Slashdot Mirror


Enterprise Finale Airing Tonight

Tycoon Guy writes "Be sure to tune in to UPN tonight, where they're going to show the 'true finale' of Enterprise with the episode Terra Prime, followed by the post-season coda, These Are The Voyages. The latter will feature appearances by Troi, Riker, and a completely CGI Enterprise-D."

571 comments

  1. Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterprise by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been a long time devotee of ST:TNG. I, like many others, never got involved with Enterprise. And from what I hear, that's a shame, as by all accounts, the show has really become much better toward the end. I do admit I had very high hopes to begin with, but found it stilted and uninteresting during the first four episodes and gave up. But I know I won't be alone watching the finale just to get a glimpse of "new" ST:TNG cast action and the familiar Enterprise-D, no matter how brief.

    This will be the first time in almost two decades that a first-run Star Trek hasn't been on TV...the end of an era. Here's hoping that the Star Trek franchise can be revived at some point, even better.

  2. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goodbye Enterprise... We'll miss you...

    1. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent down as troll!

  3. A shame by Heliologue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Poor Scott Bakula. He was so brilliant on Quantum Leap, but Enterprise just sort of floundered in the shadow of its predecessors.

    1. Re:A shame by Tx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hated Quantum Leap, and found Bakula very annoying in it, and I have to say he actually exceeded my expectations in Enterprise.

      I have yet to understand why anyone ever liked Quantum Leap - it was like an entire season of trek where every single episode was a holodeck piece.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:A shame by Heliologue · · Score: 4, Informative

      Expansive setting, fresh characters, enjoyable protagonist. Much the same reasons I enjoy MacGyver, as well.

    3. Re:A shame by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      actually it floundered due to poor scheduling, even most sci-fi geeks aren't home friday night at 8pm, which is why Firefly was cancelled as well.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    4. Re:A shame by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      You can tell when a network wants to kill a show stone-dead while trying not to be flaming obvious about it. They exile to Friday night (and preempt and bounce it around even there), then after a bit, they complain about the ratings drop and kill the show.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:A shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn did you get modded unfairly, Quantum Leap geeks I guess are worse than the Mac geeks when in possession of mod points! :) By the way I agree with you, but posting as AC incase my karma goes the same direction as Enterprise's ratings.

    6. Re:A shame by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

      As evidence, I humbly submit: Firefly. Or B5, which the station relegated to 5pm on a wednesday and pre-empted it with *golf*.

    7. Re:A shame by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      There was a period in Toronto when the channel B5 was on at the time moved it to 1 AM. Even that wasn't enough, so they started adding random(60) minutes to the start time to make it rough even for people that taped it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:A shame by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

      I remember that, it's why I learned to program my VCR. :P

  4. Sounds like a real winner by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Meanwhile, far in the future, Troi suggests that Riker use a Holodeck recreation of this moment in 'Star Trek' history to search for some command insights."

    Who's the creative genium behind that one?

    1. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Troi wanted command insights from me, she needn't turn on the Holodeck, laddie.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    2. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > "Meanwhile, far in the future, Troi suggests that Riker use a Holodeck recreation of this moment in 'Star Trek' history to search for some command insights."
      >
      > Who's the creative genium behind that one?

      Data: The creative "genium", as you put it, appears to be the source of the problem.
      Troi: Yes, Data. And I'm getting a senation of bad scriptwriting and an utter lack of focus, Captain.
      Picard: Worf, target all weapons on the temporal rift and fire!
      Riker: Berman and Braga will finally get thier just desserts.
      Worf: I couldn't agree more. Firing.
      Wesley: I'm not touching this thread with a ten-foot warp nacelle. If our weapons can hit them the 20th century, Paramount's lawyers can damn well hit us.

    3. Re:Sounds like a real winner by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 1

      senation?

    4. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Genium?
      Senation?
      O.K., Now we've got the names, Captain Genium of the Starship Senation. That's half a pilot right there, right? We can still pull Star Trek out of its slump, can't we? I mean 18 years and ... Ahw Nutz!

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:Sounds like a real winner by VGR · · Score: 1

      I heard Wesley's lines got cut at the last minute.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go away.
    6. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Meanwhile, far in the future, Troi suggests that Riker use a Holodeck recreation of this moment in 'Star Trek' history to search for some command insights."

      Who's the creative genium behind that one?


      Reginald Barclay. Duh!

    7. Re:Sounds like a real winner by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were Googleplexing for a good pr0n program and got Enterprise by mistake.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, we all discover it was another Quantum Leap... wait, Newhart already did that ...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    9. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      And I heard he is playing himself (a homeless guy) on CSI.

    10. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put that back in your pants, dickface. That bitch is like 80 years old now.

    11. Re:Sounds like a real winner by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      +2 funny, +2 insightful!
      Oh, I guess CleverNickName doesn't have any mod points today. He must be too busy working on his new book, "I am not Wesley", soon to be followed by "No, I'm still not Wesley, go fuck yourself Nimoy!"

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  5. It would be nice to see Barclay also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Since it appears that this will be the episode where we find out that "Enterprise" is actually a holo-recreation, it would be nice to have Lt. Barclay in there also since he was always doing fun holodeck stuff.
    It's a shame that Archer, Trip, T'Pol...are actually all holo-characters just like Moriarty

    1. Re:It would be nice to see Barclay also... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Bob Newhard already did that one, so don't count the idea as original.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:It would be nice to see Barclay also... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      And Dallas and Family Guy. So "not being original" shouldn't be an issue.

    3. Re:It would be nice to see Barclay also... by heymr.wilson · · Score: 1

      When are they going to bring back Mot the Barber or the Traveler!!?? I'll be sure to have this on in the background whilist I dispatch of the Orcish horde...

      --
      --"They say time is the fire in which we burn"
    4. Re:It would be nice to see Barclay also... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Dallas only made one season a dream, and I didn't see what Family Guy did. Newhart made the entire show into a dream.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  6. I think I'll make an exception by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    and watch Enterprise for the first time.

    1. Re:I think I'll make an exception by computerme · · Score: 1

      me too.

      But you can bet the farm I'll still tivo thru that inane theme song. ;)

    2. Re:I think I'll make an exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see your farm, and raise you two bales of hay, three cows and a tractor.

    3. Re:I think I'll make an exception by denidoom · · Score: 1

      There just seems to be this thought that anything Diane Warren writes is the best thing. The Enterprise theme is very awful. However, a few eprisodes they did the Alternate (dark/evil/badong) Universe and the them was awesome. So many things improved with the final episodes it makes me resentful - were they holding out?

      --
      Lane Myer: I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it.
  7. Well I'm glad for one thing by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least this show will get a proper ending and avoid the Farscape treatment.

    1. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      Wait.... you mean Archer doesn't get split into a million pieces at the end of the show, only to have every piece eaten by a gross helium-farting alien and then revived from his vomit in a special mini-series?

      Tsk.

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    2. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      You missed the Peacekeeper Wars? I'm sorry to hear that.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    3. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by Nevita · · Score: 1
      At least this show will get a proper ending

      That's a laugh. This is Berman and Braga's work at its finest (and I use that term as loosely as is possible): a lame concept that does nothing to advance the Star Trek universe. Shades of the evil, time-travelling, Nazi aliens from the Season 3 finale, anyone?

      --
      Wise men learn more from fools than fools learn from the wise.
    4. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Not at all. By "treatment" I meant the necessity of untold numbers of fans having to spend untold amounts of time and dollars to get the show a proper ending.

    5. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      Not at all. By "treatment" I meant the necessity of untold numbers of fans having to spend untold amounts of time and dollars to get the show a proper ending.

      Yes, well, don't be so sure. Jolene Blalock (T'Pol) called the series finale appalling. Being that it was written by Brannon & Braga, I'm sure it will at least live up to my expectations, if not exceed them. Yes, I'll Tivo it anyway.

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    6. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately while I agree with you, Season 4 has been a vast improvment since B&B decided they didn't want to helm it.

      The episodes this season have also been much truer to the original concept that Enterprise was supposed to engender. The Xindi Destruction of Earth and Temporal Cold War plots were wrapped up and jettisoned out the nearest airlock. This season has been about the building of the Federation, and exploring the universe of Trek with fresh eyes, and I would recomend it fr fans of the original series.

      Also unfortuantely, B&B killed the audiance before they left so that this season has probably been viewerless.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    7. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call the PK wars a proper ending to Farscape. There were still a number of loose threads that needed to be tied up, like the relationship between the Sebaceans, the Skaarans, and Earth all having a common origin, or what Earth ended up doing with the advanced technology Crichton left them, and other less important things.

      The PK wars also squandered way too much of its time in fire fights, but alas, much of Farscape's TV run did. They should have spent less time touting guns (at least on screen) and more time tying up loose ends. You can't cram season 5 into one mini series.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    8. Re:Well I'm glad for one thing by abb3w · · Score: 1
      There were still a number of loose threads that needed to be tied up, like the relationship between the Sebaceans, the Skaarans, and Earth all having a common origin,

      The common Sebacean/Terran origin was covered by the nice peacemaker aliens noting they found an obscure species from far off with no connection to local conflicts suitable muscle after some modifications. So far as I know, Skaarans don't share a common origin; IIR, they only interbreed with Sebaceans with genetic engineering assistance, and the common flower may be a terran export dating to the peacemaker visit to that area.

      or what Earth ended up doing with the advanced technology Crichton left them,

      Um... what technology? They got to peek at some of the toys for a while, and maybe a few thousand doses of translator microbes left behind. The technological impact won't be even as big as the Grays' toys from Roswell. =)

      The main tech package he left for them was a tape recorder with detailed instructions... at Tranquility Base . Assuming a history that (evidently) closely parallels ours, it will take a minimum of five years and probably closer to ten before they can get back to the moon. The main impact for at least the next decade or so would be cultural... but I doubt they will reunite the two qiblah prior to lunar or Legrangian colonization... and probably not until they reach Mars.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  8. Been long enough... by llamaguy · · Score: 1

    Fun while it lasted. Now let's go remember the better days of the franchise. So anyone up for taking down some more old enterprises (pun 100% intended) that have gone on for far too long as well? The prequels to Star Wars should never have been.

    --
    HAH! I just wasted a second of your life making you read this, but I wasted a minute of mine thinking it up. DAMN.
    1. Re:Been long enough... by brianconnolly · · Score: 1

      along the same lines, i think some people just need to give it up and realize that nothing (nothing!) will run forever. franchises sour over time and star trek long ago missed its opportunity to retire gracefully ala bill waterson or gary larson. there is, however, still hope. just let gene's show die. let gene's franchise go away and leave the memories of TNG and Voyager (the two decent post-original series in the franchise).

    2. Re:Been long enough... by KrancHammer · · Score: 1

      Its purely your opinion against mine, of course, but I would have said TNG and DS9 as the two decent non-TOS series.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    3. Re:Been long enough... by portwojc · · Score: 1

      The prequels to Star Wars should never have been.

      What is it with Star Trek fans and Star Wars?

      Envy maybe? Smaller amounts of material and a huge fan base.

    4. Re:Been long enough... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Except is he saying that the "prequels...should never have been" as a Star Trek fan, or as a Star Wars fan?

      Works either way.

    5. Re:Been long enough... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Let's see. Even if the SW prequels weren't exactly the height of good story telling, they still made truckloads of money, and it looks like the last one is going to be no different.

      On the other hand we have Trek, which has been failing creatively ever since DS9 ended, has had its viewership erode to the point where UPN is pulling the plug. SW still generates major publicity, and still makes gigatons of money. ST is a tired old nag that has been so badly mismanaged that the final two series are loathed by most Trek fans.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Ah...that explains it. by KipCas · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was wondering why all of our evening shift IT guys called in sick.

    --
    Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
    1. Re:Ah...that explains it. by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, we knew it wasn't because they all had dates. The improbability of that would require a Hitchhiker's Guide event, and not a Star Trek one.

    2. Re:Ah...that explains it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent post up please!
      That was funny!

      I know I am a Coward,
      an Anonymous Coward at that. (isn't that redundent?)

    3. Re:Ah...that explains it. by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 4, Funny
      I was wondering why all of our evening shift IT guys called in sick.

      Maybe that's the only time their moms were available to drop them off at the theater to see the new Star Wars movie. :-P

    4. Re:Ah...that explains it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's the only time their moms were available to drop them off at the theater to see the new Star Wars movie. :-P

      Nice joke.. If it just would work with a time replacement and the 13th will become the actual same day that the SWIII movie is open for public (which is the 19th just in case you missed it) :)

    5. Re:Ah...that explains it. by KipCas · · Score: 1

      Hah, I just read the response to the "parents" post. You pissed of a Star Wars geek dude. That was funny stuff. I bet his clever retort is already on his Star Wars blog. I have to clean the Mountain Dew off of my monitor now.

      --
      Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
    6. Re:Ah...that explains it. by KipCas · · Score: 1

      Make that "moms dropping them off" post. I couldnt think clearly as I was still laughing at the guy I pictured in full Star Wars regalia feverishly typing a response to that post. Hah, oh god I'm gonna pee myself.

      --
      Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
    7. Re:Ah...that explains it. by dlZ · · Score: 1

      No, they have to get on line for it!

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  10. Torrent already available! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yay, public TV sharing! It's hosted over at-

    +++
    NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Torrent already available! by angrist · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny, but I'll only watch the finale if I can torrent it. There is NO WAY that I'm going to set through ads for black sitcoms on UPN. Thats why I stopped watching the network a season or 3 into Voyager.

    2. Re:Torrent already available! by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

      It may be a bit of a coincidence, but the timing of those BitTorrent sites being sued seems to have been judged to perfection by the RIAA, just in time to piss off the tech-savvy Enterprise fans by deprieving them of the finale...

    3. Re:Torrent already available! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you can tune in UPN. In my corner of the midwest market, the affiliate seems to think poeple perfer Everyone(body?) Loves Raymond. Eeww.

  11. Ziggy? Have I leaped yet? by djbesser · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Finally.....it's all over. go to hell Scott Bakula http://www.unification-online.org/sf/IMG/jpg/bakul a_site_1.jpg

    --
    DJBeSSeR
  12. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Heliologue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sadly enough, I've gotten into loud arguments about whether Picard or Kirk was the better captain. It's a symptom of my horrible geekdom. For those of you wondering, by the way, it's Picard.

  13. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mentally, I never made it past the first episode. The Klingon in the cornfield was a touch much to stomache, and then when the electronics in Enterprise looked more sophisticated than in the Original Series, I just couldn't do it. I think trying to make a prequel to the Original Series, but having it tie into the later series whilst bypassing the Original, was a fundamental flaw. I really hope they don't try another Trek series until they have someone at the helm who truly understands what makes Trek great (hint: it ain't the technobabble).

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  14. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show, sucked. It wasn't science, it was fantasy with a large dose of PC thrown in. If they got some good science fiction writers and actually did -science- right, maybe all of the TNG series would have been worth watching, but I was disappointed by ever one.

  15. Now slashdotters can turn their attention to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...finding a date for Friday nights...buhahahahahaha, like that'll ever happen...

  16. It isn't fair by Bronz · · Score: 4, Funny


    Why do they have to cancel a fantastic show like this when there is so much drivel on television. This show was refreshing in its character depth and unique take on human colonization of space. I really enjoyed the sneak preview of the upcoming movie.

    Huh? Enterprise? Meh. I thought we were talking about Firefly. HEY! Maybe the last episode will be a daring holodeck thriller featuring 19th century villians! I hope Whoopie has a guest appearance.

    1. Re:It isn't fair by brianconnolly · · Score: 1

      that's the way of television (although enterprise is pretty crappy).

      it's the same reason arrested development will be cancelled as will the US version of the office. don't look forward to new episodes of those two shows next season.

    2. Re:It isn't fair by eyeye · · Score: 1

      LOL, you had me going then!

      That reminds me i've only just got my Firefly DVD, i'm going to have to set aside an evening and go for a firefly marathon. *rubs hands with glee*

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:It isn't fair by Script_God · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe it'll end up being what Family Guy went through. They get un-canceled some years later... But they won't be able to poke fun back at the network like they did...

    4. Re:It isn't fair by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Did you even see the re-premeire of Family Guy? The opening gag poked fun at the network!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  17. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by stinerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You must be joking.

    It was Sisko by a long shot. He wasn't afraid to disipline people that needed it.

  18. Please people, let the show die... by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Funny
    I really don't want to watch a repeated space fight with some soft porn ..

    Truthfully, they killed the show - almost. Let it die in peace

    The show sucked
    1. Re:Please people, let the show die... by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I dont like agreeing with you but you are right.

      Until they can get some decent writers Star Trek should have a break..

      The wooden acting, and terrible props didnt help either in the case of Enterprise.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    2. Re:Please people, let the show die... by seanerplay · · Score: 1

      "I really don't want to watch a repeated space fight with some soft porn .." Whoops, For a second I thought we were discussing Pornstar...er..Battlestar Galactica. It's amazing any of the characters have the energy to fly their Vipers during an episode...

  19. Let me guess.... by espergreen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sam leaps into the Enterprise D as Commander Riker and must save the relationship between him and Troi

    Oh wait..that was the good show with Scott Bakula :)

    1. Re:Let me guess.... by hal200 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, Riker will wake up, turn to Troi and say, "You won't believe it, but I just had the most amazing dream...". It will then pan out to the Enterprise-D and they'll roll the credits.

      Nielsen agents will be present in all major cities to measure the collective volume level of the ensuing screams for ratings purposes.

      --

      I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

    2. Re:Let me guess.... by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      A'la Newhart.

  20. You know, by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    You can learn a lot about a show by looking at it's time slot.

    This show is on Friday nights.

    That pretty much sums it up.

    1. Re:You know, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battlestar Galactica is on Friday nights.

    2. Re:You know, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can learn a lot about a show by looking at it's time slot.
      This show is on Friday nights.
      That pretty much sums it up.


      Yeah.. Which is why my VCR (yeah yeah, so I do not want to spend the money on a DVR) is recording SG1 and BS:G on Sci-fi instead, while I'm out having drinks with da ladies (read: sit in a corner and drool over a drink in a stripclub)

    3. Re:You know, by Cranst0n · · Score: 1

      So what does that Say about BattleStar Galactica? I think Battlestar is a fantastic show!

      --
      Just realise the reality of the situation..... There is no reality.
    4. Re:You know, by justinmikehunt · · Score: 0

      Wasn't X-Files on Friday nights for a long time? X-Files ruled.

  21. Hollo Troy more like! by essreenim · · Score: 0
    The latter will feature appearances by Troi, Riker, and a completely CGI Enterprise-D

    Deana must be gettin on a bit now. I'd rather see a CGI version of her with digitally enhanced breasts than the old one complete with Botox!!!

  22. Spoiler: "My work here is done" by rpcxdr · · Score: 5, Funny

    At the end of the episode, after he has resolved the problems facing "Enterprise", he will warp through time and space and reappear as George in Seinfeld and attempt to get the series started again. [Obligatory]

    1. Re:Spoiler: "My work here is done" by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will that be his final "leap home"?

    2. Re:Spoiler: "My work here is done" by Heliologue · · Score: 1

      Is Al going to start bursting through that holographic door of his?

    3. Re:Spoiler: "My work here is done" by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm trying to picture a Trek/Seinfeld hybrid... Jerry would start out with a monologue, like "You know what really annoys me about phasers?". They would have a "contest" and a Vulcan would win, since they can go for seven years at a time without sex. Kramer would have to be the engineer, since he was always trying out crazy schemes on the show. And after a transporter malfunction, George would complain that "there was shrinkage involved!"

    4. Re:Spoiler: "My work here is done" by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      Oh boy...

  23. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    Hey, can someone tape that for me here in France? We haven't even seen the first of the "New" Gerneration series yet...

    (cough) er, I think season #2 is on a cable station somewhere... it soitenly never made it to the main airwaves. Vive... euh...

    Vive "Le Balade des Etoiles" !

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  24. Yawn. by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    Who cares?

    1. Re:Yawn. by brianconnolly · · Score: 1

      well i believe the answer is obvious. not you. thank for your invaluable input on this. we're all better for it now that you've weighed in on the subject.

  25. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by airjrdn · · Score: 1

    Without a doubt. I may be too young (35) to appreciate Kirk, but IMO he's almost too sad for words as an actor IMO. I can't hardly stomach even commercials with him in them. In fact, I think the only thing I've watched in recent years including him was Miss Congeniality, and that's because Sandra Bullock was looking hot in it. ;)

  26. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We'll probably have to wait a while. Personally, I don't want to see more Star Trek until they get Tweedledee and Tweedledum out of the producers' chairs. They stood on the shoulders of a giant and made a mess of his vision. Perhaps bring in some of the authors of Star Trek novels? Several of those books are pretty good reads... As for a time period, I'm thinking maybe post-Voyager (but not too long after).

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  27. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by toddbu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm like you, but I gave up Star Trek after TNG. They all pretty much sucked after that, and even TNG had it's aweful moments. I had high hopes for Enterprise, especially with Scott Bakula who was great in Quantum Leap. But it degraded very quickly into the same old story lines as before.

