Slashdot Mirror


'Pacemaker'-like GPS Device for Humans

LunarFox writes "Applied Digital Solutions has announced successful field trials of a prototype GPS device that can be implanted into humans. The device, which is internally rechargable, can wirelessly transmit location, movements and vital signs via the Internet, storing the info in a database. It's said to be the size of a pacemaker, but they intend to miniaturize it to one-tenth that size. You may recall this company as having designed the 'Digital Angel,' and 'Verichip,' a ricegrain-sized RFID chip like injectable pet tracking ID chips. This same company apparently made several denials in 2002 that their product(s) would be anything but externally worn. (like a wristwatch) Many other related links can be found at WorldNetDaily." On one hand the potential cool uses astound me, while the possibilty of abuse frightens me. A lot.

347 comments

  1. kidnapping of the future: by lovebyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. kidnap victim
    2. operate on victim to remove tracking device
    3. ask ransom
    etc..

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    1. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      4. Profit

    2. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Step 0: Use tracking device to locate potential target and analyse daily movement schedule...

    3. Re:kidnapping of the future: by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't they think of that? As in not making public if you have one of these?

      Dave

    4. Re:kidnapping of the future: by gweihir · · Score: 1


      1. kidnap victim
      2. operate on victim to remove tracking device
      3. ask ransom
      etc..


      What I find very unsettling is the real 2.:

      2. operate on victim to remove tracking device and bothcthis up horribly, killing the victim or crippling it for life..

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:kidnapping of the future: by mikerich · · Score: 2, Funny

      :) Ah but surely circumventing a person's security system will violate the DMCA? The kidnappers will quake at the thought! Best wishes, Mike.

    6. Re:kidnapping of the future: by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      Step 0: Use tracking device to locate potential target and analyse daily movement schedule...

      Good point. I'll add that to my business plan

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    7. Re:kidnapping of the future: by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Not really. What happens if all you have to do to kill the antenna/electronics is run the victim over a degaussing magnet a few times. Build up enough induced current to fry the circuits without messing up the victim too much.

      Later you can extract the device at an expensive hospital and mail it back to the family with a video tape of the operation as "proof of life".

      Also, as far as not advertising that someone is chipped, it wouldn't matter. All you have to do is x-ray the victim using Korean War technology and look for something that looks like shrapnel.

      Now, implanting these bastards somewhere inoperable (like around the brain stem with a nice quantity of thermite wired to it as an anti-tamper measure) might deter such efforts. But it might also make the victim's encounters with those book check-out magnets at the local library more exciting.

    8. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Harald74 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Alternative:

      2. Wrap victim in aluminum foil

      or

      2. Keep victim indoors or inside a car where the GPS doesn't work

      This device is not _that_ hard to foil...

      --
      A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
    9. Re:kidnapping of the future: by will_die · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Kidnapping of the future as the same problems of current kidnapping, and why kidnapping in the US is basicly a dead crime. How do you collect the money and get away.
      Where it could be really usful is with carjacking, since they are so small could contain thier own power, you can stick large amounts of them in a vehicle.

    10. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This device is not _that_ hard to foil...

      no pun intended eh ?

    11. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.5 Install device in some animal and release.

    12. Re:kidnapping of the future: by KE1LR · · Score: 1

      "Curses! Foiled again!" muttered the villain as he was swathed in yards and yards of aluminum sheeting...

      Sorry wouldn't resist adding a bad pun to another one.

    13. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Noofus · · Score: 1

      Usually kidnappers know alot about the victim (if its a real high-profile victim). They would in all likelyhood figure out that the victim has the device, possibly by observing the parents use the tracking device, spying etc.

    14. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Dausha · · Score: 1

      How do you collect the money and get away[?]

      Have the money wired to an offshore account in a country where banking is confidential (e.g. Switzerland), and then extract the money from said account in a country where the US does not have an extradition treaty.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    15. Re:kidnapping of the future: by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

      Step -1: Observe user with eyes to locate target and analyze daily movement schedule. Clearly the existence of vision poses dire risks.

    16. Re:kidnapping of the future: by talesout · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else find it mildly disturbing just how much thought some folks put into potential kidnapping plots around here?

      --


      Bite my yammer.
    17. Re:kidnapping of the future: by xv4n · · Score: 1

      Step 0: Use tracking device to locate potential target and analyse daily movement schedule...

      Step 0.1: Make sure it's not a decoy.
      :)

    18. Re:kidnapping of the future: by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Step 0: Use tracking device to locate potential target and analyse daily movement schedule

      Step 1: Kidnap victim
      Step 2: Forcibly extract tracking device in a dingy alley

    19. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2. Keep victim indoors or inside a car where the GPS doesn't work


      You're joking, right? Have you ever even *used* a GPS device in a car or indoors? I happen to be working on a device that has embedded GPS. It's about the size of a quarter, and it has no problems whatsoever in a car or indoors.

    20. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how would they know where in their body the
      device was implanted or that there aren't more than
      one of them?

    21. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about you guys, but I have a pocket knife and tend to keep it pretty damn sharp. If they implanted such a device in my body, I'll take it the hell out. Technology can do some remarkable things, but never forget, they aren't necessarily in your best interest.

    22. Re:kidnapping of the future: by CharlesClarkson · · Score: 1

      And who is THEY, Mr. Paranoid?

      --

      Charles K. Clarkson
      Many people truly want to help. Unfortunately, many people truly suck at it.
    23. Re:kidnapping of the future: by Harald74 · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? Have you ever even *used* a GPS device in a car or indoors? I happen to be working on a device that has embedded GPS. It's about the size of a quarter, and it has no problems whatsoever in a car or indoors.

      I'm using an old Garmin GPS II in my car. I've got a roof-mounted antenna, which is essential. Even so, sometimes the GPS loses coverage in deep valleys or woodlands. I would think your embedded device would have bigger problems, with a small antenna and all.

      I've also used military hand-held GPS receivers in the army and had the same experience there.

      But if you can provide some sources, I would be interested to check it out.

      --
      A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
  2. Big Brother is watching!! by mharris007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not really into conspiracy theories, and generally not very paranoid; but this really makes you think of what "Big Brother" or anyone for that matter can do to track people.

    I wonder what all the future applications of this device will be? I wonder if in the future they will require known convicted felons to wear these? Just think about all the scary applications such devices can be put to.

    --


    ---
    Mike
    I'm going to kick the next person that I see with their karma rating in their sig.
    1. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      The simplest use would be for people ordered not to go near some places (paedophiles near schools, stalkers near victims etc). In the case of the paedophiles, such orders are for life - an implant would be perfect in such a case.

      I don't have a problem with convicted criminals being implanted, and their movements tracked for a certain amount of time, it'll reduce the prison populations and, hopefully, ensure convicts don't commit more crimes because theyd be found out easier. Deterring crime is far better than punishing the wrongdoer after the event.

    2. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by mikerich · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't have a problem with convicted criminals being implanted, and their movements tracked for a certain amount of time

      There would be major ethical problems for most surgeons. It would go against their creed to operate on a person without their consent when the operation was not needed for a medical condition.

      I think we should take some time to consider the implications of asking doctors and surgeons to perform such operations.

      Besides, the first people to receive these implants should be politicians, oh and the entire staff at Digital Angel.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    3. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not really into conspiracy theories, and generally not very paranoid; but this really makes you think of what "Big Brother" or anyone for that matter can do to track people.

      Don't worry about it. Make sure your tin-foil hat fits snugly and you should be OK. I still find people following me from time to time. They don't think that I know that they know that I know they're following me so they're being very elusive. Sometimes it's a guy on a park bench reading a paper. Other times it's a delivery guy in a UPS uniform. They're very shifty, but if you're smart enough you'll be able to avoid these Big Brother agents.

    4. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We already operate on the mentally ill without their informed consent. No-one seems too bothered about dosing schizophrenics with huge doses of drugs that might work to make their condition worse, even without their consent.

    5. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There would be major ethical problems for most surgeons. It would go against their creed to operate on a person without their consent when the operation was not needed for a medical condition.

      Geez. Take some lawyers, send them to med school, problem solved.

    6. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Grab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't be fooled by the "Big Brother" rubbish.

      The main application, as ever, is military. If the Army can pin-point each of their soldiers and determine easily whether they're alive, dead or injured, they'll be *very* happy. Triage becomes much easier if you know the guy is alive before you go over to him, and if you're wounded then your guys can check that you're still alive before they come to get you under fire.

      Tracking convicted felons sounds a perfect use as well, though. Anyone who thinks this is invasion of privacy, think again - a convicted felon has NO right of privacy, bcos you need to be sure they won't reoffend during their parole period. As a convicted felon, you have a choice - either stay in your cell with Bubba, or get out into the real world but have restrictions on where you can go, what you can do, and and at what time. Take your pick. Personally I reckon anyone allowed out of prison early with a curfew imposed has got pretty damn lucky, compared to the alternative. Of course there is also the point that after the parole period, you'll need to be sure the device is turned off - leaving it on forever *would* be invasion of privacy, unless your crime is such (eg. child molesting) that you are banned for life from entering certain areas such as school zones.

      Grab.

    7. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 3, Informative
      I don't have a problem with convicted criminals being implanted, and their movements tracked for a certain amount of time, it'll reduce the prison populations and, hopefully, ensure convicts don't commit more crimes because theyd be found out easier.
      Then you might enjoy this breaking news from the BBC:

      Tagged youth jailed for killing

      A teenager has been given three years detention for killing his girlfriend, a crime he committed while wearing an electronic tag.

      The case is bound to renew debate into the effectiveness of tagging.

      The youth, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was 16 at the time of the crime.

      Curfew

      He had denied murdering the 19-year-old woman, who also cannot be named, but was convicted of her manslaughter.

      She was found shot in the chest in a block of flats on the Stockwell Gardens estate in south London in September last year.

      The youth was under supervision in the community on an electronic tag when he shot her dead.

      The judge called it a "tragic accident".
      Your comments?

    8. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Heard on the news today that a criminal fitted with a tracking device shot his partner dead. These tracking devices don't stop crime, something else needs to be done.

      How about a device that injects a mild sedative at regular intervals? if you feel sleepy you're unlikely to be able to plan or commit any major crime.

    9. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Macka · · Score: 1



      That argument is baseless. The exception doesn't prove the rule. For every one criminal who ignores the tag, there may be hundreds that stop and think twice because of it.

      Macka

    10. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Dausha · · Score: 1

      Your comments?

      Here comes the political grenade, and I shall jump on it. "Tragic accidents" like this can be avoided by liberal use of the death penalty. Estabilsh draconian capital felony sentencing guidelines (i.e., if you commit a capital felony, you've got five years from sentencing to prove innocence or your dead). If individuals of this sort are executed, then it is logical to assume that that individual shan't commit another capital offense.

      While it is true that individuals on death row are being exonerated via DNA evidence, it is reasonable to assume that prosecuters will use DNA evidence more in the future to secure a conviction. With the penalty set so high, then the jury should be more sober in their judgement. One interesting fact in the US is that, while the government (through their designated attorney) files charges against such criminals, it is the local population in the body of a jury who convicts and sentences. So, let the people speak.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    11. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      my comments... err.. lock them up and throw away the key?

      However, if you read the article, you'll note a couple of things..
      1. The girl was accidently shot dead as she held the gun on the offender, which is why the judge called it an accident.
      2. The article never said what the youth was originally convicted of - tagging orders are not usually given for even slightly serious crimes.
      3. The shooting happened an hour before the curfew came into effect.

      No doubt people reading the headlines will assume that tagging is a poor means of sentencing, but in these cases, a lot of criminals convicted of lesser offences will simply get suspended or community sentences - ie. back on the street with little supervision, or a lot of time on their own anyway.

    12. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Woah, so what if THE ENEMY can hack into the GPS co-ordinates, huh?

    13. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Your comments?
      Yes, you need to get into an introductory-level class on statistics, critical thinking, or logic right away. You cannot extrapolate a general statement from a sample of one.
    14. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      "Tragic accidents" like this can be avoided by liberal use of the death penalty. Estabilsh draconian capital felony sentencing guidelines (i.e., if you commit a capital felony, you've got five years from sentencing to prove innocence or your dead). If individuals of this sort are executed, then it is logical to assume that that individual shan't commit another capital offense.

      Yeah, because this has worked so well in Israel/Palestine.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to rethink 'felons have NO right to privacy'.

      That very concept is what leads to the the Niagra Falls of laws which stream out of government, making all sorts of activities illegal; thus turning near everybody into 'paper felons', folks who could for one reason or another be brought before a court of law and be found guilty of something.

      What you are seeing nowadays is similar to the fifedoms of old, where a town lord would keep the serfs in bay by keeping them indebted. As long as they were in debt, they were owned!

      So warp to 2003, and see the ocean of laws we swim in. How easily could the government of (USA / Canada / GB / etc.) drag in an 'undesirable' and declare they are guilty of (fill in the blank)?

    16. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military would never use such a thing - because you've just created a fantastic targetting system that can be used by the enemy.

    17. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by praedor · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's all great and it is one of the first things I thought of (after Big Brother). I am in the military and I tell you what, I would flatout refuse to allow anything like this to be implanted/injected into me regardless of its military utility.


      I could perhaps accept a small, sub-q insert that is easily placed and, more importantly, easily removed immediately after I leave a combat/war arena but that is the absolute kicker. It can go in when going to a combat theater but it must, absolutely MUST come out the instant I come back. It does NOT get to stay in place. I'd quit the military, toss my commission, the works, before I allow such a device to remain inside me 24/7.


      I assure you a LOT of other military members would react the same way as I do if this came to be a common/required tool in the military. Just the requirement for anthrax and smallpox vaccination has been enough to kick up a not insignificant amount of dust (and these are trivial). 24/7 GPS tracking/spying by implant would be a far bigger deal and would wreck the military.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    18. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by ctxspy · · Score: 1

      Laws also exist..

      These people did not stop & think twice about breaking the law in the first place either.

      -Tomaj

    19. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      First, if this thing is reduced to the size of a grain of rice, I'd be able to install it, as would everyone else from jealous husbands to soccer moms.

      Second, what ethics? We live in a world where the medical profession will do ANYTHING for money, from penile thickening to unnecessary breast implants to ruining Michael Jackson's face. You think doctors who would gladly inflate a woman's tits to 40DD would balk at something as trivial as CONSENT if they could justify it with patriotism (gotta chip those terrorists) while simultaneously getting paid for something even easier than liposuction or laser surgery for tattoo removal?

    20. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! As a convicted copyright-violations felon (file-swapping on Kazaa, et al), you are sentenced to have this tracker implanted, which will keep you away from Tower Records forevermore.

    21. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Some technical people can sure turn all luddite as soon as something with vaguely possible sinister applications pops its head up.

      This is very cool technology. It hs many good uses. I'm particularly fond of using it on vermin criminals.

      As a half-joking aside, next they need to add a cyanide release code to it so they can remotely trigger instand death. Sweeeeet.

    22. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah. Right. That stupid Big Brother nonsense is simply the stuff of pure fiction. Just because we have the technology does not mean it WILL be abused.


      Convicts? Screw 'em!


      Thank God we don't have a flawed legal system that convicts African Americans or Hispanics at a disproportionately high rate as compared to regular old White People. (Maybe it's different over there across the pond, I don't know. One of these days I'd like to "go on holiday" and check out the Ol' Country for myself).


