Ummm...emacs DOES have drop down menus. Soes does gvim (I assume when you say vi you mean vim). I can't think of what you might mean by "other shell apps". The vast majority of the shell apps I use don't have an interface to add drop down menus to.
The bear's chin is in the shadows because the camera and the light swap positions. The light is coming from the left in image b. Although you are correct in saying there is no new data. Obviously there cannot be any information pulled from nowhere.
I used to have Telus DSL. One day I called to tell them the service was down. When I finally got through to a real person, they went through their typical process of telling me how to renew an IP in Windows. I sat their going "uh-huh, uh-huh" and looking at my bash prompt while they took 15 minutes to tell me how to get to the Windows control panel. Eventually managed to interrupt and tell the guy that I knew how to renew an IP, I already tried that, I'm not using Windows, their gateway wasn't responding, and I'm not using Windows. At which point they responded with "oh, we only support Windows". GAH!
There is no such thing as "perfect forward-secrecy". While TOR is good at obfuscating the source/destination of traffic, someone who is determined enough can still pull a few tricks to track you down.
As a Canadian who lives near the border, I haven't seen a US border officer do that in at least 10 years. Everytime I've crossed recently, I've been grilled, my ID checked again and again, any bags had to be carried through and scanned...
Apple laptops are definately some of the best out there. Cool, silent, long battery, great wireless range, solid construction, lightweight. The PPC architecture has some efficiency advantages over the eternally backwards compatible x86. Unless you want to run Windows, there really isn't any advantage to most x86 laptops (other than maybe a slightly cheaper price tag). While I like OS X, the hardware is more important to me than what OS is on it.
Well I live in an appartment building, and a lot of the junk (real) mail I get is un-addressed bulk flyers that are given to everyone in the building. You can't really be taken off of a list there, as there is no list. The only way would be if everyone in the building returned the flyers.
Sure, just tell me your MAC address and attatch it to all your email so I can filter you out. Please don't lie or change your MAC as that would be unkind.
I work in the IT field for a large Canadian company. The amount of spam we get is slowly but steady increasing. Currently somewhere around 98% of all the mail we get is "Junk" (spam, invalid recipients, improper smtp protocol, etc). Looking at our mail server graphs shows a definite upward trend in both overall "Junk" and confirmed spam.
Disclaimer: I am a Christian, and I do not believe that the modern evolutionary theory is true.
That said, I don't really have an opinion on keeping or removing the stickers. I guess I just don't think that the stickers mean much of anything one way or the other.
It does seem, however, that there is a misunderstanding of the scientific method (though probably not so much among the slashdot crowd). Many people seem to regard the current theories as unopposable fact. We seem to think we have the world all figured out. I believe that is highly unlikely. Historically, people have always thought their models and theories were rock solid, but now they seem laughable. In the same way, I think both creationists and evolutionist alike will be surprised by what we learn in the future.
In light of this, I think it is important that schools teach the importants of testing and evaluating ALL theories. A sticker on a textbook is certainly not the solution for that.
I'm not quite sure what those who called for the stickers hoped to accomplish. What I hope is that schools do encourage students to come up with new ideas and test existing ones. After all, aren't we all just searching for the true facts?
Bottom line:
The transmitter described is not even close to complying with FCC regs. FCC compliance depends not only on transmitter power, but also on antenna gain and several other factors. You cannot simply say "X milliwatts is safe". Not only that, but 100mW into almost any antenna is going to be a violation. Something in the range of 1mW into an omni antenna would be more like it.
You mean copyright infringement. I hate to flog a dead horse, but people still don't seem to realize that it isn't the same thing as stealing (not saying that its OK though).
Slashdot Mirror
Some external enclosures are huge and ugly, but not all. I've got one that's a nice brushed aluminum and not much bigger than the drive itself.
Ummm...emacs DOES have drop down menus. Soes does gvim (I assume when you say vi you mean vim). I can't think of what you might mean by "other shell apps". The vast majority of the shell apps I use don't have an interface to add drop down menus to.
The bear's chin is in the shadows because the camera and the light swap positions. The light is coming from the left in image b. Although you are correct in saying there is no new data. Obviously there cannot be any information pulled from nowhere.
Apple's site says this is packaged with Tiger. Did they get an early release of it?
