or so http://www.cnn.com is initally reporting, though that have no further developments at the time of this post.
Also from cnn.com
Among those presumed dead are the New York Fire Department's deputy chief and first deputy commissioner. Also presumed dead is Ray Downey, who led the NYFD team that helped out after the bombing in Oklahoma City.
This from: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/
Daniel Lewin, co-founder and chief technology officer (CTO) at Akamai Technologies Inc., is said by his company to have died Tuesday as a passenger aboard American Airlines Flight 11. The Boeing 767, originally bound for Los Angeles from Boston, crashed into the World Trade Center in New York and became the first of two airliners to slam into the 110-story structure, opening an apparently coordinated terrorist attack.
I would think it would make more sense to use the senor technology to allow/deny use of the vehicle entirely. The current solution requires police to be present and detect the signal sent out by the "breathalyzer" and this has obvious shortcomings. I would think that it would be better to have the driver's blood/alcohol content grant or deny operation of the vehicle by connecting some simple device to the ignition.
(On a side note, I would love to "test" out these devices)
Just my $0.02
Slashdot Mirror
or so http://www.cnn.com is initally reporting, though that have no further developments at the time of this post. Also from cnn.com Among those presumed dead are the New York Fire Department's deputy chief and first deputy commissioner. Also presumed dead is Ray Downey, who led the NYFD team that helped out after the bombing in Oklahoma City.
This from:
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/
Daniel Lewin, co-founder and chief technology officer (CTO) at Akamai Technologies Inc., is said by his company to have died Tuesday as a passenger aboard American Airlines Flight 11. The Boeing 767, originally bound for Los Angeles from Boston, crashed into the World Trade Center in New York and became the first of two airliners to slam into the 110-story structure, opening an apparently coordinated terrorist attack.
having flashbacks to "....windows on every desktop"
http://www.rvstuff.net/bt3500.html delevoped by PNI (couldn't seem to find thier page)
I would think it would make more sense to use the senor technology to allow/deny use of the vehicle entirely. The current solution requires police to be present and detect the signal sent out by the "breathalyzer" and this has obvious shortcomings. I would think that it would be better to have the driver's blood/alcohol content grant or deny operation of the vehicle by connecting some simple device to the ignition. (On a side note, I would love to "test" out these devices) Just my $0.02