Slashdot Mirror


Google Disappears In China

An anonymous reader submits: "The censorship in China was finally getting better since people were 'allowed' to read the CNN news now (except for certain articles). But since this weekend it seems that a new web page has been censored in China. Since this weekend it looks like everyone in China is not 'allowed' to use google.com anymore. google.com was also gaining populairity in China as the better search engine (which also works fine in Chinese). But now I guess it got too popular and thus not allowed. Or does it have anything to do with Yahoo signing the agreement to censor?" Comments to yesterday's post "Real-Time Testing of China's Internet Filters" also noted that Google has gone missing within China.

334 comments

  1. Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they wouldn't ban their communist propaganda sites... makes sense. Praise the motherland, comrade Taco.

    1. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the funniest comment I've read all day.

    2. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://slashdot.org. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

    3. Re:Slashdot still readable by Stalyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://www.asianhookers.com. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

      and the nation of China rejoices.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    4. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://goatse.cx. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

      that is one lame filter they have there. What, they couldn't afford netnanny?

    5. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      THAT is PRICELESS. If only I could post logged in, but I can't. I would be PUNISHED. That is priceless. And now, when it gets moderated down as it invariably will, i say the following:
      This is just another example of spineless crap moderation here on /.

      Mao Tse Tung, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Pinochet, Mussolini, Marshall Joseph Tito, Slobodan Milosevic, Idi Amin, Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Juan Peron, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ferdinand Marcos, General Suharto, Pol Pot, Fransisco Franco, and certainly the worst of the bunch, SLASHDOT's editing/moderating [read: censoring] "community"(*) ALL AGREE on ONE THING:

      CENSORSHIP WORKS!


      So, you busy little plebian proletariats, get busy, you have some censoring to do!

      Good job you little neo-commies. Don't want to hear the other side, shoot the fucker in the head as an ENEMY OF THE STATE [In this case anyone who seeks to improve the sad state of /.].

      I have a Gun and the Constitution [Not the urinated-on pissed-on hacked fucked up one WashingTOON thinks exists, I mean the real one, with Jefferson and Madison at my side], please, give me an excuse to use them both.

      (*)Note, the word community used often on Slashdot, this is referring to a proto communist commune.

      A few haikus to commemorate the sucktitude:
      Crack Pipe Moderators
      Crack smoke wafts though air
      Dumb shit moderator!
      Try to suck less, please

      The Humorless Moderator
      Crack smoke wafts through air
      Humorless moderator!
      Why do you hate me?

      The Proletariat
      Slashdotting Commie
      Moderator fears new idea!
      Censor him quickly

      SAYINGS, quips et al:

      It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. - Sir Winston Churchill (Especially when your democratic peers twist democracy into a reason commit cencorship, to squash dissenting or unpopular opinions, and refer to them as trolls, flaimbait overrated or offtopic when they aren't any of the said)

      A monarchy is a merchantman which sails well, but will sometimes strike on a rock, and go to the bottom; a republic is a raft which will never sink, but then your feet are always in the water. - Fisher Ames

      Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken.

      Democracy: The substitution of election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. - George Bernard Shaw.

      The reason there are two senators for each state is so that one can be the designated driver. - Jay Leno.

      The Constitution poses no threat to our current form of governement. (Death to those who defile the root documents of a free nation to make economic freedom SUPERCEDE FREEDOM! Freedom FISRT, Free market Second!)

      Occam's Razor "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily." "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" "Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora" "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" Translation: " "Simple explanations are preferred to complex ones" Modern fucking translation "JUST DO IT."

      Reading Slashdot at anything above -1 is like trying to put a shit filter on your ass.

      Get busy moderating this down, you little pack of obedient prefects of the corrupt state! You are the vanguards of purity, and dissent is not allowed!

    6. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The reason China blocked Slashdot is that when Jiang Xemin saw at how good "The Editors" at Slashdot are at suppressing the community, he knew that if more of his party members saw this degree of suppressive efficacy, he would be deposed, for the good of the people, of course, in favor of Rob Malda as the all new supreme dictator and premier of China.

    7. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, have you tried decaf, dude?

    8. Re:Slashdot still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, jackass, heads up: Slashdot isn't a fucking nation and the authors, editors, and moderators aren't politicians.

      It's one thing for the government to censor people. That's just not good for anyone except the government, and you have to get to a different country to escape it.

      This, however, is just a fucking website! You're not forced to oblige by its rules! If you don't like it, don't use it and above all quit whining about it!

      Jesus.

    9. Re:Slashdot still readable by rayray14 · · Score: 1

      I second that notion...

  2. Yahoo! also dropping Google this weekend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's what some people think anyway. Seems they've heavily de-emphasized Google in their searches, and in the past, they've used holiday weekends for similar switchovers. Time will tell...

  3. well by neo8750 · · Score: 1

    this is not the first site they blocked so whats big deal? FP..

    1. Re:well by H3XA · · Score: 1

      this is GOOGLE being blocked !!!!

      Most Chinese I know use it a lot and so do I..... I have no idea what to use now.... whats the 2nd best search engine?

      - HeXa

    2. Re:well by wa1rus · · Score: 1

      whats the 2nd best search engine?

      try altavista and metacrawler. They're both reasonable.

    3. Re:well by H3XA · · Score: 1

      Altavista has never loaded for me since I came to China..... thought it was blocked too - even BabelFish has stopped working a couple of months ago :(

      Metacrawler works but I found some other unblocked sites that use Google as a backend for searching ;)

      - HeXa

  4. Cache by Stormie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely it's because Google's cache would allow people inside the Great Firewall to read all manner of banned web pages?

    1. Re:Cache by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      At our work the filtering proxy blocks images.google.com due to porn reasons. They tried to block hotmail, but our marketing uses it, lol..

    2. Re:Cache by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      Really? I would have supposed a more elegant solution would be to force a Moderate SafeSearch cookie value, which could be easily accomplished through HTTP tunnels and Squid/SOCKS proxies. I don't know what your marketing department is doing in their spare time, but I haven't been able to squeeze a single erotic pic out of Google's safe image search.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    3. Re:Cache by jsse · · Score: 1

      Caches can be removed, the question is whether Google would agree to:
      1) Remove the caches containing stuffs sensitive to China Government, even though the requester is the China Government itself not the owners(citizens)?
      2) Remove those usenet archives which contain sensitive matter as well?

      Unless Google spams another company in China which contain exactly the same database as the original Google but without the stuffs China Government doesn't like, otherwise there's very little chance Google would contain to exist there.

    4. Re:Cache by packeteer · · Score: 1

      "I haven't been able to squeeze a single erotic pic out of Google's safe image search"... i feel sorry for you... and im not talking about your failure with google

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    5. Re:Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean sites like this?

    6. Re:Cache by cscx · · Score: 2

      Surely it's because Google's cache would allow people inside the Great Firewall to read all manner of banned web pages?

      Yeah, 10 years from now we're all gonna find out that all this Great Firewall business was just a scheme to "keep out the Mongolians...."

      I think history will tell that stuff like this just doesn't work.

    7. Re:Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it now, "you think i know how to build wall cause I Chinese!?" and "You god damn mongorians broke my shitty wall down!"

    8. Re:Cache by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      C'mon, you're not trying very hard, obviously. I typed in the first thing that came to mind, which was 'boobs.' :-) Results 1 - 20 of about 195, one of which was this wonderful shot.
      There's also tits, ass, wank, and nekkid. Granted, none of those are crazy offensive, but this is China we're talking about, so they'll do.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    9. Re:Cache by shird · · Score: 2

      But the cache server is on a different IP:

      www.google.com = 216.239.33.101
      The cache server = 216.239.33.100

      Couldn't they have just blocked the cache server?

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    10. Re:Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's what you get for employing children, just because they will work for less than an adult.

    11. Re:Cache by blhath · · Score: 0, Troll

      dude we need to talk about something, ive been seeing your picture around and everytime i see it i just know something isnt right, this time ive finally fingered it, your asshole is larger than average

      --
      "So this is what it feels like ... when doves cry." -Milhouse Van Houten
    12. Re:Cache by Cpyder · · Score: 2
      But the cache server is on a different IP:

      www.google.com = 216.239.33.101 The cache server = 216.239.33.100

      Couldn't they have just blocked the cache server?

      Google =/= 2 machines!
      When I ping google I get: PING www.google.com (216.239.53.101)... because they point you to the server farm which is closest to you (or less crowded at the moment).. The IPs change constantly, so it isn't that easy for them to block "the cache server".

      An interesting talk on this topic by a Google engineer can be found here: http://technetcast.com/tnc_play_stream.html?stream _id=420 (Speech from Atlanta Linux Showcase 2000 I believe) and here: http://www.technetcast.com/tnc_play_stream.html?st ream_id=421 (Q&A session after the speech)

    13. Re:Cache by psych031337 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe it is not widely known, but Google *can* and will ban certain queries/results/terms/sites/whatever appropriate. This is probably a factor (or should I say expected result) of their rerouting change which basically determines the geographical position of a surfer and redirects to the appropriately themed google (say .de, .fr and whatever else they are running).

      The probably best documented case of this is the "Operation Clambake" exclusion which was restored after heavy protests. But there were copyright issues involved so this might nut cut the cheese all the way.

      What worries me more is the exponation of companies towards insane or just plainly stupid government regulations. Sometime in February a single state within Germany (which is a federal republic composed of 16 states after all) ordered their local Internet providers for exclusion of questionable material, which in this case primarily concerns fascist/white-supremacist sites like stormfront.org. Checking google.com with the query "stormfront.org" delivers a link which is clearly a site in question. Sending the same string to google.de returns nothing. Softening the query to just "stormfront" gives a couple of hits on google.com, including the nazi site. Same string for google.de gives a bunch of sites, none of which is questionable in content. Most of them are sites discussing the current situation on this case.

      For the german-speaking crowd, or for those who can get their hands on a decent translator) here are some heise.de articles covering the situation: ...1... ...2... ...3...

      This is a sad state of affeirs, and you won't have to go as far as China to find behaviour which should be immoral to the pluralistic and open community the planet pretends to be nowadays.

      --
      +++ath0
    14. Re:Cache by yasth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No I think China is far more worried about 'tibet' or web searches for tibet and etc.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    15. Re:Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well duh! you think? why is this modded insightful? it's obvious that's why google or any other website is banned in china. dictatorship control of what people can and can't do, say, or think.

    16. Re:Cache by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      So that's the reason why google now redirects us to our country domain...not only is it just 'themed' but tries to be 'politically correct'(i.e. per country policy).

      I guess they need some way to protect their ass from violating laws and regulations...but it could be interesting where this leads to in the future...

    17. Re:Cache by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      A guy with a beard is somebody's idea of offensive? Okay, he looks sorta like RMS, so I'd expect half the folks here to start immediately frothing about getting GNU in their Linux, but come on.

      Besides, for "wank", I'd expect it to come up with a ponytailed guy in a BMW, yammering on his celly to his broker and honking at me for daring to ride my bike on the road he owns...

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
  5. the reason by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google's cached page feature could give anyone in china the ability to see any censored sites (or at least older copies).

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what idiot modded this redundant

    2. Re:the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same one that'll probably mod this off-topic later.

    3. Re:the reason by Psx29 · · Score: 1
      Google's cached page feature could give anyone in china the ability to see any censored sites (or at least older copies).

      I was thinking the same thing until I realised the BESS filter at the school I attend manages to block out the cache but leave the functionality of google intact. Of course I don't know exactly how it's done, but it is possible....

    4. Re:the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am from shanghai pls help us to connect google
      we love google , we hate CCP , pls help us!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. p2p by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe google labs can whip up a quick p2p client that will allow people to use google in places where it is blocked.

    1. Re:p2p by Nihilanth · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's called "Peek-A-Booty", created by the Cult of the Dead Cow. A fine bit of hacktivism inspired, if i'm not mistaken, by just this sort of behavior.

      How long before we'll be forced to use it ourselves, i wonder?

    2. Re:p2p by popeyethesailor · · Score: 2

      I wonder if that's needed. Lots of websites use Google as their default search engine, for example Netscape search uses Google.

      People smart enough to use Google cache and groups.google.com will always find alternatives .

    3. Re:p2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peek-a-booty is not a cDc project

  7. Google's cache by 42sd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it possible that google's cache allows the Chinese to view 'forbidden' websites?

    1. Re:Google's cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes :P

    2. Re:Google's cache by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 0

      yep. the firewall (probably) works on the ips of sites. cached sites would have the ip of google.

      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
  8. Google API to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using the Google API, someone else could setup a Google gateway/proxy sort of thing. It could do searches, and even retrieve cached information on pages. And, the thing is, China would never know where one of these API gateways would pop-up. Only limiting factor would be the 1000 queries per day. I bet a billion Chinese can go through those in no time!

    1. Re:Google API to the rescue? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Informative
      This has been done. And of course, a Google proxy could require the chinks to enter their personal soap key, or even request Google generate one on-the-fly and mail it to a Chinese mail account, assuming .cn SMTP's have yet to RTBL Google.

      I am more interested in Google search via phone, as done by Google voice search. In theory, someone could set up a VoiceXML 2.0 service outside China's borders on a network such as Tellme Studio, avoiding the complexity of the Internet. Too bad the Chinese government has a monopoly on telco (which is why they block Net2Phone).

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:Google API to the rescue? by rory77 · · Score: 1

      you CAN use MSN messenger internet phone service from China though... That gives you the choice of 3 providers for voice...

      of course, this means SOMEONE needs to have a CREDIT CARD to pay for the service.. and damn near no Chinese have credit cards... the country is fascinating but pretty ghetto and disorganized..

      --
      There was a time when the church ruled and everyone believed in god... this time is known as the Dark Ages. --?
    3. Re:Google API to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi i am from shanghai china
      can you tell me how to use it
      now i can't visit google
      thanks a lot

      we hate CCP
      we love google

  9. Google.cn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why doesn't Google set up a bunch of servers operating within China, behind Chinese firewalls, so that Google cannot index or cache pages the government doesn't approve of?

