They would ferment the tofu before eating it, which destroyed the estrogen mimikers.
Unfermented tofu is what is common in the USa, because you can make more quicker to a consistent flavor .
That's like blaming the rain it's your job as a parent to train and prepare your child for when they inevitably happens.itt doesn't bother them. That's what parents are for to warn you about the shity things that are coming so when they happen you're at least somewhat prepared. Because that's the difference between trauma and oh yeah I've been expecting this
And if you're paying for a second box at its none of the cable company's business. Although I can see why they would find it profitable to fast-talk people into the believing it was.
Reproduction is not theft. it's making more so that what cable companies still has their lines they still have their content. They have been deprived of nothing that they already had.
Cable is a whole different model. Cable uses something comparable to multicast. no matter how many people are connected it doesn't actually cost the cable company anything more to distribute that and so nothing is actually being lost. While unicast IP streams deplete a limited bandwidth resource. it's not about whether or not you got something it's about whether or not you took anything away. And if that neighbor was never going to pay for cable anyway that it makes zero tangible difference for the cable company for them to see that content or not. Therefore the cable company loses nothing for you to share your cable with a neighbor who can't afford it
How does one opposed A malignant regime without being disruptive? are we to never fix problems because it would require us to disrupt those problems, as well as the comfort of the people maintaining those problems?
An appropriate analogy would be you and another person are in the Town Square arguing . the Town Square is made up of various businesses and the surrounding parking lots,access roads, and Landscaping. But Town Square is the only way across town. Therefore Town Square is considered a public thoroughfare. Even though the land is privately owned because it's the only way for the public to get across town. and therefore the greater need of the public is recognized and those routes become public. You and the person you are arguing with ar private people arguing on a public thoroughfare. And so neither of you have any greater right than the other to be heard or to silence the other. Internet interactions happened on across the public thoroughfare. Nobody ever actually enters anyone else's property. As its agents of the server, that choose to propagate the requests from the public network to their databases and then proactively transmit it back across. and so nobody enters your server ever they just ask your server if it'll kindly give it up.
It's not a strict separation of powers it's a strategic overlapping of powers, enable any one part of the government to check the other to eventually Force the cooperation so we don't have parts of the government at war with each other instead of spending the money on helping citizen welfare.
Nope because you never enter anybody is properly all you do is ask them if they will send you things. And then the servers transmit that information out into the public infrastructure. You never enter their server at all all you do is send Messages to ask their servers for information. And then that server then sends you a message. Internet is a public forum made of privately owned equipment. The equipment may be privately owned but the entity known as the internet is public, buy measure of interaction if not intent. Anything connected to the internet is fair game. You can't connect to a public network and still claim privacy because it's unenforceable and not supported by physical reality
You still can do all those things now even if punished later would never give but life took from your victims. Any safety for preventing such are an illusion. And similar occurrence are in the news often. So the dangers you describe off grid exist at the same potential on grid, and so off-grid still represents higher value.
How about since I'm paying for a set amount of simultaneous streams, how I use those streams business and anybody logging in with my password on counts as my authorized proxy. Doesn't matter who's watching as long as I'm not draining server bandwidth from more than three simultaneous locations
Cash is inherently more honest I'm because then the transaction is only between the two parties. Cards are dishonest because it allows third party to collect transaction fees, off of the transaction that is private between you and the vendor. Is not honest to allow passive third-party fee collection. This rewards dishonest business practices. Nobody should get paid for doing nothing while getting to present themselves as successful honest business. Any entity is allowed to accumulate enough resources, the ability to hack the system in their favor. This is what we must prevent at all costs
They could gain some humanitarian PR, simply making a statement that Facebook Messenger is shutting down temporarily to promote people to pay attention to the real people they are spending time with in person. . Saves buttload of money , avoid a shit ton of embarrassment and look like they cared about peoples psychological health.
People are animals too. And as such if there is not a clear pecking order it will cause insecurity throughout the pack. Forts in the subconscious imperative 2 Force conflict 2 create a pecking order. Too many cooks forces everyone to fight for dominance.
Two people want to fight something out there's nothing wrong with that. It's when more people get involved from the peanut gallery look up things get out of hand. there is nothing wrong with two people who can't find a way to solve something with the words to solve it with a physical competition. In the end the ongoing onflict causes more trouble and 12 more people into the situation then if they were to just fight it out to figure out pecking order.
If you monetize your personal belongings that should be no surprise when it cost you everything. There's a reason why you keep personal assets and business assets separately. Because business assets are always at risk due to the unpredictable nature of people and events influenced by them. if you're not planning on your business at some point going belly-up and insulating your personal assets from that then you are creating your own downfall.
People are by default allowed to film anything they can see. Only specific agreement turn into freely creates any kind of restrictions. because you the individual observing a situation has the right to their own observations. And to share them if they so choose. the actions they are observing maybe of themselves a crime, if they are trespassing in order to observe it, are you can see it you can record it. if you can see it and record it you can share it as your own memory.
