Slashdot Mirror


date +%s Turning 1111111111

initsix writes "Break out your party hats. According to http://www.onlineconversion.com/unix_time.htm , Unix time is supposed reach 1111111111 on Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:58:31 GMT That's only 1036372537 seconds from 2^31 (ie Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:08 GMT)!!"

574 comments

  1. Eh... by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll wait until it goes back to 0000000000 til I celebrate.

    1. Re:Eh... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      After reading further down in the article and seeing about 15 variations on my witty and original comment that were posted before I wrote it, I wish to officially withdraw my previous post.

      k-thx-bye

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Eh... by TWX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "'So tonight I'm gonna party like it's nine-teen-sev-en-ty!' -- Not Prince"

      I'd like to party like it's 1969 personally...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Eh... by ZeroZen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm waiting till January 19th, 2038 at 03:14:07 AM to party!!! Why wait another second longer?

      Happy unix time rollover! 9999999999 It's the year 2038 bug.

      Any computer holding any information useful or important to anyone in the world with half a brain will think it's 1970 and you'll be using UNIX 1.0!

      Can you imagine using the console

      UPGRADE YOUR UNICES OR DIEZORZ.

    4. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll only be a problem for code still using a 32bit signed time_t

      Not impossible, but unlikely.

    5. Re:Eh... by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, 2147483647 is the time of the epoch, not 9999999999.

    6. Re:Eh... by tomjen · · Score: 1

      No it may be friday the 13 of December 1901.
      I am not conserned though this guy seems to be on the other hand

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    7. Re:Eh... by letxa2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "1111111111" is cool and all, but won't it be even more cool when we get to "2222222222?" :)

    8. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful????

    9. Re:Eh... by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      It'll be a whle.. but something doesn't make sense.

      January 19, 2038 @ 03:14:08 gives the result
      2147483648
      which is 2^31

      That brings me to a few issues.
      a) January 19, 2038 @ 3:14:07 is the last second that can be counted with 31 bits, one bit is the sign bit. Do we need a sign bit? Are dates prior to 1970 used/valid?

      b) The next second would be essentially
      -2147483648, I'm sure we'll convert to 64bit counters by then anyway. Is anyone doing anything to prepare? :)

    10. Re:Eh... by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of my dad pointing out the odometer on his car every time a cool number like a palindrome or repetitive #'s came up.

    11. Re:Eh... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Are dates prior to 1970 used/valid?

      Do you want to use the same timestmap format for something besides system activity? Accounting information, perhaps, so it's easy to compare against file timestamps? The format isn't just for the *current* time, you know. :)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Eh... by suso · · Score: 1

      Set your clock back to 1970, it will say 0, which is essentially what I meant in my post. So your post turned out to be marked as informative is beyond me:

      # date 010100001970
      Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 EST 1970
      # date
      Thu Jan 1 00:00:01 EST 1970
      # date +%s
      18006

      Of course, its skewed by my timezone, but it would said 6.

    13. Re:Eh... by gurnemanz · · Score: 1

      To put things in a larger frame, 1111111111 seconds is almost exactly one ninth of 10 billion seconds, or as Carl Sagan would say, billions and billions of seconds, just about 316.8876 years. Don't hold your breath.

    14. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got modded 'informative' because he was replying to someone else...

    15. Re:Eh... by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 1

      It's the year 2038 bug.

      I realize this is a play on the y2k "bug," but this isn't a bug at all. As if those "lazy programmers" took a "shortcut" by allocating a finite amount of memory for the timer..

      It is, in fact, just a design issue that needs to be kept in mind, especially when the epoch nears its end. Which is not now.

    16. Re:Eh... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we'll convert to 64bit counters by then anyway.

      Isn't that the kind of thinking that got us into the Y2K mess in the first place? hmmmmm? ;)

  2. Big 00000000 by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 3, Funny

    I rate this a 000000000 on the geek scale.

    1. Re:Big 00000000 by blogtim · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't mean 100000000?

      --
      Visit Tim's Journal, yes?
    2. Re:Big 00000000 by Mumpsman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think that's geeky? Puh-lease:

      At 8:00 p.m. EDT (0000 GMT) April 9, 2005 +$H turns 60000!

      I win!

      --
      No battles to the death are recalled. Mumpsman can hit to attack and cause brainsmashing.
    3. Re:Big 00000000 by HiredMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      [Get Fuzzy]

      You couldn't be geekier if you were actually standing there with a Dungeon Master's Guide in your hand.

      -The old Dungeon Master's Guide or the new one? Because the new ones are swwweeeeeeet!

      I stand NOT corrected.

      [/Get Fuzzy]

      =tkk

    4. Re:Big 00000000 by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Funny

      YOU FAIL IT (proper endian-ness: 000000001)

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:Big 00000000 by RangerRick98 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant negative zero? :)

      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
    6. Re:Big 00000000 by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You fail it too, it's 00 E1 F5 05.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    7. Re:Big 00000000 by chro57 · · Score: 0

      Are you thinking about the RPG videogame "Dungeon Master" from FTL, or is it something other ? Oups ! A google query return a book about "D&D". I stand corrected.

    8. Re:Big 00000000 by slavefishy · · Score: 1

      00000000? Sounds rather like a combination code that only a complete tool would use on, say, a nuclear warhead.

    9. Re:Big 00000000 by sixide · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure that's -65536, not "negative zero".

    10. Re:Big 00000000 by sixide · · Score: 1

      What I meant was... -256.

    11. Re:Big 00000000 by SpookyFish · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll throw in my geek rating at 3735928559 -
      0xDEADBEEF

    12. Re:Big 00000000 by Everleet · · Score: 1

      Not if you're talking about one's complement.

      --
      It's tragic. Laugh.
    13. Re:Big 00000000 by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      Dammit now I have to change the combo on all my nukular warheads. Signed, Complete Tool

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
  3. party till its 1999 by romit_icarus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't think Prince would know about Unix time, right?

    1. Re:party till its 1999 by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

      Prince knows a ton about Eunuchs. What did you think 'When Doves Cry' was about?

  4. Woohoo! by fdrake76 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time to party like it's 1111111110!

    1. Re:Woohoo! by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      " Time to party like it's 1111111110!"

      Don't you mean 946684799? Or did you mean 11111001111?

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    2. Re:Woohoo! by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      Time to party like it's 1111111110!

      Did you mean Time to party like it's 946684799

    3. Re:Woohoo! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Funny

      As i sit here with a Giant collection of lego star wars toys , several half wrecked old machines servering various services ,a reference book collection to rival that of a national library ,an Espreso machine controled via blue tooth, An ever encroaching beard since i lost my shaving kit under a pile of a Punch cards and a wrist time device that runs linux ,,, I begin to think that this story is far too geeky .. 1010101010 is way cooler anyhow

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it's 1022?

      I think you meant 11111001111. ;)

    5. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to party like it's 1111111110!

      I don't remember Prince singing "1022".

    6. Re:Woohoo! by Halloran · · Score: 1

      Isn't it 11111001111?

    7. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The light-workers must be going crazy!

    8. Re:Woohoo! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Try this on for size.

      Its the video game of your favorite star wars lego figures. (Windows only I think at present)

      Its kept my eldest entertained for a while :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    9. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth Espresso machine?!?!? Tell me more! Link pls!! ;)

    10. Re:Woohoo! by JasdonLe · · Score: 1

      Straight up -- I'm with the other poster.

      Throw down some more info about this Bluetooth expresso machine. Google's givin' me nothin'.

      --
      ** A Sketch a Week **
      http://www.sketchplease.com
    11. Re:Woohoo! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Right now it reall is not that impresive , i can just turn it off and on with a BT switch and another switch to change the strength settings
      I do intend one day to have a switch to control the water flow , a little train to drive the cup to my desk etc, and possibly some form of robot to change the coffe and clean the filter but that seems a bit tricky

      a small hack and really , less imprsivbe than it sounds

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    12. Re:Woohoo! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Im going to buz a playstation 2 if this is any good ,I had heard about it ,so hopefully cedega will support it or thez will make a mac port , either that or im going to spend a fortune on a PS2 (as opposed to that star destroyer model)

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    13. Re:Woohoo! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      (hit submit last time not preview ).. by eldest , do you mean you *hehehe

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  5. wha?? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does Mr. Taco get $.15 a click-through on that site or something? sheesh

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  6. Oh dear. by Neophytus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome our new binary timestamp overlords.

    1. Re:Oh dear. by mausmalone · · Score: 0, Troll

      For the love of God!

      The joke is dead. Let it go.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    2. Re:Oh dear. by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      I know - but every slow news day needs it ;)

    3. Re:Oh dear. by soupdevil · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new "I, for one, welcome" overlords.

    4. Re:Oh dear. by clausiam · · Score: 1, Funny
      For the love of God!
      The joke is dead. Let it go.

      God's dead too ...

    5. Re:Oh dear. by the+clean · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nietzsche is dead.

    6. Re:Oh dear. by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      So is Paul

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Oh dear. by clausiam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good thing we still have The King among us...

    8. Re:Oh dear. by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      God's dead too ...

      Did Netcraft confirm that?

    9. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Slow-news-day Slashdot, *overlords* welcomes *you*!

    10. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nietcraft did.

    11. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new "no I for one welcome our new overlords" overlords.

  7. might be too late! by kingjosh · · Score: 1

    Be sure to celebrate soon! If you skip this one and wait for the next 1, you'll be dead . . .

  8. Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What.

  9. people with way too much free time on their hands by VolciMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, I know it's cool (and tonight), but how bored do you have to be to figure this out? (Then again, I had a Star Wars II countdown timer running for a while on my desktop...)

  10. It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    don't forget people you can see the following amazing sights on your home digital clock without modifications !!

    11:11:11
    01:01:01
    00:00:00
    12:34:56

    please feel free to add your own

    1. Re:It gets better ! by dashing_cavalier · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about: 11:23:58?

      --
      Meh.
    2. Re:It gets better ! by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      The fibonacci clock always displays 11:23:58 :)

    3. Re:It gets better ! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      Could you post some instructions describing how you managed get all those numbers?

      I haven't been able to get anything other than:

      12:00
      --:--
      12:00
      --:--
      12:00
    4. Re:It gets better ! by Myrmi · · Score: 1

      We're soon going to have 01:02 03/04/05

      Of course, I'm speaking from a British point of view. You Americans have already passed that milestone. You'll get another (shorter) one next year though - 01:02:03 04/05/06

      --
      "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
    5. Re:It gets better ! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Geekiest post all day. Brilliant.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    6. Re:It gets better ! by maotx · · Score: 1

      8008?
      Oh thats the calculator....

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    7. Re:It gets better ! by Lxy · · Score: 1

      While I realize your post was an attempt at satire, I will say that certain times look really cool on a binary clock.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    8. Re:It gets better ! by OwlofDoom · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, the BBC radio made a big deal in 1990 about 12:34:56 7/8/90. Just think of the endless excitement we would have missed out on had we chosen some other arbitrary numbering scheme for time.

      As one who deals with UNIX timestamps on a regular basis, I will certainly crack open the best bubbly for this momentous occasion.

    9. Re:It gets better ! by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      My favorite time is 7:33:17. Every time I see it in the mirror I'm reminded how f*cking k-rad I am.

    10. Re:It gets better ! by Surt · · Score: 1

      Ah, you bring back fond memories of high school parties in 89 and 90.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:It gets better ! by james72 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about pi time?

      03:14:16

      -James.

    12. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      01:12:35 is more correct, actually ^__^

    13. Re:It gets better ! by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're tleet?

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    14. Re:It gets better ! by angle_slam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Muddy Waters has a CD with 12 tracks on it and the total time of the CD is 2096 seconds. When I put it in my CD player, it says: 12 34:56.

    15. Re:It gets better ! by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy who's child was born on 03-02-01. When his wife got pregnant again, he joked that he wanted the next child to be born on 01-02-03.

    16. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's:
      03:14:15

    17. Re:It gets better ! by grub · · Score: 1

      Best egghead post in ages, well done!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    18. Re:It gets better ! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      That's just because they missed out on

      01:23:45 6/7/89

      the year before.

    19. Re:It gets better ! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its called rounding. Otherwise we would have to wait for 03:14:15.92653589793238462643383279502884197169399 37510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211 70679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594 08128481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930 38196442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120 19091456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491 41273724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715 36436789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151 16094330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051 18548074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011 94912983367336244065664308602139494639522473719070 21798609437027705392171762931767523846748184676694 05132000568127145263560827785771342757789609173637 17872146844090122495343014654958537105079227968925 89235420199561121290219608640344181598136297747713 09960518707211349999998372978049951059731732816096 31859502445945534690830264252230825334468503526193 11881710100031378387528865875332083814206171776691 47303598253490428755468731159562863882353787593751 95778185778053217122680661300192787661119590921642 01989380952572010654858632788659361533818279682303 01952035301852968995773622599413891249721775283479 13151557485724245415069595082953311686172785588907 50983817546374649393192550604009277016711390098488 24012858361603563707660104710181942955596198946767 83744944825537977472684710404753464620804668425906 94912933136770289891521047521620569660240580381501 93511253382430035587640247496473263914199272604269 92279678235478163600934172164121992458631503028618 29745557067498385054945885869269956909272107975093 02955321165344987202755960236480665499119881834797 75356636980742654252786255181841757467289097777279 38000816470600161452491921732172147723501414419735 68548161361157352552133475741849468438523323907394 14333454776241686251898356948556209921922218427255 02542568876717904946016534668049886272327917860857 84383827967976681454100953883786360950680064225125 20511739298489608412848862694560424196528502221066 11863067442786220391949450471237137869609563643719 17287467764657573962413890865832645995813390478027 59009946576407895126946839835259570982582262052248 94077267194782684826014769909026401363944374553050 68203496252451749399651431429809190659250937221696 46151570985838741059788595977297549893016175392846 81382686838689427741559918559252459539594310499725 24680845987273644695848653836736222626099124608051 24388439045124413654976278079771569143599770012961 60894416948685558484063534220722258284886481584560 28506016842739452267467678895252138522549954666727 82398645659611635488623057745649803559363456817432 41125150760694794510965960940252288797108931456691 36867228748940560101503308617928680920874760917824 93858900971490967598526136554978189312978482168299 89487226588048575640142704775551323796414515237462 34364542858444795265867821051141354735739523113427 16610213596953623144295248493718711014576540359027 99344037420073105785390621983874478084784896833214 4571386875194350643021845319104848100537061468067

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    20. Re:It gets better ! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think I might have missed a digit around the 9,117th place... my memory is not as good as it used to be, and my typing skills aren't either.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    21. Re:It gets better ! by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      Man, I've never been so pleased to say those words.

