Its not censorship since they are not a government entity.
They really aren't exposing themselves any more to suits by including it then not as long as it has a legitimate purpose and there is a statement to some effect that they only intend it to be used that way. ( else every gun and knife maker in the world would be gone by now )
Why flush money down a losing venture until it starts to see a return? Because they can. And one of the many faults of capitalism is that those with a ton of money can do the stupidest shit and still come out okay.
When your a monopoly with enough money, its called 'investment', not 'flushing'.
Will be sad if that dies in the merger ( or just dies.. didn't realize yahoo was so bad off ) as that has become a defacto standard for a lot of people.
Without processes your people have nothing useful to do and your entire business model is suspect. Processes MUST come first. People can be inserted or removed as needed.
If you HAVE to.. then charge her the cost of the song if you bought it from your average digital download 'house'. ( going rate is 99cent i do think ) and any profit she saw if she sold 'copies'.
But i still say nothing was stolen, and nothing was lost so its all just a scam and shows how screwed up things are.
You are exercising your freedom when you choose to fly. You agree to the restrictions up front. I don't see a problem here. Don't like the restrictions, drive. That is my choice.
Once we put them on street corners, then we can talk.
At a certain point a monopolies 'rights' become limited/modified as it interferes with the common good of society.
I personally would think that Google may fall under that premise now. Once you become the sole practical source, you don't get to choose what you do with it.
Ok, but this isn't the UK so shut your face. Here even if we don't like what is being said, its your right to say it, without being harassed by the government.
Slashdot Mirror
Its not censorship since they are not a government entity.
They really aren't exposing themselves any more to suits by including it then not as long as it has a legitimate purpose and there is a statement to some effect that they only intend it to be used that way. ( else every gun and knife maker in the world would be gone by now )
Ya, until they can either blackmail or threaten FB into compliance.
Wins again. Not right, but not surprising.
Why flush money down a losing venture until it starts to see a return? Because they can. And one of the many faults of capitalism is that those with a ton of money can do the stupidest shit and still come out okay.
When your a monopoly with enough money, its called 'investment', not 'flushing'.
Who would have thought.
Mono runs on windows, mac, FreeBSD, linux and iOS. What more platforms would it need to be considered portable?
Not saying its perfect or there aren't other options, but at least be accurate.
Will be sad if that dies in the merger ( or just dies.. didn't realize yahoo was so bad off ) as that has become a defacto standard for a lot of people.
I doubt they can buy a cup of coffee at this point.
That is the beauty of having a virtual monopoly on an industry, your customers don't get much choice.
But not within normal business sense, unless you are the RIAA and like pissing on potential customers.
I thought that was part of the point of a porn film?
Didn't you really mean marginalize? Not that this wasn't expected.
Without processes your people have nothing useful to do and your entire business model is suspect. Processes MUST come first. People can be inserted or removed as needed.
If you HAVE to .. then charge her the cost of the song if you bought it from your average digital download 'house'. ( going rate is 99cent i do think ) and any profit she saw if she sold 'copies'.
But i still say nothing was stolen, and nothing was lost so its all just a scam and shows how screwed up things are.
You are exercising your freedom when you choose to fly. You agree to the restrictions up front. I don't see a problem here. Don't like the restrictions, drive. That is my choice.
Once we put them on street corners, then we can talk.
I may not care that its a copyright violation and do as i please, but i don't pretend its not, while attempting to justify it to the public.
Its what all the kids are doing.
I don't even have it installed on my laptop, i don't miss it a bit.
At a certain point a monopolies 'rights' become limited/modified as it interferes with the common good of society.
I personally would think that Google may fall under that premise now. Once you become the sole practical source, you don't get to choose what you do with it.
Ok, but this isn't the UK so shut your face. Here even if we don't like what is being said, its your right to say it, without being harassed by the government.
Its just a phone. Once they start doing this to your computers, THEN you can get upset.
Why were they not terminated?
Piracy is even more free :)
Apple. Their house, their rules. Don't like it, go play at a friends house ( like android, or blackberry or cydia )
Expect that 250 to drop as competition is bought out.
That way i can get my free viruses without having to plug something in.