One of the people I know is an ex-evolutionist. So, he was an evolutionist, until proven wrong.
Re:ADHD - No such thing.
on
Working with ADHD?
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
That's what I said in my main post, but I got modded troll. As far as I know, ADD/ADHD is related to nutrition, sleep, and exercise. Also, most of the time people are mis-diagnosed, when in fact they are simply normal kids.
You can also purchase many nutritional supplements that help a lot with ADD/ADHD.
But Ritalin is not encouraged, because it causes permanent problems.
First of all, get off ritalin. It can cause permanent neurological problems, and is very bad for your health. Also, as far as I know, ADHD (and all the others) are usually nutrition disorders, and can be easily cured by changing the person's diet, and getting proper levels of sleep, etc.
The mindset of today determines that everyone is "guilty until proven innocent." So in other words, they expect people to assume that others are racist unless they directly show they aren't. Then of course there are those who commit racist acts, but have the right "friends", so that the act is dismissed.
Now, as for something that is clearly racist, but is almost completely ignored, here's an example:
--- quotes from Charles Darwin's "Descent of Man"
"It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?"
"The enquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence; and consequently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?" "We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man) ---
So here this man is claiming that blacks are a "sub-species" that must be exterminated. Man, that's bad stuff. Everyone's equal without question. But a simple act as you suggested of placing change is determined as racist, instead of ideology like this. That's moral inversion.
That's why I don't own a cell phone (hey, i don't really have a use for one anyway). I wonder when they'll map your SSN to the phone, for ID purposes? SSN's are already being widely used as school ID numbers (at the college I go to, your ssn is everyone's knowledge). They might map SSN's once they devise a new global ID numbering system.
Find SSN -> map to cell phone id -> track to person's location -> engage -> busted.
All of this will be done, no matter who you elect; guaranteed. Totalitarianism at it's worst.
1959 - Nikita Khrushchev, ruthless Soviet dictator stated: "We can't expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism until they awaken one day to find they have Communism."
1959 - Norman Thomas, six times candidate of the Socialist Party for President of the United States, observes: "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until America will one day be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened."
-Babylonian Empire -Roman Empire -many empires in between -New Babylon/Rome (merge of all current and previous) (when an empire falls, it doesn't die; just like how asinine Nazism is flourishing in parts of Germany right now)
Considering that John was from the 1st century AD, a cashless society wouldn't directly make any sense to him, unless everything was free. He had a vision, and he described it as best he could. Certain things like the Beast, he could only describe as such, even though it represented something much more in-depth. What would you say if you saw the thoughtstream of the world's population? This, as far as I know, was what he described as the "sea"; a sea of thoughts, and a beast rising out, representing the thought movements (mindshare) towards a single dominant power. This dominant power will make Hitler, Mao, and Stalin look like infants, but only to the opposition, since the supporters will barely notice any terror; the supporters will find everything out the hard and lethal way (that's the price of complete deception).
Some movies were made a while ago, that showed the mark as being a tatoo (this includes the "Thief in the Night" series). But, since technology has advanced so much in just a few decades, the mark described could easily be some sort of a biochip. The mark's numbering is still theoretical.
The ten horns represent a ten-nation confederacy, governed by a single ruler (of course with a lead propagandist like Hitler had), known in the verse as the "name of blasphemy", or anti-Christ. The second ruler (or right-hand man) is known as the "false prophet", which so far is believed to become the head of the UN's global religion project, which they proposed during the Johannesburg summit; a single religion for all that revolves around the worship of "mother earth", also known as "Gaia". The funny thing is that the religion is shown as being new, even though it is around 4,000 years old (based on Babylonian mysticism). They even have their own "ark of the covenant" to mock the original.
The world government proposed will use a foundational class-feud system very close to Marxism, primarily coming from Charles Darwin's own racist writings:
--- "It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?"
"The enquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence; and consequently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?" "We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man) ---
According to a mix of prophetic books such as Daniel, Zechariah, Matthew, and Revelation, the world government proposed (and the global id system) will be brought on by a peace treaty that promises peace between Israel and Palesti
Of course this will probably increase the acceptance of Darwin's own ideas, some of which are here:
"It might also naturally be inquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species..."
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen as remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even that the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Quoted from Decent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man, on the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
"...Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?...We shall see that all these questions, as indeed as obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."
that's just the thing... if a cable company, or ANY company doesn't provide the customer with equal choices, opportunities, and freedom, then they are socialist - they are trying to please the government, and people "in general".
>When is the last time you agreed to how much your cable company charges you, lest you not have cable at all?
One more thing, on the topic of economics...
Most companies tend to be "interventionist", which means that they first please the politician and then the customer.
