It costs $100 buck to file in Indianapolis, it might have gone up some, but it certainly costs at least $100. Then, you go to court. The fun part is if they don't show, the judge will issue an order to show. Your responsible for serving that in an appropriate way. It's not usually free. Best case, they don't show and you can get a default judgement with a contempt of court warrant. This means if they get pulled over or interact with the police, they'll get picked up and usually have to pay your judgement to get out. (debtors prison in the US?) I'm guessing this part won't apply to a corp, but you'll have an easier time getting your judgement. Either way, your out a couple days work, filing fees, and whatever it cost to get your defendant served. If they do show, they can usually delay things by requesting paperwork, I'm sure you've forgotten something. This drags things out and makes more court dates, which usually have at least a month between them.
The point of "sanctuary cities" is that they don't ask questions and feel no obligation to act on this in an enforcement capacity. They are not required to, despite the legion of right wing Derp you find online.
Wait, don't you guys believe in small government? I guess that goes out the window when it disagrees with you or presents a chance to attack liberals.
Anyway, YOUR WRONG:
According to a 2009 Congressional Research Service report that discussed local law enforcement agencies' responsibilities under 434 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) and 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), the "primary federal restrictions on state and local sanctuary policies" concern a state or local refusal to maintain or share immigration status information. However, the report noted that the 1996 law "does not require entities to collect such information in the first place" and the U.S Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit indicated that "Congress cannot directly compel states to collect and share information regarding immigration status with federal immigration authorities"
Not from a tort liability viewpoint. Injured people sue, dead animals don't. Even if an owner steps forward and tries, there are often legal limits (very low ones) on awards for dead animals, especially if they are not on the owners property.
My wife had one. I got it at Sam's. I got a $100 gift card when I got the phone (from Sam's), then Samsung gave me a 256GB micro-SD card. When I returned the phone, I got to keep the $100 gift card and the phone she opted to switch to, a galaxy 7 Edge, now had a $100 gift card deal. I got that too.
I'm not seeing how Samsung or my retailer treated me poorly. Aside from the tedious wait.
60 years ago it was common, 40 years ago it was frowned upon but ignored, 20 years ago it was still true in many isolated areas. Today, things are still improving.
I grew up hearing stories about my grandfather, who used to get drunk and beat his wife regularly. Wife, children, etc... He was a migrant worker, so I don't think this relates well to middle class families, but there are still plenty of marginalized people who don't get the protection they need. My Grandfather only stopped when his boys were old enough to stop him.
Actually, divorce is declining and was never 50% for 1st marriages. Statistically your most likely to stay married until death. 2nd and 3rd marriages seem to fail more often and drive up the numbers.
You can pick up microtik router for under $40, their routerOS is not open source, but it's very powerful. They also support wireless better then bsd or linux and many of their low cost routers have wireless.
That sounds less free to me, forced by an oppressive bully to breath his smoke. Bullied on the road by bad, aggressive drivers. Your definition of freedom needs work.
Not a Trumper, but I'm not seeing how that's my problem. Our policies contribute to this instability and the rest of the world is perfectly capable of defending themselves.
Why shouldn't males and females be in the same pool? All people should be in one pool for maximum efficiency. The only way insurance works is for healthy to subsidize non-healthy. That includes pregnant and non-pregnant.
How Republicans want to end Abortion:
outlaw abortion, punish only providers
Effect:
Abortion available to wealthy under different names
black market abortions mean increased risk for poor
marginal decrease in actual abortions, large decrease in abortions on paper
How Democrats want to end Abortion:
Decrease povert, increase education, increase access to birth control
Pre-obomacare, expensive insurance, high deductibles and co-pays, employer trying to force me onto a high-deductible plan, employer blames increases on insurance company greed.
After obamacare, expensive insurance, high deductibles and co-pays, employer trying to force me onto a high-deductible plan, employer blames increases on obamacare.
I challenge you to do a true comparison of those plans. My guess is they were capped plans that would only last for a partial cancer treatment. You've off loaded your risk to the public, best case (for you).
This also ignores the millions who could never buy care at any price. Let's pretend your plan actually manages to cover your cancer, you go into remission. You do realize that cancer usually re-occurs. Luckily for your insurance company, they can dump your expensive ass because you now are the proud owner of a pre-existing condition.
Let me guess, you live in one of the 19 states that declined to expand Medicare. You should put the blame where it belongs, with your shittty state government. Alternatively, if your in rural area, there might only be afew options for hospital and insurers. That's your beloved free market at work.
Slashdot Mirror
It costs $100 buck to file in Indianapolis, it might have gone up some, but it certainly costs at least $100. Then, you go to court. The fun part is if they don't show, the judge will issue an order to show. Your responsible for serving that in an appropriate way. It's not usually free.
Best case, they don't show and you can get a default judgement with a contempt of court warrant. This means if they get pulled over or interact with the police, they'll get picked up and usually have to pay your judgement to get out. (debtors prison in the US?) I'm guessing this part won't apply to a corp, but you'll have an easier time getting your judgement. Either way, your out a couple days work, filing fees, and whatever it cost to get your defendant served.
