Slashdot Mirror


User: pixelpusher220

pixelpusher220's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,947
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,947

  1. Re:In the interest of appeasing both sides... on Ask Slashdot: What Does Edward Snowden Deserve? · · Score: 2

    Perhaps they can rescind Obama's and give it to Snowden

  2. Re:It might be an unpopular opinion... on Ask Slashdot: What Does Edward Snowden Deserve? · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually he wasn't pardoned. His sentence was commuted but he was never pardoned. He's still guilty.

  3. Re:any research on Facebook Is a Plague That'll Burn Out In a Few Years, Says Study · · Score: 1

    What I see as the big flaw is comparing a plague...which has no positive features to its 'users' to something that does have positive features.

    The spread may be similar to STD/STIs which obviously have a positive feature in their spread ;-), but unlike the plague Facebook doesn't kill it's users (could we add that?) so it's not going to go away in the same manner.

  4. Re:Of course it is here to stay on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 0

    The US spends more on education than anyone

    Yes, we should be dumb and stupid...great way to plan for the future.

    unemployment benefits are YEARS longer than they were just 10 years ago

    Perhaps because we're experiencing the worst recession in a generation? You know, people actually need unemployment benefits right now because they can't find jobs? And after starting off with 'decade over decade' you cherry pick one decade with a VASTLY different economic environment? well played sir troll, well played.

    Medicare was just gutted and largely replaced by ACA (overall spending increase)

    And 30-40 MILLION more people have health insurance available to them. Overall spending DECREASE since once it's fully in force and people are enrolled the number of ER visits goes way way down. Again, 'decade over decade' and you compare to just 'now'.

    I think the question meant to say, when does the government ever return power that it seized?

    I think the proper question is why aren't you getting off your lazy AC ass and actually doing something about it? If you don't like the government, you're quite free to persuade your neighbors to join you in replacing your representatives.

  5. Re:Of course it is here to stay on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 1

    So you're arguing the GOP hasn't proposed cutting social programs?

    How about cutting food stamps? Do you think it's the Dems' pushing that?

  6. Re:Of course it is here to stay on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 1

    And I'll answer it for you, again. Welfare was significantly rolled back in the 90s. Plus everything else the GOP says they want to rollback.

  7. Re:Being a Californian on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 1

    While I don't doubt things are worse in other places, that's not the standard I'm holding the US too.

  8. Re:For reals??? on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 1

    Whoops!

  9. Re:For reals??? on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 2

    see Military Industrial complex, specifically Truman's warnings...that's why she's protective of it.

  10. Re:Being a Californian on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Arizona knows something of Liberty? Papers please because you look 'foreign'...

  11. Re:Of course it is here to stay on Senator Dianne Feinstein: NSA Metadata Program Here To Stay · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unemployment benefits? Medicare cuts? Vouchers for healthcare instead of actual health care? School funding?

    If the GOP had it's way LOTS of social programs would be gone entirely..or haven't you been listening to what they actually say?

  12. Re:Boring Drive on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    cool, thank you.

    In my experience, all the failings of Google car listed exist in a sizable portion of the driving population as well ;-)

  13. Re:Safety on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    Yep it sure is.

    Probably why it isn't in production yet :) Things will improve.

  14. Re:Boring Drive on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    The Google team has admitted that, unaided by humans, the current Google cars would likely have an accident within 50k miles or so.

    Source?

  15. Re:Safety on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    300,000 miles as of last year in 3 states. linky

    The *only* accidents? Either from 'other' people driven cars, or when the driver-less cars were actually being driven by people.

  16. Re:Safety on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    Fair enough. regarding hacking....I'm much more comfortable with Google doing this since they are keenly aware of security aspects. Car companies? Not at all. And frankly I wouldn't want them to be security experts - I just want their systems to be certified by security experts. Likely there needs to be some standard/regulation/testing levels established so that the car companies have requirements they meet to sell such cars.

  17. Re:Safety on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    Google's cars are already interacting with real world drivers quite well.

  18. Re:Safety on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    Actually the car is going to see other cars reacting abnormally far far far quicker than you ever will. And it will start decelerating/avoiding before a human would too.

    The trick is having the car deduce the difference between abnormal and just odd. Google's already done a pretty good job of this and it will only improve.

  19. Re:Boring Drive on Who Is Liable When a Self-Driving Car Crashes? · · Score: 1

    Google's driverless car already disproves your theory. They've driven hundreds of thousands of miles in all kinds of regular car traffic and have accident rates that are infinitesimal - and the accidents are almost entirely the fault of the other drivers, not the Google car.

  20. Re:All the news that matters on US Customs Destroys Virtuoso's Flutes Because They Were "Agricultural Items" · · Score: 1

    made from REEDS, not trees.

  21. Re: Yes on Website Checkout Glitches: Two Very Different Corporate Responses · · Score: 1

    Never heard of them myself. Sounds like they've been living off the lack of consumer voice against them. If it's generally small stuff, people just get frustrated and don't tell that many people. Now that the customers can communicate amongst themselves...they may be in for an eye opening experience.

    Of course the next Kardashian scanda...I mean marketing event...may make people forget again.

  22. Re:Delta had no choice on Website Checkout Glitches: Two Very Different Corporate Responses · · Score: 1

    Gov't regulation....working!

  23. Re:Required by Federal Law on Website Checkout Glitches: Two Very Different Corporate Responses · · Score: 1

    So you're saying that regulation worked?

    Whether they would have or not is irrelevant. they did.

  24. Re: Yes on Website Checkout Glitches: Two Very Different Corporate Responses · · Score: 1

    'Get some perspective'

    Exactly, the company should have realized that a few products sold at a loss are far and away cheaper than an entire internet being pissed off at you. Perspective isn't a one way street.

  25. Re:Legality vs Enforceability on DoD Public Domain Archive To Be Privatized, Locked Up For 10 Years · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Checks and balances was replaced with apathy on the part of the electorate; the greed and corruption blossomed from there.

    We can still take it back, but given the state of the elector.....oooo Kardashians!

    I won't say I'm too hopeful.