Slashdot Mirror


No Space Porn (For Now)

With the entry to sub-orbital flight, and even orbital flight, becoming ever so slightly easier, the obvious thought of space porn kicks in. Who wouldn't want to see two or more people going at it like rabbits in a weightless environment (or at least trying to go at it like rabbits in a weightless environment)? Sadly, Virgin Galactic has turned down a $1 million offer to do just that. The offer was made by an unidentified party who was willing to put the money up front to do a space porn movie. Considering that a flight aboard VG costs $200,000 for a two-hour flight, $1 million doesn't seem too bad. Though how much you could actually do and perform in two hours is debatable. And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

260 comments

  1. Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two girls, one spaceship.

    1. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a free preview here

    2. Re:Still waiting for... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was gross enough when it was just a tiny little cup. If you expect two girls to fill a whole spaceship, those are going to be some big girls.

    3. Re:Still waiting for... by EdIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      Considering what you are talking about, I don't think you are being NEARLY vague enough. Somebody might actually figure out what you are talking about.

    4. Re:Still waiting for... by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I didn't think anybody remembered "Two Girls Two Catamarans"

      (And in case you didn't, it's about a maverick sailboat designer who builds a cat and duly sails it across an ocean with the 2 girls - actually I think he did it twice, with 2 different boats. Not sure if it was 2 girls each time or not. Anyway, This was James Wharram in the 1950s, before sailing carts were even believed in at all [obviously the Micronesians didn't count. Obviously]. He went on to have a happy life building and designing cheap sailing catamarans with his partner. Their plans always had (have) sweet drawing of naked girls sitting about on said cats. And he is still at it).

      The book is out of print, sadly, See Wharram (http://wharram.com/sales/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=11&products_id=73)

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    5. Re:Still waiting for... by dziban303 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is some evidence that NASA et al has had astronauts have sex in space, all in the name of science, of course--so I think exoatmospheric porn has already been made. Personally, I doubt there would be enough traction to grind effectively without the use of straps or (interesting idea?) bungee cords. Although the money shots would be pretty cool: bukkake from across the room--er, module? C'mon, who wouldn't pay $20 to watch "catch the cumwad in your mouth from the other side of the Destiny module"? Besides--what else are future astronauts supposed to do on the multiyear journey to Mars? Play checkers? Just imagine the inclusion of high doses of ecstasy in that environment. They could grow flawless crystals of MDMA in microgravity and chow down like it was MSG.

    6. Re:Still waiting for... by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "There is some evidence that NASA et al has had astronauts have sex in space, all in the name of science, of course--so I think exoatmospheric porn has already been made."

      Sources, please. I have suspicions, but it is just a guess. When I saw the list of shuttle astronauts with pictures from an internal NASA news letter in the early 1980's I circled one picture. http://space.about.com/cs/deceasedastronaut/a/judithresnik.htm

    7. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      or rather this

    8. Re:Still waiting for... by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the money shots would be pretty cool: bukkake from across the room

      Is it just me, or haven't we all dreamed of wanking off so hard the cum hits the ceiling?...

    9. Re:Still waiting for... by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's your problem? I *love* peanut butter and Nutella. And chocolate pudding too.

    10. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Their plans always had (have) sweet drawing of naked girls sitting about on said cats."

      There is a line there about naked girls and pussies, but I'm not touching it... I'm gay

    11. Re:Still waiting for... by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      Me too.......just not like *that*

    12. Re:Still waiting for... by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      Sources, please

      Here's your source

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    13. Re:Still waiting for... by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      This was James Wharram in the 1950s, before sailing carts were even believed in at all [obviously the Micronesians didn't count. Obviously].

      OT, but this caught my attention since I have Micronesian current chart on my wall (cowrie and wood, neat!). What do you mean by sailing charts not being believed in pre-50s?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    14. Re:Still waiting for... by PachmanP · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dreamed? Forget dreaming remember May 23, 2005!

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    15. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sex in space? I'd be happy if I could just manage to get laid here on Earth.

    16. Re:Still waiting for... by Malevolyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You and I should be best friends.

      --
      Your ad here.
    17. Re:Still waiting for... by StrategicIrony · · Score: 1

      pretty sure that was a typo for "sailing cats".

      as in... catamarans... which weren't a popular sailboat design till the late 90s really.

    18. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You know, I didn't think anybody remembered "Two Girls Two Catamarans"

      (And in case you didn't, it's about a maverick sailboat designer who builds a cat and duly sails it across an ocean with the 2 girls - actually I think he did it twice, with 2 different boats. Not sure if it was 2 girls each time or not. Anyway, This was James Wharram in the 1950s, before sailing carts were even believed in at all [obviously the Micronesians didn't count. Obviously]. He went on to have a happy life building and designing cheap sailing catamarans with his partner. Their plans always had (have) sweet drawing of naked girls sitting about on said cats. And he is still at it).

      The book is out of print, sadly, See Wharram (http://wharram.com/sales/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=11&products_id=73)

      Its already been done....well if not done, described in Susie Bright's American Erotica collection 2004:

      http://www.amazon.com/Best-American-Erotica-2004/dp/0743222628

      a nice little read with a twist. wouldnt surprise if similar has happened already. all those frustrated astrodudes.

    19. Re:Still waiting for... by tristian_was_here · · Score: 1

      Two girls, one spaceship.

      ...and a lot of sticky ectoplasm.

    20. Re:Still waiting for... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      What do you mean. You don't like extruded confections?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    21. Re:Still waiting for... by niktemadur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I distinctly remember news back in the mid-eighties about NASA sending a married couple into orbit, as part of a Shuttle crew. Needless to say, speculation ran rampant about sexy experiments in space, newscasters displaying a deadpan nod-nod-wink-wink attitude towards the whole thing. However, NASA being what it is, mentioned nothing about the topic in press releases either before nor after.
      So all we have to show for anything is the end scene from Moonraker, with Bond and Dr Goodhead (yet another classic name for a Bond girl) floating in the capsule, in the missionary position with a ridiculous sheet draped over their bodies, and conveniently enough, the sheet is the only thing in the capsule that seems to follow the law of gravity. As boring as it could possibly be.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    22. Re:Still waiting for... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I distinctly remember news back in the mid-eighties about NASA sending a married couple into orbit, as part of a Shuttle crew.

      I was out of NASA before then. :-(

      Judith Resnick was a #1 (unmarried) babe. I'm still betting on her as the first on the ladies' side and wishing I was first on the other, if indeed something really happened. She had one or two trips up before the accident.

    23. Re:Still waiting for... by laejoh · · Score: 0

      The shit would hit the fan the moment THAT happens!

