Its quite common for satisfied customers to quietly go on about their business, leaving the nuts cases that are unhappy to complain and grab the press.
They are still nut cases, and are still wrong.
Re:You are Totally off there
on
Revamping Freenet
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
No, more like the scum under the pot..
Let me rephrase my original comment " your entire existence is not relevant, not just your incorrect and useless comment"
Other posts? Well, if they don't agree with me they are just as worthless. Only my opinion has any merit. And anyone that doesn't agree should be wiped from the face of the earth as they have no value to me.
Most people that complain are ones that are trying to download large files and expect it to be like some other unsafe p2p setup.
For what it was designed for ( mostly text pages with a splash of graphics ) it works.. Is it fast? No of course not.. But if you stick to the fundamentals its not *that* slow either..
Re:You are Totally off there
on
Revamping Freenet
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
Strange how others don't seem to have those problems. Is it perfect? No, of course not. But its not as you claim it is.
But go ahead and complain, no one really cares as your 'review' has no relevance.
You are Totally off there
on
Revamping Freenet
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Only a browser interface? There is an 'application port', and there are applications written for it. ( such as frost )
Java bloat? No worse then other languages that try to be *universal*. Besides, don't like java? Then recode it in something else and quit bitching.
Slow? Depends on what you are doing. Are you trying to download files? Well it really wasn't designed for that. And there will be a tradeoff on speed/anonymity.
Searches? Umm there are several search engines available if you look.
You don't think they will just lay down and admit defeat do you?
They will fight as long as people continue to fund them by buying their garbage at the stores. ( or they win total control over all content and violators are executed on suspicion )
Several have settled at the threat of suit.. but who has actually gone and lost ( or won ).
Much as the RIAA P2P user suits. its all a bunch of hot air to get one to settle. Once it gets to court, all the air wil be let out.
Use the code. its been released.. if the writers dont like the virual nature of GPL that *forces* them to show the world and take the risk, then dont cry when someone uses it.
Sure.. mod me down since i said bad things about the GPL. you cant supress the truth forever.
Slashdot Mirror
Just beacuse you can shove a computer into something doesnt make it the right thing to do.
This is a great example. Ill stick with real cars.
Why do we even have to have Java be part of the equation when there are other *free* platform independent languages out there, such as python.
Sure, Java works fine, but why even ask for troubles like this by using it?
All they would really be able to buy is the 'VAR' components.
The core is all open, so all that would happen is someone else would step up to the plate.
It might ruffle some feathers and slow the corporate Linux world down for a few months, but in the end no real damage.
How about getting a book and re-typing it, then punishing yourself for mistakes.
.5 % error rate.
Perhaps a hot ember on the back of your hand if you have more then a
If you surpass 1%, you might as well just off yourself, as you are too stupid to stay here with the rest of us and simply wasting MY air.
Its quite common for satisfied customers to quietly go on about their business, leaving the nuts cases that are unhappy to complain and grab the press.
They are still nut cases, and are still wrong.
No, more like the scum under the pot..
Let me rephrase my original comment " your entire existence is not relevant, not just your incorrect and useless comment"
Other posts? Well, if they don't agree with me they are just as worthless. Only my opinion has any merit. And anyone that doesn't agree should be wiped from the face of the earth as they have no value to me.
Most people that complain are ones that are trying to download large files and expect it to be like some other unsafe p2p setup.
For what it was designed for ( mostly text pages with a splash of graphics ) it works.. Is it fast? No of course not.. But if you stick to the fundamentals its not *that* slow either..
Strange how others don't seem to have those problems. Is it perfect? No, of course not. But its not as you claim it is.
But go ahead and complain, no one really cares as your 'review' has no relevance.
Only a browser interface? There is an 'application port', and there are applications written for it. ( such as frost )
Java bloat? No worse then other languages that try to be *universal*. Besides, don't like java? Then recode it in something else and quit bitching.
Slow? Depends on what you are doing. Are you trying to download files? Well it really wasn't designed for that. And there will be a tradeoff on speed/anonymity.
Searches? Umm there are several search engines available if you look.
Sure, you can download them. Its when you share that it pisses off the *IAA's.
This is heading the route of StarWars.. Milk them for all you can.
Oh, and dont forget your donation to the MPAA when you go see these things.
Once the orginal code was released. Too bad. Use it as you feel.
That is the price you pay for letting people see your code. Quit whining like little babies.
Sure. mod me down.
Got a link? That sort of stuff needs to be spread ..
While it wont get around using a 'compromised' machine, on a safe machine using freenet would let you post ( and read ) safely.
I assume that once they 'piece together' these bad things, they go out and shut down the sites where the 'pieces' are, in the name of 'safety' ?
You don't think they will just lay down and admit defeat do you?
They will fight as long as people continue to fund them by buying their garbage at the stores. ( or they win total control over all content and violators are executed on suspicion )
I thought it went off the air 2 years ago when it sucked so bad..
Even when hes wrong he makes money, so hes right in the long run.
Id rather have direct control over my files.
Come on, you have to be kidding.
If you release code for people to see, they do what they want. If you dont know that upfront then you are a moron.
I dont acknowledge copyright. In any form.
Do i care? No. I dont honor the GPL or any other claim of 'copyright'.
I do as i please. Pretty simple.
its still not *proven* until it goes to court. Until then its just people *accepting* it.
Personally I don't accept any restrictions. If I see code, its mine to do with as I please. Don't want me to do that? Then don't let me see the code.
I tend to agree, who has been sued and lost ?
Several have settled at the threat of suit.. but who has actually gone and lost ( or won ).
Much as the RIAA P2P user suits. its all a bunch of hot air to get one to settle. Once it gets to court, all the air wil be let out.
Use the code. its been released.. if the writers dont like the virual nature of GPL that *forces* them to show the world and take the risk, then dont cry when someone uses it.
Sure.. mod me down since i said bad things about the GPL. you cant supress the truth forever.
Lets just say that your tax dollars paid for it..