      Why not use this on ANYONE who gets arrested? (The same way many U.S. agencies are now collecting DNA samples from arrestees).

      That way it would a LOT easier to track the movements of political dissidents with previous arrests.


      While we're at it: Why not make it mandatory for all minors to have these things stuck in them? Wouldn't this cut down on truancy and take a bite out of the Really Big Overwhelming Teenage Crime Wave currently sweeping America?


      Since domestic spying is all the rage these days, why not require EVERYONE to have one of these implanted in them? Since we are ALL just a bunch of suspected terrorists! This kind of system would NEVER be abused (like the "no fly" lists already being used to target traveling protesters).


      In a country where you cannot drive from your house to the corner market without breaking at least one law and our law enforcement and legal system has proven itself time and again to be flawed, biased, and corrupt, is ANY technology that furthers indivdual or mass surveilance a good idea?


      As an individual with unpopular opinions about current policies, I find this kind of thing chilling.

      ...And it always begins with those who have already been relegated to second class citizen status: Convicts, minors, Jews during the Nazi regime (I don't care if you're tired of hearing that one. It is more relevant today than it ever was. Just take the last line and substitute "Those of mid-Eastern decent" for "Jews" and "Bush" for "Nazi" and you get the idea. After all; we can't 100% trust THOSE people... they have a funny religion :)


      Hey! There's an idea. Why not require every administration official to have one of these puppies stuck in them and make their whereabouts publicly available live on the web? Wouldn't this up the ante on accountability? Why not? The only one's who wouldn't want this must have something to hide, right? (by their own logic).


      Regards!


      AC for good reason!

    23. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      I thought about it. I don't like taking away the rights of the convicted, especially basic, fundamental rights like privacy and bodily integrity. People make mistakes, and if society doesn't execute them as punishment, then the intent must be to rehabilitate them, make them responsible and civil. Jails don't do that; jails breed criminals. Subcutaneous tracking devices won't do that; they'll make the criminals get used to being tracked. I don't want anyone in society to be forced to accept Big Brother.

    24. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by asscroft · · Score: 1


      SHOT???? I thought the UK was soooooo civilized because they don't have guuunnsss. Guuuunnsss are baaaad, riiiight?

      Oh, what's that? CRIMINALS who don't respect the laws against MURDER don't respect gun laws either!!!I never would have suspected such a thing. Wow. Imagine that!

      And they don't respect laws about probation or electronic tags or any of that other crap either.

      So what now, you can punsish him for killing, and for killing with a gun, and for killing with a gun while on probation. Great. I'm sure that will make his dead girlfriend feel much better....

      oh yeah, laws aren't for prevention or victims, their for giving survivors a "legal" form of revenge to avoid street justice. Fair enough. Burn the mother fucker, but don't kid yourselves.

      gun laws don't prevent gun crimes. Not in the UK and not in America. Our criminals don't respect the laws any better than this guy did.

      --
      because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
    25. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Big Brother is very much alive and well TODAY!!! The Department of Homeland Security (the domestic branch of Big Brother) used the Air and Marine Interdiction and Coordination Center in Riverside, Ca. to track Texas Democratic state representatives. They left Texas in protest of a Republican plan to redistrict and create new boundaries that would favor Republicans. Quoting from the Fort Worth Star-Telegram "The agency received a call to locate a specific Piper turboprop aircraft. It was determined that the plane belonged to former House Speaker Pete Laney." Laney is one of the Democrats who is fighting against the redistricting bill. Here you have the Republicans using Federal assets to track state elected officials You may agree or disagree with the actions of the Democrats, but they were clearly engaged in lawful political behavior. No objective person can doubt that the right wing in this country is ready willing and able to use unlawful means to subvert democracy. They are already doing it. WAKE UP!! These people are dangerous to democracy. Are you ready to be electronically tagged like a dog or cat?

    26. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "There would be major ethical problems for most surgeons."

      Are these the same surgeons/doctors that promote every worthless product on late night infomercials?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    27. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Macka · · Score: 1


      No, but those same laws do stop the vast majority from 'breaking the law'. And that's the point, you will never stop everyone, but you will stop most.

      What you're saying is if it ain't 100% perfect then throw the lot out. Well I've got news for you, there is no such thing as a perfect solution in this world. So we make do with the best we can.

      Macka

    28. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by ctxspy · · Score: 1

      You continue to make false assumptions as to what I am and am not saying.

      All i did in my initial post was correct you.

      All i did in response to your reply was 1) correct you again, and 2) point out the fact that the people whom this passive deterrent is supposed to be effective on has already shown a disregard for the law.

      If we followed your logic, we would have to 'tag' all the people who DO follow the laws, in an effort to make them even more wary.

      -Tomaj

    29. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by prnd_ndrd · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, isn't it difficult to "refuse" to do something the military wants you to do? A) you sign away your life in a contract and, B) the military has its own justice system.

      I would think that, best case, you'd get dishonorably discharged. And worst case, you could end up in some military prison.

      But my knowledge of the military comes mainly from watching movies and reading novels... so please correct my ignorance. :-)

      --
      Want to talk? ashaver AT pdx DOT edu
    30. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by prnd_ndrd · · Score: 1

      In fact, the "justice" system is a step ahead on this one. They've already toyed with various ankle braclets with broadcast-power that they shackle on parolees and the like. I'm sure they'd cream their collective undies over a technology like this one.

      --
      Want to talk? ashaver AT pdx DOT edu
    31. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by Macka · · Score: 1


      You're right, sorry. I didn't read what you actually said, I read what I thought you'd said. I need some more sleep.

    32. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Dunno,

      They're not allowed to do that in the UK.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    33. Re:Big Brother is watching!! by ctxspy · · Score: 1

      Thanks, it's appreciated. :)

  3. BigBrother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    great. just what i always wanted. soon companies will make it manditory to where these devices in the offices. Then acces to areas could obviously be much easier(computer knows that one is at a door and checks to see if you are allowed in/out and then only unlocks) but they can also monitor you movements. eg how many smokebreaks you take, how long you stay at your desk etc.

    1. Re:BigBrother by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Where have you been for the last five years? Do you work in an office with key-less ID cards for access anywhere?

      If you do, you already have this sort of thing. Sure, you need to hold the card 6 inches from the panel for it to open the door, however it can register the presence of a card over a much longer distance. So, that ID badge you already carry could be doing just this sort of thing. It all depends on how the system was configured.

      But, this isn't all that new anyway. Mobile phones have been able to do similar things for quite some time. Take this high profile rape case in the UK, where a couple were cleared of criminal charges using mobile phone location evidence.

      Hell, while we are talking about the complete loss of privacy in todays society, I might as well throw in this link to an official European Union report into the routine monitoring of the internet and telephone networks by Echelon.

      This new thing isn't anything to fear. You should be scared already.

    2. Re:BigBrother by pimpybra · · Score: 1

      Way to go lunchbox.
      "soon companies will make it manditory to where these devices in the offices"

      How about they make it manditory to WEAR the devices.

  4. Re:You might call me paranoid... by L0k11 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    i take it you've never had an x-ray of yourself

    x-rays would tend to show if people had a GPS device with antennea implanted in them

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
  5. this is gonna make a great plugin for Doom 3! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    we're actually building a location based game you can play through a regular web browser right now, so i guess this tech will give us a bunch of NPCs?

    - that guy

    p.s.: first?

  6. The IT job market sucks.. by marcushnk · · Score: 3, Funny

    So where do I get my "career chip"?? :-P

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:The IT job market sucks.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      You gotta do what you gotta do.. sorry Fry!

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  7. Boss' revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting how this is posted hours after How to Fake a Hard Day at the Office [/.]. Just when we thought we had outsmarted them...

    1. Re:Boss' revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another AC wrote Place the device in yer dog and take it to the office. You'll get a raise.

      What if your dog likes humping things?? Then the person filing sexual harrassment will have a semen stained garment and digital proof that "ÿou" were there at the time.

  8. Extension by cwernli · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll take it, but only with an extension module: I want to run my own webserver inside myself. Must be a chilling experience to personally get DoSed.

    1. Re:Extension by JohnHegarty · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good idea. When you get that done put a link to it on slashdot.... it will be the first death by slashdotting

    2. Re:Extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he wants to run a webserver on his GPS module, not on his pacemaker. He would probably survive the slashdotting but feel a little disoriented for a while.

    3. Re:Extension by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1
      Must be a chilling experience to personally get DoSed
      Are you sure it wouldn't be rather warm, as your server overheats from the load?
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  9. We know where you live... by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 1

    Body required... (for post and implant...)

  10. Hello people, wake up by override11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All those folk with a cell phone?? You allready have one of these, no need to fret. Just have 3 base stations sent pings to your phone, triangulate position, and big brother will be there shortly. Oh, your phone is not turned on? Sok, no need for it to be on. This type of device continues to become more popular, and the amount of power that goes into the hands of people who control this is amazing. Just because its in the terms of service that they will not release this information, how much would it take for someone who REALLY wanted to find you to go see a low level tech @ the cell phone place, pay a bit of $$, and whamo get your exact position and heading. The age of privacy has been over for a long time, people are just waking up too it.

    --
    No I didnt spell check this post...
    1. Re:Hello people, wake up by override11 · · Score: 1

      They dont have to radiate energy, they just have to be in range of the tower. :P

      http://100777.com/science/08.htm

      And I really think that funky odor is your own denial

      --
      No I didnt spell check this post...
    2. Re:Hello people, wake up by heli0 · · Score: 1

      You can read about the FCC regulations regarding that here: Enhanced 911

      Cell phone carriers need to be able to pinpoint the location of a call immediately by December 31, 2005.

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    3. Re:Hello people, wake up by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would give them the position of my cell phone. If I am going somewhere I don't want people knowing about, I leave my cell phone at home. This is obviously easier to do with a cell phone than an implanted chip.

      Also, if you have Sprint PCS like I do you don't have much to worry about in many places. I can't get a good enough signal to use the phone in many places, so I really doubt they know where I am. :)

    4. Re:Hello people, wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Standby" is not the same as "off". "Standby" is when it's on but you're not currently making a call. "Off" is when it isn't putting out or receiving a signal. It's pretty obvious and non-Big-Brotherish it's putting out a signal that allows it to be located when it's on standby: how else could it receive a call?

    5. Re:Hello people, wake up by master_p · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But I can rid of my cell phone anytime I want. I can smash it, burn it, sell it, hack it... I can't do much with an implant though, unless I go for a surgery: which means hospitalization, expenses, and most importanly, other people knowing what I do.

      I can also get rid of my credit card. I can always phone using public phones, If I am paranoid enough.

      So, the age of privacy isn't really over unless we are forced to have these chip implants. Otherwise, even if the phone/cable/car company has some of my data, that does not mean that they know my every move.

    6. Re:Hello people, wake up by Agent+Green · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First of all, triangulation is a hell of a lot more difficult than you think...hence the reason for the FCC mandate that GPS be implemented in all phones. Consider how your favorite radio station gets stronger at some points than others...and then consider the higher frequency that cell phones operate on. At best, you can guess where the phone may be by looking at the signal strengths from various towers, but that's not something that some cube monkey can just feel like pulling up in a browser...you would need actual radio foxhunting skills to pinpoint the location of the phone.

      I have an old-ass StarTac without any of these fancy GPS features, and I intend on keeping it that way. Having used 911 a small number of times on this phone has required me to give a very detailed description of where I was...no GPS baby!

      Of course, if you want more anonymous location without the monthly bills...get yourself a ham radio license and go that route...and you'll get to use up to 1500 watts PEP on most bands. ;)

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    7. Re:Hello people, wake up by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

      Just have 3 base stations sent pings to your phone, triangulate position, and big brother will be there shortly.

      Technically, it's not triangulation, it's trilateration. The base station can't tell what direction you're in (within the field of view of its antennas) but it can tell how far away you are. Same principle, slightly different math.

    8. Re:Hello people, wake up by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Insightful


      For people with phones that don't have GPS, maybe this triangulation of cell ids can be done on the phone as a "poor man's GPS". I know most phone OSs, like Symbian, have some API to get the id of the current (ie strongest) cell, but I wonder if there is a way to get a list of ids for cells whose signal strength is weaker but still "within reach". Then you could triangulate those cell locations.

    9. Re:Hello people, wake up by eventhorizon5 · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't own a cell phone (hey, i don't really have a use for one anyway). I wonder when they'll map your SSN to the phone, for ID purposes? SSN's are already being widely used as school ID numbers (at the college I go to, your ssn is everyone's knowledge). They might map SSN's once they devise a new global ID numbering system.

      Find SSN -> map to cell phone id -> track to person's location -> engage -> busted.

      All of this will be done, no matter who you elect; guaranteed. Totalitarianism at it's worst.

      1959 - Nikita Khrushchev, ruthless Soviet dictator stated: "We can't expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism until they awaken one day to find they have Communism."

      1959 - Norman Thomas, six times candidate of the Socialist Party for President of the United States, observes: "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until America will one day be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened."

      USSA, here we come :(

      --
      #Secret Windows Source Code, in MS C% - if (uptime >= "24 hours") then bsod() else print "Windows License Violation!"
    10. Re:Hello people, wake up by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Yes, IIRC they can see this sort of info (I'm thinking of the Smartphone OS myself). There are some apps being developed to use this for local information services, e.g. restraunt locators etc.

      For consumer type stuff, you don't need a lot of accuracy though, a resolution of a few hundred metres would be more than enough. I'd love to see it integrated with a on-line mapping service.

  11. Re:Dick Cheney by borgdows · · Score: 1

    but nobody needs to track him... everybody knows he is at his bunker at Camp David!

  12. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You can't be too sure. Many devices do not show up as completely x-ray opaque, and if placed in an appropriate position in the ends of major bones with well shaped antenna would be quite invisible to x-rays. Indeed they may be able to extract power from them. Also many people have tooth fillings which can be used to hide just about anything, not to mention the complexity of the skull bones around a nasal cavity. Do you know your own well enough to be certain of what it SHOULD look like?

  13. What happens? by jkrise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when the US may reduce non-military GPS accuracy?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/19/0340 24 7&mode=nested&tid=126&tid=103

    The potential for abuse is more terrifying, really.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:What happens? by wirde · · Score: 1
      Good to know that the EU is developing their own alternative then (GALILEO)...

      http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/energy_transport/gal ileo/intro/challenge_en.htm

      --
      in GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUSegmentation fault
    2. Re:What happens? by it0 · · Score: 1

      A better question would be what if the US doesn't maintain it's satellites. Wired had an article explaining that some satellites are offline because of repairs/malfunctions. US military said that there was nothing to be scared of but what if GPS failed, can you imagine how many business would go bankrupt if GPS went dead. From fishing to DHL to farming!

    3. Re:What happens? by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      GPS haven't been around all that long. I doubt the likes of DHL would go bankrupt even though they depend on it today. Pretty sure they've got a backup (the old way of doing it) in case of GPS malfunction.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    4. Re:What happens? by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, what is normal GPS accuracy? The combination of this technology with the US space-based missile-defense shield is more scary.