    They could call it google.cn...

    1. Re:Google.cn? by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      or google.com/china. Surely y'all know of google.com/linux, google.com/bsd, google.com/mac. Just start the same for countries too. Has China banned microsoft.com yet? :) That'd make my list quickly.

    2. Re:Google.cn? by sinserve · · Score: 3, Funny

      Google is run by hackers, not businessmen, I doubt they would do such an immoral thing.

    3. Re:Google.cn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see it as all that immoral. That's just the way things work in China, and certainly Google of all organizations can't do anything about it.

      But Google could be a valuable service to the Chinese. So better to have censored Google than no Google at all.

    4. Re:Google.cn? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Informative
      They could call it google.cn...

      No they couldn't. CN NIC gives out third-level domains only. Second-level domains (SLDs) of the cn TLD are fixed at one of com, net, org, gov, ac, bj, sh, tj, cg, he, sx, nm, as well as ln, jl, hl, and also the domains js, zj, ah, fj, jx, not to mention sd, ha, hb, hn, gd, don't forget gx, hi, sc, gz, yn, xz, sn, yet theres more gs, gh, nx, xj, tw, hk, or mo.

      These regional domains where originally intended to provide censorship of finer granularity, as to match the legislation or lack thereof in specific providences of China.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    5. Re:Google.cn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they already have Google Deutschland, Google Italia, and even Google Lietuvos, so google.cn makes the most sense.

    6. Re:Google.cn? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      do a quick search on www.google.com/linux for "bsd" brings you to slashdot... slashdot is the ruler of all things BSD/Linux

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:Google.cn? by raspubejo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, they are businessmen enough to filter websites when they get enough pressure from government. try searching for www.stormfront.org on google.de, then on google.com. (This is just an example for googles censorship, I do not sympathise with this topic)

    8. Re:Google.cn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying "that's just the way things work" doesn't make it any less immoral.

  10. Waitaminute by shepd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Goatse.cx is A-OK by Chinese authorities, but google isn't?

    Wow... now that's what I call a strange can of worms.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Waitaminute by lpontiac · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Goatse.cx [harvard.edu] is A-OK by Chinese authorities, but google isn't?

      China has a problem with political speech, free flow of ideas, dissent and the like. I doubt the inside of a man's rectum rates as highly on their scale of things that should be oppressed.

    2. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! That script is awesome!

      Apparently Slashdot is blocked (must be all those YRO stories about China...), but everything2.com isn't (you all remember DMan?)... Contrary to what I've been hearing, nytimes.com works. And chinasucks.com isn't blocked either.

      I wonder if I should put up a website that says, "CHINA SUCKS KILL THE GOVERNMENT" repeatedly and see how long it would take for it to be banned...

    3. Re:Waitaminute by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Funny

      For the good of humanity, it ought to be.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Waitaminute by the+bluebrain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goatse.cx [harvard.edu] is A-OK by Chinese authorities, but google isn't?
      Wow... now that's what I call a strange can of worms.


      Ah, but the goat-man *has* to be visible, as a prime example of western decadence.
      Currently the average Chinese-off-the-streets thinks *all* westerners look like that ... from that, uh, particular angle.
      I can imagine the Chinese equivalents to rednecks going around making jokes: "Nope ... still too small for my dick. Open wider, Yankee."

      --
      yes, we have no bananas
    5. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this got marked as redundant, why? what the fuck is wrong with people here. man moderators suck
      This is just another example of spineless crap moderation here on /.

      A few haikus to commemorate the sucktitude:
      Crack Pipe Moderators
      Crack smoke wafts though air
      Dumb shit moderator!
      Try to suck less, please

      The Humorless Moderator
      Crack smoke wafts through air
      Humorless moderator!
      Why do you hate me?

      The Proletariat
      Slashdotting Commie
      Moderator fears new idea!
      Censor him quickly

      Mao Tse Tung, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Pinochet, Mussolini, Marshall Joseph Tito, Slobodan Milosevic, Idi Amin, Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Juan Peron, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ferdinand Marcos, General Suharto, Pol Pot, Fransisco Franco, and certainly the worst of the bunch, SLASHDOT's editing/moderating [read: censoring] "community"(*) ALL AGREE on ONE THING:

      CENSORSHIP WORKS!


      So, you busy little plebian proletariats, get busy, you have some censoring to do!

      Good job you little neo-commies. Don't want to hear the other side, shoot the fucker in the head as an ENEMY OF THE STATE [In this case anyone who seeks to improve the sad state of /.].

      I have a Gun and the Constitution [Not the urinated-on pissed-on hacked fucked up one WashingTOON thinks exists, I mean the real one, with Jefferson and Madison at my side], please, give me an excuse to use them both.

      (*)Note, the word community used often on Slashdot, this is referring to a proto communist commune.

      SAYINGS, quips et al:

      It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. - Sir Winston Churchill (Especially when your democratic peers twist democracy into a reason commit cencorship, to squash dissenting or unpopular opinions, and refer to them as trolls, flaimbait overrated or offtopic when they aren't any of the said)

      A monarchy is a merchantman which sails well, but will sometimes strike on a rock, and go to the bottom; a republic is a raft which will never sink, but then your feet are always in the water. - Fisher Ames

      Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken.

      Democracy: The substitution of election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. - George Bernard Shaw.

      The reason there are two senators for each state is so that one can be the designated driver. - Jay Leno.

      The Constitution poses no threat to our current form of governement. (Death to those who defile the root documents of a free nation to make economic freedom SUPERCEDE FREEDOM! Freedom FISRT, Free market Second!)

      Occam's Razor "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily." "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" "Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora" "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" Translation: " "Simple explanations are preferred to complex ones" Modern fucking translation "JUST DO IT."

      Reading Slashdot at anything above -1 is like trying to put a shit filter on your ass.

      Get busy moderating this down, you little pack of obedient prefects of the corrupt state!

    6. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The reason China blocked Slashdot is that when Jiang Xemin saw at how good "The Editors" at Slashdot are at suppressing the community, he knew that if more of his party members saw this degree of suppressive efficacy, he would be deposed, for the good of the people, of course, in favor of Rob Malda as the all new supreme dictator and premier of China.
      Mao Tse Tung, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Pinochet, Mussolini, Marshall Joseph Tito, Slobodan Milosevic, Idi Amin, Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Juan Peron, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ferdinand Marcos, General Suharto, Pol Pot, Fransisco Franco, and certainly the worst of the bunch, SLASHDOT's editing/moderating [read: censoring] "community"(*) ALL AGREE on ONE THING:

      CENSORSHIP WORKS!

      (*)Note, the word community used often on Slashdot, this is referring to a proto communist commune.

      So, you busy little plebian proletariats, get busy, you have some censoring to do! FUN!

      Good job you little neo-commies. Don't want to hear the other side, shoot the fucker in the head as an ENEMY OF THE STATE [In this case anyone who seeks to improve the sad state of /.].

      I have a Gun and the Constitution [Not the urinated-on pissed-on hacked fucked up one WashingTOON thinks exists, I mean the real one, with Jefferson and Madison at my side], please, give me an excuse to use them both.

      A few haikus to commemorate the sucktitude:
      Crack Pipe Moderators
      Crack smoke wafts though air
      Dumb shit moderator!
      Try to suck less, please

      The Humorless Moderator
      Crack smoke wafts through air
      Humorless moderator!
      Why do you hate me?

      The Proletariat
      Slashdotting Commie
      Moderator fears new idea!
      Censor him quickly

      SAYINGS, quips et al:

      It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. - Sir Winston Churchill (Especially when your democratic peers twist democracy into a reason commit cencorship, to squash dissenting or unpopular opinions, and refer to them as trolls, flaimbait overrated or offtopic when they aren't any of the said)

      A monarchy is a merchantman which sails well, but will sometimes strike on a rock, and go to the bottom; a republic is a raft which will never sink, but then your feet are always in the water. - Fisher Ames

      Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken.

      Democracy: The substitution of election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. - George Bernard Shaw.

      The reason there are two senators for each state is so that one can be the designated driver. - Jay Leno.

      The Constitution poses no threat to our current form of governement. (Death to those who defile the root documents of a free nation to make economic freedom Supercede Freedom! Freedom First! Free market Second!)

      Occam's Razor "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily." "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" "Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora" "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" Translation: " "Simple explanations are preferred to complex ones" Modern fucking translation "JUST DO IT."

      Reading Slashdot at anything above -1 is like trying to put a shit filter on your ass.

      Get busy moderating this down, you little pack of obedient prefects of the corrupt state! You are the vanguards of purity, and dissent is not allowed!
    7. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nope ... still too small for my dick. Open wider, Yankee."

      Everyone knows that intelligence is inverse to penis size! So unless the Chink is dumb, his wang is too!

      Bonzai!

    8. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can also go to sucks500.com, home of a "china sucks" board

    9. Re:Waitaminute by jcast · · Score: 1

      What the hell does China care about the good of humanity? They're a communist dictatorship...

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    10. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Crap flushed)


      You know . . .if you hate Slashdot that much then why the hell do you come here? Idiot. Go to geekazoid, that seems to be more your speed.

  11. They can still use google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it through the wayback machine.

    1. Re:They can still use google. by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      Until it gets blocked.

    2. Re:They can still use google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be like trying to get a drink from a photograph of a drinking fountain.

  12. Google Banned in China by rela · · Score: 1

    Is anybody even remotely surprised?

  13. Absolutely untrue! by Nathdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just tried typing "China" at google.com and I got 24,300,000 results.

    Whoever said that china disappearred from google was a complete fucking liar. :)

    1. Re:Absolutely untrue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China not in Google" != "Google not in China"

    2. Re:Absolutely untrue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said Google disappeared from China, not China disappeared from Google. Don't post drunk.

    3. Re:Absolutely untrue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have obviously had a humourectomy.

      Don't post anymore. Slashbot doesn't need anymore twats.

    4. Re:Absolutely untrue! by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2
      If you don't want them I'll take em.

      Enjoy your sausage fest.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    5. Re:Absolutely untrue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a humorlift if you think that's even remotely amusing!

  14. Blocked? Just use google by MavEtJu · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's available from Googles cache.

    Err... Never mind.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:Blocked? Just use google by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

      Hehe... taken from the standard google cache disclaimer:

      Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

    2. Re:Blocked? Just use google by Nept · · Score: 1

      The cache of Google's main page will come up, but once you run the search, nothing will come up.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  15. The Way Back Machine by ender-iii · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has China banned The Way Back Machine yet?

    --
    ender-iii
    1. Re:The Way Back Machine by stmpynode · · Score: 1
      --

      Blah.

  16. Thank God I'm an American? by DavesError · · Score: 1

    Reading news like this makes me glad I'm an American...

    But it also makes me a little scared. After reading some of the articles about how Americans are becoming so willing to give up their freedoms for a sense of security, I'm afraid that America could very easily slip into this same type of bullsh*t. Don't people see that we need to fight for our freedoms?

    Hail free speech!
    (I want to be able to keep my porn!)

    1. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stuff a sock in it jackass. tards like you give the U.S. a bad name. Please stay in your parents' basement until you get a clue.

    2. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      Reading news like this makes me glad I'm an American...

      Then read this.

    3. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Thank God you're not German, or Spanish, or Swiss, or Swedish, or Belgian, or French, or Italian, or English, or Canadian, or anything equally awful and oppressive.

    4. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about it? It's about China censoring their citizens. It has nothing to do with Americans censoring their citizens.

    5. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by jcast · · Score: 1

      Ooh, I'm a citizen of the same country as Cisco's president. I guess that makes me as bad as them...

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    6. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least China does not pretend to be a democratic country. Do not forget the anti-terrorist laws which also states that news broadcasts can be censored without even being able to tell it is censored. I remember that CNN broadcasted a 10 year old recording of celebrating Pakistanis, when they mentioned that Pakistanis were celebrating the 9-11 disaster. A lot of recordings of wounded people in Afghanistan were *NEVER* broadcasted in the US. The Bin Laden tape has officially been censored because it could contain "terrorist messages". (As if they have never heard of internet, or a sattelite dish).
      I wonder: what is worse: being a Chinese Citizen, or being an American Citizen. (At least in China I have a lesser chance of being shot by another citizen)

    7. Re:Thank God I'm an American? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      What about it? It's about China censoring their citizens. It has nothing to do with Americans censoring their citizens.

      Maybe you read it too fast.

      "The Weekly Standard writes that despite expectations, the Chinese Government has been very successful in suppressing free internet access for their citizens. Key to this success was the assistance of Cisco, who built a giant firewall tailored to the state's needs, Yahoo (who helpfully censors search results and monitors online chats), and other Western companies."

  17. Rumors by jsse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's no source, no reference; just a wild rumors from an anonymous coward. I don't believe /. editors would down to spreading FUD for a few extra hits.

    In China there are some search engines like Yam which is google based and use google's queries. Even if you haven't heard of Yam, you might have heard of a China based search engine company suing Yahoo for stealing queries. Yam is more popular than Google here.

    If they block Google they might have to block Yam as well, which would then be a real chaos. :)

    1. Re:Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      FYI, Yam is in Taiwan, not in China.

    2. Re:Rumors by Kaiwen · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      China owns Taiwan

      Aside from the fact that the article you linked to reaches exactly the opposite conclusion, the fact is Taiwanese sovereignty is still held in trust by the U.S. government, which never fulfilled its promise to return it to the ROC, partly due to the fact that the U.N. never fulfilled its promise to discuss the issue.

      The ROC being the successor government to the Ming Dynasty -- together with the Cairo Declaration's explicitly stated intent to return the island to the ROC ( not the PRC, which, despite its blustering, has never had a credible claim to the island) -- makes the ROC's claim the only legitimate one. In addition, Taiwan's right to self-determination, as spelled out in the U.N. charter, means but one thing: China does not own Taiwan.

