Slashdot Mirror


In China, Fears That Pokemon Go May Aid Locating Military Bases (reuters.com)

The sleeper hit success title Pokemon Go is preventing many people in China from sleeping properly. Although the game isn't officially available in the world's largest smartphone market, some people fear it could become a Trojan horse for "offensive action by the United States and Japan," according to a report by Reuters. "Don't play Pokemon GO!!!" said user Pitaorenzhe on Chinese microblogging site Weibo. "It's so the U.S. and Japan can explore China's secret bases!" From the article: The conspiracy theory is that Japan's Nintendo, which part owns the Pokemon franchise, and America's Google can work out where Chinese military bases are by seeing where users can't go to capture Pokemon characters. The game relies on Google services such as Maps. The theory is that if Nintendo places rare Pokemon in areas where they see players aren't going, and nobody attempts to capture the creature, it can be deduced that the location has restricted access and could be a military zone. "Then, when war breaks out, Japan and the U.S. can easily target their guided missiles, and China will have been destroyed by the invasion of a Japanese-American game," said a social media post circulated on Weibo. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said he was unaware of reports that the game could be a security risk and that he didn't have time to play with such things. He gave no further details.

173 comments

  1. When? by irrational_design · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When war breaks out?! Is this a common belief in China? Or are these just the Chinese equivalent of the American-survivalist sub culture?

    1. Re:When? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I read that the same way.

      As to the point of the article... Don't secret base employees play Pokémon Go as well?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Taiwan. There is one Chinese state with two governments, and the smaller of the two will collapse. The last treaty cities have been returned to China with Macau in 1999 and Hong Kong in 1997, now there is only island building in Spratly straits and the dispute over Taiwan, where the US formerly signed defense treaties against China in event of war between them.

    3. Re:When? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing many of those bases don't allow cell phones on the premises, which if you think about it is also a pretty big tell.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:When? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      What I don't get about the rant.
      We know where the bases are. So we send the population to the bases so we can know where the bases are so we can bomb them?
      Or is the Big Bad America just trying to increase civilian casualty.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese grad students I used to teach used to tell me that China was biding it's time and would 'soon' attack and take down the USA. 'Soon' being a relative term.

      Chinese Generals are all preparing for war with the USA.

    6. Re:When? by lgw · · Score: 2

      Maybe the people are just unclear about the idea of satellite photography? This is the popular press, after all, they might simply not realize that's how it works these days..

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re: When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The chinese people wont go to war with is until world of warcraft goes under.

    8. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would turn mainland China into an endless sea of molten glass tinged with various organic impurities near the major population centers.

    9. Re:When? by aralin · · Score: 1

      That is why they are preparing. If their economy will grow much faster than ours, we will have every incentive to do so...

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    10. Re:When? by hoggoth · · Score: 2

      > We would turn mainland China into an endless sea of molten glass tinged with various organic impurities near the major population centers.

      I see you've been to Guangdong.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    11. Re:When? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      We know where the bases are. So we send the population to the bases so we can know where the bases are so we can bomb them?

      I think the point is that we don't know where the bases are, but Pokemon GO assets are geo-scattered semi-randomly. If they end up in places that are easily accessed by the public, they will get "found." If they end up in interesting-looking locations and are never found, that's a hint that no civilians are supposed to know about/go to those places.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly that's the point of the conspiracy theory, but it has no point in reality because it's founded on myriad false premises and assumptions.

    13. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ok, I'll tell you my view, even though it's a big country, with each person having their own viewpoint, so this is partial at best.

      When I was in China, I mentioned to my Chinese teacher, "I don't like war." The teacher was confused, and responded, "Well, that doesn't matter. War is something that happens." Remember that unlike Europe or Japan, in China they never had the hippy anti-war protest movement. Think of how we in the west came to the conclusion that war is bad, and you'll see that China doesn't really have that experience. How they viewed WW2 is completely different: it was an invasion from foreigners.

      Second thing: although China is ostensibly communist, their worldview is more imperialist: they call themselves the "middle country", maps in China have China right in the center. On TV they have all these dramas and movies that take place in the old imperial times, when war was something that happened and even a way to win glory. The government is composed of hereditary "princelings" with rivalries who depose each other and fight, much like royalty. If you want to understand China today, the ancient imperial system of Legalism (fa jia) is the best way to understand it.

      Third point: in the west, we've completely moved on from colonialism. We decided it was a bad idea, and frankly it doesn't provide economic benefit anymore. China doesn't realize that. From 1850 to 1900, they were embarrassingly dominated by western powers, who came in, and sold them opium in exchange for silver. Then Japan came in, and started colonizing them, killing many people. During the Korean war (which is within living memory), the US army entered China. Finally, Mao+communism defeated the westerners, pushed America back, and gave China something to be proud of with their country. But it was a hard fight, and the Chinese view the west as someone who wants to colonize them if they can.

      Fourth point: Building on that, when westerners protect Taiwan, try to install democracy in Hong Kong (which was still colonized 20 years ago), or protest about Tibet, the Chinese see that as attempts from western colonizers to control, and humiliate China. Again, they don't realize we've moved on from colonization, and we're happy to be partners with them. The idea of "protecting the democratic freedoms of the Taiwanese people" makes no sense to them. Why would we do that?

      Fifth point: we've had constant military struggles against China. Bill Clinton sent a battleship to patrol the ocean between Taiwan and China, for example, and Bush had some spy plane issues, and Obama has sent patrols into the south China sea. These are low grade, and even cool displays of power, but they are militaristic nonetheless. Frankly, it is unethical for China to claim the South China sea at the expense of all its neighbors, and it's foolish for China to try to force Taiwan to join them (the Taiwanese don't trust China, because China treated Hong Kong really badly: taking away their freedoms).

      Sixth point: Freedom is only something you recognize when you don't have it. Most Chinese people are free to say anything they want, because they don't want to say forbidden things. But we recognize that their lack of freedom is going to hurt them in the future, and hope that they learn to respect their freedoms.

