So what you seem to indicating is the price of good management may include an overhaul of accounting and hiring systems to bring things up to par. Well it's all for naught if the existing low standards are permitted to maintain, so let's get to work
My point is that even though it's common occurrence, the philosophies behind it depends on a purposeful nievety and moral bankruptcy. If you want to get paid again, some more work.
My point is if you are getting paid multiple times for the same effort, somewhere that income has to be grifted from the paychecks of others. It's a indirect firm of fleecing the masses indirectly. Oh our broken economy that excels in keeping things away from where they are needed most
Making something illegal glamorizes it, increaseing demand which is then filled with zero oversight, as it becomes an undocumented skeleton in the closet. Yet another exclusive forbidden treasure. And the lure of the forbidden can't be denied. Tell someone that they can't do something, they will do it double just cuz you said not too
Sure wish this kind of crap would fly at the places I've worked. Just tell my boss hey could I just get endless Paychecks repeated for the work I did once. I know I already got paid for making this song but one of you guys just pay me over and over and over again but I never have to work again, it's okay you guys can just distribute my workload to live between all of you. I'll never understand why people think but they should get paid unlimited times repeatedly for one piece of work and the same people demonize others for trying to get paid properly the first time
You're under estimating the influence advertising has over the process the brain goes through to create a want, advertising exploits man hijacks the way the human brain forms judgments. Advertising methods used commonly in today's world don't get processed as astatic. They are more can the viruses or Trojan horses. They inject malicious and erroneous payloads into the function logic that results in the generation of a desire. Social engineering. Hacking humans. And the man who believes he's capable web taking his way past such things to negate this effect, is even more susceptible to being steered because that arrogance also can be hijacked to be used against the consumer
It's because bad management. A good manager facilitates his employees. They are there to deal with anything out of scope so that everyone else can continue abstracted from the abberations. they fight for raises because a sastisfied employee is more productive, engaged, excited to go to work . When paid properly for your time and given autonomy within your scope and clear derictives, any job is okay , as long as people treat each other with respect . A happy well paid employee doesn't want to rock the boat by risking his job , so that translates into additional productivity, as beauracracy can be streamlined, trust being in play
Ahh, but with out the multitudes of people working their asses off implementing most of the value, it is grossly inaccurate to discredit their Majority contribution to the situation. And so the high salary man should be paid smaller in compared to others n to the rest, because he works the least hard.
Seems to be the Natural Balance. Live by marketing die by marketing. They offered an additional service that any fool would realize before signing off on it would result in many many returns. But did the math and in the end they still make more money. So now they want to negate the check that keeps the whole thing for becoming in imbalanced, it's only fair that if you use something to make money you accept NE loss that occurs. Barter is fair trade but Business is a gamble. Betting that decisions you make will result in people deciding to give you more money when they would in the if you did otherwise after expenses.. This is just bullshit double dipping, when there is no need .
to that end property is also a societal concept. objectively there is posession, but property is a subjective concept and not at all real outside agreement to believe and participate in the concept.
guess what, we are society. and we have the ability to act in our own interests, and if that means attempting to make things we don't like more diffficult to profit from then so be it. if we can find a way to rectifi imbalance in access to the nations resources then so be it. and if we fail then so be it. but we arent going to quit trying to suit you.
Our entire judicial system was founded and designed based on a number of primary intrisic ethical imperative s. One of which is that better for 10 guilty men to go free then for one innocent man to suffer. Is it in the public interest to allocate Real World Resources that are needed more elsewhere, to persecute people who do not pose a personal danger to anyone. Intellectual property is not compatible with the nature of information. It is unenforceable. Unnatural, a tremendous drain on national resources. It absolutely curtails innovation. It prevents ability share information to build and improve on the efforts of others . It Is a failed business concept kept afloat by thug tactics and forced cooperation put in play by compromised government officials
Us government's relationship to its citizens is a custodial relationship that maintains exhistence only by threat of Harm or incarcerations to those replace their loyalties elsewhere. I like we have a choice not to deal with them. Don't trust the government they just don't give us an option to ignore or live independent of them.
What about our duty to ignore unjust laws to make them enforceable so as to prevent them from affecting us. Civil disobedience is a responsibility of every citizen to maintain. It all of our responsibilities as American citizens to enmasse violate copyright laws to give us in the best chance of our legal system aligning with reality eventually.
