He could have searched for somebody knowing tech among the republican, launched a call for a republican with fair and balanced view. He did not. He took an industry lobbyist, which had already very publicly made clear of its view.
Look that canard get touted by gun fans every time. I am sorry this is wrong. There is a reason we progressed as weapon from blunt object, to less blunt object (stone axe, stone spear, some bows) to bronze weapon and far weapon(spear, sword, arrow & bow) to iron weapon, it was a progress. WHY the FUCK do you think no FUCKING army in the world are still using ANYTHING BUT guns. I am sorry for the caps but I am screaming here. Because it is highly inefficient to use anything but a gun/riffle you dolt. With a non distance weapon you got to go to your target, target can dodge, can use other object to protect, can use arm (and yes get wounded) to defend, can run away (with a gun or riffle this is not always a winning proposition - much much harder to stab somebody with a knife while that person is running away). You don't necessarily die from 1 stab either, so while that person is trying to stab you passerby can stop her. And I pass many other. Saying that person could have killed as many or even 1 person if she had no access to gun is the most quasi lie that gun proponent keep touting. Is anybody swallowing that lie I do wonder? Or are you convincing yourself ?
They are mostly 22/7 , looking at the Rhein Main Verkehr (e.g. rmv.de) there is a pause between 01:40 and 3:40 where there is no SBahn. UBahn is a different beast. I am wagering that some line for the 24/7 of NYC are empty at some time of the night.
I am not sure the US and the EU had the same definition of naked and half naked. Looking at the microsoft dancing GDC women, first I see people everywhere naming them dancing girl. They are women. Dancing girl is already one step to remove them agency (women->girl). But yeah let us ignore that. Most article I can find say they are half naked. Nope. They are what we call in Europe maybe at worst lightly clothed, or sexy dancing outfit at best, but not half naked. Half naked is when your breast or your bottom are uncovered. When you have a bathing suit which cover both you are still not half naked. But in the case of the dancing women, they had far more coverage, from the picture I saw they had short skirt and some sort of bikini/tank top. So while i don't care about dancing women at my game party, I view the US coverage I saw on that incident really funny: lightly clothed dancing women => half naked dancing girl. *shrug*.
Actualy slavery was considered immoral by many even before that. In the 13th century germany it was considered immoral enough to be put in the law. In 14th century it was abolished by law in france, and that include serfdom. And i pass many other. Where did you get this bullshit about slavery being seen as ok before the 18th ? I am guessing you are taking an US centric view, or you are not well aware that by the 18th century slavery was already in its way to be extinguished.
Those of us who cared for their privacy and are horrified at facebook or other social media practice, ALREADY limited their use strictly. Those of us who "vomit" their private live on social media, did not care to begin with and will probably not move. The only real solution is to lobby for stronger privacy rule and data protection, which we get in Europe. Good luck with that in the US.
You are possibly sarcastic playing on the bail out. Well done. If you are not sarcastic : bitcoin even with "overinflated" value is 1/100 of the bailout value, and so far as I can tell no fiduciary institution was insane enough to buy any relevant amount.
The thing is in EU we are big on rehabilitation, and having your past crime come splat right into a new hiring would fly in the face of rehabilitation. That journalistic exception (there are other one for public figure and politician which have no right to be forgotten if i recall correctly and there are some crime which are excluded) means that you have a right to be forgotten from SEARCH ENGINE, but not from journal. e.g. CNN report you stole a dildo, then google link it. You do your time and want to work in a dildo factory, you invoke the right to be forgotten and have the link in google removed, but CNN is NOT affected and can still display the article if you search in cnn.com , or if you have the direct link. Google is claiming they are "journal" more or less for the search engine which fly in the face of that law, and of all precedent on what is considered journalism by court. I hope they get stamped out. There is a good reason the right to be forgotten was required : without it, rehabilitation is nigh impossible as google do not forget anything. So unless you were called joe smith, in all practicality rehabilitation cannot work if googling your name list your past crime. And before somebody invoke some excuse to need to be informed bullshit : in past society as far as 1990 (LOL) you HAD that right to be forgotten de facto as baring somebody doing a research on microfiche there was no easy way to look up for news like that, and that'S how rehabilitation can only work. Otherwise if you do anything, it get hanged around your neck like a dead albatross and makes not only rehabilitation impossible and thus far far more probable for you to recommit (compare recommit crime in Sweden with US....) but that dead albatross almost certainly makes you a pariah for other part of society for the rest of your life.
