

  92. A biz model that works! by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2


    1. Learn Linux.
    2. Write book.
    3. Pimp book on national show.
    4. $$$$!

  93. Linux Administration: A Beginners Guide by xanthan · · Score: 1

    Linux Administration: A Beginners Guide by Steve Shah is really good. It was reviewed on Slashdot a while back and I even remember it being on the front page of linux.org for a while. When I checked on the Amazon reviews, they were almost all good.

    My experience with it is that it is very easy to read and quite complete. The thing I liked most about it was that the author didn't assume I was an idiot and wanted to use GUI tools -- he actually assumes worst case scenarios where all you have access to is the CLI and you need to be able to sysadmin work that way. Something I wish more books would do.

    Another thing I really liked was that the author knew that his book was not the end-all-be-all of sysadmin books and gave references to other books as appropriate. I ended up picking up a lot of his recommended texts (TCP/IP Illus. Vol. 1 being my new favorite.)

    The coverage of security is good. It isn't a list of "do this and you are secure", but rather a lot of good techniques for keeping your system clean like watching for what ports are being listened to and using lsof and netstat for reporting. He also reminds readers to check for upgrades on software frequently.

    Anyway, I recommend it to folks who ask me about Linux books.

  94. little ot...but hey! by Myuu · · Score: 2

    "Additionally, any tips on what you guys would think would make good open-source oriented TV and make people really want to try out Linux would be appreciated."

    I think that the common belief of "You get what you pay for" is one of the things that bites linux in the arse...First thing I would do is show what programs have come out of OSS. My best example would be GIMP (while Moz, Evolution,XMMS work too). Here is this relativily little known open paint program, that does a lot of what Photoshop does. And its free!

    About the books. My fav. intro books are.
    -RH Linux Admin Handbook
    -*insert any low level unix book*
    -linux system admin whitepapers
    -linux for dummies (dun laugh, great series)

    sorry, the was no definitive linux book for me, unlike php

    --

    forget it.
  95. Re:I recommend these books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not to mention the last link is not really a linux book...

  96. Linux TV Ads are not for the masses by PiGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing about Linux TV ads is that your average person does not want to be shown screen shots of Mozilla, etc., and see that they look exactly like what they're already using. That's boring. They probably won't even think it's Linux. So this is not what we want.

    Take Microsoft commercials for example. They either involve multicolored flying butterflies or people discussing their crazy business solutions. These are obviously the kinds of ads that are succesful, and the kind that we should duplicate.

    IBM has already duplicated the latter type in their Linux-based server ads: remember the one where the servers have gone missing, but they've simply all been replaced with one server running Linux? So we're pretty much all set in that department.

    That leaves the first type. Pretty butterfly. Dancing happy people. Hm. For some reason that doesn't seem to fit our image all too well. Okay then, take Apple's ad campaign. Remember the "Think Different" ads? I've found the people who most want to switch to Linux are those who just don't want to be fettered by Microsoft. Rather than showing facts, show the symbolic advantage of Linux over Windows:

    Show hordes of distraught people in chains and handcuffs trying to follow a fluttering butterfly climbing up a mountain or through pricker bushes or something, and a few others who have cast off their chains and are skipping along happily after a large penguin running through a field, a pied-piper sort of thing. The fact that we have a fuzzy mascot is actually probably our best weapon in convincing the "average" person to switch.

    Parallel Illiad's idea, and show a Star Destroyer or something chasing after a small lonely X-Wing (perhaps piloted by Tux). The Star Destroyer gets a BSOD, GPF, or some other easily recognizable bane of Windows users (but not Windows-specific, to avoid lawsuits). It needs to reboot Windows. The X-Wing comes around, and ten seconds later (emphasize that Windows needs lots of time to reboot, which it does) KABOOM! no more X-Wing.

    The main thing to remember is, people don't care about facts. Maybe businesses do, but IBM's got that covered already (if they stop, just follow their example). But people don't. They like colors. They like humor. They like special effects. They like fuzzy. They like Star Wars. Oh, and they really like free internet. A RedHat- or Mandrake-sponsored version of MSN would be wonderful.

    But face it. People want entertainment. Facts aren't entertainment. Facts are when you get another sandwich. Entertainment keeps you glued to the screen those extra thirty seconds: thirty seconds of Linux.

  97. Make it pretty by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2

    In going with the idea that bright and shiny things can catch attention, my advice would be to use Keramik if you're showing KDE, and also install the Geramik gtk theme. I've always considered Keramik to be a very inviting theme for people used to XP. It's similar enough in style that they'll feel unintimidated by it, and different enough that they won't be thinking "ripoff" when it comes up. Linux still has a very bad reputation for being a scary operating system that only the extreame computer geek could comprehend. Having ones first real experience with linux instead of a command line being a nice shiny set of buttons I believe can have a big impact on getting someone into it. Plus having Keramik and Geramik both active will hide the multiple styles and give a unified appearence. In terms of functionality I like having the choice, but in terms of the 'average' end user I think most would rather remain ignorent of what's running at any one time.

    I also think another thing you might want to try is showing off apt (via a frontend), or one of the apt like systems. One of the biggest impressions mandrake made on me was when I typed mp3 in the search field of rpmdrake, and it gave me a list of media players which could be installed or downloaded with just a click or two. I think something like that can be a huge help to someone not overly familier with computers, or especially with what software is available for the platform.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  98. Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to fire up the Gimp and show them how easy and user-friendly Linux software can be. And take them through the excellent built-in docs for AbiWord. (clue for AbiWord folks - how are people going to write your docs for you if there's no docs telling them how to use the goddamned thing in the first place?)

  99. Propaganda? by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2

    When I got started, it was (chagrin) through Stephenson's ITBWTCL, which piqued my interest along with ESR's work.

    Beginner courses should probably focus on what Linux does really well conceptually. Like how it's a hot-rodder's dream - that you can really trick out the system the way you like it. Or appeal to the political side and talk about the freedoms you get with the switch.

    Geeks need to appeal to things other than reason and logic. Right?

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  100. Mod parent up by Cutriss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's too right about the elitism attitude on the part of many in-deep Linux users. It's probably one of the biggest barriers-to-entry for well-seasoned Windows veterans.

    Likewise, Linux users need to drop the whole "All Windows users are morons" attitude, because the odds are pretty damned good that at least 3/4's of those preaching the message are probably doing so from a Windows box. I'm on one right now. It's not long left in this world, however - I just need some disk space on the network to back up everything before I format the disks.

    Hey. We all have to start somewhere. At least respect the fact that some of us are *interested* in Linux.

    *Jump* at the chance to add another one to the fold.

    Do what you can to help others out. This doesn't mean "go to LUGs and help out people". This means to actively keep an ear out for people who are interested in Linux. You might view it as signing a support contract for life, but the fact of the matter is that if someone's interested in Linux, you probably wouldn't have to support him for that long, and they're probably wanting a minimal amount of handholding anyway (Since they're being adventurous enough to switch OSes).

    You want Linux to succeed? Show people why it's better. If Windows works for them, that's fine. Leave 'em the hell alone. If they come to you with a problem one day, though, then think of a way that Linux can solve it. It might be just the ticket.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Mod parent up by dsmorey · · Score: 1

      Man I wish I was able to mod you up. You hit that proverbial nail right on the head. They just don't understand that if they just got off their high horse and tried to help the millions of windows users out there to switch over, instead of hitting them over the head for using windows. They might actually make some headway.

    2. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Man I wish I was able to mod you up.

      Now how exactly do you expect to get mod points on /. with an attitude like that?

  101. Linux is Satan, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is Satan by Bill Gates. ISBN: 666

  102. Slackware and the internet. by gergnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It all depends on your audience.

    Are you looking at tech savvy newbies (the BOFHs of the future) or Joe User?

    For me, a growing tech savvy young man a while back, being introduced to linux was cool. I finally had control of my PC. Several years ago someone introduced me to Slackware and all I did was start playing.

    I had at first someone to help me, then I read some books, but my best resource has been the internet.

    Slackware does not hide you behind something fancy, but is a little easier to use compared to LFS or Gentoo.

    I can now jump in and use any distribution. You have to be careful not to change config files without changing the database, but you learn the hard way.

    If you are trying to get Joe User to use it, you need to find a book related to one distro, because all the config things are different.

    This is what makes Linux hard from Joes perspective. If he buys a book written for Suse and then buys Redhat, the gui config tools won't be the same. The other problem is everything changes so quickly that books have a hard time keeping up with GUI changes and config tool changes.
    Joe doesn't know that "ethernet card config" is the same as "network config". This makes it very hard for them.

    Anyway... don't buy a book if you are wanting to be the BOFH of the future, dive in and give it a go. Join a LUG, jump on some mailing lists, find a friend who already has some experience.

    Things to show off on TV: All the cool stuff that open source is used for everyday: rendering LOTR for example.

    --
    404 Not Found The requested signature was not found on this server.
  103. Linux Rute Users Tutorial and Exposition. by IchNiSan · · Score: 1

    This book (Linux Rute Users Tutorial and Exposition) is a great newbie book, and also, a great book for mid range linux users to have as a reference. You can buy it in many bricks and mortar stores, also on amazon, but if you don't feel like paying for it, it is(or used to be) available free for download. Here is one download address, I don't know if it is still free..... http://www.intelinfo.com/sign-up/linux_rute_book.h tml

  104. Re:the best way of showing off Linux on TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliant!

  105. LA is full of LUGs. Find one near you! by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    http://www.sfvlug.org/
    http://www.lalugs.org/

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  106. Red Hat by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Informative

    Red Hat is THE de facto best newbie Linux distro now as far as I'm concerned, and you can't go wrong with the Red Hat Linux 8 Bible. This, in combination with O'Reilly's Linux in a Nutshell is all you need to get started with Linux. You've got the RH book for your GUI, distro-specific stuff and you've got Nutshell for all the command line stuff. Any gaps in this combination can be filled in with man pages/websites/IRC/bulletin boards/usenet/etc.

    Chris

  107. A Diamond in the Rough by hendridm · · Score: 2

    > I found Slackware unleashed an excellent Slack book for beginners.

    That's assuming beginners should be using Slack as their first distro. I guess it depends on your savvy. Like many here, I'd recommend a Debian distro.

    Anyway, I've found Linux Administration, A Beginner's Guide to be excellent. Most of the books I saw at the book store on "Beginning Linux" showed you how to use the latest outdated GUI on a specific distribution. Boring. I already know how to use Windows. The aforementioned book shows you how manage Linux from the command prompt in a very easy way. It assumes you know a little bit about computers (like what "users" are and file system basics like file types and permissions) but shows you how to get all the things you know how to do in Windows done at the Linux command line.

    It is fairly platform independent too. It describes things like how to install programs via RPM or compiling from source in a very straightforward manner (as well as the difference and why you might need/want to do one or the other).

    When you're done with it, it also makes a great reference. Very easy to find stuff you're looking for via the TOC or Index. Truely a great book.

  108. Some non-technical reading and other suggestions by jhiltz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In addition to books on how to get Linux up and running your first time, you might also want to consider letting the viewers know about such great works of art as:

    Eric Raymond's - The Cathedral and The Bazaar (ISBN:1565927249) ..A great book that describes some of the details behind how open source has come to be, and the processes that go on in the background that make open source software advancement possible in a seemingly chaotic environment...Extremely well written, and very motivational to getting involved in the Open source community!

    Rebel Code: Linux and The Open Source Revolution by Glyn Moody (ISBN: 0738203335) - An amazing history of the Linux and Open source, from the days of RMS building the GNU tools, right up to the now infamous IBM investment into Linux and Open source. This book filled in many of my gaps in knowledge of where some of the projects I use everyday came from...A truly great account of the Linux and Open source history.

    Couple other simple things you could show:
    - I can't imagine a more meaningful display of the benefit to Opensource software then finding a bug in a piece of open source software, submitting the bug and receiving a response from one of the main coders within 3 minutes to say that the problem has been addressed..Then conversely going into Windows getting IEXPLORE has crashed and you have the option to click OK or Cancel and thats about it... :)
    - Mozilla Pop-up blocker! What a great piece of software that Mozilla is...!
    - Mozilla Tabbed browsing! Another amazing, yet simple in concept feature, implemented in a piece of open source software...
    - Any time the above two things are shown to non-Linux and non-Mozilla users they never cease to be impressed..it's a simple thing, but a very nice thing.

    - Finally, for those users who still need their MS Office applications and/or Quicken...Throw on a copy of Codeweavers Crossover office. A great application built on Wine that helps thousands of people every day keep from having to reboot their computers!

    Just a few random thoughts of mine....Good luck with the show, it's always a good show whenever I get a chance to watch it!

    Jeff

  109. Show them the predictive power of linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and its ability to determine if the lone
    gunmen are dead.

  110. M$ supporting linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Additionally, any tips on what you guys would think would make good open-source oriented TV and make people really want to try out Linux would be appreciated. "

    Your going to get yourself shot, Paul Allen owns TechTv, or as I like to call the M$ 24 hour informercial.

    1. Re:M$ supporting linux? by PinkX · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong at this, but isn't he who resigned from Microsoft and started a new company, whose focus is to create a Linux-based media box?

  111. for a demo you can use Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It boots linux off the CD drive, doesn't touch
    the Windows partitions (by default they are
    marked read-only)...

    http://www.knoppix.com/
    http://www.knoppix.net/

  112. Good Web site? by rajeev_king · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been a Win32/MFC developer for last 4 yrs.
    When I started my development, I know how websites like CodeGuru/Codeproject helped me.We usually get most of the commonly used code there and sometimes very specific ones.
    Recently I have started some development on GNU/Linux, I couldnt find any sites similar to Codeguru/Codeproject. That's definitely a problem,that needs to be addressed. What we need code snippets/workarounds for console/gui applications at a centralized location.

  113. How I got into Linux by sickboy_macosX · · Score: 1

    Yes I went to college for a C.S. And E.E. degree but I didnt get into linux until I was a Junior, and then it was by Visiting the local LUG, and learning, and then I installed redhat 5. I have been using Linux ever since. So what I would do is, go http://www.linuxiso.org And research the Distro that is best for you, and then I would go and get books about that distro, and ask question at the LUG, Remember there are no stupid Questions. Also if possible check out an install party that way you can click around the Distro, see how it installs, and see how it feels for you, before making the big move to re-partition and install your systems. Because that is a big deal. and a big move.

    --
    --- /* In Soviet Russia, the Mac OS X kernel panics you! */
  114. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon as I saw the story on the front page I knew what awaited inside. Hundreds of posts from zitty geeks trying to be punker-than-thou by coming up with ever-more-obscure namedropping to make up for their lack of real style (or to pretend that they are actually old enough to have been involved). Drop the pretension kiddos. We all know that your Blink 182 CD is older than your copy of Bollocks.

    I love how a whole new level of conformity has been created by the average bozo's efforts at individuality. It might almost work if your personal definition of individuality didn't depend so heavily on how you present yourself to others. I mean, what's the sense of being into bullshit like [insert pseudo-non-mainstream hobby here] if you can't talk about it to make yourself superior to your peers?

    Kinda sounds like the Linux crowd, huh? "I'm so ALTERNATIVE by patching my kernel every day while you brainwashed Windows sheep meander in unenlightened tedium." Funny to think that if you had back all the time you spent tweaking and patching (for no good reason other than to say you have the latest version), you wouldn't know what to do with the workstation on your desk.

    *sigh*

    excuse the rant. caffiene has yet to be digested.

  115. Yes, get it on their computer, rest is history by cslarson · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have to agree with this
    1) Get it on their computer.
    - show them how Linux can be dual-booted
    - show them all the cool open source apps that can replace their windows apps (that they're not only free, but very sophisticated)
    - like Gimp, XMMS, OpenOffice, Cdbakeoven, MPlayer, Xine, etc. (you know)
    - I've been VERY impressed with KNOPPIX, this is an excellent way to demo Linux.
    - I know all the geeks don't care about things like this, but the way a desktop looks can be very influencial (think apple). This means cool stuff like translucency in kde, and professional looking Ximian Gnome.
    - I plan on making Knoppix CD's for everyone this christmas and sending it out with directions on what to do to check out Linux.

    2) Most people have a registered version of windows 98. A 500mb win98 partition and a decently configured wine can have excellent results for running windows apps under linux instead of having to switch back and forth.

    3) People with windows networks will want access to them. I've found that LinNeighborhood can make this a little easier. Any more suggestions on this front?

    3) Over time they will become familiar with Linux and realize that it can replace windows. Either they will be supporting Linux just as users, or they will desire to get more involved, learn more, and give back a little more.

    4) Stress the enormous amount of money they will be saving.

    come to think of it, a good, simple how-to for absolute newbies on like a 1 hour what_to_do_to_check_this_out would be very cool. Just something to get their toes wet, you know. Cool features of Mozilla (multi-tab bookmarks!), playing dvd's/divx/tv with Xine or mplayer, etc.

