From TFA: "Proposed changes to Ontario's Education Act announced Tuesday are designed to stop students from posting online attacks against other students or teachers".
If I say my classmate can't do maths, that's an attack. But it's not defamation if it's true.
But still, my point is, it doesn't use a temp variable to store the original i value, beucase it doesn't matter. It doesn't increment it after using i in each i++, but after evaluating the entire expression. And, it increments the i that you have AFTER evaluating that, not the i you had initially... I'm not sure how much sense that made...:-)
Huuum. I get 1 and 9 on gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070405 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-3). I've no idea what the C standard says...
What happens is, the result is computed, then i is incremented. From gcc -S on a i=i++*i++:
post-increments are part of the "evaluating the whole line".., to increment i "after" evaluating the whole line, you'd have to "take out the i and put it in a temp" so you *could* increment it afterwards... right? Whereas with the pre-increment, no other term "sees" or "needs" the old value, so its just incremented immediately.
Hm, but, that doesn't happen. For example, i=2;i=1+(i++)*2; will leave i as 6. That's 1+2*2, evaluates to 5, then increments i. So, you don't need to store i, you do need a place to store the result for 1+i*2, but that different, and you'd need that for ++i too.
i++ returns the value of i before incrementing it, so that value is stored in a temporary.
++i increments i, then returns the new value - no temporary required to store the old value
Stupid question. Why couldn't it increment i _after_ evaluating the whole line? Since i++ isn't an l-value, that should work...
Putting the protest on the net simply makes it even more useless. Unless you go there and look, you won't know.
But, going back to your war protest analogy, wouldn't that mean that people all over the world could find out about this? You don't have to live in Melbourne.
Though, the right way to do it, I'd say, is going out on the streets, then posting a video of that on youtube. Best of both worlds.:-)
Maybe, just MAYBE, FoxPro being open source would have some uses. I really fail to see how one could use ANYTHING out of Microsoft Bob for anything whatsoever...
Reasoning requires both intellectual capacity and evidence. Some people find little evidence for or against God. Their paucity of reasoning comes not from a paucity of intellectual capacity but from a paucity of evidence. This way, even a smart person without solid evidence against God can have faith.
By that reasoning, smart people should believe in all sorts of things without evidence.:-)
Reasoning requires both intellectual capacity and evidence. Some people find little evidence for or against God. Their paucity of reasoning comes not from a paucity of intellectual capacity but from a paucity of evidence. This way, even a smart person without solid evidence against God can have faith.
By that reasoning, smart people should believe in all sorts of things without evidence.:-)
Science tends to not disprove things. You can disprove a hypothesis but that only effects a theory. Theories tend to be positive in verbiage.
So, the theory of gravity still holds? Theories are disproven quite often, in science. More so, it's impossible to _prove_ such a theory. No, not talking about mathematics where the whole thing is based on some definitions, but about sciences that deal with the 'real world' (Hey, for lack of a better term...): physics, chemestry, biology...
If I am to understand you correctly, you have so much knowledge about the Universe that anybody who has faith in something is beneath you?
No, but, faith requires lack of reasoning. If by stupid you mean intellectual capacity, then people that do not reason are stupid. QED.
I'm not flaming you. Just food for thought before you imply that most of the world is stupid.
As most people on Slashdot, probably, my IQ is higher than 100. So, therefore, most of the world is stupider than me.
Actually, the way I see it, no. It says that if you do send a counter notice saying that the contect was removed/disabled by msitake or misidentification and are knowingly lying, you can get sued.
Not only that, but a video they had at least SOME basis to believe infringed on their copyright material.
What basis would that be? The fact that they mistook it for something they do have copyright over doesn't really mean they have any basis to believe anything.
Probably not, if they don't follow up on the suit. They can always claim it was a mistake. The DMCA states:
Any person who knowingly materially misrepresents under this section--
(1) that material or activity is infringing [...] shall be liable for any damages [...]
Slashdot Mirror
From TFA: "Proposed changes to Ontario's Education Act announced Tuesday are designed to stop students from posting online attacks against other students or teachers".
If I say my classmate can't do maths, that's an attack. But it's not defamation if it's true.
So, you mean... Children don't have the right to free speech, but it's okay, since it's for their own good?
But still, my point is, it doesn't use a temp variable to store the original i value, beucase it doesn't matter. It doesn't increment it after using i in each i++, but after evaluating the entire expression. And, it increments the i that you have AFTER evaluating that, not the i you had initially... I'm not sure how much sense that made... :-)
What happens is, the result is computed, then i is incremented. From gcc -S on a i=i++*i++: Yes, eax is used to compute the result, but then again the same happens for i=++i*++i: And same happens for i=1; j=1; i=j*42;
What makes you think nVidia, Intel and whoever else is on the market right now won't follow suit?
Duh. I think I was the only one that thought you said zero gravity. :-) Soweee.
Wrong. http://www.spaceflight.esa.int/users/downloads/use rguides/physenv.pdf g ravity
For the difference between the two (zero gravity and free fall): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness#Zero_
You must be... Eh. Overabused jokes can still be funny, you know!
Though, the right way to do it, I'd say, is going out on the streets, then posting a video of that on youtube. Best of both worlds.
Maybe, just MAYBE, FoxPro being open source would have some uses. I really fail to see how one could use ANYTHING out of Microsoft Bob for anything whatsoever...
I reach for my gun.
P.S. Preview button is your friend.
Yeah, but then you couldn't ignore people and then tell them you weren't actually at the computer. :-)
I doubt anyone will fire you because of your caffeine addiction.
That's not true. You just have to say that. They, , have to sue.
Actually, the way I see it, no. It says that if you do send a counter notice saying that the contect was removed/disabled by msitake or misidentification and are knowingly lying, you can get sued.
I take that back. I see what he's saying, and fair use applies there.
I should really learn how to read one of these days...