    24. Re:Still waiting for... by freespac3 · · Score: 1

      Looking at your your link, and keeping the whole "naked girl" thing in mind... does their logo look like stylised breasts to you too? :P

      --
      Better to regret something you have done, then something you haven't.
    25. Re:Still waiting for... by famebait · · Score: 1

      Those would have to be weightless breasts. Great Scott, I think we're on to something!

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    26. Re:Still waiting for... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Oh man, it's space! It won't take much for them to "fill" it. It'll be floating *everywhere*... The real problem is that the cameraman and the director are going to have to want to be involved as much as the actresses. Because unless they're wearing head-to-toe space suits... some of that crap is coming their way.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    27. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty sure that was a typo for "sailing cats".

      sailing cat is watching!

    28. Re:Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May 23, 2005: Five Irish teenage school girls, all from the Loretto Convent in Navan, are killed and six others are critically injured in a bus crash in County Meath.

      Man, you are one sick bastard.

      May I subscribe to your newsletter?

    29. Re:Still waiting for... by Henneshoe · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the sheet be the only thing not following the classical law of gravity? Due to the fact that the equation specifically states the force exerted varies with inversely with the square of the distance of the 2 objects. Sheet and Earth in this example.

  2. Gah by gilgongo · · Score: 3, Funny

    There was a time when sex was interesting. Now it's just boring.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:Gah by gibbled · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are obviously not doing right.

      RTFM, dude!

    2. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when sex was interesting. Now it's just boring.

      You really ought to try the real thing.

    3. Re:Gah by hobbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not boring, it's drilling! :)

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    4. Re:Gah by Gewalt · · Score: 4, Funny

      There was a time when sex was interesting. Now it's just boring.

      Ya, well, that's marriage for you.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    5. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean RTFFM.

    6. Re:Gah by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, done right there's lots of boring bits- it does take 25 years after all, to fully finish the job of creating a new human being.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Gah by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

      That man page vanished sometime in the mid nineties.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    8. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, well, that's marriage for you.

      You said it!

      I found this linked from dont-marry.com:

      http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/wdc/121436951.html

    9. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not sex, that's masturbation. And if that's boring too, you still aren't doing it right!

    10. Re:Gah by phreakincool · · Score: 1

      That was probably when Viagra became a neccessity.

    11. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Incest is relatively boring.
      Necrophilia is dead boring.

    12. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously not doing right.

      RTFM, dude!

      or you are not doing with the right person :P

    13. Re:Gah by Miow · · Score: 1

      its not drilling its screwing

    14. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot lesbian twin sex is hot.

    15. Re:Gah by old+dr+omr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm into Bestiality and Necrophillia. Am I flogging a dead horse???

    16. Re:Gah by totallyarb · · Score: 1

      Only if you're into S&M too.

      --
      -- Note to Mods: There is a good reason there's no "-1 Disagree" option. --
    17. Re:Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      FTFM

    18. Re:Gah by Boronx · · Score: 2, Informative

      That dude is definitely doing it wrong.

    19. Re:Gah by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's just an old fart like me. Now that we're in our 50's, me and partner both have whole days where other things look less boring than sex. The good news is, she used to have weeks like that. As I've dropped, she's risen, and now we seem to be pretty well synced.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    20. Re:Gah by theelectron · · Score: 1

      <-- Insert rimshot here

      On second thought... nevermind

  3. Who are you kidding Smooth Wombat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be done by liftoff.

  4. I know why they turned it down by Talgrath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Think of the mess that a facial would make in zero-G environments...the whole ship would be all sticky.

    1. Re:I know why they turned it down by Like2Byte · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know why they turned it down (Score:3, Interesting)
      by Talgrath (1061686) Alter Relationship on Thursday October 02, @06:03PM (#25239349)

      Think of the mess that a facial would make in zero-G environments...the whole ship would be all sticky.

      0_o

      +3 Interesting? I gotta find a new crowd.

    2. Re:I know why they turned it down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it was because it's difficult enough saying 'Virgin Galactic' with a straight face as it is.

    3. Re:I know why they turned it down by lgw · · Score: 1

      Actually it was because it's difficult enough saying 'Virgin Galactic' with a straight face as it is.

      Seriously - they'd have to change the name of the company after they lost their cherry!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:I know why they turned it down by flewp · · Score: 1

      I too was disappointed it wasn't immediately modded to +5.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    5. Re:I know why they turned it down by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Well it's not Interesting anymore. Now it's Insightful...

    6. Re:I know why they turned it down by Petersson · · Score: 1

      Anyone can do zero-g sex. But 5g sex, that's one a hell of a challenge!

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    7. Re:I know why they turned it down by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Damn, beat me to that comment.

      I just pray they don't try "water sports" either.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:I know why they turned it down by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > I gotta find a new crowd.

      You ain't kidding. Some slow, lame comment like this is Teh Winnah according to people around here?

      For god's sake, frist psot was a play on 2 girls 1 cup. Hell, we've already been through lesbian incest and necrophilia before this l00ser posted this lameosity.

      Some people (this poster, and those who +modded him) have got a long way to go to catch up with the average Slashdotter's knowledge of the Wonders of the World.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  5. New Title by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zero-G-Spot

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:New Title by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sometimes Virgin just isn't interested in sex.

    2. Re:New Title by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Sometimes Virgin just isn't interested in sex.

      Ha. Haha! Yeah, don't you remember being a virgin? The only people who aren't interested in sex are those who are bored of it.

      --
      Property is theft.
    3. Re:New Title by Si-UCP · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sometimes Virgin just isn't interested in sex.

      Ha. Haha! Yeah, don't you remember being a virgin? The only people who aren't interested in sex are those who are bored of it.

      Your sentence implies that the large majority of Slashdotters have lost their virginity.

    4. Re:New Title by ebief · · Score: 1

      To this, I have only one reply: http://www.instantrimshot.com/

  6. re-write by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Funny

    >And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    This is porn, right? You could write that into the script!

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:re-write by The_Rook · · Score: 4, Funny

      >And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

      heh heh - you called them actors.

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    2. Re:re-write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?
      >This is porn, right? You could write that into the script!

      There's a script?

    3. Re:re-write by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

      >And what if one or more of the actors gets sick? Would be two birds - one shot gun - that would get the 'unidentified party' one extra SCAT episode practically free... as in... well. Think about turning lemon into juice...

    4. Re:re-write by flewp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I found the tentative script: "Nice spacesuit, wanna fuck?"

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    5. Re:re-write by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      "Actually, I found the tentative script: "Nice spacesuit, wanna fuck?""

      Ooo...that's deep.

      That's what she said.

    6. Re:re-write by niktemadur · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon, you can do better than that, there's countless possibilities out there.