A quick example of a socialist system is when the goods and services are forced upon you (basically 'fed' to you). In a socialist system, you cannot own anything yourself; everything you own is known as "public property", or "owned by the people" (a Marxist term). For example, if you bought a car in an extreme socialist system, the car would immediately become the "public's car", and everyone would be able to use it, in a fanatical attempt to remove jealously.
Here a great economic chart which shows left wing/right wing systems:
http://ministries.tliquest.net/politics/political% 20spectrum.jpg
Many corporations use force to promote and sell their products, which places them in the "radical interventionism" and "democratic socialism" areas on the chart.
You mean socialists... Capitalism is the equal exchange of goods and services. Many people think it's greed and power, but that's actually a form of socialism.
In a capitalist system, corporations cannot exploit the clients. In a capitalist system, the compay and the customer must both agree 100% on a deal, otherwise it's not capitalism...
Well, this is a classic example of how stupid Communism and Socialism (the abolition of private property) are. They just simply move societies towards an absolute dictatorship, aka Nazism (Totalitarianism) that implements Fascism (government control of corporate markets) to get it's way.
It's got it's own little name too...
Left-wing extremism.
Click this link to see an economic chart and see where China stands:
Economic-Political spectrum
That article brought up a very interesting issue. Donahue was not promoting conservative ideas. In reality, he was urging for government takeover of the video game industry through "sensorship" tactics, which is exactly what any far-left extremist would do nowadays. Donahue openly shared love for communism, which is about as liberal as you can go (check out the image at http://www.tliquest.net/truth/political%20spectrum.jpg for info)
Conservatism is all about the parent's responsibility for their children. If they let their children get messed up from violent stuff, then it's their fault. Donahue in no way could ever be conservative; he is a perfect example of liberal relativism and secular humanism.
Here's what he's rallying for:
socialism - which is, according to Marx, "the abolition of private property"
against:
capitalism (my viewpoint) - which is the free trading and exchange of materials, and the respect of the vitality of private property and personal rights.
I've got a custom built production server with 2 ppro-200s that's running Linux 2.2.18. The system is completely rock solid and has excellent performance as a server, even in today's standards. The last system uptime was about 140 days when I had to bring it down for a kernel upgrade to 2.4.17 (I ended up going back to 2.2.18 because 2.4 was too unstable). In my opinion the PPros were probably the best processors ever made by Intel.
Here's a revised comment that I posted in a past article dealing with evolution:
Some problems with the theory of evolution:
1. There is no true physical evidence. All the physical evidence points to things unrelated to evolution itself. See below for the points on this.
2. It doesn't explain the origin of dimensions (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc). It also doesn't explain the origin of time. Time is a linear single-dimensional direction. People are always at only a single point on the entire time scale, and cannot see beyond that. How could evolution have created time if time would have been needed in the evolutionary process?
3. The Big Bang theory doesn't explain the origin of the large mass of exploding matter
4. None of the measurement methods are anywhere near accurate, for example, carbon dating
5. Why would creatures evolve to sexually reproduce instead of just developing an ability to copy themselves?
6. If the big bang sent matter flying in all directions, then the formation of planets and solar systems would not work because of the inability for the matter to slow down in space and generate orbital patterns. If other bodies became attracted by gravity to other bodies, then a thrust force would be needed to create an orbit; instead they would collide. Gravity alone would not solve this problem, since for an orbit to be created a downward gravitational pull is needed PLUS a tangental velocity across the surface so that the object ends up in an eternal fall.
7. Since the moon is slowly moving away from the Earth (look in the news, online stuff, etc. There's plenty of proof), then 3 billion years ago the moon would have been inside the earth.
8. How did the sun start a massive fusion reaction all by itself and why didn't the other planets start their own also? What made the sun a 'sun' and what made a planet a 'planet'?
9. According to biographies of Charles Darwin, he was originally a Christian, who became too analytical and fell away from his faith, thus creating his own 'creationist' theory. But, before he died, he declared his theory as false and went back to his original Christian faith.
10. If humans evolved from monkeys, then why do monkeys still exist? It can't be because the monkeys diverged; since then the species of monkey that is alive today would have had to reverse its evolutionary development in order to become what it was then, now.
11. Why haven't scientists been able to pinpoint where the human subconscious is located in the brain? They have never found where all the long-term information is stored, and they've already mapped out every part of the brain. The person's brain doesn't grow when they become smarter; size is not part of it. (the reason is that it's not in the brain, it's in the spirit, which is a 4-dimensional object. How much information can be stored in a 4-dimensional object? infinite amounts.)
12. Something cannot be created out of nothing in the third dimension because of the limitation of time. A supreme being (God), since he would have created the dimensional structure and time itself, would not be restricted to the tight boundaries of time (time is the 4th dimension), and would thus have no beginning or end (people cannot imagine being beyond the restrictions of time, so they cannot really understand the meaning of the word infinate.