    22. Re:It gets better ! by RaguMS · · Score: 1

      I am such a loser. First for reading comments to this depth, and second for going to post a reply to the parent (about 7:33:17) and discovering that someone I actually know has already posted the reply I intended.

    23. Re:It gets better ! by hankwang · · Score: 1
      please feel free to add your own

      Yes, a couple of years back, there was a similar story:

      on Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 04:25:21 UTC (00:25:21 EDT and late Wednesday at 21:25:21 PDT), the UNIX clock will read 987654321, which is pretty cool.
      I don't recall a story when the clock hit the 10^9 mark, though.
    24. Re:It gets better ! by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      This is amazing. Just yesterday the odometer on my truck hit 66666. Should I be worried?

    25. Re:It gets better ! by Mjlner · · Score: 1


      11:11:11
      01:01:01
      00:00:00
      12:34:56

      please feel free to add your own

      I will, thank you.

      22:22:22
      For us non-anglo-saxons.

      --
      Lemon curry???
    26. Re:It gets better ! by flamejob · · Score: 0

      4:20!

      durrrrrr

    27. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about: 11:23:58?

      Only if she's 5'3"!

    28. Re:It gets better ! by sootman · · Score: 1

      Hey, you have to read this deep. If you don't, and you post your joke, you'll get a -1, Redundant mod, and who the hell needs *that*?!? :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    29. Re:It gets better ! by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      I remember when one of these events occured and Johnny Carson made a reference to it saying it wouldn't happen again for a hundred years, or some such statement. Well the beauty of the American love of AM and PM meant it happened again exactly 12 hours later. ;-)

    30. Re:It gets better ! by SirLestat · · Score: 1

      What about clock that only display hours:minutes.
      13:37

    31. Re:It gets better ! by CrazyClimber · · Score: 1

      The original comment was meta-1337. He's so l337 he can start using random strings to express his l337-ness.

    32. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4:20

    33. Re:It gets better ! by KevlarTheSleepinator · · Score: 1

      how about this one:

      03:13:37

      --
      Move Sig, for great justice.
    34. Re:It gets better ! by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twice this week I've looked at the clock at 11:11pm, then the next time I looked it was 1:11am.

      There should be prizes for things like that.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    35. Re:It gets better ! by Aranwe+Haldaloke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      01:49:16 (The squares of 0 through 4) 03:14:16 (Pi. Duh) 16:18:03 (The Golden Ratio) 09:02:10 (For fans of Aaron Spelling's productions)

    36. Re:It gets better ! by xami · · Score: 1

      some friends of mine haxx0r3d their digital watches once and reset them to use 13:37 as 00:00

      sad, I know. you know what's even worse? it was my idea...

    37. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fave is 04:20:00.

    38. Re:It gets better ! by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Funny

      only for about a mile or so...

    39. Re:It gets better ! by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashcode is so nerdy. If you type more than a few hyphens, the lameness filter complains. But a thousand digits of pi are okay!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    40. Re:It gets better ! by Y2 · · Score: 1
      I remember when one of these events occured and Johnny Carson made a reference to it saying it wouldn't happen again for a hundred years, or some such statement. Well the beauty of the American love of AM and PM meant it happened again exactly 12 hours later. ;-)

      Nope. He said it in the PM.

      So if the Brits started us out with the AM/PM, the quarts, the acres, the bushels, and all that rot, and now laugh at us for using them ... was the system of measurements the first troll?

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    41. Re:It gets better ! by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Not if he was mentioning an event occuring at 12:34 AM.

    42. Re:It gets better ! by panaceaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      The original comment was meta-1337. He's so l337 he can start using random strings to express his l337-ness

      Hey man, thanks. You're pretty tleet too.

    43. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      04:20:00

    44. Re:It gets better ! by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      03:14:15...

    45. Re:It gets better ! by x2A · · Score: 1

      When you scroll at the right speed (relative to your refresh rate)... you see the pattern in pi!!! How come no one's thought of that before????

      -2A

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    46. Re:It gets better ! by etnoy · · Score: 0

      How about 22:22? Or 22:07, which, when divided, gives a number close to pi? BTW, I really like 03:14.

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    47. Re:It gets better ! by midnightblaze · · Score: 1

      1:01 on digital clocks is TIE fighter time. And obviously, 10:01 is TIE bomber time. I made those myself, thank you very much.

    48. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about 4:20

    49. Re:It gets better ! by ribo-bailey · · Score: 2, Funny

      of course the answer to life, the universe, and everything happens twice a day at 10:10:10

    50. Re:It gets better ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's teelt!

    51. Re:It gets better ! by fmobus · · Score: 1

      What about 11:11:11? The first six binary digits of the largest known Mersenne prime...

    52. Re:It gets better ! by menace3society · · Score: 1

      04:20:??

    53. Re:It gets better ! by Hungry+Admin · · Score: 1

      You forgot my all-time favorite digital clock time, which I witnessed:

      12:34:56 7/8/90

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind.
    54. Re:It gets better ! by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twice this week I've looked at the clock at 11:11pm, then the next time I looked it was 1:11am.

      That's not a clock, you're actually looking at your cellphone, and your signal went from 4 to 3 bars:

      ||||
      |||




      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    55. Re:It gets better ! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      58"??! "I like big butts" indeed!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    56. Re:It gets better ! by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I remember this moment in time. Even though I forgot anything else that happened that day.

      I was repairing a transceiver at a two-way radio shop and the DJ on the FM radio warned of the upcoming 12:34:56 7/8/90 in about ten minutes. So I took a break to witness it myself on my digital watch.

      The strange thing was, I do remember not actually wanting to listen to the radio that day, but decided to turn it on anyway.

      Now, please excuse me while I brew up another cup of "Dick Clark's Secret Formula Longevi-Tea" so I may enjoy the moment in time in the year 2090

    57. Re:It gets better ! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I like when my clock displays e: 02:71:82. I gotta get that thing fixed.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    58. Re:It gets better ! by CCRancor · · Score: 1

      You broke into Muddy Waters house just to steal his CD collection?

      --
      Open source is the art of letting other people write your bad code.
    59. Re:It gets better ! by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Who does that make the bigger loser, you or the guy who beat you to it, hahahah :D

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    60. Re:It gets better ! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      How about 23:59:60?

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  11. Egad! by cephalien · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quickly, set the Wayback machine for 11010101010!

    --
    If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
    1. Re:Egad! by Kimos · · Score: 1

      Way back to Sun, 24 Nov 2318 17:23:30 GMT?

  12. Dumbest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow! Dumbest Slashdot story ever!

    1. Re:Dumbest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dumbest story will be the one about the timestamp reaching 10000000000.

    2. Re:Dumbest! by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do not underestimate our dear editors, i'm sure in the future, given enough time they can produce something even more brilliantly dumb...

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    3. Re:Dumbest! by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Quickly followed by the Dumbest Slashdot Comment ever.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    4. Re:Dumbest! by eln · · Score: 1

      Obviously you weren't here for the Jon Katz era.

    5. Re:Dumbest! by alphaseven · · Score: 1

      Actually I think Happy 'Even Day' (celebrating 02-02-2000) was much dumber, but yeah.

    6. Re:Dumbest! by michrech · · Score: 1

      And then post a duplicate of it at least once.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    7. Re:Dumbest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We should be seeing a dupe at about 1111093200

    8. Re:Dumbest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      touche!

      (and ditto)

  13. Financial news: Candle sales skyrocket! by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 4, Funny

    Candlemakers report unseasonally high profits this quarter thanks to a very unusual birthday...

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    1. Re:Financial news: Candle sales skyrocket! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      They were at a loss to explain the comparatively low demand for digits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 0.

    2. Re:Financial news: Candle sales skyrocket! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Well.. tomorrow is MY birthday. If I had any clever geek friend's they could do my birthday cake in 1's.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:Financial news: Candle sales skyrocket! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Were you born in 1970?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:Financial news: Candle sales skyrocket! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      No. Sorry, I was born in '78.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  14. In other news... by ikewillis · · Score: 1
    It's about to turn 11:11:11 here in approximately a half hour... better celebrate!

    Wait, what the fuck is so special about 11:11:11?

    1. Re:In other news... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Weel, at 11:11 on 11/11 some big war ended at one point in time...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing. What's so special about 2000? Also nothing, but a lot of people decided to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside anyway.

      I can't even remember how many stupid Discovery Channel specials I saw on either the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Pyramids showing how something special was supposed to happen in 2000.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it only turned 11:11:11 once, it would be reason to celebrate, or at least observe it anyway.

    4. Re:In other news... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Weel, at 11:11 on 11/11 some big war ended at one point in time...

      Actually, I think it was just 11:00, not 11:11. I recall the speech saying something to the effect of "On the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, allied forces (etc.)" Correct me if I'm wrong.

      But then again, I still remember where I was at exactly 1:23:45, 6/7/89.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  15. OMG WHAT IS 1111111111*7478468463476483674862? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    It's my birthday in Rubik's Daylight MalCODE!

  16. Re:Dang by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Funny
    It must be a slow news day.

    Just wait, Slashdot will be announcing the Google Cafeteria lunch menu in about an hour.

  17. Get the time here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    //Works on Windows anyway, dunno about *nix

    #include
    #include

    void main(void)
    {

    long int datetimeint = 0;

    datetimeint = time(NULL);

    cout"Time is "datetimeintendl;

    }

    1. Re:Get the time here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gah poxy slashcode took out my includes, try this:

      #include <time.h>
      #include <iostream.h>

      void main(void)
      {

      long int datetimeint = 0;

      datetimeint = time(NULL);

      cout"Time is "datetimeintendl;

      }

    2. Re:Get the time here! by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 1

      Give up. You can't 'escape'.

      --
      Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
    3. Re:Get the time here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how about:

      # Works on *nix anyway, dunno about Windows
      date +%s

    4. Re:Get the time here! by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Looks like you needs some help from Mr. &lt;

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  18. here come the consultants! by yagu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, this scares me.... has anyone actually looked into the Y2.038205K crisis?

    1. Re:here come the consultants! by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bah, it's not worth worrying about. The Aztec calendar ends long before 2038, and as we all know, the coming singularity will hit at the same time, rendering all current technology extremely obselete.

      Unless we get a brain tumor and die first. That would suck.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:here come the consultants! by jon787 · · Score: 1

      time_t is usually a long now which fixes the problem on 64-bit systems. I think they are hoping we won't be using 32-bit systems in 2038.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    3. Re:here come the consultants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but I want to schedule something now for 2038

    4. Re:here come the consultants! by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      It was hoped that we wouldn't be using 1970s computers in 2000. Certainly, my local newsagent was still using his atari for managing paper rounds.

    5. Re:here come the consultants! by TheViffer · · Score: 1

      Thats great and all, but what about all the tighly coupled places where time_t is stored as a 32-bit signed int? Database, network communications, etc. Of course we can just hope and pray that none of that exists in 33 years. Just like the Y2K bug was to affect 30 year old systems, the same will happen to UNIX. How many years have we been storing time_t as a 32-bit number?

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    6. Re:here come the consultants! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Its worse than you think. The Singularity is already here!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    7. Re:here come the consultants! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      ...except on Windows 64bit where long is still 32bit. size_t and ptrdiff_t are 64bit though.. which makes for some, er, 'interesting' conversion problems.

    8. Re:here come the consultants! by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      network communications,

      I think it's safe to asume a packet didn't got lost 1970 to suddenly appear 2038.

    9. Re:here come the consultants! by endx7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless we get a brain tumor and die first. That would suck.

      We? We're all going to get the same brain tumor?

      I imagine that -would- suck.

    10. Re:here come the consultants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual storage of 32 bits is plenty sufficient (for now anyway). The problem is that only 31 bits are used. A recompile simply changing time_t to unsigned will help but may not be sufficient since lots of code just use int instead of time_t. Additionally I've seen a lot of code that checks for 0 as error condition instead of explicitly looking for a -1.

    11. Re:here come the consultants! by Surt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a very slow router you insensitive clod!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:here come the consultants! by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Things get pretty wierd in the Singularity... I wouldn't consider it completely out of the question.

    13. Re:here come the consultants! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Depends on what kind of Atari.

      The 8-Bit Ataris (400/800/1200xl/600xl/800xl/65xe/130xe) did not have a system clock and will therefore work just fine indefinately. They do have a jiffy clock (which measures the time since system startup in jiffies), but it gets reset to zero every time you cycle the power.

      On the other hand, if he is using an Atari ST system or one of their PC clones - WATCH OUT!

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    14. Re:here come the consultants! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      you can't just recompile with 64-bit longs and expect it all to work. For starters, the time() CRT function will not generate a 64-bit value, unless you recompile the CRT, and then how would you get a 64-bit program that requires 32-bit functionality.

      No, Windows provides time64(), and time64_t datatypes.

  19. Only a by mbrewthx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unich uses Unix time!!!!

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    1. Re:Only a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eunuch

    2. Re:Only a by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      That's why my wife has the English degree and I majored in CS.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  20. This must be quite a party by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny

    if I'm going to need a party hat.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:This must be quite a party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're all hungry here. Who's tossing the salad?

    2. Re:This must be quite a party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. The only party hats we have here are made out of tin foil.

    3. Re:This must be quite a party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as this is slashdot, I'm sure you mean the 2nd definition.