      Think of this combination - known GPS signal + hyper-accurate orbital-based laser system. Anyone who has a device like this implanted could be popped the moment they stepped outside, any time anyone cared to do so.

      I could see the US government implanting these in known criminals and dissidents. Perhaps as a condition of parole.

    5. Re:What happens? by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      You must not have been paying attention back in May of 2000, when GPS's 'Selective Availability' was permanently turned off. As of midnight on May 1, 2000, all GPS units, civilian or military, became accurate to within 15 meters.

      On the subject of GPS accuracy, the development to be watching at the moment is the FAA's WAAS project. Typical GPS accuracy using WAAS correction data will be less than 3 meters. The kicker is that your receiver must be WAAS-enabled in order to use the system. WAAS will eventually replace the Coast Guard's current system of DGPS beacon stations.

      FWIW: The WAAS network must already be at least partly functional, at least in the Puget Sound region. I just upgraded our mobile receiver to a WAAS-enabled engine (the Garmin GPS-15), and I noticed an immediate improvement.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    6. Re:What happens? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      You must not have been paying attention back in May of 2000, when GPS's 'Selective Availability' was permanently turned off.

      What exactly made that permanent? A permanent change would be if the DoD gave away the keys used to encrypt the military frequencies. All they did was stopped munging the civilian signals - which make them equivalent to the military ones, but all they need to do is flip a switch and the accuracy disappears again. They could even do this regionally if necessary.

      If the US ever develops ASAT technology then civilian location determination systems aren't going to help out much more - if a serious war broke out to a degree that the US was turning Selective Availabilty you can bet that the civilian satellites would be quickly destroyed. Assuming the US were fighting a technological equal (which is likely if they took that step) then the US GPS satellites would probably not be far behind.

      Shooting down civilian satellites may sound heavy-handed, but they would be serving a military purpose. Imagine if an aerial photography company were flying around Europe offering to do reconissance to anyone willing to pay them. I'm sure the Germans wouldn't have been happy to just watch them fly over their troop positions simply because they are only being hired by the Americans and aren't Americans themselves...

  14. Paranoia and conspiracy by jellyfish_green · · Score: 3, Funny

    Military? Are you saying the alien abductions and implants left in the abductees are connected to secret programs run by the US Military? Using timeshared UFO technology? That's ridiculous, Mulder.

  15. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Oh, I've had x-rays and the doctors have told me what they saw - I don't have the training to distinguish one vague blob from another. Presumably if I did have one implanted the doctors would be disallowed to tell me - in much the same way as a system administrator (in the UK at least) is not allowed to tell someone that the police are monitoring their emails.

    There are many that say ``If you don't want the police to know, you must be guilty of something.''

  16. Tracking people by stevenp · · Score: 0, Redundant


    1. Victim enters hospital for medical treatment
    2. Tracking device is implanted "accidently"
    3. Track victim
    4. ???
    5. Profit!!!

    Who will be the first one to sell the tracking info database to an advertisement company?

    Forget about cookies, the "body" will be tracked. With an accurate map it is easy to gain enormous information about the life of the person.

    1. Re:Tracking people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok I've obviously missed some culturally relevant experience here. Perhaps its an age thing. At the risk of intense ridicule, tell me the source of the following commonly used pattern:

      1. do stupid thing A
      2. do stupid thing B
      3. ???
      4. Profit!!!

    2. Re:Tracking people by stevenp · · Score: 1

      Its just funny ;-)

  17. get a jump on those who would abuse it by wwest4 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...and advocate laws (or enforcement of existing laws) that prohibit violations of privacy. then you could take advantage of the benefits at your risk and discretion e.g. like a cell phone... you can turn it off or drive out of range if you don't want to be reached.


    Captain Picard: Computer, where is Commander Data?
    Computer: Lieutenant Commander Data is no longer aboard the Enterprise.

    1. Re:get a jump on those who would abuse it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use the GPS receiver and don't (re)transmit the location data. GPS receivers are passive devices, they don't need to transmit anything to find the current location. How about a "sixth sense" GPS? Do humans have spare (or obsolete) nerves lying around somewhere which could be used for this?

  18. Interesting... by borgdows · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't wait for a Blog featuring a 'ViewWhereIam feature'(tm).

  19. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I've had xrays of myself done and they look completely normal. What's the problem?

  20. I remember Dec. 1999.... by jkrise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We were frantically patching our beloved systems for Y2K compatibility crap, faithfully taking backups and all - the most frequently asked qn. was:
    Will this work on Jan 1st 2000?

    After a while, things got so paranoid, and my boss wondered innocently:
    Are you sure we'll be alive on Jan 1st? Our hearts and brains are Y2K OK?

    Made us all laugh then.. but if these GPS pacemakers were around, we wouldn't have been laughing surely.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  21. Introducing.... by R33MSpec · · Score: 0

    The new era of 'Embedded SpyWare'

  22. You've got to wonder... by gusnz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...how the company sees this in terms of immediate practical applications.

    I could understand if this was one of those long-sighted DARPA projects that hails from an unlimited budget and a mandate to invent, but a company like this has shareholders to whom they must justify their actions. So what's the immediate market for this device? Even with the "War On Terrah" progressing at a rapid pace, I can't see implanted GPS's being compulsory anytime soon.

    So who's got ideas for the potential use/market for these devices? Paranoid parents wanting to know their children's location at all times? A replacement for medic-alert type bracelets or similar? I somehow can't see this returning on its initial investment in terms of sales, given the risks associated with anaesthetics/implantation in non-subcutaneous tissues weighed against such a trivial funcionality gain.

    1. Re:You've got to wonder... by alphaFlight · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that this would be far more effective than a soldier's dog tags. It would not only identify a soldier, it would also locate him or her. Though this might not be the best idea, it could get pretty gruesome if enemy forces were aware of a POW's internal beacon.

      --
      -= alphaFlight =-
    2. Re:You've got to wonder... by whovian · · Score: 1

      So who's got ideas for the potential use/market for these devices? Paranoid parents wanting to know their children's location at all times?

      Yup, now you don't even have to get your children fingerprinted en masse in case they get abducted (or, in case they become a wanted criminal so you just consult your fingerprint database). Just have law enforcement turn on their tracker....

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:You've got to wonder... by Bill_Mische · · Score: 1

      So who's got ideas for the potential use/market for these devices?

      Anyone with kidnap insurance perhaps? If nothing else it should lower their premiums.

      --
      Boring Old Fart (40, married, 3 kids...er no...make that 49, married, 3 grown up kids...it's been a long time)
    4. Re:You've got to wonder... by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Paranoid parents wanting to know their children's location at all times?

      I hope not.

      Of all the possible blunders of parenting that exist, I think that parents, training their children to expect omniscient monitoring, zero privacy, heavy interrogation, and heavy discipline as a substitute for earlier, time-consuming, caring, training to be a responsible person, is one of the scariest ways to construct a future society.

      It's the kind of society that I don't want to live in.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    5. Re:You've got to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be a perfect device for parolees. As a condition of their early release they are tagged and can be monitored as to their movements. When a crime occurs, local law enforcement can check as to thier location at the time.

    6. Re:You've got to wonder... by SirGeek · · Score: 1
      I can't see implanted GPS's being compulsory anytime

      I do. All the government needs to do is have a mandate that all hospitals implant new born infants AT BIRTH so that it is always there. They can make it a requirement for getting public education (To keep the Children Safe). It isn't going to be "that" huge of an incision (and they'll prolly have it so that it is implanted as an injection soon like the pet ID chip).

      What I worry about is who they are going to have keeping track of all the ID information. This company is going to possibly have some of the most nasty law suits (They Caused my Divorce because they had the wrong tracking ID in their database and my wife thought I was having an affair or they did 2 chips with the same ID and I got arrested for a crime I didn't commit)

    7. Re:You've got to wonder... by nextfiend · · Score: 1

      If you think long term, this could also lower premiums on health insurance. There is a computer or a person out there constantly monitoring your vital signs. If they notice something out of the ordinary, they can alert you immediately. Hopefully allowing you to take some preventive measures before you would have to undergo more intrusive and expensive surgery!

      Besides how many of you geeks out there live alone. You could be dead for days before anyone would notice you're gone. Now people will know right away ;-)

    8. Re:You've got to wonder... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The skills you listed were appropriate for a different time. Times change. Adapt and overcome.

      > Of all the possible blunders of parenting that exist, I think that parents, training their children to expect omniscient monitoring, zero privacy, heavy interrogation, and heavy discipline

      ...are teaching their offspring the core survival skills that will enable them to become productive members of their society, just as your parents taught you a different set of survival skills for your society.

      Chip 'em at birth, deeply (maybe even against or into the bone) so it can't be removed with a pocketknife, and make the technology as widespread as possible, as quickly as possible. Let the benefits propagate faster than the drawbacks.

    9. Re:You've got to wonder... by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      if you consider the number of child abductions in the UK over the last few years, i would say it would be pretty easy to sell to parents.

    10. Re:You've got to wonder... by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that this would be far more effective than a soldier's dog tags. It would not only identify a soldier, it would also locate him or her. Though this might not be the best idea, it could get pretty gruesome if enemy forces were aware of a POW's internal beacon.

      Have it passive-only until certain criteria are met - the soldier goes missing (as in MIA), their lifesigns indicate severe injury or death, or they trigger it manually (little remote control). If it can only be activated locally, or remotely using some crypto key, it should be safe and useful.

      From the life-sign reference - think about medical use. A patient who has just had a heart bypass, or a transplant, or some other major surgery - with this, as soon as anything goes wrong, help can automatically be summoned immediately, instead of relying on somebody to dial 911!

      As for the "abuse" - I'd say it's usually difficult to perform surgery on someone without them knowing, especially when you're fitting them with something resembling a cellphone! It could be useful for tagging offenders (much less prone to abuse than the leg-cuff approach used now), or protecting people with a high kidnap risk, but trying to do this without the person's knowledge would be ... difficult...

    11. Re:You've got to wonder... by ajs · · Score: 1

      Until you explain to parents that this guarntees that the first thing an abductor will do is take out a knife... ick.

    12. Re:You've got to wonder... by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      i suppose...
      although if the device did have some sort of tamper-proof alarm mechanism - it could help investigation by pinpointing where exactly the event took place. most of the time it was a case of "the child was last seen"...

    13. Re:You've got to wonder... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      I met these guys back when Digital Angel was their push, and the market (as they saw it) broke down into two ares:

      1. Kids tracked by their parents
      2. Elderly folks who are mobile, but with limited mental capacity (read Alzheimers), tracked by family members. With this, some elderly folks might be able to live at home (and not in A home)longer than otherwise possible, since the concern about them wandering off is lower

    14. Re:You've got to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just need some good exposure following their credit repayment negotiations w/IBM.

      http://www.adsx.com/news/2003/032703.html

      Sucks to be ADS. Things might be better in 5 years, if they make it.

      Not the Beatles(TM)

    15. Re:You've got to wonder... by ajs · · Score: 1

      Yep, and think about that. Your sales pitch is "when the bad guy cuts into your kid to get this out, we'll know exactly where it happened."

      Not gonna fly for many, but there might be enough that are stupid enough to fall for a sufficiently sly pitch that you'd have a market....

  23. Website?? by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Apart from the terrible Flash thingie on the frontpage, something else struck me with this website.

    Top left corner. Happy white couple. Take a look at the lower right corner.. a dog, a chinese boy and a black boy. Where I come from, likening chinese and blacks with dogs are racist.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Website?? by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      As is just about everything else on earth.

      At some point you need to step back and use your brain to work out if something was intended to be racist, or if it's just a photo for publicity.

      And anyway... isn't it racist to call him a "black" boy... shouldn't he be afro-caribean?

    2. Re:Website?? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      And where do you come from? Idiotville?

    3. Re:Website?? by Inda · · Score: 1

      A black man walks into a pub with a parrot on his shoulder. The barman says "Where did you get that?" and the parrot replies "Africa".

      Is that racist or funny?

      My friend next to me laughed...

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    4. Re:Website?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top left corner. Happy white couple. Take a look at the lower right corner.. a dog, a chinese boy and a black boy. Where I come from, likening chinese and blacks with dogs are racist.

      Yes, because the photo clearly implies that minority children are of the same basic value as dogs. It couldn't be an attempt to illustrate that the tracking of children and pets are possible uses for the device, or that the children are in fact included in an attempt to be multicultural. Anyway, thanks for making me aware of this; I will be sure never to take a picture of a black person with my dog because that would be clearly racist.

    5. Re:Website?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      referring to asians as "chinese" isn't too politically correct either, so stfu :\

    6. Re:Website?? by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      I wrote this, and I wasn't modded down.

      Christ, what's next? A first post?

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  24. I've been chipped for decades... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CIA implanted a chip to read my mind 20 years ago. The only bad thing is whenever I'm near a microwave my skull starts vibrating showtunes :)

    1. Re:I've been chipped for decades... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AC writes:
      whenever I'm near a microwave my skull starts vibrating showtunes
      Hmmm, microwave? That's a euphemism for Michael's dick, I suppose.
  25. Re:premier post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monsieur, vous me voyez fort aise de votre renfort.
    Pensez-vous que ces mangeurs de biguemaques vont continuer à nous casser les esgourdes avec leur babil d'amibes-monosynaptiques ?

  26. Inject it into criminals by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

    perfect for ex-cons and people under house arrest

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Inject it into criminals by epicstruggle · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the sort of thing I could go along with. How about putting a tracking device on every prisoner while they are incarcerated. Should make sure that there are no more jail breaks.

      Under the age of 16(whatever the age a minor is in your country) track them for safety. Remove them after they reach a certain age.

      Convicted pedophiles/sex offenders could also be tracked so as to help police/community keep them away from children (see above paragraph). Ability to see how close to kids they get.

      I have very few problems with tracking the location of certain people. I cant see a day where we all have them so am not to worried about it yet.

      later,

      --
      "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    2. Re:Inject it into criminals by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Convicted pedophiles/sex offenders could also be tracked

      and combined with an electronic zapper fitted inside their testicles so that if they get within 100 yards of a school/children's playground, they drop to their knees screaming ...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    3. Re:Inject it into criminals by Dr_Willie_Feelgood · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to track anyone who speaks out against our dear leader! And anyone who attends WMF protests! And anyone who comes from a "high-crime" profile!

      Rich white guys are frequently guilty of fraud, embezzelment, pedophaelia, rape, wife-beating, and drunk driving! Anyone making over $100K MUST be chipped for the good of society!

      (Yeah, right!)

    4. Re:Inject it into criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont be dumb, there are very acceptable applications for this technolodgy. If you disagree with the principle of tracking people thats your (unfortunate) right, but please spare me your sarcasm. It is high time we started using technolodgy to help us keep our society safe.

      later,

    5. Re:Inject it into criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but i don't want your society to be safe, i want my society to be safe.

    6. Re:Inject it into criminals by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      perfect for ex-cons

      ex-cons are exactly that. Ex. They have served their debt, and are now able to resume (more or less) regular lives.

      Why would you need to track them?

    7. Re:Inject it into criminals by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I cant see a day where we all have them so am not to worried about it yet.
      Contrasts with:
      Under the age of 16(whatever the age a minor is in your country) track them for safety.

      Implant them in all kids, and pretty soon you'll have a whole population who has never lived without them. "Why should I get this removed? It's done me no harm so far."