Last time I checked numbers and accounting does not endanger or damage a person's psychological or physical health. There's no danger she is not harmed. through this is just pushing numbers around has nothing to do with harm. It's been long established Larry Gilman can live a fulfilling life without having everything they want as long as they have food Water Shelter and a handful of people to you connect with trust. There's been no harm done. this is like when your kid comes home from high school and says I wish I was one of the cool kids and you tell them that reputation is bullshit don't worry about it
Calling the cops often results in being told any number of reasons why they can't help you. But now that you're on record you better not handle it yourself. File paperwork on a at the end of the day and that's about the end of it.
People are well aware how long it takes cops to show up and how useless they are once they do. Losing you any chance to actually motivate people not to cause you trouble in the future.. part of being a responsible adult is handling your own ship and not crying to Daddy Copcop, when there's no fucking reason to go to that extreme. There are IQ limits set on being allowed to become a cop. And it limits how smart you can be. there was a national Scandal over somebody suing because they were excluded for being too smart from the police academy.
Calling the cops is essentially putting documented idiots charge of your safety. Who are more likely to assume whatever gives them an easier day or use it as an excuse to
take their anger out on somebody.
Irhey simply do not have the critical thinking skills and willingness to stand up to their boss to do the right thing most of the time.
True no private property but you still have personal property. Still get to own things. It just don't get to own the means to exploit and oppress your neighbors.
Because people don't write books primarily to make money. People write books because they have an obsession with becoming a writer. Or they want to share their ideas with others,. Because they like the idea of something of them left behind when they're gone.
Books written primarily for monetary gains, tend to be superficial, predictable, and after an initial day in the Sun, fall out of fasion. Empty drivel, churned out to make a quick buck.
Writing is an art not just a skill, it requires someone writing out of passion for the writing itself to make anything worth reading beyond a brief period of novelty appeal.
Taking is just simple harvesting of a accumulation of resources. It's people and animals naturally do when they come across useful things. also things tend to flow from where there's more to where there is less when allowed to follow natural courses. To hold onto something is to take it out the natural Flows In Cycles. To forcibly prevent natural harvesting of Resources by others that you would like to hold on to. That's the concept of ownership. To maintain exclusive access requires Force to artificially maintained control
As soon as you have called the cops, you have given up all control in the situation, just like when you were a kid it is almost always Less shityy for everybody involved, when you handle it yourself.
Those guilty of getting involved in a conflict are going to get hurt in this situation. far safer and conducive towards having a peaceful night to just use some earplugs
You know they make they make ear plugs. you and your neighbors don't just put in some earplugs and solve your own problems the easy way.. sounds like y'all would rather fight then solve your own problems
Slashdot Mirror
They would ferment the tofu before eating it, which destroyed the estrogen mimikers. Unfermented tofu is what is common in the USa, because you can make more quicker to a consistent flavor .
That's like blaming the rain it's your job as a parent to train and prepare your child for when they inevitably happens.itt doesn't bother them. That's what parents are for to warn you about the shity things that are coming so when they happen you're at least somewhat prepared. Because that's the difference between trauma and oh yeah I've been expecting this
And if you're paying for a second box at its none of the cable company's business. Although I can see why they would find it profitable to fast-talk people into the believing it was. Reproduction is not theft. it's making more so that what cable companies still has their lines they still have their content. They have been deprived of nothing that they already had.
Cable is a whole different model. Cable uses something comparable to multicast. no matter how many people are connected it doesn't actually cost the cable company anything more to distribute that and so nothing is actually being lost. While unicast IP streams deplete a limited bandwidth resource. it's not about whether or not you got something it's about whether or not you took anything away. And if that neighbor was never going to pay for cable anyway that it makes zero tangible difference for the cable company for them to see that content or not. Therefore the cable company loses nothing for you to share your cable with a neighbor who can't afford it
How does one opposed A malignant regime without being disruptive? are we to never fix problems because it would require us to disrupt those problems, as well as the comfort of the people maintaining those problems?
An appropriate analogy would be you and another person are in the Town Square arguing . the Town Square is made up of various businesses and the surrounding parking lots ,access roads, and Landscaping. But Town Square is the only way across town. Therefore Town Square is considered a public thoroughfare. Even though the land is privately owned because it's the only way for the public to get across town. and therefore the greater need of the public is recognized and those routes become public. You and the person you are arguing with ar private people arguing on a public thoroughfare. And so neither of you have any greater right than the other to be heard or to silence the other. Internet interactions happened on across the public thoroughfare. Nobody ever actually enters anyone else's property. As its agents of the server, that choose to propagate the requests from the public network to their databases and then proactively transmit it back across. and so nobody enters your server ever they just ask your server if it'll kindly give it up.
It's not a strict separation of powers it's a strategic overlapping of powers, enable any one part of the government to check the other to eventually Force the cooperation so we don't have parts of the government at war with each other instead of spending the money on helping citizen welfare.
Nope because you never enter anybody is properly all you do is ask them if they will send you things. And then the servers transmit that information out into the public infrastructure. You never enter their server at all all you do is send Messages to ask their servers for information. And then that server then sends you a message. Internet is a public forum made of privately owned equipment. The equipment may be privately owned but the entity known as the internet is public, buy measure of interaction if not intent. Anything connected to the internet is fair game. You can't connect to a public network and still claim privacy because it's unenforceable and not supported by physical reality
You still can do all those things now even if punished later would never give but life took from your victims. Any safety for preventing such are an illusion. And similar occurrence are in the news often. So the dangers you describe off grid exist at the same potential on grid, and so off-grid still represents higher value.
