Slashdot Mirror


User: hkmwbz

hkmwbz's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,812
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,812

  1. Re:What's in it? on Landmark Health Insurance Bill Passes House · · Score: 1

    You think monopoly is a good thing?

    So they will ban private hospitals?

    By the way, do you think government monopoly on the use of force (police, military) is a bad thing?

  2. Re:What's in it? on Landmark Health Insurance Bill Passes House · · Score: 1

    how the fuck am I supposed to magically be able to buy this new health insurance, or pay the fine if I can't afford it in the first place??

    Isn't the fine only for people who can afford it, but refuse? If you can't afford it, I believe you will get help.

    it's much cheaper to pay for minor care out of your own pocket

    What happens if you suddenly need major care?

  3. Re:What's in it? on Landmark Health Insurance Bill Passes House · · Score: 1

    If you don't have an insurance and get sick, who pays the bill if you can't afford it?

  4. Re:I'm thinking about moving to Norway on Norwegian Court Rules ISP Doesn't Have To Block The Pirate Bay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not intellectually stimulated by Norwegians at the least. The conversations doctors have at lunch revolve around one or two topics.

    Maybe you are just hanging around with the wrong crowd. It seems odd to describe 4-5 million Norwegian based on a bunch of rich dudes around a table.

    Take another country I've lived in, a small one called Iceland. The people there are spectacular. I love them to death. The women? Absolutely fabulous. They refer to Norwegian women as "burger butts".

    Burger butts? Sounds like you are making stuff up as you go along.

    They are a very open and warm people who speak English very well.

    That's odd, because Norwegians are well known for their English skills. I don't have the same experience with people from Iceland.

    One pet peeve of mine here in Norway is that about 90% of Norwegians don't even try to pronounce my typical English name correctly. ... I've been told that the reason for this is that Norwegians don't like to make mistakes, so they won't try to pronounce my name right for fear of that. When I take a patient into my office for a consultation, about 50% react in the stereotypical xenophobic way when I shake their hands and introduce myself as their doctor and tell them my name.

    Ok, so because they are afraid to make a mistake when pronouncing your name, they are xenophobic?

    10% get it right and become interested in me as a person and ask me where I'm from. I'm of course not here to be asked where I'm from, but it's nice once in a while when someone takes an interest in you.

    As an American, you should know that Americans are among the most superficial people on the planet. Americans don't ask because they really care. Seriously. You of all people should know that. Norwegians seem to be less happy about superficial small-talk.

    That's a major issue in this culture. I haven't figured out if it's egotism or what, but no one seems interested in each other.

    Or maybe they just aren't as superficial as Americans generally are?

    The other thing that gets me about this first 50% of people who see me with suspicion or look down on me is that no matter what I do, they will always think that they're better than me and I will never be accepted.

    How do you know that they look down on you? And how are these people who look down on you anyway?

    they don't get much exposure to the outside world

    Apart from their media being completely dominated by foreign productions, you mean? Especially American movies and music.

    All of the foreigners I've met here have the same things to say about it, especially my American countrymen.

    Funny, I have the opposite experience. One has to wonder why you feel the need to invent these things.

  5. Re:I'm thinking about moving to Norway on Norwegian Court Rules ISP Doesn't Have To Block The Pirate Bay · · Score: 1

    Norwegian speed limits are notoriously low for the conditions. A straight divided highway in the middle of nowhere will have a speed limit of 80 kph (about 49 mph) and people will drive 70.

    Huh? That's not my experience. Some roads have a 110 (or 120?) kph speed limit, and the traffic generally flows well above the limit.

    Up until around the 1970s, which is when they found oil, they were little more than farmers without any higher education or purpose.

    Actually, Norway was more of a fishing/shipping nation than a farming nation, and has had some of the world's best and most advanced fleets.

    Typical Norwegian food is poisonous

    Huh?

  6. Re:I'm thinking about moving to Norway on Norwegian Court Rules ISP Doesn't Have To Block The Pirate Bay · · Score: 1

    average speed on a 80 kph highway is about 85, police wont bother you until you're over 90-95

    That's not true from what I hear. If you drive too fast, you drive too fast.

  7. Re:I'm thinking about moving to Norway on Norwegian Court Rules ISP Doesn't Have To Block The Pirate Bay · · Score: 1

    The party you are probably referring to is closer to the Democrats than the Republicans, though. They want nationalized health care, in that even though they open up for private health care, the government still pays the bill. In US terms, that party is a left-leaning party.

  8. Re:I'm thinking about moving to Norway on Norwegian Court Rules ISP Doesn't Have To Block The Pirate Bay · · Score: 1
    So what you are saying is that Norway manages to be an awesome country because it can basically suck money straight out of the ground.

    What happens when the supply of money runs out?

  9. Re:Idocracy on Evolution's Path May Lead To Shorter, Heavier Women · · Score: 1

    Rich people generally spend and invest their money. Both benefit society greatly. Taxes do not benefit society if too high, because they will cause a lot of people to depend on handouts to survive.

  10. Re:Idocracy on Evolution's Path May Lead To Shorter, Heavier Women · · Score: 1

    The rich may move jobs out of the country, but they are also creating even more jobs inside the country.

  11. Re:Idocracy on Evolution's Path May Lead To Shorter, Heavier Women · · Score: 1

    So you vote libertarian because you think the world would be such a better place if all the rich people (i.e. not you or anyone you know) like Paris Hilton or Bill Gates got to keep all their fucking money instead of paying their taxes which can then be spent into giving you better healthcare or broadband connection?

