Slashdot Mirror


User: pauljlucas

pauljlucas's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,446
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,446

  1. Re:Invalid Invalid Invalid on Xerox Patent Ruled Invalid, palmOne Exonerated · · Score: 1
    Patents have always been a mess and i dont think any groundbreaking inventions can be said to stem from the patenting system.
    Uh... the transitor was patented by AT&T. The almost immediate groundbreaking thing developed with them was cheap, portable radios. Companies sold lots of them. Pocket-sized radios were the iPods of the day.
  2. Re:Does this mean Graffiti will make a return? on Xerox Patent Ruled Invalid, palmOne Exonerated · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You either love Graffiti 2 or hate it. I too used Graffiti for along time. I always thought some characters were weird, and I never managed to make my letter 'e's such that they'd be recognized as 'e's the first try.

    It took me only about a week to switch my brain to using Graffiti 2, but I like it much better. All of the alphabeting characters can be written "normally" and in lower-case. (Grafitti was a weird mix of upper- and lower-case.)

    My only complaint about Graffiti 2 is that the "puntuation shift" is too involved what with the leading and trailing upstroke. But overall, I like Graffiti 2 much better.

  3. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It is coming......
    I was aware of Alpine's plans, but this is the first I've seen a picture of it. I was afraid they'd do something like this: the wire is still there. Ugh. I want no wires. Remeber when cassette decks were standard in cars, then portable CD players came out, then those horrible adapters came out? You know, the ones with a fake cassette and wires all over your front seat? I hated those.

    The right solution is to make the iPod slip into a slot for it, preferably with the slot in the head unit itself behind the fold-down faceplate.

    I'm entitled to want what I want.

    This will be the first, others will come after....
    All I can do is hope that somebody gets it right.
  4. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 1
    so you want apple... to design something specifically for you rneeds... because you're too lazy to do it yourself, but too damn picky about 'style' to accept an existing solution?
    While I doubt that they're exclusively my needs (I really think such a product would sell much better than, say this), my answer is: yep, exactly. And I'm not going to compromise what I want and accept anything less. I'd rather do without than have a half-assed solution. Sorry your standards aren't as high.
  5. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 1
    next thing you'll be telling me is that people dont want to ... take pictures with their phones
    I've never seen anybody in public actually using a camera phone as a camera. It's a gimmick. Sure, a few people might use it as a camera, but I doubt it's regularly. Camera phones probably did well in test marketing because people thought they were novel/cool. But once the novelty wears off, the camera will probably see little use.

    Do you own/use a camera phone as a camera? Know anybody that does regularly?

  6. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 1
    I also posinted out the integrated console that some guy fabricated to make an elegant, integrated wireless soluction.
    That's a bit more effort than I, and I venture most people, are willing to make.
  7. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    The best thing to do know is get a head unit with an aux input and run RCA cables to the iPod.
    Again, I don't want any cables. Having cables loose and danling all over the console is not my idea of an elegant solution.

    Please stop suggesting things. (I never asked for suggestions.) I've already looked into all of them and they all suck.

  8. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The long-term digital music/movies business is not a "one trick pony" -- in the future it's bound to be integrated into every cell phone, PDA, car stereo, home stereo, cable box, and television set.
    The thing that companies haven't figured out yet is that nobody wants to watch movies on portable devices with tiny screens. It's an application looking for a market.
    I guess the development of an 'iPod' division indicates that Apple is looking at the big picture and not just the trick pony.
    If they really wanted to do that, they would have created a "consumer electronics" division.
  9. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 1
    Alpine will be making an adaptor cable that allows an alpine head unit to control an iPod.
    That's better, but it still has an ugly wire hanging. I was a slot to pop the iPod into.
  10. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 1
    You can run the wire from that jack to whatever location you want to put the iPod in.
    I don't consider a wire hanging elegant. Like I said, it's not up to Apple's standards. If Apple does it, you can be it will be done right (iPod with Bluetooth?).
  11. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Dunno why you'd presume that.
    1. Because the linked article made no mention of it: no data, assume no change.
    2. The software runs on a Mac, not an iPod.
    3. There are people (like me) who use iTunes and the iTMS who don't own iPods.
  12. Re:Better focus or Mac to be axed? on Apple Creates new iPod and Macintosh Divisions · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Apple decreases the emphasis on its Computer division to focus more and more effort on the Music side. The Mac as we know it disappears.
    As nice as it is, the iPod is pretty much a one-trick pony. Do you really think Apple could sustain itself on the (relatively small) profit margins of the iPod alone? Additionally, iTunes and the iTMS are presumeably staying in the Mac division. The FireWire sync of one's entire music library fom iTunes is the killer feature of the iPod. The iPod division will still have to work closely with the Mac division.