      - Houston, We Have Rear Entry
      - Apollo 69
      - The 100 Mile-High Club
      - Suborbital Gangbang MILFs
      - In Space, No One Can Hear You Cum
      - Lagrange Point Latinas

      Shit, these things are a dime a dozen, how about some classics:

      - Talk Dirty To Me (In A Chuck Yeager Monotone)
      - Debbie Does Clavius

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    7. Re:re-write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

      heh heh - you called it a script.

    8. Re:re-write by haggus71 · · Score: 1

      "Houston, I have a problem."

      "Well, I got the solution, baby." Cue wah-wah peddle guitar.

      I think this thread may be rated M.

    9. Re:re-write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need a much larger spaceship to do the 2001 - a space gangbang

    10. Re:re-write by Noopectro · · Score: 1

      In space, no one can hear you.. cum? what? Don't you mean in space no one can hear you cream?

    11. Re:re-write by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In space, no one can hear you.. cum? what? Don't you mean in space no one can hear you cream?

      AAMOF that's the tagline of Space Nuts.

  7. hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    then it'd just be recategorized at the site/store

  8. Duh by jdc180 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Virgin Galactic would have to change it's name!

    1. Re:Duh by svnt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno, Galactic Whore has a nice ring to it.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's leave GW out of this.

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, your mom has already taken that title.

    4. Re:Duh by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

      Virgin Gagactic?

    5. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgin Prophylactic?

    6. Re:Duh by stonedcat · · Score: 0

      Big Black Cocks In Spacelactic

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    7. Re:Duh by base3 · · Score: 1

      Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster would take on an entirely different meaning.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  9. Damnit, we already made up the title for it! by anomnomnomymous · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    When you shoot a mime, do you use a silencer?
    1. Re:Damnit, we already made up the title for it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to make a dumb pun myself, but then the captcha said "upcoming". Heh.

    2. Re:Damnit, we already made up the title for it! by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I prefer Debbie does Apollo 13 myself.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    3. Re:Damnit, we already made up the title for it! by Clever7Devil · · Score: 1

      Oh come on!

      With "Plan 69 from Outer Space" so readily available?

      You could even have the male lead be Ed Woody

      --
      "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -Gary Larson
  10. This is Porn right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have two hours...this is enough time to film 3-4 movies!

    #1 develop private space flight
    #2 include sex
    #3 PROFIT!

    1. Re:This is Porn right? by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      No, they only have about 5 minutes. Two-hour flight includes ascent and descent. Only 5 minutes of actual Zero gravity. Plenty of time for some people...

    2. Re:This is Porn right? by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      No, they only have about 5 minutes. Two-hour flight includes ascent and descent. Only 5 minutes of actual Zero gravity. Plenty of time for some people...

      Make that married people.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  11. Trying to avoid funny remarks... by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    Why not just use a zero-G environment on the ground?

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by philspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh... where on earth is there zero gravity... on earth? Underwater is apperantly hazardous to women's heath. In one of those skydiving simulators could be interesting, albeit noisy, and getting chapped would be a concern for me anyway. While actually skydiving has definitely been done.

      Anyway, duh: SPACE: the final frontier! To boldly go where no man has gone before!

    2. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Two words: Forty-five seconds.

      rj

    3. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Massacrifice · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's been done :

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/

      "Nick Lang and Silvia Saint's sex scene was filmed in free-fall aboard NASA's "vomit comet", in order to simulate zero-gravity."

      --
      -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
    4. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      To boldly go where no man has gone before!

      To boldly come where no man has come before

      There, fixed that for you

    5. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1
      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    6. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by nbert · · Score: 1

      Gravity - the only force you can't avoid by shielding. So unless you do it all in free fall to create a similar experience you are pretty much stuck with space.

      Btw: I remember someone produced a porn movie using parabolic flight when porn tried to go mainstream. Since I haven't heard of it again I assume that sex in free fall isn't as exciting as the illusion of banging the girl next door ;)

    7. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been done :

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/

      "Nick Lang and Silvia Saint's sex scene was filmed in free-fall aboard NASA's "vomit comet", in order to simulate zero-gravity."

      So, if Virgin Galactic does not want to make history let NASA do it. Porn in the ISS -- "Where No Man Has Gone Before". Now, the question is obvious: is that title more suitable for anal fun between men or would the title be "fitting" for some female-female or male-female anal action (there have never been vaginal virgins in space, most likely)?

    8. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who are wondering....

      Yes there is a torrent - with a whole heap of new leechers :)

    9. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can't be that good. How much micro g time does the vomit comet get, 30 secs?

    10. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [cit^H^H^Hlink needed]

  12. Not to worry... by benburned · · Score: 1

    Rule 34 will eventually prevail.

    1. Re:Not to worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule 34 will eventually prevail.

      Unless of course They happen to send up Rosie O' Donnel or an Anthropomorphic Animal.

      Then Rule 34 will EPICALLY FAIL.

    2. Re:Not to worry... by MetalPhalanx · · Score: 1

      You don't understand! Every comment brings the horror closer!

    3. Re:Not to worry... by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      With that comment, you have just caused someone to create Furry + Rosie O'Donnell pr0n - In Space!

      Please stop imagining ways for Rule 34 to fail - you only bring reality to nightmares.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  13. a lot can be done in two hours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though how much you could actually do and perform in two hours is debatable.

    well, if it's anyone for the crowd around here they would only need 3-4 seconds, that is if they know what intercourse is already.

    1. Re:a lot can be done in two hours... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Though how much you could actually do and perform in two hours is debatable.

      well, if it's anyone for the crowd around here they would only need 3-4 seconds, that is if they know what intercourse is already.

      The last bit gives the explanation. 1 hour 59 minutes to read the "how to" manual and one minute to do it.

  14. Performance by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    "how much you could actually do and perform in two hours is debatable"

    Are you kidding me? 10 minutes should be enough for everyone!

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Performance by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      actually you only have about 5 min of weightlessness. The guy better pop a viagra before they take off, or it will be the most expensive flop of film history.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  15. New tag by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

    New tag: idlehasnopants

    1. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Posting AC to stave off embarrassment.

      Will someone please explain the whole "idle is pants" thing? I don't get it and I'm starting to feel more clueless than usual.

    2. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Pants" is british slang for bad.

    3. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, that makes sense. Idle is indeed bad.

      But pants? Pants are good. I'm happy the average /.er often wears pants and I'm sure others are happy that I usually wear them.

      Man, that is some strange slang.

    4. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      it's because Idle started making its way to the front page on the same day as the "Lloyds is pants" story.

    5. Re:New tag by Unending · · Score: 2, Informative

      idle was becoming annoying about the time this http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/27/2246235 article was on the front page, also pants are what americans would call underwear.

    6. Re:New tag by lgw · · Score: 1

      "pants" is the new "gay" which was the new "retarded" which was the new "foolish"

      Idle is indeed folly.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But pants? Pants are good. I'm happy the average /.er often wears pants and I'm sure others are happy that I usually wear them.