    3. Re:Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, sorry, i didnt see that you liked taiwan and hated PROC.

      just redirect all my anger to the mailand.

      long live the free china!

    4. Re:Rumors by mindriot · · Score: 2

      Problem is, though, yam is no help trying to access the Google cache. I tried a query on yam, and the cache links point directly to Google, instead of being proxied through yam. Too bad...

    5. Re:Rumors by mab · · Score: 1

      Nup. Taiwan rules mainland china :) read the history

    6. Re:Rumors by H3XA · · Score: 1

      They HAVE blocked Google..... well I gather they have coz I haven't been able to access it for a couple of days now...

      Yam still works for now.... anyone know a bookie taking bets on how long it lasts?

      - HeXa

  18. Fight The Man by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Informative
    I fully support Wayne's Proxy Censorship Avoidance Site, which is quoted as saying:
    I am an advocate of free speech, full disclosure etc., of course. But that's not all. The Internet wizards are watching this censorship movement overall and think they have it under control. They have built in low-level protocols (in very clever ways) which ensure that censorship cannot work . But, in my opinion, they have forgotten that most people don't have their skills or knowledge. Sure, unless a country 'cuts the wire' there are ways to bypass the censorship. Sure, if there's an information flow into and out of a country, you can always get information you want, in spite of any attempt at censorship - and do it undetected. BUT it requires skills. Very few sites on the Internet tell you how to do it. This site attempts to redress this deficiency.
    So, as long as China has Internet, the Chinese can circumvent censorship. Unfortunately, this creates sort of a chicken-and-egg problem, where Chinese are uneducated thanks to government censorship, and thus do not possess the required knowledge to bypass censor systems. I provide the following links for those interested:

    To the Chinese Government: don't think you can get away with this. We are watching you. Remember the IIS fuck China worm? Remember when Americans penetrated Chinese censorship sites. One particularly activist group is the Cult of The Dead Cow, as they are involved with a US-Canada-Europe anti-China-human-rights-abuses hacking group, the Hong Kong Blondes.

    Its only a matter of time until the Internet disappears in China, and the Chinese government succumbs under its own agenda.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    1. Re:Fight The Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hacker Hoax
      August 18, 1999
      http://www.currents.net/newstoday/99/08/18/n ews3.h tml

      The world's press might have been fooled into believing that a Chinese
      hacker group plans to bring down the country's information infrastructure.
      According to stories that began circulating in July last year, the rogue
      group, the Hong Kong Blondes, is made up of dissidents both overseas and
      within the Chinese Government.

      The rumours began when an interview with the group's leader was published
      by US hacking group the Cult of the Dead Cow (CDC) at
      http://www.cultdeadcow.com . In the interview, illusive Hong Kong Blondes
      director Blondie Wong said that he had formed an organization named the
      Yellow Pages, which would use information warfare to attack China's
      information infrastructure.

      The group threatened to attack both Chinese state organizations and
      Western companies investing in the country. For their part, the CDC
      claimed that they would train the Hong Kong Blondes in encryption and
      intrusion techniques.

      One year after the group's supposed launch, there is no evidence that the
      Hong Kong Blondes ever existed. In fact, all evidence appears to indicate
      that the Hong Kong Blondes report was a highly successful hoax.

      [snip...]

  19. From inside the lines :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google access decreased steadily the whole of last week.

    First it was www.google.com that went down, then the country specific versions, now the wwwN.google.com types.

    IP addresses work for viewing, but a get/post doesn't work, so no searching.

    From what I can see, the firewall is just dropping packets on those ports at the 80,443 addresses.

    You can ping google, and see what open ports are on, but a raw GET on port 80 or 443 does nothing.

    Net Scan returns this:

    IP Address : 216.239.51.100
    Resolved : www.google.com
    Operating System : probably Unix
    Time to live (TTL) : 42 (64) - 22 hop(s) away

    Open Ports (2)
    80 [ Http => World Wide Web, HTTP ]
    H 400 Bad Request
    Content-Length: 1210
    Connection: Close
    Server: GWS/2.0
    Content-Type: text/html
    Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 06:45:23 GMT
    443 [ HttpS => Secure HTTP ]

    Looks like its back to the dark old days of proxy's again.

    Lawrence

    www.shanghaiguide.com

    1. Re:From inside the lines :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. The Netscan output is confusing, though--it clearly was able to get an HTTP response from Google (otherwise it wouldn't know about "Server: GWS/2.0"). So they can't be blocking port 80 completely...?

    2. Re:From inside the lines :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Many BBS in China are also commanded by local News Officials to delete the netizen's discussion on this.

  20. Internet vs. Governments by ceeam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder who will ultimately win?
    Or better make it this way - for how long peer connections will be possible?

    1. Re:Internet vs. Governments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The senseless waste of pitting these two mighty forces of nature against each other, like matter vs. anti-matter, will be a tragedy, not only for the teams involved... but for our planet. All nations must band together, to ensure that such a conflageration never takes place."

    2. Re:Internet vs. Governments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear PRC Government,

      It has become increasingly clear the only way to stop your disloyal citizens from attempting to bypass your proxy is to move to a default deny policy on all Internet traffic. Then you need to work backwards and only allow state-tested and approved sites that will not spread ideas that are at odds with the ideaology supported by your government. I recommend hiring a US consulting company to show you how to properly implement a harsh restrictive filtering firewall in order to control your disloyal emplo^H^H^H^H^Hcitizens. These kinds of companies have the most experience in keeping people from accessing harmful and immoral content that conflicts with the policies of businesses and would fit perfectly with your goals.

  21. sourceforge.net is also forbidden by bash99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    any site provide free webpage hosting will be forbidden soon, even just for free software.

    1. Re:sourceforge.net is also forbidden by jsse · · Score: 2

      is it due to the fact that sourceforge host something like that which would really piss China Government?

      Slashdot is not blocked, so is gnu.org.

      Hmm, may be I shouldn't speak too loud. :)

    2. Re:sourceforge.net is also forbidden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot.com is blocked; slashdot.org isn't. Odd.

    3. Re:sourceforge.net is also forbidden by rory77 · · Score: 1

      They already did that LONG AGO..
      (for any free web hosting site they KNOW of..)

      Geocities and most of those type sites were blocked in China over 2 years ago.. ALL redirection sites are blocked (cjb.net, surf.to, come.to, etc)

      --
      There was a time when the church ruled and everyone believed in god... this time is known as the Dark Ages. --?
  22. Not Rumors by Istealmymusic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here's your reference:
    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://google.com/. Result:
    Reported as inaccessible in China

    Yam is accessible, and so is Yahoo.

    Too bad China overlooked Google proxies...they exist you know.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    1. Re:Not Rumors by MonMotha · · Score: 2

      Very odd, as the same page gives the following results for www.google.com:

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://www.google.com. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

      http://google.com inaccessable, but http://www.google.com accessable? What's going on here?

    2. Re:Not Rumors by HacTar · · Score: 1

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://www.slashdot.org. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

      Good...
      Hello China
      Read here!

    3. Re:Not Rumors by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      not when i tested...

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://www.google.com. Result:
      Reported as inaccessible in China

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    4. Re:Not Rumors by parasite · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no thanks to you tard.

      They found THIS article within an hour, and so much for soapclient when they finish reading the comments.

  23. More on the Great Firewall of China by wumingzi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Every year or so, I get to rewrite this article, because it seems to continue to be regarded as news.

    The government of the PRC, through Zhonghua Telecom, continues to filter traffic going in and out of China.

    The filters do not work. This is old news. Proxy servers are everywhere.

    Here's the secret which doesn't seem to have gotten out of China yet, the filters don't have to work. They're not designed for the users.

    Contrary to popular belief, China is not run as an absolute dictatorship. It's run by a circle of maybe a few dozen people who's opinions really matter. Like any good-sized group, there's a lot of disagreeement about how much (or little) openness there should be to the rest of the world.

    The filters exist to appease the more close-minded members of the circle and to let them know that the best efforts are being made to keep bad stuff out of the minds of users.

    My best guess about Google disappearing is that one or more companies who are providing portal and search services in China have been complaining to the Ministry of the Information Industry about loss of market share to Google. The solution? If Google gets blocked, the market share for locally-produced Chinese portals goes up!

    Is this good policy? No. Probably not. I've seen protectionist policy used all over the world and it's generally not the consumer or even the producers who benefit. It's a few well-placed friends of the folks in power. At least in this case, there's always another open proxy server which someone "forgot" to close up to work around this bit of government silliness.

    Happy hunting all!

    j.

    1. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by evbergen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah, now I finally understand why there are so many open proxies in China and why I get so much spam through them!

      Interesting. If they're indeed left open for that reason, I'd almost change my opinion of the admins running them...

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    2. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by ptbrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If someone is operating a web proxy to bypass the Great Firewall, that's great.

      But a web proxy isn't the same thing as an open SMTP relay. Anyone with one of those should be shot, burned, dragged through the streets naked, and then really punished.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
    3. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by evbergen · · Score: 1

      A socks proxy makes very little distinction by default though.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    4. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by wumingzi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interesting. If they're indeed left open for that reason, I'd almost change my opinion of the admins running them...

      Another helpful poster pointed out the difference between a web proxy and an open mail server.

      A proxy server is only useful if it is outside of the routers which do the filtering, i.e. outside of the PRC.

      Most of the open mail relays in Asia are just due to ham-handed systems administration. There are lots of small companies running mail and web servers, and not nearly enough qualified people to administer them.

      j.

    5. Re:More on the Great Firewall of China by evbergen · · Score: 1

      Another helpful poster pointed out the difference between a web proxy and an open mail server.

      A socks proxy tends to make little difference between port 80 and port 25.

      A proxy server is only useful if it is outside of the routers which do the filtering, i.e. outside of the PRC.

      Such as Taiwan?

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
  24. Shouldn't this scare the shit out of you? by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hellooo? McFly? Anybody home?
    They are blocking 2 Billion + people of an Internetsite that's something like the cornerstone of online information!
    Don't you also think that a lot of powerpeople in the US and elsewhere envy the chinese powermongers for this? What will the world look like in 10 years from now, when books are getting scarce and drm is all over us like a polyester safari suit and each of us will be paying hard bucks only to view data - and even that will be censored?
    Pretty grim if you ask me...
    What I'm saying is: This is not the least bit funny!

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Shouldn't this scare the shit out of you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no problem with this at all. China should develop its own culture. I only wish more countries would follow in China's footsteps. Just say no a world of McCulture.

    2. Re:Shouldn't this scare the shit out of you? by kubrick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can I play on the slippery slope when you're finished with it?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    3. Re:Shouldn't this scare the shit out of you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you also think that a lot of powerpeople in the US and elsewhere envy the chinese powermongers for this? What will the world look like in 10 years from now, when books are getting scarce and drm is all over us like a polyester safari suit and each of us will be paying hard bucks only to view data - and even that will be censored?

      Well the major difference is the USA has two important constitutional rights that the PRC doesn't. The first and the second. If they take away the first then you can sure as hell be sure they won't get a chance to take away the second before they're overthrown. The trouble is, the liberals that are letting them take away the second ammendment first! Without guns you have NO way of overthrowing an oppressive regime. Look at China for instance.

    4. Re:Shouldn't this scare the shit out of you? by XSforMe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Without guns you have NO way of overthrowing an oppressive regime.

      India's independance, Yugoslavia's revolution, Soviet Perestroika, fall of the berlin wall. Must I go on?

      Wielding a gun will only give them an excuse to masacre you. Do you think you can overpower any modern day army with a bunch of mercenaries and guns? Can you give me an example of a succesful armed revolution in the last 50 years?

      It seems to me that modern day revolutions are fought without guns. Armed conflict tends to end up in a stalemate of massive bloodshed (Ruanda). How much firepower would it require for you to take down the US government?

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    5. Re:Shouldn't this scare the shit out of you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when books are getting scarce

      In the US they can't take your books until they first take your shotgun.

  25. Conflicting Results.... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Real-Time Testing of Internet Filters in China is reporting conflicting results.

    In the recent results box:
    http://www.google.com - Reported as inaccessible in China
    http://www.google.com - Reported as accessible in China

    Tests were completed within a few minutes of each other (I know because I did them both).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:Conflicting Results.... by djupedal · · Score: 0

      That site is not to be trusted (unreliable)...if you want to know, ask someone inside China to test for you.
      I did....

    2. Re:Conflicting Results.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. We have an easy way around this. Our office in Beijing needed a WAN link back to London. We got slapped down on it but they would allow for a WAN link to Hong Kong. We we installed the WAN to our office in HK and added a port to the router. Simple, uncensored internet access via London.

    3. Re:Conflicting Results.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All through the weekend, here in (southern) India, www.google.com and google.com were inaccessible. My ISP's DNS apparently syncs with another server in Hong Kong, they claimed that an upstream server had completely fscked up Google's entry. groups.google.com continued to work. Strange coincidence.

      Question: Does google.yahoo.com work in China now?

  26. So that's where he is.... by idiotnot · · Score: 0, Troll

    I guess Jim Exon has moved to Bejing.

    1. Re:So that's where he is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to the fucking dork totalitarian who market my above post redundant, and to the fucking twit scum who market the original post troll.

      read what you market redundant you fucking communist shit.

  27. Cornerstone? by djupedal · · Score: 0

    You can't be serious. Rankings on google can be bought for a fee....what kind of societly cornerstone are you worshiping that's made of USD? Don't be such a chicken little.

    1. Re:Cornerstone? by Zagadka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rankings on google can be bought for a fee....

      No they can't.