      And so it goes. One or two generations...and everyone has them, all the time.

    8. Re:Inject it into criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard of parole?

    9. Re:Inject it into criminals by ctxspy · · Score: 1

      Then they're not ex-cons, they are parolees.

      Good try!

    10. Re:Inject it into criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Quit playing semantics games. All parolees are ex-cons, though not all ex-cons are parolees.

      And there are certain rights that many ex-cons never get back even after parole, such as the right to vote. For convicted felons in most states, this means for the rest of their lives. So don't pretend that this is anything new.

    11. Re:Inject it into criminals by ctxspy · · Score: 1

      I'll address your points 1 by 1.

      First, my point was that parolees are not ex-cons. They become ex-cons when their parole is over. So therefore you can change your statement to say "All parolees are not ex-cons, and not all ex-cons are parolees".

      Also, losing the right to vote always seemed a little retarded to me. Think about it -- voting is meant to exercise your ability to change the government. However, if you do something significantly wrong (an ever increasing list), you cannot vote to change the government with which you do not agree... Does that make sense?

      I don't remember pretending that this is new.. Where did that happen?

      -Tomaj

    12. Re:Inject it into criminals by ewg · · Score: 1

      No doubt GPS implant records will clear more suspects than they convict. It's an indisputable, twenty-four hour a day alibi: "I was nowhere near the scene of the crime, and my movement records prove it."

      --
      org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  27. Mapping by GreggyBUIUC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, obvious privacy comments aside, this would be interesting in coordination with this old slashdot article which called for real time map generation by having volunteers wear GPS devices. A system like this would be allow planners to construct reliable road and interstate systems based on actual volume of traffic instead of estimates.

  28. ah I know a guy who can do that ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a friend of a friend who has this ability. Have seen proof shown me once only with police software, and presumeably somesort of network access (??). Sounds like bs, and looked like it.

    Yet proof was definate - we both waited months while he built up a number of people to prove it to, at same time to cut down chance of getting caught. Our positions of our turned-on mobiles at the time were all correct, though mine was predictable anyway (at work).

    However, bear it in mind even if you don't belive this (I wouldn't), there's always the police :p

    1. Re:ah I know a guy who can do that ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German cellphone network provider O2 (formerly known as Viag Interkom) offers this service to all their customers. They can locate their own cellphone through a web interface (page is in German, the service is called "handyfinder", "handy" is the German pseudo-English word for cellphone).

  29. I can't wait.... by inaeldi · · Score: 1

    ...until they start injecting this into people to "reduce terrorism".

  30. radiation / effect on biology? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    worse than a mobile? powered?

  31. Huh? by Pettifogger · · Score: 0, Funny

    The aliens gave me one of these a long time ago. Didn't cost a thing, either.

    --

    IAAL

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh there you are Pettifogger. We though we lost you for a while.
      At least we have full control over your leader.

  32. You'll never again have prolems... by non · · Score: 2, Funny

    finding where grandma wandered off to!

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    1. Re:You'll never again have prolems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only the robots had these devices too, then we'd be able to know beforehand that she was going down the stairs, not after.

  33. Am I the only one.. by varjag · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..who misread the topic as 'Peacemaker'-like GPS device?

    Come to think of it, a Colt-shaped GPS reciever would look impressive..

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    1. Re:Am I the only one.. by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      ..who misread the topic as 'Peacemaker'-like GPS device?

      Yeah, some people might think that, but it really seems more like something the Skarrans would use.

      Great. Now I have to line my whole suit with tinfoil, not just my hat.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:Am I the only one.. by Bvardi · · Score: 1

      Why does your comment give me the image of dirty harry with a GPS? :)

      "Frankly in all this excitement I forgot to sync my GPS... I could be 10 meters to your right, 10 meters to your left, or right in front of you. You feeling lucky punk?"

  34. READ YOUR OWN ARTICLE! by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Mobile (Cell) phones send signals that can be tracked, even when they're on standby". Turn it off, no RF energy. Simple.
    For fellow geeks with P800s, just put it in "flight mode" for the same effect.

    "I could super-impose an RF signal on the telephone line that would "jump" or "short" out the hook switch on the phone effectively creating an off-hook condition" has precisely bog-all to do with modern GSM digital handsets.

    Also, any site with a cute .gif button mentioning "The Ark of the Covenant: against Satan New World Order" probably isn't exactly a technical journal, dig?

    1. Re:READ YOUR OWN ARTICLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only has to receive information. The rest is software: The phone could wait for a trigger before it sends a beacon. Besides, the network caches the last known log-in information in order to avoid having to ping the whole network when a call for that specific cellphone arrives. As long as a cellphone stays within a cell, it only notifies the network of its presence every few hours (sending consumes much more power than receiving). In between these notifications, the phone could just as well be destroyed physically without influencing the passive location information. Only if you want to make sure that the surveillance object hasn't moved, you have to force the phone to transmit something, and for that it has to be in standby mode, not off. A "hidden standby" would consume energy, maybe not as much as real standby if it came online only every ten minutes or so, but still more than completely off.

    2. Re:READ YOUR OWN ARTICLE! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Turn it off, no RF energy. Simple.

      You pushed the power button and the screen went off and you thought it was OFF? hahaha

      Next time, try taking the battery out and holding down all the buttons to try and drain the capacitors.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  35. This approach is being used ... by zonix · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just have 3 base stations sent pings to your phone, triangulate position, and big brother will be there shortly.

    This approach is actually being used by some telephone companies here in Denmark. They can track you, and when you're at home they'll give you a low minute rate.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:This approach is being used ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no triangulation involved, just the location of the BTS and the direction of its sector antenna. Some phones can be programmed to avoid certain BTSes. This can be used to connect to your "home" BTS even though a BTS which is outside your home zone (that's what O2-Germany calls it) would give better signal quality. With triangulation this wouldn't work. Consequentially, home zones in areas with low BTS density are larger than in cities for example. This also means that you can strategically place the center of your home zone to increase the number of BTSes/sectors which must belong to your homezone (the circle with the minimum radius of the homezone touches the most desirable sectors in a voronoi diagram of the sector antennas' coverage).

    2. Re:This approach is being used ... by dmszero · · Score: 1

      they do that using the cell id on the switch record... not triangulation dms0

      --
      -= world leaders choose world leaders not us, not a democracy, not a revolution! =-
    3. Re:This approach is being used ... by mprindle · · Score: 1

      Yes that is true that they can see the cell id on the switch record, but that will only give the persons a general idea where you are since a cell tower can cover a max of 15 miles from the tower. With triangulation you have three towers locked onto your cell phone and using a bit of math they can determine where you are w/ in feet.

      Kage_

    4. Re:This approach is being used ... by dmszero · · Score: 1
      yes, im well aware of the triangulation method however for billing purposes its not necessary, nor is it practical in most cases to get someone's position down to three feet.

      most switches will only give you the calling cell id, not the triangulated location, so youll find that any provider who gives you a discounted rate for calling at home will generally do it based on what cell covers your residence

      cell towers in residential areas are genearlly quite closely packed :)

      dms0

      --
      -= world leaders choose world leaders not us, not a democracy, not a revolution! =-
  36. After reading the article... by Daemonic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The induction-based power-recharging method... functions without requiring any physical connection between the power source and the implant.

    So they're not going to be implanting these while you're not looking, unless they can also talk you into recharging it yourself later.

    The overall ickiness of having something inserted, plus of course the overtones of nazi tatoos will stop this being mandatory for a very very long time.

    It's the biometric id cards/credit cards/mobile phones that'll be the really useful peasant-tracking devices. They don't need RFID implants.

    Besides - there'd only be a market in back-street surgeons/hackers to take them out again. This wouldn't be a terribly effective way of tracking criminal types (it would be fine for ordinary citizens of course, but then they're easy enough to find at the moment anyway).

  37. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also these could be implanted to the areas that are protected from x-rays.

    For example near genitals.

  38. Eeep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long till they make it mandatory?
    Will your doctor install it at your next checkup?

    Will military and government jobs require you to have one?

    This is Big Brother, Sister, Mother, Father, and the rest of the whole Freaking 1984 family!

  39. I want more proof of racism by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...Where I come from, likening chinese and blacks with dogs are racist...

    I would like a little more proof that this was intended to be racist. The obvious intent is to identify tracking children and pets as a use.

    One of the major problems I have with accusations of racism is that behavior frequently is assumed to be racist without any investigation. To illustrate, a few years ago a news program covered racial sensitivity training that a resturant chain was ungoing as part of a court settlement. Cashiers were told to always place the change in the hand of the customer, never on the counter. Because many blacks interpret putting the money on the counter as meaning "you don't want to touch them." This hit me directly, because I have a habit of putting it on the counter regardless of whether the person is white, black, or other. Mainly because I found it easier. So the question becomes how many people thought I was racist, for doing something that I do to everyone. My futher thought is, I want more proof that things are racist before believing so. Racism exists, but not every innocent act is racist.

    1. Re:I want more proof of racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The obvious intent is to identify tracking children and pets as a use.
      If by `children' you mean `slave children,' racist.
    2. Re:I want more proof of racism by redtail1 · · Score: 0
      If by `children' you mean `slave children,' racist.

      You're an idiot.

    3. Re:I want more proof of racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the effort you are putting into detecting the innocent when it could be racist should be expended on making the world a better place. If you think racism is an exaggerated problem, sadly you are mistaken. That doesn't mean you are a racist, or that every racist accusation is true. Certainly not. But you have to be wary of simple reactionism to this. There is a far bigger and more ingrained problem to be dealt with than the problem of some improper allegations of racism.

      Another way to look at it is this: Why is our culture so f*cked that people of color feel that some whites might be avoiding touching them? That is the important issue.

    4. Re:I want more proof of racism by eventhorizon5 · · Score: 1

      The mindset of today determines that everyone is "guilty until proven innocent." So in other words, they expect people to assume that others are racist unless they directly show they aren't. Then of course there are those who commit racist acts, but have the right "friends", so that the act is dismissed.

      Now, as for something that is clearly racist, but is almost completely ignored, here's an example:

      ---
      quotes from Charles Darwin's "Descent of Man"

      "It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?"

      "The enquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence; and consequently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?"
      "We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."

      "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
      ---

      So here this man is claiming that blacks are a "sub-species" that must be exterminated. Man, that's bad stuff. Everyone's equal without question. But a simple act as you suggested of placing change is determined as racist, instead of ideology like this. That's moral inversion.

      --
      #Secret Windows Source Code, in MS C% - if (uptime >= "24 hours") then bsod() else print "Windows License Violation!"
  40. You did it !!!! by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    4. Profit.

    Gosh ! First time I see someone divulging his ultra confidential business plan on /.
    Did you patent it first ? 8p

    Now I'm waiting for the silly jokes...

    btw a good solution to prevent this to work if implanted would be putting the kidnappee in one of those highly reflective emergency covers (the gold and silver ones)...

    Also I can't begin to imagine what would have happened to me if my Mom had had access to this sort of tech 8(

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  41. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Eudial · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, if you were to make it out of a thin, soft plastic material, and make the wires extremely thin, it wouldn't show up on x-ray. it would, however show up on ultrasound.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  42. Uh... High-Risk Countries??? by samdu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the site

    the Company announced that it was accelerating development of PLD in response to demand from high-risk countries and other potential customers.


    What the hell is a "high-risk" country and why would they want such device?

    1. Re:Uh... High-Risk Countries??? by Daemonic · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that boggled my mind for a minute there too. I think it stems from their declared target market, to which they offer a:
      full range of "personal safeguard technologies" that enhance personal safety, security and peace of mind.
      So if you're travelling to a country with a history of kidnapping rich foreigners, you might want one.
    2. Re:Uh... High-Risk Countries??? by Ripplet · · Score: 2, Funny

      >What the hell is a "high-risk" country
      America of course! After all, if a third world two bit one camel country like Iraq is a serious threat, so is half of the rest of the world.
      And don't forget the French!

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    3. Re:Uh... High-Risk Countries??? by panxerox · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tracking of Sar's patients in China would come to mind seeming how they never really stop spreading the disease even after they stop having symptoms.

      --
      "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    4. Re:Uh... High-Risk Countries??? by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      What the hell is a "high-risk" country and why would they want such device?

      Columbia. Russia.

      Why would they want it? So that when their government officials or corporate executives get kidnapped, they recover them still breathing instead of receiving them in little boxes over the course of several days, and more importantly so that they recover them at a time inconvenient for the kidnappers, to prevent future kidnappings by those specific malcontents.

  43. Does this mean... by Eudial · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... that in the future you'll have to mumify yourself in copper wires / sit in a copper cage every time you wank?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:Does this mean... by wahlen · · Score: 0

      Is that the first you /.ers worry about?! That makes it seem as if you have no real life, no girlfriends, no...um, never mind...

  44. Re:You might call me paranoid... by VCAGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many devices do not show up as completely x-ray opaque

    True, but you'd be hard pressed to create an electronic device that would not show up in an MRI. Any metal at all would create field distortion--and the plastic parts of the device would show up in the field as different from surrounding tissue.

    Also, I don't think these would be undetectable by PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scanners--they find everything, including that chewing gum you swallowed a few months ago...

    --
    Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
    A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  45. Via the internet! by the+bluebrain · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the writeup:
    • [...] can wirelessly transmit location, movements and vital signs via the Internet, storing the info in a database.
    Sorry, but that sounds like one of these post-modern patent applications. "Via the internet" ... wooo-hoo!
    I hardly think anyone's building a device a tenth of the size of a pacemaker that will continuously transmit "ASL"-data (or whatever) to a satellite, or even the cell phone network. Bluetooth, WLAN, whatever, yea, but I don't expect to see anyone being tracked across the Austalian outback with one of these anytime soon.

    As for the plus side:
    Finally - a rational use for that aluminium foil beanie. Now *that's* newsForNerds/stuffThatMatters.
    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  46. Ummmm..... by thynk · · Score: 1, Funny

    The device, which is internally rechargable

    What does internal rechargable mean? You don't have to take it out to recharge it? Where do you plug in the power cord at night? ::shudder as goatse image jumpes into head::

    can wirelessly transmit location, movements and vital signs

    User number 4859932 has had 8 orgasms while sitting in front of computer. Net logs show massive pr0n downloads during same time frame.

    Could also be used to track the movements of a spouse/SO if you think something is up. "Honey are you sure you worked a double shift yesterday and you were not at the strip club for 6 hours before going to a stippers house and had sex? - Well, ok - as long as your sure."

    --

    Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    1. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably recharges induction-style kinda like a lot of electric toothbrushes (I know the Sonicare brush is like this). If you've got a coil in your charger and a similarly tuned coil in the device, you can have a transformer even if there's a little material in the way.

    2. Re:Ummmm..... by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      an AC wrote Probably recharges induction-style kinda like a lot of electric toothbrushes (I know the Sonicare brush is like this). If you've got a coil in your charger and a similarly tuned coil in the device, you can have a transformer even if there's a little material in the way.


      which is exactly what the article says.

      which also implies that unless they've built a self reseting circuit breaker into the pacemaker sized device, it would be trivial to knock it out with a big ass alternating magnetic field.

      heck, the physics lab at school and a few components from your local amplifier/stereo/music shop could probably knock one up in about 1/2 an hour if you had access to the right teachers cabinets.

