Also, what if the woman is not wearing any underwear? It is her business if she is, or is not, and by wearing a skirt she has a reasonable right to privacy in that matter.
I do agree, but the court there feels that their stuff is public and they are virtually inviting people to lay on the ground and stare at it if they dont wear underwear under their dress which under normal circumstances would be expected to hide anything..
Now if they were wearing a miniskirt which DOES rise up as you walk, well, that is their own fault if people look
If you cover your face, it means you dont want it to be public and are actively stating it with your actions, so i dont have a problem with people being beat down who do stick a camera in your hood and take a picture. ( and then arrested )
If you find what they consider music they would like it. Problem is most of what is considered music is complete trash, and barely more than coordinated noise.
You must be a clumsy idiot and shouldn't own a phone. I have never broken a phone, and i normally keep them an average of 3 *years* before they are upgraded to new technology.
That was my thought too. He is worried about being 30? WTF dude, just learn something else and move on.
Now, if you were 50, we might have something to talk about as there is discrimination going on at that level especially if you are changing fields. but 30? Umm, no.
They are not obligated to violate any contacts they had with the deceased. They also are not obligated to violate the person's privacy.
With no explicit permission how is Apple to know that the dead person was going to be ok with their family trampling thru her files, browsing history, email? its one thing to give out the device, but its another to give out the data and should be spelled out explicitly.
As a compromise Apple could either remote wipe it for them, or give them a new one. I support their stance to keep private data, well private.
Quality tablets are not approaching that range. But i do agree that sub 50 dollar tablets are disposable ( and also a dismal experience which can harm the perception of android in general )
That is what it boils down to. Do i trust a game company on a secured system? No.
So you just get treatment somewhere else in the world that is less restrictive.
Are you on the court and making a statement?
If not, i stand by my judgement that they are just a bunch of out of control perverts.
hese days, just rooting your Android device is not as simple as running some root kit.
Depends on your phone on how difficult it is. Depending on where you buy it it comes pre-rooted even.
Also, what if the woman is not wearing any underwear? It is her business if she is, or is not, and by wearing a skirt she has a reasonable right to privacy in that matter.
I do agree, but the court there feels that their stuff is public and they are virtually inviting people to lay on the ground and stare at it if they dont wear underwear under their dress which under normal circumstances would be expected to hide anything..
Now if they were wearing a miniskirt which DOES rise up as you walk, well, that is their own fault if people look
If you cover your face, it means you dont want it to be public and are actively stating it with your actions, so i dont have a problem with people being beat down who do stick a camera in your hood and take a picture. ( and then arrested )
If you find what they consider music they would like it. Problem is most of what is considered music is complete trash, and barely more than coordinated noise.
Simple industrial ( mining ) accident. I wonder of they have their own version of OSHA.
Only serves to increase my general disgust with mankind.
You must be a clumsy idiot and shouldn't own a phone. I have never broken a phone, and i normally keep them an average of 3 *years* before they are upgraded to new technology.
Tablets, same thing.
Photographing things publicly visible is fine, but what is inside of a dress is not publicly visible.
The paper should be shut down and every reporter involved fined, jailed and stripped of their rights.
That was my thought too. He is worried about being 30? WTF dude, just learn something else and move on.
Now, if you were 50, we might have something to talk about as there is discrimination going on at that level especially if you are changing fields. but 30? Umm, no.
They think a persons labor should be free or something. Or is FF so advanced now it spontaneously appears on a computer?
Get used to using them, expect a charge to come later.
Doesn't work that way anymore from what i gather. No pass code, no factory reset.
They are not obligated to violate any contacts they had with the deceased. They also are not obligated to violate the person's privacy.
With no explicit permission how is Apple to know that the dead person was going to be ok with their family trampling thru her files, browsing history, email? its one thing to give out the device, but its another to give out the data and should be spelled out explicitly.
As a compromise Apple could either remote wipe it for them, or give them a new one. I support their stance to keep private data, well private.
Ok, when did that become permitted again? last i heard it was still a 'scheduled drug' and even research was banned.
Even better: Why was his privacy violated by Newsweek in the first place?
Everything is vulnerable. its just a matter of how.
Get to make the rules. Yet another example.
They have not been worth a damn for decades, its time to throw in the towel and give up. Go out with what little bit of dignity they have left.
Sort of.
Quality tablets are not approaching that range. But i do agree that sub 50 dollar tablets are disposable ( and also a dismal experience which can harm the perception of android in general )
Umm my t/x had great battery life. It didn't lose its mind if the battery would die. its screen was also larger..
There is one manufacturer of iOS tablets, there are butt loads of android tablet makers.
That fact alone tips the balance. And like the story says, lots of them are *cheap*, in a market where apple would never tread.