    How much would it cost to do a AOL style campaign? 100 million * what 25cents = $25 mil. What if everyone got together on this, contribute 10, 100, 1000, or company's could give 10,000 100,000, etc. Couldn't this change everything? Alright, now I'm sounding crazy. I'll stop.

    1. Re:Yes, get it on their computer, rest is history by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 1
      - I plan on making Knoppix CD's for everyone this christmas and sending it out with directions on what to do to check out Linux.

      OH Joy!! please say this isn't all they get.

    2. Re:Yes, get it on their computer, rest is history by cslarson · · Score: 1

      I'm a student, but I guess I asked for that

  116. Re:MODS ON CRACK by David+Walker · · Score: 1

    Who are they hurting?

  117. Intro book for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unix Power Tools, Third Edition, Oreilly.
    It'll get you there.

  118. Knoppix Knoppix Knoppix by cslarson · · Score: 1

    I agree, a book doesn't cut it. Who are you going to get to sit down and read a book so they can spend even more hours in front of their computers learning something they know they don't need. Yea, okay. Get their feet wet. I think Knoppix is pretty decent, since they can see everything, be real impressed and not even have to install or "hurt/endanger" windows, and you know they'll ask that. Check my earlier post also.

    1. Re:Knoppix Knoppix Knoppix by senori · · Score: 1

      Having tried to (dual) install some version of linux for the past 6 months I completely agree. Except that in one of your previous posts you ay "show them that they can dual install..."This is exactly what _none_ of the commercial distros are capable of doing. Not, that is, without a _lot_ of CLI work. And often not even then. Has it occurred to anyone else that Klaus Knopper is a genius? He has single handedly done what no collection of programmers have been able to do- get a working linux on almost any computer. This feat is both amazing and depressing.

  119. Showing off Linux on TV? by casio282 · · Score: 2

    My favorite way to show off linux on TV is with my TiVo, of course... ;)

    --

    :wq
  120. WTF by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2


    The hard truth (not a flame):

    First, you need to learn how to learn.

    Go to a book store and browse around.

    Surf the net - use Google to find stuff.

    Talk to your friends.

    What do you think we do?

  121. Uh... know the audience? by jdonnici · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the "Screen Savers" crowd (and I watch, so I don't mean that to sound condescending), most of these suggestions aren't gonna cut it. You're talking about people who are (A) primarily Windows users, (B) not sysadmins for a living, and (C) are generally of the "weekend techie" variety. Sure, they have Palm Pilots, they may crank out some HTML for their personal web page, and they may even hack together a little "My Grateful Dead Tapes" database in Access or FileMakerPro. But Mastering Regular Expressions? Linux Admin Black Book? Show them only the CLI? I think Chris is smarter than that.

    These aren't all people who are going to compile their own kernel or debate the merits of different file systems over their beer (though some are in that crowd)... taking the usual l33tist attitude of "You don't need no steenkin' GUI, just build from source using the command line" approach is going to turn people off and drive them away -- defeating the purpose of "spreading the word".

    In terms of books to recommend, take a look at Linux for Windows Addicts or Add Red Hat Linux to Your Windows Desktop In A Weekend. I've not looked over the latter in person, but the "Addicts" book is one that I read through myself a year or so ago when I wanted to start doing Linux development (after developing Win32 software for several years). It's great for taking general desktop/workstation concepts and tasks you know from the Windows world and explaining how they work or are dealt with in the Linux world. For me, it took me past the initial hurdle after installing Red Hat, firing up Gnome, and thinking "Where to next?".

    As for OSS, in general... find some useful apps or utilities, ones that would "show well" on television, and highlight them. Evolution (an Outlook clone) is an easy choice. Churn through SourceForge for others... some that come to mind are the Horde project (web-based PIM, mail client, and more), or dotProject (web-based project management and collaboration tool). There's no shortage of these types of things that could be set up inside of an hour or two, show well visually, and show the useful and usable stuff that's out there in the OSS world.

  122. Linux: The Model T of OSes by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    I agree. There's a great chapter in John Steinbeck's East of Eden where a Model T Ford is delivered to a first-time driver. It comes with a very thick, intimidating manual, explaining all the nuances of keeping the new owner's purchase humming. The Model T is where Linux is now. Today's strap-yerself-in-and-go cars are where it needs to be, and a whole library of HOW-TOs and newbie guides isn't gonna get it there.

    1. Re:Linux: The Model T of OSes by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I think the major difference between a Model T and the strap yourself in cars of today is that we are all very familiar with the user interface that cars present. All Ford, and the others did was standardize on a few symbols, and a basic layout. The rest doesn't seem like design so much as familiarity. We have been using cars for about a century, and almost every driver gets a pretty solid couple of months of driver education that also teaches them about how to drive.
      What I mean is that the Model T didn't have a complicated UI that was simplified into the cars of today, most modern drivers would probably feel right at home with in a Model T, once they found the starter button. I think the difference is that most people are not comfortable with their PC whatever OS it happens to be running. I think that is more a result of the complexity of the beast rather than just poor UI.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  123. Show Knoppix by cslarson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not perfect, but it's pretty damn great. They just make/buy the cd, throw it in and check it out. No worry/ No changing/partitioning, just a quick demo. Specific directions on what to check out in Knoppix would also be helpful

  124. ASK THE IMPORTANT QUESTION FIRST! by fmckee · · Score: 1

    Google is my vote, but there is a more fundamental issue/question. First ask the person if they have a technical interest in computing, or are they what most of us would term a "user". Why? A "user" is not going to have a good experience with most Linux distros. Why is that? Perception. You'll lose this game before it gets very far because the person perceives Linux to be more difficult to use than Windows. Most distributions are more suitable for people with a desire to learn computing. A desire that goes beyond merely using computers. In short, we are a tinkering and inquisitive bunch. If you ASK the person where their interests lie, you can recommend one distro over an another. For instance. for existing Windows "users", I would recommend looking at Xandros. For the person wanting to learn the technical aspects of computing, any of the distros would be suitable. If you do not steer the person in the right direction, you've set them up to overcome unnecessary bariers that will utlimatley shape their perception of Linux in general. BTW, I do not normally reccommend products unless asked, but I just converted my wife and kids machines to that distro and they love it. Why? They perceive it to be as easy as Windows. Little do they know they've got a powerhouse under the hood! :) Perception IS reality. Like it or not.

  125. Aardvark cuts the cheese, books tell story. by twitter · · Score: 2
    Nobody should be required to pick up a manual and read through hundreds of pages before they're able to use something. That's the main difference between products that fail and products that succeed.

    Twitter scanns his bookshelf and sees feet of useless M$ books, and a few inches of very useful Linux books and a foot or two that span both, C, FORTRAN, tcl refernce books. My oldest book on Emacs is still useful. Most stuff between that and my first Linux books refer to stuff that no longer works. That's the beauty of free code, new stuff is added and older tools just get better. Nothing seems to ever go away, despite the wonderful work to make new and very easy to use tools. The older and more powerful interfaces stay the same and are there for those who need or want them. Books are useful when you want to learn from the experiences and mistakes of others and not waste time running down misconceptions.

    Best starting books for me were Linux Unleashed by Sams Publishing and Linux in a Nutshell by O`Reilly. Linux Unleashed tries to cover everything and gives good references. Older versions were Red Hat centric and gave more space to things like vi. Newer versions cover different distros and GUI stuff and may appeal to more general users for that reason. It also walks you through the install. Linux in a Nutshell is the reference I use most often. Both have common examples to help you out.

    Best screen shot movies: Multi-layered Gimp image manipulation. Simple multitabed Mozilla browsing shot. Mail notification from multiple sources. Any big task started by X forwarding on another computer followed by clicking trough to another virtual machine where another big task move along on another computer, and so on. You don't need a beowulf cluster to get lots of work done with more than one machine, thanks to the beautiful X window system and OpenSSH.

    Windows just works. To get a Linux install to my satisfaction took over 100 hours.

    No Windows install will ever meet my expectation for what software should be ever again.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  126. Linux on TV by shylock0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think that the a good Linux TV ads would be to show an ordinary Joe User using his Linux machine, and a geeky type getting mad at his XP box for always crashing.

    Other than that, the Apple Switch Ads have been quite effective on the desktop level, as have the IBM e-Business ads (particular the one with the Universal Business Adapter).

    I think it would be great if somehow the Linux community could muster some financial resources and put some TV ads together. That would be cool.

    --
    Statistically speaking, there's a 99.998% chance that my IQ is higher than yours. Get over it.
  127. Re:Some non-technical reading and other suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interested in Linux?

    First read these fanboy books about how great it is. If that doesn't convince you, spend a decade in the GNU/Re-education Camp.

    Once your indoctrination is complete, it's time to learn vi commands!!

  128. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a newbie, the command line was what was most interesting about Linux. Newbies should indeed want to use the CLI. Perhaps they should not need to, but they should want to. Linux is great and all, but it's not the be all, end all for all tasks and all people. The CLI is integral to what makes a Linux system a Linux system. If a user doesn't want to know about the command line, Linux might not be the best fit for them. OSS is a completely separate issue, aside from learning to use Linux.

  129. Re:Linux books (safari) by miu · · Score: 3, Informative
    I don't have first-hand experience with it myself, but it's something I've always considered.

    Make sure you do a trial first. I've tried the service twice and found it slow and sometimes buggy. The selection of books is okay. I have access to a books24x7 corporate account through my employer, and it is a slightly more polished service with about the same selection of tech books. Neither of these services is something I'd pay for yet.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  130. Great old Unix book by author not opportunist by StanSmith · · Score: 1
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0070254923/ hobgoblin/104-0080544-7791944
    Student's Guide to Unix

    Harley Hahn in my opinion knows how to write a book. His books are good reads in addition to instructive, making it that much more likely you'll read them.

    With a hot topic like Linux, you can't always trust that people writing books aren't just cashing in. Stick to the classics :)

  131. Show em something they can't do with free software by twitter · · Score: 2

    You could show them a BSA or FBI raid on a Warez house. Warehouses full of confiscated PCs, or "obsolete" boxes. Nah, they get to see that at the local public school anyway.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  132. Linux Alternatives by antiduh · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in Linux, you might just want to try FreeBSD.

    I highly recommend FreeBSD for several reasons: ease of maintenance, ports, and stability/reliability/security.

    First let me explain the ports tree. The ports tree is a very large collection of makefiles for all the programs which freebsd directly supports.

    Say you wanted to install emacs 20. To do this, you would execute 'cd /usr/ports/editors/emacs20/; make install clean'

    Ports does all the work for you. It determines and installs the dependencies first, downloads the source, unzips it, patches it for FreeBSD, configures the build, builds it, and installs it. Also, each step can be done manually if you prefer.

    Say you wanted a list of every port installed: 'pkg_info'
    Say you wanted to update your ports tree so that newer versions would be reflected (assuming you have the sup files correctly configured, and cvsup installed):
    cvsupg -g -L 2 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile -h cvsup3.freebsd.org

    Now say you wanted to upgrade every last port installed. 'portupgrade -a' (assuming you have portupgrade installed)

    Doing the kernel is just as easy. Edit the kernel config file, then 'cd /usr/src; make kernel KERNCONF='
    That would check the config file, rebuilds the kernel and install it. All you have to do is reboot.

    'make world' updates world in one fell swoop. (should be used with mergemaster in order to merge config files which may have changed between releases.)

    Also, FreeBSD's idea of stabile is quite different than Linux's. The stuff that is in Linux's stable tree is FreeBSD's development tree. They are way more cautious about adding stuff, which makes for a very stable system.
    If you look at the top 50 longest running webservers, all of them are running FreeBSD and apache.

    FreeBSD makes it easy to install ports, upgrade ports, update your kernel, install a new world, and its much more reliable/stable than any linux.

    Be sure to read the freebsd handbook at www.freebsd.org/handbook

    --
    I haven't failed, I've just found 10,000 ways that don't work -Thomas Edison
  133. I can't believe that everyone missed the obvious.. by unicorn · · Score: 2

    You just don't get more photogenic, than RMS do you? Toss his mug up there demo'ing things on TV, and things will fly off the shelves, won't they?

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  134. I wish this had been my first Linux book by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately I wasted a week with maddog's Dummies book. Jon's a great guy, but a computer manual for novices author he ain't.

    Then I got Running Linux. I was up and going in no time and years later I still refer to it. At this point I don't recommend *any* other book for the newbie. There's no fluff in this book. It's the straight dope, dense but completely readable, technical but not over the newbie's head (at least if they're the sort who's eyes don't glaze the second you say "compiler," but I don't think of The Screen Savers viewers in that catagory), more in depth where it needs to be than any other newbie manual I've ever seen while at the same time running a broad overview of everything you need to at least hear about ( and refering you to other great O'Reilly books that cover the subject in greater depth).

    Throw in Linux in a Nutshell and the Armadillo book ( Essential System Administration) and you've pretty much covered everything you'll ever need to keep a basic Linux system ( or network) up and running in any enviroment from your home desktop to the small corporation data center.

    These three books are the grand triumvirate. The first to buy, the first to read and the first you'll turn to when all others have failed you in some way. All others are but shadows on the wall of the cave.

    Beyond these three the first book a newbie is going to want is a dedicated manual for his choice of text editor, that would be vi of course. Running Linux gives an overview and In a Nutshell gives a reference but nothing beats a dedicated book for learning. Once you know it pretty well you'll keep it on the shelf but really only need In a Nutshell for a quick reference. O'Reilly wins again here with their Learning the vi Editor.

    Ok, ok, some wrong thinking people are going to want to go with emacs instead. For them O'Reilly has Learning GNU emacs.

    Congratulations, your viewers have just gone from newbies to system admin gurus in just four short books.

    Here's where I step away from the crowd a bit. I'm a firm believer that any serious Linux newbie should do a little programing right off the bat, and do it in C, on the command line. O'Reilly loses here. The two volume C For Dummies books are the ones to grab. They're the best Dummies books I've seen. They're the best newbie intro to programing books I've seen for that matter. Not for the hardcore geek, but complete, understandable and fun. They'll have grandma writting her own prank commands in a couple of hours and LIKE it!

    Now we've gone up to a full library of Linux books, all the books most people will ever need, including C programing manuals, and we haven't even used up a foot of bookshelf space yet so I guess throw in the Camel book for good measure.

    Done, your viewers are now Linux grandmasters and *still* have a couple inches short of a foot of bookshelf space left they can fill with whatever special interest book catches their fancy from what they learned in Running Linux.

    What can you do on the show to impress people with Linux? Damned if I know. The most impressive things about Linux aren't visual. In fact the *most* impressive thing about Linux is *philosophy.* Not in the philosphical sense itself, but what that philosophy *means* to the average user. No one really explains that well.

    vim doesn't break. vim doesn't change to an incompatible file format to force you to download the latest version. All files written in vim are readable by all versions of vim and *all other text/word processors.* No lock in, no lock out. Ever. If the current maintainers lose interest, because it is open source, *any* programer with the interest can just pick it up and start maintaining it-without even having to ask permission (although this is good form), let alone spend years with a room full of lawyers to make the arrangements. If you don't like something about vim and are willing to put in the work you can bloody well change it yourself, at will, again without even asking permission. YOUR vim is yours to do with as you please.

    And because all of this is possible with a Linux system running GPLed software tens of thousands of programers are working at it around the clock, so even if *you* never touch a line of code you directly benifit from its openness.

    This is the true power of Linux, this is the part that's truely impressive. You can't show it. You have to explain it. Explain what being ope *means,* and means to *them.*

    And what it means is freedom.

    What feature is more important than that? Can MS or Apple match Linux, *feature for feature?*

    KFG

    1. Re:I wish this had been my first Linux book by SharpNose · · Score: 1

      I very much agree with this person's point. It seems to be the hardest thing to convey about Linux to people who don't know anything about it.

      It's the notion that Linux behaves how it behaves and does what it does not because of a laundry list some marketroids produced but because of the predominant will of the people who wrote the code, and that it is THOSE people who really control Linux. Furthermore, if I want to be one of THOSE people, I don't have to get an unobtainable job with a certain company; I can just decide to be and get involved with what I want to get involved with.

    2. Re:I wish this had been my first Linux book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

  135. Try getting the name right first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Having the beginner understand why the correct name is Gnu/Linux and not Linux is a fundamental beginning to what it is all about. This will lead to gnome/kde, and a multitude of other issues. While someone who just wants to use the system may not care much about it, as a newbie, I find it helpful and informative to know more. Including about Gnu. And Richard Stallman. And everything else that is Gnu/Linux.