      Well "Lloyd's is trousers" doesn't have quite the same ring to it....

    8. Re:New tag by listen · · Score: 1

      Pants means underpants in Britain. Trousers means what you call pants.

    9. Re:New tag by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      1. British 'pants' is usually underpants, not trousers.
      2. Now imagine MST3K, where it's a special occasion, and Joel has just given out presents, and Gypsy got a Barbie make up set, and Tom Servo got a neat toy racecar big enough for him to drive off in, and Crow ends up getting a pair of J. C. Pennys medium brown straight leg slacks.
      3. Now to really Anglicise it, imagine if Crow gets underwear instead.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  16. Space Porn Bloopers by nawcom · · Score: 1

    Just think of it... simple doggy-style thrusting will make the woman run into the wall, cumshots will be a bitch to catch... I sure would love to see how hard it is for a woman to stay in the cowgirl position - she might need some handles to hang onto.

    1. Re:Space Porn Bloopers by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention afterwards for the guy... does it just STAY up?

    2. Re:Space Porn Bloopers by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Funny

      she might need some handles to hang onto?


      well the average slashdotter is probably in with a chance then...

    3. Re:Space Porn Bloopers by nawcom · · Score: 1

      Hehe... I know... as I previewed my handle comment I immediately thought of Ron Jeremy and his fatness.

    4. Re:Space Porn Bloopers by Haoie · · Score: 1

      There's no up or down in space. It's all relative.

      Good news for some, no doubt.

      --
      If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    5. Re:Space Porn Bloopers by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Provided he actually holds on, neither of them is going very far. That's the secret. You have to hold on.

    6. Re:Space Porn Bloopers by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Can anyone prove The Hedgehog isn't already experienced in zero-gee sex, say on the voyage here from his native planet?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  17. Bah by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They can make weightless porn in a parabolic flight (the vomit comet) in front of a green screen. After that, adding a space background is piece of cake. Much cheaper than $1,000,000. Shit, have I just disclosed the best business plan on earth.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Bah by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

      One of the girls gone wild videos did that, but without the green screen.

      I only know because I saw it on one of the commercials.

    2. Re:Bah by Arjun+G.+Menon · · Score: 1

      Quote Wikipedia: "giving them about 25 seconds of weightlessness out of 65 seconds of flight". Hmmm, 25 seconds vs. 2 hours.

    3. Re:Bah by Zephiris · · Score: 1

      The article clearly states that they only get five minutes of weightlessness, out of the entire two hour flight. Even if they cap at the flight at the "tourist maximum" of 15 parabolas per flight, you'd still get 6.25 minutes. :)
      Research flights offer 60-80 parabolas.
      Tourist prices are roughly $5000 per person (or about $330 per person, per parabola).
      Even if they charged extra to do a porno, you'd still be saving in the area of $950000, at least?

      --

      "A Goddess rarely smiles for she is forced by others to be an island unto herself." - Zephiris
    4. Re:Bah by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you'd have to film it in 30 second clips, as that's about how long you have in zero G. Better have a hell of a fluffer to make sure the guy's always good to go. Not to mention that if the girls' getting deepthroated or teabagged while they transition into the 2G pullup, both parties might be in for a hell of a surprise.

    5. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't exactly be 'on earth' now, would it?

    6. Re:Bah by KGIII · · Score: 1

      But that wouldn't be in space. That would just be weightless which has already been done. I think the key is that it would be in space (hopefully though I'm not sure if an orbit that low counts as space or not technically).

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    7. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At like 2 minute intervals. Didn't the girls gone wild guy do that already anyways?
      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2006_May_3/ai_n26849656 I think thats it.

    8. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can make weightless porn in a parabolic flight (the vomit comet) in front of a green screen. After that, adding a space background is piece of cake. Much cheaper than $1,000,000. Shit, have I just disclosed the best business plan on earth.

      best fucking business plan on earth

  18. Starring Trey Parker by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    Zero-Gzmo?

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  19. 640microseconds is enough by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless you're running Vista

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  20. sick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    two fetishes covered in one movie!

  21. Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vomit Comit

  22. Now where did I put that file... by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1, Funny
    Ah, here it is...

    Oh, give me a locus where the gravitons focus
    Where the three-body problem is solved,
    Where the microwaves play down at three degrees K,
    And the cold virus never evolved.

    (chorus)

    We eat algea pie, our vacuum is high,
    Our ball bearings are perfectly round.
    Our horizon is curved, our warheads are MIRVed,
    And a kilogram weighs half a pound.

    (chorus)

    If we run out of space for our burgeoning race
    No more Lebensraum left for the Mensch
    When we're ready to start, we can take Mars apart,
    If we just find a big enough wrench.

    (chorus)

    I'm sick of this place, it's just McDonald's in space,
    And living up here is a bore.
    Tell the shiggies, "Don't cry," they can kiss me goodbye
    'Cause I'm moving next week to L4!

    (chorus)

    CHORUS:
    Home, home on LaGrange,
    Where the space debris always collects,
    We possess, so it seems, two of Man's greatest dreams:
    Solar power and zero-gee sex.

    --Home on Lagrange (The L5 Song)
    © 1978 by William S. Higgins and Barry D. Gehm

  23. It's a movie, why wouldn't they fake it? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    Most of what they do is faked anyhow, wouldn't $1,000,000 buy enough flights in the vomit comet to make a film? Sure you couldn't do it all in one take, but hey, that's what editing is for.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  24. I'd turn it down too... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The concept is just plain gross, and not because it's a porno. It's due to the fact that you'd literally have bodily fluids being ejected from the human body without the physical constraints we have here on earth. That means the entire interior of the craft this is was filmed in would like resemble a Jackson pollock painting under one of those black lights they use in sensationalist news reports about how gross motel rooms are.

    "I can feel them moving!" - Peter Griffin

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:I'd turn it down too... by ral315 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oatmeal? Spittle? Semen? This must be where Wilford Brimley was strangled by Bob Crane!

    2. Re:I'd turn it down too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely just because you're in zero G it wouldn't affect it that much? I'm assuming there's still atmosphere (most elements of porn would be pretty difficult with a space helmet on) so any bodily fluids would probably only travel the same speed they would on Earth, just that the direction would be constant rather than being affected by gravity.

      As for "the entire interior" of the craft, I'm sure that being in zero G wouldn't affect the capacity of someone's scrotum to the point where they can ejaculate enough to fill, say, an Olympic sized swimming pool.

    3. Re:I'd turn it down too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have bodily fluids being ejected from the human body without the physical constraints

      That is truly the essence of porn!