    For real action, my choice of Sci-Fi is Stargate SG-1. With the exception of Season 7, it doesn't suffer from that "let's sit in a room and push buttons" syndrome that Star Trek has had problems with since the original movies. If I want to watch people explore then I really want to see them leave the room, and SG-1 is always shooting outdoors. (It's really funny how all the planets that they visit seem to look a lot like the Vancouver, B.C. area though.)

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  28. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Heliologue · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, but what other starship captain could pull off a flawless performance of King Lear. Jean-Luc Picard is so classy he makes King Louis look like Jim Bob the cable repair guy.

  29. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Funny
    and then when the electronics in Enterprise looked more sophisticated than in the Original Series


    I see where you're coming from. But still, to make the set of Enterprise look less sophisticated than the Original Series would require them drawing on the walls with crayons or perhaps using vacuum tubes.
  30. trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be pretty interesting. It's supposed to be the birth of the Federation.

    I don't know if anyone caught the Alternate universe one, but it was pretty good. Follows the crew of the Enterprise from the Mirror Mirror universe and the Terran Empire.

    The first scene is from Generations (the movie) the vulcans land and Zephrem walks up to them, the vulcan gives the "live long and prosper" line. Z tries to do the gesture and can't but instead of extending a handshake, he pulls out a shotgun and blows him away.

    1. Re:trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't "Generations" movie; it was "First Contact" movie.

      Actually a good ST:TNG movie...

  31. Boooring by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Maybe Slashdot can finally stop running stories about this bad television show. The title "Star Trek" does not automatically impart artistic quality. It's a bad, boring, cheesy, trite, poorly-written, poorly-acted, poorly-conceived piece of crap. That's why they cancelled it! How about some Stuff That Matters for once?

    According to Google, 15% of recent Slashdot stories have been about this eighth-rate television show. It's really pathetic.

  32. Old, old post from May 2001 by MisterP · · Score: 1

    Finally it's done!

    I've had this on my wall at work for 4 years!

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12163&cid=2295 18

  33. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sisko was cooler than either of them, but he not a starship captain. He was a base commander.

    Between Kirk and Picard: Kirk, obviously.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  34. Wow. by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    And your response was just as big a contribution to the conversation. Is being a hypocritical dumbass some sort of sick compulsion on /. or is it just you?

    1. Re:Wow. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      As was yours.

      So it must be a sick compulsion.

  35. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Heliologue · · Score: 1

    For 60s B sci-fi, he was probably a god. Nowadays, he's only popular because he's so awful. If it's Shatner, it's automatically funny.

    Anyone ever heard Spaced Out? Funnier than Has Been, even.

  36. Not quite by davmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the blurb about "These Are The Voyages" on Trek Nation, Brannon Braga says:

    "Some of the Enterprise cast members were very hurt that we would put Next Generation cast members on Enterprise."

    They should have been more hurt that Braga and Company gave them such drek to perform in.

    Maybe the next series or movie will be something actually *good*, instead of what ever rejected story line Paramount happened to have laying around the day someone said "Let's make a new Trek series!!!"

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Not quite by dpilot · · Score: 1

      The article I read indicated that Jolene Blalock was sickened by her lines for the last episode, "No wonder they're cancelling us."

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Not quite by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

      Largely it was the fact writers like Berman and Braga were left in charge so long, put simply, what creativity and imagination they had dried away completely by Voyager. As soon as they were succeeded by different writers the show became a show again, not some disgrace of a drama, packed to the gills with cliches and plot errors.

      Season Four proved that the concept of Enterprise was hugely workable, ideally the show would have been great from the very start and ran for seven seasons.

      The corporate need for team leaders and hierachy is to blame here, not show context or chronological period, any Trek fan who believes the 22nd century setting was to blame is nothing short of delusional.

      When Roddenberry said "Okay we're setting TNG in the late-24th Century, Kirk and Spock might not even appear as they'll be very elderly/deceased altogether", Trek fans left right and center rebelled against his judgement. Seven years of wonderful shows later, most were silent in awe.

    3. Re:Not quite by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Considering how she allowed her character to be turned into the ship's designated erection producer almost from the word go, I find that pretty funny. The only character I ended up actually thinking was any damn good was the doctor. The rest universally sucked.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Not quite by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      Dr. maccoy was there though :-)

      I still love that scene and remember how I felt when I watched the promo for the pilot.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:Not quite by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the depth of her character/dialog on SG-1 was so much deeper. Not to mention her acting kills. She fine to look at, but really, no much of an actor.

    6. Re:Not quite by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was more like one season of deja vu, and then six seasons of wonderful shows.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Not quite by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Ah, it was *her* fault, for taking the job with the paycheck. She should have held up film production, while she singlehandedly rewrote scripts to better develop her character and her lines. I'm sure Braga and Paramount would have had no problem with that.

      Or, do you resent her just because as a latent or not-so-latent homosexual male, you resented gratuitous displays of the female form?

      Tragically, the only actor that saved their reputation on that show (besides the Doctor) had to be Hoshii. Man, I hated her in every episode up to the Mirror Universe one.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  37. Saturday also... by canolecaptain · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those in New England, it will actually be airing in Saturday at 8pm instead of Friday since it's been replaced by baseball. What iritates me the most is that no mention of this is made on the UPN site - I simply stumbled upon it a couple of weeks ago.

    While I'll agree that the writing could have been better for most episodes, the shifting program times of this and other shows without mention is what drives me to stop watching the shows I like. The fastest way to kill viewership (besides bad content) is unannounced show shedule changes. And, "we told TV Guide" excuses don't cut it.

    I'm looking forward to these final episodes. While Enterprise has been a far cry from the quality of Battlestar Galactica, this last season has been better.

    1. Re:Saturday also... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      New England Geek: Man, the finale of Enterprise sucked. The Federation gave up so many runs, not even Captain Archer's line drive on bases loaded bottom of the 9th could have saved them.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Saturday also... by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those in New England, it will actually be airing in Saturday at 8pm instead of Friday since it's been replaced by baseball.

      The Red Sox are in Seattle tonight, and the Yankees are in Oakland. Both games will air at 10PM tonight, so Enterprise should be on schedule tonight. That's what TVguide online is showing anyways.

  38. Enterprise eventually learned by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what most Sci-Fi still hasn't. That is that writing and telling a good story is still the most important element. They've gotten it right this season, but it was too late to save it.

    Given the setting of this series, the logical place to start in the story was getting Earth established in the space of the era, meeting other species, forging alliances, making enemies, forming the beginnings of the Federation, etc. This is exactly what they've done this season and it's been brilliant. Had they started this way, the show would still be on the air.

    But no, for the first two seasons we had Andy Griffith in space (yes it really was THAT boring), and then they had to trot out such over the top monstrosities as a war through time and huge insect aliens that wanted to annihilate earth. It didn't help that they broke continuity a lot with the other series (introducing the Borg, etc.). This is not the Trek that the fans came for and many of them left, never to return. Unfortunate but it reinforces one of the basic requirements of any fictional narrative that many people still don't grasp. If the story isn't compelling it won't be a success. Given the past success of Trek, you can't just slap the name on any piece of work and expect that alone to carry you.

    1. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      They've gotten it right this season, but it was too late to save it.

      Several people have said they "got it right this season" but PLEASE explain to me the two Terra Prime episodes and WTF they were for? (ok, other than to see the girl's middrifts). Seriously, what in god's name are those episodes for? Filler?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      What's wrong stories about huge insect aliens that want to destroy the Earth?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by Robotron23 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I agree with your points, but its important we be clear that the "They" of Seasons 1 - 3 and the "They" of Season 4 were completely and utterly different (the team of writers was changed around completely as you likely know). The problem with most writers is that they eventually run out of creative talent and we end up with episodes like those in Season's 1-3, but as we saw with Berman/Braga a lot of writers don't want to let go of their franchise and move on, as it means quitting their jobs basically.

      With Brannon Braga, we saw his tendency to producing Time/Time Travel related episodes reach a new low, whereas he used to deliver excellent material (like TNG's Paralels) he was soon totally out of ideas, which is why Season 1/2 had all that Suliban/Daniels bullshit, cheesy cliches and the whole mysterious aspect that accompanies true Star Trek diminished completely.

      But in all, Season 4 was so much better, it was apparant the writing staff knew of the cancellation prior to the announcement in February, as they were trying to fit so many things into just a few scores of episodes! That said, in a few years we'll have a fresh, new Trek hopefully set around the turn of the 25th century.

    4. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

      (ok, other than to see the girl's middrifts)

      Hmm... Maybe I have been missing something by not watching this show.

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    5. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I could have substituted "learned" for "decided to fire all their writers".

    6. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      fwiw, i totally didn't get that either... the acronyme comes to mind... wtf?

    7. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by Foolomon · · Score: 1
      Given the past success of Trek, you can't just slap the name on any piece of work and expect that alone to carry you.

      Why not? This strategy has worked rather well for Microsoft in the past.

    8. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by Deinhard · · Score: 1
      "for the first two seasons we had Andy Griffith in space"
      I, for one, would welcome a series with this premise. Set it in the near future, a US Marshal on the Moon or Mars, raising a son and dealing with local situations. Take away the slapstick comedy and you'd have a winner.

      Oh, wait...that's Outland.
      --
      Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
    9. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What's wrong stories about huge insect aliens that want to destroy the Earth?

      He never watched Babylon 5, so he's got no idea how well that idea can work when done properly.

    10. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by superultra · · Score: 1

      Enterprise eventually learned what most Sci-Fi still hasn't.

      What sci-fi have you not been watching the last ten years?

      DS9 was very story-driven, and was probably inspired by the heavily storied Babylon 5. Since then we've had science fiction like Space: Above and Beyond, and more recently the brilliant Firefly and Battlestar Galactica. All these shows are heads and tales above what Enterprise has ever accomplished, even this late in the game.

    11. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by TXGB324 · · Score: 1
      "DS9 was very story-driven, and was probably inspired by the heavily storied Babylon 5."

      If by "inspired by" you mean "ripped off from" then yes. You must remember than in the early days when JMS was shopping around the idea for B5, he brought it to Paramount. They read over all the information he had, including character lists, pre-production art, and the outline of the 5 year story, then said "No, we're not intersted." Six months later, they hold a press conference and anounce their plan for a new Star Trek series, this time based on a space station!

      To this day, I still don't know why JMS never sued them for whatever he could get. It was very obvious to anyone that was following the birth of B5 back in the Compuserve days what had happened. And to anyone that compares the stories as they played out.

    12. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Yes. You list several good shows. But B5, Firefly and the new Battlestar Galactica are the cream of the crop. The "most Sci-Fi" he likely refers to are shows like Mutant X, Vampire High, Lost in Space, Buck Rogers (season one and season two, virtually different series), the original Battlestar Galactica, V: the Series, Cleopatria 2525, Roswell, Phil of the Future, Knight Rider, Airwolf, War of the Worlds and others. Check your Tivo under "Science Fiction" and then think about how many can be considered to have good stories, especially in later shows when any initial good ideas were used up.

      The fact that you watch well written shows does not mean that all the SciFi on television is well written; it just means you don't watch the badly written shows.

      (Oh, and don't reply "But I liked -insert show here-"... I liked War of the Worlds, but the later episodes were terrible. I enjoy Buck Rogers, but fully recognize the writing is drek. Enjoying a show does not mean it is well written with good storylines).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    13. Re:Enterprise eventually learned by unitron · · Score: 1
      "...for the first two seasons we had Andy Griffith in space..."

      Andy Griffith in space was "Salvage 1", but I think it only ran one season.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  39. Except in Phoenix by BattyMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where it'll be preempted for basketball.

    DOH! I spoke too soon - it'll be delayed two hours and aired at 9PM.
    Wow, the season finale must be _important_ - usually they just go with Malcolm
    at its usual 9PM and delay Enterprise until 2AM Saturday!

    You never can tell when or if Enterprise will be on. No wonder it got poor ratings - we can't find it even if we try.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  40. Re:Now slashdotters can turn their attention to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...finding a date for Friday nights...buhahahahahaha, like that'll ever happen...

    Tonight is not a problem.

    "My place... dinner at 7, Enterprise at 8 and 9, Berry White and wine 10 till dawn."

  41. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really hope they don't try another Trek series until they have someone at the helm who truly understands what makes Trek great

    This last season has been very good. Manny Coto has been running it, not the Killer-B's. He has shown that he cares about original Trek. We've dealt with the nasty attitude of the Vulcans, the Klingon ridges, the initial steps of starting the Federation, dealing with Tellarite/Andorian/Vulcan hostility. Plus, of course, the killer "entire episode, including opening credits, is Mirror Universe" two-parter.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  42. Hrm. by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    The title "Star Trek" does not automatically impart artistic quality

    Actually, it seems to do just the oppisite and automatically impart the lack of artistic quality.

  43. Queue up slashdotters to bash Enterprise by eviloverlordx · · Score: 1

    Well, not this one. I'm terribly disappointed that Enterprise is ending tonight. The last two seasons were great, and the first two were better than any other Trek series' first two seasons, except for TOS. The last few episodes have been quite enjoyable, especially the 'Mirror Universe' eps. Mmmm...Empress Sato. At least Paramount did the right thing by releasing the DVDs sooner rather than later.

    --
    'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
    1. Re:Queue up slashdotters to bash Enterprise by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      Mmmm...Empress Sato.

      Amen!

  44. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 1

    Well to be fair, they faced a tough choice: Making the controls look less "sophisticated" than the one in the original series would mean making them look outdated by what we have in reality right now. If the bridge of the Enterprise looked like the set of the 1930s Frankenstein, nobody would be able to swallow it.

    A better way to go would be to simply make the Enterprise in prequel look relatively cool, and explain the NCC-1701 from TOS by claiming that there was a "retro" fad in starship design at the time it was built.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  45. de rigueur by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


    "It's dead, Jim."

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:de rigueur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be throwing it into a volcano?

      Oh wait, that is the only death befitting of virgins, not a Star Trek series...

    2. Re:de rigueur by daeley · · Score: 1

      "It's dead, Jim."

      Surely you meant to say de rigor? As in mortis? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:de rigueur by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be de RIGOR?

      Bemopolis

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    4. Re:de rigueur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Damn it Jim, I'm a doctor not a network executive... there's nothing more I can do."

  46. Anyone see this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're sending a valentine to all of Star Trek" - Braga

    Yeah, it reads, "Up yours."

  47. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But he DID hold a Captain's rank.

    Picard: Accomplished Shakesprean Actor
    Sisko: Threatened, or performed, violent action on omnipotent superdimensional beings regularly.

    Winner: Sisko, because he clangs when he walks.

  48. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can pull off playing King Lear, sure, but for some reason most of his post-Trek career consists of playing gay men in art-house movies.

    Picard negotiated with female aliens. Kirk either killed them or banged them (or both).

    Advantage: Kirk.

  49. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Wybaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By the end of DS9, Sisko did achieve the rank of Captain, so I think that qualifies him for consideration. Besides, he did something Jean-Luc never did: he punched Q and put him on the ground. Picard did yell at Q, maybe he even grabbed him by the uniform and pushed him against a bulkhead (I don't remember) but he never actually struck Q.

    --
    Y|
  50. It's been a good run by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1

    I must say, since the first mission at Farpoint station (TNG) to this upcoming final episode, it has been a great run for the franchise. It will be missed.

    All good things...

    Oh well... what do you think is going to happen to Boomer now that she popped some caps in Cmdr. Adama?!?! :-)

    1. Re:It's been a good run by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      So...you don't count the original series? It seems like it should be some sort of backhanded insult of the original series, but I don't get it. Explain yourself.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    2. Re:It's been a good run by QuijiboIsAWord · · Score: 0

      I'd like to say thank you for ruining apparent story points for those of us who haven't seen anything but the pilot yet.

      --
      -Hmm...I got a G+ invite, better remember to remove the request from my sig...-
    3. Re:It's been a good run by 2sheds · · Score: 1

      He's talking about the current, unbroken 18 year run from TNG through DS9, Voyager and Enterprise. Read Braga's comments on the 'these are the voyages' link.

      --

      Absit Invidia
    4. Re:It's been a good run by Mike+Markley · · Score: 1

      Haha, dude. I've seen it, but c'mon... spoiler alert? I've got several friends who didn't wanna jump into it mid-season and waited for the repeats to start...

    5. Re:It's been a good run by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1

      Exactly... I was speaking of the franchise. I don't feel that TOS was a franchise as it was cancelled in less than 3 years. It was a failure initially. Only after it went into re-run nirvana did it become pop culture which then in turn became the franchise that we know of it today.

      Now don't get me wrong here. I love TOS and without it we wouldn't be where we are today. I'm just speaking about the last 20 years or so... geez... it's actually almost been that long! WOW!

  51. Saturday only final episode - not the Wrapup by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    So you should see two entries for Friday night - the first is the final episode. The second is the wrapup.

    The wrapup isn't showing on Saturday.

    Good luck!

    --
    Will in Seattle
  52. Rubs his hands with glee? by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is Glee codeword for vaseline?

  53. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by OglinTatas · · Score: 4, Funny

    I agree that Picard was a better captain than Kirk, but there is a lot about star trek that bugged me, not the least of which was that Capt. Jelicho and Cmdr. Data were better captains than either of them. (Riker complained to Jelicho he was being too hard on the crew. HELLO! You were at war, Riker! It's not Jelicho's fault Picard never ran battle readiness drills.) Data was the victim of starfleet's basic pro-human bias. (Ever wonder why starfleet was topheavy with humans instead of the much longer lived vulcans?) It really galled me when Troi was promoted over Data. I wasn't even aware that she was an officer, I thought she was a civilian contractor (but she donned a uniform in later shows).

    And another thing, Troi sure was hot, but God, I hated the way she abused Worf. "A Klingon does NOT [do X]!" "Well, I'm not a Klingon, but I know I would feel [feeling Y] if I were confronted with [situation Z] [and I think you damn well better change your behavior and act more like me by doing X even though I'm not a Klingon, or I will make a recommendation to Capt. Picard to include this "deficiency" in your officer's fitness report]." Which invariably concludes with Worf changing his behaviour to be more like a human-betazoid hybrid than the Klingon he is.

    Sorry about that. Thanks for letting me vent my hyper-critical warp core.

  54. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by dpilot · · Score: 1

    How... Dare... You.... Criticize... His... Acting... Ability!!!

    OTOH, it was surprising to see him in the original, "Judgement at Nuremberg."

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  55. Enterprise reached its stride too late by stlhawkeye · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I never saw seasons 1-2. But from reading show synopses from TV Tome it sounded awful to me.

    I did see a few episodes involving a terrorist attack on Vulcan, and I liked what I saw. However, it wasn't compelling enough to pick it up and try to get into it. I liked the scene where they were playing basketball on the ship, it really connected "us" with "them".

    I might check out the coda.

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    1. Re:Enterprise reached its stride too late by Robotron23 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I strongly suggest checking out the recent Mirror Universe episodes, as these represent some of the strongest points of all Season four. Also theres a rather amusing episode regarding Archer receiving some Orion slave girls (from the orig. series), and lots more.

      There isn't much in the way of crap in Season 4, the only truly bad episodes were Storm Front pt. 1 & 2, but then that was when the new writing team were trying to dig the series out of the hole B&B had dug so...

      All in all this season was fantastic, and no doubt a lot of seasoned Trekkies will be getting this season alone on DVD and putting 1,2 and 3 out of their minds, myself included. :)

      Oh and regards the basketball scene, it did hark back to those holodeck fantasys or Data with his cat/on Ten Forward, again a great addition to the show.

    2. Re:Enterprise reached its stride too late by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the recommendations, when time permits I'll go back and check it out. I still haven't seen any of Voyager yet. :)

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  56. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
    ...arguments about whether Picard or Kirk was the better captain.

    More important is who was the hottest eye candy female (of whatever species) crewmember?

  57. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by JWW · · Score: 1

    but hes not a starship captain.

    Except when hes on the Defiant....

    Of course the Defiant was just an attempt to keep up with Babylon 5 and their White Stars.

    Of course in the same vien Captain Sheridan blows ANY Star Trek captain out of the water.

  58. Like the old days... by Robotron23 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Although Enterprise has been a downright awesome show this last season, even ressurecting some of the philosophical and mysterious tendancies that made TNG so great and bringing in some elements linking with the original Trek (and not just those Orion slave girls ;) ), we will certainly be dissapointed with "These are the voyages" for the obvious reasons...

    However, season 4 proved a fantastic point for a lot of Trekkies out there; that with enough good, fresh writers a show can improve again. As soon as Berman and Braga were hastily ushered out (after THREE seasons of the most gut-wrenching awful Trek we fans have ever been subjected to) the show became a heck of a lot better.

    Since Star Trek has a timeless nature and a huge fanbase we can always count on new, fresh and innovative fans coming forward as writers with some brilliant material...and who knows? In a few years we might have another TNG that even the most cynical fans can enjoy...if not, well theres always re-runs. :)

    1. Re:Like the old days... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      (and not just those Orion slave girls ;) ITYM Orion slaver girls...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  59. TOS vs Enterprise electronics by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kind of like seeing the "progress" between Asimov's original Foundation Trilogy and the 500-years-later new Foundation novels mirror the 40-50 years progress in our world between the writing.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  60. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    BTW, the Cannes festival just kicked off this week: Any chance of my catching it there? : )

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  61. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he DID hold a Captain's rank.