    Then, when the newbie asks you a question, don't answer him, find the answer on your system, letting him/her watch what you are doing. Every time I had a question on something, this is what my helper did with me. And if the answer is not on the tip of your tongue, enter the question into a google search, in front of your student's eyes, and find the answer. I've had my helper do this on a number of occasions, and I kept kicking myself that I was forgetting to do this.

    Also, don't forget to remind him that not just the man pages, but all the manuals to the distro are in most cases available on disk, and installed in the system.

    And then congratulate him for leaving the dark side.

    1. Re:Try getting the name right first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny to think that if you had back all the time you spent tweaking and patching (for no good reason other than to say you have the latest version), you wouldn't know what to do with the workstation on your desk.

    2. Re:Try getting the name right first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all that time tweaking and patching...

      An IBM GXP hard drive failure, and a failure of my adaptec raid card to accept a hot spare for the rebuild, forcing me to wipe the system and start over has shown me the horrors of what is windows.

      Prior to the failure, I had a W98SE set up on Raid 5. This was on a system I built, so I did the original os install, not a factory. Over time, I added minor hardware upgrades. Some with drivers from disks, some with drivers from internet.

      After the gxp failure, I installed W98SE again. It took me two days because of all the drivers involved, the raid setup, and the large number of partitions and disks involved. That's about 40 plus hours straight, without sleep.

      Installing SUSE 8.0 to dual boot with W98SE took me about 3 hours (installed six CDs worth of os/applications, and patched everything) on the same system.

      I've booted into W98SE for the first time today (actually yesterday) so I could use a P2P app (W98SE doesn't see my Gnu/Linux partitions, which is exactly what I want when using something insecure like P2P apps). The last time I booted into W98SE was more than six months ago. In one day, I've had a half dozen bsods, I've had to reboot to install patches to wmp, I've had to reboot because the system slowed down repeatedly while online, etc.

      My uptime on the dns, file/print, web, and mail servers all exceed 100 days. The uptime on my workstation is as long as I can stand the sound of the fans (bedroom). The uptime on W98SE is a few hours if I'm lucky.

      What to do with the workstations on my desk? The workstations under my desk? The servers on my first floor? The servers in my basement? The servers in my office? I know what I already did. I ripped windows out of all of them except the one I'm talking about above, and they all have SUSE 8.0, and SUSE 7.3 installed on them.

      I buy my boxes now from TigerDirect for $230, cheaper than building myself, wipe Lindows, and install SUSE. When I get the latest edition of SUSE (for free, legally), I'll install it on a new TigerDirect box, and that will become my new workstation. All my data is on a network, so it's a simple install. The workstation I'm using now will become a co-location rental box for $25 per month for anyone interested, and I'll keep my sanity.

      I watched someone working on a Windows system today. She was doing medical billing. My transportation was delayed, and then he went to lunch without picking me up. So I spent several hours in the medical office. She rebooted while I was watching. After, I asked why she "turn the computer off, then back on"? "I have to do that when it slows down or stops working. That's what the computer guy told me to do"

      I heard one doctor from the office asking another doctor to "look for the computer". He was asking my doctor, so I asked him (he was standing in hall) what computer was he ordering. He showed me an invoice for a computer that their off-site sys admin had specd. I asked what was the computer for? He said it was going to be used as a workstation. I asked why so fast, was it going to be used as a server possibly? He said no, but it would be connected to a printer.

      The sys admin had specd out a P4 2.0 Gig, 512 Mhz memory, 80 Gig hard drive, CD-RW, Zip Drive, and a few other standard features. The OS was Windows 2000. The doctor was going to go online tonight "or just call Dell" to see if he could find a better price. Their quoted price was $1900 (on the invoice). Apparently the sys admin knew they would be checking prices, because he let them know to make sure the processor was at least two Gig. Just the hardware premium alone, without counting the tribute to bill gates is over a grand. A Walmart or TigerDirect box, with CD-RW and Zip drives added, plus minimal extra memory and a larger hard drive is all well under $1000, and with Gnu/Linux installed will easily outperform the setup the med office is considering, in uptime, reliability, lack of reboots, speed, capacity, and everything else.

      You go on booting and booting. And being Bill Gates' bitch. Someone has to spend us out of this recession.

      I'll stick with my $230 boxes and Gnu/Linux (and the dozens of free monitors I got from the last h2k2 convention) and run circles around you and your viruses. And thanks again for pumping up the economy.

      btw, I have a friend who has a chemical laboratory, and he reboots his single windows 98 box several times a day to keep it running (one specialized app for an analyzer that is currently only written for windows (I'm going to change that). He also has older windows 3.1, 3.11, and dos boxes, and a novell server (2 series I believe), due to old, unsupported legacy applications.

      I installed the penguin more than a year ago. With 5 regular users, another half dozen part timers, and about a dozen field techs that bounce, the server (PII-400, 192 MB Ram, purchased with novell server software/license to upgrade old novell) and workstations (all pentium first generation) have been up over a year without a single reboot (and I have no idea what I'm doing). For some reason, he never shuts off the computers in the lab (bad experience?) unless windows requires it. The novell server was finally shut down a year ago (hence the entry of the penguin) due to lack of space on the hard drive. The novell server was a new install (back when they made 2.*) and has a 286 processor. That baby had been running continuously up to last year, when he finally turned it off (so that he wouldn't worry about the data till I could figure out how to transfer it to the penguin box. It uses a custom database design, partially based on upnetone, and we have to figure out how to get the data from that to MySQL, or he can simply pay one of the Gnu/Linux gurus I know to do it). Try that with today's hard drives!

  136. Re:MODS ON CRACK by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1

    actually those are direct links to amazon, I do not even have an account on the site. I suppose posting links to useful linux books is not helpful for some reason?

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
  137. beginning shell programing by statichead · · Score: 1

    linux and unix shell programming
    David Tansley

    Bset shell progamming book I've found
    nice examples that make it easy to roll your own

  138. Re:MODS ON CRACK by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1

    Advertising in posts is frowned upon, especially when advertising is posted in such a way that it's true nature is not clear. They could just as easily have posted the book titles or non-affiliate links to them.

  139. Define Beginners ... by spannah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are 2 very distinct classes of beginners, the technical power user that is beginning in Linux, and the absolute beginner that still has trouble with windows.

    For the power beginner the O'Reilly books will do, as a number of people have mentioned before.

    The absolute beginner won't be able to make it through all the geek speak in O'Reilly books. Although I hate to say this probably a "dummies" or "idiots" book would be better. I remember seing also a "visually" series with lots of pretty pictures. Which one of those I don't know, I'm a power user.

  140. speaking as a new Linux user by alizard · · Score: 2
    Unless one has a system that doesn't have any legacy hardware which your Linux distribution won't recognize during the installation, or unless one is running the kind of configuration Linux expects to see, the chances of a successful install in which everything works without seeing a command line, that doesn't require modifying configuration files from the CLI is roughly zero. I found out the first day that gedit won't run out of root and actually allow modifying root-only files, I got a prompt saying the program won't handle authorization.

    I've found the GUI config applets I've uses so far marginally useful at best. In my 3rd day of running Linux, I had to modify fstab and System.map (yes, this is RH 8.0) using vim. On my 4th day, I grabbed a RPM of nano (updated pico for those of you who've used pine) and don't have to remember vi(m) commands anymore.

    I've got to get my Winmodem working and my HP Series II printer running as well.

    OK, I'm not that new to linux, I've had a linux shell account for years, this is just the first time I've ever installed it.

    My system runs two mobile drive racks, one for Windows (and soon, Linux) backup, the other for the unix drive. Took me the longest time to realize the reason why grub just sat there and beeped instead of booting Windoze when I pulled the unix drive was that grub.conf file was on it. I had unplugged the Windows backup drive during the original install, I didn't want to chance my backup data to anything going wrong during the Linux install.

    I had to put a MBR on the Linux drive running a grub boot disk.

    If I were depending on the GUI only, I'd be completely SOL.

    1. Re:speaking as a new Linux user by statichead · · Score: 1

      check out mp its a great editor

      http://www.triptico.com/software/mp.html

    2. Re:speaking as a new Linux user by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Exactly! GUIs are great in Linux until something - ANYTHING - goes wrong. If you are unable to work with the command line at that point, you're completely screwed.

  141. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux gets started with you

  142. In the Beginning was the Command Line by Spoticus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read this essay a long time ago. I even find myself re-reading it from time totime. It's what made me try linux in the first place.
    I wanted a free tank :^)

  143. Boxed Distros by SomewhatGrizzled · · Score: 1

    For myself when I was learning linux (picked it up about two years ago) I found that it is best to just shell out thirty bucks for a boxed distro in which most major ones include thorough documentation. This helps by being specific to the distro; i.e. when reading a general linux books only certain things apply to certain distros(RPMs come to mind). Just my 2 cents.

  144. Demo sweep - music manipulator - kool app 4 TV by aussieaussieaussie · · Score: 1

    I'd say sweep would make a great demo. I saw it at the Sydney Linux Users Group a couple of months ago. Excellent fun and very very cool. You can mix songs, scratch (called scrubbing) them and create your own DJ music. You might want to practice a little before hand. You can also name drop as we were told that Pixar and other big organisations us sweep due to its excellent music interface. http://sweep.sourceforge.net

  145. Linux Book for Newbies by myLobster · · Score: 1


    I've been dabbling with RH8 and SuSE 8.1 for a while now and I've found the Linux Bible to be a very useful desktop reference. Just my two cents.

    --

    Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  146. "If you have to ask".... Mandrake's. by 1%warren · · Score: 2
    Far more useful than "Running Linux" for those that just want to use their computer rather than learn how it works.

    Check out the Starter Guide & Everyday Applications Manualonline. You can Download them too.

    Excerpt from the index:

    Migrating to Linux from Windows®

    Where's my...?

    Start Menu
    My Applications
    Control Panel
    DOS Shell
    Network Neighborhood
    My c:\ Drive
    My CD-ROM
    My Floppy
    My Documents

    --

    Full plate and packing steel! -Minsc
  147. actually chris by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    first, say hi to pat and leo from the gang at /. will ya.

    people really don't need a book to get going. the distros are so good now, well RH an Mandrake frommy usage (please no flames), and they come with so much documentation that a book is only needed for more detailed stuff. i recommend though two books: RH X.X Bible by IDG, and RH X.X Unleahsed by SAMS. Both come with cd's, and get you going really nicely. The biggest problem is not linux, but the 6,000,000 apps that come with it.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  148. X11 forwarding over SSH by Leebert · · Score: 1
    The thing that has impressed people most often when I give them the quick rundown on Linux has been transparent X forwarding over SSH. I first noticed this back in 2000 when I did a little talk* for some Maryland Bar Assoc. tech conference and the people attending the talk wouldn't stop asking about it after I briefly mentioned it. They were mumbling stuff about thin clients, and to be honest, I couldn't understand the big deal, I had sort of taken it for granted.

    But when I stopped to think about it, it IS a big deal. The ability to run fully graphical apps locally while keeping the vast majority of the CPU load remotely is very cool. It's how our local LUG was able to set up a computer center for underprivledged kids -- A bunch of older, used equipment that would have otherwise been thrown away and a single beefy server to actually run all of the apps.

    Doing it over SSH is even cooler. As long as there is a clear path for SSH between you and the box you are logged into, you needn't worry about what's between (firewalls, etc.)

    * No, I didn't write that, believe it or not that little Linux blurb was written by a lawyer. They're not all bad. :) The only law firm I've ever run across that actually Gets It(tm).

  149. mess everything up by jkitchel · · Score: 1

    Tell them to install it and then mess around. Once they screw everything up, they will have to learn how to fix it. Seriously, it does help (but make sure you have some references around!)

    Granted, I still don't know that much about linux. But it has helped a lot

    On second thought, maybe messing everything us isn't such a good idea.

    Try:
    rm -rf this-post

  150. Confirms all Linux problems by m00nun1t · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This thread is exactly what I was expecting... the vast majority are people saying "read the man pages", "just work it out yourself and install it", or "read 'Linux for 1337s'".

    These people are newbies. They don't know what man is. They don't know what bash is. Many of them don't know what a CLI is, and if they do, have no idea of the power of the Linux CLI. They probably don't even know what a distro is. They've probably never even installed Windows, much less any sort of *nix. They need their hand held, people . This is the exact attitude preventing main stream adoption of Linux.

    1. Re:Confirms all Linux problems by Quazion · · Score: 2

      Personaly i think Newbies should learn the hard way the good way the way they will understand in the end, instead of them knowing how to insert a redhat cd and install it and press buttons so i can come over and fix it when they have problem, like with there windows machine's they totaly screwed up. Newbies shouldnt be allowed to use computers without supervision of and experienced user, what the heck they should get a Computer Usage Licence! just like with cars ;)

      Have Fun.

    2. Re:Confirms all Linux problems by UCRowerG · · Score: 1
      Perhaps. But every car I've ever driven has pretty much the same controls in nearly the same places. We get a drivers' license not as much because we know how to operate the car, nor because we have learned how to fix or reconfigure it, but to show that we understand the traffic laws in our country and can abide by them. In most places, you can legally drive a vehicle on your own property (not a public road) without a license.

      IMO, computers are becoming more like answering machines, stereos, TVs... household appliances, at least in the minds of the general public. Yes, they're MUCH more complex than any other appliance. But if the public is comparing their computer with their toaster or TV, they're going to want to be able to just use it, or at least its basic functions, right out of the box, just like their other appliances.

    3. Re:Confirms all Linux problems by Tidan · · Score: 1
      You hit the nail right on the head. Sure, the best way to learn and master Linux is by sitting down for a few hours every day and "playing" - the same was true when we all learned DOS or Windows 3.1.

      But not everyone has that luxury! Many people are looking for a quicker method of learning. As a person who grew up on DOS and Windows, I have found the following thoughts come up in my head when spending some time learning Linux:

      1. Argh! Why am I wasting my time with this! I can already do this on Microsoft and it would only take 10 seconds!

      2. Argh!! I've been at it for 2 hours now and it still doesn't work! I'm going back to my old system...

      These two frustrations are often what kills any motivation to learn - especially when the quick response you get from most Linux guru's is read the manual, or keep playing with it until you figure it out. Again - this is the best way to get a complete understanding, but someone who is looking to convert to another operating system must have strong reasons for making such large time investments. We all know that doing anything on Linux will probably be just as fast if not faster, but the hitch is that it's only faster if you know how to do it or can learn how to do it quickly! It's up to the Linux community to:

      A. Prove beyond any doubt that their product is that much better that it's worth the user's time. and/or...

      B. Make it so easy to learn and offer enough support to make the transition as quick and painless (or even entertaining) as possible.

      The way to do that is with books that can compress all those pains that we've gone through and make the transition to Linux as fluid as possible. In about any operating system there are two ways of doing something: The GUI way, or the manual way. The big difference between Linux and Microsoft (IMHO) is that Microsoft makes the GUI way work easier and more reliably. Linux seems to be moving towards this extreme, but right now to get something configured properly without having to edit text files is much less likely on a Linux distro than with a Microsoft OS. Not to say that this is a bad thing, but this is the main reason that learning Linux can be so much more involved and why it takes more effort - you need to learn what the GUI does instead of taking it for granted.

      Anyway, that's my $0.04 (...inflation)

      --
      free ipod? yeah.
    4. Re:Confirms all Linux problems by infernow · · Score: 1
      When you first started using a computer, did you learn how to use it via the CLI? Probably not. The main problem i see with switching to *NIXes is that most of the converts aren't used to the CLI in Windows, let alone Linux. The first step has to be to a nice (or at least decent) GUI so that the user isn't completely frustrated by every little thing.

      I wanted to learn DOS, but i didnt do it by booting to the prompt. I mucked about with the terminal in Windows so that when i was frustrated, i could just go do what i wanted using Windows Explorer.

      So to restate what i have said (like all good CprE majors trying to use English do): it's possible to learn to use the CLI if that's all you have, but it's much nicer to have a GUI to fall back on when you're tired of the CLI.

      --

      that that is is that that is not is not

    5. Re:Confirms all Linux problems by Quazion · · Score: 1

      My first Computer only had a CLI ;) (Acron Electron)

      But that doesnt matter, i like a GUI much better unless they start messing with system stuff since its to hard to overview configuration in multiple tabs then it is on one long text file...but thats just me maybe...

      I computer should be a tool, but it isnt its hardcore computer science stuff atleast my expierences with for me very simple computer problems as two hardware pieces using the same IRQ to Communicate over can bug a User for weeks.
      Its not the just the Interface that needs a upgrade its the whole "Computer" concept.

      Personaly since i bought a iBook i like to advert Apple computes for users since they still sell in "one" piece with software that works with the hardware. Like i was used with my Amiga and Atari Computers.

