Slashdot Mirror


Jack White Bans Cellphones At Concerts For '100% Human Experience' (nme.com)

Singer and guitarist Jack White has banned the use of mobile phones at upcoming live shows. NME reports that the policy will be strictly enforced, requiring concert-goers to lock up their smartphones in pouches." From the report: White embarks on a tour of the U.S. from April, with a statement announcing that shows would be "phone-free," confirming: "No photos, video or audio recording devices allowed." "We think you'll enjoy looking up from your gadgets for a little while and experience music and our shared love of it IN PERSON," the statement adds. "Upon arrival at the venue, all phones and other photo or video-capturing gizmos will be secured in a Yondr pouch that will be unlocked at the end of the show. You keep your pouch-secured phone on you during the show and, if needed, can unlock your phone at any time in a designated Yondr Phone Zone located in the lobby or concourse." "For those looking to do some social media postings, let us help you with that. Our official tour photographer will be posting photos and videos after the show... Repost our photos & videos as much as you want and enjoy a phone-free, 100% human experience."

294 comments

  1. is this from the artist himself by desdinova+216 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    or is this from some record label person?

    1. Re:is this from the artist himself by Luthair · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would be shocked if it wasn't Jack White making the decision. The record labels don't give a shit since from their perspective touring is just marketing for album sales / streaming.

    2. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely it's JB's own thing, he manages himself.

    3. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Black? Are we talking about Tenacious-D or the White Stripes?

    4. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not nearly as bad as adding -ly to the end of words. Yumly, Bitly,bucketlistly. ? .

      Thankfully trump put ban end to that idiocy

    5. Re: is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t forget adding hep computer terms like slash or dot to a name.

    6. Re:is this from the artist himself by sabri · · Score: 0, Troll

      I never heard of the guy, and probably never will again. But this is one artist who does not want his fans to show up. What is this guy thinking?

      "You can pay me a lot of money so I can sing songs, and in exchange for your hard-earned money I will forbid you to bring your cellphone". What an asshat.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    7. Re:is this from the artist himself by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If people valued their "hard-earned" money, they wouldn't be wasting it on a live show that they're watching on their phone. This is about people getting their actual money's worth: seeing a skilled musician performing live, not through a screen.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    8. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats the bug bounty on violating the TOS, and posting the forbidden video? Put a number on it; and he can Streisand effect himself out of a record label while becoming a lol meme (but maybe that was the plan all along...)

    9. Re: is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol.

      You've never heard of Jack White. ...Lol.

    10. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really missed the point. Do you even listen to music?

    11. Re:is this from the artist himself by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      A lot of concert goers get pretty irritated with the idiots on phones. You can tweet about it later.

    12. Re: is this from the artist himself by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Funny

      There's apparently more of us. He seems to be one of the many US artists I've never heard of, and most likely never will. Also, this.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    13. Re:is this from the artist himself by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      People go to shows so they can post on social media about it and get some likes. It's a competition with other social media users, who all seem to be having more fun (because they don't post about the day-to-day drudgery).

      These days an experience is only worth having if you can post it on Facebook later.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      album sales / streaming

      Aren't those negatively impacted by people recording shows? Pretty sure that's a big part of it. I mean the article specifically quotes: "No photos, video or audio recording devices allowed."

    15. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..go sodomize yourselves with retractable batons!!!

      Nevr!

    16. Re:is this from the artist himself by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or is this from some record label person?

      The record labels are only interested in making sure you don't bring an SLR with a nice lens into concerts. Apparently my $5000 Leica was allowed because it wasn't a good camera :-)

      There's actually a few artists speaking out against the absurd fuckery that is people recording poorly lit unwatchable content with sound that ultimately is little more than a monotonous -0dB level with the occasional distorted blip into something that sounds like actual music. Here's Roger Water's (That's Pink Floyd for the millennials) take on the issue:

      “For my part I would never turn on a cell phone at any musical event,” he wrote, “whether it’s at The Met, The Garden or anywhere else. It would seem to me to show a lack of respect to and care for fellow concert goers or for that matter for the artist. Apart from anything else, how could I possibly truly experience the thing I’d paid to see and hear, if I was fiddling with an iPhone, filming or twittering or chatting or whatever?”

      Seriously I've never seen anyone look at one of these recordings. If they did their eyes and ears would bleed. Why do people make them?

    17. Re:is this from the artist himself by skegg · · Score: 2

      These days an experience is only worth having if you can post it on Facebook later.

      Later !? Even that's too kind. It needs to be posted on Facebook stat !

      I can understand wanting to capture a moment (photo, video) to prompt one's memory in the future. Of course, living the entire experience through a lens ain't right.

      I like the move taken by this artist, especially the hiring of a professional event photographer and making the media freely available.

    18. Re:is this from the artist himself by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jack Black? Are we talking about Tenacious-D or the White Stripes?

      They need a battle of the bands type battle between Jack Black and Jack White. Maybe do it for charity or something. They can call it the Jack Off.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    19. Re:is this from the artist himself by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Eh... you know, you don't need to literally be watching through your phone in order to record with your phone, right? (Not saying I do it, practically impossible to do well at the sort of venues I go to - EDM/raves/etc, as the bass is just so, so strong! XD)

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    20. Re:is this from the artist himself by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I would be shocked if it wasn't Jack White making the decision. The record labels don't give a shit since from their perspective touring is just marketing for album sales / streaming.

      Jack White (of the White Stripes fame) is powerful enough of an artist and has enough fans that he's not dependent on a label to get sales any more, in fact he can pretty much pick and choose his label now. He's an old school musician, so I'd also be shocked if it didn't come from him.

      There has been some research that people who record things with their phone have a poorer memory of the event because they're not actually paying attention to it, they're paying attention to the phone they're recording it with. The flipside of this is that if you zoom in you tend to have a clearer memory of it as you're focusing instead of just framing (not that people who record things with phones even bother framing, but I digress).

      I largely agree with this stance, the last concert I went to I kept my phone in my pocket from the moment the band started to the moment I left. Given White's audience, I doubt they'res going to be much resistance to it, most will remember a time before we all had mobile phones, let alone smartphones.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    21. Re:is this from the artist himself by Megane · · Score: 1

      If they did their eyes and ears would bleed. Why do people make them?

      Because their eyes and ears bled so long ago they can't tell the difference anymore. Still, I think vertical video is even more hideous, and they are likely to do that too.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    22. Re:is this from the artist himself by CodeHog · · Score: 2

      You might think they have an impact to sales and you'd be right. Except not in a negative way. It actually helps increase the sales for an artist. Most of the recordings are crappy and not many people really care enough about an artist to listen to a crappy version of their favorite song. It makes for a good story though when sales drop off for an "artist" who starts making crappy music and it doesn't sale anymore.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    23. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      No. People go to shows to be entertained. Fucking stupid millenials and younger do the retarded shit you mentioned, once again ruining it for the majority of us, once again proving we can't have nice things because of that behaviour.

    24. Re:is this from the artist himself by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Apparently my $5000 Leica was allowed because it wasn't a good camera :-)

      Now I wonder if I could get my Spotmatic F in and just stick the radioactive 50mm f/1.4 or the 3rd party 135mm f/2.3 on it and push some ISO 400 film to 6400. If that fails there is always bringing in one of those old pocket folding cameras and really pushing the ISO. Given what you said about looking like a good camera I bet one could bring in a Hasselblad 500 C/M as those all look like they are antiques and no one would be the wiser. They would stop everyone who has any version of a Canon Rebel with the kit lens. Also I don't think they will be able to tell a nice lens from bad lens as I don't think anyone who isn't really serious about photography would be able to recognize a good lens from bad lens. If they could then the vast majority of kit lenses would already be in the trash.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    25. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need a battle of the bands type battle between Jack Black and Jack White. Maybe do it for charity or something. They can call it the Jack Off.

      I'd be shocked if Jack Black hasn't already approached Jack White with this exact idea.

    26. Re:is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a rock show a few years back with some friends. The couple behind us asked us to keep it down because they were recording it on their phone. What. The. Fuck.

    27. Re: is this from the artist himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of him either. After looking him up on YouTube and listening to a bit of his music, I also know why: Because I don't listen to shit music.

    28. Re:is this from the artist himself by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      Thank god, I was afraid I'd need yet another reason to not go see ...uhhh...what's his name?

    29. Re:is this from the artist himself by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      Sounds like an invitation to sing along, loudly and offkey the whole time to me

    30. Re:is this from the artist himself by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      There has been some research that people who record things with their phone have a poorer memory of the event because they're not actually paying attention to it, they're paying attention to the phone they're recording it with.

      Similar research has been done around taking notes in classes. I've certainly seen the effects of that myself. I seldom took notes but paid attention to the speaker. Later, while studying, I saw some fellow students really struggling, even though they had practically written their own textbook with the notes they were taking. They were concentrating on taking the notes, which meant they had to "teach themselves" the material from the notes after the fact.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    31. Re:is this from the artist himself by sabri · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really missed the point. Do you even listen to music?

      Yes I do. The good stuff. Like Jean Michel Jarre. Which you probably never heard of.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    32. Re: is this from the artist himself by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Can you understand needing a phone to call Lyft for a ride home? Or being notified if thereâ(TM)s a family emergency ?

      Imagine the lines for the stupid pouch things. What this is is a desperate attempt at attention.

    33. Re:is this from the artist himself by Chuk · · Score: 1

      The venues on this tour are giant arenas -- 90% of the audience is going to be viewing him via video screens set up over the stage. (Including me.)

      --
      chuk
  2. Who? by Pezbian · · Score: 2

    n/t

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:Who?

      Jack White is Jack Black's counterpart in an alternate dimension. See http://www.imdb.com/title/tt46...

      How is this relevant to Slashdot? hmmm... Oh! I got it. Cell Phones = Electronics = Nerds.

      I can't wait until we see a post regarding The Real Housewives of New York. Remember that episode when they all dropped their cell phones in the sink while doing their hair? Good stuff.