    14. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The degree of naivety in combination with paranoia rivals what I see with conspiracy theorists here in the US. We have had spy satellites with the capability of photographing license plates for a long time, and they think we don't know where ALL of their bases are? wow.

    15. Re:When? by PPH · · Score: 1

      China was biding it's time and would 'soon' attack and take down the USA

      But then Foxconn won't be getting the next iPhone contract. And no more Chinese exchange students either.

      Chinese Generals are all preparing for war with the USA.

      That's their job. To be prepared for a time when diplomacy might break down.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    16. Re:When? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You are correct.... except those survivalists are in positions of power and are all really fucking insane.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also worth examining some myths we have about war in the west:

      *) War is always terrible - No, it has terrible parts, but it also has brilliant, exciting, and fun parts. Winston Churchill said, "Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result." The strategy, the victory, the pursuit: these things are portrayed on tv in China more often than here.

      *) Only rich elites want to go to war - No, throughout history, commoners have wanted war too, to gain riches, prestige, land, and because it's fun. When Napoleon returned from exile, his soldiers greeted him joyfully.

      *) War is always caused by religion - No, war is caused by ideology, or by greed, or by fear. Plenty of historical examples of all of those.

      *) War is over - no, it's not. We don't want it.

    18. Re:When? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      As to the point of the article... Don't secret base employees play Pokémon Go as well?

      Yeah, if they think their soldiers aren't playing it... they're deluded.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    19. Re:When? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Remember that unlike Europe or Japan, in China they never had the hippy anti-war protest movement.

      To be fair... we also need to remember that Japan has invaded China - many times. We westerners tend to believe war is something remote, and unlikely due to our modern mindset and sophistication - but, in truth, World War Two happened in a world not much different than the current one.

      (Overall I agree with you though)

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    20. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      If / when a War breaks out it will be some stupid little skirmish down in the South China Sea over their brilliant idea of building islands in the middle of nowhere and declaring them sovereign territory :|

      IF that escalates and attacks on Mainland China start, I promise you the Military isn't going to rely on Pokemon Go data to know where the cruise missile targets will be. If it gets to that point, you can bet your ass those cruise missiles will be the preliminary strike atomizing their targets a few minutes before the ICBM's get launch orders.

      ( ProTip: Cruise Missiles already have pre-planned missions ready to go against anything the US would consider a valid military target. Just need to be pulled from the safe and loaded into the system. New ones can be sent to deployed forces as necessary. )

      At which point, the absolute least of all our concerns is where the f*ck a rare pokemon is hiding.

    21. Re:When? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Like that will stop anyone from "going there" to collect their idiotic pokemon. They'll just turn on mock locations and travel around the world while sitting on the sofa. (people are *ALREADY* doing that, btw.)

      Plus, this is dumb way to select targets. You're going to be bombing lots of empty buildings, warehouses, entire ghost cities, etc.

    22. Re: When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking man-children and their fucking games...

    23. Re:When? by erapert · · Score: 2

      China also has many more males than females.
      What do young bucks like to do, especially to gain female approval? War.

    24. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maps in China have China right in the center

      When everybody knows America is the actual center of the Earth.

    25. Re:When? by kqs · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. We likely can find the bases via Google Maps. Also, any place without Pokemon Go players could be a secret base, but it also could be a forest with no people, a lake, a toxic waste dump, a poor farming community without electricity, or maybe just a location without cell service (the US seems to have a few of those). This would be one of the most useless and ineffective ways of finding secret bases that I could possibly come up with.

    26. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when war was something that happened and even a way to win glory. The government is composed of hereditary "princelings" with rivalries who depose each other and fight, much like royalty. If you want to understand China today, the ancient imperial system of Legalism (fa jia) is the best way to understand it.

      And yet even Mao was looking up the first emperor as the uniter of the country and the bringer of peace after centuries of war. The communist party politics has been all about the unity of China, with a constant fear of losing that unity. Irrational fear from a perspective of an outside observer, even. Has the Chinese mindset changed so much in recent years? Sure, the current president is hardliner and a child of the cultural revolution. But a desire for annihilation of the economic progress, the accomplishments and a relatively good international reputation gained during the terms of the previous presidents is hard to believe.

    27. Re:When? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      the Chinese see that as attempts from western colonizers to control, and humiliate China... Again, they don't realize we've moved on from colonization, and we're happy to be partners with them

      And how do you know if that (to control or colonize) is not true? Do you work for the CIA?

      Look around the world, the only real competitor to the US (and its puppet Western allies) is China. Just think about that if one day Chinese Yuan succeeds becoming a real competitor to the USD and that most other countries are willing to trade everything include petroleum in RMB and accumulate RMBs as reserved, we would be much more like Greece. And all our allies would become theirs.

      That's why we care about their political suppression so much. If China is irrelevant, we would care them as much as we care about Zimbabwe. If we truly want them to be our partner, we would care as much as we care about those same issues in Saudi Arabia or now Vietnam. (We did, back in 1970s, but not now. See below.)

      it's foolish for China to try to force Taiwan to join them (the Taiwanese don't trust China

      Yeah, Taiwan should forget that we betrayed them back in the 1970s when we made China, along with Afgan and bin Laden, allies to fight the Soviets, and start trusting us again, so they can be our puppet too.

    28. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had the privilege of talking to two Chinese Communist party members in their twenties/thirties in the past few months while visiting China. They asked me what I thought about the Japanese occupied islands,and the warmongering. I said a worthless island is a stupid thing to go to war over. He responded that WWI started over less.

      He went on to explain that war with Japan was inevitable, as if a course of nature. He wasn't excited about it, but not worried, either. He didn't agree when I said that war is a terrible thing to resort to. I was surprised, because he was otherwise a very happy and agreeable person.

      When I asked about US involvement, he said that the USA would certainly support China: because of our strong ties.