    What I'm hoping will happen with the iPod division will be that they will start making their own iPod accessories. What I really want is a car head unit that has a slot that one just pops the iPod into. Current iPod adapter solutions are all crap and don't measure up to Apple design standards.

  13. Re:Build errors on Security Holes in CVS and Subversion Found · · Score: 1
    The 2nd obvious suggestions is to point out that even regardless of this particular vulnerability, you should never run cvs :pserver on the internet
    I don't. Why did you think I did?
    Instead run cvs :ext over ssh.
    I do.
  14. I'll stick to troff on Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac Released · · Score: 2, Funny

    Feh... LaTeX is a new-fangled text-markup package. I still write papers using troff, pic, tbl, etc. Seriously.

  15. Build errors on Security Holes in CVS and Subversion Found · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I just grabbed the source for 1.12.8 and I get:
    ld: warning -L: directory name (no/lib) does not exist
    ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _notify_check
    edit.o definition of _notify_check in section (__TEXT,__text)
    /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(notify_c lient.o) definition of _notify_check
    ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _regcomp
    ../lib/libcvs.a(regex.o) definition of _regcomp in section (__TEXT,__text)
    /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(regcomp. So) definition of _regcomp
    ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _regexec
    ../lib/libcvs.a(regex.o) definition of _regexec in section (__TEXT,__text)
    /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(regexec. So) definition of _regexec
    ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _regfree
    ../lib/libcvs.a(regex.o) definition of _regfree in section (__TEXT,__text)
    /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(regfree. So) definition of _regfree
    ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _regerror
    ../lib/libcvs.a(regex.o) definition of _regerror in section (__TEXT,__text)
    /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(regerror .So) definition of _regerror
    I'm compiling on Mac OS X. Any ideas?
  16. Re:Will we see something like this on linux? on Google Experiments With Local Filesystem Search · · Score: 1
    I'd love to have something blazingly fast. Is that too much to ask for?
    Nope.
  17. Re:Or how about on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The Western notion of God means the being is all-powerful, morally perfect, and the creator of the universe.
    And if somebody removes their religious blinders for just a little while and actually thinks such a statement through, they'll realize that there are some serious problems with it.
  18. Search engine != entire web on How Hard Is It To Write Your Own Search Engine? · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Not all search engines are designed or intended for indexing and searching the entire web, and not everybody needs such a search engine. Often, people want to search their stuff: their documents on their local disks, their e-mail, etc.

    While writing a local search engine isn't trivial, it's a lot easier than writing a web search engine since all the scaling issues disappear -- I know: I wrote one.

  19. Kidney-bean-shaped Discover cards on RFID MasterCard · · Score: 1
    I agree, this is a solution looking for a problem, and it's going to die a quick death.
    At least this has the potential to be marginally useful unlike that kidney-bean-shaped Discover card with a hinged case. (Remember those?) AFAIK, they were market as being "conversation starters" and didn't claim any real advantage.
  20. To cheap to meter on Coming Soon to a Wireless Hotspot Near You: Ads · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hosting these free hotspots costs money...
    Not really.
  21. Re:#define PREPROCESSOR "No!" on Gosling on Opening Java · · Score: 1
    Basically, if the condition of your if() is a constant (static final boolean)...
    But I clearly said it wasn't.
  22. Re:#define PREPROCESSOR "No!" on Gosling on Opening Java · · Score: 1

    Except that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.

  23. Re:#define PREPROCESSOR "No!" on Gosling on Opening Java · · Score: 1
    A fourth is conditional compilation for assertions or other development aids; again, you can do this more neatly with a simple 'if' statement -- and a decent compiler or runtime will optimise it away when not used.
    Suppose I have debugging code in that can be switched on/off at runtime. Furhter suppose that, for production, I want it not even present. Because the 'if' statement tests a variable and not a constant, no compiler can optimize it away.

    A preprocessor is still useful in this case.

  24. Re:iPod's nice enough but Apple itself...?? on NYT on Apple's Digital Way of Life · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I couldn't understand why the company I had invested in and believed in would do something so crass as to associate with the RIAA.
    It's really simple: if you want to sell music legally in the US, you have no choice but to do business with the RIAA.
  25. Re:Personal Search Engines. on How to Build a Search Engine · · Score: 1
    My own search engine, running on my POSIX-capable machine, indexing and organizing 'bookmarks' ...
    You could probably use SWISH++ and a modified vesion of the included httpindex script to do exactly what you want.