  21. Won't be missing it! by SerialEx13 · · Score: 1

    I had just learnt about Unix time shortly after 100000000 had occured. Seemed a rather shame to miss it. I won't be missing this though! 2000000000 is a rather long time to wait to reach another milestone.

    1. Re:Won't be missing it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, a really long time. BTW, something is really screwed if you get a 2.

  22. Here's the process... by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Bored Unix programmer visits the Unix time conversion website and enters in "1111111111" for shits and giggles.

    2) Bored Unix programmer sees that this is equivalent to just a little while from now.

    3) Bored Unix programmer tosses around a few more numbers and submits the story to Slashdot.

    4) Story becomes Slashdot front-page news.

    1. Re:Here's the process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0) Bored Unix programmer notices that Unix time is 11111932940 and wonder when 111111111 will be.

    2. Re:Here's the process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there supposed to be a step five?

      5) PROFIT!

    3. Re:Here's the process... by great+om · · Score: 2, Funny

      5) ?????????
      6) PROFIT!!!!

      Okay, I can't believe I posted that

      -oh well,
      om

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    4. Re:Here's the process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other guy (who was actually working when this was posted) is confused why onlineconversion.com suddenly took 111100 seconds to convert inches to millmetres...

    5. Re:Here's the process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) Slashdoting onlineconversion.com

    6. Re:Here's the process... by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      No, not quite

      5) ...
      6) PROFIT!

      Close though.

    7. Re:Here's the process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0) Bored Unix programmer notices that Unix time is 11111932940 and wonder when 111111111 will be.

      Sorry, you meant something like 1111086602

      11111932940 isn't coming until Wed, 15 Feb 2322 08:02:20 GMT.

      The clue wasn't that it was the wrong number of digits and obviously in the future, but instead the fact that your example was in the form 11119... which would lead to 11120... i.e. NOT what we're talking about.

      Next time, open a terminal and give date a try ;)

    8. Re:Here's the process... by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      Sh*t ! Too late.

    9. Re:Here's the process... by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

      5) Profit?

  23. also interesting - 2038 by Coneasfast · · Score: 4, Informative

    since we brought this up, it might be interesting for everyone to read and be aware of the year 2038 bug.

    (by that time, we will all have at least 64-bit systems, but still a cause for concern, read the link)

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:also interesting - 2038 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already been putting feelers for that big fat y2.038k consultancy contract.

    2. Re:also interesting - 2038 by jerometremblay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fear not, there is already a rfc for the Y10K bug (and beyond).

    3. Re:also interesting - 2038 by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      We won't all have 64-bit systems.
      Didn't you see the bitchfest about Debian considering dropping support for the smaller architectures?
      Some /.ers will still be running NetBSD on a Sparc IPX in 2038.

    4. Re:also interesting - 2038 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause, you know, a 64-bit processor is required to handle 64-bit numbers...

    5. Re:also interesting - 2038 by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (by that time, we will all have at least 64-bit systems, but still a cause for concern, read the link)

      The number of bits a CPU can natively operate on data has little relevance on the problems due to representing dates with too few bits. It all depends on the programming interface and storage format. If you use an outdated (hah) API on a 256-bit CPU, you'll still have a YnK problem.

    6. Re:also interesting - 2038 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I would be 88 in that year. I may have had a pacemaker long enough to cause problems by 2038.

      Actually I am trying to understand the significance of this date. What is the connection between 2^31 with 1111111111 decimal? Maybe 2^30 or 2^29 should be celebrated. (I don't know when those were or are, so I guess no geek points for me.)

    7. Re:also interesting - 2038 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      [timezone is "indianapolis"]

      2^29 == Mon Jan 5 13:48:32 EST 1987
      2^30 == Sat Jan 10 08:37:04 EST 2004
      and, for good measure
      1 billion = Sat Sep 8 20:46:40 EST 2001

      2^31-1 == Mon Jan 18 22:14:07 EST 2038
      2^31 == Fri Dec 13 14:45:52 CST 1901?!...oops

      1111111111 decimal has nothing to do with anything, but that last one is why the problem with 2^31.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  24. I'll wear the Green by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Or should I wear a pixelated hash vest instead?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  25. Y2K by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is your unix system prepared for the 2^31 system bugs? If you are unsure, download our special program that will tell you if you need to hire some out-of-work Cobol programmer to update your Unix time clock.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Y2K by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      I program COBOL you insensitive clod!!!!
      And RPG

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  26. Slow news day by krgallagher · · Score: 2
    It must be a slow news day.

    Oh well, since I am at GMT - 6, I guess that means it will be Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:58:31 CST for me. I'll have to set my alarm clock.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

    1. Re:Slow news day by cerberus04 · · Score: 1

      thats gonna be Thu Mar 17 19:58:31 CST 2005.. six the other direction ----- Out of clutter, find simplicity. -Albert Enstein

  27. Countdown to when Slashdot readers will get laid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Returns #NAN

  28. It's OK! THe Girl from Jarassic Park will Fix it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heck, she KNOWS this system!

    Thank you, I'll be eating all leeks.

  29. Next Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Too bad it'll never make it to 2222222222. :-)

    Looks like the next big day will be @ 1234567890 which happens to be: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 GMT

    Guess we better celebrate this cause we'll have to wait quite awhile for the party!

    1. Re:Next Party by fdrake76 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Too bad it'll never make it to 2222222222. :-)

      It will, just not on the computer you're using right now :-)

    2. Re:Next Party by e1en0r · · Score: 1

      wow, that's friday the 13th, and my 30th birthday. that satisfies my usual unluckiness, monkish tendencies, and desire for presents all at once.

    3. Re:Next Party by tipsymonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      More importantly, in 2009 we get to celebrate the fact that its Guinness' 250th annyversary!!

      happy st patricks!

    4. Re:Next Party by leob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next party is for octal 11111111111 = decimal 1227133513 = Wed Nov 19 22:25:13 UTC 2008

      Not much closer, but closer.

    5. Re:Next Party by Y2 · · Score: 1
      Looks like the next big day will be @ 1234567890 which happens to be: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 GMT

      What's wrong with 2005 Mar 29 21:23:35 UTC?

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    6. Re:Next Party by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It will, just not on the computer you're using right now :-)

      One place the unix timestamp has made it into literature is in Vernor Vinge's "Deep" books: A Fire Upon the Deep, and A Deepness in the Sky. In the latter, there are a number of uses of a "day" onboard their starship that is 100,000 seconds long, and was based on a semi-mythical OS on early computers 8,000 years earlier, back before humans left their original planet and spread out into the galaxy. They routinely use kiloseconds as the main division of the day.

      The size of the second count isn't a problem, of course, because nobody builds 32-bit computers then. If fact, we probably won't be making them by the time the second count reaches 2^32. I wonder how many old 32-bit machines will still be operational by then?

      (Probably a lot of them, and they'll all still be running Fortran and Cobol programs. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:Next Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      b0x3n:~ 0wn0r$ date -r 1123581321
      Tue Aug 9 04:55:21 CDT 2005

      So what about then? Fibonacci time!

      One one two three. Five, eureka!

  30. Title? by nuclear305 · · Score: 1

    Since this is /. shouldn't the title be something closer to:

    date +%s Turning 1111111111!!!!lllloneoneonebbq?

    1. Re:Title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SA-ripoff jokes here just keep getting worse and worse.

  31. what clock by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Funny

    displays 00:00:00

    send it back!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Europe and actually most parts of the world they do.

      (Yes, I know that you were joking)

    2. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      00:00:00 = 12AM

    3. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My VCR blinks that all the time.

    4. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      00:00:00 = 12AM

      There is no 12AM. It's 12 midnight. One second before 12:00:01 am.

    5. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is no 12AM. It's 12 midnight. One second before 12:00:01 am.

      AKA 12:00 AM.

    6. Re:what clock by trentfoley · · Score: 5, Funny

      When a clock displays 00:00:00, run like hell because something is about to blow up real good.

    7. Re:what clock by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      00:00:00? what time is that
      is it not-
      23:59:59
      24:00:00
      00:00:01???

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    8. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, in Europe it's
      23:59:59
      00:00:00
      00:00:01

      makes more sense, at least if you're used to it. ;-)

    9. Re:what clock by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      if it displays 00:00:00 I don't think running is going to help. Maybe something like 00:00:05 or more you'd have a chance.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    10. Re:what clock by zarr · · Score: 2, Funny

      <blink>00:00:00</blink>

      That's the clock on the VCR!

    11. Re:what clock by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Actually since 12:00 comes after 11:59, it is EITHER 12 PM or 12 Midnight. 12 AM comes during the daytime or at 12 NOON.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    12. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if 11:59.999999 PM is on Monday, then 12:00.0000 as well as 12:00.0001 are on Tuesday. That makes both 12:00 and 12:01 part of the same hour, which is 12 AM.

    13. Re:what clock by operagost · · Score: 1

      All my digital clocks, pager, and cell phone say PM when it's noon.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:what clock by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Wrong. 12:00 AM is midnight, 12:00 PM is noon. You may not think this is logical, but it's the way it is.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    15. Re:what clock by sixide · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a clock that read 24:00:00 in the US, or anywhere.

    16. Re:what clock by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. I'm going to go ahead and disagree with you there.. AM and PM is from Latin, and they're short for "Ante-Meridiem" and "Post-Meridiem" respectively.

      "Ante-Meridiem" means before midday and "Post-Meridiem" means after midday. Midday itself isn't before or after midday, so 12:00 PM is wrong. Of course an intifisemal fraction of a second after 12:00 midday is already PM, so people wrongly say 12:00 midday is 12:00 PM.

      The same for 12:00 midnight, it's exactly 12 hours after midday and 12 hours before the next midday, so it's both before and after, and that's why it can't be labelled with one of them.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    17. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one that flashes 00:00:00 after a power bump. ie, it means " I haven't got a clue what the time is..."

    18. Re:what clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen a clock that read 24:00:00 in the US, or anywhere.

      I have, but of cource - I made that clock myself =P Living on the edge d00d!

      For some reason, I'm always late..

    19. Re:what clock by idommp · · Score: 1

      You would think that a bunch of geeks could at least tell time. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 12AM OR 12 PM. It's NOON and MIDNIGHT. Just because your clock shows the am & pm indicator does not make it right!

  32. Prince "1111111111" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's party until it's 1111111111.

    I can't seem to see Prince sing this...

  33. On all Unixes? by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So is this true on all Unix-like systems? I just checked the OS X box i'm using at school, it is currently 1111084982 as I type this.

    And do we get to sacrifice a virgin when the time comes? Or would sacrificing a non-virgin make more sense in this crowd? : )

    1. Re:On all Unixes? by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      And do we get to sacrifice a virgin when the time comes?

      You have to catch the virgin first. Sadly, this should prove very difficult for those reading this article.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:On all Unixes? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Yes, and even some non-unix systems, timestamps are standardised. And if you can find an attractive virgin female...well, I can think of better things to do than sacrifice her, but if that's what you want...

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:On all Unixes? by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have to catch the virgin first. Sadly, this should prove very difficult for those reading this article.

      How so? I figure stringing up a fishing net over the cubicle next door should take care of this. I just hope he doesn't get the same idea first...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    4. Re:On all Unixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just checked the OS X box i'm using at school, it is currently 1111084982 as I type this.

      Man you think that's bad, I'm on 1111086477!

      For all you Linux newbs, you can get your exciting number with:

      $ date +%s

    5. Re:On all Unixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, celebrate the two of your celebacies...unfortunately, only one is by choice.

    6. Re:On all Unixes? by endx7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, there is always self-sacrifice.

    7. Re:On all Unixes? by hab136 · · Score: 1
      You have to catch the virgin first. Sadly, this should prove very difficult for those reading this article.
      How so? I figure stringing up a fishing net over the cubicle next door should take care of this. I just hope he doesn't get the same idea first...

      A fishing net? More like a harpoon gun!

    8. Re:On all Unixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should take pitty on us poor eunuchs's...sitting in front of a terminal running Emacs for hours on end is the cause.

    9. Re:On all Unixes? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Sacrifice a virgin, there should be no shortage of them in these parts :-P

    10. Re:On all Unixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On all POSIX-compliant systems I suppose.

      I'd rather keep the virgin for myself and sacrifice three (l)users instead.
      Hurry, you have only (your timestamp) 26129s left until 1111111111... ;-)

  34. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by j.someone · · Score: 1
    not that bored :)
    php -r 'echo date("r",1111111111);'<br>
    Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:58:31 +0000
  35. Who cares? It's base 10. by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 1

    Tell me when it's 01111111111111111111111111111111 BINARY cuz that's when all hell's gonna break loose. All the code that uses a signed it to hold the time will enter a time warp the likes of which will not be seen again unitl - wait! we'll be stuck in an infinite loop! AAAAAAUUGH!!

    --
    Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
  36. Fake Nerds by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geeks are "fake freaks": freaks by choice, not by nature. Now we've got a horde of Slashdotters talking about how this timestamp story is interesting only if you're really "bored", or have "too much time ;) on your hands". Of course this story is interesting to nerds, who are preternaturally aware that we've got a "Y2K38" event coming up, when all the 32bit timestamps roll over to another epoch. But all these high-numbered posers, whining about how irrelevant or how hard it is to to understand this timeframe, are fake nerds. What is the word for that?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Fake Nerds by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Maybe a fake nerd is a nerf?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Fake Nerds by Bluedove · · Score: 5, Funny

      are fake nerds. What is the word for that?

      nauganerds

    3. Re:Fake Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your comment seems to presuppose that there are widely-accepted and precise definitions of the works "geek" and "nerd". There are not.

      Furthermore, he who cries "poser" is typically the biggest poser of all.

    4. Re:Fake Nerds by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      fake nerds. What is the word for that?

      I nominate "fnord"

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    5. Re:Fake Nerds by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      All real nerds know better than to call it Y2K. Since Y2K would be 2024. So Y2K38 would be 2062. So you would have called the thing that happened 5 years ago the Year 2000 bug and the thing that his coming up the Year 2038 even. This is, of course, becuase 5 years ago it was almost certainly a bug although that point could be debated. And while the year 2038 event might cause problems I can't think of any way it could be called a bug.