    29. Re:When? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      It's one dataset. Combine it with others ("Forest locations", "Lakes", etc) you can narrow things down a bit...

    30. Re:When? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      I had a history teacher who said world history could be summed up in 2 questions: "Where's the money? (i.e., economic)", and "Who succeeds the king? (i.e. power). The rest (Religion, etc) is just for show.

    31. Re:When? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      To be fair... we also need to remember that Japan has invaded China - many times

      Just in the late 1500s, right? (ww2 also, of course)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    32. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's been one remaining superpower for a while, the USA. It's slowly losing it's advantage over the other powers. Two other major powers are attempting to become to, or get back to superpower status, China+Russia. Each of these three countries are incredibly belligerent, and freely, repeatedly invade other smaller countries with only flimsy rationalisation.

      Add to that the loose coalition of Europe working at cross purposes, the middle east both gaining power and tearing itself apart, and general murderous squabbling everywhere. At some point it's a given there will be a major collapse of some kind leading to desperation, or another mad leader who won't back down who'll finally let loose the nukes, etc.

      At some point eventually we'll fall to all out war again. If we're lucky it might even take hundreds of years before it comes to it. It's just in all likelihood we're not that lucky.

  2. Obvious Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just make all soldiers play Pokemon Go. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Obvious Solution by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      So then Google knows who works at those bases...

    2. Re:Obvious Solution by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Just make all soldiers play Pokemon Go

      So then Nintendo and Google can now collect video from inside the "secret bases" when the players use the AR play?

  3. Wait, let me get this straight... by halivar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One single Chinese microblogger with a tin foil hat advances crackpot theory and actual Chinese official can't be bothered to even talk about, and it makes front page of Slashdot?

    Shit, guys, lemme tell you 'bout some CHEMTRAILS!

    1. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sad part is that this was reported by Reuters.

    2. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Shit, guys, lemme tell you 'bout some CHEMTRAILS!

      Do you mean the ones put up by the illuminati? Or the ones by the Lizard people?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by halivar · · Score: 1

      Lemme blow your mind, here: YES.

    4. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Well... since I know that the Lizard people only inhabit the Hollow Earth... I am going with Illuminati...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be fair, I think Google now knows how they're going to get "street view" pictures of all the streets and pathways where they weren't able to send Google Cars to photograph.

    6. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      We're IN the Hollow Earth, man.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    7. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      One single Chinese microblogger with a tin foil hat advances crackpot theory and actual Chinese official can't be bothered to even talk about, and it makes front page of Slashdot?

      It's always nice to have confirmation that every culture has its crackpots, and they all post on the Internet.

    8. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry,
      the Department of Conspiracy Mitigation has arranged for all 8 of the major chemtrail manufacturing firms to be controlled by the Association for the Advancement of Entropy. So all the chemtrail chemicals are carefully balanced to neutralise one another in the quantities and distribution patterns in which they are ultimately deployed (thereby expending a lot of energy for no net effect and increasing total entropy).

      Really it's as if all those chemtrails were juts harmless water vapor. You're Welcome by the way.

      Turtleswamp Industries:
      Secretly ruling the world since 3972 (by the turtle calendar)

    9. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering why he's assuming Nintendo has access to any data or what the Japanese have to do with this. All they did so far as I understand is license Pokemon to Niantic labs.

    11. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    12. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, I think Google now knows how they're going to get "street view" pictures of all the streets and pathways where they weren't able to send Google Cars to photograph.

      That's an interesting idea, but Google doesn't have anything to do with Pokemon Go. Niantic was spun off into a completely separate company (not part of Alphabet).

    13. Re:Wait, let me get this straight... by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      Yeah, must be a hell of a slow day at Reuters, ne? Isn't there a coup or something they could cover?

      Although I must admit the theory is .. interesting :-)

  4. Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's not their military that scaring the shit out of people, it's their fucking way they do business.

    1. Re:Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shut up and drink your melamine.

    2. Re:Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The air pollution in China is an effective screen and blocks the satellites. See China, pollution is your friend. Keep belching out that crap. My kids need their plastic McDonalds crap toys.

    3. Re:Like Satellites Don't Work Over China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up and drink your melamine.

      No, that is for the infants. I will stick with the eggs and watermelon, thank you very much.

  5. You can make fun of China all you want... by HBI · · Score: 1, Informative

    But Boeing and the USG have already banned the application for all employees, government or civilian.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re: You can make fun of China all you want... by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      That's because it enables the camera by default and can be used to exfiltrate data. Confidential or Classified information stops for no Rhyhorn.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
  6. Yeah. Right. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The US and Google need a stupid game to find army bases. Right.

    Oh how did the US ever find Soviet nuclear silos without being able to get the Russkies to play some video games...?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. What no "Game Addiction" fears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citizen be all walking around just like autonomous humans

    At least we now know that secret bases are within walking distance, good job Cmdr Bulbasaur

  8. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give Pokemon Go to the soldiers in those bases. No more black spots on maps.

  9. Lu Kang doesn't play Pokemon by Kargan · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said he was unaware of reports that the game could be a security risk and that he didn't have time to play with such things.

    Of course he doesn't, too busy trying to fight his way through the tournament and take out Shao Khan.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    1. Re:Lu Kang doesn't play Pokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here for this, not disappointed.

    2. Re: Lu Kang doesn't play Pokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will have to go thru Goro first.

    3. Re:Lu Kang doesn't play Pokemon by dottrap · · Score: 1

      Though Chun Li has been focusing turtle (half-shell) evolution.

      Seriously.
      https://groups.google.com/foru...

  10. Umm, satellites? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Is there really someone so ignorant that they think the locations of anything visible to the sky is unknown? Seriously?

    Or is this just more hatemongering aimed at a game that's actually getting kids (and adults) outside and walking around? Oh, the humanity! People are actually exercising and talking to their neighbors!!!!

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re: Umm, satellites? by tysonedwards · · Score: 0

      Satellite Imagery is regularly edited to obscure sensitive information before uploaded to Google Earth.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    2. Re: Umm, satellites? by halivar · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US doesn't get its satellite surveillance from Google Earth.