    2. Re:Who? by DeathElk · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's not black like Barry White is, he's white like Frank Black is.

    3. Re:Who? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rather than mod you as a troll I'd like to take this opportunity to say that anyone who completely avoids the subject of the article in favor of making fun of an artist who they'd like to belittle by insinuating that nobody ever heard of them or in particular you're too good to have ever heard of them is being childish.

      (I think I've done it too regarding some pop-tart so I can't claim much moral superiority or anything).

      I'm not a fan of Jack White. I've heard the name, but I have no idea what kind of music he even plays, but I do know that I can type "Jack White" into Google and find out in as long as it would take me to listen to some of his music.....which I will do now....after I get another beer.

      ....a few songs and a beer later....

      I can now honestly say that I'm still not a Jack White fan, but at least his music isn't terrible. That's just a subjective opinion of course....the first song even reminded me of David Bowie just a little bit. And I even liked one of his other songs.

      God forbid I might get so bored during a show that I would need to pull out my phone. Can I still bring a camera? Maybe I should just go home.

      I've recorded shows before, both audio and video and it really does get in the way of enjoying a concert.

      Even just recording one or two songs with your phone takes a lot away from your enjoyment of the moment.

      Not only that but when you're in an audience and the stage is obscured by dozens of people holding up their cell phones above their heads that takes a lot away from the experience as well.

      So I support this move by this White guy. I mean it's his show and if his fans don't like it they can stay home. His other fans might just appreciate the lack of phones in their faces.

    4. Re:Who? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I do like this album

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Who? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      He's not black like Barry White is, he's white like Frank Black is.

      We dont need no water let the mother fucker burn... burn mother fucker, burn.

      The 90's fucking rocked.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Who? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of Jack White. I've heard the name, but I have no idea what kind of music he even plays, but I do know that I can type "Jack White" into Google and find out in as long as it would take me to listen to some of his music.....which I will do now....after I get another beer.

      ....a few songs and a beer later....

      I get and agree with your point... but

      For the uninitiated, Jack White is of the White Stripes, a rock/grunge band from the 1990's. He plays an instrument and survives without auto tune. I went to a White Stripes concert in the 00's. Just about everyone would recognise the distinct sound of Seven Nation Army even if they've got no clue about Jack White or the White stripes.

      Jack White has been in the industry long enough not to depend on labels to create fans, so he gets to do things like this with no problems. Most of his fans will be going there to see and hear him anyway.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Who? by codlong · · Score: 1

      I totally agree it takes away from the experience of being there. My daughter played a lot of softball growing up, and sadly I don't have any videos of it to enjoy now. Mainly because the few times I tried, I just didn't feel like I was watching the games. So I put the camera down and enjoyed the event.

    8. Re: Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody's talking about the White Stripes but Jack was also front for the Raconteurs and the Dead Weather as well as having a viable solo career. I'm partial to his work with the Raconteurs myself.

    9. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bravo *golf claps*. Thank you, sir, for taking the high road.

      Now FOAD you neckbeard cheetoh humper.

    10. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're presuming intent on the part of the previous poster. I doubt it's to "make fun of". I don't know who the guy was either, and that was my reaction too. The conclusion I came up with is that either I'm a complete cultural troglodyte (which I sort of am), or this is another Slashdot advertisement disguised as a news story. It's reassuring to know I'm not the only one who had no idea.

    11. Re:Who? by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      What's next, you can't talk to people while the artist is on stage?

      Granted, I'm a little annoyed by people at the front of the stage who have their phones out to record the entire show, but I think security should just toss them out of the venue instead of locking everyone's phone up.

    12. Re:Who? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Is that like the Megele Effect, foisted on the world by Dr. They?

    13. Re:Who? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Except that's a quote from "The Roof Is On Fire" by Rock Master Scott and the Dynamic Three from the 80s.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    14. Re:Who? by Pezbian · · Score: 1

      Your light-handed approach convinced me to do some research. Jack White is half of The White Stripes! I know their music. I was never a fanatic, but I don't hate it.

      I'd mod you up if I could, but it looks like you're maxed out already, as well you should be.

      Thank you for your positive approach and I guarantee I will pay it forward sevenfold.

      --
      In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    15. Re:Who? by Pezbian · · Score: 1

      He's not black like Barry White is, he's white like Frank Black is.

      We dont need no water let the mother fucker burn... burn mother fucker, burn.

      The 90's fucking rocked.

      "Hello, my name is Jimmy Pop and I'm a Dumb White Guy. I'm not old or new, but middle-school, Eighth Grade like Junior High..."

      --
      In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    16. Re:Who? by Pezbian · · Score: 1

      Except that's a quote from "The Roof Is On Fire" by Rock Master Scott and the Dynamic Three from the 80s.

      Bloodhound Gang covered and mutated it so it took a level in awesome, gaining a decade or so of relevance. It was featured in one of the CKY videos due to Bam Margera being a personal friend of Jimmy Pop of Bloodhound Gang.

      --
      In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  3. In before... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    In before all the posts crying "what if there's a disaster and the Yondr system goes down and all the lights go out and I need to call home and I can't be without my phone because reasons and disaster and my rights and oh noes and I need an Uber car and my kids must be able to reach me and did I mention active shooter and what do I do if there's a disaster?"

    --
    Beware of the Leopard.
    1. Re: In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No I am simpler. My phone runs my diabetic equipment. Itâ(TM)s even been in surgery with me and I was the patient.

      Can take my phone unless you want to help kill me. Get over it.

    2. Re: In before... by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is you know fuck-all about diabetes. Got it. I'm not OP, but maybe at least read the wiki. I had a coworker who was skinnier than you could imagine with some rare-ass form of diabetes that I can't remember and the meds for that alone were 1000k+ a month. He wasn't on a machine, and didn't have an app, but if he didn't take the pill daily that was likely it for him.

    3. Re: In before... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      1000k+ a month?

      You know that's a million dollars, right?

    4. Re: In before... by Pahroza · · Score: 2

      Shit. Yes, I actually do. I meant to write $1000/mo. Mea Culpa.

    5. Re: In before... by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what you're saying is you know fuck-all about diabetes. Got it. I'm not OP, but maybe at least read the wiki.

      Don't read the wiki, it's full of stuff that's not medically recognized like "type 3" and "type 1.5" among other garbage. There's only three types 1, 2 and gestational(pregnant women), everything else has it's own diagnosis standard and despite the people pushing for LADA(adult onset) to become a new one. It's still type 1 even if you develop it in adulthood, the treatments are the same, the precautions are the same. If they were paying $1k/mo they were likely paying for a brand new drug, where a combination of 2 medications would have only run them $60/mo. The farce with liraglutide is a good example. $1k/mo, but could be done with two drugs.

      This happens a lot when sales reps push doctors to use "new" medications because they're obviously better, and safer, that's what they're saying and you best believe it! Ever wonder why the vast majority of reps are stunningly pretty women who were hired based on their looks not their background? I'll give ya a hint, it's because male or female both respond to the tactic.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re: In before... by Pahroza · · Score: 2

      Thank you for your insight. You're obviously more knowledgable than I am on the subject, and you could very well be right about the cause for the price of the coworkers meds.

      My initial point was that one should not assume all diabetics are overweight. I've dealt also with gestational diabetes among members of my family, so I have done some research, though am not as well versed as you are.

    7. Re: In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit your bullshit. None of the insulin pumps out there that interface with a smart-phone app rely on the app because that would require the manufacturer to certify your phone for life-critical operations which will never happen.

    8. Re: In before... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely not knowledgeable on it, similar to you just dealing with multiple family members over 30+ years, one of my sisters is type 1, and had a great aunt and aunt on my fathers side who developed type 2. Just like anything else, you pick some stuff up and the rest you have to stay abreast with because of various reasons.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re: In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this, and a an anesthesiologist for a minor case if probably let you keep your pump on but for anything else is have you turn it off and check sugar myself and give you insulin. No pump required. If you're taking about your 10 minute colonoscopy you didn't need the insulin pump anyway.

    10. Re: In before... by antek9 · · Score: 1

      What? The guy you're replying to seems to know more than you about diabetes if you have to bring up an anecdote of (your words) a rare-ass form of it just to prove his point in the end: diabetics are, on the whole, more commonly whales than dolphins. Get over it.

      And to the person that needs to bring all that equipment to a two hour concert: Have your dinner before going to the venue, measure your glucose level, pop your Insulin accordingly, and you're going to be fine for the next hours (unless you actively try to kill yourself by slurping lots of softdrinks or beer while you're there, but maybe, just maybe, that same lack of self discipline is what brought you your metabolic syndrome in the first place).

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    11. Re: In before... by jshackney · · Score: 1

      If they were paying $1k/mo they were likely paying for a brand new drug, where a combination of 2 medications would have only run them $60/mo.

      Man, I don't know what insurance you're talking about, but we fork over about $500/month [cost of insulin, infusion sets/reservoirs, amortized costs of quarterly Endo visit, lancets (actually no co-pay on those!), and test strips (insurance won't cover those at all so we buy out of pocket)]. This is on top of a approx. $700/month insurance premium. I wouldn't know what to do if I were paying $60/month. One 10ml vial of humalog costs me $180. We're using an out of date Medtronics Paradigm pump as well to keep costs down because the insurance won't cover a newer pump, particularly a model that supports GCM/phone apps (looking at about $15k out of pocket for the new whiz-bangery). All told, the preponderance of my insurance/medical out-of-pocket costs goes toward diabetes and it easily adds up to $1200/month (if you include my premiums).

      ** [ I looked into a higher premium plan, but based on the expenses vs. deductible vs. what's covered, I wouldn't get any more out of it and the insurance company would get significantly more money from me ]

    12. Re: In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had read GP, you'd know he mentioned a "pill", not insulin.

    13. Re: In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Izzat hard disk $ or RAM $? 4% difference there

    14. Re: In before... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      No I am simpler. My phone runs my diabetic equipment.

      Just because you're suicidal doesn't mean you should use your phone at a concert.

      Oh and quit lying. There's no life dependent system in the world that is approved for medical use if it requires to be tethered to a phone.

    15. Re:In before... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You know, for a Known Nutter you're making a surprising amount of sense :-)

    16. Re: In before... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Man, I don't know what insurance you're talking about, but we fork over about $500/month

      For around $300/mo in Canada, I can get all of what you're talking about with 80% payment by green shield or blue cross. Drop it to 60-70% and it nearly halves the cost with no upper limit. If you're paying that much and you're in the US, well it sure didn't get any better after Obamacare managed to drive the insurance rates right through the roof. I should know, several of my neighbors down in FL who weren't on medicaid and lost their insurance were in very tight spots and/or ended up selling their homes and going into a nursing home.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    17. Re: In before... by torkus · · Score: 1

      And to the person that needs to bring all that equipment to a two hour concert: Have your dinner before going to the venue, measure your glucose level, pop your Insulin accordingly, and you're going to be fine for the next hours (unless you actively try to kill yourself by slurping lots of softdrinks or beer while you're there, but maybe, just maybe, that same lack of self discipline is what brought you your metabolic syndrome in the first place).

      Are you kidding? No, you're just an idiot who doesn't know what they're talking about so let me clue you in. Type 1 diabetics - the ones who need to closely monitor their glucose levels and use insulin - didn't get that way because of their diet. They also wouldn't check their levels *right after* dinner. In fact, doing that then NOT checking for several hours is dangerous. There's cumulative damage from high blood sugar and the danger of passing out *or dying* from low blood sugar.

      So climb back down off that pillar of righteousness you've got over there.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    18. Re:In before... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Meh. I would simply destroy whatever locking sack you made me use as a matter of general principle. You'd either get an empty & shredded one back at the door; or they wouldn't get it back at all and I'd cut it open at home, though I can't imagine that anything cheap enough to hand out in concert-goer numbers would be durable enough that I couldn't work out *some* way to open it quickly.

      If you want to embrace some "Life isn't life unless you're living solely in the moment." or "The playa is your one true home; embrace radical self-reliance and discard the trappings of the default world." pseudo-spirituality, then fine. You do you. Don't presume to impose whatever hippy-dippy gobbledygook you've invented up on others though.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    19. Re: In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone, and maybe an add-on or two to do the testing, is a lot of equipment? TIL. Sheesh.

    20. Re:In before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody wanna take bets on how long "sufficiently motivated Individuals" (aka pissed-off concert-goers) with the technical wherewithal will let all his wireless equipment do what it's supposed to do?

    21. Re: In before... by torkus · · Score: 1

      No I am simpler. My phone runs my diabetic equipment.

      Just because you're suicidal doesn't mean you should use your phone at a concert.

      Oh and quit lying. There's no life dependent system in the world that is approved for medical use if it requires to be tethered to a phone.

      JFC do you really not have the decency to google two words like "diabetes smartphone" before accusing someone of lying about a medical condition and device? Any who does (or, ya know, has or knows someone with diabetes) will know how completely wrong your bold declarative statement actually is.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    22. Re: In before... by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Type 1 diabetes is rare, and type 2 diabetes is the more common syndrome, growing rapidly among your fellow citizens, strongly correlated to their ever growing waist diameters, which is the type I was obviously talking about. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

      If there is, as you say, "cumulative damage from high blood sugar and the danger of passing out *or dying* from low blood sugar," then simply going keto will probably remove that danger from your life. Keep those glucose levels low in the first place.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  4. This is a good precedent! by Templer421 · · Score: 4

    Hope this becomes the rule.

    1. Re:This is a good precedent! by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 3, Informative

      THere's zero chance that it will. Even though I don't use my phone during shows, the sheer inconvenience of this process ensures that I would never attend a show in which it was required. I'm certain I'm far from alone here.

      This is a marginal at best artist sniffing his own farts.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re: This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on... This is so unhandy. These pouches are also quite large and uncomfortable to carry. Why can't they at least make like a normal phone case? Just have the discipline to leave the phone in your pocket...

    3. Re:This is a good precedent! by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I'm on call 24/7/365.25, and have 4 small children who by the nature of childhood are prone to accidents and other crises. Anyplace I cannot answer a phone on the first ring is someplace I cannot and do not wish to be.

    4. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good. I'll be at the concert and I'll enjoy not have annoying cell-phone addled paranoid people like you around.

    5. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excuse me if I read into your comment more than I should have, when I read it I got the impression that you dislike this policy and believe that it should not be allowed for them to confiscate / disable / make otherwise unusable your phone. If that's not what you meant, then ignore me.

      Now for my response based on how I interpreted yours:
      What you said is fine. You should understand the position you're in, and that there are certain times and places that don't make any sense for you. A concert, movie theater, Broadway show and any other such venue where it is completely and utterly inappropriate for someone to be a distraction to others are examples of things you simply should not attending with such demands placed on you. I would also hope that your children would be left in capable hands when you aren't around them, and that you stop worrying so darn much as it's not good for them or you! Maybe that's why you think they are so prone to "other crisis", because your definition of crisis needs to be reevaluated and adjusted. The thing is, the last part of your statement says it all... If you can't answer your phone on the first ring, it's someplace you cannot and do not wish to be. Simple, don't go there. Don't expect others to lessen their experience just so you can live your unnecessarily over-stressed lifestyle.

    6. Re: This is a good precedent! by chispito · · Score: 1

      I have two young ones and I just figure, my parents did fine on date nights when I was growing up with no cell phones. It's a foreign concept now but the way you used to do it was leave a series of emergency contacts. As for the always on call part, not sure what that's all about.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    7. Re:This is a good precedent! by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      No. Their concert, their right to make whatever rules they wish. No one is forcing anyone to attend. My point is that I *cannot* attend if that is the policy they choose to make, and that is likely the case for many, many other people as well. Better approach IMO: ask customers to agree to emergency use only, and deal with offenders on a case by case basis.

    8. Re:This is a good precedent! by Pascoea · · Score: 1
      I remember going to a theater production when I was younger and pagers were the only means of communication. There was a strict "no pager" policy, indicating that if yours went off you would be escorted out of the theater. They offered to monitor your pager for you, and come deliver the message if it went off. Perhaps augmenting this policy with something like that would help.

      I know how you feel about your kids, but what exactly are you going to do to help them when you are in the middle of the concert and they are presumably at home?

      From a professional side, I can't imagine a profession that is required (in the truest meaning of that word) to be able to answer the phone within one ring at any time of day or night. Your boss, customers, patients, whatever may get mad at you, but that's different. You make it sound like being able to answer your phone at any time is a life critical situation. If it actually is life or death that you answer the phone immediately I'd love to know what you do for a living.

    9. Re:This is a good precedent! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Like trying to enforce something on the "Honor System" seems to be working... There are too many "It's about ME!" people out there who don't care and throwing out all these folks is a logistical and legal nightmare.

      As draconian as these rules are, If you don't like them, don't buy a ticket and stay home or go to some other show that doesn't do this.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re: This is a good precedent! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Come on... This is so unhandy. These pouches are also quite large and uncomfortable to carry. Why can't they at least make like a normal phone case? Just have the discipline to leave the phone in your pocket...

      Or leave it in your car?

      The pouches are for those who simply MUST have their phone on them. If you are not on call or need to answer he emergency call from the babysitter, leave the phone in the car. Problem solved.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you wouldn't be at a concert, because you're a responsible adult, RIGHT?

    12. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, people are assholes, that policy will not work. Just don't go if you or yours can't survive without a phone for a couple hours. Or wear a pager.

    13. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not have children if your approach is that a child will always be in capable hands as accidents will/are going to happen, regardless of who is watching them. I can leave my kids with my spouse and somehow life will find a way for a drunk driver to strike their vehicle on their way home, I'd prefer to know about that accident as soon as it happens not 4 hours later after I've retrieved my phone from some locked bag.

      I enjoy concerts and movies, but I also need to be able to answer my phone the moment my child or spouse contacts me. They know I'm occupied but they're told to contact me if its a true emergency, and if my phone rings, I click Accept while I proceed to get up, leave my chair and make my way to a quiet hallway or space in the back and away from everyone else enjoying their money's worth. At a concert, this might mean a good minute walk to decend stadium seating, but in the end I'm not bothering anyone with my cell and I'm able to be contacted by those who need to. I think these types of policies are more of weak effort to combat recording of content versus providing a 'human experience.'

    14. Re:This is a good precedent! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever had to carry an actual pager, as opposed to receiving notifications to my phone, if it ever went off I'd be immediately on my way out anyway. It wasn't "life or death" but it was the top of the escalation chain after all other avenues had been exhausted. And it wasn't tied into PagerDuty or any other automated system. Other humans had to first be contacted, tried and concluded that they couldn't deal with the issue, before manually escalating to whoever had the pager. So... same result either way. Hell, I'd have been booking it out of there before anyone had a chance to come "escort" me.

      There are plenty of professions, some "life or death", some not; that require after-hours reachability. Working in one of them should not mean that you sit at home all the time and never have a social life.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    15. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's hard to believe humanity was able to thrive before a cell phone! How did all those parents raise their children who went on to raise children and so forth before the 1980s?

    16. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never use my cell phone at concerts but nobody has the right to tell me I cant

    17. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are totally right, people with responsibilities should never get relaxation time. Only people with no obligations and low stress should get to enjoy their favorite artists.

    18. Re:This is a good precedent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone having a phone in their pocket bother you? He didn't say he wanted to film or anything, just that if he gets called he wants to be able to answer.

  5. This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lots of artists are doing this now. A Perfect Circle/Tool refuses to perform with phones, pretty much lighting of any kind, or vapes. Their roadies will call the security teams if they see smoke. It is obviously for Maynard, but also for the rest of the audience that is smart enough to not be a complete douche hole for others in the audience.

    1. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha no vapes that's a great one. Let me guess they don't use stage fog machines either then? The juice that goes into those fog machines is pretty much exactly what is in a vape other than the addition of flavor and a minute amount of nicotine.

    2. Re: This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be pretty surprised if Tool did bullshit like stage fog. Do you not know about Maynard? He's not about flashy stage BS.

    3. Re: This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen Tool live, but I saw A Perfect Circle and there was no flashy stage junk going on.

    4. Re: This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you go see Tool FOR the flashy stage BS, idiot.

  6. Featured article has autoplaying video by tepples · · Score: 0

    While viewing the featured article in Firefox ESR 52, after I scrolled to a certain point, an autoplaying video of a singer-guitarist popped up in the lower right hand corner of the viewport. Audio played for about half a second. I clicked the X button to make the video go away, but then a few seconds later, the audio resumed playing in a video above the scroll position.

    1. Re:Featured article has autoplaying video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clicked the X button to make the video go away

      Don't even bother. Any time a website has anything autoplaying and/or sticky on it just skip straight to opening the element hider and creating a new adblock/ublock filter. If shit's still playing in the background after that either open the Blockable Items pane and start going ham or just close the tab and mentally blacklist that site.

    2. Re:Featured article has autoplaying video by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      My browser has a 'close tab' feature that quickly stops any self playing shit.

    3. Re:Featured article has autoplaying video by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a news site, not the artist's site.

  7. And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is why I don't bother with live venues anymore.

    Between the assholes in the audience and the assholes on stage...

    Not sure what happened to "just come in, be a decent person and enjoy the scene".

    So fuck them all. NONE of them get a cent of my money.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:And shit like this by Pahroza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, you pretty much said it, most people can't be decent people anymore. I'm not a fan of the artist mentioned here, but I do think an artist should be able to perform under conditions they'd like to perform. Siouxsie Sioux for example has -- in the past -- been a stickler for venue temperature when she performs because her vocal chords could be damaged otherwise. While that could suck if you didn't know you should dress warmer or colder to what you're used to, that's her livelihood.

      I wouldn't expect people at an opera to be holding up their phones and carrying on with random conversations either. Don't like the rules, don't go.

      So I guess I both agree and disagree with you. It's your money, you do what you want with it, but you could miss out on some great performances just because you don't want to give up your "right" to something.

    2. Re:And shit like this by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is why I don't bother with live venues anymore.

      Between the assholes in the audience and the assholes on stage...

      Not sure what happened to "just come in, be a decent person and enjoy the scene".

      THANK YOU!!! If that's how you feel about live music in 2018, you're either going to the wrong shows or YOU'RE the one we don't want there. Most of the festival and one-off shows I see are a good time with no crowd problems. I generally avoid stadiums and large arenas because you are too far away to see anything and the prices are too high, but smaller theaters and clubs provide the same great experience the always have.

      Humanity's biggest problem is not that it suddenly changed, it's people writing off the next generation or the current times as past prime and heading downhill. The same phenomenon can be seen in some of the oldest historical accounts and literature we know. It just means you're crotchety. Most people are still good, decent people.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    3. Re:And shit like this by quonset · · Score: 1

      Not sure what happened to "just come in, be a decent person and enjoy the scene".

      Like the people at this concert?

    4. Re:And shit like this by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have no problem not holding up my phone. I dont' use it. I have a problem having to go through a process to lock it in a bag and unlock it because of some primadonna fuckwad. As for Siouxe Sioux, I could give a fuck if it's her livelihood. If I'm attending the show I'm PAYING her fucking livlihood. THOUSANDS of singers can sing without exact requirements to temperature, myself included. If I'm paying the increasingly rediculous sums for a show and it's uncomfortable? I'm getting a fucking refund.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:And shit like this by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Just go to outdoor, multi-day music festivals for live music. Not only do you get to see a lot of great acts that you've probably never heard of before, but most people there are too stoned to care about dragging out their phone to capture the moment because they're too busy being in it.

      And if some people do haul out the phones or act like obnoxious shits, you can personally be too stoned to get bothered by any of it.

    6. Re:And shit like this by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, it's action->reaction at it's simplest. You want more rigid rules? Sure, great, deal with the consequences of lower attendance.

      I'm not the one to pull out my phone and hold it up for 30 minutes recording part of a set, but if I get a message I'll check it, and I also don't want to give it up, so like you, won't be going to those shows. I do still think the artist can ask for whatever they want though.

    7. Re:And shit like this by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't expect people at an opera to be holding up their phones and carrying on with random conversations either. Don't like the rules, don't go.

      So I guess I both agree and disagree with you. It's your money, you do what you want with it, but you could miss out on some great performances just because you don't want to give up your "right" to something.

      You also won't see many people in jeans at operas or people in tuxedos at rock concerts, cause rock n' roll ain't opera.

      I won't give up my right to not be talked down to, nor my right to see non-egomaniacs who actually appreciate the audiences who pay for their lavish lifestyles, hence I won't pay to see Jack White. His music is good, but it isn't worth dealing with him, so I can stand to miss it. Crowds may be the target of his whiny brand of angst now, but in the past he's started public shit with The Black Keys, Meg White, Billy Childish, journalists, Twitter, Lady Gaga, vegans, the dude from the Von Bondies, etc., etc...

      A wise man once told me, if you run into an asshole in the morning, big deal, you ran into an asshole. But if you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole. Jack White is that guy who whines about everyone and everything.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    8. Re:And shit like this by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      How times have changed. When I was much younger I remember people getting caught sneaking in cameras and recording equipment. It typically resulted in the equipment getting smashed by security/roadies and getting the shit kicked out of them by security/roadies. In all honesty, I preferred that to people holding up phones and fucking iPads in front of everyone behind them.

      I don't have an problem with people taking a picture during a concert, with a non tablet sized device, but recording the entire concert is ridiculous. I'd prefer to not go through the inconvenience of locking/unlocking a bag to use my phone though. I'd like to see them simply ban tablets and throw people out of the venue after one warning for holding up their camera for more than a quick snapshot.

    9. Re:And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 2

      Okay, going to echo Gojira Shipi-Taro here.

      I have no problem NOT holding up my camera to bootleg the performance.

      I have no problem memorizing and retaining the experience with two pieces of OEM equipment.

      The Mark I Eyeball.
      The Mark I Binaural Ear Set.

      If I have to make, or take a call, I'll get the hell out of the audience (or the venue if necessary) and take/make the call.

      I don't need some self-riteous asshole to tell me how to act like a goddamn adult.
      Hell, I don't even take that shit from my MOTHER (and DAMN if she doesn't have the capital to claim it anyhow).

      Them demanding I put it in a lock-bag under THEIR control is treating me like a child.
      It's also telling me "I don't want your money."

      Fine. They can fuck off without my money.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    10. Re:And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 1

      I'm probably going to the wrong shows.

      And yeah, I'm probably crotchety.

      But I've been this way all my life. I have a low tolerance for people being jackasses, and an even lower tolerance for random nobodies trying to tell me what to do just because they think they're entitled to.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    11. Re:And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 1

      Sorry, if you dislike the content of my post(s), you're entirely free to fuck the hell off.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    12. Re:And shit like this by Pahroza · · Score: 2

      Thanks for something new to read up on, I've never heard of virtue signaling before. Perhaps I'm out of touch. If I had to guess it would have something to do with me expressing my opinions and you not agreeing with them and feeling a little hurt?

    13. Re:And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of a dick move but he's trying to help people enjoy the show.
      It's our first instinct to try and record anything of interest but really who wants to look at shitty pictures of a concert? It's like when people take pictures of fireworks. It's pointless.

    14. Re: And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So youâ(TM)re one of the good folks. But so many people canâ(TM)t keep it in their pants (their cell phone, I mean) that rules like this are becoming more common. It just isnâ(TM)t viable to police all the assholes ruining concerts for everyone else, so we all have to put the phones away.

    15. Re:And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to Jack White, you're the random nobody. And I don't even know his music.

    16. Re: And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah really decent people!! Sexy girls with classic hair cuts and shaking it all. Yeah. Thanks for that

    17. Re: And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're whining about an artist you'll never see making a decision he's allowed to make for a show you'll never go to, prima donna.

    18. Re:And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah! You kids think you're the first to be treated badly by an asshole on stage? Look up Axl Rose sometime....

    19. Re:And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not a fan of the artist mentioned here, but I do think an artist should be able to perform under conditions they'd like to perform."

      Absolutely. However every action as a reaction. So if he's fine with having a small audience to play to because his requirements make a lot of people not bother showing up, that's fine. It's market forces at work, and how you vote with your wallet like everyone says you should.

      So long as the artist doesn't come back and bitch at the general population for alienating him and his shows because they have to keep their precious $800 phone on them, then it's cool. The second he starts bitching about getting what he indirectly asked for though, the gloves come off! :)

    20. Re: And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're whining about an artist you'll never see making a decision he's allowed to make for a show you'll never go to, prima donna.

      You're whining about a poster you'll never meet expressing an opinion he or she is allowed to make about a situation you may or may not care about.

    21. Re:And shit like this by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      cause rock n' roll ain't opera.

      "You were born to rock, You'll never be an opera star, oh, oh oh oh oh ooohhhh" - Neil Young

    22. Re: And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 1

      And like a great many things. I refuse to be treat a certain way based on the bad behavior of others.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    23. Re:And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 1

      Everyone's a random nobody (also known as "A random asshole on the Internet with an Opinion").

      Sure, he may have a larger sphere of people who know him (or of him) than I do.

      So what? It doesn't, somehow, magically make him a better class of human being.
      Nor does it confer on him any superior morality or authority.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    24. Re: And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why did you go out of your way to describe him as a "random nobody" when stating your rationale as to why his opinion doesn't matter to you?

    25. Re: And shit like this by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Try wikipedia:

      Virtue signalling is the conspicuous expression of moral values done primarily with the intent of enhancing standing within a social group.[1] The term was first used in signalling theory, to describe any behavior that could be used to signal virtueâ"especially piety among the religious.[2] In recent years, the term has become more commonly used as a pejorative characterization by commentators to criticize what they regard as empty, or superficial support of certain political views, and also used within groups to criticize their own members for valuing outward appearance over substantive action.[3][4]

    26. Re: And shit like this by Chas · · Score: 1

      *WHOOSH*

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    27. Re:And shit like this by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Part of being decent is not shoving your mobile in everyone's face constantly.

    28. Re:And shit like this by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      He does something you don't do. He gives big concerts. His concerts, his rules. Don't like them, don't go.
      Then when you do something he doesn't do, you can set your rules too.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    29. Re:And shit like this by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Well, you pretty much said it, most people can't be decent people anymore.

      That's the thing right; and it's a big fucking problem.
      No longer can you tell the asshole to stop being an asshole in fear that you may offend them and have a mob of people washing over you calling you intolerant.

      How're you going to receive/pass the J if you're holding a fucking phone in your hand anyways?!
      Everyone's special. Yeah right! Fuck off. Gahh I need coffee...

      --
      I tend to rant.
    30. Re:And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is typical. There are two types of musicians. The first who made their name before the 2000s, and the ones after. Before 2000, it was easy to get a fan base, a name, and make money from CDs. After the 2000s, courtesy of music piracy, the small guys have zero chance of making it (no CD sales possible), so you wind up just being one more voice in the din, while the record labels don't sign bands. They create bands from actors with some musical talent to sing on stage and make a show.

      Hate to say it, but people got their free music from Napster, AudioGalaxy, eDonkey, and BitTorrents. We all paid for that in the end, as, it ensured that only the most established or corporate bands have a chance of success.

      Let Jack White have his power trip. IMHO, His stuff is mediocre and unremarkable (tons of better bands to spend time listening to), and these shenanigans are only to try to get his name into places and websites (like Slashdot) where nobody really gives a shit otherwise.

    31. Re:And shit like this by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Nice one. I haven't heard that NY song in a long time.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    32. Re:And shit like this by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I can relate to that. If they simply said "no recording", that'd be great except that people won't honor that request. But having grown up way before the advent of cell phones, I can appreciate that they facilitate easy communication in an emergency, a major component of their original purpose before they became "smart" with all the extra functions. If my son was out somewhere, I'd feel better knowing he could quickly call home for whatever reason. After all, payphones pretty much don't exist anymore, cellular killed them off.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    33. Re:And shit like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how would the "assholes in the audience" get a cent of your money anyway?

    34. Re: And shit like this by edris90 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, music artists in the 90s made their money through tours and direct merchandising. Almost everything made from CDs sells was absorbed by the record companies through clever accounting , and anti artist weighted contracts. Pirating actually help the 90s artists. Because having pirated their music there than able to spend their money on the band t-shirts and other merchandising which actually go to the artists wallet

    35. Re:And shit like this by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      For comparison, if you attend a performance of "Hamilton", you'll be told at the door that phones must not be used during the show, and if caught, you'll be escorted out of the venue by the usher.

      As long as the rules of the show are stated when you buy the ticket, I don't think anyone has the right to complain.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    36. Re:And shit like this by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Is why I don't bother with live venues anymore.

      Between the assholes in the audience and the assholes on stage...

      Not sure what happened to "just come in, be a decent person and enjoy the scene".

      So fuck them all. NONE of them get a cent of my money.

      Yes. We're teaching people to feel entitled. What they want is more important than what anyone else wants. They don't need to be considerate of anyone else. Sometimes it's really hard to not break their face.

      However sometimes a really nice act comes in. Nice small venue, Hard to stay away.

  8. Very cool by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Who is this guy anyway?

    Is he like one of those grandpas that tour?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Very cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's 42, so yes, he could be a grandpa. But if you mean in the sense of people like The Stones etc., no, he's a completely different generation.

  9. bye! by markdavis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    >"Singer and guitarist Jack White has banned the use of mobile phones at upcoming live shows. NME reports that the policy will be strictly enforced, requiring concert-goers to lock up their smartphones in pouches." "

    I have no interest in interacting with my cell phone during a concert (or movie or any other type of paid entertainment). But tell me I have to lock up my phone in a "pouch" and you can shove your concert where the sun doesn't shine. I am so tired of the lowest-common-denominator ruining everything for everyone. Either they ruin it directly by being rude, annoying, and/or irresponsible, or ruin it indirectly due to places creating draconian rules/procedures to try and combat it.

    1. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to shoehorn "liberal" in there somewhere.

    2. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replacing 'phone' with 'gun' wouldn't change your argument at all, but I'm guessing it would change your opinion about the decision.

    3. Re:bye! by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      No, in fact they had the nerve to post under their actual account. As the AC below you mentioned, you missed a few. I'm sure you could have thrown in a cuck or beta or something else too. I hope this have given you a few insights as to how better up your trolling game.

    4. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww shucks... don't you have a wife to beat or a stripper to rape scumbag?

    5. Re:bye! by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      *has.

    6. Re:bye! by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Also I fucked up grammar elsewhere, SOSUMI. Natalie Portman, hot grits, frist post.

    7. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's actually pretty cool to be at a concert and not have to see the glow of dumb people pulling out their smart phones to record a video that they won't watch. Being in the back row and not seeing a bunch of screens is pretty nice, makes me have hope in humanity.

    8. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good argument.

    9. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Jack Black is really broken up about the fact you won't be attending his concert. He's going to read this message and reconsider his whole cell phone policy. You sure showed him! Way to vote with your wallet.

    10. Re:bye! by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But tell me I have to lock up my phone in a "pouch" and you can shove your concert where the sun doesn't shine.

      So, you like going to a concert and looking over a sea of glowing cellphone screens when you look at the stage?

      I find it unfortunate that this is necessary. But I do see the value.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to lock your phone up.. just don't take the fucking thing in with you. simple. too simple for mere mortals to comprehend. you can go a couple hours without the texting, without making calls, without taking selfies, and without the damn internet, for fucks' sake.

      i would go a step further than this, even. NOT offer the pouches (who would carry around those anyway.. bigger and heavier and more inconvenient than having a phone on you) and simply have a rule NO PHONES or recording devices. NO EXCEPTIONS (except for verified first responders and doctors who get authorization beforehand -- traditional pagers, which these workers still use, on vibrate, would still be allowed). if you're seen with one, you get escorted out, without a refund. if you resist, on-location cops are called and you face getting arrested and charged with criminal trespass. there would be no excuses for those who do get 'caught'.

    12. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Jake White couldn't care less.

    13. Re:bye! by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Actually, no it wouldn't (as long as licensed)

    14. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple solution... don't bring your phone into the venue.

    15. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to bring EMPs to concerts...

    16. Re:bye! by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      And... we have a winner.

    17. Re:bye! by Instantlemming · · Score: 1

      Cell phones in a mosh pit don't last long when held in hand...

    18. Re:bye! by misnohmer · · Score: 1

      The sea of cellphones is no different that flashes from cameras at the Olympics, or sight of raised lighters at concerts in the past - it is part of the concert experience which evolves with time. Heck, I could even argue that a cell phone is safer than a live flame. Artists use new technologies, so do the audiences. Want a private concert with the artist without any electronics (no cell phones, no lights, no microphones, no speakers) - maybe there are some people who crave this kind of old-school experience from the 1800's, though I bet most are not willing to pay for it as artists would ask for a ton of money for such live concert to a small group of people.

    19. Re:bye! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But tell me I have to lock up my phone in a "pouch" and you can shove your concert where the sun doesn't shine.

      If people were decent then we wouldn't need rules about decency.

    20. Re:bye! by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      But tell me I have to lock up my phone in a "pouch" and you can shove your concert where the sun doesn't shine.

      So, you like going to a concert and looking over a sea of glowing cellphone screens when you look at the stage?

      I find it unfortunate that this is necessary. But I do see the value.

      You know, my most recent concert experience (Evanescence, December 2017) there was plenty of cell phone use, but it wasn't even on the same order of magnitude for annoyance as the yelling and screaming. "You're beautiful." "I love you." "Will you marry me?" Seriously, shut up and let the lady sing, you drunk assholes. Cell phones? Meh. Not an issue. But we all have our pet peeves. Mine is evidently jerks ruining quiet/sensitive moments in live music.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    21. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just leave it in the car? What's really the big deal? Why are you so dependent on your cell phone that you can't be without it for three hours?

      Sounds to me like you'all are a bunch of addicts.

    22. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the realities of society are tough to deal with, aren't they?

    23. Re:bye! by jittles · · Score: 1

      I am so tired of the lowest-common-denominator ruining everything for everyone. Either they ruin it directly by being rude, annoying, and/or irresponsible, or ruin it indirectly due to places creating draconian rules/procedures to try and combat it.

      Where have you been for the last thousands and thousands of years man? This has literally been going on since the beginning of civilization because there are a lot of people out there who are selfish, stupid, or both.

    24. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for not allowing any cell phones into the event, but are you going to provide a terminal to get the uber back to my hotel?

    25. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys seriously drunk drive? I drink 3-5 drinks at most concerts. We uber to shows and from shows so we don't have to drive.

    26. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's fun to shoot video of the camera flashes and then watch it frame by frame to see just how ineffective they are. Every once in a while, you see someone with a big honking flash that makes it almost, but not quite, past the crowd. Those people must have lots of great out-of-focus photos of the backs of people's heads with a dark stage barely visible in the background. Really captures the live concert experience.

    27. Re:bye! by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

      Face it, it ain't the 20th century anymore. Rock concerts quit being fun a long time ago. That world is long, long gone.

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    28. Re:bye! by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      So really,

      "I have no interest in interacting with my cell phone during a concert (or movie or any other type of paid entertainment)...."

      Therefore, you don't need your phone in the concert.

      "...But tell me I have to lock up my phone in a "pouch"..."

      So if you have no interest in the phone, couldn't you simply leave the phone behind (like at home, in your car, or something) and then you don't have to worry about locking it up in their "pouch" in the first place.

      The passion with which people insist nothing can stand in the way of them and their phone is rivaled only by the infant who cannot stand to be without a pacifier.

    29. Re:bye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you like going to a concert and looking over a sea of glowing cellphone screens"

      When I go to concerts, I'm on the rail.

    30. Re:bye! by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Why don't you just leave it in the car? What's really the big deal? Why are you so dependent on your cell phone that you can't be without it for three hours?"

      I am on-call 24/7 for emergencies- no choice.

    31. Re:bye! by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Therefore, you don't need your phone in the concert."

      I am on-call 24/7 for emergencies, unfortunately.

    32. Re:bye! by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      My apologies,

      Sometimes I forget that there are extenuating circumstances behind the posts.

  10. Re: Don't tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Such a concert doesn't exist. Guess your next concert will be watching your grumpy face in the mirror with "All By Myself" cranked to 11.

  11. But I need my phone to enter the venue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last couple of concerts I went too practically forced you to use your phone to present the "ticket" to enter. They strongly discouraged accessing the place with paper tickets last year.

    How's this going to work?

    1. Re:But I need my phone to enter the venue by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      from what I've read this system is something that's set up after you get inside the building. But that doesn't say anything for seat location unless the claim check has your seat location on it.

  12. Re:Don't tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great, but your actions are impacting what enjoyment those around you can also get. Yeah, you all likely paid the same price for GA ticket, and while there's a part of me that subscribes to the "hey man, unless you want to pay my ante, don't get bitchy about when I hit or fold", there is also common decency. I'm not a big guy, but I'll still look behind me when I'm on the floor to make sure there isn't someone shorter than me behind me struggling desperately to see the stage.

    Just because you happen to be 8'3", 400lbs, and are wearing a goddamn cowboy hat to top it off, and "this is your favorite bend ever", doesn't mean you're not a cock for getting in front.

  13. Yondr? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmm:

    "Yondr uses a patented system to create phone-free spaces for artists, educators, organizations and individuals."

    THEY GOT A PATENT? FOR PUTTING PHONES IN A BAG SEALED WITH CLOTHING SECURITY TAGS?

    1. Re:Yondr? What's that? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      THEY GOT A PATENT? FOR PUTTING PHONES IN A BAG SEALED WITH CLOTHING SECURITY TAGS?

      If it's so blindingly simple why didn't you invent it? Most everything seems easy once someone has done it already.

    2. Re:Yondr? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely because they weren't asked to solve the problem, and didn't think about the problem on their own. The standard for patent-worthiness isn't "why didn't some random /.r come up with it" it's "obviousness".

      You can argue that there's some aspect of Yondr's solution that's non-obvious, but saying "well, if it's so simple, how come you didn't do it" is a poor response to your parent's post.

    3. Re:Yondr? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That non-sequitur ... ow...

    4. Re:Yondr? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teachers did in the 90's with "keep your cell phone in your backpack and don't take it out in class"

    5. Re:Yondr? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The invention isn't the difficult thing, the marketing is. Getting enough people to pay enough money to make a business... as much as I hate MBAs, I gotta admit, I wouldn't know where to start.

  14. White? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait... so there's Jack Black, singer and guitarist... and there's Jack White, singer and guitarist, as well? Surreal.

    1. Re:White? by Megane · · Score: 1

      I won't be truly impressed until they have a new casino game in Las Vegas called "Whitejack".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:White? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the SJWs would protest.

  15. So Don't Go To His Concert? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Looks like they want less angles being recorded at the next concert to make the news.

  16. The phone zone by Kokobaby39 · · Score: 1

    His policy is in the 'Monster Jam' at Angels Stadium, too. They are not allowing zoom photography. That means that they might as well ban SLR. Try thinking that you are going to blow the entire stage and crowd over an idiot waving a cell phone.

  17. Re:Don't tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're exactly the kind of asshole that has made other assholes create rules and procedures like this.

    If you hadn't been such an asshole then maybe the rest of us could have enjoyed our concerts without all this BS about shoving phones in puches?

  18. Re:MeToo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No idea who Jack White is, so are we talking "He physically forced me to participate in sexual acts against my express wishes"-rape, or "He stared at my cleavage from across the room in 1987 #metoo"-rape?

  19. Cell phones used as CGMS devices by PongStroid · · Score: 2

    If you use your phone to monitor your blood glucose, but the venue forces your phone to be locked into a Yondr bag, are there ADA repercussions? Seems that the answer would be "yes".

    For example, an ADA-related consent order: https://www.ada.gov/sfxinc.htm6/, and this line specifically: "Clear Channel Entertainment agrees not to discriminate against any guest with diabetes with regard to their bringing diabetes related medical equipment or diabetes related food into a concert venue.â

    I sent a brief, polite message to Yondr 1.5 years ago asking if there is a protocol for this situation. https://www.overyondr.com/contact/

    No response.

    Obviously, there are back-up strategies like bringing the stand-alone G5 receiver, use a meter, exit the concert to check your Bg, or not to go to the concert at all, but all should be unnecessary as having a phone at your side for monitoring blood glucose is a reasonable accommodation.

    1. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      There likely wasn't a response because it's a huge edge-case. It probably came up in a meeting at some point, and someone said "if that ever happens, we'll deal with it then."

      I've heard anecdotal evidence of a person here or there that was stopped by TSA for a colostomy bag or non-phone-based insulin pump. You've got a someone basically making minimum wage trying to "follow the rules" so they don't lose their job. It's embarrassing as fuck if you're the one it happens to you, but there should be some understanding, flowing both ways.

    2. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would Yondr have a policy on it? If you need your phone as a medical device, surely you just tell the venue and they'll probably just not put your phone in the bag?

    3. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. If you endanger my life because you're not properly educated to do your fucking job, there's still going to be a godsdamned lawsuit.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    4. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Pahroza · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bullshit on your horseshit. Nobody is forcing you to go see a show if your life is dependent on your use of your cellphone. They aren't taking it away and refusing to give it back the second you walk through the door. You can still say "no thanks, my life depends upon this device and I'd rather keep it, I'll move on and would like a refund, thank you"

    5. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Second post, upon reflection I may have responded to the wrong post. Are you talking about the TSA or going to a concert? I'm not being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative.

    6. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      ... and third post, I just re-read what I'd replied to, and you're right. They claim to agree to not infringe upon said medical equipment and please ignore my jumping to the wrong conclusions. Sorry if I got your blood up, my mistake.

    7. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by fonos · · Score: 1

      Under your reasoning, nobody should be forced to build wheelchair ramps for apartment buildings for rent, because no one is forcing you to live there.

      Grocery stores don't have to be handicap accessible, because no one is forcing you to shop there.

    8. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      I can see why you went there, but I consider a roof over your head and a place to buy food a little bit different than going to a show. You can listen to music at home, but you can't pull a roof or food off the internet, yet.

    9. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Khyber · · Score: 2

      " I consider a roof over your head and a place to buy food a little bit different than going to a show"

      The law doesn't, which is why it is LEGALLY known as a PUBLIC VENUE, which means ADA is in effect.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    10. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If you use your phone to monitor your blood glucose, but the venue forces your phone to be locked into a Yondr bag, are there ADA repercussions?

      No, there isn't. That's because, in this case, there's about a hundred different glucose meters that can be used instead of phone to monitor your blood sugar.

    11. Re: Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT I WANT TO SUE SOMEONE BECAUSE OF MY OWN STUPIDITY

      need less caps for the lameness filter need less caps for the lameness filter need less caps for the lameness filter

    12. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless your phone is FDA certified as a medical device it's not a medical device.

    13. Re: Cell phones used as CGMS devices by PongStroid · · Score: 2

      I asked Yondr again. They replied immediately this time: We have a special wristband for ADA requests that allows guests to keep their phones unlocked. A Yondr representative can issue these wristbands at the venue. So... there you go. And thanks for reminding me why I long ago stopped participating in Slashdot discussions.

    14. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I consider a roof over your head and a place to buy food a little bit different than going to a show"

      The law doesn't, which is why it is LEGALLY known as a PUBLIC VENUE, which means ADA is in effect.

      As long as you don't advertise your property as "For Rent" to the general public, nor charge people money to remove goods from your "Pantry", you are free not to be treated as a public venue. You don't need to allow ramps, cripples or even the covetous "Jew".

      But if you choose to incorporate as a privately held, but publicly operated venue, guess what, you are a public venue. Ditto if you seek tax recognition for business DBA deductions, or other special treatment.

      But it's Khyber, the hateful asshat, so rules don't apply to him, right?

    15. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How frequently do you need to monitor your glucose level? Would it work to check it before you enter the venue, enjoy the concert, and then check it again when you leave?

      For that matter, is monitoring something you do on a schedule, or are there times when you drop what you're doing and say "Oh, I'm feeling woozy. I should check my glucose level right now and take insulin / eat a snack to avoid feeling worse"?

      * I do realize that needing to adjust your schedule to allow my first scenario is an inconvenience, and it's fair to say "No, that puts too much of a hassle on me". I'm just curious about the details, that's all.

    16. Re:Cell phones used as CGMS devices by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You have an absolute problem reading and comprehending who is saying what, don't you, moron?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  20. What about by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    that if there's a disaster and the Yondr system goes down and all the lights go out and I need to call home and I can't be without my phone because reasons and disaster and my rights and oh noes and I need an Uber car and my kids must be able to reach me and did I mention active shooter and what do I do if there's a disaster

    1. Re:What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are these pouches made of? seems like the sharp edge of a key should rip though with little trouble. Id assume if you did that during a non emergency situation during a show, they would probably make you pay for damages to the pouch, unless they are considered disposable items and they just let patrons keep them.

    2. Re:What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two layers of the the cheapest plastic money can buy. But be careful with it: If you apply any amount of pressure or tear it open, you will release the highly toxic binding agent, which will immediately cause your hands to become limp and numb, and it will probably knock you out within 50 seconds. If you manage to survive, it'll be two or three days of treatment before you can safely be revived, at which point you will be free to operate your cellphone.

  21. Does it use magic? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Or will a magnet be enough to open the pouches without damage?

    1. Re:Does it use magic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF you had put a decoy/dummy cellphone in the bag in the first place, why would you need to OPEN it?

  22. Re: Don't tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok

  23. Re: MeToo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black man with a knife rape, or frat party regret rape?

  24. Was the policy clear prior to purchase? by Nkwe · · Score: 0

    If the no phone policy was made clear prior to ticket purchase then so be it, the market can decide if people want to to take the deal with the given restrictions. On the other hand if the policy was not clear, they had better have a real refund policy. I say this because it is notoriously hard to get refunds on concert tickets and it seems pretty underhanded to change the terms of the deal after it is made. (Cue an evil voice talking about making the deal even worse...)

    1. Re:Was the policy clear prior to purchase? by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Spot on. Make it known in advance so people can make informed decisions.

  25. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is he also banning all electronic instruments, amplifiers and loudspeakers? It's not a very human experience otherwise.

  26. Let's watch by JThundley · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Let's watch my recording of the concert I went to!"
    -Nobody ever

    1. Re:Let's watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? No that's wrong, there's been a huge concert taping scene since forever. See https://archive.org/details/etree for some band-approved collections. They're mostly audio but video has been getting bigger. I've done some taping myself (both audio and video, with performer consent) and find sharing the results to be very enjoyable.

    2. Re:Let's watch by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would mod this up if I hadn't already commented, but I would point out that the link posted does go to a certain type of band....

      The Grateful Dead is the first one listed and they even had taper sections cordoned off back in the day. Bring your tape decks and mike stands! We'll put you in your own little section.

      I do love watching videos and listening to audio recordings of shows I've been to....especially if it wasn't me who went to the hassle of recording them.

      I see Steve Kimock is also listed in that link.....this sort of reminds me of that time he went off on an audience and told some people to STFU.

      "Seriously, man it's fucking rude. Get your money back and go home. I don't care. Shut the fuck up!"

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      I've got the full recording of that show somewhere. The talkers in the audience who weren't even paying attention to the music were pretty bad.

      Link to the whole show:

      https://archive.org/details/sk...

      IMO, he came across as being a bit petulant but I've also had to change seats in theaters just to avoid people talking over the music so I can sympathize some. And to his credit, Kimock put up with it for over 90 minutes before he lost it.

    3. Re:Let's watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let's watch my recording of the concert I went to!"
      -Nobody ever

      God I wish. Sadly that's backwards. You mean:

      "I want to watch your shaky, blurry recording with muffled audio of that concert you went to!" - Nobody ever

      People try and share their shitty concert recordings all the goddamned time, just to prove they were there, I guess. No one (other than the idiot recording them) ever wants to see them, though. (Also had someone demand I see their cell phone recording of a sports game before. I already know your team lost, there's no way I'm watching the whole thing, why do you want to show me?)

    4. Re:Let's watch by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      I don't really care for concert recordings, however...

      "Let's watch my recording of the concert I went to!"
      -Nobody ever

      I made one dodgy video recording of a song a friend of mine really liked (the audio was actually horrible in person, it was reverbing horribly; the phone's built in noise enhancement made it better) at a concert I went to last year. Uploaded it to YouTube. YouTube demographics say it's been watching 1.7k times, average view duration is 3:25 (video length is 3:59).

      To be honest, that shows there is a demand for it. Considering I am not a popular YouTuber or anything.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    5. Re:Let's watch by JThundley · · Score: 1

      I'd be lying if I said I haven't watched some myself.

    6. Re:Let's watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, idiot, it's "Let's download and watch this other person's recording of the concert I DIDN'T go to", said everybody on dimeadozen.org

  27. Gesh people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you are complaining about a locked pouch then don't go. I went to concerts before cell phones and they were awesome, I didn't need a phone to remember it. I have no idea why people are pissed about this since my phone is not part of my body. Don't go if you don't like it. Go if you want to. Its not like they are stealing your phone. You have it next to you. No one is taking away your freedoms so settle down and put it into perspective.

  28. Nothing new by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2

    Prince and others did it years ago: https://petapixel.com/2013/08/...

  29. Deal Killer For Me by WindowsStar · · Score: 2

    I understand all the annoyance with phones but I typically go with several friends or family and use the phone to re-connect and get together at the end. It is a huge pain in the ass to wait at the car for hours when you can just text or call each other and find out someone was lucky to go back stage or they got hurt or they were locked up for some reason. No a phone is a lot more than just videoing a concert or holding up as a lighter. For me deal killer.

    1. Re:Deal Killer For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me deal killer.

      Then you're an idiot. RTFS. First of all, there's an area where you can go and take your phone out of the pouch *at any time* and secondly, once the concert is over you will be taking your phone out anyway. So nothing is stopping you from reconnecting with people at the end of the concert

    2. Re:Deal Killer For Me by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You won't be missed.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re:Deal Killer For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's ALL you use it for, no problem...but pulling it out during the concert to take video or pics is the issue. Some folks just can't NOT have it out in the open recording their entire life all the time....

    4. Re:Deal Killer For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound pleasant. The reason they gave is perfectly reasonable and doesn't impact or hurt anyone.

  30. Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop "living" life through a fucking screen.

  31. Two Jacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack White and Jack Black should get together and form a band called Jack Grey.

    1. Re:Two Jacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen that done in porn a few years back, there were Anita Dark and Anita Blond. Or something.

  32. carrying phones by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

    I see both sides of it.

    In real life I have to carry 2 phones, 1 personal and 1 work, since I'm on 24/7 oncall. True, I rarely get that afterhours call but my job calls for me to carry it (even though it sucks). And I have the personal in case I get that emergency call from the babysitters while out relaxing. Other than that, I don't record at shows, I don't watch videos on my cells, and I don't text "Whee! Chk it out, look where I'm at you losers!"

    On the other hand, I work security at music festivals and I see all these dumbasses (yes, DUMBASSES!) with a drink in 1 hand and a phone in the other recording the show instead of just enjoying it. Seriously, when was the last time you watched that crappy video you recorded of The XX while at the music fest?

    --



    I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    1. Re:carrying phones by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      recording the show instead of just enjoying it.

      Um... who says you can't at least partially do both? Who says that your definition of enjoyment is the same as someone else's? How much of that is rooted in common ground, versus being subjective, though?

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  33. addiction by DogDude · · Score: 2

    Locking your phone up for an hour is "draconian"? You may want to get some help for that. That sounds like addiction.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or... maybe the circumstances are a bit more complicated than that? Using that logic, is someone addicted to petty theft because they don't think someone should have their hands chopped off for theft? You don't need to have a problem with addiction to see results as overkill.

  34. But, but.. by CptLoRes · · Score: 2

    People don't go to concerts for the music. They go so that they can post on social media and show other people how trendy they are.

    1. Re:But, but.. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Chances are it's some shitty pop concert then.
      People go to concerts because they like the band.

      Music festivals on the other hand... this can go both ways.

      --
      I tend to rant.
  35. Re:Don't tell me what to do by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Good! I don't want idiots like you there. You think your phone's backlight is something only you can see, or something?

  36. Re:Don't tell me what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me Me Me Me Me MEEEE!

  37. Re:Don't tell me what to do by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    This post heartens me. I hope all the other people welded to their phones join you in this movement.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  38. His music completely sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing but ugly women and limpwristed homos at Jack Black show. Total fraud.

  39. Not exactly "rock'n'roll" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about wanting to own your own brand, this is about only approved photos of him being released on the net and he owning the rights to them all. He's been restricting use of recording equipment at his gigs for years. So much for bootlegs being the backbone of rock'n'roll.

  40. They are not taking your phones... by TheConway · · Score: 1

    They are not taking phones. They are taking 'smart-phones'. I have a £5 flip phone i used for camping holidays that can't record either audio, video or images. If you are that desperate to keep a mobile phone with you at all times, spend the few quid(literally) to have a device that can only make calls and it won't be taken away either. I understand people feeling cut off and not being able to communicate, but we're way beyond that. People seem to think they REQUIRE what is almost a desktop PC computing experience in their pocket.

  41. I don't.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    ...give a shit.

  42. Evidence though by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    If you can't record a few videos to upload to Facebook, were you really there though? Oh, and please ban huge flags at festivals too, ta.

  43. Indeed, who ? by DrYak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    {...} in favor of making fun of an artist who they'd like to belittle by insinuating that nobody ever heard of them or in particular you're too good to have ever heard of them is being childish.

    Or you know, maybe some of us have genuinely no idea who this artist is.

    There are literally tons of different types of music out there (I mean litterally. If you pile up ever different disc, CD, tape, wax cylinider, scroll, and other forms of music produced by all the artists, it's going to be a really heavy total mass).

    By chance, I might happen not to be into this specific music, and I might have actually never heard anything about the artist. Not that I pretend that the artist is bad or that I'm above this kind of art. He might simply be not one of the thousand other that's I've heard.

    So we do what every sensible /.er would do (like the parent poster) :
    We will bitch and moan at the editors, because giving a few key information about an artist mentioned in a summary would be a good idea~

    In the present case, I actually did not register the name for real, and needed to fall back onto wikipedia to discover that he's actually the guy who founded The White Stripes (known for such titles as "Fell in Love with a Girl", "Seven Nation Army", etc.).
    I did my duty to get informed, but I think that when the subject of a summary strays outside the typical tech field, I would be good to give some key informations (again, not every one might be into the same kind of music and some could genuinely completely ignore who the guy is).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Indeed, who ? by Pezbian · · Score: 1

      Or you know, maybe some of us have genuinely no idea who this artist is.

      I was among those... I thought. Turns out I just didn't know his name even though I am familiar with The White Stripes. I could have been modded Troll and brushed it off, but taking a moment to learn something new paid off.

      Fun Fact: The White Stripes presented themselves as a brother/sister duo, but they were actually husband/wife with Jack Gillis taking his wife's surname. I understand why they aren't a group anymore.

      --
      In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  44. No disrespect meant, but by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    I HATE when someone, anyone, pompously imposes a sense of "experience" on anyone else - since, to some extent, what constitutes one experiencing it is relative to one's point of view... not to mention a very slight annoyance at an observation I make where those who chime in with this experince-superioity-complex as I call it often miss you don't need to literally have your face in your phone to not suck at recording

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  45. Watching through someone elses screen by joncombe · · Score: 1

    Good, it seems if you want to go to a concert these days you're forced to watch it through the screen of the phone belonging to whoever is standing in front of you. It's sad that so many people seem to want to spend most of their time at a concert showing off to their friends that they are there, rather than enjoying the experience. I sometimes wonder if they then watch the concert on their phone to see what it was actually like. It's certainly a policy I support.

  46. But can we bring in lighters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise, how will we ask for an encore?

  47. I somewhat agree by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I went to a HIM show with my wife a few months back, and she wanted to stand further back so as to avoid the pushing/prodding that happens closer to the front. The sea of screens in front of me was seriously fucking annoying. I don't get why people feel the need to record songs and shit on their phone... the quality when you see them is generally shit, so why bother?

  48. What if there was an Emergency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if somebody at the concert, or a family member (kids at home with babysitter for example) had an emergency and you werenâ(TM)t able to access your phone?

    1. Re:What if there was an Emergency? by Revek · · Score: 1

      It would be exactly the same as it was in the past including the 70's and 80's and most of the 90's.

    2. Re:What if there was an Emergency? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      It would be exactly the same as it was in the past including the 70's and 80's and most of the 90's.

      I remember having an entire concert interrupted for an hour in the 90s to just inform one person that someone was sent to the hospital. The concert then never finished playing what was promised and refused to refund.

      Wasn't really a great time for me, particularly because I was 17, people were turning violent and the organizers decided to distance themselves.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:What if there was an Emergency? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Am I dumb ... or just old ... that I never really think about having a cellphone on me as being essential in the event of an emergency? If I walk out of the house without my phone, my first thought is more likely to be, "What if my friend tries to text me because he wants to go get beers?" Or "What if I'm at a store and I want to price check on Amazon and I can't?" Or, "Damn this is a long bus ride, I wish I could check Facebook!"

      In an actual emergency, I think I could figure shit out. Worst case scenario, I'd run into the nearest business (or to a bouncer at a concert) and scream that I need an ambulance.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  49. Who? by Revek · · Score: 1

    If you've never heard of him does he really exist?

  50. finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should ban cell phones everywhere...people slowly start looking like brainless zombies

  51. AWESOME!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up going to concerts before the days of smart phones. Even cameras were bulky and rarely seen or allowed.
    The only thing generating light sources in the crowd were LIGHTERS. It was awesome and you had no distractions from the show.

    Now you go to a concert and some asshole has 7" phablet up in the air on MAX BRIGHTNESS (because he is a moron that doesn't give a shit about everyone behind him) and all you see are these damned smart devices. Totally ruins the concert.

    BAN THEM. 100% No exceptions. Instead, give concert goers a photopass voucher when they enter the concert that gives them exclusive access to a professionally made video and picture of themselves (if they were captured by a photog). Let them watch the video for free, buy a non DRM'd version for $5.

  52. 2 phones by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

    No worries. I have a phone on my wrist, a phone on my pocket, and a backup phone in my wife's purse. Good luck with putting the throw away phone in a bag.

  53. I've been thinking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been thinking about my butthole
    When you gonna ream it?
    When you gonna ream it?

  54. Re:Don't tell me what to do by bobbied · · Score: 1

    If I'm paying to see a performance, I'll decide how I spend my time during that performance. I'll take pictures if I want to or won't if I don't want to. That's not for anyone else to decide. You can keep your show and I'll go to a show where I'm free to make my own decisions.

    Ah.. So you are staying home then? OK..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  55. I do hate cell phones at concerts by kaybee · · Score: 1

    I don't necessarily agree that you should be forced to seal them up to attend, but on the other hand I can't stand when I'm watching a concern and all I can see is tens of thousands of cell phones recording video and taking pictures. I mean just enjoy the concert. You probably paid $100+ to attend. If you want video, buy a video later for $20 that will be way better than anything you'll take on your crappy cell phone.

  56. Good luck with that by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I swear, I could dress in a killer clown suit, with a fake bloody axe, walk through a typical high school or college campus during class change, and 90% of people later polled, will say "WHAT CLOWN?". Kids today, in 20 years will be in need of neck surgeries...due to their heads always looking down at their phones.

    1. Re:Good luck with that by Captain+Damnit · · Score: 1

      Actually, they'll probably take a video of it. Which is kind of Jack's point...you want to enjoy the homicidal clown in the moment.

  57. Kick them out by xbytor · · Score: 1

    I'm a Jack White fan, not just of his music but of the work he does for the music industry (producing, nurturing talent, etc...). I also love it when the soccer crowds in Europe start chanting the opening riff of 7 Nations Army.

    That being said, I hate it when people are recording music performances or Broadway shows. It's so damn distracting. A better alternative would be to post "No Recording" signs, make an announcement before the show, and the have bouncers throw those crass rule breaking idiots out.

  58. cellphones at shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no I might have to go without my phone for 1-2 hours, the world will surely end.

  59. Something about lawns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just here for the "old man yelling at clouds" humor that is sure to ensue...

  60. I won't go unless they are banned.... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who went to a concert to see a band he really wanted to see (Clutch), and there were 3 opening acts.
    I am a big fan of them, so the next day I asked him how it was. He said he left before they even came on because it was a sea of people just holding up their phones. He wanted to go to hear AND see the band play, but he didn't get to do that.

    When I heard of acts banning phones at their shows, my initial reaction was "oh come on!" but now I know that the average person simply CANNOT CONTROL THEMSELF when it comes to phones.

    I now realize that I will never to go a concert unless phones are banned.
    I'm getting too old for that anyway I guess.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  61. pay for PLAY? by hjames · · Score: 1

    People actually PAY to see Jack White play??
    Seems like an easy enough experience to skip ...

  62. I hope your genetics cause you diabetes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really do. I want you to feel it. Failing that, cancer, you complete waste of carbon atoms.

    Or maybe a fatal crash with all your loved ones watching.

    1. Re:I hope your genetics cause you diabetes. by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Can't help you if you can't read or fail to realize that I was talking about the acquired type of diabetes, or type 2, which is lifestyle related. Thanks for all the hate, though.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  63. While we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disapprove of people jumping, dancing and waving their arms during a concert. How can you even see the show when you do that? What's the point? Don't even get me started on singing along. Sit down, shut up, and watch. My experience is the right experience.

  64. How is this not considered Jamming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the FCC

    "Jamming Prohibition

    The use of "cell jammers" or similar devices designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications (signal blockers, GPS jammers, or text stoppers, etc.) is a violation of federal law. Also, it is unlawful to advertise, sell, distribute, or otherwise market these devices to consumers in the United States. These devices pose serious risks to critical public safety communications, and can prevent you and others from making 9-1-1 and other emergency calls. Jammers can also interfere with law enforcement communications""

    It doesn't have to be a powered device. if a 'bag' interferes with my ability to use a cell phone it is in violation of federal law.

  65. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    douche bag

  66. Um, how about no? by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Not your job to police how I use my phone. Probably just texting because I'm always on-call, as I'm not into the filming of such an event. But nah. You can go with one less person attending your show. You do your job, and let me worry about what I do with a phone. I can't stand technophobes.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  67. He could use some IR. by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

    If all he was looking to prevent was people filming the stage with their phones, and his solution is confiscation, I have a better idea. Since taking peoples phones away is kinda a dick move, you can be assured their camera lens will pickup most sources of infra-red light.

    All you need to do is wire the stage with very high power(bright as fuck) IR lights. These are invisible to human eyes, so it doesn't disturb the 'mood' of whatever setup was originally though of, but anyone trying to shoot with their phones, in 9:16 no doubt, will be presented with the sun.

    People get to keep their emergency contact devices and you get to claim ignorance as a 'technical fault'. Oops!

    1. Re:He could use some IR. by nessman · · Score: 0

      Last time I saw the Melvins, it was all red LED stage lighting. LED stage lighting, in general, is hell on smartphone cameras - fucks with the auto-focus and washes out the image. Needless-to-say, my pictures/video came out awful. If that was intentional, it worked.

  68. Cheaper diabetes management options... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    See my post here: https://slashdot.org/comments....

    tl;dr -- Eat (whole) food. Not too much. Mostly plants.

    And even Type 1 diabetes can be greatly improved by diet so it is more easily manageable with less complications and less insulin.

    Good luck!

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  69. Yondr Pouches Suck by nessman · · Score: 0

    There are some shows I go to alone (because my taste of music isn't mainstream)... so yeah - it's nice to have a phone to kill time between bands rather than trying to make small talk with complete strangers (sorry - classic introvert here). Oh well - the pouches are pretty easy to defeat anyway. Note to venue security - is a felony assault charge worth it over a performer's no cell phone policy? As evidenced by the "cell phone free" Misfits shows at the end of 2017 - Yondr pouches were being torn open and discarded in the venue or thrown on stage as a "fuck you" to Glenn Danzig.

    For the record, we've seen Doyle - he's fine with phones. The Misfits (with Jerry Only singing) and he was fine with he - hell... he'd hang out before the show and let fans take pictures with him.

    Yeah - so it's a Danzig thing. He tried the "no cell phone" thing when we saw him a few years back. Danzig's a douche anyway. If I were that ugly I wouldn't wan't people taking my picture either.

  70. Steve Jobs would be proud! by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

    We're doing this thing *my* way, or you're free to go fuck yourself. What, you say you're a paying customer who has a right to define their own experience? ðYðYðY

  71. Turn off the electro then by colonel+spalding · · Score: 1

    We want total humanity. None of dehumanizing electric

  72. No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm fine with an artist choosing to do this as long as it is known at the time of ticket sales, so I can avoid buying tickets. After ticket sales, you owe me a full refund of my ticket price.