  151. why ask slashdot at all . . . . by kraksmoka · · Score: 2, Informative
    just try the books for Dummies series. i'm not bein sarcastic, but have found them to be oustanding. PHP/MySQL for dummies has more than made up for the cover price, many times over.

    i'm just waiting for become a billionaire like bill gates for dummies . . . . .

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  152. Aren't you the guy they call "Lefty". . . by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because you thought using the bandsaw should just be "intuitive?"

    By the way, you're right, Linux isn't intuitive, neither is Windows. People have to learn Windows. They use, ummmmm, books to do it. Go into Borders and look at all the books on Windows explaining how "intuitive" it is.

    "Ok, now click this, pull down that, go over to the other thing, don't ask us what it's called, we don't know either, now stick out your left elbow and scratch the cat with your right foot and chant . . . "Please don't crash again.""

    Yeah, intuitive. No book reading needed here. The Video Professor must be some sort of philanthropist paying for all those ads, just for something to occupy his time, because "Windows is intuitive."

    This is the single biggest load of malarky that anyone ever says about Windows, or Macs for that matter. Windows and Mac OS's are *learned.* They only seem intuitive because you've already learned them. My 70 year old mom learned KDE alongside her Mac OS8. She prefers KDE.

    It's "intuitive." Or at least it was *after she had learned it for a while.*

    *Linux* just works. Most of the Windows books at Borders, however, are about how to make Windows work despite itself because it's "intuitive."

    Linux *at the command line* is arcane, but just works. Always.

    English is arcane too but most one year olds manage to pick it up. They even resort to reading books by the time they're five or so. You should read one too. Maybe that install wouldn't have taken so long if you'ld read the bandsaw manual and had both hands to work with. My last install took about half an hour and consisted of putting the CD in the tray and clicking "Ok, whatever" a couple of times.

    Wish I could do that with Windows, but the Goddamned wizards puke on drivers all the time and keep asking for second floppies that don't exist because "Windows just works" and is "intuitive." To uninstall a program cleanly I had to hack the "intuitive" registry and to make the "Start" button do something as simple as change its label I had to hack the *binary code* of the GUI shell itself because Windows "just works" and is "intuitive."

    But at least people seem to have "that kind of patience" for this stuff.

    Well, actually, they don't. A study about stress in the workplace revealed that the majority of stress in the workplace these days came from their computers not working right, computers running Windows, which "just works" and is "intuitive."

    Am I anti MS? Damned straight. After more than a decade of being a loyal customer they damned well made me that way and they damned well deserve it.

    Am I anti Windows? No. I'm writing this under W98 right now.

    But it DON'T "just work." And it AIN'T "intuitive."

    Tell you what, use your remaining hand to crack a a book. I'd recommend you start with Vonnegut's "Welcome to the Monkey House." From there go on to reading the bloody manual. It might save your remaining hand. And get your kids bike assembled in time for Christmas-WITHOUT any "spare parts" left over.

    KFG

  153. Ease of Programming,especially games. by Razorviro · · Score: 0

    Chris, I've seen you on the TSS and I've learned a lot about linux from you. I think that your should show how easy it is to program in almost any language in Linux, versus all the time you would have to spend downloading stuff on windows to do the same job. For example show how easy it is write a tcl script, show off the python interpreter, or write a c++ program,compile, and test it. Show them some of the editors that come with Linux, such as emacs(my fav.),vi, and pico.
    If you really want to get there attention show them how to make a simple game, using sdl or ClanLib, and how they can simply recompile it to run on windows. I was just at gamedev.net and noticed they had an article on learning how to develop programs in Linux, with an emphasis on games.
    http://gamedev.net/reference/programming/f eatures/ linuxgamedev1/
    Keep up the good work.
    TSS Rules!

  154. Dumb questions! by ro5coe · · Score: 1

    The only way to learn *nix is by doing *nix. A book whetting one's appetite would be the classic by Neal Stephanson: In the Beginning was the Command Line. TV shows are a waste of time, tech tv is for losers, or for guys who like looking at Morgan's boobs. There are so many flavors of *nix and *BSD that are so easy to load and use, that any one incapable of jumping in and doing it is someone who ought to stay with the morons: AOL, Micro$oft, etc. Or maybe they just ought to die or something. Who needs 'em? I sure don't!

  155. "Running Linux" by xagon7 · · Score: 1

    Most useful and informative Linux book I have ever owned... aside from www.deja.com, man pages, and the how-to s

  156. HOWTOs by Hasie · · Score: 5, Informative
    I learnt Linux about two years ago by reading HOWTOs. I even went out and bought one of those enormous "Learn Linux" books and I have almost never opened it. The HOWTOs are nice because they tell you how to do a common task, or give an introduction to a topic. Start with the "DOS/Win to Linux HOWTO" and then just read the ones for the stuff you need to do (like "Printing HOWTO").


    Oh yes, and find a Linux user you can ask for help when you get stuck!

    1. Re:HOWTOs by jackstack · · Score: 1

      This is total bullshit and goes to show how many people can be so guillible and take things as they are without questioning them. *Many* howtos are out of date and POORLY WRITTEN. Information is disjointed, incomplete, and written without the likely audience in mind. Call me a punk... but I KNOW what good instructional writing is and many HOWTO's do NOT qualify.

  157. Best linux book for my buck by thpook · · Score: 1

    Paul Sheer's Linux Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition, available online at http://wwwacs.gantep.edu.tr/linux/rute/ and a couple of other places.

  158. In Soviet Russia by UnixRevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linux reads books on how to use YOU!!

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  159. Missing two important points by Ektanoor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apart of any books you may read, the gurus that may advise you, the tons of information that you may get on Internet, there is two thing that are highly important to take into account.

    The first one is what you expect to find on Linux. You can be sure that you don't get the same thing as Windows. So any expectations should be put in the typical rule of economics: "You choose something for the price of loosing the other choices". However, take into attention that this thing is more tricky than it seems. You may loose some present choices, which, in the moment you are now, may be very important for you. However nothing can be said about the potential of your choice. Here you may obtain some important personal victories or get such a slap in the face, that you will always flame Linux for the rest of your life. To avoid such desilusions, you should not only read books and news, but also take care to search for real goals in this world. Linux, and *NIX in general, is a world too vast and too amorphous to show you a direction. Here there are no arrows and signs asking where do you wanna go. You choose your path.

    But here enters the second important factor. On choosing your path, you will have to manage this new system. And this is not so simple as it seems. For the last years, a lot was done, that approached the *NIX world of interfaces to the more common Windows GUI. But, still the *NIX never has lost its rawness in the bottom line. Besides, it keeps paths of development that go quite far from what you may expect in Windows or some other systems. The *NIX world is a mix of rational conservatism and risky progressism. Coming here, brings a feeling much like the one that some people may find on changing cars of different countries. Imagine that you go from an confortable american car, for which you are offered service, maintenance, features and choose a rough jeep where even the driver sits in the "wrong" side. Worse, this "jeep" is much like those weird australian cars that made so much fame in certain stories. A mix of an old car and some fresh new technological mess. With exception of a certain skeleton, everything else is what you put into it. You may find a mechanic or some service that may check and maintain some general parts, but which will surely not help in everything you have there. By changing cars in this way, you will get some sort of psychological shock. You will get some feelings about the positive and negative effects of this change, you will be surely forced to change some driving habits, and you will surely need to know, more deeply, the mechanics of the monster you drive with. However, there can be a big danger here. Before you get real acquainted to the positive or negative effects of your move, despair may overcome you, and you quit early in the race. That's what happens to 90% of the people who try Linux. Unfortunately, the majority does it in a very superficial way, much like installing a new game, so, their critics cannot be taken seriously. The *NIX world is rough and wild. It needs time to reach the level of flexibility you may need to feel confortable in it. So think, that no matter the books and howtos, you may need some good months of patience before you can make a wise and weighed judgement.

    And remember - negative results are also results. There can be lots of them before reaching a certain level of practice and knowledge.

  160. A very nice piece has been written about this... by Erpo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... The people who contacted you want to know how to get started using GNU/Linux, not Linux.

    I'm not writing this to berate you or get into some political issue about giving GNU credit, although I do think that's important. (Actually, I still slip up and write Linux instead of GNU/Linux, or NIC card instead of NIC or network interface card. [hey, it happens ;)] ) I'm writing to underscore one of the problems that your viewers will come up against: there are too many distros. Well, ok, that's a value judgement on my part, but in reality your viewers are going to be confused when they hear there's more than one GNU/Linux. In terms of picking a good beginner's resource, my only advice would be (this comes from experience):

    The fastest, most effective way to turn a user off to GNU/Linux and send him back to his Windows or Mac box is to tell him that the easiest way to do any task is through a CLI.

    Avoid books that say that if you can.

    Yes, I know that's the truth sometimes (one of the great parts about *nix is that everything is scriptable, and scripts are great tools for getting things done), but Joe User wants to do everything graphically. The problem is that Joe User is already very comfortable with a GUI, and so even if there were a task that he wanted to do on a regular basis that would be easier on a command line, the extra work and annoyance of having to get used to a CLI would more than balance out the gain in productivity.

  161. I always liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Linux System Administration: A User's Guide" by Marcel Gagne as a text aimed at a beginning audience.

  162. Have you ever had to handle these type questions? by jesus_of_the_trailer · · Score: 1

    I've spent hours on IRC in #linux on various networks, and it's usually considered a general discussion channel, and not a help forum. Mostly all we get is people coming in and _demanding_ we help them with some inane problem that we have no real reason to help with, because it _is_ a discussion channel, not a help forum.

    Oftentimes, these are questions that could easily be answered by using man, or reading the relevant howto documentation. If you've never read the "Asking Smart Questions HOWTO", maybe you should... it's not meant as a howto guide on asking a question per se, more of a reference on how to not be annoying when asking for free help.

    Those of us who do spend our time on IRC answering questions, or moderating forums, we don't do this because we get paid, we do it because we enjoy being around people of similar mindset. The only thing that most of us ask is a bit of common courtesy, don't come into channel, or onto a forum and start telling everyone how stupid they are because they don't want to tell you the proper syntax for some program when they're busy with more complex questions.

    That is what RTFM is for... if you want to get help, arm yourself with a little info, and then when someone tells you to RTFM, you can say, "I already did, and I don't understand... how exactly does it work?", and someone's more likely to help, than if you just start talking about how you're not stupid, and all you want is help with this or that.

    Don't ever _expect_ something for free... you won't get it.

  163. Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knoppix is a great way to get familiar with Linux without the effort of installing a distro.

  164. I dont know really. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    Myself as a geek i always throw any manual out the window upon purchase. I have learned linux the hard way and even if i now manage linux pretty well i could have learned it in much shorter time. Ofcourse experience cant be read but many of the pitfalls can be avoided by reading a newbie book.

    As of showing linux off at the telly it wont have to be anything special. just show that you can surf, play music, movies, write calcs and letters etc. Everything you do on windows you can do in linux.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  165. Peter Norton's Complete Guide To Linux by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 2

    Peter Norton's Complete Guide To Linux was the only book I used when I decided to learn linux. It is a little bit outdated now (the version of Redhat mentioned in it is 6.0), but it took me from "never used linux/unix in my life" to "set up own web, dns, ftp, and mail servers" in a matter of days. It is concise, informative, and sometimes humorous ("comprehensive sendmail books can be used as boat anchors", reads the chapter on sendmail). However, I would not go so far as to recommend it on the show unless a new version comes out.

  166. what every linux user should use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best thing is to not get started down the wrong path at all. It's best to run FreeBSD instead. Check out www.freebsd.org.

  167. props to daxbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.linuxisforbitches.com

    love the xinetd rant!

  168. linux books by killerface · · Score: 0

    I think that instead of actual books you could send them to the linux documentation project where there are some Very good beginner guides Thats how I learned it

  169. I know this was a joke, but it can work. by Artifex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The deal is, a lot of people worry about functionality while learning Linux or a BSD, etc. With VMWare, you can still run your old MS-Windows software in a little box, and gradually move to *nix-based tools.

    When I was working high-level tech support for a major ISP, a small number of us got approval from our boss (and pissed off the IT department) to reformat our workstations, install Red Hat, and then drop the demo version of VMWare in on a trial basis, installing NT 4.0 (it was a while ago, but a lot of shops STILL use it, you know).

    We could use things like Matt's Traceroute and other stuff that we normally had to ssh into production machines for, we didn't have to deal with those stupid NET MSGs from the lower level teams, and we could still use Microsoft Office apps (we had the licenses already) to fill out our expense reports and use IE for whatever internal webservers had been built using ActiveX or other IE-only stuff.

    I think if you show this type of thing, you can get people hooked. Especially if you take a windows-crasher test program and show it running under WinXP vs. WinXP-in-VMWare. BSODs become a joke, a chance to say "silly old MS" and restart the virtual PC.

    The accountants for small businesses should like the fact that they won't have to burn the money they paid for licenses, like I mentioned in my example. I think IT people will still grumble because for many people IT = MS (MCSE drones, etc.) and they don't want to have to learn new stuff and support it.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  170. My recommendations. by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    Here's one that's available for free on the web.

    /. wrote about a book made just for new users here

    Some books, like this one come with a distribution CD-ROM.

    Good luck learning Linux!

    1. Re:My recommendations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, you'd get +10 FUNNY!

  171. Computer Book Works Bookstore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative



    When mentioning computer books, I freak at the thought. Just like when I was in college, the prices of college texts, and computer texts are too rich for my blood.

    Until I discovered Computer Book Works. Too good to be true. They have new titles at decent discounts. But once a new edition comes out, or if the title is at all old, out comes the price hatchet!

    This most awesome bookstore has good Gnu/Linux books, certification books, programming books, any kind of computer books, and most of them are 50% off or more!

    The Coriolis Exam Prep General Linux I book is 75% off cover price. The orange book (LPIC Prep Kit, forgot the rest of the title and author, also known as the orange book), another Linux LPI exam book which is used by one of the nearby LUGS for their Gnu/Linux intro course is 75% off.

    The Programming Perl 2nd edition is 50% off or more (I think I got my copy at 75% off), and the Perl 1 class I took is still teaching out of the second edition, but you can use the third edition for the class if you like wasting money.

    I've purchased Samba books, dns and bind books, other certification books, IBM red books, html, unix, and so many other titles, all 50% to 75% off the cover price, and all still useful.

    Last time I checked, they didn't have a web site. Their info is:

    Computer Book Works 78 Reade St., NYC NY (near city hall)

    call them for zip code

    212-385-dont-use-555-the-fives-1616

    and their email is: bookmanJV@mindspring.com

    tip: take out the two caps (JV)from the above email address, and replace the two capital letters with a single number, 3, and you have the correct you know what.

    They don't have a web site, but they do ship UPS. So you can call and order by phone (which is more secure than internet). And they are a good bunch of people there. Not a huge publicly traded company. Email them for what you are looking for, and ask the price. You'll be pleased with the response. It's the cheapest I've found for "used" or older edition books. Cheaper than other online sources.

    This is one great store. Very highly recommended.

  172. Your all gonna laugh by cheshiremackat · · Score: 1

    The way I got started into linux was to buy one of those "for dummies books"... I think it was redhat 7.1... Anyway if you go to Borders or B&N you can pick one up CHEAP... and you get a pressed CD of the distro... yes I know you can burn one for free but I find CD-Rs to scrach too easy so a pressed CD is definately worth the $15... What to do on T.V... how about install Linux... just show people how /fast/easy it is... I read somewhere that Mandrake takes 20 minutes or so to load... Sooooo install the program on the show... put in the CD and then do the rest of the show... come back at the end and show people how /easy/fast it is to get Linix on your system... Just like on FoodTV ... start the install and do a swapout @ the end... would be cool for people to see that it is not complicated/or require lots of CLI tinkering _CMK

    --
    Bad spellers of the world untie!
  173. Getting started with custom kernels by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You can get the most out of your system if you build a custom kernel. This will also allow you to update your kernel before your distro supplies a new binary, apply bug-fix patches sooner, and support drivers and other features that aren't part of the main kernel distribution.

    My article Why We Should All Test the New Linux Kernel gives some tips on how to get started building new kernels (although it emphasizes testing the development patches).

    The #kernelnewbies IRC channel has a website at www.kernelnewbies.org that you will find helpful.

    And finally there is of course The Linux Kernel HOWTO.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  174. Show them a.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..Beowulf cluster.

    Seriously. For the pure geek "how cool is that" factor, a beowulf cluster cannot be topped. Heck, even I want one - and I'm a loony FreeBSD fanboy.

  175. Linux books by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Informative

    My first Linux book was Linux Unleashed, 1st edition, published by Sams Publishing. This book included Slackware with it. I'm afraid to think what verion, as this book is (c) 1995. It was good for a start. It's been read, borrowed, and stolen over the years. Hopefully it has a good home now.