    3. Re: Umm, satellites? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Oh, so the US government cannot see it then? That will put the Chinese' mind at ease.

    4. Re:Umm, satellites? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Satellite imagery can't tell you everything. In this case you might see a building that you suspect might be some kind of military installation, but you're not sure. Pokemon Go usage would probably be a half decent datapoint, but could be confounded by things like civilian employers who don't like their employees goofing off. Realistically, the US probably just monitors which places have government or military cell phones frequenting them.

    5. Re: Umm, satellites? by halivar · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to make any kind of threat analysis. That's a whole Intelligence specialty I'm not trained it. I was simply pointing out that Google is not a significant source of surveillance info compared to spy satellites.

    6. Re:Umm, satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I dunno, its actually a pretty clever plan. Areas with specific mobile device bans would be pretty unusual and this would definitely highlight them. For example in the US most military locations have the same kind of ban, privately owned phones can't be taken into sensitive areas at all. Surely the US has a good deal of threat intelligence from both satellite data, and from actual informants, as to where the secret bunkers are that they need to bomb, but this layer of data could be useful in its own right.

    7. Re:Umm, satellites? by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      Or is this just more hatemongering aimed at a game that's actually getting kids (and adults) outside and walking around? Oh, the humanity! People are actually exercising and talking to their neighbors!!!!

      I think it's because the game is from Nintendo, which is a Japanese Company.

    8. Re: Umm, satellites? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Well, I doubt that Google would do so at the behest of China's government considering that Google gave them the finger and walked away from their market a few years ago, rather than censor and spy on their users.

      And, as someone else pointed out, the government doesn't get its military intel from Google.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    9. Re:Umm, satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no outer space.
      Blind generation.

    10. Re: Umm, satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no outer space. The sky is a closed, sealed, waterproof dome.
      (Hint: the Van Allen Belts are an euphemism for dome. The euphemism already suffices to preclude any satellite).

    11. Re: Umm, satellites? by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      There is no outer space. The sky is a closed, sealed, waterproof dome.

      Nonsense! Given the amount of rain we see, you can hardly call the sky dome waterproof!

  11. what about satellites? by cfa22 · · Score: 1

    and they're not worried about satellite imagery?

  12. Google !== Baidu by tomxor · · Score: 1

    Just because large businesses in China are at the knees of government doesn't mean it's the same in other countries... In fact it appears to be the other way around in America.

    1. Re:Google !== Baidu by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      What are you, like 15?

    2. Re:Google !== Baidu by tomxor · · Score: 1

      cos ad hominem always works.

  13. China needs to get out of 1939. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is 2016. The last thing *any* country is gonna do is blow up their source of cheap manufacturing.

    Sometimes, the Chinese leadership really impresses me (they are scientists and one economist), and then they say shit like this.

    1. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That wasn't said by a leader. That was said by some random loser who posts things on the Internet. You know what THOSE people are like!

    2. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

      I think you should re-evaluate. I think the Chinese are very astute, in this and in other things...

      What materially changed since 1939 that prevents war? (correct answer is nothing)

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by XXongo · · Score: 1

      What materially changed since 1939 that prevents war? (correct answer is nothing)

      Correct answer is the fact that mainland China now has a single unified government (not a patchwork of semi-independent warlords and factions) with a large mliitary that is very, very well equipped by the standards of 1939.

      I really don't think Japan can walk in and declare Manchuria a client state anymore.

    4. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      This is 2016. The last thing *any* country is gonna do is blow up their source of cheap manufacturing.

      The economic argument against war.....that we won't hurt our own economic interests. Nope, throughout history, people have been willing to hurt their own economic interests to go to war. Most notably in World War 1: before world war 1, people were making the same kinds of arguments you just did: that the economies are too entertwined, the war would be too painful for everyone. And they were right: it was painful, but they destroyed their lives anyway.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

      China is a state with 1.3 billion people and can barely feed itself. Its population is barely held together by jingoistic propaganda against its natural impulses for greater self-rule.

      It wouldn't take much of an interdiction campaign to reduce it to a rebellious shambles.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    6. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Read "The Better Angels of our Nature" by Stephen Pinker.

      The answer to your question is that lots of things have changed since 1939 (or 1039 for that matter) and while the exact details of the mechanics may not be precisely clear, the incidence of interstate and civil war, genocide, other killings by governments, terrorism and murder have all decreased dramatically.

      Factors that appear to make it unlikely for states to go to war with each other are one or both being democracies, a strong reliance on international trade, and membership in international organizations. While China isn't really a democracy, the US is (mostly) and both rely very heavily on international trade and are members of a great number of international organizations.

    7. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We could give two shits about cheap manufacturing. The world only cares about China's rare earth elements just like how they only care about oil or the middle east would have been a parking lot ages ago.

    8. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

      I haven't read Pinker's book but I disagree entirely, based on your summary. If you had cited MAD doctrine and the likelihood of nuclear release, I would have agreed as far as that went. Not that it stops war, but it makes it more likely to involve non-state actors and insurgencies that cannot be clearly traced to a nuclear state. The actual frequency of war itself doesn't seem to have abated much, though.

      That said, it's on my reading list.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    9. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The trends Pinker talks about have been statistically consistent over at least the last thousand years, and not just in war. Do you think the number of murders has gone down because of MAD? The number of third world genocides? Incidence of terrorism?

    10. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an ignorant and racist comment. One random blogger does not represent "The Chinese" or their astuteness in anything, not to say that there aren't plenty of astute people the world over.

    11. Re:China needs to get out of 1939. by HBI · · Score: 1

      The trends Pinker talks about have been statistically consistent over at least the last thousand years, and not just in war. Do you think the number of murders has gone down because of MAD? The number of third world genocides? Incidence of terrorism?