  28. If I wanted to censor web content by jukal · · Score: 2
    ...I would use a list of allowed sites, instead a list of creating a black list. Also I would assume there would be more to block than allow. Use same principles as when setting up a firewall :)

    Anyway, I wish China could realize and use this (internet) as a chance to stop censorship without loosing their face.

  29. censorship--it's all the rage by g4dget · · Score: 2
    So, China doesn't like its citizens to see subversive or immoral content on the Internet. The US sends in the FBI when people look at the latest Windows distribution, teenagers having sex, or a bootlegged Britney Spears video on the Internet.

    In my opinion, both the US and China have, in different ways, crossed the line of what is reasonable in terms of controlling on-line information. Both societies seem to be driven by irrational fear, and neither is afraid to crush people with the full force of the respective government and police force.

    (What would be reasonable you ask? In the US, copyright violations should be treated as civil matters, not criminal matters. Tax payers shouldn't have to pay for enforcing conformance to bizarre contractual obligations imposed by companies like Microsoft.)

    1. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps the difference is that the U.S. does not shoot its criminals in the head without a trial and then make the "criminal's" family pay for the bullet. You don't think this happens in China? Ask any tibetan.

    2. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which is much the same argument against there being a left and right side to politcs. you go so far in either direction that you end up on the other side.

    3. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah...why, just the other day, a friend of mine was "censored" when the army came and took him away for publically speaking out against the government. Later, there was a report on the news that he was to be imprisoned, tortured, and shot.

      He was part of a rally in Times Square, and they arrested him. Sucks that we live in a country without peaceable assembly.

      Wait...I think it was actually someone I didn't know who was killed in Tiananmen square for a pro-democracy demonstration.

      I think I got it straight now. The US is NOTHING like China when it comes to censorship. We don't imprison and kill people because we don't like what they say. We certainly don't use full force; on the contrary, our main censorship punishment is fines, or at the very most, a minimum security prison sentence. Of course, you have to consider that we are not trying to censor, our goal is to avoid copyright violations. You can say anything you want, as long as it isn't libel (untrue statement of FACTS - all opinions are allowed).

      Don't belittle our freedom or China's suffering by such a comparison.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > our main censorship punishment is fines, or at the very most, a minimum security prison sentence

      What about the NET act?

    5. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little problem here, they are getting more freedom while you are losing more everyday

      in 10 years, you will be the laughing stock(If Bush and his team continue today's trend)

    6. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by g4dget · · Score: 2
      We don't imprison and kill people because we don't like what they say.

      Sure we do--read your US history. The Haymarket Massacre and Kent State come to mind immediately. The history of American Indians, slavery, suffrage, and the civil rights movement provide plenty more examples.

      There are lots of other ways in which speech or information can get you imprisoned for a long time or executed: "espionage", "child pornography", "promotion of terrorism", "treason", "incitement of civil unrest", etc.

      Don't belittle our freedom or China's suffering by such a comparison.

      It has nothing to do with belittling or judging the relative merits of the US and Chinese forms of governments. The US today is clearly freer and kills fewer of its citizens than China.

      But you have to understand the history and the inconsistencies in our own position in order to deal effectively with the Chinese. When we think they restrict free speech, they think they are preventing riots and political instability. If we want them to change, we better make some pretty convincing arguments. Your kind of self-righteous drivel isn't going to cut it.

      And there is plenty more work we have to do at home. Free speech in the US is not exactly all that alive and well, given the concentration of media power in a small number of private hands. Sure, we can talk here, but 99% of Americans are going to believe the junk that FOX feeds them. And try to hold a public rally or demonstration in a mall or any other place where most people actually spend their time--most have gotten privatized and don't have to bother with niceties like allowing free speech.

    7. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ten years, Bush won't be president, dumbass.

    8. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My neighbor is in the Army now. A couple years I heard him joking about how all the guys in his unit wished they could bust up the WTO protestors in Seattle and their like. He said those hippies wouldn't last long against his SAW, hehe. :( I didn't have the heart to tell him that he sounded like the Red Army.

    9. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by chrisbord · · Score: 1

      of course the difference is that the idea of him actually getting to do that (or even that he was remotely seriously) is 0 in America, in China it has happened recently and does in fact happen all the time today.

    10. Re:censorship--it's all the rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US may not use the Army, but US police and other government agencies have shot and killed civilians during protests. It was worse in the 19th and early 20th century, but it's still going on, and it may get worse again.

  30. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As of September 2nd 2002, the United States Internet surpasses the China Internet by a tenfold. Rebuild China Internet today.

  31. Time for google.cn! by MavEtJu · · Score: 2

    It's time for a pragmatic approach: The people at Google should get in touch with the people from the Chinese Government Networking Services and get a deal done for hosting a mirror (mirror? link? whatever) inside the Chinese part of the Internet.

    It's ideal in a couple of ways:

    - The 1+ billion people (yes I know that they don't have all access to the internet) have access to a good working search-engine. Even if it's without the "view cache" feature, at least they have the search-engine.

    - The traffic of the 1+ billion people searching through the Google database doesn't have to go over the ocean toward the US anymore (yes I know that US ISPs don't pay for the intercontinental links)

    - (think of some other advantages yourself)

    Of course, the first thing what is going to be said now is "Who is going to pay for this?"...

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:Time for google.cn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about we american companies don't make it easy for an oppressive and immoral regime to perpetuate its evil on its own citizens?

  32. wayaroundit by djupedal · · Score: 0

    Eaxctly :0 You and 1000 other businesses since 1990....

  33. Big deal, use google.ca or yam.com instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Use google.ca or yam.com instead.

    They don't seem to be blocked in China.

  34. Which is better: censorship or propaganda by jukal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't like censorship. But I also don't like the fact that in the countries that allow free speech, the biggest megaphones are controlled by only a very small group of companies and individuals.

    Basicly, if the media wants, they can brainwash majority of people in believing anything they want.

    In the case of censorship, you know atleast, that you don't have access to unbiased information - and you know that if you want to create an unbiased opinion, you need to do it yourself.

    But, as we have free speech, it is easy to leave thinking to the media, and let someone else form your opinion. So, to some extent, I think that the fact that media is controlled by tiny interest groups, is maybe even a bigger threat than censorship.

    1. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by lux55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least in our case (being uncensored), our main form of censorship is self-censorship. This is a choice. It's a choice people are all too willing to make these days, but at least the few of us willing to excercise our rights and our brains to form our own opinions (amidst the constant bombardment of media pressure) have the right to do so.

      You raise an interesting point though. +5 from me.

    2. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by PigleT · · Score: 2

      I have one opinion that might want to jump in here: if a country can't cope with its inhabitants having a wide range of views, it has problems all its own.

      Sure there'll be techie ways around it, as always; it doesn't serve any good purpose except to chop their own foot off - see what happens when they want to go for a jog.

      --
      ~Tim
      --
      .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
      Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
    3. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by jukal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > if a country can't cope with its inhabitants having a wide range
      > of views, it has problems all its own.

      The problem is that majority of people think that they have formed their opinion after inspecting a wide range of views (as there's free speech, this must be the case, right?) - when in reality their opinion was formed by only 1 or 2 views that reflect the view of a very small interest group or they formed their opinion based on biased "information".

      You saw it in TV news, it must be true - effect.

    4. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of censorship, you know atleast, that you don't have access to unbiased information - and you know that if you want to create an unbiased opinion, you need to do it yourself.

      Why are you so certain that a 'censored' individual would draw this conclusion? I lived in shanghai for 6 months and I did not get this impression. As a general rule, people will question information they are given only if they are taught to do so. This is quite normal, as most of our beliefs are based on what our culture tells us rather than any rational inquiry.

    5. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by jukal · · Score: 2
      > Why are you so certain that a 'censored' individual would draw this conclusion?
      I > lived in shanghai for 6 months and I did not get this impression

      Well, in that case you have better insight on this than me. I, "just" assumed that educated people atleast would in todays world ave some connections to outer (uncensored) world and would have heard about censoring. I am probably mistaken in this :)

      Anyway, even the well educated people in the "uncensored" world seem to not process - but just eat -unprocessed - the information that they receive and believe for example that what they hear from TV/Radio whatever, is unbiased and relevant information to be used to base one's own opinion on.

    6. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, you're less-than-half right (well in the eyes of /. you have more karma). What I'm about to say was certainly more true with the USSR, but applies to PRN. As an American who has lived in China, I do have *some* authority in the matter.

      Both censorship *and* propaganda have the same problem, but censorship has it worse. The Soviets rewrote WWII to a noble East-West battle for example.

      China certainly hasn't gotten to this extent, but the idea that censorship forces you to form your own opinion is *ridiculous* since censorship, like propaganda, is a gov't tool to stop those opinions and control the masses. Opinions need facts; censorship stifles facts; hence, censorship (moreso than prop.) stops opinions.

      Your argument seems to hold water on /. but I think anyone with any knowledge would disagree. Doubting whether the PRC censors beyond the web? Ask a Chinese about Tibet.

      Finally, yes prop is rampant here in the US--it merely pales in comparison to the PRC.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    7. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by jukal · · Score: 2
      > but the idea that censorship forces you to form your own opinion is *ridiculous*

      I agree with this 100 % - I put things to extreme just in effort to try to make people think and realize that the fact that they live in US, Europe, Australia or whatever considered as an "uncensored" country, does not mean that they do not need to use their brains to form their own opinion.

      It's good that you made this comment, I was waiting for it to complete the story, thanks :)

    8. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Like on slashdot. Come here to speak. By our rules. we can crush you if we see fit. We being a small group of people controlling the megaphones.

      The internet is really a way for people to escape the government and opression, PROVIDED that these foolish mega corps STOP allowing china and other scum to filter the net by offering up the tech to do it.

      What ever happened to the VOICE OF AMERICA being beamed into the eastern block? Now we help commies keep google out of China. No good.

      Mao Tse Tung, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Pinochet, Mussolini, Marshall Joseph Tito, Slobodan Milosevic, Idi Amin, Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Juan Peron, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ferdinand Marcos, General Suharto, Pol Pot, Fransisco Franco, and certainly the worst of the bunch, SLASHDOT's editing/moderating [read: censoring] "community"(*) ALL AGREE on ONE THING:

      CENSORSHIP WORKS!


      So, you busy little plebian proletariats, get busy, you have some censoring to do! I'm not saying a good thing here, I'm a THREAT!

      Good job you little neo-commies. Don't want to hear the other side, shoot the fucker in the head as an ENEMY OF THE STATE [In this case anyone who seeks to improve the sad state of /.].

      Get busy moderating this down, you little pack of obedient prefects of the corrupt state!
    9. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good point, but ulitmately you cannot question every fact. So yes, I trust (for that most part) what CNN and the BBC reports even though they have often been very biased or untrue. Perhaps my trust of these sources is naive but I have no plans on hopping on a plane to Kabul to get the information first-hand :-)

    10. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i am that guy you though was a troll you met before in another thread. you argued in favor of slashdot, in a nested reply exchange with me. your reward for defending slashdot was being marked more offtopic and moderated down that i was as an AC. see how this community treats people. theyprobably didnt even read your comments to realized they were in defense of slashdots clearly ridiculous system of legislated mediocrity mobocracy. and i part by saying this rant that i wrote as a summation of various things that i feel, some jokes and some resentment for supressive actions against free thinking
      This is just another example of spineless crap moderation here on /.

      Mao Tse Tung, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Pinochet, Mussolini, Marshall Joseph Tito, Slobodan Milosevic, Idi Amin, Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Juan Peron, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ferdinand Marcos, General Suharto, Pol Pot, Fransisco Franco, and certainly the worst of the bunch, SLASHDOT's editing/moderating [read: censoring] "community"(*) ALL AGREE on ONE THING:

      CENSORSHIP WORKS!

      (*)Note, the word community used often on Slashdot, this is referring to a proto communist commune.

      So, you busy little plebian proletariats, get busy, you have some censoring to do! FUN!

      Good job you little neo-commies. Don't want to hear the other side, shoot the fucker in the head as an ENEMY OF THE STATE [In this case anyone who seeks to improve the sad state of /.].

      I have a Gun and the Constitution [Not the urinated-on pissed-on hacked fucked up one WashingTOON thinks exists, I mean the real one, with Jefferson and Madison at my side], please, give me an excuse to use them both.

      A few haikus to commemorate the sucktitude:
      Crack Pipe Moderators
      Crack smoke wafts though air
      Dumb shit moderator!
      Try to suck less, please

      The Humorless Moderator
      Crack smoke wafts through air
      Humorless moderator!
      Why do you hate me?

      The Proletariat
      Slashdotting Commie
      Moderator fears new idea!
      Censor him quickly

      The reason China blocked Slashdot is that when Jiang Xemin saw at how good "The Editors" at Slashdot are at suppressing the community, he knew that if more of his party members saw this degree of suppressive efficacy, he would be deposed, for the good of the people, of course, in favor of Rob Malda as the all new supreme dictator and premier of China.

      SAYINGS, quips et al:

      It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. - Sir Winston Churchill (Especially when your democratic peers twist democracy into a reason commit cencorship, to squash dissenting or unpopular opinions, and refer to them as trolls, flaimbait overrated or offtopic when they aren't any of the said)

      A monarchy is a merchantman which sails well, but will sometimes strike on a rock, and go to the bottom; a republic is a raft which will never sink, but then your feet are always in the water. - Fisher Ames

      Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken.

      Democracy: The substitution of election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. - George Bernard Shaw.

      The reason there are two senators for each state is so that one can be the designated driver. - Jay Leno.

      The Constitution poses no threat to our current form of governement. (Death to those who defile the root documents of a free nation to make economic freedom Supercede Freedom! Freedom First! Free market Second!)

      Occam's Razor "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily." "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" "Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora" "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" Translation: " "Simple explanations are preferred to complex ones" Modern fucking translation "JUST DO IT."

      Reading Slashdot at anything above -1 is like trying to put a shit filter on your ass.