One of the biggest abusers and mishandlers of the USA economy, the NFL, had a glitch that affected a small percentage of recipients with numerous available work around.vif the Superbowl was so important to the viewer they would have had ota set up as secondary failover in the first place. Redundancy with failover is due diligence in any personal endeavor. To listen to football fans complain , you would think someone's jonesing over some heroin and then you slap your forehead in dishustwhen you realize that they're just talking about watching some guys screw off with ball. Man our country raises some damaged people
Measureing the popularity of personal behavior relative to current social and moral trends as is completely out of scope for administrator s of this award to consider. Yeah the Integrity they would have dissolved this award system rather than pervert and distort it's metrics
Bullshit, music artists in the 90s made their money through tours and direct merchandising. Almost everything made from CDs sells was absorbed by the record companies through clever accounting , and anti artist weighted contracts. Pirating actually help the 90s artists. Because having pirated their music there than able to spend their money on the band t-shirts and other merchandising which actually go to the artists wallet
It's more like telling them that if they're going to play then they have to play fair with everybody because they're only so much room in the market. so is essential that those who are allowed to compete do so in a manner that serves the entire country. Is only the industry's failure to handle themselves proactively to ensure this that has forced the government to step in and try to give the isps another chance to find a way to get everyone decent internet cuz that's what people pay you for that's why we support you the existence of your business that's why the people support the government recognizing and protecting the ability for you to do business. If the isps continue to fuck it up the government is left no choice but to take on the job themselves because private business as shown they are incapable or unwilling to do the job right. If you don't want them or interference and your business then do yourself a favor and limit yourself before an external force is forced to do it for you. Sure it's your business but the way you do your business fux with our lives. We are against you were for us and you're only able to exist as a business because we have been yet made laws that allow us to take everything away from you so play nice
That would depend. The value of a given holding of money to an individual is dependent in the specific context of what will happen if that money wasn't available. For instance. If the wether or not I have that money results in a safety concern or simply may not achieve a disired outcome unrelated to basic survival and viability of being lawful. The distinct ion between the two is so fundlemental relevent to human experience and making sound judge ment that our languages are littered with words created address these separate concepts. Needs vs wants, essential vs indulgent. Nessesity vs luxury. If the whole country can be intelligently managed to enable access to the internet at 10mbs where previously there where gaps in service quality, and the cost amounts to some people who have everything they need might only get 10 extra luxery items instead of 20, seems a small disruptive to pay for countywide upgrades on basic infrastructure.
if if didn't we would have litigated physics until they were to our liking and antigrav , ftl travel would have been written into existence. we wuld just make it illegal to for death to occur, we would all live forever. running out of room? we'll just litigate tardis rooms that are bigger in then out into exhistence.. no no my friends. i'm afraid reality will always the higher authority to legality. laws are wishes made en masse. nothing more
But the fact remains, "Any reproduction of this broadcast in whole or in part without the expressed written consent of the NFL is strictly prohibited". So no, you shouldn't be able to stream it in that way.
If it's an actual broadcast, they lose all expectation to stop distribution once they put it out there. It's the equivalent of shouting from a mountain top (and in many cases it is literally that) and expecting all those who hear you to not repeat what you said. Even if copyright law is on their side, common sense says "fuck you".
No it doesn't.
Obligatory Car Analogy: If you park your car in public, should I be able to take it? It's just sitting there in public. You chose to leave it there.
nope, because your car never left the parking lot, you still have your car, what i would be doing is observing your vehickle and making my own that looks and works just like it, al without ever touching anything you own. money isnt real until its in your hand. its not yours until tyou have it. future earnings don't exist they are purely thoretical. and as such do not equate to real value. and thus nothing would be owed you. for you have been deprived of nothing that you actually possesed
this may not be supported by law. but is enforced by reality. reality trumps legality
As long as he is completing his responsibilities within deadline, and the rate of pay equitable to what is generated or retained by the employees labor, then how or when he does his work is nobody else's business
If you hire competent people then after they get the hang of their job over time they become more and more efficient at it. Now I see how it might be advantageous to an employer to attempt to extort additional productivity without an increase in salary or wages but there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. As long as that employee was generating income or preventing loss of at the cost of empoying them plus a polite ten percent fir the company, the company is getting it's moneys worth. An employee is a labor vendor. A employer is a client. You get what you pay for, and working more efficient ly doesn't give a person their time back then why would anyone ever be motivated to more then the minimal.