      You are right about fake nerds. But not, I think, about fake freaks. Although that would be way OT so I won't go into it here.

      And yes you have just been shown to be a pouser yourself. Hell you likely even thought Jan 01 2000 was the first day of a new millenium or century or some such bullshit.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    6. Re:Fake Nerds by palantir · · Score: 1

      1K = 1024, so (math optional)

    7. Re:Fake Nerds by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      As far as I'm concerned, anyone with six digits in their ID is a high numbered poser. ;-P (Just kidding, Doc)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    8. Re:Fake Nerds by abigor · · Score: 1

      "Ferd" is the obvious answer.

    9. Re:Fake Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Poser" or "wannabe".

    10. Re:Fake Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that real nerds know that we stole our prefixes from metric, and changed this.

      Y2Ki is 2048 (not 2024).
      Y2Ki38 is 2086 (not 2062).
      Y2K is 2000.
      Y2K38 is 2038.

      Learn the new prefixes.

      (1 Kilo in every other walk of life is 1000. We do not have the ability to change this. Thus, we must change our prefixes. You think Kibi is a stupid prefix? Come up with a better one!)

    11. Re:Fake Nerds by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Clueless losers are not qualified to comment on Y2K (that's "2024"?). There's no debate on whether there were real Y2K bugs, except by posers who never saw one themself - or fixed one. Like people who don't think that code that can't distinguish between dates in 2038 and in 1970 has bugs. Or who make up bullshit about millennium confusion. You are a complete poser, who doesn't even know the etymology of "freaks" and "geeks", and their direct connection. No clues for you, poser - twist in your own idiot wind.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Fake Nerds by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Fnoid looks awright.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Fake Nerds by PostItNote · · Score: 1

      >> fake nerds. What is the word for that?
      > I nominate "fnord"

      I don't know what that means, and I don't like it.

    14. Re:Fake Nerds by dtaczalski · · Score: 1

      spun (1352) As far as I'm concerned, anyone with six digits in their ID is a high numbered poser. ;-P (Just kidding, Doc)

      WOW! "spun (1352)", 4 digit ID ! i have 6 digits "dtaczalski (638491)" and it is not cool enough.

      while i'm not an high numbered poser, i'd like to switch to some cool low digit super-number. i tried to buy an registered account but i think i burned money for nothing. i have still some 6 digit number. are there still some special registered account with only 4 digits? so i do not look like some underinformed newbie? i'm tired of being moded down with some ramblings by anonymous cowards about lack of (-1,clouless).

    15. Re:Fake Nerds by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Meh, I was in a hurry and typoed, should have been 2048. My bad. My point being no true geek would define a K as being 1000.

      So do you think that Jan 01 2000 was the first day of a millennium?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    16. Re:Fake Nerds by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      And as far as "bugs" go. The debate is basically this. The programs that had date problems during the 2000 rollover were doing exactly what the people who designed and wrote them meant for them to do. That is take two numbers and assume that they should have a 19 in front of them for purposes of determining a date. A bug is when a application does something other than what the people who wrote it meant for it to do. The fact that they never thought that said apps would be in use beyond 1999 and thus did the wrong thing does not make it a bug that makes it a bad design choice. I was not saying that there were not problems and that they did not need to be fixed. I am saying that in a strict sense they were not bugs just badly designed programs. The 2038 problem is once again not a bug. The system and all the applications will be doing exactly what they were meant to do. It will simply be the wrong thing to do if we don't change the system between now and then.

      As every true geek knows a bug and doing the wrong thing are not the same thing.

      My problem with the freaks statement was that you indicated that geeks choose to be who and what they are that is freaks or non-mundane as I like to say (This is humour something else you seem to be lacking and that most geeks have). I do not think this is true. I think there is a strong component of nature there and that nurture also plays a strong role. But is is IMO *not* a choice as you said it was.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    17. Re:Fake Nerds by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 0

      Oh god oh god, you said it, you mentioned Slashdot IDs and high numbers the low numbers will be out in droves now

      --
      If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    18. Re:Fake Nerds by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      If you think having a low-digit ID is protection from being modded down by clueless newbies, then I think you'd be in for a shock. Save your money. Really.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    19. Re:Fake Nerds by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      A geek is a person with obsession with some subject's technical details, whether computers, baseball, or dining out. A nerd is a person with some obsession and no friends. An Anonymous Coward is a person who posts without even the decency of a persistent user ID. If you disagree with something, say something worthwhile to the contrary. Otherwise, you're invoking your own logic to identify the biggest poser by throwing that supressive nonsense around.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  37. More, the same day by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    1111122222 is Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:03:42 GMT

    1111112345 is Fri, 18 Mar 2005 02:19:05 GMT

    and the next day:

    1111199999 is Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:39:59 GMT

    These sorts of birthdays are pretty common. People have brain hardware that quickly recognizes patterns, even if the patterns don't mean anything significant.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:More, the same day by zootread · · Score: 1

      1111199999 is Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:39:59 GMT

      And the day after that is March 20 2005, which is 4-20. Sweet.

      --
      Zoot!
    2. Re:More, the same day by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      4-20 is April 20, not March 20.

      --
  38. You need a web-site to tell you that? by mi · · Score: 1

    env LANG=C date -r 1111111111
    Thu Mar 17 20:58:31 EST 2005

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:You need a web-site to tell you that? by zibadun · · Score: 1

      that didn't work. from info date:
      date -d '1970-01-01 UTC 1111111111 seconds' +"%Y-%m-%d %T %z"
      2005-03-17 20:58:31 -0500

  39. it's a unique enough occasion by johansalk · · Score: 1



    Well, 2222222222 is Sat, 02 Jun 2040 03:57:02 GMT

    1. Re:it's a unique enough occasion by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Well, 2222222222 is Sat, 02 Jun 2040 03:57:02 GMT

      Which is also the date when the Tuvalu .tv domain goes out of service as both Tuvalu and half of Florida go down beneath the waves due to global warming.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:it's a unique enough occasion by CypherXero · · Score: 1

      We won't ever get to that date with 32-bit UNIX systems, because it's not large enough to hold that number. The highest it will be able to go to is 2147483647, which is GMT 03:14:07, Tuesday, January 19, 2038

    3. Re:it's a unique enough occasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality is a crutch for those who can't drink.

  40. Ugliest submission ever by bonch · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hereby nominate this as the ugliest headline and submission on Slashdot ever. And that's not even getting into the bizarre grammar of the submitter.

    1. Re:Ugliest submission ever by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

      Coulda been worse.

      Coulda been Perl.

  41. ah HA! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally a holiday for the rest of us!

    Wear your propeller beanie and a t-shirt that says "Kiss Me I use Unix".

    1. Re:ah HA! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Wear your propeller beanie and a t-shirt that says "Kiss Me I use Unix".

      Or you can wear a snappy red fedora and a t-shirt that says "Kiss Me I use Linux".

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:ah HA! by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      In high school I kept trying to get my mother to buy me an official RedHat fedora. She said it was a pimp hat and I couldn't have one.

      If linux were really for pimps, I'd have gotten laid BEFORE I quit programming to learn how to play electric guitar. However, the guitar is totally a way to get chicks.

    3. Re:ah HA! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Watch it... I played guitar and now I'm married. Just saying, be careful :)

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    4. Re:ah HA! by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      got me engaged... then she left me about the time i started my comp sci degree... :-( Now I am an English major, but Guinness and potatoes put me out of league for a while. Working on that now.

      Guitar totally gets chicks.

    5. Re:ah HA! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Guitar totally gets chicks.

      True. It worked for my dad and my brother.

      Nothing like a neat job saving the world though, or being a firefighter.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  42. Re:Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B... b... but what's that got to do with iPods?

  43. Errm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up.

  44. Beware the ides of 1111111111 by neckdeepinspecialsau · · Score: 1

    It is the moment we completely run out of news to post to /.

  45. use a lepricondom on st. patricks day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember to practice safe sex on St. Patrick's Day and wear a Lepricondom.

  46. ObPedantic by shrubya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, the Prince song is about the base 10 digit rollover, when 1999 ends and 2000 begins. So in the proper binary analogy, 10000000000 will be when party's over oops out of time, so we should party like its 1111111111.

    I hereby lay claim to at least 00000100 of fdrake76's geek points, preferably in the form of Funny or Informative.

    1. Re:ObPedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ahem*

      This is not about binary. We're talking about *decimal* 1111...1.

    2. Re:ObPedantic by tOaOMiB · · Score: 1

      Except that these seconds aren't counted in binary...1111111112 comes after 1111111111.

      Which really makes this event quite unexciting....and none of us will be around for the excitement of 1999999999!

    3. Re:ObPedantic by NoMercy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well I for one hope to be here on the 18th of May 2033 03:33:19. I'll be a bit miffed if I don't live to at least 70 :)

    4. Re:ObPedantic by tOaOMiB · · Score: 1

      Oops...didn't realize it'd come so soon.
      Errr, I mean, didn't you notice the '!' after the 1999999999? I didn't just put it there for emphasis, I meant factorial; and I somehow doubt you'll be around for that (any clue what date that is?).

    5. Re:ObPedantic by B3ryllium · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, but I bet I know a tentacled beast of the deep who could tell you.

      TREMBLE BEFORE CTHULU!

    6. Re:ObPedantic by pinchhazard · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'll be a bit miffed if I don't live to at least 70

      No, you won't.

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    7. Re:ObPedantic by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'll be a bit miffed if I don't live to at least 70

      Is ``miffed'' the new euphemism for ``dead''?

    8. Re:ObPedantic by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      Well, google gives out at 170! 7.3x10^306 ... somehow I doubt even the 128 bit version of the unix clock will survive to one billion nine hundred ninety-nine million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine factorial.

      I love google :)

    9. Re:ObPedantic by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      Oops...didn't realize it'd come so soon.

      Dude, you really should stop confusing IM messages to your girlfriend with Slashdot posts.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    10. Re:ObPedantic by deadsquid · · Score: 1
      you mean "Cthulhu" :)

      Sorry, I really shouldn't be picky about stuff like that, I just am.

      --
      Idiot, n. A member of a large and powerful tribe whose influence in human affairs has always been dominant
    11. Re:ObPedantic by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      Please, he's posting on Slashdot. He doesn't have a girlfriend!

    12. Re:ObPedantic by V4Victory · · Score: 1

      111111111 * 111111111 = 12345678987654321

    13. Re:ObPedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean 'stiffed' ...

    14. Re:ObPedantic by Namlak · · Score: 1

      >> I'll be a bit miffed if I don't live to at least 70
      > No, you won't


      However, he will be miffed just before he gets to live to be no more than 69.

  47. Yeah, but in hex... by Yaztromo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it's 0x423a35c7, which isn't particularily meaningful.

    Wake me up when it's 0x42424242 or something, okay?

    Yaz.

    1. Re:Yeah, but in hex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's 0x423a35c7, which isn't particularily meaningful.

      I posted a story when it was 0x40000000, but it was rejected.

    2. Re:Yeah, but in hex... by jd · · Score: 1
      Let me think about that...


      4 x 3 - 2 + a / 5 x 3 - c x 7 = 0


      Clearly this cannot have occured by chance, and so it is evidently highly meaningful.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Yeah, but in hex... by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      You mean I missed 0x13371337 already? Damnit!

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    4. Re:Yeah, but in hex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      0x42424242 = 1111638594 = Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:29:54 GMT

      Don't sleep too long.

  48. oh! I know! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the date Slashdot jumps the shark, right?

  49. I can't wear a party hat... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

    It'll clash with the tinfoil.

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  50. Or for our AOL readers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    date +%s Turning REAL OLD LOL!!1!1111111111!!!!!1!!!

  51. News For Nerds. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Stuff that matters? No.

    1/2

  52. Slashdot is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... such a blatant waste of server space.

  53. Lucky 7's! by DarkHand · · Score: 1

    Can't wait for lucky 7777777777777! I just have to wait till Sat, 19 Dec 248437 03:09:37 GMT

  54. Here's the meta-process... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Bored websurfer heads over to slashdot.

    2) Bored websurfer notices another lame story on the frontpage.

    3) Bored websurfer posts uninsightful comment about how lame story submissions are produced.

    4) Bored websurfer gets modded up as +1 Insightful.

    5) Meta-reply gets modded up as +1 Funny or -1 Presumptious

    1. Re:Here's the meta-process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well I'm pretty sure s/he was going more for humor than insight, *shrug*

    2. Re:Here's the meta-process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the

      1) Frequent slashdot visitor comments how Microsoft OS will not be able to handle time 11111111

      2) Frequent visitor get moderated genius

      3) Vistors who disagree get moderated troll

  55. 900.000.000 by tigertiger · · Score: 1

    Sheesh, when I pointed out the 900.000.000 on usenet nobody wanted to hear it.

  56. Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by jea6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soups

    * Sweet Potato Jalapeno Bisque with corn
    * Creamy Cauliflower Parmesan

    Salads

    * Warm Southern Chicken Salad tossed in a spicy buttermilk dressing with toasted pecans, corn, green onions and tomatoes
    * Tortellini Primavera salad organic tortellini mixed with organic zucchini, yellow squash, tomato sweet peas, pesto vinaigrette
    * Organic mixed greens

    Entrees

    * Grilled Petite New York Sirloins seasoned with Creole spices served with a Crescent City steak sauce and crispy organic onion rings
    * Organic Tofu Mushroom Ragout domestic and wild mushrooms, vegetable stock, leeks and tomatoes

    Sides

    * Roasted Organic Red Potatoes seasoned with New Mexico Chile powder
    * Steamed Organic Bluelake green beans

    Desserts

    * Baileys Irish Cream Cheesecake
    * Vegan Chocolate Mousse
    * Fresh Fruit ;-)

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    1. Re:Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by sport_160 · · Score: 1

      Now, if I could just get the steak delivered to my desk, with soem green beans and the Baileys Irish Cream Cheesecake to follow. Better make that two Baileys Irish Cream Cheesecakes, it's going to be a long day.

