I pushed her against the wall and roughly pulled her skirt down. I pressed my turgid cock against her cunt, and then remembered her underwear. I puled them down, and gave a solid two minutes of frenzied pumping. I knew she came because after I'd withdrawn she said "Oh, God."
Having read many of your works, I must first thank you for such a stimulating read. Much better than the other crap we're bombarded with.
What I wanted to know was how did you keep the inspiration for such fascinatingly original works? In your third book for example, you shun the usual literary clich of sex between man and woman, instead choosing homosexual scat sex. As a coprophage myself, I was stunned by the remarkably true-to-life way in which you describe the involuntary coughing caused by a peanut scratching the inside of your throat as it pokes out of the side of a shit.
Another example would be when your character Maldaster Tacolion urinates in the face of Lunax Trovast, comes up his nostrils and then sucks the mixture out.
Please could you enlighten me where such inspiration flows from?
The results are given in the article, and they are ~1/6th as vulnerable. The original poster strangely seemed to read straight past those results though...
No, rtfa. There are entries for 2k and for more up-to-date NT versons. That is what makes the OP such a wanker - he deliberately ignored the pertinent information in order to demonstrate how insecure Microsoft is.
When I read it they appear to have published the results to more recent Windows versions as well. You know, the more up to date NT versions, and 2k.
I wonder how it came to be that you didn't publish the only meaningful indications of Microsoft's security? Oh, I know. It's because they are about 1/6th as bad as the outdated versions you impartially decided to cite.
Although you can do some replication work yourself, I'm happy to concede that if you want the work done for you you need thrid party software. To say that Postgres doesn't support it is a bit misleading though.
Postgres doesn't support automated replication in the core code but there are open source plugins that will handle this. Equally, PHP does not support gzip functions as part of the core language, but should this be highlighted as a shortcoming of the language? No - just install zlib et voila!
I don't care whether the automated tools come with the core download or not - if they're freely available and work cleanly with the code (not dirty hacks) then there is no problem. Nested subqueries in MySQL is a problem as there was no (as far as I could google) patch I could apply that would enable this functionality. This is not true for pg replication.
A chapter on the shortcomings of Postgres wrt replication would be half a page long and consist of a list of URLs, saying "install one of these".
Shit! PostgreSQL can't do replication? Oh no, the database we've had replicated for the last 12 months must have been an illusion, and in fact the project was never finished. Argh!
I'd rather it came on a CD with the book. Why? Because I don't want to spend x hours downloading shite just so that you don't see a CD in your copy. And I've got DSL - just imagine what it would be like for those on dial up.
Honestly, that is the most pathetic argument I've ever heard in a review - it would be more reasonable if you had said "they didn't provide a CD but made it available for download. This will be a major irritation for modem users, and there is no reason why they couldn't have shipped it with the book."
Dude, did you read the page about that game? It sounds gayer than a Taco in an orphanage. I cannot do its shitness justice - just once I beg you to follow the last link and read a couple of paragraphs.
Do I get the FP now?
What I wanted to know was how did you keep the inspiration for such fascinatingly original works? In your third book for example, you shun the usual literary clich of sex between man and woman, instead choosing homosexual scat sex. As a coprophage myself, I was stunned by the remarkably true-to-life way in which you describe the involuntary coughing caused by a peanut scratching the inside of your throat as it pokes out of the side of a shit.
Another example would be when your character Maldaster Tacolion urinates in the face of Lunax Trovast, comes up his nostrils and then sucks the mixture out.
Please could you enlighten me where such inspiration flows from?
It is if you like poking chickens.
None, fucktard AC.
enn tee.
Hehe - aside from the initial shock, the best bit is the stunned silence at the end.
Even though they're not running on slashcode they will still go bankrupt in a short while and maintain the LNUX status quo.
When it's just s FP sitting right there?
The results are given in the article, and they are ~1/6th as vulnerable. The original poster strangely seemed to read straight past those results though...
No, rtfa. There are entries for 2k and for more up-to-date NT versons. That is what makes the OP such a wanker - he deliberately ignored the pertinent information in order to demonstrate how insecure Microsoft is.
I wonder how it came to be that you didn't publish the only meaningful indications of Microsoft's security? Oh, I know. It's because they are about 1/6th as bad as the outdated versions you impartially decided to cite.
And did those trolls,
In tedious times,
Shit upon Jon Katz' ar-tic-les
.
.
.
'Till we have built MSDN,
On Taco's gay and bankrupt site.
Now fuck off, AC, and tend to your boyfriend Sanity
Take solace in the fact that you don't look like a fucking prick.
They neglect to mention if God then took a video of someone discovering it then sending it in to "You've been framed!" for a £250 cash prize.
No point in me re-writing what this guy wrote.
Postgres doesn't support automated replication in the core code but there are open source plugins that will handle this. Equally, PHP does not support gzip functions as part of the core language, but should this be highlighted as a shortcoming of the language? No - just install zlib et voila!
I don't care whether the automated tools come with the core download or not - if they're freely available and work cleanly with the code (not dirty hacks) then there is no problem. Nested subqueries in MySQL is a problem as there was no (as far as I could google) patch I could apply that would enable this functionality. This is not true for pg replication.
A chapter on the shortcomings of Postgres wrt replication would be half a page long and consist of a list of URLs, saying "install one of these".
Shit! PostgreSQL can't do replication? Oh no, the database we've had replicated for the last 12 months must have been an illusion, and in fact the project was never finished. Argh!
Honestly, that is the most pathetic argument I've ever heard in a review - it would be more reasonable if you had said "they didn't provide a CD but made it available for download. This will be a major irritation for modem users, and there is no reason why they couldn't have shipped it with the book."
USA have gone. Gone 1-nil down. BWAHAHAHA!
Yes. Yes I will.
Suicide is the only option.
With a clitoral master.
Dude, did you read the page about that game? It sounds gayer than a Taco in an orphanage. I cannot do its shitness justice - just once I beg you to follow the last link and read a couple of paragraphs.
Don't you just have to get the oil really hot?