Slashdot Mirror
So what you seem to indicating is the price of good management may include an overhaul of accounting and hiring systems to bring things up to par. Well it's all for naught if the existing low standards are permitted to maintain, so let's get to work
I suppose in our county the culture is that any gain is justified as long as no one can stop you.
My point is that even though it's common occurrence, the philosophies behind it depends on a purposeful nievety and moral bankruptcy. If you want to get paid again, some more work.
My point is if you are getting paid multiple times for the same effort, somewhere that income has to be grifted from the paychecks of others. It's a indirect firm of fleecing the masses indirectly. Oh our broken economy that excels in keeping things away from where they are needed most
Making something illegal glamorizes it, increaseing demand which is then filled with zero oversight, as it becomes an undocumented skeleton in the closet. Yet another exclusive forbidden treasure. And the lure of the forbidden can't be denied. Tell someone that they can't do something, they will do it double just cuz you said not too
Sure wish this kind of crap would fly at the places I've worked. Just tell my boss hey could I just get endless Paychecks repeated for the work I did once. I know I already got paid for making this song but one of you guys just pay me over and over and over again but I never have to work again, it's okay you guys can just distribute my workload to live between all of you. I'll never understand why people think but they should get paid unlimited times repeatedly for one piece of work and the same people demonize others for trying to get paid properly the first time
You're under estimating the influence advertising has over the process the brain goes through to create a want, advertising exploits man hijacks the way the human brain forms judgments. Advertising methods used commonly in today's world don't get processed as astatic. They are more can the viruses or Trojan horses. They inject malicious and erroneous payloads into the function logic that results in the generation of a desire. Social engineering. Hacking humans. And the man who believes he's capable web taking his way past such things to negate this effect, is even more susceptible to being steered because that arrogance also can be hijacked to be used against the consumer
It's because bad management. A good manager facilitates his employees. They are there to deal with anything out of scope so that everyone else can continue abstracted from the abberations. they fight for raises because a sastisfied employee is more productive, engaged, excited to go to work . When paid properly for your time and given autonomy within your scope and clear derictives, any job is okay , as long as people treat each other with respect . A happy well paid employee doesn't want to rock the boat by risking his job , so that translates into additional productivity, as beauracracy can be streamlined, trust being in play
Ahh, but with out the multitudes of people working their asses off implementing most of the value, it is grossly inaccurate to discredit their Majority contribution to the situation. And so the high salary man should be paid smaller in compared to others n to the rest, because he works the least hard.
Seems to be the Natural Balance. Live by marketing die by marketing. They offered an additional service that any fool would realize before signing off on it would result in many many returns. But did the math and in the end they still make more money. So now they want to negate the check that keeps the whole thing for becoming in imbalanced, it's only fair that if you use something to make money you accept NE loss that occurs. Barter is fair trade but Business is a gamble. Betting that decisions you make will result in people deciding to give you more money when they would in the if you did otherwise after expenses.. This is just bullshit double dipping, when there is no need .
to that end property is also a societal concept. objectively there is posession, but property is a subjective concept and not at all real outside agreement to believe and participate in the concept.
guess what, we are society. and we have the ability to act in our own interests, and if that means attempting to make things we don't like more diffficult to profit from then so be it. if we can find a way to rectifi imbalance in access to the nations resources then so be it. and if we fail then so be it. but we arent going to quit trying to suit you.
Our entire judicial system was founded and designed based on a number of primary intrisic ethical imperative s. One of which is that better for 10 guilty men to go free then for one innocent man to suffer. Is it in the public interest to allocate Real World Resources that are needed more elsewhere, to persecute people who do not pose a personal danger to anyone. Intellectual property is not compatible with the nature of information. It is unenforceable. Unnatural, a tremendous drain on national resources. It absolutely curtails innovation. It prevents ability share information to build and improve on the efforts of others . It Is a failed business concept kept afloat by thug tactics and forced cooperation put in play by compromised government officials
Us government's relationship to its citizens is a custodial relationship that maintains exhistence only by threat of Harm or incarcerations to those replace their loyalties elsewhere. I like we have a choice not to deal with them. Don't trust the government they just don't give us an option to ignore or live independent of them.
What about our duty to ignore unjust laws to make them enforceable so as to prevent them from affecting us. Civil disobedience is a responsibility of every citizen to maintain. It all of our responsibilities as American citizens to enmasse violate copyright laws to give us in the best chance of our legal system aligning with reality eventually.