13. Where did the explosive compounds come from that made the large amount of matter from the big bang explode? What ignited them?
14. Anybody knows that when you burn paper that you end up with carbon soot. Explosions cannot create things; they destroy things.
15. Why are there many languages? If people evolved, wouldn't they all communicate the same? Why would they want segregation? Would you want to abandon English and go make up your own language?
16. What's the purpose of life if people just die and then that's it? Also, sex is for reproduction, and what's the point of reproduction if the produced living beings have no point of existence?
17. Life itself is not a physical object; if people evolved they would be able to create life with their bare hands. Define life. What is it? What makes it possible? Shoving cells together and starting chemical reactions does not create life; if it did then we would have our own created beings in labs.
18. Who or what created mathematics? How about the simple ability of calculation and relational mathematical structures? People 'discover' mathematical principles, but who originally developed them? It's like writing computer apps in the C++ language. The language had an origin, and people learn about it. What if there was no original creator of the language, and it just suddenly got 'discovered'?
19. Who or what created the laws of physics?
Some easy facts:
The world is approximately 7000 years old
Dinosaurs never existed; the fossils found are from animals that died from the flood.
People have found that the soil layers show a sudden massive death of beings. I don't have time to show the proof for everything about the flood, but if you look for it, it's there.
Evolution. The ignorant's excuse for everything.
Visit a site I found, http://www.geocities.com/evononsense/creation_argu ments.htm for more reasons
I am a born again Christian who has seen and read proof that God created the world and all the people in it. Not just from the Bible, but even in modern science such as physics. The truth and facts are all layed out plain as day, but since the majority of the world, including the US is not Christian, that makes most people ignorant fools. To declare yourself Christian, you must have a personal relationship with Christ and have accepted him. A reply asked what's the name of my 'god', and my answer is that he is the I Am.
I hate Microsoft, I hate government corruption, I hate evolution.
Mostly Christian?! I would say about 90% of the world population is not even close to being Christian.
Christianity is not a religion; it is not a group of religions.
A 'religion' is a form of man-made biased interpretation of the Bible or other forms of spirituality.
Being a Christian means that you have accepted Jesus Christ and have a personal relationship with him.
These things do not make you a Christian:
Being Catholic
Being Muslim
Being Mormon
Belonging to any other religion
Simply knowing that God 'exists'
Simply knowing about Jesus
Most people who say that they're Christian are not. You are only a Christian if you have done the things said in sentence 4. Otherwise, forget it.
Here's some problems with the theory of evolution:
1. There is no physical evidence
2. It doesn't explain the origin of dimensions
3. The Big Bang theory doesn't explain the origin of the large mass of exploding matter
4. None of the measurement methods are anywhere near accurate
5. Why would creatures evolve to sexually reproduce instead of just copying themselves?
6. If the big bang sent matter flying in all directions, then the formation of planets and solar systems would not work because of the inability for the matter to slow down in space and generate orbital patterns. If other bodies became attracted by gravity to other bodies, then a thrust force would be needed to create an orbit; instead they would collide.
7. Since the moon is slowly moving away from the Earth, then 3 billion years ago the moon would have been inside the earth.
8. How did the sun start a massive fusion reaction all by itself and why didn't the other planets start their own also?
9. Darwin was originally a Christian, who became too analytical and fell away from his faith, thus creating his own 'creationist' theory. But, before he died, he declared his theory as false and went back to his original Christian faith.
10. If humans evolved from monkeys, then why do monkeys still exist?
11. Why haven't scientists been able to pinpoint where the human subconscious is located in the brain? (the reason is that it's not in the brain, it's in the spirit, which is a 4-dimensional object)
12. Something cannot be created out of nothing
13. Where did the explosive compounds come from that made the large amount of matter from the big bang explode? What ignited them?
14. Anybody knows that when you burn paper that you end up with carbon soot. Explosions cannot create things; they destroy things.
15. Why are there many languages? If people evolved, wouldn't they all communicate the same? Why would they want segregation?
16. What's the purpose of life if people just die and then that's it?
17. Life itself is not a physical object; if people evolved they would be able to create life with their bare hands.
18. Who or what created mathematics?
19. Who or what created the laws of physics?
Some easy facts:
The world is approximately 7000 years old
Dinosaurs never existed; the fossils found are from animals that died from the flood
Evolution. The ignorant's excuse for everything.
Visit a site I found, http://www.geocities.com/evononsense/creation_argu ments.htm for more reasons
I am a born again Christian who has seen and read proof that God created the world and all the people in it. Not just from the Bible, but even in modern science such as physics. The truth and facts are all layed out plain as day, but since the majority of the world, including the US is not Christian, that makes most people ignorant fools.