    Eventually. He was not a captain when the series started, and was never given command of a full-size starship.

    Kirk made it as high as admiral.

    Damn, I'm such a nerd...

  62. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by damsa · · Score: 1

    Professor X is gay. I guess that explains alot.

  63. That argument is universal by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Sadly enough, I've gotten into loud arguments about whether Picard or Kirk was the better captain.

    I'm with you on that one. Back when I was a young infantry officer in the Army, the three other lieutenants in my company and I used to get together at our CO's house to watch the latest Next Generation episode.

    We would get into blistering arguments about the leadership styles of Picard and Kirk. Two of the guys came down in favor of Kirk, and three of us (including our boss, the CO), though Picard was a better leader. We actually had extensive discussions about it, comparing their actions on various episodes to examples from the Army's leadership manuals, books we'd read about leadership, and our own real-world examples.

    A few months after these regular Trek sessions started, we were deployed to a rather remote part of Somalia. The CO asked his wife to record and send episodes, even though being a light infantry company we deployed with no real luxury items. Sure enough, several weeks after arriving in Somalia, we received a tape with two episodes. By then a heavy engineer unit had colocated with us, and we were able to phinagle a couple of hours on their TV late one night between patrols.

    Strange though it may sound, that night spent watching Trek with a generator humming loudly outside in the hot Somali air was one of the best cinematic experiences of my life.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:That argument is universal by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

      Its also quite accurate that a lot of "serious" Trekkies are greatly in favour of Picard. Why? Well his steadfast, obedient, and intellectual nature seems to appeal to a lot of dedicated Trekkers.

      Kirk for most was a less serious take on Trek, in that he basically slept with an alien chick every third episode, and battled for the rest! :)

      What a lot of dedicated fans have to realize is that TOS is a series of pure fun and games, that is why Kirk is slightly better, and always will be to the casual and well rounded Trek fan.

    2. Re:That argument is universal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha!! holy shit, I could just picture your rotund figure smacking away at the keys with your sausage fingers while mouthing the words around granola spittle.

    3. Re:That argument is universal by Tiger4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the truth is in between. Kirk was the better tactician, but Picard was the better overall leader. I got the impression Picard really did know what was happening, or should have been happening, on his ship and he could make executive decision based on that. Kirk was the kind of guy that was good in a crisis and could quickly figure his way out of individual problems, but set himself up for another crisis down the road.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    4. Re:That argument is universal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You evoke a vivid image. Kudos. I bet you're 100% on target, too.

    5. Re:That argument is universal by Mr+SaLTy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your comment reminds me of Project Misty. Billed as 'Cult and SF TV for the Troops' Its an effort to send MST3k and other scifi videos and DVD's to troops overseas. Very cool idea. http://www.projectmisty.com/

    6. Re:That argument is universal by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      Picard is definitely the better leader. A true soldier-statesman in the classic sense.

      "The society that separates it scholars from its Soldiers will have cowards doing its thinking and fools doing its fighting"
      --William Francis Butler

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    7. Re:That argument is universal by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      So you're trying to say that Picard was the better strategist. Was that the word you're looking for?

      It's kind of ironic that Kirk, not Picard, was eventually made an Admiral, since Picard was better suited for it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:That argument is universal by SoLO · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the cool story

    9. Re:That argument is universal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your opinion of who was the better captain was based on ARMY leadership manuals? The ones that say its OK to kill innocent bystanders? Or to kill POW's and wounded? Or rape POW's? Or rape female service members?

      I think you could likely find a better standard than the US military, in fact I doubt you could find a worse standard.


      Do I hear a piece of Euro-shit in the background? Why yes, I did.. or maybe it was just a Canuck.

      Either way, it must suck being sans gonads, as you are.
    10. Re:That argument is universal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirk did things like challenge God to fist fights and stuff, though. It's hard NOT to promote someone when their captain's log entries continually read like that.

    11. Re:That argument is universal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Was that the word you're looking for?"

      No, I was going to say manager, but I know that is considered a dirty word around here. I didn't get masterful leadership vibes from him, but Picard was clearly in strong command of the resources available to him and he knew how to use them.

      Picard was only an OK strategist, certainly better than Kirk, but we never really saw enough of his results to know if things consistently worked out better for him than Kirk's attempts, though it seems obvious they would have.

      Yes there is a difference between being a good manager and being a good leader. Part of that is the charaismatic aspect of a personality. A good manager knows what to do and does it. Intellectually that is fine, but it may be lacking at the emotional "gut" level. A good leader can convince (or inspire) the troops that the course of action is correct, even when faced with contradictory or non-existent evidence. People MAY follow a good manager, but they'll be doubting him all the way, even to assured victory. People WILL follow a good leader, and be shocked when his plans fall to defeat, even when it should have been obvious from the first.

      Ideally you get both in the same package and the problem never arises.

    12. Re:That argument is universal by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      "Was that the word you're looking for?"

      No, I was going to say manager, but I know that is considered a dirty word around here. I didn't get masterful leadership vibes from him, but he was clearly in strong command of the resources available to him.

      Picard was only an OK strategist, certainly better than Kirk, but we never really saw enough of his results to know if things consistently worked out better for him than Kirk's attempts, though it seems obvious they would have.

      Yes there is a difference between being a good manager and being a good leader. Part of that is the charaismatic aspect of a personality. A good manager knows what to do and does it. Intellectually that is fine, but it may be lacking at the emotional "gut" level. A good leader can convince (or inspire) the troops that the course of action is correct, even when faced with contradictory or non-existent evidence. People MAY follow a good manager, but they'll be doubting him all the way, even to assured victory. People WILL follow a good leader, and be shocked when his plans fall to defeat, even when it should have been obvious from the first.

      Ideally you get both in the same package and the problem never arises.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    13. Re:That argument is universal by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      Mainly, it isn't fair to compare them: 2 main reasons:

      Its been said they when the recreated Trek, for Nextgen they split qualities of old characters into New ones, SPOCK... non-human, examines the human condition critically, and incredible mental powers -> Data, but cultural aspect and mindmold becomes Troi. The Captain is split as well, with Riker being most like Kirk personality wise ( luck w/ the ladies, young, etc ) but the authority of Kirk is ( of course) Picard ... this way they avoid just duping Kirk... but they still get, in way, to keep Kirk, basically they can do some of the same stuff they did with Kirk, but with Riker instead... I believe for most of the early seasons, dramatically, Riker is in the Kirk role, as he is the center were everyone goes, the focus, so what I'm saying is drama-wise, Riker was, basically Kirk, forget his rank, think of in terms, of who has a scene with whom, who says what to whom -- It's Riker confronting Q at first, Riker shouting at heavens at some apparently all-powerful, supernatural being, and the character of Picard at the time was incredibly stiff. As far as, the butting heads with Authority aspect of Kirk, an example of which can be found, in any original episode containing a 'Commodore', well obiviously, has appeal to anti-authoritarian demographic, was part of Kirk's appeal , that's in Worf, but largely he represses it.

      The other reason it isn't really fair to compare, it you need to compare to also compare across time periods. Rodenberry's vision of the StarTrek and the Federation meant to analog a U.S. naval ship in the early U.S. history. Sorry but at the time of Tripoli there was no army, only Navy and Marines, so to compare Kirk to anything modern is just foul. How many times would Kirk have to act, because it would take days to communicate to Starfleet Command? I recently read _Savage_Wars_of_Peace, and how Kirk acts is very similiar to how some actual naval captains acted. Basically, a naval captain had a lot more authority at the time, acting kind of like regent for the excutive,kind of like part of the state-department almost, they were expected to act to preserve U.S. interests, and again, the communication problem is the reason... If there was an emerging crisis, and you expected them to wait for orders, well they might as well have stayed in port, since they'd have to send themselves back to report, and get the order, then comes back. By Picards time, he can talk real-time with Star Fleet Command, with video , Kirk couldn't, most of the time It would 10 minutes of show time to get a response back... Also, it seems like there federation space seems more stable, and federation space has grown since from Kirks time. Kirk spent half his time helping out human colonist who clearly came from human worlds, his helping them, is kind of like the Marines saving Americans abroad, Picard is on a more diplomatic mission, mostly encountering people whose species did not orginate from Earth.

      The incredible breath-through techwise of subspace communications was never explained between them has never been really explained, I mean Kirk's Enterprise could do about a sustained warp 6 before thing started to fall apart, and
      Picard's ship warp 8.5 or so., yet Kirk had to wait days at time to contact Star Fleet, yet Picard always has real-time
      communications available...

    14. Re:That argument is universal by jadel · · Score: 1
      It's kind of ironic that Kirk, not Picard, was eventually made an Admiral, since Picard was better suited for it.
      Only to get himself busted back down to captain for being a reckless fool.
      The only reason they didn't kick him out completely was because he was a successful reckless fool.
    15. Re:That argument is universal by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Strange though it may sound, that night spent watching Trek with a generator humming loudly outside in the hot Somali air was one of the best cinematic experiences of my life.

      What episodes was it? :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    16. Re:That argument is universal by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Years since I watched TNG, but didn't Picard turn down a promotion to the Admiralty?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    17. Re:That argument is universal by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Probably. The difference is that unlike Kirk, he would have actually been good at it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  64. So they could only afford Troi then? by jonbusby · · Score: 0

    So they could only afford Troi and Riker then. Better luck next time. Maybe the Nazis or will make an appearence.

  65. Google stats... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    oooh... do the goole stats for SCO stories.... Never get enough of those!!! And why is their stock still above $3???? Later.... off to keep my vow to stop drinking so much Coke... gonna get me a Dr. Pepper instead.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  66. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words:

    Professor Xavier.

    Advantage Picard.

  67. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Defiant was Warf's ship. Sisko took control a few times, but his command was the DS9 base (which the Defiant was assigned to), not the Defiant itself, which was not even a full-size starship of the Enterprise's class.

    IIRC, Warf was the offical commander of the Defiant.

  68. Another Star Trek please by readin · · Score: 1

    I hope they don't use the poor ratings of this show as an excuse not to do anymore Star Trek series. The name still has selling power, at least enough to get people to give a new show a try. But they should have learned from DS9 and Voyager that while the name can get people to watch a couple episodes, writing is what really keeps them watching week after week. If they need a more recent example of that they should look at Battlestar Galactica.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    1. Re:Another Star Trek please by jhoger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Huh? The writing on DS-9 was fantastic. But yeah, Voyager was 100% cheese.

      Enterprise was always decent and in the last season, really good.

      Most of the comments on Enterprise stories on /. are just ads for BSG which while very good is not Star Trek, period. So it is no more relevant in the context of ST than Star Wars, or bloody Firefly or Buffy, etc.

      My personal opinion is that it wasn't the writers that killed Enterprise, but too many of the actual fans gave up on it too early. Come on-- TNG totally sucked when it first started, but picked up as it went on. DS-9 was the only series to really get off to a running start. Watch the first few episodes -- these guys knew their characters, and the writers in general knew where they were going.

      -- John.

    2. Re:Another Star Trek please by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The writers on that show actually planned out what would happen through an entire season before shooting the first episode, that let it develop the big stories it needed.

    3. Re:Another Star Trek please by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My personal opinion is that it wasn't the writers that killed Enterprise, but too many of the actual fans gave up on it too early. Come on-- TNG totally sucked when it first started, but picked up as it went on.

      The critical difference was that there hadn't been a Star Trek TV show since 1968, so the fans were far more willing to forgive the TNG cast and writers. Enterprise came something like thirteen or fourteen seasons into Star Trek series, and on the heals of the crap that was Voyager. Fans were expecting improvement, not idiotic temporal war crapola. They were hoping to see the foundation of the Federation, not soft porn. There was no room for forgiveness or patience this time.

      DS-9 was the only series to really get off to a running start. Watch the first few episodes -- these guys knew their characters, and the writers in general knew where they were going.

      I didn't see it at all. I thought the actors were for the most part mediocre, the characters rather wooden, and while things did loosen up slightly, all in all, it was just the same sort of schtick we'd seen with Voyager; uninspired drivel. After they brought the Borg back and totally smashed any notion of continuity, I stopped watching it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Another Star Trek please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > too many of the actual fans gave up on it too early.

      May want to look up the word fan. It really doesn't fit in the context you've tried to use it.

      Anyways, I *have* watched nearly every episode. And from the second episode on, I have thought, or even said out load, "it can't be worse than last weeks." And every week, I am pleasantly surprised.

    5. Re:Another Star Trek please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyways, I *have* watched nearly every episode. And from the second episode on, I have thought, or even said out load, "it can't be worse than last weeks." And every week, I am pleasantly surprised.

      Say it, Brother!

      I've been a Star Trek fan for decades; I own complete DVD sets of three of the series, and all the movies except the first. I know my shit, ST-wise.

      And I can say, without reservation, that Enterprise is bad. I record each episode when it comes on, and sometimes don't get around to watching it for weeks, because it's just not that compelling.

      The grandparent poster seems to think that "actual fans" are responsible for the series' failure. I'd say that the series was just that bad, and deserved to die earlier.

    6. Re:Another Star Trek please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also helped to have their hands held in the first few episodes by bringing about actors from The Next Generation into the fold and the main TNG characters taking part in the first episode to set precedents that are correct and accurate.

      The first episodes of Voyager were good, with all the Starfleet-Maquis tension, but soon everyone loved each other and it became sociology in space, I agree.

      -Steve

    7. Re:Another Star Trek please by istewart · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The first season or so of TNG did pretty much suck, yes. But there had not been any Star Trek on television for almost 20 years, just a new movie every 2 or 3 years. Most people were willing to give it the benefit of the doubt.

      I remember the first two seasons of DS9 being really boring, as well. Maybe I need to go back and watch them again, but the show really hit its stride when they finally discovered the Dominion.

      Voyager is where we start to see signs of desparation on the part of the writers. There was indisputably a lot of wasted potential there. In my opinion, they should have played up conflict between the Maquis and Starfleet crew members. On top of that, once they realized that most of their new Delta Quadrant villains (Kazon, Viidians, couple of other lame one-offs) weren't compelling at all, they brought in the Borg. Ultimately a logical choice, since it was alluded to earlier that the Borg came from that area of space. But then they completely destroyed the whole mystique of the Borg since there's no way a single Starfleet ship could possibly beat the Collective (as they had been portrayed up to that point) on their home turf. On top of that, they insult the viewer by ending the series with a shot of Voyager returning to Earth but not showing the characters' actual homecoming. The only two characters I liked were Tuvok and the Doctor, but people had developed an empathy for the cast. Kinda lame that they missed the whole point of the show there at the end.

      So Voyager was mostly bungled. Then we learn that the same production and writing team is doing a prequel series. My first thought was, "Oh my God they're ripping off Lucas," but the concept could be awesome if done right. So I tune into the first episode. By the time it's half-over, I've lost interest. Call me ADD, but the characters just weren't interesting and the plotline of the first episode was practically another TNG/Voyager "alien of the week" rehash. The crew didn't have the diversity and interesting backgrounds of DS9 or even Voyager. There just wasn't that much there to explore.

      I tuned in a couple more times, especially when there was an episode with a gimmick that was supposed to get me interested again. The Xindi thing was pretty convoluted, especially the last episode with Archer's action-hero antics and alien space Nazis. Plus the terrorism allegory was really heavy-handed. The writers got that Trek thrives when it relates to the present day, but they didn't understand that the allegories totally fall apart when they're force-fed to you.

      I also watched the Borg episode and almost laughed at how they tried to cram it into continuity. I watched the first two Brent Spiner episodes and almost cried because almost nobody on the guest cast (and even the main cast) except him gave a convincing performance. In the end, I think the best episode of the series was "In a Mirror, Darkly," because it frees them from either trying to fit in with what's come before or doing damage control for their own mistakes.

      I don't know if the last sentence in your comment is referencing DS9 or Enterprise, but I have to say that considering the muddle of the Temporal Cold War and the sudden shift to another storyline, the writers DID NOT know where they were going, and thus the actors had no idea what to do with their characters. A sad, miserable waste of potential (hey, just like another prequel series that's also ending this month!).

    8. Re:Another Star Trek please by jhoger · · Score: 1

      As if it weren't obvious, I meant Star Trek fans, not Enterprise fans.

    9. Re:Another Star Trek please by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Voyager is where we start to see signs of desparation on the part of the writers. There was indisputably a lot of wasted potential there. In my opinion, they should have played up conflict between the Maquis and Starfleet crew members.

      Have you seen Ronald D. Moore's thoughts on the matter? He says that he would have done with Voyager what he's doing with Battlestar Galactica, plotwise--deal with the harsh realities of being stranded in space, and all the sundry materials shortages that entails--and make it an epic fight to survive and find their way to Earth.

      Plus the terrorism allegory was really heavy-handed. The writers got that Trek thrives when it relates to the present day, but they didn't understand that the allegories totally fall apart when they're force-fed to you.

      Hardly an original mistake--"Let That Be Your Last Battlefield"?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  69. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by mapmaker · · Score: 5, Funny
    And another thing, Troi sure was hot, but God, I hated the way she abused Worf. "A Klingon does NOT [do X]!" "Well, I'm not a Klingon, but I know I would feel [feeling Y] if I were confronted with [situation Z] [and I think you damn well better change your behavior and act more like me by doing X even though I'm not a Klingon, or I will make a recommendation to Capt. Picard to include this "deficiency" in your officer's fitness report]." Which invariably concludes with Worf changing his behaviour to be more like a human-betazoid hybrid than the Klingon he is.

    Replace "Klingon" with "man", and "human-betazoid hybrid" with "woman" in the above statement, and you've got a stereotypical heterosexual relationship.

  70. You're right. by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here I go again!

    1. Re:You're right. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Bravo on taking it in the humor it was intended with. :)

  71. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah. Three more words:

    T. J. Hooker

    Advantage Kirk.

  72. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    True, but rank isn't everything.

    "I may hold the rank of Captain, but I ne'er wanted ta be anything but an engineer"

  73. Don't Panic! by David+Horn · · Score: 1

    Nooo....

    BTefnet appears to have broken. Now how am I going to watch it tomorrow morning?

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:Don't Panic! by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Btefnet is not broken they got sued along with all the other good bittorrent sites this week by the MPAA. So it got shut down.

      Damn means I'm actually going to have to dig up the tv guide and record the shows instead of just downloading them. :(

    2. Re:Don't Panic! by Gulthek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know you're fishing, so here:

      Torrent Spy. Still the only torrent site worth visiting in my book.

    3. Re:Don't Panic! by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      not broken - shut down. They were sued and are now history. It was in an earlier articel about the MPAA crackdown (or maybe that was on Evilavatar) - at the very bottom of the article they listed which sites had been shut down - and btefnet was one of them.

  74. Here's An Idea by RedElf · · Score: 1

    Lets make yet another Star Trek series, The Next Universe.

    Hey its a new universe, that means at least 20-30 more years of new episodes, right?

    --
    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
  75. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


    You're all wrong.

    The best captain, hands down, was Captain Pike .

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  76. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, can someone tape that for me here in France? We haven't even seen the first of the "New" Gerneration series yet...

    I have one word for you...

    bittorrent

    You're welcome. Every ST series, every year, every episode is out there.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  77. Production Dynasties by Marillion · · Score: 1
    I like trying to draw parallels between Star Trek and Doctor Who. With Doctor Who, there was one producer running the show for a long time, John Nathan Turner. I'm sure he's a fine producer, but anyone who runs a show that long is going to get into a rut. That staleness also carries into the creative team (writers, effects, costumes, ... yada) In the Star Trek franchise, you've got Brandon Braga, who's been running the Trek universe for a long time.

    I'm of the opinion that one team can't sustain the level of creativity that fans expect for more than a decade. I think the good folks at Stargate are going to the facing this Real Soon Now.

    BBC shelved Doctor Who for a few years, assembeled a fresh team with new ideas of what the programme should be and they've got a show that by all accounts is a hit. Sure there are critics who deride the show or certian aspects of it, but on the whole, it's a hit.

    Paramount should learn that lesson. Let Trek rest for a while. Diversify the old Trek production team into other projects. Then, after a few years, create a fresh team with all new people and lookout!

    --
    This is a boring sig
    1. Re:Production Dynasties by CrackedButter · · Score: 1


      I dunno, they have had 8 seasons so far which was good and season 9 is supposed to have a different dynamic, they are changing a lot of things because Richard Dean Anderson isn't on the show anymore. They also closed some big story arcs with season 8. Thats good news because you are not rehashing the same old bad guys either, there was only so far you could go with the replicators, they were that powerful, unlike with the Borg where they humanised them until they were the opposite of what they were at the start, mean, powerful and didn't compromise.
      I have high hopes for SG1, surprised that it is even still around. But also these same producers and creative types are in charge of SGA and its already a lot better in some respects. You can tell they have looked at what they do in SG1 and streamlined it for SGA. The Chevron countdown for one, there isn't one, that helps with pacing and gets the characters where they need to be. But also the puddle jumpers replace the MALP. Allthough it is little things, it shows that they mean to improve. There are also more 2nd tier characters in SGA, providing more flexibilty.
      Another bonus is that story lines can be linked with each show and like I mentioned in the first paragraph, big story arcs were closed but in turn it opened up new ones which helps to keep everything fresh. It again helps that big changes were made with characters, being replaced for new ones. So far I know of 4 new resident characters for season 9 of SG1. Thats a lot for a show and none of trek did that, normally it would be one character.
      Just watching the DVD extra content gives the impression that the folks who run the STARGATE franchise care more about what they are doing, with the characters, the techno babble, the humour and what episodes do for an audience.