One of the biggest abusers and mishandlers of the USA economy, the NFL, had a glitch that affected a small percentage of recipients with numerous available work around.vif the Superbowl was so important to the viewer they would have had ota set up as secondary failover in the first place. Redundancy with failover is due diligence in any personal endeavor. To listen to football fans complain , you would think someone's jonesing over some heroin and then you slap your forehead in dishustwhen you realize that they're just talking about watching some guys screw off with ball. Man our country raises some damaged people
Measureing the popularity of personal behavior relative to current social and moral trends as is completely out of scope for administrator s of this award to consider. Yeah the Integrity they would have dissolved this award system rather than pervert and distort it's metrics
Bullshit, music artists in the 90s made their money through tours and direct merchandising. Almost everything made from CDs sells was absorbed by the record companies through clever accounting , and anti artist weighted contracts. Pirating actually help the 90s artists. Because having pirated their music there than able to spend their money on the band t-shirts and other merchandising which actually go to the artists wallet
It's more like telling them that if they're going to play then they have to play fair with everybody because they're only so much room in the market. so is essential that those who are allowed to compete do so in a manner that serves the entire country. Is only the industry's failure to handle themselves proactively to ensure this that has forced the government to step in and try to give the isps another chance to find a way to get everyone decent internet cuz that's what people pay you for that's why we support you the existence of your business that's why the people support the government recognizing and protecting the ability for you to do business. If the isps continue to fuck it up the government is left no choice but to take on the job themselves because private business as shown they are incapable or unwilling to do the job right. If you don't want them or interference and your business then do yourself a favor and limit yourself before an external force is forced to do it for you. Sure it's your business but the way you do your business fux with our lives. We are against you were for us and you're only able to exist as a business because we have been yet made laws that allow us to take everything away from you so play nice
On another note, where where do you find the option to edit a post ?always end up with typos and can't figure out how to revise them
That would depend. The value of a given holding of money to an individual is dependent in the specific context of what will happen if that money wasn't available. For instance. If the wether or not I have that money results in a safety concern or simply may not achieve a disired outcome unrelated to basic survival and viability of being lawful. The distinct ion between the two is so fundlemental relevent to human experience and making sound judge ment that our languages are littered with words created address these separate concepts. Needs vs wants, essential vs indulgent. Nessesity vs luxury. If the whole country can be intelligently managed to enable access to the internet at 10mbs where previously there where gaps in service quality, and the cost amounts to some people who have everything they need might only get 10 extra luxery items instead of 20, seems a small disruptive to pay for countywide upgrades on basic infrastructure.
if if didn't we would have litigated physics until they were to our liking and antigrav , ftl travel would have been written into existence. we wuld just make it illegal to for death to occur, we would all live forever. running out of room? we'll just litigate tardis rooms that are bigger in then out into exhistence.. no no my friends. i'm afraid reality will always the higher authority to legality. laws are wishes made en masse. nothing more
But the fact remains, "Any reproduction of this broadcast in whole or in part without the expressed written consent of the NFL is strictly prohibited". So no, you shouldn't be able to stream it in that way.
If it's an actual broadcast, they lose all expectation to stop distribution once they put it out there. It's the equivalent of shouting from a mountain top (and in many cases it is literally that) and expecting all those who hear you to not repeat what you said. Even if copyright law is on their side, common sense says "fuck you".
No it doesn't. Obligatory Car Analogy: If you park your car in public, should I be able to take it? It's just sitting there in public. You chose to leave it there.
nope, because your car never left the parking lot, you still have your car, what i would be doing is observing your vehickle and making my own that looks and works just like it, al without ever touching anything you own. money isnt real until its in your hand. its not yours until tyou have it. future earnings don't exist they are purely thoretical. and as such do not equate to real value. and thus nothing would be owed you. for you have been deprived of nothing that you actually possesed this may not be supported by law. but is enforced by reality. reality trumps legality
As long as he is completing his responsibilities within deadline, and the rate of pay equitable to what is generated or retained by the employees labor, then how or when he does his work is nobody else's business
If you hire competent people then after they get the hang of their job over time they become more and more efficient at it. Now I see how it might be advantageous to an employer to attempt to extort additional productivity without an increase in salary or wages but there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. As long as that employee was generating income or preventing loss of at the cost of empoying them plus a polite ten percent fir the company, the company is getting it's moneys worth. An employee is a labor vendor. A employer is a client. You get what you pay for, and working more efficient ly doesn't give a person their time back then why would anyone ever be motivated to more then the minimal.