I like the way you characterize the Vietnam war as "an attack on their country." The U.S. forces in Vietnam were requested by the legitimate government of Vietnam which due to an unfortunate lack of determination on the part of the U.S. and incompetence on the part of the ROV general staff was overtaken by the VC. Glad to hear you're putting your money where your mouth is, so to speak--just remember that having frank political discussions within the PRC's borders is likely to get oneself disappeared.
"Millions of civilians"? Looks like you're the one in the fantasy world, Sunshine. If you love your PRC so much and Americans are war criminals, why not move to your workers' paradise?
World War II ended in 1945--check your math. Wars in Vietnam and Iraq were and are wars against aggression and terrorism, respectively. There's no valid comparison between defending one's country and running tanks over one's own citizens, though I'm sure apologists for the criminal PRC government would like to think there is.
How about the ones from the last fifty years or so. Does that clear it up? Or does the fact that the West has blood on its hands from the past excuse that on the hands of present-day barbarians?
Yes, Kent State was a full-on riot (though how much of that was false flag we'll never know). But the students shot weren't all even INVOLVED in the protest, and even if they had been,.30 rounds are never an appropriate response to unarmed students. Those national guard soldiers along with those in command should have faced firing squads.
Not much. But if your email is stored on your own machine, you decide what your retention policy is and know exactly what your exposure in the event of a legal order demanding access to your stored mail--and when and if such an order were executed, particularly since it would probably come in the form of a no-knock warrant, but I digress. If "they" want your email from Gmail or a third party provider, it's just a matter of faxing over a subpoena. And Google, for one, refuses to comment on how many of those with which they've complied.
But I *do* have an example of the PRC doing what I had said. So looks like I've produced a cite and you're produced a strawman counterexample.
So you took four paragraphs to say you don't have any cites. Well done.
Convenient that eBay has pulled all the completed listings so it's harder for we mere taxpayers to see what this guy had fenced through eBay.
Cites of western powers running over their own unarmed citizens with tanks?
I like the way you characterize the Vietnam war as "an attack on their country." The U.S. forces in Vietnam were requested by the legitimate government of Vietnam which due to an unfortunate lack of determination on the part of the U.S. and incompetence on the part of the ROV general staff was overtaken by the VC. Glad to hear you're putting your money where your mouth is, so to speak--just remember that having frank political discussions within the PRC's borders is likely to get oneself disappeared.
"Millions of civilians"? Looks like you're the one in the fantasy world, Sunshine. If you love your PRC so much and Americans are war criminals, why not move to your workers' paradise?
World War II ended in 1945--check your math. Wars in Vietnam and Iraq were and are wars against aggression and terrorism, respectively. There's no valid comparison between defending one's country and running tanks over one's own citizens, though I'm sure apologists for the criminal PRC government would like to think there is.
Ballmer actually said "Google and their apps can bite me."
How about the ones from the last fifty years or so. Does that clear it up? Or does the fact that the West has blood on its hands from the past excuse that on the hands of present-day barbarians?
Let me clear it up for you--try not running tanks over your citizens when they're peacefully protesting. That should help.
Works for me, so long as they don't let in any filthy Persians.
Yes, Kent State was a full-on riot (though how much of that was false flag we'll never know). But the students shot weren't all even INVOLVED in the protest, and even if they had been, .30 rounds are never an appropriate response to unarmed students. Those national guard soldiers along with those in command should have faced firing squads.
If they want to participate in Western traditions, by God, they should have to abide by Western standards. So yes.
Yup -- the cost of potentially being required by market or someday legal forces to run DRM servers in perpetuity MIGHT clue them in.
Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster would take on an entirely different meaning.
Not much. But if your email is stored on your own machine, you decide what your retention policy is and know exactly what your exposure in the event of a legal order demanding access to your stored mail--and when and if such an order were executed, particularly since it would probably come in the form of a no-knock warrant, but I digress. If "they" want your email from Gmail or a third party provider, it's just a matter of faxing over a subpoena. And Google, for one, refuses to comment on how many of those with which they've complied.
The taggant article from Princeton's site wasn't deleted; its URL just changed. It's here.
Never know what idiotic (or corrupt) judge might grant a preliminary injunction forcing them to remove the source.
Very nice, took me longer than it should have to get it :).
And don't forget that BASIC doesn't grok printf format specifiers :).
they'd have plenty. Anyway, since they censor the Internet, they only need one public IP.
. . . which Nevada legislator's friend or relative just happens to sell some kind of compliant encryption solution.
Which is why the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals correctly held>/a> building codes to be in the public domain when included in law by reference.
Legal posession happened when I paid for my copy at the register. Any contract presented after that is without consideration.
Have you ever gotten anything like this?
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc,char** argv) {
printf("1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10\n","%s%");
}