    2. Re:Production Dynasties by Marillion · · Score: 1
      Good points.

      I still think they face the problem of stagnation. How they face the problem is important. If they can continue to adapt and innovate then there's all kinds of life left in the series.

      Perhaps another thing, is that the SG series is not from a "Big Studio" and perhaps has less intervention that might stiffle the creative process.

      I really hope that Stargate can continue to innovate. Two more months til season 9!

      --
      This is a boring sig
    3. Re:Production Dynasties by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Yay! But I do hope this isn't one of those seasons where things do change but then they get cancelled, it would be nice if they carried it on for more than 1 more season, if everybody involved wants to carry on and the ratings are good enough then why not? The problem is, characters will come and go over a long period of time.

  78. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by OglinTatas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As groundbreaking as the original series was, it was still based on '60s concepts of how the future would look. Even the later series, which did a great job trying to keep continuity with the original, had a few huge problems to overcome. One of the best episodes ever, DS9's reprise of "Trouble With Tribbles" had to contend with the fact that the original Klingons looked more like Ming the Merciless than they looked like "modern Klingons" with the riged forehead and larger muscles. There was no way to reconcile that, so they just had Warf say "We Klingons do not talk about it." How could Enterprise possibly make technology that looked more advanced than ours, but less advanced than the original? (Maybe they could have it look like current military technology, which already looks pretty high tech--HUD's and virtual controls on a multifunction touch screen--you know, like they used in later star treks, but more "today looking" so it naturally looks less advanced.)

    btw, I never watched Enterprise, I was already tired of the Star Trek universe by then (a few episodes of STV did that for me) but I hear that some of the actresses were pretty hot.

  79. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All hail the alpha Nerd!

  80. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    No rank isn't everything. Sisko is also a god.

  81. After it became Voyager... by twl1973 · · Score: 1

    I gave up on it.

    I was pulled back by what people were saying about the Mirror Universe episodes so I watched those but after Enterprise started heading off into an unknown part of space I turned it off.

    Did they actually have old Voyager scripts on the shelf that they had paid for before and wanted to use?

    Anyways, I'll watch the last episode just to see how it ends as most people will but too bad they ruined a series with some promise.

    1. Re:After it became Voyager... by NetSettler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I gave up on it. I was pulled back by what people were saying about the Mirror Universe episodes so I watched those but ...

      The Mirror universe was clever, but I wished they'd put as much energy into the rest of the series. It was a brilliant premise and they botched it from the start.

      The right use of the mirror episode would have been to pull a Dallas and just erase the entire series by admitting that all the preceding episodes were the mirror version. They could have a version of T'Pol enter and find herself horrified to see that there's a universe where she's just a sex object with emotions and pointy ears and not a regular crew member, a scientist, and a practicing emotionless vulcan. Then they wouldn't have to worry how they were going to link up all the temporal inconsistencies with the subsequent series either. We could have gone back with the good guys to our universe and lived happily ever after.

      What I liked about the original premise of the Enterprise series was the notion of putting some humor and adventure back into Star Trek. For as much as TNG was brilliant, it suffered in the end because it appears they had no more places where no man had gone before, and they turned inward to the mental. A lot of us think Space is about new starts, things that don't always work, a chance to rebuild and make up for past mistakes, etc. Here was a series where transporters didn't quite work, the universal translator wasn't debugged, people were not experienced diplomats, and there was a big chance of things going wrong, sometimes comedically and sometimes tragically.

      It was to be a show about real adventure and uncertainty, showing how hard it was surviving in Space before the invention of the red shirt for expendible crewmen. Maybe with characters that came and went on shorter timelines than the whole series, if that's even possible in modern television qua business. My generation grew up with Star Trek to teach us about optimism and hope for the future. Those are things people needed to get the Space program going. But recently, we panic in real life when the space program loses even one life. That's not realistic. We need Star Trek to be brave enough to teach us that good lives will be lost, and that this is acceptable. I think we are losing that sense, and insisting on a completely planned experience both in real life and on the show.

      Other than venue, the show has mostly just converged on the same old formula, made worse only by intensive pushes for a love story with T'Pol and the need to constantly be pushing to undress her, just as killed Lt. Yar's hope for being an equal. Yar's only really good episode was Yesterday's Enterprise, and it's probably not a coincidence that she had to be dead to do it. I grew up on the original series and loved its characters, but sad as it was, I really thought it a genius stroke to kill a main character in one of the movies (you know which one, but I'm trying not to spoil it). I thought "Yes! Finally we know they're playing for keeps. Now the uncertainty will be real..." This was to be a show about uncertainty, but it didn't deliver.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    2. Re:After it became Voyager... by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

      I myself gave up on Enterprise midway through Season 2, disgusted with the Suliban/Daniels arc. It took the sentiments of an old friend to lure me back into it at the end of Season 3, and what a treat it was too...

      Aside from a couple of stonkers (notably the first two episodes), Season 4 was an awesome piece of work that harked back to TOS/TNG a heck of a lot, the critique of the Mirror Universe episodes is largely from the elite core of fans who can't seem to realize that occansionally writers like to have fun, and feel a lot of fans will be able to have fun with them...sadly that concept is lost among some Trekkies.

      In short both Mirror Universe eps were fantastic, they had a sort of quality about them only classic Trek can retain, their well worth watching.

    3. Re:After it became Voyager... by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      Those are things people needed to get the Space program going. But recently, we panic in real life when the space program loses even one life. That's not realistic. We need Star Trek to be brave enough to teach us that good lives will be lost, and that this is acceptable. I think we are losing that sense, and insisting on a completely planned experience both in real life and on the show.
      I disagree. Lives will be lost, as with pretty much any venture into the unknown. However, this is not 'acceptable', merely inevitable.

    4. Re:After it became Voyager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I disagree. Lives will be lost, as with pretty much any venture into the unknown. However, this is not 'acceptable', merely inevitable.

      If you don't accept it , you stop doing it. If you're going to do space travel, you need to accept that there will be deaths.

    5. Re:After it became Voyager... by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

      They could have a version of T'Pol enter and find herself horrified to see that there's a universe where she's just a sex object with emotions and pointy ears and not a regular crew member, a scientist, and a practicing emotionless vulcan.

      Sooo... she wasn't a sex object already?

    6. Re:After it became Voyager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's innevitable, it better be acceptable. Otherwise, you just don't have your head screwed on straight, and are going to get it messed with, big-time.

      'Merely inevitable' is as stupid as anything I've heard all week. And it's Friday.

    7. Re:After it became Voyager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the interaction between T'Pol and Trip to be one of the most interesting aspects of the show. Unlike most SciFi which tend to be just high tech shoot 'em ups, Enterprise was addressing something really interesting: an ongoing emotional and intellectual relationship between two different sentient species.

    8. Re:After it became Voyager... by NetSettler · · Score: 1

      Well, if it were a real different species, of course, their problem would be inability to mate. So I don't think it's exploring that at all.

      But Star Trek has made a tradition of highlighting the condition of man by contrast with aliens. And sure, there were things about ourselves to learn here. But they were paid short shrift, and the thing we really got a lot of was overt sexuality, including "sharing her around" instead of focusing on a special thing between her and Trip. On some days I had to wonder if she actually had a preferred person, or if that person was Trip. The number of tender moments and legitimate emotions was too small, I thought. That's why I summed it up as "good setup, bad delivery". They could have done lots better with what they started with.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  82. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Jhan · · Score: 1

    [Mind plays tricks, coffee hits keyboard]

    The parents post looked like an attempt to put his own words to the Enterprise theme song...

    I've been a long time
    devotee of ST:TNG.
    I, like many others,
    ne'er got involved with Enterprise.
    And from what I hear, that's a shame,
    as by all accounts
    I've got faith!
    ...

    OK, so it wasn't that funny.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  83. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 1

    More important is who was the hottest eye candy female (of whatever species) crewmember?

    Yeoman Rand for t3h win!!!1!

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  84. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Foz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're kidding, right? That's a serious no-brainer.

    7 of 9. As if there's anyone else that even comes close.

    -- Gary F.

  85. MOD PARENT UP +5 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Replace "Klingon" with "man", and "human-betazoid hybrid" with "woman" in the above statement, and you've got a stereotypical heterosexual relationship.

    I don't have mod points, but I can try modding by proxy :P

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP +5 Funny by (nil) · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, it's really +5 insightful.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP +5 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But you're not!

      And what's with this Slow Down Cowboy shit. Is slashdot run by retarded elf-queers with leather fetishes. Why don't y'all go stick your dicks in toasters, ya hear!

  86. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny
    The best captain, hands down, was Captain Pike .

    *BEEP*
    *BEEP*

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  87. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Or you could just use a little suspension of disbelief and accept the sets as what they portrayed.

    Do you bitch about how unrealistic the sets are when you go see a play? Special-effects addled Americans think everything has to be hyperreallistic or its crap. All the sets need to do is give the viewer's imagination a prod in the right direction.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  88. UPN sabotaged Enterprise by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    From the get-go, UPN basically doomed Enterprise by running mid-season re-runs. That caused viewers to switch to other channels in the same time-slot. The veiwer gets involved in another TV show and never comes back. I can't think of a better way to deliberately sabotage your own ratings.

    As far as being preempted by sports, they have been doing similar stuff in the Wash DC area with our new baseball team pushing Enterprise to saturday (although thankfully my TV guide says this episode really will air tonight)

  89. I'll become a fan of the show by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    When I can watch the reruns on sci fi at 2 in the afternoon :)

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  90. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    ...and hey, who can forget him *cough* singing "Rocketman".

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  91. And yet... by AlltheCoolNamesGone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... we've been left with all the briliant reality tv shows....

    --
    M$ it's whats for diner!!!!!
    1. Re:And yet... by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      I took a mass comm class this semester and was dismayed to learn that to a TV station, it's not about what is best... it's about what gets the most eyeballs. "Smarter" shows like Enterprise are doomed from the start -- replacing it with mudwrestling hobos is always going to get more attention. A publicly owned corporation has a legal obligation to its shareholders to switch to the promise of more eyeballs. Sucks huh!

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I took a mass comm class this semester and was dismayed to learn that to a TV station, it's not about what is best... it's about what gets the most eyeballs.

      You're old enough to go to school and you didn't know that already?

  92. KillEnterpise Efforts have proven successful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The killenterprise.com efforts appear to have proven successful. They've been at the vanguard of a campaign to first encourage the cancellation of the show and then with a massive campaign to thank UPN/paramount for actually cancelling the show.

    Thank you KillEnterprise.com - Mission Accomplished.

    1. Re:KillEnterpise Efforts have proven successful by darthcamaro · · Score: 1

      obviously spelling not a strong point for these braniacs

  93. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

    which was not even a full-size starship of the Enterprise's class.

    No, but they hacked the ship to give it extra capabilities, like a cloaking device.

    And it was small & cute, like the Whitestar ships.

  94. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    To truly appreciate Shatner's "acting" you should see the old Outer Limits episode "Cold Hands, Warm Heart". It shows Shatner's pre-Kirk ham acting in all its glorious ignimony.

    Of course, I think the best thing Shatner ever did was a "book-on-tape" of the first chapter of Foundation and a somewhat obscure (to me at least) but nonetheless wonderful short story called "Mimsy Were the Borogoves".

    Nah, Patrick Stewart is definitely a much better actor with the guy who plays Sisco (can't remember his name, my geek card will now be temporarily suspended) at a good second place. Shatner only lives off of poking fun at his own campy style.

  95. Re:Now slashdotters can turn their attention to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My place... dinner at 7, Enterprise at 8 and 9, Berry White and wine 10 till dawn."

    It only counts as sex if someone else is participating. Otherwise, it's just masturbation, and frankly, we don't want to hear about your preparation. Yuck.

  96. Confirmation from the man himself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "booooop... ... booooop"

  97. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by brownpau · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Four more words:

    Denny Crane.

    Nansy Pansy.

  98. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T. J. Hooker is a minus, not a plus. Have you watched that crap?

  99. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 1

    IIRC, Sisko was captian of the Defiant, but I don't know if she qualified as a true starship. I always thought of Defiant as being Star Fleet's version of a PT boat -- small, heavily armed, and not really suitable for extended deployment.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  100. How do drive up the number of viewers... by jtseng · · Score: 1

    They can announce during commercial breaks they will show the trailer from SW:RotS.

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  101. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by vivin · · Score: 1

    I guess for Berman, Enterprise was his "baby". And what a terrible, terrible, ugly monster it was in the beginning. He was slowly moving away from Star Trek into "Star Trek, the Berman Way". DS9, was lukewarm until Piller got hold of it, and Berman turned his attention to Voyager. And Voyager has some REALLY terrible episodes that fuck with the canon. Remember "Transwarp"? OMG LOL!11!! Warp 10 si teh rox0rz!11!! I mean... WHAT THE FUCK?!

    Things wrong with Enterprise:

    a) Theme song. Ok, I know some of you like it. But the VERY first time I saw it, my initial gut reaction was "eww... why not an instrumental theme like the other Trek series"?

    b) Deliberate pandering to the young "omg i wanna screw teh hot chick in star trek lolololol" demographic. Jolene Blalock was used as a vulcan sex symbol instead of just a vulcan. Hell, if they were doing that, they could have shown more of Hoshi too... I thought she was way more sexy (as was evident in the mirror universe episodes). But anyway, this was stupid.

    c) Cheesy, stupid jokes and terrible lines. I remember one episode (can't remember) where Archer is so tired that he says something about T'Pol's "boobs". Yeah that's right... "hahahaha he said boobs! hahahahaha!". PLEASE GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK!

    d) Temporal cold war. 'Nuff said.

    e) The show turned into an action series. That's it. Trek was never meant to be JUST an action series. I mean, hell. I love the cool space ship battle scene as much as the next fan, but come on... just action? And then there's the moral clichees. That was tried in TOS, perfected in TNG (and then it got old). There were still things they could do in Enterprise as far as moral stuff goes. They did that in certain areas (like a nascent form of the Prime directive).

    Things right with enterprise:

    a) Almost anything post Manny Coto.

    The show had a LOT of potential. Instead of concentrating on a stupid arc like the Temporal Cold war, the entire series, or at least, most of it should have been about the formation of the federation. Seasons 3 and 4, IMHO were really good. I got turned off after the first few episodes, and I only watched seasons 1 and 2 after I saw a few episodes of season 3. Season 1 should have shown some normal episodes with the crew exploring the galaxy, season 2 should have been the Xindi attack and humanity realizing "you know what, the galaxy is a fucking terrible place! We need strength in numbers!" and season 3 starting an arc about the formation of the federation.

    I am sad to see Enterprise go in a way, because I kinda got into it during Season 3. Season 4 seems so hurried and I can see how much potential it has - especially with Coto at the helm.

    We need to get Dumb and Dumber out of the captain's chair. They only ruin Trek. /rant off.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  102. It's a shame... by PrettyBoy_75 · · Score: 1

    because season 4 has been a vast improvement over prior seasons and it seems as though the show is finally hitting it's stride. Trust me, I've suffered through seasons 1-2 and tolerated season 3. A new show runner (in Manny Coto) who cares about trek, has done wonders this season.

    1. Re:It's a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. If you look at NG you can see that it took a couple years for the writing to come together, and really shine.

      In some of the episodes you can see they were trying different directions. Remember when they found the ship from earth that had 3 people on board. I think they were banished to space for some reason. Maybe 1 of them was like a Bill Gates character. They all seemed to have some different supernatural powers. It seemed like it would have a recurrent theme like the appearence of Que, but instead they disappeared at the end of the episode to only never be seen again.

      With Enterprise, it seemed like it was taking forever to jell. 4 Seasons [imho] before the writing began to get good. Then it was beginning to really crank.

      But at the same time, I wasn't buying the Tucker - Vulcan or Vulcan drug addiction story line. This part really began to degrade the series.

      Porthos was overlooked to. Something could have been done to incorporate him in a story line.

      Sexuality in the series was severely overlooked until the last season, with the green skinned slave girls, and crew members in midrift baring uniforms. Don't forget Star Trek also gave us Seven of Nine!!!

      If this show had made it to 6 seasons, it probably would have rocked.

      Hope the SciFi Channel picks it up.

    2. Re:It's a shame... by GutBomb · · Score: 1
      Sexuality in the series was severely overlooked until the last season, with the green skinned slave girls, and crew members in midrift baring uniforms. Don't forget Star Trek also gave us Seven of Nine!!!


      are you kidding? how many episodes were there semi-nude de-con chamber scenes? or workout scenes, or t'pol's catsuit. if there was one thing this show had, was unnecessary and forced sexuality.
  103. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

    Sisko was a commander, not a captain for the majority of Deep Space Nine, in the view of us Trek fanatics, he doesn't qualify! :)

  104. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by MaxRahder · · Score: 2, Funny

    I prefer to call her "10 of 10".

  105. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    ...thank you. Never thought to look for it until I hard it was over...

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  106. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    And I would agree with you- but only to a certain extent. Props and sets also need to be internally consistent with themselves. They can be whatever you want them to be, but once your decision is made, you need to stick with it. If you have an already established environment, which the Trek universe surely is, than the various pieces of that universe should be internally consistant with each other. When they are not- then there's a problem.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  107. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always looked at it thusly, to say who was the better captain goes like this - "If I had to choose which captain? If I was serving on the ship - I'll take Picard, if I had a choice which captain I'd be? Kirk - all the way...."

    As for the series final of "enterpoop"?

    Waiter? I'll take a pitcher of Pan galactic gargle blasters and a funnel..

    and make that two lemons on the brick please...

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  108. Yeah, except by sveskemus · · Score: 1

    I'm in Europe, you insensitive clod!

    (Oh well, I wouldn't watch the damn thing anyways...)

  109. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    ...haha "heard"

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  110. I would be happy if... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    all they ever show was the decontam shower scene on endless loop....

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  111. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by th3space · · Score: 1

    It..was..Kahn, damnit.

    --
    "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  112. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    T'Pau. Jeri Ryan is made of plastic. Jolene Blalock might not be.

  113. Obligatory Futurama quote: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    Zapp: "Do you understand the charges?"
    Kif: "One beep for yes, two beeps for no."
    FRY: *beep*
    Zapp: "Yes, so noted. Do you plead guilty?"
    Fry: *beep* *beep*
    Zapp: "Double-yes. Guilty!"
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  114. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

    38 of D works best for me.

  115. slashdoted by nazsco · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Be sure to tune in to UPN tonight

    as usual, no mirrors mentioned. tsk tsk tsk

  116. Are you forgetting something? by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

    The show Lost maybe? The best damn show evah, one that blows enterprise out of the water and makes it scream "You sunk my battleship!"

    1. Re:Are you forgetting something? by AlltheCoolNamesGone · · Score: 1

      No I wasn't mentioning that show, hell I haven't even seeing it, but what I was referring too is such greats as: Fear Factor Real World ad nausum Cheaters Chaotic "The life of Britney Spears" Any of the Dating Shows The one with Nicole Richie and Paris Hilton I hate Reality TV.... I know that selling to the lowest possible denominator is a fact of business but that doesn't mean I have to like it... Kind of makes me wish that we could buy shows on a pay per view/subscription basis. I want to watch/pay for what I like, not what the masses deem fit for consumption....

      --
      M$ it's whats for diner!!!!!
  117. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You'vd got to be kidding. Jadzia Dax has it all over 7 of 9.

    IMHO Terry Ferrel is way hotter than Jeri Ryan. But then, I prefer exotic natural beauties over silicone-enhanced bleach-blonde barbie dolls.

    Besides, Jeri Ryan is a prude.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  118. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
    That would be why making a prequel was inherently flawed- you just can't get around and through the huge disparaity between the two. The choice taken (at least in reagrds to the first few episodes I saw) was to simply ignore TOS. In doing so, however, they lost track of what made Trek good- that it was SciFi mirroring who we were.

    So, instead of mucking about with timelines and throwing around pseudoscientifically sounding technobabble, why not mack a show based upon our reality now. There are numerous ways of doing this, many of which would be far more promising than a prequel. The electronics being better, therefore, weren't the problem so much as a symptom.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  119. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

    Not that it really matter, but its T'Pal not T'Pau. And yeah, shes definatly the best looking eye candy ive seen in the startrek franchise.