      Damn. A world where only stoner guitarists and their nerdy friends are free....

    3. Re:Ummmm..... by scalis · · Score: 2, Informative

      What does internal rechargable mean? You don't have to take it out to recharge it? Where do you plug in the power cord at night? ::shudder as goatse image jumpes into head::

      I know your post was to be funny but the article says that "The induction-based power-recharging method is similar to that used to recharge implantable pacemakers. This recharging technique functions without requiring any physical connection between the power source and the implant."
      Just in case you actually DID wonder. This means that you dont have to get pysical with your mechanical goat just yet, and if you decide to be anyway, please dont let me know....

      --

      True ravers don't need drugs
  47. All Americans... by Karem+Lore · · Score: 0
    George W. Bush invoked a little known (and recently added) law that allows him to enforce the implanting of digital GPS devices into each new-born as matter of procedure. His argument for this is that it will enable him and his government to track terrorists...

    In a related article, media and advertising companies are lobbying GWB to allow them access to the data from such devices to allow them to change wall-mounted adverts to reflect the person that is walking past them...

    In more related material, B. Gates has implemented a functionality into windows that allow it to confirm that the person using the computer is a licensed user.

    "Eventually", a spokeperson for the whitehouse starts,"we will own the arses of everyone."

    Karem

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
    1. Re:All Americans... by Cackmobile · · Score: 0

      i'd love advertising to change to me. I'd buy lots of porn so when walking through a train station or something hardcore pr0n pops up.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  48. Missing the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are missing the great potential of a device like this- Sex Offenders, Murderes and such would have one of these implanted and presto- no more missing fugatives and chester molesters.

    I don't mind Big Brother watching, so long as he's watching out for my children...

    1. Re:Missing the boat by fireweaver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have a much simpler solution. Kill child molesters. One strike and you're DEAD.

  49. Hmm, DRM for people. by MrFenty · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I can see a two-tier society of the future where you have the "official" class of people who (not only being owned by MS, the government, RIAA, whoever you want to pick on this week) are willing to submit to having this sort of personal DRM so that law enforcement and other agencies know where they are; and also an underclass of people who refuse this "treatment", and as such as denied access to various funky services, perhaps only getting the most basic of social services.

    Submit to the chip, join The Club - or live on the outside. Very scary.

    1. Re:Hmm, DRM for people. by Fesh · · Score: 1

      Beautiful... I notice you stopped short of speculating on the implantation site. *shivers*

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    2. Re:Hmm, DRM for people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not one of those people who likes to take things too literally or read things into stuff, but I would like to point out a bit of similarity between what you just described and a passage from a famous book:

      He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark.

      I go back and forth on how I think about that particular book, but sometimes it's interesting to see that parts of it really don't sound too far-fetched. At least, that particular part sounds like the general direction that things could be going, eventually (in a few decades or centuries).

  50. Three Words by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Lojack For Humans.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  51. Cashless Society / 666 by dochood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has probably been posted on Slashdot before (and been thoroughly pooh-poohed), but "Digital Angel" sounds an awful lot like the "Digital Demon" mentioned in Revelation chapter 13, the "Mark of the Beast" (666). In Rev. 13, everyone is required to get a mark before they can buy or sell.

    It seems odd that John would come up with the idea that you would have to have a mark (I'm told it means "etching, as with a needle" in the Greek, but I'm sure some Greek-speaking-geek here can probably shoot that down if it isn't correct) to buy and sell. I'm sure he was thinking of it as a tatoo that they would merely look at, before allowing you to use your cash. He probably wasn't thinking of a "cashless society", but I've often heard people talk about the benefits of a cashless society (thwart drug-dealers, kidnappers, extortion rings, etc). Supposedly, we'd all start with a "debit card" arrangement. But they could be stolen or forged. An implanted chip would be harder to fake.

    As a starting point to mandatory chipping, I've heard people suggest that you would chip criminals, aliens, and of course, "the scum of the earth".... gun owners! If you want to own a gun, you must get a tracking chip! Small price to pay for a "privilege" that the government lets you have...

    I'm not saying that D.A. would be the Mark, just that it sounds hauntingly familiar... that similar technology could be used for that purpose.

    So most readers here probably don't read or believe the Bible, but if you see it happen someday..... think about it.

    dochood

    1. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      So most readers here probably don't read or believe the Bible, but if you see it happen someday..... think about it.


      wouldn't it be funny if the person who is scoffing while reading this now gets this chip and their Unique UserID just happens to be "666"

      After all, the number is supposed to stand for a mans name. That means that half the population is in the running, plus all those women who have men's names.

      Heck, I'd feel pretty special to get THE mark of the beast. I mean, think of the odds.

    2. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by fruey · · Score: 0

      Some quotes about that:

      13.1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

      A pretty strange beast... that suddenly demands:-

      13.16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

      13.17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

      13.18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

      I can't read anything into that chapter ... doesn't make any sense to me.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So most readers here probably don't read or believe the Bible, but if you see it happen someday..... think about it.

      Speaking as someone who was brought up in a religious family and studied scripture for many years, I've always found Revelations to be one of the dodgier parts of the bible. At best it could be seen as allegorical, at worst the ramblings of a schizophrenic.

      The unfortunate side effect of quoting from Revelations in this context is that you always come across as a paranoid nutter.

    4. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (The following is all In My Opinion (IMO):

      Isn't it clever. Digital "Angel". Sounds so nice, warm, fuzzy, and safe. Cause we all know most people think of these things when they think of an angel. What better name to give a company or product with what could become a sinister product. I've seen this type of clever name usage before for products that are anything but nice. The sad truth is, many people are fooled by it. I'm not. I will not receive any chip inside or outside my body for any purpose. Never. Won't do it. I don't care how much easier someone claims it makes X, Y, or Z. It's my body.

      The more you look at the simplicity of the Amish people's life or Catholic Monasticism, the more you see the benefits of throwing away much of society's miconceptions. One good example is that Monks and Nuns typically live longer than the average person, much longer. They don't clutter their life with all the junk we have, nor do they have all the stresses which we have manufactured for ourselves. Many of these electronic devices aren't making our lives easier, they're putting up another barrier between us and the other person.

    5. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please take your paranoid evangelical ramblings to the nearest psycho ward and seek professional help.

      But of course, anything that forces you to think of religion scares you to think about it. That's why atheists (the tools of communism) are so rabid about removing Christian symbols from plain view. Next they'll be after removing the churches too, because they can't stand thinking about Christianity, yet they spend most of their time thinking about it when they're involved in their attempts to remove these Christian icons.

      The world is not out to get you,

      Unlike atheists who love the world, Christians are to live in the world but not of the world.

      you are not important,

      Each of us is very important. You have a negative and bitter view of things and you seem to enjoy passing this off to others to make yourself feel better. Toxic.

      there is no grand conspiracy,

      Because you know it all? Please.

      the "Left Behind" series was fiction,

      Never read it. The rapture idea is only that, and not a very scriptual based one.

      and drugged out Middle Easterners could not predict the future.

      God gave people the visions. I know that conflicts with your atheistic human worship dogma though but tough.

      But -- of course -- I am just a foolish tool of the conspiracy, duped by Satan's minions and too stupid to see The Truth that is The Word. Of course.

      You said it yourself. :)

      Weirdo.

      Now that's not nice.

    6. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by brwski · · Score: 1

      The word is charagma, and Louw and Nida define it as: "a meaningful mark, whether engraved, imprinted, or branded -- 'mark, brand.' "

      Another use of the term cited by Louw & Nida is: "an object (not necessarily three-dimensional) which has been formed to resemble a person, god, animal, etc. -- 'likeness, image' "

      Arndt and Gingrich define it as "a mark or stamp engraved, etched, branded, cut, imprinted."

      Brighton's commentary on Revelation notes that it was common in John's day for slaves to be branded by their masters, and devotees of certain deities to be branded with the mark of their god.

      Put these together, and it seems clear that the mark spoken of by John is one with distinct religious significance, and visibly signifies whether one is with the Beast or not. So while implanted GPS units are a Bad Idea, they likely do not fit the criteria for whatever the "Mark of the Beast" would be.

      brwski

      --

      brwski
      "Because without beer, things do not seem to go as well''

    7. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by dochood · · Score: 1

      >>> Put these together, and it seems clear that the mark spoken of by John is one with distinct religious significance, and visibly signifies whether one is with the Beast or not. So while implanted GPS units are a Bad Idea, they likely do not fit the criteria for whatever the "Mark of the Beast" would be.

      Unless they stick out... a grain of rice sized object (the VeriChip) under the skin would still stick out and still be visible to the eye.

      And, why merely have a "mark" to buy or sell? The mark makes much more sense when combined with the cashless society. How could you possibly prevent people from buying or selling without it? If it gave them access to their MONEY.

      As far as the religious significance, it is widely believed that in order to take it, one has to pledge complete allegiance to the "beast" (both a man and a country, as explained in the book of Rev. itself, for one of the above posters), to include WORSHIPPING him.

      That's my take on it.

      Thanks for the help with the definition, though!

      dochood

    8. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by dochood · · Score: 1

      I agree whole-heartedly! Chips in the body, especially GPS trackers, whether M.O.T.B. or not, are a bad idea, even from a mere privacy perspective!

      I also agree about the Amish way of life. There's a lot to be said for it.

      I would become Amish, if they would let me keep my guns and my Mac! I could give up everything else electronic! ;)

      dochood

    9. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by dochood · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant to say "both a man and a CITY" (sitting on 7 hills) not "a man and a country"

      dochood

    10. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by dochood · · Score: 1

      >>> I can't read anything into that chapter ... doesn't make any sense to me.

      The clue to the chapter is in Rev 17, where the Mystery of
      Babylon explained...

      (from the New International Version:)

      "This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits. 10They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for a little while. 11The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.
      12"The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. 13They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast. 14They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings--and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers."

      So, it isn't a 7-headed, 10-horned monster, but the beast represents 10 kings (apparently reigning concurrently), and the 7 horns represent kings of the past (from our perspective). The "eighth king", also mentioned as the "little horn" in the book of Daniel, is commonly called "The Antichrist". He deposes three of the kings and sets himself up above the remaining of the other seven (or six, if he was one of the 10). So, this is predicting that the world will eventually be divided into 10 "kingdoms" (countries), and the "beast" (the most evil tyrrant the world has ever seen) will take over the whole world, and will be worshipped as God.

      So, it's not so "senseless" if you see the explanations of the visions that are very often contained in the text of Revelation itself. It's talking about the politics of world domination, and the future "kings" (leaders, in our speech) who will rise up to take over the world, including the final, evil man-king, a.k.a. "The Antichrist".

      dochood

    11. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by eventhorizon5 · · Score: 1

      It's part of the "Mystery Babylon"

      -Babylonian Empire
      -Roman Empire
      -many empires in between
      -New Babylon/Rome (merge of all current and previous)
      (when an empire falls, it doesn't die; just like how asinine Nazism is flourishing in parts of Germany right now)

      Considering that John was from the 1st century AD, a cashless society wouldn't directly make any sense to him, unless everything was free. He had a vision, and he described it as best he could. Certain things like the Beast, he could only describe as such, even though it represented something much more in-depth. What would you say if you saw the thoughtstream of the world's population? This, as far as I know, was what he described as the "sea"; a sea of thoughts, and a beast rising out, representing the thought movements (mindshare) towards a single dominant power. This dominant power will make Hitler, Mao, and Stalin look like infants, but only to the opposition, since the supporters will barely notice any terror; the supporters will find everything out the hard and lethal way (that's the price of complete deception).

      Some movies were made a while ago, that showed the mark as being a tatoo (this includes the "Thief in the Night" series). But, since technology has advanced so much in just a few decades, the mark described could easily be some sort of a biochip. The mark's numbering is still theoretical.

      The ten horns represent a ten-nation confederacy, governed by a single ruler (of course with a lead propagandist like Hitler had), known in the verse as the "name of blasphemy", or anti-Christ. The second ruler (or right-hand man) is known as the "false prophet", which so far is believed to become the head of the UN's global religion project, which they proposed during the Johannesburg summit; a single religion for all that revolves around the worship of "mother earth", also known as "Gaia". The funny thing is that the religion is shown as being new, even though it is around 4,000 years old (based on Babylonian mysticism). They even have their own "ark of the covenant" to mock the original.

      The world government proposed will use a foundational class-feud system very close to Marxism, primarily coming from Charles Darwin's own racist writings:

      ---
      "It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?"

      "The enquirer would next come to the important point, whether man tends to increase at so rapid a rate, as to lead to occasional severe struggles for existence; and consequently to beneficial variations, whether in body or mind, being preserved, and injurious ones eliminated. Do the races or species of men, whichever term may be applied, encroach on and replace one another, so that some finally become extinct?"
      "We shall see that all these questions, as indeed is obvious in respect to most of them, must be answered in the affirmative, in the same manner as with the lower animals."

      "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
      ---

      According to a mix of prophetic books such as Daniel, Zechariah, Matthew, and Revelation, the world government proposed (and the global id system) will be brought on by a peace treaty that promises peace between Israel and Palesti

      --
      #Secret Windows Source Code, in MS C% - if (uptime >= "24 hours") then bsod() else print "Windows License Violation!"
    12. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by Morgoth_Bauglir · · Score: 1

      "Unlike atheists who love the world, Christians are to live in the world but not of the world."

      Whose tools were atheists before communism?

      "Unlike atheists who love the world, Christians are to live in the world but not of the world."

      Huhn-- that explains all the Jesus fish on SUVs.

    13. Re:Cashless Society / 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the US is made up of ten FEMA regions. Those are more important right now than state boundaries, which are becoming irrelevant for "federal" purposes. The federal planning revolves around those regions. They already have fema governors. The illusion of states and states rights and individual rights is that-an illusion. The constitution has been completely corrupted, you have only that which the government allows you, whereas the original design was you had all rights, the government had strictly defined and limited rights, with over lapping checks. people accept loss of rights over the generations and years and don't care. We've lost juries, any time the government doesn't want a jury, there is none. Voting has become co opted and now hackable by government completely. Tracking and locating devices are being put into more and more devices by government mandate. Data is collected, collated, and it can also be altered by government, leaving any potential victim with the near impossible task of proving their innocence. Government already denies exculpatory evidence when they wish to, and even when caught, nothing happens to them. They can deny requests, merely by uttering the word "security". You may be accused and convicted on the spot by being called a "terrorist". "Detained" which is really kidnapped, interrogated using "stress and duress" techniques. moved even over seas, held in secret. All of this is RIGHT NOW, it is not "the future".

      The chip is coming, some in the military have them already. It will become mandatory for all people, and soon. Every possible way to misuse those chips will be taken. All you need to do is to ask people who have had their records munged by government, who have been made victim before, to see how this will be used and abused. It's heinous beyond belief.

  52. Fortress by EvilMike · · Score: 1

    The first thing that comes to my mind is prisoner control, like in Fortress. A GPS device, a receiver and a small amount of explosive....

    1. Re:Fortress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* But what happens to the prisoner that is forcefully removed from his/her confinement area by the victim/victim's family? I mean, except "BOOM! *thud*"?