I remember using OS/2 Warp 3 years ago on an old 486, since it flew on that machine; unlike win95 which ran like a piece of crap. OS/2 was a really fast operating system with direct virtual machine capabilities built in (you could boot operating systems from image files in the OS without any special software). Here's how OS/2 died. Back in the early 90's, Microsoft and IBM co-developed OS/2, and it was called Microsoft OS/2. When version 1.2 came out, the two companies split, and IBM continued production all the way to version 4, while Microsoft rewrote the kernel and transformed it into Windows NT. If you do speed benchmarks, you'll easily realize that NT is far more bloated than any version of OS/2. NT was and is a RAM hog, while OS/2 3 ran on 4 megs of RAM easily.
If IBM opened up the source code for OS/2 and strictly made it illegal for microsoft to steal any kernel code advances, then we would all be set. We could develop a Windows-killer OS. That's what OS/2 was destined to be since version 2. It's funny how the development of OS/2 was the second time Microsoft ripped off IBM; the first was DOS when Microsoft sold IBM PC-DOS and kept MS-DOS for themselves. Then it was Windows NT versus OS/2.
A man named Norman Thomas, a US Socialist Party member for many years, made this unbelievable statement: "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing how it happened."
Globalism is a threat to the entire existance of mankind. September 11th is a small example of an attempt to restructure the United States into a single socialistic society, and then merging it with the other communistic regimes, thus forming a single world government, known as the New World Order. Osama bin Laden and the Taliban DID NOT DO IT. It wouldn't make any sense for them to attack the US, since over 90% of Afghanistan was destroyed by the Russians years ago, and the entire Taliban would just be committing suicide if they really did attack, considering the power difference between their forces and ours. Almost everyone in Afghanistan is dying; everybody is poverty stricken; almost all homes were destroyed including hospitals and food supply locations. This is PURE TRUTH. If you don't believe it, just think of where the planes that attacked on 9/11 came from. Not from Afghanistan. Not from Pakistan. From the US. The 'selected elite', higher officials who are simply greedy for power and money have been establishing a world government since the 20's. Humans naturally want a scapegoat for the attacks, and refuse to believe that their own country had any part in it. So what happens? The moment the planes hit, everybody started talking about Afghanistan. It never changed. It never will. It demonstrates the media's insane influence on the people. How about anthrax? Notice how only 5 people out of all the people in the entire country have died? Wow, that is a real killer. Yeah sure. Think of the media hype, portraying it as a devistating outbreak ready to kill everybody and everything. We are witnessing the outcome of years of MK-ULTRA mind control research which has been portrayed as being a 'conspiracy' even though there is almost too much proof of it. Society is being brainwashed into submitting to a soon-to-be communistic system. Sure, some of you might just laugh and say it's just a 'conspiracy theory'. Some of you might completely ignore any notion of higher governments. But what if it's been proven time and time again. What can you say about that?
I'll name some of the so-called higher organizations that control much of this. They all portray themselves as discussing 'international issues' even though it goes deeper than that. First, the United Nations was established to be a single world government under the viewpoint that it keeps peace (Vietnam? Kosovo? you call this peace?!). Above that is two equally powerful groups; the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission. Finally, above all, is the Bilderberg Group; a team of greedy, apocalyptic, insane, power-hungry bastards that all deserve to be imprisoned for life for committing treason against almost every country in existance. One guy I hate the most is David Rockefeller, part of the Rockefeller dynasty that has established most of this crap.
Quick facts:
-Aids never existed. It was proven in Spain by a doctor injecting himself with HIV-infected blood on national TV. It's the side affect of a treatment drug for HIV. HIV is a natural every-day occurrence too that is not a threat. Currently, AIDS is a billion-dollar industry.
-A cure for cancer was created in 1922, and is currently banned in the US because it has no side effects (weird, huh!). Cancer treatment is also a billion-dollar industry. Why do they do stuff like this? Because they make more money creating a problem than solving one. When you're greedy, what do you care only about? Money.
Re:Nothing new under the sun
on
Globalization
·
· Score: 1
Sweet... You're very right on what you're saying. I'm a Christian too, and support competitive markets which stimulate technological growth (that's what Micro$oft is destroying) and also personal freedom, and the constitutional structure of the US. I'm just freaked out right now that the 'New World Order' headed by organizations such as the UN, CFR, Tri-lat, and Bilderberg is becoming more visible each day, which has been a prophesy in many chapters of the Bible, described as a One World Government, communistic politically that would lead the world into its own destruction. A great source I found about it is at http://www.endtimes.com
I did an entire web site on this issue and other related things just recently. Please, don't take the information in the site the wrong way, since it's based on lots of other sources. Enjoy:)
Read it here:
http://www.tliquest.net/truth
Slashdot Mirror
One of the people I know is an ex-evolutionist. So, he was an evolutionist, until proven wrong.
