An exit interview is silly, because the employee is leaving. They are cutting ties and as such have nothing to gain by such a thing. Why would you help a company that valued you so little, that when you went to leave, they didn't start a bidding war to retain you.
The point is it doesn't matter who did what and what name gets attached to things as long as the information on how to do things is still available. What importance is knowing that this specific person did it versus knowing that somebody did it.
what I'm saying is what difference does it make whether he's alive or dead now now that his contributions have already been propagated? What what useful output is expected from this? What did the article writer hope to achieve by bringing specific notes to his death? How does that help people?
An internet connection was desire able and useful before e-commerce. Without Ecommerce the internet was as much nicer place. Compared to the 90s, the internet is a dirty slum now
This is a silly article. what the hell do you want me to do with this information besides forget about it because I don't know what the hell you want me to do with it. It's not relevant to anything I need to do
All of science borrows from the works of all scientists before. There should be no protection of scientific works as it's all derivative work countless people gone by. Every time things are monetized they go to shit
Yeah I guess you're right. Have the time I think people are joking when they're being bossy. It's like haha why would I reward that tone with any kind of attention? That's not pleasant I'm not going to teach you to do that to me
Next Comes enumeration of the observed factors, and events,etc... we all know the scientific method or at least we're all responsible for knowing it if we have at least a high school diploma or ged.
So basically the 1st step in responsible observation is eliminated if you're already disassociated from the problem because it's not you.
After all you can't observe a situation for what it is until you disassociate from it to prevent emotional Distortion and bias from blinding you.
Being bossy comes from telling other people what to do beyond the simple delegation and then getting out of their way. Bossy is another name for micromanagement. if you are delegating tasks but you're not granting them the autonomy and access they need , to have control and latitude in the scope of their job then that is the definition of being bossy, or micromanaging.
A good boss hires and trains a competent crew that does not need their boss unless something out of the ordinary happens. A competent boss doesn't even need to be there for normal day-to-day operations. they are there to handle anything outside of normal scope and do act as a coordinator.
The culture must be different where you work and live. Because everyone I know who is the girl that cusses and doesn't put on Airs, and tells the occasional dirty joke, tends to get treated like "one of the guys" or another terms "as a peer".
If you can't see the absurdity , an arbitrary natureof social standards then you're hardly qualified to work in a field of technical expertise. Too caught up in subjective modes of thinking to see past your own bias.
That kind of attitude is one of ignorance and placing social value above tactical and practical value. Essentially fashion over function. Sand flea shows that someone would choose an arbitrary standard of behavior over what functions the best from a technical standpoint. way easier to hire in sensitive people that don't bitch and moan to the point of lawsuits than it is to deal with the repeated distractions and escapades of the sensitive. Those who would take the illusion of being right over higher levels of function with less limitations and censorship are not qualified to be making decisions over those who have graduated from such primitive thoughts
I don't believe in gambling with our nation's critical resources, which is what you have described. because of money represents end potential to solve problems that get in the way of people's perceptions of satisfaction and safety. Money is just a method but not the end goal. Sacrificing the end goal of providing for people , to the means of distribution, negates the justification for the means of
Yeah and then the context of a coding all that matters is that the program operates properly and efficiently. So a thousand fucks Don't matter as long as they don't interfere with program operation
If you're not intelligent enough to see the message instead of being focused on their particular vernacular, then you do not qualify for the project. Your inability to see past transport protocol Prejudice in verbal communication shows a certain lack of perspective and maturity necessary 2 a technical project
Correction if you can motivation someone to discontinue attempts, before they happen upon one that works, you may potentially avoid circumvention for the moment.
I mean really shouldn't we have been expecting this and continue to expect this kind of thing to happen every so often just due to the illusionary nature of security it self. Security is a motivation game if you can be motivate someone to continue trying different methods before they find one that works they may choose to move on. Anybody who doesn't quit will eventually bypass any security.
This is a good thing. Companies keep things secret then overtime the secrets are lost to history. It's nice when intellectual property gets stolen and copied so it's our might actually be around later when the original company no longer exists. I mean unless we're planning on the human race not existing in 50 Generations
Free-rider isn't a problem it's an exercise in efficiency.. see a certain amount of our society are Workaholics. Even after they have obtained their needs they can't I'll help but always go back to work harder, ranging from diligent worker to the point of compulsive mental disorder. We also have people who range on the other side of the spectrum , ranging from working just how much they need to to supply their daily habits, 2 not working at all to the point sometimes of compulsive mental disorder.
Between the two they average each other out, allowing everyone to do okay. Workaholics tend to be dicks. But they get a lot done. People who don't work as much tend to smile more and have better attitudes, they help to cheer up the Workaholics and remind them how to play, and to cover aspects of society they're not work related to Workaholics have no time to tend to. It takes all types. Some people's contributions are just more in the Limelight than others. but all types are important to keep life balanced
No because the politician is not loyal to the money is already paid the politician is that additional money will be spent derail them. Is not for reward the politicians operate but by threat
Music industry business model is just not supported by reality, and opposed by the majority of people in practice, if not by words. Piracy being rampid is a direct demostration that the people do not support the concepts of intellectual property. Businesses are not people. I be owned by people but unlike a person it's okay for any business to go out of business while it is not okay for us to just let people die.
Slashdot Mirror
An exit interview is silly, because the employee is leaving. They are cutting ties and as such have nothing to gain by such a thing. Why would you help a company that valued you so little, that when you went to leave, they didn't start a bidding war to retain you.