  120. In the Toronto universe .. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    (where everyone wears a tuque eh?) CITY-57 is showing Terra Prime at 8pm, the holowrap at 9pm, and the Borg episode at 10pm.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  121. Re: Shatner's "acting"--Incubus + Devil's Rain by Paul+Freedman · · Score: 1

    Curious bystanders might consider purchasing the newly released DVD of the 1965 film "Incubus," not only starring Shatner but featuring Esparanto dialogue--Shatner's work with Ernest Borgnine in "The Devils Rain" (1975) covers satanic shenanigans in tumbleweed country and has been shown in TV--the earlier film is more obscure: "Shot in black and white around Big Sur, California, the story is about a nobleman who becomes enticed by a Succubus and lured towards evil only to later incur the wrath of the male Incubus when he fails to give his soul to the lost dark side." (http://www.kaos2000.net/archives/film/incubus/)

  122. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    So which ones did do porn?

  123. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Captain Sheridan is indeed still the supreme commander to me. Politics, diplomacy, internal strife, war design, battle strategy, and in-the-heat-of-the-moment battle tactics. He could do it all. Man, I have to get Babylon 5 on DVD.

    Ranking the captains by their displayed ability:

    Sheridan > Sisko > Sinclair > Picard > Kirk

  124. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    "Sing" is the wrong term. It was more of a bad rap.

  125. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by operagost · · Score: 1

    Sisko was played by Avery Brooks.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  126. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by zrk · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I agree, but just to point out, I'm not voting with my brain :)

  127. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    yeah, T'Pau is some one-hit wonder from the 80's, my bad.

    That V-GER herald chick from TMP was pretty hot too, at least from the hairline down.

  128. Picard is better = +5 Funny by glrotate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's for sure. Picard was a geriatric weener.
    Kirk is J.T. Fucking Kirk. Unless you're a homo or a retard there's no way you could think Picard's better.

    1. Re:Picard is better = +5 Funny by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Funny
      Bah...

      You just didn't like him because he was French. Like all the times he would order his favorite French beverage, "Tea, Earl Grey, Hot," in that snooty French accent.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    2. Re:Picard is better = +5 Funny by Azrael+Newtype · · Score: 1

      Earl Grey was a Briton, and his tea is therefore British. And delicious.

      I know little of this humor of which you speak. Tell me more.

      --
      I'm always right and I can prove it, because to the best of my knowledge, I've never been wrong.
  129. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by angrist · · Score: 1

    They could have gone with a cramped submarine type look. Tight corridors with pipes and valves and such, tiny bunks, etc.

  130. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by idontgno · · Score: 1
    Replace "Klingon" with "man", and "human-betazoid hybrid" with "woman" in the above statement, and you've got a stereotypical heterosexual relationship.

    If, by "stereotypical", you mean "dead-on 100% absolutely accurate".

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  131. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Foz · · Score: 1

    I gotta admit, Jadzia is pretty hot... and that lesbian kiss thing she did on DS9 with her "former wife" (well, the wife of one of her symbiants former hosts) was uhm... yeah. Whew. Anyway.

    Maybe I mispoke about 7 of 9. But then again, maybe Jadzia and 7 of 9, together on the observation deck with a tub of crisco, some jumper cables and the mandatory hot grits... ok, back to work, geez, not gonna get anything done today.

    -- Gary F.

  132. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
    TNG took a season or two before it really got cooking, but the secret there was that it had been the better part of twenty years since the original series, so audiences were significantly more forgiving. Beyond that, it was still a series very heavily influenced by Roddenberry, and I've come to the opinion that Roddenberry, despite his many faults, was really the only one who could do it right.

    DS9 was tolerable, mainly because the characters were sufficiently interesting that they could cover up for some of the flaws creeping into Trek. Voyager and Enterprise had all that was bad about DS9, and none of the Roddenberry idealism that had made TOS and TNG, even during the weaker moments. Worse, the characters were just plain unappealing and uninspired. They were both trainwrecks, but the whole franchise might have been saved if they had decided to put things on hiatus after the dismal final episode of Voyager. Instead the soldiered on and found a means, even with a not-too-bad idea, to utterly wipe Trek out. They through any notion of canonicity out the window, such as making Vulcans virtually unrecognizable. Now the future of the whole franchise is in serious doubt.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  133. Enterprise eventually learned-Good SciFi costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "what most Sci-Fi still hasn't. That is that writing and telling a good story is still the most important element. They've gotten it right this season, but it was too late to save it."

    Good SciFi costs to live up to the grandiosity in our heads. Epic space battle? Costs. Scenic planets with complete and consistent cultures? Costs. Uniquelly alien species? Costs. Yes we know about B5. That cost too. Are potential audiances willing to take the same risks as studios to bankroll something that only shows up on a teaser reel?

  134. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 1
    Denise Crosby (Tasha Yar) posed nude for Playboy; IIRC, that pictorial resurfacing was the reason she was asked to leave the show. Marina Sirtis had a brief topless scene in some forgetable Charles Bronson B movie.

    AFIK, the only Star Trek actress who actually did full-on porn was Angelique Pettyjohn, who played Shahna in the TOS episode The Gamesters of Triskelion. She did several adult films under the names Angel St. John and Heaven St. John.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  135. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    Do you bitch about how unrealistic the sets are when you go see a play? Special-effects addled Americans think everything has to be hyperreallistic or its crap.

    Not all of us. I for one think rolling rubbish bins are SCARY.

    EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!

  136. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'vd got to be kidding. Jadzia Dax has it all over 7 of 9.

    That's a man, baby!

  137. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
    Jeri Ryan is made of plastic.

    The Borg meant to augment her with silicon but accidentally used silicone.

  138. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by baadger · · Score: 1

    Shame! Feeel ashamed! all of you! shaaaame, I hope these actresses never read of your cold heartless disprespectful opinions...

    besides it's quite obviously Major Kira Nerys. Fools. :-P

  139. I guess I'll chime in... by NardofDoom · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I didn't like Enterprise. Suprise, suprise, right?

    Here's what I didn't like about it: There's all this really amazing stuff going on at Earth. Humans have just learned they're not alone. They've just received technology that basically makes economics impotent, as well as technology that allows them to spread throughout the galaxy.

    What do they do? Go far, far away from Earth! Nobody cares about politics or other stuff. There's a species with three genders we've never heard of! There's a temporal cold war! How about making contact with the Romulans? Nobody wants to watch things about how people deal with life-changing events.

    The last season has really picked up. The idea of Terra Prime is excellent. If they had run with this idea from the beginning, maybe they'd have a seven year run like TNG.

    Obligatory: Berman and Braga killed it.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:I guess I'll chime in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that in the Enterprise timeline, humans haven't "just" learned they aren't alone; that happened about 90 years earlier.

      Also, Vulcans weren't forthcoming with the technological side of things; as far as I understand the Trek universe, between first contact with the Vulcans and the beginning of Enterprise, humans have gradually eliminated poverty and disease, mostly on their own, but perhaps inspired by the knowledge that there is a possibility to advance further socially and technologically than the pre-first contact state.

      Perhaps the Enterprise series should've started out soon after first contact.

  140. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

    You're right, my logic got lost in my rambling,.. there is no way to reconcile the technology discontinuity. So they should have just plain ignored it, and concentrate on storyline/universe continuity, like the Tribble show. And you are also right, IMO, that they should just not have made the show--I never watched it because the star trek franchise had been driven into the ground by then. There are a whole bunch of other sci fi shows that outshine startrek--farscape, stargate, battlestar galactica, firefly--great stuff can be done with a good idea, good characters and good scripts. It is just laziness to take a good name and try to achieve maximum exploitation with minimum effort.

  141. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    Another option would be to steal a reason from BSG: highly computerized ships were vulnerable to viruses or other attacks, so during TOS they had gone with gauges and dials for a while. In Enterprise they just hadn't been attacked electronically yet.

  142. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    T'Pau. Jeri Ryan is made of plastic. Jolene Blalock might not be.

    Ah! Zat charming T'Pau! She weell be like china in my hands...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  143. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by stinerman · · Score: 1

    Well, depending on your interpretations I can see your point. I'm a die-hard ST fan as well.

    One thing we can agree on is that Janeway was a bitch.

  144. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 1

    Hey, take it easy pal. I'm not the one who had a problem with the way the sets looked on Enterprise.

    (I thought the show itself was about as dull as a radio broadcast of a golf tournament, but that's another story.)

    For the record, my favorite TV sci-fi ever was Doctor Who... so you can hardly accuse me of being a "Special-effects addled American."

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  145. Ermm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May I say just one thing.. 'Who Cares!' There are TV series such as Eastenders, Neighbours and loads of other bad sitcoms all over the world, the only thing that makes Star Trek different is that they have a slightly bigger budget and aim at a more nerdy audience. Please, lets keep trash off the TV, and I hope this is the end of that whole damn Trek fiasco.

  146. Andy Griffith, boring? People still love the thing by ianscot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    writing and telling a good story is still the most important element... ...But no, for the first two seasons we had Andy Griffith in space (yes it really was THAT boring),

    Brzt. Does Not Compute.

    Andy Griffith's like a lot of other classic TV -- if you watch it now next to the latest crop of new sitcoms, you realize how well-written the thing was. Each episode's basically a little one-act play, and it's pretty tight writing. It's basically superior to Enterprise in the traits you're talking about, despite no story arc from episode to episode. That would explain why people still remember favorite episodes of Andy Griffith decades after its run ended, whereas Enterprise is dying of neglect despite a colossal built-in audience.

    TV used to do so much better with character actors than it does now. The Mary Tyler Moore show wasn't episode after episode of "Mary goes on another date," you know? (Ted, Murray, Lou Grant, Sue Ellen, Rhoda, Phyllis, Georgette.)Heck, "Leave It to Beaver" looks like a friggin' Pulitzer Prize-winning play next to Voyager or Enterprise, and the cast of regulars was more interesting, despite them all being whitebread suburbanites.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  147. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    ...did rap even exist then? Maybe he invented it.

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  148. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
    ...and hey, who can forget him *cough* singing "Rocketman".

    Better still;

    "She wants to sleep with... common people ... ... ... common people... like... me..."

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  149. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    farscape, stargate, battlestar galactica, firefly

    I don't know how I left bab-5 off that list...

    I'm just one guy, ogling tatas and replying to his own posts. (I'm not sure, but I think that is poor etiqutte-- the self replies, I mean--so I'm making it anon to kind of mitigate that)

  150. *nerdy voice* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars sucks!

  151. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by k96822 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'll throw in my vote on Sheridan too. B5 has never been beat.

  152. Does it matter? by kulakovich · · Score: 1


    Does it matter how badly These Are The Voyages is written?
    You know you are going to cry at some point in the episode.

    Just like All Good Things...

    kulakovich


    ...and you thought this was a troll...

    1. Re:Does it matter? by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

      You know you are going to cry at some point in the episode.

      Yeah, but for completely different reasons.

      And no I didn't believe that was a troll.

    2. Re:Does it matter? by kulakovich · · Score: 1


      Looks like I owe you a Coke.

      kulakovich

  153. Ughhhh preempted by something by iLeader · · Score: 3, Funny

    For the past I dunno, 4 weeks it's been replaced with some sort of game in which players hit a ball will a stick. I have to download it in order to see it

    1. Re:Ughhhh preempted by something by antispam_ben · · Score: 4, Funny

      For the past I dunno, 4 weeks it's been replaced with some sort of game in which players hit a ball will a stick.

      See the two-hour premire episode of ST Deep Space 9. It explains this game.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    2. Re:Ughhhh preempted by something by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      See the two-hour premire episode of ST Deep Space 9. It explains this game.

      Gah! Not another continuity conflict with the rest of the Trek canon!

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  154. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by k96822 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but she was hot....
    Why are you all looking at me like that?

  155. Wasn't it destroyed already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is going to be an obscenely geeky nitpicking point, but...

    Wasn't the Enterprise-D (and E) destroyed in a movie?

  156. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by k96822 · · Score: 1

    LOL; thanks for that :-) I was wondering if someone was going to mention Jelicho. He was bad-ass.

  157. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by PriceIke · · Score: 1

    Kira Nerys is indeed hot .. she'd probably be my first pick, just over Jennifer Lien. (Not all the women on ST:V were bitches.)

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  158. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Heck, forget the decorated rolling rubbish bins, try the undecorated ones!

    (Referring to the trascan that gulped down Rose's boyfriend...)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  159. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Marina Sirtis had a brief topless scene in some forgetable Charles Bronson B movie.

    ...as well as an extensive, 20-minute long scene where she runs around stark naked and is whipped by another woman. Horrible movie..."The Wicked Lady" or some such drivel.

  160. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by HardSide · · Score: 1

    Actually I was quite suprised that shatner was featured in 4 of the episodes of the Twilight Zone. Was falling asleep one night while the twilight zone was on,and i heard his voice, and i got up frantically and looked at the screen and said "KIRK!?"

  161. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Pyrion · · Score: 1

    What's even worse is that it only took an implied few weeks of "bridge officer training" for Troi to get her Commander's pip. Star Trek obviously never had the benefit of military advisors.

    --
    "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
  162. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    Damn....who was that alcoholic captain in TOS? The episode that had the planet eating giant cigar. He was cool.

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  163. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by k96822 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The 23rd century ships were actually sleeker and more high-tech, with more tactile gems instead of flat-panel displays. They employed three senses: visual, aural, and tactile, instead of two: visual and aural. The extra tactile dimension made them easier to use and a superior interface, particularly when dealing with many different species that might have different levels of one of these three senses (they have the other 2 to fall back on).

    The ships were brighter, too, which I think you really need in deep space (Enterprise D was good for this too, though). Bright colors and brightly lit hallways will lift spirits. I can't defend the tricorders (those just looked bad), but as far as the bridge goes, in a way, I like 23rd century design over 24th/22nd. Sure, the special fx weren't the same, but consider the usability.

  164. It would figure that a Pongo would like Picard.... by DG · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ol "let's have a staff meeting" Picard a better leader than Kirk, the man of action?

    Pish tosh!

    That's what I'd expect from somebody who thinks a hole in the ground is a good place to be.

    Those of us in the Armoured Corps know better. You guys sit in your holes and have a touchy-feely staff meeting. We'll take Kirk and go on ahead. :P

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  165. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
    I'm just one guy, ogling tatas and replying to his own posts. (I'm not sure, but I think that is poor etiqutte-- the self replies, I mean--so I'm making it anon to kind of mitigate that)

    As long as you provide a link its all good;-)

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  166. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

    queue the whip-crack sounds :-D

  167. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 1
    as well as an extensive, 20-minute long scene where she runs around stark naked and is whipped by another woman
    Seeing her getting whipped would almost be worth it...
    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  168. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want to serve under him. I'd rather serve under a captain that would attempt a peaceful negotiation than some hot-head that pisses off a god and gets us all killed.

    Picard=Clinton
    Sisko=Bush

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  169. Best captain? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

    The original question is who was the better captain of the Enterprise, but was expanded to include all Star Fleet captains, every one seems to forget or over look the other notable captains:
    of the Enterprise(s):
    Jonathan Archer (NX-01)
    Robert April (1701)
    Christopher Pike (1701)
    Montgomery Scott (held rank of captain but served as engineer on 1701-A)
    Willard Decker (1701-A)
    Spock son of Sarek (1701)
    John Harriman (1701-B)
    Rachel Garret (1701-C)
    Richard Costello (acting captain of the 1701-C after the death of Capt. Garret)
    William T. Riker (1701-D and the 1701_c just before he transferred to the Titan)
    Edward Jellico (1701-D)
    Data (1701-D)
    Worf son of Moog (1701-D, done only to deceive some klingon-sicles to go home instead of attacking, saving the fragile Klingon-Federation alliance)
    Dr. Beverly Crusher (1701-D in a parallel universe she was the only crew member, making her the de facto captain and the officer I'd most like to serve under ;) )

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:Best captain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... did you deliberately leave Picard off the list?

    2. Re:Best captain? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      I deliberately left Picard and Kirk of the list because they had both been covered in the parent post. My post was to mention the *overlooked* Captains....

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    3. Re:Best captain? by TheNumberSix · · Score: 1

      My geekdom compels me to report that Decker was never in command of the 1701-A. The Enterprise from The Motion Picture was the same one as the the original series, NCC-1701. (It was just heavily overhauled/updated.)

      I'm going to forget that I posted this now.

      --
      Never confuse feeling with thinking.
    4. Re:Best captain? by reiggin · · Score: 1

      Okay, so suddenly, with mod powers activated once again, I realize another gaping whole in the Slashdot mod arena: "Parent's Basement Dwelling Nerd, -1" ... come on /. editors... you know we need it.

  170. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by toddbu · · Score: 1
    Deliberate pandering to the young "omg i wanna screw teh hot chick in star trek lolololol" demographic. Jolene Blalock was used as a vulcan sex symbol instead of just a vulcan. Hell, if they were doing that, they could have shown more of Hoshi too... I thought she was way more sexy (as was evident in the mirror universe episodes). But anyway, this was stupid.

    That's pretty much when Enterprise jumped the shark for me. It didn't take long to see that this was going to be nothing more than a skin-fest with very little meat. (No pun intended.) What I really love about Amanda Tapping's character on SG-1 is that they really play up all the good things about her beyond the fact that she's physically attractive. I mean she can kill a Jaffa, bake a souffle, pick a lock, and ride a motorcycle all in the same day. There's nothing wrong with having good looking people on the show, but there's got to be more to it than that to keep my interest. But let's face it - a little sex appeal is a good thing. I'm sure all the women on /. (current count = 0) would tell you that RDA is pretty hot and if they're honest then they'll say that that's at least a small part of the reason why they watch the show.

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  171. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1
    And from what I hear, that's a shame, as by all accounts, the show has really become much better toward the end.

    I thought so too. What I liked from what had started happening was the filling of the background stories as to how the Federation came to be. They were beginning to show some of the Worlds of the federation and the interaction of their peoples, most notably Vulcans and Andorians. It would have been nice to see the development of those interactions into the Federation.

    --
    I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
  172. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Sadly enough, I've gotten into loud arguments about whether Picard or Kirk was the better captain."

    *sigh*

    There'll never be a Slashdot: The Next Generation.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  173. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    If it's Shatner, it's automatically funny.

    Until you get to Hell and find out you have to spend eternity listening to him sing Stairway to Heaven.

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  174. Terra Prime? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    You mean the Mirror Universe ones?

    Apparently the Mirror Universe has occasionally showed up in previous Trek episodes, it apparently makes much more sense if you remember those. (I don't, but looking at the ep summaries at tvtome make those two episodes MUCH more sensible.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Terra Prime? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I do vaguely remember those, but they had a point. These just seemed like two episodes that didn't tie into anything, didn't say anything, didn't prove (or disprove) anything. They simply exist.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Terra Prime? by LionMage · · Score: 1
      You mean the Mirror Universe ones?

      No, he's referring to the episodes of Enterprise guest-starring Peter Weller. Weller plays a xenophobic isolationist who wants to remove non-humans from Earth.
    3. Re:Terra Prime? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      He says "Terra Prime", but he describes the Mirror Universe episodes instead.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:Terra Prime? by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Ah, just re-read that. I stand corrected. Of course, it was hard to tell because all the OP mentioned was bare midriffs on the female crew members.

      (I probably would have been slightly less confused if you'd phrased your comment differently, e.g., "It seems as though you're describing the Mirror Universe episodes and not...")

  175. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "(Riker complained to Jelicho he was being too hard on the crew. HELLO! You were at war, Riker!..."

    No they weren't.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  176. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You'vd got to be kidding. Jadzia Dax has it all over 7 of 9."

    Except that if you do her, you're also doing an old man.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  177. Finale? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I thought it went off the air 2 years ago when it sucked so bad..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  178. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peaceful negotiation. Is that like the peaceful negotion he dropped on Bosnia? Or Afghanistan? Or the Sudan? Or the peaceful negotiation we used the Blackhawk helecopters for in Somalia? Just curious.

    Clinton was a very bellicose president, who chose the "gunboat diplomacy" option far more quickly than any in recent memory.

  179. Favourite Star Trek Episode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious what everyone's favourite episode is out of all the series that ever aired.

    Mine is "Inner Light"

    1. Re:Favourite Star Trek Episode? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Damn, I'm gonna stroke out trying to nail down the favorite.

      Inner Light was incredibly great. But I think I liked Tapestry a bit more; it actually had a message at the end of the story that I could apply to real life. And Q was my favorite character in TNG (the good episodes, that is). And the series finale I liked better than Inner Light as well.

      And yet, there were still TOS episodes I liked even more. Amok Time, Balance of Terror, with honorable mentions to City on the Edge of Forever, and The Trouble With Tribbles. (...Devil in the Dark, on and on...)

      I liked DS9 better than TNG, but only because I feel there was less of a mediocrity factor to it than TNG. (Thus, I could better stand watching every DS9 episode more than every TNG episode.)
      DS9 did not have an episode, IMHO, that alone stood out over the "best" TNG or TOS episode.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  180. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by sakasune · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if you take Ezri you get Jadzia AND Kurzon..............oh god, I really am a geek

    --
    "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
  181. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by sakasune · · Score: 1

    No actually, it's T'Pol And what she and Hoshi were wearing the mirror universe episodes were hot

    --
    "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
  182. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Picard got the business from a fat Yeoman while in the captain's chair. Amazing I missed that episode.