    4. Re:I'd turn it down too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think that wouldn't sell because??

  25. Is Virgin Galactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unaware of Rule 34?

    http://xkcd.com/305/

  26. Already been done... sorry by Peregr1n · · Score: 4, Informative

    I call Rule 34; zero-g porn has already been done, utilising parabolic flight aircraft;

    http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/movies/uranus_experiment_000516.html

    Surprise surprise, the title is 'The Uranus Experiment'.

    1. Re:Already been done... sorry by dosymedia · · Score: 0

      Then it must be time for Plan B® From Outer Space

    2. Re:Already been done... sorry by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Why is this marked funny? It's... ahem... informative.

    3. Re:Already been done... sorry by stonefry · · Score: 1
      FTFA:

      "Insiders described the filming process as particularly messy from a technical and logistical standpoint."

    4. Re:Already been done... sorry by dpilot · · Score: 1

      A while back, Penn Gillette wrote about his charter flight on a vomit comet. His was the second charter, right after the filming of "The Uranus Experiment," which he mentioned in the article.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    5. Re:Already been done... sorry by Missing_dc · · Score: 2, Funny

      A while back, Penn Gillette wrote about his charter flight on a vomit comet. His was the second charter, right after the filming of "The Uranus Experiment," which he mentioned in the article.

      Oh Sweet Zombie Jesus!! Talk about sloppy seconds!!

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    6. Re:Already been done... sorry by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Googling for "penn jillette vomit comet" gives a lot of results, and one supposedly the article, at "thestoreroom.tk", whatever that is.
      http://www.thestoreroom.tk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43

      Did he actually put the article online somewhere? I realize it's probably that, I'm just not sure.

    7. Re:Already been done... sorry by dpilot · · Score: 1

      That looks like the article I read, though it's been over a year, so details are obviously fuzzy.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    8. Re:Already been done... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it, but I happen to know the cumshot wasn't done in the vomit comet - they didn't get the timing right. If you watch the movie, it's obvious. It's not one of Sylvia Saint's better films, though.

    9. Re:Already been done... sorry by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not getting on one of those after Penn's been there!

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  27. 2 hours? More like 5 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although the flight may take two hours, the article says passengers are only weightless for about five minutes. Even with velcro suits, I imagine it would take considerably longer than that just to figure out how to get the damn thing done.

  28. Space Sex? by billlava · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of any husband/wife pairs that have been in space together? Although they would not be the only ones who would have sex in space, they might be the only ones who would admit to it... Does anyone know if astronauts are hooking up in space at all? Does NASA have policies on this?

    1. Re:Space Sex? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      NASA states that they have no official policy on sex though they're pondering it for the planned mission to Mars but have yet to disclose any details as far as I have seen.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  29. Semi-Bondage is a must by PhetusPolice · · Score: 1

    Sex at zero-gravity must be done so that the two partners are bound to each other in such a way as if they were a wooden paddle and a pink rubber ball tied by a string. I can't think of it in any other way..
    More people may be added so that we have a human-representation of Newton's Cradle in effect.
    I am very eager to masturbate to this idea.

  30. Darn it... by jejones · · Score: 1

    A movie version of Ben Bova's "Zero Gee", or better still, the whole Kinsman saga, would have been great.

  31. Like all new applications of technology by hey! · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm guessing there'll be a few false starts in the space porn field.

    The first examples are likely to be more humorous than erotic.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Like all new applications of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this differs from other porn... How?

  32. Two Points by cephyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    2 hours isn't a problem. Porn movies aren't really known for their epic length. Well, not in minutes, anyway.

    And so what if some actors get sick? You just make a different movie. There's an audience for everything (disturbingly)!

    --
    Moo.
  33. Niche porn by kabrakan · · Score: 1

    "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?"
    There's a niche for anything when it comes to porn.

    --
    Slartibartfast:"Is that your robot?"
    Marvin:"No, I'm mine."
  34. Girls Gone Whiled && Rule 34 by Jizzbug · · Score: 0

    I think the Girls Gone Wild crew has already applied Rule 34 to weightlessness...

    At least I've seen so late nights on Comedy Central.

    --

    -=/\- Jizzbug -/\=-
  35. Not surprising by evanbd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, the flight may be two hours, but the weightless period isn't -- it's under ten minutes, maybe more like 5 (I haven't looked at their numbers recently). Also note that it's $200k on an 8-seat (6 passengers) craft -- so the normal fee for the whole craft would be $1.2M. He's offered less than the nominal price, for what is certainly a lot of extra work by Virgin and may have adverse effects on their publicity (or maybe positive, but I'm not the one making that judgement).

    Also, we don't yet know whether they'll be requiring pressure suits. The craft has a double pressure hull, but that still means there are common mode failures possible. Originally Rutan said the double hull meant no pressure suits, but that was at a time when it wasn't clear that affordable pressure suits existed. As companies like Orbital Outfitters have begun to show that they can supply rental suits at reasonable prices (a few $k per person per flight -- custom tailoring included), Rutan has talked about maybe using pressure suits. Last I heard, the issue wasn't fully decided yet. If they do use pressure suits, they may be reluctant to allow unsuited passengers even at a price premium. (Note that the suit would be worn unpressurized with the visor up as long as cabin pressure held. I've seen the suits, and while they're not as lightweight as a t-shirt, they aren't bad either. We're not talking about Apollo-type space suits or anything.)

    Then there's the regulatory headache. The craft will be an experimental aircraft, not a certificated one, and the tourists will be spaceflight participants, not passengers. The distinction may be semantic, but it's a very important one. Flying for commercial purposes rather than tourism may make it more difficult to get FAA/AST approval for the flight. If so, that would be a deal breaker regardless of any other concerns.

    I've interned with XCOR Aerospace (a competitor of Scaled's); while none of this should be taken as official XCOR policy, I would be surprised if Scaled, XCOR, or anyone else was willing to do this any time soon. The headaches in safety, regulation, PR, and logistics are just too large, especially with no financial incentive. (Note that this would be difficult in XCOR's Lynx, as there's only one passenger and they don't get to remove their seatbelt.)

    All of that said... I think it's wonderful to see this much interest in commercial spaceflight. I'd also love to see some space porn, if only to laugh my ass off at the awkwardness. I'm sure they'll find a way to do it eventually, and I hope it's sooner rather than later.

    1. Re:Not surprising by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! But what are you doing posting something so informative/insightful to idle?

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    2. Re:Not surprising by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1

      And in spite of all that, someone's going to do it "off the record" soon enough anyway. The sex part. Filming notwithstanding.

  36. and the PERFECT job for... by owlnation · · Score: 1

    Robert Bigelow, Space Gigolo!

    Just as well he already works in space.

  37. to boldly come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    where no man has come before

    /obvious

    1. Re:to boldly come by badran · · Score: 0

      Hmm What about those long MIR missions....

  38. front page? by wondershit · · Score: 1

    Sure this topic is somewhat funny but is it really worth being on front page?