The point is it doesn't matter who did what and what name gets attached to things as long as the information on how to do things is still available. What importance is knowing that this specific person did it versus knowing that somebody did it.
Specific notice, not notes. Was it just social duty to ritual acknowledgement?
what I'm saying is what difference does it make whether he's alive or dead now now that his contributions have already been propagated? What what useful output is expected from this? What did the article writer hope to achieve by bringing specific notes to his death? How does that help people?
An internet connection was desire able and useful before e-commerce. Without Ecommerce the internet was as much nicer place. Compared to the 90s, the internet is a dirty slum now
This is a silly article. what the hell do you want me to do with this information besides forget about it because I don't know what the hell you want me to do with it. It's not relevant to anything I need to do
My my don't you have a chip on your shoulder... Would you like a hug?
All of science borrows from the works of all scientists before. There should be no protection of scientific works as it's all derivative work countless people gone by. Every time things are monetized they go to shit
Yeah I guess you're right. Have the time I think people are joking when they're being bossy. It's like haha why would I reward that tone with any kind of attention? That's not pleasant I'm not going to teach you to do that to me
Next Comes enumeration of the observed factors, and events,etc... we all know the scientific method or at least we're all responsible for knowing it if we have at least a high school diploma or ged.
So basically the 1st step in responsible observation is eliminated if you're already disassociated from the problem because it's not you. After all you can't observe a situation for what it is until you disassociate from it to prevent emotional Distortion and bias from blinding you.
Being bossy comes from telling other people what to do beyond the simple delegation and then getting out of their way. Bossy is another name for micromanagement. if you are delegating tasks but you're not granting them the autonomy and access they need , to have control and latitude in the scope of their job then that is the definition of being bossy, or micromanaging. A good boss hires and trains a competent crew that does not need their boss unless something out of the ordinary happens. A competent boss doesn't even need to be there for normal day-to-day operations. they are there to handle anything outside of normal scope and do act as a coordinator.
The culture must be different where you work and live. Because everyone I know who is the girl that cusses and doesn't put on Airs, and tells the occasional dirty joke, tends to get treated like "one of the guys" or another terms "as a peer".
If you can't see the absurdity , an arbitrary natureof social standards then you're hardly qualified to work in a field of technical expertise. Too caught up in subjective modes of thinking to see past your own bias.
That kind of attitude is one of ignorance and placing social value above tactical and practical value. Essentially fashion over function. Sand flea shows that someone would choose an arbitrary standard of behavior over what functions the best from a technical standpoint. way easier to hire in sensitive people that don't bitch and moan to the point of lawsuits than it is to deal with the repeated distractions and escapades of the sensitive. Those who would take the illusion of being right over higher levels of function with less limitations and censorship are not qualified to be making decisions over those who have graduated from such primitive thoughts
Guys like when girls cuss. It takes away the abrasive holier then thou, impression. The girl that cusses gets treated as a peer
I don't believe in gambling with our nation's critical resources, which is what you have described. because of money represents end potential to solve problems that get in the way of people's perceptions of satisfaction and safety. Money is just a method but not the end goal. Sacrificing the end goal of providing for people , to the means of distribution, negates the justification for the means of
Yeah and then the context of a coding all that matters is that the program operates properly and efficiently. So a thousand fucks Don't matter as long as they don't interfere with program operation
If you're not intelligent enough to see the message instead of being focused on their particular vernacular, then you do not qualify for the project. Your inability to see past transport protocol Prejudice in verbal communication shows a certain lack of perspective and maturity necessary 2 a technical project
Correction if you can motivation someone to discontinue attempts, before they happen upon one that works, you may potentially avoid circumvention for the moment.
I mean really shouldn't we have been expecting this and continue to expect this kind of thing to happen every so often just due to the illusionary nature of security it self. Security is a motivation game if you can be motivate someone to continue trying different methods before they find one that works they may choose to move on. Anybody who doesn't quit will eventually bypass any security.
This is a good thing. Companies keep things secret then overtime the secrets are lost to history. It's nice when intellectual property gets stolen and copied so it's our might actually be around later when the original company no longer exists. I mean unless we're planning on the human race not existing in 50 Generations
Free-rider isn't a problem it's an exercise in efficiency.. see a certain amount of our society are Workaholics. Even after they have obtained their needs they can't I'll help but always go back to work harder, ranging from diligent worker to the point of compulsive mental disorder. We also have people who range on the other side of the spectrum , ranging from working just how much they need to to supply their daily habits, 2 not working at all to the point sometimes of compulsive mental disorder. Between the two they average each other out, allowing everyone to do okay. Workaholics tend to be dicks. But they get a lot done. People who don't work as much tend to smile more and have better attitudes, they help to cheer up the Workaholics and remind them how to play, and to cover aspects of society they're not work related to Workaholics have no time to tend to. It takes all types. Some people's contributions are just more in the Limelight than others. but all types are important to keep life balanced
No because the politician is not loyal to the money is already paid the politician is that additional money will be spent derail them. Is not for reward the politicians operate but by threat
Music industry business model is just not supported by reality, and opposed by the majority of people in practice, if not by words. Piracy being rampid is a direct demostration that the people do not support the concepts of intellectual property. Businesses are not people. I be owned by people but unlike a person it's okay for any business to go out of business while it is not okay for us to just let people die.