It has nothing at all to do with over-development in what used to be (and by all rights and common sense, still ought to be) swampland and coastal forest.
FLOSS isn't "out in the open;" it's unknown. We don't KNOW that it's affected, and the "may be affected" line in the summary is purely speculative. The known affected parties were notified and given a short time to fix, as is standard procedure. If these security bug disclosure sites had unlimited resources, no one would be out in the cold. Alas, it cannot be.
Your experience is an outlier. The elderly are using the internet with increasing regularity; but that number falls off drastically after 75; of whom only a fifth use the internet with regularity (Pew Research; you know how to Google, unlike my grandparents).
No. Grandmothers share recipes on weathered old index cards. Hipster millennials who can't cook worth a damn use FB to share "Tasty" videos of shit recipes with not enough salt.
The thing is, they are trying really hard to emulate Roger Ebert's classic "North" review, and falling far, far, short: http://www.rogerebert.com/revi...
Yeah, BUT they select from a curated list of critics. Recently, many of these critics (Chicago Tribune, I'm looking at you) that see movie critique as an opportunity to show off their acerbic wit in a series of ever increasingly scathing roasts. At this point, I'm wondering if some of these critics actually enjoy movies. Basically, I have to take RT ratings with a grain of salt.
I wasn't trying to make any kind of threat analysis. That's a whole Intelligence specialty I'm not trained it. I was simply pointing out that Google is not a significant source of surveillance info compared to spy satellites.
Slashdot Mirror
Guess who has two thumbs and bought a D-Link router yesterday?
*This* dumbass. :(
It's likely too late for anyone with mod points to see it, but you should get modded up.
I think both you and the GP need a healthy dose of [citation needed].
I say, the hot, molten magma fields are quite muggy today.
It has nothing at all to do with over-development in what used to be (and by all rights and common sense, still ought to be) swampland and coastal forest.
That's about how long it took to nail John Gotti, also. Eventually the teflon wears off.
Bing is actually better that Google in returned results. But I do absolutely hate the interface with a fiery passion.
That is the problem with the rich, they will use their money to destroy anyone who crosses them.
One counterexample for whom that didn't work: Nick Denton.
FLOSS isn't "out in the open;" it's unknown. We don't KNOW that it's affected, and the "may be affected" line in the summary is purely speculative. The known affected parties were notified and given a short time to fix, as is standard procedure. If these security bug disclosure sites had unlimited resources, no one would be out in the cold. Alas, it cannot be.
Your experience is an outlier. The elderly are using the internet with increasing regularity; but that number falls off drastically after 75; of whom only a fifth use the internet with regularity (Pew Research; you know how to Google, unlike my grandparents).
No. Grandmothers share recipes on weathered old index cards. Hipster millennials who can't cook worth a damn use FB to share "Tasty" videos of shit recipes with not enough salt.
When the state chooses the winners, it's not capitalism anymore.
Maybe they're applying the same engineering principles they used to make King Tiger tank turrets in WWII.
Planning and Coding of Problems for an Electronic Computing Instrument, written by Von Neumann and Goldstein in 1947. You'll have to dig them up to see if your neck-beard is longer than theirs.
And every one of those pages tries to hijack my browser to another page.
The thing is, they are trying really hard to emulate Roger Ebert's classic "North" review, and falling far, far, short: http://www.rogerebert.com/revi...
Yeah, BUT they select from a curated list of critics. Recently, many of these critics (Chicago Tribune, I'm looking at you) that see movie critique as an opportunity to show off their acerbic wit in a series of ever increasingly scathing roasts. At this point, I'm wondering if some of these critics actually enjoy movies. Basically, I have to take RT ratings with a grain of salt.
You must be popular at parties.
The GOP's presumptive heir-apparent this year was Jeb Bush. Whoops.
Can we at least agree that Camaroism is a heresy?
I was predestined to make that error.
Now, if we could only prove that free will actually exists, we would have something.
I'm a Calvanist, you insensitive clod.
That's a great argument for some level of economic protection of minorities. Crunchy white art-school millennials? Not so much.
I wasn't trying to make any kind of threat analysis. That's a whole Intelligence specialty I'm not trained it. I was simply pointing out that Google is not a significant source of surveillance info compared to spy satellites.
Lemme blow your mind, here: YES.