Slashdot Mirror


User: mebert

mebert's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:I am VERY surprised... on Programming As a Part of a Science Education? · · Score: 1

    I concur. I recently finished my Ph.D. in applied (computational) physics, focusing on Materials Science. I'm now a postdoc in a very well regarded engineering program, doing an entirely different kind of computational work (NEGF quantum transport). The most important trend I have seen across several disciplines is the practice of writing highly efficient, modular, numerical libraries (e.g. molecular dynamics, kinetic Monte Carlo, ab initio first principles, linear solvers) in C or Fortran, then creating wrappers for those libraries in Ruby, Perl, Python, Tcl, Matlab, etc. One can quickly write very flexible and adaptable tools without delving into the complex guts of a code. Ruby makes this process so easy, and the language itself is beautiful. I write all my top level simulation tools in Ruby, calling C libraries, and the data analysis is easily done in Ruby as well.

  2. Re:Unity in the product line on Phoenix and Minotaur Get New Names · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the one called Balrog.

  3. Re:The net isn't rocket science on World of Ends Public Draft · · Score: 1

    Hide the dog well.

    You'll never find him now! HAHAHA!

  4. Re:age-old answer: it depends on Use of Math Languages and Packages in Research? · · Score: 1

    I agree. For hardcore numerical work, most people write custom code. In our group, it's C/Fortran 90 with LAPACK, FFTPACK, mpi, ... libraries. For data analysis and visualization, Mathematica and IDL are our tools of choice.

  5. Re:Demonstrage *the power* of the command line! on Getting Started In Linux · · Score: 1

    rm -rf /