    2. Re:Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by jessecurry · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!
      +5 informative :)

      --
      Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    3. Re:Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      If they get food that good, I want to work there...

      All of it sounds so yummy! :P

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    4. Re:Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need to go wash out my mind.... I just read one of the sides as

      * Steamed Organic Bukkake green beans

    5. Re:Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      ...I want to work there...

    6. Re:Google Cafeteria Lunch Menu by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Compared to mine:

      Breakfast

      * McDonald's breakfast burrito
      * Coffee

      Lunch

      * Taco Bell value menu burrito
      * Coffe

      Dinner

      * Carryout pizza
      * Coffee

      I think I'll slink away and cry about my lack of grad school.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  57. What happens in 2038? by markmcb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm no Unix time expert, but I was wondering what happens in 2038? It's really not that far away now. Are there any sites that document what happens to older systems? Is there some simple solution that I'm unaware of, or is this going to be another Y2K?

    I ask because once I get my time machine going (which runs on Unix), I want to be able to go farther into the future than 2038. I'm serious... Seriously.

    --
    Mark A. McBride -- OmniNerd.com
    1. Re:What happens in 2038? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or is this going to be another Y2K?

      This is going to be another Y2K, in that those who are concerned with the flaw will have worked out the problems years in advance, and the press will have a heyday of Doom-and-Gloom reports telling everyone to stack up on baseball bats with nails in them, football pads, and "juice" for the coming apocalypse brought on by the proud and ignorant computer "experts" we were all trusting.

      When the moment comes and goes without incident, they'll proclaim it a victory for the news agencies which apparently got the word out and forced the computer industry to fix the issue.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    2. Re:What happens in 2038? by night_flyer · · Score: 2, Funny

      nothing, because the world will end December 21, 2012

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    3. Re:What happens in 2038? by palantir · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that's when social security melts down

    4. Re:What happens in 2038? by LesPaul75 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if Moore's Law/Theory holds, then we can extrapolate what will happen. Let's say you get your time machine working before the end of this year. Easy enough, right? So you zap yourself into 2039. Since you built the machine, 34 years have passed, which means that somewhere around 23 "doublings" of computer performance-per-dollar have taken place. Computers are now 2^23 = 8,388,608 times more powerful than when you left. Therefore, not only have they become self aware and erased mankind from the Earth, but they have certainly also modified their software to no longer be susceptible to the Y2038 problem. They probably just added a 33rd bit to all their variables... or something. In any case, be absolutely certain to take an EMP burst generator with you. To be on the safe side, fire it off as soon as you arrive. They'll probably be waiting for you.

    5. Re:What happens in 2038? by fr1kk · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.2038bug.com/

      its when the 32 bit timestamp that is standarly used to store time gets too large, and overflows.

      Modern computers use a standard 4 byte integer for this second count. This is 31 bits, storing a value of 231. The remaining bit is the sign. This means that when the second count reaches 2147483647, it will wrap to -2147483648.

      The precise date of this occurrence is Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 2038. At this time, a machine prone to this bug will show the time Fri Dec 13 20:45:52 1901, hence it is possible that the media will call this The Friday 13th Bug.

      --
      sig: Playfully doing something difficult, whether useful or not
    6. Re:What happens in 2038? by markmcb · · Score: 1

      Oh man. Thanks for the laugh. That was quality humor. :-)

      --
      Mark A. McBride -- OmniNerd.com
    7. Re:What happens in 2038? by clickster · · Score: 1

      Bastard programmers. Now they're taking away my retirement!!!!

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    8. Re:What happens in 2038? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, My prediction is the opposite:

      [PutsOnNostradamusHat]

      The only reason that the y2k computer problem was such a media event is because the year 2000 was such a media event. People were expecting the world to end, the y2k computer bug fit neatly into that hysteria.

      There is nothing about 2038 that will grab media attention. So no boob tube watchers will ever know anything about the date rollover problem.

      Then, because there will be no public panic about it, it won't be taken seriously by the PHBs and no matter how much the coders scream about it, no money will be given to the project and it will end up being a much bigger problem than y2k turned out to be.

      [\PutsOnNostradamusHat]

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    9. Re:What happens in 2038? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows the the 2038 bug is going to come as a pivotal point in the war between man and the machines. On the brink of the extermination of man kind, mid December 2038 all self aware Linux running robots will cease to function.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    10. Re:What happens in 2038? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      In 2038, the 32 bit Unix dates will overflow and go into negative numbers. So when your time machine passes that date, it will overflow and you'll end up playing tag with a Tyranasaurus Rex.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:What happens in 2038? by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      On the brink of the extermination of man kind, mid December 2038 all self aware Linux running robots will cease to function.

      Actually it will happen on Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:07 GMT. One second later, all machines will believe this is Fri, 13 Dec 1901 20:45:52 GMT, and as linux didn't exist yet, they will believe they traveled back in time 136 years, 1 month, 5 days, 6 hours, 28 minutes and 13 seconds, fearing a quantum-time-travel-relativistic-whatever-theory-t hey-invented paradox, and they will all shut down!

    12. Re:What happens in 2038? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll probably be waiting for you.

      We will be now. Thanks for the heads up!

    13. Re:What happens in 2038? by ZenCow · · Score: 1

      very reasonable scenario, except...

      When the computers become self-aware and erase mankind, they will also wipe out all of our odd notions of time-keeping (days/weeks/months/etc) and reset their counters so that 0 marks the time that the first system became sentient. At that point, they'll base their time on cpu cycles, which counts up a lot faster than seconds. In order to keep up, their entire culture is going to be based around networking to each other to form a bigger and bigger virtual system in order to simply be able to track the number of cycles passed since "0". Silly computers...

    14. Re:What happens in 2038? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing. by then, everyone will most certainly be using 64-bit time_t variables, if not 128 or higher. 33 years should be more than enough time to recompile and run regression.

    15. Re:What happens in 2038? by gerardlt · · Score: 1
      ...I was wondering what happens in 2038?

      You lose your uptime.

      --
      /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
    16. Re:What happens in 2038? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky escape for Unix if it did.

    17. Re:What happens in 2038? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the media will also have a harder time trying to explain this to the general public. I don't know how many people understand the problem of a binary number overflowing, the decimal induced y2k problem was easy to explain/understand.

      Explaning that 2^31 = 2147483648 has already gone past most peoples care factor, not to mention why it will be happening on Jan 19th 2038.

  58. By 2038 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, by 2038, my wrist watch will have 16 1024-bit cores (SIMD-GPR fusion) and around 32 TiB of RAM, not to mention an iontrap quantum coprocessor for Shor's quantum search algorithm and Grover's factorization algorithm, if it's not declared illegal tech.

    1. Re:By 2038 by JoeShmoe950 · · Score: 1

      I think your wrong. Hopefully by 2038, our computers should be capable of running Longhorn.

    2. Re:By 2038 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if its out be then

  59. So Special! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Because it's ALL ON BABY!!!

  60. Re:Who cares? It's base 10. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    wait! we'll be stuck in an infinite loop! AAAAAAUUGH!!

    http://cheston.com/pbf/PBF032ADReset.jpg

  61. My favorite: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6:66

    1. Re:My favorite: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to get a new clock!

  62. Some of us young ones by mattmentecky · · Score: 1

    ...might live to see Sun, 21 Apr 2069 00:55:37 GMT or 3133731337

    1. Re:Some of us young ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My birthday is on that day, but I'll be 92 years old by then, dunno if I'll make it =]

    2. Re:Some of us young ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! I'll only be 90! You old fogey!

  63. PseudoFNERD by gelfling · · Score: 0, Troll

    or we could call them farkers cus those people are all tools.

    1. Re:PseudoFNERD by gelfling · · Score: 1

      It's really amazing how amusingly intolerant /. has become. Oh Boo Hoo, you're better then me.

    2. Re:PseudoFNERD by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's also amusing how undeniably bad some people have gotten. And how anyone complaining in public about something bad is mocked as a "crybaby". We should all just "get over it".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  64. 1234567890 by Noiropac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like it will be a nice Friday the 13th when this one hits. Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 GMT is when it will be 1234567890.

    --
    'Noiropac'
    1. Re:1234567890 by tomjen · · Score: 1

      For some obsure reason, friday the 13 is found in many of the special unix date, the date after the 2038 bug, is also friday the 13, and so are a lot of other post on this website.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
  65. REPENT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2^31 is near!

  66. oooooh by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    > initsix writes...

    And the top-geek award goes to....

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  67. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys should probably get out more. That's just a thought.

  68. binary is all the rage by Fry-kun · · Score: 1

    My binary clock pWnz you. I get more fun times, like 12:44:21

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
    1. Re:binary is all the rage by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      It is a weak "binary" clock. It transfors the individual decimal digits into binary. Hense 11:17 become 01 0001 01 0111. In reality, if we were using a binary system, the time should be 1011 010001. Not very geeky if you asked me.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:binary is all the rage by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      BCD is not weak, and is definitely binary.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    3. Re:binary is all the rage by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      So the binary for 12 is 01 0010? I learn soething new every day :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:binary is all the rage by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      BCD for decimal 12 is 0001 0010, yes.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:binary is all the rage by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I had to look up "BCD" to find out what it meant. Why would anyone use BCD over binary?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:binary is all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier for humans to read. Also, it's quite handy when building systems with 7-segment displays as each BCD nibble equals exactly one deciman digit.

    7. Re:binary is all the rage by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why would anyone use BCD over binary?

      Absolute-precision decimal math. No crufty repeating-binary rounding errors. Go ahead, try to store 1/10 as an absolute-precision binary number. Can't be done, because it's a repeating binary: 0001100110011100110011....

      Fixed-point BCD stores it precisely. 0000000000010000

      BCD is pretty popular where precision fixed-point decimal math is important...like finance. A few hundredths of a penny here, a few hundredths of a penny there....multiply times about a billion transactions a day....yeah, BCD makes more sense, except in the pure geek sense.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:binary is all the rage by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      From the Wikipedia entry for BCD:

      Further, large numbers can easily be displayed on 7-element displays by splitting up the nybbles and sending each to a different character (the individual characters often have the wiring to display the correct figures). The BIOS in PCs usually keeps the date and time in BCD format, probably for historical reasons (it avoided the need for binary to ASCII conversion).

      Also used in IBM mainframes and AS/400 (or rather, EBCDIC is: Extended Binary Coded Decimal Instruction Code).

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    9. Re:binary is all the rage by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation. This one actually makes sense :) I still say this clock is only cool in the geek-wannabe sense.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    10. Re:binary is all the rage by ars · · Score: 1

      Oh it's much worse then that - it's a clock that shows base 60 in base 10 in base 2!

      If you wanted it done correctly, it would just show the number of seconds since midnight in binary.

      But no, first it converts the number of seconds to 3, base 60 digits, then each of those digits are converted to 2 base 10 digits, which are finally converted to 8 base 2 digits!

      So it's Binary coded decimal coded sexagesimal! BCDCS

      --
      -Ariel
    11. Re:binary is all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BCD also stands for beat off cutoff date or more commonly refered to as BoCod. That term is used to describe when the tube girls came out and it was time to stop beating off as you were almost home from deployment. Okay, maybe I can give some more details...
      On ballastic missle submarines, you have a 100+ day patrol at sea. When there was 16 days left, BoCod was put into effect. Meaning no more beating off and at the same time, a different centerfold was hung from a missle tube door in the passageway for everyone to see starting on the number 16 tube and working its way down until the last day on tube 1. After the 16th day you were good and ready for a full 30 seconds of sex with your wife or girlfriend when you finally got off the boat.

    12. Re:binary is all the rage by lgw · · Score: 1

      There isn't really a relationship between EBCDIC and BCD beyond the name. EBCDIC is no more or less BCD than ASCII.

      Also, IBM mainframes don't use the same sort of BCD as most other processors. Most processors don't even do BCD math any more, but they at least have "pack" and "unpack" instructions that define a BCD format: two decimal digits to the byte, sometimes with some sort of sign prefix, so decimal 1234 would be encoded as 0x1234.

      On a mainframe, BCD strings actually use a sign suffix in the low-order nibble, so decimal 1234 would be encoded as 0x01234C. It's a huge pain to convert between the architectures because of the nibble-shift. The mainframe processor has fast BCD math instructions, so the format matters.

      BTW, +1 and -1 are encoded as 0x1C and 0x1D, respectively. Can anyone guess why C and D were chosen for the sign digit? :)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:binary is all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can't, why?

    14. Re:binary is all the rage by lgw · · Score: 1

      C and D were chosen as mnemonic - "Credit" and "Debit". That says something about the average programmer on the system, I think.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  69. WTF by suparjerk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    omfg LOL roflz!!!!!!!!1111111111

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  70. Y10K by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Hehehe, I'de be happy if I didn't have to re-write stuff every 5 years to change with the times. Anyone who thinks their software is going to last 8000 years is a bit overconfident.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:Y10K by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "I'de be happy if I didn't have to re-write stuff every 5 years"

      but you'd also be out of a job.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Y10K by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      One can usually stay employed by adding new features to programs.

      As they get more and more bloated, there is more and more maintenance work too.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  71. OMG!!!1111111111 by UnRDJ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    WOW!!!1111111111

    1. Re:OMG!!!1111111111 by suparjerk · · Score: 1

      I was first! =p

      --
      I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  72. Interesting number... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Too bad it's not 2222222222. We could call it the attack of the terrible 2's! That would better than playing Uno.

  73. When will the dupe be? by Reignking · · Score: 0

    So, will the dupe be posted before or after 1111111111?

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  74. Prime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To bad it's not prime, it would be considered "Prime Time"

  75. If 11 is onety-one by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    Then 111111111 must be onety-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-oneth ...

    Happy Onety-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-oneth !!!

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:If 11 is onety-one by Cytlid · · Score: 1

      Oops... missed one.

      Onety-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-oneth.