  183. Call it collateral damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much like legitimate business being blocked from the Net because their ISP is on a blacklist due to some other customer's spamming, the Enterprise bittorent is lost because this site allowed someone to share something much more valuable, the latest Brittney Spears song.

    1. Re:Call it collateral damage by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Yeah... the majority of people in other countries who download it on the day of release are either never going to get it shown in their country, or are dedicated enough fans to watch it on TV when it comes around anyway.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  184. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Thats because Picard is more diplomatic. Picard wins. I would give Sisko second. Shatner dead last...be..cause....i...can't....sta...nd....hea.. ..ring....him....spe...ak.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  185. The Problem with Enterprise by Deinhard · · Score: 1

    As I see it, from a sci-fi standpoint, the problem with Enterprise is that it is a Star Trek series.

    This is not meant to be a flame, but if you had the same episodes with a different ship, aliens, and names for the technology Enterprise would have been a better series. The problem is that when you watch an episode you think "but it's not supposed to look/be like that that."

    Of course, most slashdotters would then start saying "but it's just like Star Trek without the Vulcans and Klingons."

    --
    Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
  186. CGI? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... a completely CGI Enterprise-D
    Really? Tvtome is reporting that they rebuilt 10-Forward for this ep. Also the Constellation-class bridge in the mirror universe eps was very obviously not CGI. Perhaps they borrowed the original set back from the Smithsonian, though that would probably be as expensive as building it from scratch. Interesting that they would spend so much money on sets only meant to be used once. Last-ditch effort to boost production values?
    1. Re:CGI? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they mean the model shots? But DS9 had CGI Galaxy class ships in the big battles in the later seasons, so it's nothing new really.

      I'd also imagine they'd rebuild sets, at least for scenes with major action (I suppose they could do bluescreen if it's just something seen breifly).

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    2. Re:CGI? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that all the external shots in the first season of TNG was CGI. It was decently done, with some cute effects ("Quick! Raise the shields before that debris hits us!") that you can't do with models. But it was still obviously animation, which is, I guess, unacceptable. So they switched to model-based effects as soon as they could afford to.

  187. Deduction by Aggrav8d · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the first few seasons sucked but when they realized they were in trouble they started to get their act together and when they were cancelled they got even better? When I hold up this information next to the politics surrounding Firefly a theory emerges: The way to get good sci-fi is to give them the budget they need but keep them thinking they're about to get canned unless they make tv gold.
    This has two benefits. I keeps everybody hungry and desperate which brings out the best effort. It also unites the fans and mobilizes them to do a lot of grass roots marketing.

    1. Re:Deduction by Wandering-Seraph · · Score: 1

      Of course the problem with that is that after the third or so time the threat might not hold the same fervor as it once did. Well, maybe more so for the fans than those whose job depends on it, not to mention some might just try looking up a new job just a little sooner than they really needed to for job security.

  188. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

    T'Pau was the female Vulcan leader who appeared in the ST:TOS episode Amok Time, and later in the film Star Trek III.

    The band of the '80s was named after her.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  189. Dang and they just took away my tv torrent sites.. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I don't recieve these, so I have been torrenting them, and here we are losing the torrent sites on the same day as the Finale.

    A well timed attack I guess.

  190. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    And then it would look like a submarine from today - except its a space submarine. Unfortunately, even our real modern day space shuttles equipment looks more high-tech then the original series. My computer has a more high-tech look. We cannot blame them on having better set equipment.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  191. My first thought... by Ninwa · · Score: 1

    Was what the hell is Enterprise and why are they advertising a television show on Slashdot? Then I realized they were talking about Star Trek and I realized where I was...

  192. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by OwlofCreamCheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    by the end of DS9 sisko achived the rank of time traveling demi-god!

    --
    -You're wasting your time. Alfador only likes me.
  193. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by l1gunman · · Score: 1

    Actually, I prefer 6 of 9!

  194. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Zemrec · · Score: 1

    I'll admit I watched ST:V. I actually did like some of the episodes, but mostly watched it just because it was Trek.

    But Kes....mmmmmmmm. I had a crush on her for a long time. So girlishly cute but with a sexy sultry voice....drool.

    But then they axed her to put in robo-bimbo. Meh.

    And then they brought Kes back for an episode and she was old...and fat! Gah.....destroyed my fantasies.

  195. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by clem9796 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "that pictorial resurfacing was the reason she was asked to leave the show."

    Denise Crosby felt that her character wasn't being explored enough, that's why she left the show. It's part of a hardcover i have and i can't remember the title for some reason. It goes through production and series problems, all the trials and tribulations of running a TV show, things like that.

    --
    IANALOOA
  196. Oh, you mean like William Shatner! by krudler · · Score: 1

    He wrote some awesome books. They should let him write episodes, or better yet, a movie!

  197. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Everleet · · Score: 1

    How can a relationship be "accurate"?

    --
    It's tragic. Laugh.
  198. "CGI Enterprise-D" by prell · · Score: 1

    A totally CGI-composed Enterprise-D?? That sounds impressive, but with such a high-profile announcement for such a complex project, they're really setting themselves up as a target for buffer-overflow attacks. I hope they debugged it!

  199. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

    A mood-swing prone, semi-delusional, prime directive violating, technobabble spewing excuse for a captain! :-D

  200. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by IceFreak2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You got problems with his speech? How about his singing for chrissakes? ;)

    --
    Life is like a sewer; what you get out of it depends on what you put into it...
  201. Dr. Who!!! by HeighYew · · Score: 0

    Where am I supposed to get Dr. Who now?!?!

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't...what about the other 8?
  202. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by osgeek · · Score: 1

    How about Janeway?


    /em runs ducking and covering.

  203. ...yaawwwn..... by Steevee · · Score: 1

    this was over a long, long time ago. what a waste of time. maybe trekkies will finally get a life.

    --
    if electricity is created by electrons, is morality created by morons?
  204. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm, i dont think she was the only one. warning not safe for work

  205. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I always thought Sisko was a nice synthesis of Kirk's take no shit attitude and Picard's thoughtfulness.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  206. Is that you Grandpa? by krudler · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize you posted on slashdot!

  207. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

    IIRC during one of the DS9 episodes shortly after the Defiant appeared they referred to it as an "Escort" ship. If I recall my Star Trek terminology correctly would make it more like a destroyer then a PT-boat, in that it is designed to protect large vulnerable ships from small nimble ones.

  208. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There'll never be a Slashdot: The Next Generation." ... and there was much rejoicing.

  209. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

    So, Patrick Stewart isn't suffering from typecasting post-Trek. ;-)

    --
    10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
    20 GOTO 10
  210. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying they should have stayed completley acurate to TOS? I think people would be a little confused when they heard about the great wars in the 1990s.

  211. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

    I thought he was more of a Messiah. I wish DS9 had had a bit more of Prophet-related weirdness, it was always quite interesting when it happened, the trouble with DS9 is it never quite became the series it could've become (insert Babylon 5 reference here).

    --
    10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
    20 GOTO 10
  212. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Kudos for your encyclopedic knowledge of pornography :-)

    The parent was probably referring to my lame sig about Babylong 5 cast members who did porn.

    I don't know that any of the recurring cast actually did porn, but some of them look the part.
    *cough* Tracy Scoggins/Marjorie Monaghan *cough*
    I was hoping the Slashdot crowd would out some individuals complete with URLs.

    I'm positve that Claudia Christian and Andrea Thompson did not, because they are cleary very wholesome.
  213. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    Uh, spoiler warning? The new Who isn't running here yet...it it on bittorrent yet?

  214. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    No way. Dr. Beverly. Man was she a babe. She maintained her awesome femeninity without becoming all tits like 7 of 9...

    And Jerry Ryan almost always had her hair back. She's all friggin' lips. Her lips so big, Mick Jagger be sayin' "Them's some big-ass lips"

    =D

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  215. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by JamesD_UK · · Score: 1

    Terry Farrell . Please leave your geek pass at the door as you leave.

  216. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy solution: ::takes deep breath::

    Okay, you have to understand that when we see something in TNG or DS9 or VOY or ENT, we are seeing what 'really' happened. Starfleet has released it's recordings, logs, etc, and edited them together with other video sources to form a story.

    But when we see what happened in TOS, those are NOT the 'real' recordings, but rather they are Starfleet re-creations. Why would Starfleet only release re-creations of that time period, and not the 'real' footage? Well, I don't know, but security concerns might be an issue. Or maybe they were undergoing societal changes and were concerned that the 'common man' might not 'get' what was happening. So, they kept the original recordings and made fake ones, ones that gave the viewer a 'hero' to focus on, and a dead-simple morality to follow. (Or maybe TOS was propaganda made to be leaked to the Klingons, designed to made Starfleet look low-tech?)

    Anyway, that explains why TOS technology does not match the other shows- TOS is a dumbed-down, made-for-TV version of what actually happened. OF COURSE they would simplify the tech, so as not to obscure the 'message'. It also explains the Klingons- they were not Klingons, just human actors in the re-creation.

    The only thing that blows this theory is the DS9 ep where they go back in time. Oh well.

  217. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 1

    besides it's quite obviously Major Kira Nerys. Fools. :-P

    This may be evidence that there's something seriously wrong with me, but I find that she's way hotter with her alien make-up than without it.

    Kira Nerys (with the weird nose ridges): Sexy.

    Nana Visitor (without them): Not so much.

    Anyone else feel the same way, or am I just really sick?

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  218. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by vpetersen · · Score: 1

    Sheridan > Sisko > Sinclair > Picard > Kirk

    Captain Solo?

  219. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Difference is, in a play, the actors only have one take to get it right. You can overlook the set because you usually have great acting in front of you...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  220. Babylon 5 and Porn by thegameiam · · Score: 1

    Ok, I've got to know the answer to your .sig trivia question: which B5 cast member did porn?

    -David Barak

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  221. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Cylix · · Score: 1

    You completely forgot about Marina Sirtis!

    It wasn't actually know she had done anything like that until the third or so season. (Memory is a bit sketchy) So it was far too late to make her go away.

    They eventually let Yar come back and play as well.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  222. Prude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You call someone a prude who doesn't like people having sex in front of other people? I call that common sense!

  223. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good heavens, you sound like those losers on FARK.

    Next you'll complain that her knees are too pointy.

    Fess up: You would crawl over broken glass for the chance to drink her dirty bathwater.

  224. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    and as a young lady in the 4th season of enterprise.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  225. Maybe I am doing something wrong by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    But, whenever I try to use bittorrent it is more like bitdribble...not a torrent at all and I have a broadband connection.

    1. Re:Maybe I am doing something wrong by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      No, you aren't doing anything wrong, its just that people don't leave their torrents running for long enough. My policy is to try to uplaod at least as much as I download. Usually 2 to 1 or more. Most folks get the download they want then bail out ASAP, stranding anyone else that might not be as far along as they are.

      It is the ultimate confluence of pop culture and jungle behavior: get in there, grab what is popular today, and move on before you get orphaned.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    2. Re:Maybe I am doing something wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you, some people have reason to.

      I have never used bittorrent, even though I'm dying to see some shows that have never come to New Zealand (where I am), because we have capped limits that include download and upload.

      When I'm sharing a broadband connection with a 10gig limit per month which includes upload, I can't use bittorrent or we'd run over our limit in the first week or few days.

      There's a reason a lot of people close their connection as soon as they receive the file they want :)

    3. Re:Maybe I am doing something wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's a reason a lot of people close their connection as soon as they receive the file they want :)

      There's the reason why i like using private trackers that enforce ratios. :-)

      If you don't want to share, just download from usenet.

    4. Re:Maybe I am doing something wrong by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I've got the same trouble you do. I've heard that the problem is the upload is maxing out your bandwidth and the ACKs for the download can't get through. Apparently the fix is to use a QoS tool, but I haven't gotten around to actually figuring that out yet...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Maybe I am doing something wrong by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Be sure to choke your upload back to 80% of the rated capacity. Also, it may be slow for 6 hours, then fast for 2 hours, then slow, etc. It runs in the background away, its not like you have to be active with it.

      Also, be sure to use non standard ports (ie: 20000 to 50000 range, but limit to about 10 ports) for clients that use multiple ports. And open your firewall for the same ports, very important, or others can't find you for you to seed to them properly.

      Keep in mind, it also depends on what tracker/site you use. Some suck, some are great. filelist.org is great for new stuff, for example, and can average as fast as 3mbit on a 5mb cable line (really) The main problem is being able to upload enough to keep your ratio above 1.05 I have great luck with older stuff on isohunt. Again, its slow, its fast, its slow, its fast....but it wont stop you from using your computer for any other purpose. Its free anyway, just be patient.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  226. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    I only wish that they had continued with the mirror universe and done a whole series based on Empress Hoshi's Starfleet.

    That would have been worth watching, but an evil Earth would be too politically dangerous for the studio... especially since 'the federation' has always *really* been about 'yanks in space'.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  227. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by abb3w · · Score: 1
    But then, I prefer exotic natural beauties over silicone-enhanced bleach-blonde barbie dolls.

    "Gentlemen prefer blondes; I prefer brunettes... but everyone smiles at a redhead." Which goes far in explaining the wide popularity of Bev Crusher, and X-Files' Dana Sculley. (Yes, you in the back, X-Files is not Trek; now please shut up.)

    Myself, I think I prefered Dax's Ezri incarnation, but that's because of my fondness for petite, short haired, assertive women.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  228. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    What I loved most about TNG was all the reflection it made us do. It made us look at ourselves and human nature more. DS9 was cool, and VOY less so, and ENT just sux, but they all lacked the kind of reflection that TOS and TNG offered us.

    I mean, that black/white people episode was so obvious, but it was still fantastic, especially given the era that it came from. Move to TNG. It started huge, right off the bat; Q and his court case about humanity and how destructive we've been. I mean, there's such deep meaning there.

    IMO DS9, VOY, and ENT were lacking in reflection. DS9 was cool in many other ways. As soon as they started the war, the show took a fantastic direction, but it still didn't offer much reflection. Not like TOS or TNG.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  229. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by ipxodi · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, In "The World of Star Trek" , a book that came out in the 70's all about Star Trek -- the US Navy actually came to the set of the Original Series to study the layout of the bridge control panels. Roddenberry and the set designers gave a lot of thought to the "ergonomics" of the controls when the were designing the bridge and the Navy supposedly utilized some of those ideas in their ships.

    --
    load "windows7" ,8,1
  230. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Slider451 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The rank of Captain is not the same as position/title of ship's captain.

    In the Navy, from which ST borrows its rank structure, Captain is both a title and a rank.

    Captain, the rank, is equal to Colonel in the other services, and often has responsibility over thousands of sailors/employees. The Captain can be in charge of a base, a ship, or any unit of sufficient size to justify a manager/leader of that level.

    Captain, the title, is reserved for the commander of a vessel, independent of rank. A small craft can be commanded by a LT, or even an Ensign. The crew addresses the person as Captain regardless of their rank.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  231. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by omaha · · Score: 1

    In a name: Hornblower.

  232. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    DS9 got rad when Berman moved onto VOY.

    Until then it kinda sucked ass too. I really got hooked on DS9 when Avery Brooks shaved his head and got some character to him. When they brought in the Klingons that just thickened the plot. I loved the long story arc.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  233. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    "I am Seven of Nine. You will be augmented."

  234. Must... resist... temptation... by david.given · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Must... resist... temptation... by david.given · · Score: 1
      Mr. Worf (buy the album! It's great!)

      Damn. I've just realised that that's just a two-minute clip. Sorry about that.

      But the album's definitely worth getting --- you may want to check out a preview on a P2P somewhere, but if you like it, do buy it...

  235. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by arthurs_sidekick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would be *Commodore* Decker (outranked Kirk, which is why he was able to endanger the Enterprise). His son was the guy in the first ST movie that ended up merging with V'ger and whasername played by Persis Khambatta.

    --
    "Oh, I hope he doesn't give us halyatchkies," said Heinrich.
  236. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by iced_773 · · Score: 1

    Warf was the offical commander of the Defiant.

    But what about before Worf joined? The Defiant appeared in the 3rd season while Worf didn't join until the fourth.

  237. Unresolved storylines: RESOLVED HERE! by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 1

    1) Future Guy is a Vulcan who wants to retroactively eliminate the Federation because he belives it contaminated Vulcan culture and prevented reunification.

    2) Daniels is a "descendant" of Data, although far more human-like.

    3) The Xindi die off before the era of Kirk. They cannot resolve their post-Sphere Builder differences and war unto extinction.

    4) The USS Archer, as alluded to in "Star Trek: Nemesis," is an unarmed garbage scow.

    I have no sources to support this; I'm just filling a void. It's true because I say it is.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  238. Re:It's been a good run - no, it hasn't. by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    If you like drek, sure, it's been a good run. The problem is that most of Trek has been garbage.
    - First 2 years of Next Gen - Unwatchable crap.
    - Voyager - seven years of absolute garbage
    - Enterprise - utter and complete bilge

    Seasons 3 - 7 of Next Gen were good, with a smattering of truley inspired shows and a solid season (I think it was 6) that was some of the best post TOS shows made.

    Deep Space Nine was the only series since TOS to land on its feet with good shows and only started to get old durring the last year when they were trying to wrap up too many loose ends too quickly.

    Otherwise, it's been a moldering crapfest of badly written cliches, horrid dialog (sp?) and plots so feeble you could sneeze through them.

    And speaking of Farpoint, that has to be one of the most painful TV experiences of my life. Two hours of heavy-handed tripe. Q was the only thing in that episode worth watching and he couldn't even save it. And the whole golly-gee factor made me sick. "You've never been on a Galaxy class Starsip before." *SHUDDER*

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  239. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to the court documents, Ms. Ryan claimed that her husband attempted to pressure her into having public sex with him in front of an audience.

    I think Terry Farrel is cuter too, but calling Jeri a "prude" because she didn't want to screw her husband in a club where there were "cages, whips and other apparatus hanging from the ceiling," is a little unfair.

  240. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You'vd got to be kidding. Jadzia Dax has it all over 7 of 9.
    That's a man, baby!
    When the sex change is down to the somatic level, not in any way I give a damn about. The only thing left at that point is she knows exactly how much you enjoy it when she swallows.

  241. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Faw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whitestars cute? They look like plucked chickens!!

  242. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought she was too. Hey, she can whoop my ass anytime.

  243. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tape_Werm · · Score: 0

    Pfft, Picard. Everyone knows the best captain is Han Solo.

    --
    Linux sucks. And you're fat. Take a shower hippy.
  244. tv torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope this turns up on one of the remaining torrent servers. Now with btnet down, we poor european have lost a good source of US tv shows.

    And this month is especially bad, because so many shows end or end their season.

  245. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    queue the whip-crack sounds :-D

    Troi? Worf? Whip-cracks? Hey, I was looking for slash, not that kinky BDSM fanfic stuff!

    (Rereads.)

    Oh dear God, now my own joke is putting sick images in my head. Damn me! Damn me to Hell!

  246. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Sisko: Threatened, or performed, violent action on omnipotent superdimensional beings regularly.

    When they announced that the next Star Trek show would be on a space station, I was extatic! Those huge mushroom shaped space docks were awesome, I wanted to see more of those. Hell, they seem to be massive enough to hold the entire population of a small civilisation.

    But they went with "crappy, ferengi-infested alien military surplus fixer-upper". That was the first disapointment... one of many.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  247. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by steeef · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, both Jeri's boobs and her hair are real, or at least they were during Voyager. I heard she recently had a boob job though...

  248. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, Kira does it for me every time/any time. So hot.

  249. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

    The original Adama!

  250. Out-of-order airing of episodes by LionMage · · Score: 1

    It looks as though in the Phoenix Metro market, they're airing "These are the Voyages..." tonight, and "Terra Prime" on Sunday (May 15th). Kind of lame, if you ask me.

    Then again, we have the Phoenix Suns to thank. Anyone else in other television markets having this problem?

  251. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Picard is a wimp. Kirk is a man's man.

    Picard trys to go by the Prime Directive, even if it means misery for people on the planet. Kirk always violated it, because he put the good fortune of others ahead of a buerocratic/pollitical idea.

    Picard always tries to get out of fighting, if possible, tries to reason with Klingons, etc. Kirk knows that he has an edge in fighting, and that Klingons, etc won't listen to reason anyway.

    Picard always is concerned for the safety of his crew, and never has the engineer exceed safety regulations. Kirk knows that his engineer is smart enough to exceed safety regulations without endangering the crew.

    Picard is a prude, doesn't have many girlfriends. Kirk has a woman on every planet, and apparently spread his seed across the galaxy.

    Picard does not know how to fight, someone stronger than him can easily take him out. When faced with a genetically engineered madman with ten times his strength, Kirk evened the odds with a pipe.

    Picard is bald, even in the future there is no cure for baldness. Kirk lost some hair, but was smart enough to join the hair club for men or wear a toupee.

    Picard crashed his ship due to his mismanagement. Kirk set his ship to self destruct so the Klingons wouldn't get it, and it would take some Klingons out when it blew up.