I used to have Telus DSL. One day I called to tell them the service was down. When I finally got through to a real person, they went through their typical process of telling me how to renew an IP in Windows. I sat their going "uh-huh, uh-huh" and looking at my bash prompt while they took 15 minutes to tell me how to get to the Windows control panel. Eventually managed to interrupt and tell the guy that I knew how to renew an IP, I already tried that, I'm not using Windows, their gateway wasn't responding, and I'm not using Windows. At which point they responded with "oh, we only support Windows". GAH!
They've requested a court order. So far, the courts have said no. Until they actually have a court order, why should they get private information?
RTFA. Videotron is giving out the info without a court order. The courts have said no to the CRIA every time they asked.
There is no such thing as "perfect forward-secrecy". While TOR is good at obfuscating the source/destination of traffic, someone who is determined enough can still pull a few tricks to track you down.
And at the current exchange rate, a Chinese millionaire works out to $120,821.10 US. Maybe they should go for billionaire.
As a Canadian who lives near the border, I haven't seen a US border officer do that in at least 10 years. Everytime I've crossed recently, I've been grilled, my ID checked again and again, any bags had to be carried through and scanned...
Apple laptops are definately some of the best out there. Cool, silent, long battery, great wireless range, solid construction, lightweight. The PPC architecture has some efficiency advantages over the eternally backwards compatible x86. Unless you want to run Windows, there really isn't any advantage to most x86 laptops (other than maybe a slightly cheaper price tag). While I like OS X, the hardware is more important to me than what OS is on it.
Well I live in an appartment building, and a lot of the junk (real) mail I get is un-addressed bulk flyers that are given to everyone in the building. You can't really be taken off of a list there, as there is no list. The only way would be if everyone in the building returned the flyers.
Sure, just tell me your MAC address and attatch it to all your email so I can filter you out. Please don't lie or change your MAC as that would be unkind.
heh, "until [ 6 -eq 9 ]". How about "while :"?
I work in the IT field for a large Canadian company. The amount of spam we get is slowly but steady increasing. Currently somewhere around 98% of all the mail we get is "Junk" (spam, invalid recipients, improper smtp protocol, etc). Looking at our mail server graphs shows a definite upward trend in both overall "Junk" and confirmed spam.
From the article, it sounds more like ISPs will be required to notify authorities if they are made aware of a specific instance of child pornography.
DSA or RSA.
Well said. The fact is that we don't know everything, and most people don't like to be told that (creationists included).
- A creationist.
Disclaimer: I am a Christian, and I do not believe that the modern evolutionary theory is true.
That said, I don't really have an opinion on keeping or removing the stickers. I guess I just don't think that the stickers mean much of anything one way or the other.
It does seem, however, that there is a misunderstanding of the scientific method (though probably not so much among the slashdot crowd). Many people seem to regard the current theories as unopposable fact. We seem to think we have the world all figured out. I believe that is highly unlikely. Historically, people have always thought their models and theories were rock solid, but now they seem laughable. In the same way, I think both creationists and evolutionist alike will be surprised by what we learn in the future.
In light of this, I think it is important that schools teach the importants of testing and evaluating ALL theories. A sticker on a textbook is certainly not the solution for that.
I'm not quite sure what those who called for the stickers hoped to accomplish. What I hope is that schools do encourage students to come up with new ideas and test existing ones. After all, aren't we all just searching for the true facts?
Ah, I see. I would have counted the ChangeLog as part of the source code, seeing as it is in the source tarball.
On FM frequencies, these devices are limited to an effective service range of approximately 200 feet (61 meters).
/ Documents/bulletins/oet63/oet63rev.pdf
source:
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/lowpwr.html
see also:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology
Bottom line:
The transmitter described is not even close to complying with FCC regs. FCC compliance depends not only on transmitter power, but also on antenna gain and several other factors. You cannot simply say "X milliwatts is safe". Not only that, but 100mW into almost any antenna is going to be a violation. Something in the range of 1mW into an omni antenna would be more like it.
Did you even read it? "and gave credit to the spinoff team in the changelog"
Java does not necessarily run in a sandbox, although it does as a web applet.
You mean copyright infringement. I hate to flog a dead horse, but people still don't seem to realize that it isn't the same thing as stealing (not saying that its OK though).
yee gads, no wonder his server gets /.ed every year! spdt keeps running a few hundred thousand simultaneous connections!