Sure, lets put backdoors on all or encryptions so hackers and find out how to get it. Smart move. And you know, If you make a gun not fire when a terrorist holds it. He'll just go get a different gun. Meaning, if you make encryption open for snooping, they'll just employ someone to right an encryption program that isn't open. Hell, how many encryption algarithims are known right now? If they put a back door in the software doesn't not effect the algaritm, the algrithim is still secure. What is all this summitting key's to the government crap, what terrorist is going do be so much of a moron to use a key he gave to the government? This is all a bunch of MOO POO!
I just knew exactly how they were going to use the transporter, I was just waiting for the capt. to get stuck somewhere and the crew was going to be forced to use it on him despite his fear of it. It was so predictible. Thats my only grevience with it. I'm not a big star trek fan, I watch it when ever I see it on. So I wasn't disappointed because of reused concepts like most of you did. Overall I thought it was a pretty good show. Better then I expected, I'm always sceptical of people screwing up good things.
We better watch out with our networking code, and accidentally wacky ping might get us life in prisonment because it could be considered a DOS attack if it slows down a server. BTW, what exactly determines a DOS attack, could one day a server goes down and the admin determines it was DOC attack to cover his butt after he secretlly finds out he misconfigured something. What happens if the higher up's tell him to find out who did it and he blames so guy who was just scanning ip's for the hell of it? Would that poor soul get life inprisonment? And one more thing, is the digital equivelent of graffiti, "defacing", really deserve life in prison? jezz,..
Slashdot Mirror
I'm pretty sure someone will notice the difference because 100 mhz and 2 ghz.
Don't forget the all to important Z-Modem, with compression, wahoo...
Sure, lets put backdoors on all or encryptions so hackers and find out how to get it. Smart move. And you know, If you make a gun not fire when a terrorist holds it. He'll just go get a different gun. Meaning, if you make encryption open for snooping, they'll just employ someone to right an encryption program that isn't open. Hell, how many encryption algarithims are known right now? If they put a back door in the software doesn't not effect the algaritm, the algrithim is still secure. What is all this summitting key's to the government crap, what terrorist is going do be so much of a moron to use a key he gave to the government? This is all a bunch of MOO POO!
I just knew exactly how they were going to use the transporter, I was just waiting for the capt. to get stuck somewhere and the crew was going to be forced to use it on him despite his fear of it. It was so predictible. Thats my only grevience with it. I'm not a big star trek fan, I watch it when ever I see it on. So I wasn't disappointed because of reused concepts like most of you did. Overall I thought it was a pretty good show. Better then I expected, I'm always sceptical of people screwing up good things.
We better watch out with our networking code, and accidentally wacky ping might get us life in prisonment because it could be considered a DOS attack if it slows down a server. BTW, what exactly determines a DOS attack, could one day a server goes down and the admin determines it was DOC attack to cover his butt after he secretlly finds out he misconfigured something. What happens if the higher up's tell him to find out who did it and he blames so guy who was just scanning ip's for the hell of it? Would that poor soul get life inprisonment? And one more thing, is the digital equivelent of graffiti, "defacing", really deserve life in prison? jezz,..