Relying on an IDE makes you a more productive programmer. Programmers who think they're elite because they use some primitive text editor are simply wasting time. If that's your attitude, why are you writing code on a computer at all? Why not go back to punched cards? Or cuneiform on clay tablets?
Agreed. And where other hospitals try to provide all the care they think they can bill your insurance for, the VA is trapped between trying to be fiscally responsible and being seen by the public as taking good care of our veterans. It's a tough position to be in. I've had good and bad experiences with the VA, but mostly good. And I'm a priority 7 patient or whatever level it is that means broke as hell but without any service-connected disability.
The US and Japan aren't still bombing each other. But Microsoft is still pulling the same stunts. In fact, they never stopped. They just kept doing it until it seemed normal and the government forgot why it was angry.
The only reason anyone "needs" more than $60K a year is because of their proximity to even larger concentrations of wealth. To the extent that wages "trickle down", so do prices.
Because the upper middle class is both beneficiary of and political buffer for the uber-elite. If the tax structure made them the new upper class, their wealth and power would actually increase despite their nominal decrease in pay. Their resistance to this is both self-destructive and harmful to the rest of us. If they can't be made to see that, then they should be thrown under the bus.
Some jobs are harder than others, and deserve to be rewarded more than others. But absolutely nobody "earns" more than a small multiple of minimum wage, and this should be enforced with a progressive tax structure based on an algorithm in which the only variable is the minimum wage. At today's minimum wage, astronauts, brain surgeons, and the President of the United States should be making about $60K a year, and it should only go down from there.
...simply by providing the pieces of the J2SE API that are missing from the Android API. And the door is wide open for them to "embrace, extend, and extinguish" Google's Android while lowering the bar for developers and raising the quality of apps. Google has a bizarre obsession with making Android run in an ever-smaller footprint when phone and tablet hardware is obviously trending in the opposite direction. The decisions Google made to allow the OS to aggressively limit its memory use require Android developers to carefully adhere to a complex API that forces you to manage a lot of tedious details yourself. And the platform punishes faulty MVC separation more than any other I've encountered. It's a platform for expert developers, which seems contrary to the concept of Android as popular, open, and accessible.
Some of my co-workers brag about working 12-hour days, as if to say they're more valuable than the rest of us. I think it's important to be able to do that in an emergency, but it's no way to operate for any length of time. I don't care who you are or what you do — nobody puts out quality work for twelve hours a day, at least not for very long. And this is especially true when it comes to code. The very best coders can write truly great code for about six hours a day, tops, before they're mentally exhausted.
The blueprint is right there in the show!
on
Star Trek Economics
·
· Score: 1
The Trek universe shows what a post-scarcity world could be like. It also shows what it would take to achieve it: a practically unlimited source of energy and a way to convert it into human sustenance. Fortunately for the chances of seeing it happen in my lifetime, we don't need anything as powerful as antimatter to meet our needs here on Earth.
When more money is introduced, the value of circulating currency decreases proportionally. When the Federal Reserv prints money, it's effectively a tax on held currency.
But it's what happens next that really hurts. If the Fed prints $100, it ends up on deposit in a bank somewhere. That bank can now lend $90 to someone, who deposits it in another bank. That bank can now lend $81... etc. Less than 0.5% of the "money" in circulation was ever actually issued by the Fed; the rest was created out of thin air through fractional reserve lending. And every penny of it cuts into the real value of your savings and investments.
I worked for one of those guys once. Not long after I was hired, he eagerly explained to me that sigma is how many nines there are after the decimal point.
So they can serve you ads.
Visually stunning film at 11.
Relying on an IDE makes you a more productive programmer. Programmers who think they're elite because they use some primitive text editor are simply wasting time. If that's your attitude, why are you writing code on a computer at all? Why not go back to punched cards? Or cuneiform on clay tablets?