  39. Side Effects by isBandGeek() · · Score: 1

    Considering that a flight aboard VG costs $200,000 for a two-hour flight, $1 million doesn't seem too bad. Though how much you could actually do and perform in two hours is debatable. And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    I think the PR side effects would cost more than what they make in profit.

  40. May not be possible by coolamber · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to an article in Wired, there has already been some Russian research done in this area:

    From tfa
    There are no dead man's sticks in space. And no matter how stressed anyone gets, they can't even enjoy a little release by manipulating their own joystick: One of the effects of weightlessness is reduced blood flow to the lower half of your body. The rumor in Star City is that many have tried in vain to get it up out there. "There vas top-secret program of this," Driga says. "But the man could not perform. Viagra vill not help."

    So it may not be possible to perform in zero g, not enough blood flow to the lower extremities.

    1. Re:May not be possible by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Simple way to verify this. If you can get hard while hanging upside down then you can do it in space. Allow me to remain sceptical about the "impossibility" of doing so. Difficulty certainly, but it's doubtful it would be impossible.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:May not be possible by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a penis pump? The article is complete bullshit.

    3. Re:May not be possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fair enough, we'll just have to settle for some girl on girl then.

    4. Re:May not be possible by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. More girl-on-girl action then?

    5. Re:May not be possible by ca111a · · Score: 1

      even with the Austing Powers' swedish-made pump? Actually, you wouldn't even need to pump, just connect the thing to the outside of the ship.

  41. Please don't go there by isomeme · · Score: 1

    And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    Then you sell your video to a different niche market. One that I really, really wish I'd never found out about. Eccch.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  42. "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?" by altek · · Score: 1

    Then you sell your film in Japan.

    Profit!

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  43. If one of the actors get sick: by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    $1,100,000

    Niche markets.

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  44. hmmm by Goldsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    I seem to remember reading somewhere that it's extremely difficult (if not impossible) to get an erection during prolonged space flight.

  45. MSNBC did a report on this subject back in 2006 by Milkyfresh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The link:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14002908/

    My favorite quote from TFA

    Woodmansee said sex would be "the killer app of space tourism ... because every couple who goes up there, or threesome or whatever their personal choice is, is going to want to try this."

    TFA :

    Outer-space sex carries complications
    Experts say new devices and data would be needed to hit the zero-G-spot
    By Alan Boyle
    Science editor
    updated 4:38 p.m. ET, Mon., July. 24, 2006
    LAS VEGAS - Having sex in the weightlessness of outer space is the stuff of urban legends and romantic fantasy â" but experts say that there would be definite downsides as well.

    Spacesickness, for instance. And the difficulty of choreographing intimacy. And the potential for sweat and other bodily fluids to, um, get in the way.

    "The fantasy might be vastly superior to the reality," NASA physician Jim Logan said here Sunday at the Space Frontier Foundation's NewSpace 2006 conference. Nevertheless, Logan and others say the study of sex and other biological basics in outer space will be crucial to humanity's long-term push into the final frontier.

    "Sex in space is not just a good idea, it's survival," said Vanna Bonta, a writer who blends romance with space travel and quantum physics in the novel "Flight."

    Sex in the space environment has long been a source of rumor and speculation: Several years ago, one author claimed that NASA had conducted a study of sexual behavior during a space shuttle mission, sparking a quick round of denials. Today, NASA follows something of a "don't ask, don't tell" policy on the subject â" leading Logan to stress that he was not representing the space agency at Sunday's panel discussion.

    The subject is coming to the fore again now for several reasons â" including next month's publication of a book by Laura Woodmansee titled "Sex in Space," as well as billionaire Robert Bigelow's plan to host research into animal propagation on his commercial space modules.

    After all, sometime in the next decade Bigelow Aerospace envisions putting a hotel complex in orbit, "where people will probably be recreating and having sex," Bonta said.

    Woodmansee said sex would be "the killer app of space tourism ... because every couple who goes up there, or threesome or whatever their personal choice is, is going to want to try this."

    However, off-Earth romantics will have to cope with some practical challenges:
    # Sex in space would likely be "hotter and wetter" than on Earth, Bonta said, because in zero-G there is no natural convection to carry away body heat. Also, scientists have found that people tend to perspire more in microgravity. The moisture associated with sexual congress could pool as floating droplets.
    # The physics of zero-G make the mechanics of sex more complicated. Bonta said it was challenging even to kiss her husband during a zero-G simulation flight they took recently. "You actually have to struggle to connect and stay connected," she recalled. Partners would have to be anchored to the wall and/or to each other. To address that need, Bonta has come up with her own design for garments equipped with strategically placed Velcro strips and zippers.
    # Although zero-G could be a boon for saggy body parts, Bonta said males might notice a "slight decrease" in penis size due to the lower blood pressure that humans experience in microgravity.
    # Romantics will also need to guard against the type of motion sickness that space travelers often encounter, especially if they get too adventurous right off. "Save the acrobatics for post-play vs. foreplay," Bonta advised.

    For all these reasons, Logan said spontaneous sex in space could be "a little underwhelming."

    "It's a pretty messy environment, when you think about it," he said. "And for every

    1. Re:MSNBC did a report on this subject back in 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you could figure out how to live in space, there is no chance anybody would actually WANT to do it for their whole lifetime. And its damned expensive to get up and down.

    2. Re:MSNBC did a report on this subject back in 2006 by shmert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recall reading recently that astronauts on board the space station complained about not being able to get an erection. At all. Reduced blood flow due to zero-g might put a hamper on your porno plans. Now zero-g girl-on-girl is probably possible, and in the end a lot less messy.

      --
      You drank my drink, you drunk!
    3. Re:MSNBC did a report on this subject back in 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If you can't figure out how to 'bioneer,' you're not going anywhere,"
      - I speed-read that as boner, LOL

      "Otherwise it's just going to be a wild flail."
      - what other kind of sex is there?!

  46. Done in 2 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure some of the nerds on this list could easily be done in 2 minutes. Even without girls.

  47. You'd need straps or sommit ... by archshade · · Score: 1

    ... because a thrust will push someone away from you and send you flying forward
    I mean its just basic physics youd have to get the actors tied down

    --
    Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
    1. Re:You'd need straps or sommit ... by Zorque · · Score: 1

      Haha, I'm sure it'll be hard to find porn actors agreeable to being tied down.

  48. It was done in Barabarella in 1968 by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    It was done in 1968 in Barbarella.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  49. Of course Virgin Galactic turned them down by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should have approached Slut Galactic.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  50. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... Heath? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Underwater is apperantly hazardous to women's heath."

    I suppose you meant "health".

    But, one could substitute "hearth", in which, given the topic now, could be her "oven".