Imagine that instead of replacing the chip, they wait the card is activated , murder the victim and steal the card. Same effect they have an activated card. OK so no what ? Maybe for ecommerce you can use that, but then again so would simply write down the card number and write down the 3 digits number behind - no need to replace the chip. But you still cannot use the card to withdraw fund because you haven't have the pin...
Advertiser do not care much for fish gut, but neither do they think it will damage them - fish are not considered cute by most. On the other hand animals which people see as "cute" could damage the brand if seen associated. So no it isn't about SJW or whatever , it is most probably in this case solely about not putting advertiser in a bind. That is why most of the content is getting sanitized and demonetized : it is too extreme for advertiser. And unfortunately for the right, the advertiser see the writing on the wall, and see many of such view as not advertising friendly. That is why something about feminism or similar left "wingish" issues (even a bit extreme) has faaaaar more chance to stay monetized than something right wing thema with the same fanatism.
By the time something so catastrophal happen the chance you find a shop filled with goods are nil. They will be looted ir sold out and not reshelved. If infrastructure is gone then your cash is also worthless.
Because cash is a pita for both client and shop. You need change, you need to secure it (you can be robbed either as shop or client), if stolen you cant secure it : it is gone, you need to withdraw cash so you lose time going to an atm and during long week end money can be absent etc... i was a cash believer but as i got older i found cash to become a nuisance.
I was , what , 12 ? When I found out my floppy disk original ultima 5 disk stopped working "please insert original". I had started a month before to play around with debug to learn about how to make a ball (actually an ascii O) bounce around a screen. So I went into debug and used it against ultima.com (yes it wasn't even an exe at that time we were still in the 64K segment model). After bypassing the int 3h trap (they were replacing it with a jump to avoid people using it to set a breakpoint) I found out there were about 30 bytes IIRC which were encrypted (started using a single byte key, XOR it against first byte, then add 3 to key, XOR agaisnt next byte etc...). In that XORed area I found out that they were making a strange disk call (can't recall what it was, trying to set it on a track which should not exists but was present on the disk or the contrary) repalced it with 90h / NOP / reencrypted it, exchanged the byte in debug.com write it et voila i could play my legally owned game.
You never forget your first time;). It is actually what brought me to in the end land in development. And I doubt any 12 year old would be able to have the same chance or the same start today.
Irrational phobia would be to run screaming when one see the PICTURE of a gun. To view gun as a dangerous instrument which should not be owned by the general public (general public which I remind everybody obey a gaussian law when it comes to pretty much everything related to intelligence , safety) is actually not a phobia, it is pretty much the rule in most of the western world. The US is an aberration when it comes to that. Albeit I will admit that the lack of rules (even California is weak compared to the standard in western Europe) is not the only factor. I have suspected for a long time that societal factor like the lack of care for mental illness, and the lack of societal net to avoid you falling down the crack in debt and despair, are also 2 gigantic factors.
Nobody accuse gun of the violence. The people are always the source of the violence. BUT the point is that you can take steps to lower the access of guns to some people, and lower the amount of accidents done with it. Heck if the law only allow in the end to reduce the amount of fatal gun violence among 12 year d kids (yes there are kids as low as 4 year old which die every year - not many but enough to be incredibly sad) that would be progress. But NAAAAAAN guns must be freeeeee man. Second amendment babbbby. Nothing should stop anybody to have a gun and store it in any condition. Evaaaar. No you will excuse my sarcasm but your strawman earned it.
From what i can see most chrome and ue browser usage are due to being default on the OS/hardware they are on. I woukd wager a very small percentage use it as a conscious choice, OTOH i am relatively certain that is a huge percentage for non standard browser.
If you look at the western hemisphere, the US has the most restrictive, the most slow immigration process, and particularly make it very hard to be a political/war refugee.
The finding of facts in the report can be used. It is the interpretation of those facts which is out of bound of the court. E.g. if NSTB find out there was tension work of the rod that day, that there was a 21 inch V form crack on member 11/member 12, and that the road was not closed contrary to best practice, it can be used as a fact in the court. But any interpretation of those facts ("it was likely involved in the failure" / "it was not likely involved in the failure") will not be admissible.
"giving them ammunition to potentially roll back industry standards worldwide"
I am sorry ? But since then the US is setting standard WORLDWIDE on emission, pollution , or whatnot ? For fuck's sake they can't even adhere to a unit measurement standard like the meter...
"could not be confirmed as eligible" does not mean in my book "are fraud". Sounds to me you interpret it that way when the report does not explicitely state it.
Slashdot Mirror
He could have searched for somebody knowing tech among the republican, launched a call for a republican with fair and balanced view. He did not. He took an industry lobbyist, which had already very publicly made clear of its view.