That's what I said in my main post, but I got modded troll. As far as I know, ADD/ADHD is related to nutrition, sleep, and exercise. Also, most of the time people are mis-diagnosed, when in fact they are simply normal kids.
You can also purchase many nutritional supplements that help a lot with ADD/ADHD.
But Ritalin is not encouraged, because it causes permanent problems.
troll?! wtf? whoever rated this as troll must be a ritalin fanatic
First of all, get off ritalin. It can cause permanent neurological problems, and is very bad for your health. Also, as far as I know, ADHD (and all the others) are usually nutrition disorders, and can be easily cured by changing the person's diet, and getting proper levels of sleep, etc.
So GET OFF THE RITALIN - I mean it
see this site (i quickly found a random one)
The mindset of today determines that everyone is "guilty until proven innocent." So in other words, they expect people to assume that others are racist unless they directly show they aren't. Then of course there are those who commit racist acts, but have the right "friends", so that the act is dismissed.
Now, as for something that is clearly racist, but is almost completely ignored, here's an example:
---
quotes from Charles Darwin's "Descent of Man"
"It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?"
"The enquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence; and consequently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?"
"We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
---
So here this man is claiming that blacks are a "sub-species" that must be exterminated. Man, that's bad stuff. Everyone's equal without question. But a simple act as you suggested of placing change is determined as racist, instead of ideology like this. That's moral inversion.
That's why I don't own a cell phone (hey, i don't really have a use for one anyway). I wonder when they'll map your SSN to the phone, for ID purposes? SSN's are already being widely used as school ID numbers (at the college I go to, your ssn is everyone's knowledge). They might map SSN's once they devise a new global ID numbering system.
:(
Find SSN -> map to cell phone id -> track to person's location -> engage -> busted.
All of this will be done, no matter who you elect; guaranteed. Totalitarianism at it's worst.
1959 - Nikita Khrushchev, ruthless Soviet dictator stated: "We can't expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism until they awaken one day to find they have Communism."
1959 - Norman Thomas, six times candidate of the Socialist Party for President of the United States, observes: "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until America will one day be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened."
USSA, here we come
It's part of the "Mystery Babylon"
-Babylonian Empire
-Roman Empire
-many empires in between
-New Babylon/Rome (merge of all current and previous)
(when an empire falls, it doesn't die; just like how asinine Nazism is flourishing in parts of Germany right now)
Considering that John was from the 1st century AD, a cashless society wouldn't directly make any sense to him, unless everything was free. He had a vision, and he described it as best he could. Certain things like the Beast, he could only describe as such, even though it represented something much more in-depth. What would you say if you saw the thoughtstream of the world's population? This, as far as I know, was what he described as the "sea"; a sea of thoughts, and a beast rising out, representing the thought movements (mindshare) towards a single dominant power. This dominant power will make Hitler, Mao, and Stalin look like infants, but only to the opposition, since the supporters will barely notice any terror; the supporters will find everything out the hard and lethal way (that's the price of complete deception).
Some movies were made a while ago, that showed the mark as being a tatoo (this includes the "Thief in the Night" series). But, since technology has advanced so much in just a few decades, the mark described could easily be some sort of a biochip. The mark's numbering is still theoretical.
The ten horns represent a ten-nation confederacy, governed by a single ruler (of course with a lead propagandist like Hitler had), known in the verse as the "name of blasphemy", or anti-Christ. The second ruler (or right-hand man) is known as the "false prophet", which so far is believed to become the head of the UN's global religion project, which they proposed during the Johannesburg summit; a single religion for all that revolves around the worship of "mother earth", also known as "Gaia". The funny thing is that the religion is shown as being new, even though it is around 4,000 years old (based on Babylonian mysticism). They even have their own "ark of the covenant" to mock the original.
The world government proposed will use a foundational class-feud system very close to Marxism, primarily coming from Charles Darwin's own racist writings:
---
"It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?"
"The enquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence; and consequently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?"
"We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
---
According to a mix of prophetic books such as Daniel, Zechariah, Matthew, and Revelation, the world government proposed (and the global id system) will be brought on by a peace treaty that promises peace between Israel and Palesti
Of course this will probably increase the acceptance of Darwin's own ideas, some of which are here:
...We shall see that all these questions, as indeed as obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."
"It might also naturally be inquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species..."
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen as remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even that the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Quoted from Decent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man, on the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
"...Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?
Darwinism sounds like blatant racism to me...
that's just the thing... if a cable company, or ANY company doesn't provide the customer with equal choices, opportunities, and freedom, then they are socialist - they are trying to please the government, and people "in general".
>When is the last time you agreed to how much your cable company charges you, lest you not have cable at all?