      Get busy moderating this down, you little pack of obedient prefects of the corrupt state! You are the vanguards of purity, and dissent is not allowed!

      ========

      The last few months I have been doing some research into the trolling phenomenon on slashdot.org. In order to do this as thoroughly as possible, I have written both normal and troll posts, 1st posts, etc., both logged in and anonymously, and I have found these rather shocking results:

      More moderator points are being used to mod posts down than up. Furthermore, when modding a post up, every moderator seems to follow previous moderators in their choices, even when it's not a particularly interesting or clever post . There are a LOT more +5 posts than +3 or +4.

      Logged in people are modded down faster than anonymous cowards. Presumably these Nazi Moderators think it's more important to burn a user's existing karma, to silence that individual for the future, than to use the moderation system for what it's meant for : identifying "good" and "bad" posts (Notice how nearly all oppressive governments in the past and present do the same thing : marking individuals as bad and untrustworthy because they have conflicting opinions, instead of engaging in a public discussion about these opinions)

      Once you have a karma of -4 or -5, your posts have a score of -1 by default. When this is the case, no-one bothers to mod you down anymore. This means a logged in user can keep on trolling as much as he (or she) likes, without risking a ban to post on slashdot. When trolling as an anonymous user, every post starts at score 0, and you will be modded down to -1 ON EVERY POST. When you are modded down a certain number of times in 24 hour, you cannot post anymore from your current IP for a day or so. So, for successful trolling, ALWAYS log in.

      A lot of the modded down posts are actually quite clever, funny, etc., and they are only modded down because they are offtopic or an unpopular viewpoint. Now, on a news site like slashdot, where the number of different topics of discussion can be counted on 1 hand, I must say I quite like the distraction these posts offer. But no, when the topic is yet another minor version change of the Linux kernel, they only expect ooohs and aaahs about this great feat of engineering. Look at the moderation done in Open Source centric to see what I mean. Notice any people taking shots at errata present in Open Source software get slaughtered.

      It is a well known, proven by poll FACT indicates the vast majority does NOT want the moderation we have here today.
    11. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 0

      I'm glad it makes sense--I'm switching to dvorak and I end up avoiding needed typing at times.

      These are certainly times where more information is given to us than we care to handle, and various interests attempt to use that against us. That is why we must avoid the common temptation to switch our minds to 'autopilot.'

      Moderators: I realize that this is offtopic--I'm going off into a tangent, not trolling.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    12. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      Every other day you find a statement on slashdot that is so simple and so true it should deserve a mod point from anyone - too bad I don't have any to share right now.

      mod parent up, please

      --
      +++ath0
    13. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by broken_bones · · Score: 1

      I think you may want to consider a third culprit: apathy. It seems to me that if things don't affect people directly they don't care. The average Joe doesn't care if Fox and NBC merge as long as they don't cancel his favorite show. Likewise there are a significant number of people who only care about the news to get the latest sports scores and the weather report. Just look at a typical 11:00 news broadcast. Where I come from probably, half of the broadcast is taken up with sports and weather no matter how many interesting and important things happened during the day.

      As long as people are apathetic censorship and propoganda take a back seat to that apathy. How effective is propaganda when people don't care about the issues? If you censor information about a topic that people don't care about, will they be more inclined to read the censored information?

      Of course, the the truly insidious propaganda is the stuff we feed ourselves that we can't make a difference...

      Just some thoughts. Ignore them if you like.

      --

      Never disturb your enemy while he is busy making a mistake.
    14. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by Kaiwen · · Score: 2
      Doubting whether the PRC censors beyond the web? Ask a Chinese about Tibet.

      Or Taiwan? In Chongqing just last week I spent nearly an hour listening to a Chinese acquaintance telling me why Taiwan should be independent. Anyone who thinks the Chinese are unable to form independent opinions overestimates the reach of Chinese censorship and propoganda.

      Lee Kai Wen, Taiwan, ROC

    15. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by chrisbord · · Score: 1

      But I also don't like the fact that in the countries that allow free speech, the biggest megaphones are controlled by only a very small group of companies and individuals. What drivel! You can choose from ABC,CBS,NBC,MSNBC,FOX,SKY NEWS,BBC, and a few more major news organizations, plus tens of thousands of newspapers, magazines, online publications, etc.! Instead of talking generically about 'potential' abuses by supposedly all-powerful, omnipotent companies, why don't you come up with some actual instances of real abuse.

    16. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by jukal · · Score: 2
      > why don't you come up with some actual instances of real abuse.

      because picking up specific instances would require publishing opinions that are in no way related to /. and would just shock you.

    17. Re:Which is better: censorship or propaganda by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 0

      In my exeriences in China many have their own opinion contrary to the government--it is simply hard to find any information that is not biased. Even in colleges, which should have that, information is scarce. The internet threatens the current powers that be in just this way: hence the firewall.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  35. To hell with Google. by Perdo · · Score: 2

    Sourceforge is blocked but IBM's Developer center is not.

    We will never see the benefit of IBM's 1 billion dollar investment in Linux because the majority of that investment is in China which is blocked by Cisco for China.

    Hate to sound like chicken little but it shure looks like IBM is hijacking GNU/Linux.

    What difference does it make if source is posted if it never makes it out of the country?

    And just because China is free with other people's intellectual property does not mean they are free with their own.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:To hell with Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Savannah, GNU's free (as in liberty) alternative to sourceforge, is not blocked in China.

  36. google.ca by Cplus · · Score: 2

    Everytime I type google.com in I get redirected to google.ca. I've deleted my cookies, rebooted my browser, tried again, same thing. Does google redirect me according to my ip which would be in a range specific to Canada? This bothers me on a subtle level, but also makes me think about why there is no google.cn, that's all.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    1. Re:google.ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's because you live in canada, dude.

    2. Re:google.ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/dude/eh/

      It's because you live in Canada, eh?

    3. Re:google.ca by Micah · · Score: 2

      hey, interesting. I live in the States so wasn't aware they do that kind of thing. But I have a co-located server in Vancouver, BC. When I lynx to google from there, it redirects to google.ca. Cool...

    4. Re:google.ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just click on the "Google.com" link at the bottom right. That seems to give you a cookie which redirects you to google.com all the time.

      When they first started doing this IP-based redirection, I found it almost offensive; I didn't like being automatically forced to another website because of my country (try going to Showtime's site from Canada). Now I'm starting to learn to accept it. In fact it might even be better since the search results are exactly the same unless you choose "Pages from Canada".

  37. yahoo by dirvish · · Score: 1

    Yahoo uses google for part of its searching now so the Chinese could use it and get similar results.

    The /. editors are going to this site banned also if they keep posting stories about China.

    1. Re:yahoo by saihung · · Score: 2

      Its bad enough that the Chinese gov't can silence their own media. I wouldn't want to live in a world where fear of getting "banned" can silence the truth. This ain't 1650 - the emperor can't revoke our trading privileges for refusing to ketou. If China wants the foreign press to stop reporting bad things about China, then they should take it easy on their own citizens. We're not going to shut up.

    2. Re:yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it's Google's pagerank stuff, it's still Yahoo's database, and not the vast wild web.

  38. Not Quite by Nept · · Score: 2

    Thank god for Google Labs, once again. You can run a search off of Keyboard Shortcuts, and take advantage of cached copies, etc. Some of the images that were on the main google server don't come up. But hey, it works. Also, Google Images/Google Directory & Google Groups still work.
    I'm currently in China right now on a project, and coding without Google is not easy - especially since there isn't any english bookstore I can run over to while I'm here to pick up a tech manual.
    But maybe I shouldn't be posting this? I guess this is a good chance to see if the Chinese government reads /. :)

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    1. Re:Not Quite by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      Now that is a real crime, not allowing the use of USENET for programming help.

      In fact, e-mail me if you get desperate and need someone to search the groups for you.

  39. It's not news, so what? by fateswarm · · Score: 1

    Why do some people want from Slashdot to have 0-day news? Isn't it enough nobody really mentions such things on other news reports? gawd.. I hate to see these "It's not really news so what" in every single news article. Did you really know it? Perhaps not. Have you ever talked about it on a news site that allows you to write your comments? Perhaps not.

  40. Re:p2p - not possible by CreatorOfSmallTruths · · Score: 1

    p2p isn't possible if the guys who rule the Great Firewall know what they are doing (which brings on an interesting question... who rules the rulers? somewhere in China are people who are VERY CLOSE to the power that be... I wonder where they surf...)
    You probably ask "why isn't it possible" and the answer is pretty simple: by working over TCP/IP you have to send all of the data in some recognizble protocol ( a format in which both the client and the server knows how to read and what to read ) and therefor all you have to do is block the packets who looks like they belong the p2p mechanism (and any other packets you don't like).

  41. Re:Propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    your propaganda doesn't wash here. google does not sell placement. their ads are clearly marked as such, and do not appear mixed in with the results. get your facts strait, bucko!

  42. Score! by DavesError · · Score: 1

    I knew I could grab some flames from someone.

    Thanks man!

  43. Goatse's at harvard? by wirefarm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Goatse.cx [harvard.edu] is A-OK by Chinese authorities, but google isn't???

    Goatse's at harvard?
    I figued that guy was from Yale...

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Goatse's at harvard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pahk the cah in yaah aaas

  44. Elite dislike the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not good to have people learning about stuff. Expect similar things in the US. All governments are deeply interested in having a hand in what their people think about. The internet is making that a difficult task.

    This is the sort of thing you probably aren't seeing in the mainstream press.

    These suits are becoming popular with police forces. Have something you don't like about the government and want to hold a peaceful protest? Kinda makes you think twice. Which is the desired effect of the scary looking suits. This is the United States in 2002. Really.

  45. Quote by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I read articles like this, a quote from Alpha Centauri (the video game) comes to mind:

    As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    Commissioner Pravin Lal
    "U.N. Declaration of Rights"


    And every one of these articles I see reinforces that belief.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and now people are seeking wisdom from video games. please tell me this is a joke.

    2. Re:Quote by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      and now people are seeking wisdom from video games. please tell me this is a joke.

      Hey, it beats seeking wisdom in crude lowbrow 16th century plays.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  46. god or someone else bless us... by z01d · · Score: 1, Insightful


    slashdot finally post this story on the fp...
    i feel both gratified and worrying

    the 16th All-Hands meeting of CCP will be held on 18th Nov at BeiJing, it will announce the fourth core-leader of the party (the first three is Mao, Deng, Jiang), the political battle just run in white hot. you can image how could this be, in a autarchy. currently, they are very sensitive about the public media, as well as the internet, this is so called "the very period", that's why google has been banned. it's quite understandable(not acceptable) from my point of view (No, i'm not brainwashed), google will be ok after this year.

    my respect goes to google
    for their disobedience

    my useless indignation goes to Cisco and Yahoo!
    for their "commercial operation"

    god or someone else bless us...
    free speech rulz

    1. Re:god or someone else bless us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsmax says, "Marxist Control," China is a reaction against Marxism.

  47. Re:p2p - not possible by BitHive · · Score: 1
    all you have to do is block the packets who looks like they belong the p2p mechanism

    It's called "encryption", and I believe it would avoid this.

  48. Help the Chinese learn to use Peekabooty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Normally I don't post as A.C. but I don't want the Chinese to know what I'm up to because they might firewall my web site.

    I am helping a friend in China get set up to use Peekabooty.

    The way it works is basically that lots of people outside the firewall run proxy servers. People inside the firewall need to get Peekabooty's IP address list, and then they select a proxy to use. You can get the host.lst file from http://pabdb.cjb.net/.

    Their web browsing is private because the connection to the proxy uses SSL encryption. The chinese will think you're shopping online. If they try to block the SSL port, then China will be unable to participate fully in the world economic system, increasingly so in the next few years.

    The problem is that if Peekabooty's website isn't already blocked, it certainly will be soon. To avoid stimulating the interest of the authorities, I am making arrangements for my friend and I to have an encrypted conversation where I will tell him what he needs to do.

    The peekabooty proxy runs on windows, but there is a linux port in progress. The people inside the firewall don't need to install any software, only configure their browser to use one of the SSL proxies.

    It would be helpful for people to mirror Peekabooty's documentation and the IP address list. Likely many of the mirrors won't be blocked and so the chinese (and the Singaporeans, and residents of many Muslim countries) can access the information.

    If you personally know anyone inside a firewalled country, do your part by helping them learn to use peekabooty. But find a way to arrange to tell them how while using encryption.

    Unfortunately, PGP messages are pretty obvious that they're encrypted. If someone starts sending and receiving them, the authorities might take notice even of that.

    But most web browsers nowadays support 128-bit SSL encryption. Thus it is possible to arrange to have a conversation with someone via SSL encrypted form submission.

    There doesn't appear to be a way right now to do this, but it is being worked on.

    In the meantime, mirroring the peekabooty instructions and proxy list and making the URL's available where the Chinese might pick them up will help get things started.

    1. Re:Help the Chinese learn to use Peekabooty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use ssh.

      ssh and talk(1), or ssh into a box with an IRC server then connect your favorite console IRC client to localhost...

      Or set up ssh to tunnel IRC...

    2. Re:Help the Chinese learn to use Peekabooty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Secure Internet Live Conferencing (SILC) at http://silcnet.org, and it ain't blocked yet.

    3. Re:Help the Chinese learn to use Peekabooty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore is not being tightly censored. The filters, to my knowledge, are not actively maintained . The filters only applies to consumer internet providers. My leased lines are definately not censored.

    4. Re:Help the Chinese learn to use Peekabooty by goingware · · Score: 2
      Thanks, and thanks to the guy who suggested ssh and talk. Both of these would work.



      Probably ssh and talk would get me started the quickest.

      --
      -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  49. Poor Bastards! by Perdo · · Score: 1

    Autopr0n is blocked!

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Poor Bastards! by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      I don't think that Asian pr0n has the same allure for people who actually are Asian, anyway :).