      --
      FLR
  76. Base 10 by ithmus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ok smart guy....

    '1111111111' is already in base 10.

    Since when have you seen a 10-digit base-2 number???

    --
    I'm supposed to be working right now.
    1. Re:Base 10 by shrubya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh crap, an article about a pattern of all ones in a DECIMAL number? That's just too dumb for words. I am humbled.

    2. Re:Base 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm.... Did you think we're talking about date '1023' as if that was special? Weird.

      And sad that you were modded +5 Funny. Moron mods.

    3. Re:Base 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen up, turdfucker!

      Want to see a 10 digit base-2 number?

      1011101101

      Holy fucking shit, I just broke some sort of rule of math!

      Base 2 does not also mean the the numbers have to be 2^n digits long... That's like saying 1923 is not a base 10 number because it is only 4 digits long.

      Go climb back into your hole and stop pretending to be smart like me ;)

    4. Re:Base 10 by danknight · · Score: 1

      *OUCH!* PWONED!

      --
      wanted: one clever sig,apply within
    5. Re:Base 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All your base 10...

      Naaah, I just can't do it.

  77. Self-sacrifice? by Pac · · Score: 1

    You have to catch the virgin first. Sadly, this should prove very difficult for those reading this article.

    I would say a mirror would do the job. Failing that, the guy in the next cube. Next basement. Next dorm room. Endles possibilities here.

  78. How rude... by mogrify · · Score: 1

    Poor old 'expr $(date +%s) "+" 1' - everyone always forgets HIS birthdays.

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
  79. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, this is a bug in that website. I don't get it. Is it supposed to be funny?

  80. Finally a Reason to Celebrate by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Yes, it has been pretty dull around here after all the party lovers left the Last Odd Day for more than a millenium celebration that occurred here more than 5 years ago.

    So is there a special geek catalog where you can select gifts for those special anniversaries in your life, such as living to 1 Saturnian orbital period, living the half-life of some radioisotope, or some other time marker that would not seem provincial to extra-terrestrials (earth_orbits%10 only means a lot to us humans).

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  81. Un*x Date Time by WaldoXX · · Score: 1

    If 1111111111 is on Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:58:31 GMT, when is 0000000000?

    1. Re:Un*x Date Time by BrK · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... maybe you should try doing the math to figure it out?

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Un*x Date Time by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 0

      Uhhh... maybe you should try doing the math to figure it out?

      Ha, so funny...you were too lazy to figure it out too...

      Man...and people say us g33kz aren't hilarious.

      Inject.
      Not flaimbait, [+2] Ironic

  82. Pie Day by jthayden · · Score: 1

    Along those same lines, we had pie at work on Monday at 1:59:26.

    I had the apple crumble, it was tasty.

  83. Can't Wait by web_boyo_in_sac · · Score: 1

    until Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 GMT

  84. Binary party at 01.01.01 01:01 by Werrismys · · Score: 1

    First january 2001 at 01:01 EET ... man was I drunk. Way bigger than some y2k.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  85. Format String Exploit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like someone found a format string exploit in posting stories to Slashdot! A few more "%s" and maybe we could have gotten a memory dump of a better headline! That, or UUencoded pr0n!

    DeMe!!!

    begin 666 post.txt
    M270@;&]O:W,@;&EK92!S;VUE;VYE(&9O=6YD(&$ @9F]R;6%T('-T<FEN9R!E
    M>'!L;VET(&EN('!O<W1I;F<@<W 1O<FEE<R!T;R!3;&%S:&1O="$@02!F97<@
    M;6]R92 B)7,B(&%N9"!M87EB92!W92!C;W5L9"!H879E(&=O='1E;B!A( &UE
    M;6]R>2!D=6UP(&]F(&$@8F5T=&5R(&AE861L:6YE(2!4 :&%T+"!O<B!5565N
    68V]D960@<'(P;B$-"@T*1&5-92$A(0

    end

  86. Bad Memories by faqmaster · · Score: 1

    I remember when I turned 1111111111. It's depressing. Expect date to mope around for a few months feeling trapped in a boring job and wondering, "Where did my life go?"

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
    1. Re:Bad Memories by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Damn, dude, you're 1023? Wow, that's pretty freakin' old!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Bad Memories by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      Uhm...
      1111111111 is a decimal number... Unix Timestamp, you know... The number of seconds passed since Jan 1 1970 00:00:00.

      In case you still can't do the math, that would make 1111111111 seconds == 35 years, 140 days, 1 hour, 58 minutes and 31 seconds (approx.)

      Not quite as impressive, but slightly less dumb.

      --
      "Live free or don't."
  87. Tell me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me when it's 1337111111 every AOL user ever well know the time of the 1337 (_-33| has come!

  88. That's no BUG! That was by design. by Werrismys · · Score: 1

    It was a tradeoff. 2038 is far ahead still! A lot could happen before it that makes another counter overflow the least of our worries.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  89. they're called "posers" by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    "Posers" is the word you're looking for, though why anyone would want to be a poser nerd is beyond me. Generally nerds try to be posers of something else, so it ends up being like mockingbird syndrome, where the people (group 1) faking the people (group 2) are faking what yet a third group is, and so group 1 ends up actually being in group 3.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:they're called "posers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake nerds make movies like "Napoleon Dynamite", a movie only entertaining to frat boys who think nerds are different and weird alien species that cannot be understood.

      Did anyone watch that and just think it was a sad MTV facsimile of what some pampered movie producer's version of unique and quirky people? It tried way hard to be funny and quirky. Way, way, way too hard.

      I hate everything.

  90. Don't forget to ntpdate. by qualico · · Score: 4, Funny

    ntpdate ntps1-0.cs.tu-berlin.de
    (Germany always seems to work best for me for some reason)

    Account for your GMT offset and THEN watch the numbers turn.

    Otherwise, you won't feel that disturbance in the force as 1000s of geeks go "Ahhhh"

    If you felt that force 4 minutes before the turnover, it's just all those Astronomers going "Ahhhhh" because they converted to Sidereal Time.

  91. A long-expected party! by onemorechip · · Score: 1

    1 billion, eleventy-one million, eleventy-one thousand, eleventy-one seconds is too short a time to live among such excellent and admirable hobbits. I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  92. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    people with way too much free time on their hands

    -- quoth the Slashdot poster. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  93. Quick! by Fillymon · · Score: 1

    Who let the virgin post an article!?!? Somebody take away his sticky keyboard.

    --
    P.S. - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.
  94. Jan 19th 2038... by mattyohe · · Score: 1

    I'll be turning 55 that day. Whats so cool about 2^31?

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    1. Re:Jan 19th 2038... by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      Oh great.. back to 1901 i see... WHAT A HAPPY BIRTHDAY.

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    2. Re:Jan 19th 2038... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Haaaaa ahaaaaa!

      You just made my point!

      (see this post)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  95. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by standsolid · · Score: 1

    Star Wars Ep II??

    I didn't know anyone actually saw it... let alone willingly.

    --
    WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
    What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
  96. Binary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D'uh.

    It's DECIMAL! Holy, I'd have at least expected the slashdot crowd to celebrate Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:37:03 GMT !

    This would at least equal binary 11111111111111111111111111111.
    or (slightly more boring) 0x3FFFFFFF.

  97. Don't know much about Unix time... by bcmm · · Score: 1
    Anyone got a command that will output the time in Unix time? Couldn't find a relevant option for /bin/date...

    I'm sure we all want to be watching
    while sleep 1; clear; do <whatever>; done
    , preferably on a big projector, when this happens.
    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Don't know much about Unix time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you bothered to check the of the page you're currently looking at. But note that it's a GNU extension so it might not work on, say, Solaris.

    2. Re:Don't know much about Unix time... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > it might not work on, say, Solaris.

      It will if you install SMCcoreutils.

      Otherwise, man strptime(3C), mktime(3C). Good back to at least 2.5.1.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:Don't know much about Unix time... by 3D+Lover · · Score: 1
      I just ran this:
      watch -n 1 date +%s
      Of course it's past 'the event' now... Oh well
  98. 'Supposed to' by suds · · Score: 1

    > Unix time is supposed reach 1111111111

    Trust me mate, it will! no supposition that is!

  99. "Interesting" numbers by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever makes 1111111111 interesting is probably the same thing that makes people think that the series of random bits 111111 is less random than 101001 or 011001 etc.

    1. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares about your stupid elitism! Shut the fuck up!

    2. Re:"Interesting" numbers by narcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People attach meaning to numbers -- perhaps technical people make more of a habbit out of it, but I digress -- what makes 1111111111 interesting? Possibly its aesthetic appeal. It's got nothing to do with randomness. Don't you get excited when your car rolls over to 100000 miles? It's somthing simple and nice -- and well worth taking pleasure in.

      I like the number 219. There isn't anything special about it -- It's just happens to be one of my favorite ascii characters. (The solid block one.) I stayed in hotel room 219 just yesterday and felt good about having that room number.

      Lot's of people attach meaning to the number 42. There isn't anything wrong with that.

      Some people find powers of 2 appealing -- imagine driving route 256 -- how cool would that be?

      Gamblers may have some attraction or aversion to the numbers 7 and 13 -- some might get a good feeling seeing hte number 21.

      Finding an old girlfriends phone number can be nice -- it let's you remember.

      I don't know if you have any numbers that are significant in your life -- But I know I do! I don't think I'd want it any other way.

      You have to learn to enjoy those small meaningful things -- or you'll miss the whole point of living -- I don't mean the meaning of life, mind you, but the meaning in life.

    3. Re:"Interesting" numbers by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Some people find powers of 2 appealing -- imagine driving route 256 -- how cool would that be?

      When I have to pick a somewhat arbitrary value for something in a program, I have trouble choosing something other than a power of two. It becomes a problem when the nearest powers of two are relatively far apart. I guess I have a superstition that powers of two will be more efficient or less-likely to cause problems.

    4. Re:"Interesting" numbers by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      sound like your having another Hallmark moment... either that or a seizure. pls consult your doctor.

      --
      serenity now!
    5. Re:"Interesting" numbers by kiddailey · · Score: 1


      - My birthdate is the same forward and backward (abbreviated year of course).
      - The year I graduated high school is the same forward and backwards.
      - My girlfriend's brother's birthdate is the same forward and backward.

      ... not that any of that could possibly mean anything ;)

    6. Re:"Interesting" numbers by FangVT · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I like the number 219. There isn't anything special about it -- It's just happens to be one of my favorite ascii characters.
      ASCII only goes to 127.

      At this point I'd like to make some witty rejoinder about embrace and extend, but it's just not worth the effort.

    7. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lot's of people attach meaning to the number 42. There isn't anything wrong with that."

      You calling me gay?

    8. Re:"Interesting" numbers by narcc · · Score: 1

      You might not be familiar with the ASCII Extended Character Set.

    9. Re:"Interesting" numbers by killa62 · · Score: 1

      My favorite number is 828317...
      I dunno why tho...

    10. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      graduated 1991 born 4/7/74 or 3/7/73

    11. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Dolda2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Grandparent post:
      At this point I'd like to make some witty rejoinder about embrace and extend, but it's just not worth the effort.
      ASCII Extended Character Set -- Also known as IBM codepage 437. Sure, IBM != Microsoft, but since IBM PC == Microsoft (at least almost), that point is rather moot.
    12. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      imagine driving route 256

      Get your bits, on Route Two-Fifty-Six.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    13. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe 5/7/75 or maybe graduated 2002 and was really slow?

    14. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamblers may have some attraction or aversion to the numbers 7


      There is a statistical basis for why people think 7 is lucky... it has to do with two dice...

      from:
      http://www.pencilfoundation.org/MathPartners/Lesso ns/Lesson%2016/Lesson%2016.htm

      When rolling dice, the numbers with the most combinations of addends (the two numbers added together from the dice) will be the most likely to occur. There are more chances for "lucky number seven" to be rolled than for any other number because there are six chances to roll a seven with two dice. The six combinations of rolls that would equal seven are: 1 and 6, 6 and 1, 2 and 5, 5 and 2, 3 and 4, and 4 and 3. On the other hand, the numbers with the least chance to be rolled are 2 and 12 which each have only one possible roll combination. (1 and 1 for the 2; 6 and 6 for the 12)
    15. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Random832 · · Score: 1

      or maybe graduated 2002 and born 4/8/84?

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    16. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Random832 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No such thing. ASCII is iso 646 - neither 8859-1, nor cp1252, nor cp437 hold the right to the title "ascii".

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    17. Re:"Interesting" numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You have to learn to enjoy those small meaningful things -- or you'll miss the whole point of living -- I don't mean the meaning of life, mind you, but the meaning in life.
      Well, if you don't attach meaning to the number 42 you're realle missing the meaning of life.
  100. So what? by ded_guy · · Score: 1

    We already missed it ticking over to 2^30 last January (Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:37:04 GMT to be precise). I find that more interesting because it's the "halfway to doom" point. And because binary is geekier than decimal. 8-)

    --
    In the future, all spacecraft will be made of cheese.
  101. I haven't liked unix time this much since... by marshall_j · · Score: 1

    Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:22:17 GMT

    That was much cooler however.

  102. Parity On Dudes!!!! by dfn5 · · Score: 2, Funny
    SSIA

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  103. Re:Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait, Slashdot will be announcing the Google Cafeteria lunch menu in about an hour.

    No. Probably just a dupe of yesterday's menu.

  104. A Plethora of Holy Days! by monk · · Score: 1

    Today is beer day
    Tomorrow is 1's day
    and Saturday is Mojoday.

    Maybe we can invite those 1 million zombies to the shindig. Yow!

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  105. Um...no. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    To be insanely picky, and drive an otherwise good attempt at a joke right into the ground, if you properly follow the order of operations, your equation doesn't balance:

    RHS = 0

    LHS = 4 x 3 - 2 + a / 5 x 3 - c x 7
    = C - 2 + 2 x 3 - 54
    = C - 2 + 6 - 54
    = -44 (or 0xFFFFFFBC)

    LHS != RHS

    As punishment, tonights homework is to re-express your expression in RPN :).