  53. health chip + GPS = better insurance packages by romit_icarus · · Score: 1
    I once read about how inserting GPS and chips in cars can be used to better understand the risk of a car/driver leading to a personalised and dynamic insurance premium. This compares to the current model where the companies take an average view of the demographic (weighed by age etc), so even though I might have put my car in the garage all year, I still have to pay for the insurance.

    Why can't the same be applied to medical/life/personal insurance given all these fancy tracking tools?

    1. Re:health chip + GPS = better insurance packages by geirhe · · Score: 1
      I once read about how inserting GPS and chips in cars can be used to better understand the risk of a car/driver leading to a personalised and dynamic insurance premium
      Why do I need an insurance if it is "personalized"? Wouldn't putting the money in a bank and paying for my own fender benders if and when they occur be a better solution?

      I thought insurance was supposed to be something where everyone pay a little to cover the costs of the unlucky.

    2. Re:health chip + GPS = better insurance packages by romit_icarus · · Score: 1
      Personalised in the sense, that my risk profile is better understood.

      Currently premiums are profiled on factors like age, the make of your car, where you live etc. What these chips can do is feed more refined information than this and create more number of differential premiums that are better suited to you.

    3. Re:health chip + GPS = better insurance packages by Gorgonzola · · Score: 1

      Insurance is supposed to have people with similar risk profiles pooling their risks and ending up with a lower risk profile. The more homogeneous the risk profiles, the more chance of ending up with a much lower one. You wouldn't want to end up with a higher risk profile because of you getting lumped together with those who drive like idiots, would you?

      --
      -- Spelling and grammar errors tend to be a sign of erroneous thinking.
  54. Hostage recovery guys must Unionise against this by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    If this goes ahead, then "Proof of Life" would be one very short movie, and that guy Russel Crowe plays would be unemployed.

    You do not want ex-SAS people who kill heavily armed guerillas, employing nothing but a leatherman wave and a tightly puckered lower-bowel, to be just sitting around in their houses with nothing to do all day.

  55. How do I interface to it. by crovira · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want an interface. If I get lost, I want to be able to use it. I'm not interested if Joe Schmoe can find me if I can't find myself...

    Then again, it would be a great device for tracking the elderly when they wander off in a fog. I have an ancient and venerable mother whose hippocampus and therefore her ability to process short-term memory is "flambayed".

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  56. homeland security by koi88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frightened? Just think how effective we could fight terrorism! Every person in the US could be tracked, we could see who they meet and if they're sleeping, working maybe, in the future, what they're talking about. Of course, only criminals who have something to hide would fear this prospect.
    Yes a device like that is frightening, especially in the hand of a totalitarian regime like the United States' government.
    (Yes, mod me down... I know there are regimes where I couldn't say something like that without risking my life and I'm grateful I can still say that. But the US government do put people in jail without accusing them properly, they torture people outside the country, etc. Just say a person is a suspected terrorist and he automatically loses all human rights. I can still say I disapprove of that. But I'm afraid it's slowly becoming like the USSR in Stalin's times...)

    --

    I don't need a signature.
    1. Re:homeland security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm afraid it's slowly becoming like the USSR in Stalin's times

      Except that in Stalin's times you weren't implanted a chip, weren't tracked. And if you were just laying low not disturbing the regime, no one cared about what you did. Hunters had guns (ooh guns! they'll be banned by Bush soon!), people had privacy if they wanted to...
  57. Novels based on similar technology by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

    To read what one author has written regarding tracking and stored data on humans, read:

    http://www.sfwriter.com/exho.htm

    Really good trilogy so far and it raises the question whether no privacy can benefit a society.

    --

    Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
  58. Easy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What does internal rechargable mean? You don't have to take it out to recharge it? Where do you plug in the power cord at
    You have one of these embedded in your mattress. Remember to turn your mattress on, though.
  59. Re:You might call me paranoid... by plugger · · Score: 1, Funny

    Being born in 1968, I guess any such implant would be about the size of a football.

  60. Longer chain of events by whovian · · Score: 1

    1. kidnap victim (particularly one of public importance or of substantial wealth)
    2. operate on victim to install tracking device
    3. release victim
    4. Track victim to collect compromising evidence
    5. Ask for ransom
    6. Profit

    Meanwhile, you open up or set up a collaboration with a chip removal facility.
    7. Ask for ransom
    8. Operate to possibly remove chip
    9. Profit.

    Repeat as needed.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  61. Not necessarily without their permission by mdfst13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you had the choice between being in jail and undergoing an operation that would let you get out, which would you choose?

    I'm not sure that they would use this with criminals anyway. It would seem more secure to me to add it externally with a lock for criminals. Internally, it seems to me that they would just get another operation and have it removed.

    1. Re:Not necessarily without their permission by mikerich · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you had the choice between being in jail and undergoing an operation that would let you get out, which would you choose?

      Perhaps in a \. first I will admit that I really don't know.

      There are so many implications raised by the introduction of this sort of pervasive technology. I can easily see any use by governments as a slippery slope. We have overcrowded prisons so implant people with trackers (after all its only a small step from current tags), convicted of shop-lifting? have a tag put in your body which will alert shop security when you enter a mall, a refugee awaiting naturalisation - better have you tagged so you don't go wandering...

      I have a great dislike of this sort of technology. but an even greater dislike of the sort of politician and business shysters who will see it as a quick route to earning lots of money or plaudits for being 'tough on crime'.

      We (in the UK), already have a government that appears to consider almost any intrusion into people's lives to be legitimate, I can imagine David Blunkett will be salivating when this is read to him.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    2. Re:Not necessarily without their permission by me3head · · Score: 1

      Apparantly you haven't seen A Clockwork Orange.

    3. Re:Not necessarily without their permission by Parsec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I concur... not just removed, but possibly also used as an alibi.

      1. have tracking device removed
      2. leave at home
      3. commit crime
      4. have tracking device re-installed
      5. use records indicating you were at home during the crime as defense

      For every system someone will be there looking to make money from beating it.

      Also, what's to prevent people from disabling the device? Could it be made resistant to ultrasonic, microwave, close-range EMP, precise laser, or other creative attacks?

      THX-1138 has disappeared.

    4. Re:Not necessarily without their permission by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're thinking of the hard way.

      If they implanted it, one of the conditions would be that you check in, where they could verify that it was still implanted, using one mechanism or other.

      If you remove it, you either have to run or show up and fail the GPS placement test. So you're caught, with some lead time. So we can't do that.

      If you shield it all the time, they are going to throw you back in the clink. So you're caught, maybe with lots of lead time.

      If you shield intermittently, they are going to send someone to look for you whenever you fall off their map. If they think you're abusing the system, you end up back in jail. So you're caught maybe with no lead time.

      I think the best bet would be to weaken the battery so that it retains less charge, giving you some 'free time' before you have to go back to your induction mat, or a way to burn out the induction charge system in the GPS, causing the whole unit to fail after charge is depleted. It leaves you with total innocence - "What!?! I didn't know walking under those high-voltage lines would kill my unit. They're on my way to work - I have to pass them." And if they start talking about replacing it numerous times, you'll have all sorts of human rights groups up in arms about cruel and unusual punishment (if the constitution is still in place in the US). That could take it to the point where they can't require it as a condition of parole, which puts us back where we are today, which sounds better than that dark world...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    5. Re:Not necessarily without their permission by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Even better is just to outsource prisons. You're allowed to walk from home to the grocery store along a set route. You are mailed $x in food stamps once a week. If you walk more than 2 feet off the appropriate sidewalk or spend more than x minutes outside the house the police show up and your house-arrest privs are suspended. Given the choice of concrete cells or a living room I think most prisoners would choose the latter. Obviously you would only apply this to those guilty of relatively minor crimes.

      You could even use this technology to put people under house arrest for a week for running a red-light camera. Just make them take vacation time at work or something and let them make one trip to the grocery store on day 1 to stock up for the rest of the week.

    6. Re:Not necessarily without their permission by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1
      If you had the choice between being in jail and undergoing an operation that would let you get out, which would you choose?

      Yeah, just look at "A Clockwork Orange." That kind of stuff works really well. After all, behavior comes before humanity.

  62. Noooooo!!!! by nounderscores · · Score: 1, Funny

    That would turn some bloggers into bullet magnets.

    Can you imagine someone putting the WhereIam on their slashdot journal and having hoardes of screaming admins running after them yelling "Ask before you link! ASK BEFORE YOU LINK!!!!"

  63. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're female that might not be so bad.

    Doing anything friday night?

  64. Re:You might call me paranoid... by Dr_Willie_Feelgood · · Score: 1

    Especially one the size of a snuff can (2 1/2 inches in diameter by a half inch thick).

    Even if they shrink it, it's still going to be frickin' huge!

  65. memento by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to tatoo "remember Sammy Jenkis" all over her?

  66. Re:Some food for the conspiracy theorist among us by tedrlord · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool use: Ability to keep track of your girlfriend/boyfriend/significant other.

    Frightening abuse: Your girlfriend/boyfriend/significant other keeping track of you.

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
  67. Re:Some food for the conspiracy theorist among us by tedrlord · · Score: 1

    Hey, it looks like Galeon saved the subject from my last post. How... useful.

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
  68. Here's where a tinfoil hat comes in by johannesg · · Score: 0

    and why skip over (4) profit?

    1. Re:Here's where a tinfoil hat comes in by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      and why skip over (4) profit?
      OK, it is the last time I try to be subtle on /. and leave the blindingly obvious out.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  69. Big deal by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Frightened? Just think how effective we could fight terrorism! Every person in the US could be tracked, we could see who they meet and if they're sleeping, working maybe, in the future, what they're talking about.

    Santa's been doing that for years.

    That means, instead every year we'll be going to Tom Ridge to ask for a an official Red Ryder, carbine action, two-hundred shot range model air rifle with a compass in the stock and this thing that tells time.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  70. Star Trek, anyone? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
    The device, which is internally rechargable, can wirelessly transmit location, movements and vital signs via the Internet, storing the info in a database.
    I've often wondered how crewmembers on Star Trek are able to have their vital stats read aloud by the computer (see the Picard & Beverly scene in the TNG episode Remember Me )... Perhaps something like this would be necessary? While their communicators could relay position, I'm not so sure that they are responsible for vital stats. Any more experienced trekkers out there who know the answers?
  71. And some legit uses... by upstateguy · · Score: 1

    When it comes to the military for finding POW's and those listed as MIA.

    Ever see on your local news elderly persons who wander off and are confused due to dementia or alzheimer's? They frequently don't come back alive. Their personal rights have been signed off and a nursing home (wary of being sued when they loose one of their charges) might make it a condition upon entry.

    And of course, for every geek that wants to make him/herself into the borg. :-)

    But, for every good reason, there will be many more potential abuses.

    1. Re:And some legit uses... by Paradigma11 · · Score: 1

      hmm, well whats going to happen if war parties are no longer able to keep the position of their pows secret, especially in those little asymetrical adventures the us is so fond of lately. i guess the propability of survival is higher as it is now. such a system might be more comfortable for the military since they are no longer going to be blackmailed or humiliated but from a soldiers point of view i am not sure about it. but well, i am no soldier.

  72. Wildlife? by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Field researchers have tons of tracking applications, and they're always using transmitters in awkward collars and so on. Not having the thing on the surface where it can get bashed around by the hard lives animals lead (and interfere with their range of motion and so on) might be an advantage?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  73. Who Supports "THE Chip"? by Dr_Willie_Feelgood · · Score: 1

    Looking for a good scare? Check out the mindset of people who think this is a great idea! http://messages.yahoo.com/?action=q&board=ADSX (as long as THEY get paid...they could care less if those funny-talking foreigners, or even Americans themselves, are outfitted with silicone slave chains)

  74. Where I am - ready for download by asmithmd1 · · Score: 1

    If you hav a Motorola i88s phone with Nextel service you can download an app that updates a web page with your location.

  75. There Is at least one already... by danro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can view this really cool hack here.

    This guy has his GPS cellphone periodically sending a single UDP package with his coordinates to his server, that builds a http-GET you can click to locate him on MapQuest.
    Pretty neat.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    1. Re:There Is at least one already... by asmithmd1 · · Score: 1

      I am that guy

    2. Re:There Is at least one already... by BigMe · · Score: 1

      heh... you got a lil something hanging outta yer nose

  76. Newest Promo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just image the commercial now:
    Can you find me now? Can you find me now? Can you...

  77. DRAMATIC!! by Buttercup · · Score: 0

    Frightens you. A lot.

    Ba-duuuummmmm!!!!! WAAAAAAAAAAH
    !

    --
    Don't try that "protecting the children" shit you people use to keep the tits and bad words off my TV. --Seanbaby
  78. Go America! by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Patriot Implant by Halliburton. Only terrorists refuse them.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  79. Practical (good) applications by maddogsparky · · Score: 1
    There are a number of obvious abuses that can occur with such a tracking system, but there are some good uses.

    For the military: tracking down wounded soldiers to bring them back to medical facilities or locating captured/MIAs.

    For explorers or other remote personel: tracking down wounded or missing explorers (people still die in jungles, the outback, while hiking in the mountains, etc.)

    For legal defense: a lot of people are worried that the government will be able to track them; this is a good thing if you are falsely accused and can prove that you were somewhere else.

    For epidemic tracking and prevention: with diseases like SARS, it might be possible to trace back and find all the people that were exposed to a pathogen or even find a common source when non is obvious by cross referencing the paths of the victims.

    For disasters: this may help locate victims of floods, avalanches, collapsed buildings, etc., especially those that aren't even known to be missing or in danger.

    --
    science is a religion
    1. Re:Practical (good) applications by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      For legal defense: a lot of people are worried that the government will be able to track them; this is a good thing if you are falsely accused and can prove that you were somewhere else.

      If you're American, then I'm sad for where your country is let alone where it is going. One of the core concepts of your judicial system used to be innocent until proven guilty. The onus is not on you to prove innocence. That's just as bad as saying that encryption is bad because if you were a good citizen, you would have nothing to hide...

      Once upon a time, I thought my sig was funny. Now it's starting to look like a worldwide condition.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  80. Short term use by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Just put one of these inside a 'vitamin' pill. Have the trackee swallow. No surgery necessary, you get to track his movements for a day or two, and all evidence is removed completely.

    1. Re:Short term use by IroNick · · Score: 1

      Never swallow pills from strangers!

      What do you mean "knew that one already".

  81. Don't know by Cackmobile · · Score: 0

    Ok some good uses for this and some bad. THe way governments are currently going i'd be thinking that they would use it for bad, under the guise of good.

    Good Stuff
    Keeping track of children, old people,criminals
    Finding lost people. At sea, in the wilderness what ever

    Bad Stuff
    Tracking our whereabouts
    Advertising
    Who knows

    Only problems with using it to track criminals is that they would probably work out how to remove them.

    Imagine removing one then tying to your dog or something.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  82. well... by koi88 · · Score: 0

    that's new possibilities for suicide bombing...

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  83. Okay, so when... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    Okay, so when are those gonna include a career chip ???? That would be the perfect thing to track delivery boys ...

    1. Re:Okay, so when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get yours here: icwiener.com

  84. Ever seen the movie "Proof of Life"? by Xebikr · · Score: 1

    Ever seen the movie Proof of Life? Takes place in a country where kidnapping and ransome is a business. This would be usefull for executives or other potential targets in areas like that.