    Now, thinking of Alien, can we now say of Virgin Galactic's move, "In SPACE, no one will see you STREAM" (stream being whatever you want in the context here...).

    As for dealing with the possibility of an actor coming down sick, plan ahead. Sex flights could be expensive, and messes (human discharge of various types) would be an onerous thing to clean up. So, contract out a job to design durable, ultra transparent bubbles. They can have vacuum hoses, intermittent water-washdown/wash-in, and air recycling. This could keep the air clean in the bubble, such the fluids out of the bubble, and keep it clean for the camera.

    I remember listening to NPR a few weeks back, with two producers who are popular (damn me for i cannot recall the tv production of theirs that is VERY popular...), and both of whom started out in the porn industry, filming porn, that is.

    One of them said, "If TV delivered the sense of smell as part of the product, no one would go watch another porn video again." He said that because he once had a shoot which lasted like 11 hours, and the set was FILLED with odors and messes of various sorts. Didn't say whether or not they considered or actually used fans to blow the farts and other odors off-set...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  51. Obligatory by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

    In space no one can hear you scream!

  52. Horror by mqduck · · Score: 1

    When I first read the subject, I thought it said "No Space *For* Porn"!! :-o

    --
    Property is theft.
    1. Re:Horror by Onaga · · Score: 1

      Heh... I actually thought it was "porn in no space" as in that negative matter or whatever that was in Ultraviolet. Or just maybe in an airplane bathroom.

    2. Re:Horror by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just hypothetical porn.

      --
      Property is theft.
  53. Cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two girls, one spacesuit. Make it transparent, please.

  54. Oh you mean Porn as in SEX! by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

    I thought you just wanted to stream live video from the VG ship as it went up and came back! I'd pay for that, and for views of the Earth from LEO. Add some girl on girl action to all of that and I'd never leave Home!

    --
    Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
  55. It has been done already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google the "uranus experiment"

  56. In the spirit of Pigs in Space by anarkavre · · Score: 1

    Porn...in...spaaaaaaaccccccceeeeeeee!

    --
    "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
  57. ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the third piece of shit from idle on the front page today. STOP IT!

  58. Two Girls... by josef.salyer · · Score: 1

    ...one space suit!

  59. "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Market it to Japan.

  60. Theres some good. by jmickle · · Score: 1

    At least a donkey punch can rid of the walk of shame..... she just wont be able to float back

  61. They can't. by SDFanboy · · Score: 1

    If you read the story about Lord British in Cosmonaut camp, he said he was told by Russian authorities that a man can't get a woody in zero g. They tried and Viagra is of no use.

  62. What, UP, but soft? by mangu · · Score: 1

    So close, and yet so far...

  63. Somewhere, a Slashdot editor is laughing. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    The amazing thing here is not your information, (which is actually pretty interesting), but the fact that you were able to squeeze it all through the stupid little keyhole-sized comment window on these dippy idle pages.

    Maybe you were posting in micro-gravity.

    -FL

  64. Obviously you are unfamiliar with... by leamanc · · Score: 1
    --
    :q!
  65. NOT "two hours": FIVE MINUTES by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    though how much you could actually do and perform in two hours is debatable

    Obviously the submitter didn't RTFA

    SpaceShipTwo craft, which is released during flight and then climbs to 100 kilometers in altitude to offer fee-paying passengers around five minutes of weightlessness

    Normal intercourse is going to be difficult, without weight to overcome friction. I can see space bukkake being more likely, and even more disgusting than the earthbound variety.

  66. Needs New Scripts? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

    The *knock* *knock* : "Pizza Man!" meme won't work any more.

  67. What else can you film in only 6 minutes? by quenda · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Virgin "two-hour" flight includes only "up to six minutes" of weightlessness. Its like a bigger version of the Vomit Comet. So you ain't going to have time to shoot a zero-G period drama. What else but pr0n in that time? With multiple camera angles and some slow-mo, you might stretch it to a 15-minute reel.

    1. Re:What else can you film in only 6 minutes? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      I think the last thing we need in space pr0n is a zero-G period, so thanks but no thanks on that.

    2. Re:What else can you film in only 6 minutes? by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      What else but pr0n in that time?

      And even then, there's barely enough time to pull off some quickie gonzo pr0n!

      Actually, since you mention the Vomit Comet, with a series of parabolas (which is what the VC does) and a bit of work in the editing room, they can manage quite a long scene.
      The first parabola would be used to get a feel for zero-g, I imagine it would be next to impossible to concentrate on the business at hand on the first go, completely new and intense external stimuli would be incredibly distracting for the, erm... "actors".

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    3. Re:What else can you film in only 6 minutes? by damburger · · Score: 1

      This is not a small thing. Being able to, ahem, deliver on cue is considered a talent in the porn industry, and being able to do so in a 6 minute window, with the sudden loss of gravity reducing the amount of blood gettting down there, could be hard. Multiple takes are not an option.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  68. teabagged, LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had to look up "teabagged". Can't wait til Garg features this one.

  69. You don't get two hours by untree · · Score: 1

    The VG flight plan involves more like 10 minutes of weightlessness. Most of the two-hour flight is taking off attached to WhiteNightTwo, then rocketing up from that, and then gliding back down to landing.

  70. Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A porno was made a few years back where they went up in the "Vomit Comet" plane to get some zero-G money shots.

    1. Re:Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Uranus Project" - it's by Private.

  71. In space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    no-one can hear you scream 'yes... yes... YES!!'

  72. $1 million not enough by khallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the real problem is that the money is too small for this sort of thing. Basically, they're going to take over a flight, it's going to require special gear, and such a film would probably be very popular.

    Now, if that film maker were offering say, 10 million (or more), that might be enough to make it worthwhile for Virgin Galactic.

  73. ..And I was planning on playing Jabba the Hutt by Greg151 · · Score: 1
  74. Entertainment value aside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entertainment aspect is interesting. However you have a big problem. Its called Newton's Third law of motion.

    It is usually stated as: "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction."

    Sex is a weightless environment won't work unless both partners are strapped into something to push against. We are used to having gravity assist us in reproducing. This is a big problem in exploring far away places like Mars and beyond. How do we survive as a species without adapting to reproduction without gravity?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_in_space

  75. I can't believe it. by Freddy872 · · Score: 1

    No one's mentioned Golden Palace yet? I'm ashamed of all of you.

  76. nausea by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Porn actors often lick each other's butt holes, perform fellatio direct from ass to mouth, and frequently spit on each other and suck it off. I don't think a little low G is going to make them nauseous.....

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  77. False by Bragador · · Score: 1

    I would do it.