If they don't , then they aren't capitalist.
http://www.capitalism.org/
click here for that link
One more thing, on the topic of economics... Most companies tend to be "interventionist", which means that they first please the politician and then the customer. A quick example of a socialist system is when the goods and services are forced upon you (basically 'fed' to you). In a socialist system, you cannot own anything yourself; everything you own is known as "public property", or "owned by the people" (a Marxist term). For example, if you bought a car in an extreme socialist system, the car would immediately become the "public's car", and everyone would be able to use it, in a fanatical attempt to remove jealously. Here a great economic chart which shows left wing/right wing systems: http://ministries.tliquest.net/politics/political% 20spectrum.jpg
Many corporations use force to promote and sell their products, which places them in the "radical interventionism" and "democratic socialism" areas on the chart.
You mean socialists...
Capitalism is the equal exchange of goods and services. Many people think it's greed and power, but that's actually a form of socialism.
In a capitalist system, corporations cannot exploit the clients. In a capitalist system, the compay and the customer must both agree 100% on a deal, otherwise it's not capitalism...
Well, this is a classic example of how stupid Communism and Socialism (the abolition of private property) are. They just simply move societies towards an absolute dictatorship, aka Nazism (Totalitarianism) that implements Fascism (government control of corporate markets) to get it's way. It's got it's own little name too... Left-wing extremism. Click this link to see an economic chart and see where China stands: Economic-Political spectrum
That article brought up a very interesting issue. Donahue was not promoting conservative ideas. In reality, he was urging for government takeover of the video game industry through "sensorship" tactics, which is exactly what any far-left extremist would do nowadays. Donahue openly shared love for communism, which is about as liberal as you can go (check out the image at http://www.tliquest.net/truth/political%20spectrum .jpg for info)
Conservatism is all about the parent's responsibility for their children. If they let their children get messed up from violent stuff, then it's their fault. Donahue in no way could ever be conservative; he is a perfect example of liberal relativism and secular humanism.
Here's what he's rallying for:
socialism - which is, according to Marx, "the abolition of private property"
against:
capitalism (my viewpoint) - which is the free trading and exchange of materials, and the respect of the vitality of private property and personal rights.
I've got a custom built production server with 2 ppro-200s that's running Linux 2.2.18. The system is completely rock solid and has excellent performance as a server, even in today's standards. The last system uptime was about 140 days when I had to bring it down for a kernel upgrade to 2.4.17 (I ended up going back to 2.2.18 because 2.4 was too unstable). In my opinion the PPros were probably the best processors ever made by Intel.
Here's a revised comment that I posted in a past article dealing with evolution:
u ments.htm for more reasons
Some problems with the theory of evolution:
1. There is no true physical evidence. All the physical evidence points to things unrelated to evolution itself. See below for the points on this.
2. It doesn't explain the origin of dimensions (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc). It also doesn't explain the origin of time. Time is a linear single-dimensional direction. People are always at only a single point on the entire time scale, and cannot see beyond that. How could evolution have created time if time would have been needed in the evolutionary process?
3. The Big Bang theory doesn't explain the origin of the large mass of exploding matter
4. None of the measurement methods are anywhere near accurate, for example, carbon dating
5. Why would creatures evolve to sexually reproduce instead of just developing an ability to copy themselves?
6. If the big bang sent matter flying in all directions, then the formation of planets and solar systems would not work because of the inability for the matter to slow down in space and generate orbital patterns. If other bodies became attracted by gravity to other bodies, then a thrust force would be needed to create an orbit; instead they would collide. Gravity alone would not solve this problem, since for an orbit to be created a downward gravitational pull is needed PLUS a tangental velocity across the surface so that the object ends up in an eternal fall.
7. Since the moon is slowly moving away from the Earth (look in the news, online stuff, etc. There's plenty of proof), then 3 billion years ago the moon would have been inside the earth.
8. How did the sun start a massive fusion reaction all by itself and why didn't the other planets start their own also? What made the sun a 'sun' and what made a planet a 'planet'?
9. According to biographies of Charles Darwin, he was originally a Christian, who became too analytical and fell away from his faith, thus creating his own 'creationist' theory. But, before he died, he declared his theory as false and went back to his original Christian faith.
10. If humans evolved from monkeys, then why do monkeys still exist? It can't be because the monkeys diverged; since then the species of monkey that is alive today would have had to reverse its evolutionary development in order to become what it was then, now.
11. Why haven't scientists been able to pinpoint where the human subconscious is located in the brain? They have never found where all the long-term information is stored, and they've already mapped out every part of the brain. The person's brain doesn't grow when they become smarter; size is not part of it. (the reason is that it's not in the brain, it's in the spirit, which is a 4-dimensional object. How much information can be stored in a 4-dimensional object? infinite amounts.)
12. Something cannot be created out of nothing in the third dimension because of the limitation of time. A supreme being (God), since he would have created the dimensional structure and time itself, would not be restricted to the tight boundaries of time (time is the 4th dimension), and would thus have no beginning or end (people cannot imagine being beyond the restrictions of time, so they cannot really understand the meaning of the word infinate.
