What are you talking about? A welded-shut hood isn't a copy-protection technology, and not even the most foolih judge/jury would think it was. Yes, even in the USA.
Another puzzling thing to note, if encryption is being used, and the government can support their claims, someone in government must have the capability to crack encryption, and assuming "Muslim extremists in Afghanistan, Albania, Britain, Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Syria, the USA, the West Bank and Gaza and Yemen" are using crypto, some agency must have some ultra powerful quantum based grid computer up to crack anything in seconds.
Maybe they were tipped off by the big ---PGP ENCRYPTED MESSAGE--- header on their emails?
My school uses this. My current theory is that it saves a copy of the FAT (or for NTFS whatever it uses) in memory, and uses copy-on-write to an unused block whenever you alter the filesystem. I don't actually have any comfirmation for this though.
If you combine GPL'ed code with proprietary code you either relicence the proprietary code or infringe the GPL code's copyright. It dosen't force you to relicence, per se, but you'd be sued if you refused to, probably.
Cryptographic public keys could take the place of authoritative NS entries for a zone, and sign all keys within said zone. Only problem is if some host consistently responds with an old but valid entry long after it should have been replaced.
Fireb^Hfox has a HUGE number of:config options, many of which rarely (if ever) need to be used. They can't make a GUI option for all of them. In addition, it's still beta, even though most people seem to forget. So if it really bothers you, file a feature request for that specific option, and/or wait for the final release.
"You may use this Software for any non-commercial purpose, subject to the restrictions in this License." In other words, no commercial use, which means no inclusion in Linux distributions and such. The only way they want anyone to be able to fetch Allegiance's source code is through their clickwrap licence.
The downside of this is that rc-update takes ages to update the deps. I'd like to see it use python or perl when available (when/usr is mounted), of bash when not.
Framebuffer is fine with one program, but you can't have multiple programs just randomly writing to one bitmap. Or fighting over the mouse/keyboard in fact. X's primary purpose is to mediate multiple programs accessing the hardware.
Slashdot Mirror
What are you talking about? A welded-shut hood isn't a copy-protection technology, and not even the most foolih judge/jury would think it was. Yes, even in the USA.
My school uses this. My current theory is that it saves a copy of the FAT (or for NTFS whatever it uses) in memory, and uses copy-on-write to an unused block whenever you alter the filesystem. I don't actually have any comfirmation for this though.
These people can't even figure out <, but they feel that they're qualified to comment on linux module coding?
Except for the bug where it never closes its socket file descriptors
If you combine GPL'ed code with proprietary code you either relicence the proprietary code or infringe the GPL code's copyright. It dosen't force you to relicence, per se, but you'd be sued if you refused to, probably.
Cryptographic public keys could take the place of authoritative NS entries for a zone, and sign all keys within said zone. Only problem is if some host consistently responds with an old but valid entry long after it should have been replaced.
Fireb^Hfox has a HUGE number of :config options, many of which rarely (if ever) need to be used. They can't make a GUI option for all of them. In addition, it's still beta, even though most people seem to forget. So if it really bothers you, file a feature request for that specific option, and/or wait for the final release.
No. They ship the output, which is *not* covered by the GPL.
What's the point of installing from source instead of binaries if you get the same thing as everyone else [and check that that's the case]?
It's not a web service unless it uses [X]HTML over HTTP[S]. In this case, it's just an Internet service.
Non-commercial distros could use it, right?
What about GNU Screen? It has the added benifit of allowing you to attach to an already-running session from a new terminal (or ssh session).
Not to mention that the signature may be corrupted by inserted whitespace...
Actually... I don't think ISO C guarentees that the letters of the alphabet be contigous. I may not remember correctly though.
The downside of this is that rc-update takes ages to update the deps. I'd like to see it use python or perl when available (when /usr is mounted), of bash when not.
rc-update (add|del) (service) default
rc
Have fun.
Can't toupper() be implemented as a macro that does an array lookup?
What about raw sockets?
Old article here
Actually, it's called a Web of Trust, not a ring of trust, and it's the basis behind PGP and GnuPG
This is the exact same link that is in the parent post, at the end.
How can one send from users.sourceforge.net forwarder addesses then? Or no-ip.org addresses? (they don't let you add TXT records)
Framebuffer is fine with one program, but you can't have multiple programs just randomly writing to one bitmap. Or fighting over the mouse/keyboard in fact. X's primary purpose is to mediate multiple programs accessing the hardware.