      Absolutely not in terms of murder, third world genocides and terrorism - probably quite the opposite given the financial and military support of certain global powers for certain movements to cause trouble for their perceived enemies. Behind every incident of terrorism is a government funded movement. "Which government?" is the question.

      If Pinker goes back a thousand years, the issue of the change in human minds over that time comes up. Feudal systems were very bloody by their nature. I have heard people theorize that the human brain has altered over time and our perceptions are different than those from a thousand years ago. That said, I read Caesar's Commentaries, and he doesn't sound all that different from Napoleon, Bismarck or Sherman in terms of his perceptions. Or, for that matter, from twentieth century military figures.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  14. Dumb dumbs and here's your secret areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about all the military personel playing the dumb game??? Are they not somehow on the "secret" bases catching Pokemon??? ...they are doing some really good analysis of the data on "who" is going to these places before the "off limits" zones are found in the data. But that can be already done using the GPS apps in general, this game is overkill for exposing how bad those "google/apple maps" are for things like privacy of "secret" bases. It would be extremely easy to show that some areas are never visited by anyone... then map out low number of "repeat-visitors" areas to isolate who works on secret or highly secure areas.

    1. Re:Dumb dumbs and here's your secret areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The better option is to just log into the Signalling System No. 7 (SS7), also known as C7 in the UK or CCSS7 in the US, using all the phone numbers in the world to track this type of location stuff during work and non-work hours. Once you have the areas where people don't go and a select few go but only repeat-visitors, then you can guess where all these bases are with almost certainty -- especially when the base commanders and higher ups keep visiting all the other bases during work hours, cross over of secret base areas without anyone else going there.

      No games or map apps required, just a cell phone Base Station ID and Location database and a few weeks of data can show you where the entire population works and sleeps (and sleeps around).

      These little "trackers" we all love to buy leak so much information about our lives, it is amazing that anyone things they have privacy or "secrets"... doh!

  15. Unless you are Hillary Clinton... by HBI · · Score: 5, Funny

    She can play all the Pokemon Go she wants.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Unless you are Hillary Clinton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that's what Hillary was doing while Secretary of State. It certainly explains all the flying to other countries....

    2. Re:Unless you are Hillary Clinton... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2

      I don't think you can "come under sniper fire" in Pokemon, even if it is imaginary, so it must have been some other game she was playing.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  16. Google is already tracking them by mveloso · · Score: 1

    It's stupid that the Chinese government is afraid of Pokemon Go since Google/Android is already tracking them.

  17. Up next... by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chinese government creates new arm of military tasked with collecting all Pokemon Go characters located in military bases.

    1. Re:Up next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet China, Pokemon catch you?

    2. Re:Up next... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Chinese government creates new arm of military tasked with collecting all Pokemon Go characters located in military bases.

      Call them, say, Team Rocket.

    3. Re:Up next... by watermark · · Score: 1

      Us simple folk have a shorter name for "Pokemon go characters", we call them "pokemon".

    4. Re:Up next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those Pokemon spies are a real menace. They go everywhere.

  18. It may not have been their intention... by manu144x · · Score: 2

    Imagine having an army of idiots precisely mapping with their smartphone GPS's huge areas in countries, virtually for free, on their own time and with their own equipment.

    If it wasn't used initially, I am sure after this huge success the black suits have surely contacted nintendo with an offer to access and use all that data. It's not conspiracy theory, it's exactly what happened with Facebook. After it became mainstream and it's potential was noticed, one of the investors is the CIA R&D arm.

    It's no secret, the same people who funded face recognition technology startups, license plate recognition, mapping, and who knows what else.

    I think it was called IN-Q-Tel or something.

  19. Whelp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like someone in china just had a Furby moment.

    1. Re:Whelp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this in regards to the pentagon banning furbys because they thought they were spies?

  20. Crap they figured it out!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abort!! Abort!!

  21. So hard to see from above by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    This seems absurd. Military bases are not invisible. Planes, drones and satellites watch them all the time. The Chinese are just messing with the minds of their military people for some unknown propaganda reason..

  22. Clarification by HBI · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a misconception. Military bases permit cell phones. When passing into SCIFs or classified briefing rooms, you are required to get rid of your cellphones into lock boxes. If you like your battery, you turn it off or put it in airplane mode before doing so.

    There are some buildings that are all-classified that require you to not have a phone along, but this would be a "building", not a whole base.

    In the field, most people have a cell phone on them for basic communications, and they are rarely collected - only when someone has a bug up their ass about it.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Clarification by subanark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but what about "Secret" "Chinese" bases, that might have a different policy. On the other hand, knowing China, they will have strict rules that prohibit this, but no one will follow them.

    2. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are certainly a few sites where cell phones are not permitted. Probably fewer than most people would think, but they do exist.

    3. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but if you look at a population and notice all the cellphone users who turn off their phones, it is kinda easy to see where they turn them off... Big Tall Signal in the data.

    4. Re:Clarification by HBI · · Score: 2

      The US military also has strict rules that are bent and broken regularly in regards to wireless devices. One IA officer I knew actually yelled at me for leaving my cell phone at home, "How am I going to get in touch with you? Go get it!" when I was trying to think security and follow the rules.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:Clarification by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      if this base is outdoors on the surface of the planet..... it's not secret. even google earth has enough resolution to easily spot anything the size of a gas station on the surface of the planet and identify it. a "secret base" would be obvious as hell.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Clarification by boristdog · · Score: 2

      Ah, so you've been to China.

      I loved the fact that there were x-ray machines and people with scanner wands at all major train and subway stations (and airports, of course). I soon realized that usually none of this equipment was even powered up, but they still ran the wand over you and your bags through the scanners anyway. I would purposely leave metal things in my pockets and the scanners never went off.

    7. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Depends how they do it, if you want it secret then make it underground or hide it within something else that isn't secret. NORAD would be very hard to spot from a satellite, it's really the unusual traffic to it that would give it away. Storing your tanks in caves or the like would be fairly easy, and the only thing giving that away would be the unusual traffic. Also if you do secret work inside a regular office building it can be easily hidden, it has twenty offices, one is called XY-group and it's really a secret front for your military offices.