13. Where did the explosive compounds come from that made the large amount of matter from the big bang explode? What ignited them?
14. Anybody knows that when you burn paper that you end up with carbon soot. Explosions cannot create things; they destroy things.
15. Why are there many languages? If people evolved, wouldn't they all communicate the same? Why would they want segregation? Would you want to abandon English and go make up your own language?
16. What's the purpose of life if people just die and then that's it? Also, sex is for reproduction, and what's the point of reproduction if the produced living beings have no point of existence?
17. Life itself is not a physical object; if people evolved they would be able to create life with their bare hands. Define life. What is it? What makes it possible? Shoving cells together and starting chemical reactions does not create life; if it did then we would have our own created beings in labs.
18. Who or what created mathematics? How about the simple ability of calculation and relational mathematical structures? People 'discover' mathematical principles, but who originally developed them? It's like writing computer apps in the C++ language. The language had an origin, and people learn about it. What if there was no original creator of the language, and it just suddenly got 'discovered'?
19. Who or what created the laws of physics?
Some easy facts:
The world is approximately 7000 years old
Dinosaurs never existed; the fossils found are from animals that died from the flood.
People have found that the soil layers show a sudden massive death of beings. I don't have time to show the proof for everything about the flood, but if you look for it, it's there.
Evolution. The ignorant's excuse for everything.
Visit a site I found, http://www.geocities.com/evononsense/creation_arg
I am a born again Christian who has seen and read proof that God created the world and all the people in it. Not just from the Bible, but even in modern science such as physics. The truth and facts are all layed out plain as day, but since the majority of the world, including the US is not Christian, that makes most people ignorant fools. To declare yourself Christian, you must have a personal relationship with Christ and have accepted him. A reply asked what's the name of my 'god', and my answer is that he is the I Am.
I hate Microsoft, I hate government corruption, I hate evolution.
Ignorance is bliss.
Mostly Christian?! I would say about 90% of the world population is not even close to being Christian. Christianity is not a religion; it is not a group of religions. A 'religion' is a form of man-made biased interpretation of the Bible or other forms of spirituality. Being a Christian means that you have accepted Jesus Christ and have a personal relationship with him. These things do not make you a Christian: Being Catholic Being Muslim Being Mormon Belonging to any other religion Simply knowing that God 'exists' Simply knowing about Jesus Most people who say that they're Christian are not. You are only a Christian if you have done the things said in sentence 4. Otherwise, forget it.
Here's some problems with the theory of evolution:
u ments.htm for more reasons
1. There is no physical evidence
2. It doesn't explain the origin of dimensions
3. The Big Bang theory doesn't explain the origin of the large mass of exploding matter
4. None of the measurement methods are anywhere near accurate
5. Why would creatures evolve to sexually reproduce instead of just copying themselves?
6. If the big bang sent matter flying in all directions, then the formation of planets and solar systems would not work because of the inability for the matter to slow down in space and generate orbital patterns. If other bodies became attracted by gravity to other bodies, then a thrust force would be needed to create an orbit; instead they would collide.
7. Since the moon is slowly moving away from the Earth, then 3 billion years ago the moon would have been inside the earth.
8. How did the sun start a massive fusion reaction all by itself and why didn't the other planets start their own also?
9. Darwin was originally a Christian, who became too analytical and fell away from his faith, thus creating his own 'creationist' theory. But, before he died, he declared his theory as false and went back to his original Christian faith.
10. If humans evolved from monkeys, then why do monkeys still exist?
11. Why haven't scientists been able to pinpoint where the human subconscious is located in the brain? (the reason is that it's not in the brain, it's in the spirit, which is a 4-dimensional object)
12. Something cannot be created out of nothing
13. Where did the explosive compounds come from that made the large amount of matter from the big bang explode? What ignited them?
14. Anybody knows that when you burn paper that you end up with carbon soot. Explosions cannot create things; they destroy things.
15. Why are there many languages? If people evolved, wouldn't they all communicate the same? Why would they want segregation?
16. What's the purpose of life if people just die and then that's it?
17. Life itself is not a physical object; if people evolved they would be able to create life with their bare hands.
18. Who or what created mathematics?
19. Who or what created the laws of physics?
Some easy facts:
The world is approximately 7000 years old
Dinosaurs never existed; the fossils found are from animals that died from the flood
Evolution. The ignorant's excuse for everything.
Visit a site I found, http://www.geocities.com/evononsense/creation_arg
I am a born again Christian who has seen and read proof that God created the world and all the people in it. Not just from the Bible, but even in modern science such as physics. The truth and facts are all layed out plain as day, but since the majority of the world, including the US is not Christian, that makes most people ignorant fools.
Ignorance is bliss.