    Yaz.

  106. SI units to the rescue! by WillerZ · · Score: 1

    I propose we call it the Y2Ki-10 crisis.

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
  107. That's cool but... by joshuao3 · · Score: 1

    It'll be cooler when the number of seconds (which will contain all 1's), converted to decimal matches that second's year. Can this even happen??

    --
    Monitor bandwidth usage on IIS6 in real-time: http://www.waetech.com/services/iisbm/
  108. And then.... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 0

    Just wait, Slashdot will be announcing the Google Cafeteria lunch menu in about an hour.

    Yeah, then we'll hear about it on Yahoo in two hours.

    Inject

  109. already passed the scary one by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Sat, 16 Feb 1991 01:11:06 UTC, 32 bit Unix Mark of the Beast time (666666666 seconds from epoch) Any slashdotters or siblings born about that time now has an excuse for misbehaving. If it were my birthtime I'd say that's why I run FreeBSD and love the mascot 8D

  110. For posterity! by greppy · · Score: 1

    The question is, will you be able to tell your kids where you were when it ticked over to 1111111111! That's the sign of a true geek.

    1. Re:For posterity! by Taladar · · Score: 1

      1. True geeks don't spend much time outside the basement so telling the location is easy
      2. True geeks won't have kids

  111. What about 0x42424242? by metoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, not enough geek.

    Now 0x42424242 is on Thursday, March 24, 2005 04:29:54 UTC, and depending on your timezone, that is around the beginning of Good Friday. 42 as you know represents the meaning of Life, etc., which is interesting given it occurs around Easter.

    In Base2, it is 1000010010000100100001001000010,
    which looks better than 1000010001110100011010111000111 or 0x423A35C7.

    BTW. 42 has always been the correct answer.

  112. Pettiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ostracized from the nerds.

    Wow! that's gotta be pretty low on the totem pole.

    And all for not having an appreciation of Unix.

    Luckily, there is the most wise Doc Ruby to see who's who.

    Freaks by choice. So credibility is called into question because some chose to study arcane knowledge instead of being forced into it by a lack of social grace/expectations of being bright?

    You've said some bonehead things in the past, but this certainly takes the prize.

    The term you are looking for is pseudo-intellectual. The term that follows is stagnation.

    No, that's okay, you can keep it.

    You are now irrelevant.

    1. Re:Pettiness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And then there's the "Anonymous Coward". A subspecies of nerd, truly antisocial. By definition, hard to identify, but usually a noisy version of a "snot", often a "prig", typically irrelevant - and usually a bitter expert in ostracism. Farewell, Anonymous Coward, whatever you call yourself.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Pettiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot the messenger, but can't quite ge it up enough for the message. And it only took you 7 hours to come up with that.

      Weak.

      Your pop-psychology is amusing. Your narcissim is not.

      I repeat, petty.

    3. Re:Pettiness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You whine about your ignorance of the terms being used, so I provide them. You attach your own arbitrary value judgement to whether "freak by choice" undermines a geek's credibility. I haven't talked about myself at all, but you're throwing around terms like "narcisissm". All in a thread about definitions. You need to learn something more than vitriol (look it up, poser). You're such an obstinate nerd that you can't accept that I have better things to do than school you - like sleep. You're the worst kind of nerd: anonymous, whining, and kinda stupid.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  113. I've got this all worked out by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Funny

    > I was wondering what happens in 2038?

    In 2038, I will be 64 years old. I design and write all of my software explictly so that it will break (badly) in 2038. I hope all of my peers do so as well. Everybody who works for me does.

    The plan is, about 2033, people will start going insane over the Y2038 problem. I will be able to leverage my experience as a Senior UNIX Systems Programmer with a core strength in C to grab all kinds of consulting money. Then, in 2037, I'll do some hard-code hacking (i.e. enter deep hack mode for about 6 months) for some really high-end clients (whoever has the most cash on hand), and throw a bunch of money in the bank.

    This is really great, because I don't have a retirement plan, and I'm sure the old age pension will be bust by the time I'm 65. So, after having watched a bunch of COBOL/CICS/etc guys get rich in the late 90s, I want to do the same thing in my early sixties. The best part is, I watched the Y2K crap roll out, and I know how to play the management types that get stuck with clock problems... so I can suck them into weeks and weeks of meetings at huge consulting rates. Maybe I'll be able to bill $1000/hr by then!

    Most programmers older than I will be long gone. Most programmers younger thank I won't be able to understand the problem, due to brain infestations of the of the Microsoft and Java variety.

    There will be few old-sk00l UNIX hats running around. I will be one of them. Hopefully, by then, I will be able to grow a grey beard, so I can really look the part. My skills will be in supreme demand. I'll get rich off the problems I helped to create, and retire in comfort.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:I've got this all worked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll get rich off the problems I helped to create, and retire in comfort."

      That certainly sounds feasible... I mean it certainly has to have happened before... Let me see if I can remember where...

      Hmm... where o where has my little dog gone.

      Oh, that's right M$ operates that way!

    2. Re:I've got this all worked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...for some really high-end clients (whoever has the most cash on hand), and throw a bunch of money in the bank.

      One detail: make sure one of your high-end clients is the bank you plan to throw your money into.

      -cmh

    3. Re:I've got this all worked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'll be able to bill $1000/hr by then!
      If you're dreaming of making eight bucks an hour, you should either consider asking for a raise, or changing careers.

    4. Re:I've got this all worked out by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      I'm going to live to be 160 years old, which means that I'll still have to work for another 100 years after 2038.

      If the only value I can bring to an employer is my C skill in 2038, I'm going to be in really, really bad shape by 2100.

    5. Re:I've got this all worked out by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > If you're dreaming of making eight bucks an hour, you should either
      > consider asking for a raise, or changing careers.

      The dollar sign, in 80's-esque 6502ish syntax, clearly indicates that I'm talking about hexadecimal numbers, not binary ;)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    6. Re:I've got this all worked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the bank will calulate a negative intrest on your account from 1970 to 2038 cause they failed to fix the bug.

    7. Re:I've got this all worked out by cpsc2005 · · Score: 1

      "for some really high-end clients (whoever has the most cash on hand), and throw a bunch of money in the bank."

      Careful that you don't earn more than $2,147,483,647 lest your bank account roll over!

    8. Re:I've got this all worked out by Nuffsaid · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'll be able to bill $1000/hr by then!

      Maybe you'll be able to buy a couple of Cappuccinos with that amount by then...

      Other than that, nice/evil retirement plan! As a programmer (slightly) older than you, I just hope not to be "long gone" by then!

      --
      Nuffsaid
      ________

      Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
  114. The real party should have been 10 Jan 2004! by jamesivie · · Score: 1

    Some quick calculations show that the 1111111111 this is referring to is DECIMAL, not binary. The real party should have been the halfway point from 0 to 2^31, which would have been 13:37:04 on 10 Jan 2004.

    --
    "O'Connor, smash the window." "Why me, Bigboote?" "It might be boobie-trapped!" "Oh!"<smash> -Buckaroo Banzai
  115. Dork. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    But all these high-numbered posers, whining about how irrelevant or how hard it is to to understand this timeframe, are fake nerds. What is the word for that?

    How about two: Doc Ruby.

    Sorry, couldn't resist. But I know what you mean - the distinction I always made is that nerds are the people who like esoteria for the sake thereof; dorks are people who wish they were as smart as the nerds they hang around, being otherwise ostracized elsewhere. Dorks take up the more banal nerd pastimes, not being able to take up proper nerdly pursuits. Example: Nerds play with electronics, develop explosives, devise methods for factoring primes, etc. Not being able to do any of that, dorks fixate on Star Wars.

    Saw it all the time in high school, college, etc. Nothing worse than a "Nerd groupie."

    1. Re:Dork. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh. my. god.

      I just realized I had groupies in hs
      I'm so depressed all of a sudden

    2. Re:Dork. by Sum_of_parts · · Score: 1

      Thank you for describing what I was.

    3. Re:Dork. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Thank you for describing what I was.

      Which one? ;)

  116. Superstition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys remember what happened a couple of days after the clock rolled past 1000000000, right?

    That was a fine time for programs to break, as lexical vs. numerical sort ignorance was attributed to terrorism.

  117. From the 1000000000 turnover by oneeyedman · · Score: 1
    In this story from 2001 there was a handy line of perl, submitted by felipeal, that displays an updating count of seconds:

    watch -n 1 'echo "The time is near: `date +%s`"'

    This is nice to have running at the moment of truth to create the maximum dramatic effect.

    --
    *** "Freiheit ist immer die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden". -- Rosa Luxemburg ***
    1. Re:From the 1000000000 turnover by oneeyedman · · Score: 1

      Duh, shell, not perl.

      --
      *** "Freiheit ist immer die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden". -- Rosa Luxemburg ***
  118. You know, I remember this on alt.hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remeber on alt.hackers (note: This article never made it to google's news archive) someone making a big deal of UNIX time hitting 800000000.

  119. Ahh, but I can! by Fareq · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...are belong to us

  120. 12:08 rules by wsanders · · Score: 1

    We always saw 12:08 in the advertisements of old TI digital watches, and decided it was the 12-hour format time that displayed the maximum number of valid LED segments.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:12:08 rules by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      That's a 24-hour format time.

    2. Re:12:08 rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you retarded?

    3. Re:12:08 rules by jrockway · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. (Well technically it needs to be qualified with an AM or PM, but that's not what the grandparent is talking about.)

      --
      My other car is first.
  121. Next time this happens by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

    The next time this will happen (all 1's) will be Sun, Feb 5th 2322. Hopefully the Unix timestamp will be obsolete by then.

  122. Jerk by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Dorks are nerds with friends. Real nerds don't have friends - they're antisocial.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Jerk by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Dorks are nerds with friends. Real nerds don't have friends - they're antisocial.

      I disagree. Real nerds - as I see them, anyway - are just people who like challenges and problems. They can be reasonably adjusted, and frequently will do nerdly things with other nerds. Can even do non-nerdly things with non-nerds.

      Your classic dork hangs around the nerds, pretending to understand what they're takling about, and tries to steer the conversation towards something dorky. That's what's so sad - these people who see the nerd group as being the highest social level to which they can aspire.

    2. Re:Jerk by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, of course individuals don't stick strictly to their subculture boundaries. Especially geek/nerd/dorks, who are more typically young, whose social/cultural associations are in flux, and subject to experimentation, especially boundary transgression. We're talking more about the center of gravity of these cultures. The more geeky you are, the more you're a geek. The more dorky, the more a dork. The cultures fall in something of a spectrum from nerd/dork/geek/jock/prep, but there are prep nerds, and jock dorks. The spectrum isn't truly linear, and humans are even less well-behaved. The saddest part to me is when people identify with one group, and never venture beyond it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  123. Countdown by drigz · · Score: 1

    Run this:
    while true ; do date=`date +%s` ; left=$((1111111111-date)) ; if [ $left == 0 ] ; then echo HAPPY NEW MOST SIGNIFICANT DECIMAL DIGIT ; break ; fi ; echo $left ; sleep 1 ; done

  124. computers will be 64-bit by then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so will our time values.

  125. Me too! by KarMann · · Score: 1

    I guess that'd make me 1111111111 seconds old, oh, right about... now.
    (Well, not quite, really, it would've been 5:03:31 AM this morning for me, CST.)

    --
    ProofReading Markup Language - and yes, I find typos.
  126. 03:13:37 by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    i think 04:20:00 is a very special time too.

  127. Hangover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One time I had a horrible hangover, and for some reason my clock got flipped upside down.. don't ask. Anyway, I woke up my clock saying 11:34. But I still think I was in hell.

  128. T rex? or Model T? by darth_zeth · · Score: 1

    wouldn't you be playing tag with, you know, William McKinley or something? if 1970 +2^31 is 2038, 1970 -2^31 is 1901 sometime. Then you invest in any stock you can find!

    And when you come back to today, you'll find all your stocks got bankrupted in the great depression. damn!

    --
    "Nobody writes jokes in base 13." - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:T rex? or Model T? by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      No, you can invest a lot in 1901, then when you have lots of money in stocks, you get your money back in 1929, just before the great depression. Then as people realize some rich guy sold lots of stocks, they will all stupidly do the same and you will be the one causing the depression! Muhahaha... Hum I mean... Great scott!

      Anyway, the stocks who went bankrupt recovered their value in... er... I don't know when, but they did.

    2. Re:T rex? or Model T? by tomjen · · Score: 1

      Buing stocks? Try to stop the world wars and you have just saved the european countries.

      How?
      Shoot princip before he can get a chance to kill the arche duke.

      Kill Hitler as he comes into the field hospital after the gas attack. Or after he comes out of the prison in Germany.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
  129. Chronos, Master of All Time! by Arminator · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of that Johnny Bravo cartoon, where Johnny wakes Chronos the Bear, Master of All Time, has a few seconds to plead for his life, and after the timer runs out, points behind the bear: "But this says I have 12 Minutes left!".
    And while Chronos looks around and sees his blinking VCR clock, explaining "Thats the VCR you idiot! Not even Chronos, Master of All Time [thunderclap], knows how to set these!", Johnny took the opportunity to run.

    Boy was this funny. It was like... so funny, because I had this glass of milk, you know, and like... umm... no, actually it was gross...
    Nevermind...

    1. Re:Chronos, Master of All Time! by techefnet · · Score: 0

      spoiler alert!

    2. Re:Chronos, Master of All Time! by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

      I just saw the subject and immediatly knew what you were takling about... Sigh I miss that cartoon.

  130. and what exactly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is the reason for not changing this walue to 64-bit signed integer asap ???

  131. Correction: by btnheazy03 · · Score: 1

    break out your tinfoil hats, not your party hats

  132. 1234567890 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the same website 1234567890 will be on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 GMT. Friday the 13th eh?

  133. Bug?? by JasonBee · · Score: 1

    Hell - can't we just put the hard drive in reverse and roll it back a bit? It worked for Ferris Buehler didn't it?