If they do show, they can usually delay things by requesting paperwork, I'm sure you've forgotten something. This drags things out and makes more court dates, which usually have at least a month between them.
The point of "sanctuary cities" is that they don't ask questions and feel no obligation to act on this in an enforcement capacity. They are not required to, despite the legion of right wing Derp you find online.
Wait, don't you guys believe in small government? I guess that goes out the window when it disagrees with you or presents a chance to attack liberals. :
Anyway, YOUR WRONG
According to a 2009 Congressional Research Service report that discussed local law enforcement agencies' responsibilities under 434 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) and 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), the "primary federal restrictions on state and local sanctuary policies" concern a state or local refusal to maintain or share immigration status information. However, the report noted that the 1996 law "does not require entities to collect such information in the first place" and the U.S Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit indicated that "Congress cannot directly compel states to collect and share information regarding immigration status with federal immigration authorities"
Not from a tort liability viewpoint. Injured people sue, dead animals don't. Even if an owner steps forward and tries, there are often legal limits (very low ones) on awards for dead animals, especially if they are not on the owners property.
The planes should just mirror the internet to a local drive. They can rsync it all down while they are fueling. ;)
My wife had one. I got it at Sam's. I got a $100 gift card when I got the phone (from Sam's), then Samsung gave me a 256GB micro-SD card.
When I returned the phone, I got to keep the $100 gift card and the phone she opted to switch to, a galaxy 7 Edge, now had a $100 gift card deal. I got that too.
I'm not seeing how Samsung or my retailer treated me poorly. Aside from the tedious wait.
60 years ago it was common, 40 years ago it was frowned upon but ignored, 20 years ago it was still true in many isolated areas. Today, things are still improving.
http://www.womensafe.net/home/index.php/domesticviolence/29-overview-of-historical-laws-that-supported-domestic-violence
I grew up hearing stories about my grandfather, who used to get drunk and beat his wife regularly. Wife, children, etc... He was a migrant worker, so I don't think this relates well to middle class families, but there are still plenty of marginalized people who don't get the protection they need.
My Grandfather only stopped when his boys were old enough to stop him.
Actually, divorce is declining and was never 50% for 1st marriages. Statistically your most likely to stay married until death. 2nd and 3rd marriages seem to fail more often and drive up the numbers.
citation (with plenty more on google): http://psychcentral.com/lib/th...
You can pick up microtik router for under $40, their routerOS is not open source, but it's very powerful. They also support wireless better then bsd or linux and many of their low cost routers have wireless.
Pick up a Mikrotik device running RouterOS, they have them for under $40 with wireless.
It's a mistake to try and mix racism and rational thinking. They don't go together.
That sounds less free to me, forced by an oppressive bully to breath his smoke. Bullied on the road by bad, aggressive drivers.
Your definition of freedom needs work.
But, but... ...It's the investors who are shouldering the risk,not the employees...
Shell companies that buy your product and stockpile it. Not legal, but it happens all the time.
Looks like a Freudian slip. He sees income and payroll as theft, those employees should be grateful to bask in his presence.
Whose going to retire in 20 or 30 years? We'll all be busy fighting over who runs Bartertown.
Not a Trumper, but I'm not seeing how that's my problem.
Our policies contribute to this instability and the rest of the world is perfectly capable of defending themselves.
Sure, because that's exactly the same thing. Every place with single payer has adopted such and now looks like whoville.
Why shouldn't males and females be in the same pool? All people should be in one pool for maximum efficiency. The only way insurance works is for healthy to subsidize non-healthy. That includes pregnant and non-pregnant.
How Republicans want to end Abortion:
outlaw abortion, punish only providers
Effect:
Abortion available to wealthy under different names
black market abortions mean increased risk for poor
marginal decrease in actual abortions, large decrease in abortions on paper
How Democrats want to end Abortion:
Decrease povert, increase education, increase access to birth control
Effect:
actual decrease in abortions
Pre-obomacare, expensive insurance, high deductibles and co-pays, employer trying to force me onto a high-deductible plan, employer blames increases on insurance company greed.
After obamacare, expensive insurance, high deductibles and co-pays, employer trying to force me onto a high-deductible plan, employer blames increases on obamacare.
I challenge you to do a true comparison of those plans. My guess is they were capped plans that would only last for a partial cancer treatment. You've off loaded your risk to the public, best case (for you).
This also ignores the millions who could never buy care at any price.
Let's pretend your plan actually manages to cover your cancer, you go into remission. You do realize that cancer usually re-occurs. Luckily for your insurance company, they can dump your expensive ass because you now are the proud owner of a pre-existing condition.
What is desirable about that?
Let me guess, you live in one of the 19 states that declined to expand Medicare. You should put the blame where it belongs, with your shittty state government.
Alternatively, if your in rural area, there might only be afew options for hospital and insurers. That's your beloved free market at work.
no, but you can get that lung transplant way easier. You can also get surgery quicker, more care during recover, etc.
You don't think doctors will become more risk averse in such a situation? Pay up front or get out. Sounds great.