    Kirk gave his own life to save Picard and the universe. Picard couldn't even save himself from his own clone, without having one of his crew (Data) sacrifice his life, because Picard is too much of a wimp.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  252. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    Solo? What leadership ability did he display? Fighting ability: sure. Flying ability: hell yes! Combat thinking: you bet. But politics, diplomacy, real leadership: no, at least not in the movies.

  253. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know this.

    Of course, you could also boil it down to "Head Honcho of the show" since he was the leader of a motley crew of rebels, outsiders, and misfits. :)

  254. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by pod · · Score: 1
    Almost anything post Manny Coto.

    Traditionally this means 'after Coto (departed)', which clearly is not what you wanted to say.

    --
    "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  255. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Slider451 · · Score: 1

    I like that. You could call him "The Head" for short, and people wouldn't know whether you were talking about the leader or the toilet. :)

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  256. Re:Andy Griffith, boring? People still love the th by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Andy Griffith's like a lot of other classic TV

    Classic TV and Sci-Fi are two very different genres. I just don't think Andy Griffith is a good model for a Sci-Fi show.

  257. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Slider451 · · Score: 1

    oblig. TMBG - Everybody wants prosthetic foreheads on their real heads.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  258. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by vpetersen · · Score: 1

    In the SW books, he went as far as General.

    If we count the books, which present an official part of Lucas galaxy, than we'll have to consider Admiral Thrawn as well. In the Empire, admiralship was preceded by captainship. Thrawn also commanded Himaera w/Pellaleon at the end of his career. I'd put Thrawn against Sheridan, Picard, Kirk or any other captain.

    More info here:

    www.starwars.com/databank/character/

    (click on the name)

    ~vp

  259. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by caseydk · · Score: 1


    I think Han Solo blew them all away... and he got the Princess.

  260. Re:*Clears Throat* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Montreal? hahahahahah!

  261. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Babbster · · Score: 1
    The Defiant was not Worf's ship. Worf (or Dax, or Kira) commanded the ship when Sisko wasn't aboard, just as Riker commanded the Enterprise when Picard wasn't aboard. Sisko was, de facto and de jure, the captain of the Defiant - witness the fact that when Worf was commanding Defiant, the bridge crew still didn't call him "captain" and instead addressed him by his actual rank. Other evidence can be found when Admiral Ross turned over the second Defiant to Sisko's command. Yet another related note is that in a later episode, when Worf put his wife's life above completing a mission, Sisko told him that he would probably never get a command in Starfleet, implying that he had never had his own command in the first place.

    On the ship, the Defiant may not have had the size of a Galaxy-class starship but it easily had the punch. The class was designed (at least partly by Sisko himself) to fight the Borg, after all.

    Sweet Jeebus, I'm a geek. :)

  262. Be sure to tune in to UPN tonight... by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

    Why start now?

  263. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Cerv · · Score: 1

    That was even mentioned in DS9. I can't remember which ep, but Nog fucked up and O'Brien had to explain it to him. Good job Starfleet Academy!

    --
    sig
  264. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Keith+Russell · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sisko: Threatened, or performed, violent action on omnipotent superdimensional beings regularly.

    Sisko punching Q upside the head was the highlight of Season One!

    You hit me! Picard never hit me.
    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  265. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    I wonder what they could have done with the series if, instead of a prequel, they had focused on the later years of the Federation. Have it be the only Superpower remaining, that sort of thing. You could even incorporate religious strife, terrorism, and the fight to keep a large stable society from decaying. I realize that that kind of fictional universe might have made for some squirming TV Execs, but I also think that, if it had survived its first season, that it would still be on the air.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  266. Re:Dang and they just took away my tv torrent site by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 1

    Hint: if you search for Enterprise on Isohunt, and use the torrents from 'NiteShdw,' they will work....

    --
    "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
  267. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by javamann · · Score: 1

    Does Bush count as 'recent memory'?

  268. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Cerv · · Score: 1

    The first ep at least was on BitTorrent before the BBC had shown it. I'd link to the Slashdot story, but I can't be arsed searching.

    --
    sig
  269. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by bleaknik · · Score: 0

    Now I've only seen Season 1 (and a select few other misc. episodes) of DS9, but that's the feeling I got...

    The Federation was the "Superpower" that wasn't necessarily wanted...

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  270. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by javamann · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes they were!

    (your turn)

  271. It's worse than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's dead Jim
    dead Jim
    dead Jim
    It's worse than that
    It's dead jim
    dead Jim
    DEAD

  272. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 1

    In the SW books, he went as far as General.

    He was addressed as "General Solo" in the briefing room during "Return of the Jedi."

    Holy crap, I'm a huge geek for knowing that!

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  273. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Golias · · Score: 1

    You think you a nerd for coming up with all that, but if you were a real nerd you would know that Trek magazine ran stories back in the 70s explaining that the Klingons which appeared in TOS were genetically altered to infiltrate human worlds.

    (Being that it is a tactic of deception, it's not a proud moment in Klingon war history, hence Worf's line in DS9 saying, "we don't like to talk about it.")

    It wasn't until the movies that we got to see what "real" Klingons look like.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  274. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    Hawk!!!!! /me waits for the mods who don't get the very ontopic joke.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  275. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by vivin · · Score: 1

    Blargh... what I meant post Berman...!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  276. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by istewart · · Score: 1

    Like that poor Romulan ambassador.

    ("In The Pale Moonlight")

  277. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    No, they weren't.

    The Federation and the Cardassians weren't exactly in love with each other, but that was not a war.

    I would agree if you said they were in a hostile situation and that battle drills were a good idea, however, war is a serious overstatement of the predicament they were in. Had they been at war, there wouldn't be kids on the Enterprise.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  278. Re: Troi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't even aware that she was an officer, I thought she was a civilian contractor (but she donned a uniform in later shows).

    She also donned a uniform in the exact episode you were talking about, with Jelicho as captain, because he demanded a "certain formality on the bridge". (yeah I score loser points for that one).

    And, she wore a uniform of the old mini-skirt variety in the earliest episodes -- Encounter at Farpoint. It wasn't until later that she started wearing the Counselor-pajamas.

  279. It's dead Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figure once a SciFi show does the time-travel back to WW2 bit, it's jumped the shark. Sorry, but after Voyager, Enterprise wasn't much of an improvment.

    Oh well, the new Doctor Who is fun :)

  280. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But politics, diplomacy, real leadership: no, at least not in the movies.

    General Solo showed this in RotJ.

  281. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sisko had the rank of commander at the start of DS9 and was promoted to full Captain later in the series. This was probably because they were moving to bring Worf onboard who was already a commander at that point. So Sisko had both the rank and the title of Captain towards the end of the series.

  282. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by istewart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Kirk gave his own life to save Picard and the universe. Picard couldn't even save himself from his own clone, without having one of his crew (Data) sacrifice his life, because Picard is too much of a wimp.


    In the interests of fairness, I must interject that Picard's characterization in Nemesis is extremely spotty. There's no real reason for him to behave as he does, nearly destroying the ship and killing his entire crew. The "action-hero" machismo gives way to resignation, with no attempt to stop the death-ray maguffin after his clone dies. No matter what you say about Picard, I hardly think he'd give up if his crew was on the line.

    That whole story was thrown together just so they could kill Data and rip off Wrath of Khan. The box office take reflects this.
  283. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She had a former lover doing her review. You really think she was going to fail? Riker was still secretly hoping for another hookup.

  284. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your girlfriend is reporting your deficiencies to Capt. Picard? I don't get it.

  285. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Except that if you do her, you're also doing an old man.

    That might not be so bad. She'd certainly know what a man likes...

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  286. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that the one with the insane, gung-ho Red Squad crew?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  287. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Actually, that sounds better, but IMO it wouldn't work in a post 9/11 - some activist group would label it "anti-american" or something (America is really the only superpower right now too)

    I think they could stand to make some bold statements, but no TV Exec has the courage to make such a statement.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  288. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Sir+Penguin · · Score: 1
    The Klingon in the cornfield was a touch much to stomache, and then when the electronics in Enterprise looked more sophisticated than in the Original Series, I just couldn't do it.
    The electronics on my dad's Coast Guard ship look more sophisticated than the ones in the Original Series.

    SP
  289. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Naw, DS9 was about helping out a race of ppl who just go their independance. They were asked to be there, and they made Cisco their "god" so to speak (that was the only story arc that annoyed me).

    I'd bet if it were out today, the story line would be vastly different...

    Kardassians = Hussein, Bajorans = Iraqi ppl, Federation = Americans. Could do some really cool stuff with THAT story line... Imagin the controversy? It would be labeled anti-american, and tv stations would stop carrying it lol!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  290. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by pdbogen · · Score: 1

    The way I see it, the original series tech was just simplier in its interface, but probably infinitely more complex in its details. I.e., crystal circuitry/data storage and whatnot, whereas Enterprise uses much more conventional technology. I can see original series onward (chronologically) as being way in the future, where was it's easy to see Enterprise being only 50-100 years in the future (not counting e.g., World War 3)

  291. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it could still be cramped. To be honest, they tried to convey that (e.g. engineers having to climb on top of the antimatter reactor), but they didn't really succeed. Maybe if they'd made the corridors too narrow to walk side-by-side in...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  292. Two almost insuperable problems with "Enterprise" by gdav · · Score: 1

    I have dipped in and out of Enterprise here in the UK on Sky (the guys that funded the new Battlestar Galactica - yes I do know that it's basically Murdoch).

    It occurs to me that there are two fatal flaws in "Enterprise":

    (1) Being a prequel, it lacks any sense of tension for the overall story arc. A common problem. Lucas, I'm looking at you.

    (2) Diane Warren theme tune.

  293. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1
    I like Jeri Ryan better than Terry Ferrel except for Jeri being a prude (in interviewers she complained about her costumes being too revealing).

    However, Jolene Blalock is the hottest of all the Star Trek chics. She's a hot sexy model who is not a prude and she's not old. You also can find lots videos and pictures of her wearing very little clothes, which is a big plus.

    Although Kirsty Alley looked pretty hot in Star Trek 2. Also, the guest appearences of Ashley Judd as Wesley Crusher's girlfriend were very nice. She wasn't in enough episodes to be considered a Star Trek hottie.

    --
    :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
  294. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by rilian4 · · Score: 1

    Sisko was given the rank of Captain when he was given command of the Starship USS Defiant. Therefore he held both the rank and title of Captain. Therefore you can compare him to Captains in the other ST shows...

    --

    ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
  295. "true finale?" by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Anyone care to explain this?

    1. Re:"true finale?" by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      I thought the series finale was the epitome of Enterprise and the Star Trek franchise. Incredibly crappy episode with "time-travelling" in a holodeck.

      Am I the only one utterly disgusted at how Archer was directed to be more concerned with his dumbassed ceremony rather than his actions resulting in croaking his friend and chief engineer?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re:"true finale?" by Mikito · · Score: 1

      The TNG finale moved me.
      The DS9 finale touched me.
      The Voyager finale made me glad it was all over.
      The Enterprise finale made me think "Ewww."

      I thought that both Archer and Trip were very out of character. Trip's not the type to beg and whine when faced with danger. Archer normally doesn't worry so much about formalities.

      This episode also demeans Riker, making him look indecisive and insecure. I still don't see how watching a holodeck program would help Riker decide whether or not he should defy his former CO.

      I think Jolene Blalock said it best: "Appalling."

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
  296. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're correct, they were not at war. But your reason is weak. The best evidence is when the Cardassians were onboard negotiating with Jericho. Riker demanded that Picard be given treaty protections that would treat him as a prisoner of war. The Cardassians, in turn, wanted an admission that the Federation *started* a war, and asked if they were willing to admit that. Jericho quickly said "no". So the Cardassian said "then he (Picard) will be treated as a terrorist".

  297. Does Patrick Stewart do Commericals? by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1

    Shatner does a "Have you been hurt in an accident?" commerical for a personal injury law firm. I think it's Brad Hendricks law firm.

    --
    :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    1. Re:Does Patrick Stewart do Commericals? by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Patrick Stewart did voiceover for Porsche commercials in the 90s.

    2. Re:Does Patrick Stewart do Commericals? by Mikito · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Porsche, but he briefly did voiceover for the Pontiac SSEi cars several years ago.

      More recently, he narrated a rhyming ad for the cholestorol-lowering drug Crestor. The ad was later pulled because the FDA felt it (the TV spot) didn't do an adequate job explaining the potential risks and side effects of taking Crestor.

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
  298. It's all in the timing ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that the MPAA chose to start suing (well, okay ... threatening to sue) some more major BitTorrent sites right on the eve of a Star Trek series final episode. All they've probably managed to do is seriously piss off the very people who are most likely to know how to commit "rampant piracy" and who are more than willing to do it. Good job. I hope your member companies are very pleased.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  299. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Pollardito · · Score: 1

    Picard pays full price, Kirk names his own price and saves!

  300. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both do.

    And even though both led us to war, the two of them combined did not attack other nations as often as Clonton.

  301. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woah, look out!

    If you were standing a little higher, that joke would have caught you right on the top of the head!!!

    Close one, there.

  302. ENT people complaining about TNG presence in final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just wanted to make the comment that I think it is quite fitting that the 'late great one' (i.e. TNG) is in Enterprise. I think it is appropriate, in the same way that a 19th century father on the farm, sturdy strong and powerful of body and mind, when finding that his son has foregon his chores and let the family down and skipped church for the evening, takes his mighty hand and crashes it upon the face of the insolent youth both as a lesson in love and in respect.

    lol. Without the extended metaphor: ENT fu**ed things up quite nicely for the dynasty for most of its 4 years. It deserves to be in the presence of the greatness that was TNG, if only as a reminder to fans of what a great show we once had.

    Ah. Respect is a powerful word

  303. Re:It would figure that a Pongo would like Picard. by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    You guys sit in your holes and have a touchy-feely staff meeting. We'll take Kirk and go on ahead. :P

    Informative???? A tread-head talking trash about guys who engage the enemy at close range with rifles, rather than from inside the protective confines of a steel box?

    Beh, I say! Beh!

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  304. Give it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it up, Enterprise has gone the way of the Amiga.

  305. I'll take the bait by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Your opinion of who was the better captain was based on ARMY leadership manuals? The ones that say its OK to kill innocent bystanders? Or to kill POW's and wounded? Or rape POW's? Or rape female service members?

    You obviously haven't seen Army leadership manuals. Read FM 22-100 (the core Army leadership manual) and SH 21-76 (the Ranger Handbook), then we can talk rationally about this.

    Innocent bystanders always get killed in war, and sometimes it's deliberate. Some armies inculcate a wanton disregard for human life in their soldiers, while others try their best to impress upon soldiers the importance of safeguarding the lives of noncombatants. You would more than likely be amazed at the risks we took in Somalia so we could be sure that we were not putting civilians in danger. I'm not in Afghanistan or Iraq, but my guess is that the situation is not uniform for every unit, and that in some cases there are commanders and soldiers who are acting with wanton disregard for human life. Then again, if you took random group of people and put them in a situation where combatants and noncombatants were closely mixed, you might very well find that the majority of them made mistakes and killed civilians. The Bush Administration went into Iraq ludicrously unprepared for a long-term occupation, which has led to a situation in which soldiers are spread too thin and are under tremendous stress, fighting an enemy that is willing to kill its own people in order to kill Americans.

    As to your statement about other crimes, rape and killing of POWs is not condoned in American military manuals. People in your town all know that murder is wrong, but some people do it. That doesn't mean that your town is teaching people to murder.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  306. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by dimator · · Score: 1

    Picard and Kirk were captains in completely different eras.

    With Kirk, the Federation was relatively new, and there was still a kind of Old West atmosphere to the galaxy. The Federation was still trying to establish its role.

    With Picard, there was a lot more beurocratic pressure on the Enterprise, as the flagship of the Federation, to act in the right way. That's not to say that they went by the book in all cases; I recall more than a couple episodes where Picard either broke the prime directive, or else chose not to punish the crewmember that did.

    I don't think it's fair to compare the two in the way that you have, in the same way you can't compare Kennedy to Lincoln to determine who was the better President.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  307. stereotypes aren't meaningless, I guess, by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Replace "Klingon" with "man", and "human-betazoid hybrid" with "woman" in the above statement, and you've got a stereotypical heterosexual relationship.

    And vice versa.

    Which is probably the pith of the arguments presented by the homosexual movements.

    But also, conversely, probably the entire reason for sex.

    (I say as my wife expresses disgust that I would be reading /. and laughing about this Star Trek thread.)

  308. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

    Denise Crosby

    She was also on Red Shoe Diaries as a cop.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  309. Lame, lame, lame, and lame by stox · · Score: 1

    A sad end to a remarkable idea. The finale of TNG was brilliant, the finale this evening was more of the SOS.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Lame, lame, lame, and lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. A total stinker. There were sooo many lame, badly acted, sappy scenes. The dialogue was atrocious. It was like they had Lucas writing the script. This old dog needed a bullet in its head for a long time.

    2. Re:Lame, lame, lame, and lame by capedgirardeau · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I agree it was terrible. An insult to the cast and the fans.

      It was a crappy episode of STN:TNG.

      It should have been about Enterprise and not about Riker.

      To the cast: You did wonderful, you deserved better, and I and others will blot out this travesty and remember you for the good work you have done.

      Cheers

      --
      Wax on, wax off baby!
  310. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sisko was my favorite too..

    there was a lot of "hawk" in avery brooks' portrayal of sisko, and i loved that about ds9. they really did a good job working that side of brooks into the scripts.

    and it was a consistently well-acted lead role. can't say that about any of the other star trek series.

  311. Re:It would figure that a Pongo would like Picard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Informative???? A tread-head talking trash about guys who engage the enemy at close range with rifles, rather than from inside the protective confines of a steel box?


    I believe the term is "DAT" or "dumb ass tanker".. but then again, you have to admit that it isn't wise to argue with sixty tons of armor.
  312. Riker, does the holodeck run the latest version of by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Firefox?

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  313. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    I know all about Thrawn. But you should properly call him Grand Admiral Thrawn, and he was the only alien to be granted that honor by the Emperor. That said, Thrawn was pretty brilliant, but nowhere near Sheridan's level. He was another character that did superb combat, excellent war strategy, iffy politics, no diplomacy.

    I explicitly stated that I was just considering the movies. Because otherwise I'd have to include certain Babylon 5 and Star Trek books that are also canon.

  314. I, for one, welcome our new vacuum overlords. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now maybe I can do something else besides watch TV.

  315. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kirk has a woman on every planet, and apparently spread his seed across the galaxy.

    "I've always wondered why there were so many humanoids scattered through the galaxy."

    -- Dr. McCoy in "The Paradise Syndrome" (WAV clip)

  316. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Oh Jesus, yes. They out-hotted all the Trek hotties in that storyline.

    --

    +++ATH0
  317. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1
  318. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Dude, the CURRENT Adama is a better commander AND more interesting than the original.

    Come on. He fucking kicks ass.

    --

    +++ATH0
  319. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how "heavily armed" PT boats are, but the Defiant had the latest of top-of-the-line combat technology - a Romulan cloak, multiphasic shielding, ablative armor, gatling phasers, quantum torpedoes - the list goes on.

    --

    +++ATH0
  320. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Aside: I think the reason she was technobabble-spewing was because shortly before she moved to the command track, she was a science officer on several ships.

    Just thought I'd point that out. I rather liked the idea of a scientist captain, though of course the idiot writers never actually made use of it.

    --

    +++ATH0
  321. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I miss DS9 like crazy, and Sisko is no small part of why. Avery Brooks is a terrific actor and I'm dying to see what he and the rest of the cast can do in a movie format.

    Perhaps we'll see.

    --

    +++ATH0
  322. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even better, Janeway tried to run from Q. BEAT THAT!

  323. Jennifer Ann Lien by tengu1sd · · Score: 1
    Kes in ST Voyager.

    The only STV episode I can remember is the one where she got possessed by a dying alien. She was hot in black and dominated minions. Sign me up for Kes' Army.

  324. Different strokes for different folks... by Tassach · · Score: 1
    I think Terry Farrell is cuter too, but calling Jeri a "prude" because she didn't want to screw her husband in a club where there were "cages, whips and other apparatus hanging from the ceiling," is a little unfair.
    Whips and cages hanging from the ceiling? Sounds like my kind of place [NSFW]. Compared to my wife and our circle of friends, she does seem a bit... boring and unadventurous, if you prefer that phrasing. It all depends on your frame of reference, I guess; but I'd say someone who claims to have gotten physically ill at the sight of other people having sex is a bit on the prudish side.

    What the hell's the point of being a sex symbol if you aren't actually willing to have freaky sex? It's like having a world-class sports car and never getting it out of first gear.

    According to the court documents, Ms. Ryan claimed that her husband attempted to pressure her into having public sex with him in front of an audience.
    He said, she said. You should take anything said in a messy divorce with a grain of salt, particularly if there are large sums of money at stake. Since she wound up getting $20 million out of the deal, and was angling for more, I think it's safe to say she had motive to... exaggerate the facts a bit.

    Now, I don't doubt they went to the clubs in question. However, having been in that situation, I find it highly unlikely that anyone who did any even a modicum of research (as she claims he did) wouldn't have learned the basic etiquette[NSFW] that is expected in such venues.