    8. Re: Clarification by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      The obvious point is that the signal can get lost in the noise. School children in the US often are required to turn off phones or temporarily surrender them. Confusing a military base with a school would be tragic. Although I imagine that American companies collect enough data to tell the difference.

    9. Re: Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because people keep going crazy and stabbing other people.

      I have seen them not running though, in those cases they go through the motions and then randomly pick people for a full search. Except if you're a giant white guy, they don't suspect us.

    10. Re:Clarification by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Manning walked in with a Lady Gaga CD; erased the contents; walked out with the store.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    11. Re:Clarification by kqs · · Score: 1

      The US military also has strict rules that are bent and broken regularly in regards to wireless devices. One IA officer I knew actually yelled at me for leaving my cell phone at home, "How am I going to get in touch with you? Go get it!" when I was trying to think security and follow the rules.

      Can't be. I've been told that every single person who breaks any of the government's security policies is immediately punished, unless they are named Hillary which just proves that she blackmailed the FBI. People regularly break the rules and don't get punished? Unpossible!

      Sorry, had to say that. Yeah, I never worked for the government (military or otherwise) but since every other human I know would ignore rules which were inconvenient and hard-to-enforce, seems like military folks would do so too. Contractors, OTOH, I know well, and they'll ignore any rules, even those which are helpful and easy-to-enforce.

    12. Re:Clarification by HBI · · Score: 1

      Vis a vis Hillary, what she did was pretty blatant and if I tried it, i'd get silver bracelets and a stay in Club Fed. But yes, the more mundane rules get flouted regularly because it makes things hard to do, like get in touch with critical personnel when you need them.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    13. Re:Clarification by kqs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I mean. Nobody can seem to find a case where someone who mishandled classified material but did not leak it ended up in jail. The closest recent case seems to be Petraeus, who actively gave/leaked classified material to a journalist. In fact, Comey even said: "In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: [various things]. We do not see those things here."

      I do agree that Hillary is treated very differently than anyone else. For anyone else, people would see the recommendations and say "oh well, I thought her actions were more serious, and I'm unhappy with the result, but I guess it's closed; I assume the FBI is more of an expert on the law than I am." For Hillary, I expect at least 4 more years of hearings, select committees, accusations, insinuations, leaks, conspiracy theories, and all the rest of the circus. And little evidence of crimes and no convictions, either because she is a criminal mastermind who makes Lex Luthor seem like an idiot, or because she is, well, kinda an asshole but innocent of serious crimes.

      I know I won't convince you or anyone else. Once we "know" something, we won't let new evidence change what we believe. But I'm still saddened. There are so many valid reasons to hate Hillary, but most folks fixate on the invalid ones.

    14. Re:Clarification by HBI · · Score: 1

      What she did was "spill" classified data onto an unclassified, public system.

      The proper fix for a spill is to confiscate every computer that the spilled data is on and wipe it. You can find the processes in Army Regulation 25-2 "Information Assurance". The reg was written as it is to comply with the extant laws covering classified data as well as the Privacy Act.

      Spillage is a big deal.

      She signed SF 312, in which the penalties for this kind of mishandling of classified information are covered.

      Belief that she should have gotten away with it is bogus. Her crime was evident, Comey wimped out, as usual for him.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  23. ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even better, read the credits :)

    "(Reporting by Beijing Newsroom and Shanghai Newsroom; Additional reporting by Megha Rajagopalan, Ben Blanchard, Jake Spring and Jeremy Wagstaff; Editing by Ian Geoghegan and Raju Gopalakrishnan)"

    So it took 2 newsrooms and 4 additional reporters plus 2 editors to write this insightful story of the reason behind it :O ...and a microblogging site? Reuters doesn't have any other sources left?

    1. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Megha's last name taking up most of the second newsroom door

  24. If you think that's ironic... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    I work in government IT. My facility has two Pokemon gyms. I found a Zubat Pokemon at the bus stop down the street.

    http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Zubat_(Pok%C3%A9mon)

    1. Re:If you think that's ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you wonder how government it got its' bad reputation... Here's your sign!

  25. Wow. Just... Wow. by pla · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, and people make fun of "preppers" in the US?

    Guess what, China - The US already has high-res satellite imagery of every base, outpost, cave, and jeep (or whatever brand) you own.

    It would better serve the Earth's (and your own, as inhabitants thereof) needs if you focused more on not spewing crackpot bullshit like TFA, than worrying about whether or not we notice your target practice city-grids out in the middle of nowhere based on kids not crawling around them looking for pokestuff.

  26. Sort of true by mu51c10rd · · Score: 4, Funny

    If my morning commute is any indication, most of the Pokemon Go players would have no idea they are on a secret military base...

  27. Waiting for the Twilight Zone moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone claims there's a Pokemon on the wing of an airborne plane and everyone inside has to restrain them from opening the airlock.

  28. Know nothings and China by sjbe · · Score: 1

    China is a state with 1.3 billion people and can barely feed itself.

    You haven't been to China have you? I have and your description doesn't come close. To anyone who has been there you sound like an ignorant imbecile.

    1. Re:Know nothings and China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a state with 1.3 billion people and can barely feed itself.

      You haven't been to China have you? I have and your description doesn't come close. To anyone who has been there you sound like an ignorant imbecile.

      HBI is right and you're a dick. China is an unsustainable shithole [like the UAEs] and a hard landing is long overdue. Sit down and watch it come crumbling down in 20, 19,......

    2. Re:Know nothings and China by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And you out yourself as someone else who's obviously never been there.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  29. Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you tried this sort of thinking in Canada, you'd figure the majority of the country has military bases. After all, we don't even have roads between all our territories! There are many places here you simply can't get to without extreme measures (helicopters or small aircraft only, or extreme hikes for weeks/years on end).