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  50. Filtered or Non-Filtered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who's going to sort through Google's three billion ever-changing pages to decide what's OK for China and what's not?

    To understand Chinese censorship of the Web, and everything else, you first need to understand the obscurity of it; while of course there are some areas, like pro-Falun Gong sites, that are off-limits, there's a huge grey area where who knows what goes. That's the real problem for AOL and others operating directly in China and subject to Chinese restrictions on what appears on their sites: it's just not possible to know where the line is drawn.

  51. now if only ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the great wall firewall maintainers would block outbound port 25, all of us /.ers would see this as acceptable

  52. Blocked, is it? by dacarr · · Score: 1
    What it sounds like to me is that the Chinese government wants to try and block out all memory of capitalism. It kind of reminds me of Tienamen (sic) Square a while back in a way.

    The thing is though is that this is not going to work. It seems to me it's a classic case of a government underestimating the intelligence of its people.

    In short, this may be one of the things that brings the "red curtain" down in China. I can only fear for what will happen afterwards though.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Blocked, is it? by rory77 · · Score: 1

      dude...
      this has nothing to do with blocking "capitalism"..
      China IS capitalist... Ask anyone who has lived there.. There is almost nothing socialized or communalized in the nation....

      what it fears is DEMOCRACY and dissent and gathering. Americans need to stop masturbating over capitalism, there is nothing virtuous about it. A nation can be a capitalist dictatorship or a socialist democracy. The capitalism does NOT make a thing good OR bad..

      But I'll be damned if that democracy doesn't make life better!

      --
      There was a time when the church ruled and everyone believed in god... this time is known as the Dark Ages. --?
  53. Re:p2p - not possible by _Knots · · Score: 1

    Nice try, but unless the routers know where packets are headed they can't route them. And oh, this packet looks like it's headed for port 6346? Ditch it. Oh, you've changed to KaZaa now? That port's toast. Oh, you've decided to get tricky and conviced everybody to use port 80. Nix - you can only visit official websites now. ICMP? Nope, we'll just overwrite any twiddlable bits that might be carrying information.

    Oh, look, "They" can block our information pathways. Sucks, don't it?

    --Knots;

    --
    Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
  54. Translated from the Official China News Service by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    American search engine Google disappeared without a trace Monday morning in what party officials are calling a triumph of morality.

    "Google was long known as a tool for hackers and perverts," said Truth Minister Chu. "It didn't serve any purpose for the greater good of the people, which is why it presumably went out of business without even a goodbye. Every economist knows this rude, erratic behavior is common among companies that can not find a way to serve the needs state."

    Most good citizens won't even miss the Web site.

    "It was too boring," said Jie Zhang, a rice farmer. "There was only one picture on the whole site and it was promoting the self-serving ideals of capitalist branding. Plus many of the pages were in other languages, so the site was useless to me. I'm glad I couldn't understand it, because I wouldn't want to be imprisoned for reading dangerous materials."

    Many citizens said they have never used Google; they remain true to the official Chinese search engine: http:///www...

    (If this had been a real news story, I would have linked to the source. If you still take it seriously after reading this, you deserve to be laughed at. A lot.)

    1. Re:Translated from the Official China News Service by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

      "Google was long known as a tool for hackers and perverts," said Truth Minister Chu.

      Replace "hackers and perverts" with "thought criminals" and you'd have 1984...

  55. Sites inaccessible in China by RPoet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a list of sites Chinese people shouldn't see. The list includes Google, Altavista. Amnesty, geocities, various .mil sites, free speech sites, Slashdot, SourceForge, and some porn sites as well as a variety of politically oriented sites.

    Does the US currently have any plans for a "regime shift" over there? :)

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    1. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Strangely enough, while Amnesty International is blocked, Amnesty's Australian site isn't.

    2. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by MediaBoy77 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      For the record, Slashdot does appear to be available through the Great Firewall:

      Starting testing...
      Stage one testing complete.
      Stage two testing complete.

      Testing complete for http://www.slashdot.org/.
      Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

    3. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does the US currently have any plans for a "regime shift" over there?

      No - China, unlike Iraq, has already developed nuclear weapons.

    4. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by jcast · · Score: 1

      Do you reall think we'd win against China?

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    5. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are only 3 slots in the 'axis of evil' array. One would have to be popped before China could be pushed.

    6. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT!!!

      WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!!

      Time for a pre-emptive strike before they build any more. The world will thank us for it! :-)

    7. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Harvard,

      Thank you for your list of "must see" porn sites.

      A (er...) satisfied Web surfer.

    8. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by Nept · · Score: 2

      umm... I'm having no trouble accessing slashdot from China at this moment. I don't think we need to worry about /. being blocked because it's an english language site, and while a lot of people here in China speak english (in varying degrees) I have yet to find anyone who reads it regularly. I assume they have their own equivalents.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    9. Re:Sites inaccessible in China by giminy · · Score: 2

      No - China, unlike Iraq, has already developed nuclear weapons.

      No - China, unlike Iraq, does not have any large dead dinosaurs.

      :)

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  56. Get rid of the communist leaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's becoming clear that the Chinese government want one thing and the people another.

    Get rid of the communist regime and then you can build for the future. It may not be a perfect future, but it's sure a damn sight better than what you've got now.

  57. Filters & Good Use by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

    Now if they'd at least use those filters to get rid of all the spam, but nooooo, that side of the capitalist west is acceptable. Probably because it brings some cash.

    Then again, maybe the Herbal Viagra and Enlarge Your Penis Now spams are the People's Republic's way of waging a war of terror against us capitalist pigs.

  58. Re:Propoganda by djupedal · · Score: 0

    ...right, and the check is in the mail. How's it feel being duped?

  59. Re:p2p - not possible by CreatorOfSmallTruths · · Score: 1

    It's called "encryption", and I believe it would avoid this.

    no it can't. you can't envrypt the actual port you are using, and if you will try encrypting the http headers a basic firewall can detect it and throw your packets...

  60. My testing result by nonamenoname · · Score: 3, Informative

    First of all, i am living in china, and i am using one adsl connection here, so i think my test is more accuray. Sorry, my english is not so good. From all of my testing result, i can sure that they are using some DYNAMIC PACKET PATTERN MATCHING method to banning sites!
    test 1: As all of you already know, www.google.com access was filtered, although i can still visite it through ircache proxy (sv.us.ircache.net)ï¼OEbut if i input some FORBIDDEN WORDS to search, it instantly stops, and what i get is "connection reset by peer", and in short time it is not available.
    test 2: About the havard testing page, they have a link contains all of the inaccessable sites, but i even can not fully open that page, why? That site is not in the ban list, but it contains some FORBIDDEN WORDS, such of "frxxnet"(i think this is the main reason why they banned sxxxxxfxxge.net).So my explorer just stops after shows the word "frxxnet".
    My opinion is, they are doing pattern matching in packets to stop sensored words, that surely stopped most sites & proxies & emails from working. I think the only thing we can do is build a ssh tunnel outside....FXXK!

    1. Re:My testing result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool
      what words are forbidden?

  61. Re:Not Rumors? by HacTar · · Score: 1

    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://www.google.com. Result:
    Reported as inaccessible in China

    ... is your firewall better than mine?

  62. Possible proxy by GothicManSlut · · Score: 1

    As a result of this, Imm looking into options about getting around it, Im pretty sure if somone setup a squid proxy server, that might allow buddies in china to access censored pages. Right ? Come to thing of it lemme try that out now ;p

  63. Typical by Raul654 · · Score: 2

    When you can't argue the facts, just nitpick the source...

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  64. Has google censored DCSS and Kazaa links yet? by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    Speaking of censorship, what about censorship on our own turf? Google has been good to us so far and has not gone and censored the search results however, how much longer before the RIAA and MPAA sues google for linking to the wrong links?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  65. Still not as many blocks are RIAA and MPAA make by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Troll



    RIAA and MPAA will block anything which allows you to share music, will block you from your ISP if you disagree with their philosophy, will raid your house and throw you in jail for sending music.

    Speaking of censorship if anyone is doing the censorship we censor even more than China.

    In China theres "piracy" but the Chinese while they know piracy does harm certain american business, they should be learning from our mistakes, what they have done is started moving to Redflag linux instead of microsoft, open source solutions solves the piracy problem, people will stop pirating software when software is open source.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  66. Is this really our business? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    If Google is blocked (sounds rumorish to me), then why are we so upset about it?

    I don't know much of anything about China, or any other Asian country for that matter. I just know that they're different in many ways. My values are not the same as theirs. I really don't want to go impressing mine upon them either. If the Chinese people aren't fighting the censorship of Google, then I'm not fighting it either.

    They probably think American kids are nutso about believing in an overweight man who climbs down chimneys and drops off toys every year, but I never had a Chinese person approach me and tell me about the great hoax!

    To put it another way: it's only our problem if they ask for our help. It becomes their problem when we force help on them. Leave them be.

    1. Re:Is this really our business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I just know that they're different in many ways. My values are not the same as theirs.

      What makes you think that their values are ANY different than yours...they're Chinese, not Alien.

      >it's only our problem if they ask for our help.

      I seem to remember they did that before, but their government sent the tanks in...

      >Leave them be.

      Cant remember who said it but....The only thing necessary for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing...

    2. Re:Is this really our business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is the /. audience just western? A lot of Chinese also read /. and isn't this then a way to complain like you just said?

      I happened to be in China and it IS a hoax and a lot of people are complaining about it!

    3. Re:Is this really our business? by jcast · · Score: 1

      Tell that to 19th century abolitionists.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    4. Re:Is this really our business? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "What makes you think that their values are ANY different than yours...they're Chinese, not Alien."

      Well, they don't celebrate Christmas, their new year is different... Come to think of it, why are you asking me such a stupid question? Betcha don't got the balls to answer.

      "I seem to remember they did that before, but their government sent the tanks in..."

      Okay, tell me when exactly the people asked our government to unblock Google? 'I seem to remember' is not a fact.

      "Cant remember who said it but....The only thing necessary for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing..."

      Apples....oranges....bowling balls... If they can't say 'help us' then what good are we gonna do them? Try replying with good points instead of just arguing me for the sake of arguing.

    5. Re:Is this really our business? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "A lot of Chinese also read /. and isn't this then a way to complain like you just said?"

      At the time I wrote that, I hadn't seen anybody saying "Im from China". Sue me.

    6. Re:Is this really our business? by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

      All it takes for evil to thrive is for good men to keep silent. Your attitude is reminicent of that before World War II. Most American's response to Hilter's conquest was exactly word for word what you said. (If the French won't fight for their country, why should we? ) History has shown us time and time again that evil will certaintly thrive in this climate. What will you say when China will attack the US? If you don't believe this is feasible, just look at their enourmous military buildup, their cosyness to the Arab world, and their anti-US attitude in everything they do. It's just a matter of time. Your attitude allows for them to succeed.

      --
      Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
      Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
    7. Re:Is this really our business? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      No it doesnt. That's absurd. This isn't about evilness, it's about choices. There's a difference between cutting off Google and building up arms to invasion.

      Seriously dude, gain some perspective. Everybody acts like I'm stuck on autopilot until the end!

  67. Posession at a party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am from Perth Western Australia and am currently living in Belfast in Northern Ireland.

    My father was catholic and my mother Jehovah witness, my father also used to get violent and walk the house tearing up bibles, so I saw my fair share of turmoil growing up. My girlfriend and I don't class ourselves as any religion.

    In my fathers house, I would hear my name being called, the TV and stereo switching on "by itself". My ex girlfriend would also hear babies crying in the house when she was on her own. These "minor" happening continued for the remaining time I would stay there.

    The next major happening was a night when I invited a large group of friends to a have a party at the house. All the guests left to go to a night club (including my ex girlfriend), except myself and three of my friends. One of my friends had taken a mixture of different drugs and alcohol. About 30 minutes after everyone left, my intoxicated friend started to change. His voice changed, his eyes turned bright read, and his shoulder length hair stood on end. At this time one of my friends sat staring wildly at him, while the other one being very drunk, could not handle it and curled up into a ball on the ground. We could also hear footsteps all around us, and the lid of the cooler box started to flip over on the ground.

    This intoxicated friend started asking us in a crackling voice to hit him and kick him in the face. My other two friends went to the park across the road and left me alone with him. They eventually came back and all this kept happening.

    It stopped about 5 minutes before my ex girlfriend got home. All up it probably went for about 2 - 3 hours.

  68. Google does a body good by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    Two people in the dairy section of a chinese supermarket....

    Chinsese shopper #1 (looking at a milk carton) I didn't know google had their own brand of milk.

    Chinese shopper #2: It's not a brand logo, it's a "missing" picture.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  69. CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least they let the people of china laugh at the americans!

  70. I Guest China want otstart there own Search Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Guest China want otstart there own Search Engine. ie AOL + China Goverment = china.com i Guest they were too jelous that google was far more sperior. that china polled the plugged on google, and when with AOL CRAPY NETLOSE Search Technology instead.

  71. It is a culture thing. by nagarjun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally speaking, many of us in Asian countries do not have a problem with censorship, though may not be in Google'case. There are two reasons for this

    1. Culturally, we are comfortable with others making decsions for us, well into adulthood. Many Indians are fine with arranged marriages, so what's wrong with arranged browsing?! :) The underlying assumption is that elders know best, and sometimes this gets extended to the state as well. Of late though, some youth have started to resent this, but the overwhelming majority remains in favor of censorship in movies, websites, books, whatever.

    2. The other reason of course is there is usually a way to get around censorship. For instance, it is common knowledge that benned X-rated films are freely available. But any talk of legalizing them would be met with huge outcries. As a society, we sometimes have a need to tell ourselves that we are clean of all offensive stuff, though the reality may be something else. I mean, we sometimes willingly fool ourselves...

    Slashdotters from non-Asian countries need to keep this in mind whenever issues of censorship come up.

    1. Re:It is a culture thing. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      You sound like Americans.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:It is a culture thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a European.

    3. Re:It is a culture thing. by jcast · · Score: 1

      That's why y'all got colonized by Europe in the 19th century. Seriously. This kind of subservient attitude does nothing good for a country.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    4. Re:It is a culture thing. by Donthassleme · · Score: 1

      You are a total idiot! I don't usually use 'ad hominems' (attacks on the person) but in your case it is a blatant truth. It is that attitude that makes a country impoverished and ignorant. By handing over the responsiblity of making your own choices you forgo the chance to learn for yourselves. To think the powers that be are acting in your best interest and honestly without prejudice is to show an ignorance for history and current reality. You will have the slavery you have chosen if you continue such thinking.

  72. tasteless by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Given recent Chinese history (and the content of several of the blocked sites dealing with human rights abuses) your gag is somewhat tasteless...

  73. Spiritdaily Blocked By China Too by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    The Spiritdaily website is blocked by China too (according to the real time list). It's the only Catholic or Christian site to be blocked, it seems. Can anyone find other Christian sites which are blocked?

    1. Re:Spiritdaily Blocked By China Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, they definitely got that one right.

      Nationalistic and religious sites should have been banned from the start.

    2. Re:Spiritdaily Blocked By China Too by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      AC, I'll ignore your comment. Or rather I'll tell you my opinion - fake 'religiosity' is bad, real and authentic religion is good. In this world you have both, and the bad makes bad publicity for the good. I believe that everyone has the right to express themselves in a civil manner. I believe that Spiritdaily is a very civil website and should not have been banned.

    3. Re:Spiritdaily Blocked By China Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Story at 11. Catholics are Christians.

    4. Re:Spiritdaily Blocked By China Too by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      People in China might be interested to know that it can also be accessed at the mirror url
      www.spiritdaily.org which is not blocked.

  74. this is old hat but.... by Jewbird · · Score: 1

    i'm in shanghai right now and i'm reading slashdot, so it clearly isn't censored. contrary to the people on this list who aren't nearly as smart as they think they are, the chinese government doesn't give a fuck about pro-democracy sites. they're only concerned really with falun gong sites, as far as i can tell. oh yeah, google doesn't work. as of like yesterday or the day before. hey, check out jewbird.blogspot.com.

    --
    For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods
    1. Re:this is old hat but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you can explain to me what the fuck the chinese govt.'s problem is with falung gong. it's just a bunch of people doing tae bo from what i can tell. why are they considered so threatening?

  75. it's working now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well.. at least it has been for the last 45 minutes or so.. (i'm in shanghai)..
    now i can finally get some work done.. o.. wait.. it's 6:30 PM.. time to go home!

  76. Anybody notice a pattern? by Dthoma · · Score: 2

    It seems as if they're just banning web sites which are (in)famous among the Internet community. All the less obscure (yet equally objectionable sites) are still perfectly accessible. If they just keep banning the most popular sites, then all that will happen is that people will become more discreet in their surfing habits and they won't have any popular sites to block.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  77. Ironic, Isn't It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to email abuse (spam) originating from or relayed through servers located in China, and the fact that Chinese ISPs appear completely unresponsive to complaints, I've got all of China blackholed for SMTP (email).

    Ironic, isn't it, that the Chinese government and ISPs seem to be able to find the time and technology to censor content originating elsewhere in the 'net, but can't seem to come up with the resources to avoid being a source of 'net abuse.

    1. Re:Ironic, Isn't It? by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Where do you think they're earning the money to pay Cisco?

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  78. China seems a touchy subject for yankees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For a country that doesn't really care about the rest of the world (Kyoto, Johannesburg, International court, ...)
    Your so-called 'care' for democracy in China is questionable if not pathetic.

  79. CNN as archetype of freedom in journalism? by pgilman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is tangential to the story, but worth mentioning:

    The original anonymous poster mentions CNN, ostensibly as an example of free western journalism; this is a dangerous premise. As a dual citizen of the USA and a Western European country, I have the opportunity to see things from both sides of the fence, as it were, and I'm here to tell you that most of the mainstream U.S. "news" channels, and particularly CNN, are regarded outside the USA as little more than the U.S.'s propaganda machine; at best a joke, and at worst a shameful abdication of journalistic integrity.

    Here's just one example (there are dozens!): Some of the Slashdot audience may not be old enough to remember the role of the news in the Vietnam era: during that conflict, news channels carried real, uncensored battlefield footage, which was by its nature often graphic and gruesome. People in the USA were able to see what was going on and what it was like; dead people and napalm and all. Consequently, there arose a tremendous opposition to the war, with lots of protests and high-profile objectors; the U.S. government's involvement was highly criticized. These factors certainly influenced the course of the war itself and U.S. policy afterward.

    But the government learned their lesson.

    During recent U.S. conflicts such as the "Gulf War" and the action in Afghanistan, the American "news" has been subject to governmental "guidelines," which allows them to show the public only press briefings and select footage from missile-mounted cameras depicting "surgical strikes" which only kill bad guys, never women and children and civilians. No bodies, not even body counts. Why? The government knows it needs to control public opinion; if we don't know what's going on, we won't object - so the media are subjected to "guidelines" invoked in the name of national security.

    Again: this is only one example; there are many others. The point is that accepting what you see and hear and read in the American mainstream news media at face value is dangerous, like burying your head in the sand. These days, they tell us only what they want us to hear.

    --
    if i'm a grammar nazi, you're an illiteracy nazi.
    1. Re:CNN as archetype of freedom in journalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Basically, feel free to break the guidelines, but then don't expect the opportunity to air any ratings-boosting smart-bomb footage, or indeed any DoD press releases.

      Capitalism in action. ;)

    2. Re:CNN as archetype of freedom in journalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok fine. then tell me where i can get the real news. what am i missing? what's the truth? gimme a website or something.

    3. Re:CNN as archetype of freedom in journalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/

    4. Re:CNN as archetype of freedom in journalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bbcnews.com/ or http://news.bbc.co.uk/
      http://www.timesonline.co. uk/
      http://www.smh.com.au/ ...

      And for the Communist view...
      http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/
      http: //www.gramna.cu/ingles/

      etc.
      etc.

  80. Can Google sue to the WTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all China is stopping them from conducting business in order to promote their own portals?

  81. Yes its missing from my logs by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    I was receiving daily hist from the chineese version of google as people accessed it from china to read about P2P and mobile java programming and technology..

    Now no referrals like that at all..

    I miss my chineese viewers!

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  82. PageRank is rank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  83. f*** PoizonBOx by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Remember the IIS fuck China worm?

    No I don't. I remember the Sadmind worm that spread among Solaris machines and defaced IIS machines with "fuck USA Government fuck PoizonBOx" and a .com.cn e-mail address, and I remember some other worm (Code Red?) that jokes "Welcome to www.worm.com! Hacked by Chinese!" on pages it defaces hosted on servers running USA Windows.

    Oh wait, after a quick search of the web, I find that somebody patched Code Red to use a slight variation of the Sadmind worm's payload: "fuck CHINA Government fuck PoizonBOx".

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:f*** PoizonBOx by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

      Yeah that must be it. I only vaugely recall coming across a defaced IIS default install when scanning my ISP's local subnet.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  84. google mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just juse the google mirror

  85. been to china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is dirty and mostly still primitive, but Chinese censorship isnt so bad. When I was in China just last year I and just about everyone could access every single website we wanted to. The government doesnt even pretend to monitor every computer or even isp. Its a myth created by the right wing that the Chinese "firewall" is this massive all seeing police tool. In reality it barely exists and most Chinese dont know what your talking about when you bring it up. The government has trouble controlling some of its regions. How are they going to control every computer or every ISP? They dont especially since corruption in China is worse than in Russia. You can probably buy your way out of a murder charge as easily as EVERYONE buys themselves out of a speeding ticket.

    1. Re:been to china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They barely control their muslim regions to the north, the Russian border in many places is still in dispute, they still have problems in Tibet and some of the poorer areas in the west of China, but none of these issues are massive or serious enough to threaten the governments overall stability and lets not forger about Taiwan. The Chinese firewall is far from all powerful as you CAN access every site ALMOST everywhere, but it does exist especially on government computers.

  86. It is just a DNS glitch. by Slave1007 · · Score: 1

    One of the explanation for the disappearance of GOOGLE in China is that the DNS has gone wrong, because you can easily access the GOOGLE with IP address. If a site is censored or blocked, the IP address should not work. But it is not true this time.

  87. Another sure shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we all see this coming?

  88. Alltheweb.com? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    There was a slashdot story about alltheweb a while aback, with them claming to be >= google. My own search for my own name yielded more and (possibly even) better results then google. And, like google the superfluous crap is stripped out. It's just a clean interface to search, not a 'portal'.

    They also have a nicer graphic design :P

    Of course, I still use google most of the time because 1) Its easier to type 2) Its hardcoded into my homepage and 3) It usually finds anything I'm looking for.

    If I couldn't get to google, (or if alltheweb had a better domain name) I'd probably use them.

    Otoh, doing in a search in Chinese for "&#36710" (new car) on Alltheweb and got only two results, vs about 4,450 on google.

    Altavista converted the chinese characters into HTML entities (新汽车) and found nothing

    Metacrawler found about 27 results, but displayed the link titles and 'abstracts' in ASCII so they all looked like "ÓÐ×ÅÓÆ¾ÃÄÀúÊ£" or whatever.

    So I dunno. For chinese people doing queries in english alltheweb would be great. I have no idea what could replace google for chinese language searches. Since I'm only barely literate in Chinese I can't really go looking around for native-chinese pages to comment on :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Alltheweb.com? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      My own search for my own name yielded more and (possibly even) better results then google.


      More results yes, but the ranking and relevancy numbers. . . . . rather, err, odd.

      A search for Com2Kid on Google turns up my homepage as the first result.

      A search for Com2Kid on Alltheweb turns up, err, well a lot of stuff, but my homepage is not on the first 4 pages (and I do not really feel like checking much beyond that, nor would anybody actually searching for me)

      The rest of the search results are ordered in a very funny way, where as Google has a strong tendency towards grouping results from a site together in the search result listings, Alltheweb seems to be content with pretty much spreading things around quite randomly. (well sure there is some algorithm being applied, but the usability of the order of the returned links is pretty much akin to them being randomized)


      It's just a clean interface to search, not a 'portal'.


      True, but it appears to be using absolute rather then relative text sizes, thus resulting in the majority of Internet users (IE5.x+) being unable to change the size of the text on the page. That they are using a fairly small font size to begin with does not help matters any either.

      Oh yes, and if I search for a site address, Google gives me the option of retrieving further information about the site, searching for pages that contain that term, showing me a list of pages that link to that site, or showing a list of pages that is simular to the one given.

      If the page is not within Google's database it tells me so and just asks me if I want to use that address as a search term instead.

      Alltheweb just, err, well. Uses the site address as a term to begin with. Hardly as powerful or usable. Not to mention it does not even tell me if the site exists within their database or not.

      Oh, and no cache means I just won't use it period. As it is I do a goodly percent of my browsing solely through the Google cache now, a lot quicker and all that, I do not even bother to click on the main links anymore.

  89. What a suprise, slashdot censors unicode chars.... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Yeh, god forbid people should speak in any language but english around here.

    Otoh, doing in a search in Chinese for "&#36710" (new car) on Alltheweb and got only two results, vs about 4,450 on google.

    The 'new car' would have been 'xin qi che', which theoreticaly you could see by going to the URL about:

    Anyway...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  90. ugh by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    that URL would be about:新汽车

    And no, I (apperantly) can't make it clickable, because /. changes the text in the about part.

    It's so hypocritical the way slashdot argues for free speech but then places so many filters on what you can post, especially since they do it in such a ham-fisted manner, frequently preventing valid points from being posted.

    Oh well, enough bitching for one day.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  91. Ports? Port blocking won't do anything. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    you know, if you got to http://autopr0n.com:8080/ (for example) You'll make an http connection over port 8,080, and talk directly to the apache tomcat servlet/JSP engine rather then going through apache. (but don't do that, there is no mod_gzip on 8080 :P)

    There is no reason I couldn't run a web server, or any other server on any other port. I could even run a p2p app on 80 if I wanted to. Blocking ports only makes things more frustrating for people because things don't work 'out of the box'. A little configuration will get it running in no time.

    Also, a lot of protocols (such as HTTP, as in the example) include port numbers in URLs or other identification. So rather then getting a packet that says "there's another Freenet node on bla.somesite.com" it says something like "there's another Freenet node on bla.somesite.com port 80"

    Freenet can even masquerade as other services, so connecting to them with a non-Freenet client will give you another service ("nothing to see here, move along") which means there is actually (well theoretically) no way to detect Freenet by bulk scanning. (well, actually there's away to get around that... and then another way to get around that workaround, but describing that would take me forever and would be entirely beside the point)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  92. uh, how could they do google.com/china by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    how could google.com be in the US but google.com/china be in china? The could do google.com.cn or google.cn or cn.google.com, but http directories can't be served from different machines without at least connecting to the 'base' machine first and being redirected.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  93. Heh, .tw.cn must be pretty popular. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I'd imagine.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  94. Spreading the word by aengblom · · Score: 2

    Can't get Google?

    Try the recently released Googlemai;
    http://www.capescience.com/google/index.shtml

    send an e-mail to: google@capeclear.com with your query in the subject line.

    Of course, google cache is probably not accessible

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  95. Germany is a special case by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Culterally, these people are really, really scared of Fascists and white supremicists. Kinda hard to blame them, isn't it? So they have all kinds of laws to make sure that Nazis never again get anything resembling power in Germany. For example, giving the "Heil Hitler" salute is illegal in Germany.

    Frankly, I think this is commendable in this specific case. Here's a country that bends over backwards, any way it can, to avoid making the same mistake twice. How many other governments would do the same?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Germany is a special case by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      So they have all kinds of laws to make sure that Nazis never again get anything resembling power in Germany. [...] Frankly, I think this is commendable in this specific case.

      And I would disagree. You drive something underground, you make it cool and anti-establishment - which I understand has happened to Naziism in Germany. But in America, Nazis are idiots; it's not cool to be a Nazi, you just make yourself the target of derision and hatred. Of course, there are huge differences, but the difference is thought-provoking.

      Here's a country that bends over backwards, any way it can, to avoid making the same mistake twice.

      How many countries wouldn't? The US government puts a lot of money and support into combating racism in the US.

      IMO, once you cross that path, you'll never go back. Naziism will never be a serious power in Germany, or anywhere else, again. But the question is, how much nasty stuff will be done in the name of Naziism by punks and jerks trying to be cool and anti-establishment?

  96. doesn't yahoo -use- google? by *weasel · · Score: 1

    did we already forget that?

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:doesn't yahoo -use- google? by Asia-Business · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does. This incident serves to show that the internet self-censorship pledge Yahoo took several weeks ago is virtually meaningless.

      --
      Rich / Asia Business Intelligence / Commentary on Asian Events, with a Focus on China / http://blogs.salon.com/0001319
    2. Re:doesn't yahoo -use- google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely it serves to prove the opposite? i don't think google signed the pledge

    3. Re:doesn't yahoo -use- google? by Asia-Business · · Score: 1

      Google isn't a China-based ISP, the target of the pledge, and would not have been asked. The pledge was supposed to limit the kind of content available to users in China. But Google is still available through yahoo. So the intent of the pledge has been completely circumvented. Whether through strict obedience to an order or through incompentence (or both) is anybody's guess.

      --
      Rich / Asia Business Intelligence / Commentary on Asian Events, with a Focus on China / http://blogs.salon.com/0001319
  97. Quoted in the BBC by Mzilikazi · · Score: 1
    Looks like you got quoted in the Beeb without reference to you or Slashdot:



    Link



    Another contributor to a web forum said he used Google for research, not politics.



    "I'm currently in China right now on a project, and coding without Google is not easy," he said, "especially since there isn't any English bookstore I can run over to while I'm here to pick up a tech manual."



    Cheers,

    Mzilikazi

    --
    Random Musings at Rum Smuggler
    1. Re:Quoted in the BBC by Nept · · Score: 2

      actually, the blocking over here is pretty spotty. If I try going directly to the page via the url, it resolves to this ip:
      216.239.33.101
      and times out. If I ping google, I get back this ip
      216.239.51.100 and can usually run a search. I'm guessing the telco here blocked out a range of IPs and just happened to miss a few.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  98. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poster has a valid point. Google isn't accessible, but "fuckcommunism.com" is? What's going on here?

  99. Google.yahoo.com alive and well for now by alizard · · Score: 2

    I did a search on a site I run that isn't in any Yahoo directory, therefore must be accessed via actual search engine. I'm looking at a URL starting with http://google.yahoo.com . Check it yourself with a search.

  100. Later the same day... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Starting testing... Stage one testing complete. Stage two testing complete. Testing complete for http://google.com/. Result: Reported as accessible in China

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  101. It can't be that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apparently porn.com works just fine

  102. Re:Thank God I'm an CANADIAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even more freedom and the best country in the world!

  103. Peek-A-Booty URL by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    It is opensource, easy to use, and available here.

  104. How about GoogleMail (doing a search via an email) by billylo · · Score: 1

    CapeScience built this GoogleMail to show off the Web Services interface of Google. Email your keyword on the subject line to google@capeclear.com and it will reply you the search results.

    It's not meant to get through censorships, but, you see, the Net is filled with creative ideas.

    It's sad to learn that things like sourceforge.net are also blocked.

  105. NOT COOL. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    I can't believe I got modded down as 'troll' for my post. I was serious. I wanted people to either see my point or tell me (politely) that I'm wrong.

    It burns me up that we think we need to parade our values around town and make everybody assymilate. I can't stand it when religious people try that crap on me.

    Trolling indeed.

  106. Google's Statement by Jamyang · · Score: 1
    Google has always been committed to providing our users with the most open access to information possible.

    We are currently working with Chinese officials to get our full service restored to the millions of Chinese users who depend on Google every day.

    Corporate Communications, Google Inc.

    Jamyang
    see also: Web 'proxies' frustrate censorship efforts

    1. Re:Google's Statement by Jamyang · · Score: 1
      The popular search engine Google has said it is trying to get the ban on its site in China lifted.

      China has made no official comment on the ban on Google. But when asked why Beijing was blocking the search engine, a foreign ministry spokesman defended state controls on online access.

  107. Re:Touche by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

    Then what are you talking about?

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  108. Altavista inaccessible from China by bedelman · · Score: 1

    Right. Multiple tests using our testing system ( http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/test ) have indicated that Altavista.com is inaccessible from China.

  109. Re:Its not by DigitalHammer · · Score: 2, Informative

    This kind of subservient attitude does nothing good for a country.

    Ok, the "subservient attitude" you speak of in Asian countries is a byproduct of the Asian stereotype broadcasted throughout your country. (assuming you live in America). That stereotype labels Asians as submissive, docile people. However, as I am of Asian descent myself, I can state that most of the Asians you will encounter today in their native homelands, for example the Chinese, are, for the most part, either aggresive, fast-paced, witty, or a combination of all three.

    That's why y'all got colonized by Europe in the 19th century.

    Against their will, that is. The "subservient attitude" is not entirely to blame for European colonization in Asian countries; rather, it was concepts of Social Darwinism and the "White Man's Burden" ideals popular during the time. Note that this idea was definetly not well accepted by the Filipinos (as depicted by the war between America and the Phillipines after the Spanish-American war), China's Communist and Cultural Revolution (in which almost all peoples of non-Chinese descent were banished from the country, and "foreign" buildings such as churchs were destroyed). Also, China's Boxer Rebellion is a perfect example to disprove the "submissive, docile" stereotype.

    Who are you referring to by the word "y'all"? The Asiatic peoples as a whole? If so, the "y'all got colonized by the Europeans..." statement is partially incorrect. While India, Vietnam, Laos, the Phillipines, and a throng of other Asian countries were technically colonized, China, Thailand, and especially Japan, were not.

  110. Good points, but... by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    The US actually isn't working all that hard to combat bigotry - it's been detaining Arab-looking men more or less at random. And as for how much damage Nazi punks will do in Germany - not much, for the simple reason German police don't put up with this nonsense. If you're a Nazi, they come and throw you in prison. Very simple.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Good points, but... by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      If you're a Nazi, they come and throw you in prison.

      If you are stupid enough to wave a Nazi flag around. On the other hand, I can't remember the last time a synagouge got attacked in the US, whereas there are a number of cases of Jews being attacked in Germany. If you search for Jews on the Amnesty International, I get them being attacked in Germany and being considered two sympathetic to keep on a jury in the US.

    2. Re:Good points, but... by a1g2b3 · · Score: 1
      I can't remember the last time a synagouge got attacked in the US
      Uh.

      Try typing in "synagogue" and "arson" into google. Replace "arson" with "shooting" if you want a different set of news articles.
  111. Translation of Taiwan paper's article by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 1

    My Wife saw this this morning. The main point was the Cache. If I can remember I'll post the link later (maybe there's someone around who'd enjoy translating the whole thing and typing it up).

  112. Re:Its not by jcast · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I'm mis-informed. I was simply going off what nagarjun said. If I'm wrong, I'm glad I'm wrong. I hate to see a people incapable of freedom (like nagarjun basically said the Asians were). If the Asians prefer freedom, more power to them, I say.

    --
    There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
    -- David D. Friedman
  113. china... by eventhorizon5 · · Score: 1

    Well, this is a classic example of how stupid Communism and Socialism (the abolition of private property) are. They just simply move societies towards an absolute dictatorship, aka Nazism (Totalitarianism) that implements Fascism (government control of corporate markets) to get it's way. It's got it's own little name too... Left-wing extremism. Click this link to see an economic chart and see where China stands: Economic-Political spectrum

    --
    #Secret Windows Source Code, in MS C% - if (uptime >= "24 hours") then bsod() else print "Windows License Violation!"
    1. Re:china... by Proquar · · Score: 1

      That link is as spurious as the argument.

      (I'd be quite happy to see Americans use their right to remain silent much more than their infamous 'freedom of speech')

      --
      ---- *dog sitting next to a computer, with his beady eyes shifting left to right*
  114. China refuses to come into the 20th century by borgheron · · Score: 1

    China needs to face reality. Any country willing to run over it's people with tanks because they dared to speak out for freedom deserves whatever comes it's way.

    China has not even come close to improving its stance on human rights due to the old, power hungry, selfish, dictators who are running it.

    I cannot believe that the US has given China anything approaching "most favored nation" trade status given China's utter refusal to treat it's people like human beings. No wonder I have known so many Chinese immigrants who were happy to get out of there since the goverment is so totalitarian and evil.

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  115. HELL YES! And I'm an American so I should know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada r0cks the hizouse!!

  116. OpenFind Now Slamming My Site, A Coincidence? by meehawl · · Score: 2

    So I was checking my logs and a spider for some new Chinese Google lookalike site, OpenFind, is crawling my site voraciously. It's not shy and retiring like the GoogleBot but instead likes to swallow a lot of resources. Reminds me of the nasty AltaVista bot in its heyday.

    Anyway, knowing the way business gets done in China, perhaps someone in the party-military-industrial complex with serious guanxi got Google firewalled to make a nice cosy space for this OpenFind in the Chinese marketplace?

    --

    Da Blog
  117. Ignorance is bliss. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The fact that you don't understand the difference between censorship and copyright infringement and protection of minors (even against themselves) shows clearly you are one of the many people that will not and can not defend effectively their rights.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  118. Ye takes the king's money... by SkipChaser · · Score: 1

    China is communist (big news), China censors its people (more big news), so why is it a surprise that they would try to control the internet.
    Everyone that does business with them will eventually be asked to giveup something.
    We need to know about what Boeing is giving up in order to sell 747s to the PRC.
    Yahoo had to cut a deal and allow itself to be censored.
    What did GM giveup to get all their tool line made in China?
    Cisco sold them the routers that facillitates the censorship. What did they giveup and why did the Clinton Administration allow it.
    I read somewhere that there is only 4 internet pipelines in and out of the PRC all controlled by the government's computer communes.
    Thousands of government workers monitoring usage and censoring sites. If I'm wrong, show me where I can find out the truth about this. Thanks.

    --
    Supra et Ultra
  119. Google VP Sergey Brin's DynURL announcement by Jamyang · · Score: 1
  120. Re:Google VP Sergey Brin's DynURL announcement by Jamyang · · Score: 1
  121. China blocks access to all .tk domains by MoonRock · · Score: 1
    I was surprised to read about China blocking Google...and was looking around the Net for other Chinese censorship. Anyone hear about this one? I came across a Press Release about China beating up on a little Island in the South Pacific called Tokelau. I ended up emailing back and forth with a Rep. at the Registry (called DOT TK) and am told that the situation is still unresolved. They have no news from the Chinese on why they did it or if it will ever reverse the block.

    Could it be, as the DOT TK Rep speculated...that because they offer free ccTLD domains and within just a few months from the time they introduced the service, they had registered 250,000 domains, 60,000 of them by Chinese citizens (more than double the number of domains for Chinese citizens than the country has registered for its own .CN domains)...that .tk represented some sort of Internet territorial threat?

    If anyone thinks they know why the Chinese blocked all .tk domains, or can find out, I would be really interested to hear.

    Their site is http://www.dot.tk.

    Anyway, here is an excerpt from the Press Release. The whole release can be found at:

    http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020625/phtu016_1.html

    Largest Country in the World Blocks Internet Access to Websites Of One of the Smallest Countries in the World,
    Announces Dot TK

    The islands of Tokelau, with just 1500 inhabitants, consisting of three little atolls in the South Pacific Ocean face a ban from the largest country in the world: the Peoples Republic of China.

    China's Data Communication Bureau, residing at the Ministry of Information Industry, has blocked access to all websites bearing a .TK domain name. Many years ago, the International Standard Organization assigned Tokelau their .TK extension, just as .DE is assigned to Germany and .JP to Japan. Tokelau accepts registrations from all over the world. That's why the registry is larger than countries like Sweden or Russia.

    Currently there are more then 220,000 websites containing a .TK domain name, which are not reachable by any Chinese individual or company.

    The reason why the Data Communication Bureau blocked access to the .TK websites is unknown. Taloha tried to contact the Ministry of Information Industry several times in the last couple of weeks, but without success. The content displayed on the 60,000 Chinese websites, registered with a .TK domain name, varies from search engines to vacation-photo collections.

    More information about Dot TK and the Islands of Tokelau can be found on www.dot.tk.

  122. Re:Not Rumors -- google proxies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should just set up some millions of proxies so the Chinese government has the choice of
    accepting it or completly cut China off the Internet maybe then will the Chinese people realize what is hapening. Need a proxy?:

    http://141.40.144.104:5189/

  123. I love China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I live in China I was rather surprised; a couple days ago, to find that I could not access Google. Originally I thought that it was a problem on Googles end, until I saw an article in the South China Morning Post (HK English newspaper). According the SCMP the Chinese government turned off access to Google because they wanted to prevent access to anti-Jiang Zemin websties. Apparently the Chinese government wants to spruce up its image for the 16th party congress, and what better way than by preventing access to websites that point out the corruption and general stupidity of the communist party. Now since I live in China I think that this is a wonderful idea, and I complement the Chinese on their intelligent decision. I also think the Jiang Zemin is a fantastic leader, who is not only extremely intelligent, but also very witty and good-looking.

  124. what about a strike back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone who can hack the great firewall, let's do it.

    that will be fun hey..