Look that canard get touted by gun fans every time. I am sorry this is wrong. There is a reason we progressed as weapon from blunt object, to less blunt object (stone axe, stone spear, some bows) to bronze weapon and far weapon(spear, sword, arrow & bow) to iron weapon, it was a progress. WHY the FUCK do you think no FUCKING army in the world are still using ANYTHING BUT guns. I am sorry for the caps but I am screaming here. Because it is highly inefficient to use anything but a gun/riffle you dolt. With a non distance weapon you got to go to your target, target can dodge, can use other object to protect, can use arm (and yes get wounded) to defend, can run away (with a gun or riffle this is not always a winning proposition - much much harder to stab somebody with a knife while that person is running away). You don't necessarily die from 1 stab either, so while that person is trying to stab you passerby can stop her. And I pass many other. Saying that person could have killed as many or even 1 person if she had no access to gun is the most quasi lie that gun proponent keep touting. Is anybody swallowing that lie I do wonder? Or are you convincing yourself ?
They are mostly 22/7 , looking at the Rhein Main Verkehr (e.g. rmv.de) there is a pause between 01:40 and 3:40 where there is no SBahn. UBahn is a different beast. I am wagering that some line for the 24/7 of NYC are empty at some time of the night.
I am not sure the US and the EU had the same definition of naked and half naked. Looking at the microsoft dancing GDC women, first I see people everywhere naming them dancing girl. They are women. Dancing girl is already one step to remove them agency (women->girl). But yeah let us ignore that. Most article I can find say they are half naked. Nope. They are what we call in Europe maybe at worst lightly clothed, or sexy dancing outfit at best, but not half naked. Half naked is when your breast or your bottom are uncovered. When you have a bathing suit which cover both you are still not half naked. But in the case of the dancing women, they had far more coverage, from the picture I saw they had short skirt and some sort of bikini/tank top. So while i don't care about dancing women at my game party, I view the US coverage I saw on that incident really funny: lightly clothed dancing women => half naked dancing girl. *shrug*.
Actualy slavery was considered immoral by many even before that. In the 13th century germany it was considered immoral enough to be put in the law. In 14th century it was abolished by law in france, and that include serfdom. And i pass many other. Where did you get this bullshit about slavery being seen as ok before the 18th ? I am guessing you are taking an US centric view, or you are not well aware that by the 18th century slavery was already in its way to be extinguished.
Those of us who cared for their privacy and are horrified at facebook or other social media practice, ALREADY limited their use strictly. Those of us who "vomit" their private live on social media, did not care to begin with and will probably not move. The only real solution is to lobby for stronger privacy rule and data protection, which we get in Europe. Good luck with that in the US.
You are possibly sarcastic playing on the bail out. Well done. If you are not sarcastic : bitcoin even with "overinflated" value is 1/100 of the bailout value, and so far as I can tell no fiduciary institution was insane enough to buy any relevant amount.
Private entity are free to censure. Since reddit is private...
there is nigh such thing as proof in astronomy or physic or heck even biology or chemistry.
The thing is in EU we are big on rehabilitation, and having your past crime come splat right into a new hiring would fly in the face of rehabilitation. That journalistic exception (there are other one for public figure and politician which have no right to be forgotten if i recall correctly and there are some crime which are excluded) means that you have a right to be forgotten from SEARCH ENGINE, but not from journal. e.g. CNN report you stole a dildo, then google link it. You do your time and want to work in a dildo factory, you invoke the right to be forgotten and have the link in google removed, but CNN is NOT affected and can still display the article if you search in cnn.com , or if you have the direct link. Google is claiming they are "journal" more or less for the search engine which fly in the face of that law, and of all precedent on what is considered journalism by court. I hope they get stamped out. There is a good reason the right to be forgotten was required : without it, rehabilitation is nigh impossible as google do not forget anything. So unless you were called joe smith, in all practicality rehabilitation cannot work if googling your name list your past crime. And before somebody invoke some excuse to need to be informed bullshit : in past society as far as 1990 (LOL) you HAD that right to be forgotten de facto as baring somebody doing a research on microfiche there was no easy way to look up for news like that, and that'S how rehabilitation can only work. Otherwise if you do anything, it get hanged around your neck like a dead albatross and makes not only rehabilitation impossible and thus far far more probable for you to recommit (compare recommit crime in Sweden with US....) but that dead albatross almost certainly makes you a pariah for other part of society for the rest of your life.
It remove compromise from the equation. And having non independent groups draw voting zone line further push the knife in the back.