    They invest their money in various ways, which leads to jobs for "normal" people.

  12. Re:Idocracy on Evolution's Path May Lead To Shorter, Heavier Women · · Score: 1

    Which yields weird and amusing behaviours from middle class nowhere-near-rich people. They're against taxes on the rich as if they ever were going to make it one day

    Or because they realize that the rich are investing their money in more jobs for middle class nowhere-near-rich people. Jobs = good.

  13. Re:Article already out of date on Android 2.0 — Competition Against the iPhone and the Rest · · Score: 1

    So you have no other source than your own speculation, is that what you are saying? Maemo is no-profit, no-margin etc. as well, so according to your logic they will be dropping that.

  14. Re:Article already out of date on Android 2.0 — Competition Against the iPhone and the Rest · · Score: 1

    Even Nokia is abandoning Symbian for maemo

    Source? Just because Maemo exists doesn't mean that Nokia is abandoning Symbian.

  15. Re:I read both articles... on A Tale of Two Windows 7s · · Score: 1

    Manjoo's piece attempted to 'prove' that Windows 7 was a better operating system based on one feature (Taskbar/Aero Views vs. Exposé

    What on earth are you talking about? The article mentions several thing, such as Windows 7 staying out of your way more than Vista, the new "Libraries" file management, the new device connectivity handling, the several new improvements/additions to the taskbar, etc. Did you really just read the couple of sentences referring to Aero Peek, or are you consciously lying?

  16. Re:Why? on 50+ Android Phones Expected In Near Future · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't the HTC Leo a Windows Mobile phone?

  17. Re:Droid ad didn't make complete sense on 50+ Android Phones Expected In Near Future · · Score: 1

    Widgets are incredibly useful because they allow you to customize your home screen the way you want it. I've got several useful widgets, including detailed battery info, WiFi and GPS toggling (to save battery), etc.

  18. Re:Any have a decent Camera? on 50+ Android Phones Expected In Near Future · · Score: 1
    A 4 megapixel camera, and no camera light or flash. That's rather pathetic. Other than that, yes, I'm drooling over it.

    By the way, that list of "50 phones to be released in the near future" has 13 phones that are already available, so why on earth are they claiming that 37 == 50?

  19. Re:No, this is a creationist's response on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1

    I would not say the bacteria had been created with the ability to break down nylon molecules. I would say the bacteria was created to survive.

    They weren't created. They just exist, and they survive because Evolution ensures that life adapts to its environment.

    Here's an article I found enlightening on the broad subject:

    You find misinformed, anti-scientific drivel enlightening? Why don't you read actual scientific literature instead of pseudoscientific nonsense? Educate yourself.

    As an aside, "survival of the fittest" is often far more closely associated with evolution than it is with creation - but I was struck one day how brilliant the idea is. If you could design a free-wheeling thing like this earth, how would you design it any other way?

    You are indeed an idiot. Life was created without death, remember?

  20. Re:hmmm on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1

    many other inconsistencies with evolution

    There are no inconsistencies, only your amazing ignorance.

    that are still a challenge for gradual, incremental evolution to explain

    No, you ignorant fucktard. You are just spewing the same old Creationist nonsense that has been debunked time and time again. Why don't you educate yourself instead of spouting nonsense? No, these are not a challenge. They have been explained already.

    evolved-over-billions-of-years-from-a-singularity-filled-with-energy evolution is still a challenge for me to accept

    You are a fucking moron. The Big Bang has got nothing to do with Evolution. Evolution is biology, you ignorant fucking redneck.

  21. Re:hmmm on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1

    After 40,000 generations, the organism was still in E. coli and nothing else.

    Nope, it was something else because it no longer matched the criteria of E. coli.

    Thousands of generations of fruit flies have been bred, with many variations and mutations, but all are still essentially fruit flies.

    Your ignorance and dishonesty is astounding. Where you you get this idiotic nonsense from?

  22. Re:hmmm on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1
    Wow, your ignorance (or is it dishonesty?) is amazing. How about you pick up a basic biology book instead of asking all these misguided questions, and making all these dishonest claims?

    We do have the fossils you ask for. It's just a matter of you educating yourself.

    No, evolution is not "fairly rapid".

    Why "should" one mammoth be successful enough to have offspring alive today?

    We have found several "spot" where these branches meet".

    Indeed, tigers and lions are showing speciation.

  23. Re:hmmm on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1

    Give it up already. It was clearly not an honest question, as he used the standard Creationist lie "I believe in Evolution, but". And it is not that people are incapable of answering it, it's that the answer is so easy to find only dishonest creationists will ask it.

  24. Re:hmmm on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1

    No, the new bacteria were not E. coli because of the trait that made previous generations E. coli was no longer present.

  25. Re:No, this is a creationist's response on Observing Evolution Over 40,000 Generations · · Score: 1

    In some of my previous posts, I've tried to convey the idea that perhaps we're not seeing new characteristics generate - rather we're seeing a reconfiguration / recombination / whatever of existing information.

    Yes, a mutation. Which resulted in a new species of bacteria, with new characteristics. There are many examples of this, such as Nylonase. But I guess you are saying that they carried the ability to digest nylon in their genes since they were magically created by God! Geez.

    As the quote says, it already knew how to use citrate. Creationists are fine with that. I think when you look closely at each example of evolution, this theme will keep coming up. The information was already there, it just needed to be flipped on or off or the genes reconfigured or recombined.

    No, the "information" was not already there. A mutation enabled it to use citrate in conditions which it would otherwise not be able to do it.