    I still highly recommend Slackware for a distribution. It's what we use on all our servers, and my workstations (Home, Work, and Laptop)

    I bought a co-worker Linux System Administration: A User's Guide by Marcel Gagne. Published by Addison Wesley. Flipping through it, this seems like a very good book. It seems to be working out. He's coming to me with very intelligent questions after reading chapters, rather than "What do I do at the prompt".

    After the Unleashed book, I personally got into the O'Reilly books. If you do this, go to the store with the company credit card, it'll be expensive. Oddly enough, most bosses are ok with paying for books, even when they're being tight with equipment. You can't get a new $5 CPU fan, but you can spend $500 on books. Hmmmm.. Well, buy more books. :) Borders and Barnes & Noble frequently have sales on previous edition books. If you flip through both, sometimes you'll see there were only very subtle changes, or chapters which aren't important to you. For a $40 price difference, it's worth getting the older one. :)

    O'Reilly Essential Systems Administration

    Learning
    the Unix Operating System (got it for my girlfriend, so she'd understand what I was doing all night)

    vi Pocket Reference. It seems none of my coworkers could use vi before I got to this office. Now they're all using it. [esc][esc]:wq!

    Programming Perl. If you're going to play with Unix, you should learn Perl.

    Then you should read up on what you're working with. If you're networking or on the Internet, TCP/IP is good to know.

    TCP/IP Network Administration

    DNS and BIND very definately, unless you want to be clueless about what happens between typing in "yahoo.com" and it coming up in your browser. Having a good understanding there definately helps you debug problems.

    Sendmail This is the perfect book to spin your head, and leave you with a headache for months. But it's the topic, not the book, that's so complicated. If it didn't do absolutely everything, I'm sure it would be simpler to use.

    O'Reilly has a lot of great books.

    "Learning" books are for beginners.

    "Nutshell" books are usually to help you figure out something if you don't really know it.

    The rest of the books have various degrees of learning to them. On my desk at work, for O'Reilly books, I have 3 different PERL books, the JavaScript book, and a few others that I reference on a regular basis.

    I recommend going to book stores, and flipping through everything they have (restock it to the proper places). See what your comprehension level is. If you have no clue what they're talking about, you need an easier book. If you almost understand, buy it, read it, and then share it with a friend (especially on the company expense account! hehe).

    When you're ready to get out of the books, and into the real world, the most valuable reference you'll ever have is dejanews.com. If you don't know an answer, search it there. Probably someone in the last 20 years has already asked it. It's the quickest way to look smart and impress your friends, even if you're stupid. :)

    Having the stack of O'Reilly books is always good though. I recently changed offices (same company), and while riding in the elevator, I was offered a job because I looked educated and had a big stack of O'Reilly books in my arms.. Little did she know that was only 1/3 of them. The rest were still in my car..

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  176. Don't forget RUTE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This marvel from Paul Sheer is perfect for beginners and not so linux enthusiasts.

    RUTE stands for Rute User Tutorial and Exposition.

    It has an online version and you can buy the book as well.

    It's well written, a bit long but everything is useful.I've been in the IT industry for almost 16 years and I learned a lot reading this book.

    You can find it at http://rute.2038bug.com/rute.html.gz

  177. In Denmark and Norway by NKJensen · · Score: 2

    you should try the site:

    http://www.sslug.dk

    which is a goldmine of nicely arranged information about Linux.

    Well, it't in Danish which is very similar to the "Bokmål" of Norway.

    --
    -- From Denmark
  178. The Unix Administration Handbook Third Edition by Quazion · · Score: 2

    http://www.admin.com/

    They also have a Linux version,
    i personaly think this book rocks.

    I bought it after a review on slashdot,
    let me find it: http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/10/10/ 146252&mode=thread&tid=130

    Have Fun

  179. Babani Books... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    Bernard Babani Publishing do *fantastic* books on a wide range of subjects. They tend to be inexpensive beginner-to-intermediate level, and they do a couple of books like "Linux for Windows Users", and "Using Linux the Easy Way". Pretty much all their books are small paperbacks, and cost about ?6-?7. They start at around ?2 for the cheapest, and the dearest I've seen was the Mindstorms book for ?13. They're pretty cheaply printed, but seem to last well - I've got a copy of "Electronic Projects for Beginners" which I got when I was first learning about electronics, around 23 years ago (yep, I was a geek when I was six).

    The authors tend to be well-known (at least in the UK) technical writers and journalists, like Robert Penfold and Noel Kantaris, who's "Introduction to C Programming" is still probably one of the best guides to getting started with C I've read.

    I've bought some quite expensive books on computing, and electronics, and been utterly disappointed with them. I've always found these guys to be consistently helpful and well-written, with a nice "light" style. I should point out that I'm in no way associated with Babani Publishing. I'm just a very satisfied customer.

  180. Books rule! by ctar · · Score: 2

    I'm a BIG believer in tech books...I'm only 4 years out of school (non-technical), and working as a completely self-taught network engineer, using Unix/Linux regularly, and starting to get into C and Perl...

    "The Unix Programming Environment" by Kernighan (of K&R) and Pike, is a great intro to Unix. The book gets very complicated very quickly, but the first 2.5 chapters are VERY basic, and give you a great foundation in how unix, the filesystem, and the shell works...Get it used and cheap on Ebay.

    I started with "Learning Red Hat Linux" (O'Reilly) which may be outdated now, and of course "Running Linux" (O'Reilly) which is a great intro and resource.

    After you've got the basics down, I highly recommend doing LFS, or Gentoo (or both), as they hold your hand every step of the way, and even if you only understand 10% of what you've just done, it is guaranteed to fill in some conceptual knowledge gaps that don't get filled by reading a book, or even just screwing around on your own...

  181. Then again.... by thumperward · · Score: 1

    notepad's Help Topics doesn't cover keyboard usage, how to access the menu, the importance of file extensions...

    Does an operating system need to come with a 'use this having just climbed down from the trees'-level help system built in? Is it not reasonable to expect that the user DOES have access to a 'unix for dummies' book before attempting to use it? It's not as if a car's manual tells you how to drive...

    - Chris

    1. Re:Then again.... by Malcolm+MacArthur · · Score: 1
      Does an operating system need to come with a 'use this having just climbed down from the trees'-level help system built in?

      No. Just centralise it. See VMS, and its HELP command.

      Not only is everything centralised in one place, but the first two pages of help describe how help works, how to navigate through HELP, and even suggests some starting points if you are a TOTAL newbie!

      I said it before: man pages suck.

  182. Learn Linux in a Day, take a lifetime to Master it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I picked up Linux in 1996 and after six years of using it constantly instead of windows I can say I feel like just this year I've begun to become proficient with it and with modifying its kernel and modules.

    How do you show off Linux on TV? How the heck do you show off any computer on TV? You need to show off end-user benifits. Try showing off how customizable Linux is, show off GUI's since it's TV. Show off CrossOver and other apps that help people to "CrossOver" to Linux.

    Things you can talk about but can't show: Linux is free as in speech... saving companies from being tied to a single vendor. One vendor dies and all its customers die with it.

    Linux can't be killed. If you are a small company, you can have custom software that you never have to worry about a big company pulling the plug on or wrecking support for. Linux spells security and security for long-term investments. Other OSes are at the mercy of the vendor. You could end up like all the SGI Irix users too... Linux and GNU won't die.

    If you have to you could maintain your own distro of Linux. That's appealing if you are a big company. If you are small, you can take solice in all the other small companies out there and the community of Linux users.

    However, Linux requires a gigantic investment in people. You need good solid System Admins and you need them to be knowledgeable. Nothing will substitute for an experienced SysA. You can get by with novice programmers but you can't get by with novice System Administrators.

  183. Knoppix by chris_sawtell · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't really give somebody new to unix or linux any idea of what it's all about without giving them a real hands-on experience. The best safe way to do that is with a Live CD. Knoppix is one which actually works. Demonstrate it on your show.

  184. Re:MODS ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it got called a troll because the last link, rather than to a linux administrator's tome, is a book about anal sex. It doesn't help that your name has "goat" in it; you know how sensitive slashdotters are to any mention of goats and anal sex in the same post.

  185. This is the only book they need to start by neognomic · · Score: 1

    http://www.informit.com/isapi/product_id~{D2DC4A4F -FD63-414C-9140-6E8C603017C6}/st~{E4CD8850-0597-41 77-B459-A48B8F5332B9}/session_id~{544BBC32-9B38-42 B1-A9B7-D6D7A65C899A}/content/index.asp
    and then type " man bash " at any CLI prompt.

    BUT there are more there to read for free(online books ).

    And, if that is not enough, the fast readers can read any of these FOURTY Linux booksfor free during a 14 day trial or take the Safari online trip and spend more time(&money).

    InformIT rocks.

    1. Re:This is the only book they need to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      I took a look at all the books you mentioned and linked to at informit. Starting a newbie on books printed in 1999 and 2000 is not the way to go. While the unix, bash, shell scripting and vi books may be ok, the Gnu/Linux beginner books, especially those that use one or more distros as examples, should not be purchased if they were published in 1999 and 2000. Gnu/Linux has come a LONG way since then. There have been too many changes.

      You are also talking about electronic books. While I have dozens and dozens of electronic books on disk, including some of the ones from informit, they simply can't compete with a hard copy dead tree book.

      I've even gone to the trouble of transferring from pdf to ps, then reformatting into smaller type, less whitespace, better paragraphs, then attempting to print it out. Even with my cost per page below $0.02, with me paying for toner (refurbished=cheap), paper, and electricity, not including the cost of the binder, it still doesn't pay to print out the electronic version.

      This is coming from someone who stubbornly refused to pay for text books in college, bought a copy machine instead, used refurbished toner cartridges, and photocopied books from other students.

      Go to Computer Book Works, find recently published titles for 50-75% off the cover price, and put the books to good use. Keep the electronic versions as backup and for reference for any books you don't need to really study from. Or to try before you buy. But find a better source for newer books. informit's books are simply too old, excepting those mentioned above.

    2. Re:This is the only book they need to start by neognomic · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the comments. And, very good and observant ones too.
      I, too, like the feel of a good hardback book and the quick and easy reference it can provide, assuming that I have read it and know where to look. I do get tired of online reading...

      You're correct that InformIT does have _free_ books that are old. Linux _has_ come a long way since even 2000 and, consequently, some of the information is dated. The principles seem to be the same though, i.e., ls still works like ls did a long time ago and grep still greps, shell is still a shell(which most MSWin.x users don't know anything about), etc. ...
      I bought "Running Linux" a couple of years ago- worst purchase I have ever made in a book. Except for a single page of reference to a couple of the VIM commands, it has helped me ZERO. Others really like it but I found the (then) *new* edition to be full of _very_ outdated info. I could have gotten the same info from InformIT for free. In fact, I did, later.
      InformIT's list of free Linux books has decreased considerably. It had more than 2 dozen at one time but over the last couple of years, the "free" books have been cut quite a bit, mostly to eliminate books like "Installing RedHat 6.x" that have little to no value. They have kept some (not all) of the free books that are somewhat timeless. I think it was an editor's decision to remove the old-er books and that they might be at a low-ebb at this time - not sure.
      It is also a financial issue which is where Safari takes over. Safari provides ~40 Linux specific books, many published this year and some within the last few months. All of those can be 'previewed' before purchase. Some pre-release books are also available. E.g., last year I read a great deal of Peter Norton's book on securing Linux _before_ it ever hit the press.

      My major point is that Mandrake Linux has become so very easy to install and use that, with their manuals, a nOObie really does not need to buy the books first; buy the books _after_ finding out what they really need to know to get better at using Linux. Also, I was suggesting to read/preview as much as possible before purchasing any book (or software).
      MandrakeSoft's manuals/documentation have come a long way in the last couple of years towards being more newbie-friendly. They still need work but they are working on them and the docs improve with each release.

      Thanks again for the comments.

      ***

  186. slackware. seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    best way to get started in linux is to try out slackware. explore the the cli. install some programs not needing X then install X and apps.
    this will give an idea of un*x and the freedom/power. especially for summun coming from MS windows world this is the best method.

  187. Try the Redhat 8.0 boxed distro by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Redhat 8.0 retail box set comes with Excellent Documentation, and is quite specific without being overly technical. As an added bonus, it also comes with a CD full of documentation.

    Chris, I watch the ScreenSavers on TechTV quite often, and saw the Quake server demo. Qudos to TechTV to give it a try. For a good topic for a show, most folks want to see what Linux can DO! Show them Ximian Evolution and Mozilla, OpenOffice, and TuxRacer. If you have time, do a demo of the Redhat setup agent, and show off Redhat Network (sorta like Windows Update). The new GUI RPM Package Manager and other GUI config tools are nice looking and will display well.

    A dual boot setup would be nice to show off also.{I set up a dual boot Win98/RH8 for a newbie laptop user and they have been very happy to boot into Linux, and don't really bother with Windows anymore.}

    Anyhow, love the TechTV, please say Happy Holidays to Patrick and Leo and Megan and Morgan and Yoshi and Martin and Sumi and Adam and Jennifer and Michaela and Chris and Erica and Alex and Becky and . .did I forget anyone?

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
  188. Tips of a usefull nature by Jus+ad+Bellum · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have a great idea.

    Fly me down to the show and get me on it. I'm entertaining and have, as they say in the biz, an excellent stage presance (speeling eror knot entended). Plus I don't lose my train of thought in uncomfortable situations.

    My knowledge of the modern world is vast and plentiful. I am the very image of a modernary general (useless pop trivia full of I am (I can actually do Yoda/Kermit/Marvin the Martian's voice to)).

    vague_knowledge(lisp(i_have)))

    I am the next Bill Nye, minus the TV of course... JAB War, good god y'all what is it good for? Huugh, absolutly nothin'!

  189. I like this by malana-cream · · Score: 1


    I like this book alot: The Linux Cookbook

    It's fully available online. Not a step by step guide for newbies, but it's a good read, if you search for help on everyday-issues.

  190. Info2HTML by bockman · · Score: 2
    GNU info is an abomination. The interface to it is just totally unusable and unwieldy.

    Last time I checked, both Gnome and KDE Help systems where able to render info pages in an HTMLish way using info2html or something similar.
    It makes the reading of info data much less painful.

    A documentation standard for *ix would be nice. But consider that the way you present your information has to change according to the target audience.You can't use the same _semantic_ structure for a tutorial and a reference manual.

    --
    Ciao

    ----

    FB

    1. Re:Info2HTML by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      Yeah, using Konqueror to browse info pages is infinitely preferable to GNU info. But the formatting still leaves something to be desired. It's all in a monospace font, with ascii art section separators and no use of bold or italics except in the page header and the redundant "Menu" text that preceeds every list of links. It doesn't even use the browser's text flowing capabilities, everything is hard wrapped at 80 columns! It reads like an ascii text file with the addition of an incomprehensible header (like #(info)Getting Started#(info)Top#(info)Creating an Info File) and a few other links here and there. I don't know if this is the fault of the info format or info2html, but geez. It could stand a little improvement. OTOH, KDE's manpage renderer is quite nice. If info2html rendered info pages like that, info would be a bit more tolerable. But there's still the issues of searching and the lack of a standard structure for info documentation.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    2. Re:Info2HTML by Guilly · · Score: 0

      You're right.

      Using yelp (the GNOME help application) you can browse info pages quite easily... it looks at least as good as if they were made in HTML.

  191. Retrospective book wish list + some advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    0. The manual of your distribution
    Skip through it, check what you need to get your system up and running. Don't try to get too much out of it. Most CLI tasks are better described in the following books.

    1. Learning the UNIX operating system (O'Reilly)
    This one is very basic and covers the things you have to know before you can actually do anything.
    There are surely free manuals which provide the same information, but this book is IMHO easier to read and contains all necessary information for this level.

    2. Learning the vi Editor (O'Reilly)
    While some people dislike vi very much, it still has two big advantages compared to other editors.
    First, it is available (almost) everywhere everytime. Second, it allows very fast and comfortable editing when you get used to it.
    There is no need to read the whole book at once, just grab the basics and practice a lot.

    3. UNIX Power Tools (O'Reilly)
    This is the book I wish I had have after I had mastered the basics. It gives you some really neat tricks to actually get some work done in a clever way.
    There is again no need to read the whole thing at once, just skip through it and pick out the interesting parts.
    My tip is chapter 4, Organizing Your Home Directory.
    And don't use the CD too much. Almost everything on it is already available on your Linux system.

    -

    Here you should feel pretty comfortable with your Linux system (at least on the command line).
    The next thing is to decide which way(s) to go.
    I think there are four big directions:

    1. Free software
    Learn what free software and open source are about, where they come from and what their goals are. More political are software patents and things like the DMCA and similar laws.
    Don't forget to build your own opinion ;-)

    2. Applications
    LaTeX, Emacs, Gnome, ...
    whatever you want or need. Almost everything can be accomplished with Linux but you should not try to do it the way it is done on other systems.
    Do it the UNIX way and you will have an easy time.

    3. Developing
    Shell, sed and awk, Perl, C, Assembler, ...
    This is a huge area in which free software is really strong and gives you a wide variety of possibilities.

    4. Administration
    First learn to configure your own system.
    If like it you can try other UNIX systems which will help you in understanding your own system better (and any other computer system FWIW).
    When you are interested in how your browser or your email client works, you can try to set up your own server. This will perhaps lead you to network administration, which is again a huge area for itself.

    Take your time and have fun.

    -

    About my history with Linux

    I learned Linux the hard way. I started with SuSE 6.1 and its manual. I didn't know anything about UNIX or the Internet and there was no local guru.
    Most people in my region only knew rumours about this whole "strange" UNIX stuff and associated it only with mainframes, i.e. things that are far out of reach for normal people.
    So, as I had nobody to ask and just learned to use the Internet (I didn't even know that mailing lists exist), I had to depend on the SuSE manual which was very helpful when configuring something but didn't give much information on how to actually use this "cool" new system productively.

    Now, some years later, I can administer several different UNIX systems, applications and whole networks (at least I hope so, as this was my education and is my job).
    And now, I am the one whom others ask questions about Linux (actually it feels like they ask me about anything that somehow works digitally).

    I think if somebody had told me to use these books, I would have needed half the time and it surely would have been much more fun.

    -

    PS.
    The O'Reilly books mentioned (and some others) are available as the UNIX CD Bookshelf.

  192. My Personal Path by tacocat · · Score: 1

    I started with some Que or Sybex Linux book, I think it was one of the Unleashed series. But it had insanely simple step by step instructions. Mind you, at the time I had been a windows user since DOS 2 and had never seen a Unix machine before. It was these instructions that got me past the problems of:

    1. how do you list files (dir / ls)
    2. how do you remove files (del / rm)
    3. similarly, how do you move, copy, rename, backup... All the little stuff

    After this (about 3 weeks) I got a slackware installation and used that, with the online docs and HOWTO for about 2 years. Then I went Debian and have stayed

    I would not recommend Slackware to a newbie. I would recommend it to someone who wanted to learn about Linux. There is a difference.

    I have the O'Reilly Running Linux book. I use it rarely. I do not have a RedHat installation and therefore most of it is not applicable to my environment. I've tried RedHat on several occassions and it's not for me.

    The How-To's are really excellent. Once you get past the stage of moving files around, I would introduce them to the How-To's. The "Learning in 24 hours" series is too shallow to have any real value other than to make a sale as a quick fix.

  193. Command line _could_ be very user friendly by bockman · · Score: 2
    Remember the computers shown in the movies, before script writers learned about GUI? You just tell the computer what to do in plain english and the computer answers in the same way.Would you call that not user-friendly? (I'm not talking about being fast and productive, for which plain language may be cumbersome).

    Even without all that AI, the command line could be made much more user-friendly. What is more user friendly : use the mouse (a most unintuitive device) to double-click (what?) on an icon (uh?) that try to represent an interconnected globe, or just type "Web Browser" ?
    True, the *ix command-line tools are conceived for expert usage and in an epoch when not typing two or three extra characters was seen as a great advantage. However, with alias, scripts and maybe a user-oriented shell integrated in a graphical environnment, the command line could become a real friend for computer newbies.

    --
    Ciao

    ----

    FB

  194. Don't forget the HOWTO's by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    Howto's were (and still are) a great way to learn about linux. That's how I did it. But I'm afraid you'll allways have to be interested in comuters to use Linux. If you're not, just write down what you want to do (read mail, surfing), let someone else install linux for you, and let him explain how things work. Otherwise, I'm afraid Linux will look too intimidating.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  195. useful... by hairmare · · Score: 1

    like switching to vim after years of saving docs with alt-d-s in notepad?

  196. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You learn something new every day!

  197. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  198. A Few Books That Keep the Beginner in Mind by cascadefx · · Score: 2
    I would recommend a few titles. These are all geared toward the beginner (some more than others), but they give a very solid foundation and even mild guru's can learn a thing or two from them:

    1. Unix Made Easy: Unix and Linux Basics & Beyond by John Muster; George T. Charbak; Lyssa Wald: A step by step walk thru (with easy to follow exercises and explanations) of working with the Unix/Linux command line. It also includes a bit on working with X-Windows. A really good "first-time-user" book that hits the fundementals in an approachable way.
    2. Practical Guide to Linux by Mark G. Sobell: Along the lines of Unix Made Easy with a little more explanation and fewer hands on actvities. Still good for new comers to the whole Linux/UNIX world.
    3. UNIX for the Impatient (2nd Edition)
      by Paul W. Abrahams, Bruce Larson:
      Older book meant for literate computers looking (or forced) to get their feet wet with Unix. The tone is nice because it doesn't talk down to you like most "beginner" books do. Highly recommended.


    4. Finally,

    5. Linux: The Textbook
      by Syed Mansoor Sarwar, Robert Koretsky, Syed Aqeel Sarwar:
      More along the lines of a college textbook, so it is thorough... but may be a bit dry for some people's taste (also large blocks of text...good and informative, but maybe a bit too long for most beginners). Check into the other books first and use this one to transition to O'Reilly texts meant for the experienced user.


    I hope these help...

  199. For new Linux users.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest problem for a windows user/developer when getting into the Linux world is understanding and changing config files. I found
    a solution and that is..

    www.webmin.com

  200. good books for learning Linux by Aodh · · Score: 1

    I tried two books, one was lame, the other pretty good. The 'learn Linux in Easy Steps' was written in a way that you needed to know how to use Linux before you started. I then tried the SAMS guide, 'Teach yourself Linux in 24 hours', which I found to be excellent for moving from knowing nothing to finding your way around comfortably (the title refers to the way there are 24 chapters, that take one hour to go through). The edition I bought came with Caldera.

  201. Slighty Off-Topic by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    I want to put Linux on a 166 32MB. It will be an X terminal running fvwm2 or twm. Not KDE or GNOME.

    Hard drive is relatively small so I want little bloat.
    What is the best linux dist for this type. I normally use freebsd but need linux on this box? Opinion.

    Mods: I posted with no bonus no need to mod me down :-)

  202. For those used to running MS networks: by banzai51 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Linux for Windows Administrators by Mark Minasi & Dan York

  203. dive right in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT caN'T be any worse than that infactdead payper liesense BugWear(tm) scam that you've been held hostage buy, for so long, can IT?

    you could have a gnu/linux/o-s home/office & website up buy nightfall, then learn about all feechurns of the brave gnu wwworld of open/honest communications/commerce, in your spare time. you could do that for little more than the price of a few books (which you might buy later anyway).

    you can only imagine our elation, after only 1 year in "business", being listed as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002(tm) , on some search motors. that's a different book. mod me up robbIE, everything's almost brand gnu DOWn here.

  204. TV Advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're making a TV advert for Linux you wouldn't bother trying to show all the cool individual software made for Linux. Instead u would just make some fun advertisement with a CG Tux in it and speak more generally about the benefits of a linux machine.

  205. probably redundant,but... by frozencesium · · Score: 1

    Running Linux 4 ed. and Learning Debian GNU/Linux however the debian book is availible only on-line. i found people new to linux can very easily manage with debian with this book as a refereance.

    let us also not forget Linux docs can be an invaluble reference for the newbie (and experianced alike ;-)

    -frozen

    --
    I'm not always the brightest pixel in the stream
  206. Online resources by TheTick · · Score: 1

    When I was starting out with UNIX, I purchased the bunny book (UNIX for the Impatient by Abrahams and Larson) and, later, when I was setting up my own Linux installation, I picked up Running Linux by Matt Welsh. I'm not even sure what edition Running Linux is up to, now. The first is definitely user-oriented, while the latter gets more into the nuts and bolts.

    In retrospect, though, for really being effective with my Linux machine, I got more out of the how-tos archived by the Linux Documentation Project, man pages, and searches on google. A little mentoring from someone already comfortable with the Linux environment doesn't hurt either.

    --

    --
    bachiatari na torisetsu o yome!

  207. that's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    with all the advances in brand gnu gui interfaces/scripting, IT's become relatively easy to set up/administrate workstations/web servers. plus, you NEVER have to worry about the m$.compliance po'lice, coming around to pick your pocket/censor your content, or infect your systems with fuddle's pateNTdead m$SpyWear(tm). mod me up robbIE.

  208. Highly recommended by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

    Linux Administration Handbook (Nemeth, Snyder, Hein, PH/PTR 2001). The title might indicate that it's for administrators, but the style is very gnubie friendly, and it's the best overall introduction to Linux, bar none.

    The manuals that ship with SuSE Linux Personal are quite excellent, as well.

    Frankly, I haven't yet seen a good book, or even a decent online doc or tutorial on Guh-Nome or KDE.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
  209. Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will never appeal to the masses and it is too cryptic and confusing to be really useful. Too subseptical to hacks.

  210. For GRLS, get a book by a female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense intended, but I couldn't *get it* until I got a book written by a woman, "Linux System Administration Black Book," by Dee-Ann LeBlanc, by Coriolis Open Press (http://www.dee-annleblanc.com/writing.html). She also wrote "Linux for Dummies" 4th Edition. I do know that men and women tend to think differently, neither being superior, but just different, and that difference made it hard for me to follow "Linux in a Nutshell"-style books (though that one sometimes was invaluable). I always found myself thinking, "OK, but exactly how to I do that, when you left out an important explanation of a vital step?" Women use more words, I think, and when you are learning something new and are a female, it helps to have those extra explanatory words.

  211. Think Unix by felonius · · Score: 1

    After I finished up all the mandatory books (Slackware Unleashed, Linux in a nutshell). I found that Think Unix by Jon Lasser helped finally put everything into perspective. I would recommend it to anyone who is past learning the raw basics and is ready to learn things from a more conceptual feel.

  212. Online books? by stevey · · Score: 1

    Other people have suggested Running Linux already, I had that for a while and ended up giving it away to a newbie who appreciated it.

    I had the benefit of a couple of local experts and found that and a working modem to be sufficient to get me up to speed.

    To throw in a handy link I found The Linux Cookbook a good site.

    It has common activities listed and pointers to more documentation, and software - very interesting:

  213. Red Hat Linux 7.2 Bible Unlimited Edition by shantipole · · Score: 1

    I am currently working through Red Hat Linux 7.2 Bible Unlimited Edition that I bought at a 50% off deal because Red Hat 8.0 just came out. Tons of information, relatively straight forward, 3 CDs of software and a website of bonus material makes this a pretty good bargain in my opinion. No complaints so far.

  214. Red Hat Linux 7.1 Bible by Radioheadhead · · Score: 1

    At ~900 pages, a "way more than I'll ever need" book, which is exactly why I bought it. Step-by-step yet quite in-depth (of course, RHL 7.1 CD-ROM's were enclosed). Published by Hungry Minds.

  215. This ain't no fancy book-learning by gosand · · Score: 2
    This actually happened at my last job. We were hiring into our QA group, and our apps ran on Solaris back ends with web/client front ends. We needed someone to test the front end with the potential to help us on the Unix side as well.

    When we interviewed one guy, he said he knew Unix well. I asked him what his favorite shell was, and he looked at me with a blank stare. Have you ever done any shell programming? Yes, in C. Needless to say, he didn't get the job.

    We had to eventually get someone hired, and hope to teach them basic Unix skills later. When asked if he knew Unix, he said he could learn it if we had a manual. From then on, every time we were at a terminal installing/configuring software, he was there with his notepad and pen, writing down every command. (even ls, pwd, etc) He would constantly be asking questions like "ok, so I type ls -l, and that will...?) It was oh so painful. I am all for teaching people, but this guy (who TAUGHT junior college CS classes) could not pick up the basic commands of Unix.

    Then one day the server stopped responding. After investigating, we found out he had typed this command: rm -rf /bin

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:This ain't no fancy book-learning by abischof · · Score: 2
      Then one day the server stopped responding. After investigating, we found out he had typed this command: rm -rf /bin
      Out of revenge, or just due to lack of knowledge?
      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

  216. Unless... by NineNine · · Score: 2

    Plus it makes you look cool to your friends when ur flying though the command line:)

    Unless any of your friends happen to be female. Then it makes you look like a complete dweeb.

    1. Re:Unless... by Yaroslavna · · Score: 1

      Nay, my porn-loving friend. There are those of us females who think command line is sexy. :) (And useful, too.)

  217. Basic Linux Training by Worf+Maugg · · Score: 1

    http://basiclinux.net/ Wonderful little starter course.

  218. Oreilly's "Unix Power Tools" by avdi · · Score: 2

    Unix Power Tools is the book for learning, not just what all those oddly-named UNIX utillities do, but how to use them together to accomplish useful tasks. I've never seen a better book on how to think like a longtime UNIX-user.

    --

    --
    CPAN rules. - Guido van Rossum
  219. DashPC by yack0 · · Score: 2

    Get the guys (Todd et al) from Dash PC on the show. They're doing some cool work with in car PC building and (mostly) linux. The DashPC project is on Sourceforge.

    j

    --
    -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  220. Linux Complete paperback by RealSkee · · Score: 1

    A few months ago I promised myself to do it and run linux no matter what. I d/l'ed redhat and got Linux Complete book (ISBN 0-7821-4036-X). It is cheap since it's a paperback that is a collection of chapter from well knows publications by SAMs etc. Ofcourse on some topics I had to do some digging elsewhere.

  221. What a fun query you pose... by i0wnzj005uck4 · · Score: 1

    The problem with learning Linux is not the command line, GUI(s), or program set, for which there are countless books (the O'Reilly ones are particularly good, and the Unleashed set are also nice, both linked above by others). I find that the problem is when you have a severe difficulty, there's few ways to come across a decent set of information on how to fix it.

    Learning linux requires two computers; one that runs whatever distro you've chosen, and another running a commercial, PNP OS that's internet ready so you can scan mailing lists, websites, and other things when your X Server refuses to start or your sound card thinks it's a modem (a problem I had a few years back, if you can believe it). (Dual booting is out because of the time required to reboot, attempt a fix, and then begin the search process anew.) The great bulk of books released aren't about solving problems, or have quick troubleshooting sections that only solve a handful of easily-fixed difficulties. Really learning Linux is about finding the info on your hardware config so that you can go in and edit the config files by hand.

    What makes this harder is that no two distros are alike, and most of them now have their own "proprietary" (though OSS) configuration wizards, etc. Debian and Slackware are too intimidating for most newbies, and learning Red Hat config is worlds apart from Mandrake or SuSE.

    So in the end, people can recommend whatever general knowledge books they want on console commands and GUI usage, but as anyone who's gone through their linux infancy knows, it comes down to searching the web and reading endless page after man page for your configuration, and that's something few books touch upon in a satisfactory manner.

    However, if you really want to get people used to Linux, I've found lately that an easy migration path is Apple's OS X. I'll probably get shot for saying it, but the underpinnings work just as well as most Linux distros, and it's a great place for people to learn the command line (the real workhorse) in an environment with a safety net and no hardware worries before letting them jump into the hardcore life. Just a thought, and after a few software upgrades from GNU mirrors, the OS X console is almost indistinguishable from any other unix variant.

    Not to mention, it's only a few short steps from OS X to yellowdog. ^.^

    --
    - Cloud
  222. I miss scriptable CLIs by dodongo · · Score: 1

    The other day, I had the delight of working on a Win 3.11 system... and about the only reason I say "delight" is because the first thing I was able to do is CLOSE THE HELL OUT OF WINDOWS!

    Don't get me wrong... I use XP as my main box, and like what it does for me and what I can do with it. But the freedom, the fun, the old days when a three-button serial mouse and a green monitor were cutting-edge... ahhh... you could write batch files and edit them on the fly and...

    *walks down memory lane*

    Sorry :) Just thought I'd share!

  223. Multitool Linux by longduckdong · · Score: 1

    I would recommend Multitool Linux. My email to you will explain in detail.

    --

    -- Knuckle Blood : Official Lube of Team Rusty Nuts.
  224. The Linux Cookbook by selan · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Linux Cookbook: Tips and Techniques for Everyday Use by Michael Stutz

    PART ONE: Working With Linux
    # Introduction
    # What Every Linux User Knows
    # The Shell
    # The X Window System

    PART TWO: Files
    # Files and Directories
    # Sharing Files
    # Finding Files
    # Managing Files

    PART THREE: Text
    # Viewing Text
    # Text Editing
    # Grammar and Reference
    # Analyzing Text
    # Formatting Text
    # Searching Text
    # Typesetting and Word Processing
    # Fonts

    PART FOUR: Images
    # Viewing Images
    # Editing Images
    # Importing Images
    # PostScript

    PART FIVE: Sound
    # Sound Files
    # Audio Compact Discs
    # Editing Sound

    PART SIX: Productivity
    # Disk Storage
    # Printing
    # Cross-Platform Conversions
    # Reminders
    # Mathematics

    PART SEVEN: Networking
    # Communications
    # Email
    # The World Wide Web
    # Other Internet Services
  225. PLEASE.. make the clarification by wesmo · · Score: 1

    Help the UNIX community and please, please, please make the clarification that Linux is JUST THE KERNEL, whereas a Linux Distribution is everything else; everything that gets piled on top.

    That one key point is missed by so many.. I've seen dozens of articles in magazines and other rags that are written by people who do not understand the difference and, as a result, only spread further confusion.

    To be honest, and I am sure that flames will shoot at me from everywhere, a friendly and GUI oriented distribution would be the best for a true newbie to use, such as RedHat.

    Linux In A Nutshell is a good start, along with the very simplified RedHat documentation. UNIX In A Nutshell is also very helpful.

    And to echo what others have said, stick to the GUI. Those that are truly interested will dig under the covers of the GUI to find the powerhouse of the command line interface. Neither one should be what people are FORCED to use.

  226. Groupthink Exception Warning !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Poster,

    Your comment contains memes that are contrary to the great /. GROUPTHINK DIRECTIVE #9643 (see below) and must therefore be suppressed.

    GROUPTHINK DIRECTIVE #9643:

    All OSS is inherently superior to commercial equivalents regardless of features, usability, quality of engineering, level of support, or any other consideration.

    Thank you for your time.

    We trust you will not post any similarly controvercial comments in future.

    Kind regards, /. Nazis

  227. Free Linux Books/ Linux Glossary for Windows Users by magurer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I started off with linux (maybe a year ago) i actually never needed to buy a linux book. I found that all information I needed was online often hard to find and often contradictive or outdated (especially howtos etc.). But often times you find some serious pearls.

    A power application that is typical for linux/unix i think is a linux X terminal server. Nearly impossible to do for a windows environment (unless you have money out the ass). But with a linux desktop of reasonable size and a couple old machines you can have a whole family on a full scale computer. check out www.k12ltsp.org.
    and it isn't too difficult to setup either. this is definitely a linux power app.

    O'Reilly Learning Debian GNU/Linux
    http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/debian/c hapter/inde x.html

    A brief Linux Glossary for Windows Users
    ftp://www6.software.ibm.com/software/develo per/lib rary/l-gloss.pdf

    More free books
    http://www.intelinfo.com/it_training_materi als_and _books/free_linux_training_materials.html

  228. The "Securing and Optimizing Linux" books . . . by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    . . .are a pretty good series to get one introduced to the nitty gritty parts of Linux administration that are often glossed over in some of the "beginners" books.

    My single biggest complaint about learning Linux was it was extraordinarily difficult to get at the "why" of things rather than the "how". Telling a user to download Apache and type "make install" may get that user a web server, but it doesn't really teach him how it works. Too often, I've found that starter books take the "you just need to do this" approach without offering clear and precise reasons why. Usually, it only after consulting a slew of man pages, alternate books, and mailing list posts that most can finally be able to get a glimpse at the deeper connections and dependencies between the software and the OS.

    What I like about this series is that it complements the man pages and the O'Reilly/Unleashed books by providing practical advice on basic system security, while also teaching the reader how to construct a system from the ground up in a manner that shows them how and why the different programs work with one another.

    For the curious, here's a link:

    http://www.openna.com/products/books/books.php

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  229. linux from scratch by towaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I started out trying to learn Linux and was doing well from the odd book and looking through the man pages. As soon as I found the website http://linuxfromscratch.org I learned more in a month then I had done in a year.
    Depends how deep you want to get into linux but its well worth a look.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
  230. linuxdoc.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    need i say more

  231. Best methods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can show the /true/ power of linux by going into a chat room and asking "Can anyone help me with setting up KDE?" and watching all of the morons respond with "RTFM IDIOT" "HAHA YOU WINDOZE LAMER" "GO JOIN THE FLOCK YOU LUSER" etc etc until eventually you get kicked with a reason along the lines of "BILL WANTS YOU TO SUCK HIS COCK AGAIN!".

    Only Linux can create this kind of respsonse! Such Power!

    But seriously. I use Linux and Windows everyday for programming to word processing. I put off using initially linux just because of the attitude problem from what seems to be 99.9% of the Linux community. It appears that if you aren't already a BOFH you are some sort of Microsoft lacky and treated like shit. I tried many times to get started but I couldn't get ANY help from anyone on newsgroups, web forums of chat rooms other than suggestions that I let Bill Gates rape me etc...

    Until this attitude problem disappaears Linux is doomed.

  232. Excellent book by UC1WP · · Score: 1

    "Linux System Administrator's Survival Guide" by Tim Parker, SAMS Publishing, is about the best book I have found. Regarding the previous post about books by-women-for-women: I've never read the book mentioned, but I do agree about the difference in learning styles, and IMHO, the "Man" pages are just that, pages for "MEN"! For at least, I'd say 40% of the time, a man page search only tells me what the flags mean, and doesn't really explain how to best use the command. Just my take on it.

  233. Re:Linux for beginners: Knoppix GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (And by the way, it's pronounced ken-ah-pics (I think))

    I personally discovered this very recently (yesterday in fact). I've been wanting to move from Windows to Linux, but, as my post name indicates, I'm a coward :P My friend pointed me to this program. I downloaded the ISO CD image, burned it, put it in my CDROM drive and rebooted my computer.

    With a couple of minor things to type in (like "knoppix" to start and a selection for screen resolution that I guessed correctly), it was up and running. It detected my cable modem, and I had no trouble getting to the Internet. I got to play around with the GUI a bit (it was either Gnome or KDE, I forget which), and generally had fun. The best part, as previously mentioned, is that it does NOTHING to your existing hard drive unless you specifically do something to "make it so".

    It also comes with things like Open Office for making office documents, and an x-chat client for accessing IRC (like I do). It detected my floppy drive as well, and if I had a second CDROM drive, I bet it would detect that as well.

    Did I mention that it does NOTHING to your hard drive unless you tell it to?

    My friend mentioned that running it off a CD has some distinct advantages. With Linux running off a CD, why have a hard drive? You can just get a computer with some nice goodies, plunk the CD in and have some fun. Set it up for your kids! You can teach them an alternative to Windows, and never have to worry about them crashing the OS (unless they physically break the CD, at which time you can just burn another). The computer itself is still vulnerable to salami in the CDROM.

    This whole thing sounds like a sales pitch doesn't it? Maybe I should get a job in copywriting... or maybe not. Anyway, I've only played with it a little bit, but from what I've seen, it's a GREAT way to introduce people so at least SOME flavor of Linux. As they say, "The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step."

  234. I learned about FreeBSD to learn about Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally learned about FreeBSD before tackling Linux. In many ways its much simpler since everything you need to know is in their well-written, handy on-line Handbook. One of the the troubles with learning about Linux is that many of the distros do things differently. Hopefully all this talk about a united linux distro will help such issues...

    1. Re:I learned about FreeBSD to learn about Linux by jackstack · · Score: 1

      So how did that work for you... did it help?... did learning BSD first help with learning linux? Just curious...

  235. My favorite Linux book... by samdu · · Score: 2

    ...is The Linux Network Toolkit. Granted, it's not exactly a total newbie's book, but it really got me rolling on the Linux thing and networking Windows and Linux machines. Which, if someone is just starting out with Linux, is a very likely scenario.

  236. LUG's by betasaur · · Score: 1

    Chris, as past president of the Silicon Valley Linux User Group, you know the benefit a user group can provide.

    Take the cameras to a local (not regional, too scary?) LUG meeting. Show that even the newest of newbies can get expert help and get their (what they might think is stupid) question answered. Take the cameras to an "InstallFest". Take the cameras to a "Demo Day". Take them to a "Workshop".

    Most potential Linux users are simply afraid or don't know how to take that first step to breaking their reliance on a certain OS. They need to know they can get help to partition their drive, recover their MBR or even that some LUG members will come to their home if they're in a real bind!

    (Yes, I'm the current president of a LUG. Tri-Cities Linux User Group in Eastern Washington)

  237. X11, VNC and User-Mode-Linux by Brian+Hatch · · Score: 1
    Here are my thoughts to show some visually-recognizable Linux features:

    1. X11 forwarding.

      Put a machine (server) with no screen on one end of the desk. Put a desktop on the other. Show how easy it is for the desktop to "ssh -X" to the server and run gui programs on the server with the display on the desktop. Explain how useful this would be to have a bunch of very underpowered desktops with a powerful server and still have everyone able to do all their work. And the files are all on the server, making backups easier. etc.

    2. VNC

      Similarly, get a very low powered desktop (running linux or windows) and run vncviewer on it, and vncserver on the server. Each person has fast CPU of the server, viewed on piddly clients.

    3. User-Mode-Linux

      Show how you can run Linux within Linux to do fun things like test software without the possibility of crashing your actual machine, run suspicious applications in a sandbox-like environment.

  238. Webmin by samdu · · Score: 2

    Here's an idea for something that would be interesting to go over for the newbies... Webmin. There seem to be a lot of comments related to the (lack of)virtue of the CLI. I like the CLI, but sometimes don't feel lie screwing with it. With Webmin, I can configure just about anything on the box via this web interface. I can also update Webin from within Webmin in addition to adding functinonality to it from within it. All of the configuration modules are right there at your fingertips. Very cool stuff. You can even configure a box remotely if you've got everything set up correctly. Windows can't touch Webmin.

  239. shell scripts as macros by evocate · · Score: 2

    We all know scripts are a great way to deal w/ command line complexity. But it takes a lot of background knowledge (editor, obscure scripting language, filesystem & permissions, jobs, piping, etc.) to start writing and using scripts. Debugging scripts isn't for the beginner. Running scripts isn't as easy as it could be. Sharing scripts requires yet another set of skills. I've often wondered if and easier scripting system couldn't be created. One of the most profound inventions of this sort was the macro system in Lotus 123. It took some learning, but it was learning that newbies could accomplish because Lotus made it very accessible. The knowledge leap from spreadsheet building to macro writing wasn't very far. I know people who otherwise knew nothing about computers who wrote some truly astounding macros (for their skill level). They weren't fast, elegant or even stable, but they scratched the itch. The shell script concept seem to offer the same possibility for this kind of mass creative expression, if only the environment for doing it was more obvious and available to the inexperienced.

  240. My Favorite App by Brent_DS · · Score: 1
    If I had to pick an app to show off Linux, it would probably be MythTV. It basically makes your PC into a TiVo + music browser, and there's no monthly service charge!

    Now, if I could just get my system properly set up for it...

  241. Osmosis by mmuskratt · · Score: 1

    useful information:
    I found the following books to be very good:
    Linux Complete - Sybex (Compiled by Grant Taylor)...because of the Internet links. Lots of links made this book really informative. Good Cheat sheets, too. And this book actually includes paragraphs and such, something nice to actually read when you're trying to understand a little bit about your system.

    Unix System Administration Handbook - Third Edition - PH PTR (Evi Nemeth, Garth Snyder, Scott Seebass, Trent R. Hein, et. al). Pretty hardcore, but if you're using Linux, I'm assuming you're not just some Grandma who wants to see pictures of her pomeranian in her email...

    Running Linux - O'Reilly. These books assume a fairly advanced user is going to be installing Linux, but they are really comprehensive. A great resource.

    Real World Linux Security - PH PTR (Bob Toxen). Install Linux, harden Linux. Do it today, and actually understand it.

    Linux: The Textbook - Addison-Wesley Publishing (Sarwar, Koretsky, Sarwar). Nicely written, introduces Mandrake and takes you through the gambit.

    rant:
    Learning Linux has been a real chore. There are tons of people out there willing to give you help like this:

    In order for your mouse to work, simply modify the mouse.conf file.

    Now, that's pretty easy, right? Except that in order to modify the file, you need to actually find the file. So you go to the nice little book you have, and try to locate instructions on how to actually find the .conf file you're looking for. Then, when you learn a few "simple" commands, you finally locate the mouseconf.conf file (this distro of Linux happens to be different, so the file name is different, yay). Cool. Great. Shit, now I found the mouseconf.conf file, but I actually want to *modify* the file. Hmmm. Oh, wait, you need a text editor, that's it! So you go online to the Internet, and you find instructions on how to run vi. The "instructions" are literally 3 pages of shortcut keys like :q, :qw, /l and such. But that shouldn't discourage anyone from using Linux, because it is soooo easy!

    --
    man rtfm
  242. Learning Linux... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

    I think the best way to learn Linux is just to use Linux.

    Learn your way around a shell first. Navigate the directories, learn the commands cd, mkdir, ls, cp, mv, etc..., learn the help commands info, man and "commandname --help", understand the concept of the symbolic link, go thru /etc and take a look at some of the important files there fstab, mtab, lilo, etc..., take a tour of /proc, /dev, /sbin, /bin and /boot. Learn about the STDIN, STDOUT, and STDERR facilities and how to redirect input and output from a running program. Also, learn how to pipe or string commands together with conditionals too. Learn job control.

    Learn the boot process of Linux: bootstrap, loader, kernel, INIT, INIT scripts, shell, X etc...

    Once you've got a basic understanding of the system, then venture into X and learn how it ticks (from a user point of view). Learn how to copy and paste, kill a running program, operate your windowmanager, switch virtual terminals.

    Learn how to use the various package formats from tar.gz (tgz), rpm, tar.bz2, deb, zip, etc and how to compile and install programs.

    Learn how not to run as root.

    Most of the help you will ever need with Linux is already right there on the machine.

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    1. Re:Learning Linux... by fataugie · · Score: 1

      I agree with that!

      Do like most others back in the early '90's did.....dive in head first! Don't be a pussy and worry about screwing up. Just find a computer (or better yet, repartiton and try to get an install on your XP machine) and install a system. Don't go the easy route and just pick the standard install, get into it and choose packages, partition your disk yourself, install and make mistakes. I learn best by getting my hands dirty.

      Print off man pages (if you get the printer working, bully for you...it took me along time to get that right) and read them before going to sleep. Experiment. Try installing a different system to see what apt vs emerge vs RPM manager vs package manager [is that what slackware calls it?] is all about.

      Try Slackware, Red Hat, Mandrake, Debian. Uninstall, reinstall, compile custom kernels, install them and get them to work properly (did you make dep? Did you remember to make modules?). Install lilo or Grub and practice.

      I assume the "how do I get into Linux" means you want to try something new. Try, observe, refine and try again. You will be amazed at what a choice of books you have now than back in the early 90's. I learned most of what I know from the mini how-to's and the other fine how-to's out there on the net. If you have the drive to learn, this will be alot of fun. If you discourage easily, then maybe you should pass this by. Can you install a system and use it with little technical expertise? The answer is yes, especially compared to 6 yrs ago.

      To sum it up, I think that the best way to _learn_ linux is to dive in! I'm sorry this is a rambling post, I have so much to say and so little organizational skills :-)

      --

      WTF? Over?

  243. google.com/linux by FreedOhm · · Score: 1

    I was never really able to find any one book that was really helpful in all newbie areas- When I got started with linux, I just blew away my win partition, installed LFS (very slowly mind you) and learned about linux the hard way. While I recognize that this isn't a good way for many people to learn about linux- it did teach me a good lesson. Running a search on http://www.google.com/linux and including the word "FAQ" or "HOWTO" in the search pretty much gets you anything you need to know. The best resource I've found for linux is the various linux howtos.... 'course, they don't do much good if you can't get your new linmachine online. ;-)

  244. A web site for newbies by leed_25 · · Score: 1

    Well you asked for web sites, so here is one of my favorites. They have forums for most of the major distributions as well as forums for software, hardware, networking, security and others. The regulars at this site are helpful, tolerant and --it seems to me-- altruistic.

  245. Could the standard you're looking for be..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...HTML? Links! Color! Standard readers! Searchable and hierarchial (directories and grep; a "super-lynx" front-end could automagically invoke these, or do it itself (mm, Perl))!

    Go ahead, write the standard. :)

  246. First Learn to Learn, then Learn.... by danalien · · Score: 1
    = = = =
    W A R N I N G - This comment is filled with all kinds of non-related information

    So READ Accordingly!:

    A] IF YOU are a "talky" person, please read the whole comment; from top to bottom.

    B] IF YOU are somewhat like me, then read only the Bolded text, the rest is just "unessential" for us.

    = = = =



    Not everyone in this world is someone who loves to read books (and I'm one of them;), so pointing to some nice big/fat/large books "that have everything in them" won't make me tick one sec (quite the opposite).

    "It's not the quantaty that matters, its the quality" , you've all heard that one.

    As in life I'm not much of a talker [Hmm, associate me to vulcans; were not that damn talky are we? :)], meaning I don't like my books "talky". A commond trademark I've repeatedly found in books I've read, their "too damn talky" for my taste. I.e. meaning; instead of reading 60 pages writers have become so skilled in the arts of book-crafting that they can spread those 60 pages into 300 [or more] with their thoughts and the convincing "this is the ultimate book avalible", "it's this good", "it's changed so, and so, and so may lives" etc etc....

    In summary their filled with all kinds of non-related information [every slashdoter knows this *I think*; guess why I love the-slashdot-concept? :)]

    What I'm trying to put into context is; First develope your in-Learing capabilities [don't "Learn", but try to learn how you've Learned, learn the method how _you_ learn stuff; Everyone has his/her own in-learning method; Common ground they all have, but differ they do; Meaning not everyone learns by reading books, sitting still in class, paying 100% attention to the teacher etc etc;] before trying to learn anything else first.

    Accelerated Learning is the word you should be ogle'ing around for beforehand learning liunx/giving advice[that's my advice to you; you slashdoters my disagree;]

    The Book I link to isn't in english, so it will not be much of use for non-swedish-reading-people.
    ISBN: 91-630-8899-1 "Gör studierna enklare och förbered dig för livet i kunskapssamhället", by Christer Westlund.
    But it derives from the "Accelerated Learning" concept, just written in swedish, so search the web for english once.... [Isn't that a typical advice from a *nix user; saying "RTFM!" in a nice way? :)]


    [Some time has past, you've aged (a bit), and you've masterd the skills in-learnig]
    Now, you're ready to step inside the *nix world.

    A] Sit down, and formulate a bunch of questions [what _you_ want to know about!].
    i.e "I wonder how do I run a webserver?", "I wonder, how do I start linux?", "I wonder, how do i INSTALL *nix!?"

    B] At random, go to the library, pick out any *nix book, read the contents until you find something that lures you [like you _want_ to know how to do that/how it works].

    C] Those were just mere examples, so if non of them suits you, feel free to experiment your way forward to something that does.

    So depending on your lifestile [Free-Sourcer, or Buy-Sourcer], find either a Nice [free] jucy Manual/how-to/book to *nix or buy a book you can read.

    And start applying all your in-Learnig skills and start learning yourself.


    [That's it! THE END]

    !ps - notice how I counted "Manual/how-to/book" in that order? - now that's my way of learning, books come last, first comes the "man" - command, then the web [usual I get all the info I need here]... and usually no books :) - but it happens when I do read one, but only If I _RRReally_ like the "non-related information of all kinds" :)

    This is just me, and my style; as I wanted to show you an example; So you go now and do your style and leave me alone! It's time for my daily meditation


    [All who know Vulcans, know we need meditation or we agitated & rood...: ) *hehe*]

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  247. Any other groups you'd like to slam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great hate web-site. Any other groups you'd like to slam in the name of your "god"?

  248. So many books, so little time by Wintermancer · · Score: 2

    And this represents the major problem facing Windows users.

    I say, divide and conquer. Or more to the point, know your user. Different people have different expectations.
    Programmers want to know about toolsets and whatnot. Windows reboot monkeys (sorry about the mandatory dig) want to learn about being able to run a server. Office users want to know about applications and usablility.

    The first two camps are relatively easy to accomodate. The last is the hardest due to the fact that Linux just-ain't-there-yet-but-we-will-be-real-soon.

    Some of the administrative books I recommend are:
    Linux Admistration: A Beginners Guide 2nd Ed.by Steve Shaw
    I toss this one under every Windows admin's nose who wants to come over to our camp. It's a good starting point.

    Linux Administration Handbook by Evi Nemeth et al.
    The bible. Old Testament-style. Polemic. God bless them.

    Essential System Administration by Aeleen Frisch.
    The one that sits on your desk when you need to look things up. The New Testament. Less polemic. Still excellent.

    Throw in Linux in a Nutshell for quick reference and those represent my "Linux Admin Starter Kit". Add your own ingredients to make it work.

    I won't bother listing each and every other good admin book because many of them are specialized. BUT, a good book on bash, vi, emacs, sendmail, dns/bind, firewalls, etc. are all nice for expanding ones brain. Oddly enough, most of them are known by the fact that they have an animal on the front cover....

    \Programmers can just go and have at 'er with all the tools available to them for the amazing price of free.

    Office worker types: be prepared for some serious hand holding. They don't want to deal with administrative issues, security, etc. They just want something that's going to work. I'd actually recommend OS X first. Failing that, Running Linux in the latest and greatest eddition.

    Oh yeah, parting words: HELP those who want to make the transition. The Linux community needs to change from RTFM, STFW and STFU to, "How can I help you?" THAT will help people to be more willing to make the move.

  249. IBM has a head start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, Linux on TV won't work, until we get commercial support. But IBM is commercial in a big way, so we've got those IBM ads. Still, why not fight fire with fire and show "ordinary people" using Linux, and show how cool the Penguin is? Or the GNU?

    As for getting started on Linux, I'd reccomend websites first, anyway. First, you want to get a distribution like RedHat to learn on -- I'd reccomend RedHat, because it has a cool logo, usually works out of the box, and best of all, is quite easy to install. Still, you'd want to search the web for a way to Dual Boot properly.

    With PAUD (Parted And Utilities Disk) and a RedHat install disk, it shouldn't take too much of a guide to get someone started, assuming they don't have a GPT setup, though I don't think anyone uses those except for 64-bit. Resize their hard disk, and let them unleash themselves on Linux!

    Once on the system, the documentation is good, though I don't know what book to reccomend. Still, I'd reccomend learning a lot about RedHat, including that intimidating shell, and after that's been mastered, on to Gentoo. RedHat taught me more about Windows than I ever learned on Windows itself, and so has Gentoo taught me more about Linux then I'd ever have learned on RedHat.

    But really, start using it as a desktop system, and have the documentation installed. Learn "man" and "info". I think this applies to anyone -- it won't work perfectly out of the box (most likely), but as you try to solve problems, you'll learn things, read documentation, and eventually develop more experience than a book will ever give you.

  250. linux by prell · · Score: 1

    I heard a rumor theyre going to open-source LCARS in 400 years. I'll just wait for that

  251. Linux GUIs are as good as any! by aquarian · · Score: 2
    You have to learn the CLI if you want to use Linux in any sort of reasonable fashion.

    Not so. You can do everything with a Linux GUI that you can do with a Windows GUI, and more. You can point and click your way around just as well, and do everything that most users do by pointing and clicking. Web, email, word processing, image editing, printing, etc.
    How could you possibly deal with, for instance, securing Linux without the CLI?

    Well, with Mandrake, for example, you can first select the purpose of your machine when installing, by clicking on a button for Desktop, Server, Developer, etc. This will install only the software you need, so you don't have every service in the universe the installed and running. Then you can go to a nice control panel, just like Windows' Start/Settings/etc., and find a nice list of services that you can start/stop by checking/unchecking little boxes. Then, through another icon, you there's a neat wizard that sets up a very effective firewall, with really simple questions a third grader could understand. After all this, you'll have a system more secure than most Windows boxes run by professional admins. Windows offers nothing this simple or effective. And it's all point and click.
    1. Re:Linux GUIs are as good as any! by Mnemia · · Score: 2

      It may well be true that Mandrake is that easy; I haven't tried it so I don't know. The main problem I've had with GUI utilities in Linux is that they work fine most of the time and for most cases, but they don't offer the flexibility or reliability of the command line. Granted, Windows definitely suffers from that problem as well; there are lots of options in Windows that are inaccessible from the GUI, and you're basically stuck if the GUI malfunctions or breaks.

      My point is that by using Linux with a GUI only, you're ignoring most of its strengths over Windows. I personally think that Linux GUIs have a ways to go before they are as polished as the commercial OSes. But Windows can't touch Linux for command line flexibility. I just think you should learn to use tools the way they work best if you want to be a really effective user.

  252. How 'bout TheopenCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There was a fascinating article about TheopenCD a few days ago on Newsforge, this is a neat package for introducing newbies to Free Software. Also the Suse 8.1 LiveEval disk can be fun for showing newbies what they're missing without the hassle of doing a full Linux install

  253. Knoppix by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

    Knoppix is one of the more amazing things that you can show a non-user. First, it's easy to jump into since you don't have to know anything about re-partitioning your drive. Also, watch their faces as an entire operating system along with tons of useful apps boots from just one CD. Plus, it's virtually idiot-proof, as all you have to do to get back to windows if you mess up is just log-out and remove the CD.

  254. Show Linux on TV by trollhunter4life · · Score: 1

    the best way to show off Linux on TV I believe, is to show its higher stability than window, it gives the user more control and precision to their PC, and of course, you gotta have Tux

  255. open source tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In creating a show to motivate people to try linux it would be particularly effective to point out that the whole reason for using a computer recreationally is to play and create and have fun. This can best be done if you have as much power over the computer as possible. Without open source you can only do what someone else (mostly larg uncreative money centric companies) decide to let you do. This is simply a drag.With open source you have a base to build on your self if you program for fun. As well these are programs oftwn created for the shear pleasure of ither creating them or using them. not just to make a buck.

    Secondly it is obvious that any open system is more stable, more egalitarian, and more effective. This could be greatly elaborated on but any idiot can see it

  256. linux books for the non-technical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone can recommend various books on linux for newbies, from those which basically take you through the installation process and simple commands to those for the more technical minded which really show you what the operating system is about.
    What I am after, however, is a book which doesn't presume any sort of technical ability whatsoever. I'm a physics student at university, and am extremely fortunate in that my parents are getting me a laptop for christmas. We've been doing a bit of python programming this term and will do a lot next term and in the subsequent years, going into a few more languages. We use sun workstations at the labs, but I could do all this in my room. Of course you can get the various languages on windows, but I'd like to get to know how to use the unix operating system happily rather than feeling like I am just following a set of instructions so am looking to install linux on my new laptop. Problem is, well, I look into it, and they all use lots of technical terms straight off! So what is the ultimate best book for total idiots like myself, who want linux for practical purposes, not to hack and fiddle!

  257. KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should show them the latest KDE 3.1-rc5 desktop environment with the Keramik style, and your viewers draws will drop...!

  258. Books I'd like to see.... by Ogman · · Score: 1


    "How to Make Friends and Piss Off Gurus"

    "I'm Having a Newbie For Lunch with Fava Beans and a Nice Chianti"

    "Read THIS F&%king Manual!"

    "Emily Post on Newbie and Guru Etiquette"

    "Lindows for Dummies" "Lord of the Command Line"

    --
    But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
  259. Depends on the newbie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This is for newbies, and newbies don't want to know command line stuff.

    When I was a Linux/Unix newbie, CLI is all I wanted to know.

    I found that the best way (in my case, anyways) to learn Linux was to just set up a spare box (486, here) and always just telnet/ssh to it. This requires the least committment by the user, in that they don't have to stop using Windows to start using Linux - they can have both at an alt+tab away instead of a lengthy reboot (or even, reinstall) away.

    When getting friends involved in Linux, I find that they will often be excited about all the "neat features," etc. in GNOME/KDE. This enthusiasm dulls after a week and next time they reboot, they boot back into familiar old Windows, forgetting Linux for months at a time.

    As I often say: GUI->down is the easiest way to get interest; Wires->up is the best way to understand everything, in time.

    -BW

  260. Join a LUG by martinflack · · Score: 2

    Books are ok, but the best thing for beginners might be simply to join a LUG (Linux User Group) and make friends with some people who are experts. When I was starting out I learned TONS just from watching other people at their consoles.

  261. Don't forget magazines. by MoronBob · · Score: 1

    I like Linux Magazine for how to articles. There is one from the UK that is pricy but worth it called Linux Format. It has writers that can condesend to a beginners level unlike the writers in Linux Journal.
    As for books The Red Hat Linux Bible has always been one of my favorites. Hacking Linux Exposed for security. Linux Administration by Nemeth and Seabass is a well rounded reference. For TV? I get the most comments at work on the Screensavers that come with the Red Hat 8.0 Distro. My personal favorite is a remote session intro using VNC. Fun Stuff.

    --
    Telecommuting! What about socialization?
  262. Unix Power Tools by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2

    This is the book to give to a n00b if they are really interested in Linux/UNIX "methodology".

  263. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try Google :)

  264. Re:Google | more: redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod post down

    redundant

  265. Think Unix by DukeWellington · · Score: 1

    My favourite "learning" book is Think Unix by Jon Lasser from Que.

    It's not specifically about Linux, but it covers all the things I routinely have to re-learn when things go wrong on my Linux box. Things like file permissions, groups, shell script basics, hard and soft links, and importantly, the reasons these things exist.

    It demystifies the command line and provides a new user with the true understanding rather than just a bunch of tutorials on how to install packages like most of the other Linux books I've read.

    It also covers some of the history and development of Unix-type systems (including Linux) so the current state of the art makes more sense than it might otherwise make to someone who only recently crawled out of a micro$oft-centric universe and discovered that there really was life on other operating systems (BIG life :-).

    Regards, Simon

  266. Learning Linux by igiveup · · Score: 1
    I have found the best way to learn something is total immersion. I have found that most "Learning" books are more suited for non-technical users, but fustrating for techies.

    Pick up one of the following books: Running Linux from O'Reilly or Linux System Administration: A User's Guide from Addison-Wesley. Browse the books to get a general idea on what to do for basic tasks.

    Next, find a friendly distribution that will allow you to get started, such as Mandrake.

    Finally, use the OS. Try doing as much as possible in Linux. I'd suggest trying to connect to the internet first, the wealth of information available will help you with any later problems. But with each task you don't know how to do or problem you need to solve, look it up in the book you purchased or online. It may seem fustrating at times, but it really seems to stick in memory better if you actually have to do the task.

    --
    --- igiveup ---
  267. Google by padlamoij · · Score: 1

    Hey kids check out this crazy book i just found. It's magical. You type in what your looking for and it tells you the answer.
    I know books are nice and they sit in your lap and you can read them on the bus and stuff, but linux it a perfect example of the fact that software and technology moves a lot faster than a publisher. The time it takes to write, assemble and print a book on linux will make it obselete the day it comes out.
    I know books can be really helpful. I have "running linux" sitting on a bookshelf next to me. It's just that when i learned linux 90% of what i learned was from reading the wonderful web pages written by hundreds of people around the world who were kind enough to share their knowledge. A new day is upon us. And i think that's the first thing you should tell a newbie when they ask what book they should buy.

  268. "Msys for dumbies"? by Felinoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been unimpressed with all the Linux books for newbies. The expert books are great but if your new to Linux they are also useless.
    I've not looked at Linux for Dumbies and I have over all been impressed with the dumbies books.
    The best by far was a booklet made by SCO for Xenix. This is obveously out of print but it was a mini refence.

    Probably the best thing is time in the trenches. For exsisting Mac Os X and Linux users thats call up the shell and experement.
    For Windows users however that's not so easy. But it can be done...
    Msys is a Unix environment targeted at Windows software develupment.
    Software dev is easyer from the Unix shell what can I say?

    It's very Unix but still running under Windows. Just an app. Not a scary install like Linux as it dosen't threaton to destroy everything in favor of the new os...
    (Think of an Os install as the Genisis torpedo from Star Trek II.)
    Spock "It would destroy such life in favor of it's new matrix"
    In otherwords Installing Linux means never being able to go back to Windows (the old matrix).
    All your data is gone.. everything...
    Your not just trying Linux your commiting to it.
    New users need some asurence that Linux is the way to go.

    If they can learn Linux from the safe confines of having never installed it so much the better.
    Cygwin is annother Unix environment again for software develupment.

    Add a good Linux or Unix newbie book and the trasnsition should be smoth.
    I used Danix to move from Dos to Unix.
    Unlike the rest Danix is a dos port of Unix commands so as to give Dos that "Unix" feal.
    The other files in the linked archive are also good for the job.

    Also I was going to frivlously suggest using a "hot geek chick" the way beer ads use super modles to sell beer.
    "Drink beer and date a super modle"
    "Use Linux and date a hot geek chick"

    But being realistic people aren't going to switch to Linux in order to date hot chicks. I honnestly could not think of a dumber reason.

    Still ammusing to think of Cat teaching Linux... Yummm.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  269. The Unix Philosophy by Kojo · · Score: 1
    Piggybacking on the above comments about "Think Unix", I'd also recommend "The Unix Philosophy" by Mike Gancarz. Great book about how Unix is designed and how it does things. Not a "This is what the kernel does" book, but a "Unix uses many small tools that each excel in their task and can be chained together" book.

    According to Amazon, there's a new version "Linux and the Unix Philosophy" coming out soon.

    Slim book, easy reading and it will help new users figure out what makes *nix different from Windows/MacOS