MS Guy: Oh.. we haven't really encountered that before, can't help..
With our level of support, we have never got that response and they are committed to find a solution, and do. We also don't communicate by email. We have a dedicated live contact for us to call 24/7. ( not that he's the expert, he's more of a point man to get the right people on the issue ).
We have even had them onsite for those really bad head-scratcher problems where a remote view just didn't cut it..
My comment was a response about his signature concerning not carrying weapons on commercial flights, not about anti-child porn 'crusaders'. Except perhaps for your built-in agendas that cloud your judgement, there was NO reference to porn of any kind in my statement, not even remotely.
You need to read a little closer before you go tossing stones there bud.
To be nice and address your statement however, ill give you that anti-*child* porn 'crusaders' are not part of the lunatic fringe, however, i do think that anti-porn 'crusaders' qualify as lunatics and shouldn't be lumped in the same group. One is good, the other is really twisted and evil.
It really does exist, for those people willing to pay the big bucks.
And sometimes you find they actually DO know what they are talking about, with their products at least. Once you get into the depths of the support structure you no longer see the 1st level 'by the book' call centers and discover that elusive developer.. who actually does have a clue.
While it might be a pretty modern front end to usenet it doesn't help the fact that the back end feed is slowly being strangled by spam, and now legislation.
If guns kept people safer we'd be allowed to carry them on commercial flights.
No, if politicians didn't have their head up their asses and bend over for lunatic fringe anti-rights groups we would still be allowed to do what we did for decades.
I thought the guy was puling a gun on me, so i blocked his arm, i apologize that it was a camera instead and it hit the ground and shattered. *case dismissed*
Shouldn't have pulled out a 'questionable' object on a cop during an incident. Feel lucky they don't shoot you instead.
I think that is the case in a few other areas as well. That is is illegal to record a public official doing official things without permission. ( or something like that )
Do they define actual applications or some sort of nebulous 'act' of sharing binary data among other users?
And that also means i cant perform a *legal* activity with their product, especially now that several media places use BT to distribute the content you purchased?
I personaly have lost nothing, i can remove the ECM from any car i buy or completely reprogram it, replace the EFI with a carb, drive manual transmissions, etc. You also dont know the age of the chassis/body of the car i normally drive.
So please only speak for yourself when you claim ive lost control of *my* car.
Slashdot Mirror
Since when is a *hateful* remark a crime?
Sure you cant claim false facts about a person, or threaten them, but just being hateful?
MS Guy: Oh.. we haven't really encountered that before, can't help..
With our level of support, we have never got that response and they are committed to find a solution, and do. We also don't communicate by email. We have a dedicated live contact for us to call 24/7. ( not that he's the expert, he's more of a point man to get the right people on the issue ).
We have even had them onsite for those really bad head-scratcher problems where a remote view just didn't cut it..
My comment was a response about his signature concerning not carrying weapons on commercial flights, not about anti-child porn 'crusaders'. Except perhaps for your built-in agendas that cloud your judgement, there was NO reference to porn of any kind in my statement, not even remotely.
You need to read a little closer before you go tossing stones there bud.
To be nice and address your statement however, ill give you that anti-*child* porn 'crusaders' are not part of the lunatic fringe, however, i do think that anti-porn 'crusaders' qualify as lunatics and shouldn't be lumped in the same group. One is good, the other is really twisted and evil.
I have not heard that. Public record is what the tape would be so i don't see how they can deny you access to the evidence in court.
It really does exist, for those people willing to pay the big bucks.
And sometimes you find they actually DO know what they are talking about, with their products at least. Once you get into the depths of the support structure you no longer see the 1st level 'by the book' call centers and discover that elusive developer.. who actually does have a clue.
While it might be a pretty modern front end to usenet it doesn't help the fact that the back end feed is slowly being strangled by spam, and now legislation.
If guns kept people safer we'd be allowed to carry them on commercial flights.
No, if politicians didn't have their head up their asses and bend over for lunatic fringe anti-rights groups we would still be allowed to do what we did for decades.
Is what killed the internet. At least what it was and should have remained.
What we have now is some evil bastard child.
It all depends on the state laws in your area.
For example some states let you record the call without telling the other 1/2 of the party. Only one 1/2 needs to know. Others, both.. it all varies.
This is why they have cameras in most cars now, in a sealed box that the patrol officer cant get into.
Hard to fake the evidence when you get get to it. It serves to watch *both* parities for when they end up in court.
I thought the guy was puling a gun on me, so i blocked his arm, i apologize that it was a camera instead and it hit the ground and shattered. *case dismissed*
Shouldn't have pulled out a 'questionable' object on a cop during an incident. Feel lucky they don't shoot you instead.
I think that is the case in a few other areas as well. That is is illegal to record a public official doing official things without permission. ( or something like that )
If they can keep out the chuckholes that are beating my cars suspension to death every summer, im all for it.
in other words, you want to clamp down on file sharing and make the AA's happy.
I don't think bit-locker will even run.
NAT worked out of the box for me, it was TUN that i never got working ( on a linux host anyway )
Went back to VMware since that is what we have at work anyway ( ESX flavor )
According to others, they lost that long ago and legally separated their data business units fro their telecomm units.
Do they define actual applications or some sort of nebulous 'act' of sharing binary data among other users?
And that also means i cant perform a *legal* activity with their product, especially now that several media places use BT to distribute the content you purchased?
that wasnt a typo, i was thinking VAR as in valued added... ( tho i dont see any value being added )
I personaly have lost nothing, i can remove the ECM from any car i buy or completely reprogram it, replace the EFI with a carb, drive manual transmissions, etc. You also dont know the age of the chassis/body of the car i normally drive.
So please only speak for yourself when you claim ive lost control of *my* car.
Until either federal regulations or insurnace requires it.
I wonder why its taken so long to seriously consider this.
I want to retain control of my car, thank you very much, and adding a bunch of so called 'var computers' is not going to do that.
Keep your grubby mitts off my vehicle.
You first.
Some of us have families to support. Cant do that while in detention.
Any charismatic CEO/founder is in effect 'the company' as far as public perception goes.
Its part of the curse.