Imagine that instead of replacing the chip, they wait the card is activated , murder the victim and steal the card. Same effect they have an activated card. OK so no what ? Maybe for ecommerce you can use that, but then again so would simply write down the card number and write down the 3 digits number behind - no need to replace the chip. But you still cannot use the card to withdraw fund because you haven't have the pin...
The chip is supposed to also contain keys and pins. How do the crook even replace that ?
Advertiser do not care much for fish gut, but neither do they think it will damage them - fish are not considered cute by most. On the other hand animals which people see as "cute" could damage the brand if seen associated. So no it isn't about SJW or whatever , it is most probably in this case solely about not putting advertiser in a bind. That is why most of the content is getting sanitized and demonetized : it is too extreme for advertiser. And unfortunately for the right, the advertiser see the writing on the wall, and see many of such view as not advertising friendly. That is why something about feminism or similar left "wingish" issues (even a bit extreme) has faaaaar more chance to stay monetized than something right wing thema with the same fanatism.
By the time something so catastrophal happen the chance you find a shop filled with goods are nil. They will be looted ir sold out and not reshelved. If infrastructure is gone then your cash is also worthless.
Because cash is a pita for both client and shop. You need change, you need to secure it (you can be robbed either as shop or client), if stolen you cant secure it : it is gone, you need to withdraw cash so you lose time going to an atm and during long week end money can be absent etc... i was a cash believer but as i got older i found cash to become a nuisance.
I was , what , 12 ? When I found out my floppy disk original ultima 5 disk stopped working "please insert original". I had started a month before to play around with debug to learn about how to make a ball (actually an ascii O) bounce around a screen. So I went into debug and used it against ultima.com (yes it wasn't even an exe at that time we were still in the 64K segment model). After bypassing the int 3h trap (they were replacing it with a jump to avoid people using it to set a breakpoint) I found out there were about 30 bytes IIRC which were encrypted (started using a single byte key, XOR it against first byte, then add 3 to key, XOR agaisnt next byte etc...). In that XORed area I found out that they were making a strange disk call (can't recall what it was, trying to set it on a track which should not exists but was present on the disk or the contrary) repalced it with 90h / NOP / reencrypted it, exchanged the byte in debug.com write it et voila i could play my legally owned game.
;). It is actually what brought me to in the end land in development. And I doubt any 12 year old would be able to have the same chance or the same start today.
You never forget your first time
Irrational phobia would be to run screaming when one see the PICTURE of a gun. To view gun as a dangerous instrument which should not be owned by the general public (general public which I remind everybody obey a gaussian law when it comes to pretty much everything related to intelligence , safety) is actually not a phobia, it is pretty much the rule in most of the western world. The US is an aberration when it comes to that. Albeit I will admit that the lack of rules (even California is weak compared to the standard in western Europe) is not the only factor. I have suspected for a long time that societal factor like the lack of care for mental illness, and the lack of societal net to avoid you falling down the crack in debt and despair, are also 2 gigantic factors.
Nobody accuse gun of the violence. The people are always the source of the violence. BUT the point is that you can take steps to lower the access of guns to some people, and lower the amount of accidents done with it. Heck if the law only allow in the end to reduce the amount of fatal gun violence among 12 year d kids (yes there are kids as low as 4 year old which die every year - not many but enough to be incredibly sad) that would be progress. But NAAAAAAN guns must be freeeeee man. Second amendment babbbby. Nothing should stop anybody to have a gun and store it in any condition. Evaaaar. No you will excuse my sarcasm but your strawman earned it.
e.g. shooting yourself in the head is not 100% fatal. But in this case, the procedure always lead to brain death.
From what i can see most chrome and ue browser usage are due to being default on the OS/hardware they are on. I woukd wager a very small percentage use it as a conscious choice, OTOH i am relatively certain that is a huge percentage for non standard browser.
If you look at the western hemisphere, the US has the most restrictive, the most slow immigration process, and particularly make it very hard to be a political/war refugee.
The finding of facts in the report can be used. It is the interpretation of those facts which is out of bound of the court. E.g. if NSTB find out there was tension work of the rod that day, that there was a 21 inch V form crack on member 11/member 12, and that the road was not closed contrary to best practice, it can be used as a fact in the court. But any interpretation of those facts ("it was likely involved in the failure" / "it was not likely involved in the failure") will not be admissible.
I am sorry ? But since then the US is setting standard WORLDWIDE on emission, pollution , or whatnot ? For fuck's sake they can't even adhere to a unit measurement standard like the meter...
"could not be confirmed as eligible" does not mean in my book "are fraud". Sounds to me you interpret it that way when the report does not explicitely state it.