    Likewise, I have a hard time believing that a highly successful stockbroker -- someone who makes his living by being persuasive and a good negotiator -- could have been as tactless and inept as she describes. Hell, I'm a socially-challenged computer geek, and even I can do a better job of convincing a woman to go to a swing club than that.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    1. Re:Different strokes for different folks... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      It all depends on your frame of reference, I guess; but I'd say someone who claims to have gotten physically ill at the sight of other people having sex is a bit on the prudish side.

      Somehow I suspect that her feeling ill had less to do with seeing other people having sex than having been deceived into going into that club by a man who promised he would never ask her to go to one again.

      The legal document also doesn't specify what kind of sex club it was. I've been to a few fetish nights, and I get queasy when I see some of the stuff that goes on there, so I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  325. acceptability by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    Lives will be lost ... However, this is not 'acceptable', merely inevitable.

    People often use the word intolerable, and then go on to tolerate. They use the word unacceptable, and then they accept. I guess you can make a definition of acceptable that doesn't mean what the word means, but in the end, lives will be lost and if you don't accept that, it means you don't do it.

    Remedial viewing: Glory (on the matter of sacrifice), The Princess Bride (on the topic of words that people use but don't really mean, in that case, "inconceivable").

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  326. Oh the bullcrap level is running high tonight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I'm sorry to burst everyone's bubbles, but Star Trek in every one of its various and myriad forms (from original recipe to the last extra moldy version) was one of the worst long running pieces of utter schlock to ever get bundled under the banner of Science Fiction. Its science was laughable, its writing was banal, its humor was on par with hillbilly one-liners, its situations were stilted and its acting was worse. Sure it's special effects got better with time and it featured some hot babes to keep male interest levels high, but that was about all you could say for it. Out of, what, seven movies or so, only Wrath of Khan is worth watching twice and the rest were in varying grades of lousy. I for one am glad it's gone and I can only hope they never bring the cheesy thing back. Instead maybe we'll see some decent Sci-Fi make it, like some of the Vorkosigan stories or some Honor Harrington or William Gibson or almost anything with some plot and CHARACTER DEVELOPEMENT. Decent writing and dialogue wouldn't hurt either. If you need examples of much better shows try Babylon Five, Farscape, Firefly, etc.
    For that matter if it's making gold from lead that you want to see an example of, try Dr. Who or Red Dwarf. These shows managed to overcome the most low budget effects and silliest plot lines ever imagined and still came out looking a hundred times better written and performed.
    Only Buck Rogers (starring Tweeky!) and the original Battlestar Galactica (Gee Pa them Cylons shure is mean ol' hombres) managed to be even worse then Star Trek in its many incarnations. Lost in Space and Time Tunnel were probably at the same level as ST(NG,V,DS9,or E) and we will simply hope that no one even thinks about Irwin Allen and the drivel he produced (I still shudder to wonder what incompetent naval architect ever thought about putting ventilation ducts big enough to crawl through in a submarine, but I digress).
    Yes DS9 was marginally the best of the StarDrek breed, but we're arguing for who sucks least here and they scarcely merits the nostalgic angst I'm reading here.
    The collective series is dead, I'm glad it's dead, and I hope they never resurrect it.

  327. Spoiler: It turns out that... by mpaque · · Score: 1

    It turns out that the whole "ST: Enterprise" series was just another holodeck malfunction.

  328. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

    Of course it's Picard. Kirk never did anything like this.

  329. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    Nope. 7 of 9, aka 10 of 10, aka 38 of D.

    But poor Terry Farrell was totally, totally wasted in DS9. I never even though of her as attractive until DS9 did the Tribble episode. And seeing her in that ST:TOS uniform... WHOA! And she got extra points for having the hots for Spock over Kirk.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  330. Denny. Crane. by tarpy · · Score: 1

    I gotta admit, at first I didn't like that character (back when it was on The Practice), but Denny. Crane. has so grown on me.

    And only Shatner could really pull off a character who honestly used the sound of his name as some sort of amulet to ward off lesser beings.

  331. Fools, small chidren, and ships named Lincoln by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
    I don't think it's fair to compare the two in the way that you have, in the same way you can't compare Kennedy to Lincoln to determine who was the better President.

    Oh come on! Lincoln was a much better President than Kennedy! Lincoln sucessfully presided over a major war. He persevered despite having significantly less competent generals than the South. Politically, he was constantly threatened by his opposition. He helped unite a fractured country.

    What did Kennedy do? Lost his nerve invading a 3rd world island. Prevailed in a nuclear chicken session with Kruschev. Banged Hollywood starlets and Eastern bloc spies.

    Hmmm, I'm starting to see what you mean...

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  332. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 1
    Kudos for your encyclopedic knowledge of pornography :-)

    Thank you, sir. Thank you.

    I'm positve that Claudia Christian and Andrea Thompson did not, because they are cleary very wholesome.

    As for Claudia Christian, you're probably right (although it's often the quiet ones who'll really shock you in private). But Andrea Thompson? Not only did she show quite a bit of skin on NYPD Blue on more than one occasion, she also did a very steamy nude scene on the HBO series Arli$$. MMM yum. Plus on B5, there was that whole implied (unconsummated?) lesbian relationship between Talia and Ivanova...

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  333. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1
    When faced with a genetically engineered madman with ten times his strength, Kirk evened the odds with a pipe.

    Khan? Damn, don't remember that scene. (Time to turn over the official geek identification card...)

    I don't think you meant Spock. Funny, that's one of my favorite scenes too, in "This Side of Paradise". Kirk, noting in his log before confronting Spock, how Spock could kick his ass. And then during the fight, Spock whacks the pipe Kirk uses to block and crushes it, illustrating just how screwed Kirk was. Kirk was a master at evaluating a tactical situation. Picard had to study Kirk, not vice versa.

    And remember, Kirk took out a Gorn as well! (My only quibble with the "Mirror Enterprise" episode. They made the Gorn look like a skinny gekko, rather than the slowassed, meat ripping machine...)

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  334. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think Jolene Blalock looks like a house dancer at a mid-grade strip club -- reasonably attractive and boinkable, in a slightly white-trash kind of way.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  335. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

    It was better toward the end, way better actually. I also gave up watching it, for much the same reasons, and only recently got involved, to point of actually trying to watch it, this season. Actually, I think they should have done this
    sooner, perhaps only done 1 of Deep Space Nine, and Voyager ... or combined them somehow, remember when they
    were running both simulatenously? they have treked us out, a little bit. The song intro really hurt them, imo, totally unlike anything before, and therefore killed the ritualistic aspect of star-trek viewing. Imagine if next-gen had blundered on the opening title? I doubt it would have much fared better, Q got a little tedius.

  336. Trek from Birth by buccaneer9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My first memory of Star Trek is tangential. I came upon my older bother and sister in the TV room watching a spaceship on the tube. I asked them if Star Trek was on; they "shushed" me. I sat watching with them and slowly realized that it was a real space mission, not the TV show. This must have been Apollo 8, 9, or 10 in 1967 or '68 -- there were three people in the ship and I know it wasn't the first moon landing.

    This early memory (I was born in '63) tells me that I knew at the time what Star Trek was, though I don't have distinct memories of the episodes or watching it during the first seasons.

    While this is a time for geeks of my age to rejoice (we have the final Star Trek episode and the final Star Wars movie now - I was 14 in 1977 for the debut of Star Wars), Star Trek has always been closer for me. Going back to that time, the future then was a dark thing: Cold War, oil shortages, stagflation, Club of Rome, overpopulation . . . the list goes on. Star Trek provided an optimistic view of a future world - not without pain and suffering to achieve it, but a final world in which the differences of the '60's and 70's were achieved.

    Well, boys and girls, we've reached that world; and not a little bit because there were fictional sources to point the proper way. Lt. Uhuru was the first major black character on a TV series. The Cold War is over; my beautiful wife is Hungarian, inaccessible before behind the Iron Curtain - today, we have a boy and a girl together. It's not because of Star Trek - but Star Trek was a touchstone for many of us here in the west - a common vision and means of communication.

    There is a previous memory in this list of watching Trek in Somolia. My memory is watching Star Trek 4 in Taipei, Taiwan, in a youth hostel almost entirely populated by non-Americans. Yet they shared so many of the visions. Truly, Hollywood is a powerful tool. Too bad too few of those in control have the vision of Gene Roddenbery.

  337. Re:ENT people complaining about TNG presence in fi by istewart · · Score: 1

    Too bad the elements of TNG that were present in the episode were dumbed down to the suck-level of Enterprise.

  338. Re:Fools, big shidren, chips named Enterprize by vpetersen · · Score: 1

    Picard slapped Q in one of STNG books. I think it was mutual slapping or something. The book started about the universe pulling itself into a giant vortex soon after when Data and Picard went holodeck fishing, and the whole plot rotated about The End of Everything As We Know It or some such key phrase. For some reason, I tought the author was influenced by Douglas Adams books although I hoped it wasn't true.

    ~vp

  339. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Tassach · · Score: 1
    I've heard both versions of the story. Which is true and which is rumour? Who knows?

    However, the re-release of her Playboy spread and the announcement of her departure from TNG were so close together that it seems unlikely that the timing was mere cooincidence.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  340. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget, Sisko had the bawls to punch Q.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  341. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Have you watched that crap?
    If, by "crap", you mean a young, nubile, and extremely sexy Heather Locklear, then I shall have to ask you to step outside.
    However, if, by "crap", you mean anything else about that horrendous abortion of a TV show, then I shall have to state, for the record, that you are an extremely insightful person whose post should be modded up post-haste.
  342. Re:Dang and they just took away my tv torrent site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuck - the NiteShdw avis are only 175MB. The 'normal' size torrents (350MB) are working, albeit slower than usual.

  343. Re:Dang and they just took away my tv torrent site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the torrents for the 350 MB versions are working, some are not. I think it depends on which of btefnet's trackers the torrent uses.

  344. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by slittle · · Score: 1

    I believe the ridges were explained in Enterprise.

    A handful of remnants of the eugenics wars (kept in secret by data's creator, before he turned to robotics) started getting delusions of grandieur (as they do), left their secret home and captured a klingon vessel. The klingons decided to create their own engineered people in response.

    Unfortunately, they fucked up somehow and created/mutated a virus that infected an entire klingon planet. So the scientists responsible captured the Enterprise doctor to help create a cure, otherwise other klingons were going to exterminate the planet's population to contain the virus.

    This cure was created from human DNA (or some shit) and resulted in the patient losing his ridges.

    In the future came technology to give them back their ridges, but until then, klingons from that planet were human-like.

    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  345. Better question by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Is it still on BitTorrent? :)

    New episodes air every Saturday and wind up on BT within 2-3 hours. Episode 8 should be out sometime tonight.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  346. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worf was a Lt. Cmdr., one rank below Sisko's rank of full Commander, and equal to Major, the same rank as Kyra. No conflict of authority if Sisko was not promoted.

    It made sense to promote Sisko in the story arc because of the increasing importance of DS9, and the greater responsibilities Sisko had to undertake.

  347. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Mikito · · Score: 1

    Not to mention "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds".

    "Picture yourself...in a boat!"
    "On a river! With...TANgerine trees and MARmalade skies!"
    "Somebody calls you"[anguished voice]"you answer"
    [normal voice]"quite sloooowly"
    [growl]"A GIRL!"
    [normal voice rising in pitch]"with kaleidoscope eyes."

    Awful. Simply awful. Funny, but still awful.

    --
    Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
  348. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    If you're a real geek (i.e., the kind that likes playing with numbers and memorizing the electronegativity values in period table order, not the kind that like iPods and animé because they are trendy), check out the SCE series of books - Starfleet Corps of Engineers. Really good series with Scotty as a deskbound administrator controlling teams of engineers fixing oddball problems throughout the Federation.

    And the best captain? Captain Mackenzie Calhoun of the USS Excalibur. Notable at being the only alien captain in charge of a series (even if it is a book series), and also in charge of a vastly more diverse crew in terms of species (which being a book series helps). Very few humans on the bridge, and each species is at a post where they excel. Brikar security officers just make sense.

    Oh, and I liked Enterprise, but the screwed with the Thollians, for which I am very upset and will pretend never happened.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  349. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    Jeri Ryan is made of plastic. Jolene Blalock might not be.

    Not to burst yer bubble, but Jolene is a skinny little skater grrl. I've heard her interviewed (by Howard Stern) and she describes her on-screen rack as totally artificial. "Tube socks".

    Personally I think Terry Farrell has it all over both of 'em.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  350. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Picard is a wimp. Kirk is a man's man.

    Picard trys to go by the Prime Directive, even if it means misery for people on the planet. Kirk always violated it, because he put the good fortune of others ahead of a buerocratic/pollitical idea.


    Kirk may be a mans man, but Picard is an adult. Kirk would just do what he closed minded wanted. Say, if he was president he would "liberate" a coutry even if it ment 100000 died in the process.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  351. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by destroyingworld · · Score: 1

    Field leadership perhaphs, but not political leadership or diplomacy.

  352. Re:After it became Voyager... [spoiler near end] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, the scientific aspect of producing a Human-Vulcan mix is utter tripe (iron v. copper based blood for a start) but, since TOS gave us Spock already, to me it was already part of the willing suspension of disbelief that the two species could mate (yes, the sexually incompatible portion of the definition of "species" means they can't mate but science has already left the building).

    I didn't get a sense of T'Pol being "shared around". I think at the beginning of the series she developed a respect for Archer and, therefore, some attachment. However, has she and Trip spent more time together she developed a sort of monogomous relationship with him. That is not to say respect and attraction had for Archer vanished but, just as in human relationships, she moved on while maintaining a fondness for him. Also, Archer, like Kirk (perhaps even more so), is "married" to his ship and career.

    Her period of being married was a perhaps unnecessary complexity but life often throws curves which would screw up a nice story arc so maybe it can be excused. It certainly led to the next thing: Trip's coolness towards her.

    I did find Trip's casual dismissals of her efforts to open up and connect annoying but understandable as a developing relationship. He needed to learn that she was in the process of learning to crawl while he could already run. It was evidence of the strength of T'Pol's feelings that she continued to pursue the relationship once Trip became so cool towards it.

    To conclude, I think they were onto something with the Trip-T'Pol relationship and that it could have been developed into an even more interesting story line. The killing of Trip at the end of the series, which ruins the possibility of ever developing the relationship further, was completely idiotic and pure Braga/Berman shortsightedness. It was so stupid I would even accept a crappy way to reverse it such as having T'Pol finding a way to time travel just to save him (bringing her skepticism about time travel into the plot!).

    I have read that Jolene Blalock was very unhappy ("appalled") with the ending of the series and I have to conclude she was referring to Trip's death.

  353. Re:After it became Voyager... [spoiler] by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    [Spoiler context not repeated. Get context from previous messages, and stop reading now if you've not seen the last episode and care about having it spoiled.]

    I can understand her upsetness. Although I had remarked upthread that a death could be instructive to our space program, I meant "by way of showing that things can continue", not "as a way of so demoralizing everyone that they would know the series was really over". That kind of misses the "sometimes death is necessary for things to move ahead" message.

    Plus, this is a lesson Star Trek has already taught us well, and is not one that required repeating. I heard my wife muttering "The good of the many must outweigh..." before the incident was even half-over and we knew the outcome. You could see it coming a mile away.

    It seemed a serious diss either to the people who canceled it or personally to Connor Trinneer (who played Trip in the series but won't be in any movies without help from the 28th Century Temporal Police--they closed the door on that relatively firmly with Riker's historical commentary and museum video).

    [Actually, IMDB shows its bounding notation "(2001-2005)", usually reserved for characers present only for part of a series after not just Trip but also Archer, T'Pol, Flox, and Malcolm (but not Travis and Hoshi, for example). Wonder what that's about. Conspiratorial thought: Did I see talk here on Slahdot of the South Park people picking up the show? Maybe that's why Chef was the central character in the last episode... maybe he's the common element that's going to tie the two shows together.]

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  354. Re:It would figure that a Pongo would like Picard. by DG · · Score: 1

    See, you made my point. If you Picard-lovers weren't so busy having those staff meetings and finding out how every junior officer *felt* about each potential course of action, then you wouldn't be engaging the enemy at *close* range.

    You would have, like Kirk, figured out that they were the enemy, made the immediate decision to engage NOW, and engaged at LONG range.

    Thppppt! :P

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  355. Reynolds? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Malcolm Reynolds? Anyone?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Reynolds? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Hell Yes! He seems to be a decent political/social manipulator (choosing not to eliminate middlemen when selling meds), an excellent and brilliant strategist especially when the chips are down, and he's the best leader of them all--he knows when to lay the smackdown, when to coax, when to wheedle, and when to be generous.

      List revision (Reynolds takes #2. While he was shaping up to be the best of all, we simply don't have enough data for a decent comparison):

      Sheridan > Reynolds > Sisko > Sinclair > Picard > Kirk

  356. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by gfreeman · · Score: 1

    There'll never be a Slashdot: The Next Generation

    It'll be reruns anyway.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  357. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by unitron · · Score: 1

    Before Sisko was Sisko he was Hawk. Coolness contest over before it started.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  358. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by unitron · · Score: 1
    "So you're saying they should have stayed completley acurate to TOS? I think people would be a little confused when they heard about the great wars in the 1990s."

    What you have to remember is that the Star Trek universe, i.e., all of the Star Trek stories, came from a black Sci-Fi pulp mag writer named Benny Russell who created it all back in the '50s.

    This helps explain the different "looks" of the different series', each reflecting the era in which some of Russell's stories were turned into television shows and movies. Sort of like how Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers might have a look different from the original '30s visuals if the same stories were filmed again today.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  359. Sadly, the Riker thing was very lame by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    "These are Voyages" was so boring I gave up part way and did the dishes.

    But the season finale for ST was fantastic!

    Sigh. Back to Battlstar Galactica, Lost and Grey's Anatomy for me.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  360. Re:After it became Voyager... [spoiler] by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    Trip can return in a movie or expansion on the series, as long as it takes place in the long time span they gave themselves between the Terra Prime thing and the coda where he is killed.

  361. Re:After it became Voyager... [spoiler] by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    Trip can return in a movie or expansion on the series, as long as it takes place in the long time span they gave themselves between the Terra Prime thing and the coda where he is killed.

    Now I'm not remembering clearly, nor am I highly motivated to rush out and find a friend who cared enough to record this fiasco of a last-two-episodes, but didn't T'Pol mention she hadn't thought of him in all that time? Presumably implying that he wasn't on the ship, and at least implying that the one plot feature people want to see (the two of them together) can't usefully happen?

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  362. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Yeah and Picard would allow the evil dictator to rule that country and try to deal with him diplomatically. All the while, the evil dictator is sending his people to slaughterhouses and not agreeing with Picard. Then Picard sends a team down to negotiate with the Evil Dictator, and they get captured. Then, yes, for the sake of humanity, Picard goes himself, only to be captured and executed, and the Evil Dictator takes over the Enterprise.

    Scotty was right "The only diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank."

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  363. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Snaller · · Score: 1

    The invasion of iraq has killed more than saddam could, and created tons of emenies. That's what shotgun diplomacy gets you.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  364. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Freedom does not have a price tag. Communism has killed over 100 million people, yet I do not hear you complaining about that.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  365. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Freedom does not have a price tag.

    ah, so you think its ok to kill and slaughter if you put the right label on it. How inhuman of you.

    Communism has killed over 100 million people, yet I do not hear you complaining about that.


    If you murder your wife, you are not going to get off because someone else has.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  366. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Sure by all rights, according to you, we still should be slaves to the British Empire in the good old USA. Also Hitler should be running the planet after World War II. Just because you say it is not ok to kill if you put the right label on it. I'll bet you never stood for anything in your life that was worth fighting for.

    Therefore, you are pro-Facism, pro-Slavery, and pro-Freedom because you would rather let those things happen than kill people to prevent it.

    There is a difference between kill and murder. Murder is unjustified, killing can be justified.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  367. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Er that should have been Anti-Freedom instead of Pro-Freedom. I got caught up in the momment.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  368. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Mod: -1 crackpot
    Mod: -1 fanatic
    Mod: -1 Low IQ
    Mod: -2 Makes world more dangerous to live in

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  369. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Mod: -1 Wimp
    Mod: -1 Whiner
    Mod: -1 Retarded
    Mod: -2 Uses moral relativism to justify doing nothing.
    Mod: -3: Only the Sith think in absolutes.

    The last one is slightly related to the thread. It is, at least Sci-Fi.

    Have fun living in your unrealistic black and white world.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  370. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Mod: -2 Uses moral relativism to justify doing nothing.
    Mod: -3: Only the Sith think in absolutes.


    And of course those with an IQ larger than a dead rat will find those two amusing since they contradict each other.

    Pity this place doesn't have an ignore function.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  371. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Learn to laugh, or you will go insane. You cannot ignore the truth.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  372. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wake up will you - If morals are absolute then you are a fanatic, a sith, and alqueda. If you say "if you are not with me you are against me" they only way out is war.

  373. Re:Fools, small chidren, and ships named Enterpris by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    So he's par with Wesley.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck