I started out using Andromeda and switched to Zina.
Zina is a graphical interface to your MP3 collection, a personal jukebox, an MP3 streamer. It can run on its own, embeded into an existing website, or as a Postnuke/PHPNuke module. It is similar to Andromeda, but released under the GNU General Public License.
Apple now offers its entire suite of professional applications optimized to leverage the performance advantages of the Power Mac G5. Mac-based hardware and software from Apple and our partners form the backbone of professional workflows at every level of video and audio production, so the industry moves with us. Keep up. Whatever your choice in tools and formats, there's room for them and for you on the Apple platform for professional digital production.
" The eMac is a dorky unit. It also represents what is a glaring hole in the Apple line. There is a huge market of consumers that are buying low end PCs in that $500-700 range. The only unit Apple has to compete with that is the eMac. Now someone somewhere might think that is a good option, but I haven't met that person.
What Apple needs for this market is a low-end tower. Potential switchers should have the option of buying a mid tower with the eMac specs (800Mhz G4, 128MB RAM, 40GB drive, CD) for $600. If you are trying to get people to switch, it kind of goes without saying that they already have a monitor. A low-end tower would let them get into a Mac at a more attractive price while retaining the equipment they already paid for. "
Would an $600 iTower mean more switchers or cannibalize PowerMac sales?
Re:From the "Reminds me of this classic prose" guy
on
Review: Harry Potter
·
· Score: 1
You can buy the British version in softcover from
www.amazon.co.uk
and have them shipped to the U.S.
1) Forced Open Standards on all M$ apps.
2) Release whatever kneebreaking agreement M$ has with IBM over OS/2 Warp
3) Allow IBM to market Warp as IBM Windows with similiar name scheme (ME/2000/XP etc...)
Yes, this would create confusion for the customer but they would figure it out quickly enough. I think this would quickly create a huge competitor for M$ with backbone that has a BIG ax to grind.
1) Forced Open Standards on all M$ apps.
2) Release whatever kneebreaking agreement M$ has with IBM over OS/2 Warp
3) Allow IBM to market Warp as IBM Windows with similiar name scheme (ME/2000/XP etc...)
Yes, this would create confusion for the custom but they would figure it out quickly enough. Now we have a huge competitor with backbone that has an ax to grind.
Slashdot Mirror
BB screwed me over years ago with its anti-costomer policies.
I haven't been back and always direct people to other stores and better buys.
I started out using Andromeda and switched to Zina.
Zina is a graphical interface to your MP3 collection, a personal jukebox, an MP3 streamer. It can run on its own, embeded into an existing website, or as a Postnuke/PHPNuke module. It is similar to Andromeda, but released under the GNU General Public License.
Zina Website
Apple now offers its entire suite of professional applications optimized to leverage the performance advantages of the Power Mac G5. Mac-based hardware and software from Apple and our partners form the backbone of professional workflows at every level of video and audio production, so the industry moves with us. Keep up. Whatever your choice in tools and formats, there's room for them and for you on the Apple platform for professional digital production.
Apple - Software - Pro
also noticed this for the first time linked to at the bottom of the apple's main page
G3/Mac OS X Settlement
Dated: September 2, 2003
that looks like a fun home project but I would start here when looking for a small office server Penguin Computing Relion Servers
here is a nice piece of kit I've been really happy with
Spire U.S.A.
Maybe M$ wants access to Apple source code. Longhorn is due 2005 after all.
saw this on macwrite
http://www.macwrite.com/yourturn/windows-guy-buys- mac.php
" The eMac is a dorky unit. It also represents what is a glaring hole in the Apple line. There is a huge market of consumers that are buying low end PCs in that $500-700 range. The only unit Apple has to compete with that is the eMac. Now someone somewhere might think that is a good option, but I haven't met that person.
What Apple needs for this market is a low-end tower. Potential switchers should have the option of buying a mid tower with the eMac specs (800Mhz G4, 128MB RAM, 40GB drive, CD) for $600. If you are trying to get people to switch, it kind of goes without saying that they already have a monitor. A low-end tower would let them get into a Mac at a more attractive price while retaining the equipment they already paid for. "
Would an $600 iTower mean more switchers or cannibalize PowerMac sales?
You can buy the British version in softcover from www.amazon.co.uk and have them shipped to the U.S.
Hows this.
1) Forced Open Standards on all M$ apps.
2) Release whatever kneebreaking agreement M$ has with IBM over OS/2 Warp
3) Allow IBM to market Warp as IBM Windows with similiar name scheme (ME/2000/XP etc...)
Yes, this would create confusion for the customer but they would figure it out quickly enough. I think this would quickly create a huge competitor for M$ with backbone that has a BIG ax to grind.
Hows this.
1) Forced Open Standards on all M$ apps.
2) Release whatever kneebreaking agreement M$ has with IBM over OS/2 Warp
3) Allow IBM to market Warp as IBM Windows with similiar name scheme (ME/2000/XP etc...)
Yes, this would create confusion for the custom but they would figure it out quickly enough. Now we have a huge competitor with backbone that has an ax to grind.