How about since I'm paying for a set amount of simultaneous streams, how I use those streams business and anybody logging in with my password on counts as my authorized proxy. Doesn't matter who's watching as long as I'm not draining server bandwidth from more than three simultaneous locations
Cash is inherently more honest I'm because then the transaction is only between the two parties. Cards are dishonest because it allows third party to collect transaction fees, off of the transaction that is private between you and the vendor. Is not honest to allow passive third-party fee collection. This rewards dishonest business practices. Nobody should get paid for doing nothing while getting to present themselves as successful honest business. Any entity is allowed to accumulate enough resources, the ability to hack the system in their favor. This is what we must prevent at all costs
They could gain some humanitarian PR, simply making a statement that Facebook Messenger is shutting down temporarily to promote people to pay attention to the real people they are spending time with in person. . Saves buttload of money , avoid a shit ton of embarrassment and look like they cared about peoples psychological health.
People are animals too. And as such if there is not a clear pecking order it will cause insecurity throughout the pack. Forts in the subconscious imperative 2 Force conflict 2 create a pecking order. Too many cooks forces everyone to fight for dominance.
Two people want to fight something out there's nothing wrong with that. It's when more people get involved from the peanut gallery look up things get out of hand. there is nothing wrong with two people who can't find a way to solve something with the words to solve it with a physical competition. In the end the ongoing onflict causes more trouble and 12 more people into the situation then if they were to just fight it out to figure out pecking order.
If you monetize your personal belongings that should be no surprise when it cost you everything. There's a reason why you keep personal assets and business assets separately. Because business assets are always at risk due to the unpredictable nature of people and events influenced by them. if you're not planning on your business at some point going belly-up and insulating your personal assets from that then you are creating your own downfall.
People are by default allowed to film anything they can see. Only specific agreement turn into freely creates any kind of restrictions. because you the individual observing a situation has the right to their own observations. And to share them if they so choose. the actions they are observing maybe of themselves a crime, if they are trespassing in order to observe it, are you can see it you can record it. if you can see it and record it you can share it as your own memory.
Correction, "larry Gilman" should read "a person" Fucking autocorrect I turned it off. It turns itself back on.
Last time I checked numbers and accounting does not endanger or damage a person's psychological or physical health. There's no danger she is not harmed. through this is just pushing numbers around has nothing to do with harm. It's been long established Larry Gilman can live a fulfilling life without having everything they want as long as they have food Water Shelter and a handful of people to you connect with trust. There's been no harm done. this is like when your kid comes home from high school and says I wish I was one of the cool kids and you tell them that reputation is bullshit don't worry about it
Calling the cops often results in being told any number of reasons why they can't help you. But now that you're on record you better not handle it yourself. File paperwork on a at the end of the day and that's about the end of it. People are well aware how long it takes cops to show up and how useless they are once they do. Losing you any chance to actually motivate people not to cause you trouble in the future.. part of being a responsible adult is handling your own ship and not crying to Daddy Copcop, when there's no fucking reason to go to that extreme. There are IQ limits set on being allowed to become a cop. And it limits how smart you can be. there was a national Scandal over somebody suing because they were excluded for being too smart from the police academy. Calling the cops is essentially putting documented idiots charge of your safety. Who are more likely to assume whatever gives them an easier day or use it as an excuse to take their anger out on somebody. Irhey simply do not have the critical thinking skills and willingness to stand up to their boss to do the right thing most of the time.
True no private property but you still have personal property. Still get to own things. It just don't get to own the means to exploit and oppress your neighbors.
Because people don't write books primarily to make money. People write books because they have an obsession with becoming a writer. Or they want to share their ideas with others,. Because they like the idea of something of them left behind when they're gone. Books written primarily for monetary gains, tend to be superficial, predictable, and after an initial day in the Sun, fall out of fasion. Empty drivel, churned out to make a quick buck. Writing is an art not just a skill, it requires someone writing out of passion for the writing itself to make anything worth reading beyond a brief period of novelty appeal.
Taking is just simple harvesting of a accumulation of resources. It's people and animals naturally do when they come across useful things. also things tend to flow from where there's more to where there is less when allowed to follow natural courses. To hold onto something is to take it out the natural Flows In Cycles. To forcibly prevent natural harvesting of Resources by others that you would like to hold on to. That's the concept of ownership. To maintain exclusive access requires Force to artificially maintained control
As soon as you have called the cops, you have given up all control in the situation, just like when you were a kid it is almost always Less shityy for everybody involved, when you handle it yourself.
Those guilty of getting involved in a conflict are going to get hurt in this situation. far safer and conducive towards having a peaceful night to just use some earplugs
You know they make they make ear plugs. you and your neighbors don't just put in some earplugs and solve your own problems the easy way.. sounds like y'all would rather fight then solve your own problems