    I know I'd miss the earth, especially the forests and mountains, but I would do it. As long as the spaceship is damn well equiped for entertainment and as long as there are computers and a couple of persons I can talk to when I need it, there's no problem. The spaceship would be a kind of small village and I really hate urban areas so I'd feel at home. No more mountain biking or trekkinh for me, but spacewalks would be nice. I can imagine myself in space, starring at the void, dreaming about reality...

    I don't have 20 Ph.D. so nobody would select me though...

  78. Did you say maverick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > And in case you didn't, it's about a maverick sailboat designer who builds a cat and duly sails it across an ocean with the 2 girls - actually I think he did it twice, with 2 different boats. Not sure if it was 2 girls each time or not.
    [...]
    > Their plans always had (have) sweet drawing of naked girls sitting about on said cats. And he is still at it

    Wow! There's so much I didn't know about John McCain!

  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Re:"And what if one or more of the actors gets sic by CaTfiSh · · Score: 1

    ahh.. you beat me to it.

  81. transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-1hr. Possible opportunity approaching. Conditions optimal. Standard procedures in effect.
    T-30min. A communications issue has arisen. All parties are working towards a solution. Countdown on hold.
    T-30min(cont). Countdown reinstated. All issues successfully negotiated.
    T-10min. Terminal count started. All preconditions and hurdles have been cleared. Systems on automatic, external communications have been severed.
    T-60sec Final check. Hydraulic pressure rising within normal levels. We are go.
    T-20sec. Retracting all covers and hold-downs.
    T-5sec. All systems primed and positioned.
    T-0sec. We have ignition. Maximum thrust.
    T+4sec. All obstacles cleared. Thrust reduced. Systems nominal.
    T+1:00. Approaching maximum dynamic pressure. High stress could result premature ending of the mission.
    T+1:08. Max Q. All systems still nominal.
    T+2:00. Velocity nominal. External guidance terminated.
    T+2:30. Thrust terminated. We have separation. Undergoing reconfiguration.
    T+2:40. Second stage initiated. Maximum thrust.
    T+8:00. Approaching thrust termination. Velocity increasing quicker then any previous point.
    T+8:21. Powering down. Minor thrust transients as pressure decays. Entering coast phase.
    T+8:30. Communications established. Data being collected on all parameters.
    T+9:00. All parties agree optimal insertion was achieved. Coast phase continues.
    T+1hr. Primary mission complete. Systems reconfiguring for trip home.
    T+1:10:00 Heat levels rising. Concern expressed for status of protection systems. Failure could result in excessive burning of key systems.
    T+1:11:00 Communications black-out
    T+1:30:00 Communications reestablished. All parties appear ok, but physicians will perform thorough checks to be safe.
    T+2:00:00 Minor issues discovered. Improvements to protection systems recommended for all future missions.

  82. Had to? by renoX · · Score: 1

    [[That was money we had to refuse, I'm afraid.]]

    I don't like this sentence: they chose to refuse this money (afraid of the bad publicity in the US probably), nobody forced them to refuse!

  83. You're late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Uranus Experiment

    Private Media Group filmed a brief scene for the space-themed pornographic film The Uranus Experiment in a Russian aircraft flying a parabolic track (similar to NASA's Vomit Comet). The Uranus Experiment features around 20 seconds of actors Sylvia Saint and Nick Lang (who portray astronauts living on a space station) having sex in freefall. The scene was controversially nominated for a Nebula Award, but did not win. [12]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_in_space#The_Uranus_Experiment

  84. Rule 34 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://xkcd.com/305/

  85. Seriously by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    The flight will last 2 hours including boosting and reentry/landing. Weightlessness will last 5 to 15 minutes. Hardly enough time for much more than the money shot, and then you've got to worry about stuff (!) floating around and getting into things (other than the intended docking port).

    Add to that the fact that it'll be very difficult for a ground pounder to learn and carry out docking procedures, it's likely the result would be so clumsy as to be comedic. Of course the client in this case doesn't care if the result sucks, they just want to be able to slap "Made In Orbit" on the box to make money.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  86. If you want good space porn by LM741N · · Score: 1

    Prepare to buy LOTS of velcro.and glue it to the walls.

  87. You think that's bad? by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    Just wait until the japanese make their space-bukkakke-productions.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  88. if they use *nix in space... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    $man woman
    No manual entry for woman

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  89. Two hours? by tokul · · Score: 1

    Weightlessness lasts only 30 seconds on Zero-G plane. After that gravity is up to 2g.

    1. Re:Two hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o man, 2G porn FTW!!

  90. Awwwww. by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    Then it will sell even more to some people. You can't overestimate the depravity of humanity.

    I love the new story posters. The're so cute when they still have faith in humanity.

  91. I'm sure this craft is sanitary..... by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    It smells like chlorine in here!

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  92. Zero-G Sickness by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    smooth wombat writes:
    "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?"

    That's called "niche market."

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  93. It worked for video and the internet! by haggus71 · · Score: 1

    Think about this:

    The video industry was a niche market until Porn started getting involved. Now we have Blockbuster.

    The internet was a home for geeks and scientists. Porn took an interest. Now it's our primary source of everything but food and water

    The space industry is a niche for the very rich entrepreneur...

    See where I'm going with this? SPACE NEEDS PORN!

  94. This has been done. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    The Uranus Experiment series was filmed using the Vomit Comet, and even had music from members of the Prodigy and Massive Attack.

    --
    -mkb
  95. of course by ca111a · · Score: 1

    Virgin rejected - they would have to change the name first

  96. Fantasies by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    A group of friends was sitting around talking about fantasies - the girls were all saying bear skin rugs in a cabin in the snowy mountains with a fire in the fireplace blah blah blah. The guys were talking about stuff like against the window of a room in a tall building looking over the city. And other such standard fantasies.

    I said space. They all thought I was crazy. But mine is the best. And we all know I'm right.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  97. Re:Trying to avoid funny remarks... Heath? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YSOSRS?

  98. Men In Black Who Like to Have Sex With Each Other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, that alien looks like a hot guy.

    Yeah, we better have sex with it.

  99. Bonus footage by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

    "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick? "

    That really hits on some more specific targeted markets, I think a bonus features section is in order.

  100. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but we all saw what porn did for VHS... imagine what it can do for space flight!

  101. Space STD by BigJClark · · Score: 1

    And what if one or more of the actors gets sick?

    You mean, like herpes?

    --

    Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
  102. Ahem. by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 1

    While not, strictly speaking, *space* (it was filmed on a vomit comet), microgravity porn HAS been produced already:

    http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/movies/uranus_experiment_000516.html

    --
    Life would be easier if I had the source code.
  103. when u run out of ideas... by prozaker · · Score: 1

    this is what happens, everything goes to space. remember Jason X . thats pretty much the end of unscripted pr0n as we know it, it can only go downhill from there....

  104. Vomit? by ahow628 · · Score: 1

    "And what if one or more of the actors gets sick? " There's a market for that...