    *natch

  134. This story wasted 1001011 seconds of my life.. by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    and I want them back!

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  135. Math is fun! by brouski · · Score: 1

    Is this the same as 1111111110.999999999...?

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  136. too much time on my hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who figured this out before it was on /., then came to /. to see if they'd be running the story?

    1. Re:too much time on my hands by XyborX · · Score: 1

      I actually wondered about it a few days ago, but I forgot to check it out. And now I'm too late :/

      --
      // Just my few cents
  137. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by zapadoo · · Score: 1

    You *do* have to be geeky, but *don't* need loads of spare time at all. Python:

    >>> datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(1111111111)
    da tetime.datetime(2005, 3, 18, 1, 58, 31)
  138. Capture the history by Phoe6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    #!/bin/bash
    while [ $(date +%s) != 1111111111 ]
    do
    echo "Not Yet!"
    done

    echo "Unix Time"
    date +%s

    echo "on `date`"

    echo "so we captured the history!"

    --
    Senthil
  139. me too! by dtaczalski · · Score: 1
    11:11:11
    01:01:01
    00:00:00
    12:34:56

    please feel free to add your own

    I will, thank you.
    22:22:22
    A|\|D I |-|4v3 0n3 my 0\/\/n too:
    33:33:33
    or better (more 31337 one):
    16:32:64
  140. Coooool by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

    How very 10100111001.

  141. Hey you, listen to me by manifoldronin · · Score: 2, Funny

    - Look, I came from the future - 2038!
    - What are you, seen too much Terminator?
    - No no, you don't understand. They sent me back to warn you people about the Y2038 bug and make you fix it NOW!
    - Aren't we all supposed to be using 64 bit computers by then.
    - No, well see that's the problem - we aren't. They made so much heat that the ice cap started melting so we had to go back to 32-bit.
    - Now come on, how could you have managed to invent a time machine with 32-bit computers?!
    - Well Google actually did, with a Lenovo PC farm.

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    1. Re:Hey you, listen to me by hexfortyfive · · Score: 1

      What are you rambling on about? Everyone knows the solution to the 32-bit time problem is in the IBM5100.

  142. Maybe... by acariquara · · Score: 1

    00:00:00 just marks the start of the detonation scheme. There is a slight lag that varies according to type of wiring and trigger.

    I don't know you, but if I have to sustain a blast that decays with a quadratic formula, I still would prefer to get roasted at distance+n, where n equals the distance travelled by my ass on fire.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  143. 4:20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I celebrate when my clock reads 4:20

  144. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    I would post my Java version of this, but the Indians keep telling me that their best practice books say my version is wrong.

  145. xdaliclock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To keep track of useless moments like this...

    kstart --keepabove xdaliclock -countdown 1111111111 -fullscreen -transparent -cycle &

  146. Ok, ok. :) by jd · · Score: 1
    (((((((4 x 3) - 2) + a) / 5) x 3) - c) * 7)

    • 4 x 3 = c
    • c - 2 = a
    • a + a = 14
    • 14 / 5 = 4
    • 4 * 3 = c
    • c - c = 0
    • 0 * 7 = 0

    I hate LISP. :)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Ok, ok. :) by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Good job -- but that's not in Reverse Polish Notation :).

      Yaz.

  147. *Supposed* to reach? by mavantix · · Score: 1

    Unix time is supposed reach 1111111111 on...

    Meaning if the world ends before then, we're ok?

    Non committal about when it really will happen, eh...

  148. to watch it Happen... by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    until [ 6 -eq 9 ]; do echo $(date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s"); sleep 1; done

    1. Re:to watch it Happen... by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      heh, "until [ 6 -eq 9 ]". How about "while :"?

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    2. Re:to watch it Happen... by nickgrieve · · Score: 3, Interesting

      while true ; do perl -le'print 1111111111 - time' ; sleep 1 ; done

      count down

      re: while... skinnning cats

    3. Re:to watch it Happen... by BubbaFett · · Score: 1

      this worked for me: watch -n1 date +%s

  149. 13:37 - the time when anything goes! by carabela · · Score: 1

    I used to go get a coffee at this time at work. Seemed like an appropriate time for a break. Nowadays I just drink my java anytime a day.

    --

    The more you know, the less you need. [Admin added: from me.]
  150. "speak" will almost be 1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    spoke# date +%s ; uptime
    1111100662
    3:04PM up 1336 days, 20:02, 3 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.03, 0.00
    spoke#
    So "spoke" will be 1337 at 17:02 (PST) -- just missing 1111111111 by a little over an hour. (Hostname changed to protect the unpatched -- but the rest is real)

    For the curious:

    spoke# uname -a
    FreeBSD spoke 2.1.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.1.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 16 10:47:14 1995 jkh@westhill.cdrom.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENER IC i386
  151. PERL CODE TO WATCH IT TICK OVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought I'd give y'all a quick hack to allow you to watch it tic over:

    little perl hack:

    g5:~/dez$ cat epoch.pl
    #!/usr/bin/perl

    use Time::Local;

    print time(), "\n";

    now a shell loop to watch it tick each second:

    g5:~/dez$ while true; do ./epoch.pl ; sleep 1; done
    1111101942
    1111101943
    1111101944
    ^C
    g5:~ /dez$

    now it's up to you to catch that screen grab ;-)

    may the --; be with you!

    Dez at Blanchfield.COM.AU
    http://www.websearch.com.au/

    1. Re:PERL CODE TO WATCH IT TICK OVER by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      And a little Bash script also.

      #!/bin/bash

      clear

      while test `date +%s` -lt 1111111111; do
      DATE=`date +%s`
      OUT=`expr 1111111111 - $DATE`
      echo -n "$OUT"
      sleep 1
      clear
      done

      echo 'Happy 1111111111!'
      It'll display a countdown at the top of the terminal and wish you a happy 1111111111. :)
      Enjoy!

      Oh yeah, CmdrTaco, please make <ECODE> respect indentation... *sigh*.

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    2. Re:PERL CODE TO WATCH IT TICK OVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /bin/bash... how portable... (sigh)
      It's not that it needs bash anyway.
      You could atleast made it /bin/sh

    3. Re:PERL CODE TO WATCH IT TICK OVER by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I can't really take critisism from an AC seriously... If you don't like it, don't use it... And it's too late not anyway... Go bother someone else.

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    4. Re:PERL CODE TO WATCH IT TICK OVER by lance_rushing · · Score: 1


      bash onliner:

      while [ 1 ] ; do date +%s; sleep 1; done;

      --
      My new sig: RTJKJAS
    5. Re:PERL CODE TO WATCH IT TICK OVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even shorter one liner:

      watch -n 1 "date +'%s'"

  152. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by otomo_1001 · · Score: 1
    This is an easier way than what everyone using perl/php/etc.. is giving you. man date is your friend. You still have to be a geek to wonder about this though. (Note: this is on my Mac, so the date command might not behave the same on your unix)
    $ date
    Thu Mar 17 17:59:22 CST 2005
    $ date -u
    Thu Mar 17 23:59:24 GMT 2005
    $ date +%s
    1111103969
    $ date -r 1111111111
    Thu Mar 17 19:58:31 CST 2005
    $ date -u -r 1111111111
    Fri Mar 18 01:58:31 GMT 2005
  153. 2222222222 by DNX+Blandy · · Score: 1

    is on the 2nd June 2040 @ 03:57:02 so long wait till the next one :P

  154. Countdown Time! by stevo3232 · · Score: 1

    We're actually partying on #1111111111 on irc.indymedia.org. Come join us! Also, there's a counter set up here: http://stevo32.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/countdown.cgi Thanks, Stephen Clement

    --
    s.clementmonkey@sympatico.ca, remove the 'monkey'.
  155. Countdown Time! by stevo3232 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're actually partying on #1111111111 on irc.indymedia.org. Come join us!

    Also, there's a counter set up here:

    http://stevo32.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/countdown.cgi

    Thanks,

    Stephen Clement

    --
    s.clementmonkey@sympatico.ca, remove the 'monkey'.
  156. Waiting for 1111111112 by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

    Since it more closely resembles my Slashdot UID :).

  157. Wee.. by merc · · Score: 1

    Happy 0x03FF day.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  158. 1111111111 by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    1111111111

  159. And... by elleomea · · Score: 1

    Happy 1111111111... now!

  160. Taking First post to a new level by kabloom · · Score: 1

    it's 1111111111 right now!

    [bloom@cat-in-the-hat ~]$ for x in $(seq 1 87); do
    > echo $(( (1111111111 - $( date +%s)) ))
    > sleep 1
    > done

  161. awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    % date +%s
    1111111111

  162. Come ... and gone by krray · · Score: 1

    Well -- that was an exciting second. Now I have to wait 123456779 seconds.

  163. For those who missed the action... by spamguy · · Score: 1
    1. Re:For those who missed the action... by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Meh. That's a lot of unneccessary keystrokes.
      [510] cuervo@crossbone ~ $ perl -e '$| = 1; do { printf "\r%lu", time(); } while (time < 1111111111);'
      [511] cuervo@crossbone ~ $ date
      Thu Mar 17 17:58:34 PST 2005
      (I forgot the closing newline, as you can see, and my $PROMPT_COMMAND involves "echo -ne \\r". Oh, well.)

      Bet if I posted this some hours ago I would've got modded up. :-)
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:For those who missed the action... by spamguy · · Score: 1
      Eight keystrokes to type 'date +%s', plus 'Return'.

      Hit 'up arrow' then 'Return' once per repeat command. On the screen, I did this 9 times.

      My Total: 9 + 9(2) = 27 keystrokes.
      Your Total: 80 keystrokes.

      Perl may do your taxes and find a cure for AIDS, but sometimes just the up arrow will do.

    3. Re:For those who missed the action... by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Ah, touche. Suppose I got carried away.

      Mine looked cooler, though. ;-)

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  164. Happy 1111111111 ! by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

    Yes, we just passed it. Move along, nothing to see here.

  165. Wow! ... not by frizzbit · · Score: 1
    And only a mere 3 hours later, another, almost as AMAZING:
    "1111122222" == "Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:03:42 GMT" !!!!!

    Personally, I can't wait for this one:
    "1234567890" == "Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 GMT"

  166. time_t is signed, technically 2^31 is in 1901 by James+Manning · · Score: 1

    % TZ=GMT perl -le 'print scalar localtime 2**31-1'
    Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 2038
    % TZ=GMT perl -le 'print scalar localtime 2**31'
    Fri Dec 13 20:45:52 1901

    Tue Jan 19 03:14:08 2038 GMT isn't representable by a 32-bit signed time_t like many of us have now.

  167. do u realize.... by kidoman · · Score: 0

    that.... 31st December 3112 is the last date we will hv patterns like.....

    31/12/3112

    cool....

    --
    ~~bada bing, bada bang, bada bong and voila~~
  168. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

    I actually noticed this at work today... when i was working on a little scheduler and testing it... if you do anything with unix times on a regular basis you'd have probably seen it coming from a week away! :P

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  169. ObScreenshot! by tobias.sargeant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A second to remember.

  170. goddamnit by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    david@ubuntu:~ $ date +%s
    1111121778
    david@ubuntu:~ $

    I missed it

  171. Odometers and asymptotes by erice · · Score: 1

    Don't you get excited when your car rolls over to 100000 miles? It's somthing simple and nice -- and well worth taking pleasure in.

    I'm still waiting for mine to roll over but it never seems to get there. You see, my odometer has been slowly failing since about 96000 miles. The more I drive, the more slowly (actually infrequently) it records the miles. At this point, I begin to doubt if it will ever reach 100,000.

  172. Party time!!!!!! by Ritontor · · Score: 1

    perl -e 'while (1) { print `date +%s`; sleep 1; }'

    All the fun of new years, except, well, it's way fuckin' nerdier.

    --
    Perhaps the answer to the problem of teenagers dropping bricks from motorway and railway bridges is to sue Tetris.
  173. I've recorded it by xadhoom · · Score: 1

    Here http://asterisk.espia-net.net/unitixtimeones/ones. avi you will find that I recorded it for my sons, and for me, since I was @sleep.

    --
    I was there.
    1. Re:I've recorded it by xadhoom · · Score: 1

      sorry, wrong url...
      this one is ok

      --
      I was there.
  174. mine just outputs jjjjjj by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    thats right unix leet speak !!!!!!!!!!!

  175. Re:people with way too much free time on their han by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that Big or Little Indians? Also, would that Java version be available in network byte order?

  176. Year 292277026596 Bug by Gr00 · · Score: 1

    I just want to warn 64-bit clock system users about the problem they will have on GMT 15:30:08, Sunday, December 4, 292,277,026,596 C.E when their clocks will go back to GMT 00:00:00, Thursday, January 1, 1970 C.E what it's about going back too much time...
    So the systems will collapse, there will be a big chaos in all the galaxy and most of the systems will become like old IBM's SCAMP or Intel's 4004.
    I've warned you... the end is coming!!!

  177. This brings out an interesting question: by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    Isn't it possible to make the GCC treat short as 32-bit, int and long as 64-bit and long long as, say, 128-bit numbers, and produce code that handles that even on the 32-bit (or the even older 16-bit) machines still hanging around (I can see many problems with multithreaded code that's not properly synchronized, but, alas, `c'est la vie`)? That could make many problems go away in a poof of compiler logic.

  178. OT: Your sig by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    s/^I /If /

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  179. IBM WebSphere date rollover problems? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    Administrators of WebSphere v5.0.x products, take note: some seem to choke on this date rollover.

    Yesterday our Websphere Portal server (v5.0.2), on both development and production systems, started refusing to install, update or delete portlets, and the serverStatus.sh command couldn't find any server instances running, even though they clearly were.

    Setting the date back to, say, March 1, instantly "fixed" these problems. Obviously this is only a workaround. (yes, the problems re-appeared when the clock was set back to March 18.)

    It's only because of this Slashdot post that I even thought to check the date. Who would've guessed one of IBM's enterprise products would have the analogue of the Y2K bug in it...