  85. Oh great... by bargonzo · · Score: 1

    Now we'll have to endure more of those obnoxious "everyone in Aluminum Foil" adds from the Gap stores...

  86. Great Idea for implanting into convicted felons. by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    This is a great idea to implant into convicted felons, and I'm not talking about little felony convictions, I'm talking about "Life without Parole" and "Death Row" inmates. The devices could be implanted inside an individual and secretly hidden, as in the case of the Star Wars slave Anakon Skywalker, or perhaps a large intestonator ball like in the movie Fortress. Inmates who misbehaved got "intestonated", or rather, experienced writhing pain in their intestines from the little devices. Powering the device would not be problematic since the technology already exists to power electronics with body heat.

  87. Application. by Dri · · Score: 1

    Is it proprietary communication or may I use Perl to write my own personal tracker application reporting every heartbeat to my very own MySQL database thru SSH tunnels? Imagine every heartbeat is a row in a database showing where and when it occured. You can spend the rest of your life making summarizing reports. Well, if that's the case, I'm in. Otherwise, drop the big brother stuff and show us the source!

    --
    Girls are strange. They don't come with a man page.
    -- Michael Mattsson
  88. POSSIBILITY??? of abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No possibility - an ironclad guarantee of abuse.
    If you think otherwise, you have not been paying attention.

  89. Trinity can help by bitshifter0101 · · Score: 1

    Trinity has a virus removing widget that will prolly work. Stings a little though.

  90. Judges in UK need some chlorine in the gene pool! by BobBoring · · Score: 1

    The judge called it a tragic accident.

    Accident? Aren't guns banned in the UK? Anyone with a gun in the UK is a criminal just for having a gun. The judge's attitude toward the criminal seems to be "Poor, poor laddie he dinna mean to kill her. He just committed a tragic series of voluntary criminal acts by getting a gun and loading it and then accidentally shot her to death." Yeah, right.

    This is as bad as Tony Martin being refused parole as 'danger to burglars'

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/ne ws/2003/01/17/nmart17.xml

    Maybe tagging everyone is a good idea and let's cache the data on where everyone has been for about a year. <sarcasm>Then execute everyone that is reported to be within 500 meters at the time of death if a death cannot be ruled as 'natural causes'.</sarcasm>

  91. Very impractical.... by hughk · · Score: 2, Informative
    First, GPS doesn't like shielding and wants to look upwards. Surrounding it with a salty wet sponge isn't going to help reception. GPS needs to orientate to a horizon, otherwise it won't see enough satellites.

    Something embedded transmitting vital signs and GPS will use a reasonable amount of power. Batteries can't hack it because rechargeables need replacement after one to two years. Its no problem if it is something to help you live (i.e., a pacemaker), otherwise would you really want the thing replaced so often?

    Personally, I think this is just a project to get Homeland Insecurity money and VC funding.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  92. Been there, done that. by NetDanzr · · Score: 2, Informative

    SkyBitz, a Virginia company, has developed a similar device a few years ago. Last I've heard (late 2000), they've been in talks with the Pentagon to get this device implanted into all soldiers, for more precise command and control.

  93. could it be by sanermind · · Score: 1

    SUBDERMAL GPS
    + Reality TV
    + Cops
    -------------
    Running man, here we come!

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
  94. What a great system. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Comitt a crime, go to jail for 10 years as punishmnet, and never be able to get a decent job again. OH, and no more rights, despite having paid your debt to society, whatever that means.

    DOnt get me wrong, im not about going easy on criminals, but i also think that theres a limit to how long you can keep kicking someone before they just stop giving a shit, because thay have nothing left to loose.

    I have no problem using this for house arrest, and probation/parole purposes. But once someone has served their time, AND shows good prospects for rehabilitation, please leave them the fuck alone and let them get on with their lives. I personally think once someone is finished with their prison term/probation/and whatnot, they should get ALL their rights back and get their record wiped clean after a time. However, i also think that there are some people who cant be turned loose ever again. THin charles manson.

    ANd before you start wailing about teh expense of keeping somone locked up forever, remember, abot 90% of the prison budget is for drug related stuff, granted, a good portion of that is turf war murders and such. How much more effective at rehabilitation would prisons be if you sould focus 90% more resources on that 10 percent that would be left?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:What a great system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell and properly capitalize sentences please.

  95. Big potential use by jridley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I've fallen and I can't get up"
    Seriously; the health monitoring industry isn't that small. What if you could implant a device in your alzheimers patient grandfather, so he couldn't forget to put it on, and you could always find him if he wandered away, and an instant 911 call went out if he started having an irregular heartbeat, crazy blood pressure, etc.

    I think this thing has some SERIOUSLY good potential uses. But as typical on slashdot, every technology is only seen in the most paranoid possible way. Hey, it's a good idea to think of how new technologies can be abused, but get real; the mere existance of this technology does not immediately create a police state in which everyone can be forced to have the chip implanted. It's society that decides whether such a thing can happen to law-abiding citizens (and yes, who is defined as "law-abiding").

    Technology is neither good nor bad, nor does it promote good or bad behavior. It may enable a behavior but it does not, on its own, immediately cause a police state or any other societal change, unless and until society is ready to change.

    Non-law-abiding citizens already have this, it's called a radio collar.

  96. I have found many ugly situations in life by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    where literally asking "Excuse me, but did you just mean to insult me" or "did i do something to offend you" has quickly de-escalated an arguement.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  97. Great solution for pedophiles !! by Macka · · Score: 2, Interesting



    In the UK, convicted pedophiles are held on a nation wide sex register for life. When ever they move town they have to register their whereabouts with the police. Despite this, many of them re-offend and the cost is sometimes a childs life and devastated family/community.

    So it strikes me that this would be a great help in the battle against habitual pedophiles. If on release from prison they were legally chipped and their location tracked 24hrs, then the incidents of death by re-offenders should drop dramatically.

    And yeah I know, its a breach of human rights, blah blah. But IMO, anyone who sexually violates a child for their own gratification forfeits their claim to the rights that the rest of us enjoy. And there are millions of parents all over the world who'd sleep better at night.

    Macka

    1. Re:Great solution for pedophiles !! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Same should go for rapists of all sorts as well as murderers and the like.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  98. A Scenario... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    A worried crowd gathers on Main Street:

    Dr. Watson here! Make way people... out of the way... I'm a doctor! Turn him over and let me look at him. MY GOD!!! Look at his skin color. This man's has a pacemaker BSOD! Quick, shove that LILO floppy down his throat while I hold his mouth open!

    Cleaning out horse stables? It seems to come naturally to me after being laid off from the Trustworthy Computing Project...

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  99. Laziness is not an excuse for poor service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [... B]ecause I have a habit of putting it on the counter regardless of whether the person is white, black, or other. Mainly because I found it easier.

    How is it easier for you to put it on the counter? The customer usually has their hand out in the first place, or will put it out if you motion towards them. I know I hated it when customers just plop their money down... especially when my own hand was out, ready. It's plain rude to just put the money down on the counter... whether you are the cashier OR the customer.

    I worked Retail for over 7 years at different places, and I was always told to put the change in the customer's hand. You are not there to have an easy job, you are there to service the public, and to give them a good experience.

    FM888

  100. just a thought by mattsucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just had this thought: Yes, government use of an implantable tracking device has a lot of implications for infringing on my privacy. But it also has substantial non-infringing uses.

    And then my head began to hurt. It has always fascinated me how some technologies are vilified BECAUSE of their potential for abuse, whereas others are idolized DESPITE their potential for abuse. Which is right? I don't have the answer, but I do know its fun to watch.

    And no, I'm not suggesting that Big Brother watching my every move is in any way equivalent to me downloading the latest Britney Spears via p2p. Although if I'm listening to Ms. Spears, maybe someone SHOULD keep an eye on me ...

  101. You can't have it both ways, people by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    How many times here has this situation come up here in the reverse direction? We're all quite happy to tell corporations to fuck off when they point out how we might abuse our new toys. "You damn corporations can't stop technological progress", remember? Well, neither can us geeks. These devices WILL arrive and they WILL gradually enter more and more of our lives. The ability to find the location of any unique object on demand has applications we can't even dream of. And *everything* can be used for ill if you put your mind to it.

  102. Stop them shooting the Brits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the US could implant all NATO troops (except the french) with these devices.

  103. Palladium User Verification Device? by eegad · · Score: 1

    Imagine devices like these replacing password verification. Tie that in with Palladium and you've extended the secure hardware model past the computer.

    So everyone get implanted and, oh yeah, sign up for Microsoft Passport. And then you can buy and sell everything securely with a little chip under your skin....

    Oh... wait...

  104. The time to worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is when it's compulsory and/or can't be removed or tampered with without making you sick or killing you. First it will be required for parolees/house arrestees, then will slowly make its way everywhere. And students will be tracked this way, the "authorities" will just not remove the device after you graduate from high school.

  105. *Trak by jmerelo · · Score: 1

    Do these guys have something to do with the *trak scam unearthed by Wired 5 years ago?

  106. Not from Digital Angel by Animats · · Score: 1
    Digital Angel has been stuck at "real soon now" on their wristwatch-like device since about 2000. For a while, they were taking "pre-orders" for it on their web site, but they've stopped doing that.

    Eventually, somebody will do this, but it probably won't be Digital Angel. NTT DoCoMo is more likely to make it happen. They're now shipping a wrist cell phone.

  107. Pro and Con by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1
    Cool: tiny ricegrain-sized chip enables EMTs to immediately know your blood type and you are allergic to certain meds when then cut your ass out of a car wreck to begin treatment.

    Not Cool: same as above, except that one of the EMTs has a beloved relative who needs an organ transplant and learns from your chip that you are a potential organ donor. And no other witnesses are nearby at the moment.

    Jack

  108. OK Mr. Smith, by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    You passed your Driver lic. test with flying colors!!

    Now BEND OVER any take this intrusive GPS based tracking module up the ass like a man.

    No sir, it simply allows us to track your every movement, send you tickets for your traffic violations and send out the death squad when you try and cancel your MSN account.

    Have a nice day!!

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  109. Look! by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

    The black helicopters are coming for you all.

    --
    IAALS.
  110. tracking pill done years ago by drwho · · Score: 1

    BBN (Bolt Beranak & Newman -- one of the inventors of the internet) has had this government contact building what is called the 'bodylan' - among other things, a pill can be swallowed which will allow satellites to track you from orbit (until excreted).

    I've heard this 3rd hand so I could have some of the details wrong -- anyone care to add/correct?

  111. Sorry. Actually, I need to proofread. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  112. But that finer granularity has a cost.... by BobBoring · · Score: 1

    You might get a decreasing rate for a while but as your rate declines someone else's rate will increase. Soon the 'bad' risk drivers are all marginalize and pushed out of the insured pool because they can no longer pay the increased rate. Soon the shrinking pool of insured drivers causes a rebound in the rate. So you lose.

    In many states the auto insurance business is 'no fault' i.e., your insurance pays the damages to the other driver and the other driver's insurance pays damages to you. Since bad drivers now can't afford insurance you are more likely to be stuck trying to get relief through the court and even if you win your damages how can the other driver pay? So you lose.

    The some other state 'no fault' rules work like this: 1. Everyone must have insurance and everyone's rate it the same. 2. The state sets the rate based on the payout + administration costs across the state. 3. The state collects your insurance premium as part of your vehicle registration fees. Since the market forces are not present to minimize the direct costs of insurance, and since when have public programs had lower administrative costs than private sector, the premium soon reaches $3000-$5000 a year per vehicle. This means even if you can buy a $500 junker you have to pay ~$4k extra a year every year to drive it. This forces low wage earners out of the job market because they can't drive to work. So they go on the dole and you pay them to sit at home and drink beer. Or you could pay a tax for a good public transportation network that you don't use to let the low wage folks get to work to keep them off the dole but in the end you still pay. So you lose.

  113. One more step... by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

    I can imagine that it only takes one more small step to swap out the pacemaker/monitoring hardware for a small explosive device. Step outside your "allowable area" and *POOF*, your chest explodes. Of course, it's the who defines the "allowable area" that worries me...

  114. woohooo no more timesheets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least I won't have to fill out my timesheet anymore...they'll be able to tell when I was programming and when I was crapping.

  115. NOT EVEN REMOTELY Practical (good) applications by ajs · · Score: 1
    For the military: tracking down wounded soldiers to bring them back to medical facilities or locating captured/MIAs.

    Think about that for a second. Right now, when someone is taken as a hostage, they're usually beaten and interrogated. Not Geneva, but certainly SOP, even for the U.S. (though *we* know better than to leave marks) :-/

    So, what you're guaranteeing here is that not only will they be beaten, but someone's going to whip out a knife and go digging for the tracking chip; a procedure from which you will suffer a great deal of pain and could possibly die of infection. Great.

    Of course, if your captors are smart, until they locate the chip or after they kill you, they will just keep you in a wire-mesh cell of the appropriate guage and density to block the signal.

    For explorers or other remote personel: tracking down wounded or missing explorers (people still die in jungles, the outback, while hiking in the mountains, etc.)

    Carry a cell in a zipped pocket. If you're paranoid, carry an extra in your bed-roll. No need to go in for surgery (which, I guarantee will cost more than that backup cell).

    For legal defense: a lot of people are worried that the government will be able to track them; this is a good thing if you are falsely accused and can prove that you were somewhere else.

    Legitimize that database as evidence and the risks are gigantic. Want to convict someone you don't like of any old arbitrary crime? All you need is a friend on the inside. Talk about the world's most powerful DBA!

    For epidemic tracking and prevention: with diseases like SARS, it might be possible to trace back and find all the people that were exposed to a pathogen or even find a common source when non is obvious by cross referencing the paths of the victims.

    Let me re-phrase that:
    For epidemic tracking and prevention: with diseases like homosexuality, it might be possible ot trace back and find all the people that...
    Need I go on? Please don't tell me that you are naive enough to think that this would never happen. Look at the rape-rooms in Iraq. Look at the mass exterminations in Serbia. Look at the abuses of Central and South American countries (Argentina and El Salvador make for particularly brutal examples). Some minority group that enough people hate will be first. Gays? Arabs? Blacks? Jews? Hispanics? Socialists? It won't matter. When it comes, and it will someday, even if it's not this decade or even this century, the tools that those people have will make all the difference. Nazi Germany's abuses would not have been "practical" pre-industrial revolution. Saddam's total control was mostly based on fear, and I'm sure listening devices and advanced optics helped breed that fear (of course, randomly killing half of his own power structure helped).

    What tools would you like to add to that arsenal? Choose wisely.

    For disasters: this may help locate victims of floods, avalanches, collapsed buildings, etc., especially those that aren't even known to be missing or in danger.

    Again, carry a cell. We don't have to keep a database of where anyone has been (though, we probably do...) in order to find them in a crunch. We also do not have to have our cells turned on all day, ever day in order to have this work well in general. Risk vs. reward is the concept that we should be applying.
  116. Practical application courtesy The West Wing by acq3 · · Score: 1

    Put on in every secret services agent. that'll make season finales harder to write...

    On a serious note, if I was in law enforcement or any dangerous field and I could get something that would trigger on a change in my vitals and call the 'cavalary' I would probably ber first in line to get it shoved in my butt...

  117. Yes, Taco? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    On one hand the potential cool uses astound me, while the possibilty of abuse frightens me. A lot.

    Shut up and bend over.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  118. SF novels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repent Harlequin! Said the Tick-Tock Man sprang to mind immediately

  119. Global Tracking system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This device will be powered off your own body heat, and although this is just a guess your entire body could potentially be the Antenna. They will probably start with the military, then criminals, and then to increase there wealth they will market it to parents to protect there children. (As the company already does.) I would also imagine that they will link this up with a more extensive database, that tracks everything you do. From whatever you buy at the supermarket, to where you go, what kind of "mental" state your in, if your excited, happy, sad. And it could also be linked up to your credit accounts, so that you can't buy or sell anything. (The convineance of this devise is how they'll get the rest of us to use it) I need some new Gap Jeans, a new Gap Hat, and shirt. Ok, wave your hand over this Ms. Dumbkopf. Presto. This will allow total Micromanagement of your life, restriction from areas, restrictions to healthcare, privliages granted to those that Obey! Its you're total Mark of the Beast Global Tracking System, and your Globalists Dream Device.

    I'm posting this article because it has some more links at the bottom about this company, that has had nothing but financial problems. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTI CLE_ID=32572

    Also for those that are interested http://news.phaseiii.org

  120. Sub-dermal? Sky view needed?? by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1


    If it's actually GPS, then it needs a clear line of sight to a good number of satellite signals. Usually I can't even go under a dense canopy of leaves, let alone sticking my GPS under my skin in an office building or under a heavy coat...

    How is this thing going to be useful for anyone but the nudist outdoorsman clubs??

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  121. Like hell I will by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find this scary? I don't really like the idea of having a tracking device (or any other) implanted in my body. Unless it has an off switch that I can control, it will be implanted into my dead body.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  122. Nasty Legal Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to know the legal implications of if say, an elderly person had one of these implants because of a heart condition or something, and this person or thier family failed to pay their bill. If there was an alert at the monitoring center that this person collapsed, but since they didn't pay their bill, no service would be performed. Would they have to just let the person die even though they were aware of the problem?

    1. Re:Nasty Legal Issues by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would probably done like hospitals are done. Even if you say that you can not pay, they still are required to treat you to the best of thier abilities, regardless. I can't imagine this being any different.

  123. What we all have to look forward to... by tprime · · Score: 1

    The land of San Angeles (Demolition Man) "What are you scratching at, CaveMan? You were implanted the second you were thawed" At least in the future all restaurants are now Taco Bells....

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
  124. pacemakers considered harmful by bartash · · Score: 1

    From Private Eye's 'Funny Old World' section:
    http://www.private-eye.co.uk/fow.htm

    "Every time this happens, it's a disaster," Claes Foghmoes of the Danish Crematorium Owners Association (DCMA) told reporters in Copenhagen, "and the explosions are happening more and more often these days. Whenever there's a blast, it disables the entire mechanism, and we have to let the oven cool for two to three days, before we can go inside to change the parts. And as a result, we're often left with a backlog of bodies, which have to be rerouted to other crematoriums."
    Earlier, Dr Niels Bloch of the Medical Officers Association had described how explosions were disabling or destroying crematoriums throughout Denmark, because doctors forget to remove pacemakers from deceased patients. "It's my impression that these accidents aren't due so much to forgetfulness, but to the fact that the doctor who signs the death certificate often isn't aware that the deceased has a pacemaker to begin with. Lithium batteries are commonly used in pacemakers, and they explode like TNT when exposed to extremely high temperatures. This sort of explosion is so powerful that the crematory oven brickwork, heat sensors, and cover can all be irreparably damaged, and the DCMA then sends damage bills of up to DKK 100,00 to liable hospitals and doctors.
    "What we need is legislation that makes it a matter of standard procedure for patients to have the word 'pacemaker' tattooed to their chests when they are fitted with one. How can doctors know otherwise, except by asking them? And of course, when the patient is dead, that line of enquiry becomes rather tricky." (The Danish Post, 4-10 April 2003. Spotter: Tom Sandars)

    --
    Read Epic the first RPG novel.
  125. cool! we're finally using this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the aliens can do it, we should be able to, also. :)

  126. Misssile System by Dryheat · · Score: 1

    You could in theory build devices that react to this. Missiles that track you down. Landmines that will only blow up the person who has the ID. The main problem is what happens if you could swap them around. A terrorist could kidnap you and take it out.

  127. I'll get this if..... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

    I also get to be a cyborg with the strength of 5 gorllaz and jets so i can flip out like wolverine and take out the bad govt. guys coming to get me.

  128. Or this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about cyber stalking? Now you don't need to follow them, you just need to know there name....Oh look they're at disney world and when I get home I'm gonna kill'em

  129. You're assuming this would be a government mandate by maddogsparky · · Score: 1
    Many of the things you mention have definite concequences if they are a government mandate. If they are opt-in (just like owning a phone), you can make an individual choice whether or not to participate.

    --
    science is a religion
  130. I, CowboyNeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On one hand the potential cool uses astound me, while the possibilty of abuse frightens me. A lot.

    This sentence could follow every story ever posted here. I'm convinced CowboyNeal is a bot. The spelling mistake is but a clever ploy to appear human. Don't be fooled!

    (Why this feature is being offered to non-subscribing plebes I'll never know. Sheer genius!)

  131. I'll ne3ver allow an implant in my body or anyone by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    This is bogus 1984 bullshit. I urge everone not
    to allow an implant like this. Better yet, I should
    take this implant and shove it up the developers'
    ass! What a joke. If your lost learn how to triangulate on the stars, damn it!

  132. TEXAS REPUBLICANS PLAN TO USE CHIP ON DEMS by asscroft · · Score: 1

    Austin, TX. Lawmakers in Texas have proposed State Bill TX-01121301213 proposing that all Democratic lawmakers get the Applied Digital Devices GPS implant chip immediately following a protest and walkout by all but four of the Texas Democratic Legislators to prevent a redistricting policy being forcefully pushed by the Republican Majority. Republicans, being honest Americans are exempt from the requirement -- which some wish to extend to all public workers. If ammended to require all state and city workers to have the chip, don't expect a massive jump in the number of registered Republican voters. Only Republican lawmakers are exempt. Government employees of all parties would be required to have the chip. The only exemption in that section of the law is proposed for those earning more than 250K a year.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  133. Wayne's Law by Compulawyer · · Score: 1

    The cooler the potential misuses for a technology, the scarier the potential misuses are.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  134. Won't Work for Tracking Crooks by John+Murdoch · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hi!

    We explored the issues involved with tracking humans for a client a couple of years ago. Bottom line: you can only track humans who a) know they are being tracked, and b) are willing to participate. The converse is true: you cannot track someone who is not willing to participate.

    The crucial point is this: it is possible to do field trials with willing subjects, to demonstrate the feasibility of receiving signals. However--it is child's play to defeat the system. And a tracking system that can be defeated is substantially worse than no system at all.

    How GPS works
    Most geeks understand the idea behind GPS, in the sense of determining position based on comparing the time signatures broadcast from multiple satellites. What many people don't realize is how low the signal strength actually is: it's actually not much stronger than background radiation. GPS works because DSPs can dig the signals out of that background radiation and get the data. Key point: Very Weak Signal.

    Result: It's easy to defeat
    Because the GPS signal is so weak, you lose GPS lock (the ability to receive signals from enough satellites) all the time. You lose it going into practically any building; you lose it in tunnels; you can frequently lose it in urban areas (like Manhattan). As a consequence, GPS chipsets simply store (and report) their last known good position. That's usually a good thing. If you're tracking a convict, it could be a very bad thing.

    A very bad thing: here's why
    A while ago we were contacted by a government official with a specific challenge: in the official's words, "In 40% of all homicides the victim has an outstanding Protection From Abuse order against her attacker." I don't know how accurate that figure is--but it's a compelling number. What the official wanted to do was put a GPS tracking device on people (99% men) with current PFA orders. Great idea!

    Except...it is brutally easy to defeat the GPS tracker. Just wrap the device with aluminum foil--or simply cover the GPS antenna with aluminum foil. The GPS unit will simply lose lock--and keep recording your position as the last known good (LKG) position. You can then travel across town, secure in the knowledge that the device cannot report your actual location and warn your ex-wife. And after you've successfully beaten her to death, you'll be able to present the county's own data to demonstrate that while the crime was in progress you were at home--because the GPS unit thinks you're still at the LKG point.

    Bottom line:
    Great idea. (And I'll elaborate in another message.) But not a viable idea for tracking perps.

  135. Re:You might call me paranoid... by L0k11 · · Score: 1
    with all the people involved in the medical industry its a bit hard to think that the government could be covering something up by gagging doctors.

    I'm just a medical student but i'm pretty sure i'd know about any gag orders by now

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
  136. Re:Star Trek, anyone? Other ones about trackers.. by jswitte · · Score: 1

    While their communicators could relay position, I'm not so sure that they are responsible for vital stats.

    I remember the episode. I'd say the computer just uses some kind of long-range RF energy to read it off from a distance.. after all, the medical tricorders read off all *sorts* of stuff without ever touching the patient, so it has to use some kind of RF/subspace signals to do it.

    If you accept this kind of reading vitals at a distance, the only problem is the range. Tricorders seem to work at a range of less than about 2 meters, except where they were scanning for large energy sources (at a range of several 10s of meters, something I figure we could do today - well, except for subspace radiation ;-) The specifically-designated "medical tricorders" have that little thingee that the doctor waves around the patient's body at a range of about 10 cm. So the range of the scan in "Remember Me" seems definately a plot hole. (Not the first, and not the last, as I read once, "Voyager had plot holes so big you could drive the ship though them!")

    More to the point of the tracking thins, anybody remember the season 7 episode "Attached"? Where Picard and Beverly were telepathically linked together - in a way that also meant they couldn't get outside of about 2 meters distance without getting sick..

    Back to reality, I'm really surprised noone has raised the frightening possibilty of the INS using this to track foriegn students..

    Jim

  137. You Can Count On This Being Used... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    in the Federal prison system or on supervised release inmates eventually. They'll start on the state level by using it on "habitual sex offenders" (i.e., anyone who jacks off to Playboy while in the joint) and eventually make it federal. If your dick gets hard, the device will communicate this "vital sign" to your parole officer and back you go into the joint... Then, of course, suspected "terrorists" (i.e., anybody who doesn't vote) will be next...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  138. Where can I get about 500 by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    of them coded to me....
    There is no place to hide but in plain sight, at several hundred locations at one time :)

    Put one on the dog, under a log,
    on a train, in some grain,
    I will not wear a tracker sam I am
    I will depend on some white hacker
    I will not eat green eggs and ham..

    sigh TGIF :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  139. Almost the same, but backwards by Clockwork000 · · Score: 1

    I remember watching this MTV special about hacking. (I'm sorry :) Anyway, they had this one group of guys who were using police scanners, and some software to triangulate the location of every cop in New York. From what I remember, they hadn't perfected it, but they were very close. Not exactly the same as what's being talked about here, but very similar, and very scary.

    --
    get em girls. daddy needs new shoes.
  140. Good/bad we're the men with the guns. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Almost Good: Tagging violent convicted criminals.
    Bad: Tagging non-violent convicted criminals, tagging anyone arrested for any reason regardless of conviction or not. The US Justice system isn't.

    Good: Voluntary tagging of kids to help track them down.
    Bad: Body parts are removed to remove the tag.
    Bad: It won't work in a farad cage.
    Bad: It allows abuse by those controlling the device.

    For Your Own Good:Tagging all "Real Americans" to tell them from terrorists.
    Bad: It's got to have an ID along with the GPS and is subject to abuse.
    Bad: Hacking takes on a whole new meaning when a terrorist needs some quick ID. So what is the new and spiffy term for "Meat Hacking", "macking" sounds too appleish and smells fishy.
    Bad: False sense of security. http://stupidsecurity.com/
    Bad: Old hat hacking will make you Bridgette Fonda! (Only good if you get the body to match.)

    Really Bad: Farad cage clothing becomes all the rage.
    Good for them: An epidemic rash caused by the farad clothing causes a mass rekindling of public nudity.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  141. What is this for? by DaemonGem · · Score: 1

    I've tried to read as many replies as possible, but still it is not clear to me exactly what this is good for? I certainly wouldn't want to have it implanted in me. The implications would be tremendous. I don't want, nor do I think many kids want, my/their parents checking up on them all the time via this thing. Sure, it's neat in the electronics sense, in that it's an interesting piece of engineering, but still the question remains. What is this good for?
    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
  142. How would God describe an implant? by polished+look+2 · · Score: 1

    By that, I mean how could God relate an implant to John? An embedded microchip is, for all practical purposes, a mark or form thereof. Say, if I "mark" someone with a marks-a-lot, and write upon that person, "Coca Cola", then I'm marking it with "Coca Cola" but in order to accomodate an cashless society, something more - a lot more - will be needed besides a few words, specifically numbers. For, if physical currency is exchanged then there could be no check on a person's affiliation with the beast, but, OTOH, by implanting some kind of "numeric mark" (albeit embedded), such a system could easily be implemented.

  143. well, this is easy to fix...... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    this is as simple to fix as RFIDs are.....

    1.Find location of body where GPS unit is
    2.Stick said body part into microwave
    3.profi......o.....wait.......

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  144. Re:Mapping (being done in Portland, sort of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are sort of doing this in Portland, Oregon already.

    All the city buses there have GPS receivers and transmit their location real-time back to hq.

    In addition to using this for figuring out real-time bus arrivals and things like that, they are finding that the data are very useful for determining average traffic speed on the roads buses travel. Useful either in real time -- you notice that all the buses on Taco Street are at a dead stop, you figure there's an accident or something -- and especially the collected historical data so that traffic planners can figure out where and when congestion happens. Gives them a much larger database than they used to get from car counters or video recorders or whatever.

  145. You can't track me if I don't whant you to by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    1. Use X-rays and RF receivers (about $2000 equipment) to find where exactly the device is in your body.
    2. Remove device (you can do it at a veterinarian clinique, or even by yourself, but it is better to have someone around to help you.) Scalpels, needles, threads, bunzen burners, sterile cloths, rubbing alcohol will be needed. As well as surgical clamps.
    3. Now you can use this device as a decoy. All you need is to 'implant' it with someone else, put it into a stranger's car or just implant it with some animal (someone's dog's collar)
    4. Now you are outside of the system. Congrats.

  146. Coming up! by Autolycus · · Score: 1

    They'l figure out the biological signs of stuff like drug use, sex, etc and have the implant record that! Or better yet tell the cops, or even administer electric shocks to deter such activity, the possibilitys are really endless.

  147. FFS... by RMH101 · · Score: 1
    No, I pushed the power button, the current drain on the battery fell to zero and when I measured the RF output that too was zero. If you think current phones act any differently then you're paranoid.

    Of course it's technically possible, but it doesn't happen now with current GSM phones.

  148. Re:Judges in UK need some chlorine in the gene poo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh! That makes assassinations really easy! Just kill someone within 500m of your intended target with a sniper rifle. There are several such rifles that can shoot well over a km. Of course, they're louder than the voice of God, but that doesn't really matter when you're over 1km away from your target (and, hopefully any police or escorts).