    I know China is highly populated, but I am willing to bet there are still areas in China that are basically impassable.

    All you'd succeed in doing, at least to Canada, is landing a nuke in the centre of Nunavut. And in China, Rutog County would probably be lit up.

  30. Hot CIA topics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fear, Pokemon, and China in one CIAdot article.

  31. IMPLYING by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Implying that U.S. and Japanese intelligence services don't already know where all of China's military bases and assets are at any given time -- and vice-versa.

    Nothing to see here, kids.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  32. Here's my shot at a crackpot theory by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I bet Google is kicking itself that it sent out those camera-laden streetview cars, instead of publishing an augmented reality game that also could send location and direction-marked camera captures back to the server.

    That's not to say that they don't have a finger in the pie with the company that published the game, or perhaps more indirectly via the Android platform.

    Since I have already established that shotguns seem to work against drones, I'll next try if they can make pokemons go away - or at least pokemon go players...

    And don't forget that the above sentences may be full of irony and satire.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  33. It makes sense by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    China is worried that the rest of the world is trying to do to them what they are trying to do to the rest of the world.

  34. A solution too simple for the Chinese government.. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Know the solution to that, China? It's really simple, China. Want to know what it is, China?

    Hey, China, allow your soldiers to play Pokemon GO on-base in their off time.

    Problem solved.

    Or, you know, don't try to screw us over and we won't have reason to invade you and, thus, won't need to know where your bases are in order to target them.

    Either (or both) of those will work.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  35. Turn the tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey China, All your base are belong to US.

  36. Sweet new military job: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine all the people vying to be the official classified Pokemon catcher to nullify this clear and present danger to the Chinese military.

    Sgt.: "Private Chang, why didn't you report for KP?"

    Pvt.: "I had to catch a Ratata that was in the nuclear launch communications center."

    Sgt.: "Very well. Carry on."

  37. Obligatory by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    All your bases are belong to us...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  38. The Pokemon Montecarlo Reconnaissance Operation by garompeta · · Score: 1

    It suddenly doesn't sound that crazy of an idea.
    Distribute pokemons randomly in vast numbers across all continental China, clusters of uncaught pokemons will eventually appear. Filter out the ones appearing over water, and investigate the rest.

  39. The world is not rainbows by Texmaize · · Score: 2

    One of the things I very enjoyed about college was meeting people from other countries, and learning a little about them. Something that struck me was despite what TV, my liberal professors, and fellow American students were telling me, other cultures and perspectives really do exist, and few of them actually follow the school of thought that is being popularized in the U.S. We tend to take a very parochial, Euro-centric view of the world. So, while multi-culurism is preached, what is really meant is just the one that agrees with Euro-liberalism. There are other ideas, many that are in direct conflict with ours.

    For example, China. China is a very conservative country, that has a value system going back thousands of years. They have withstood several invasions, and their culture proved stronger, ultimately subverting their would be conquerers. They are very proud of this. They view the West insistence that only their values matter and are correct as a profound intrusion and disgustingly arrogant. They value family. We no longer do. They value structure and order; we clearly do not. They see the collective as important, we seem fixated celebrating the rebel. They think the majority should set the tone of commerce and culture. We have....well, read the news. Most of all, they teach their kids to love their country. For some reason, we have made it cool to be self loathing

    The net result is that they think of us as the enemy. As an extension, the believe war will come because the leftist philosophies of the lest simply cannot leave others alone. If you stop and think about it, this is the main driving force behind Muslim aggression and other little rebellions around the world. They do not follow the party line, and deeply understand that they are being threatened.

    So, I guess I am trying to say is that the world is a tough place. There are competing ideas and ways people want to organize their societies. The views that many on these forums hold as unchallenged and sacrosanct create enemies and alienate people. Is your world view really so limited that you are surprised by this?I

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
    1. Re:The world is not rainbows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They value family. We no longer do.

      If you look at modern areas of China (say Shanghai), I'd argue the family unit is not much different. If you are equating love / value to living at home, I'd instead argue it is more an issue of economics and not value.

      They value structure and order; we clearly do not.

      The fuck?

      China is a reasonably corrupt country by western standards. Furthermore, have you tried driving there? It is chaos. Where are you getting this structure and order thing from?

      Further, I would argue this whole conversation of referring to all Chinese and generalizing them and their beliefs is ridiculous.

  40. Don't play Pokemon Go! by lkcl · · Score: 1

    "Don't play Pokemon GO!!!" said user {insert microblogger's name here} on {insert country of origin here} microblogging site. "It's so the U.S. and Japan can explore {insert country of origin}'s secret bases!"

  41. The great trojan pokemon conspiracy by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Woo hoo hoo. That is such a hilariously pathetic level of paranoid insecurity. That really made my day.

    Seriously do we still have this level of middle ages paranoid national fervor? Lighten up and catch some monsters.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:The great trojan pokemon conspiracy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Seriously do we still have this level of middle ages paranoid national fervor?

      I don't know - has Trump weighed in on Pokemon Go yet?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  42. Silly people, we don't use guided missiles by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    We use hunt and seek pop up drone packs that the Chinese don't even know are there.

    Now those do use the Poke database, but that's just a coincidence.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  43. Just because you're paranoid... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

    ...doesn't mean they aren't out to get you!

    But yeah, sometimes you're just paranoid.

  44. Oh China... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2
    What I don't get about the rant...

    Oh, there are numerous flaws with this line of thinking. Why would the US & Japan, both of who poses advanced spy satellite technology need to get video game data to try to collect info on military bases? You think that they don't already have that info?

    Moreover, why would we want to attack a country with a huge population, and massive standing land army? Isn't there some sort of old saying about land wars in Asia? I thought our plan was to just seduce them with freedom and material goods and let them toss out their own government because they think it sucks. You know, say like eastern Europe and Russia?