Agreed. And where other hospitals try to provide all the care they think they can bill your insurance for, the VA is trapped between trying to be fiscally responsible and being seen by the public as taking good care of our veterans. It's a tough position to be in. I've had good and bad experiences with the VA, but mostly good. And I'm a priority 7 patient or whatever level it is that means broke as hell but without any service-connected disability.
I've often thought the same thing. Too bad most lawyers are the analogues of the horrible developers coming out of code mills in Bangalore.
The US and Japan aren't still bombing each other. But Microsoft is still pulling the same stunts. In fact, they never stopped. They just kept doing it until it seemed normal and the government forgot why it was angry.
It's the Microsofting of Google.
...to test the Windows performance of Java programs I write on Linux.
The only reason anyone "needs" more than $60K a year is because of their proximity to even larger concentrations of wealth. To the extent that wages "trickle down", so do prices.
Because the upper middle class is both beneficiary of and political buffer for the uber-elite. If the tax structure made them the new upper class, their wealth and power would actually increase despite their nominal decrease in pay. Their resistance to this is both self-destructive and harmful to the rest of us. If they can't be made to see that, then they should be thrown under the bus.
Some jobs are harder than others, and deserve to be rewarded more than others. But absolutely nobody "earns" more than a small multiple of minimum wage, and this should be enforced with a progressive tax structure based on an algorithm in which the only variable is the minimum wage. At today's minimum wage, astronauts, brain surgeons, and the President of the United States should be making about $60K a year, and it should only go down from there.
...simply by providing the pieces of the J2SE API that are missing from the Android API. And the door is wide open for them to "embrace, extend, and extinguish" Google's Android while lowering the bar for developers and raising the quality of apps. Google has a bizarre obsession with making Android run in an ever-smaller footprint when phone and tablet hardware is obviously trending in the opposite direction. The decisions Google made to allow the OS to aggressively limit its memory use require Android developers to carefully adhere to a complex API that forces you to manage a lot of tedious details yourself. And the platform punishes faulty MVC separation more than any other I've encountered. It's a platform for expert developers, which seems contrary to the concept of Android as popular, open, and accessible.
Some of my co-workers brag about working 12-hour days, as if to say they're more valuable than the rest of us. I think it's important to be able to do that in an emergency, but it's no way to operate for any length of time. I don't care who you are or what you do — nobody puts out quality work for twelve hours a day, at least not for very long. And this is especially true when it comes to code. The very best coders can write truly great code for about six hours a day, tops, before they're mentally exhausted.
The Trek universe shows what a post-scarcity world could be like. It also shows what it would take to achieve it: a practically unlimited source of energy and a way to convert it into human sustenance. Fortunately for the chances of seeing it happen in my lifetime, we don't need anything as powerful as antimatter to meet our needs here on Earth.
That's not what the article says at all.
If the boss demands that the builder builds the Great Wall of China in a week, he has nobody but himself to blame when it falls over.
I think the opposite: school should be about differentiating the elite, but it seldom ends up that way.
"there is a residual possibility of it being completely wrong"
Indeed. And what many people fail to understand is that this is true of all empirical knowledge.
"The purpose of school isn't to differentiate between who are the elite and who are the median . . ."
Yes, it is.
The required reserve is currently 10%. Make it 100%.
Give them a break. They're just trying to emulate the United States.
But it's what happens next that really hurts. If the Fed prints $100, it ends up on deposit in a bank somewhere. That bank can now lend $90 to someone, who deposits it in another bank. That bank can now lend $81... etc. Less than 0.5% of the "money" in circulation was ever actually issued by the Fed; the rest was created out of thin air through fractional reserve lending. And every penny of it cuts into the real value of your savings and investments.
I worked for one of those guys once. Not long after I was hired, he eagerly explained to me that sigma is how many nines there are after the decimal point.
They "reinvent" themselves every few years... basically whenever they start attracting too many users.
Then they must be more elastic. They're certainly different in some important way.