I remember using OS/2 Warp 3 years ago on an old 486, since it flew on that machine; unlike win95 which ran like a piece of crap. OS/2 was a really fast operating system with direct virtual machine capabilities built in (you could boot operating systems from image files in the OS without any special software). Here's how OS/2 died. Back in the early 90's, Microsoft and IBM co-developed OS/2, and it was called Microsoft OS/2. When version 1.2 came out, the two companies split, and IBM continued production all the way to version 4, while Microsoft rewrote the kernel and transformed it into Windows NT. If you do speed benchmarks, you'll easily realize that NT is far more bloated than any version of OS/2. NT was and is a RAM hog, while OS/2 3 ran on 4 megs of RAM easily. If IBM opened up the source code for OS/2 and strictly made it illegal for microsoft to steal any kernel code advances, then we would all be set. We could develop a Windows-killer OS. That's what OS/2 was destined to be since version 2. It's funny how the development of OS/2 was the second time Microsoft ripped off IBM; the first was DOS when Microsoft sold IBM PC-DOS and kept MS-DOS for themselves. Then it was Windows NT versus OS/2.
That last replay was made by me. it didn't log me in right...
A man named Norman Thomas, a US Socialist Party member for many years, made this unbelievable statement: "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing how it happened."
Globalism is a threat to the entire existance of mankind. September 11th is a small example of an attempt to restructure the United States into a single socialistic society, and then merging it with the other communistic regimes, thus forming a single world government, known as the New World Order. Osama bin Laden and the Taliban DID NOT DO IT. It wouldn't make any sense for them to attack the US, since over 90% of Afghanistan was destroyed by the Russians years ago, and the entire Taliban would just be committing suicide if they really did attack, considering the power difference between their forces and ours. Almost everyone in Afghanistan is dying; everybody is poverty stricken; almost all homes were destroyed including hospitals and food supply locations. This is PURE TRUTH. If you don't believe it, just think of where the planes that attacked on 9/11 came from. Not from Afghanistan. Not from Pakistan. From the US. The 'selected elite', higher officials who are simply greedy for power and money have been establishing a world government since the 20's. Humans naturally want a scapegoat for the attacks, and refuse to believe that their own country had any part in it. So what happens? The moment the planes hit, everybody started talking about Afghanistan. It never changed. It never will. It demonstrates the media's insane influence on the people. How about anthrax? Notice how only 5 people out of all the people in the entire country have died? Wow, that is a real killer. Yeah sure. Think of the media hype, portraying it as a devistating outbreak ready to kill everybody and everything. We are witnessing the outcome of years of MK-ULTRA mind control research which has been portrayed as being a 'conspiracy' even though there is almost too much proof of it. Society is being brainwashed into submitting to a soon-to-be communistic system. Sure, some of you might just laugh and say it's just a 'conspiracy theory'. Some of you might completely ignore any notion of higher governments. But what if it's been proven time and time again. What can you say about that?
I'll name some of the so-called higher organizations that control much of this. They all portray themselves as discussing 'international issues' even though it goes deeper than that. First, the United Nations was established to be a single world government under the viewpoint that it keeps peace (Vietnam? Kosovo? you call this peace?!). Above that is two equally powerful groups; the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission. Finally, above all, is the Bilderberg Group; a team of greedy, apocalyptic, insane, power-hungry bastards that all deserve to be imprisoned for life for committing treason against almost every country in existance. One guy I hate the most is David Rockefeller, part of the Rockefeller dynasty that has established most of this crap.
Quick facts:
-Aids never existed. It was proven in Spain by a doctor injecting himself with HIV-infected blood on national TV. It's the side affect of a treatment drug for HIV. HIV is a natural every-day occurrence too that is not a threat. Currently, AIDS is a billion-dollar industry.
-A cure for cancer was created in 1922, and is currently banned in the US because it has no side effects (weird, huh!). Cancer treatment is also a billion-dollar industry. Why do they do stuff like this? Because they make more money creating a problem than solving one. When you're greedy, what do you care only about? Money.
Visit my website dealing with all of this and more at http://www.tliquest.net/truth
God help us all...
Sweet... You're very right on what you're saying. I'm a Christian too, and support competitive markets which stimulate technological growth (that's what Micro$oft is destroying) and also personal freedom, and the constitutional structure of the US. I'm just freaked out right now that the 'New World Order' headed by organizations such as the UN, CFR, Tri-lat, and Bilderberg is becoming more visible each day, which has been a prophesy in many chapters of the Bible, described as a One World Government, communistic politically that would lead the world into its own destruction. A great source I found about it is at http://www.endtimes.com
:)
Christ rox
I did an entire web site on this issue and other related things just recently. Please, don't take the information in the site the wrong way, since it's based on lots of other sources. Enjoy :)
Read it here:
http://www.tliquest.net/truth