    At this point, it should be pretty obvious that the US isn't really interested in what other countries do with their governments as long as they don't engage in wars of conquest or wholesale slaughter of their own people, so I just wonder what this person is thinking.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  45. Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Johnson, did you read this? The Chinese are worried about us using Pokemon Go to locate their secret bases. Why didn't you think of that?"
    ::furiously flicking smartphone:: "What? Sorry sir, I'm kind of in the middle of...DAMN YOU PIKACHU!"

  46. Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    If Pokemon Go relies on Google Maps, players in China can expect to wind up in the river... https://twitter.com/isonno/sta...

    1. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I thought you could not use Google Maps at all in China.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You can if you have mobile data through a non-Chinese carrier and you don't mind paying the international roaming charges.

      Or so I hear.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I've always switched to China Unicom when there. I assumed that the infrastructure was the same and the same blocks would apply. I guess the OP reference might have some sort of VPN also.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    4. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      At least that's the case in Guangzhou--perhaps it has something to do with its proximity to HK.

      Certain hotels that mostly cater to Rather Important People also don't filter. The KingRand in Beijing being one such example, if you can afford it. (Normally would be way out of reach for me, but I knew somebody who knew somebody who arranged a steep discount and a Gold Member Card guaranteeing me the same discount in future. Alas, I don't normally go to Beijing except to pass through it on the way to/from Guangzhou.)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Google Maps in China is a quarter mile off by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I'll try it when in Kunming next month, thanks.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  47. Slashdot you've done it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Random retard in random Chinese forum spouts conspiracy theory and BAM all of a sudden The US is using Pokemon Go to Exploit Chinese Military Bases.

    The problem here, idiots, is that Nintendo is a Japanese company.

    Check out the big brain on slashdot brad!

  48. Already divulging Chinese military secrets! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Ha! Pokemon Go has now revealed the existence of cloaked Chinese military bases that aren't visible on satellite images like all of the world's other military bases!

    (Half-seriously - maybe they have bases hidden under dummy neighborhoods like the US had during WW2, and this could indeed reveal them through apparently suburban neighborhoods in which nobody hunts Pokemon?)

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  49. This headline no verb (or subject?) by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    In China, what do fears-that-Pokemon-Go-may-aid-in-locating-military-bases do?

    Alternatively, in China, who fears that Pokemon Go may aid in locating military bases?

    The headline lacks either a verb (if the fears are the subject) or a subject (if fearing is the verb).

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:This headline no verb (or subject?) by danaris · · Score: 1

      Most correctly, it's "In China, there are fears that..."

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  50. So all the chinese need to do to counter this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is buy a few hundred to thousand cell phones, load pokemon go on it, and then spoof, or run security personnel through 'sanitized' environments to make those ultra-secure places appear boring and normal so that rare pokemon don't end up there?

    Seems like a simple counter-intelligence fix to augmented reality games. Hell if you have the hacker resources, like china, nk, etc do, you could even spoof the IO to the cell phones, or run virtualized android instances to spoof the data without ever having to physically move out in the field. Do that enough, especially if you throw in lots of deserted areas your civilians don't normally visit either, and you can have plenty of bogus data to overshadow things.

    That said: This presumes all bases have 'public' cell reception/data access. Is that true? If not, then none of those areas would show up visited by pokemon go anyways, since it is an online game, as far as I know. So if all the ultra rare pokemon end up in cell dead zones, either a blackmarket will appear to use portable cellular basestations to reach those areas, or satellite internet and wifi to connect to go servers and harvest dead zones for rare pokemon. Either sounds extremely negligent on Nintendo's part. They should have mapped pokemon only within a public map of cell station radiuses to ensure the relative safety of their consumers.

    That said I think this is really just more propaganda from China trying to slap their tiny dick in Japans equally flat face. I'd say they should try making love, not war, but that just seems to lead to 'War and rape' when you offer the suggestion to East Asians :)

  51. We should just start sending them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the slutty women who really want/like/enjoy gangbangs, and teach them that polyandry is alright.

    It'll be a self solving problem in a few decades since all those males sharing a female will naturally limit the population due to a woman only being able to pop out a child around once a year, while also relieving all those men of their repressed sexual needs.

    Seems like a win win win to me. Society wins with natural population control. Slutty women win because they can take as much dick as they want, while also being financially taken care of. All those horny men win by having a nice warm set of receptacles to relieve themselves in on a regular basis, potentially also having a better financial situation due to shared expenses with the other men in their 'new' GB friendly household.

    Of course China's current government would never allow it, since they are too traditionalist. But this would solve the issue a lot better than 1 child per household, and provide an easy and statistically provable way to limit population growth, especially when you consider what percent of the population is probably sufficiently slutty women to be taking it all day long.

  52. WTF ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... just walk around until you hear the handgun racking and ship the coordinates up.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  53. Ludicrous by dottrap · · Score: 1

    Ridiculous. We all know Pokemon is a plot to get children to bomb Pearl Harbor. South Park already proved it.

  54. When they see the victorious message at endgame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your base are belong to US!! (Us meaning the U.S.of A.)

  55. One crazy is news? by melting_clock · · Score: 1

    I'd agree that this is a funny story but one conspiracy theorist does not seem like news. It looks more like viral marketing for a game... There are crazies everywhere, with irrational views on many things but ignoring them is generally the best option.

    Anyway, Google is just trying to make is easier for Chinese soldiers to find their way back to the secret bases with Maps.

  56. Stupid China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worry about offensive action by my squid army instead.

  57. LOL nice control system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like American's don't know the location of static strategically important positions in china! The american superpower had 60 years to watch these places grow, expand and getting spies in china is easy as fuck!

    the chinese are scared of their own people, not americans! LOL

    1. Re:LOL nice control system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol like Americans know anything except how to type "lol"

  58. On the other hand by dynamo · · Score: 1

    Or if the chinese are really that worried, they can order their military people to play pokemon go to make it seem like it's not a base.

  59. This is kinda funny though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People all over the world are now suddenly putting a ton of noise on location tracking, NSA must be freaking out